Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout FULL PACKET_2019-11-19ORDINANCE NO. NS-2978 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 36, ARTICLE VIII OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING METERS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A. The City Council is authorized pursuant to section 2508 of the California Vehicle Code, to set parking rates and parking zones; and B. The City Council has determined that a parking meter system is justified to defray the cost of installation, operation, and control, as well as the costs of the other parking management related activities; and C. Revenues from parking meters will be used not only in defraying the expenses of installation, operation, and control of parking spaces and parking meters, but also those incurred in the control of traffic and enforcement of traffic regulations; and D. Revenues from parking meters may also be used to fund alternative transportation programs, projects and enhancements that reduce the demand for, or increase the supply of, parking resources in the parking district in which receipts are generated; and E. The density of the City and the number of people working or visiting the City on a daily basis significantly impacts traffic circulation and parking availability on the City's existing street network and off-street parking facilities; and F. Planned new development and expansion in Downtown Santa Ana together with the OC Streetcar Project currently under construction are likely to increase traffic and parking demand and reduce the number of available on -street parking spaces; and G. The City has conducted stakeholder meetings and rate surveys as part of the Parking Modernization and Downtown Enhancements Plan; and H. The City has designated on -street parking spaces with parking meters in order to regulate and manage traffic circulation and parking availability; and I. The location of and rates for parking directly impact traffic and parking circulation patterns, traffic congestion and other traffic hazards, and parking availability; and J. Adjusting the parking rates as a means of regulating the use of all City parking Ordinance No. NS-2978 Page 1 of 7 facilities and resources will distribute the parking load more evenly between residents and visitors, and maximize the utility and use of all City parking facilities and resources, including automation of City owned parking faculties and expansion of operating days and hours, thereby making parking easier, reducing traffic hazards and congestion, and promoting the public convenience, safety, and welfare: and K. Based on the foregoing, it is necessary to amend various sections of the Code various sections of the Code in order to better manage, control, and regulate traffic and parking circulation throughout the City; to improve the City's transportation network in order to promote a more sustainable transportation system; to ensure adequate parking availability for residents, workers, and visitors; to prevent traffic congestion and hazardous traffic conditions; and to promote compliance and facilitate more efficient and effective notice and enforcement, all of which will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; SECTION 2. The adoption of this ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act and a Notice of Exemption will be filed if this ordinance is adopted. SECTION 3. Section 36-398 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended such that it reads as follows: Sec. 36-398. - Parking meter district; zones and fees. (a) Pursuant to section 22508 of the California Vehicle Code, parking meter districts and parking meter district zones may be established and determined by ordinance of the city council and the boundaries of the parking meter district shall be as follows: Beginning at the intersection of South line of First Street and the Southerly prolongation of the West line of Olive Street, thence Easterly in a direct line to the intersection of the Southerly prolongation of the East line of Spurgeon Street and the Easterly prolongation of the South line of First Street; Thence Northerly in a direct line to the Southeast corner of Spurgeon Street and Third Street; Thence Easterly in a direct line to the intersection of the Southerly prolongation of the East line of French Street and the Easterly prolongation of the South line of Third Street; Thence Northerly in a direct line to the Southeast corner of Fourth Street and French Street; Thence Easterly in a direct line to the intersection of the Southerly prolongation of the East line of Mortimer Street and the Easterly prolongation of the South line of Fourth Street; Thence Northerly in a direct line to the Northeast corner of Sixth and Mortimer Street; Thence Westerly in a direct line to the Northeast corner of French Street and Santa Ana Boulevard; Thence Northerly in a direct line to the intersection of the Easterly prolongation of the North line of Eighth Street and the Northerly prolongation of the East line of French Street; Thence Westerly in a direct line to the Northeast corner of Spurgeon Street and Eighth Street; Thence Northerly in a direct line to the Northeast corner of Washington Avenue and Spurgeon Street; Thence Westerly in a direct line to the Northeast corner of Bush Street and Washington Avenue; Thence Northerly in a direct line to the Northeast corner of Seventeenth Street and Bush Street; Thence Westerly in a direct line to the Northeast corner of Main Ordinance No. NS-2978 Page 2 of 7 Street and Seventeenth Street; Thence Northerly in a direct line to the intersection of the Easterly prolongation of the South line of Buffalo Avenue and the Northerly prolongation of the East line of Main Street; Thence Westerly in a direct line to the Southwest corner of Main Street and Buffalo Avenue; Thence Southerly in a direct line to the Northwest corner of Seventeenth Street and Main Street; Thence Westerly in a direct line to the Northwest corner of Broadway and Seventeenth Street; Thence Southerly in a direct line to the Northwest corner of Washington Avenue and Broadway; Thence Westerly in a direct line to the Northwest comer of Flower Street and Washington Avenue; Thence Southerly in a direct line to the Northwest corner of Civic Center Drive and Flower Street; Thence Westerly in a direct line to the intersection of the Northerly prolongation of the West line of Boyd Way and the Westerly prolongation of the North line of Civic Center Drive; Thence Southerly in a direct line to the Northwest corner of Sixth Street and Boyd Way; Thence Westerly in a direct line to the intersection of the Northerly prolongation of the West line of Shelton Street and the Westerly prolongation of North line of Sixth Street; Thence Southerly in a direct line to the Southwest corner of Santa Ana Boulevard and Shelton Street; Thence Easterly in a direct line to the Southwest corner of Flower Street and Santa Ana Boulevard; Thence Southerly in a direct line to the Northwest corner of Third Street and Flower Street; Thence Westerly in a direct line to the intersection of the Northerly prolongation of the West line of Olive Street and the Westerly prolongation of the North line of Third Street; Thence Southerly in a direct line to the intersection of South line of First Street and the Southerly prolongation of the West line of Olive Street, the point of the beginning. (b) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (d), the fee charged for parking in any metered parking spaces in the parking meter district shall be five cents ($0.05) for each three (3) minutes or one dollar ($1.00) per hour. (c) Parking Meter Zones. The following parking meter zones are hereby created within the parking meter district as described in subsection (a): (1) Willard Zone. The boundaries of the 'Willard Zone" shall be as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the Northwest corner of Broadway and Civic Center Drive; thence Northerly in a direct line to the Northwest corner of Broadway and Washington Avenue; thence Westerly in a direct line to the Northwest corner of Flower Street and Washington Avenue; thence Southerly in a direct line to the Northwest corner of Civic Center Drive and Flower Street; thence Easterly in a direct line to the Northwest corner of Broadway and Civic Center Drive the point of the beginning. (2) Midtown Zone. The boundaries of the "Midtown Zone" shall be as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the Easterly prolongation of the North line of Eighth Street and the Northerly prolongation of the East line of French Street; thence Westerly in a direct line to the Northeast corner of Spurgeon Street and Eighth Street; thence Northerly in a direct line to the Northeast corner of Washington Avenue and Spurgeon Street; thence Westerly in a direct line to the Northeast corner of Bush Street and Ordinance No. NS-2978 Page 3 of 7 Washington Avenue; thence Northerly in a direct line to the Northeast corner of Seventeenth Street and Bush Street; thence Westerly in a direct line to the Northeast corner of Main Street and Seventeenth Street; thence Northerly in direct line to the intersection of the Easterly prolongation of the South line of Buffalo Avenue and Northerly prolongation of the East line of Main Street; thence Westerly in direct line to the Southwest corner of Main Street and Buffalo Avenue; thence Southerly in a direct line to the Northwest corner of Seventeenth Street and Main Street; thence Westerly in a direct line to the Northwest corner of Broadway and Seventeenth Street; thence Southerly in a direct line to the Northwest corner of Broadway and Civic Center Drive; thence intersection of the Easterly prolongation of the North line of Eighth Street and Northerly prolongation of the East line of French Street, the point of the beginning. (3) Downtown Zone. The boundaries of the "Downtown Zone" shall be as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the South line of First Street and the Southerly prolongation of the East line of Spurgeon Street; thence Northerly in a direct line to the intersection of Spurgeon Street and Third Street; thence Easterly in a direct line to the intersection of the Southerly prolongation of the East line of French Street and the Easterly prolongation of the South line of Third Street; thence Northerly in a direct line to the Southeast comer of Fourth Street and French Street; thence Easterly in a direct line to the intersection of the Southerly prolongation of the East line of Mortimer Street and the Easterly prolongation of the South line of Fourth Street; thence Northerly in a direct line to the Northeast corner of Sixth Street and Mortimer Street; thence Westerly in a direct line to the Northeast corner of French Street and Santa Ana Boulevard; thence Northerly in a direct line to the intersection of the Easterly prolongation of the North line of Eighth Street and the Northerly prolongation of the East line of French Street; thence Westerly along the North line of Civic Center Drive to the intersection of the Northerly prolongation of the West line of Boyd Way and the Westerly prolongation of the North line of Civic Center Drive; thence Southerly in a direct line to the Northwest corner of Sixth Street and Boyd Way; thence Westerly in a direct line to the intersection of the Northerly prolongation of the West line of Shelton Street and the Westerly prolongation of the North line of Sixth Street; thence Southerly in a direct line to the Southwest corner of Santa Ana Boulevard and Shelton Street; thence Easterly in a direct line to the Southwest corner of Flower and Santa Ana Boulevard; thence Southerly a direct line to the Northwest corner of Third Street and Flower Street; thence Westerly in a direct line to the intersection of the Northerly prolongation of the West line of Olive Street and the Westerly prolongation of the North line of Third Street; thence Southerly in a direct line to the intersection of the South line of First Street and the Southerly prolongation of the West line of Olive Street; thence Easterly in a direct line to the intersection of the South line of Ordinance No. NS-2978 Page 4 of 7 First Street and the Southerly prolongation of the East line of Spurgeon Street, the point of the beginning. (d) Fees. The parking fees for parking in the parking meter zones as hereinabove described shall be as follows: (1) Willard Zone. The fee charged for parking in any metered parking space within the Willard Zone shall be five cents ($0.05) for each three (3) minutes or one dollar ($1.00) per hour. (2) Midtown Zone. The fee charged for parking in any metered parking space within the Midtown Zone shall be five cents ($0.05) for each three (3) minutes or one dollar ($1.00) per hour. (3) Downtown Zone. The fee charged for parking in any metered parking space within the Downtown Zone shall be five cents ($0.05) for each one and one- half -minutes or two dollars ($2.00) per hour. SECTION 4. Section 36-399 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended such that it reads as follows: Sec. 36-399. - Hours. (a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b) of this section, the provisions of this article relating to the operation of parking meters shall be effective only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday and Saturday of each week, except such parking limitations shall not be operative on any legal holiday. Further limitations of the hours of operation shall be effective only when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are affixed to specific parking meters. (b) In the following parking meter zones effective parking hours shall be as follows: (1) Willard Zone. The provisions of this article relating to the operation of parking meters shall be effective only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday of each week, except such parking limitations shall not be operative on any legal holiday. Further limitations of the hours of operation shall be effective only when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are affixed to specific parking meters. (2) Midtown Zone. The provisions of this article relating to the operation of parking meters shall be effective only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday and Saturday of each week, except such parking limitations shall not be Ordinance No. NS-2978 Page 5 of 7 operative on any legal holiday. Further limitations of the hours of operation shall be effective only when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are affixed to specific parking meters. (3) Downtown Zone. The provisions of this article relating to the operation of parking meters shall be effective only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday of each week, except such parking limitations shall not be operative on any legal holiday_ Further limitations of the hours of operation shall be effective only when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are affixed to specific parking meters. (c) Legal holiday shall be defined as those legal holidays observed by city employees as identified in section 9-135 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. (d) The executive director of the finance and management services agency or designee is authorized to place signs or markings, on or immediately adjacent to parking meters, prohibiting parking in excess of twelve (12) minutes, fifteen (15) minutes, twenty-four minutes (24), thirty (30) minutes, one (1) hour, two (2) hours, three (3) hours or four (4) hours on any portion of any street within such parking meter district zone, for any time period up to and including twenty-four (24) hours per day. Such restrictions may be limited so as not to apply on specified days. SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance after its adoption by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana shall be effective January 1, 2020. Ordinance No. NS-2978 Page 6 of 7 ADOPTED this day of , 2019. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: SjAt:� Ryan 6vHodg4 Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on, and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-2978 Page 7 of 7 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO VACATE A PORTION OF BRISTOL STREET AT 815 NORTH BRISTOL STREET, ABANDONMENT NO. 19-03 {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 3,2) /s/ Kristine Ridge CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: 05:• ll ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on V Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Adopt a resolution declaring the City's intent to vacate a portion of Bristol Street at 815 North Bristol Street. 2. Set a public hearing for December 17, 2019. DISCUSSION On November 21, 2017, the City Council approved the purchase and sale agreement with In-N-Out Burgers, a California Corporation, for the sale of property located at 827, 829, and 907 North Bristol Street. That transaction was advantageous to the City because those remnant parcels, which had been acquired by the City to widen and improve Bristol Street, became available upon completion of the Bristol Improvements at market value. The reconfiguration of the project accommodates the restaurant's expansion, while also resolving traffic and safety concerns from the drive -through traffic spill -over. Moreover, the City will benefit by retaining a valued business, while also recovering grant funding which was expended to acquire the parcels for the Bristol Improvements. The negotiation of the sale of the properties and the requested street vacation of approximately 2,021 square feet (Exhibit 1) was contingent on a redesign of the restaurant's site plan and mitigating the spill -over traffic issue. On May 28, 2019, the Planning Commission approved the project site plan, which includes tripling the drive -through stacking capacity, meeting the site vehicular demands. Due to the restaurant's popularity, over the last several years spill -over traffic regularly backs up on Bristol Street far enough to block adjacent business driveways and pedestrian crosswalks, and interferes with regular traffic flow. As a result, the City has been dealing with many complaints from adjacent businesses, residents, and neighborhoods, including threats of legal action that could result in an involuntary solution. Resolution of Intent to Vacate Portion of Bristol Street at 815 N Bristol Street November 19, 2019 Page 2 The proposed street vacation is behind the proposed sidewalk of the Bristol Street Improvements and it is no longer needed for public right-of-way purposes. The City currently has ownership of a street easement and a fee dedication over the proposed vacation area as reflected in a title report submitted by the applicant. Utilities, other government agencies, and City agencies have been advised of the street vacation. In addition, In-N-Out Burgers is required to complete any necessary utility relocations, construct the proposed redesign of the restaurant's site plan, and mitigate the spill -over traffic issue. The recommended action adopts a resolution of City Council's intent to vacate a portion of Bristol Street at 815 North Bristol Street (Exhibit 2) and sets a public hearing date for December 17, 2019, at which time the order to vacate may be approved by the City Council. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT This item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #3 - Economic Development, Objective #2 (Create new opportunities for business/job growth and encourage private development through new General Plan and Zoning Ordinance policies). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Fuad S. Sweiss, PE, PLS Executive Director Public Works Agency FSS/EWGITH Exhibits: 1. Street Vacation Area Map 2. Resolution of Intent EXHIBIT 2 jmf 9/12/19 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF BRISTOL STREET AT 815 NORTH BRISTOL STREET, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON, AND DIRECTING NOTICE THEREOF TO BE POSTED AND PUBLISHED (ABANDONMENT NO. 19-03) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. In accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares its intention to vacate a portion of Bristol Street at 815 North Bristol Street. The area proposed for vacation is shown on the map attached as Exhibit 1. B. Notice is hereby given that on November 19, 2019, at 5:45 P.M. or as soon as possible thereafter, in the Santa Ana City Council Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, a public hearing will be held by the City Council at which time any and all persons interested in or objecting to the proposed vacation described above may appear and be heard. Section 2. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to cause this Resolution to be published twice, once in each of the two successive weeks priorto the above -referenced hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. Section 3. The Executive Director of the Public Works Agency is hereby directed to post conspicuously, in the manner prescribed by law, notice of the adoption of this Resolution, containing the statement of the day, hour, and place of hearing set forth above, and describing the areas to be vacated at least two weeks before the day set for said hearing. Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of 2019. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor Resolution No. 2019-XXX Page t of 2 jmf 9/12/19 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: 12w ohn M. Funk Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council, do hereby certify the attached Resolution No. 2019 - to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on 2019. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2019-XXX Page 2 of 2 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 004-123-52, 004-123-48 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement"), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and Merchant Star International General Trading ("Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 004-123-52, 004-123-48 located at 828 N Bristol St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. AGREEMENT The parties therefore agree as follows: PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: EXHIBIT 4 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $1,025,000 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment"). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 4 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment") binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closinq Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 5I Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Seller will not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 36 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the A open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Restaurant (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) Buyer acknowledges that the Seller is coordinating the undergrounding of utilities along Bristol Street and a future twenty-five (25) foot by twenty- five (25) foot easement for Southern California Edison shall be required at the northeast corner of the site as detailed in the Seller Request for Proposal No. 19-026 and Buyer's proposed site plan (Exhibit C). The limits of the easement shall be determined concurrent with the Approvals. Buyer shall ensure that the Intended Improvements shall not be in conflict with the proposed easement. No compensation shall be provided for the easement. (d) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (e) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive 7 remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Buyer: Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) Merchant Star International General Trading 701 Park Center Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors 9 in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 004-123-52, 004-123-48 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation By: Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST By: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: _ !w Ji-in M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: Merchant Star rnational General Trading By: 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] Exhibit A In the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, being those portions of Parcel 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 79.905, per Parcel Map Book 150, pages 12 and 13, filed in the Office of the.County Recorders of said County,. Except that [and described in a Deed per Instrument Number?, ir4ddo 2_ y,yB L2, official records` of said County.. Containing 25000.0 square feet, more or less. Subject to all Covenants, Conditions, Reservations, Restrictions, Rights of Way and. Easements of record, if any. All as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Prepared by me, or under my direction on � I qe John M. Gonzales, PI_S 9065 ©N� '&��p . ` JOHN M. o .,r GONZAL S No, 9085 OF caLIFQ�� Page 1 of I EXHIBIT "Br PRC SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4' 48'23 - 1 ! w R T 2000.00' ua r L. = 167..78' _ ; f g TH STREET N 89°_:31' 30"W ins Po, o DEED B.K 591. PG. 109. N 94.21) I 8 Y O cI (A) c3 9RC (aA5-)— Q� C2 C4 �; I pQaD`° K 64' C()NCENTR [C ;� 1 L11. ��acjQ y 64' PARALLEL _j e. ¢el:Lu LLI rA Ora r s 24.21 — —.M. —I Lu no 0 txl rtl, � LL C7 L®1t -- tiZe.� ww¢Sc.i.. i II' GC1 RADIAL BEARINGS I 5 B 1 N 19 0 0 8` 4 8" E __ (8 TH STREET) _ - B2 N 27° 43` 44 E — _ _ -- "y B3 = 5 45017' 05" E I i 12' J ` 64 = N 81"37'42" E CMC .CENTER DR. i C1 C2 C3 G4 I 14°53`08" © 83041'23" A = 141050'42" = 0'39'34"' IL R = 95.00' R = 43.00' R 5.00` R = 2064.00' L = 24.68' L = 62.81' L 12..3.8L = 23.76` PER PM 79-905. PMB 15012-13. PER DEED BK. 591, PG. 109. O = STREET R.W. PER INSTRUMENT NO. ZQL` iiQc? V_ 3 0- PAGE 1 OF 1 GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instrument to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXES APPROVED AS TO APPROVED BY DESCRIPTION DISCRIPTION A.P. R/W MAP PARCEL FORM BY ATTY. DIRCTOR WRITTEN BY CHECKED O.K. NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER 004-123-48 & 52 C3 DEEDNUMBER 828 N. BRISTOL STREET 8737 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: Merchant Star International General Trading, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Dated: Bv: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C" INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] I s J+J' tilt,' U COMMERCIAL r ... RESIDENTIAL I LU LLI (, ffESTA P.ANo a y �. 4,5W St I r1awF :rF AtEwecl�li, •a4,rr u. witol:p Ato. 4wo$f. sne loA t 1bRUf5, 1172 kri CO'•'fPhC:F 9TT/ MAI$: BRISTOL STREET PARKPAG SlIMMA.R" - RESTA IZA111. ,n-A YACi lrwc! vts ,[ealPm PfauPto rta�[o F 731ALPw+, N�GPU13. Ss IS ♦SIMx4�l0air sesrK3Y1 VARIANICE PEGLiR�II • --3!w i e I.. C3 MERCHANT STAR INTERNATIONAL nil ��f O o. ;ram P 10 EucAN hA. + '. � STN STET AND 5K.—'77L STREET. SAVGA ANA. CA __rJ3 9if�sflC r ,e.A, axu D[.SIGY OPTION #t3 ote a us - tpq�wfaa<rs ••••�. Page 60 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 004-123-52, 004-123-48 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement"), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and Merchant Star International General Trading ("Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 004-123-52, 004-123-48 located at 828 N Bristol St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. AGREEMENT The parties therefore agree as follows: PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: EXHIBIT 4 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $1,025,000 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment"). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 4 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment") binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closinq Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 5I Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Seller will not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 36 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the A open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Restaurant (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) Buyer acknowledges that the Seller is coordinating the undergrounding of utilities along Bristol Street and a future twenty-five (25) foot by twenty- five (25) foot easement for Southern California Edison shall be required at the northeast corner of the site as detailed in the Seller Request for Proposal No. 19-026 and Buyer's proposed site plan (Exhibit C). The limits of the easement shall be determined concurrent with the Approvals. Buyer shall ensure that the Intended Improvements shall not be in conflict with the proposed easement. No compensation shall be provided for the easement. (d) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (e) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive 7 remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Buyer: Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) Merchant Star International General Trading 701 Park Center Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors 9 in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 004-123-52, 004-123-48 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation By: Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST By: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: _ !w Ji-in M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: Merchant Star rnational General Trading By: 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] Exhibit A In the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, being those portions of Parcel 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 79.905, per Parcel Map Book 150, pages 12 and 13, filed in the Office of the.County Recorders of said County,. Except that [and described in a Deed per Instrument Number?, ir4ddo 2_ y,yB L2, official records` of said County.. Containing 25000.0 square feet, more or less. Subject to all Covenants, Conditions, Reservations, Restrictions, Rights of Way and. Easements of record, if any. All as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Prepared by me, or under my direction on � I qe John M. Gonzales, PI_S 9065 ©N� '&��p . ` JOHN M. o .,r GONZAL S No, 9085 OF caLIFQ�� Page 1 of I EXHIBIT "Br PRC SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4' 48'23 - 1 ! w R T 2000.00' ua r L. = 167..78' _ ; f g TH STREET N 89°_:31' 30"W ins Po, o DEED B.K 591. PG. 109. N 94.21) I 8 Y O cI (A) c3 9RC (aA5-)— Q� C2 C4 �; I pQaD`° K 64' C()NCENTR [C ;� 1 L11. ��acjQ y 64' PARALLEL _j e. ¢el:Lu LLI rA Ora r s 24.21 — —.M. —I Lu no 0 txl rtl, � LL C7 L®1t -- tiZe.� ww¢Sc.i.. i II' GC1 RADIAL BEARINGS I 5 B 1 N 19 0 0 8` 4 8" E __ (8 TH STREET) _ - B2 N 27° 43` 44 E — _ _ -- "y B3 = 5 45017' 05" E I i 12' J ` 64 = N 81"37'42" E CMC .CENTER DR. i C1 C2 C3 G4 I 14°53`08" © 83041'23" A = 141050'42" = 0'39'34"' IL R = 95.00' R = 43.00' R 5.00` R = 2064.00' L = 24.68' L = 62.81' L 12..3.8L = 23.76` PER PM 79-905. PMB 15012-13. PER DEED BK. 591, PG. 109. O = STREET R.W. PER INSTRUMENT NO. ZQL` iiQc? V_ 3 0- PAGE 1 OF 1 GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instrument to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXES APPROVED AS TO APPROVED BY DESCRIPTION DISCRIPTION A.P. R/W MAP PARCEL FORM BY ATTY. DIRCTOR WRITTEN BY CHECKED O.K. NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER 004-123-48 & 52 C3 DEEDNUMBER 828 N. BRISTOL STREET 8737 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: Merchant Star International General Trading, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Dated: Bv: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C" INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] I s J+J' tilt,' U COMMERCIAL r ... RESIDENTIAL I LU LLI (, ffESTA P.ANo a y �. 4,5W St I r1awF :rF AtEwecl�li, •a4,rr u. witol:p Ato. 4wo$f. sne loA t 1bRUf5, 1172 kri CO'•'fPhC:F 9TT/ MAI$: BRISTOL STREET PARKPAG SlIMMA.R" - RESTA IZA111. ,n-A YACi lrwc! vts ,[ealPm PfauPto rta�[o F 731ALPw+, N�GPU13. Ss IS ♦SIMx4�l0air sesrK3Y1 VARIANICE PEGLiR�II • --3!w i e I.. C3 MERCHANT STAR INTERNATIONAL nil ��f O o. ;ram P 10 EucAN hA. + '. � STN STET AND 5K.—'77L STREET. SAVGA ANA. CA __rJ3 9if�sflC r ,e.A, axu D[.SIGY OPTION #t3 ote a us - tpq�wfaa<rs ••••�. Page 60 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Q!t, CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: APPOINT SIMON GONZALEZ AND JACK HALEY TO THE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD FOR A PARTIAL TERM EXPIRING MAY 31, 2022 (STRATEGIC PLAN NO 5,1) Is/ Kristine Ridq( CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 1s' Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO I9IN:@IN] UTAA.14 Appoint Simon Gonzalez and Jack Haley to the Workforce Development Board representing private sector businesses (replacing McGowan and Piwnica) for a partial term expiring May 31, 2022. DISCUSSION On May 17, 2016, the Santa Ana City Council adopted Resolution 2016-031, establishing the Santa Ana Workforce Development Board (WDB), and appointed 25 members. In accordance with the federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Section 107(b)(2)(A-D), a local WDB is to be comprised of representatives from specific categories and the number of WDB members in the categories be proportional in different ways to the total membership while maintaining a greater than 50 percent representation from the business sector. WDB members are appointed by the City Council under the categories of membership, prescribed by law, as follows: • Representatives from local businesses 13 members • Representative from labor, labor registered 5 members apprenticeship, and/or community based organization) • Representatives from local education institutions 3 members • Representative from government entities 4 members (Dept. of Rehabilitation, Social Services Agency, Employment Development Department (EDD), and Economic Development) The Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce recently submitted a letter nominating Simon Gonzalez, General Manager at D.F. Stauffers Biscuit Company, Inc., and Jack Haley, Principal at Lee and Associates, to represent private sector businesses on the Workforce Development Board (Exhibit 1). The nominees will replace private sector members McGowan and Piwnica who are no longer serving on the board. Appoint Simon Gonzalez and Jack Haley to the Workforce Development Board For a Partial Term Expiring May 31, 2022 November 19, 2019 Page 2 STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval assists the City in meeting Goal #5 (Community Health, Livability, Engagement and Sustainability). Objective #1 (Establish a comprehensive community engagement initiative to expand access to information and create opportunities for stakeholders to play an active role in discussion public policy and setting priorities). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. Steven A. Mendoza Executive Director Community Development Agency Exhibit: 1. Nomination Letter and Resumes — Simon Gonzalez and Jack Haley October 21, 2019 Dear Mayor Pulido and Members of the City Council, The Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce enthusiastically supports the nomination of Simon Gonzalez (Stauffer's Laguna Cookie Company) and Jack Haley (Lee & Associates Commercial Real Estate) to join the join the Workforce Development Board as members from our Santa Ana business community. It is important that our Workforce Development Board have outstanding business leadership from the business community. We feel that Simon and Jack are good representatives from our business community. Appreciate your consideration of these two outstanding people. Sincerely, If avid' A,' C�- David Elliott President/CEO Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce 1631 W. Sunflower Ave #C-35, Santa Ana, CA 92704 (714) 541-5353 EXHIBIT 1 SIMON GONZALEZ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Successful executive experience in strategic planning, new business development, distribution & logistics, cost accounting, Board -level relationship building and industry networking initiatives in consumer -facing, multicultural marketplaces. Demonstrated record as a Strategic Thinker, Change Agent and Product Champion driving value -based solution in sales, marketing, production planning, import/export and quality control. Recognized as a hands-on business driver in creating and implementing successful business plans and high -impact deals with a conscientious approach; rapid delivery of value-added business growth, optimal revenue results and maximum operating efficiencies. Solid expertise in negotiating and executing corporate transactions, establishing joint ventures and negotiating complex commercial and distribution agreements with business owners, senior management, major vendors and key decision -makers. Self -motivated to achieve focused business performance, develop competitive markets, maintain product quality and meet aggressive business objectives in multi -country marketplaces. Highly skilled in building, training, motivating, mentoring and supervising top -performing teams of cross -discipline management and professionals; fully familiar with P&L, budgeting and cost controls. Extensive stewardship background in building and maintaining efficient organizations and profitable relationships in diverse industries, multinational marketplaces and Anglo/Hispanic cultures. Knowledge of cross-cultural dynamics and international business practices in Latin America, US and the Caribbean through frequent travel and long-term residency. US Citizen; fluent in Spanish. CORE COMPENTENCIES • Production Management • Strategic Planning • Business Planning • P&L/ Budgeting • Competitive Analysis • Contract Negotiations • KPI Management • Technology Integration • Cost Reductions • Quality Assurance • Turnaround Strategies • Multi -Lingual EXPERIENCE D.F. Stauffers Biscuit Company, Inc. Santa Ana, CA 2017- Present General Manager Responsible for all aspects ofManufacturing, Planning & Scheduling, P&L, budgeting, cost controls, quality assurance, human resources, Warehousing & Distribution, Plant Sanitation and maintenance. For a $60 million processor and distributor ofbaldng products. • Complete transformation of business mentality, putting together a new management team and establishment of clear objectives and expectations from the new team. • Improved People Safety, Product Safety and Facilities Safety. • Development of middle management team, making them accountable for results and empowering them to make decisions leading to cost reductions and increase on productivity. EXHIBIT 1 SIMON GONZALEZ • Cost reduction initiatives by $Imillion in terms of labor costs reduction and equipment efficiency improvements • Production volume growth over 20% Vs previous year in 2017 and over 50% in 2018. • Created a TEAMWORK environment and a very positive work environment for the 400 employees at the plant. • Execution of key capital projects to add more production capacity and to automate part of the manufacturing processes. • New product development and launching these within expected time frame. Bumble Bee Seafoods LLC, Santa Fe Springs, CA 2012- 2016 Vice President/General Manager Tuna Operations In Charge of all Tuna Canning Operations with a 8-member cross discipline management team, 320 employees. Also responsible for the manufacturing co -packing agreement, supervising two Bumble Bee staff at co -packer facilities; and responsble for a yearly $ 275 million operating budget. • Personally leading the transformation process of this operation in terms of raising people morale and providing the correct management team to improve f raucial performance of the business. • Actively involved on improving plant efficiency from 76% to 85% thru better planning and production controls. • Successful completion of the integration of additional productions lines from Puerto Rico operation into Santa Fe Springs plant. • Direct involvement on developing a strong Safety culture in the entire organization. Bumble Bee Seafoods LLC, Puerto Rico 2011- 2012 General Manager In Charge of all Tuna Canning Operations with a 7-member cross discipline management team, 230 employees and a yearly $ 102 million operating budget. Personally leading the transformation process of this operation in terms ofraising people morale and providing the correct management team to improve financial performance ofthe business. Personally involved on the decision of closing Puerto Rican operations and move production volumes to US, to maximize company sinergies and cost reduction targets. Bumble Bee Seafoods LLC, Trinidad & Tobago 2007 — 2011 General Manager In charge of all production plant operations with a 6-member cross -discipline management team, 320 employees and a yearly $30 million operating budget for this consumer food product manufacturer. Personally coach, mentor and empower management and staff to achieve maximum operational productivity. Frequently involved in industry associations and community social responsibility initiatives. • Succeeded in turning this unit around from last to #1 position in the entire company for 2 years straight in KPI areas of productivity, quality, and safety and financial. • Efficiently reduced headcount by over 100% over 3 years, generating annual savings of $2.5 million. • Instituted LEAN manufacturing methodologies and improved fish yield from 57% to 60% with a highly empowered team, resulting in $1.5 million in savings annually. • Saved another $500,000 each year through the implementation of KAISAN teams in all critical business areas. Euro Caribe Packing Company, Carolina, Puerto Rico Chief Executive Officer 2002 — 2007 Responsible for all aspects of sales, marketing, operation, P&L, budgeting, cost controls, quality assurance, human resources and banking relations for this $20 million processor and distributor of meat products. • Aggressively expanded sales volume from $12 million to $20 million in only 4 years through persistent account development, key customer negotiations and focused merchandising programs, rescuing this company from imminent closure by the investment bank. • Developed and rolled out new product lines and branding strategies, including new Deli offerings that generated $3 million in new sales each year. • Reduced distribution costs by $300,000 through outsourcing this function and converting union drivers to independent carriers. • Improved all manufacturing facilities with better production processes, GMPs and HACCP plans to comply with USDA requirements. EXHIBIT 1 SIMON GONZALEZ Nestle Puerto Rico Inc. / Nestle Ice Cream Division, Puerto Rico 1997 — 2002 General Manager Directly supervised all levels of sales, marketing, purchasing, distribution, production, and HR and quality assurance at this $16 million plant with 150 employees. Active member of the Dominican Regional Technical Group encompassing Puerto Rico, Cuba and the Dominican Republic. • Transitioned this company over 2 years into a marketing -oriented business after its acquisition by Nestle. • Piloted the development and launch of 3 new impulse ice cream product each to build portfolio offerings, driving 11 % in sales growth per year. • Opened up a new distribution channel by deploying 500 new impulse ice cream cabinets in Puerto Rico. • Worked at Nestle Mexico to streamline several ice cream distribution channel nationwide. Mantecados Nevada / Borden Foods Inc., Puerto Rico 1994 —1997 General Manager In charge of coordinating P&L, budgeting, production planning, sales, marketing, quality control, purchasing, HR, engineering and finance for this $13 million manufacturing facility with 125 employees. Key participant on the corporate Latin America Management and Management Charter teams. • Completely turned around this highly -troubled business, recovered customer loyalty and facilitated new sales, merchandising & marketing efforts. • Launched multiple products every year that generated $3 million in additional sales annually. • Played a key role in the sale and divestiture of this business to Nestle in 1997. PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE Held management and professional positions in plant operations, quality assurance, business process analysis, production planning, shipping/receiving, warehousing and cost reductions. Gained hands-on knowledge of a wide array of consumer -oriented product lines with such industry leaders as Borden Foods and Kraft Foods Panama. consistently recognized for supporting corporate growth, achieving optimal productivity, meeting performance goals and maintaining accurate documentation. EDUCATION Master's Degree in Industrial Administration Universidad Santa Maria La Antiqua, Panama City, Panama Bachelor's Degree in Chemistry University of Panama, Panama City, Panama PROFESSIONAL TRAINING Seminars in various management topics through Nestle, Borden Foods and Kraft, as well as INCAE (Central America Business Administration Institute); 10-hour OSHA General Industry program. Fully familiar with MS Office and proprietary applications. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS OpX Leadership Network Represented Bumble Bee Seafoods, in all activities related to this dynamic association Belongs to one of the multifunctional solutions groups, working on workers' safety enhancement. Santa Fe Springs Chamber of Commerce Represented Bumble Bee Seafoods, in all activities related to Santa Fe Springs, CA. Chamber of Commerce. Especially on assigned specific task forces for the improvement of the industry. Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce Represents D.F. Stauffers Biscuit Company, in activities related to Santa .Ana, CA Chamber of Commerce PROFILE As a Principal of the Lee & Associates Orange office, Jack Haley specializes in leasing and sales of user and investment properties. Over the past 28 years Jack has successfully completed over 1,700 Southern California transactions and represented both national and locally based companies in acquiring industrial and office facilities. Jack is consistently a Lee & Associates' Top Producer. O 714.647.9100 CAREER SUMMARY D 714.564.7172 • Over 2 Million square feetand One Hundred Million ($100,000,000.00) in transaction volume over the last 3 years. F 714.543.5285 • Completed over 10 nationwide (outside of California) investment sales. 1haley0lee-associates.com • Extensive knowledge of the Orange County and Inland Empire Industrial Markets. LeeOrange.com • Competitive research and marketing for users, investors, and developers of commercial 1004 W. Taft Avenue, Suite 150 properties. Orange, California 92865 DREID:01064859 EDUCATION • California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Bachelor of Arts (Concentration in Finance, Real Estate &Law, Emphasis in Real Estate Finance & Development) PARTIAL CLIENT LIST ► RREEF ► Calwest RECOGNITIONS/AFFILIATIONS ► Advanced Image • Top 5 Producing Broker, Lee & Associates (2007, 2013, 2015, 2018) ► Tires Warehouse • Top Producing Broker, Lee &Associates (2003, 2005) ► BTL Machine ► Goodwill OC • Member, Board of Directors- Lee & Associates ► Omohundro • Certified Commercial Investment Member (CCIM) ► Poach Secured Storage 0- Tempo Industries ■ CCIMs are considered the elite of commercial real estate, sharing a set of skills that puts ► Moore Packaging them far ahead of the competition. The CCIM designation is granted by the Commercial ► Cheung Rattan Investment Real Estate Institute (CIREI). CCIMs course topics include financial analysis for commercial real estate, commercial brokerage, advanced techniques in sales and marketing, market analysis, tax planning, decision analysis, negotiation, presentation skills, managing and marketing troubled assets, among others. • Member, National Association Industrial Office Parks (NAIOP) LEE& Y � ASSOCIATES COMMERCiAt. REAL ESTATE SERVICES LOCAL EXPERTISE. INTERNATIONAL REACH. WORLD CLASS. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION pl_ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE QUARTERLY REPORT FOR HOUSING DIVISION PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES JULY— SEPTEMBER 2019 {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 3C} CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 181 Reading ❑ Ordinance on god Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION Receive and file the Quarterly Report for Housing Division Projects and Activities for the period of July 2019 — September 2019. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING COMMISSION ACTION At its regular meeting on October 23, 2019, by a vote of 6:0 (Garcia absent) the Community Redevelopment and Housing Commission approved the recommended action. DISCUSSION This report for the quarter ending on September 30, 2019 provides statistics for all of the affordable housing projects and activities for the Housing Division. The report is divided into four sections: Loan Activity, Loan Portfolio Management and Monitoring, Affordable Housing Funds and Commitments, and Development Projects. Loan Activity Applications The Housing Division offers several different programs including down payment assistance for first-time homebuyers and rehabilitation loans for mobile homes, single-family, multi -family, and historic homes. Inquiries are received from the public and applications are accepted for these programs on a continual basis. Table 1 shows the number of inquiries, applications sent out, received and approved by type for the quarter and for the total fiscal year. Quarterly Report for Housing Division November 19, 2019 Page 2 Table 1: Applications Sent Out, Received & Approved Program Inquiries Applications Sent Out Applications Received Applications Approved Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Single -Family Rehabilitation 16 16 2 0 Mobile Home Rehabilitation 5 0 1 0 Multi -Family Rehabilitation 0 0 0 0 Historic Home Restoration 0 0 0 0 Homeownership / DPAP 80 75 2 0 The number of applications received is typically lower than the number of applications sent out in any given period due to the stringent program guidelines for eligibility regulated by the federal government. The Residential Construction Specialist position has been filled and applications for the Single -Family and Mobile Home Rehabilitation Program are being processed. In addition to the three new applications, ten single-family and three mobile -home applications that were previously on hold are now active. In total, there are sixteen applications in process for rehabilitation of single-family and mobile homes. Rehabilitation Loan Underwriting and Approval Progress During this quarter, zero (0) home rehabilitation loans were funded due to the program previously being on hold. Rehabilitation Program Construction Progress During this phase, homeowners receiving rehabilitation loans are guided through an open selection of contractors to complete the work on their homes. Each homeowner is given a list of contractors that have been screened by staff for license and insurance requirements. However, homeowners are allowed to select any contractor that meets these same requirements. Staff assists the homeowners with the evaluation of bids and selection of a contractor. Staff also monitors the construction work, approves payments to contractors, and tracks expenditures to ensure compliance with the loan agreement and program guidelines. During this quarter, the rehabilitation of two (2) single-family homes and two (2) mobile homes was completed. Down Payment Assistance Loan Program Progress For the Down Payment Assistance Loan Program, staff evaluates applicant eligibility and oversees underwriting to ensure compliance with program guidelines and requirements established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Applicants must meet established income requirements, complete an eight -hour pre -purchase counseling program from a HUD -approved housing counseling agency, be pre -qualified for a first mortgage and have a minimum of three percent of the purchase price from their own savings. On March 6, 2018, City Council approved an update to the Down Payment Assistance Loan Program increasing the loan amount to $80,000 for low-income households and approving the use of the Inclusionary Housing Fund to offer down payment assistance of up to $40,000 for moderate -income households. The updated program requires the buyer must be a current resident of Santa Ana and/or work in Santa Ana at least 32 hours per week (except U.S Military Veterans). Additionally, the property Quarterly Report for Housing Division November 19, 2019 Page 3 needs to be in good condition and pass an inspection. During this quarter, staff conducted one (1) down payment assistance workshop in which a total of 40 people attended. The City of Santa Ana participated in the NeighborWorks Homebuyer Fair and Lender Panel in August in which 73 participants attended. In addition, two (2) inclusionary housing purchase applications at City Ventures were received and are still undergoing review. Loan Portfolio Management & Monitoring The Housing Division is responsible for managing the residential loan portfolio which includes all of the loans entered into by the City and Housing Authority acting as the Housing Successor Agency. As of the end of this quarter, the principal balance was $135,269,148. This is comprised of 390 loans of which 367 are deferred or residual receipt payment loans. As shown in Table 2, the loan portfolio generated $2,130,052 in payments of principal and interest during this quarter. The large increase in payments reflects the payoff of multiple loans which was required for the refinance and resyndication of senior debt for the purpose of rehabilitating 126 units in the Cornerstone Apartments project. This project is discussed in further detail in the section 'Projects Under Development'. Table 2: Portfolio Revenue Funding Source HOME CDBG Redevelopment NSP CaIHOME Loan Payoffs $93,032 $0 $1,853,430 $10,256 $0 Residual Receipts Payments $76,092 $0 $74,650 $0 $0 Amortized Loan Payments $5,859 $5,843 $10,890 $0 $0 Total For Q1 $174,983 $5,843 $1,938,970 $10,256 $0 Monitoring As part of the requirements for these funds, staff must monitor the owner -occupancy of single- family homes that have received loans, and the building code compliance of units in rental projects with long-term affordability covenants. During this quarter, 44 owner -occupancy recertification letters were mailed and 20 were returned and processed. Staff also conducted building code compliance inspections for 211 units on fourteen (14) properties which represents a sampling of 20% of the total units in the properties. Regulations require that only a sample of units be selected for inspection. Staff also inspects the grounds and common areas such as laundry rooms to ensure they also meet municipal code requirements. The grounds, common areas and all of the inspected units were found to be in compliance at the time of initial inspection. All forty-eight (48) units in a fifteenth property were inspected for compliance. All of the interiors were found to be in compliance. The common areas and exteriors are pending correction of compliance issues and re -inspections are ongoing. Available Funds and Land Assets for Affordable Housing Development Projects The City of Santa Ana and the Housing Authority acting as the Housing Successor Agency manages multiple sources of local, state and federal funds to promote and facilitate the Quarterly Report for Housing Division November 19, 2019 Page 4 development of affordable housing as well as land assets held by the Housing Authority. Exhibit 1 provides a summary of the funds available. Exhibit 2 provides a summary of available land assets. Housing Opportunity Ordinance On -Site Development: Since 2011, a total of 33 units have been developed on -site as a result of the Ordinance, including 23 ownership units for -sale and 10 rental units: Units Built On -Site Ownership Rental TOTAL 23 10 33 In -Lieu Fees Generated. - All in -lieu fees, penalties and other monies collected pursuant to the Housing Opportunity Ordinance, including interest, are deposited into the Inclusionary Housing Fund. Since inception, the Inclusionary Housing Fund has generated $17,872,871 to be used for the development of housing affordable to low- and moderate -income households, with a reasonable amount spent on administrative or related expenses associated with the administration of the Housing Opportunity Ordinance. These fees were generated from a total of 12 projects that opted to pay the in -lieu fee instead of building units on -site. If those 12 projects had instead built the inclusionary housing units on -site, a total of 409 affordable housing units would have been created. By comparison, there were 2,702 market -rate units produced or are under construction. Affordable Housing Units under Construction / Pre -Development with In -Lieu Fees: A total of 203 units are under construction / pre -development with an investment of in -lieu fees generated. This includes a $4,775,000 loan of in -lieu fees to develop 57 units of affordable housing at the Santa Ana Arts Collective; a $1.3 million loan of in -lieu fees to develop 51 units of affordable housing at the Tiny Tim Plaza project; a pre -loan commitment of $3,170,547 to develop 93 units of affordable housing at the Legacy Square project; and a commitment of $231,494 to develop two affordable homeownership units by Habitat for Humanity at 416 Vance Street and 826 N. Lacy Street. Units Under Construction / Pre -Development with In -Lieu Fees Project # of Units Santa Ana Arts Collective 57 Legacy Square 93 Tiny Tim Plaza 51 416 Vance Street & 826 N. Lacy Street 2 TOTAL 203 Quarterly Report for Housing Division November 19, 2019 Page 5 In addition, $3,131,700 of in -lieu fees was provided by City Council on September 14, 2018 to create 200 emergency shelter beds at the Link interim emergency shelter. This report reflects the status of funds and projects for the period ending September 30, 2019. Request for Proposals — RFP #19-063 for Affordable Housing Development The City of Santa Ana and the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Ana issued a new Request for Proposals (RFP # 19-063) on July 8, 2019 for the development of affordable housing in the City. Proposed developments may be for acquisition and/or rehabilitation of eligible properties for rental or transitional housing; acquisition and conversion of non-residential property to multifamily rental units; and/or new construction of housing units for rental housing. One land asset owned by the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Ana is also available for development under the RFP. Additional information regarding the RFP is available on the City of Santa Ana's website and PlanetBids. The first round of proposals were turned in on October 15, 2019. Staff will now be forming a Review Panel to review the proposals under the City's Affordable Housing Funds Policies and Procedures. PROJECTS UNDER DEVELOPMENT There are five (5) affordable housing developments under construction and five (5) affordable housing projects in pre -development. An existing affordable housing development (Cornerstone Apartments) is also being rehabilitated. Below are brief summaries for the ten (10) projects under construction / pre -development and the eleventh project under rehabilitation. Exhibit 3 provides a development timeline for the larger development projects. Projects under Construction First Street Apartments (1440 E. First Street) • Developer: AMCAL Multi -Housing, LLC. • Description: Demolition and new construction of an affordable multifamily apartment complex consisting of 68 units of rental housing serving very -low and extremely -low income families, and 1 manager's unit. • City Funds: Housing Successor Agency ($8,522,740) • Update: Construction was completed in September and Property Management has began the leasing process. City staff audited the waiting list to verify implementation of the local preference for Santa Ana residents prior to conducting a lotterized drawing. Move -ins were scheduled throughout the end of October 2019. A grand opening event will not be held. Santa Ana Arts Collective (1666 N. Main Street) • Developer: Meta Housing Corporation • Description: Acquisition, adaptive reuse and new construction project comprised of 57 affordable rental units designated for professional artists of all disciplines, and 1 manager's unit. Permanent supportive housing for 15 units will be funded by MHSA/SNHP funds from the County of Orange. Quarterly Report for Housing Division November 19, 2019 Page 6 • City Funds: Inclusionary Housing ($4,775,000), HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) ($2,627,631), Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) ($500,000) • Update: The contractor is completing plumbing, mechanical, electrical installation and drywall. Windows, doors and cabinets are being installed. Construction is 73% complete and anticipated to be complete at the end of December 2019 with occupancy expected in January 2020. The marketing timeline has been adjusted accordingly since tenant eligibility documentation must be dated within 120 days of occupancy. The educational sessions to inform artists on how to apply for housing were held on Saturday, July 27th and an additional two sessions were held on Monday, August 5th with application submittals due in September. A total of 171 pre -qualifying applications were received. Due to the low number of 3-bedroom applications received and the anticipated absorption rate, the application period was re -opened with additional outreach to local Santa Ana artists to maximize the number of applications from artists. City staff is in the process of auditing the waiting list for compliance with the local Santa Ana preference. Applicant interviews will begin at the end of October. Santa Ana Veterans Village (3312 W. First Street) • Developer: Jamboree Housing Corporation • Description: New construction of an affordable multifamily apartment complex consisting of 75 units of permanent supportive housing with wrap -around supportive services for HUD -Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) eligible homeless veterans and 1 manager's unit. • City Funds: Seventy-five (75) HUD-VASH Project -Based Vouchers, HOME-CHDO ($477,345.90) • Update: Framing is complete, and installation of windows, window flashing and tubs is in process. Solar supports on the roof are in place; roof sheathing and crickets are to be completed; and scaffolding is being set up. Electrical and low voltage are being run through the project. The project is approximately 41% complete and remains on schedule. The estimated completion date is February 2020. Aqua Housing (317 E. 17th Street) • Developer: Community Development Partners with Mercy House as the service provider • Description: Acquisition, demolition and new construction of a former motel yielding 56 units of affordable permanent supportive housing with wrap -around supportive services for chronically homeless individuals and 1 manager's unit. 28 of the 56 units will be funded by MHSA/SNHP funds from the County of Orange. • City Funds: Fifty-six (56) Project -Based Vouchers (PBVs) • Update: The developer closed on their financing in April and a ground -breaking ceremony was held on July 22, 2019. The contractor has commenced and completed the demolition of the existing motel building, site grading and pouring of perimeter wall footings and started the concrete slab foundations. Quarterly Report for Housing Division November 19, 2019 Page 7 Tiny Tim Plaza (2239 West 51h Street • Developer: Community Development Partners • Description: New construction of an affordable multifamily apartment complex consisting of 50 units of rental housing serving very -low and extremely -low income families, and 1 manager's unit. • City Funds: Inclusionary Housing ($1,300,000), Housing Successor Agency ($4,700,000) • Update: A ground -breaking ceremony was held on July 24, 2019. The contractor has completed the demolition of the existing buildings and site preparations, and is currently completing footings and foundations for the building, to be followed by construction of the podium deck. Projects in Pre -Development Crossroads at Washington (1126 and 1146 E. Washington Avenue) • Developer: Related Companies of California with A Community of Friends (ACOF) as the service provider • Description: New construction of a 100% affordable multifamily apartment complex consisting of 85 units of rental housing and 1 manager's unit. All units will be affordable to households earning less than 30% AMI of which 43 units will be set -aside for permanent supportive housing. • City Funds: HOME Investment Partnerships Program ($3,007,489), Neighborhood Stabilization Program ($963,951), sixty-two (62) year ground lease agreement for 1126 and 1146 E. Washington Avenue (Appraised Value as of Oct. 25, 2018: $3,080,000) • Update: The developer has submitted site plans for review. The City and County are in the process of preparing the master ground lease, option for ground lease, joint powers agreement (JPA) and quitclaims associated with the JPA. FX Residences. formerly Francis Xavier (801. 