CORRESPONDENCE - 75D - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Data provided in the EIR indicates a nominal level of economic development associated with the instant project but does not provide any meaningful assessment of the economic impact associated with removing office or other commercial space from the City. B. Lack of Project Alternatives The EIR also fails to provide a reasonable list of project alternatives. The EIR compounds the error by not providing an accurate description of the scant alternatives provided. CEQA requires the City consider a reasonable range of alternatives. Of course, the fact that some of the alternatives may not be as profitable or that the applicant overspent assuming it would receive its entitlements for high -density residential should not be considered when evaluating the feasibility of alternatives. See e. ., Preservation Action Council v. City of San Jose, 141 Cal. App. 4 t 1336 (Cal. App. 6' 2006). In that case, the court stated: An EIR's discussion of alternatives must contain analysis sufficient to allow informed decision making.... Without meaningful analysis of alternatives in the EIR, neither the courts nor the public can fulfill their proper roles in the CEQA process.... `To facilitate CEQA's informational role, the EIR must contain facts and analysis, not just. the agency's bare conclusions or opinions.' An EIR must include detail sufficient to enable those who did not participate in its preparation to understand and to consider meaningfully the issues raised by the proposed project ... It is the [agency f s responsibility to provide an adequate discussion of alternatives. That responsibility is not dependent in the first instance on a showing by the public that there are feasible alternatives. If the lagencyj concludes there are no feasible alternatives,_ it must explain in meaningful detail in the EIR the basis for that conclusion. (Emphasis added). The EIR provides three alternatives. These alternatives include: • A no -build alternative; • Reduced project alternative; and • Build out of the existing zoning alternative. Although CEQA does not require an exhaustive review of alternatives, there are a number of feasible alternative projects that could be developed onsite. By way of example, the current zoning of the property supports 11 different uses. Similarly, the General Plan designation supports either an overlay or specific zone. Less intensive retail,