My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75D - PH - 2525 N MAIN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
11/19/2019
>
75D - PH - 2525 N MAIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 7:54:38 PM
Creation date
11/14/2019 5:55:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75D
Date
11/19/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9.6.1.1 Exposure to Potential Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death — Earthquake <br />Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, <br />including the risk of loss, injury or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on <br />the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or <br />based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 29-30) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of the Project would have no impact related to the exposure <br />of people or structures to the rupture of a known earthquake fault. There are no Alquist-Priolo fault zones <br />or other faults mapped on or adjacent to the Project site. The closest major active faults are the Elsinore <br />Fault Zone, which is 10 miles northeast of the Project site, and the Newport -Inglewood -Rose Canyon <br />Fault Zone, which is located 10 miles to the southwest. Thus, the Project will not expose people or <br />structures to potential substantial adverse effects from rupture of a known earthquake fault that is <br />delineated on an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map or any other known fault. (Initial Study, <br />pp. 29-30) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. <br />9.6.1.2 Exposure to Potential Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death — Seismic Ground Shaking <br />Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, <br />including the risk of loss, injury or death involving strong seismic ground shaking? <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 30) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is located within the seismically active region of Southern <br />California. The principal seismic hazard that could affect the site is ground shaking resulting from an <br />earthquake occurring along several major active or potentially active faults in Southern California. As <br />discussed above, the closest active faults are the Elsinore Fault and the Newport -Inglewood -Rose Canyon <br />Fault Zone that are both located approximately 10 miles from the Project site. Movement along these <br />faults, or other regional faults, could result in seismic ground shaking on the Project site. <br />However, structures built in the City are required to be built in compliance with the California Building <br />Code (CBC [California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2]), as included in the City's Municipal Code <br />as Chapter 8, Article 2, Division 1, which regulates all building and construction Projects within the City <br />and implements a minimum standard for building design and construction that includes specific <br />requirements for seismic safety, excavation, foundations, retaining walls and site demolition. Because the <br />Project must be constructed in compliance with the CBC and the City's Municipal Code, which would be <br />verified through the City's plan check and permitting process, the proposed Project would result in a less <br />than significant impact related to strong seismic ground shaking. This conclusion also applies, for the <br />same reasons, to the Modified Project. <br />9.6.1.3 Exposure to Potential Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death — Seismic -Related Ground <br />Failure, Including Liquefaction <br />Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, <br />including the risk of loss, injury or death involving seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? <br />Resolution No. Page 31 of 76 <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.