809. 809 % East Santa Ana Boulevard • Developer: HomeAid Orange County, Inc. with Mercy House as the service provider • Description: New construction of an affordable multifamily apartment complex consisting of 16 units of permanent supportive housing, and 1 manager's unit. • City Funds: Housing Successor Agency ($1,069,947), three (3) HUD-VASH PBVs, 99- year ground lease agreement for 801 E. Santa Ana Blvd. (Appraised Value as of Oct 25, 2018: $788,000) • Update: The developer submitted their development application to the City on September 191h for site plan review. Public outreach was then conducted leading up to the Sunshine Ordinance Meeting on October 8th, 2019. The developer has also submitted their application to the County for the Special Needs Housing Program (SNHP) funding. The project is being renamed from Francis Xavier to FX Residences. Habitat for Humanity (416 Vance Street & 826 N. Lacy Street) • Developer: Habitat for Humanity of Orange County • Description: New construction of two single-family detached homes for homeownership serving households up to 120% AMI. Quarterly Report for Housing Division November 19, 2019 Page 8 • City Funds: Inclusionary Housing ($231,494) and 99-year ground lease agreement for 416 Vance Street and 826 N. Lacy Street (Appraised Value as of Oct 25, 2018: $578,000) • Update: The developer is moving forward with the original proposal to provide two single-family detached homes on the site and is working on their site plans. Leoacv Square, formerly Santa Ana United Methodist Church (609 North Spurgeon Street) • Developer: National Community Renaissance with Mercy House as the service provider • Description: New construction of a 100% affordable multifamily apartment complex consisting of 92 units of rental housing and 1 manager's unit. All units will be affordable to households earning less than 60% AMI of which 33 units will be set -aside for permanent supportive housing. • City Funds: Inclusionary Housing ($3,170,547) and eight (8) HUD-VASH PBVs • Update: AHSC funding awards were announced on June 21st and the developer did not receive an AHSC grant due to extraordinary competition. Developer is pursuing an alternative financing scenario by applying for Multifamily Housing Program (MHP) funds on August 20. Developer was awarded a total of $6,013,134 for 16 No Place Like Home (NPLH) units - $3,135,262 for capital and $2,887,872 for the capitalized operating subsidy reserve. NPLH funding will provide additional leverage for a competitive MHP application. North Harbor Village (1108 N. Harbor) • Developer: Jamboree Housing Corporation • Description: New construction of a 100% affordable multifamily apartment complex consisting of 89 permanent supportive housing studio units for homeless veterans. • City Funds: Eight -nine (89) HUD-VASH PBVs and CDBG ($1,687,047) • Update: The project received an Affordable Housing Program award of $890,000 from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco on June 26. The project submitted for the Multifamily Housing Program (MHP) on August 20 and is waiting for the award determination. If awarded, developer will apply for 4% tax credits in early 2020. Alternatively, developer is analyzing the No Place Like Home (NPLH) or Veterans Housing and Homelessness Prevention (VHHP) Program funds which are due in January 2020, in combination with 4% or 9% tax credits later in 2020. Existing Projects under Rehabilitation Cornerstone Apartments (805. 810. 815. 816. 825. 835 and 904 S. Minnie Street • Developer: Jamboree Housing • Description: Rehabilitation of a 126-unit affordable housing project originally built in 1961. • City Funds: HOME Investment Partnerships Program ($5,128,152) and Housing Successor Agency ($2,054,327) in existing affordable housing loans Quarterly Report for Housing Division November 19, 2019 Page 9 • Update: Ten (10) existing HOME Program loans and thirty-three (33) existing Housing Successor Agency loans were consolidated into two (2) Amended and Restated Loan Agreements in order to enable the project to re -syndicate and resubordinate existing affordable housing loans to a new senior loan. Renovations have been started and are anticipated to be completed in May 2020. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT The activities covered by this report allow the City to meet Goal # 5 - Community Health, Livability, Engagement & Sustainability, Objective # 3 (Facilitate diverse housing opportunities and support efforts to preserve and improve the livability of Santa Ana neighborhoods). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Steven A. Mendoza Executive Director Community Development Agency Exhibits: 1. Available Funds for Affordable Housing Development Projects 2. Available Land Assets for Affordable Housing Development 3. Project Timelines Exhibit 1 Available Funds for Affordable Housing Development Projects As of September 30, 2019 Housing Successor Agency (Housing Authority) $1,639,104 Cash on Hand ($85,227) First Street Apartments Loan ($125,031) First Street Apartments Project Costs ($1,069,947) Frances Xavier Residence Project Pre -Commitment Loan Z ($250,000) Administrative Costs Allowance s $108,899 Available Funds Inclusionary Housing Funds $7,962,879 Cash on Hand ($240,958) Santa Ana Arts Collective Project Costs 4 ($320,000) Down Payment Assistance Program s ($206,381) Interim Emergency Homeless Shelter Agreement o ($3,170,547) Legacy Square Project Pre -Commitment Loan 7 ($231,494) Lacy Street Project Pre -Commitment Loan o ($58,983) Tiny Tim Plaza Project Costs o ($465,786) Administrative Costs Allowance (CDA/PBA) $3,268,729 Available Funds 10 HOME Program $4,840,172 Funds to Drawdown ($3,007,489) Crossroads at Washington Pre -Commitment Loan " $1,832,683 Available Funds to Drawdown CDBG Program (Acquisition/Rehabilitation Projects Only) $2,546,897 Funds to Drawdown ($1,687,047) North Harbor Village Project Pre -Commitment Loan o $859,850 Available Funds to Drawdown NSP Program (Abandoned, Foreclosed or Vacant Properties Only) $1,314,726 Funds to Drawdown ($963,951) Crossroads at Washington Pre -Commitment Loan " ($322,281) Administrative Costs Allowance $28,494 Available Funds to Drawdown Rental Rehabilitation Grant Program $384,432 Cash on Hand 12 $384,432 Available Funds $6,483,086 Total Available Funds Approved by Housing Authority on January 16, 2013. 90% of loan paid on March 13, 2013, 10% remaining to be paid upon completion of construction. x Approved by Housing Authority on Jan uary 15,2019. ' The Housing Successor Agency relies on available ash to fund the monitoring and compliance functions related to the former Redevelopment Agency's housing loans. c Project costs only ;$48M In loans approved by Cry Council paid on July 26,2017. $400,000 originally approved by City Council on March 6, 2018 Two loans paid through end of March 2019 e Approved by City Council on September 13,2018 Agreementwith Mercy House Living Centers Inc Only first year commitment reflected here. Approved by City Council/Housing Authority on January 15, 2019. e Approved by City Council/Housing Authority on March 5, 2019. e Project costs only ;$6 OM In loans approved by Cry Council/Housing Authority and paid on May 2,2019. '0 $2,423,300 ofthis amount may be needed for the second year commitment of the LINK Shelter, if other anticipated revenue sources are not available. Approved by City Council on July 2, 2019. 12Old program Income available after close out of program with HUD i0a:110-11 a EXHIBIT 2 AVAILABLE LAND ASSETS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT (1) 302 E. a. b. C. d. e. f. Twenty -Second Street APN: 003-122-25 Lot Size: 27,817sf Current Zoning: R1 Single -Family Reside Parcel was acquired 10/30/2002 using Lo Fund - 20% Set Aside. nce, which allows one house per lot. wand Moderate Income Housing Asset Previous Use: Purchased from Cal Trans. It was a remnant parcel from the freeway widening project. The site was vacant and undeveloped at the time it was acquired. General Plan: Low Density Residential, which allows single-family residences and ancillary uses. g. Maximum du/ac: Seven units per acre. h. Site Condition / Environmental Conditions: Property is irregular in shape, is below the minimum lot size for a residential lot, and will most likely require the approval of several variances from the zoning code in order to facilitate a residential unit. Current Affordable Housing Development Project Timelines Projects under Construction First Street Apartments -1440 E. First St Oct-15 Developer Submitted Request for Funds to CDA Apr-16 Planning Entitlements Approved Jun-17 Awarded Successor Agency Funds Jun-17 Relocation Plan Approved Sep-17 9% Low-income Housing Tax Credits Awarded Jan-18 Final Housing Authority Loan Approved Mar-18 Close of Escrow Mar-18 Construction Initiated Sept-19 Construction Completion Oct-19 Occupancy Santa Ana Arts Collective - 1666 N. Main St Jun-15 RFP Issued Nov-15 Approved HOME/CDBG Funds Mar-16 Submitted Application forAHSC (Cap & Trade Funds) Sep-16 Awarded AHSC (Cap & Trade) Funds Nov-16 9% Low -Income Housing Tax Credits Awarded Dec-16 Relocation Plan Approved Jul-17 Final Loan Approved/ Close of Escrow Jul-17 Planning Entitlements Approved Jul-17 Building Permits Pulled/Construction Initiated Apr-19 Anticipated Construction Completion Oct-19 Dec-19 Revised Project Completion Date * (Foundation/Building Seismic Adjustments) Revised Project Completion Date Santa Ana Veterans Village - 3312 W. First St Dec-16 RFP Issued for PBVs Apr-17 Approved HUD VASH PBVs Jun-17 Awarded HOME CHDO Funds Jun-17 Planning Entitlements Approved Jan-18 Awarded County Special Needs Housing Funds Feb-18 Submittal of 9% Low -Income Housing Tax Credit Application Jun-18 Award of 9% Low -Income Housing Tax Credits Dec-18 Close of Escrow Feb-19 Construction Initiated Feb-20 Anticipated Construction Completion Page 1 of 5 Aqua Housing - 317 E. 17th St Dec-16 RFP Issued for PBVs Apr-17 Approved PBVs Jun-17 Planning Entitlements Approved Jun-17 Approved Additional PBVs Jan-18 Awarded County Special Needs Housing Funds Jan-18 Submitted Application for HCD Infill Infrastructure Funds Jun-18 Award of HCD Infill Infrastructure Funds Aug-18 Submittal of 4% Low -Income Housing Tax Credit Application Oct-18 Allocation of4%Low-income Housing Tax Credits Apr-19 Close of Escrow June-19 Construction Initiated Tiny Tim Plaza - 2223 W. Sth St Dec-16 Developer Submitted Request for Funds to CDA Jun-17 Awarded City and Housing Successor Agency Funds Jan-18 Planning Entitlements Approved Jul-18 Submittal of 9% Low -Income Housing Tax Credit Application Oct-18 Award of 9% Low -Income Housing Tax Credits May-19 Anticipated Close of Escrow June-19 Anticipated Construction Initiated Projects in Pre -Development Aug-19 The Crossroads at Washington Submitted PSH Application to County Oct-19 Submitted for Planning Entitlements Oct-19 Community Meeting Nov-19 Approval of Joint Powers Agreement, Option to Ground Lease, Voucher Resolution and Cooperation Agreement, Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) Agreement, and Density Bonus Dec-19 PSH Funds and Voucher Approval from County Board of Supervisors Dec-19 NEPA EA City Approval —City of Santa Ana Submits NEPA EA to HUD Feb-20 Planning Entitlements Approved Mar-20 TCAC 9% Application —1s` Round 2020 May-20 Assuming a 1s` Round 2020 TCAC 9% Award Allocation, start Design Development Drawings Jun-20 TCAC 9% Award Allocation Jul-20 Submit for 1" Plan Check Page 2 of 5 Dec-20 City Issues Permit Ready Letter Dec-20 Construction Loan Closing Dec-20 Start of Construction Feb-22 Construction Complete Jun-22 Full Occupancy North Harbor Village Permanent Supportive Housing (Formerly Budget Inn) Mar-19 Start of Design Development Mar-19 Applied to FHLBSF for AHP Financing ($830,000) Mar-19 Award of VASH Vouchers & City Loan by City Council (89 Vouchers and $1,687,047) Mar-19 Start Environmental Approval Process with City of Santa Ana (CEQA/NEPA) Mar-19 Applied for Home Depot Grant ($500,000) Apr-19 First Submittal for Architectural Review May-19 Community Meeting Jun-19 Apply to HCD for MHP Funding (Amount TBD) Jun-19 Arch. Review Comments Received from City Jun-19 CEQA/NEPA Approval — City of Santa Ana Jun-19 Receive AHAP Contract Jun-19 AHP Award Date Jul-19 Resubmit Plans for 2nd Architectural Review Jul-19 TCAC Application — 2nd Round 2019 Jul-19 Apply for OCCF Financing (If Necessary) Jul-19 Receive Ministerial Approvals for Design Aug-19 Home Depot Grant Award Date Sep-19 OCCF Award (TBD — If Necessary) Sep-19 TCAC Allocation Sep-19 Start Construction Documents for Rehab Sep-19 Submit First Plan Check Dec-19 Receipt of First Plan Check Comments Dec-19 Submit Second Plan Check Jan-20 Receipt of Second Plan Check Comments Jan-20 Submit Third Plan Check Feb-20 Receipt of Permit Ready Feb-20 Construction Loan Closing Feb-20 Start of Construction Feb-20 Construction Complete Feb-20 Start of Lease Up Jun-20 Full Occupancy Page 3 of 5 FX Residences - 801, 809, 809 1/2 E. Santa Ana Boulevard Jan-19 Council Approval for Land Lease and Project Funding Jan-19 Submittal of Application for NPLH Funding Feb-19 Confirm with City Staff That Project Site Can Yield Additional Units Under Existing Zoning Mar-19 Revise Conceptual Drawings for additional 5 units (17 total units, up from the original 12 units) Mar-19 SNHP Funding Application Submitted to County Apr-19 City Staff to Review Revised Conceptual Design Apr-19 Begin Development Agreement May-19 Board of Supervisors Meeting for SNHP Funding Jul-19 Execute Development Agreement Jul-19 Formal Awards Letters for NPLH Funding To Be Issued Aug-19 Initial Planning Submittal Sept-19 Sunshine Ordinance Meeting Jan-20 Planning Commission Meeting (ministerial approval of density bonus) Feb-20 City Council Meeting (ministerial approval of density bonus) Feb-20 Begin Construction Docs Aug-20 Approval of Grading Plans Mar-20 Begin Construction (Grading, Weather Permitting) Mar-21 Completion of Construction Habitat for Humanity - 416 Vance Street & 826 N. Lacy Street Jul-19 DDA signed Aug-19 Prepare Grading Plans Aug-19 Land Conveyance Sep-19 Submit Grading/Improvements Sep-19 Prepare Architectural Plans Nov-19 Submit Architectural Plans Dec-19 Grading Permit Issued Jan-20 Commence Grading Feb-20 Building Permits Issued Feb-20 Begin Construction Jan-21 Anticipated Construction Completion Jan-21 Certificate of Occupancy/Closings Page 4 of 5 Santa Ana United Methodist Church "Legacy Square" (609 North Spurgeon Street) Aug-18 Santa Ana CDA Funding Application Dec-18 Apply for NPLH and SNHP Funds Jan-19 Santa Ana Funding Award Feb-19 Planning Entitlements Approved Feb-19 AHSC Funding Application May-19 Award of SNHP Funds Jun-19 AHSC Funding Award Aug-19 Apply for 4% tax credits Aug-19 Apply for Tax -Exempt Bonds Sep-19 Construction Drawings (8-12 weeks) Oct-19 Award of 4% tax credits Oct-19 Award of Tax -Exempt Bonds Dec-19 Plan Check (12-16 weeks) Jan-20 Building Permit Issuance Apr-20 Construction Closing/Syndication Apr-20 Begin Construction (18 months) Oct-21 Construction Complete Dec-21 100% Fully Leased (2 months) Page 5 of 5 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE QUARTERLY REPORT OF INVESTMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 4, 1D} /s/ Kristine Ri CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 1sl Reading ❑ Ordinance on god Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO 911:8011111V1.101N Receive and file quarterly report of investments as of September 30, 2019. DISCUSSION California Code Section 53646 (b) states that if a quarterly report is rendered to the legislative body, the quarterly investment report shall be submitted within 30 days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. In an effort to meet the statutory requirement, Finance & Management Services Agency submitted the Report via email for review and distribution to the City Council in advance. The report was emailed for distribution on October 25, 2019. The legislation specifies that this quarterly report contain the seven major elements listed below: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Type of investments, Date of maturity, Par and dollar amounts invested in each security, Weighted average maturity of the investments, Market value as of the date of the report, Source of the market value information, and Any funds, investments or programs, including loans, under the management of contracted parties. These specifications include a statement outlining the ability of the City to meet the budgeted expenditures for the subsequent six months be submitted to the City Council on a quarterly basis. Staff performs an end -of -month expenditure analysis to comply with the expenditure requirement and a statement confirming the ability to meet this requirement in the monthly and quarter -ending Treasurer's Report. The information is in compliance with State law and the City's Investment Policy. The attached Treasurer's Report (Exhibit 1) accurately reflects all pooled investments held on behalf of the City as of September 30, 2019. Quarterly Report of Investments November 19, 2019 Page 2 The following two tables represent: (1) percentage limits set by the City's Investment Policy and State Law and shows respective City investment portfolio investment types, amounts, and percentages; and (2) the restricted cash balance as of September 30, 2019. Type of Investment Amount Invested $ o Portfolio / COSA Policy o Limits � State Law 0 Limits � Certificate of Deposit (CD) $1,982,000.00 0.73% 30% 30% Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB) $47,385,610.25 17.25% None None Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) $79,013,485.45 28.76% None None Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (FHLMC) $86,951,609.60 31.65% None None Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) $29,957,210.00 10.91% None None Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) $29,402,572.15 10.70% None None sub -Total $274,692,487.45 100% Cash $24,662,003.49 Total $299,354,490.94 Restricted Cash In-$ Restricted Cash t, $4,479,629.27 Total $4,479,629.27 t Restricted cash is held by a Trustee, Bank of New York Mellon, and is segregated from cash used for daily operations. (exp: Bond reserve funds) Quarterly Report of Investments November 19, 2019 Page 3 The following City investment portfolio graph represents percentages within the respective investment types as of September 30, 2019. CD City of Santa Ana 73% Investment Portfolio Asset Allocation FNMA 10.91% LAIF 10.70 FHLMC 31.65% September 30, 2019 ■ Certificate of Deposit (CD) ■ Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB) • Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) ■ Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (FHLMC) ■ Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) ■ Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) The following two tables represent, as of September 30, 2019: (1) the aggregate Average Market Yield to Date (AMTD); and (2) the breakdown of by investment type. Aggregate Average Market Yield To Date Average Month To Date (AMTD) 1 2.033% Breakdown by Type of Investment Par Value of Investments Yield to Maturity % of Portfolio Average Market Yield to Date Certificate of Deposits $1,982,000.00 1.743% 0.73% 0.01% LAIF $29,402,572.15 2.341% 10.70% 0.25% Federal Agency Securities $243,307,915.30 1.999% 88.57% 1.77% Total $274,692,487.45 2.034% 1 100.00% STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item allows the City to meet Goal #4 - City Financial Stability, Objective #1 (Maintain a stable, efficient and transparent financial environment), Strategy D (Develop a fiscal Quarterly Report of Investments November 19, 2019 Page 4 health analysis tool that informs a department of its financial position in order to assist in its decision making process). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency Exhibit: 1. Treasurer's Report m C E Id adEN t Eo N y_ d o m o ° o d zo D, V OD. U7 a `o2 v; N k N N N N p CM N 1; Q CI g N g N ry N � NUM1 V�E A N �B$ U'� t NSW $�Q m c c �a m c�u ern S�y Cy N N $N c U V +S q a�v L Z�Z Nw >te 0.3 o r N $49 b � w YSow 2 C M 12 � c E � N D d� N d c m m �R^ m w n EPN {pF Z_ M M > vJ Ti � C O €E� o % CON N O Ea Na ?i q a A E m m y g c V o$ w 0 F0 w co m ¢ i'`- w �d O}O}yyO O1CN m K N N 10 O§1 0 0 0 0 o 0 o g $ o mo d m N N N N N N N N � vm mry ii v"�� IWo N Q W N O m n o W CI nl m d N N N N N N N N W C c E N o Q N j N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C o > 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 r• �' L 6 m m M W m V V P O P V V V .0 W a g�a�aag� a° w W Q U O 2y N 1- N 2 > Y W 2 W R N 9 Q m K w O m m�a. w Y m j Z zq Y Mn N Z Q LL Q E W tmd Z CCZ V W$ M p d m ro V W ri Qm O d R � _ a N N N N N N qq Q qq qN Q ry N8"vi gW',8��n, i�d, 6i0d, id ol,N N N 0 o 0 0 0 O O O o N o p O O O o O o o O O 8�0�00880g0pp�0�og_g$� 8 8 25 0 m 8 8 8 e m 8 m 6 G g 0 o V Y 1+1 V V N O P N 17 V N V 0 0 0 0 o g o a o u4, $ 0 0 o o$$ o o m o 9 m 8 m m m� m o b� 8 g 5i a o o a� `m n M CI N Y Y P 16 Y M Ci M V V 0 0 0 0 0 o g 0 0 0 o S o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58� 8 8$ 8 58� 8 8 8 8 8 8 q8q 8 8 8 Qo 8 8 8 S 258 08 8808 8 m 88 i7i,8886 °� S m o �nm mtom m M m � W m m m m mQQ,,m m m m w W N N N N W N N N N .. N N N N N N N N mp m mpp imp m ym ym pm pm 'mQ 0] ym ym ym m_ m m m m m m U U U UE U U U U U U U U U U U d d d d d d o o E LL LL LL LL LL LL LL II. li LL LL IL LL 2 S 2 2 S S v m m 9 p 0 0 a 0 g a v m V N N m m N LL IL LL li � 4 IL IL LL � � IL IL LL LL LL 4 IdL Idi yC N g-- - - - - ------- -- - - -- 3 � gg � LLLLLLU' I9 W x W y ry W� ry W� W W W � Wy ry W� 1 W� W W W ry W� W W Q Q Q Q 'pd M CJ CMJ LL M M M M M CI M M 10 N M 1+1 M M M N M M lh M M � ry �`1 1q� {V P P P P Q' � Q ` O C N U pQ 5qV yV Qk rya ryn a n �N- MNoiNNNwN N NNNNN�y-q-q ��++ qq �M �g � rvry rvrvry v� pp' gg 55��gg 55��q 5Q�ry �p R ��ry io8 a mo'Qn'rym �ig�8 tl'�YiKK86 �i��i eni 8'rys uwi �olsmrvry rr�rkNii rywry N N INM INM N N N N N N N N N N N N 8��"o388S'o 'o Soo88880o'o �SS888o'o Soo$ Ia�n In sss�888a�88 ��. m8888s8_�m,d a5 RRSNo�B , $8�F$8S8S "o SoS888�y8&'o,�$S.$8o$0oo8^ocaa 4m�N S 88SSS8 8888S,SS 588888SSSSSB$S �M saosa`ss.s,so,0-s8_ss.880.88g�8888888s,8=.o.�. u �888 8 888o88m S�'8 N gad moMm$�888888� OO m m m w w wq w w w m m. ti r m m m wp m4 mV pm_O qw_ a O p q p Q {�wV� [ N 4ioV Na a d? 3 `o 0 0 o a o a o o S o a U U U [S UUU (l U (] [] c yNC yC m 0 da m m m N� of N� Nro Na m m� 0 m Nro Nro ro Na m mi�2 `C 999999999999999999999999999999®�B o0 o v a v o v v v a a v v v v m v a E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E g g g E E E E E E E E E E E E 2 x 2 2 2 2 2 x 2 2 S S 2 2 x 2 2 2 x 2 I 2 2 2 2 x 2 x 2 2 2 2 x 2 2 2 ''eee�ee.e.memeee��ecee�ewe�ee����ee88 vLLLLLLLLLLLLLLmaLLLLLLLLLL���LLLLa�LL��4S S 8 8 'u v o - .n„Sry-------S--- RSS-------M--m---m - ro 0 0 c v�MMm��M ���MMM M�rv�MM���xxxx�� §§888 )� • ;,E „! 1■ § § | / t )0) f a !! 1000 /i0 CL � )! ) i § \ N d F Z W f/1 ON N w L Lu m F-a�iEv E . O N uai y W C N {o a y Q U m m In m o am m m m m m m a m m m m m m n h v o 'o 0 {pl{p�yy pp33 P o NN O P P P O O O m m N m J J U HU Qm Z Z Z Z Q¢ Q Q 6 Q Q DU' t0J Up' 2 Zp Z Q TOUT' z z z Z W w w w 6¢ W W W Q Q 6 6 r W r W r W r W r r r Z Z z z ~ K K K F F N Ft K N J J J L L J J J 2 m N N 0@ C 0 0 0 @ pZ O N N M (m) N N W N M N 0 1MD (O N N N CJ N N N mm��Smm��mm� 0 ry ry W W W W W W Vi p W ryNj m W W W p p p o p p p p o 0 o p ro p m m N M m m m N (/1 l/1 m N m > Y m_ m m N fO fq m m t9 > m m S (n m D X X JG X V m p�� o�� m m m X X X u) X !n X v) X X X m m X X X 6 6 @ U U@ V g w x n � d 7 N W d a d Y REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: QUARTERLY REPORT OF CONTRACTS UP TO $50,000 FOR NON-PUBLIC WORKS AND UP TO $250,000 FOR PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY MANAGER AS PERMITTED BY CHARTER SECTION 421 {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 4, 1} /s/ Kristine CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 1sl Reading ❑ Ordinance on god Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Receive and file Quarterly Report of Contracts entered into between July 1, 2019 to September 30, 2019 valued at up to $50,000 for non-public works contracts and agreements and up to $250,000 for public works contracts and agreements. DISCUSSION Section 421 of the Charter requires the City Manager to submit a quarterly report to the City Council that outlines all contracts approved and executed under her/his authority for informational purposes. The quarterly report is required to include the names of the contractors and the amounts of each contract, and a brief description. On March 19, 2019, the City Council approved an ordinance amending the City Manager's contracting authority to enter into non-public works contracts and agreements up to $50,000 and public works contracts and agreements up to $250,000. Exhibit 1 is a listing of all purchase orders and agreements entered into July 1, 2019 to September 30, 2019, valued at amounts between $500 and $50,000 for non-public works and $250,000 for public works contracts and agreements, as provided by Public Works and Clerk of the Council's Office. Contracts and service agreements valued at greater than $50,000 for non- public works and greater than $250,000 for public works require approval by the City Council. Additional Items During the course of Finance and Management Services Agency's review of blanket orders and agreements for the period ending September 30, 2019, the following items are noted. A subscription agreement with Lexipol, LLC (Exhibit 1 - Item No. 212) exceeds the City Manager's authority of $50,000 for non -Public Works contracts. The contract was executed prior to City Council approval due to staff oversight. To date $24,000 has been expended. However, Quarterly Report of Contracts November 19, 2019 Page 2 no additional expenditures will be incurred prior to City Council approval. The Police Department will be taking the agreement for City Council consideration during the month of December 2019. Furthermore, the Public Works Agency entered into an emergency agreement with Ocean Blue Environmental Services (Exhibit 1 - Item No. 256) to assist the Quality of Life Team (QOLT) with immediate homeless clean-up efforts. Although the contract is for $250,000 per year, it will need to return to City Council for approval for the entire two-year term and total of $500,000. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's effort to meet Goal #4 — City Financial Stability, Objective #1 (maintain a stable, efficient and transparent financial environment). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency Exhibit: 1. Quarterly Report of Contracts H m W Q �o w o a a U Vl K J W Vl K N w N 2 > 2 K 2 2 W W J z w in v7i vSi a 0 �^ N N w N i O S C7 w u N C7 Op vl z z vl a W J W J c W H W Vl Vl u O Q C7 } c2i a a 2 0 Gw a W a �^ I1 w 2 H S O> y�j U W Q U J 2 Q W Q W Vl W J J J D J V V� w W CJ p} K N Q Z p LL�z��a�¢cQ.�QwQOQc�G� a>iSilO�ww�Q W O� W Z N W O °� - a O S w U w S Q w N i^ vl ~ w w cz a Q o v v Q< Q 0 0 w w 0 v aQ = c2i O m O w O> z �Ju Q a cW.7 •C. Q Q J J C w w Vl Vl 0 Q J G K J W Q Q LL N X Z W W u K Q J O W W Vl U N w W S W W d' Vl of 3 C7 >O iVil p Z 0 > Q> S evil evil Z D evil Z iyil 2 w Q w Q w w Q �Z Z a w iWil O c c O c c O c W Q d> LL d J (� K Q W d W C Vl CJ G G J K LL Vl Q 2 G G CJ G G u G K J Vl S Q V LL W Vl F Vl J U Q LL K 0000000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000000000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0000000000000000000000000000000000 O O O O O O O vt O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O 111 111 O O O O W N 111 O O 111 O O O 111 V O O V V O m 0 0 111 111 111 O m m m N Y i 3 0 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 0 0 0 0 D O D O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD to 0 Q a a u u u a u a 0 0 0 0 a D a u u u u u u a a a a a u a a a u u u a a £ �noNamoNm�nmo.-INmaio Norm o.-Im a�n io o.-IN aio No�mN MUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU F m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m z w coo Nw z < d u< W J Z p W U U i S D 3 J O i Q (U V1 O_ K J 65. J Vl O Q Q Vl J Vl F V Z_ W ~ ZHW�' p 2 d' W U Z J W d F- J p 0 J 7 O J0 Z Q Z w Z W 30 W� W U w 3 Z U J w N Z w 2 a w E to u J Q — Z U K E O O O_ z U w N O a R U a a OS D N U w W N Q O ° v p 3 LL W Z z z¢¢ 3¢ a w u 0 o W Z v W Q w N 1 p v O D w Q v ^ Z w ^ w N Z 7 Z O Q z a z J Z O Q i~il imil w¢ w w u m W w O Q p S; O N O 0 U j d a O S a J U 0 vl a 0 v c2i > z Q� Q v J� U Q 0 p> 0 O Q u > m u vl u Q Q 2 u m a Q 2 m a C7 S� Q v a O 2 LL Q v 0 ON S. u a Q m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G O 0 N w m 0. N m a m 0 N w m 0 Z N N N N N N N N N N m m m m m Zwo� u Q o z w� U z (D N > J Q Vl a Z J J w dJ N LL Z p H Z W Q 2 W N N N N W K N K Vl H J 2. CY1 a (7 LL W J S J U Q Z m (7 in Z in cz a O p 0 Q w H w a w z 2 in J z a W in H J in Z W N w Q in in vl p w U Q z a N X O O in w w p m 2 O w w Z Z w m 3 H w N w w O N 2 in Z Q W in O 2 J in w Q Q u Q w 0 in w a C7 cz 2 w w cj5 } CJ K¢ �_ to u CNJ ¢ `� K g w 3 2 O¢ O C0 > p a "' J c W H `° ¢ Z O w O K x p u W Q Z } S Vl H� W Vl X m Q G a J W Vl J Z u O K $ O in w O w Z w~ H N O W w `1 Q D m in w m u O m W m v2i m Q 0 a� Q in Q w V� v� w N z m Q 2 Q z 2� Q�� '�" w2 J� x� N m a Q ��" 2� O ~O W `u vl ( N Y U Y W K U K K U 7 vl W }- (J p O S a Q z a 0 u w S u Z 0 0 in O Q in U w C a (7 OJ w> OJ ((D E O Q v~ v m v 2�� 2 0 m m = U w CJ Z vwi > w OLL m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m o o o� M O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O O O O m N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m N O O W O m 000000000000000000000000000lm O O O N M m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m o o m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m oo 0 m.ti o m � �o 0 vt vt vt O O vt vt N O O lD O vt I� O O n O O vt O lD vt O O O vt ti vl O O m O ti vt ti Y C 3 Q VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT ✓? VT VT ✓? VT VT VT VT VT VT w w w w w w w w Q too 3 3 3 J 3 3 a a a 3 Q a a 3 3 a a a a a a a a 0 o Q Q ¢ 2 2 u u 2 u 2 u u 2 2 2 u a a a u 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 u 2 S 2 2 u 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 Ol N N N N O .ti ti ti ti 0 mm O O �fl �Il lD lmD W W Ol Ol O^l Owl o .ti N N m N O O O O O .......... 3 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol N N N N N N z lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl. lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl. rl Z Z Z Z Z rl rl rl rl rl 0000000000000000000000f m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Z Z Z Z Z o Q Q Q Q Q o o o o o W (7 N OJ w U O H u N Z Z a w w w z > > u m W O O K K LL U (7 to p J Q K U w 0 N LL U a W CJ } p to 2 m Z w< w u 65 O O O O Q� p U O O J u m a p (7 vi ¢ O O O d ZZ pD S >o w J p K > m 2 u a w w J wmwa } Q J E mHOm Owp mpNOp E H Z2 > Z J_z HK pH W a m QO pm N FcW m nw0u"i }Ozav O p J n 2 mZ w O OU apap w zU aa w QmO J C7 w p% Om acap a Wa _ } >S ci %p OJ SQ J > m w QJ �J0N0 2 2� z a u OO J u Y mSLL > H 7 a V 2 m> 2 p aaJ a Wt~il H u m V LL N N 0 u N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o N m m m m o o W W W W d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n C 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 N U) Z m 0 m w m 0 w m 0 vNi m m 0 v w m 0 lND lmo m F0 D l w m 0 n n 2 Z Z J m m m m J J W W U W U_ m m Z w > N m (7 m Z Z D (D Z (7 7 7 0 w N Z Z 7 K p Z H Z O O U w a a S z ac (7 2� a J p J Q Z Z- U a U m O p G LL O m H N vwi m tW/1 m w H 0 J LL Z Z Z w U O_ O_ W 0 m p w Q Q (7 z S �^ O w 0 (D7 O 7 a a K 0 O� U Z O (7 = (7 m z U Z < < a O Z N W 0 w 2 N H p O O m w 0 w, � � t D z m a z ~O = a O N D w a 0 Q Q Z U Z CZ7 w Op > w>> °� Z d Z 2 U m w U m r z H v a �p O Q 0 (7 a O W O J J Z Z a w w Y K Y 0 2 O J m lD LL K m N p W U a (7 U 2 U Y w Z O D U O N(D Q U w H w O a z a z (Wj 2 X tail a Z 7 O O w Z Z H O H a 0 (7 C7 a s z w m Z m J> a 0 N m m _ w Z m U m Y w 0 a D O O v Y C7 a p w r a z z 0 z w a O a (JJ p p X am Q Q K a Z Z .a S z_ O z 0 O O 0 7 a 0 ��" Q O Q 0 z 0 2 w 0 0 0 w W Ow frt Q p Z p (Wj Q m Q a a r r w �-^ m O a U a' p a' J>> `� U J a m a a' > LL w C7 p S z a m d 7 a p K S m m W to J - m a a a 0 �j J U S> W O a to J p lD U Z 2 Z Z U m U a U S p K m to K W a p m m a m- p- m o o O m o o o o m m m m m O m N N N. ti O N O O to O N ti O m O ti o o o o o 0 M M m" O I m to N N m to to O m m m O O O O O O O ti O m N Ol O O vt Ol vt lD N O I� O O O m m ti� O m vt O tT � O ti I� to n O O O O m I� to O O to ti 0 0N m l O vt lD vt I� W m rl O O N O O Ol I� W m N N 9 0 0 0 O .-I N O ri N to -I .-N m N I� ri ri .-I N N lD tft .-I N N to N .-I Ol Ol to tft O tft to m Y C 3 d Q VT VT VT ✓? VT ✓? VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT ✓? VT VT VT VT ✓? VT VT VT ✓? VT VT ✓? VT VT VT VT VT VT VT ✓? VT VT VT d m cmJ a O U J J J (mj J a (mj a J J a a cmJ a a a a cmJ a m J (mj a a a a a J J J eo2U3a�000�o3U3o�o33U3m333U32oU3m3333000 Q LL 2 2 U 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 S 2 2 2 2 2 J 2 2 2 2 2, 2 2 2 J 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 N N N N m m N N to m m m .ti ti ti ti ti ti ti O .ti ti ti ti d I� m Ol p1 m p1 Ol Ol Ol O ti N m p1 0 I� m m O m 0 I� 6 m O N ti N vt m m m 6 6 6 m 0 0 0. ri ri .-I .-I .-I N N N N N .-I N N N N m m m m. m a. a a a a a m ti ti ti ti N N N O N O O O O N N N N N O N N N N N N N N O N N O N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 3 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z rl rl rl Z rl Z Z Z Z rl rl rl rl rl Z rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl Z rl rl Z rl rl rl rl rl rl rl Z Z Z Z d a 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 f 2 2 2 a 2 a a a a 2 2 2 2 2 a 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 a 2 2 a 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 a a a a Y J m J H Z O Q O a z a w U w U U dJ K H U K Z U 7 J a w z u Z Z m a Z o z m a m 0 U y J U Z O m. > Z LL m Z U Y H Z H U m O p S Z w O w O m Z m U 2 m (7 H wO w m w p r u m U S m 2: Z Z O O Z O O z =) U J S Z w H U H O LL p m m Z U 025 U d m U U D U r H m J z J H a U m a a ��" z a 0 a Ow a p> K a Q m (~j O z Z °'� J z U O a m m w d (U S p} J CJ Z Z K WWUm z >S W m m J D W O O a a W N O Z~ N u W S Z LL qZ W U m twit w O Z 7 U Z H> a U Z w p 0 0 Z 7 0 7 J 7 LWJIJ }~ N w Z Z O z 0 7 K K Jd•' O H O> CW_J 2 E o (aJ 0 2 Wp O C, w 2i LL ui w z > o z� m z S p c Y J O w `^ OW K S c a Z m u 2 a 0 p c W W m O U 2 a a X a J z u> U 7 W K a K d> a CJ w S O O c S O a r S OYJ W a K W J 0 LL_ J K O X O N S a S W >> U m 2 E H (7 U m m m d 0 J (7 z K a m m d= d O LL LL O E D m J a 2 a H 2 m S lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT � lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT lT N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ d n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n C 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 m v dmavt(o�mmo.�Nmvvt (o�mmo.�Nmavt (o�mm00000000000 m m Z > W > Z �u Q twit Z z m w m m w w Q W J Z m ~ U w Q w Q Q (D Z Q Q W z ¢ o m w J u Z W u u cWc N Z LL d W G W W Vt Vt S (D Z H LL Vt Q J S W J J Q H U w J> w w m Q w m H w a Q m C7 Q Q W> Q m U twit >~ w U U w N Z O y j LL O LLp 0 0 0 O w o w N w K m H K Z Z J O O p p Z w a N r w N N U XY N Z 0 NJ 0 a� Q� N Q N p 3 m z a� H O p c=J J Z I J m t7it Q w� Q Q J N Z_ O Z_ �_ w a J > a �_ w 0 0 p z 3 w j w CJ m 7� u w d 0 m w a 2 w w NUJ vt D Z Q LL N Z a> Q K F H Q c w Z OJ Z O w S y a/ LL a N Q H K m K K K Z w 0 m Q W O OYJ Q H I W LL a S a W Q 2 p W' Q H O Z Vt Vt Q OYJ Q O 06 06 Q K N a 0 w N Y U Q dJ w Z w w pZ w N Q O r Q Q w z 0 w z z a —r p C7 > p a 0 twit w 7 J dJ '-'-' w C7 >Q> Qm Q t^ Q a O Q Q U O Q > Q> a s a W 025 U O d �' S K a Q Vt W W 2 Z> CJ K w Vt J J 2 cz K I Z J W J J> O W •d Q K J p N K W mr Z Q Q a 0 O Q O K O W a S Z U K O S J W U 2 W W O Z 2 C m a= > LL C7 U S O a LL LL w a m a U p vt - O Q m U Q m O m m m m w Q o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o m o o o a O m m m m m m m N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O 0 O ti N O N m v ti n ti 0 0 0 0 0 0� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O l o m O m N O lm m m m O m m v m O O O O O o m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O MOO 0 0 m M O" m m v O" m a m 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O vt lD lD N .ti O vt vt N I� m I� <D N O m N O N to to to O lD vt O vt vt ti <D to to O O to to to O lD N m O ti m ti O ti ti Q VT VT VT ✓? V1 VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT ✓? VT ✓? VT VT UT VT VT w y Q Q Q U J U U Q 3 Q U Q Q Q U m U m J a a J a U Q U U U O Q O O J a a Q aaaaaaaac�aaaaaa a aaaaaaaaaa uxuu uaaa ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti N (T (T (T (T m O ti N vt 0 m O ti N m 0 m (T (T (T (T (T (T O O O O m m lD m I� w O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O N N N N N N Ol m a lfl I� m O N m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w m m m mOl Ol N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z Z Z Z Z lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl Z Z Z Z Z Z rl rl N U U U U U U U U U U � 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O F Q Q Q Q m m m m m m m m m m a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a¢¢¢¢¢¢ a a K W r w U U 2 ~ Z J J J Y Z 2 W Z U 65 2 Z Vi — Z Z U w D O w Z U J Q p K U (7 U Z ? m p I a p z r 2' U m O p Z O wm Q m W W' 2 LL W W m a Z d Z S~ Q O Z W O O d' H 2 C7 CZ H LL m H H J m r OQ Q w Q m~u Z a Ipa W ~ Q OJ U 0WO z LL HwJ Hw UmQ UZa > ~ wZQ 65 0 U 0 N iw Z Q £wO Q Q U / wQQu00 UUomIO p J UjUQZ¢ILQ JwpJS UZ r 0 mzw a- O � Z UWmW �¢ Z 7 O Z 7pX¢O I U OSIQ o a IQ 0w 'Q>Q QQ 0O OSQWQ p >> Y UmUJ2 H 2>YU p Z U U Q Omm OmU K p H mm2 C7a m Q m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti N N N N N N N N N N m m o m m m m o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o. ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 ON G ti N m vt 0 I� m m O ti N m vt 0 I m m O ti N m vt 0 I� m m O ti N m vt lD I� m ODD .-I .-I .-I .-I .-I .-I .-I .-I .-I N N N N N N N N N N m m m m m m m m m m t0 Z .ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti a Z Z w 0 � 0 0 0 u w QQ W c a m cc w a m lD pr pr K p G W W w W W G U Q W Oc J w H Q m j UN W w d Z 0 Z S Vl J O (7 0 Ol W w > m} O 0 O Q m a mp w vwi D O Z O R c2i Q W (7 C7 w w O Z z m cUJ Z w w z m Z w 0 Q Y w z z CUJ K U Z CWJ w m 0 Z w Z U w J H O a Q W^ w Q W; Q O v p m K m 0 K K 7 Z W_ W I� Z H Q W z LL S Q U O a + w Z 0 Z a CZ Q K U m Y Y 0 wQ K l~/1 l~/1 K Z> J� W D Z Q J Z O— o S p w H W W N N} oz�zowomml C7 Q m Q m> m Q z> Z p O m Q O a z w� Q O U m w Q} C7 Q p C7 c Q Q m vwi U D m Q Q m Q - J O } U c Q > Q> 0 a Q m LL U a z a O U J w O G H_ W Q H J W J } Z W 3 O W K Z G> Z W Y Q Q Q �. Z a z U LL¢ H w C7 w¢ c~—J z cwJ 0 Q¢ �_ Q w w O S m Z w C7 w vUi�°ZUS OzD v7i Oz zmaza03aZZOQZ��Zvai am ocYJ d 0 0 w w w O w w O Z 2 N O w> O w O z w Q O Q 0 v D Q C> Q K> w Q CJ J H J u Q 0 X CJ K 0 m H u Q K m u H LL 0 Q} w U C7 m I n N m O O O O O O m to O I O O n m m 0 0 m 0 0 0 O O m 0 m O O O O O O O m. mmi0000000io�o�om. timooti0000000m�000000 O N m�� 0 0 0 ti 0 0 I� vl m to m m n m N� to to m I� O O O m W N N O O O O O O m ri N N O O lIl I� lr lr lr � m m N N .-I m I� O to to N N .-I N lfl to lIl lIl lIl to Q l/T VT VT VT VT ✓? VT VT ✓? VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT ✓? VT VT ✓? Vl VT VT VT ✓? ✓? Vl VT VT VT w w >j0 >j0 d Q Q J a Q J U U U J a J J J U m m O a a J U Q Q J Q m J J a Q T T a a ao0 m O m m O O o o O m U O 0 0 0 0 m o o 0 U U Q CJ 2 2 J 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 J LL LL CJ 2 2 2 2 CJ CJ 2 CJ J LL 2 2 2 CJ CJ CJ 2 2 N O m ti N m a vt m m m O n ti m m m W W .ti ti ti ti ti ti O .ti ti ti ti ti d �fl .-I N m �Il D7 D7 D7 D7 D7 6 W W n m f� ri N m to m m m m m D7 ri N m pl d) M O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O N m m m m m m m m m m m m 0 0 0 0 m m m m O O n m"� m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m 3 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m m w m m Z rl rl rl rl rl Z Z Z Z Z Z rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl Z Z Z Z rl rl rl rl Z Z lfl lfl lfl lfl. d U U U U a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 F a a a a a Q Q¢¢¢¢ a a a a a a a a a a a a a¢¢¢¢ a a a a¢¢ m m m m m U } > z 0 w Q H U N U K K O U Z LL u um U Z 7 (7 Z W O O m Z Z w z Z Z a ~ m } p U Z m Q U Q O w c2 D 2 m Z vwi a w U 0 w > O> p S W (D ~ U G C'5 LL J J 2 025 0 S S a p m Z Q ~ z U w = v~i z u Z C7 vOi vmi << D C7 w m 0 �O g O w cw.) O p} Q O Q Z_ Z J Z Q O u W' Q W O> w (DZ m Q Q J W 2 7 J 7 Z Z> (� Z a U w �% D YO U Y m c w a w (7 a J K m w> m 0 u u O W K Q w > N w Q LL_ 0 H c m d 2 w p z J O c d' > m J J H C7 w 7 m m W W Z C7 ~ CJ Y K W 7 w U O 0 U i Q Z Q Q� m Q a w a '-'-' a Z Q z? v~i Z Q p Z w a a 0 K v~i a a w a 0 .6 U' w w 0 Z v~i K w vi Z Q z v0 Q Q a 0 0 vWmi vWmi U Q Q p w a OW O z X LL z m d w Q Q O Q p w Q Q— O w OX vmi Q C7 O Y Q w w U Q 0� w 0 O D O Z z Q > C7 m m H u 2 S� 0 � � C7 Q Q z O Z 2i z 2i 2i J z 0 2 m O 2 z m a D O a C7 OU wm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ................. 0 0 0 0 0 0 mmmmmm0000 d W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W C 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 11 d m O to m m O to m m O to m m O ti N m� vt to OD d� vl vl vl vl vl vl vl vl vl vl W W W W W W W W W W n n n n n n n n n n m m m m m m m m W 0 > w > N (7 Z F K m N CC W H C K K W W m Uj W O N N 7 Q D C W W cz N O J O H W Z(D 0 [L W m >> w Q vww 2 a z 0 F W Q Q 0 O O u N N O w Q o w 0 0p O O m Q > Q w F W U K F J m Q CL K d J LL K Q CL LL Z Z W Q u W w Q O z N W a N 0 W z Q L O vxi Q w w 0 0 w N 0 Q w a W (~-7 m N Z O J Q w» z w OU w a W W W Q C m "' J p j 0> m W w U> 2 O� '^ O Z 3 w Q 0 `• Y W H a p 0 v�ji a Q��� O Q Q O p c2i ¢= 0m a Q w N a C of ww D w x O Q z Q (D 0O C7 U (Dv7i O w w Y 0 0 u w P u C 2i m CL J x (7 O N Q J E W Z O O m U 0 (D O( O O O O O O O O O m m to O O W m m W m� 0 0 N 0( o o o o o o o o o m m. o o io m a m m a m o m o O O O O O O O O O� N lD O O O N .ti ti m ti ti O m 0 O O O O O O O O O N O O N .ti W lD m N N 0 O O O O O O O O O W M M O m O O m ti v) W O L lf) lf) lf) lf) lf) O lf) O O N rl m lf) N N N n O N O( Y C 3 0 _ W Q Z Z W Y Q K m x K e wlo 3 Q w W OXWZOU Zi~il � I��wQO �l QV1 O 0 Q=D K)2ZW 00 �OLL(LLC ZW N K w K °'5 O 0 w U a S 0 z 0 0 0 J O J a J W J z U Z W CL w CL 0 a x ^ x i s (7 Q Z d� w u u w o Z o W Z J CJ K Z O LL E N K N [ J K w D [L K K Q W 0 0 1 C C W 0 K 0 m J W u W )O W W mmn m�00000 m I� ti W W m ti v) O O O N O 1 0 m v) n m lD lD N .ti O O n v) 1 r-I N .--I r-I Lr Lr N lD Q VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT ✓? ✓? V1 VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT ✓? ✓? VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT ✓? VT ✓? VT VT w 0 d Q U(J 0 3 Q J Q Q Q U U Q O J W (J Q (J Q Q J J Q Q Q Q Q U U U U Q a a a u u a a a a m a a a u a a a a a= a a a a a a u a a a a a ti 0 a a 0 m m W N m mW m o m m m W m a w W o m m m m m � m m m .ti ti m m a a a a a a� ti ti ti� w w w w w � ti ti ti ti ti m m O O ti ti m m� ............................. 3 W W m m m m m m m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl rl rl rl Z Z rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl Z Z Z rl rl rl rl rl rl rl Z Z Z Z Z MUUUUUUUUU a000000000000000000000000000000000 7C7000 F m m m m m m m m m a a a Q Q a a a a a a a a a Q Q Q a a a a a a a Q Q Q Q Q r U x J Z u U Q � O Z Q m W u (7 Z D Qj Z Z w Z 0 U W N W CL W O CC Z z D J} W Z J U U O 0 J Z D Q U z Z J Q Y z '-'-' (J u Z CJ H u U Z O Z 2 U m U x to Q Y w K W J u u z LL } W LL W i F LL W O W F W Z O O v� O z Z w O J U O O u O a u OZ O W O J W W w y m m 3 Z 0 (D F w zO O Q �^ U 0 � Q 3 Z Z H w v 0 Z~> U� 0 E a w Q 025 O O Z O w JO Z Z LL Q- 7 0 70 U v U w Z J OU Q w w (D v W w> 0� z Z 0 3 m Q O Q w> in w w w 0 w v~i vmi �^ Z Z 3 0 Q J> W 3 Z O Q w m Q � LL W D Z vwi vWi Z D O m a w W (D �_ O w a �_ �_ O N W O D S w vwi C D O Q> O Q> 0— Z W m 0 0 Q Z J a vine J X W m a 0 Z 2i w w Q (L > > Z� S Q 0 2 w�-� m txit K>� a Z t � 7 w 2 w t 0 w d m w K t w u H 2: Q t7it 0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 O\l O O O O O O O O ti ti ti ti N N N N N N N N d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 T) U I� W m Oo W W W m m m m .-I m.-I m.-I ON W m O ti D n Wti mti O Z m m m m m O 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O N N NNNNNNNN........N tiN NN mN �N OmD N N N N N N N CL u O >z N 0(D(D(D> J (D(D(D W ¢m Z m Z a a a N a a a a z w w a a W¢ } > Z H Q H H H (7 >> 0 H H H W —> u¢ J W¢ 2 O w O 0 Z K K K Z LL O w K K K w w¢ K D J Q a m }>¢ ,ti (D om 2 N C7 C7 C7 S 0 C7 C7 C7 ¢ m 2� CJ S m Z LL (D 0 Nw LL w Q W O H Z LL N m 2 a Z w w w H w w w w 2i C7 Z w O w O 0 O ~ cG0 LL c7 U Z LL z u>>>> J¢ S O >>> J z w m U OLL m m¢ W\ K Z W¢ U lD m J J J W W¢ O d W J J J>¢ w Z O K} OYJ c Z 2 u N 07 H C7 0 vwi w m0 O u u u U H w w U U U 2 w C�7 t0—it N m Z 'a w w p ¢O z m 0 _ ¢m v¢�i O¢ w w 0 0 0 Q 3 Q w Q 0 0 0 Q w W w- 0 `u (7 Q m Z o= 0 OW Z J Z 3 a a m m m> 0 O Q 3 m m m 3 ¢ u~ J N¢ w 0¢ O a 0 a O O¢ LL J K O O Z Z¢ J LL H H H m N H d H a a S O J� x O w 0 u O O O 0 a O w¢ w Z Z O` w C m m w m m ¢ a 2i w 2i m w LL u¢¢¢ a 2i cJ a S m¢¢¢ 0 S m Q w O m 0000moioa. NNOOOOmOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo. OOOO o o o o m o io mo m m o. o o ti N o o o o o o o o m o o o o o o o io o o o o 0 o N o N N a m m N a vt io vt m m N o 0 0 0 o a m N .� w o 0 0 0 o m m vt o 0 0 o io m vt vt a O m �o vt O m m N N m N 0 0 0 0 0 a vt m w m .� O O o o m a m o 0 0 , , , , , , , N, N, N, to .-I N, N, N, to N l0 1l O N, m ri ri <D O O N, O m lIt m mm N to N N Y C 3 d Q VT VT VT VT Vl VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT VT ✓? ✓? VT VT VT VT VT VT VT ✓1 VT VT VT {/1 VT ✓? VT VT VT VT ✓1 d C C C C ¢ U ¢ ¢ m J J U ¢ U ¢ ¢ J ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ J J J ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ J ¢ ¢ O ba���3�33�00�3�3300000 3300000033m0o33¢ Q 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 LL 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 u u u u ~ 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 J u 2 2 2 u to N m O N� to o N m m O ti N m � to o N N N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m y ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti d p) p) p) p) .ti N m m O ti N m m m m O m m m m m m to <D N m m m m m m m O ti m m m . ti ti ti N N N N m m m m m m m m m ti ti ti ti ti m m m m ti ti ti ti ti ti M O O .ti ti ti O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O N N N N O O O O O O N N N O O O Z Z Z Z Z NN NNrrr rrrrrrZZZZZrrrrZZZZZZrrrZZZ d a 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 f¢¢¢¢ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2¢¢¢¢¢ 2 2 2 2¢¢¢¢¢¢ 2 2 2¢¢¢ IW K U Z > w m LL K w 0 U 0 twit U > Z 0 u O ¢ O 65 OD 0 Q J w w z F- O D U LL m ¢ H m m m W m O a z LL 0 0 O Z v °� (D w Z Q J v x - O O w O - z z 0 v a¢ C7 w ? 65 j D 5 w < O w U C7 O Z O w 5 Q Z Z w J N Z_ J m d' W J W O x D u D u J 0 ¢ Z d O_ Om Z Z a ¢ J CJ Z J 0¢ H w¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ H O> C7 Z O m> 2 " W K¢ Z Z W~ x Z D 0 w- z a u z D U 0 Q x Z m z z W d W z 2 > t d 0 N O N Z K .-I u 0 D H u �>i¢>�i O ¢ W Z 0 z m W c Z U a S 0 w Cc7 ¢¢ Z W m Z W J D m Z W J W W (J W. Z LL LL¢ m¢ 0( CJ > O¢ O c O 0 Z Z w m G_ C7 U¢ O 0¢ Z U� m w U= m Z vt K 0 H O Z K¢—¢—~ Z K ¢ J K¢ W N Z J 2 Z O N m 0 w< Y w CJ 0i W LL H 0 c� w 0¢ ¢ W 0 O 0 0 O S O x U O S x¢¢ w d¢ ¢ "' 2=¢ U~ S� O K z u w > C7 m m Z m u m U 2 7 m X Z LL m O S Z Y U m¢ CJ H D m O o H m 2 J Z m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ......................... C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N d G to <D N m m O 0 m m O to N m m O 0 m m O N N N N N N N m m m m m m m m m m a a a a v v a a a avt vt vt io io io Z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ....... N N N N N N 2 W > W G W � Q J W cW > G U H < 0 Q Z Q N N F K O Q K > G 0 u H W W .a J V1 K K Q J 2 U Q u W C O J ¢ z O O m O 00 m o O O ti m W c-I to O O N O O O N m N O O ti ti ^ W N O c-I y. 01 N � 3 7 O O d m Q VT ✓1 VT VT t/} t/} >Q ba Q O O E Q 2 u 2 2 #+ W tw 3 o `m w Lim d Ol Ol 0 O 0 Q E 0 0 tA Z Z Z .ti ti yta w d d is 's u �¢¢aa F F as m m m m N N N N 0 O O d N N m m d C 0 0 0 0 O 0 m O 0 O N � O m W W W . O O O a 0 a m w m 0 w a rri vi o a o r-� a ri a vi of od m N m O O O W 0 W m N m O N �fl N �fl lD �I1 I� W m N lD I� W d W o� N �n O tr O a lr� m io m a W ti O m lr a m a O m I� 0 Y d } m N LL O 0 m O 0 O N O m W W W .� O O O a 0 a m .� w m 0 w i o a o r< a .-i a i of od m N N Lr m N 0 Lr 0 lR 0 Lr w I� 0 W w m m N N lR m I� 0 W W N O O m I� m W O m m O I� o� �n tr a m io a ti m a a m 0 L N � f Y F c� G v N u c E Y 10 y \ Y d pp Q Q u u O T O Q T a+ u U O p u d Y _ d u cJ u O OdD C c0 G T a+ u Q Q C d n? ) v 0 Y E J E E> O u d a+ CJ d U N on m d U C W '^ d U 00 d d l0 E J S 0 t v C O 0 E o C m v `� � J 2 � > d N E u U d K v N 2 m a .� m m , N 2 J O 2 d "— O 2 2 a O U_ n 2 `0 YO H all m a m 0 Z N N N N REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: APPROVE DESTRUCTION OF OBSOLETE CITY RECORDS (STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5,1) /s/ Kristine Ridge CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on ls' Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO I�I��R�LUI:3gi Approve the request for the destruction of obsolete records from the City Attorney's Office, Human Resources, Information Technology, Santa Ana Police Department, Community Development Agency, City Manager's Office, and the Finance and Management Services Agency, in accordance with the retention scheduled in City Council Resolution 2013-014. DISCUSSION On April 1, 2013, the City Council approved Resolution 2013-014 ("Resolution"). This Resolution provides to the multiple agencies, departments, and offices of the City, guidance on the retention of City records and how long the records need to be retained. To assist the City, the Citywide Records Team compiled the Citywide Records Retention Schedule ("Schedule") which sets forth the retention period for a particular record. The Schedule reflects the requirements of the Public Records Act, is modeled after the California Secretary of State's sample for local government, and incorporates other statutory periods applicable to Santa Ana. The Resolution attaches the Schedule, which is broken down into multiple sections covering the varied responsibilities and retention periods for a City department. These are minimum retention periods. Each department makes discretionary decisions on whether to retain records past the minimum retention period requirements. Section 5.13 of this Resolution and the City's Municipal Code requires that the City Attorney approve the destruction of a City record. Accordingly, the executive directors for the City Attorney's Office, Human Resources, Information Technology, Santa Ana Police Department, Community Development Agency, City Manager's Office, and the Finance and Management Services Agency, consulted with their staff on the attached lists of obsolete records proposed for destruction. A copy of each memorandum was reviewed by staff from the City Attorney's Office and approved by the City Attorney. Each memorandum is attached as an exhibit to this staff report. Destruction of these records will serve to benefit each office with a more efficient access to files and alleviate the City's current storage needs to maintain these obsolete records. Destruction of Obsolete Records November 19, 2019 Page 2 STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #5 -Community Health, Livability, Engagement & Sustainability, Objective #1 (Establish a comprehensive community engagement initiative to expand access to information and create opportunities for stakeholders to play an active role in discussing public policy and setting priorities). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney City Attorney's Office Jack Ciulla Chief Technologies Innovation Officer Information Technology Department Steven Mendoza Executive Director Community Development Agency Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency Kristine Ridge City Manager City Manager's Office Steven V. Pham Executive Director Human Resources Department David Valentin Chief of Police Santa Ana Police Department Exhibits: 1. Request for Destruction of Records — City Attorney's Office 2. Request for Destruction of Records — Human Resources 3. Request for Destruction of Records— Information Technology 4. Request for Destruction of Records — Santa Ana Police Department 5. Request for Destruction of Records — Community Development Agency 6. Request for Destruction of Records — City Manager's Office 7. Request for Destruction of Records — Finance and Management Services Agency Exhibit 1 u I D10V lei::►1u To: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney From: David Quintana Senior Paralegal Date: July 30, 2019 Re: REQUEST FOR DESTRUCTION OF RECORDS Staff members of the City Attorney's Office have reviewed and identified City records that may be scheduled for destruction in accordance with the attached retention schedule outline in City Council Resolution 2013-014. Staff is respectfully requesting your approval. Thank you. RECORDS TO BE DESTROYED: Number of Boxes: 184 APPROVED BY: -�:�' MM Sonia K. Carvalho Date City Attorney Attachment City of Santa Ana Records Retention Schedule CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Exhibit C RECORD CATEGORY RECORD SERIES RECORD DESCRIPTION RECORD RETENTION REMARKS CUSTODIAN START DATE PERIOD code o7 nd cqD FEDERAL COURT CASES By Case Case file for federal court Case dosing Date 5 years Procedures Sec. 337 ERIMINALCASES By Case Case file for Cmmeal Court Case Cbsing date 5years JUDGEMENTS & Bycase CO rdooling Case documents Closing Data 10 years SETTLEMENTS ERSONNEL BOARD by Appellant Personnel Closing Dale 5years PPEALS SUPERIOR COURT By Case Case fne for Suweer Court Case Closing Date 5 years ASES EMINENT DOMAIN CASES By Property Cos., Date 5years GO 30d090 GENERAL FILES By Subject Sublecl matter fses Closing Date 2vears 1 aft Exhibit 2 MEMORANDUM To: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney Date: July 15, 2019 Steven V. Pham From: Executive Director of Human Resources Subject: _Request for Destruction of Records The Human Resources Department requests your consent to destroy City records relating to the Risk Management Division on the attached listing, in accordance with the retention schedule outlined in City Council Resolution 2013-14, Thank you. Steven V. Pham Cc Deborah Scott-Leistra, Risk Manager Attachments Approved to form Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Abdelsayed, Sarnia 9/8/2003 04-2945 x n/a 2012 Abreu, Veronica (Mendez) 9/18/2003 04-2866 x n/a 2012 Abrigo, Kevin 11/10/2004 05-3331 x n/a 2012 Abrigo, Kevin 10/18/2006 07-4046 x 3 2015 Abrigo, Kevin 6/26/2006 06-3937 x 3 2015 Abundiz, Carmelita 10/03/1999 00-1198 x n/a 2018 Achziger, Clint 8/10/2010 10-0191 x n/a 2017 Achziger, Clinton 11/8/2007 08-4412 x 3 2015 Acosta, Candice 8/27/2004 053257 x n/a 2012 Acosta, Candice 11/16/2003 043066 x n/a 2012 Acosta, Candice 4/18/2003 032689 x n/a 2012 Acosta, Carmelita 08/08/2013 13-0117 x n/a 2018 Acosta, Cecilia 1/18/2002 022108 x n/a 2012 Acosta, Suzan 4/12/1999 99PDN0126 x n/a 2012 Acosta, Suzan 5/24/2004 05-3197 x 3 2015 Ada me, Victor 11/24/2005 06-3706 x 3 2015 Adame, Victor 9/17/2007 08-4356 x 3 2015 Adams, Kara 4/29/2007 07-4209 x 3 2015 Adams, Rose 7/13/1999 001096 x n/a 2012 Adamson, Thomas 03/15/1993 93FDS0191 x n/a 2018 Admire, Guy 7/25/2001 021907 x n/a 2012 Aguilar, Arthur 1/5/2005 053443 x n/a 2012 Aguilar, Arthur 1/6/2004 043000 x n/a 2012 Aguilar, Arthur 7/7/2003 042780 x n/a 2012 Aguilar, Arthur 1/14/2003 032663 x n/a 2012 Aguilar, Arthur 2/4/2006 06-3791 x 3 2015 Aguilar, Arthur 8/8/2005 06-3588 x 3 2015 Aguilar, John 07/23/2013 13-0107 x n/a 2018 Aguilar, Keene 7/25/2003 042801 x n/a 2012 Aguilar, Keene 3/19/2001 011748 x n/a 2012 Aguilar, Keene 8/27/2001 02-1948 x 3 2015 Aguilar, Keene 7/30/2007 08-4298 x 3 2015 Aguilar, Keene 7/5/2011 11-0164 x n/a 2017 Aguilar, Keene 04/18/2013 13-0053 x n/a 2018 Aguilar, Kenney 8/19/2007 08-4315 x 3 2015 Aguilar, Richard 10/30/2003 042922 x n/a 2012 Aguilar, Richard 3/7/2008 08-4505 x 3 2015 Aguilar -Portugal, Yvette 9/25/2005 06-3649 x 3 2015 Aguinaga, Ramsey 12/13/2010 10-0309 x 1 2016 Ahearn, Stephen 7/5/2004 053190 x n/a 2012 Ahearn, Stephen 7/14/2002 032322 x n/a 2012 Ahearn, Thomas 11/2/1997 97PDS0361 x n/a 2012 Ahearn, Thomas 9/22/1992 92PDS0354 x n/a 2012 Akhavan, Esther 6/12/2006 06-3922 x 3 2015 1of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List :Claimant,- Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Alba, Michael 8/26/2006 07-3984 x 3 2015 Alba, Michael 9/16/2007 08-4353 x 3 2015 Alba, Mike 6/3/2003 032736 X n/a 2012 Alcala, Daniel 01/04/2013 13-0003 X n/a 2018 Alcantar, Abel 3/16/2002 022175 X n/a 2012 Alcantra, Gregory 02/28/1995 95PDS0083 X n/a 2018 Alcaraz, Giovanni 5/1/2003 032702 X n/a 2012 Alcaraz, Giovanni 7/17/2002 032328 X n/a 2012 Aldecoa, Mary 5/28/2002 022262 X n/a 2012 Aldecoa, Mary 2/24/2006 06-3805 x 3 2015 Aldecoa, Mary 11/14/2007 08-4417 x 3 2015 Alegre, Steven 8/22/2007 08-4324 x 3 2015 Aloyian, Adam 09/02/2013 13-0134 X n/a 2018 Altamirano, Monica 4/17/2007 07-4195 x 3 2015 Altamirano, Monica 2/24/2006 06-3822 x 3 2015 Alvarado, Evelyn 2/7/2011 11-0033 X n/a 2017 Alvarado, Gloria 2/24/2004 043041 X n/a 2012 Alvarado, Gloria 2/28/2006 06-3837 x 3 2015 Alvarado, Richard M. (Ricardo) 8/19/2003 042823 X n/a 2012 Alvarado, Richard M. (Ricardo) 7/21/2003 042791 X n/a 2012 Alvarado, Richard M. (Ricardo) 3/26/2003 032632 X n/a 2012 Alvarado, Richard M. (Ricardo) 4/10/2001 011780 X n/a 2012 Alvare, Ivan 7/30/2004 053225 X n/a 2012 Alvare, Ivan 3/30/2006 06-3839 x 3 2015 Alvarez, Alice 11/8/2002 032502 X n/a 2012 Alvarez, Andrew 11/13/2003 042943 X n/a 2012 Alvarez, Andrew 10/19/2002 032449 X n/a 2012 Alvarez, Andrew 1/1/2006 06-3734 x 3 2015 Alvarez, Andrew 4/2/2008 08-4535 x 3 2015 Alvarez, Andrew 5/6/2006 06-3883 x 3 2015 Alvarez, Nivaldo 11/12/2005 06-3693 x 13 2015 Alvarez, Nivaldo 6/23/2007 07-4261 x 13 2015 Alvarez, Nivaldo 1/25/2005 05-3394 x 13 2015 Alves, Albert 4/15/2004 043108 X n/a 2012 Alves, Albert 1/11/2001 011665 X n/a 2012 Alvidrez, Jesse 7/2/2001 021881 X n/a 2012 Alvidrez, Manuel 1/7/2003 032535 X n/a 2012 Amador, Mary 3/1/2001 011721 X n/a 2012 Amaro, Remy 8/10/2001 021929 X n/a 2012 Amende, Gerald 3/20/2002 022185 X n/a 2012 Amende, Gerald 1/21/2001 011677 X n/a 2012 Amende, Gerald 2/23/2007 07-4157 x 13 2015 Amende, Gerald 12/21/2005 06-3726 x 13 2015 Amende, Gerald 07/26/2004 05-3223 X n/a 2018 2of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Am erson,Joyce 1/1/2002 022132 X n/a 2012 Amezquita, Jose 10/13/2003 042881 X n/a 2012 Amezquita,Jose 02/21/2013 13-0029 X n/a 2018 Amezquita, Rachel 9/11/2003 042907 X n/a 2012 Amezquita-Lopez, Raquel 12/6/2006 07-4096 x 13 2015 Anderson, Brent 3/6/2004 043072 X n/a 2012 Anderson, Brent 11/1/2003 042965 X n/a 2012 Anderson, Brent 7/2/2003 042782 X n/a 2012 Anderson, Brent 2/4/2003 032578 X n/a 2012 Anderson, Brent 11/15/2002 032485 X n/a 2012 Anderson, Brent 9/18/2005 06-3636 x 13 2015 Anderson, Brent 7/1/2006 07-3945 x 13 2015 Anderson, Richard 8/5/2003 042808 X n/a 2012 Anderson, Richard 5/7/2002 022243 X n/a 2012 Anderson, Richard 9/19/2001 021974 X n/a 2012 Anderson, Richard 6/1/2001 011849 X n/a 2012 Anderson, Richard 3/17/2005 05-3450 x 13 2015 Anderson, Richard 12/5/2005 06-3719 x 16 2015 Andrade, Edward 6/5/2001 011842 X n/a 2012 Andrade, Roland 9/29/2005 06-3646 x 13 2015 Andrade, Roland 2/16/2007 07-4152 x 13 2015 Andrade -Villa, Claudia 1/5/2008 08-4451 x 13 2015 Andrade -Villa, Claudia 12/02/2013 13-0198 X n/a 2018 Angel, Virginia 8/9/2002 032365 X n/a 2012 Anguiano, Martin 2/14/2008 08-4488 x 13 2015 Anzai, Ron 2/9/2004 043048 X n/a 2012 Anzai, Ron 1/6/2003 032529 X n/a 2012 Anzai, Ron 3/26/2008 08-4522 x 13 2015 Anzai, Ron 12/29/2006 07-4114 x 13 2015 Anzai, Ron 4/19/2007 04-4204 x 13 2015 Anzai, Ron 2/11/2007 07-4150 x 13 2015 Apodaca, Ralph Jr 8/11/1977 80000900 x 1 2016 Aragon, Frank 11/18/2004 053485 X n/a 2012 Aragon, Frank 1/3/2006 06-3761 x 13 2015 Archer, Philip 5/7/2003 032714 X n/a 2012 Arevalos, Gilbert 11/8/1996 97WOM0007 X n/a 2017 Armendarez, Daniel 3/24/2008 08-4536 x 13 2015 Armendarez, Daniel 8/13/2007 08-4312 x 13 2015 Armendarez, Daniel 5/28/2007 07-4235 X 13 2015 Armendarez, Daniel 02/13/2008 08-4485 X n/a 2018 Armendarez, Daniel 06/18/08 08-4612 X n/a 2018 Armendarez, Daniel 05/12/2010 10-0105 X n/a 2018 Armendarez, Daniel 08/02/1989 89140233 X n/a 2018 Armendarez, Daniel 09/26/2007 08-4361 X n/a 2018 3of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Armendariz, Daniel D. 11/19/2003 042934 X n/a 2012 Armendariz, Daniel D. 9/14/2002 032415 X n/a 2012 Armendariz, Daniel D. 11/23/2001 022041 X n/a 2012 Armendariz, Daniel D. 1/25/2001 011685 X n/a 2012 Armenta, Karina 02/27/2013 13-0034 X n/a 2018 Armstrong, James 8/10/2005 06-3586 x 3 2015 Arnold, Al 6/7/2005 05-3530 x 16 2015 Arnold, Al 10/14/2005 06-3668 x 16 2015 Arnold, Alan 4/2/2003 042847 X n/a 2012 Arnold, Alan 9/11/2002 032467 X n/a 2012 Arnold, Alan 3/9/2009 09-4844 X n/a 2017 Arnone,Anthony 7/9/2010 10-0165 x 1 2016 Arnone,Anthony 2/8/2004 043028 X n/a 2012 Arnone,Anthony 1/19/2004 043008 X n/a 2012 Arnone,Anthony 12/16/2003 042972 X n/a 2012 Arnone,Anthony 3/7/2003 032643 X n/a 2012 Arnone,Anthony 4/10/2006 06-3847 x 16 2015 Arnone, Anthony 1/13/2006 06-3780 x 16 2015 Arnone,Anthony 6/11/2009 09-4933 X n/a 2017 Arnone,Anthony 10/22/2009 09-5072 X n/a 2017 Arostegui, Guillermo 4/23/1998 99PDS0067 X n/a 2012 Arostegui, Guillermo 4/23/1998 98PDS0369 X n/a 2012 Arroyo,Jorge 7/20/2012 12-0137 X n/a 2017 Arroyo, Jorge 1/20/2012 12-0026 X n/a 2017 Arzate,Francisca 5/15/2012 12-0103 X n/a 2017 Ashworth, Jennifer 6/20/2001 01-1858 x 16 2015 Astran, Marian 4/11/2009 09-4913 X n/a 2017 Astran, Marian 04/20/2013 13-0005 X n/a 2018 Atkinson, Bryan 8/18/2004 053247 X n/a 2012 Atkinson, Bryan 11/16/2002 032482 X n/a 2012 Atkinson, Bryan 10/17/2006 07-4044 x 13 2015 Atkinson, Bryan 10/25/2007 08-4390 x 16 2015 Attar, Richard 12/20/2007 08-4446 x 13 2015 Au, Di 4/4/2003 032658 X n/a 2012 Audelo, Claudia 04/30/2013 13-0060 X n/a 2018 Avalos Jr., Jose 12/5/2000 011625 X n/a 2012 Avalos, Joaquin 10/21/2005 06-3675 x 13 2015 Avina, Gabriel 9/3/2002 032410 X n/a 2012 Avina, Gabriel 4/19/2005 05-3478 x 13 2015 Avina, Sergio 7/14/2004 053199 X n/a 2012 Avina, Sergio 4/18/2003 032685 X n/a 2012 Avina, Sergio 9/10/2005 06-3627 x 13 2015 Avina, Sergio 8/18/2005 06-3593 x 13 2015 Avina, Sergio 6/25/2005 05-3557 x 13 2015 4of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Ayou, Scott 9/18/2001 021957 X n/a 2012 Ayres, Robert 5/6/2006 06-3877 x 13 2015 Backes, Charles 4/3/2003 032668 X n/a 2012 Baker, Estella 4/1/2001 01-1762 x 13 2015 Baker, Kathleen 4/18/2006 06-3852 x 16 2015 Baker, Patricia 3/24/1998 98PBS0101 X n/a 2012 Baker, Patricia 2/17/1998 98PBS0050 X n/a 2012 Baker, Patricia 06/01/1993 93PBS0209 X n/a 2018 Bao,Chuong 1/6/2006 06-3787 x 16 2015 Bao,ChuongL. 