My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75D
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
11/19/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75D
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 3:16:37 PM
Creation date
11/13/2019 5:37:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
11/19/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
429
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salas, Diana <br />From: <br />Ellen Koldewey <mrskold@yahoo.com> <br />Sent: <br />Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:38 AM <br />To: <br />eComment <br />Cc: <br />council@santa-ana.org <br />Subject: <br />City Council Meeting- 2525 North Main Street Agenda Item 75(D) November 19, 2019 <br />Greetings Mayor and Councilmembers, <br />Request for Council Action in City Council Meeting Agenda Item 750: <br />I continue to oppose the development at 2525 North Main Street of the 256-unit multi -family project on the 4.4-acre site with 180 <br />parking spaces on approximately 1.4 acres to be shared by residents and the Discovery Center. <br />I ask that you vote for option 1 in Agenda Item 75(D). Adopt the resolution affirming the recommendation of the Planning <br />Commission and deny the following applications: Development Agreement No. 2018-01; General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06; <br />and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 establishing Specific Development No. 93. <br />Further, do not adopt the resolution certifying Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 (SCH No. 2018021031), do not adopt <br />the findings of fact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations, or adopt <br />the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. <br />Do not vote for option 2. <br />2A) Do not adopt the resolution certifying Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 (SCH No. 2018021031), adopting <br />findings of fact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and <br />adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program <br />2B) Do not adopt the ordinance approving Development Agreement No. 2018-01; <br />2C) do not adopt the resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06; and <br />2D) do not adopt the ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2018-10 for Specific Development No. 93. <br />Information Reported in the Record in Support of the Modified Plan <br />Remains Incomplete, Out of Date, and/or Inaccurate <br />Here are some of the issues in the current record still requiring clarification that constituents have already brought to the City's <br />attention: - the financial benefit now estimated to accrue to the City from this project in terms of average annual revenue and <br />gross general fund revenue is now substantially less than originally predicted; <br />- the negative impact on traffic safety and parking availability remains unacceptable or unknown, particularly with the anticipated <br />sale of some of the acreage to the Discovery Center and modifications to Main Street between Walkie Way and Edgewood; <br />- the height is still equivalent to a six -story building; <br />- the environmental impact of the now approved Main Place Mall is still not evaluated; <br />- the mandatory Environmental and Transportation Advisory Committee (ETAC) recommendations to Council to preserve or <br />remove city trees may not all be included; and <br />- the term/duration of the Development Agreement is still not described consistently. <br />Reasons for Opposition to Current Project/Support for Responsible Development <br />The changes made in this project since the last time the Council considered it are not substantial. Significant problems with this <br />project remain. The people of Santa Ana do not need to settle for this misplaced, high density, outsized housing project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.