My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75D - PH - 2525 N MAIN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
11/19/2019
>
75D - PH - 2525 N MAIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 7:54:38 PM
Creation date
11/14/2019 5:55:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75D
Date
11/19/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that does not contain or is adjacent to large slopes, and the Project would not generate large slopes. <br />Furthermore, as stated in the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation prepared for the Project site, the <br />Project site is not at risk for earthquake induced landslides. For the foregoing reasons, implementation of <br />the Project would not expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects involving landslides, and <br />impacts related to landslides would not occur. (Initial Study, p. 31.) This conclusion also applies, for the <br />same reasons, to the Modified Project. <br />9.6.2 Soil Erosion <br />Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 31-32.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is largely impervious, as it is generally covered by <br />pavement or the building structure. However, small areas of landscaping exist within the parking area, <br />along the site boundary, and adjacent to the existing building. The Project would redevelop the site for <br />multi -family residential uses, which would include areas of landscaping that would surround the proposed <br />structures and be located along the site boundary, similar to the areas of landscaping that currently exist. <br />The new paved areas and landscaping from the Project would not result in soil erosion or the loss of <br />topsoil. In addition, Section 18-156 of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code states that all significant <br />redevelopment within the City, such as the Project, shall be undertaken in accordance with the County <br />Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). The DAMP requires construction sites to implement control <br />practices that address erosion and sedimentation (DAMP Section 8.0). Additionally, the Statewide <br />National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for General Construction Activity <br />requires implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), by a Qualified SWPPP <br />Developer. The SWPPP is required to be consistent with the County DAMP, address site -specific <br />conditions related to sources of sediment, and implement erosion control and sediment control Best <br />Management Practices to reduce or eliminate sediment during construction. The Project is required to <br />adhere to a City approved SWPPP, which would be verified prior to the issuance of a demolition or grading <br />permit; this will ensure that potential erosion associated with construction activities would constitute a <br />less than significant impact. (Initial Study, pp. 31-32.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, <br />to the Modified Project. <br />9.6.3 Soil Stability <br />Threshold: Would the Project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would <br />become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral <br />spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 32.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site does not contain unstable soils or unstable geologic units. <br />As discussed above, the Project site is located in a flat, developed urban area that does not contain, and is <br />not adjacent to, large slopes; moreover, the Project would not generate large slopes. Accordingly, impacts <br />related to landslides would not occur as a result of the Project. Also, as discussed above, the depth to <br />groundwater and the types of soils onsite result in a low potential for liquefaction and related lateral <br />spreading or ground failure. In addition, as further discussed above, the Project would be required to have <br />building foundations and pavement areas and must be constructed in compliance with the CBC and the <br />Resolution No. Page 33 of 76 <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.