8/13/2002 032363 X n/a 2012 Bao,Laure 7/7/2007 08-4279 x 16 2015 Baptista, Joshua 6/12/2003 032757 X n/a 2012 Baptista, Joshua 12/7/2007 08-4434 x 16 2015 Barasch, Theresa 12/30/2004 053382 X n/a 2012 Barela, Andrew 8/15/2003 042828 X n/a 2012 Barela, Anthony 10/3/2002 032437 X n/a 2012 Barela, Anthony 5/8/2006 06-3884 x 16 2015 Barela, Anthony 10/3/2005 06-3651 x 16 2015 Barela, Anthony 10/16/2006 08-4343 x 16 2015 Barkley, Sheri 1/29/2008 08-4471 x 16 2015 Barnard, Robert 1/1/2007 07-4154 x 16 2015 Barnard, Robert 8/25/2008 09-4790 x 16 2015 Barnard, Robert 9/1/2006 07-3993 x 16 2015 Barnette, Bradley L. 2/15/2002 022137 X n/a 2012 Barnette, Bradley L. 8/29/2001 021967 X n/a 2012 Barnette, Bradley L. 8/29/2001 021966 X n/a 2012 Barnette, Bradley L. 8/29/2001 021965 X n/a 2012 Barnette, Bradley L. 8/29/2001 021964 X n/a 2012 Barnette, Bradley L. 8/29/2001 021963 X n/a 2012 Barnette, Bradley L. 8/29/2001 021962 X n/a 2012 Barnette, Bradley L. 7/2/2001 021884 X n/a 2012 Barnette, Bradley L. 5/1/2001 032545 X n/a 2012 Barnette, Bradley L. 5/2/1995 95FDS0187 X n/a 2012 Barnhardt, Oscar 12/6/2002 032508 X n/a 2012 Barnhardt, Oscar 8/23/2002 032389 X n/a 2012 Barnhardt, Oscar 8/13/2002 032367 X n/a 2012 Barrera, Ross 1/29/2003 032565 X n/a 2012 Barrera, Ross 6/16/2002 032373 X n/a 2012 Barrera, Ross 5/29/2002 022263 X n/a 2012 Barrera, Ross 9/16/2001 021954 X n/a 2012 Barrera, Ross 1/14/2001 011673 X n/a 2012 Barrera, Ross 7/6/1997 97PDS0199 X n/a 2012 Barrera, Ross 3/27/2008 08-4527 x 16 2015 Barrera, Ross 5/22/2005 05-3511 x 16 2015 5of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Barrera, Ross 2/15/2005 05-3420 x 16 2015 Barrera, Ross 09/29/2013 13-0145 X n/a 2018 Barrett, Anita 3/6/2001 011736 X n/a 2012 Barrett, William 7/20/1989 89140207 X n/a 2017 Barrett, William 4/3/2006 07-4047 X n/a 2017 Barrett, William 3/28/2004 04-3116 X n/a 2017 Barrett, William 1/29/2006 06-3809 X n/a 2017 Barrett, William 10/30/1989 89140327 X n/a 2017 Bartholome, David 3/13/2005 05-3442 x 16 2015 Bauer, Sarah 8/18/2004 053242 X n/a 2012 Bauer, Sarah 1/13/2003 032564 X n/a 2012 Bauer, Sarah 12/20/2002 032517 X n/a 2012 Bautista-Montanez, Yolanda 3/29/2004 043085 X n/a 2012 Bazaire, Richard 12/19/2004 053368 X n/a 2012 Bazaire, Richard 10/3/2004 05-3300 x 16 2015 Beach, Glenn 05/15/2013 13-0073 X n/a 2018 Bear, Bryan 6/10/2006 06-3921 x 16 2015 Beaumarchais, Peter 05/22/2013 13-0076 X n/a 2018 Becerra, Jose 1/29/2004 043019 X n/a 2012 Becerra, Jose 7/12/2003 042781 X n/a 2012 Becerra, Jose 11/15/2005 06-3699 x 16 2015 Beckx, Randolph 11/12/2013 13-0180 X n/a 2018 Beckx, Randy 3/30/2006 06-3841 x 16 2015 Beilby, Karl 1/6/2003 032530 X n/a 2012 Beilby, Karl 1/16/2002 022093 X n/a 2012 Bell, Thomas 7/25/1978 80001352 X n/a 2017 Belles, John 3/31/2004 043083 X n/a 2012 Belles, John 9/10/2008 09-4707 x 16 2015 Belles, John 3/30/2011 11-0083 X n/a 2017 Benard, Christian 4/4/2007 07-4190 x 16 2015 Bento, Jay 5/24/2006 06-3898 x 16 2015 Bento, Jay 4/6/2008 08-4532 x 16 2015 Bento,Jay 10/1/2010 10-0241 X n/a 2017 Berg, Alan 05/10/2013 13-0063 X n/a 2018 Berg, Sondra 7/6/2011 11-0174 X n/a 2017 Berg, Sondra 2/8/2011 11-0036 X n/a 2017 Berg, Sondra 10/09/2013 13-0153 X n/a 2018 Berger, Matthew 1/11/2005 053388 X n/a 2012 Berger, Matthew 7/18/2004 053206 X n/a 2012 Berger, Matthew 4/20/2002 022217 X n/a 2012 Berger, Matthew 8/20/2007 08-4320 x 16 2015 Bernal, Lisa 3/9/2001 011741 X n/a 2012 Berwanger, James 3/12/2008 08-4507 x 16 2015 Berwanger, James 10/2/2006 07-4025 x 16 2015 6of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Berwanger, James 01/28/2013 13-0015 X n/a 2018 Berwanger, Leticia 4/22/2003 032703 X n/a 2012 Bidgood, Gary 11/12/2001 022046 X n/a 2012 Bidgood, Gary 10/5/2004 05-3298 x 16 2015 Biering, Derek 4/26/2005 05-3487 x 16 2015 Bishop, Mark 2/25/2004 043057 X n/a 2012 Bishop, Mark 2/15/2005 05-3421 x 1 2015 Black, Randy 5/5/2003 032704 X n/a 2012 Blackmore, Michael 9/10/2004 053288 X n/a 2012 Blackmore, Michael 1/17/2008 08-4459 x 1 2015 Blackmore, Michael 9/6/2002 03-2405 x 2 2015 Blackmore, Michael 8/31/2005 6-3608 x 2 2015 Blackmore, Michael 10/12/2005 06-3661 x 2 2015 Bias, Alberto 4/27/2005 05-3489 x 2 2015 Blascovich, Angelo 4/27/2001 011806 X n/a 2012 Blascovich, Angelo 3/13/2000 001342 X n/a 2012 Blascovich, Angelo 5/1/2010 10-0141 X n/a 2017 Blohm, Clyde 1/31/2001 011690 X n/a 2012 Bodo, John 2/4/2003 032577 X n/a 2012 Bodo, John 11/14/2001 022032 X n/a 2012 Bogue, Patricia 9/1/2004 05-3404 x 2 2015 Bollinger, Pete 9/2/2007 08-4392 x 2 2015 Bonilla, Rene 8/1/2007 08-4305 x 2 2015 Booker, Brian 8/7/2004 053234 X n/a 2012 Booker, Brian 3/20/2004 043073 X n/a 2012 Booker, Brian 10/24/2003 042890 X n/a 2012 Booker, Brian 12/25/2002 032520 X n/a 2012 Booker, Brian 5/5/2007 07-4221 x 2 2015 Botello, Jorge 2/7/2004 043043 X n/a 2012 Boulter, Deborah (Debbie) 11/4/2002 032468 X n/a 2012 Boulter, Deborah (Debbie) 4/5/2002 022196 X n/a 2012 Bowers, Carol 11/29/2004 053354 X n/a 2012 Brackman, Garth 1/26/2003 032581 X n/a 2012 Brackman, Garth 12/3/2001 022056 X n/a 2012 Brandt, Dennis 7/13/2005 06-3569 x 2 2015 Braswell, Deshannon 10/02/2013 13-0147 X n/a 2018 Braswell, Deshannon D. 5/19/2004 043138 X n/a 2012 Braswell, Deshannon D. 4/19/2004 043115 X n/a 2012 Braswell, Deshannon D. 8/30/2001 021941 X n/a 2012 Briones, Roberta 2/2/2005 05-3407 x 2 2015 Brocker, Douglas 9/11/2005 06-3617 x 2 2015 Brown, Matthew 11/1/2007 08-4399 x 2 2015 Browne, Jeff 4/17/2007 07-4201 x 2 2015 Browne, Jeff 1/22/2008 08-4466 x 2 2015 7of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Browne, Jeffrey 6/7/2004 043164 X n/a 2012 Browne, Jeffrey 7/22/2002 032350 X n/a 2012 Bruce, Gary 8/15/2002 032440 X n/a 2012 Brunmeier, Anthony (Jim) 10/30/2002 032464 X n/a 2012 Brunmeier, Anthony (Jim) 9/25/2002 032421 X n/a 2012 Brunmeier, Anthony (Jim) 7/27/2002 032766 X n/a 2012 Brunmeier, Anthony (Jim) 3/17/2000 001329 X n/a 2012 Buckle, Sue 6/10/2005 05-3537 x 2 2015 Buelna, Michael 3/8/2006 06-3814 x 2 2015 Buelna, Michael 11/8/2005 06-3690 x 2 2015 Buelna, Michael 9/22/2005 06-3637 x 2 2015 Bun,Ny 11/1/2010 10-0280 X n/a 2017 Buren, Michael 7/30/2002 032360 X n/a 2012 Burgos, Leticia 7/25/2001 021905 X n/a 2012 Burns, Jason 2/12/2008 08-4493 x 2 2015 Butler, Song Yul 1/16/2002 022115 X n/a 2012 Byl, John 7/6/2006 07-3947 x 2 2015 Byl, John 05/08/2013 13-0066 X n/a 2018 Byron, John 8/12/2002 032359 X n/a 2012 Cabral, James 8/12/2004 053239 X n/a 2012 Cabral, James 10/6/2003 042880 X n/a 2012 Cabral, James 5/21/2001 011827 X n/a 2012 Calbert, Sheryl 7/13/2004 053211 X n/a 2012 Calbert, Sheryl 5/1/2002 022274 X n/a 2012 Camacho, Sergio 10/23/2003 042894 X n/a 2012 Camacho, Sergio 1/29/2003 032585 X n/a 2012 Camacho, Sergio 10/22/2000 011574 X n/a 2012 Campbell, Wayne 10/17/2000 011578 X n/a 2012 Campuzano, Mary 1/2/2004 042992 X n/a 2012 Campuzano, Mary 6/11/2005 05-3536 x 2 2015 Canchola, Sara 6/21/2007 07-4265 x 2 2015 Canlas, Kathia 4/18/2011 11-0098 X n/a 2017 Cante, Angel F. 10/31/2003 042909 X n/a 2012 Cante, Angel F. 4/25/2002 022236 X n/a 2012 Cante, Juan 9/28/2004 053290 X n/a 2012 Capacete, Adrian 7/12/2010 10-0164 X n/a 2017 Cardona, Leonard 3/9/2004 043058 X n/a 2012 Cardona, Leonard 11/23/2013 13-0185 X n/a 2018 Cardona, Ruby 11/12/2004 053333 X n/a 2012 Carillo, Maria 1/20/2010 10-0028 x 1 2016 Carlson, Bruce 1/25/2006 06-3794 x 2 2015 Carlson, Jeff 5/24/2007 07-4233 x 2 2015 Carmona, Maribel 3/25/2006 06-3835 x 2 2015 Caro, Sergio 3/8/2007 07-4177 x 1 2015 8of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box tt Purge Year Caro, Sergio 10/08/2013 13-0150 X n/a 2018 Carrera, Robert 3/11/2010 10-0056 x 1 2016 Carrera, Robert 4/19/2004 043155 X n/a 2012 Carrera, Robert 5/8/2002 022253 X n/a 2012 Carrera, Robert 1/7/2002 022086 X n/a 2012 Carrera, Robert 1/11/2001 011675 X n/a 2012 Carrera, Robert 1/25/2007 07-4134 x 2 2015 Carrera, Robert 4/6/2005 05-3542 x 2 2015 Carrera, Robert 5/8/2007 07-4216 x 2 2015 Carrera, Robert 3/10/2008 08-4509 x 2 2015 Carrera, Robert 5/15/2005 05-3504 x 2 2015 Carrillo, Daniel 11/16/2007 08-4419 x 2 2015 Carrillo, Daniel 7/30/2011 11-0197 X n/a 2017 Carrillo, Lorenzo 11/20/2003 042941 X n/a 2012 Carrillo, Lorenzo 2/5/2002 022121 X n/a 2012 Carrillo, Yolanda 4/19/2005 05-3476 x 2 2015 Carrizales, Clair 6/26/2007 07-4266 x 2 2015 Carroll, Jimmy 5/17/2001 011823 X n/a 2012 Casey, William C. 4/17/2004 043110 X n/a 2012 Casey, William C. 11/23/2001 022042 X n/a 2012 Casillas, John L. 9/25/2003 042867 X n/a 2012 Casillas, John L. 5/5/2003 032709 X n/a 2012 Casson, Nicholas 4/19/2005 05-3473 x 2 2015 Casson, Nicholas 1/18/2007 07-4132 x 2 2015 Casson, Nicholas 8/19/2005 06-3592 x 2 2015 Casson, Nicholas 4/21/2006 06-3861 x 2 2015 Casson, Nicholas M. 8/19/2004 053252 X n/a 2012 Casson, Nicholas M. 5/28/2004 043149 X n/a 2012 Casson, Nicholas M. 2/10/2004 043032 X n/a 2012 Casson, Nicholas M. 3/21/2002 022194 X n/a 2012 Castellanos, Joe 6/10/2007 07-4252 x 2 2015 Castellanos, Joe 02/04/2013 13-0018 X n/a 2018 Castellanos, Joe 10/3/2006 07-4027 x 2 2015 Castellanos, Joe 4/19/2007 07-4199 x 2 2015 Castillo, Aaron 8/17/2005 06-3611 x 2 2015 Castillo, Mary 12/31/1999 053543 X n/a 2012 Castillo, Mary 3/21/2006 06-3832 x 2 2015 Castillo, Ronald 8/21/2005 06-3593 x 2 2015 Castillo, Ronald 7/14/2006 07-3956 x 2 2015 Castillo -Gonzales, Mary 3/12/2005 05-3444 x 2 2015 Castillo -Gonzalez, Mary 9/5/2001 021949 X n/a 2012 Castillo -Moreno, Lucille 6/3/2002 022296 X n/a 2012 Castorena, Arturo 8/29/2003 042841 X n/a 2012 Castorena, Arturo 8/1/2002 032344 X n/a 2012 9of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Castro, Alfredo 6/20/2005 Castro, Fernandez 11/30/2007 Castro, Fernando 8/2/2002 Castro, James 1/19/2006 Castro, Joe 2/15/2002 Castro, Joe 11/6/2001 Castro, Joe 11/3/2001 Castro, Joe 7/24/2007 Castro, John 8/7/2004 Castro, John 12/4/2002 Castro, John 8/28/2001 Castro, John 7/23/2011 Castro, Ronald 12/2/2003 Castro, Ronald 9/4/2007 Castro, Ronald 4/27/2008 Castro, Ronald 5/29/2005 Casul, Margarita 9/21/2000 Caswell, Christian P. 2/23/2003 Cauble, Leticia 7/19/2003 Cazarez, Juan 9/6/2002 Cebreros, Hector 3/23/2003 Cebreros, Hector 5/8/2008 Cebreros, Hector 9/28/2004 Cebreros, Hector 5/3/2004 Cebreros, Hector 12/2/2003 Cebreros, Hector 6/5/2003 Cebreros, Hector 2/4/2003 Cendejas, Marlyn C. 8/1/2001 Centanni, Jon 9/13/2005 Cervantes, Elia 11/15/2002 Cervantes, Rene 11/28/2005 Cervantes, Rene 3/9/2011 Cesena, Albert 4/11/2002 Cesena, Albert 1/8/2002 Cesena, Albert 10/1/2007 Cesena, Albert 7/27/2011 Cesena, Jesse 4/18/2002 Cesena, Jesse 5/5/2001 Chacon, Armando 2/23/2011 Chairez, Monica 5/2/2003 Chamberlain, Brian 8/2/2004 Chamberlain, Brian 7/27/2005 Chamberlain, Brian 12/3/2007 Chambers, John 1/30/2002 Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year 05-3511 x 1 2015 08-4426 x 1 2015 032362 X n/a 2012 06-3765 x 1 2015 022159 X n/a 2012 022023 X n/a 2012 022056 X n/a 2012 08-4291 x 1 2015 053231 X n/a 2012 032536 X n/a 2012 021937 X n/a 2012 11-0193 X n/a 2017 042947 X n/a 2012 08-4334 x 1 2015 08-4560 x 1 2015 05-3523 x 1 2015 01-1536 x 17 2016 032607 X n/a 2012 042787 X n/a 2012 032411 X n/a 2012 03-2667 x 1 2016 08-4593 x 1 2016 053295 X n/a 2012 043123 X n/a 2012 042957 X n/a 2012 032760 X n/a 2012 032598 X n/a 2012 021917 X n/a 2012 06-3623 x 1 2015 032479 X n/a 2012 06-3712 x 1 2015 11-0063 X n/a 2017 022203 X n/a 2012 022084 X n/a 2012 08-4368 x 1 2015 11-0201 X n/a 2017 022214 X n/a 2012 011814 X n/a 2012 11-0057 X n/a 2017 032712 X n/a 2012 053226 X n/a 2012 06-3577 x 1 2015 08-4429 x 1 2015 022156 X n/a 2012 10 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Chapman, Elta 6/26/2003 042773 X n/a 2012 Chapman, Elta 12/18/2002 032507 X n/a 2012 Chapman, Elta 5/17/2001 011828 X n/a 2012 Chapman, Elta 7/9/2008 09-4627 x 1 2015 Chapman, Elta 7/19/2005 06-3576 x 1 2015 Chapman, Elta 1/17/2008 08-4457 x 1 2015 Chavez,Edgar 8/22/2008 09-4680 x 1 2015 Chavez, Joe M. 2/10/2001 011708 X n/a 2012 Chavez, Larry 4/15/2003 032677 X n/a 2012 Chavez, Stephen 8/30/2003 042838 X n/a 2012 Chavez, Stephen 12/24/2002 032540 X n/a 2012 Chavez, Stephen 3/6/2001 011738 X n/a 2012 Chavez, Stephen 12/19/2006 07-4108 x 1 2015 Chavez, Stephen 5/8/2007 07-4215 x 1 2015 Chavez, Stephen 11/05/2013 13-0172 X n/a 2018 Chedister, John 11/14/2003 042921 X n/a 2012 Chedister, John 1/31/2002 022123 X n/a 2012 Chedister, John 11/11/2007 08-4408 x 1 2015 Chedister, John 2/27/2007 07-4160 x 1 2015 Chedister, John 4/6/2005 05-3467 x 1 2015 Chesanek, Tyrone 4/4/2003 032652 X n/a 2012 Chiechi, Mary 6/6/2001 011850 X n/a 2012 Chitjian, Mark 10/23/2002 032460 X n/a 2012 Chiu, Daphne 5/10/2003 032718 X n/a 2012 Christensen, Angela 08/19/2013 13-0123 X n/a 2018 Chumacero, Juan 10/14/2010 10-0256 x 1 2016 Chumacero, Juan 11/2/2006 07-4064 x 1 2015 Chumacero, Juan M. 12/12/2003 042970 X n/a 2012 Chumacero, Juan M. 9/11/2003 042853 X n/a 2012 Chu macero,Juan M. 9/14/2002 032418 X n/a 2012 Chumacero, Juan M. 5/2/2002 022238 X n/a 2012 Ciraulo, Christopher 11/29/2004 053344 X n/a 2012 Ciraulo, Christopher 4/3/2003 032651 X n/a 2012 Claborn, Michael 10/2/2006 07-4024 x 1 2015 Clark, Kevin 2/9/2001 011701 X n/a 2012 Clemente, Jason 1/5/2002 022083 X n/a 2012 Clevenger, Don 12/14/2007 08-4437 x 8 2015 Clevenger, Don 8/24/2005 06-3599 x 8 2015 Clinkingbeard, Janell 7/12/2002 032323 X n/a 2012 Coleman, Lawrence 7/12/2000 011455 X n/a 2012 Coleman, Lawrence 03/21/2013 13-0041 X n/a 2018 Combs, Jan 10/18/2002 032459 X n/a 2012 Combs, Jan 04/03/2013 13-0045 X n/a 2018 Conde, Ernest 8/18/2008 09-4686 x 8 2015 11 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Conde, Ernest A. 12/23/2003 042985 X n/a 2012 Conde, Ernest A. 6/4/2002 022300 X n/a 2012 Conde, Ernest A. 3/14/2001 011744 X n/a 2012 Conde, Ernesto 09/01/2011 11-0224 X n/a 2018 Contreras, Caroline 9/3/2009 09-5019 x 17 2016 Contreras, Richard 7/29/2003 042802 X n/a 2012 Cooper, Dawn 01/15/2003 03-2544 X n/a 2018 Cooper, Dawn 01/06/2001 01-1655 X n/a 2018 Cooper, Dawna 10/11/2004 05-3304 x 8 2015 Cooper, Dawna 4/30/2006 06-3873 x 8 2015 Cooper, Dawna 1/19/2006 06-3766 x 8 2015 Cooper, Dawna 8/21/2005 06-3595 x 8 2015 Cooper, Dawna 1/28/2004 04-3018 x 8 2015 Cooper, Dawna 8/21/2005 06-3595 x 8 2015 Cooper, Dawna 7/31/2004 05-3227 X n/a 2017 Cooper, Dawna 8/4/2002 03-2349 X n/a 2017 Corby, John 8/12/2004 053243 X n/a 2012 Corby, John 3/7/2001 011746 X n/a 2012 Corby, John 5/14/2005 05-3520 x 10 2015 Corby, John 10/24/2006 07-4050 x 10 2015 Cordova, Enrique 7/23/2006 07-3963 x 10 2015 Cornejo, Arnoldo 10/4/2006 07-4026 x 10 2015 Corona, Mario 2/7/2007 07-4144 x 10 2015 Corona, Mario 4/27/2005 05-3490 x 10 2015 Corona, Mario 03/01/2013 13-0031 X n/a 2018 Corona, Mario 09/19/2013 13-0142 X n/a 2018 Corona, Mario A. 11/14/2003 042920 X n/a 2012 Correa, Leonard 8/14/2003 042821 X n/a 2012 Cossios, Esther 8/29/2005 06-3605 x 10 2015 Costello, James 8/22/2005 06-3594 x 10 2015 Costello, James 11/6/2007 08-4414 x 10 2015 Couisine, Hank 03/11/2013 13-0044 X n/a 2018 Cox, Michael 11/20/2001 022043 X n/a 2012 Cox, Michael 6/23/2001 011869 X n/a 2012 Cox, Michael 2/6/2007 07-4142 x 10 2015 Crawford, Richard 11/12/1985 85003049 x 10 2015 Crews, John 2/17/2004 043059 X n/a 2012 Critchfield, Michael 12/29/2004 053381 X n/a 2012 Critchfield, Michael 4/10/2004 043094 X n/a 2012 Critchfield, Michael 9/28/2002 032436 X n/a 2012 Critchfield, Michael 10/1/2007 08-4370 x 10 2015 Critchfield, Michael 8/25/2005 06-3598 x 10 2015 Critchfield, Michael 9/30/2005 06-3645 x 10 2015 Critchfield, Steve W. 5/18/2004 043137 X n/a 2012 12 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Critchfield, Steve W. 5/29/2002 022264 X n/a 2012 Crook, Kathleen 9/19/2006 07-4009 x 10 2015 Croopnick, Roseli D. 7/15/2004 053204 X n/a 2012 Croopnick, Roseli D. 7/4/2002 032317 X n/a 2012 Cruz, Maer 8/26/2006 07-3986 x 10 2015 Cruz, Phillip 12/18/1996 96PAR0346 x 10 2015 Cuevas, Silvia 11/6/2006 07-4075 x 10 2015 Cung,Kha 4/24/2002 022223 X n/a 2012 Daley, Michael 8/11/2003 042818 X n/a 2012 Daley, Michael 10/16/2002 032448 X n/a 2012 Daley, Michael 8/21/2002 032380 X n/a 2012 Daley, Michael 7/13/2002 032330 X n/a 2012 Daley, Michael 4/21/2008 08-4548 x 10 2015 Daley, Michael 09/19/2012 12-0195 X n/a 2018 Dasher, Albert 9/6/2004 053266 X n/a 2012 Dasher, Albert 7/5/2003 042772 X n/a 2012 Dasher, Albert 2/5/2002 022129 X n/a 2012 Dasher, Albert 12/29/2001 022078 X n/a 2012 Dasher, Albert 9/17/2005 06-3631 x 17 2015 Dasher, Albert 6/8/2008 08-4604 x 17 2015 Dasher, Albert 2/23/2005 05-3425 x 17 2015 Dasher, Albert 3/17/2008 08-4552 x 17 2015 Dasher, Albert 8/28/2006 07-3985 x 17 2015 Dasher, Albert 12/16/2006 07-4105 x 17 2015 Dasher, Albert 4/5/2011 11-0087 X n/a 2017 Davenport, Donald 5/11/2001 011820 X n/a 2012 Davidson, Juanita 4/4/2001 011766 X n/a 2012 Davies, Barry 11/1/2003 043111 X n/a 2012 Davies, Barry 12/4/2001 022053 X n/a 2012 Davies, Barry 1/21/2006 06-3767 x 17 2015 Davis, Fred 1/27/2004 043017 X n/a 2012 Davis, Fred 6/14/2002 022281 X n/a 2012 Davis, Fred 2/22/2002 022161 X n/a 2012 Davis, Fred 8/30/2001 021940 X n/a 2012 Davis, James 6/4/1990 91140139 x 17 2015 De Deaux, Kevin 2/13/2011 11-0051 X n/a 2017 De LaTorre, Raul 1/18/2005 053393 X n/a 2012 De Leon, Michael 8/30/2010 10-0213 x 1 2016 Deakins, Charles 9/15/2004 053277 X n/a 2012 Dedeaux,Kevin 8/11/2010 10-0189 x 1 2016 Dee, Mary S. 3/8/2002 022168 X n/a 2012 Defries, Trent 3/3/2010 10-0048 x 1 2016 Defries, Trent 07/23/2011 11-0192 X n/a 2018 Delabarcena, Jesus 10/3/2003 042878 X n/a 2012 13 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Delabarcena, Jesus 3/4/2003 032625 X n/a 2012 Delabarcena, Jesus 2/25/2001 011716 X n/a 2012 Delabarcena, Jesus 7/14/2008 09-4656 x 17 2015 Delabarcena, Jesus 02/22/2012 12-0043 X n/a 2018 Delaney, Robert 10/17/2005 06-3664 x 17 2015 Delgadillo Renteria, Aubrey 1/10/2003 043913 X n/a 2012 Delgadillo Renteria, Aubrey 10/23/2002 032455 X n/a 2012 Delgadillo, Manuel 3/18/2003 032666 X n/a 2012 Delgadillo, Manuel 3/16/2008 08-4524 x 17 2015 Delgado, Manuel 03/19/2013 13-0040 X n/a 2018 Demarco, Edward 5/26/2007 07-4243 x 17 2015 Demopoulos, Eric 7/24/2006 07-3955 x 17 2015 Demopoulos, Eric 11/29/2005 06-3742 x 17 2015 Dennis, Scott 9/7/1987 88140123 x 23 2015 Desantiago, Jose 06/16/2010 10-0153 X n/a 2018 Diaz, Andy 5/7/2007 07-4220 x 8 2015 Diaz, Galen 11/26/2002 032498 X n/a 2012 Diaz, Galen 06/10/2012 12-0113 X n/a 2018 Diaz, Luis 7/21/2004 053212 X n/a 2012 Diaz, Ricardo 11/1/2004 053323 X n/a 2012 Diaz, Ricardo 3/31/2003 032646 X n/a 2012 Diaz, Ricardo 6/3/2002 022267 X n/a 2012 Diaz, Ricardo 10/3/2006 07-4031 x 8 2015 Diaz, Ricardo 3/29/2007 07-4183 x 8 2015 Dinger, Jason 9/1/2002 032400 X n/a 2012 Dinger, Jason 10/29/2001 022015 X n/a 2012 Dinh, Quyen 8/17/2007 08-4325 x 8 2015 Dinh, Quyen 01/27/2011 11-0023 X n/a 2018 Dix, Susan 4/11/2005 05-3495 x 13 2015 Dolan, Daniel 12/8/2004 053359 X n/a 2012 Dolin, Glenn 4/24/2008 08-4557 x 18 2015 Dolin, Glenn 1/27/2011 11-0026 X n/a 2017 Donnelly, Jim 4/24/2007 07-2403 x 18 2015 Donnelly, Patricia 8/1/2001 021911 X n/a 2012 Donnelly, Patricia 11/18/2005 06-3703 x 18 2015 Dougherty, Michael 6/5/2003 032746 X n/a 2012 Dougherty, Michael 5/1/2000 011662 X n/a 2012 Dougherty, Michael 1/20/1999 99PWM0028 X n/a 2012 Driggs, Daniel 5/6/2002 022234 X n/a 2012 Driggs, Daniel 3/26/2002 022183 X n/a 2012 Driggs, Daniel 4/23/2001 011796 X n/a 2012 Dryva, Ronald 2/22/2001 011710 X n/a 2012 Duarte Jr., Frank 8/12/2004 053238 X n/a 2012 Duarte Jr., Frank 7/19/2002 032335 X n/a 2012 14 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Duarte Sr., Frank 9/20/1999 001168 X n/a 2012 Duarte, Frank 8/27/2006 07-3988 X 18 2015 Duquin, Cherryl 10/05/2012 12-0197 X n/a 2018 Duran, Pedro 2/23/2011 11-0056 X n/a 2017 Duran, Tony 7/5/2003 042774 X n/a 2012 Duran, Tony 9/20/2001 022007 X n/a 2012 Duran, Tony 5/17/2007 07-4228 x 18 2015 Duron, Christina 10/15/2001 022000 X n/a 2012 Edwards, Rocky 8/20/2007 08-4322 x 18 2015 Eggers, Terri 09/12/2012 12-0181 X n/a 2018 Eggleston, Robert 04/01/2004 05-3424 X n/a 2018 Eide, Mark 4/17/2003 032693 X n/a 2012 Eide, Mark 3/2/2001 011725 X n/a 2012 Eide, Mark 3/14/2006 06-3824 x 18 2015 Eide, Mark 5/25/2007 07-4238 x 18 2015 Eide, Mark 10/9/2005 06-3662 x 18 2015 Eide, Mark 05/03/2010 10-0115 X n/a 2018 Eide, Mark 08/13/2001 02-1920 X n/a 2018 Eldridge, Randall N. 1/29/2003 032563 X n/a 2012 Elizonso, James 06/27/2012 12-0121 X n/a 2018 Elliot, Lourdes 7/18/1997 97PDNO230 x 8 2015 Elliot, Lourdes 7/8/1998 98PDNO242 x 8 2015 Elliot, Lourdes 12/19/2002 03-2516 x 18 2015 Elmore, Donald 1/22/2004 043016 X n/a 2012 Elmore, Donald 5/3/2006 06-3879 x 8 2015 Elmore, Donald 3/14/2005 05-3447 x 8 2015 Elmore, Donald 9/9/2005 06-3655 x 8 2015 Elms, Charles 7/3/2003 042776 X n/a 2012 Elms, Charles 5/24/2003 032726 X n/a 2012 Elms, Charles 9/28/2002 032425 X n/a 2012 Elms, Charles 1/7/2002 022092 X n/a 2012 Elms, Charles 3/21/2001 011747 X n/a 2012 Elms, Charles 6/3/2007 07-4240 x 8 2015 Elms, Charles 05/18/2009 09-4925 X n/a 2018 Elms, Charles 11/09/2012 12-0208 X n/a 2018 Encinas, Theodore 7/17/1975 80000057 X 1 2016 Encinas, Theodore 12/24/1975 80000250 x 1 2016 Encinas, Theodore 02/10/1977 80000668 X n/a 2018 Encinas, Theodore 02/12/1980 80001956 X n/a 2018 Enomoto, Michael 10/4/2002 032447 X n/a 2012 Enriquez, Adrian 04/16/2013 13-0050 X n/a 2018 Enriquez, Adrian 07/15/2012 12-0131 X n/a 2018 Enriquez, Liz 11/14/2011 114-0283 X n/a 2018 Enriquez, Sergio 5/24/2001 011836 X n/a 2012 15 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Escobar, Alfonso 1/31/2001 011698 X n/a 2012 Escobar, Alfonso 12/13/2000 011642 X n/a 2012 Escobar, Mynor 3/10/2001 011735 X n/a 2012 Escobar, Mynor 2/5/2000 001290 X n/a 2012 Escobar, Mynor 5/30/2008 08-4589 x 8 2015 Esparza, Benita 2/8/2007 07-4145 x 7 2015 Esparza, Enrique 1/8/2001 011606 X n/a 2012 Esparza, Enrique 9/14/2007 08-4351 x 7 2015 Esparza, Janet 7/15/2002 032338 X n/a 2012 Esparza, Janet 12/17/2001 022099 X n/a 2012 Esparza, Janet 8/16/2000 011501 X n/a 2012 Esparza, Janet 2/13/2006 06-3796 x 7 2015 Esparza, Janet 04/07/2011 11-0092 X n/a 2018 Esparza, Rosa 9/15/2004 053275 X n/a 2012 Esparza, Rosa 7/29/2009 09-4986 x 17 2016 Esparza, Rosa 7/8/2005 06-3573 x 7 2015 Espino, Hector 7/12/2002 032324 X n/a 2012 Espinosa, Anthony 8/8/2001 021947 X n/a 2012 Espinosa, Laura 7/8/2002 032329 X n/a 2012 Espinosa, Martin Ochoa 2/10/2011 11-0038 X n/a 2017 Espinoza, Anthony 04/08/1993 93FDS0097 X n/a 2018 Espinoza, Anthony 02/10/2005 05-3416 X n/a 2018 Espinoza, Anthony 02/014/2000 01-1834 X n/a 2018 Espinoza, Anthony 09/09/1994 94FDS0371 X n/a 2018 Espinoza, Anthony 05/13/2011 11-01257 X n/a 2018 Espinoza, Anthony 09/14/2010 10-0254 X n/a 2018 Espinoza, Fernando 6/10/2003 032749 X n/a 2012 Espinoza, Fernando 4/14/2003 032671 X n/a 2012 Espinoza -Quintero, Frank 1/9/2002 022089 X n/a 2012 Esser, Chris 9/29/2003 043087 X n/a 2012 Esser, Chris 9/29/2003 043087 X n/a 2012 Esser, Chris 11/5/2007 08-4406 x 7 2015 Esser, Chris 1/5/2008 08-4450 x 7 2015 Esser, Chris 2/10/2005 05-3413 x 7 2015 Estrada, Augustine 5/3/2004 043122 X n/a 2012 Estrada, Augustine 11/28/2002 032505 X n/a 2012 Estrada, Augustine 2/16/2007 07-4168 x 7 2015 Estrada, Augustine 12/21/2006 07-4110 x 7 2015 Estrada, Donna 6/11/2003 032750 X n/a 2012 Estrada, Donna 7/18/2002 032327 X n/a 2012 Estrada, Donna 10/3/2005 06-3650 x 7 2015 Estrada, Donna 04/17/2013 13-0054 X n/a 2018 Estrada, Donna 02/09/2012 12-0035 X n/a 2018 Estrada, Mauricio 4/22/2005 05-3483 x 7 2015 16 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Evagues, Virginia 11/11/2003 042940 X n/a 2012 Evans, Taylor 4/27/2007 07-4213 x 7 2015 Evans, Taylor 3/2/2009 09-4855 X n/a 2017 Eyraz, Teresa 3/29/2002 022189 X n/a 2012 Eyraz, Teresa 12/22/2001 022076 X n/a 2012 Fahrney,Scott 12/31/2010 11-0016 X n/a 2018 Fahrney,Scott 05/12/2013 13-0065 X n/a 2018 Fairchild, Jason 7/14/2004 053202 X n/a 2012 Fairchild, Jason 8/16/2006 07-3978 x 7 2015 Fairchild, Jason 8/11/2010 10-0190 X n/a 2017 Fajardo, Frank 2/3/2004 043023 X n/a 2012 Fajardo, Frank 10/12/2006 07-4041 x 7 2015 Fajardo, Frank 05/21/2012 12-0099 X n/a 2018 Farran, Jorge 11/7/2004 053329 X n/a 2012 Feieraband, Karl 05/22/2008 09-4631 X n/a 2018 Felix, Daniel 02/24/2000 00-1323 X n/a 2018 Ferguson, Michael 9/12/2001 02-1960 x 7 2015 Fernandez, Armando 8/29/2007 08-4335 x 7 2015 Fernandez, Gregory 12/12/2011 11-0304 X n/a 2018 Fernandez, Luis 10/23/1998 98FDS0438 x 7 2015 Fernandez, Luis 9/29/2000 01-1659 x 7 2015 Fernandez, Luis 11/20/2003 04-2950 x 7 2015 Fernandez, Luis 2/17/2002 02/2172 x 7 2015 Fernandez, Luis 2/19/2003 03-2637 x 7 2015 Fernandez, Mollie 12/31/2003 04-2990 x 7 2015 Fernandez, Mollie 9/10/2001 02-1955 x 7 2015 Fernberg, Mark 4/8/2006 06-3845 x 7 2015 Fernberg, Mark 3/20/2003 03-2633 x 7 2015 Fernberg, Mark 3/23/2002 02-2179 x 7 2015 Fernberg, Mark 12/1/2004 05-3352 x 7 2015 Fernberg, Mark 7/9/2007 08-4276 x 7 2015 Fernberg, Mark 10/02/2009 09-5080 X n/a 2018 Fernberg, Mark 08/26/2002 03-2391 X n/a 2018 Fix, Alfred 6/29/2001 01-1876 x 7 2015 Fleet, Michael 09/04/2007 97PDS0420 X n/a 2018 Flores, Caesar 4/21/2007 07-4205 x 7 2015 Flores, Jesse 5/10/2004 043129 X n/a 2012 Flores, Jesse 8/21/2003 042826 X n/a 2012 Flores, Jesse 2/15/2005 05-3419 x 7 2015 Flores, Jesse 4/2/2008 08-4530 x 7 2015 Flores, Jesse 1/12/2006 06-3764 x 7 2015 Flores, Jesse 7/12/2010 10-0167 X n/a 2017 Flores, Jesse 12/1/2010 10-0296 X n/a 2017 Flores, Jose 8/20/2000 011506 X n/a 2012 17 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Flores, Jose 6/30/2003 042768 X n/a 2012 Flores, Jose 10/14/2002 032446 X n/a 2012 Flores, Jose 5/12/2005 05-3514 x 7 2015 Flores, Jose 1/8/2006 06-3749 x 15 2015 Flores, Lucy 05/17/1999 99-1006 X n/a 2018 Flores, Mark 3/9/2004 043063 X n/a 2012 Flores, Mark 5/20/2003 032732 X n/a 2012 Flores, Mark 1/25/2002 022122 X n/a 2012 Flores, Mark 10/15/2001 022006 X n/a 2012 Flores, Mark 11/23/2000 011615 X n/a 2012 Flores, Mark 2/7/2007 07-4146 x 15 2015 Flores, Mark 02/26/2006 06-3866 X n/a 2018 Flores, Mark 02/24/2006 06-3807 X n/a 2018 Flores, Mary 07/10/2009 09-4959 X n/a 2018 Flores, Patricia 6/6/2008 08-4594 x 15 2015 Flores, Richard 10/17/2002 032444 X n/a 2012 Flores, Richard 3/28/2002 022198 X n/a 2012 Flores, Richard 9/22/2004 05-3283 x 15 2015 Flores, Richard 9/15/1997 97PDS0293 x 15 2015 Flores, Santiago 12/22/2003 042981 X n/a 2012 Floyd, Monte 9/13/2004 053271 X n/a 2012 Floyd, Monte 4/28/1999 991049 X n/a 2012 Floyd, Monte 10/2/2006 07-4020 x 15 2015 Floye, Monte 11/23/2005 06-3708 x 15 2015 Flynn, Charles 1/13/2006 06-3775 x 15 2015 Follo, John 9/15/2004 053281 X n/a 2012 Follo, John 6/18/2004 043174 X n/a 2012 Follo, John 7/7/2007 08-4282 x 15 2015 Forrester, David 4/9/2003 032659 X n/a 2012 Forrester, David 5/26/2006 06-3901 x 15 2015 Forrester, David 08/07/2011 11-0028 X n/a 2018 Foster, Keith 2/24/2006 06-3816 x 15 2015 Foster, Keith 8/14/2006 07-3981 X n/a 2017 Frainie, Jack 1/9/2004 043006 X n/a 2012 Frainie, Jack 6/3/2003 032739 X n/a 2012 Frainie, Jack 8/14/2000 011499 X n/a 2012 Franco,Jose 8/27/2005 06-3607 x 15 2015 Franco,Jose 9/14/2001 02-1956 x 15 2015 Franco,Jose 6/3/2002 02-2275 x 15 2015 Franco,Jose 10/09/2010 10-0251 X n/a 2018 Franco,Jose 08/30/2010 10-0211 X n/a 2018 Franco,Jose 10/07/2011 11-0255 X n/a 2018 Franco,Jose 08/25/2011 11-0221 X n/a 2018 Franco, Jose L. 8/7/2004 053233 X n/a 2012 18 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Franco, Jose L. 4/7/2003 032662 X n/a 2012 Franco, lose L. 3/19/2003 032635 X n/a 2012 Franco, Raymond 2/10/2004 043029 X n/a 2012 Franks, John 4/24/2003 032691 X n/a 2012 Franks, John 3/16/2003 032626 X n/a 2012 Franks, John 6/2/2002 032306 X n/a 2012 Franks, John 3/1/2002 022184 X n/a 2012 Fratus, Gary 2/20/2002 022293 X n/a 2012 Frazee, Jacqueline 8/16/2001 021921 X n/a 2012 Frazee, Jacqueline 3/1/2001 011722 X n/a 2012 Fuller, Corene 7/25/2001 021931 X n/a 2012 Fullerton, Carolyn 12/13/2004 053366 X n/a 2012 Fullerton, Carolyn 5/20/2005 05-3512 x 18 2015 Gableman, John 11/18/2010 10-0287 X n/a 2018 Gaelana, Luis 7/30/2010 10-0196 x 1 2016 Galarza, Gianni 12/13/2004 053361 X n/a 2012 Galarza, Gianni 9/25/2004 053285 X n/a 2012 Galarza, Gianni 11/8/2003 042914 X n/a 2012 Galarza, Gianni 4/28/2003 032759 X n/a 2012 Galarza, Gianni 11/23/2002 032489 X n/a 2012 Galarza, Gianni 6/5/2005 05-3528 x 18 2015 Galaz, Vincent 2/13/2003 032591 X n/a 2012 Galaz, Vincent 2/23/2005 05-3431 x 18 2015 Galaz, Vincent 11/19/2005 06-3700 x 18 2015 Galeana, Luis 12/4/2005 06-3710 x 15 2015 Galeana, Luis 2/27/2008 08-4497 x 18 2015 Galeana, Luis 2/24/2011 11-0055 X n/a 2017 Galeana, Luis 10/29/2013 13-0165 X n/a 2018 Galguera, Isidro 8/11/2004 053236 X n/a 2012 Galguera, Isidro 1/31/2001 011695 X n/a 2012 Galguera, Isidro 7/25/2007 08-4294 x 15 2015 Gallardo, Julio 10/29/2012 12-0207 X n/a 2018 Gallardo, Julio O1/27/2013 13-0010 X n/a 2018 Gallardo, Maria 9/18/2007 08-4359 x 15 2015 Gallardo, Maria 08/26/2011 11-0227 X n/a 2018 Gallardo, Maria G. 5/3/2003 032710 X n/a 2012 Gallegos, Myra 11/26/2012 12-0222 X n/a 2018 Gallegos, Sandra 2/14/2003 03-2592 x 1 2016 Gallegos, Sandra 9/23/2005 06-3658 x 1 2016 Gallegos, Sandra 7/31/2002 03-2342 x 1 2016 Galvan, Nicolas 4/26/2011 11-0123 X n/a 2017 Galvez, Aura 8/26/2002 032382 X n/a 2012 Garbutt, Joe 2/18/2000 001309 X n/a 2012 Garbutt, Joe 12/16/1999 001240 X n/a 2012 19 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Garcia, Alejandra 6/24/2005 05-3553 x 4 2015 Garcia, Alma 1/31/2006 06-3785 x 15 2015 Garcia, Amparo 12/14/2000 011639 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Amparo 3/13/2007 07-4189 x 4 2015 Garcia, Amparo 3/23/2005 05-3456 x 15 2015 Garcia, Carlos V. 9/26/2002 032426 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Carlos V. 7/2/2002 032312 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Carlos V. 2/13/2002 022151 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Elizabeth 11/1/2001 022051 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Elizabeth 4/21/2001 011798 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Frank 3/18/2008 08-4521 x 4 2015 Garcia, Frank 7/2/2006 07-3941 x 4 2015 Garcia, Frank 2/27/2005 05-3433 x 4 2015 Garcia, Gonzalo 8/18/2007 08-4327 x 4 2015 Garcia, Guadalupe 10/30/2002 032474 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Guadalupe 1/15/2002 022112 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Israel 4/17/2003 032747 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Israel 11/24/2002 032490 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Israel 1/16/2001 011679 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Jason 5/9/2011 11-0121 X n/a 2017 Garcia, Jim 8/24/2004 053253 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Jose 9/4/2004 053260 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Jose 1/1/2001 04-2771 x 4 2015 Garcia, Jose A. 11/6/2003 042915 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Jose A. 3/28/2003 032649 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Jose A. 8/12/2002 032366 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Juan 4/23/2002 022222 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Juan 9/9/2006 07-4001 x 4 2015 Garcia, Juan 2/7/2008 08-4482 x 15 2015 Garcia, Juan 2/22/2007 07-4153 X 15 2015 Garcia, Juan 10/22/2010 10-0268 x 1 2016 Garcia, Manuel 4/2/2003 032657 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Michael A. 11/4/2004 053339 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Michael A. 8/29/2001 021938 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Rosalba 2/4/2003 032599 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Rosalba 11/9/2000 011598 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Russell 1/28/2006 06-3784 x 1 2016 Garcia, Russell 11/15/2004 053334 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Russell 2/1/1999 99FDS0053 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Russell 1/20/2008 08-4467 x 4 2015 Garcia, Russell 8/1/2006 07-3973 x 4 2015 Garcia, Sonia 8/22/2003 042832 X n/a 2012 Garcia, Zeke 10/03/2011 11-0250 X n/a 2018 Garrova, Thomas 03/21/2011 11-0095 X n/a 2018 20of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Gatt, Sandra 1/4/2002 022094 X n/a 2012 Gatto, Richard 3/3/2003 032624 X n/a 2012 Gatto, Richard 12/10/2007 08-4444 x 4 2015 Geist, Rosemary 9/5/2005 06-3628 x 4 2015 Ghizzi, Mario 7/26/2001 021909 X n/a 2012 Gibbons, Michael 1/30/2006 06-3779 x 4 2015 Gielda, Norman 09/16/2011 11-0242 X n/a 2018 Godinez, Victor 12/31/2000 04-3070 x 2 2016 Godinez, Victor 12/31/2000 04-3071 x 2 2016 Godinez, Victor 12/22/2003 042984 X n/a 2012 Godinez, Victor 1/14/2002 022098 X n/a 2012 Godinez, Victor 3/25/2005 05-3454 x 4 2015 Godinez, Victor 3/18/2005 05-3451 x 4 2015 Godinez, Victor 1/1/2005 05-3497 x 4 2015 Godinez, Victor 11/26/2001 02-2246 X n/a 2018 Gomes, Robert 10/3/2003 042876 X n/a 2012 Gomez, Angelina 12/14/2005 06-37290 x 18 2015 Gomez, Darrell 03/11/2003 03-2619 X n/a 2018 Gomez, Darrell 10/13/2006 07-4039 X n/a 2018 Gomez, Ernesto 10/24/2003 042897 X n/a 2012 Gomez, Esmeralda M. 10/29/2003 042904 X n/a 2012 Gomez, Francisco 4/17/2001 011789 X n/a 2012 Gomez, Gabriel 10/24/2005 06-3674 x 5 2015 Gomez, Hector 5/10/2001 011821 X n/a 2012 Gomez, Irene 5/18/2010 10-0129 x 2 2016 Gomez, Irene 3/21/2003 032647 X n/a 2012 Gomez, Irene 3/14/2003 032661 X n/a 2012 Gomez, Irene 12/17/2005 06-3756 x 5 2015 Gomez, Irene 4/22/2005 05-3482 x 5 2015 Gomez, Irene 07/23/2012 12-0146 X n/a 2018 Gomez, Margarita 06/19/2012 12-0118 X n/a 2018 Gominsky, Kenneth 1/23/2008 08-4464 x 2 2016 Gominsky, Kenneth 8/22/2001 021945 X n/a 2012 Gominsky, Kenneth 09/01/1981 80002450 X n/a 2018 Gonsalves, Paul 7/8/2005 06-3565 x 5 2015 Gonzales, Angel 6/20/2003 043114 X n/a 2012 Gonzales, Angel 6/29/2002 032314 X n/a 2012 Gonzales, Angel 5/19/2006 06-3892 x 5 2015 Gonzales, Angel 6/29/2004 04-3185 x 5 2015 Gonzales, Benito 7/15/2003 042804 X n/a 2012 Gonzales, Benito 1/7/2003 032551 X n/a 2012 Gonzales, Benito 2/19/2002 022153 X n/a 2012 Gonzales, John 6/13/2006 06-3924 x 5 2015 Gonzalez, Alan 3/1/2008 08-4502 x 5 2015 21 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Gonzalez, Benito 01/28/2012 12-0032 X n/a 2018 Gonzalez, Efrain 7/27/2004 053222 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Emma 9/3/2003 042844 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Emma 02/05/2004 04-3024 X n/a 2018 Gonzalez, Gloria 8/1/2002 032396 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Gloria 8/1/2002 032395 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Gloria 4/30/2001 011811 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Joel. 8/29/2002 032397 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Joel. 8/8/2001 021914 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Jose 8/11/2001 021942 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Jose 8/1/2004 053228 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Joseph 4/17/2003 032706 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Joseph 11/21/2000 011619 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Joseph 11/15/2006 07-4149 x 5 2015 Gonzalez, Juan 5/25/2003 032734 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Juan 2/10/2002 022134 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Luis 11/8/2004 053330 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Mary G. 5/12/2003 032721 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Michael 7/20/2000 011468 X n/a 2012 Gonzalez, Michael 9/14/2007 08-4350 x 4 2015 Gonzalez, Miguel 6/5/2006 06-3912 x 2 2016 Gonzalez, Miguel 12/27/1995 95WOM0448 x 2 2016 Gonzalez, Miguel 10/03/2003 04-2899 X n/a 2018 Gonzalez, Philip 5/29/2007 07-4246 x 2 2016 Gonzalez, Ulysses 7/20/2004 053207 X n/a 2012 Gonzlez, Joe "John" 05/12/2011 11-0124 X n/a 2018 Gonzlez, Michael 12/02/2002 03-2612 X n/a 2018 Goosby, Johanna 6/23/2006 07-3939 x 4 2015 Gorajewski, Michael R. 1/16/2002 022101 X n/a 2012 Goss, Kurt 07/25/2011 11-0195 X n/a 2018 Graber, Timothy 8/4/2004 053256 X n/a 2012 Graber, Timothy 7/13/2004 053213 X n/a 2012 Graber, Timothy 1/8/2004 043001 X n/a 2012 Graber, Timothy 4/13/2002 022215 X n/a 2012 Graber, Timothy 7/21/2003 042812 X n/a 2012 Graber, Timothy 7/4/2001 021896 X n/a 2012 Graber, Timothy 1/31/2001 011706 X n/a 2012 Graber, Timothy 10/18/1999 001204 X n/a 2012 Gragg, George 6/1/1988 96PBS0124 x 14 2015 Graham, Antonio 11/20/2005 06-3705 x 4 2015 Graham, Kevin 4/14/2003 032670 X n/a 2012 Graham, Kevin 3/14/2002 022278 X n/a 2012 Graham, Kevin 1/24/2005 05-3395 x 4 2015 Graham, Kevin 2/1/2011 11-0031 X n/a 2017 22 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Granados, Elizabeth 2/1/2009 09-4825 x 2 2016 Granados, Elizabeth 1/15/2008 08-4465 x 4 2015 Granados, Elizabeth 12/18/2010 10-0311 X n/a 2017 Granieri, Chris 3/19/2009 09-4856 x 2 2016 Granieri, Christopher 11/7/2002 032475 X n/a 2012 Granieri, Christopher 4/27/2006 06-3864 x 4 2015 Granieri, Christopher 7/15/2005 06-3575 x 4 2015 Granieri, Christopher 5/11/2005 05-3505 x 4 2015 Grant, Connie 2/24/2004 043040 X n/a 2012 Grant, Connie 3/30/2003 032641 X n/a 2012 Grant, Connie 7/23/2002 032333 X n/a 2012 Grant, Connie 7/21/2002 032332 X n/a 2012 Grant, Kirk 8/29/2010 10-0216 x 2 2016 Grant, Kirk 1/9/2002 022087 X n/a 2012 Grant, Kirk 11/22/2011 11-0288 X n/a 2018 Grant, Oliver 5/24/2011 11-0132 X n/a 2017 Graves, Mitch 6/22/2007 07-4257 x 4 2015 Graves, Mitchell 3/2/2001 011724 X n/a 2012 Graves, Mitchell 8/21/1999 001132 X n/a 2012 Graves, Mitchell 6/15/2011 11-0157 X n/a 2017 Graves, Monica 11/12/2005 06-3697 x 4 2015 Greaver, Duane 3/19/2008 08-4551 x 4 2015 Greaver, Duane 09/08/2011 11-0238 X n/a 2018 Greaver, Duane 03/11/2011 11-0064 X n/a 2018 Greene, Eileen 9/4/2006 07-3999 x 4 2015 Grindle, Guy 4/19/2002 022221 X n/a 2012 Grindle, Guy 7/25/2001 021903 X n/a 2012 Grindle, Guy 2/27/2008 08-4496 x 4 2015 Grindle, Guy 9/21/2005 06-3634 x 4 2015 Grindle, Guy 04/19/2011 11-0103 X n/a 2018 Gripentrog, Joshua 04/05/2009 09-4877 X n/a 2018 Gross, Michael 6/17/2002 022303 X n/a 2012 Guadan,Ruben M. 5/6/2002 022242 X n/a 2012 Guadan,Ruben M. 4/2/1978 80001182 X n/a 2012 Guerrero, Alma 3/6/2003 032621 X n/a 2012 Guerrero, Alma 6/20/2005 06-3564 x 4 2015 Guerrero, Heliodoro 8/13/2007 08-4313 x 4 2015 Guidry, Bob 06/21/2012 12-0120 X n/a 2018 Guidry, Troy 3/2/2011 11-0062 X n/a 2017 Gutierrez, Ed 9/7/2010 10-0237 x 2 2016 Gutierrez, Edward 11/14/2005 06-3701 x 4 2015 Gutierrez, Edward 4/8/2005 05-3463 x 4 2015 Gutierrez, Edward 12/22/2005 06-3738 x 4 2015 Gutierrez, Edward R. 9/5/2004 053263 X n/a 2012 23 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Gutierrez, Edward R. 6/26/2004 043181 X n/a 2012 Gutierrez, Edward R. 5/8/2003 032724 X n/a 2012 Gutierrez, Fatima 4/26/2011 11-0118 X n/a 2017 Gutierrez, Frank 1/8/2011 11-0013 X n/a 2017 Gutierrez, Nick 8/28/2003 042835 X n/a 2012 Gutierrez, Nick 7/17/2003 042795 X n/a 2012 Gutierrez, Roberto 12/22/2003 042979 X n/a 2012 Gutierrez, Roberto 5/7/2003 032715 X n/a 2012 Gutierrez, Sergio 7/22/2007 08-4290 x 4 2015 Gutierrez, Sergio 04/10/2012 12-0069 X n/a 2018 Gutmann, Steve 8/20/2007 08-4317 x 4 2015 Guy, Bruce 3/24/2005 05-3455 x 4 2015 Guy, Bruce 9/22/2006 07-4023 X n/a 2017 Guy, Bruce 10/01/2005 06-3666 X n/a 2018 Guy, Bruce 09/22/2005 06-3653 X n/a 2018 Guy, Bruce 12/31/2004 07-4072 X n/a 2018 Guy, Bruce D. 11/14/2001 022034 X n/a 2012 Hadley, Brad 8/20/2002 032431 X n/a 2012 Hadley, Brad 3/16/2000 001367 X n/a 2012 Hadley, Weston 5/9/2001 011818 X n/a 2012 Hagen, Kim 7/17/2001 021893 X n/a 2012 Hahm, Stephen 10/31/2002 032615 X n/a 2012 Hahm, Stephen 11/22/2006 07-4083 x 4 2015 Hall, Albert 1/1/2004 042993 X n/a 2012 Hall, Albert 3/22/2002 202186 X n/a 2012 Hand, Bryan 10/1/2001 021986 X n/a 2012 Hanks, Linda J. 1/3/2003 032522 X n/a 2012 Hannon-Audette, Mercy 11/9/2010 10-0279 x 2 2016 Harrison, Joe 12/2/2003 042956 X n/a 2012 Hart, Howard 3/29/1999 99PBS0127 X n/a 2012 Harvey, Sondra 6/9/2004 043167 X n/a 2012 Harvey, Sondra 3/29/2003 032644 X n/a 2012 Harvey, Sondra 4/17/2002 022219 X n/a 2012 Harvey, Sondra 2/24/2005 05-3432 x 4 2015 Harvey, Sondra 10/3/2007 08-4371 x 4 2015 Harvey, Sondra 3/15/2007 07-4179 x 6 2015 Hashempour, Farshid 5/17/2001 011822 X n/a 2012 Hawkins, Cassandra 5/12/2008 08-4575 x 6 2015 Hawkins, Stephen 6/29/2004 043183 X n/a 2012 Hawkins, Stephen 7/23/2002 032337 X n/a 2012 Hawkins, Stephen 12/26/2000 011648 X n/a 2012 Hawley, Ronald 11/5/2003 042910 X n/a 2012 Hawley, Ronald 3/26/2007 07-4182 x 6 2015 Hay, Brian 2/16/2006 06-3801 x 6 2015 24of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Hayes, Jimmy 4/2/2008 08-4526 x 6 2015 Hayes, Jimmy 12/21/2010 10-0312 X n/a 2017 Hayes,Paul 9/20/2000 011602 X n/a 2012 Hayes,Paul 6/5/1995 95PDS0217 x 6 2015 Haynes, Henry 10/16/2001 032525 X n/a 2012 Haynes, Henry 5/16/1994 94PDS0154 X n/a 2012 Haynes, Henry 9/26/2000 01-1559 X n/a 2017 Hebert Scott, Tanya 6/13/2001 011860 X n/a 2012 Heidari, Fred 8/20/2007 08-4318 x 6 2015 Heider, Heather E. 12/15/2003 042973 X n/a 2012 Heider, Heather E. 9/28/2001 021976 X n/a 2012 Helton, Robert T. 5/17/1999 991012 X n/a 2012 Hencke, William 10/10/2001 021998 X n/a 2012 Hencke, William 10/3/2006 07-4037 x 6 2015 Henry, Tod 11/8/2005 06-3695 x 6 2015 Heredia, Joseph 10/28/2010 10-0292 X n/a 2017 Hermans, Matthew D. 5/3/2003 032711 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Andres 3/30/2004 043077 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Andres 1/7/2003 032552 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Andres 6/8/2001 011874 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Arturo 10/11/2007 08-4377 x 6 2015 Hernandez, Edward 12/17/2003 042962 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Edward 10/24/2001 022004 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Elvia 11/13/2001 022035 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Eva 4/2/2003 032654 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Gilbert 12/20/2006 07/4109 x 6 2015 Hernandez, Hector 1/3/2003 032528 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Hector 4/17/2001 011786 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Hector 11/7/2000 011597 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Johnny 8/31/2010 10-0214 x 2 2016 Hernandez, Johnny V. 1/30/2003 032569 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Jose 6/2/1990 90140288 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Jose 12/31/1989 91140018 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Jose 10/15/1985 85002627 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Liz 2/18/2009 09-4840 x 2 2016 Hernandez, Liz 1/31/2005 053403 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Maria 6/16/2006 06-3935 x 6 2015 Hernandez, Mary 6/5/2001 011843 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Pariet 2/20/2003 032594 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Pariet 6/25/2002 032308 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Pariet 4/17/2006 06-3850 x 6 2015 Hernandez, Pariet 11/29/2006 07-4089 x 6 2015 Hernandez, Pariet 5/22/2011 11-0128 X n/a 2017 Hernandez, Renee 8/15/2003 042825 X n/a 2012 25 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Hernandez,Renee 3/11/2002 022173 X n/a 2012 Hernandez,Renee 6/19/2001 011856 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Robert 9/14/2005 06-3624 x 6 2015 Hernandez, Robert 9/29/2009 09-5041 X 17 2016 Hernandez, Robert Y. 11/25/2003 042944 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Robert Y. 7/17/2003 042790 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Robert Y. 5/20/2002 022256 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Robert Y. 2/26/2002 022155 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Robert Y. 10/4/2000 011562 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Rodolfo 6/25/2003 032764 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Rosa M. 6/14/2001 021887 X n/a 2012 Hernandez, Teresa 9/7/2010 10-0221 x 2 2016 Hernandez, Teresa 3/9/2008 08-4506 x 6 2015 Herrera, Andrew 11/20/2004 053371 X n/a 2012 Herrera, Andrew 3/31/2003 032640 X n/a 2012 Herrera, Andrew 1/31/2011 11-0029 X n/a 2017 Herschleb, Daniel 10/1/2009 10-0070 x 2 2016 Hiatt, Kristen 9/21/2006 07-4015 X 6 2015 Hill, Ricky 6/14/2001 011890 X n/a 2012 Hinkle, Carol 4/25/2000 001372 X n/a 2012 Hinojosa, Rehel 2/6/2005 05-3409 X 6 2015 Hittle, Nathan 7/29/2003 042807 X n/a 2012 Hittle, Nathan 3/4/2003 032622 X n/a 2012 Hittle, Nathan 8/7/2006 07-3972 x 6 2015 Hittle, Nathan 6/4/2006 06-3909 x 6 2015 Hodowanec, Leslie 8/21/2004 053258 X n/a 2012 Hodowanec, Leslie 5/13/2004 043134 X n/a 2012 Hodowanec, Leslie 9/24/2007 08-4382 X 6 2015 Hodowanec, Leslie 3/12/2011 11-0067 X n/a 2017 Hoffer, Dennis E. 12/20/2003 042975 X n/a 2012 Hoffer, Dennis E. 11/9/2001 022029 X n/a 2012 Holcomb, James 7/23/2006 07-3953 x 6 2015 Holderman, Michael 5/26/2009 09-4923 x 2 2016 Holderman, Michael 7/8/2003 043152 X n/a 2012 Holderman, Michael 10/2/2002 032443 X n/a 2012 Holderman, Michael 4/25/2001 011800 X n/a 2012 Holderman, Michael 10/10/2000 011570 X n/a 2012 Holderman, Mike 7/17/2007 08-4338 x 6 2015 Holland, Ravel 10/2/2001 021983 X n/a 2012 Holmes, Kimberly 7/31/2000 011484 X n/a 2012 Holquin, Dora 6/9/2005 05-3534 x 6 2015 Holt, Willard 1/31/1996 96FIN0020 x 2 2016 Holt, William 12/7/2006 07-4099 x 6 2015 Hopp, Brian 4/19/2002 022226 X n/a 2012 26 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Howard, Andre 1/31/1997 97PDS0115 X n/a 2012 Hoyos, Oscar 12/23/2004 053378 X n/a 2012 Hoyos, Oscar 5/9/2003 032719 X n/a 2012 Hoyos, Oscar 3/14/2002 022216 X n/a 2012 Hoyos, Oscar 12/13/2000 011631 X n/a 2012 Huerta, Carlos 7/25/2006 07-3958 x 6 2015 Huerta, Carlos 12/23/2006 07-4107 x 6 2015 Hughes, John 9/24/1998 98PDS0321 X n/a 2017 Huizar, Louie 2/25/2002 022154 X n/a 2012 Huizar, Louie 7/11/2001 021900 X n/a 2012 Hummel, Kathryn 12/9/2003 042961 X n/a 2012 Hummel, Kathryn 5/8/2003 032730 X n/a 2012 Humphrey, Donald 6/24/2001 011875 X n/a 2012 Humphrey, Ryan 9/3/2005 06-3626 x 6 2015 Humphrey, Ryan D. 11/3/2004 053325 X n/a 2012 Humphrey, Ryan D. 1/7/2003 032556 X n/a 2012 Humphrey, Ryan D. 12/23/2002 032539 X n/a 2012 Humphrey, Ryan D. 3/21/2002 022192 X n/a 2012 Humphrey, Ryan D. 1/22/2001 022045 X n/a 2012 Hunt, George 9/21/2006 07-4014 x 6 2015 Ibarra, Henry 5/25/2011 11-0136 X n/a 2017 Ibarra,lssac 2/22/2008 08-4495 x 6 2015 Ibarra, Issac 12/31/2007 08-4447 x 6 2015 Ingram, Michael 9/10/2002 032408 X n/a 2012 Irmscher, Bruce 8/5/2003 042805 X n/a 2012 Irmscher, Bruce 4/12/2006 06-3848 x 6 2015 Irwin, Rex 12/16/2003 042966 X n/a 2012 Irwin, Rex 3/29/2002 022191 X n/a 2012 Irwin, Rex 3/4/2005 05-3436 x 6 2015 Irwin, Rex 2/26/2007 07-4158 x 6 2015 Irwin, Rex 6/11/2007 07-4260 x 6 2015 Izac, David 4/22/1997 97FDS0105 x 12 2015 Jackson,Joe 7/7/2004 053194 X n/a 2012 Jansen, David 2/27/2007 07-4176 x 5 2015 Jansen, David 3/30/2005 05-3460 x 5 2015 Janzen,Jake 7/30/1984 85002094 X n/a 2012 Jaramillo, Julio 10/3/2002 011584 X n/a 2012 Jaramillo, Vivian 6/9/2003 032751 X n/a 2012 Jarusek, Charles 9/14/1999 001171 X n/a 2012 Jarusek, Charles 3/10/1999 99PDS0081 X n/a 2012 Jarusek, Charles 3/10/1999 99PDS0081 X n/a 2012 Jason,John 6/1/2002 022271 X n/a 2012 Jason, John 1/3/2000 001263 X n/a 2012 Jason, John 9/5/2006 07-3997 x 5 2015 27 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Jason, John 9/5/2007 08-4339 x 5 2015 Jason, John 4/19/2004 04-3106 x 14 2016 Jason, John 2/4/2000 00-1300 x 14 2016 Jason, John 2/6/2008 08-4480 x 5 2015 Jilek, Gabriela 5/3/2011 11-0112 X n/a 2017 Jimenez, Rodrigo 5/31/2010 10-0117 x 2 2016 Jimenez, Rodrigo 6/1/2011 11-0138 X n/a 2017 Jiron, Pedro 11/2/2001 022025 X n/a 2012 Jiron, Pedro 11/1/2007 08-4404 x 5 2015 Aron, Pedro 10/25/2007 08-4405 x 5 2015 Johannessen,Oddsverre 5/12/2004 043131 X n/a 2012 Johannessen,Oddsverre 4/30/2008 08-4565 x 5 2015 Johnson, Dean 5/20/2003 032727 X n/a 2012 Johnson, Dean 4/18/2003 032688 X n/a 2012 Johnson, Dean 4/16/2001 011802 X n/a 2012 Johnson, Dean 12/24/2005 06-3728 x 5 2015 Johnson, Dean 1/31/2006 06-3786 x 5 2015 Johnson, Dean 11/22/2006 07-4084 x 5 2015 Johnson, John 11/29/2000 011729 X n/a 2012 Johnson, John 12/1/1986 87003511 X n/a 2012 Johnson, John 10/20/1982 82001058 X n/a 2012 Johnson, Laura 10/4/2000 011564 X n/a 2012 Jones, David 12/12/1990 90140495 X n/a 2017 Jones, Irene 11/3/2003 042938 X n/a 2012 Jones, Irene 10/10/2002 032439 X n/a 2012 Jones, Teresa 1/25/2004 043014 X n/a 2012 Jones, Teresa 2/5/2001 011717 X n/a 2012 Jones, Teresa 10/3/1998 98PBS0330 X n/a 2012 Jones, Teresa 12/3/2006 07-4090 x 5 2015 Jones, Vera 8/19/2004 053248 X n/a 2012 Jones, Vera 4/18/2001 011788 X n/a 2012 Jones, Vera 9/15/1999 001160 X n/a 2012 Jones, Vera 5/7/1998 98PDN0157 X n/a 2012 Juarez,Frank 6/6/2004 043158 X n/a 2012 Juarez, Katherine 5/25/2005 05-3516 x 5 2015 Juarez,Teresa 12/6/2004 053358 X n/a 2012 Judson, Michael 7/12/1998 98PDS0243 X n/a 2012 Jurado, Jennie 7/20/2001 021923 X n/a 2012 Jurado, Jennie 2/5/2005 05-3140 x 5 2015 Jurado, Rogelio 6/5/2001 011844 X n/a 2012 Kabia, Amadu 12/14/2007 08-4443 x 5 2015 Kagle, David 12/6/1999 001301 X n/a 2012 Keating, Kenneth 3/26/2007 07-4184 x 5 2015 Keaton, Edward 9/24/2004 053289 X n/a 2012 28 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Keaton, Edward 6/3/2003 032745 X n/a 2012 Kennedy, Donald 5/5/2001 011816 X n/a 2012 Kennedy, Donald 9/25/2005 06-3654 x 5 2015 Kennedy, Donald 4/13/2004 04-3099 x 5 2015 Khoury, Naiim S. 3/13/2003 032627 X n/a 2012 Kilgore, Bruce D. 10/18/2001 022002 X n/a 2012 Kim, Camillo 5/5/2008 08-4568 x 5 2015 Kim, Camillo 1/23/2011 11-0019 X n/a 2017 Kim, Eugene 12/16/2002 032512 X n/a 2012 Kim, Sandy 2/12/2011 11-0040 X n/a 2017 Kirkpatrick, Caprice 11/17/2004 053397 X n/a 2012 Kirkpatrick, Caprice 8/14/2003 042833 X n/a 2012 Kirkpatrick, Caprice 11/28/2002 032499 X n/a 2012 Kirkpatrick, Caprice 11/3/2006 07-4135 x 5 2015 Klein, Lynnette 9/2/2001 021952 X n/a 2012 Klein, Lynnette 7/1/1997 98PDN00ll X n/a 2012 Kloss, Eli 8/18/2005 06-3600 x 11 2015 Kozakowski, Don 9/3/2006 07-3992 x 11 2015 Kozakowski, Donald 2/20/2004 043037 X n/a 2012 Kozakowski, Donald 8/27/2000 011514 X n/a 2012 Kozakowski, Donald 6/30/2000 011441 X n/a 2012 Kozakowski, Mark 3/8/2001 011812 X n/a 2012 Kramer, Paul 1/15/2002 022105 X n/a 2012 Kron, Kevin 8/23/2007 08-4328 x it 2015 Krutsinger, Jeff 3/4/2010 10-0052 X n/a 2017 Krutsinger, Jeffrey 10/13/2010 10-0247 X n/a 2017 Kuplast, Michael 12/16/2004 053367 X n/a 2012 Kuplast, Michael 11/3/2006 07-4065 x 5 2015 Lackey, William 11/30/2002 032509 X n/a 2012 Lacy, Robert 5/5/2005 05-3498 x 11 2015 Lacy, Robert J. 5/22/2002 022259 X n/a 2012 Laguna, Enrique 9/24/2004 053294 X n/a 2012 Laguna, Enrique 9/15/2003 042857 X n/a 2012 Laguna, Enrique 9/19/2002 032420 X n/a 2012 Laguna, Enrique 4/19/2006 06-3863 x 11 2015 Laguna, Henry 1/17/2007 07-4138 x 11 2015 Lai, Anthony 4/29/2004 043124 X n/a 2012 Lambert, Doris 10/13/2004 053306 X n/a 2012 Lambert, Doris 2/27/2006 06-3881 x 11 2015 Lam phear,Joseph 7/13/1984 84002250 X n/a 2012 Lampman, David 4/21/2010 10-0084 x 2 2016 Lampman, David 11/7/2003 042918 X n/a 2012 Lampman, David 8/21/2002 032378 X n/a 2012 Lampman, David 1/12/2006 06-3759 x 11 2015 29of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Lampman, David 9/14/2005 Lampman, David 8/24/2006 Lampman, Debbie 3/17/2009 Lampman, Debbie 2/17/2011 Landeros,Lupe 2/11/2003 Lanzner, Lewis 8/6/2004 Lanzner, Lewis 6/20/2002 Lanzner, Lewis 9/20/2006 Lanzner, Lewis 2/12/2008 Lappin, Olgvanna P. 12/19/2001 Lappin, Olgvanna P. 10/5/2000 Lara, Jose Luis 12/1/2004 Lara, Patricia 3/4/2002 Lara, Patricia 8/20/1998 Lara, Ron 1/20/2002 Lara, Ron 8/18/2000 Lara, Ron 12/9/2006 Lares, Jessica 6/19/2001 Larry, Leotis 6/16/2003 Larry, Leotis 11/27/2002 Larry, Leotis 4/9/2002 Larsen, James 9/11/2004 Larsen, James 1/18/2007 Larsen, James 11/5/2003 Larsen, James 7/9/2007 Larsen, James 8/3/2008 Larsen, James 3/23/2005 Larsen, James 3/9/2007 Larsen, James 3/5/2006 Laser, Amanda 12/16/2005 Lassiter, Maureen 7/19/2000 Latos, Robert 10/15/2005 Launi, Jeff 1/8/2004 Laura, Rommel 7/25/2010 Laura, Rommel 4/25/2008 Lazarine-Mccarty, Lorraine 10/21/2004 Lazarine-Mccarty, Lorraine 7/14/2003 Le Geyt, Kelvin 5/29/2005 Leach, Stephanie 3/20/2003 Leach, Stephanie 7/14/2005 Learner, Bruce 3/9/2005 Learner, Bruce 1/20/2004 Lechuga, Gerardo S. 1/6/2003 Lecours, Philip 3/6/2006 Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year 06-3641 x 11 2015 07-4040 x 11 2015 09-4851 x 17 2016 11-0046 X n/a 2017 032583 X n/a 2012 053232 X n/a 2012 022294 X n/a 2012 07-4013 x 11 2015 08-4483 x 11 2015 022068 X n/a 2012 011563 X n/a 2012 053406 X n/a 2012 022163 X n/a 2012 98LIB0280 X n/a 2012 022103 X n/a 2012 011513 X n/a 2012 07-4100 x it 2015 011859 X n/a 2012 032752 X n/a 2012 032494 X n/a 2012 022204 X n/a 2012 05-3269 x 11 2015 07/4133 x 11 2015 04-2927 x it 2015 08-4283 x it 2015 09-4665 x 11 2015 05-3458 x 11 2015 07-4170 x 11 2015 06-3830 x 11 2015 06-3721 x 11 2015 01-1469 x 11 2015 06-3799 x 11 2015 04-3015 x 11 2015 10-0179 x 2 2016 08-4559 x 11 2015 05-3309 x 11 2015 04-2784 x 11 2015 05-3519 x 19 2015 032639 X n/a 2012 06-3572 x 11 2015 05-3556 x 16 2016 043011 X n/a 2012 032538 X n/a 2012 06-3813 x 11 2015 30 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Lecours, Philip 11/9/2005 06-3692 x 11 2015 Lecours, Philip 7/11/2006 07-3946 x 11 2015 Lee, Dianna 2/8/2003 032589 X n/a 2012 Lee, Dianna 8/23/2002 032379 X n/a 2012 Lee,Tony 4/8/2004 043096 X n/a 2012 Lee,Tony 12/31/2003 042999 X n/a 2012 Lee,Tony 1/6/2011 11-0007 X n/a 2017 Lee, Zandra 5/1/2002 022235 X n/a 2012 Leftige, Ronald 5/14/2010 10-0114 x 3 2016 Leftige, Ronald 11/6/2004 053328 X n/a 2012 Leftige, Ronald 2/26/2008 08-4492 x 11 2015 Leftige, Ronald 11/4/2006 07-4067 x 11 2015 Leftige, Ronald 6/3/2005 05-3527 x 19 2015 Leftige, Ronald 8/18/2006 07-3979 x 19 2015 Leifkes, Rebecca 9/26/2002 032428 X n/a 2012 Leiva, Carol 8/4/2005 06-3584 x 19 2015 Lenz, Evelyn 9/26/2007 08-4365 x 3 2016 Leos, Joseph 9/21/2006 07-4017 x 19 2015 Leos, JosephL. 12/9/2002 032510 X n/a 2012 Leos, JosephL. 11/25/2002 032497 X n/a 2012 Leos, Joseph L. 11/8/2002 032486 X n/a 2012 Levatino, Anthony 12/2/2004 053353 X n/a 2012 Lewellen, Melvin 7/18/2002 032334 X n/a 2012 Lewellen, Melvin 4/16/2002 022213 X n/a 2012 Lewis, Brenda E. 7/4/2002 032310 X n/a 2012 Lim, Sonny 5/5/2007 07-4218 x 19 2015 Lima, David 7/12/2000 011453 X n/a 2012 Linares, Katherine 3/26/2011 11-0077 X n/a 2017 Little, Brian 10/24/2007 08-4398 x 19 2015 Livingston, James 12/11/2003 042974 X n/a 2012 Livingston, James 1/17/2001 011752 X n/a 2012 Livingston, James 1/25/2007 07-4143 x 19 2015 Lizardi, Oscar 9/10/2000 011531 X n/a 2012 Lizardi, Oscar 12/29/2005 06-3739 x 19 2015 Lockwood, Michael 3/8/2004 043064 X n/a 2012 Lockwood, Michael 3/19/2003 032636 X n/a 2012 Lockwood, Michael 11/27/2001 022048 X n/a 2012 Loepz, Vincent 3/30/2006 06-3842 x 19 2015 Lofton, Oliver 2/23/2002 022149 X n/a 2012 Lofton, Oliver 12/19/2001 022071 X n/a 2012 Lomeli, Paula 1/6/2004 043133 X n/a 2012 Lopez, Alejandro 4/20/2004 043113 X n/a 2012 Lopez, Alejandro 2/23/2004 043038 X n/a 2012 Lopez, Alejandro 6/26/2002 032315 X n/a 2012 31 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Lopez, Alejandro 4/4/2002 022195 X n/a 2012 Lopez, Alejandro 12/1/2000 011630 X n/a 2012 Lopez, Alejandro 2/16/2005 05-3422 x 19 2015 Lopez, Alejandro 5/18/2005 05-3509 x 19 2015 Lopez, Christina 1/17/2001 011713 X n/a 2012 Lopez, David 1/7/2003 032554 X n/a 2012 Lopez, David 3/1/2007 07-4164 x 19 2015 Lopez, Diego 2/18/2005 05-3427 x 19 2015 Lopez,Eva 4/3/2002 022230 X n/a 2012 Lopez, Jaime 12/4/2003 042955 X n/a 2012 Lopez, Jaime 2/18/2005 05-3426 x 19 2015 Lopez, Jaime 10/21/2005 06-3683 x 19 2015 Lopez, Jesse 9/8/2004 053265 X n/a 2012 Lopez, Jesse 11/3/2005 06-3688 x 19 2015 Lopez, Jorge 9/26/2002 032434 X n/a 2012 Lopez, Jorge 5/20/2008 08-4579 x 19 2015 Lopez, Jorge 12/5/2006 07-4093 x 19 2015 Lopez, Jorge 2/23/2011 11-0058 X n/a 2017 Lopez, Juan 5/29/2001 011839 X n/a 2012 Lopez, Mario 7/22/2011 11-0200 X n/a 2017 Lopez, Patricia 8/15/2011 11-0216 X n/a 2017 Lopez, Sandra 9/21/2005 06-3638 x 19 2015 Lopez, Sandra 1/30/2008 08-4473 x 19 2015 Lopez, SandraL. 1/16/2003 032541 X n/a 2012 Lopez, SandraL. 10/31/2000 011587 X n/a 2012 Lopez, Valerie 4/13/2005 05-3472 x 19 2015 Lopez, Vincent 2/14/2011 11-0044 X n/a 2017 Lopez, Vincent A. 11/6/2002 032477 X n/a 2012 Lopez, Vincent A. 2/4/2002 022128 X n/a 2012 Lopez, Vincent A. 12/8/2000 011627 X n/a 2012 Lopez -Hidalgo, Arthur 5/21/2004 043147 X n/a 2012 Lopez -Hidalgo, Arthur 6/2/2006 06-3906 x 9 2015 Lozano, Efren 1/15/2002 022118 X n/a 2012 Lucas, Charmaine 12/2/2003 89140191 X n/a 2012 Lucas, Charmaine 8/1/2003 042830 X n/a 2012 Lucas, Charmaine 8/1/2003 042829 X n/a 2012 Lucas, Charmaine 8/24/1994 94PDN0270 X n/a 2012 Lucas, Ted 11/13/2004 053335 X n/a 2012 Lucas,Ted 11/28/2003 042942 X n/a 2012 Luis, Alfonso 4/18/2003 032690 X n/a 2012 Lujan, Mario 8/19/2003 042824 X n/a 2012 Lujan, Mario 1/26/2001 022011 X n/a 2012 Lujan, Mario 12/18/2000 011644 X n/a 2012 Lujan, Mario 12/17/2001 02-2065 x 19 2015 32 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Luna, Elisa 10/18/2004 053386 X n/a 2012 Luna, Frank 1/9/2001 011777 X n/a 2012 Luna, Frank 1/9/2001 011776 X n/a 2012 Luna, Frank 1/9/2001 011774 X n/a 2012 Luna, Frank 1/8/2001 011715 X n/a 2012 Luna, Frank 6/1/1998 011775 X n/a 2012 Luna,Pedro 3/1/2001 011720 X n/a 2012 Luna,Pedro 8/4/2009 09-4991 x 14 2016 Luna,Pedro 9/1/2005 06-3610 x 19 2015 Luna,Ray 10/11/2004 053313 X n/a 2012 Luclue,Nymia 4/30/2002 022231 X n/a 2012 Lynwood, Jesse 8/3/2010 10-0198 X n/a 2017 Lynwood, Jesse 1/5/2011 11-0015 X n/a 2017 Lynwood, Jesse 5/12/2011 11-0153 X n/a 2017 Macchiaroli, Michelle 6/20/2004 043173 X n/a 2012 Macchiaroli, Michelle 3/1/2007 07-4166 x 9 2015 Macchiaroli, Michelle 9/21/2005 06-3647 x 9 2015 Macias, Javier 2/26/2001 011718 X n/a 2012 Macias, Manuel 8/17/2004 053245 X n/a 2012 Macias, Manuel 10/22/2002 032456 X n/a 2012 Macias, Manuel 4/30/2006 06-3885 x 12 2015 Macias, Miguel 5/31/2006 063904 X n/a 2012 Macias, Miguel 4/9/2003 032674 X n/a 2012 Macias, Miguel 9/7/2002 032409 X n/a 2012 Macias, Miguel 4/10/2001 011785 X n/a 2012 Macias, Miguel 3/23/2000 001341 X n/a 2012 Macias, Miguel 3/6/1990 90140099 X n/a 2012 Maciha, Greg 12/4/2006 07-4092 x 12 2015 Maciha, Gregory 1/30/2005 053398 X n/a 2012 Mack, Margaret 5/23/2001 011847 X n/a 2012 Maculsay, Hilary 5/16/2008 08-4578 x 12 2015 Maddox, Carmen 8/13/2003 043022 X n/a 2012 Maddox, Carmen 3/1/2000 001347 X n/a 2012 Maddox, Carmen 1/1/1991 91140012 X n/a 2012 Maddox, James 8/24/1997 97PDS0264 X n/a 2012 Maddox, James 9/2/1991 91140290 X n/a 2012 Maddox, Madeleine 8/20/2002 032374 X n/a 2012 Madrigal, Osiel 5/11/2004 043132 X n/a 2012 Maffey, Ricardo 9/16/2004 053292 X n/a 2012 Magana, Rigo 1/12/2007 07-4129 x 12 2015 Magana, Rigo 7/15/2006 07-4006 x 12 2015 Magana, Rigo 4/26/2006 06-3869 x 12 2015 Magee, Albert 12/10/2001 022091 X n/a 2012 Magee, Albert 8/24/2001 021936 X n/a 2012 33of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Mahany, Donald 3/7/1998 98FD50073 x 3 2016 Mahany, Donald 9/15/2004 053273 X n/a 2012 Mahany, Donald 6/22/2004 043176 X n/a 2012 Mahany, Donald 4/23/2006 06-3872 x 19 2015 Maiocco, Michael 9/23/2001 021979 X n/a 2012 Maiocco, Michael 2/1/2005 05-3418 x 12 2015 Maiocco, Michael 7/4/2011 11-0173 X n/a 2017 Majors, Eric 6/19/2007 07-4255 x 12 2015 Maldonado, Miguel 10/1/2006 07-4021 x 12 2015 Manning, John 8/24/2009 09-5097 x 19 2015 Manzo, Alexander 4/9/2003 032665 X n/a 2012 Manzo, Alexander 2/15/2001 011702 X n/a 2012 Manzo, Alexander 12/21/2011 12-0006 X n/a 2018 Manzo, Victor 11/21/2006 07-4082 x 12 2015 Marban, Enrique 7/8/2002 032321 X n/a 2012 Marckstadt, Richard 2/24/2004 043047 X n/a 2012 Marckstadt, Richard 10/15/2002 032473 X n/a 2012 Marckstadt, Richard 4/30/2001 011832 X n/a 2012 Marckstadt, Richard 1/12/2006 06-3754 x 12 2015 Marckstadt, Richard 9/16/2005 06-3632 x 12 2015 Marckstadt, Richard 9/4/2006 07-3991 x 12 2015 Marckstadt, Richard 6/14/2005 05-3549 x 12 2015 Marckstadt, Richard 08/02/2012 12-0150 X n/a 2018 Marckstadt, Rick 12/20/2005 03-2724 x 3 2016 Marek, Carl 08/13/2012 12-0155 X n/a 2018 Mariani, Hector 9/22/1999 001162 X n/a 2012 Marinello, Dennis 8/16/2004 053240 X n/a 2012 Marinello, Dennis 12/14/2000 011714 X n/a 2012 Marinello, Dennis 7/31/2008 09-4653 x 9 2015 Marinello, Dennis 5/28/2006 06-3902 x 9 2015 Marinello, Dennis 9/8/2006 07-4002 x 9 2015 Marinello, Dennis 7/30/2006 07-3967 x 12 2015 Marinello, Dennis O1/31/2011 11-0027 X n/a 2018 Maroyoqui, Gus 11/21/2007 08-4422 x 21 2015 Marquez, Gilbert 10/30/2000 011589 X n/a 2012 Marquez, Grady 8/9/2001 021935 X n/a 2012 Marquez, Grady 11/19/2006 07-4079 x 9 2015 Marquez, Grady 08/19/2009 09-5008 X n/a 2018 Martinez, Carlos 10/15/2003 042893 X n/a 2012 Martinez, John 12/30/2005 06-3737 x 26 2015 Martinez, John 03/10/2006 06-3807 X n/a 2018 Martinez, Jose 7/23/2004 053219 X n/a 2012 Martinez, Jose 2/27/2002 022157 X n/a 2012 Martinez, Jose 7/15/2001 021894 X n/a 2012 34 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Martinez, Jose 4/16/2001 011783 X n/a 2012 Martinez, Jose 9/19/2000 011551 X n/a 2012 Martinez, Jose 8/27/2008 09-4687 x 26 2015 Martinez, Jose 6/30/2011 11-0163 X n/a 2017 Martinez, Jose 1/19/2005 05-3405 X n/a 2017 Martinez, Jose 01/20/2005 06-3808 X n/a 2018 Martinez, Jose 04/29/2003 03-2700 X n/a 2018 Martinez, Jose 07/02/2004 05-3191 X n/a 2018 Martinez, Julia 08/05/2012 12-0152 X n/a 2018 Martinez,Leobardo 03/12/2012 12-0056 X n/a 2018 Martinez, Louie 06/26/2004 04-3180 X n/a 2018 Martinez, Maria Esther 2/25/2005 05-3434 x 14 2015 Martinez, Nancy 12/29/2003 042988 X n/a 2012 Martinez, Obet 4/7/2011 11-0093 X n/a 2017 Martinez, Sal 3/7/2005 05-3438 x 26 2015 Martinez, Sal 0. 