Laserfiche WebLink
for providing additional off -site parking spaces, maximizing <br />on -site parking spaces, and/or reducing parking demand on <br />the project site. In response, Toll Brothers prepared a PMP <br />that addresses incentives for reducing vehicle ownership, <br />encouraging transit ridership, providing valet services on -site <br />to maximize parking areas, and providing off -site parking <br />spaces through long-term agreements with the City in <br />nearby parking structures. <br />Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act <br />(CEQA), the City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and <br />declares as follows: <br />Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not <br />limited to the 2010 EIR and the 2019 Addendum, the City Council finds that an <br />addendum is the appropriate document for disclosing the changes to the subject <br />properties, and that none of the conditions identified in Public Resources Code <br />section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 requiring subsequent <br />environmental review have occurred, because: <br />A. The project does not constitute a substantial change that would <br />require major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of <br />new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in <br />the severity of previously identified significant effects. <br />B. There is not a substantial change with respect to the circumstances <br />under which the project will be developed that would require major <br />revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of new significant <br />environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the <br />previously identified significant effects. <br />C. New information of substantial importance has not been presented <br />that was not known and could not have been known with the <br />exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the 2010 EIR was <br />certified or adopted, showing any of the following: (i) that the <br />modifications would have one or more significant effects not <br />discussed in the earlier environmental documentation; (ii) that <br />significant effects previously examined would be substantially more <br />severe than shown in the earlier environmental documentation; (iii) <br />that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be <br />feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce <br />one or more significant effects, but the Applicant declined to adopt <br />such measures; or (iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives <br />considerably different from those analyzed previously would <br />Resolution No. 2019-xx <br />Page 4 of 11 <br />