7/11/2003 042778 X n/a 2012 Marty, Joseph 2/6/2008 08-4487 x 26 2015 Marty, Joseph 12/24/2005 06-3748 x 26 2015 Marty, Joseph 2/15/2011 11-0045 X n/a 2017 Masip, Daniel 3/2/2004 043051 X n/a 2012 Masip, Daniel 1/12/2004 043003 X n/a 2012 Masip, Daniel 12/8/2003 042960 X n/a 2012 Masip, Daniel 8/8/2006 07-3974 x 26 2015 Masip, Daniel 1/9/2006 06-3751 x 26 2015 Masip, Daniel 12/6/2010 10-0297 X n/a 2017 Masip, Daniel 12/31/2006 09-4846 X n/a 2018 Mason, David W. 2/14/2002 022144 X n/a 2012 Mason, Deanna M. 2/25/2004 043044 X n/a 2012 Mason, Deanna M. 12/9/2000 011628 X n/a 2012 Mathers, John 2/16/2002 022152 X n/a 2012 Mathers, John 9/11/2007 08-4349 x 26 2015 Mathews, Brian J. 7/31/2002 032392 X n/a 2012 Matlock, Kyle D. 8/30/2001 021950 X n/a 2012 Mattke, Eric 2/7/2001 011696 X n/a 2012 Matulin, Ann 5/2/2001 011810 X n/a 2012 May, Robert 4/16/2003 032675 X n/a 2012 Mayo, Brad 5/29/2008 08-4590 x 26 2015 Mayo, Brad 10/3/2007 08-4389 x 26 2015 Mayo, Brad 12/15/2004 05-3365 x 26 2015 Mayo, Brad 7/22/2008 09-4650 x 26 2015 Mayo, Brad 06/06/2011 11-0176 X n/a 2018 Mayorga, Raul 4/15/2008 08-4542 x 26 2015 Mayorga, Raul 8/20/2007 08-4316 x 26 2015 Mccarthy, Michael 3/1/2007 07-4165 x 26 2015 35of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year McCarthy, Michael 2/16/2003 03-2597 x 26 2015 McCarthy, Michael 8/20/2001 02-1925 x 26 2015 McCarthy, Michael 8/9/2003 04-2851 x 26 2015 McCarthy, Michael 12/6/2000 01-1626 x 26 2015 McCarthy, Michael 9/18/2003 04-2863 x 26 2015 McCarthy, Michael 8/4/2004 05-3235 x 26 2015 McCarthy, Michael 6/27/2005 05-3554 x 26 2015 McCarthy, Mike O1/15/2009 09-4814 X n/a 2018 Mcclary 11/30/2000 01-1604 x 28 2015 Mcclaskey, Paul 7/18/2009 09-4978 X n/a 2017 McClelland, Tracy 7/23/2004 05-3215 x 26 2015 McCoy, Daniel 8/25/2001 02-1978 x 28 2015 McCoy, William 2/5/2002 02-2299 x 14 2015 McCoy, William 8/11/2001 02-1930 x 26 2015 McCoy, William 9/28/1998 98FDS0349 x 26 2015 McCoy, William 7/26/1997 97FDS0263 x 28 2015 McCoy, William 9/3/2001 02-1981 x 28 2015 McCoy, William 7/22/1991 91140256 x 28 2015 Mcdaniel, James A. 4/22/1998 98PDS0139 X n/a 2012 Mcdaniel, James A. 2/11/1998 98PDS0057 X n/a 2012 Mcdaniel, James A. 6/13/1997 97PDS0186 X n/a 2012 Mcdaniel, James A. 5/7/1997 97PDS0129 X n/a 2012 Mcdaniel, James A. 9/14/1996 96PDS0250 X n/a 2012 Mcdaniel, James A. 12/25/1989 89140354 X n/a 2012 Mcdermott, Daniel 5/6/2001 011819 X n/a 2012 Mcdermott, Daniel 5/13/2000 001389 X n/a 2012 Mcdermott, Daniel 9/17/1998 98PDS0317 X n/a 2012 Mcdermott, Daniel 11/30/2007 08-4430 x 26 2015 Mcdermott, Daniel 9/14/2006 07-4004 x 26 2015 Mcdermott, Daniel 5/16/2005 06-3757 x 26 2015 Mcdermott, Mark J. 7/29/2003 042815 X n/a 2012 Mcewan, James 3/5/2004 043054 X n/a 2012 Mcewan, James 7/21/2003 042792 X n/a 2012 Mcewen, James 2/23/2005 05-3430 x 26 2015 Mcgeachy, Douglas 8/8/2001 021912 X n/a 2012 Mchugh, Patrick 1/11/1999 99FDS0025 X n/a 2012 Mchugh, Patrick 11/26/1998 99FDS0027 X n/a 2012 Mchugh, Patrick 8/18/2007 08-4319 x 26 2015 Mchugh, Patrick 7/3/2005 06-3582 x 26 2015 Mchugh, Steven 5/21/1999 991048 X n/a 2012 Mcleod, Matthew L. 6/29/2003 042769 X n/a 2012 Mcmanus, Eugene 9/30/2003 042870 X n/a 2012 Mcmanus, Eugene 2/19/2002 022160 X n/a 2012 Mcmanus, Eugene 3/22/1992 92240079 X n/a 2012 36 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Mcnatt, Victer 12/15/2003 042964 X n/a 2012 Mcnatt, Victer 4/9/2002 022199 X n/a 2012 Mcpeck, Kim 12/10/2009 09-5120 x 3 2016 Meacham, Mike D. 6/3/1999 991036 X n/a 2012 Medibles, Carmen 2/8/2006 06-3790 x 26 2015 Medina, Eveniser 11/9/2010 10-0281 x 3 2016 Medina, Octavio 6/7/2006 06-3915 x 26 2015 Medina, Octavio 4/24/2005 05-3480 x 26 2015 Medina, Octavio 12/8/2006 07-4101 x 26 2015 Medina, Octavio 9/1/2006 07-3994 x 26 2015 Medina, Octavio 12/10/2010 10-0306 X n/a 2017 Medina, Octavio A. 1/10/2003 032549 X n/a 2012 Medina, Octavio A. 6/11/2002 022287 X n/a 2012 Medina, Octavio A. 10/10/2000 011571 X n/a 2012 Medina, Yvonne 6/2/2001 011846 X n/a 2012 Medina, Yvonne 2/19/2000 011878 X n/a 2012 Medrano, Eddie 5/6/2009 09-4968 x 3 2016 Medrano, Edward 9/16/2007 08-4359 x 26 2015 Mejia, Jerry 9/24/2007 08-4362 x 26 2015 Mejia, Nancy 1/22/2011 11-0022 X n/a 2017 Melendez, Carlos 4/26/2011 11-0117 X n/a 2017 Melendez, Jose 6/10/2002 022280 X n/a 2012 Melendez, Lisa 4/22/2002 022241 X n/a 2012 Melgar, Armandina 4/22/1998 98FIN0182 X n/a 2012 Melgoza, Tirzo 9/9/1991 022109 X n/a 2012 Melton, James 4/30/2002 022228 X n/a 2012 Melton, James 3/5/2001 011742 X n/a 2012 Melton, James 8/2/2000 001490 X n/a 2012 Melton, James 8/26/2005 06-3606 x 26 2015 Melton, James 10/17/2005 06-3677 x 26 2015 Mendez, Edward 8/9/1999 011515 X n/a 2012 Mendez, Edward 4/1/1999 99PWM0112 X n/a 2012 Mendez, Edward 8/4/1997 97PWM0247 x 14 2015 Mendoza, Ben 2/11/2010 10-0034 x 3 2016 Mendoza, Benjamin 2/18/2004 043034 X n/a 2012 Mendoza, Benjamin 8/1/2001 021915 X n/a 2012 Mendoza, Benjamin 9/27/2007 08-4363 x 26 2015 Mendoza, Eddie 2/6/2007 07-4140 x 21 2015 Mendoza, Edward 2/27/2004 043045 X n/a 2012 Mendoza, Edward 2/21/2011 11-0050 X n/a 2017 Mendoza, Francisco 8/6/2007 08-4303 x 14 2015 Mendoza, Jaime 5/28/2008 08-4583 x 3 2016 Mendoza, Jose 12/29/2008 09-4800 x 3 2016 Mendoza, Jose 2/18/2007 07-4156 x 21 2015 37of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Mendoza, Jose 7/15/2007 08-4285 x 21 2015 Mendoza, Roberto 3/24/2004 043075 X n/a 2012 Mendoza, Roberto 4/8/2003 032682 X n/a 2012 Mendoza, Rosalinda 8/28/2007 08-4329 x 21 2015 Menendez, Nelson 6/13/2000 011569 X n/a 2012 Menendez, Nelson 4/5/2005 05-3466 x 21 2015 Menendez, Nelson 5/15/2011 11-0119 X n/a 2017 Menendez, Nelson 11/28/2010 11-0004 X n/a 2017 Mercer, Brian 12/5/2009 '09-5115 x 3 2016 Mercer, Brian 10/14/2007 08-4378 x 21 2015 Mercer, Brian 5/10/2007 07-4226 x 21 2015 Mercer, Brian 7/10/2009 09-4967 X n/a 2017 Merner, Suzanne 3/4/2009 09-4841 x 3 2016 Merner, Suzanne 7/6/2009 09-4960 x 3 2016 Merner, Suzanne 4/12/2009 09-4871 X n/a 2017 Merner, Suzanne 1/13/2010 10-0043 X n/a 2017 Merritt, William 7/7/2004 053193 X n/a 2012 Merritt, William 4/14/2003 032680 X n/a 2012 Merritt, William 1/26/1999 99WOM0035 X n/a 2012 Meza, Evelyn 8/19/2002 032377 X n/a 2012 Meza,Socorro 6/9/2008 08-4602 x 21 2015 Miller, Jay 11/28/2008 09-4784 x 3 2016 Miller, Jay 10/20/2010 10-0260 x 3 2016 Miller, Jay 8/3/2010 10-0182 x 3 2016 Miller, lay 8/1/2006 07-3969 x 21 2015 Miramontes, Norma 4/19/2004 043109 X n/a 2012 Miramontes, Norma 11/4/2002 032495 X n/a 2012 Miranda, Erik 10/26/2008 09-4751 x 3 2016 Miranda, Erik 4/14/2007 07-4206 x 21 2015 Miranda, Gary 1/7/2010 10-0004 x 3 2016 Miranda, Gary J. 9/9/2004 053268 X n/a 2012 Miranda, Gary J. 11/11/2001 022036 X n/a 2012 Miranda, Gary J. 6/21/2000 001434 X n/a 2012 Miranda, Tony 11/10/2008 09-4771 x 3 2016 Mochizuki, Kyle W. 4/5/2001 Rsry Firefighter X n/a 2012 Moeller, Blaine 6/14/2001 011863 X n/a 2012 Molina, Gilbert 11/4/2008 09-4764 x 3 2016 Molina, Gilbert 6/6/2004 043159 X n/a 2012 Molina, Gilbert 11/19/2003 042928 X n/a 2012 Molina, Gilbert 11/4/2002 032466 X n/a 2012 Molina, Gilbert 7/10/2001 021892 X n/a 2012 Molina, Gilbert 5/28/2001 011835 X n/a 2012 Monreal, Manual 7/1/2008 09-4618 x 21 2015 Monreal, Manual 2/12/2008 08-4484 x 21 2015 38of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Monreal, Manuel 10/19/2008 09-4745 x 3 2016 Monreal, Manuel 2/21/2011 11-0053 X n/a 2017 Monreal, Manuel 9/6/2009 09-5022 X n/a 2017 Montalvo, Jessica 10/19/2009 09-5061 X n/a 2017 Montiel, Juan 4/16/2007 07-4197 x 21 2015 Monville, Sean 4/27/2008 08-4584 x 3 2016 Monville, Sean 1/5/2007 07-4130 x 21 2015 Mooney, Hugh 5/10/2001 022021 X n/a 2012 Moore, Franklin Terry 10/17/2001 022010 X n/a 2012 Moorhouse, Danny D. 8/7/2000 011503 X n/a 2012 Morales, Arthur 12/17/2003 042967 X n/a 2012 Morales, Arthur 1/31/2001 011692 X n/a 2012 Morales, Janet 11/17/2003 042935 X n/a 2012 Morales, Janet 7/31/2002 032348 X n/a 2012 Morales, Janet 7/28/1998 98PBPO266 X n/a 2012 Morales, Javier 5/15/2007 07-4230 x 21 2015 Moran, George 4/6/2009 09-4870 x 3 2016 Moran, George 9/18/2003 042859 X n/a 2012 Moran, George 5/25/2006 06-3899 x 21 2015 Moran, George 1/17/2006 06-3763 x 21 2015 Moreno, Damian 3/24/2009 09-4857 x 3 2016 Moreno, Damian 4/10/2008 08-4541 x 21 2015 Moreno, Daniel E. 2/19/2003 032593 X n/a 2012 Moreno, Eddie 9/10/2004 053274 X n/a 2012 Moreno, Eddie 8/18/2004 053244 X n/a 2012 Moreno, Jessica 6/20/2001 011868 X n/a 2012 Moreno, Jorge E. 6/11/2002 022289 X n/a 2012 Moreno, Manuel 2/21/2008 08-4494 x 3 2016 Moreno, Manuel 5/6/2004 043127 X n/a 2012 Moreno, Manuel 1/15/2004 043009 X n/a 2012 Moreno, Manuel 12/6/2003 042959 X n/a 2012 Moreno, Manuel 3/4/2003 032614 X n/a 2012 Moreno, Manuel 9/23/2002 032417 X n/a 2012 Moreno, Manuel 4/8/2005 05-3465 x 21 2015 Moreno, Stephen 5/26/2007 07-4247 x 21 2015 Moreno, Stephen L. 5/11/2003 032716 X n/a 2012 Moreno, Stephen L. 7/11/2002 032320 X n/a 2012 Moreno, Stephen L. 12/12/2000 011632 X n/a 2012 Morgan, Jeffrey 5/27/2001 011837 X n/a 2012 Moriel, Oscar 2/8/2003 032588 X n/a 2012 Moriel, Oscar 3/7/2002 022165 X n/a 2012 Moriel, Oscar 7/26/2007 08-4295 x 21 2015 Moroyoqui, Diana 8/23/2001 021928 X n/a 2012 Moroyoqui, Gus 12/14/2006 07-4103 x 21 2015 39 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Moroyoqui, Gustavo 4/28/2003 032697 X n/a 2012 Moroyoqui, Gustavo 2/25/2003 032617 X n/a 2012 Mosqueda, Edward 9/20/2006 07-4011 x 3 2016 Mosqueda, Edward 7/15/2009 09-4974 x 3 2016 Mosqueda, Edward 6/6/2011 11-0140 x 3 2016 Mosqueda, Edward 3/11/2010 10-0057 x 4 2016 Mosqueda, Edward 12/29/2009 09-5133 x 4 2016 Mosqueda, Edward 9/19/2006 07-4008 x 4 2016 Mosqueda, Edward 6/27/2010 10-0152 x 4 2016 Mosqueda, Edward 8/12/2007 08-4311 x 4 2016 Moyer, Loren 6/7/1984 85001486 x 4 2016 Moyer, Loren 6/9/2004 043175 X n/a 2012 Moyer, Loren 2/6/2003 032610 X n/a 2012 Moyer, Loren 5/19/1998 98FDS0172 X n/a 2012 Moyer, Loren 6/7/1984 85ANA0157220 X n/a 2012 Moyer, Loren 2/28/2005 05-3435 x 21 2015 Moyer, Tyler 12/8/2007 08-4433 x 21 2015 Muir, John 10/12/2001 022003 X n/a 2012 Muir, John 6/28/2001 011879 X n/a 2012 Muir, John 11/29/2007 08-4428 x 21 2015 Muir, John 12/5/2006 07-4104 x 21 2015 Muir, Jon 12/1/2008 09-4789 x 4 2016 Muir, Jon 6/8/2005 05-3531 x 4 2016 Muir, Jon 7/19/2010 10-0168 X n/a 2017 Munguia, Vianey 8/4/2004 053229 X n/a 2012 Muniz, Jose 8/31/2009 09-5026 x 4 2016 Muniz, Jose 2/18/2010 10-0040 x 4 2016 Muniz, Jose 12/10/2003 042968 X n/a 2012 Muniz, Jose 6/10/2002 022277 X n/a 2012 Muniz, Jose 4/26/2001 011799 X n/a 2012 Muniz, Jose 10/31/2005 06-3680 x 21 2015 Muniz, Jose 3/7/2005 05-3437 x 21 2015 Munoz, Patricia 5/4/2009 09-4894 x 4 2016 Munoz, Patricia 1/1/2002 022079 X n/a 2012 Munoz, Patricia 10/10/2005 06-3656 x 21 2015 Muro, Netzher 6/23/2009 09-4946 x 4 2016 Muro, Netzher 12/15/2009 09-5123 x 4 2016 Muro, Netzher 12/10/2008 09-4792 x 4 2016 Muro, Netzher 10/22/2010 10-0264 x 4 2016 Muro, Netzher 10/29/2001 022017 X n/a 2012 Muro, Netzher 12/13/2005 06-3720 x 21 2015 Muro, Netzher 4/19/2006 06-3856 x 21 2015 Muro, Netzher 7/14/2007 08-4292 x 21 2015 Murray, Marianne 10/26/2005 06-3679 x 4 2016 40 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Murray, Marianne 2/27/2008 09-4657 x 4 2016 Murray, Marianne 11/4/2003 042919 X n/a 2012 Murray, Marianne 1/9/2003 032542 X n/a 2012 Murray, Marianne 9/14/2002 032412 X n/a 2012 Murray, Marianne 1/15/2001 011671 X n/a 2012 Murrietta, Mike 7/17/2008 09-4642 x 4 2016 Murtough, Katie 9/6/2007 08-4347 x 21 2015 Napolitano, James 12/23/2004 053376 X n/a 2012 Napolitano, James 12/2/2003 042954 x n/a 2012 Napolitano, James 9/19/2002 032478 x n/a 2012 Napolitano, James 1/21/2006 06-3769 x 21 2015 Nava, Margarita 10/1/2004 053301 x n/a 2012 Nava, Margarita 9/19/2002 032664 x n/a 2012 Nava, Martha 8/31/2001 021946 X n/a 2012 Nava, Martha 3/17/2005 05-3446 x 21 2015 Navarro, Adam 4/22/2005 05-3477 x 21 2015 Navarro, Adan 9/3/2002 032394 X n/a 2012 Navarro, Adan 1/5/2006 06-3746 x 21 2015 Navarro, Antonio 6/11/1998 98PAR0188 x n/a 2012 Navarro, Bernardina 8/12/2009 09-4993 x 4 2016 Navarro, Bernardina 4/29/2002 022232 X n/a 2012 Navarro, Bernardina 7/17/2006 07-3954 x 21 2015 Navarro, Juan M. 2/21/2002 022148 X n/a 2012 Navarro, Rogelio 5/22/2008 08-4580 x 21 2015 Nellesen, James 6/29/2004 053188 X n/a 2012 Nellesen, James 7/17/2002 032326 X n/a 2012 Nelson, Brent 11/19/2007 08-4423 x 21 2015 Nelson, Brent 7/29/2006 07-3964 x 21 2015 Nelson, Brent 1/12/2006 06-3760 x 21 2015 Nelson, Brett 11/22/2009 09-51003 x 4 2016 Nelson, Brett 12/29/2004 053383 X n/a 2012 Nelson, Brett 5/16/2002 022249 X n/a 2012 Nelson, Brett 12/21/2000 011649 X n/a 2012 Nelson, Brett 07/17/2012 12-0138 X n/a 2018 Nelson, Brett 03/29/2012 12-0070 x n/a 2018 Nelson, Brett 08/21/2013 13-0129 X n/a 2018 Neri,Yovany 6/14/2008 08-4609 x 25 2015 Newton, Arlene 9/29/2007 08-4369 x 25 2015 Ngo,Bang 5/12/2007 07-4222 x 25 2015 Ngo,Sonny 11/8/2003 042923 X n/a 2012 Ngo,Sonny 1/29/2003 032568 X n/a 2012 Ngo,Sonny 6/11/2002 032307 X n/a 2012 Ngo,Sonny 3/2/2001 011727 X n/a 2012 Ngo,Sonny 6/14/2000 001427 x n/a 2012 41 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Ngo,Sonny 12/25/1999 001277 X n/a 2012 Nguyen, Angie 7/21/2004 053209 X n/a 2012 Nguyen,Anthony 6/17/2006 06-3926 x 25 2015 Nguyen,Anthony 9/15/2006 07-4005 x 25 2015 Nguyen,Cong 10/6/1998 98PDS0329 X n/a 2012 Nguyen, Dinh 10/14/2003 04-2917 x 15 2016 Nguyen, Dinh 10/4/2003 042917 X n/a 2012 Nguyen, Francois 8/2/2008 09-4661 x 4 2016 Nguyen, Francois 12/5/2009 09-5113 x 4 2016 Nguyen,Paul 12/9/1999 01-1568 x 4 2016 Nguyen,Paul 4/25/1996 96CDH0112 X n/a 2012 Nguyen,Thone 9/4/2008 09-4697 x 4 2016 Nguyen,Thone 7/21/2010 10-0174 x 4 2016 Nguyen,Thone 9/12/2010 10-0232 X n/a 2017 Nguyen,Thone 01/17/2007 07-4125 X n/a 2018 Nguyen, Victoria 3/17/2008 08-4510 x 25 2015 Nguyen, Vinh 5/8/2000 001386 X n/a 2012 Nguyen,Phuong 9/27/2006 07-4018 x 4 2016 Nicely, Christopher 2/12/2002 022130 X n/a 2012 Nichols, Gary 04/18/1977 80000756 X n/a 2018 Nichols, Mary 4/12/2002 022201 X n/a 2012 Nichols, Mary 12/20/2000 011646 X n/a 2012 Nick, David 5/31/2002 032570 X n/a 2012 Nick, David 11/O1/1995 95PDS0404 X n/a 2018 Niemeyer, Thomas 7/13/2004 053198 X n/a 2012 Niemeyer, Thomas 6/9/2004 043161 X n/a 2012 Niemeyer, Thomas 4/25/2004 043117 X n/a 2012 Niemeyer, Thomas 12/19/2003 042983 X n/a 2012 Nino, Mary 10/27/2006 07-4060 x 25 2015 Nino, Mary 3/15/2006 06-3833 x 25 2015 Novak, Michael 10/2/2001 021997 X n/a 2012 Novak, Michael 09/12/2010 10-0225 X n/a 2018 Novak, Michael 05/22/2011 12-0058 X n/a 2018 Novak, Michael 11/22/2008 09-4781 X n/a 2018 Novak, Michael 02/23/2011 11-0082 X n/a 2018 Novella, Manuel 7/8/2004 053196 X n/a 2012 Novella, Manuel 09/05/2012 12-0185 X n/a 2018 Novella, Manuel 05/10/2005 05-3500 X n/a 2018 Novella, Manuel 07/18/2012 12-0144 X n/a 2018 Novella, Manuel 04/14/1995 95PWM0144 X n/a 2018 Nunez, Alvaro 7/14/2004 053203 X n/a 2012 Nunez, Amelia 05/08/1996 96PWA0354 X n/a 2018 Nunez, Amelia 05/08/1996 96PWA0354 X n/a 2018 Nunez, Jimmy 6/01/09 09-4924 x 4 2016 42 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Nunez, Jimmy 11/18/2004 053341 X n/a 2012 Nunez, Jimmy 12/14/2002 032521 X n/a 2012 Nunez, Jimmy 02/06/2009 09-4823 X n/a 2018 Nunez, Jimmy 02/06/2009 09-4823 X n/a 2018 Nunez, Lorenzo 8/30/2008 09-4691 x 4 2016 Nunez, Lorenzo 6/24/2004 053186 X n/a 2012 Nunez, Lorenzo 3/23/2001 011778 X n/a 2012 Nunez, Lorenzo 6/21/2006 06-3934 x 25 2015 Nunez, Martha 6/13/2006 07-3966 x 21 2015 Nunez, Martha 8/30/2006 07-4029 x 25 2015 Nungaray, Julie A. 9/19/2002 032423 X n/a 2012 Ochoa, Adolfo 1/20/2006 06-3768 x 25 2015 Ochoa, Francisco 4/17/2001 011803 X n/a 2012 Ochoa, Francisco 2/27/2007 07-4202 x 25 2015 Ochoa, Francisco 3/13/2006 06-3821 x 25 2015 O'Conner,Todd 12/20/2004 053373 X n/a 2012 O'Conner,Todd 9/18/2007 08-4357 x 25 2015 Ogren, Andrew 12/29/2005 06-3733 x 5 2016 Ogren, Andrew 4/16/1995 95FDS0189 x 5 2016 Ogren, Andrew 10/15/2002 032462 X n/a 2012 Ojedo,Ramiro 7/3/1984 84002462 x 28 2015 Olea, Vince 9/17/2003 042865 X n/a 2012 O'Leary, Virginia A. 2/15/2002 022145 X n/a 2012 Olivares, Tanya 2/24/2010 10-0047 x 5 2016 Oliver, John 11/15/2005 06-3698 x 5 2016 Oliver, John 1/20/2009 09-4816 x 5 2016 Oliver, John 11/15/2005 06-3698 x 5 2016 Oliver, John 1/29/2001 011693 X n/a 2012 Olivo, Elizabeth 6/26/2003 032762 X n/a 2012 Olivo, Xavier 7/31/2001 021916 X n/a 2012 Ontiveros, Joe R. 12/17/2002 032513 X n/a 2012 Ontiveros, Joe R. 10/4/2001 022014 X n/a 2012 Oregel, Eileen 12/17/2001 022072 X n/a 2012 Oregel, Eileen 1/7/2005 05-3390 x 25 2015 Ornelas, Larry 5/4/2010 10-0126 x 5 2016 Ornelas, Philip 2/3/2003 032574 X n/a 2012 Ornelas, Philip 1/7/2003 032557 X n/a 2012 Oropeza, Abel 7/3/2006 07-3943 x 25 2015 Oropeza, Abelardo 8/4/2005 06-3583 x 5 2016 Oropeza,Abelardo 10/28/2010 10-0273 x 5 2016 Oropeza,Abelardo 11/12/2008 09-4768 x 5 2016 Oropeza,Abelardo 3/26/2004 043078 X n/a 2012 Oropeza,Abelardo 1/17/2004 043007 X n/a 2012 Oropeza, Thomas 2/4/2002 022120 X n/a 2012 43 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Oropeza, Thomas 1/9/2006 06-3747 x 25 2015 Oropeza, Thomas 7/21/2009 09-4975 x 5 2016 Orozco, Herminia 7/23/1992 92FIN0247 X n/a 2012 Orozco, Ignacio 8/18/2010 10-0217 x 5 2016 Orozco, Ignacio 5/15/2003 032740 X n/a 2012 Orozco, Ignacio 8/22/2007 08-4323 x 25 2015 Orozco, Ignacio 6/8/2005 05-3547 x 25 2015 Orozco, Ignacio 1/9/2011 11-0010 X n/a 2017 Orozco, Yvonne 6/2/2000 001417 X n/a 2012 Ortiz, Gregory 7/27/2010 10-0172 x 5 2016 Ortiz, Leslie 1/13/2006 06-3755 x 25 2015 Ortiz, Pedro 3/20/2010 10-0065 x 5 2016 Ortiz, Pedro 11/14/2006 07-4087 x 25 2015 Ortiz, Richard 6/28/2004 043184 X n/a 2012 Ortiz, Richard 3/20/2007 07-4178 x 25 2015 Ortiz, Richard 4/15/2005 05-3496 x 25 2015 Ortiz, Richard 5/15/2007 07-4227 x 25 2015 Ortiz -Rodriguez, Lorraine 5/10/2002 022248 X n/a 2012 Ortiz -Rodriguez, Lorraine 7/30/2003 042803 X n/a 2012 Osorio, Juan 7/30/2009 09-4983 x 5 2016 Osorio, Juan 4/15/2010 10-0078 x 5 2016 Osuna, Felix 5/26/2004 043153 X n/a 2012 Osuna, Felix 4/24/2003 032811 X n/a 2012 Osuna, Felix 7/5/2000 011445 X n/a 2012 Osuna, Felix 5/4/2000 001403 X n/a 2012 Overn, Michael 4/21/2001 011804 X n/a 2012 Overn, Tom 9/10/2002 032406 X n/a 2012 Overn, Tom 2/4/1983 83000918 X n/a 2012 Oviedo, Aurora 9/6/2007 08-4340 x 5 2016 Oviedo, Henry 7/17/1998 98PDS0088 X n/a 2012 Oviedo, Henry 02/29/98 98PDS0088 X n/a 2012 Owen, Dave 4/15/2010 10-0091 x 5 2016 Owen, David 5/6/2006 06-3878 x 31 2015 Owen, David A. 1/9/2002 022100 X n/a 2012 Padilla, Annette 8/23/2003 04-2836 x 17 2016 Padilla, Annette 11/O1/1994 94PDN0451 X n/a 2018 Padilla, Consuelo 5/5/2000 001379 X n/a 2012 Padilla, Dominick 02/09/2012 12-0034 X n/a 2018 Padilla, Dominick 11/02/2011 11-0274 X n/a 2018 Padilla, Manuel 4/2/2008 08-4534 x 31 2015 Padron, Daniel 11/3/2006 07-4066 x 5 2016 Padron, Daniel 1/28/2004 043013 X n/a 2012 Padron, Daniel 7/9/2006 07-3948 x 31 2015 Padron, Daniel 12/6/2010 10-0301 X n/a 2017 44 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Padron, Daniel 09/02/2012 12-0177 X n/a 2018 Pagan, Luis 11/21/2002 032567 X n/a 2012 Pagan, Luis 5/6/2002 022237 X n/a 2012 Page,Joni 12/11/2002 032504 X n/a 2012 Page,Joni 6/17/2002 022283 X n/a 2012 Page,Joni 6/27/2005 05-3555 x 31 2015 Pahed, Brian 7/10/2007 08-4334 x 31 2015 Pahissa,Johnathan 12/15/2009 09-5128 x 5 2016 Pahrissa, Jonathan 03/14/2012 12-0059 X n/a 2018 Palacios, Gloria 4/28/2004 043121 X n/a 2012 Palacios,Jeniffer 11/17/2007 08-4420 x 31 2015 Palomino, Helen 10/11/2002 032438 X n/a 2012 Pando, Laura 3/16/2001 011734 X n/a 2012 Panzica, Anthony 12/16/2008 09-4804 x 5 2016 Panzica, Anthony 1/4/2002 022085 X n/a 2012 Panzica, Anthony 3/24/2001 011754 X n/a 2012 Paquin, Rene 10/16/2009 09-5062 x 5 2016 Paquin, Rene 10/17/2004 053308 X n/a 2012 Paquin, Rene 1/11/2004 042996 X n/a 2012 Paquin, Rene 03/23/2008 08-4519 X n/a 2018 Parent, Theresa 3/13/2007 07-4171 x 31 2015 Parga, Frank 11/01/2004 05-3322 X n/a 2018 Park, Daniel 2/15/2004 043090 X n/a 2012 Park, Daniel 4/19/2003 032684 X n/a 2012 Park,Jae 4/24/2008 08-4555 x 5 2016 Park, Jae 1/23/2008 08-4468 x 5 2016 Park, Jae 07/06/2011 11-0175 X n/a 2018 Park, Jae 01/01/2009 09-4810 X n/a 2018 Park, Jae 04/25/2007 07-4212 X n/a 2018 Parks, Sarah 1/13/2011 11-0017 x 5 2016 Parmenter, Wayne 1/25/2010 10-0020 x 5 2016 Parmenter, Wayne 08/19/2006 07-3980 X n/a 2018 Parmenter, Wayne A. 10/30/2003 042931 X n/a 2012 Parmenter, Wayne A. 2/14/2002 022140 X n/a 2012 Parmenter, Wayne A. 10/9/2001 021994 X n/a 2012 Parmenter, Wayne A. 8/20/2001 021944 X n/a 2012 Parmenter, Wayne A. 3/9/2001 011755 X n/a 2012 Partida, Alejandro 06/14/2012 12-0116 X n/a 2018 Partida, Alejandro O1/04/2013 13-0007 X n/a 2018 Partida, Micaela 3/16/2001 011750 X n/a 2012 Paschoal, Stacy 1/14/2010 10-0015 x 5 2016 Paschoal, Stacy 11/15/2012 12-0212 X n/a 2018 Pearson, Dennis A. 4/26/2002 022229 X n/a 2012 Pearson, Dennis A. 11/23/2001 022044 X n/a 2012 45 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Pena,Jose 5/5/2007 07-4253 x 31 2015 Pena, Yolanda 6/24/2002 022288 X n/a 2012 Pena, Yolanda 1/28/2002 022114 X n/a 2012 Pena, Yolanda 3/15/2006 06-3826 x 31 2015 Pena, Yolanda 11/16/2010 10-0291 X n/a 2018 Pendergraft, Robert 08/13/2011 11-0214 X n/a 2018 Pennell, Rhonda R. 7/19/2001 022088 X n/a 2012 Perales, Dan 1/21/2009 09-4815 X n/a 2017 Perales, Daniel 8/7/2003 042810 X n/a 2012 Perales, Daniel 1/23/2003 032558 X n/a 2012 Perales, Daniel 8/16/2002 032381 X n/a 2012 Perez, Edgar 9/20/2002 032427 X n/a 2012 Perez, Edgar 11/21/2007 08-4425 x 31 2015 Perez, Edgar 7/2/2006 07-3944 x 31 2015 Perez, Edgar 10/24/2012 12-0199 X n/a 2018 Perez, Edgar 08/15/2012 12-0162 X n/a 2018 Perez, German 11/25/2002 032492 X n/a 2012 Perez, German 11/30/2001 022057 X n/a 2012 Perez, German 6/26/2001 021883 X n/a 2012 Perez, German 2/2/2001 011691 X n/a 2012 Perez, German 12/12/2000 011643 X n/a 2012 Perez, German 7/19/2005 06-3580 x 31 2015 Perez, Gloria 7/27/2004 053221 X n/a 2012 Perez, Henry 9/30/2003 042874 X n/a 2012 Perez, Johanna 7/17/2010 10-0166 X n/a 2017 Perez, Johanna 06/27/2009 09-4964 X n/a 2018 Perez, John 1/2/2004 043030 X n/a 2012 Perez, John 9/17/2003 042861 X n/a 2012 Perez, John 4/18/2003 032694 X n/a 2012 Perez, John 1/2/2004 043030 X n/a 2012 Perez, John 1/2/2004 043030 X n/a 2012 Perez, John 3/19/1994 94PDS0082 X n/a 2012 Perez, Juan A. 1/7/2003 032532 X n/a 2012 Perez, Juventino 12/31/2001 032351 X n/a 2012 Perez, Juventino 5/10/2001 011817 X n/a 2012 Perez, Luis 6/6/2008 08-4599 X n/a 2017 Perez, Magda 7/1/2004 053189 X n/a 2012 Perez, Magda 3/8/2001 011733 X n/a 2012 Perez, Magda 4/5/2011 11-0096 X n/a 2017 Perez, Magda 4/7/2011 11-0089 X n/a 2017 Perez, Magda 04/05/2011 11-0096 X n/a 2018 Perez, Mark 6/22/2009 09-4943 X n/a 2017 Perez, Miriam 5/4/2004 043126 X n/a 2012 Perez, Raymundo 1/11/2006 06-3753 x 31 2015 46 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Perez, Raymundo L. 6/25/2003 032763 X n/a 2012 Perez, Richard 5/27/1999 001288 X n/a 2012 Perez, Robert 2/16/2008 08-4489 x 31 2015 Perez, Robert 12/26/2006 07-4111 x 31 2015 Perez, Robert 11/23/2008 09-4788 X n/a 2017 Perez, Rosalva 5/18/2003 032729 X n/a 2012 Perez, Rosalva 12/17/2002 032511 X n/a 2012 Perez, Rosalva 5/26/2002 022260 X n/a 2012 Perez, Rosalva 11/18/2000 011611 X n/a 2012 Perrigoue, Vanessa 5/6/2008 08-4569 x 31 2015 Perrigoue, Vanessa 1/21/2006 06-3776 x 31 2015 Perrigoue, Vanessa 12/6/2006 07-4094 x 31 2015 Perrigoue, Vanessa 6/28/2009 09-4950 X n/a 2017 Perrigoue, Vanessa M. 8/23/2003 042831 X n/a 2012 Perrigoue, Vanessa M. 5/21/2003 032728 X n/a 2012 Perry, Lynnette 8/29/2003 042843 X n/a 2012 Perry, Michelle L. 9/13/2003 042855 X n/a 2012 Perry, Michelle L. 5/26/2003 032725 X n/a 2012 Perry, Michelle L. 12/22/2002 032514 X n/a 2012 Perry, Michelle L. 12/3/2001 022054 X n/a 2012 Petko, David 3/18/2003 032631 X n/a 2012 Petko, David 11/29/99 00-1229 X n/a 2018 Petz, Mark 8/2/2009 09-4990 X n/a 2017 Pham, Dung John 10/28/2004 053319 X n/a 2012 Pham, Dung John 7/28/2003 042799 X n/a 2012 Pham, Katrina 9/26/2007 08-4366 X n/a 2017 Pham,Loi 12/11/2008 09-4793 X n/a 2017 Pheonix, Brad 10/5/2006 07-4054 x 31 2015 Phoenix, Brad 06/03/2011 11-0137 X n/a 2018 Phoenix, Brad 07/17/2011 11-0181 X n/a 2018 Phoenix, Brad -Allen 2/9/2004 043026 X n/a 2012 Piampiano, Philip 11/21/2000 011614 X n/a 2012 Picone, Peter 8/9/2009 09-4663 X n/a 2017 Picone, Peter 08/31/2012 12-0182 X n/a 2018 Picone, Peter 11/29/2011 11-0291 X n/a 2018 Pineda, Isidro 9/13/2007 08-3452 x 31 2015 Pineda, Isidro 3/26/2010 10-0068 X n/a 2017 Pingree, Brian 10/4/2006 07-4038 x 31 2015 Pingree, Brian 7/7/2008 09-4622 X n/a 2017 Pingree, Brian 10/26/2008 09-4749 X n/a 2017 Pingree, Brian 8/2/2010 10-0180 X n/a 2017 Pingree, Brian 11/9/2009 09-5099 X n/a 2017 Pingree, Brian 04/06/2011 11-0086 X n/a 2018 Pingree, Michael 3/23/2004 043156 X n/a 2012 47 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Pingree, Michael 10/2/2003 042977 X n/a 2012 Pingree, Michael 2/4/2003 042995 X n/a 2012 Pingree, Michael 12/02/2003 04-2948 X n/a 2018 Pitzer, Lawrence 8/16/1988 88140137 x 14 2015 Placinta, Paul 10/11/2004 053305 X n/a 2012 Placinta, Paul 11/13/2003 042930 X n/a 2012 Placinta, Paul 1/24/2003 032566 X n/a 2012 Placinta, Paul 10/14/2002 032445 X n/a 2012 Placinta, Paul 2/2/2002 022127 X n/a 2012 Placinta, Paul 11/6/2001 022037 X n/a 2012 Placinta, Paul 1/3/2001 011653 X n/a 2012 Pletl, Greg 6/30/2008 08-4617 X n/a 2017 Pletl, Greg 12/28/2012 13-0002 X n/a 2018 Pletl, Greg 08/01/2007 10-0286 X n/a 2018 Pletl, Gregory 5/31/2010 10-0128 X n/a 2017 Pletl, Gregory 8/28/2006 07-3987 X n/a 2017 Pletl, Gregory W. 4/28/2003 032708 X n/a 2012 Pletl, Gregory W. 1/27/2003 032559 X n/a 2012 Pletl, Gregory W. 6/3/2002 022266 X n/a 2012 Pletl, Gregory W. 4/16/2001 011779 X n/a 2012 Pletl, Gregory W. 11/27/2000 011617 X n/a 2012 Poe, Stephen 1/4/2005 053387 X n/a 2012 Poe, Stephen 06/07/1988 88140111 X n/a 2018 Poe, Stephen 08/04/1995 95FLT0308 X n/a 2018 Poissant, Timothy 9/15/2011 11-0239 X n/a 2017 Poissant, Timothy 11/O1/2005 06-3684 X n/a 2018 Poli, Ethan 2/22/2009 09-4853 X n/a 2017 Poli, Ethan 04/27/2010 10-0088 X n/a 2018 Poli, Ethan 08/27/2007 08-4326 X n/a 2018 Ponce De Leon, Rosa 12/12/2007 08-4439 x 31 2015 Ponce De Leon, Rosa 7/29/2006 07-3970 x 31 2015 Ponce De Leon, Rosa 9/6/2008 09-4706 X n/a 2017 Ponce, Elizabeth 3/14/2006 06-3823 x 31 2015 Ponce, Elizabeth 8/26/2005 06-3603 x 31 2015 Preciado, Albert 7/17/2003 042789 X n/a 2012 Preciado, Albert 7/4/2007 08-4272 x 31 2015 Preciado, Albert 9/7/2006 07-4000 x 31 2015 Preciado, Albert 7/25/2006 07-3960 x 31 2015 Preciado, Albert 7/23/2007 08-4289 x 31 2015 Preciado, Jiovanny 12/12/2007 08-4440 X n/a 2018 Prewett, Dave 04/25/2010 10-0085 X n/a 2018 Prewett, David 2/19/2008 08-4490 x 31 2015 Prewett, David 12/29/2007 08-4448 x 31 2015 Prewett, David 7/31/2006 07-3968 x 31 2015 48 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Price, Cameron 8/7/2009 09-4996 X n/a 2017 Price, Cameron 6/11/2011 11-0148 X n/a 2017 Price, Daniel 6/7/2002 022298 X n/a 2012 Price, Patricia 4/2/1997 97PDN0120 X n/a 2012 Price, Terrill 11/9/1998 98FLT0398 X n/a 2012 Provence, Collie 10/30/2003 042902 X n/a 2012 Provence, Collie 7/14/1994 94PDS0240 X n/a 2012 Provence, Collie 1/26/1995 95PDS0012 X n/a 2012 Provence, Collie 10/16/1987 87005676 X n/a 2012 Provence, Collie 11/14/1979 80001910 X n/a 2012 Quach, Jason 10/22/2010 10-0259 X n/a 2017 Queller, Phillip 6/26/2001 011870 X n/a 2012 Queller, Phillip 7/1/2004 053287 X n/a 2012 Queller, Phillip 4/19/2006 06-3875 x 31 2015 Queller, Phillip 7/15/2005 06-3571 x 31 2015 Quezada, Louis 05/22/2013 13-0075 X n/a 2018 Quick, Richard 3/28/2001 011769 X n/a 2012 Quijas, Johnny 2/10/2004 043046 X n/a 2012 Quijas, Johnny 11/3/2001 022020 X n/a 2012 Quijas, Johnny 12/16/2000 011651 X n/a 2012 Quijas, Johnny 8/22/1997 97PDS0277 X n/a 2012 Quijas, Nicole 04/27/2011 11-0110 X n/a 2018 Quinn, Josephine 7/5/2002 03-2318 x 31 2015 Quintana, Jessica 10/13/2010 10-0248 X n/a 2017 Qureshi, Naseer 9/30/2003 042869 X n/a 2012 Qureshi, Naseer 4/25/2007 07-4207 X n/a 2017 Qureshi, Naseer-Ahmad 7/24/2006 07-3961 x 31 2015 Radic, Milanka 10/8/2001 021996 X n/a 2012 Ramirez, Angelica 12/1/2001 022261 X n/a 2012 Ramirez, Catalina 10/16/2003 042885 X n/a 2012 Ramirez, Daniel 8/18/2005 06-3600 x 31 2015 Ramirez, Gema 7/26/2002 032343 X n/a 2012 Ramirez, Jessie 8/18/2004 053249 X n/a 2012 Ramirez, Jessie 3/8/2001 011740 X n/a 2012 Ramirez, Karina 4/3/2003 032653 X n/a 2012 Ramirez, Karina 2/11/2006 06-3792 x 31 2015 Ramirez, Manuel 1/20/1999 99RPT0436 X n/a 2012 Ramirez, Ramiro 10/30/1978 80001490 X n/a 2012 Ramirez, Richard 10/23/2003 042903 X n/a 2012 Ramirez, Richard 10/5/2000 011565 X n/a 2012 Ramirez, Victor 11/28/2011 11-0290 X n/a 2018 Ramos, Debra 06/28/1994 94PDN0209 X n/a 2018 Ramos, George 01/26/2012 12-0028 X n/a 2018 Ramos, George (Jorge) 2/25/2003 032605 X n/a 2012 49 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Ramos, George (Jorge) 4/22/2001 011791 X n/a 2012 Ramos, Maria Dolores 5/26/2004 043151 X n/a 2012 Ramos, Robert 1/12/2002 022096 X n/a 2012 Ramos, Robert 10/6/2009 09-5055 X n/a 2017 Ramos, Robert 07/13/2009 09-4969 X n/a 2018 Ramos-Amador, Rosalva 02/28/2008 08-4501 X n/a 2018 Rangel, Osvaldo 11/12/2004 053336 X n/a 2012 Rangel, Osvaldo 10/17/2002 032451 X n/a 2012 Rangel, Osvaldo 10/17/2009 09-5065 X n/a 2017 Rangel, Osvaldo 10/19/2009 09-5066 X n/a 2017 Raphael, Kathleen 3/8/2006 06-3818 x 31 2015 Rawson, Michael 4/11/1998 98PD50126 X n/a 2012 Raya,Pearl 11/5/2004 053326 X n/a 2012 Raya,Pearl 4/20/2011 11-0106 X n/a 2017 Raygoza,5al 10/22/2009 09-5067 x 5 2016 Raygoza,Sal 5/12/2009 09-4912 x 5 2016 Record, Randall 5/20/2009 09-4908 x 5 2016 Record, Randall 4/13/2006 06-3849 x 31 2015 Record, Randall 4/19/2006 06-3855 x 31 2015 Record, Randy 4/8/2004 043103 X n/a 2012 Record, Randy 9/18/2002 032413 X n/a 2012 Record, Randy 2/25/2002 022150 X n/a 2012 Reed,Aron 2/23/2003 032604 X n/a 2012 Reed, Greg 3/18/2000 Denied -Not EE Not EE n/a 2012 Reed,Theron 1/25/2010 10-0018 x 5 2016 Reed,Theron 1/13/2007 07-4123 x 31 2015 Reeves, James 6/29/2007 08-4273 x 31 2015 Renck, Jeff 8/7/2002 032356 X n/a 2012 Renck, Jeffrey 9/6/2007 08-4342 x 5 2016 Renck, Jeffrey 3/30/2005 05-3459 x 5 2016 Renck, Jeffrey 1/21/2000 00-1273 x 6 2016 Renck, Jeffrey 1/7/2010 10-0002 x 6 2016 Renck, Jeffrey 7/28/2007 08-4299 x 31 2015 Revere, Chris 5/5/2005 05-3499 x 25 2015 Revere, Christopher 5/24/2004 043142 X n/a 2012 Revere, Christopher 6/19/2001 011854 X n/a 2012 Reyes, Alejandro 4/18/2006 06-3851 x 6 2016 Reyes, Kathia 10/20/2008 09-4754 x 6 2016 Reynaga, Margarita 5/11/2009 09-4900 x 6 2016 Reynoso, Nancy 4/4/2006 06-3843 x 25 2015 Reynoso,Rodolfo 7/14/2002 032325 X n/a 2012 Reynoso,Rodolfo 12/22/2000 011647 X n/a 2012 Reynoso,Rudy 1/30/2008 08-4470 x 6 2016 Reynoso,Rudy 7/7/2005 06-3567 x 25 2015 50 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Ribble, Jon A. 6/15/2002 022285 X n/a 2012 Riebe, Harold 9/17/2009 09-5034 x 6 2016 Rife, Jack 3/29/2001 011763 X n/a 2012 Rife, lack 7/19/2000 011461 X n/a 2012 Rife, Jack 10/31/1987 87005922 X n/a 2012 Riggin, Chris 3/13/2001 011745 X n/a 2012 Riles, Johnnie 3/30/2004 04-3082 x 25 2015 Rimat, Eric 7/16/2004 05-3251 x 6 2016 Rimat, Eric 4/2/2003 032655 X n/a 2012 Rimat, Eric 8/25/1991 91140284 X n/a 2012 Rios, Catalina 3/30/2001 011760 X n/a 2012 Riquier, Edgar 10/18/2005 06-3672 x 25 2015 Rivas, Eric 12/13/2000 011637 X n/a 2012 Rivas, Thomas 12/2/2010 10-0294 x 6 2016 Rivas, Thomas 9/19/2009 09-5036 x 6 2016 Rivas, Thomas 5/23/2007 07-4245 x 6 2016 Rivas, Thomas 3/9/2004 043065 X n/a 2012 Rivas, Thomas 10/10/2003 042891 X n/a 2012 Rivas, Thomas 5/13/2002 022258 X n/a 2012 Rivas, Thomas 2/14/2006 06-3800 x 22 2015 Rivas, Thomas 12/3/2006 07-4097 x 22 2015 Rivera, Christina 1/31/2001 022018 X n/a 2012 Rivera, Christina 1/28/2001 011709 X n/a 2012 Rivera, Javier 3/26/2004 043076 X n/a 2012 Rivera, Javier 8/29/2001 021933 X n/a 2012 Rivera, Javier 1/30/1997 97PDS0040 X n/a 2012 Rivera, Raymond 3/31/2003 032645 X n/a 2012 Rivera, Samuel 5/29/2004 043171 X n/a 2012 Rivera, Samuel 3/6/2002 022164 X n/a 2012 Rivero, Richard 4/24/2002 022224 X n/a 2012 Rivero, Richard 10/20/2000 011580 X n/a 2012 Rizk, Nasser 1/3/2000 001253 X n/a 2012 Robertson, James 8/30/2004 053264 X n/a 2012 Robertson, Larry 10/12/2001 021993 X n/a 2012 Robinson, Aaron 6/6/2011 11-0139 x 6 2016 Robles, George 5/8/2002 022250 X n/a 2012 Robles, Jorge 3/16/2008 08-4511 x 22 2015 Robles, Jorge 9/21/2007 08-4360 x 22 2015 Robles, Jorge 12/7/2010 10-0307 X n/a 2017 Robles, Sylvia 4/28/2008 08-4582 x 6 2016 Rocca, Al 11/1/2010 10-0274 x 6 2016 Rocca, Al 2/2/2008 08-4476 x 22 2015 Rocha, Frank 4/23/2009 09-4885 x 6 2016 Rodarte, Estella 5/14/2003 032720 X n/a 2012 51 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Rodarte, Gerardo 3/19/2002 022180 X n/a 2012 Rodarte, Gerardo 3/13/2002 022174 X n/a 2012 Rodgers, Terrance 9/24/2007 08-4358 x 6 2016 Rodgers, Terrance 2/5/1992 92240032 N x 6 2016 Rodgers, Terrance 2/20/2007 07-4159 x 22 2015 Rodriguez, Ben 12/21/2004 05-3375 X n/a 2017 Rodriguez, Benny 3/13/2007 07-4172 x 22 2015 Rodriguez, Benny 12/12/1996 96PDS0330 X n/a 2017 Rodriguez, Benny 8/4/1997 97PDS0262 X n/a 2017 Rodriguez, Danny 4/26/2002 022227 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, David J. 7/6/2001 021886 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, David J. 11/3/2000 011593 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Ernie 6/3/2003 032744 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Gabriela 10/21/2004 053310 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Gabriela 10/31/2001 022016 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Gilbert 9/14/2004 053278 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Gilbert 12/13/2001 022063 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Gilbert 11/2/2001 022022 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Gilbert 1/26/1999 99WOM0034 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Gilbert 6/4/2008 08-4600 x 22 2015 Rodriguez, Jesus 9/20/2005 06-3633 x 22 2015 Rodriguez, Jesus David 4/15/2004 043112 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Jesus David 9/30/2003 042875 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Jesus David 10/17/2002 032450 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Jesus David 9/12/2001 021953 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, John 6/9/2006 06-3917 x 22 2015 Rodriguez, John 4/30/2007 07-4211 x 22 2015 Rodriguez, Joseph 2/21/2006 06-3812 x 6 2016 Rodriguez, Joseph 5/27/2010 10-0122 x 6 2016 Rodriguez, Joseph 2/21/2006 06-3812 x 22 2015 Rodriguez, Joseph 5/21/2005 05-3515 x 22 2015 Rodriguez, Julian 12/6/2003 042969 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Julian 4/2/2003 032656 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Julian 11/7/2002 032472 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Julian 4/8/2005 05-3464 x 22 2015 Rodriguez, Julian 9/2/2007 08-4336 x 22 2015 Rodriguez, Magdaleno 6/21/2010 10-0157 x 6 2016 Rodriguez, Magdaleno 7/1/2002 032311 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Magdaleno 5/20/2001 011830 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Magdaleno 7/2/2006 07-3942 x 22 2015 Rodriguez, Mary 4/30/2010 10-0103 x 6 2016 Rodriguez, Mary 4/19/2003 032679 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Mary 9/21/2002 032580 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Mary 6/10/2011 11-0158 X n/a 2017 52of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Rodriguez, Robert 9/16/2003 042856 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez, Robert 1/5/2006 06-3743 x 22 2015 Rodriguez, Victor 11/6/2007 08-4407 x 22 2015 Rodriguez, Vincent 9/4/2006 07-3995 x 22 2015 Rodriguez -Zamora, Leticia 6/10/2002 032304 X n/a 2012 Rodriguez -Zamora, Leticia 4/6/2001 011773 X n/a 2012 Roel, Erick 6/8/2009 09-4931 x 6 2016 Roelle, Christopher 1/7/2003 032553 X n/a 2012 Rohan,Ruby 4/1/2010 10-0076 x 6 2016 Rohan,Ruby 10/21/2009 09-5063 x 6 2016 Roman, Luis 10/1/2009 09-5077 x 6 2016 Roman, Luis S. 12/14/2002 032506 X n/a 2012 Roman, Martha 12/20/2001 022070 X n/a 2012 Romero, Aide 3/29/2004 043086 X n/a 2012 Romero, Antonio 11/2/2009 09-5083 x 6 2016 Romero, Antonio C. 3/13/2002 022178 X n/a 2012 Romero, Aurora 7/20/2004 053210 X n/a 2012 Romero, Aurora 4/18/2006 06-3853 x 22 2015 Romero, Ben 11/11/2007 08-4409 x 6 2016 Romero, Ben 11/23/2008 09-4779 x 6 2016 Romero, Ben 11/16/2009 09-5093 x 6 2016 Romero, Benjamin 12/23/2005 06-3729 x 22 2015 Romero, Benjamin 4/29/2007 07-4208 x 22 2015 Romero, Benjamin 6/3/2007 07-4241 x 22 2015 Romero, Robert 6/14/2003 032754 X n/a 2012 Romero, Robert 11/16/1992 92PD50409 X n/a 2012 Romero, Robert 1/25/2011 11-0028 X n/a 2017 Romo, Victor 1/20/2008 08-4463 x 22 2015 Rondou,David 10/6/2003 042877 X n/a 2012 Root, Elouise 9/5/2006 07-4016 x 9 2015 Rosales, Monique 6/28/2008 08-4616 x 9 2015 Rosario, Lourdes 4/12/2001 011793 X n/a 2012 Rosario, Lourdes 7/9/2006 07-3951 x 9 2015 Rosas, Luis 9/15/2007 08-4354 x 22 2015 Rosas, Maria 2/20/2002 022147 X n/a 2012 Rosas, Maria 5/22/2008 08-4595 x 22 2015 Rose, James 3/14/2012 10-0059 x 13 2016 Rose, Melody 6/1/2005 05-3522 x 22 2015 Rosen, William 4/30/1997 97PWM0155 x 17 2016 Rosselle, Pedro 12/22/2004 053379 X n/a 2012 Rosselle, Pedro 2/20/2003 032611 X n/a 2012 Rosselle, Pedro 1/8/2001 011656 X n/a 2012 Rosselle, Pedro 9/7/2000 011544 X n/a 2012 Rosselle, Pedro 6/26/2007 07-4270 x 22 2015 53 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Rosselle, Pedro 3/28/2008 08-4523 x 22 2015 Rosselle, Pedro 9/24/2009 09-5040 X n/a 2017 Rossman, Cameron 9/27/2001 021984 X n/a 2012 Rossman, Cameron 7/29/2006 07-3965 x 9 2015 Rotter, Mary 6/9/2011 11-0144 X n/a 2017 Rubalcaba, Maria 1/13/2009 09-4811 x 7 2016 Rubalcaba, Maria 9/17/2004 053280 X n/a 2012 Rubalcaba, Maria 4/1/2011 11-0116 X n/a 2017 Rubalcaba, Robert 8/17/2002 032368 X n/a 2012 Rubio, Christopher 10/19/2002 032458 X n/a 2012 Ruelas, Theresa 5/21/2004 043144 X n/a 2012 Ruelas, Theresa 2/4/2004 043035 X n/a 2012 Ruiz, Erin 6/16/2004 043179 X n/a 2012 Ruiz, Erin 8/31/2003 042845 X n/a 2012 Ruiz, Erin 1/12/2001 011674 X n/a 2012 Ruiz, Erin 8/11/2006 07-3976 x 9 2015 Ruiz, Erin 11/8/2010 10-0278 X n/a 2017 Ruiz, George 5/22/2011 11-0134 X n/a 2017 Ruiz, Kevin 6/17/2004 043169 X n/a 2012 Ruiz, Ramona 2/10/2006 06-3793 x 9 2015 Runnells, Bob 1/20/1997 97FDS0008 X n/a 2012 Ruvalcaba, Brenda 5/26/2008 08-4596 x 7 2016 Ruvalcaba, Brenda 8/1/2001 022028 X n/a 2012 Ruvalcaba, Enrique 10/1/2008 09-4773 x 7 2016 Ruvalcaba, Enrique 8/21/2003 042827 X n/a 2012 Ruvalcaba, Enrique 2/26/2003 032606 X n/a 2012 Saale, Charles 10/30/2004 053321 X n/a 2012 Saale, Charles 11/15/2003 042937 X n/a 2012 Saale, Charles 5/26/2006 06-3910 x 9 2015 Saale, Charles 12/03/2009 09-5110 X n/a 2018 Saba, Nabil 3/21/2008 08-4518 x 9 2015 Saenz, Sixto 9/8/2008 09-4704 x 7 2016 Saenz, Sixto 4/12/2004 043100 X n/a 2012 Saenz, Sixto 9/29/2005 06-3652 x 9 2015 Saenz, Sixto 10/01/2009 09-5043 X n/a 2018 Sahm, John 6/19/2009 09-4939 x 7 2016 Sahm, John 8/22/2007 08-4332 x 9 2015 Sahm, John 10/29/2011 11-0302 X n/a 2018 Sahm,John 03/05/2010 10-0049 X n/a 2018 Sahm, John 01/25/2011 11-0020 X n/a 2018 Salas, Adrian 7/27/2011 11-0194 X n/a 2017 Salas, Mario 12/3/2005 06-3714 x 9 2015 Salas, Mario 7/8/2007 08-4296 x 9 2015 Salazar, Arthur 7/13/2004 053201 X n/a 2012 54 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Salazar, Arthur 10/25/2002 022116 X n/a 2012 Salazar, Arthur 7/12/2001 021889 X n/a 2012 Salazar, Arthur 2/8/2001 011699 X n/a 2012 Salazar, Arthur 1/20/2000 001278 X n/a 2012 Salazar, Gilbert 12/12/2002 032547 X n/a 2012 Salazar, Juventino 12/18/2008 09-4797 x 7 2016 Salazar, Juventino 5/6/2010 10-0099 x 7 2016 Salazar, Juventino 8/5/2002 032353 X n/a 2012 Salazar, Juventino 11/13/2006 07-4081 x 9 2015 Salazar, Juventino 1/25/2006 06-3773 x 9 2015 Salceda, David 3/17/1999 99PDS0102 X n/a 2012 Salceda, David 2/25/1997 97PDS0155 X n/a 2012 Salcedo, Leonard 12/1/2002 032496 X n/a 2012 Salcedo, Leonard 11/1/2001 022269 X n/a 2012 Salcedo, Leonard 5/21/2001 021897 X n/a 2012 Salcedo, Leonard 2/18/2001 011707 X n/a 2012 Salcedo, Leonard 2/20/1999 99PDS0064 X n/a 2012 Salcido, Ronald 4/12/2004 043107 X n/a 2012 Saldana, Carlos 2/1/2010 10-0026 x 7 2016 Saldana, Dion 5/13/2009 09-4906 x 7 2016 Saldana, Dion 7/23/2004 053216 X n/a 2012 Saldana, Dion 6/3/2003 042794 X n/a 2012 Saldana, Dion 3/17/2003 032628 X n/a 2012 Saldana, Dion 2/23/2007 07-4161 x 9 2015 Saldana, Dion 4/26/2008 08-4563 x 9 2015 Saldana, Dion 5/12/2005 05-3506 x 9 2015 Saldana, Dion 6/14/2006 06-3923 x 9 2015 Saldana, Dion 8/9/2010 10-0188 X n/a 2017 Saldana, Dion 12/13/2010 11-0008 X n/a 2018 Saldana, Dion 11/28/2005 06-3709 X n/a 2018 Saldana, Dion 04/18/2011 11-0097 X n/a 2018 Saldana, Dion 05/02/2006 06-3874 X n/a 2018 Saldana, Dion O1/29/2010 10-0027 X n/a 2018 Saldana, Dion 12/02/2009 09-5116 X n/a 2018 Saldivar, Arabela 6/1/2004 043162 X n/a 2012 Saldivar, Arabela 8/5/2003 042809 X n/a 2012 Saldivar, Arabela 2/23/1999 99CDH0071 X n/a 2012 Salerno, Anthony 3/31/2010 10-0071 x 7 2016 Salerno, Anthony 11/5/2010 10-0127 x 7 2016 Salerno, Anthony 6/26/2004 043182 X n/a 2012 Salerno, Anthony 7/9/2007 08-4284 x 9 2015 Salerno, Anthony 7/29/2008 09-4652 x 9 2015 Salinas, Miguel 7/27/2001 021904 X n/a 2012 Salinas, Miguel 7/4/2001 021895 X n/a 2012 55of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Salo, Tyler 10/29/2009 09-5075 x 7 2016 Salo, Tyler 10/27/2003 042929 X n/a 2012 Salo, Tyler 5/21/2007 07-4232 x 9 2015 Salo, Tyler 10/28/2010 10-0270 X n/a 2017 Samora, Julian 3/30/2001 011758 X n/a 2012 Samuel, Michael 9/10/2009 09-5028 x 7 2016 Samuel, Michael 5/17/2009 09-4916 x 7 2016 Samuel, Michael 4/24/2001 011808 X n/a 2012 Samuel, Michael 11/16/2006 07-4076 x 9 2015 Sanchez, Elma 2/6/2003 032579 X n/a 2012 Sanchez, Elma 6/15/2002 022291 X n/a 2012 Sanchez, Eugenio 6/23/2005 05-3552 x 7 2016 Sanchez, Eugenio 7/2/2008 09-4615 x 7 2016 Sanchez, Eugenio 5/14/2007 07-4264 x 9 2015 Sanchez, Eugenio 11/17/2005 06-3702 x 22 2015 Sanchez, Eugenio 10/30/2008 09-4759 x 22 2015 Sanchez, Eugenio 4/0/08 08-4539 x 22 2015 Sanchez, Eugenio 03/25/2011 11-0076 X n/a 2018 Sanchez, Oscar 11/8/1998 98PDN0387 X n/a 2012 Sanchez, Otilio 6/23/2004 043178 X n/a 2012 Sanchez, Otillio 7/29/2005 06-3581 x 22 2015 Sanchez, Otillio 11/10/2006 07-4088 x 22 2015 Sanchez, Otillio 2/5/2008 08-4498 x 22 2015 Sanchez, Veronica 2/3/2001 011697 X n/a 2012 Sanchez, Victor 12/1/2003 042952 X n/a 2012 Sandford, Richard 9/5/2005 06-3612 x 7 2016 Sandlin, Brian 7/23/2004 053214 X n/a 2012 Sandlin, Brian 4/18/2004 043118 X n/a 2012 Sandlin, Brian 5/26/2006 06-3903 x 22 2015 Sandlin, Brian 2/17/2011 11-0047 X n/a 2017 Sandlin, Brian 9/12/2010 10-0234 X n/a 2017 Sandlin, Brian 10/05/2011 11-0254 X n/a 2018 Sandlin, William G. 11/4/2004 053324 X n/a 2012 Sandlin, William G. 9/15/2004 053272 X n/a 2012 Sandlin, William G. 3/31/2004 043081 X n/a 2012 Sandlin, William G. 2/11/2004 043080 X n/a 2012 Sandlin, William G. 12/22/2003 042980 X n/a 2012 Sandlin, William G. 2/12/2002 022136 X n/a 2012 Sandlin, William G. 4/15/2001 011790 X n/a 2012 Sandoval, David 4/19/2006 06-3858 x 22 2015 Sandoval, Dora 06/29/2010 10-0155 X n/a 2018 Sandoval, Rachel 5/22/2006 06-3895 x 22 2015 Sandoval, Silviano 11/26/2007 08-4426 x 22 2015 Santa Ana, William 10/11/2007 08-4379 x 22 2015 56 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Santa Ana, William 04/09/2013 13-0057 X n/a 2018 Santana, Maria 11/19/2002 032488 X n/a 2012 Santana, Maria 6/22/2001 011873 X n/a 2012 Santiano,Editha 10/12/2000 011577 X n/a 2012 Santos,Laura 4/5/2009 09-4865 x 7 2016 Santos, Nubia 1/3/2007 08-4380 x 22 2015 Sarabia, Mel 7/31/2008 09-4730 x 7 2016 Sarabia, Pablo 9/12/2005 06-3622 x 22 2015 Sarabia, Pablo 10/10/2011 11-0259 X n/a 2018 Sarinana, Arthur V. 9/24/2002 032419 X n/a 2012 Sato, Randy 7/20/2006 074003 X n/a 2012 Saucedo, Roberto 9/21/2005 06-3640 x 22 2015 Saunder, Randy 04/29/2012 12-0090 X n/a 2018 Saunders, Amelia 1/13/2010 10-0008 x 7 2016 Saunders, Amelia 9/12/2002 053538 X n/a 2012 Saunders, Randy 7/22/2004 053218 X n/a 2012 Saunders, Randy 7/25/2003 042798 X n/a 2012 Saunders, Randy 7/24/2002 032361 X n/a 2012 Sayne, Robert 07/24/1995 96PD50014 X n/a 2018 Scanlon, Michael 12/27/2004 053377 X n/a 2012 Scanlon, Michael 10/5/2004 053299 X n/a 2012 Scanlon, Michael 4/18/2003 032687 X n/a 2012 Scanlon, Michael 08/28/2001 02-2126 X n/a 2018 Schanderl, Wolfgang 1/10/2001 011664 X n/a 2012 Scharf, Roger 3/7/1990 90140101 x 7 2016 Scheer, William 10/30/1997 97PDSO417 X n/a 2017 Scheer, Williams 6/7/2005 05-3529 x 22 2015 Schiebe, George 8/28/2003 042837 X n/a 2012 Schiebe, George 7/23/2003 042796 X n/a 2012 Schnabl, James 3/27/2004 043079 X n/a 2012 Schnabl, James 7/14/2000 011458 X n/a 2012 Schnabl, James 7/05/06' 07-3949 x 29 2015 Schreckler, Brian 12/13/1999 00-1247 x 17 2016 Schreckler, Brian 4/17/2000 00-1368 x 17 2016 Schreckler, Brian 10/11/1999 00-1192 x 17 2016 Schultze, Donna 5/6/2009 09-4903 x 7 2016 Schultze, Donna 5/1/1999 99RECO148 X n/a 2012 Schultze, Donna 06/03/2013 13-0084 X n/a 2018 Schultze, Donna 07/19/2011 11-0199 X n/a 2018 Schwacher, David 5/23/2005 05-3513 x 29 2015 Scoggins, James 12/13/2003 042989 X n/a 2012 Scotti, Joseph 10/4/2000 042889 X n/a 2012 Sedivec, Jeffery 3/13/1998 02-2119 x 24 2015 Seehr,Ross 5/3/1991 91140156 x 7 2016 57of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Seleno, George J. 1/5/2000 001375 X n/a 2012 Sepeda, Gilbert 12/5/1992 92PSS0432 x 29 2015 Sepeda, Gilbert 9/14/1994 94PWS0304 x 29 2015 Sepeda, Gilbert 4/20/1987 87002150 x 29 2015 Sepulveda, Marylou 11/1/2006 07-4062 x 29 2015 Sera, Dymphno 12/17/2007 08-4441 x 8 2016 Serafin, Thomas 6/17/2004 04-3170 x 8 2016 Serafin, Thomas 9/20/2000 011547 X n/a 2012 Serafin, Thomas 8/1/2007 08-4307 x 29 2015 Serafin, Thomas 9/21/2006 07-4012 x 29 2015 Seran,Janet 6/8/2005 05-3545 x 8 2016 Serna, Dymphno M. 9/15/2010 10-0227 x 17 2016 Serna, Dymphno M. 7/17/2002 032331 X n/a 2012 Serna, Dymphno M. 6/21/2002 022295 X n/a 2012 Serrano, Ada 10/12/2010 10-0252 X n/a 2018 Serrano, Gerry 7/10/2006 07-3950 x 29 2015 Serrato, Richard 6/29/2006 06-3938 x 8 2016 Serrato, Richard 4/23/2008 08-4571 x 8 2016 Server, Gail 1/8/2007 07-4118 x 29 2015 Shin, Curtis 6/19/2008 08-4611 x 8 2016 Shin, Curtis 10/30/2007 08-4400 x 29 2015 Shirey, Martha 7/3/2008 09-4623 x 8 2016 Shirey, Martha 4/21/1998 02-2205 x 8 2016 Shirey, Martha 8/24/1997 97PDS0412 X n/a 2012 Shirey, Martha 12/16/1982 82001163 X n/a 2012 Shorthouse, Mark 4/27/2004 043120 X n/a 2012 Shuck, Larry 10/22/2002 03-2465 X n/a 2017 Sianez, Lydia 12/17/2001 022062 X n/a 2012 Sierra, John 7/14/1992 92FDCO243 X n/a 2012 Silva, Adrian 7/2/2008 09-4625 x 8 2016 Silva, Adrian 6/8/2005 05-3533 x 29 2015 Silva, Celia 8/14/2010 10-200 x 8 2016 Silva, Celia 8/23/2008 09-4683 x 29 2015 Silva, Celia Z. 11/3/2001 022019 X n/a 2012 Silva, Celia Z. 10/25/2003 042895 X n/a 2012 Silva, Elizabeth 8/5/2003 042806 X n/a 2012 Sisk, Earl 4/23/2003 032731 X n/a 2012 Sisk, Earl 4/8/2003 032673 X n/a 2012 Skelly, Thomas 10/06/1997 97FDA0331 X n/a 2018 Slayton, Corey 7/18/2009 09-4972 x 8 2016 Slayton, Corey 12/24/2008 09-4799 x 8 2016 Slayton, Corey 2/22/2006 06-3810 x 29 2015 Slayton, Corey 09/13/2011 11-0237 X n/a 2018 Slayton, Corey 10/30/2011 11-0266 X n/a 2018 58 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Small, Robert 10/11/2003 042887 X n/a 2012 Smith, Doyle 8/10/2002 032357 X n/a 2012 Smith, Gregory 7/12/2000 011450 X n/a 2012 Smith, Gregory 9/8/2005 06-3618 x 30 2015 Smith, Gregory 5/16/2003 03-2722 X n/a 2017 Smith, Janice 3/3/2004 043055 X n/a 2012 Smith, Jeff 1/17/2001 011672 X n/a 2012 Smith, Mildred 6/21/2004 043172 X n/a 2012 Smith, Mildred 11/20/1989 89140357 X n/a 2012 Smith, Robert 3/12/2009 09-4848 x 8 2016 Smith, Robert 11/14/2003 042926 X n/a 2012 Smith, Robert 11/4/2007 08-4415 x 30 2015 Smith, Robert 06/09/2011 11-0145 X n/a 2018 Smith, Ruth 8/20/2001 022197 X n/a 2012 Smith, Stewart 8/19/2002 032398 X n/a 2012 Smith, Stewart 1/20/2002 022146 X n/a 2012 Smith, Stewart 12/19/1999 001244 X n/a 2012 Smith, Stewart 7/5/1998 98PDS0245 X n/a 2012 Smith, Stewart 6/18/2008 09-4640 x 30 2015 Smith, Wayne 7/13/2009 09-4970 x 8 2016 Smith, Wayne 9/10/2003 042854 X n/a 2012 Smith, Wayne 2/4/2003 302575 X n/a 2012 Smith, Wayne 10/24/2001 022009 X n/a 2012 Smith, Wayne 4/8/2008 08-4540 x 30 2015 Smtih, Robert 3/19/2008 08-4515 x 30 2015 Soderman, Lidia 12/29/2011 12-0007 X n/a 2017 Solideo, Maybelline 7/23/2007 08-4297 x 30 2015 Solideo, Maybelline 08/13/2011 11-0213 X n/a 2018 Solis, Liza 5/21/2001 011825 X n/a 2012 Solis, Luis 01/20/2012 12-0023 X n/a 2018 Solomon, Steven 9/10/2008 09-4708 x 8 2016 Solomon, Steven 5/15/2004 043135 X n/a 2012 Solomon, Steven 2/19/2004 043036 X n/a 2012 Solomon, Steven 11/3/2003 042912 X n/a 2012 Solomon, Steven 5/28/2003 032735 X n/a 2012 Solomon, Steven 11/4/2002 032469 X n/a 2012 Solomon, Steven 8/1/2001 021910 X n/a 2012 Solomon, Steven 3/23/2005 05-3453 x 30 2015 Solomon, Steven 7/14/2006 07-3977 x 30 2015 Solomon, Steven 11/10/2011 11-0278 X n/a 2018 Solomon, Steven 07/29/2011 11-0211 X n/a 2018 Solorio, Ernesto 11/30/2012 12-0228 X n/a 2018 Solorio, Sandra 3/19/2002 022177 X n/a 2012 Sontag, Brandon 2/18/2010 10-0039 x 8 2016 59 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Sontag, Brandon 8/2/2008 09-4660 x 8 2016 Sontag, Brandon 6/28/2008 08-4613 x 8 2016 Sontag, Brandon 09/22/2010 10-0236 X n/a 2018 Sorenson, Mathew 11/26/2008 09-4787 x 8 2016 Sorenson, Mathew 3/13/2004 043068 X n/a 2012 Soria, Gaspar 7/17/2004 053205 X n/a 2012 Soria, Gaspar 2/21/2003 032602 X n/a 2012 Soria, Gaspar 6/22/2005 05-3550 x 30 2015 Soria, Gaspar 09/07/2011 11-0235 X n/a 2018 Soria, Gaspar 12/O1/2008 09-4783 X n/a 2018 Soria, Robert 6/27/2002 03-2313 x 8 2016 Soria, Robert 10/19/2005 06-3670 x 30 2015 Soto Jr., Jesus (Jesse) 9/22/2004 053282 X n/a 2012 Soto,Jesus 08/10/2000 01-1489 X n/a 2018 Sovine, Nancy 1/1/2002 032683 X n/a 2012 Sowder, Mark 7/9/2004 053195 X n/a 2012 Sowder, Mark 3/7/2002 022171 X n/a 2012 Sowder, Mark 12/16/2001 022067 X n/a 2012 Sowder, Mark 9/15/2001 021961 X n/a 2012 Sowder, Mark 1/8/2001 011661 X n/a 2012 Sowder, Mark 09/17/2004 05-3279 X n/a 2018 Spiker, Chad 12/17/2004 053370 X n/a 2012 Spitler, Richard 9/21/2000 011553 X n/a 2012 Spitler, Richard 3/20/2007 07-4185 x 30 2015 Standke, Eugene 12/17/2009 09-5131 x 8 2016 Standke, Eugene (Victor) 4/18/2008 08-4550 x 30 2015 Standke, Eugene (Victor) 1/4/2007 07-4120 x 30 2015 Standke, Victor 9/12/2004 053270 X n/a 2012 Standke, Victor Eugene 4/12/2004 043093 X n/a 2012 Starling, Nellie 6/21/2001 011871 X n/a 2012 Starling, Nelly 9/8/2010 10-0192 x 8 2016 Steaffens, Elaine 8/16/2005 06-3590 x 30 2015 Steaffens, Elaine 8/27/2003 04-2840 x 30 2015 Steen, Mark 6/5/2003 032743 X n/a 2012 Sterling, William 8/19/2008 09-4673 x 8 2016 Sterling, William 12/12/2008 09-4796 x 8 2016 Sterling, William 4/24/2008 08-4558 x 30 2015 Sterling, William 2/19/2008 08-4491 x 30 2015 Sterling, William Jr 12/21/2001 022074 X n/a 2012 Sterling, William Jr 8/27/2001 021934 X n/a 2012 Stevens, Jeff 10/1/2009 09-5042 x 8 2016 Stiles, Ken 9/25/2008 09-4722 x 8 2016 Stiles, Ken 1/7/2008 08-4449 x 30 2015 Stiles, Kenneth 7/10/2003 042779 X n/a 2012 60 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Stiles, Kenneth 6/2/2003 032733 X n/a 2012 Stiles, Kenneth 10/3/2001 021987 X n/a 2012 Stiles, Kenneth 4/17/2001 011792 X n/a 2012 Stiller, Scott 3/22/2001 011833 X n/a 2012 Stills, Kenneth 4/1/2005 05-3462 x 30 2015 Stills, Kenneth 6/19/2005 05-3541 x 30 2015 Stills, Kenneth 10/2/2005 06-3648 x 30 2015 Stills, Kenneth 1/1/2006 06-3918 x 30 2015 Stills, Nedka 4/30/2010 10-0092 x 8 2016 Stires, Ronald 1/25/2005 05-3414 x 9 2016 Stires, Ronald 1/26/2011 11-0024 X n/a 2017 Stong, Kattie 5/20/2010 10-0113 x 9 2016 Stong, Kattie 11/18/2010 10-0285 X n/a 2017 Stow, Donald 2/8/2005 053412 X n/a 2012 Stow, Donald 6/22/2005 05-3548 x 30 2015 Strohman, Mark 12/16/2003 042971 X n/a 2012 Stuck, James 2/3/2007 07-4141 x 30 2015 Stuck, James 5/7/2008 08-4572 x 30 2015 Stuck, James 7/15/2011 11-0183 X n/a 2017 Stueland, Dennis 11/26/2004 053508 X n/a 2012 Stueland, Dennis 10/24/2001 022110 X n/a 2012 Stuhl, Michael 4/17/2003 032681 X n/a 2012 Suarez, Antonio 7/6/2008 09-4647 x 9 2016 Suarez, Antonio 12/26/2001 022077 X n/a 2012 Suarez, Antonio 4/17/2005 05-3532 x 29 2015 Suarez, Antonio 9/2/2005 06-3613 x 29 2015 Suarez, Antonio 12/13/2005 06-3725 x 30 2015 Suarez, Antonio 1/16/2006 06-3778 x 30 2015 Suarez, Antonio 1/13/2007 07-4122 x 30 2015 Suarez, Antonio 12/29/2005 06-3732 x 30 2015 Sullivan, Danny 8/1/2007 08-4304 x 29 2015 Summers, Michael 10/14/2005 06-3669 x 29 2015 Summers, Michael A. 11/17/2002 032550 X n/a 2012 Summers, Michael A. 11/17/2000 011610 X n/a 2012 Summres, Michael 5/4/2009 09-4899 x 9 2016 Swaim, Robert 9/23/1993 93PDS0306 X n/a 2012 Swanson, Joann 9/1/2008 09-4699 x 9 2016 Sweet, William 7/20/2005 06-3574 x 9 2016 Sweet, William 9/4/2007 08-4388 x 29 2015 Tabako,Leon 3/26/2003 032634 X n/a 2012 Tabako,Leon 1/9/2003 032537 X n/a 2012 Tabako,Leon 1/11/2002 022095 X n/a 2012 Talmage, Jeff 3/8/2010 10-0054 x 9 2016 Talmage, Jeff 3/16/2009 09-4849 x 9 2016 61 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Talmage, Jeffrey 10/12/2010 10-0249 X n/a 2018 Talmage, Jeffrey 05/16/1988 86000829 X n/a 2018 Talmage, Jeffry 3/28/2001 011767 X n/a 2012 Talmage, Jeffry 5/12/2005 05-3507 x 29 2015 Talmage, Jeffry 6/9/2008 08-4598 X n/a 2017 Tanksley, Rufus 5/1/2003 042777 X n/a 2012 Tanksley, Rufus 3/23/2005 05-3452 x 29 2015 Tapawan, Elenita 12/5/2003 042953 X n/a 2012 Tarbutton, Ken 4/3/2007 07-4192 x 29 2015 Tarbutton, Kenneth 8/15/2004 053241 X n/a 2012 Tarbutton, Scott 10/19/2010 10-0257 X n/a 2018 Tavenner, James 6/1/2010 10-0121 x 9 2016 Tavenner, James 12/3/1999 001235 X n/a 2012 Taylor, Coleen 6/22/2007 07-4262 x 20 2015 Taylor, Coleen 6/3/2006 06-3907 x 20 2015 Taylor, Coleen 3/8/2008 08-4504 x 20 2015 Taylor, Colleen 11/7/2002 03-2476 x 9 2016 Taylor, Colleen 11/17/2011 11-0285 X n/a 2018 Taylor, Ryan 7/1/2003 042770 X n/a 2012 Taylor, Ryan 10/18/2011 11-0261 X n/a 2018 Te, David 5/31/2007 07-4242 x 20 2015 Teed, Chris 8/17/2008 09-4676 x 9 2016 Teed,Chris 10/18/2006 07-4045 x 20 2015 Teed,Chris 1/11/2006 06-3789 x 20 2015 Teed,Chris 03/10/2008 08-4514 X n/a 2018 Teed,Chris 02/21/2009 09-4831 X n/a 2018 Teed, Chris K. 3/26/2003 032648 X n/a 2012 Theilman, William 4/29/2005 05-3491 x 20 2015 Theilman, William 1/30/2007 07-4136 x 20 2015 Theilman, William 12/7/2006 07-4095 x 20 2015 Theilman, William 6/3/2007 07-4250 x 20 2015 Theilman, William 5/27/2005 05-3518 x 20 2015 Thielman, William 10/17/2004 05101704 X n/a 2012 Thielman, William 9/5/2004 053267 X n/a 2012 Thielman, William 8/19/2005 06-3601 x 20 2015 Thielman, William 5/14/2011 11-0125 X n/a 2017 Thomas, David 9/4/2005 06-3860 x 20 2015 Thomas, Suzanne 11/21/1998 98PDNO404 X n/a 2012 Thomas, Suzanne 2/11/2005 05-3417 x 20 2015 Thomas -Reed, Suzanne 8/31/2009 09-5000 x 9 2016 Thompson, Aaron 3/26/2008 08-4533 x 20 2015 Thompson, Kathleen 7/7/2009 09-4956 x 9 2016 Thompson, Kathleen 3/4/2008 08-4513 x 20 2015 Thyr, Robert 7/25/2000 011478 X n/a 2012 62 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Tilson, Michael 10/24/2004 053314 X n/a 2012 Timoti, John 8/29/2007 08-4333 x 9 2016 Timoti, John 12/21/2004 053374 X n/a 2012 Timoti, John 6/8/2006 06-3914 x 20 2015 Titel, Daniel 3/8/2007 07-4175 x 20 2015 Tolosa, Roger 07/16/2013 13-0112 X n/a 2018 Tong,Dung 11/25/2004 053343 X n/a 2012 Tong,Dung 4/7/1999 99PDNO123 X n/a 2012 Torres Sr., Larry 8/14/2002 032369 X n/a 2012 Torres Sr., Larry 3/13/2002 022169 X n/a 2012 Torres Sr., Larry 2/14/2002 022138 X n/a 2012 Torres Sr., Larry 11/21/2001 022050 X n/a 2012 Torres Sr., Larry 3/28/2001 011757 X n/a 2012 Torres Sr., Larry 1/11/2001 011667 X n/a 2012 Torres Sr., Larry 1/7/1999 99PWM0014 X n/a 2012 Torres, Edward 6/21/2007 07-4256 x 20 2015 Torres, James 7/27/2005 063597 X n/a 2012 Torres, James 1/9/1997 97FDS0005 X n/a 2012 Torres, James 9/28/2005 06-3657 x 20 2015 Torres, James 11/30/2005 06-3713 x 20 2015 Torres, James 5/18/2000 00-1400 x 20 2015 Torres, James 8/16/2001 02-1922 x 20 2015 Torres, James 5/17/2003 03-2723 x 20 2015 Torres, James 7/28/2003 04-2797 x 20 2015 Torres, James 6/22/2005 05-3558 x 20 2015 Torres, Larry 02/13/1997 97PWM0028 X n/a 2018 Torres, Larry 07/18/1996 96PWM0185 X n/a 2018 Torres, Larry Sr. 4/16/2004 04-3154 x 20 2015 Torres, Luis 11/1/2002 032471 X n/a 2012 Torres, Luis 6/15/2001 011855 X n/a 2012 Torres, Luis 1/23/2001 011681 X n/a 2012 Torrez, Linda 8/11/1999 001114 X n/a 2012 Torrez, Nancy 02/27/2012 12-0052 X n/a 2018 Tosh, Mary 9/17/2001 021971 X n/a 2012 Townley, Thomas 12/25/2004 053380 X n/a 2012 Townley, Thomas 2/4/2003 032576 X n/a 2012 Townley, Thomas 4/25/1996 96FDS0103 X n/a 2012 Townley, Thomas 9/12/2005 06-3621 x 20 2015 Townley, Thomas 09/15/2010 10-0229 X n/a 2018 Townley, Thomas 03/04/2008 08-4500 X n/a 2018 Tran, Hiep 7/10/2002 032347 X n/a 2012 Tran, Marcel 10/27/2006 07-4058 x 20 2015 Tran, Michael C. 3/21/2002 022176 X n/a 2012 Trattner, Harry 5/28/2004 043150 X n/a 2012 63of71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Trattner, Harry 2/22/2002 022158 X n/a 2012 Trattner, Harry 8/28/2005 06-3609 x 20 2015 Trattner, Harry 8/23/2007 08-4330 x 20 2015 Trattner, Harry 4/6/2007 07-4193 x 20 2015 Trattner, Harry 01/29/1999 99MED0048 X n/a 2018 Trattner, Harry 07/02/2011 11-0168 X n/a 2018 Trattner, Harry 03/29/1998 98MED0116 X n/a 2018 Trattner, Harry 07/08//2007 08-4286 X n/a 2018 Trattner, Harry 08/11/2009 09-5002 X n/a 2018 Trejo, Roberto 2/15/2001 011703 X n/a 2012 Trenholm, Chris 5/14/2010 10-0173 X n/a 2017 Trenholm, Chris 04/02/2004 04-3140 X n/a 2018 Trenholm, Christopher 9/17/2000 011546 X n/a 2012 Trevino, Thelma 5/6/2010 10-0094 x 9 2016 Trevino, Thelma 4/15/2010 10-0079 x 9 2016 Trevino, Thelma 9/6/2004 053262 X n/a 2012 Trevino, Thelma 3/30/2007 04-4186 x 24 2015 Trinajstich, Chris 10/22/1991 91140362 X n/a 2012 Trinajstich, Chris 2/10/1989 89140048 X n/a 2012 Trinajstich, Chris 11/29/1988 88ANA212436 X n/a 2012 Trinajstich, Chris 7/12/1988 88140162 X n/a 2012 Trinajstich, Chris 5/1/1988 88140014 X n/a 2012 Tripp, Timothy 4/23/2001 011797 X n/a 2012 Tripp, Timothy 4/20/1999 99PAR0138 X n/a 2012 Trujillo, Rose Ann 11/8/2002 032533 X n/a 2012 Truong, Lien 5/5/2009 09-4897 x 9 2016 Truong, Lien 9/23/2009 09-5037 x 9 2016 Tucker, John 5/22/2004 053261 X n/a 2012 Tucker, John 9/18/1998 98PDS0312 X n/a 2012 Tucker, John 03/01/1997 97PDS0369 X n/a 2018 Tuller, Wendy 1/11/2010 10-0006 x 9 2016 Turley, Doris 5/18/1998 98CDA0179 X n/a 2012 Underwood, Larry 04/03/2010 10-0074 X n/a 2018 Underwood, Lawrence 4/1/2003 032676 X n/a 2012 Underwood, Lawrence 7/3/2000 011444 X n/a 2012 Underwood, Lawrence 10/19/2005 06-3678 x 24 2015 Underwood, Lawrence 1/4/2007 07-4115 x 24 2015 Underwood, Lawrence 3/19/2008 08-4517 x 24 2015 Uribe, Hiram 9/22/2000 011555 X n/a 2012 Uribe, Hiram 10/5/2008 09-4726 x 24 2015 Uribe, Hiram 04/10/2012 12-0068 X n/a 2018 Urtez, Alex 9/28/2004 053291 X n/a 2012 Urtez, Alex 9/8/2003 042848 X n/a 2012 Urtez, Alex 12/11/2001 022059 X n/a 2012 64 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Urtez, Alex 9/4/2006 07-3996 x 24 2015 Urtez, Belinda 09/26/1997 97PWA0317 X n/a 2018 Uruza, Christian 10/14/2001 02-2013 x 9 2016 Urzua, Christian 5/23/2001 011826 X n/a 2012 Urzua, Christian 4/19/2001 011801 X n/a 2012 Urzua, Christian 2/24/2008 08-4503 x 24 2015 Valdez, Ana 6/7/2005 05-3539 x 24 2015 Valdez, Clemente 4/4/2006 06-3844 x 24 2015 Valdez, Elliott E. 4/24/2002 022225 X n/a 2012 Valdez, John 3/26/09 09-4868 x 9 2016 Valdez, John 8/22/2003 042839 X n/a 2012 Valdez, John 4/9/2002 022200 X n/a 2012 Valdez, John 07/28/2010 10-0175 X n/a 2018 Valdez, John 12/10/1998 99FLT0010 X n/a 2018 Valdez, John 07/13/2004 05-3200 X n/a 2018 Valdez, John 06/06/1997 97FLT0174 X n/a 2018 Valdez, Joseph 07/23/2013 13-0109 X n/a 2018 Valdez, Judith 12/7/2009 09-5121 x 9 2016 Valdez, Judith 09/09/2012 12-0179 X n/a 2018 Valdez, Robert 11/7/2001 022026 X n/a 2012 Valdez, Robert 5/2/2001 011813 X n/a 2012 Valenzuela, Jaime 9/30/2008 09-4735 x 9 2016 Van Es, Jeff S. 11/1/2000 011585 X n/a 2012 Van, Alex 5/3/2003 032705 X n/a 2012 Van, Alex 2/14/2001 011704 X n/a 2012 Van, Alex 11/01/1995 95MED0405 X n/a 2018 Van, Alexander 9/21/2005 06-3635 x 10 2016 Van, Alexander 2/16/2009 09-4828 x 14 2015 Van, Alexander 12/20/2001 02-2073 x 24 2015 Varela, Andres 8/11/2008 09-4675 x 10 2016 Varela, Andres 3/8/2004 043056 X n/a 2012 Varela, Andres 9/16/2002 032407 X n/a 2012 Vargas, Fernando 10/9/2003 042898 X n/a 2012 Vargas, Fernando 6/27/2003 042765 X n/a 2012 Vargas, Fernando 4/11/2002 022202 X n/a 2012 Vargas, Joe 10/28/2010 30-0272 X n/a 2017 Vargas, JoeL. 2/11/2002 022139 X n/a 2012 Vargas,Jorge 7/23/2004 053217 X n/a 2012 Vargas,Jorge 5/5/2004 043125 X n/a 2012 Vargas,Jorge 2/3/2003 032573 X n/a 2012 Vargas,Jorge 5/4/2001 011815 X n/a 2012 Vargas, Jorge 1/7/2007 07-4121 x 24 2015 Vargas, Martha 2/15/2005 05-3423 x 10 2016 Vargas, Michael 1/2/2004 042991 X n/a 2012 65 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Vargas, Michael 2/12/2007 07-4148 x 24 2015 Vasquez, Andres 7/15/2011 11-0187 X n/a 2017 Vasquez, Joe 07/01/2003 04-2789 X n/a 2018 Vasquez, Joseph 1/28/2005 053401 X n/a 2012 Vasquez, Joseph 4/2/2004 043089 X n/a 2012 Vasquez, Joseph 10/29/2007 08-4394 x 13 2016 Vasquez, Joseph 3/21/2003 032401 X n/a 2012 Vasquez, Joseph 2/14/2001 011723 X n/a 2012 Vasquez, Joseph 05/19/2004 04-3136 X n/a 2018 Vasquez, Joseph 09/12/2005 06-3673 X n/a 2018 Vasquez, Melissa 5/6/2002 022244 X n/a 2012 Vasquez, Veronica 5/9/2001 021985 X n/a 2012 Vasquez, Veronica 2/5/2001 011712 X n/a 2012 Vazquez. Andres 1/7/2008 08-4452 x 10 2016 Vega,Hugo 9/10/2002 032416 X n/a 2012 Vega, Lupita 11/13/2007 08-4432 x 10 2016 Velasco, Monica 08/16/2012 12-0157 X n/a 2018 Velasco, Robert 11/12/2013 13-0177 X n/a 2018 Velasco, Teresa 1/15/2005 053392 X n/a 2012 Velasco, Teresa 1/9/2002 022097 X n/a 2012 Velasco, Teresa 11/23/2010 11-0003 X n/a 2017 Velasquez, Ricardo 11/12/2012 12-0211 X n/a 2018 Verdugo,Gegardo 10/7/2007 08-4376 x 10 2016 Verdugo,Gerardo 12/09/2010 10-0302 X n/a 2018 Verduzco,Violetta 5/18/2004 043141 X n/a 2012 Veres, Deborah 1/28/2004 043021 X n/a 2012 Vergara, Ramiro 5/30/2010 10-0137 x 10 2016 Vergara, Ramiro 7/22/2006 07-3959 x 24 2015 Vergara, Ramiro 03/03/2012 12-0049 X n/a 2018 Vergara, Ramiro 12/09/2012 12-0223 X n/a 2018 Vergara, Ramiro 09/09/2013 13-0137 X n/a 2018 Vergil, David 3/4/2003 032618 X n/a 2012 Vergil, David 6/13/2001 011852 X n/a 2012 Vergil, David 2/21/2001 011711 X n/a 2012 Viar, David 1/14/2010 10-0013 x 10 2016 Viar, David 6/14/2010 10-0136 x 10 2016 Viar, David 11/3/2004 053327 X n/a 2012 Viar, David 8/12/2004 053237 X n/a 2012 Viar, David 6/5/2004 043160 X n/a 2012 Viar, David 3/3/2004 043053 X n/a 2012 Viar, David 3/14/2003 032630 X n/a 2012 Viar, David 11/12/2002 032484 X n/a 2012 Viar, David 3/7/2002 022170 X n/a 2012 Viar, David 2/11/2001 011705 X n/a 2012 66 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Viar, David 8/16/1998 98FDS0288 X n/a 2012 Viar, David O1/30/2008 08-4475 X n/a 2018 Vidaurreta, Vince 8/16/2002 032390 X n/a 2012 Vidaurreta, Vince 4/26/2006 06-3865 x 24 2015 Viescas, Elaine 2/2/2005 05-3408 x 10 2016 Vigil, Brian 8/10/2009 09-4999 x 10 2016 Villa, Eduardo 2/26/2004 043050 X n/a 2012 Villa, Tony 02/18/2011 11-00479 X n/a 2018 Villamar, Ruben 9/17/2003 042862 X n/a 2012 Villamar, Ruben 9/24/2001 021982 X n/a 2012 Villamar, Ruben 6/20/2001 011866 X n/a 2012 Villamar, Ruben 5/30/2001 011840 X n/a 2012 Villarreal, Antonio 12/6/2005 06-3717 x 24 2015 Villarreal, Antonio 2/13/2006 06-3798 x 24 2015 Villasenor, Daniel 4/26/2005 05-3486 x 24 2015 Villasenor, Daniel 8/24/2006 07-3982 x 24 2015 Villasenor, Jose 1/4/2002 022081 X n/a 2012 Villasenor, Larry 3/23/2009 09-4863 x 10 2016 Villasenor, Marcella 5/16/2002 022268 X n/a 2012 Villegas, Ernest 4/26/2014 10-0069 x 10 2016 Villegas, Ernest 11/15/2005 06-3696 x 24 2015 Villegas, Ernest 08/15/2012 12-0161 X n/a 2018 Villela, Edmundo 9/29/2004 053307 X n/a 2012 Villela, Edmundo 7/20/2001 021901 X n/a 2012 Villela, Edmundo 3/23/2001 011753 X n/a 2012 Villela, Edmundo 7/24/1999 001100 X n/a 2012 Villela, Edmundo 10/30/2006 07-4086 x 24 2015 Villela, Edmundo O1/22/2013 13-0025 X n/a 2018 Viramontes, Evelia 3/19/2001 011749 X n/a 2012 Viramontes, Jason 1/30/2009 09-4830 x 10 2016 Viramontes, Jason 1/10/2008 08-4456 x 10 2016 Viramontes, Jason 12/29/2005 06-3740 x 24 2015 Viramontes, Jason 4/12/2005 05-3471 x 24 2015 Viramontes, Jason 8/26/2003 04-2834 x 24 2015 Viramontes, Jason 3/3/2011 11-0066 X n/a 2017 Viramontes, Jason 05/22/2012 12-0100 X n/a 2018 Vlatkovich, Joseph 12/22/2006 07-4112 x 24 2015 Vlatkovich, Joseph 2/7/2004 04-3025 x 24 2015 Vlatkovich, Joseph 1/6/2006 06-3744 x 24 2015 Vlatkovich, Joseph 4/26/2011 11-0109 X n/a 2017 Vo,Huong 12/13/2006 07-4102 x 10 2016 Vo,Huong 9/10/2009 09-5050 x 10 2016 Vo,Huong 7/27/2006 07-3971 x 24 2015 Vo,Huong 1/25/2006 06-3777 x 24 2015 67 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Vo,Huong 4/6/2001 01-1772 x 24 2015 Vo,Huong 06/08/2013 13-0085 X n/a 2018 Vo,Huong 03/06/2013 13-0035 X n/a 2018 Vo,Huong 10/25/2011 11-0271 X n/a 2018 Vo, Huong (Margaret) 1/25/2006 06-3802 x 24 2015 Vo, Margaret 3/27/2008 08-4564 X 10 2016 Vu, Chieu T. 6/13/2002 022292 X n/a 2012 Vu, Khoa 12/14/2009 09-5132 x 10 2016 Vu, Khoa 04/01/2010 10-0072 X n/a 2018 Waelder, Kelly 7/1/2002 032319 X n/a 2012 Wagner, Debera 8/24/1992 92CDA0312 X n/a 2012 Wagner, Debera 5/25/1992 92CDA0402 X n/a 2012 Waite, William 3/14/2008 08-4512 x 24 2015 Waldo, Mark 11/16/2008 09-4802 x 10 2016 Waldo, Mark 10/10/2002 032441 X n/a 2012 Walker, James 10/4/2006 07-4022 x 11 2016 Walker, James 1/28/2005 05-3402 x 11 2016 Walker, Jennifer 3/14/2009 09-4847 x 11 2016 Walker, Jennifer 3/9/2006 06-3820 x 27 2015 Walker, Jennifer 10/23/2012 12-0198 X n/a 2018 Wallace, Jason 8/11/2003 042817 X n/a 2012 Wallace, Jason 6/18/2001 011865 X n/a 2012 Waltermire, Salvador 3/16/2004 043067 X n/a 2012 Waltermire, Salvador 1/8/2006 06-3821 x 27 2015 Walters, Paul 5/20/2005 03-2767 x 11 2016 Wangensteen, Elizabeth 07/05/2013 13-0098 X n/a 2018 Ward, David 11/8/2008 09-4766 x 11 2016 Ware, Gregory 10/8/2009 09-5054 X 11 2016 Ware, Gregory 6/2/2010 10-0146 X 11 2016 Ware, Gregory 3/26/2010 09-4868 x 11 2016 Ware, Gregory 5/4/2004 043177 X n/a 2012 Ware, Gregory 1/30/2002 022117 X n/a 2012 Ware, Gregory 1/4/2001 011654 X n/a 2012 Ware, Gregory 6/21/2006 06-3933 x 27 2015 Ware, Gregory 5/9/2005 05-3501 x 27 2015 Ware, Gregory 2/28/2007 07-416 x 27 2015 Ware, Gregory 09/13/1993 93FLT0278 X n/a 2018 Washington, Samuel 4/5/2002 022193 X n/a 2012 Watkins, Derrick 1/21/2002 022107 X n/a 2012 Watkins, Derrick 8/13/2001 021918 X n/a 2012 Watson, Michael 5/1/2009 09-4891 x 11 2016 Watson, Michael 1/1/2004 04-3102 x 11 2016 Watson, Mike 12/28/2002 032518 X n/a 2012 Watson, Mike 9/7/2002 032399 X n/a 2012 68 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Watson, Mike 8/11/2008 09-4664 X 27 2015 Watson, Zachary 9/30/1999 001181 X n/a 2012 Welch, Yolanda 2/22/2006 06-3804 X 27 2015 West, Glen 10/25/2006 07-4053 X 27 2015 West, Glen 12/8/2005 06-3718 X 27 2015 West, Glen 04/30/2012 12-01114 X n/a 2018 West, Glen R. 10/17/2001 022039 X n/a 2012 Weston, Gregory 02/02/2010 10-0060 X n/a 2018 Wharton, Matthew 3/2/2004 043049 X n/a 2012 Wharton, Matthew 11/19/2006 07-4077 X 27 2015 Wharton, Matthew 10/9/2007 08-4375 X 27 2015 Wharton, Matthew 8/5/2007 08-4309 X 27 2015 Whitaker, Patricia 7/24/2001 021906 X n/a 2012 Whitaker, Patricia 5/30/1996 96CDH0140 X n/a 2012 White, Eric 8/2/2008 09-4659 X 11 2016 White, Eric 9/21/2005 06-3639 X 27 2015 Whitley, Brian 5/2/2005 05-3495 X 11 2016 Whitley, Brian 9/9/2003 042860 X n/a 2012 Whitley, Brian 1/7/2002 022090 X n/a 2012 Wiemann, Kurt 2/5/2007 07-4147 X 27 2015 Willard, Ken 2/14/2011 11-0041 X n/a 2017 Willard, Kenneth 11/30/2005 06-3716 X 27 2015 Willard, Kenneth 7/26/2007 08-4310 X 27 2015 Williams, Charles 11/14/1985 85003073 X n/a 2018 Williams, Charles E. 12/5/2000 042933 X n/a 2012 Williams, Don 3/31/2009 09-4859 X 11 2016 Williams, Don 5/4/2009 09-4896 X 11 2016 Williams, Don 4/1/2008 08-4529 X 11 2016 Williams, Don 1/3/2006 06-3741 X 11 2016 Williams, Don 4/12/2004 043097 X n/a 2012 Williams, Eric 4/18/2003 032686 X n/a 2012 Williams, Hugh 06/06/1985 87005067 X n/a 2018 Williams, Joseph 8/15/1991 93PDS0027 X n/a 2012 Williams, Rayna 5/14/2009 09-4920 X 11 2016 Williams, Rayna 11/8/2009 09-5082 X 11 2016 Williams, Rayna 10/23/2008 09-4761 X 11 2016 Wilmorsky, Craig 06/13/2011 11-0154 X n/a 2018 Wilson, Rashad 05/13/2010 10-0104 X n/a 2018 Winston, Stephen 1/22/2002 022111 X n/a 2012 Winston, Steve 2/15/2008 08-4486 X 27 2015 Witt, Kendall 9/2/2010 10-0218 X 12 2016 Witt, Kendall 8/4/2010 10-0222 X n/a 2017 Wong, Alice 3/5/2001 011737 X n/a 2012 Woods, Brian 6/2/2009 09-4929 X 12 2016 69 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Woods, Brian 1/6/2007 07-4117 x 27 2015 Woods, Brian 10/09/2011 11-0262 X n/a 2018 Woods, Gerardo 5/26/2006 06-3900 x 27 2015 Woods, Kendall 10/7/2006 07-4028 x 27 2015 Yamaguchi, Kent 9/28/2007 08-4367 x 27 2015 Yarbrough, Kenneth 07/31/2003 04-3039 X n/a 2018 Yarnall, Cheryl 4/17/2007 07-4196 x 27 2015 Ybarra, James 6/15/2007 07-5254 x 27 2015 Ybarra, James 6/1/2005 05-3524 x 27 2015 Yettaw, David 1/23/2006 06-3770 x 27 2015 Yettaw, David 12/25/2007 08-4460 x 27 2015 Zambrano, Miguel 6/4/2001 011841 X n/a 2012 Zamora, Jess 12/11/2002 032515 X n/a 2012 Zamudio, Rocio 8/12/2008 09-4677 x 27 2015 Zanca, Lisa 8/25/2008 09-4688 x 27 2015 Zapien, Maria E. 8/22/2002 032375 X n/a 2012 Zaragoza, Claudia 5/6/2010 10-0096 x 12 2016 Zaragoza, Claudia 7/2/2007 08-4271 x 27 2015 Zaragoza, Edward 2/21/2002 022166 X n/a 2012 Zaragoza, Edward 04/11/2011 11-0100 X n/a 2018 Zastrow, William 3/27/2007 07-4187 x 12 2016 Zastrow, William 7/7/2007 08-4630 x 12 2016 Zastrow, William 10/6/1999 98FDS0334 X n/a 2012 Zastrow, William 6/21/2006 06-3932 x 27 2015 Zavala, Dave 12/27/2004 074258 X n/a 2012 Zavala, Dave 12/8/2004 053357 X n/a 2012 Zavala, Dave 5/19/2003 053385 X n/a 2012 Zavala, Marco 1/6/2005 053439 X n/a 2012 Zavala, Marco 7/25/2002 032339 X n/a 2012 Zavala, Marco 3/2/2000 001316 X n/a 2012 Zavala, Marco 5/8/1998 98PDS0159 X n/a 2012 Zavala, Marco 7/7/2008 09-4629 x 27 2015 Zavala, Ricardo 3/11/2001 011739 X n/a 2012 Zavala, Ricardo 1/7/2011 11-0012 X n/a 2017 Zavala, Ricardo 10/31/2012 12-0205 X n/a 2018 Zeigler, Brittany 4/21/2006 06-3859 x 27 2015 Zell, Brian 3/18/2010 10-0063 x 12 2016 Zell, Brian 08/02/2012 12-0148 X n/a 2018 Zell, Brian 11/05/2013 13-0168 X n/a 2018 Zembruzski, Richard 9/12/2000 01-1537 x 27 2015 Zembruzski, Richard 3/31/2004 06-3828 x 27 2015 Zroka, Darren 2/13/2011 11-0039 X n/a 2017 Zul, Gregorio 10/8/2004 053303 X n/a 2012 Zull, Gregorio 6/14/2009 09-4949 x 12 2016 70 of 71 7/10/2019 COSA Workers' Compensation Unit Record Destruction List Claimant Date of Injury Claim #: Medical Indemnity Box # Purge Year Zuniga, Gerardo 8/9/2010 10-0210 x 12 2016 Zuniga, Johnny 7/19/1999 00-1098 X n/a 2012 Zuniga, Johnny 7/11/2007 08-4281 x 27 2015 Zurita, Bianca 2/3/2009 09-4821 x 12 2016 71 of 71 7/10/2019 Exhibit 3 MEMORANDUM To: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney From: Jack Ciulla Chief Technology Innovations Officer Date: October 3, 2019 Re: REQUEST FOR DESTRUCTION OF RECORDS Staff members of the Information Technology Department have reviewed and identified City records that may be scheduled for destruction in accordance with the attached retention schedule outline in City Council Resolution 2013-014. Staff is respectfully requesting your approval. WIl] Oty MiManam. Mwn Nw nui wades Mf Zyelf w�vip ]Ymn GG 3a090 Flrwn l01]� Thank you. RECORDS DESTROYED: All emails prior to October 1, 2017 and not flagged for legal hold, will be deleted from the City's email archive server. Number of emails: Approximately 32 million APPROVED BY: Sonia R. Carvalho Date City Attorney Attachment Exhibit 4 Memo To: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney From: Robert Rodriguez, Commander Date: September 25, 2019 Re: Request for Destruction of Records The Internal Affairs Division requests your consent to destroy records, listed on the attached request, in accordance with the records retention schedule outlined in City Council Resolution 2013-014. Respectfully submitted, K. . Internal Affairs CITY OF SANTA ANA OBSOLETE RECORDS DESTRUCTION SCHEDULE POLICE DEPARTMENT Division Name: Internal Affairs Division Record Record Series Record Description Record Dates Category Administrative Employee Accidents involving on -duty 01/01/2012- Investigations Accidents department personnel. 12/31/2012 Administrative K-9 Reports Investigations of K-9 bite 01/01/2012- Investigations incidents. (Not to Include SB1421 12/31/2012 related files) Administrative Use of Force Use of Force and in -custody 01/01/2012- Investigations injuries. (Not to Include SB1421 12/31/2012 related files) Administrative OIS Officer Involved Shootings. (Not to 01/01/2009- Investigations Include SB 1421 related files) 12/31/2012 Citizen and By Employee Investigations of alleged 01/01/2012- Internal Name employee misconduct. (Not to 12/31/2012 Complaints include SB1421 files) Prepared by: Name: Saul Esquivel Date: September 25, Title: Corporal 2019 Number of boxes to be destroyed: 8 CONSENT BY: C1h u'r, vftww,^� avi lentin, Chief of Police APPROVED BY: ,LS rQ �t uv R CSC Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney Page 1 of 2 ko Date l0/a (I Date CITY OF SANTA ANA OBSOLETE RECORDS DESTRUCTION SCHEDULE POLICE DEPARTMENT Division Name: Internal Affairs Division Records destroyed by: Print Name & Badge # Signature Date of destruction: Once your records have been destroyed return this form to the Records Manager and keep a copy of this form for your files. Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA OBSOLETE RECORDS DESTRUCTION SCHEDULE POLICE DEPARTMENT Division Name: Internal Affairs Division Record Record Series Record Description Record Dates Category Administrative Employee Accidents involving on -duty 01/01/2013- Investigations Accidents department personnel. 12/31/2013 Administrative K-9 Reports Investigations of K-9 bite 01/01/2013- Investigations incidents. (Not to Include SB1421 12/31/2013 related files) Administrative Use of Force Use of Force and in -custody 01/01/2013- Investigations injuries. (Not to Include SB1421 12/31/2013 related files) Administrative OIS Officer Involved Shootings. (Not to 01/01/2013- Investigations Include SB 1421 related files) 12/31/2013 and By Employee Investigations of alleged 01/01/2012- al E Name employee misconduct. (Not to 12/31/2013 ints include SB1421 files) Prepared by: Name: Saul Esquivel Title: Corporal Date: September 25, 2019 Number of boxes to be destroyed: 8 CONSENT BY: �t>= C6-%b4- Vlit_� to c Davi alentin, Chief of Police Date APPROVED BY: R �&t1-P-t4A_ 10 L7 i Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney Date Page 1 of 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA OBSOLETE RECORDS DESTRUCTION SCHEDULE POLICE DEPARTMENT Division Name: Internal Affairs Division Records destroyed by: Print Name & Badge # Signature Date of destruction: Once your records have been destroyed return this form to the Records Manager and keep a copy of this form for your files. Page 2 of 2 Exhibit 5 CITY OF SANTA ANA OBSOLETE RECORDS DESTRUCTION SCHEDULE Community Development Agency 2019 Record Record Record Description Record Dates Category Series Programs ARRA 102 & 103, Rapid Response 501 Workforce and Adult 201 Participant Files, WIA & WIOA FY ECONOMIC Investment Act Forms. (Enrollment and various participant forms, June - July DEVELOPMENT (WIA; WIOA) supporting paperwork.) pp g p p ) 2009 -2013 July 2019 (18 Boxes) Workforce Wes Bosch -Vocational Assessment -Participant FY ECONOMIC Investment Act Files, Forms (supporting paperwork). June - July DEVELOPMENT July 2019 (1 Box) (LIMA) 2012 -2013 SSA/CaIWORKS and SSA/WEX Participant Files. ECONOMIC Workforce (Enrollment and various participant forms FY DEVELOPMENT Investment Act supporting paperwork.) June - Jul Y (WIA) July 2019 (9 Boxes) 2012 -2013 Youth Work Force Development Program and Workforce YSPN / STEM I NAPS / SAPL I CCOS I CTAC / FY ECONOMIC Investment Act TSJT Programs Participant Files (enrollment and June -July DEVELOPMENT (WIA; WIOA) various participant forms, supporting paperwork). 2011 -2013 July 2019 (5 Boxes) Youth Procurement Documents (Proposals, RFPs, ECONOMIC Workforce Rating Sheets) (including Admin files, supporting FY DEVELOPMENT Investment Act backup paperwork and training forms). June - July (WDB; WIA) July 2019 (2 Boxes) 2011 -2013 Youth Monitoring / One -Stop I ETPL State ECONOMIC Workforce Monitoring Reports (including supporting FY DEVELOPMENT Investment Act paperwork, forms) July 2019 (2 Boxes) June - July (WIA) 2008 - 2013 Original procurement documents (proposals, RFPs, rating sheets). Contracts and other backup Federal data for processing invoices, oversight and ECONOMIC Empowerment monitoring reports, including backup data and Jan -Sept DEVELOPMENT Zone (FEZ) program operation audit reports and miscellaneous 1999-2010 administration files. Sept. 2019 (44 Boxes) Santa Ana Procurement records and RFPs, subgrantee, ECONOMIC Empowerment agreements, plans and miscellaneous DEVELOPMENT Corporation administration files. (SAEC) Sept. 2019 (5 Boxes) PREPARED BY: Terri Eggers Date Senior Community I pment Analyst Community Development Agency RECORDS DESTROYED: Number of boxes CONSENT BY: Jan - Sept 1999 - 2010 I l•64-zAt 1 Steven Mendoza Date Executive Director Community Development Agency APPROVED BY: Sonia R. Carvalho Date City Attorney CITY OF SANTA ANA OBSOLETE RECORDS DESTRUCTION SCHEDULE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 2019 RECORD RECORD RECORD EXPIRATION CATEGORY SERIES DESCRIPITION DATES Agency/Dept. Head Contracts entered into by the City October 1, Agreements Approved relating to goods, services, legal 2015 and settlements and programs prior Forms used by the Mayor and October 1, Correspondence Council Requests Councilmembers to request 2016 and information and/or staff actions prior "Loose" correspondence that Incoming and cannot be legitimately attached October 1, Correspondence Outgoing General to some major record series such 2016 and Correspondence as AGREEMENT or PROJECT prior (City Council) "Loose" correspondence that Incoming and cannot be legitimately attached October 1, Correspondence Outgoing General to some major record series such 2016 and Correspondence as AGREEMENT or PROJECT prior (City Manager's Office) Exception Sheets, Leave of Absence Mayor and City Council October 1, Payroll Forms, and related City Manager Office Staff 2016 and Payroll Reports prior October 1, DPV forms, Petty Cash Receipts, 2016 and Reports Accounts Payable Credit Card Statements prior October 1, Travel Folders Councilmembers and Travel forms and related 2016 and CMO Staff documentation prior APPROVE: Kristine Ridge Date City Manager CONSENT: 1 Wwg C aji Sonia R. Carvalho Date City Attorney ------------------------------------------------------ RECORDS DESTROYED: AUDITED BY: Volume In Cubic Feet Weight in Pounds Rosa Flores Date Secretary to the City Manager CITY OF SANTA ANA OBSOLETE RECORDS DESTRUCTION SCHEDULE FINANCE 6 MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGENCY • TREASURY DIVISION 2019 RECORD CATEGORY RECORD SERIES RECORD DESCRIPTION RECORD DATES BANKS Daily Bank Balance Reports of daily banking activity. 01/01/2016 Report and Prior Treasurys copy of all City deposit 01/01/2016 Deposit Slips slips sent to bank and Prior Copies of customer checks returned Returned Checks by bank, letters sent to customers 01/01/2016 other miscellaneous documents and Prior Statements Statements relating to investment 01/012016 banking. and Prior Transfer Activity Documents pertaining to the wiring of 01/01/2016 Records funds to/front bank accounts and Prior BUSINESS Miscellaneous Business License LICENSE TAX Monthly Register Account Summery Information Reports reports. and and Prior Deletion Records Deleted and/or cancelled accounts. 01/01/2016 and Prior Gross Receipts & Business License Tax statements 01/01/2016 Variable Assessments filed by business operators. and Prior Statements Miscellaneous Receipts for miscellaneous payments. 01/01/2016 Receipts and Prior Original business license tax Original Applications applications, 01/012016 amendments/correspondences for and Prior inactive accounts. Statements relating to calculation and O11012016 Payment Records payment of business license tax. and Prior Renewal Registration Statements relating to business 01/012016 Records owner information and Prior Payments / Daily Cash Business License Tax payments 01/01/2016 Receipts received and processed via Treasury and Prior cashiers. Page 1 RECORD CATEGORY RECORD SERIES RECORD DESCRIPTION RECORD DATES ChECKS (con') Transmission of all List of all City checks issued to allow checks issued by City bank to Gear checks through O'ew 7 to Bank. account for Positive Pa purposes. nd Fdw and DOG LICENSES Application for Dog License and amendments/corrections for inactive 0110112016 Original Applications accounts. and Prior Including Rabies Vaccination records. Daily payment information; 01/01/2016 Reports unpostables; renewals; and Prior noncompliance; tag list; penalties. Payments / Daily Dog License payments received and 01101/2016 Cash Receipts processed via Treasury Cashiers. and Prior Cancellations Dog Licenses cancelled 01101/2016 and Prior HOTEL VISITORS Original Registration and TAX Filing Records amendmentslcorections for inactive 01101/2016 accounts. and Prior Monthly filings and remittances and Payment Records amendmentslcomi clams for inactive 0/101/2016 accounts. and Prior WATER Original copies of applications for ACCOUNTS of new waterservice water Applications for originated originated by Public Works and 01/01/2016 Service amendments/corrections or inactive and Prior accounts. MUNICIPAL UTILITY Billing Register Computerized reports detailing 01/0112016 ACCOUNTS Reps accounts billed g respective and Prior charges Work Orders Investigations of water meter 01/01/2016 notices and meter exchanges and Prior Miscellaneous information I Customer files corespondence regarding customer 01101/2016 accounts and Prior Deposit Reports List of Municipal Utility Service 01/01/2016 accounts that have a deposit and Prior Lists daily receipts processed via Treasury Cashiers to Municipal 01101/2016 Payment Report Utility Service accounts by account and Prior number Daily receipts processed to Payments Municipal Utility accounts by 01101/2016 Services account number and Prior Municipal Utility Municipal Utility Service refunds 0110V2016 Services requests and backup information and Prior Lists balances of all Municipal Utility 01/01/2016 Aging Report Service accounts and Prior PARKING CITATIONS 0emization of citation payments Collections collected by contract 01fi 0nd service agency and Prior PARKING CITATIONS Register Parking Citation Payments process 01/01/2016 by Treasury Staff and Prior Page 2 RECORD CATEGORY RECORD SERIES RECORD DESCRIPTION RECORD DATES (Cont) Amounts Wdttenaff List of parking citations written -off by O110112016 Report DMV and Prior Citations Referred to Itemization of citations referred to 01/012016 DMV DMV for collection and Prior DMV Collections DMV parking citation Collections 01/012016 and Prior REFUND REQUESTS Business Tax Office Treasury Refund requests to Tr 01/O112016 Division:includessupportingTreasury 8 Miac. Refunds documentation and Prior TREASURY Report of daily revenues received Daily Treasurers vnth detail a payment information and OV0 Reports and Prior related working papers Treasury Investment All documents pertaining to 01/012016 Activity Records Investment Activity and Prior UTILITY USERS TAX Original Registration and 01/072016 1120 Filing Records amendments/corrections for inactive accounts. and Prior Monthly filings and remittances and Payment Records amendmentslconections for inactive 01/012016 ano Prioraccounts. PREPARED BY: �I Aejarl(O Gutierrez Date Management Analyst CONSENT BY: L/ // thryn Do ns Date Executive Director Finance & Management Services APPRO $Onia R. Carvalho Date City Attorney Page 3 CITY OF SANTA ANA OBSOLETE RECORDS DESTRUCTION SCHEDULE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 2019 RECORD RECORD RECORD EXPIRATION CATEGORY SERIES DESCRIPITION DATES Agency/Dept. Head Contracts entered into by the City October 1, Agreements Approved relating to goods, services, legal 2015 and settlements and programs prior Forms used by the Mayor and October 1, Correspondence Council Requests Councilmembers to request 2016 and information and/or staff actions prior "Loose" correspondence that Incoming and cannot be legitimately attached October 1, Correspondence Outgoing General to some major record series such 2016 and Correspondence as AGREEMENT or PROJECT prior (City Council) "Loose" correspondence that Incoming and cannot be legitimately attached October 1, Correspondence Outgoing General to some major record series such 2016 and Correspondence as AGREEMENT or PROJECT prior (City Manager's Office) Exception Sheets, Leave of Absence Mayor and City Council October 1, Payroll Forms, and related City Manager Office Staff 2016 and Payroll Reports prior October 1, DPV forms, Petty Cash Receipts, 2016 and Reports Accounts Payable Credit Card Statements prior October 1, Travel Folders Councilmembers and Travel forms and related 2016 and CMO Staff documentation prior APPROVE: Kristine Ridge Date City Manager CONSENT: 1 Wwg C aji Sonia R. Carvalho Date City Attorney ------------------------------------------------------ RECORDS DESTROYED: AUDITED BY: Volume In Cubic Feet Weight in Pounds Rosa Flores Date Secretary to the City Manager REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY QUARTERLY PROJECT STATUS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR JULY THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2019 {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 11 CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on I" Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2ntl Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION Receive and file the Public Works Agency Quarterly Project Status and Capital Improvement Program Report for July through September of 2019. DISCUSSION The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Executive Summary (Exhibit 1) provides Public Works Agency activity on CIP projects for the third quarter of 2019, and is also available on the City's website at: httys://www.santa-ana.ora/yw/capital-improvement-I)roj ect-schedule/ STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT This item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #5 — Community Health, Livability, Engagement & Sustainability, Objective #1 (establish a comprehensive community engagement initiative to expand access to information and create opportunities for stakeholders to play an active role in discussing public policy and setting priorities). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. Fuad S. Sweiss, PE, PLS Executive Director Public Works Agency FSS/W EG/JG/LJO Exhibits: 1. CIP — Executive Summary Schedule may be reviewed at: https://www.santa-ana.ora/pw/capital-improvement-project-schedule/ REQUEST FOR 4' COUNCIL ACTION al_ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: APPROVE APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT AND AGREEMENT ACCEPTING A GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $60,000 WITH GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ORANGE COUNTY FOR THE VETERANS' EMPLOYMENT - RELATED ASSISTANCE PROGRAM {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 2,4) CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on V1 Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing Veterans' Employment -Related Assistance Program grant funds in the amount of $60,000 into the Federal Grant -Indirect revenue account (no. 12418002-52001) and appropriating the same amount into the Veterans' Employment - Related Assistance Program expenditure account (nos. 12418743-various). 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement, Contract No. K9110010, with Goodwill Industries of Orange County for $60,000 awarded to the City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana WORK Center for workforce and job development activities, effective August 13, 2019 through March 31, 2021, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute non -substantive amendments such as adjustment of operational expenses during the term of the agreement. DISCUSSION Goodwill Industries of Orange County received a grant award entitled, Veterans' Employment - Related Assistance Program (VEAP), from the State of California's Employment Development Department. The purpose of the program is to offer services targeted to meet the veterans' unique needs and occupational goals with an emphasis on veterans with significant barriers to employment, including, but not limited to, disabled veterans, homeless veterans, and recently separated veterans who are long-term unemployed. Agencies funded are tasked in preparing veterans for careers in a variety of high demand fields. The Santa Ana WORK Center, in collaboration with Goodwill of Orange County's Tierney Center for Veteran Services, will be contracted to provide veterans with workforce services that may include Veterans' Employment -Related Assistance Program November 19, 2019 Page 2 comprehensive assessment, case management, supportive services and job development to eligible veterans. One WORK Center staff will be co -located one day a week at the Tierney Center for Veteran Services to better assist eligible veterans. The Tierney Center is located in the City of Tustin. The City of Santa Ana WORK Center has partnered with Goodwill of Orange County for over 20 years to provide employment and training services. The program will serve a minimum of 130 people from August 13, 2019 through March 31, 2021. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's effort to meet Goal #2 - Youth, Education, Recreation, Objective #4 (Partner with groups and organizations to promote education, senior services, job training and development for all Santa Ana residents). FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the Veterans' Employment -Related Assistance Program (VEAP) appropriation adjustment will recognize $60,000 into Federal Grant -Indirect revenue account (no. 12418002- 52001) and appropriate the same amount into the expenditure account (nos. 12418743-various) as follows. Fiscal Year Accounting Fund Accounting Unit, Account Amount Unit -Account Description Description FY 19-20 12418743- Orange County Goodwill Workforce Innovation and $27 700 Nov - June Various Grants Opportunity Act VEAP, Various FY 20-21 12418743- Orange County Goodwill Workforce Innovation and $32,300 Jul - Mar Various Grants Opportunity Act VEAP, Various Total Contract Amount $60,000 Steven A. Mendoza Executive Director Community Development Agency Exhibit: 1. Agreement APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency CONTRACT # K9110010 BETWEEN GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ORANGE SAOS /:f► 11 SANTA ANA ONE STOP I VETERAN'S EMPLOYMENT -RELATED ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (VEAP) SERVICES FUNDING SOURCE: EDD (FEDERAL DOL) 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -I- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE 1 TERMS AND CONDITIONS.............................................................................. I 1.1 Coordination/Administration of CONTRACT.....................................................1 1.2 Purpose..................................................................................................................2 1.3 Term of Contract...................................................................................................2 1.4 Contingency of Funds...........................................................................................2 1.5 Program Income....................................................................................................2 1.6 Fiscal Appropriations............................................................................................3 1.7 Fiscal Accountability............................................................................................3 1.8 Non -Supplantation of Funds.................................................................................4 1.9 Amendments - Changes/Extra Work....................................................................4 1.10 Nondiscrimination and Compliance Provisions....................................................4 1.11 Payments...............................................................................................................5 1.12 Performance Standards.........................................................................................6 1.13 Satisfactory Work.................................................................................................7 1.14 Modification of Program Components and Service Levels..................................7 1.15 Access and Records..............................................................................................8 1.16 Breach of Contract................................................................................................8 1.17 Conditions Affecting Work...................................................................................9 1.18 Conflict of Interest - SAOS' S Personnel..............................................................9 1.19 Conflict of Interest - GIOC Personnel..................................................................9 1.20 Consulting Contract - Follow -On Work...............................................................9 1.21 SAOS Personnel....................................................................................................9 1.22 SAOS'S PROJECT MANAGER and Key Personnel..........................................9 1.23 SAOS of Orange Child Support Enforcement Provision....................................10 1.24 Data - Title To....................................................................................................10 1.25 Intellectual Property............................................................................................10 1.26 Disputes - CONTRACT.....................................................................................16 1.27 Complaint Handling Procedures.........................................................................17 1.28 EDD Independent Contractor Reporting Requirements ..................................... 17 1.29 Gratuities.............................................................................................................18 1.30 Sectarian Activities............................................................................................. 18 1.31 Drug Free Workplace..........................................................................................18 1.32 Debarment...........................................................................................................18 1.33 Lobbying.............................................................................................................IS 1.34 Fraud...................................................................................................................19 1.35 Standards of Conduct..........................................................................................19 1.36 News/Information Release..................................................................................20 1.37 Notices................................................................................................................20 1.38 Literature/Publicity.............................................................................................20 1.39 Ownership of Documents...................................................................................20 1.40 Precedence..........................................................................................................20 1.41 GIOC's Project Manager....................................................................................21 1.42 Reports/Meetings................................................................................................21 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 '1- Page 1.43 Termination - Orderly........................................................................................21 1.44 Errors and Omissions..........................................................................................21 1.45 Signature in Counterparts...................................................................................22 ARTICLE 2 Program Specific Terms and Conditions............................................................22 2.1 Participants..........................................................................................................22 2.2 Pell Grants/BEA Title IV....................................................................................22 2.3 Policies and Procedures......................................................................................22 2.4 Budget Schedule.................................................................................................23 2.5 Modification of Budget Schedule.......................................................................23 2.6 Sweat -free Code of Conduct...............................................................................23 2.7 Annual Audit.......................................................................................................24 2.8 Corporate Status..................................................................................................24 2.9 Equipment...........................................................................................................24 2.10 Publication..........................................................................................................25 2.11 Other Requirements - Program Confidentiality.................................................25 2.12 Compliance with Law - CONTRACT...............................................................26 2.13 Scope of Services................................................................................................26 2.14 DUNS Number and Related Information...........................................................27 ARTICLE 3 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS........................................................27 3.1 Governing Law and Venue.................................................................................27 3.2 Entire Contract....................................................................................................27 3.3 Amendments.......................................................................................................27 3.4 Intentionally left blank........................................................................................28 3.5 Delivery ...............................................................................................................28 3.6 Acceptance/Payment...........................................................................................28 3.7 Warranty.............................................................................................................28 3.8 Patent/Copyright Materials/Proprietary Infringement........................................28 3.9 Assignment or Sub-Contracting..........................................................................28 3.10 Non-Discrimination............................................................................................28 3.11 Termination.........................................................................................................28 3.12 Consent to Breach Not Waiver...........................................................................29 3.13 Remedies Not Exclusive.....................................................................................29 3.14 Independent Contractor.......................................................................................29 3.15 Performance........................................................................................................29 3.16 Insurance.............................................................................................................29 3.17 Intentionally left blank........................................................................................33 3.18 Changes...............................................................................................................33 3.19 Change of Ownership.........................................................................................33 3.20 Force Majeure .....................................................................................................33 3.21 Confidentiality....................................................................................................33 3.22 Compliance with Laws.......................................................................................33 3.23 Intentionally left blank........................................................................................33 3.24 Pricing.................................................................................................................33 3.25 Intentionally left blank........................................................................................33 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -II- Page 3.26 Terms and Conditions.........................................................................................33 3.27 Headings.............................................................................................................34 3.28 Severability.........................................................................................................34 3.29 Calendar Days.....................................................................................................34 3.30 Attorney Fees......................................................................................................34 3.31 Interpretation....................................................................................................... 34 3.32 Authority.............................................................................................................34 3.33 Employee Eligibility Verification.......................................................................34 3.34 Mutual Indemnification Provisions.....................................................................35 3.35 Audits/Inspections...............................................................................................35 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - General Program Requirements Attachment B - Scope of Services Attachment C - Budget Schedule Attachment D - Performance Standards 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 —111— This Agreement # K9110010 hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACT," is made and entered into as of the date fully executed by and between the Goodwill Industries of Orange County (GIOC), California, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, hereinafter referred to as "GIOC," and the Santa Ana One Stop (SAOS), DUNS Number 07-815-6551, with a place of business at GIOC (Payment/Ordering address at 410 North Fairview Street, Santa Ana, CA 92703), with GIOC and SAOS sometimes referred to as "PARTY," or collectively as "PARTIES." RECITALS WHEREAS, Congress enacted the "Workforce Investment Act of 1998," subsequently reauthorized on July 22, 2014 as the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act ("WIOA"), hereinafter referred to as "the Act," to provide workforce investment activities, through statewide and local workforce investment systems, that increase employment, retention and earnings of participants, and increase occupational skill attainment by participants, and, as a result, improve the quality of the workforce and enhance the productivity and competiveness of the Nation; Workforce Investment Act citations, rules, and regulations cited herein shall continue to be implemented until such time Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act issued guidance and/or regulations supersede such citations, rules, and regulations; and WHEREAS, the Employment Development Department (EDD), in coordination with the California Workforce Development Board and the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency, announced the availability of WIOA funds for the Veterans' Employment -Related Assistance Program (VEAP) for the program years 2019-2021; and WHEREAS, GIOC, responded to a Solicitation for Proposals (SFP) for VEAP program year 2019-2021; and WHEREAS, the VEAP SFP required a local WIOA partnership/collaboration which included the SAOS; and GIOC responded to a Request for Proposal for FY 2019-2021 and was deemed eligible for funding; and WHEREAS, GIOC responded to the SFP, with SAOS named as a partner responsible for administration, participant services, recruitment, case management, among other responsibilities; and WHEREAS, GIOC, having been awarded VEAP program year 2019-2021 grant funding, and acting as the Administrator of the Act grant funds, is empowered to make a portion of the funds available pursuant to the Act (hereinafter referred to as "grant funds") to SAOS, for the purpose of implementing the provisions of VEAP under the provisions of WIOA Act; and WHEREAS, GIOC approved an allocation of S 60,000.00 (60,000 Dollars and 00 Cents) in Program funding to SAOS for Fiscal Year 2019-2021 to carry out certain program services/activities; and WHEREAS, SAOS, in order to receive grant funds, is agreeable to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 NOW, THEREFORE, the PARTIES mutually agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1.1 Coordination/Administration of CONTRACT. Kathy Copeland or another GIOC designee (hereinafter referred to as "DIRECTOR") and Denton Knapp or another GIOC designee (hereinafter referred to as "GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER") shall assume responsibilities through coordinating the grant under the Act, its regulations, and the WIOA services provided by GIOC. Ramon Medina or another GIOC designee (hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACT MANAGER") shall administer this CONTRACT as is necessary or reasonable to comply with GIOC policies. 1.2 Purpose. The purpose of the program funded by this CONTRACT is to provide workforce innovation activities that increase employment, retention, earnings and occupations skill attainment through local workforce development systems to those seeking employment. Additionally, this program is funded to increase the effectiveness of local and regional business through business improvement and development activities, job matching, and other services. All services are intended to improve the quality of the workforce and enhance the productivity and competitiveness of Orange SAOS and the United States. GIOC shall ensure that the program funded hereby shall comply with this purpose. 1.3 Term of Contract. The effective term of this CONTRACT shall commence on [08/13/2019] and terminate on [03/31/2021] subject to the provisions of this CONTRACT; however, GIOC shall perform such duties extending beyond this term, including but not limited to obligations with respect to indemnification, audits, monitoring, reporting and accounting. GIOC and CONTRACT MANAGER may mutually agree in writing to extend the CONTRACT for a period of up to twelve (12) months, provided that GIOC's maximum obligation stated in this CONTRACT does not increase as a result, and on the same terms and conditions upon mutual CONTRACT of the PARTIES in writing without further action by the Board of Directors of GIOC (the "Board"). Pursuant to the provisions contained herein, the CONTRACT may be terminated earlier. 1.4 Contingency of Funds. GIOC acknowledges that the obligations of GIOC under this CONTRACT are contingent upon the availability of Federal and/or State funds as applicable and inclusion of sufficient funds for the services hereunder. In the event that such funding is terminated or reduced, CONTRACT MANAGER may immediately terminate this CONTRACT, reduce GIOC's maximum obligation, or modify this CONTRACT, without penalty. The decision of CONTRACT MANAGER shall be binding on GIOC. CONTRACT MANAGER shall provide GIOC with written notification of such determination. GIOC shall immediately comply with DIRECTOR'S or CONTRACT MANAGER'S decision. 1.5 Fiscal Appropriations. This CONTRACT is subject to and contingent upon applicable budgetary appropriations being approved by the GIOC's Board of Directors for the fiscal year during the term of this CONTRACT. If such appropriations are not approved, the CONTRACT will be terminated, without penalty to GIOC. 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -2- 1.6 Fiscal Accountability. (a) Financial Management System. GIOC shall establish and maintain a sound financial management system, based upon generally accepted accounting principles. GIOC's system shall provide fiscal control and accounting procedures that will include the following: (i) Information pertaining to tuition rates, payments, and educational assistance payments; (ii) Source documentation to support accounting records; and (iii) Proper charging of costs and cost allocation. (b) SAOS's Record. SAOS's records shall be sufficient to: (i) Permit preparation of required reports; (ii) Permit tracking of funds to a level of expenditure adequate to establish that funds have not been used in violation of the applicable restrictions on the use of such funds; (iii) Permit the tracking of Program Income, or profits earned, and any costs incurred (such as stand-in costs) that are otherwise allowable except for permit tracking and reporting of leveraging as required by S13734. (c) Costs Charged. Cost shall be charged to this CONTRACT only in accordance with the following: (i) The Act; (ii) 20 CFR NPRM Part 683; (iii) State implementing legislation; and (iv) Requirements of other funding sources. (d) Disallowed Costs. SAOS will be liable for and repay to GIOC any amounts expended under this CONTRACT found not to be in accordance with WIOA including, but not limited to, disallowed costs. (e) Accounting and Cash Management (i) SAOS will comply with controls, record keeping and fund accounting procedure requirements of WIOA, federal and state regulations, and directives to ensure the proper disbursal of, and accounting for, program funds paid to SAOS and disbursed by GIOC, under this CONTRACT. 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -3- 1.7 Non -Supplantation of Funds. SAOS shall not supplant any Federal, State, or GIOC funds intended for the purposes of this CONTRACT with any funds made available under this CONTRACT. SAOS shall not claim reimbursement from GIOC for, or apply sums received from GIOC with respect to, that portion of its obligations which have been paid by another source of revenue. SAOS agrees that it shall not use funds received pursuant to this CONTRACT, either directly or indirectly, as a contribution or compensation for the purposes of obtaining Federal, State, or GIOC funds under any Federal, State, or GIOC program without prior written approval from GIOC. 1.8 Amendments — Changes/Extra Work. SAOS shall make no changes to this CONTRACT without GIOC's written consent. In the event that there are new or unforeseen requirements, GIOC with SAOS's concurrence has the discretion to request official changes at any time without changing the intent of this CONTRACT. If GIOC initiated changes or changes in laws or government regulations affect price, SAOS's ability to deliver services, or the CONTRACT schedule, SAOS shall give GIOC written notice no later than seven (7) calendar days from the date the law or regulation went into effect or the date the change was proposed by GIOC and SAOS was notified of the change. Such changes shall be agreed to in writing and incorporated into a CONTRACT Amendment; said Amendment shall be issued by the GIOC CONTRACT MANAGER, shall require the mutual consent of all PARTIES, and may prohibit SAOS from proceeding with the work as set forth in this CONTRACT. 1.9 Nondiscrimination and Compliance Provisions. (a) SAOS shall comply fully with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions; the Nontraditional Employment for Women Act of 1991; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended; the Equal Opportunity provisions in Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375 and supplemented by the requirements of 41 CFR Part 60; and with all applicable requirements imposed by or pursuant to regulations or Executive Orders implementing those laws, including, but not limited to, 29 CFR Part 33 and 38. The United States, the State of California and GIOC have the right to seek judicial enforcement of this requirement. (b) SAOS shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (California Government Code, Section 12900 et seq.) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 7285.0 et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code Section 12990 (a-f), set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations are incorporated into this CONTRACT by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. (c) In the performance of this CONTRACT, SAOS shall not deny the CONTRACT'S benefits to any person on the basis of race, ancestry, national origin, 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -4- religion, color, ethnic group identification, sex, age, mental or physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), medical condition (including cancer), marital status, denial of family care leave, political affiliation or belief, nor will they unlawfully discriminate, harass or allow harassment against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, ancestry, national origin, religion, color, ethnic group identification, sex, age, mental or physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), medical condition (including cancer), marital status, denial of family care leave, political affiliation or belief. SAOS shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of employees and applicants for employment are free from such discrimination and harassment. (d) SAOS will include the non-discrimination and compliance provisions of this Paragraph 1.10 of the CONTRACT in all subcontracts to perform work under this CONTRACT. (e) SAOS will give written notice of its obligations under this Paragraph of the CONTRACT to labor organizations with which SAOS has a collective bargaining agreement or other CONTRACT. (f) SAOS shall furnish any and all information requested by GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER and shall permit GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER access, during business hours, to books, records and accounts in order to ascertain SAOS's compliance with the above non-discrimination requirements. 1.10 Payments. SAOS agrees that any and all funds received under this CONTRACT shall be disbursed or encumbered on or before 03/31/2021 and that any and all funds remaining as of 03/31/2021 which have not been disbursed shall be returned by SAOS to GIOC within thirty (30) days of the expiration or earlier termination of the CONTRACT as provided herein. No expense of SAOS will be reimbursed by GIOC if incurred after 03/31/2021. No SAOS expense shall be paid if billing is received by GIOC after 03/31/2021. Upon the effective date of this CONTRACT, GIOC shall make payments to SAOS in accordance with the following payment schedule: (a) Monthly Payments. Beginning the 2e, upon receipt and approval by GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER of SAOS's invoice showing the prior month's actual expenditures, GIOC shall make monthly reimbursement payments based on SAOS's invoice so long as the total payments under this CONTRACT do not exceed ($60,000 Dollars and 00 Cents). (b) GIOC Discretion. At the sole discretion of GIOC, payments to SAOS may be made more frequently than monthly, but such payments shall always be in arrears and not in advance of the provision of services by SAOS (c) Advance. Notwithstanding Paragraph 1.11(b) above, upon written request and justification of an immediate need based upon cash forecasting from SAOS, GIOC may advance to SAOS a portion of GIOC's maximum obligation hereunder. GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER shall reduce the amount of monthly payments in the seventh, 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -5- eighth, ninth, tenth, and eleventh months by an equal amount of any advance payment, under Paragraph 1.1 l(a) above, to recover any outstanding advance or part thereof. Such recovery may not exceed the total of all outstanding advances. No monthly payment shall be made to SAOS which would result in less money remaining unpaid to SAOS than the total of advances made to SAOS. (d) Invoices. GIOC will reimburse SAOS for eligible CONTRACT -related costs only. SAOS shall submit requests for reimbursement to GIOC on a monthly basis beginning on the 1ls' and must provide adequate documentation as required by GIOC. Failure to provide any of the required documentation will cause GIOC to withhold all or a portion of a request for reimbursement, or return the entire reimbursement package to SAOS, until such documentation has been received and approved by GIOC. Invoices are due on the 2e of each month for prior month's expenses. 1.11 Performance Standards. SAOS shall comply with and adhere to the performance accountability standards and general program requirements described in Attachment A and applicable regulations and as contained in Attachment D, Performance Standards. Should the Performance Requirements defined in the Agreement between the State of California and GIOC be changed, GIOC shall have the right to unilaterally modify this CONTRACT to meet such requirements upon written notice, and mutual agreement of SAOS. 1.12 Satisfactory Work. Services rendered hereunder are to be performed to the written satisfaction of SAOS and GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER. SAOS and GIOC's staff will interpret all reports and determine the quality, acceptability and progress of the services rendered. 1.13 Modification of Program Components and Service Levels. The PARTIES hereto agree that those program components and service levels detailed in Attachments A, B, C and/or D may be modified upon mutual written agreement of the DIRECTOR and SAOS so long as the total payments under this CONTRACT are not increased and the basic goals and objectives of the program are not altered. Should the Federal Government and/or the State of California modify any program component and/or service level detailed in Attachment A, B, C and/or D then GIOC shall have the right to unilaterally modify this CONTRACT to meet such requirements. (a) CONTRACT MANAGER may at any time, by written change order to SAOS, make changes within the general scope of this CONTRACT, including, in the definition of services and tasks to be performed, the manner in which services are performed, the time and place of performance thereof and additional related provisions, and CONTRACT term. Such change orders may be made when necessitated by changes in the WIOA Orange SAOS One -Stop System operations or performance, the operations or performance of SAOS, or changes in applicable statutes, regulations or State of California or federal mandates or directives. SAOS and CONTRACT MANAGER shall make a good faith effort to reach agreement with respect to change orders, which affect the price of services under the CONTRACT. SAOS's protest or failure to agree to the amount of any adjustment to be made as a result of a change order shall be a dispute for which an appeal may be made pursuant to this CONTRACT. 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -6- Notwithstanding the foregoing, the price of services under this CONTRACT shall not be increased except by written modification of this CONTRACT indicating the new services and price of this CONTRACT if applicable. Until the PARTIES reach agreement, SAOS shall not be obligated to assume increased performance under the change order beyond the limitation of funds established within this CONTRACT. (b) SAOS may request changes in the scope of performance or services under this CONTRACT, by submitting a written request to GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER describing the request and its impact on the "Scope of Services" and "Budget Schedule." GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER will review the request and respond in writing within ten (10) business days. GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER'S decision whether to approve the request or request the GIOC Board of Director's approval shall be final. GIOC's CONTRACT MANAGER may approve a request that meets all of the following criteria: I. It does not materially change the terms of this CONTRACT, and II. It is supported by adequate consideration to GIOC. The GIOC Board of Director's action is necessary to approve a request from SAOS that does not satisfy all of the criteria listed above. 1.14 Access and Records. (a) Access. GIOC, the State of California and the United States Government and/or their representatives, shall have access, for purposes of monitoring, auditing, and examining, to SAOS's activities, books, documents and papers (including computer records and emails) and to records of SAOS's subcontractors, consultants, contracted employees, bookkeepers, accountants, employees and participants related to this CONTRACT. SAOS shall insert this condition in each contract between SAOS and a subcontractor that is pursuant to this CONTRACT and shall require the subcontractor to agree to this condition. Such agencies or representatives shall have the right to make excerpts, transcripts and photocopies of such records and to schedule on -site monitoring at their discretion. Monitoring activities also may include, but are not limited to, questioning employees and participants and entering any premises or onto any site in which any of the services or activities funded hereunder are conducted or in which any of the records of SAOS are kept. SAOS shall make available its books, documents, papers, financial records, etc., within twenty-four (24) hours after receipt of written demand by DIRECTOR which shall be deemed received upon date of sending. In the event SAOS does not make the above referenced documents available within the SAOS of Orange, California, SAOS agrees to pay all necessary and reasonable expenses incurred by GIOC, or GIOC's designee, in conducting any audit at the location where said records and books of account are maintained. (b) Records Retention. All accounting records and evidence pertaining to all costs of SAOS and all documents related to this CONTRACT shall be kept available at SAOS's office or place of business for the duration of this CONTRACT and thereafter as specified in 2 CFR 200.333-337. Records which relate to: (1) complaints, claims, 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -7- administrative proceedings or litigation arising out of the performance of this CONTRACT; or (2) costs and expenses of this CONTRACT to which GIOC or any other governmental agency takes exception, shall be retained until final resolution or disposition of such appeals, litigation, claims, or exceptions. (c) Liability. SAOS shall pay to GIOC the full amount of GIOC's liability to the State or Federal government or any agency thereof resulting from any disallowance or other audit exceptions to the extent that such liability is attributable to SAOS's failure to perform under this CONTRACT. 1.15 Breach of Contract. The failure of SAOS to comply with any of the provisions, covenants or conditions of this CONTRACT shall be a material breach of this CONTRACT. In such event GIOC may, and in addition to any other remedies available at law, in equity, or otherwise specified in this CONTRACT: (a) Notwithstanding Paragraph 1.16(b) below, terminate the CONTRACT immediately, pursuant to Paragraph 3.11 herein; (b) If GIOC does not terminate the CONTRACT immediately as set forth in Paragraph 1.16(a), afford SAOS written notice of the breach and ten calendar days or such shorter time that may be specified in this CONTRACT within which to cure the breach; (c) Discontinue payment to SAOS for and during the period in which SAOS is in breach; and (d) Offset against any monies billed by SAOS but yet unpaid by GIOC those monies disallowed pursuant to the above. 1.16 Conditions Affecting Work. SAOS shall be responsible for taking all steps reasonably necessary, to ascertain the nature and location of the work to be performed under this CONTRACT; and to know the general conditions which can affect the work or the cost thereof. Any failure by SAOS to do so will not relieve SAOS from responsibility for successfully performing the work without additional cost to GIOC. GIOC assumes no responsibility for any understanding or representations concerning the nature, location(s) or general conditions made by any of its officers or agents prior to the execution of this CONTRACT, unless such understanding or representations by GIOC are expressly stated in this CONTRACT. 1.17 Conflict of Interest — SAOS's Personnel. SAOS shall exercise reasonable care and diligence to prevent any actions or conditions that could result in a conflict with the best interests of GIOC. This obligation shall apply to SAOS; SAOS's employees, agents, and relatives; sub -tier SAOSs; and third parties associated with accomplishing work and services hereunder. SAOS's efforts shall include, but not be limited to, establishing precautions to prevent its employees or agents from making, receiving, providing or offering gifts, entertainment, payments, loans or other considerations which could be deemed to appear to influence individuals to act contrary to the best interests of GIOC. 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 'S' 1.18 SAOS Personnel. SAOS warrants that all persons employed to provide service under this CONTRACT have satisfactory past work records indicating their ability to accept the kind of responsibility anticipated under this CONTRACT. 1.19 Data — Title To. All materials, documents, data or information obtained from GIOC data files or any GIOC medium furnished to SAOS in the performance of this CONTRACT will at all times remain the property of GIOC. Such data or information may not be used or copied for direct or indirect use by SAOS after completion or termination of this contract without the express written consent of GIOC. All materials, documents, data or information, including copies, must be returned to GIOC at the end of this CONTRACT (or final renewal), as applicable. 1.20 Disputes — CONTRACT. (a) The PARTIES shall deal in good faith and attempt to resolve potential disputes informally. If a dispute concerning a question of fact arising under the terms of this CONTRACT is not disposed of in a reasonable period of time by SAOS's PROJECT MANAGER and GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER, such matter shall be brought to the attention of the GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER by way of the following process: (i) SAOS shall submit to GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER a written demand for a final decision regarding the disposition of any dispute between the PARTIES arising under, related to, or involving this CONTRACT, unless GIOC, on its own initiative, has already rendered such a final decision. (ii) SAOS's written demand shall be fully supported by factual information, and, if such demand involves a cost adjustment to the CONTRACT, SAOS shall include with the demand a written statement signed by a senior official indicating that the demand is made in good faith, that the supporting data are accurate and complete, and that the amount requested accurately reflects the Contract adjustment for which SAOS believes GIOC is liable. (b) Pending the final resolution of any dispute arising under, related to, or involving this CONTRACT, SAOS agrees to proceed with the provision of services under the original terms of this CONTRACT. SAOS's failure to proceed under the original terms of this CONTRACT shall be considered a material breach of this CONTRACT. Any final decision of GIOC shall be expressly identified as such, shall be in writing, and shall be signed by the CONTRACT MANAGER. If GIOC fails to render a decision within ninety (90) days after receipt of SAOS's demand, it shall be deemed a final decision adverse to SAOS's contentions. Nothing in this Paragraph 26 shall be construed as affecting GIOC's right to terminate the CONTRACT for "Cause" or for convenience as stated in Paragraph 3.8 herein. 1.21 Complaint Handling Procedures. SAOS shall comply with grievance procedures, as defined by the California Employment Development Department. SAOS shall advise participants of their right to file complaints and of the procedures for resolution of complaints. SAOS shall follow the California Employment Development Department's procedures for handling complaints which is available from GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER for 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -9- alleging a violation of regulations, grants or other agreements. Any decision of GIOC, the State or the Federal government relating to the complaint shall be binding on SAOS. 1.22 EDD Independent Contractor Reporting Requirements. Effective January 1, 2001, GIOC is required to file federal Form 1099-Misc for services received from a "service provider" to whom GIOC pays $600 or more or with whom GIOC enters into a contract for $600 or more within a single calendar year attached hereto as Exhibit 6 and incorporated herein by this reference. The purpose of this reporting requirement is to increase child support collection by helping to locate parents who are delinquent in their child support obligations. The term "service provider" is defined in California Unemployment Insurance Code Section 1088.8, subparagraph B.2 as "an individual who is not an employee of the service recipient for California purposes and who received compensation or executes a contract for services performed for that service recipient within or without the state." The term is further defined by the California Employment Development Department to refer specifically to independent contractors. An "independent contractor" is defined as "an individual who is not an employee of the ... government entity for California purposes and who receives compensation or executes a contract for services performed for that ... government entity either in or outside of California." The reporting requirement does not apply to corporations, general partnerships, limited liability partnerships, and limited liability companies. Additional information on this reporting requirement can be found at the California Employment Development Department web site located at http://www.edd.ca.gov/Payroll_Taxes/Independent_ Contractor Reporting.htm. 1.23 Sectarian Activities. SAOS certifies that this CONTRACT does not aid or advance any religious sect, church or creed for a purpose that is sectarian in nature, nor does it help to support or sustain any school, college, university, hospital or other institution controlled by any religious creed, church, or sectarian denomination. 1.24 Fraud. (a) SAOS shall immediately report all suspected or known instances and facts concerning possible fraud, abuse or criminal activity under this CONTRACT. SAOS shall inform staff and the general public of how to report fraud, waste or abuse through appropriate postings of incident reporting notice. (b) SAOS confirms that none of its officers have been convicted of fraud or misappropriation of funds within the last two (2) years. 1.25 Standards of Conduct. (a) General Assurance. Every reasonable course of action will be taken by SAOS in order to maintain the integrity of this expenditure of public funds and to avoid favoritism and questionable or improper conduct. This CONTRACT will be administered in an impartial manner, free from efforts to attain personal, financial or political gain. SAOS, and its officers and employees, in administering this CONTRACT, will avoid 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -10- situations which give rise to a suggestion that any decision was influenced by prejudice, bias, special interest or desire for personal gain. 1.26 Notices. Any and all notices, requests demands and other communications contemplated, called for, permitted, or required to be given hereunder shall be in writing, except through the course of the PARTIES' routine exchange of information and cooperation during the terms of the work and services. Any written communications shall be deemed to have been duly given upon actual in -person delivery, if delivery is by direct hand, or upon delivery on the actual day of receipt or no greater than four calendar days after being mailed by US certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, whichever occurs first. The date of mailing shall count as the first day. All communications shall be addressed to the appropriate party at the address stated herein or such other address as the PARTIES hereto may designate by written notice from time to time in the manner aforesaid. For GIOC: For SAOS: Goodwill Industries of Orange County, CA Santa Ana One Stop Attn: Joe Ringer Carlos de la Riva 410 N. Fairview 801 W. Civic Center, St. 200 Santa Ana, CA 92703 Santa Ana, CA 92701 1.27 Ownership of Documents. GIOC has permanent ownership of all directly connected and derivative materials produced under this CONTRACT by SAOS. All documents, reports and other incidental or derivative work or materials furnished hereunder shall become and remains the sole property of GIOC and may be used by GIOC as it may require without additional cost to GIOC. None of the documents, reports and other incidental or derivative work or furnished materials shall be used by SAOS without the express written consent of GIOC. 1.28 Precedence. The CONTRACT documents consist of this CONTRACT and its attachments. In the event of a conflict between or among the CONTRACT documents, the order of precedence shall be the provisions of the main body of this CONTRACT, i.e., those provisions set forth in the recitals and articles of this CONTRACT, and then the attachments. 1.29 GIOC's Project Manager. GIOC shall appoint a PROJECT MANAGER to act as liaison between GIOC and SAOS during the term of this CONTRACT. GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER shall coordinate the activities of GIOC staff assigned to work with SAOS. 1.30 Reports/Meetings. SAOS shall develop reports and any other relevant documents necessary to complete the services and requirements as set forth in this CONTRACT. GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER and SAOS's PROJECT MANAGER will meet on reasonable notice to discuss SAOS's performance and progress under this CONTRACT. If requested, SAOS's PROJECT MANAGER and other project personnel shall attend all meetings. SAOS shall provide such information that is requested by GIOC for the purpose of monitoring progress under this CONTRACT. 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -11- 1.31 Errors and Omissions. All reports, files and other documents prepared and submitted by SAOS shall be complete and shall be carefully checked by the professional(s) identified by SAOS as SAOS's PROJECT MANAGER and key personnel attached hereto, prior to submission to GIOC. SAOS agrees that GIOC review is discretionary and SAOS shall not assume that GIOC will discover errors and/or omissions. If GIOC discovers any errors or omissions prior to approving SAOS's reports, files and other written documents, the reports, files or documents will be returned to SAOS for correction. Should GIOC or others discover errors or omissions in the reports, files or other written documents submitted by SAOS after GIOC's approval thereof, GIOC's approval of SAOS's reports, files or documents shall not be used as a defense by SAOS in any action between GIOC and SAOS, and the reports, files or documents will be returned to SAOS for correction. 1.32 Signature in Counterparts. The PARTIES agree that separate copies of this CONTRACT and/or electronic signatures and handwritten signatures may be signed by each of the PARTIES, and this CONTRACT will have the same force and effect as if the original had been signed by all the PARTIES. ARTICLE 2 Program Specific Terms and Conditions 2.1 Participants. (a) Eligibility. Only participants who have been determined to meet all federal eligibility requirements to receive training hereunder shall be enrolled by SAOS in any occupational training. Determinations that participants meet federal eligibility requirements shall be made by One Stop Centers funded by SAOS of Orange. (b) Benefits. Benefits shall be provided to participants in accordance with the standards and requirements set forth in the Act, including Section 181. (c) Labor Standards. SAOS shall adhere to the Labor Standards described in the Act, including Section 181 of the Act, and all other applicable codes and regulations. 2.2 Pell Grants/FIFA Title IV. If SAOS provides any services under this CONTRACT to applicants for or recipients of Pell Grants or awards pursuant to Title IV of the Higher Education Act, SAOS shall cooperate with GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER in coordinating these grants and awards with WIOA funding in accordance with 20 C.F.R. 663.320 and Section 134 (d) of the Act. SAOS shall inform GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER in writing of the amounts and disposition of any Pell Grants, Higher Education Act Title IV awards and other financial aid granted to each WIOA participant under this CONTRACT. 2.3 Policies and Procedures. SAOS shall monitor its program for compliance with the provisions of this CONTRACT. SAOS shall also comply with all of GIOC's policies and procedures relating to subcontractors for recruitment, intake, assessment and referral, copies of which are available from GIOC's PROJECT MANAGER. 2.4 Budget Schedule. SAOS agrees that the expenditures of any and all funds under this CONTRACT will be in accordance with the Budget Schedule, a copy of which is attached 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -12- hereto as Attachment C and which by this reference is incorporated herein and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. 2.5 Modification of Budget Schedule. (a) Upon written approval of CONTRACT MANAGER, SAOS shall have the authority to transfer allocated program funds from one category of the overall program budget to any other category of the overall program budget, as long as the amount of the total contract is not increased and the basic goals and objectives of the program are not altered. No such transfer may be made without the express prior written approval of CONTRACT MANAGER. A modification of the Budget Schedule may include the addition of any new budget category. Approval of the Budget Schedule modification by CONTRACT MANAGER includes approval of the new Budget category. Budget Schedule modifications are limited to once each calendar quarter. Budget Schedule modification requests will not be processed after April 30. (b) SAOS may submit a program or Budget Schedule modification request in response to the modification of program components and/or service levels which significantly alter SAOS's Scope of Services. Without further Board action, DIRECTOR may execute amendments to this CONTRACT modifying SAOS's services in amounts that do not collectively increase by more than ten percent (10%) the price of said services under this CONTRACT when originally executed. Increases in excess of ten percent (10%) of the original CONTRACT price must be approved by GIOC's Board. GIOC may execute amendments to decrease the amount of the CONTRACT without obtaining approval by the Board. 2.6 Annual Audit. SAOS shall arrange for an independent audit to be performed by a Certified Public Accountant, which shall include an audit of the WIOA funds received from GIOC, in accordance with the Act, 20 CFR WIOA NPRM Part 683.200, and 2 CFR 200 Subpart F and 2 CFR 2900 Subpart F. SAOS shall submit two (2) copies of each required audit report to GIOC within thirty (30) days after the date received by SAOS. 2.7 Other Requirements — Program Confidentiality. (a) Without prejudice to any other section of this CONTRACT, SAOS shall, where applicable, maintain the confidential nature of information provided to it concerning participants in accordance with the requirements of federal and State law. However, SAOS shall submit to GIOC, the State of California and/or the United States government or their representatives, all records requested for administrative purposes, including audits, examinations, monitoring and verification of reports submitted by SAOS, costs incurred and services rendered hereunder. (b) SAOS shall require all of its employees, agents, subcontractors and volunteer staff who may provide services to SAOS under this CONTRACT to sign an agreement with SAOS before commencing the provision of any such services, to maintain the confidentiality of any and all materials and information with which they may come into contact, or the identities or any identifying characteristics or information with respect to 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -13- any and all participants referred to SAOS by GIOC, except as may be required to provide services under this CONTRACT or to those specified in this CONTRACT as having the capacity to audit SAOS, and as to the latter, only during such audit. SAOS shall provide reports and any other information required by GIOC in the administration of this CONTRACT, and as otherwise permitted by law. (c) The State of California Information Practices Act of 1977 sets forth certain requirements and safeguards regarding records pertaining to individuals, including the rights of access by the subject individual and by third parties. The disclosure of information from student records is governed by the Federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and in part by the State of California Education Code and Policies Applying to the Disclosure of Information and Student Records. It is the purpose of these policies to provide reasonable interpretations of those laws and to protect the student's right to privacy. The Federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) is a U.S. federal law that protects the privacy of student records. Generally, this law states schools must have written permission from the student in order to release any information from a student's education record. SAOS shall be guided by the following principles: (1) the release of any personally identifiable student information to any third parties shall be managed in ways that are in compliance with FERPA and (2) the information in the student's file should be disclosed to the student upon request. Therefore, SAOS shall procure the written consent from students enrolled through GIOC allowing SAOS to disclose to the participants' employer, SAOS of Orange, State of California, or U.S. Department of Labor student information such as grades, academic disputes and other matters related to a student's status as a student. Such consent shall be obtained materially in the form titled Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) Authorization to Release Information to a Designated Third Party. (d) SAOS agrees that any and all subcontracts entered into shall be subject to the confidentiality requirements of this CONTRACT. 2.8 Compliance with Law — CONTRACT. In its performance under this CONTRACT, SAOS shall fully comply with the requirements of the following, whether or not otherwise referred to in this CONTRACT: (a) The Act and all applicable federal statues, regulations, policies, procedures and directives, including but not limited to, 20 CFR WIOA NPRM Parts 676 through 678, Part 675, and Parts 679 through 687. (i) All applicable standards and orders and requirements issued under Section 306 of the Clean Air Act, Section 508 of the Clean Water Act and Environmental Protection Agency regulations in contracts in excess of $100,000. (ii) All mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency as particularized in the state Energy Conservation Plan (Title 20, California Code 2807/099999 2489 e 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -14- of Regulations), as required by the U.S. Energy Policy and Conservation Act (P.L. 94-163) as each may now exist or be thereafter amended; (b) The provisions of WIOA and all legislation, regulations, directives, policies, procedures and amendments issued pursuant thereto; (c) All applicable State statutes, legislation, regulations, policies, procedures and directives; (d) Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) part 200 (Office of Management and Budget Guidance); (e) Title 2, C.F.R. Part 2900 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards); (t) All applicable GIOC policies, procedures and directives; (g) All applicable local ordinances and requirements, including use permits and licensing; (h) The provisions of the Jobs for Veterans Act (Pub. L. No. 107-288) as the law applies to Department of Labor job training programs; (i) The terms and conditions of this CONTRACT, including Attachments. SAOS shall also ensure diligence in managing programs under this Agreement, including performing appropriate monitoring activities and taking prompt corrective action against known violations of WIOA. 2.9 Scope of Services. This CONTRACT specifies the contractual terms and conditions by which GIOC will procure services from SAOS as further detailed in Attachment B, Scope of Services, and Attachment D, Performance Standards which are part of this CONTRACT and which by this reference is incorporated herein and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. 2.10 DUNS Number and Related Information. The DUNS number is a unique 9-digit identifier issued and maintained by Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) that verifies the existence of a business entity. The DUNS number is needed to coordinate with the System for Award Management (SAM) that combines federal procurement systems and the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance into one new system (https://www.SAM.gov). The DUNS number must be provided to GIOC prior to the execution of this CONTRACT. SAOS shall ensure all DUNS information is up to date and the DUNS number status is "active," prior to execution of this CONTRACT. If GIOC cannot access SAOS's DUNS information related to this federal sub award on the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Sub award Reporting System (SAM.GOV) due to errors in SAOS's data entry for its DUNS number, SAOS must immediately update the information as required 2807/099999 2489 c 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -1 J- ARTICLE 3 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 3.1 Governing Law and Venue. This CONTRACT has been negotiated and executed in the State of California and shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California. hi the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this CONTRACT, the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in Orange SAOS, California, and the PARTIES hereto agree to and do hereby submit to the jurisdiction of such court, notwithstanding Code of Civil Procedure Section 394. Furthermore, the PARTIES specifically agree to waive any and all rights to request that an action be transferred for trial to another SAOS. 3.2 Entire Contract. This CONTRACT, including Attachments A, B, C, and D which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, when accepted by SAOS either in writing or by the shipment of any article or other commencement of performance hereunder, contains the entire CONTRACT between the PARTIES with respect to the matters herein, and there are no restrictions, promises, warranties or undertakings other than those set forth herein or referred to herein. No exceptions, alternatives, substitutes or revisions are valid or binding on GIOC unless authorized by GIOC in writing. Electronic acceptance of any additional terms, conditions or supplemental contracts by any GIOC employee or agent, including but not limited to installers of software, shall not be valid or binding on GIOC unless accepted in writing by GIOC's CONTRACT MANAGER. 3.3 Amendments. No alteration or variation of the terms of this CONTRACT shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the PARTIES; no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on either of the PARTIES; and no exceptions, alternatives, substitutes or revisions are valid or binding on GIOC unless authorized by GIOC in writing. 3.4 Delivery. Time of delivery of services is of the essence in this CONTRACT. GIOC reserves the right to refuse any services and to cancel all or any part of the descriptions or services that do not conform to the prescribed Scope of Services. Delivery shall not be deemed to be complete until all services have actually been received and accepted in writing by GIOC. 3.5 Assignment or Sub -Contracting. The terms, covenants, and conditions contained herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the PARTIES. Furthermore, neither the performance of this CONTRACT nor any portion thereof may be assigned or sub -contracted by SAOS without the express written consent of GIOC. Any attempt by SAOS to assign or sub -contract the performance or any portion thereof of this CONTRACT without the express written consent of GIOC shall be invalid and shall constitute a breach of this CONTRACT. 3.6 Non -Discrimination. In the performance of this CONTRACT, SAOS agrees that it will comply with the requirements of Section 1735 of the California Labor Code and not engage nor permit any subcontractors to engage in discrimination in employment of persons because of the race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, or sex of such persons. SAOS acknowledges that a violation of this provision shall subject SAOS to all the penalties imposed for a violation of Section 1720 et seq. of the California Labor Code. 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -16- 3.7 Termination. In addition to any other remedies or rights it may have by law, GIOC and SAOS have the right to terminate this CONTRACT without penalty immediately with cause or after 30 days' written notice without cause, unless otherwise specified. "Cause" shall be defined as any breach of CONTRACT or any misrepresentation or fraud on the part of SAOS. Exercise by GIOC of its right to terminate the CONTRACT shall relieve GIOC of all further obligations. 3.8 Consent to Breach Not Waiver. No term or provision of this CONTRACT shall be deemed waived and no breach excused, unless such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by the party claimed to have waived or consented. Any consent by any party to, or waiver of, a breach by the other, whether express or implied, shall not constitute consent to, waiver of, or excuse for any other different or subsequent breach. 3.9 Remedies Not Exclusive. The remedies for breach set forth in this CONTRACT are cumulative as to one another and as to any other provided by law, rather than exclusive; and the expression of certain remedies in this CONTRACT does not preclude resort by either party to any other remedies provided by law. 3.10 Independent Contractor. SAOS shall be considered an independent contractor and neither SAOS nor its employees; nor anyone working under SAOS shall be considered an agent or an employee of GIOC. Neither SAOS nor its employees; nor anyone working under SAOS shall qualify for workers' compensation or other fringe benefits of any kind through GIOC. 3.11 Performance. SAOS shall perform all work under this CONTRACT, taking necessary steps and precautions to perform the work to GIOC's satisfaction. SAOS shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical assurance, timely completion and coordination of all documentation and other services furnished by SAOS under this CONTRACT. SAOS shall perform all work diligently, carefully, and in a good and workman -like manner; shall famish all labor, supervision, machinery, equipment, materials, and supplies necessary therefor; shall at its sole expense obtain and maintain all permits and licenses required by public authorities, including those of GIOC required in its governmental capacity, in connection with performance of the work; and, if permitted to subcontract, shall be fully responsible for all work performed by subcontractors. 3.12 Insurance Provisions. Prior to the provision of services under this CONTRACT, CONTRACTOR agrees to purchase all required insurance at CONTRACTOR'S expense, including all endorsements required herein, necessary to satisfy GOODWILL that the insurance provisions of this CONTRACT have been complied with. CONTRACTOR agrees to keep such insurance coverage, Certificates of Insurances, and endorsements on deposit with GOODWILL during the entire term of this CONTRACT. In addition, all subcontractors performing work on behalf of CONTRACTOR pursuant to this CONTRACT shall obtain insurance subject to the same terms and conditions as set forth herein for CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR shall ensure that all subcontractors performing work on behalf of CONTRACTOR pursuant to this CONTRACT shall be covered under CONTRACTOR'S insurance as an Additional Insured or maintain insurance subject to the same terms and conditions 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -17- as set forth herein for CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR shall not allow subcontractors to work if subcontractors have less than the level of coverage required by GOODWILL from CONTRACTOR under this CONTRACT. It is the obligation of CONTRACTOR to provide notice of the insurance requirements to every subcontractor and to receive proof of insurance prior to allowing any subcontractor to begin work. Such proof of insurance must be maintained by CONTRACTOR through the entirety of this CONTRACT for inspection by GOODWILL representative(s) at any reasonable time. All self -insured retentions (SIRS) and deductibles shall be clearly stated on the Certificate of Insurance. If no SIRS or deductibles apply, indicate this on the Certificate of Insurance with a zero (0) by the appropriate line of coverage. Any self -insured retention (SIR) or deductible in an amount in excess of $25,000 ($5,000 for automobile liability) shall specifically be approved by GOODWILL upon review of CONTRACTOR'S current audited financial report. If CONTRACTOR fails to maintain insurance acceptable to GOODWILL for the full term of this CONTRACT, GOODWILL may terminate this CONTRACT. Qualified Insurer The policy or policies of insurance must be issued by an insurer with a minimum rating of A- (Secure A.M. Best's Rating) and VIII (Financial Size Category as determined by the most current edition of the Best's Key Rating Guide/Property-Casualty/United States or ambest.com). It is preferred, but not mandatory, that the insurer be licensed to do business in the state of California (California Admitted Carrier). If the insurance carrier does not have an A.M. Best rating of A-NIII, GOODWILL retains the right to approve or reject a carrier after a review of the company's performance and financial ratings. The policy or policies of insurance maintained by CONTRACTOR shall provide the minimum limits and coverage as set forth below: Coverage Minimum Limits $1,000,000 per occurrence; Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 aggregate Automobile Liability including coverage for owned, non -owned, and hired vehicles $1,000,000 per occurrence Workers' Compensation Statutory Employers' Liability Insurance $1,000,000 per occurrence $1,000,000 per claims made; Professional Liability Insurance $1,000,000 aggregate 2807/099999 2489 0 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -1 O- Sexual Misconduct Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence Employee Dishonest if applicable) Limit of insurance equivalent to exposure Network Security & Privacy Liability $1,000,000 per claims made Required Coverage Forms The Commercial General Liability coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CG 00 01, or a substitute form providing liability coverage at least as broad. The Business Auto Liability coverage shall be written on ISO form CA 00 01, CA 00 05, CA 0012, CA 00 20, or a substitute form providing coverage at least as broad. Required Endorsements The Commercial General Liability policy shall contain the following endorsements, which shall accompany the Certificate of insurance: 1) An Additional Insured endorsement using ISO form CG 2010 or CG 2033 or a form at least as broad naming GOODWILL and its officers, agents and employees as Additional Insureds. 2) A primary non-contributing endorsement evidencing that CONTRACTOR'S insurance is primary and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by GOODWILL shall be excess and non-contributing. The Network Security and Privacy Liability policy shall contain the following endorsements which shall accompany the Certificate of Insurance: 1) An Additional Insured endorsement naming GOODWILL, its officers, agents and employees as Additional Insureds for its vicarious liability. 2) A primary and non-contributing endorsement evidencing that CONTRACTOR'S insurance is primary and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by GOODWILL shall be excess and non-contributing. The Workers' Compensation policy shall contain a waiver of subrogation endorsement waiving all rights of subrogation against GOODWILL, its officers, agents and employees. All insurance policies required by this CONTRACT shall waive all rights of subrogation against GOODWILL, its officers, agents and employees when acting within the scope of their appointment or employment. If applicable, GOODWILL shall be the loss payee on the Employee Dishonesty coverage. If applicable, a Loss Payee endorsement evidencing that GOODWILL is a Loss Payee shall accompany the Certificate of Insurance. Employee Dishonesty insurance is required only for entities that need an Advance described in Paragraph 1.11(c). 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -19 - CONTRACTOR shall notify GOODWILL in writing within thirty (30) days of any policy cancellation and ten (10) days for non-payment of premium and provide a copy of the cancellation notice to GOODWILL. Failure to provide written notice of cancellation may constitute a material breach of the CONTRACT, upon which GOODWILL may suspend or terminate this CONTRACT. If CONTRACTOR'S Professional Liability and/or Network Security & Privacy Liability are "Claims Made" policy(ies), CONTRACTOR shall agree to maintain coverage for two (2) years following completion of this CONTRACT. The Commercial General Liability policy shall contain a severability of interests clause also known as a "separation of insureds" clause (standard in the ISO CG 0001 policy). Insurance certificates should be forwarded to the agency/department address listed on the solicitation. If CONTRACTOR fails to provide the insurance certificates and endorsements within seven (7) days of notification to GOODWILL, award may be made to the next qualified contractor. GOODWILL expressly retains the right to require CONTRACTOR to increase or decrease insurance of any of the above insurance types throughout the term of this CONTRACT. Any increase or decrease in insurance will be as deemed by GOODWILL as appropriate to adequately protect GOODWILL. GOODWILL shall notify CONTRACTOR in writing of changes in the insurance requirements. If CONTRACTOR does not deposit copies of acceptable Certificates of Insurance and endorsements with GOODWILL incorporating such changes within thirty (30) days of receipt of such notice, this CONTRACT may be in breach without further notice to CONTRACTOR, and GOODWILL shall be entitled to all legal remedies. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit CONTRACTOR'S liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this CONTRACT, nor act in any way to reduce the policy coverage and limits available from the insurer. *Certificate Holder Information GIOC has contracted with POMS & Associates to monitor insurance certificates and endorsements for compliance with the above requirements. Upon initial award of a CONTRACT, the certificate(s) and endorsements(s) should be forwarded to the agency/department address listed on the solicitation. GIOC will forward these documents to POMS & Associates on your behalf. POMS & Associates may contact you to advise you of deficiencies and request corrected documents. Please cooperate with their request for information or corrections in order for GOODWILL to continue your CONTRACT through the expiration date. 3.13 Force Majeure. SAOS shall not be assessed with liquidated damages or unsatisfactory performance penalties during any delay beyond the time named for the performance of this CONTRACT caused by any act of God, war, civil disorder, employment strike or other 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -20- cause beyond its reasonable control, provided SAOS gives written notice of the cause of the delay to GIOC within thirty-six (36) hours of the start of the delay and SAOS avails himself of any available remedies. 3.14 Confidentiality. SAOS agrees to maintain the confidentiality of all GIOC and GIOC-related records and information pursuant to all statutory laws relating to privacy and confidentiality that currently exist or exist at any time during the term of this CONTRACT. All such records and information shall be considered confidential and kept confidential by SAOS and SAOS's staff, agents and employees. 3.15 Compliance with Laws. SAOS represents and warrants that services to be provided under this CONTRACT shall fully comply, at SAOS's expense, with all standards, laws, statutes, restrictions, ordinances, requirements, and regulations (collectively "laws"), including, but not limited to all other laws applicable to the services at the time services are provided to and accepted by GIOC. SAOS acknowledges that GIOC is relying on SAOS to ensure such compliance, and pursuant to the requirements of Paragraph 3.34 below, SAOS agrees that it shall defend, indemnify and hold GIOC and GIOC INDEMNITEES harmless from all liability, damages, costs, and expenses arising from or related to a violation of such laws. 3.16 Terms and Conditions. SAOS acknowledges that it has read and agrees to all terms and conditions included in this CONTRACT. 3.17 Headings. The various headings and numbers herein, the grouping of provisions of this CONTRACT into separate clauses and Paragraphs, and the organization hereof are for the purpose of convenience only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the meaning hereof. 3.18 Severability. If any term, covenant, condition, or provision of this CONTRACT is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby. 3.19 Calendar Days. Any reference to the word "day" or "days" herein shall mean calendar day or calendar days, respectively, unless otherwise expressly provided. 3.20 Attorney Fees. In any action or proceeding to enforce or interpret any provision of this CONTRACT, or where any provision hereof is validly asserted as a defense, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, costs and expenses. 3.21 Interpretation. This CONTRACT has been negotiated at arm's length and between persons sophisticated and knowledgeable in the matters dealt with in this CONTRACT. In addition, each PARTY has been represented by experienced and knowledgeable independent legal counsel of their own choosing or has knowingly declined to seek such counsel despite being encouraged and given the opportunity to do so. Each PARTY further acknowledges that they have not been influenced to any extent whatsoever in executing this CONTRACT by any other PARTY hereto or by any person representing them, or both. Accordingly, any rule or law (including California Civil Code Section 1654) or legal decision that would require interpretation of any ambiguities in this CONTRACT against the PARTY that has drafted it is not applicable and is 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -21- waived. The provisions of this CONTRACT shall be interpreted in a reasonable manner to affect the purpose of the PARTIES and this CONTRACT. 3.22 Employee Eligibility Verification. SAOS warrants that it fully complies with all Federal and State statutes and regulations regarding the employment of aliens and others and that all its employees performing work under this CONTRACT meet the citizenship or alien status requirement set forth in Federal statutes and regulations. SAOS shall obtain, from all employees, consultants and subcontractors performing work hereunder, all verification and other documentation of employment eligibility status required by Federal or State statutes and regulations including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, 8 U.S.C. §1324 et seq., as they currently exist and as they maybe hereafter amended. SAOS shall retain all such documentation for all covered employee, consultants and subcontractors for the period prescribed by the law. SAOS shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved in writing by GIOC, and hold harmless, GIOC, and its agents, officers, and employees (collectively, "GIOC INDEMNITEES") from employer sanctions and any other liability which may be assessed against SAOS or GIOC or GIOC INDEMNITEES, or any combination of the three in connection with any alleged violation of any Federal or State statutes or regulations pertaining to the eligibility for employment of any persons performing work under this CONTRACT. 3.23 Mutual Indemnif►cation Provisions. (i) SAOS agrees to indemnify, defend with counsel approved in writing by GIOC, and hold harmless GIOC, the State of California, and the Orange SAOS Workforce Investment Board, their elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents ("GIOC INDEMNITEES") harmless from any claims, demands or liability of any kind or nature, including but not limited to personal injury or property damage, arising from or related to the services, products or other performance provided by SAOS pursuant to this CONTRACT. (ii) GIOC agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless SAOS, its officers, employees and agents harmless from any claims, demands or liability of any kind or nature, including but not limited to personal injury or property damage, arising from or related to the services, products or other performance provided by GIOC pursuant to this CONTRACT. (iii) If judgment is entered against SAOS and GIOC by a court of competent jurisdiction because of the concurrent active negligence of GIOC or GIOC INDEMNITEES, SAOS and GIOC agree that liability will be apportioned as determined by the court. Neither PARTY shall request a jury apportionment. 3.24 Audits/Inspections. SAOS agrees to permit GIOC's authorized representative (including auditors from a private auditing firm hired by GIOC) access during normal working hours to all books, accounts, records, reports, files, financial records, supporting documentation, including payroll and accounts payable/receivable records, and other papers or property of SAOS for the purpose of auditing or inspecting any aspect of performance under this CONTRACT. The inspection and/or audit will be confined to those matters connected to the performance of the 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -22- CONTRACT including, but not limited to, the costs of administering the CONTRACT. GIOC will provide reasonable notice of such an audit or inspection. GIOC reserves the right to audit and verify SAOS's records before final payment is made. SAOS agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of three (3) years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated under this CONTRACT or by law. SAOS agrees to allow interviews of any employees or others who might reasonably have information related to such records. Further, SAOS agrees to include a similar right to GIOC to audit records and interview staff of any subcontractor related to performance of this CONTRACT. THE REMAINDER OF THE PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -23- i0:0:u:1ifi IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto certify that they have read and understand all the terms and conditions contained herein and have hereby caused this CONTRACT to be executed. Goodwill Indushties of Orange County, CA Name: (Print) By: Name: (Print) Title: Title: Dated: Dated: GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A California nonprofit public benefit corporation M ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Lo Dated: CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: STEVEN MENDOZA Executive Director, Community Development Agency 2807/099999-2489 11276904.2 at0/25n9 -24- ATTACHMENT A: PROGRAM SUMMARY `-i Employment EDD Development Department SFate of California Organization Name STATE USE ONLY EXHIBITA Subgrant Number: K9110010 Grant Code: 1151 Initial Plan: 06/01/2019 Project Modification Date: 07/19/2019 Tierney Center for Veterans Services (TCVS) at Goodwill of Orange County (GWI) Section I —Statement of Need 1.1. Targeted Region--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Located in Southern California, Orange County encompasses 948-sq.-miles and has 3,010,232 residents. The County has 34 municipalities. According to the 2010 Census, Orange County's population includes 136,611 veterans. Of this figure, 10,519 are post- 9/11 service veterans. The California Department of Veterans Affairs (Ca1Vet) reports Orange County has the third largest number of veterans of any California county, and each year approximately 6,500 military veterans will settle in Orange as they transition from the military. Unlike their predecessors, today's service men and women are returning from multiple deployments and with increasing mental health diagnoses and physical disabilities sustained during combat. The Orange County Community Foundation, an important philanthropic change - agent in our community, supported a local study conducted by the University of Southern California's Center for Innovation and Research on Veterans and Military Families found these significant needs and issues among 1,227 veterans living in Orange County (60% pre-9/11 and 36% post-9/11) (Castro et. al., 2015): -- Post-9/11 veterans reported difficulty adjusting to civilian life, with 61 % of veterans who served after 9/11 reporting adjustment challenges compared to 30% of pre-9/11 veterans. -- Nearly 70% of pre-9/11 and 74% of post-9/11 veterans did not have a job when they left the military. -- More than one in three post-9/11 veterans have an annual income below or near the U.S. national household poverty level guidelines for 2014 ($23,850). 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -25- --Twenty-nine percent of pre-9/11 veterans and 35% of post-9/11 veterans had not lined up housing when they left the military. -- Post-9/11 veterans were more likely to screen positive for PTSD and depression than pre-9/11 veterans. -- Post-9/11 veterans are less likely than pre-9/11 veterans to seek treatment for physical or psychological issues. -- Forty-four percent of post-9/11 veterans and 26% of pre-9/11 veterans report that they do not know where to go to get help. Around 24% of both groups believe they can handle the problem on their own. --The greatest needs reported by post-9/11 veterans were VA service assistance (50%), healthcare assistance (47%), educational assistance (43%), and employment assistance (43%). --The greatest needs reported by post-9/11 vets are educational assistance (32%), VA service assistance (30%), and health care assistance (27%). The unmet needs and statistics described above are exacerbated by the lack of a local VA in Orange County. Additionally the same report indicated that often the hardships described above are often a result of veterans being unable to find and retain gainful employment. 1.2. Targeted Industry -Sector--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Manufacturing. Incoming California Governor Newsom posted his economic plan (GavinNewsom.com/economic-development, October 2018) in which he states "California's vibrant manufacturing sector employs more than 12 million Californians and generates over $270 billion a year." The California plan is to boost exports and gear workforce training toward 21 st century demands. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (Military.com, December 2018) indicated that manufacturing employment rose by 27,000 jobs in November, 2018, with job gains of 6,000 in chemicals and 3,000 in primary metals. Over the past 12 months, manufacturing has added 288,000 jobs. Average hourly earnings of $17.80 /Hr, known as AHE, with an above average growth rate of 14% (O'Net) or higher that will open up over 13,000 manufacturing jobs in CA. Manufacturing, construction and wholesale trade have all been major contributors, even though they make up a relatively small share of total hours worked in the U.S. (Bloomberg Data). In Orange County there are a wide range of manufacturing companies from high tech to low tech with focus on creating finished goods from raw materials including, food processing, apparel and semiconductors. Advanced Manufacturing specialize in emerging elements of high-technology manufacturing. These include biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and aerospace. The average salary is $72,675 per year. 2807/099999-2489 11276904 2 z10131/19 -26- Business/Professional Services are specialized services in support of businesses. These include areas such as law, accounting, architecture, computer programming, consulting, market research, and advertising. There is also a sub -cluster in this group including management and administration. Average hourly earnings of $18.43 /Hr, known as AHE, with an above average growth rate of 4% (O" Net) or higher that will open up over 230,000 Administrative/Professional services jobs in CA. A large portion of our placements for disabled veterans are in administrative positions in city, county, and state and federal jobs. Veterans have an intrinsic skill set for this sector and job placement is very successful in the area of professional services. This sector was selected because of our success in placement as well as the discipline and professionalism that the military instills in veterans often lead to success in leadership and management positions. Veteran employment, on a national and local level is concentrated in two large categories: managers and professionals, as well as sales and office occupations. Seventeen percent of the Orange County veterans hold managerial and professional occupations compared to 10.8% of veterans at the national level (County of Orange, OC Community Services, 2017). The average wages for these positions for veterans is $28.61 per hour. 1-3. Employment Opportunities/Skills Gap--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -- ------------------------ Orange County has a reported "middle -skills gap" in which there is a lack of the right mix of technical and soft skills (OC Community Indicators Report 2016). The solution to close this gap often means certification gained through community college or collaborative training programs between employers and educational institutions. A study by Deloitte and Manufacturing Institute in 2015 noted the skills gap is widening for manufacturing and that over the next decade, 3.4 million manufacturing jobs will be needed and that 60% of these positions are likely to be unfilled due to talent shortage. Training veterans to meet the needs would build on skill sets possessed by veterans including experience in logistics, supply -chain management, and technical skills. In the Economic Forecast from Chapman University (2018)revealed that the California Composite Index measuring the overall manufacturing activity, increased from 63 to 65 in the fourth quarter pointing to a higher growth rate. The Forecast also predicted growth in advanced industries in the tech sector including Aerospace and computer equipment. One of the three top job postings in Orange County is in the field of wholesale manufacturing with almost 10,000 posting (Orange County Workforce Indicators Report, 2017). Professional and Business Services showed the largest absolute growth in Orange County to over 50,000 (California Employment Development Department, September 2017). Business/Professional Services has exhibited skills gaps in the growing need for soft skills. Many new graduates and transitioning veterans, while tech -savvy, lack the basic communication skills and other critical soft skills (Careeronestop.org). In 2018, Tierney Center for Veteran Services placed 161 veterans into jobs, 72 of them through our VEAP program. Of these 85% were placed into Business/Professional Services fields. Laraelv due to the abilitv for veterans with 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -27- additional soft skills training and appropriate certificates are successful in gaining employment in this sector. Section II —Target Group 11.1. Target -Group Description------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The target group will primarily be comprised of veterans with significant barriers to employment which include but are not limited to low income, lack of education, limited work experience, and mental health barriers. Additionally, disabled veterans with a service -connected disability will be served by the current program. Over 50% of the veterans served at Tierney Center for Veterans Services (TCVS) have a service connected disability of 60% or higher. Over 75% of those served are post 9/11 veterans with some kind of service connected disability. These individuals require structure, case management, supportive services (including tools and equipment, supplies, transportation assistance, housing, and emergency funds), and individualized employment planning and support to be successful in finding and keeping gainful employment. Common and significant barriers to employment, training and services also include: lack of preparation for finding a civilian job and unrealistic expectations, unaddressed mental health issues, and difficulty adapting to civilian work culture (Stripes.com). The costs of training or education programs required to obtain a license or certificate can also prevent or delay a veteran's entry into a given occupation. Many veterans who have received military training in an occupation may only need a few additional hours or an additional course before being eligible for the related certification. Orange County has a reported "middle -skills gap" in which there is a lack of the right mix of technical and soft skills (OC Community Indicators Report 2016). The solution to close this gap often means certification gained through community college or collaborative training programs between employers and educational institutions. A study by Deloitte and Manufacturing Institute in 2015 noted the skills gap is widening for manufacturing and that over the next decade, 3.4 million manufacturing jobs will be needed and that 60% of these positions are likely to be unfilled due to talent shortage. Training veterans to meet the needs would build on skill sets possessed by veterans including experience in logistics, supply -chain management, and technical skills. 11. 2. Outreach/Recruitment of Target-Population------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The America's Job Center of California (AJCC) system in Santa Ana and throughout Orange County and the comprehensive services and supports offered through the Tierney Center and the County Veterans Service office offer a broad opportunity to outreach to Orange County veterans and disabled veterans who are seeking services. The Santa Ana Workforce Development Board also operates an America's Job Center of California (AJCC) office in Santa Ana across the street from a large homeless shelter. This office specializes in serving veterans and their families with multiple barriers to emplovment. Our outreach efforts in the last two vears have resulted in connecting with 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -28- over 8,500 veterans and peer navigating them to either employment assistance through the Tierney Center or with one of our 87 partner agencies for other services to include but not limited to: housing, mental health services, education, VA Benefit Navigation, food pantries, veteran financial assistance, furniture and pro bono legal services. Our outreach efforts have been consistent and replicable with a current average of 240 new veterans identified and contacted personally every month by one of our veteran Outreach Specialists. Outreach Specialists located in the AJCCs including the Joint Forces Training Base in Los Alamitos, county VSO, and at the Tierney Center outreach to veterans who come in for services. Additionally, outreach throughout Orange County occurs at all of the community college Veteran Resource Centers as well as hosted community veteran events such as the Veteran Business Network, Career Pathways, and OC Veterans Advisory Council meetings. In 2018 The Tierney Center hosted over 80 veterans events and attended over 200 events. A large professionally managed social media presence allows veterans to sign up for more information or to be notified of special events occurring in the community. Our social media campaign connected over 1500 veterans to the TCVS in 2018.The co -location of four VBA Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors within center also significantly increases the number of disabled veterans (over 200 per month) visiting the Tierney Center. 11.3. Veterans with Significant Barriers Planned Total Number of Planned Number of Percentage of Veterans Veterans to be Served Veterans with Significant with Significant Barriers Barriers to be Served Total Number Served 130 100 77% Section III —Project Plan I11.1. Service Approach -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Veterans with significant barriers, disabled veterans, and their eligible spouses will enroll in the VEAP program after a thorough assessment and determination of eligibility. As illustrated in the Service Process Flowchart, the Assessment is robust and assists in determining the appropriate career and training path for the veterans. The employment specialists provide case management and assist in connecting the veteran to additional support services or services provided by partner agencies. A career plan is developed and training options are reviewed. A veteran enrolled through the AJCC or Vocational Rehabilitation will be eligible to choose from any of the trainings outlined below including approved licensed training programs resulting in an industry recognized certificate. Manufacturing has a wide array of specialties and certifications; therefore the veteran's skillset and preference will determine the type of training needed. Also available through vocational rehabilitation are paid internships and internal/external situational assessments. On -the -lob traininq opportunities will also be available for 2807/099999-2489 11276904 2 z10131/19 -29- eligible veterans and spouses. Upon completion of assessment and training, the veterans will be matched with the appropriate job opportunities and receive assistance in job seeking skills, resume development, soft skills and networking. Following successful career placement, follow up is conducted every 30, 60, 90, and 180 days. Annual follow up will also be completed and ongoing engagement with the veteran community is encouraged. Satisfaction surveys are completed upon exit from the VEAP services ILL. I CI OI ICU I1011 III I � ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In partnership with the Santa Ana AJCC, eligible veterans will be assessed and enrolled into an approved provider form the ETPL. Career pathways are developed through the Individual Career Plan outlining goals and objectives. The trainings listed below are endorsed by the Manufacturing and Professional Services industries and lead to either employment or career advancement. Accelerated programs are preferred by the veterans that we serve, so most recommended certifications are less than 6 weeks in duration. Skills learned and developed through approved trainings are endorsed by the Manufacturing and Professional Services sectors evidenced by the employment rate of veterans following training and certification. OSHA Health and Safety Certificate and Project Management Certificates apply to both Manufacturing and Professional Services sectors. Upon completion the education requirements are satisfied to sit for the Project Management Professional Exam recognized domestically and internationally as setting the standard for excellence in project management. Competency Models (doleta.gov) illustrate how occupational and industry competencies build on a foundation of personal effectiveness, academic and workplace competencies. Employment Specialists will utilize occupational competencies through the O'net evaluation and through the development of the Individualized Career Plan. Training Training Length of Industry -Recognized Component Provider Training Certificate Or Degree Logistics, Materials, ESSC, Inc. 3 weeks OSHA Health and Safety and Supply Chain Certificate, Lean Continuous Management Improvement Certificate Project UCI 6 months UCI Project Management Management Certificate Program Forklift Operator Goodwill of One day Forklift Certification Orange County 2807/099999-2489 11276904 2 z10131/19 -30- Office Clerk/Admin Approved ITA at AJCC Goodwill of 5 Week Orange Course County Santa Ana College Certification Approved 3-12 Certificate or Credential in ITA List months Business/Professional Services 111.3. Occupational/Wage Range The occupations listed below include employers who successfully hired our VEAP participants last year. We have strong relationships and OJT agreements with the emplovers who are committed to workina with us in vears to come. Occupations and Explanation Expected Wage Range Project Manager (Based on O'NET $34.61 - $62.50 Online & relationship with Employers) Analyst(Based on O'NET Online & $18.50 - $35.73 relationship with Employers) Employment Specialist(Based on O'NET $20.00 - $23.00 Online & relationship with Employers) Support Specialist(Based on O'NET $17.43 - $21.00 Online & relationship with Employers) Technician(Based on O'NET Online & $19.91 - $28.85 relationship with Employers) 111.4. Employer Outreach/Recruitment As the largest nonpublic workforce development agency in Orange County with a major focus on job sourcing for people with barriers to employment, Goodwill of Orange County is highly experienced in creating satisfactory and meaningful relationships with employers who partner with our agency to place clients at their business site(s) for paid or unpaid work. TCVS is the proven leader for veteran employment services in Orange County. Employers such as Amazon, Edwards Life Sciences, Boeing, Bank of America, and Kaiser have created partnerships with Goodwill of Orange County specifically for veteran hiring. Goodwill's CEO will begin her board membership in January 2019 on the Orange County Business Council which consists of leading Orange County employers from local industry sectors including banking/finance, media, manufacturing, professional services, real estate, education, government, engineering, utilities, health care, hospitality, transportation, and technology. TCVS job development success has been based on access to and frequent, timely analysis of labor market information available through the California Labor Market Division (http://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/) and through the staffs well developed connections to businesses, Chambers of Commerce, and partnerships. Additionally, TCVS hosts Career Pathways seminars bi-monthly in which large employers in the industry sector identified, share the how and the why of finding employment in that 2807/099999-2489 11276904 2 a10131119 -31- specific industry. Previous sectors have included Kaiser and United Health for Healthcare, Blizzard Entertainment for Professional Services, Boeing for Advanced Manufacturing and FBI and DEA for Professional Services. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 111.5. Occupational Skills Hiring Veterans with a minimum of three to four years of hands-on military experience in their field provides experience and transferrable skills to employers in concert with any possible civilian work experience and or training in the manufacturing sector. The Veteran candidates receive quality training similar to advanced vocational schools in the military. Employers will be getting these highly trained and trainable candidates with an already large manufacturing skillset provided at the government's expense. The Tierney Center for Veterans Services uses several tools to help evaluate and translate military skillsets into civilian manufacturing industry terms and descriptions. We currently use Military Skills Translator, CareerScope and O'NET. Santa Ana AJCC will also administer an extensive evaluation for those veterans interested in training opportunities. The Comprehensive Assessment Report utilizes Career Category Best Matches, COPS -Interests, COPES -Values, GAIN, and the full CAPS evaluation. This valuable assessment ensures that the veteran is able and capable of utilizing his/her training to become employed in the industry sector identified. By using these tools, Veterans take advantage of the most important skills gained in the military and translate them on to their resumes and include them in their conversations with manufacturing, and business employers in terms they understand. Ill. 6. Service Delivery Plan----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tierney Center for Veterans Services (TCVS) at Goodwill of Orange County has a proven service delivery model that has been very successful with our veteran population. The key to effective placement in employment is a thorough assessment of the veterans' skills, interests, and capabilities upon intake. Following the assessment described above, veterans are enrolled into the program and begin to work with their Employment Specialists on an Individual Career and Financial Plan (ICFP). Enrollment into either our two week orientation designed for Chapter 31 disabled veterans, or individual assistance with resume writing and Job Seeking Skills prepare the veteran for the job application process. Our ICFP directly addresses the barriers to employment. If additional services such as housing or mental health support are required, we refer directly to our partner agencies. Peer navigation is a strong component of our model; our Employment and Outreach Specialists are able to provide direct services related to employment and also ensure that the other needs are addressed with support from our community partners. Once the appropriate track of services is determined the veterans or their eligible spouses will be identified as Chapter 31(veterans only) vs co -enrolled at AJCC, Manufacturing vs. Business/Professional Services, Training (OSHA Health and Safetv. UCI Proiect Manaaement or approved funded trainina throuah AJCC's or 2807/099999-2489 11276904 2 z10131/19 -32- Vocational Rehabilitation). Each career pathway will include case management, job development, and placement and retention services. The co -enrolled and Chapter 31 veterans will have additional training opportunities through the ITA funds as well as through VA approved training funds. Once a veteran or the eligible spouse obtains employment, we continue to follow up with him/her 30, 60 and 90 days after employment via personal visit, telephone contact and email. Following successful retention our outreach specialists reach out to every veteran one time a year personally to assess progress and current needs. Additionally we continue engagement with the veteran, if desired, to attend the Veterans Business Network and Career Pathways seminars. ��./. VVIVM VVVCI IIVI J -J I JGICLIVIIQ I Y QI IU IVIQ LIaI rUI Iuo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TCVS is funded through multiple funding sources to maximize our sustainability and impact on our community. Goodwill of Orange County's proposed project emphasizes the need for high level community engagement in order to develop strategic partnerships with potential employers and funders. The current project will be matched by funding from the Orange County Community Foundation ($114,000), Santa Ana Area Board and AJCC ($60,000), and two donor directed funds totaling $175,000 Veterans Rehabilitation and Employment funding ($250,000) which supports the Mission Employment classes and vocational assessments, Additionally, budgeted private grant funding through Bank of America, Boeing, Edison, and donor directed funding ($200,000) will collectively surpass the match required for the current project. The WIOA Governor's Discretionary funds will primarily be spent on employee wages and benefits, due to the level of individualized services being offered. $80,000 will be budgeted for training and OJT's. Our partnership with the Santa Ana Area Board will require $75,000 in the funding to be earmarked for staffing and assessments at the AJCC. The leveraged resources will also provide training dollars through the AJCC's and qualifying Chapter 31 approved training programs. 111.8. Project Work Plan Please review SFP Form 1. Upon completion of signing contracts and agreements between partners, Goodwill along with partners, Santa Ana AJCC and EDD, will begin outreach and recruitment activities for both veterans and employers. Upon assessment and enrollment a clear career pathway will be established and training needs determined. Training will be provided by approved training programs through the AJCC's as well as the training programs offered through TCVS. Upon completion of training, staff will offer positive recruitment and networking opportunities to begin placing veterans and eligible spouses into employment. Retention and continued outreach and support are offered at 30, 60, 90, 180 days and one year of employment. 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -33- Following a successful year in employment, outreach specialists contact the participants annually. Section IV —Performance Objectives IV.1. Performance Goals Matrix The plan for the current VEAP project is to serve 130 participants, 60 of whom will be disabled and at least 39 will have a documented service connected disability of 60% or higher, and 32 will have a documented service connected disability. Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Counselors are co -located in the Tierney Center and referrals are seamless and efficient for the disabled veterans being served. Eighty-four will be employed at the 2nd quarter after exit, 80 will be employed within 4 quarters after exit. Although all milestones regarding barriers were surpassed in our last VEAP contract, we plan to serve at least five homeless, 10 offenders, 30 recently separated, 25 low income and 60 disabled veterans. IV.2. Obiectives Measurement and Effectiveness Locai economic analysis of inaustry sectors for Manutacturing, Havancea Manufacturing and Business/Professional Services predict growth for both industries. The analysis of Orange County veterans found that 17% of the Orange County veterans hold managerial and professional occupations compared to 10.8% of veterans at the national level (County of Orange, OC Community Services, 2017). Project goals will be measured in real-time through CaIJOBS and WarriorServe. When measuring in real- time, in addition to looking at employment outcomes, we will determine training -related employment in the targeted industries and occupations. We will also survey employers regularly to ensure that that we are training veterans in the skillsets necessary for today's workforce. WarriorServe is a case coordination platform in which the veteran or family member is assigned a case number and an employment specialist/case manager to assist in connecting the participant with necessary services and supports. Community partners are able to enter and review cases through the partner portal to WarriorServe resulting in efficient case management and coordination. Constant updates through EDD and AJCC and Local Area partners and LMI data will also assist in tracking progress toward goals. Impact on the local economy is tracked through wages and wage differentials. One employment specialist who is able to find training and employment for 60 veterans in one year with an average wage of $26.00 an hour will have an economic impact of $3,244,800 on our local economy. Section V—Local Partnerships and Leveraged Resources -----V.1. Partnerships------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Please review the mandatory partnership letters attached. Goodwill of Orange County has demonstrated lonq time partnerships with our Orange County Development Board 2807/099999-2489 11276904 2 a10131119 -34- as well as our local Santa Ana Job Center. We currently share space in the Santa AJCC and plan to rent space in 2019 for this current project. Co -location will ensure close partnership, co -enrollment, and collaboration of services. We successfully delivered contracted goals working with Adult Workers who had long histories of unemployment in 2016. Working together with the Local Area, AJCC staff, and EDD we were able to successfully find employment for 61 Adult Workers and training for 20 and OJT opportunities for 3. Our relationship with EDD is demonstrated through our collaborative partnership with EDD counselors in working together with TCVS employment specialists. Regional partnerships with mandatory partners is demonstrated by the success or the 2017 VEAP contract. The community partners and the VA partners also were instrumental in serving the disabled veterans and non - disabled veterans who required additional services including benefits, mental health services, housing, and transportation. TCVS is considered a leader and valued partner in veteran employment and coordination of service delivery. V.2. Partner Roles and Responsibilities r------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TCVS's leadership in the Orange County Veterans and Military Families Collaborative (OCVMF) has resulted in strong relationships with over 80 veteran service organizations. Agencies such as Veterans Legal Institute, Volunteers of America, Child Guidance Center and Strength in Support all work together to ensure the veteran receives the necessary services. Additional partnerships have been formed with each of the community colleges and local universities through their Veterans Resource Centers. Moreover the Orange County Veterans Initiative in which Goodwill partners with 15 veteran agencies and educational institutions adds to the depth and breadth of our partnership relationship. Each of these partners meet monthly to ensure employment, outreach, educational benefits, and supportive services are being delivered in an organized and collaborative fashion. The common approach among partners is to not only work in one another's offices but to share resources and referrals so that the veteran avoids multiple contacts with a myriad of providers. In 2019, VOALA, Zero8Hundred and 211 OC will be co -located at the Tierney Center creating a HUB for veterans services. These partnerships in addition to the public/private partnership of co -location with the VA has resulted in a one -stop model for veterans to receive services. TCVS has the unique position of having an outreach specialist located in our County Veterans Service Office. Our Outreach Specialist is able to connect with the veterans seeking services on a daily basis and either provide the veteran with the assistance he/she needs, or refer the veteran to the multiple partners we work with. Once the Outreach Specialist had assessed the veteran's needs; the roles and responsibilities of our partner agencies are simple: meet the needs of the veterans. V.3. Employer Engagement 2807/099999-2489 11276904 2 a10131/19 -35- TCVS is actively engaged in working groups and holds leadership roles within the Orange County Veterans and Military Family Collaborative (OCVMFC). TCVS regularly hosts these working groups as well as an event called Career Pathways that has well known employers from various employment sectors at our facility. TCVS also facilitates quarterly meetings, which bring together over 100 veteran service providers, including the Veterans Administration. TCVS Outreach Specialists attend and participate in approximately 10 community engagement events per month that are focused on veterans and military families which assists in the identification of veterans who have not previously accessed services in the county. We are engaged with the local VFW, American Legions, and the Veteran Business Network social mixers where over 100 veterans attend per event and connect with and identify veterans with employment needs. Additionally, TCVS Director sits on the national board of the US Veterans Business Alliance with a focus on entrepreneurial opportunities for veterans as well as connecting veterans with local businesses for employment. The program delivery method focuses on engaging the entire community of employers, services providers and veterans. rVA. Mandatory Partnerships --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- Please review attached Partner Roles Responsibilities and Resources Chart. (SFP Form J) V.S. Other Partnerships Please review attached Partner Roles Responsibilities and Resources Chart. (SFP Form J) V.6. Cash/In-Kind Match Please review attached Partner Roles Responsibilities and Resources Chart. (SFP Form J) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Section VI —Statement of Capabilities VI_1 _ _Capability -and Knowledge-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Goodwill of Orange County has been providing services to individuals with barriers to employment for over 90 years and has a proven track record of administering large contracts and awards as exemplified by annual renewal of contracts by the Department of Rehabilitation, Social Services Agency, Orange County Regional Center, Health Care Agency and Employment Development Department. Additionally we were awarded the VEAP contract through EDD 2017 of which we are on track to meet/exceed contracted goals and outcomes. Within the last 4 years, Tierney Center for Veterans Services (TCVS program has grown from serving about 115 veterans in 2015 to providing basic services to 3,381 veterans, case management services to almost 500 veterans and found emplovment for 287 veterans in 2017 alone). In total we have 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -36- provided basic services to over 8,000 veterans and placed 161 veterans into employment with an average wage of $26.00/hour in 2018.We utilize a comprehensive data base called WarriorServe and which tracks completion of individual career and financial plans as well as training. As charter members of the Orange County Veterans and Military Families Collaborative (OCVMFC) TCVS Director Denton Knapp currently serves as the Vice -Chair (OCVMFC) and Community Veterans Engagement Board (CVEB). He is a National Board Member, US Veterans Business Alliance (USVBA), a Board Member on Association of the United States Army (AUSA), Greater Los Angeles Chapter, and Commander (Brigadier General), Army Component Command; California State Military Reserve. Marine Veteran Jeff Pagano, Manager of the Tierney Center, is the Chair for the Resource Working Group and also sits on the Steering Committee. Jeff is also the VP of the US Veterans Business Alliance. We have a proven record of performance with the America's Warrior Partnership grant, Operation Goodjobs, and we successfully completed our Orange County Community Foundation Veteran's Initiative and were chosen for two additional projects serving veterans through the Orange County Community Foundation. VI.2. Infrastructure/Staffing---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- r ----- Our current veterans program employs 16 full time staff and 1 part time staff. 80% of our current staff is veterans with extensive experience in working with veterans and veteran organizations. To ensure that grant activities are completed within the performance period, a detailed project work plan is developed by the Program Supervisor and are distributed among staff and partners. The current staffing outlined in the budget includes 1 FTE for the Program Supervisor, and 2 FTE's for the Employment Specialists. Additional in -kind staffing for the current project includes business developers who will be connecting with employers. Outreach Specialists will be conducting outreach in the community at the county VSO office as well as the community colleges and veterans functions and events. Our Employment Specialists have a 20 year combined experience in recruiting, human services, mental health, sales and marketing and program management VI.3. Past/Present Performance -November 2013-December2015 Operation GoodJobs subgrant through Goodwill International and Walmart. This pay for performance grant focused on serving 300 veterans by providing Individualized Career and Financial Plans, job placement, job retention, and earned credentials. -May of 2015-Present TCVS was selected fora National Award from America's Warrior Partnership. This four year grant funded the development of a warrior community within Orange County in which the goal is to establish relationships with 80% of the post-9/11 veterans. Success is measured by usage of VA benefits, reduction in veteran homelessness, reduction in unemployment, and enrollment into a national database, 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -3 7 ' WarriorServe. This holistic service model provides the veteran with an advocate or peer navigator who assist the veteran in creating an individual, comprehensive and solution -focused plan. -October of 2015-Present TCVS was selected as one of seven high -performing nonprofit veteran service organizations to be awarded the Veterans Initiative Grant (OCVI) through the Orange County Community Foundation. The OCVI's key goal is to improve critical and fundamental services so thatveterans: knowwhere to go in Orange County to get the services they need, develop trusting relationships with community providers, connecting early and proactively to services they and their families need, and obtain employment in career -oriented opportunities and positions. -July 2017-Present TCVS was awarded the 2017 FY grant for VEAP. Focused on serving disabled veterans we are currently on track to meet/exceed required goals. Section VII—Budget Summary Plan and Narrative VI1.1. a) Budget-Summary-Plan------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please review attached Budget Summary Plan (SFP Form L) VI1.1. b Cost Effectiveness r------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Line Item A, Section 1. Staff salaries $195,852.84. This expense equates to salaries for two full-time Employment Specialists and one full-time VEAP Supervisor for the grant period. 100% of these costs will be charged to the project. These positions are the critical piece to building productive relationships with community employers and getting veterans employed. Employment Specialist responsibilities include but are not limited to; participation at various chamber of commerce meetings, attending community events, researching sector specific job markets, making appointments and/or calls to potential partner employers, interviewing, assessing and advocating for project participants. Employment Specialist will be responsible for assisting veterans through the hiring process and with becoming adjusted to their environments and assignments. The pay rate for these positions is roughly equivalent to the starting pay of a job development position at GIOC for a person who is either entry level or with some experience and is comparable with similar positions at partner agencies. Line Item A, Section 2. Staff salaries. Cash. $71,053.00. This expense equates to about $51,999.96 leveraged cost to support the Staff Salaries in Line Item A, Section 1 and the rest for clerical help for the grant period. These are in -kind expenses and 0% of the cost shall be absorbed by the project. The Employment Specialist is a necessary part of this endeavor as this position is responsible overall for disabled veterans in the community who are unemployed, underemployed or otherwise in need of services and to connect them to the services that will be provided as well as leveraging in place resources of GIOC for the overall wellbeing and employment of veterans with disabilities. The pav rate for this position is roughly equivalent to the starting pav of an 2807/099999-2489 11276904 2 z10131/19 -38- Employment Specialist at GIOC or a person who is comparable with similar position at partner agencies. These are In -kind expenses and 0% of these costs will be paid by the project. Line Item C, Section 1. Staff Benefit Cost. $48,179.80 for Staff Benefits. This expense equates to 24.6% of the staff salaries for the two full-time Employment Specialists and one full-time VEAP Supervisor for the grant period and includes all agency burden required to employ an individual minus salary for that period of time. The percentage used to calculate an employee's burden is based on a number which is slightly lower than industry standard. 100% of these costs will be charged to the project. Line Item C, Section 2. Cash/In-kind Match is $21,315.90. This expense equates to about $12,791.99 leveraged cost to support the Staff Benefit Cost in Line Item C, Section 1, and the rest for clerical help for the grant period, with the industry standard of 24.6% for the staff benefit rate and includes all agency burden required to employ an individual minus salary for that period of time. These are In -kind expenses and 0% of these costs will be paid by the project. Line Item E, Section 1. Staff Travel. $6,500 equates to the travel expenses of two full- time Employment Specialists and one full-time VEAP Supervisor for the grant period averaging 330 miles per month, assuming the Federal mileage reimbursement rate of $0.545 per mile. 330 miles per month is an average of present Goodwill Job Development Staff. 100% of these costs will be charged to the project. Line Item GA., Section 2. Furniture and Equipment. $3,050. This expense equates to the cost of two laptops. These equipment needs are for the two Employment Specialists are necessary for meeting the demands of these positions. The costs of these laptops are roughly equivalent to similar items which have been purchased by GIOC recently. These are In -kind expenses and 0% of these costs will be paid by the project. Line Item I, Section 1. Tuition Payments/Vouchers. $67,135. This expense equates to all training fees for all participants. 100% of these costs will be charged to the project. Line Item J, Section 1. On -the -Job Training. $43,500. 100% of these costs will be charged to the project for On -the -Job Training. Line Item L, Section 1. Participant Support Services. $3,155. This expense equates to necessary supportive services removing barriers for veteran clients seeking employment to include but not limited to: fuel cards, work boots, clothing and food cards. 100% of these costs will be charged to the project. Line Item L, Section 2. Participant Support Services. $45,000. This expense equates to necessary emergency supportive services removing barriers for veteran clients seeking employment and mitigating homelessness to include but not limited to: fuel cards, work boots, clothing, auto repairs, food cards and rent. These are In -kind expenses and 0% of these costs will be paid by the project. 2807/099999-2489 11276904 2 z10131/19 -39- Line Item M, Section 1. Contractual Services. $60,000. This expense equates to AJCC/One-Stop services provider and/or operator costs. 100% of these costs will be charged to the project as detailed in Form G attached. Line Item M, Section 2. Contractual Services. $60,000. This expense equates to leveraged resources for advertising, social media, and print media through Cornerstone Media. These are In -kind expenses and 0% of these costs will be paid by the project. Line Item N, Section 1. Indirect Costs. $44,312.36 (9.0686% of total Funding). 100% of these costs will be charged to the project. Line Item O, Section 1. Administrative Costs. $20,000 (4.09303% of total Funding). 100% of these costs will be charged to the project. Line Item O, Section 2. Leveraged Resources. $349,000 includes grants and donations secured by GIOC for 2019 that will be leveraged for Employment and Outreach efforts to include but not limited to full time Employment Specialists, Outreach Specialists, outreach projects and employment projects. These are In -kind expenses and 0% of these costs will be paid by the project. VI1.2. Project Sustainability Goodwill of Orange County, in partnership with the AJCC/One-Stop services provider, has developed processes, partnerships and relationships that will ensure sustainability of the program going forward. From outreach, to training, to employment, the program has demonstrated a dedicated focus to its local veteran population. Veterans are seamlessly walked through an established process that has a proven track record of success. The integration of veteran service providers, now collocated, within the process has encouraged a healthy and growing collaboration within the local community and also added significant value to both the program and the partner's operations. Fellow veteran service providers as starting to collocate to better serve the veteran. Extensive relationships have also been built within the local business community that have resulted in successful and quantifiable employment of veterans. Additionally, the program has demonstrated the benefits of hiring veterans to the business community which ensures continued participation in the program. Goodwill of Orange County is a Social Enterprise. For over 90 years the Goodwill thrift stores have supported programs and services to individuals with barriers to employment. Ninety- two cents of every dollar generated goes directly to programs and services. Moreover two major fundraising events each year are dedicated to supporting the Tierney Center for Veterans Services at GIOC. Our current vocational rehabilitation program for disabled veterans is funded through the Veterans Administration and will continue to support job placement services and training as well as our dedicated development team sourcing private donations and grants in the private sector. 2807/099999-2489 11276904 2 a]OH1/19 -40- VI1.3. Semi -Annual Cumulative Plan Period Ending Expenditures Match Funds 11fr iT:1 IIiF7 $19,000 M. November June 2020 December 2019 2020 $152,950 $372,450 $488,635 $152,718 $366,523 $549,785 Grant ends March 31. 2021. No extension will be allowed. 2807/099999-2489 n 11276904 2 z10131/19 -YI- ATTACHMENT B: STATEMENT OF WORK CITY OF SANTA ANA SCOPE OF WORK BACKGROUND EXHIBIT B For over 20 years, the City of Santa Ana's WORK Center has demonstrated its abilities in designing, implementing, and managing a full array of workforce development programs to area residents. In 1996, the City of Santa Ana further expanded its services by opening the Santa Ana WORK Center and later partnering with various agencies, including the State Employment Development Department, Orange County Social Services Agency, Department of Rehabilitation, Rancho Santiago Community College District, Goodwill Industry, and community based organizations to ensure a comprehensive and integrated service delivery in a One -Stop environment. The services have benefited, youth, adults, dislocated workers, and families on -aid. PLANNED APPROACH The Santa Ana WORK Center will assume the responsibility to ensure the VEAP enrolled participants who are referred by Goodwill Industries of OC will be co -enrolled and receive needed WIOA services. Participants will be screened for WIOA eligibility. These services may include one or more of the following services: 1. Basic Career Services: Basic Career Services will be offered to all participants. These services are by their nature self-service. These services require minimal staff assistance such as access to job postings, referrals to other program, and provision of labor market information. Selfservice also includes staff establishing access to CaIJOBS for an individual or looking up a password. 2. Job Coaching: This activity will help prepare students for employment. Participants will be offered one-on-one coaching to develop skills necessary to obtain employment. Job coaching is designed to help job seekers gain confidence so they can successfully enter the workforce, obtain and sustain employment. Job coaches will provide guidance and motivation in setting and achieving job and career goals. Participants will also receive one-on-one guidance in increasing job retention by promoting effective workplace habits, attitudes and choices. 3. Supportive Services: As part of the planned approach, supportive services will be identified and the participant will receive assistance in those services. Supportive services include but are not limited 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -42- to, transportation assistance, clothing assistance, assistance with tool purchases, or testing fees. Participants must be eligible for WIOAto receive supportive services. 4. Job Training: WICA is designed to increase participant access to training services. Training services may be provided to equip individuals to enter the workforce and retain employment. Examples of training services may include: • occupational skills training, including training for nontraditional employment; • on-the-job training (OJT), including registered apprenticeship; • transitional jobs in accordance with WIOA §134(d)(5). The Santa Ana WORK Center will focus on transitional jobs, but other options will be explored as appropriate and as funding permits. 5. Job Development/Job Creation: The Employment Services Team will interact with the local business community. The goal is to ensure that sufficient employment opportunities are created for WIOA eligible students who are co -enrolled in the WIOA program. PARTICIPANT RECORDS AND DATA COLLECTION 1. CalJOBS: Participant records and data collection will be achieved by using CalJOBS. CalJOBS is designed to not only provide online workforce services to job seekers, it also serves as a program management tool for workforce professionals. For the management of a workforce program, CalJOBS incorporates customer tracking, program activities, outcomes, and follow up services. a) Customer Tracking -Participants will be registered into CalJOBS. Registration captures basic client information including demographics and contact information. Each registered participant receives a unique application number which is utilized to track client participation. b) Program Activities: CalJOBS provides a method to track program activities including start dates, end dates and completion status. Completion status is limited to successful and unsuccessful completions. CalJOBS has hundreds of activity codes including Job Search, Orientation and Supportive Services. c) Outcomes: Closing program activities is manually entered by staff. Upon completion of planned services, a closure form is entered which captures program related outcomes such as employment and credential attainment. d) Follow Up: After creating a closure, follow-up activities can be created to track program outcomes, up to a year after program exit. 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 —43- 2. Reports: CalJOBS reports will be submitted monthly including a) Total Enrollment Summary b) Activity Reports 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -44- ATTACHMENT C: BUDGET SUMMARY Employment EDD Development Department Bill DGET SUMMARY State ❑f Californian FORM F ntNumber K9110010 FSTATELISEONLY ntCode 1151 in Date 06/01/19 cation Date C17119/19 Organisation Goodwill Industries of Orange County(GWI) Project Name Veterans' Employment -Related Assistance Program (VEAP) 2019-2019 1 2 3 4 5 [ Expense Item Amount Requested Amount Leveraged Total Project Budget Source of Leveraged Funds [,Kind/Cash A. Staff Sa lad es $195, 852.84 $71.053.00 $266.905.84 GICC ❑� In -Kind ❑cash B. Number of full-time equivalents: 3.0 C. Staff Benefit Cost $48,179.80 $21.315.90 $69.495.70 GIDC ❑In-iuund ❑Cash D. Staff Benefit Rate (percent) 24.6% E. Staff Travel $5,500.00 $o.o❑ $6,500.00 GIDC 2IM'und ❑cash E. Ope rating Expenses (communications, facilities, utilities, maintenance, consumable supplies, audit, $o.cw $ono $onD GIDC ❑� Int3nd ❑Cash G. Furniture and Equipment I_Small Purchase(unitcost of under j"5,0D0) $0000 $305000 $3,090000 GIDC 2Infiind❑cash z Equipment Purchase(u nit cost of$5,00) or more and useful l ife of more than one yea r.) Complete Exhibit F2- Supplemental Budget $000 $000 $000 0 ❑In -Kind ❑cash 3_Lease $000 $000 $0.00 0 ❑bNGnd El cash b. Consumable Testing and Instructional Materials $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ❑ ❑k M.d ❑Cash I. Tuition Paymentr]Vouche6 $67,135.00'.". $0.40 $67,135.00 0 ❑Tn-iml ❑cash I. On -The -lob Training $43,50000". $0.00 $43,500.00 0 ❑TnaCind ❑cash K. Participant Wages a nd Fringe Benefits WOO 5000 $0.00 CDBG/Donation ❑ In -Kind ❑cash L Participant Support Services $3,155.0❑''.. $45,0❑❑.00 $49,155.00 CDBG/Donation ❑Tn-Kind OGsh M. Contractual Services (must complete Form G) ....................................... $60,000.001 ..................................... $50,013O.00i $120,000.00 WIDA Titlel Ed In4Cind ❑CasM1 N_ Indirect Costs'(complete items l and 2 below) $4431236 $0 ❑0 $44,31235 0 ❑RM.d 2C.A o. Other: Adminstrative Costs f Leveraged Resources $20,000.00$349,000.00 $369,000.00 Grant/Donation❑In-Mnd ❑J cash P_ TOTALFBNDING— $488,63500 $549,41890 $1,038,05390 `Indirect Cost Rate must be negotiated and Total Award $ 489,635 "Administrative Costs. Program costsl 498,535 indices III or IV to uniform Guidance, 2CFRPart200. 1. Indirect Cost Rate (percentj:9.97% 2. Nameof Cognizant Agen,V DOL •' A maxim um of 7.5%ot the fatal project budget will be al lowed for administ rat{ve costs. The definitionof administrative costs is provided In Appendix B of the RFA. 2807/099999-2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 - n a 5- ATTACHMENT D: PERFORMANCE MATRIX VEAP SFP 1&14 PERFORMANCE GOALS MATRP% .�-- Fenpinemrnt �r nrrntotarrirnr DO STATE USE OMIY WISOM! i o.P a r i m e n r Suhgrane Member f V1R1• ihl {al�lorn�• Gr�[� ial Plan Manger Yay MuddRc~ Gate Ma,t -Yea• • ant: Parfwmarru Goeb Dncriptlan Tatal Partklpartta PerWnance Goal Rate % 1. Total Participants to be served 130 12, mploynent Rate 2nd Quarter After Exit 85 65% 3. Employnent Rate eth Quarter After Exit 81 ti2% 1 a. Credential Aetairunent within4 Ctuanemrs After Exit 69 53% 15, Median Eaminp 2nd (quarter After Exit 6, SWW DiwWd or DHaWed Veteran 60 i. FWneiess VMt an 8. An Offender 5 10 9. Recently Separated Veterans 30 10. Lacking Ho School Diplona or E uWalent 11. Low -Income Veteran _ 0 25 12. Servl ng 25% GWIs service connected disabled vlraranS 33 25% 13. Serving 30%GWIt service wnnected disabled veterans with 60%diaaWky rating m higher 39 309E WW Wtrr-ara R;owtp 2807/099999 2489 11276904.2 a10/31/19 -46- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION = CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT, AMEND THE FY 2019-20 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, AND AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO VIDO SAMARZICH, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $876,183, FOR THE RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FY 2018-19 PROJECT WITH AN ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF $1,061,506 (PROJECT NO 19-7528) {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 6, 1C) CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 1s' Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2"6 Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment to spend $222,319 from prior year fund balance in Sanitary Sewer Capital Recovery Charges, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account, to pay for Sewer service adjustment work necessitated by this project. 2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Capital Improvement Program Residential Street Repair Program FY 2018-19 Project to include additional construction funds in the amount of $222,319. 3. Award a contract to Vido Samarzich, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $876,183, for construction of the Residential Street Repair Program FY 2018-19 Project, for the term beginning upon execution of the contract and ending upon project completion, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney. 4. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $1,061,506, which includes $876,183 for the construction contract; $97,704 for contract administration, inspection and testing; and an $87,619 project contingency (approximately 10% of the construction contract amount). DISCUSSION The City's Pavement Management System has identified Garnsey Street from Richland Street to Santa Ana High School as high -priority road pavements in need of rehabilitation (Exhibit 1). The Award Contract for Residential Street Repair Program FY 2018-19 Project November 19, 2019 Page 2 pavements are deteriorating due to weather, age, and heavy use. The improvements include performing localized concrete pavement reconstruction, replacing damaged concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, cross gutters, and curbs ramps, and sealing cracks to prevent deterioration from water infiltration, which was included in the approved Fiscal Year 2019-20 Capital Improvement Program. In addition, sewer laterals and a sewer manhole require relocation and adjustment for this project, which will be covered by Sanitary Sewer Capital fund in amount of $222,319. All works referenced in the recommended action provides the total financing for the project (Exhibit 2). Once completed, these improvements will enhance the ride quality, surface drainage, and appearance of the neighborhoods. Public Outreach and Contractor Participation To provide an opportunity for local vendors to submit bids, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on September 13 and 18, 2019. Bid were received electronically via the City's web -based electronic bidding system, PlanetBids, on October 4, 2019. Through the PlanetBids online portal, vendors may register to receive notifications on all current and future City projects, as well as download contract documents, receive project updates and submit bids electronically. Additionally, a total of 778 vendors, including 37 located in the City of Santa Ana, were notified of the project via PlanetBids. 37 vendors requested bidding documents and 5 bids were received. No bids were received from Santa Ana contractors. Bid Results Summary RANK BIDDER'S NAME LOCATION BASE BID 1 Vido Samarzich, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga $876,183 2 EBS General Engineering Inc. Corona $893,241 3 Hardy & Harper, Inc. Lake Forest $990,000 4 Western Construction Specialists inc. Santa Fe Springs $1,011,975 5 All American Asphalt Corona $1,313,139 All 5 bids were responsive and Vido Samarzich, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive bid (Exhibit 3), in the amount of $876,183. Based on the bid analysis and a contractor's reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract (Exhibit 4) to Vido Samarzich, Inc. in the amount bid. Project Delivery To deliver a complete project, in addition to the construction contract, the estimated total cost to deliver the project also requires construction administration, inspection, and testing, along with an allowance for contingencies to account for unexpected or unforeseen conditions. Construction administration and inspection includes construction management; implementation of the City's Community Workforce Agreement requirements; inspection of the Contractor's work to ensure contract compliance, workmanship, and quality; and material testing. As indicated in the Cost Award Contract for Residential Street Repair Program FY 2018-19 Project November 19, 2019 Page 3 Analysis (Exhibit 5) and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $1,061,506. Construction Contract 1 $876,183 Construction Administration, Inspection, and Testing $97,704 Contingencies $87,619 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $1,061,506 Approval of Recommended Action #2 updates the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Capital Improvement Program Residential Street Repair Program FY 2018-19 Project approved Construction budget of $852,977, to recognize additional Sanitary Sewer Capital funds in the amount of $222,319, for an amended CIP project Construction total budget of $1,061,506. This recommended action expands the project budget by 26% to afford necessary improvements above the estimated cost for project delivery. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #6 — Community Facilities & Infrastructure, Objective #1 (Establish and maintain a Community Investment Plan for all City assets), Strategy C (invest resources and technology to extend the service life of existing infrastructure to protect the City's investment and support a high quality of life standard). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER-2019-86 was filed for the project. FISCAL IMPACT As indicated in the Cost Analysis (Exhibit 5), the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $1,061,506, which includes the construction contract, contract administration, inspection, testing, and project contingency. Approval of the requested appropriation adjustment will recognize $222,319 from the Sanitary Sewer Capital Fund, Prior Year Fund Balance revenue account (No. 05417002-50001) and appropriate the same amount into the Sanitary Sewer Capital Recovery Charges, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (No. 05417647-66220). These funds will be used to pay for the sewer service relocation work necessitated by this project. The following table summarizes the funds budgeted to deliver construction of this project: Award Contract for Residential Street Repair Program FY 2018-19 Project November 19, 2019 Page 4 Fiscal Year Accounting Fund Accounting Unit, Account Amount Unit -Account # Description Description Community CDBG Programs - $839,187 FY 0 13518 Development Improvements Other Than July -June July -June -7528)220 (19-7528) Block Grant Buildings APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS FY 2019-20 05417647-66220 Sanitary Sewer Capital Recovery Charges, July -June (19-7528) Capital Improvements Other Than $222,319 Building Total: $1,061,506 All funds are scheduled for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2019-20. Fuad S. Sweiss, PE, PLS Executive Director Public Works Agency Steven A. Mendoza Executive Director Community Development Agency FSS/TC/MO APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency Exhibits: 1. Location Map 2. Amended FY 2019-20 CIP Project Sheet 3. Bid Proposal 4. Construction Contract 5. Cost Analysis NT'Sl 1 ST ST PROJECT ;LOCATION Exhibit 1 1-1 �BN oN�hc � SANTA ANA �1 Project No. 19-7528: RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FY 2018-19 f® POBM WORKS AGENCY N N N m n p c m� aci m E W N a ti r a c 3 rz o L U a m m � N � W o � o W a W a� a) a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m N N O O O O N N n o A o a LL LL O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w vi N o ie o 0 oo o 0 ry N W N yq 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N n o N o 0 o O A o O 0 0 0 0 0 rn� O n o O n W 0 0 0 o O Doe o e � m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ o 0 o p 4� 4� c90 m �-rn is m N a N N N N a N M IA {� w 6 N 66 c _g W o 0 w 0 m o w 00 EXHIBIT 2 a U1 i+ N Y' C Y W [ W W ielN N W m fb iT C G W M wy } LEI � U N Q a W W Y IL 50, N F LL Lu 0 Q n zQa H Z W W oa UQ Q U 4 N N �c Os L' C N O O cs �p N y o X d m� rq 3 t mmti Z��n�Qa-Ga�3 Otvav�i c>,t� a m�Goycma.� -LL U "mmoyUG•. s., V�otyyma3� W °mm�mmv; aaia Qcc 3a>,Ua�>_�a.c a mUUyOU Uo,�Z o c IQ G O ` U W m m O O N U m n w W Ea CO P: m U a= 0 W W .� O ° O `z I I a a o o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL o o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 sn srj o N o 0 N � N ` LL IL o o p o 0 0 0 o O O sn sn o M o 0 N O O N O N 0 0 0 0 0 n C o 0 o sv o 0 ry M N f9 } 4i fA SO C 0 0 0 0 0 paNi o p o 0 sry Q N N N N O � cOC N O � rn rn J U U Z O Q ej)O LL y F LL O E W U Q .� o LLI 2 er a L D ° a0 W u0i n es p rswxxex � am*7s rsnwns f rsmans Y- I City of Santa Ana Page 1 Residential Street Repair Program FY 18/19 (19-7528), bidding on October 4, 2019 2:00 PM (Pacific) Printed 10/09/2019 EXHIBIT 3 Bid Results Bidder Details Vendor Name Vldo Samarzich, Inc. Address 6829 Billings Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 United States Respondee Vido L Samarzich Respondee Title Vice President Phone 909-987.6377 Ext. Email vldosam@yahoo.com Vendor Type CADIR License # 433210 CA DIR Bid Detail Bid Format Electronic Submitted October 4, 2019 12:29:28 PM (Padfic) Delivery Method Bid Responsive Bid Status Submitted Confirmation # 190108 Ranking 0 Respondee Comment Buyer Comment Attachments File Tilde File Name File Type General Does General does for Santa Ana Residential Street Repair.pdf General Attachment Line Items Type kern Code UOM City Base Bid Items 1 Unclassified Excavation CY 847 2 Removal of 6" PCC at Various Locations CY 1020 3 Construct 6" PCC Pavement with (3-day) Cure including Dowels CY 1020 4 Crack Seal with Deery Super Gray LS 1 5 PCC Sidewalk (T=4") SF 3990 Unit Price $140.00 $180.00 $350.00 $12,000.00 $8.00 Line Total Comment $118,580.00 $163,200.00 $357,000.00 $12.000.00 $31,920.00 PlanetBids, Inc. City of Santa Ana Page 2 Residential Street Repair Program FY 18/19 (19-7528), bidding on October 4, 2019 2:00 PM (Pacific) Printed 10/0912019 Bid Results Type Item Code UOM Oty unit P1la Line Total Comment 6 PCC Driveway Approach (REsidential=6") SF 225 $16.00 $3,375.00 7 PCC Curb Ramp SF 5280 $16.00 $84,480.00 8 PCC Curb and Gutter LF 500 $46.00 $22,500.00 9 PCC Cross -Gutter (Local Street) SF 3150 $17.00 $53,660.00 10 PCC Grinding LF 246 $19.60 $4,777.50 11 Root Shave EA 12 $275.00 $3,300.00 12 Adjust Water Valve Frame and Cover to Finished Grade EA 9 $600.00 $4,51l 13 Adjust Sewer and Drainage Manhole to Finished Grade EA 2 $750.00 $11600.00 14 Signing and Striping LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 15 Project Advertising Sign EA 2 $760.00 $1,600.00 16 Labor Agreement Overall LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Subtotal 4970,182.50 Total $876,182.50 PlanetBids, Inc. CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FYI 8/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD BID PROPOSAL TO: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FROM: Vido Sama REQUIREMENT: The undersigned bidder declares that they have carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that they have examined the Contract Documents in its entirety and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said plans (if any) and the specifications for the unit price(s) or lump sum(s) set forth in the following schedule: Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 1 Unclassified Excavation -PCC 847 CY $ $ 2 Removal of 6- at Various Locations 1,020 CY $ $ 3 Construct 6" PCC Pavement with (3- day) Cure including Dowels 1,020 CY $ $ 4 Crack Seal with Decry Super Gray I LS $ $ 5 PCC Sidewalk (T=4") 3,990 SF $ $ 6 PCC Driveway Approach (Residential=6") 225 SF $ $ 7 PCC Curb Ramp 5,280 SF $ $ 8 PCC Curb and Gutter(13-1) 500 LF $ $ 9 PCC Cross -Gutter (Local Street) 3,150 SF $ $ 10 PCC Grinding 245 LF $ $ 1 I Root Shave 12 EA $ $ 12 Adjust Water Valve Frame and Cover to Finished Grade 9 EA $ $ 13 Adjust Sewer and Drainage Manhole to Finished Grade 2 EA $ $ P-1 ofP-16 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FYI 8/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 14 Signing and Striping 1 LS $ $ 15 Project Advertising Sign 2 EA $ $ 16 Labor Agreement Oversight I LS $10,000 $10,000 TOTAL BASE BID $ SEE ELFcT/LD-JI C The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected based on the total base bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add -alternate bid items (if any). * The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the " 25%" limit as stated in Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly. 7 This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 2-3.2 of the Standard Specifications. TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within fifty (50) working days after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $1,500 per calendar day. Name of Firm Signature of BII Title Vice (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) Vido Samarzich, Inc. Vido Samarzich - President Vido L. Samarzich - Vice President Monika Samarzich - Secretary P-2 of P-16 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FYI 8/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD BIDDER'S STATEMENT BIDDER understands and agrees that this Bid Proposal, Contract Documents and subsequent Construction Contract Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between BIDDER and the AGENCY only after it has been accepted by the City Council, endorsed by the Clerk of the Council with her signature and official seal noting hereon the action of approval of the Council, signed by the Public Works Agency Executive Director or his/her duly authorized agent, and signed by the City Attorney, denoting his approval of the form of this document, and its execution, and when it or an exact copy of it has been either delivered to BIDDER or deposited with the United States Postal Service properly addressed to the BIDDER with the correct postage affixed thereto. BIDDER further agrees that upon delivery (as defined above) of the accepted agreement he/she will furnish AGENCY all required bonds and certificate of liability insurance within ten (10) business days or the funds, check, draft, or BIDDERS bond substituted in lieu thereof accompanying this proposal shall become the property of the AGENCY and shall be considered as payment of damages due to the delay and other causes suffered by AGENCY because of the failure to furnish the necessary bonds and because it is distinctly agreed that the proof of damages actually suffered is difficult to ascertain; otherwise said funds, check, drafts, or BIDDER'S bond substituted in lieu thereof shall be returned to the undersigned. BIDDER understands that a bid is required for the entire work, the estimated quantities set forth in the bid schedule are solely for the purpose of comparing bids, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed. The BIDDER also certifies that the bid is a balanced bid. In accordance with Section 7028.15 of the California Business and Professions Code, the undersigned certifies under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Name of Firm Signature of BI] Title (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) Vido Samarzich, Inc. Vido Samarzich - President Vido L. Samarzich - Vice President Monika Samarzich - Secretary P-3 ofP-16 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FYI 8/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRACTOR'S LICENSING AND REGISTRATION STATEMENT The undersigned contractor, or corporate officer, declares under penalty of perjury that he/she and all his/her subcontractors are registered with the State of California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), and that the following is true and correct. Contractor's Name: Vido Samarzlch, Inc. Business Address: 6829 Billings Place, Rancho Cucamonga CA 91701 Business E-Mail Address: vidosam@yahoo.com Telephone: (909) 987-6377 State Contractor's License No. and Class: 433210 A License Expiration Date: 12/31/2020 State Dept. of Industrial Relations (DIR) Registration No.: 1000013213 State Dept. of Industrial Relations (DIR) Registration ExpirAion Pate: 6/30/2020 Signed: Title: Vice President P-4 of P-16 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FYI 8/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD PREVAILING WAGE COMPLIANCE AND MONITORING STATEMENT Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16,000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Since the services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and since the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Contractor with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor's principal place of business and at the project site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The undersigned certifies that the foregoing is true and correct Name of Firm Signature of BII Title Vice President (if an individual, so state) P-5 ofP-16 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FYI 9/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD OWNERSHIP AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE j SS: CITY OF SANTA ANA ) Vido L. Samarzieh being duly sworn, deposes and says: ❑ INDIVIDUAL That he/she is the party making the foregoing proposal: ❑ PARTNERSHIP That he/she is a member of the co -partnership Flnn designated as: and who has been and is duly vested with the authority to make and execute instruments for the co -partnership by: who constitute the other members of the co -partnership. CORPORATION That he is of: Vido Samarzich Inc. a corporation which is making the foregoing proposal: El JOINT VENTURE That he is of: one of the parties making the foregoing proposal as a joint venture, and the he/she has been and is duly vested with the authority to execute instruments for an on behalf of the parties making said bid who are: that such a bid is genuine and not collusive or sham, and has not in any manner sought by collusion to ecur any advantage against the City of Santa Ana or any person interested in the proposed c trac fo himself or any other person. Sign ture of td r Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 1 EE Signature of officer Administering Oath (Notary Public) 017 P-6 ofP-16 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of LOS ANGELES Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this 3RD day of OCTOBER 20 19, by VIDO L. SAMARZICH proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me. ldlllilalll oMNNMMa"N"11 Ilaa� DEGMO14D G. WARREN COMM. 02190534 Notary Puoilc - California Riverside County My COMM, Expires Apr. B, 2021 IIIIIIII,"I 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIIII1 (Seal) Signature +' CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJ ECT NO.: 19-7529 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FY18119 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD Bond No. VIDSA-2058 Inl17�Lti7�1�7 KNOW ALL PRESENT that, VidoSamarzich, Inc. _ _ __ as BIDDER, and mpany o Fidelity & Deposit Cof Maryland _ , as SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF SANTA ANA, as AGENCY, in the penal stun of _ Ten Percent of the Total Amount Bid _ Doi lays ($ W'/b of Bid ), which is ten percent (10%) of the total amount bid by BIDDER to AGENCY for the above -stated project, for the payment of which sum, BIDDER and SURETY agree to be bound, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITIONS OF THIS OBLIGATION ARE SUCH that, whereas BIDDER is about to submit a bid to AGENCY for the above -stated project, if said bid is rejected, or if said bid is accepted and a contract is awarded and entered into by BIDDER in the manner and time specified, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect in favor of AGENCY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have set their names, titles, hands, and seal this 26th day of September _ 20 19 BIDDER* Vido Samar;Ah, Inc., 6829 By: SURETY* Fidelity & s By: Randy Spoh Subscribed Signature:, Billings Place, Rancho — Vivo a iy of MaryjaQ, 777 S. F A before me , 20_. Notary Public in and for the County of CA 91701, 909-897-6377 St. Ste. 3900, Los Angeles, CA 90017, 619-235-1388 this _ day off = State of _ * Provide BIDDER/ SURETY name, address, and telephone number and the name, title, address, and telephone number of authorized representative. P-7 of P-16 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of the State of New York, the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, a corporation of the State of Illinois, and the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND a corporation of the State of Illinois (herein collectively called the "Companies"), by Robert D. Murray, Vice President, in pursuance of authority granted by Article V, Section 8, of the By -Laws of said Companies, which are set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the date hereof, do hereby nominate, constitute, and appoint Randy SPOHN, Ashley M. SPOHN, Matthew R. DOBYNS and Hamilton KENNEY, all of Santa Ana, California, EACH, its true and lawful agent and Attorney -in -Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver, for, and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: any and all bonds and undertakings, and the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon said Companies, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at its office in New York, New York., the regularly elected officers of the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY at its office in Owings Mills, Maryland., and the regularly elected officers of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at its office in Owings Mills, Maryland., in their own proper persons. The said Vice President does hereby certify that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article V, Section 8, of the By -Laws of said Companies, and is now in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice -President has hereunto subscribed his/her names and affixed the Corporate Seals of the said ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this 20th day of September, A.D. 2019. �:'Jo utayI- avo rNaity �Si oroy �Yom(( �a�pp r.� t! r 4 � � ` 816AL 6\ rasa ,,aa _ ,w •vj ATTEST: ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OC'MAi2YLAND By: Robert D. Murray Vice President By: Down E. Secretary State of Maryland County of Baltimore On this 20th day of September, A.D. 2019, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly commissioned and qualified, Robert D. Murray, Vice President and Dawn E. Brown, Secretary of the Companies, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and acknowledged the execution of same, and being by me duly sworn, deposeth and saith, that he/she is the said officer of the Company aforesaid, and that the seals affixed to the preceding instrument arc the Corporate Seals of said Companies, and that the said Corporate Seals and the signature as such officer were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporations. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set illy hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written. �'��gtr11Y)! _ '�^rr�CJt�Q ap'y w " ,r'..�a�h� / r.�a puoY .':`� ......... ... Constance A. Dunn, Notary Public My Commission Expires: July 9, 2023 EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF THE COMPANIES "Article V, Section 8, Attorneys -in -Fact. The Chief Executive Officer, the President, or any Executive Vice President or Vice President may, by written instrument under the attested corporate seal, appoint attorneys -in -fact with authority to execute bonds, policies, recognizances, stipulations, undertakings, or other like instruments on behalf of the Company, and may authorize any officer or any such attorney -in -fact to affix the corporate seal thereto; and may with or without cause modify of revoke any such appointment or authority at any time." CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Vice President of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney is still in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that Article V, Section 8, of the By -Laws of the Companies is still in force. This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 15th day of December 1998. RESOLVED: "That the signature of the President or a Vice President and the attesting signature of a Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the Seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile on any Power of Attorney ... Any such Power or any certificate thereof bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Company." This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 5th day of May, 1994, and the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 10th day of May, 1990. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced seal of the company and facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Vice -President, Secretary, or Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certifir-d copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seals of the said Companies, this 26tfi daycf September 2019. M. Hodges, Vice President TO REPORT A CLAIM WITH REGARD TO A SURETY BOND, PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE CLAIM INCLUDING THE PRINCIPAL ON THE BOND, THE BOND NUMBER, AND YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION TO: Zurich Surety Claims 1299 Zurich Way Schaumburg, IL 60196-1056 www repatsfelaims@zurichna coin 800-626-4577 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of CALIFORNIA County of ORANGE On eftn ` 2 o l l o p I before me, ASHLEY MARIE SPOHN, NOTARY PUBLIC personally appeared RANDY SPOHN ® who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(sj is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity (ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Win, A51-ILEY MARIE SPO_ � i"; COMM. # 2188665 I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of nV NOTARY PUBucCALIFORNIA o California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. ORANGE COUNTY ry My comm. expires Mar. 27, 2021 WITNESS my hand and official seal. WStUelfNotary �c a Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED _ ® ATTORNEY -IN -FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: _ NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) notary public or other officer completing this rtificate verifies only the identity of the individual io signed the document to which this certificate attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or Ilidity of that document. State of California County of LOS ANGELES Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this 2ND day of OCTOBER 20 19, by VIDO L. SAMARZICH proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person,X who appeared before me, �nnnnini mwwmunESMO uD G. WARREN m DE9MOND G. WARREN z COMM.R21B0534 Notary Public - Calilarnla R Riverside County My Comm. Expires Apr. 9, 2021 '— ainmm�i minninmmmmmmnnmmnunnumimm i''. (Seal) Signature CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FYI 8/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD LIST OF SUB -CONTRACTORS Section 4100 et. seq. of the Public Contract Code requires listing of all subcontractors with the bid for all subcontract work exceeding the following amount: o Streets, highways including bridge projects: %x% of the bid or $10,000, whichever is greater o Buildings, parks, or other projects: %z% of the bid Section 1725.5 of the Public Contract Code requires all Subcontractors be registered with the State Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). BIDDER proposes to subsit lions of the work to the firms listed below: Name b Name License #/Exp. License #/Exp. DIR Reg. 4JExPCDIR Reg. #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. Location Location Phone Phone Type Of Work Type Of Work Amount $ Amount $ Name Name License #/Exp. License #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. License # License # Location Location Phone Phone Type Of Work Type Of Work Amount $ Amount $ Name Name License #/Exp. License #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. License # License # Location Phone Type Of Work Amount $ Signature of id r Location Phone Type Of Work Amount $ P-8 of P-16 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FYI 8/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for THREE public agencies for which the BIDDER has performed similar work within the past three years. 1• SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION Name and Address of Owner. Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. Contract Amount Type of Work 2. SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION Name and Address of owner. Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. Contract Amount 3. SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION Name and Address of owner. Name and Telephone Number Contract Amount Type of Work person familiar with project. Type of Work Date Completed Date Completed Date Completed The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all brokers and sureties from whom BIDDER intends to procure insurance and bonds. Surety = Zurich - Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland 777 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3900, Los Angeles, CA 90017 - (619) 235-1388 Agent = R S Bonding & Insurance Agency, Inc. 1633 E. 4th Ave Ste. 228 Santa Ana CA 92701 - (714) 541-4700 P-9 of P-16 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FYI8/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ADDITIONAL REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for THREE public agencies for which the BIDDER or Subcontractor has performed similar work in the past five years. 1• SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION Name and Address of Owner. Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. Contract Amount Type of Work 2. SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION Name and Address of owner. Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. Contract Amount 3. SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION Name and Address of owner. Type of Work Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed Date Completed Date Completed The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all brokers and sureties from whom BIDDER intends to procure insurance and bonds. Surety = Zurich - Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland 777 S. Figueroa Street Suite 3900 Los Angeles, CA 90017 - (619) 235-1388 Agent = R S Bonding & Insurance Agency, Inc. 1633 E. 4th Ave Ste. 228 Santa Ana CA 92701 - (714) 541-4700 P-10 of P-16 VIDO SAMARZICH, INC. General Engineering Contractor No. 433210 A 6829 BILLINGS PLACE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91701 TELEPHONE 909-987-6377 FAX 909-987-8988 COMPLETED CONSTRUCTION PROJECT REFERENCES Project Name: La Palma Ave Sidewalk Improvements Owner: City of Anaheim Phone Number: (714) 765-5052 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Joel Jordan Contract Amount: $479,000.00 Date of Completion: 2019 2. Project Name: Wilshire Avenue Bicycle Blvd Improvements Owner: City of Fullerton Phone Number: (714) 738-6853 Engineer/Contact: Mr. David Grantham Contract Amount: $2,100,000.00 Date of Completion: 2019 3. Project Name: FY 17-18 ADA Access Ramp Improvements at Various Locations Owner: City of Rancho Cucamonga Phone Number: (909) 774-4070 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Romeo David Contract Amount: $975,000.00 Date of Completion: 2018 4. Project Name: Wilshire Avenue Water and Sewer Improvement Project Owner: City of Fullerton Phone Number: (714) 738-6895 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Gar Huang Contract Amount: $550,000.00 Date of Completion: 2018 5. Project Name: Elm/Malden Area Street, Sewer and Water Improvements Owner: City of Fullerton Phone Number: (714) 773-0049 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Joseph Hernandez Contract Amount: $2,200,000.00 Date of Completion: 2018 Page 1 of 6 VIDO SAMARZICH, INC. General Engineering Contractor No. 433210 A 6829 BILLINGS PLACE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91701 TELEPHONE 909-987-6377 FAX 909-987-8988 6. Project Name: Anaheim Hills Road Water Main Replacement Owner: City of Anaheim Phone Number: (714) 863-8020 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Luis Tapia Contract Amount: $600,000.00 Date of Completion: 2018 Project Name: CDBG ADA Wheelchair Access Ramp Replacement at Various Locations Owner: City of Orange Phone Number: (714) 744-5566 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Matthew Lorenzen Contract Amount: $204,300.00 Date of Completion: 2018 8. Project Name: 2017 Citywide Curb Ramp Improvements Owner: City of Laguna Beach Phone Number: (949) 497-0741 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Tri Nguyen Contract Amount: $285,000.00 Completion Date: 2017 9. Project Name: Safe Routes to School Improvements, Phase 3 Owner: City of Glendale Phone Number: (818) 402-0225 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Gary Edsall Contract Amount: $908,000.00 Date of Completion: 2017 10. Project Name: Heim Ave at Canal St Storm Drain Improvements Owner: City of Orange Phone Number: (714) 744-5566 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Matthew Lorenzen Contract Amount: $99,000.00 Date of Completion: 2017 11. Project Name: Citywide Sidewalk Repair Project FY 15-16 Owner: City of Santa Monica Phone Number: (951) 522-4505 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Craig Wheeler Contract Amount: $878,000.00 Date of Completion: 2017 Page 2 of 6 VIDO SAMARZICH, INC. General Engineering Contractor No. 433210 A 6829 BILLINGS PLACE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91701 TELEPHONE 909-987-6377 FAX 909-987-8988 12. Project Name: FY 16/17 Curb Access Ramp Installation Project Owner: City of Huntington Beach Phone Number: (714) 536-5259 Engineer/Contact: Mr, Joe Fuentes Contract Amount: $679,000.00 Date of Completion: 2017 13. Project Name: Comstock Avenue Water Main Improvements Owner: City of Whittier Phone Number: (562) 567-9302 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Carl Hassel Contract Amount: $578,000.00 Date of Completion: 2017 14. Project Name: Monterey Road Street Improvements Owner: City of South Pasadena Phone Number: (626) 590-0570 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Alex Chou Contract Amount: $1,550,000.00 Date of Completion: 2017 15. Project Name: Fletcher Avenue Reconstruction Owner: City of South Pasadena Phone Number: (702) 204-4025 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Mark Peterson Contract Amount: $878,000.00 Date of Completion: 2016 16. Project Name: Patterson Street Reconstruction Owner: City of Fullerton Phone Number: (714) 732-9060 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Pete Acosta Contract Amount: $675,000.00 Date of Completion: 2016 17. Project Name: Magnolia/Bolsa Intersection Widening Owner: City of Westminster Phone Number: (714) 548-3464 Engineer/Contact: Ms. Theresa Tran Contract Amount: $975,000.00 Date of Completion: 2016 Page 3 of 6 V IDO SAMARZICH, INC. General Engineering Contractor No. 433210 A 6829 BILLINGS PLACE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91701 18. Project Name: 2015 Water Main Improvements Owner: City of Westminster Phone Number: (714) 548-3456 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Tuan Pham Contract Amount: $I,100,000.00 Date of Completion: 2016 19. Project Name: Red Hill Lake Modernization Owner: City of Rancho Cucamonga Phone Number: (909) 477-2740 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Romeo David Contract Amount: $300,000.00 Date of Completion: 2016 20. Project Name: 2015 Concrete Improvements Owner: City of Inglewood Phone Number: (714) 468-7319 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Hunter Nguyen Contract Amount: $425,000.00 Date of Completion: 2015 21. Project Name: El Centro Avenue Rehabilitation Owner: City of South Pasadena Phone Number: (626) 590-0570 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Alex Chou Contract Amount: $1,100,000.00 Date of Completion: 2015 22. Project Name: Concrete Bus Pads Owner: City of Rancho Cucamonga Phone Number: (714) 548-3456 Engineer/Contact: Curt Billings Contract Amount: $175,000.00 Date of Completion: 2015 23. Project Name: ADA Wheelchair Ramps Owner: City of Orange Phone Number: (714) 744-5566 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Matthew Lorenzen Contract Amount: $275,000.00 Date of Completion: 2015 Page 4 of 6 TELEPHONE 909-987-6377 FAX 909-987-8988 VIDO SAMARZICH, INC. Genera] Engineering Contractor No. 433210 A 6829 BILLINGS PLACE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91701 24. Project Name: 2014 Water Improvement Owner: City of Westminster Phone Number: (714) 548-3456 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Tuan Pham Contract Amount: $1,100,000.00 Date of Completion: 2015 25. Project Name: ADA Sidewalk Improvement Owner: City of Artesia Phone Number: (951) 314-6984 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Chuck Burkhardt Contract Amount: $200,000.00 Date of Completion: 2014 26. Project Name: YLHS Park Bryant Cross Feeder Pipeline Owner: Yorba Linda Water District Phone Number: (714) 701-3104 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Joe Polimino Contract Amount: $675,000.00 Date of Completion: 2013 27. Project Name: County Road Storm Drain Owner: City of Pomona Phone Number: (909) 322-7471 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Dave Barron Contract Amount: $570,000.00 Date of Completion: 2013 28. Project Name: Adams Square Park Owner: City of Glendale Phone Number: (818) 548-2864 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Hagop Kassabian Contract Amount: $1,100,000.00 Date of Completion: 2010 29. Project Name: Various Public Work Purchase Orders and Contracts 2000-2013 Owner: City of Pasadena Phone Number: (626) 484-5640 Engineer/Contact: Mr. Dale Torstenbo - dorstenbo@cityofpasadena.net Contract Amount: $2,500,000.00 Date of Completion: 2000-2013 Page 5 of 6 TELEPHONE 909-987-6377 FAX 909-987-8988 VIDO SAMARZICH, INC. General Engineering Contractor No. 433210 A 6829 BILLINGS PLACE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91701 TELEPHONE 909-987-6377 FAX 909-987-8988 30. Project Name: Misc Park Improvements From 2000-2010 Owner: City of Glendale Engineer/Contact: George Balteria — (951) 201-2710 Peter Vierheilig — pvierheilig@ci.glendale.ca.us Contract Amount: $3,500,000.00 Date of Completion: 2000-2010 Page 6 of 6 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FYI 8/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) In conformance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the BIDDER declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER or any other BIDDER, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. Note: The above Non -collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. BIDDERS are cautiyned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal Signed State of California County of Los Angeles Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this 2nd day of October , 2019, by Vido L. Samarzich , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons) who appe red before me Notary Pu lic S gnature „.. «r»» «»nn»nn»n» n n y _ ,„ OE9MOND G. WARREN a COW #2190534 'g?ra Notary Public - Calilarnle E Riverside County _ 6 My Comm. Expires Apr. 9, 2021 '— Ruunnm nnnimm�nmmunnimnnuuninnmmnnwuP Notary Public Seal P-11 ofP-16 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FY18/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATE The undersigned contractor or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: The Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Contractor shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Contractor shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Contractor shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Contractor's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Contractor shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Contractor shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 6. In the event of the Contractor's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. P-12 ofP-16 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FYI 8/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD The Contractor shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Contractor may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, no discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any contractor of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of Z hapter.Signed: J� �/�/ — V112O�/JnaCdJ Title: Vice President Finn: Vido Samarzich, Inc. Date: 10/4/2019 P-13 of P-16 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FYI 8/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD STATEMENT REGARDING APPRENTICESHIP REQUIREMENTS The undersigned BIDDER is familiar with the requirements of Section 1777.5 of the State Labor Code regarding employment of apprentices, and understands that contractors on contracts exceeding $30,000 or 20 working days shall: Apply to the joint apprenticeship committee administering the apprenticeship standards of the craft or trade in the area of the site of the public work for a certificate approving the contractor under the apprenticeship standards for the employment and training of apprentices in the area or industry affected. 2. Employ the number of apprentices or the ratio of apprentices to journeymen stipulated in the apprenticeship standards. 3. Contribute to the fund or funds in each craft or trade in which he/she employs journeymen or apprentices on the public work, in the same amount or upon the same basis and in the same manner as the other contractors, except contractors not signatory to the trust agreement shall pay a like amount to the,California Apprenticeship Council. Title: Vice President Firm: Vido Samarzich, Inc. Date: 10/4/2019 P-14ofP-16 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FYI 8/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD STATEMENT REGARDING "ANTI -KICKBACK" REQUIREMENTS The undersigned is submitting this proposal for performing by contract the work required by these bid documents, agrees to comply with the Copeland "Anti -Kickback" Act (18 USC 74) as supplemented in the Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR, Part 3). This act provides that each contractor or subcontractor shall be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he/she is otherwise entitled. Title: Vice President Firm: Vido Samarzich Inc. Date: 10/4/2019 P-15 of P-I6 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FYI 8/19 HENINGER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 10162 QUESTIONNAIRE In conformance with Public Contract Code Section 10162, the BIDDER shall complete, under penalty of perjury, the following questionnaire: Has the BIDDER, any officer of the BIDDER, or any employee of the BIDDER who has a proprietary interest in the BIDDER, ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a federal, state, or local government project because of a violation of law or a safety regulation? Yes No If the answer is yes, explain the circumstances in the following space. P-16 of P-16 AM� B)YfLN WIt.riYAHD11N:MxiHIWf V�er> ay111cnA1tee jSAr }eAa1.I•V)' A NEW WAY TO SIGN IN - If you already hove log ha a SAM account, use your SAM email for Intimacy, liv Iugin.gov FAQs m '"-EW': Aurae ir,xm8:Solid" register lrg in SAM mnst sublpil n Both,-11 letter Appainling their mthoriad entity Adnihislmas R2Ml mo uu11wd PAUs to lem'n more nl a dollars to the notarised letter review process and other system Improvements. ® ALEWf.SAM,., will be down (A,,,wduled mdncIonore Sminday,a6/s5/aale, from 8mr, AM to l:oa FM(EVC. m ALERT: CAGE is mnrentlyexterlenningn ldgh volameoftegistrmiolss,and is working them in the ord"Inwhich dayarerecelved. When yonr legislation is assigned tan CAGE Teehnicixn, you will he rnntneled by CAGE. If neressnly, for any Additional information. Search Results Current Search Terms: VIDO SAMARZICH, INC.' Total mcnrd8:1 Resuit Page: 1 Your search for VIDO SAMARZICH, INC." returned the following results gnap ----�—1 Vida 9nmaezich, roc. DUNS: 026486266 Has Active e%ebalaa%: No E.Pirmion Date: os/x4/s:000 Purpose.(Heglstmtion: Alf Awmds Result Page: I IRAI-11 unyml,Igss WWWs ,:Save PDF _Export Results Pdn[ Salt by Relevance Order by Descentlin8 — C-- l f-.:.-_:.___�l Stitt.: Activel CAOECale: 711011 DODAAC: LVkw Delius Debt Suhlect to Offset]: No Search Recohxis Disclainmrs FAPIISgm' Data Access Ausmsihility C$Agov/IAl•: Check Stomas Privucy Policy 0.9A.gov About USA.gav Help Save PDF .E%Fait Results F Pint Illie4xlr.>.Iir,x Ivd.lra,i e�.YLr,ixiN., l:"I.".I l inrr,...... nrnlx,ler xt+Aar l6+l1+'1'1 NI<)1'.1.A AL rrl.: 141.1" Il,i'wtswn, urdrhv'I urnxx,iAninp.lYrlAnlxxlxlrnnnl 1++fn'rnI,rornr,16nia'd wiow" Ilw+Yhl In dln'061:ra-nrn rotudloa v.imind lro,npvlin,,. i Welcome Y00 Samanich I San Out dun &?bradstreet Government Update User profile Transaction History FAtjs Contact Us Home u RhaMwMal.Manu > [Update Main Menu ®'rhe following companies are associated with your profile, Select the company you would like to review, then select an option from the menu , below. D-U-N-SA Company Address, City, State (D 026486266 IVIDO BAMARZICH, INC. 116829 Billings PI, Rancho Cucamonga, CA t;) Slarl 1)pdm., tmc.as s ` ❑ale Upd.te hill cis. and PAD. s l% view f trim c.,,,pnny Report s Its., trellis s 0 Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 2000-201 S. All rights reserved. FAgs1 Contact Us EXHIBIT 1 City of Santa Ana Section 3 Contract Clause These Clauses are to be inserted in all contracts A. The work to be performed under this contract number 4- i$ 8 by and between the City of Santa Ana, hereinafter referred to as "City" and Do cw ,hereinafter referred to as "Contractor", is subject to the requirements of Section 3 of the Housing dnd Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended 12 U S.C. 1701 u (section 3). The purpose of Section 3 is to ensure that employment and other economic opportunities generated HUD assistance or HUD -assisted projects covered by Section 3, shall, to the greatest extent feasible, be directed to low -and very low-income persons. B. The parties to this contract agree to comply with HUD's regulations in 24 CFR Part 135, which implement Section 3. As evidenced by their execution of this contract, the parties to this contract certify that they are under no contractual or other constraint that would prevent them from complying with the Part 135 regulations. C. The contractor agrees to send to each labor organization or representative of workers with which the Contractor has an agreement or other understanding, if any, a notice advising the labor organization or workers' representative of the Contractor's commitments under this Section 3 clause, and will post copies of the notice in conspicuous places at the work site where both employees and applicants for training and employment positions can see the notice. The notice shall describe the Section 3 preference, shall set forth minimum number and job titles subject to hire, availability of apprenticeship and training positions, the qualifications for each; and the name and location of the person(s) taking applications for each of the positions; and the anticipated date the work shall begin. D. The Contractor agrees to include a Section 3 clause in every subcontract subject to compliance with regulations in 24 CFR Part 135, and agrees to take appropriate action, upon a finding that the subcontractor is in violation of the regulations in 24 CFR part 135. The Contractor will not subcontract with any subcontractor where the Contractor has notice or knowledge that the subcontractor has been found in violation of the regulations in 24 CFR Part 135. E. The Contractor will certify that any vacant employment positions, including training positions, that are filled (1) after the Con tractor is se lected but before the contract is executed, and (2) with persons other than those to whom the regulations of 24 CFR part 135 require employment opportunities to be dir ected, were not to circumvent the Contractor's obligations under 24 CFR part 135. F. Noncompliance with regulations in 24 CFR Part 135 may result in sanctions, termination of this contract for default, and debarment or suspension from future HUD assisted projects. The Contractor by this signature affixed hereto declares under penalty of p erjury: Contractor has read City requirements and accepts all its requirements contained therein for all of his/her operations within the City of Santa Ana. vtoo L 54MMtz��r1— V.p l0 3 / Signature o C ntractor Print Name and Title Date 1-133z10 /a OUY89)66 Contractor License Number & Designation Federal DUNS Number Project Location: Street Contractor Name: EXHIBIT 2 City of Santa Ana Section 3 New Hire Calculation Form City Contractor Contact: V i DD I, Sa6,Ak-v.t Contractor Telephone Number: Qo(? - !%8`7 - a7) Contractor Email Address: V DIOS m 6) ';tAHoO. qn" State Section 3 Resident Hiring Goals Trade/Craft I Number of New Hires Total Number of New Hires: Z Total number of Section 3 resident new hires necessary to comply with contract: ID 3 aor Sign ture of C tr or Date EXHIBIT 8 Contractor's Section 3 Affirmative Action Plan 0-ISIS REWMAm& IWO& 44, FY161(q 9t►J1HAF1T Wk WEI4�?at p Project Number and Title The undersigned contractor agrees to implement the following affirmative action steps directed at increasing the utilization of lower income residents and business concerns located within the County of Orange. I. Take affirmative action to ensure that employees or applicants for employment or training are not discriminated against because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. 2. Send a notice of the contractor's Section 3 commitment to each labor organization or representative of workers and p ost a copy of the notice at a conspicuous place available to employees and applicants for employment or training. 3. To the greatest extent feasible, make a good faith effort to recruit for employment or training lower income residents from the County, and to award contracts to business concerns which are located in or owned in substantial part by persons residing in the County through use of: local advertising media, signs placed at the project site and notification to community organizations and public or private institutions operating within or serving the project area such as Service Employment and Redevelopment (SER), Opportunities Industrialization Center (OIC), Urban League, Contracted Employment Program, U.S. Employment Service, Chamber of Commerce, labor unions, trade associations and business concerns. 4. Maintain a file of all low-income area residents who applied for employment or training either on their own or on referral from any source, and the action taken with respect to each area resident. 5. Maintain a fi le of all business concerns located in the County who submitted a bid for work on the project, and the action taken with respect to each bid. 6. Maintain records, including copies of correspondence, memoranda, etc., which document that affirmative action steps have been taken. 7. Incorporate the Se ction 3 clause provisions in a II subcontracts, and r equire subcontractor(s) to submit a Section 3 Affirmative Action Plan. V1 �& S19AVIM Company Name pp''�814 'd(6�ING.S �cAGE ry1Nc.HJ CuriAAtoNCwt, cd 4(i0/ Address: Street, City, State, Zip DUNS Number I Zid) Sign weofC ntr for V (bo M. SAM0 %# CN Printed Name Vice 8qa DEr/T Title EXHIBIT 9 City of Santa Ana Section 3 Contract Award Consideration Bidder's i0 Please check the numbered statement that is applicable to your business: I . X My business qualifies as a Section 3 business concern: If you have checked statement IVIIMRF.R 1 please read the attached Section 3 Business Concern Preference - Bidding Requirements. (Please check the applicable qualification for statement number 1) Y51 % owned by Section 3 residents; or Permanent, full-time employees include at least 30% Section 3 residents; or Will subcontract more than 25% of the dollar award of all subcontracts to be awarded to business concern(s) that meet either of the two preceding qualifications. Note: You are required to list all subcontractors and owner -operators in your bid statement. 2. _ My business does not qualify as a Section 3 business concern. Note: Section 3 business concern definitions are located in this project's Contract Documents & Specifications Manual within the section titled Section 3 Economic Opportunities Plan. 1 3 / Signature of us ness Owner Date V (P'O L. SRrrA/Utt cl� Print Name EXHIBIT 12 CITY OF SANTA ANA WOMEN OWNED/MINORITYBUSINESS OWNED ENTERPRISES (W/MBE) GOOD FAITH EFFORTS Project Name: FK; io ,r„ OK S T 044 — Fy r8 19 EN Project Number: 19 — 7sL$ Project Location: g el 118on S oh 401 Pursuant to 24 CFR Part 85 § 85.36 (e) of Code of Federal Regulations, contractor must take all necessary affirmative steps to assu re that minority business firms, women's business enterprises and labor surplus firms are used whenever possible. Contractor shall submit the following information to demonstrate that a goof faith effort has been made to comply with the above section of the Code of Federal Regulations. Submittal of this form, in and of itself, may not provide sufficient documentation to demonstrate that goof faith effort was made. Documentation such as copies of advertisement, letters of solicitation, telephone logs, rejected quotes, etc. shou Id accompany this form. 1. The names and dates of advertisement of each newspaper, trade paper, and minority -focus paper in which a request for W/MBE participation for this project was placed by the bidder: 2. The names and dates of written notices sent to W/MBE soliciting bids for this project and methods used for following up initial solicitation to determine with certainty whether the W/MBE were interested. Names of W/MBE Solicited Dates of Solicitation Follow-up Methods and Dates Gr w6 iZ ( c 11✓ .err &ww i The items of work which the bidder made available to W/MBE firms, including, where appropriate, any breaking down of the contracts into economically feasible units to facilitate W/MBE participation, and the information furnished to W/MBE such as plans, specifications, and requirements for the work. Items of Work: % ^ir_ire_� /i✓11 Breakdown of Items: 1` if Information Furnished: Pul,is I}ivD SpBGS FOOCS�PROPSVCSWUDFORMS\MBU5BO4AMB - Sectiw3Specs. DOC EXHIBIT 12 (cont.) 4. Efforts made to assist W/MBE in obtaining bonding, lines of credit or insurance, and any technical assistance related to the plans, specifications and requirements for the work which was provided to W/MBE: 5. Any additional data to support a demonstration of good faith effort, such as contracts with W/MBE assistance agencies: j-� T /N 'jD GK Nb 13 O^J'-Y I AJ prt Ic, /}ILA4L L -7v tl/ MQE Fin.+-r .S bN `PHIS Prw7�e-T` 1 declare under penalty ofperjury that the foregoing information is trite and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the City of Santa Ana and/or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development may verify the information provided herein in connection with W/MBE compliance evaluation/audit activities and that failure to fully and truthfully complete this form may result in economic or other sanctions. Name: Title: Date: Name of Contractor/Subcontractor: ViUb �Flnf1yQ2 (c K Tit/c. Contractor/Subcontractor Identification Number: Lf3Zalo Address (Street, City, State, Zip): �$JQ 13(LG INl<S �4/1LF rWJ4(-qr> Gubq 6-4 4l'Ja l Business Racial/Ethnic/Gender Code: Circle the numeric code which indicates the racial/ethnic/gender character of the owner(s) and controller(s) of 51 % of the business. When 51% or more is not owned and controlled by any single racial/ethnicity/gender category, circle the code which seems most appropriate. 0= White Americans 2 = Black Americans 3 =Native Americans Woman Owned Business: Circle One: Yes or 4 = Hispanic Americans 5 = Asian/Pacific Americans 6 = Hasidic Jews ME FADOCSIPROPSVCSWUDFORMS\MBU5804AMB- Section3SpK&DOC EXHIBIT 15 NONCOLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section H2 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) To the City of --')A yQ &A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS In accordance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Publ is Contract Code 7106, the bidder declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or sol icited any other bidder to put in a fal se or s ham bid, and has not di rectly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. V 1 b& �AAgAF 2-re' H r TNG Name of Contractor 01911:cwGS��RAurvn �tucvenlGt�gg176 Address Signature 54 Title l Date FBOOCSI ROPSVCS\MUDFORMS\MBU5BO4AMB- Seclion3Specs.DOC EXHIBIT 16 FEDERAL LOBBYIST REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION Name of Firm: V 1 ph 41MAR2icR 1;'/VP-. Date: 164 Address: State: 44 Zip Code: Telephone: 101-997- 077 Acting on behalf of the above -named firm as its Authorized Official, I make the following Certification to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Community Development Commission, County of Los Angeles: 1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid, by or on behalf of the above -named firm to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of C ongress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, and any extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification thereof; and 2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee or any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the above -named firm shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying" in accordance with its instructions; and 3) The above -named firm shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub -awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, sub -grants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all sub -recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into the transaction imposed by Section 1352 Title 31 U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Authorized Official: Name: r/1D> &9M4R1tGF/ Title: /a&Signature: Date: �P /v/3Z 9 F \0OCWROPSVCS%HUDFORMSWBU58WM0 - SecticnMpece. DOC EXHIBIT 17 CERTIFICATION OF UNDERSTANDING AND AUTHORIZATION Proj ect Name: Project Number: 11— ~%S�2 This is to certify that the principals and the authorized payroll officer, below, have read and understand the labor standards clauses pertaining to the subject project. The following person(s) is designated as the payroll officer for the undersigned and is authorized to sign the Statement of Compliance, which will accompany our weekly certified payroll reports for this project: &P4. 544MR210 aR DEfir7on/n 11AA/L�E`�,r Payroll lice's Name Pa •ol f er's Signature -0gA 1-2 Contract be ttr ctor by Signature/ Vl91-1' &AiiAN22 Printed Name lI(G� FSIDkn/� Title Date 3�Mo Contractor/Subcontractor License No, DUNS Number F%DOCSTROPSVCS%HUDFORMSIMBU5Bo4AMB - Secbon3Specs. DOC EXHIBIT 4 CITY OF SANTA ANA CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PROJECT 19-7528 RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FY 18/19 PROJECT This CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT is made and entered into this 1951 day of November, 2019 by and between the City of Santa Ana, California, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "CITY"), and Vido Samarzich, Inc. (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR"). WITNESSETH: The CITY and the CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all the work and furnish all the materials at its own cost and expense necessary to construct and complete in a good and workmanlike manner and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the CITY, the Residential Street Repair Program FY 18/19 Project (hereinafter referred to as the "WORK OF IMPROVEMENT") identified in and in accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by the City's Public Works Agency and approved by the City Council. 2. The complete Construction Contract consists of the "Contract Documents" as defined by the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and which include the following: • Notice Inviting Bids • Information to Bidders • Bid Proposal • Bid Bond • Contract Form • Contract Bonds • General Provisions • Special Provisions • Technical Provisions and Project Plans • Community Workforce Agreement • Appendices In case of conflict between the Contract Documents, the precedence of documents shall be as established in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. 3. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT the sum total amount not to exceed Eight Hundred Seventy -Six Thousand One Hundred Eighty-two Dollars and Fifty Cents ($876,182.50), as set forth and identified in the BID PROPOSAL, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A." The BID PROPOSAL contains a schedule of unit price(s) or lump sum(s) based on approximate quantities only, and the City does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or advisable. rev. 09/012017 Page 1 of 3 4. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT within the time specified in the Time for Completion of Improvements section of the BID PROPOSAL (Exhibit "A") including commencing construction within the timeframe therein specified after issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 5. The CONTRACTOR will pay, and will require all subcontractors to pay, all employees on the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT a salary or wage at least equal to the prevailing salary or wage established for such work as set forth in the wage determinations for this work in accordance with applicable State and Federal law. 6. If applicable, the CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the CITY'S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA), a pre -hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA may be found on the City's website at: httn:H ww.santa-ana.ora/owa/documents/CWA.odf 7. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish two bonds to be approved by the CITY, one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price, to guarantee the faithful performance of the work (Performance Bond), and one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price to guarantee payment of all claims for labor and materials furnished (Payment Bond). This Contract shall not become effective until such bonds are supplied to and approved by the CITY. 8. CONTRACTOR shall, prior to the release of the performance and payment bonds or the retention payment, furnish a warranty performance and payment bond (Warranty Bond). Said Warranty Bond shall also be required as a condition of project acceptance. For projects up to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or Twenty Percent (20%) of the final contract price. For projects above Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or Ten Percent (10%) of the final contract price. 9. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish Certificates of Liability Insurance and Worker's Compensation Insurance as outlined in the General Provisions, to be approved by the CITY. H Page 2 of 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Construction Contract on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: 4 7A, �.w.L JCIAN FUNK Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: FUAD SWEISS, PE, PLS Executive Director Public Works Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager CONTRACTOR: Vido Samarzich, Inc. L Jl NA E: TITLE: V i p p VICE P►1EsipE�T V ► PO �i4mARZ►c.Y� In/C. Page 3 of 3 COST ANALYSIS CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT NO. 19-7528: RESIDENTIAL STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FY18/19 Construction Contract $ 876,183 Contract Administration $ 44,062 Inspection and Testing $ 53,642 Contingencies $ 87,619 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 1,061,505 EXHIBIT 5 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION_ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: -�' CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: APPROVED APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION ❑ As Recommended ADJUSTMENT, AUTHORIZE AN ❑ As Amended A ❑ Ordinance on 1st Reading AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF ❑ Ordinance on 2nd Reading CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC ❑ Implementing Resolution SAFETY FOR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ❑ Set Public Hearing For SAFETY PROGRAM FUNDS NOT TO EXCEED $100,000, AND AUTHORIZE AN AGREEMENT WITH CHARITABLE VENTURES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $100,000 {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 1, 313} CONTINUED TO /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize Office of Traffic Safety Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety grant funds in the amount of $100,000 in the OTS-PWA Traffic Safety Grants, Federal Grant -Indirect revenue account and appropriate the same amount to the OTS-Bicycle Safety PWA, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account. 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a one-year agreement, PS20034, with the State of California Office of Traffic Safety for Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program funds in an amount not to exceed $100,000, for a one-year period from October 1, 2019, through September 30, 2020 (timeframe consistent with the Grant Cycle), subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Charitable Ventures (a fiscal sponsor for Santa Ana Active Streets) to provide bicycle safety education services, for a one-year period from November 19, 2019, through November 18, 2020, in an amount not to exceed $100,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION The Santa Ana Public Works Agency partnered with Santa Ana Active Streets (SAAS) and California Walks (Cal Walks) to develop a custom Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program (Program) for the City of Santa Ana. The Program was submitted by the Public Works Agency in partnership with SAAS and Cal Walks to the State of California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) and Agreement for Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program November 19, 2019 Page 2 has been awarded a $100,000 grant. These funds will be used to address pedestrian and bicycle safety through a series of safety education workshops and events. The goal of the grant program is to reduce the number of deaths and injuries in traffic collisions involving bicycles and pedestrians. This bilingual education program is intended to reach all members of the community. It will include a series of comprehensive workshops; some of the workshops consist of educating adults about traffic safety and others consist of educating youth about bicycle safety and maintenance. At the end of the adult series, community members will recommend improvements for the Public Works Agency to pursue future grant funds. At the end of the youth series, community youth will earn the bicycle that they repaired and maintained in the classes. Additionally, the program includes family -friendly bicycle safety skills classes taught by League of American Bicyclists Certified Instructors, and a variety of other benefits, such as access to nighttime lights and helmets that are distributed to the community at safety equipment distribution events targeting pedestrians and bicyclists, equipment demonstration events, and youth pedestrian and bicycle traffic safety fairs at community events. All tasks outlined in the Program scope of work will be delivered directly by SAAS and by Cal Walks as a sub -consultant to SAAS. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #1 - Community Safety, Objective #3 (Promote fiscal accountability to ensure financial responsibility at all levels of the organization), Strategy B (Promote ongoing efforts to obtain grant funding for activities that will assist in preventing, enforcing and reducing criminal activity and traffic collisions). FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the requested Appropriation Adjustment will recognize Office of Traffic Safety Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety grant funds in the amount of $100,000 in the OTS-PWA Traffic Safety Grants, Federal Grant -Indirect revenue account (No. 16517002-52001) and appropriate the same amount to the OTS-Bicycle Safety PWA, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (No. 16517611-66220) for expenditure as follows: Accounting Accounting Unit —Account Fiscal Year Unit — Fund Description No. Description Amount Account No. 16517611- OTS-Bicycle Safety PWA — FY 2019-20 66220 Office of Safety Grant Improvements Other Than $80,000 Building 16517611- OTS-Bicycle Safety PWA — FY 2020-21 66220 Office of Safety Grant Improvements Other Than $20,000 Building TOTAL: $100,000 Agreement for Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program November 19, 2019 Page 2 APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Fuad S. Sweiss, PE, PLS Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Executive Director Public Works Agency Finance and Management Services Agency EWG Exhibits: 1. Grant Agreement with the State of California Office of Traffic Safety 2. Agreement with Charitable Ventures (a fiscal sponsor for Santa Ana Active Streets) State of California— Office of Traffic Safety GRANT AGREENIENT EXHIBIT 1 GRANT NUM1tRER PS20034 1. GRANT TITLE Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program 2. NAME OF AGENCY 3. Crant Period Santa Ana From: 10/01/2019 4. AGENCY UNI'E roADMINIS'FERGRAN'I Santa Ana Public Works Agency To: 09/30/2020 5. GRANT DESCRIPTION Best practice strategies will be conducted to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving pedestrians and bicyclists. The funded strategies may include classroom education, bicycle rodeos, community events, presentations, and workshops. These countermeasures should be conducted in communities with high numbers of pedestrian and/or bicycle related collisions including underserved communities, older adults, and school -aged children. Coordinated efforts such as Safe Routes to School initiatives, Vision Zero campaigns, and working with community based organizations are highly encouraged to prevent fatalities and injuries of vulnerable non -motorized road users. 6. Federal Funds Allocated Under This Agreement Shall Not Exceed: $100,000.00 7. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following which are by this reference made a part of the Agreement: • Schedule A— Problem Statement, Goals and Objectives and Method of Procedure • ScheduleB— Detailed Budget Estimate and Sub -Budget Estimate (if applicable) • Schedule B- I — Budget Narrative and Sub -Budget Narrative (if applicable) • Exhibit A— Certifications and Assurances • Exhibit B*— OTS Grant Program Manual *items shown with an asterisk (*), are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement as if attached hereto. These documents can be viewed at the OTS home web page wider Grants: www.ots.ca.Qov. Wc, the officials named below, hereby swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that we arc duly authorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the above described Grant terms and conditions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto. 8. Approval Signatures A. GRANT DIRECTOR B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL OF AGENCY NAME: Zed Kekula PHONE: (714) 647-5606 NAME: Kristine Ridge PllOVE: (714) 647-5200 TITLE: Senior Civil Engineer FAx: (714) 647-5616 TITLE: City Manager F_,ci. ADDRESS: 20 Civic Center Plaza ADDRESS: 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92702 Santa Ana, CA 92702 EMAIL: zkekula(c&rsanta-ana.org E-MAIL: kridge(wsanta-ana.org (Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date) C. F1sCAL OR ACCOUNTING OFFICIAL D. AUT110R1ZING OFFICIAL OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY NAME: Kathryn Downs PHONE (714) 647-5420 NAME: Randy Weissman PHONE (916) 509-3030 TITLE: Executive Director of FAA: (714) 647-6956 Finance & Management TITLE: Acting Director FAx: (916) 509-30S5 Services ADDRESS: 20 Civic Center Plaza M-17 ADDRESS: 2208 Larsen Drive Suite 300 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Elk Grove, CA 95758 EMAIL: kdoays(asanta-ana.org EMAIL: randy.weissman(gots.ca.gov (Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date) E. ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY 9, DUNS INFORMATION DUNS #: 083153247 NAME: Carolyn vu ADDREss: 2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 000 REGISTERED ADDRESS: 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, Elk Grove, CA 95758 CA 92701-4058 CITY:City of Santa Ana Zip+4:92701-4058 10. PROJECTED EXPENDITURES PROJECTED FUND CFDA ITEI\•VAPPROPRIATION F.Y. CHAPTER STATUTE EXPENDITURES 402PS-20 20.600 0521-0890-101 2019 2019 BA/19 S100,000,00 AGREEMENT TOTAL $100,000.00 AMOUNT ENCUMBERED BY THIS DOCUMENT $100,000.00 I CERTIFY upon my own personal knowledge that the budgeted fiends for the current budget year care available jor the period and purpose of the PRIOR AMOUNT ENCUMBERED FOR THIS expenditure stated above. AGREEMENT $ 0,00 OTS ACCOUNTING OFFICER'S SIGNATURE DATE TOTAL AMOUNT ENCUMBERED TO DATE SIGNED $100,000.00 Approved as to Form jhn M.Funk Assistant City Attorney Attest Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council State of California— Office of Traffic Safety GRANT AGREEMENT Schedule.A CRAM, NUNIRRR PS20034 1. PROBLEM STATEMENT With apopulation of just under 330,000; the City of Santa Ana is one of the fourteen highest population cities in the State (Group A). The City is approximately 27.1 square miles. Santa Ana has a large volume of motor vehicle traffic, with the arterials carrying 30,000 to 40,000 vehicles per day. There are also four freeways that converge within the city and a total of 450 miles of streets. Relative income and vehicle ownership levels within the City are significantly lower than statewide averages. The City population's median age is the youngest of the seven largest cities in Orange County and the residential density is one of the highest in the State. Transit ridership in Santa Ana is the highest in the County with several of the busiest OCTA bus lines serving the City. As a result of climate and demographics, bicycle dependent population is relatively high when compared to other communities in the County or the State. Also, a significant portion of the adult bicyclists may not speak English or understand the rules of the road. In 2015 the City of Santa Ana ranked 2/15 for bicycle involved collisions and 8/15 in bicycle collisions (under 15). In addition, collisions involving bicyclist riding at night increased from 35 in 2015 to 43 in 2016. Finally, bicycle involved collisions remained steady with 172 in 2015 and 176 in 2016. 2. PERFORMANCE MEASURES A. Goals: I . Reduce the number of persons killed in traffic collisions. 2. Reduce the number of persons injured in traffic collisions. 3. Reduce the number of pedestrians killed in traffic collisions. 4. Reduce the number of pedestrians injured in traffic collisions. 5. Reduce the number of pedestrians killed under age 15 in traffic collisions. 6. Reduce the number of pedestrians injured under age 15 in traffic collisions. 7. Reduce the number of pedestrians killed over age 65 in traffic collisions. X. Reduce the number of pedestrians injured over age 65 in traffic collisions. 9. Reduce the number of bicyclists killed in traffic collisions. 10. Reduce the number of bicyclists injured in traffic collisions. 11. Reduce the number of bicyclists under age 151cilled in traffic collisions. 12. Reduce the number of bicyclists under age 15 injured in traffic collisions. 13. Increase bicycle helmet usage. B. Objectives: Target Number 1. Issue a press release announcing the kick-off of the grant by November 15. The kick-off 1 press releases and media advisories, alerts, and materials must be emailed to the OTS Public Information Officer at pio(dots.ca.gov, and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval 14 days prior to the issuance date of the release. 2. Participate in traffic safety fairs and/or community events with an effort to reach 2 individuals. 3. Work closely with community -based organizations at both the neighborhood and 2 community level with an effort to reach individuals. 4. Participate in the following campaigns, National Walk to School Day, National Bicycle 3 Safety Month and California's Pedestrian Safety Month. 5. Conduct pedestrian and/or bicycle safety presentations at community groups with an effort 4 to reach individuals. 6. Conduct pedestrian and/or bicycle safety classroom presentations with an effort to reach 3 students. 7. Conduct pedestrian and/or bicycle safety courses with an effort to reach community 3 members. S. Distribute pedestrian safety equipment to children that may include reflective armbands I and/or zipper pulls. 9. Distribute bicycle headlights and tail lights during bicycle safety community events or 1 bicycle safety courses. 10. Develop bicycle and pedestrian safety educational materials to be distributed during 1 classroom presentations, workshops, and community events. 11. Participate in Safe Routes to School coalition meetings. 4 12. Conduct pedestrian Walking Field Trips with an effort to reach adults and senior citizens. 1 13. Conduct community outreach events with an effort to reach adults and senior citizens. 2 14. Conduct pre and post -grant bicycle helmet usage surveys during the months of October 2 (start of the grant) and September (end of the grant). A pre -surrey will be required to determine the base year helmet use rate and a post -survey will be required to determine the operational rate. 15. Conduct bicycle rodeos with an effort to reach individuals. 2 16. Distribute and properly fit bicycle helmets at bicycle rodeos, workshops, and community 602 events. 17. Conduct bicycle helmet inspections and make necessary adjustments at schools and 1 community events. 18. Conduct community bicycle rides promoting safe bicycling in the community with an 4 effort to reach bicyclists. 19. Hold quarterly meetings with countywide pedestrian and/or bicycle safety stakeholders to 4 collaborate on events, share best practices, and leverage resources. 20. Collaborate with law enforcement agencies to increase knowledge and awareness of 1 pedestrian and bicycle safety. 21. Conduct community action planning sessions with an effort to identify community 2 concerns and needs. 22. Conduct community stakeholder meetings to identify community experiences, needs, and 2 concerns 23. Conduct a community demonstration project of safe bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure I with an effort to reach individuals. 24. Host connnunity Open House with an effort to reach youth, adults, and senior citizens. 1 3. METHOD OF PROCEDURE A. Phase 1 — Program Preparation (Vt Quarter of Grant Year) • Develop operational plans to implement the "best practice" strategies outlined in the objectives section. • All training needed to implement the program should be conducted this quarter. • All grant related purchases needed to implement the program should be made this quarter. Media Requirements • Issue a press release announcing the kick-off of the grant by November 15. but no earlier than October 1. If unable to meet the November 15 date, communicate reasons to your OTS Coordinator. The kick-off press releases and any related media advisories, alerts, and materials must be emailed for approval to the OTS Public Information Officer at pioLdots.ca.gov, and copied to your OTS Coordinator, 14 days prior to the issuance date of the release. B. Phase 2 — Program Operations (Throughout Grant Year) • Task 1: Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Education Workshops and Classes to help support increased knowledge and understanding of safety. • Host four (4) bilingual English/Spanish presentations and four (4) bilingual English/Spanish interactive workshops to provide education to community members on safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Conduct three (3) Bicycling Basics Classes in the City of Santa Ana. At least one (1) of these classes will be taught in Spanish. • Conduct four (3) Wrench and Ride programs in the City of Santa Ana. At classes will be taught in English or Spanish, with Vietnamese as needed • Task 2: Active Transportation Champions Cohort: Plan and deliver meetings, trainings, and a community open house to cultivate a cohort of 10-20 residents who will identify and develop pedestrian and bicycle safety education, encouragement, and engagement activities to strengthen and advance the City's existing pedestrian and bicycle safety infrastructure improvements and non -infrastructure strategies. • Conduct two (2) workshops on quantitative and/or qualitative data collection and collision data analysis • Organize one (1) community -led walking and biking assessment or collection of pedestrian/bicycle counts • Conduct two (2) action planning sessions • Host one (1) community open house • Conduct two (2) engagement meetings Task 3: Provide community encouragement activities to support increased use of walking and biking in the City of Santa Ana. • Conduct two (1) education and encouragement events in the City of Santa Ana, based on recommendations from the "Active Transportation Cohort." • Conduct four (4) family cycling education classes in the City of Santa Ana. At least two (2) of these classes will be available in Spanish. • Conduct five (2) i Laces Vivas! Events to help encourage and provide education for walking and riding safely at night. • Conduct two (2) Pedestrian and Bicycle Traffic Safety Fans Media Requirements • Send all grant -related activity press releases, media advisories, alerts and general public materials to the OTS Public Information Officer (PTO) at pioLtbots.ca. og_v, with a copy to your OTS Coordinator. The following requirements are for grant -related activities and are different from those regarding any grant kick-off release or announcement. • if an OTS-supplied, template -based press release is used, there is no need for pre -approval, however, the OTS PTO and Coordinator should be copied when at the same time as the release is distributed to the press. • If an OTS-supplied template is not used, or is substantially changed, a draft press release shall be sent to the OTS PTO for approval. Optimta r lead-time would be 10 days prior to the release distribution date, but should be no less than 5 working days prior to the release distribution date. • Press releases reporting the immediate and time -valued results of grant activities such as enforcement operations are exempt from the recommended advance approval process, but still should be copied to the OTS PTO and Coordinator when the release is distributed to the press. • Activities such as warrant or probation sweeps and court stings that could be compromised by advanced publicity are exempt from pre -publicity, but are encouraged to offer embargoed media coverage and to report the results. • Use the following standard language in all press, media, and printed materials: Funding for this program was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. • Email the OTS PTO at Vio(&,ots.ca. oo and copy your OTS Coordinator at least 30 days in advance, a short description of any significant grant -related traffic safety event or program so OTS has sufficient notice to arrange for attendance and/or participation in the event. • Submit a draft or rough -cut of all printed or recorded material (brochures, posters, scripts, artwork, trailer graphics, etc.) to the OTS PTO at pio(c)ots.ca.gov and copy your OTS Coordinator for approval 14 days prior to the production or duplication. • Space permitting, include the OTS logo, on grant -funded print materials; consult your OTS Coordinator for specifics and format -appropriate logos. • Contact the OTS PTO or your OTS Coordinator, sufficiently far enough in advance of need, for consultation when deviation from any of the above requirements might be contemplated. C. Phase 3 — Data Collection & Reporting (Throughout Grant Year) • Invoice Claims (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30) • Quarterly Performance Reports (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30) • Collect and report quarterly, appropriate data that supports the progress of goals and objectives. • Provide a brief list of activity conducted, procurement of grant -funded items, and significant media activities. Include status of grant-frinded personnel, status of contracts, challenges, or special accomplishments. • Provide a brief summary of quarterly accomplishments and explanations for objectives not completed or plans for upcoming activities. • Collect, analyze and report statistical data relating to the grant goals and objectives. 4. METHOD OF EVALUATION Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will complete the "Final Evaluation" section in the fourth/final Quarterly Performance Report (QPR). The Final Evaluation should provide a brief summary of the grant°s accomplishments, challenges and significant activities. This narrative should also include whether goals and objectives were met, exceeded, or an explanation of why objectives were not completed. 5. ADMINISTRA'PIVESUPPORT This program has full administrative support, and every effort will be made to continue the grant activities after grant conclusion. State of California— Office of Traffic Safety GRANT AGREEMENT Schedule B GRANT, NUMBER PS20034 FUNDNUMBER CATALOGNUMBER FUNDDESCRIPTION TOTALAMOUNT (CFDA) 402PS-20 20.600 State and Community Highway $100,000.00 Safety COST CATEGORY CFDA TOTAL COST TO GRANT A. PERSONNEL COSTS Positions and Salaries Full -Time $0.00 Overtime $0.00 Part -Time $0.00 Category Sub -Total $0.00 B. TRAVEL EXPENSES $0.00 woo Category Sub -Total $0.00 C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Pedestrian and Bicycle Education- S 100,000 20.600 $0.00 Task la: Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Workshops 2Q600 $19,000,00 Task lb: Bici Basics 20.600 $12,300.00 Task le: Wrench and Ride Program 20.600 $1-),800.00 Task 2b: Data Analysis Workshops 20.600 S3,600.00 Task 2c: Walking and Biking Assessment 20.600 S2,000.00 Task 2d: Action Planning Sessions 20.600 S3.200.00 Task 2e: Cotranunity Open House 20.600 S2,100.00 Task 2f. Stakeholder Engagement Meetings 20.600 S3,400.00 Task 3a: Education and Encouragement Event 20.600 $11,000.00 Task 3b: Family Cycling Education Classes 20.600 $12,000.00 Task3c: •Luces Vivas! Events 20.600 S4,600.00 Task 3d: Traffic Safety Fairs 20.600 S4,800.00 Bicycle Helmets 20.600 S6,020.00 Bicycle Safety Equipment 20.600 S2,180.00 Category Sub -Total $100,000.00 D. EQUIPMENT $0.00 Category Sub -Total $0.00 E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0.00 Category Sub -Total $0.00 F. INDIRECT COSTS $0.00 Category Sub -Total $0.00 GRANT TOTAL $100,000.00 State of California— Office of Traffic Safety GRANT AGREEMENT Schedule 13-1 CRAM, NUNIRER PS20034 BUDGET NARRATIVE PERSONNEL COSTS QUANTITY TRAVEL EXPENSES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Pedestrian and Bicycle Education- $100,000 - Consultant to conduct pedestrian and bicycle events and 0 Presentations customized for a targeted population. Task I a: Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Workshops - Presentations and interactive workshops that will 4 educate residents on bicycle and pedestrian safety strategies, including nationally recognized best practices and emerging successes from localities across California. 4 Workshops x $4,750 ea= $19,000 Task lb: Bici Basics - Bicycling Basics classes are geared towards new riders to teach basic skills and 3 build confidence in riding a bicycle. All classes will be taught by trained League Cycling Tnstructors (LCTs). 3 classes x $4,100 ea= $12,300 Task lc: Wrench and Ride Program - Wrench and Ride is a nine-weekprogram, hosted at The Bicycle 3 Tree, in which participants learn about bicycle anatomy, bike safety, and maintenance. 3 Wrench and Ride Programs x $4,600 ea: $13,800 Task 2b: Data Analysis Workshops - Data workshops provide quantitative and/or qualitative data 2 collection and collision data analysis for walking and biking. These sessions will help build understanding of community members of the needs that exist and safety concerns. 2 workshops x $1,900 ea— $3,600 Task 2c: Walking and Biking Assessment - Community -led walking and biking assessments will 1 outline potential challenges and opportunities to increase walking and biking. Pedestrianibicycle counts to support the need for projects may also be included in the assessment. 1 assessment x $2,000= $2,000 Task 2d: Action Planning Sessions - Action planning sessions allow participants to identify 2 infrastructure and non -infrastructure solutions to address their pedestrian and bicycle safety concerns and plan for the implementation of the project. 2 sessions x $1600 ea— $3.200 Task 2e: Community Open House - Community open house events allow community members to 1 share/present knowledge and experience gleaned from participation in walking and bicycling safety events. Presentations will be made to fellow residents and city staff. 1 open house x $2,100— $2,100 Task 2f: Stakeholder Engagement Meetings - Stakeholder meetings will engage community members 2 and key city stakeholders responsible for traffic safety improvements where participants will share their active transportation experiences, concerns, and needs. 2 meetings x $1,700 ea=$3,400 Task 3a: Education and Encouragement Event - Pop-up demonstrations of active transportation project 1 or program will demonstrate what a permanent project or improvement could look like in real-time and provide safety education and encouragement of walking and biking. 1 event x $1 1.000 ea= $1 1,000 Task 3b: Family Cycling Education Classes - The class merges the traditional Traffic Skills curriculum 4 developed by the League of American Bicyclists with the basic skills taught to youth in a bike rodeo. Rider will learn the rules of the road for entering traffic at intersections and riding in the street. 4 classes x $3,000 ea— $12,000 Task 3c: iLuces Vivas! Events - iLuces Vivas! is an education and night light distribution program 2 intended to provide education and encouragement for riding bikes and walking in Santa Ana safely at right. 2 events x S2,300 ea= $4,600 Task 3d: Traffic Safety Fairs - Traffic Safety Fair events teach students how to interact with the 2 roadway and traffic. The class instruction on using the different intersection devices, bicycling in the roadway, bicycle safety inspections, and helmet fit. The course uses a combination of simulation and hands-on training to teach the student how to make safe decisions while walking or riding within the roadway. 2 Safety Faits x $2,400 ea= $4,800 Bicycle Helmets - Helmets to be distributed during bicycle rodeos and other bicycle safety related 602 events. Bicycle Safety Equipment - Safety equipment such as bicycle headlights/taillights, reflectors, and I reflective arm and leg bands to be distributed during bicycle rodeos and other bicycle safety related events. Additional items may nirchased upon OTS approval. EQUIPMENT OTHER DIRECT COSTS INDIRECT COSI'S STATEMENTS/DISCLAIMERS There will be no program income generated from this grant. State of California — Office of Traffic Safety GRANT AGREEMENT Exhibil A CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES HIGHWAY SAFETY GRANTS (23 U.S.C. CHAPTER 4 AND SEC. 1906, PUB. L.109-59, As AMENDED) GRANT NUDIBER PS20034 Failure to comply with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives may subject Grantee Agency officials to civil or criminal penalties and/or place the State in a high -risk grantee status in accordance with 49 CFR §19.12. The officials named on the grant agreement, certify by way of signature on the grant agreement signature page, that the Grantee Agency complies with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives and State rules, guidelines, policies and laws in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding. Applicable provisions include, but are not limited to, the following: • 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4—Highway Safety Act of 1966, as amended • 49 CFR Part 18—Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments • 23 CFR Part 1300--Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs NONDISCRIMINATION (applies to subrecipients as well as States) The State highway safety agency will comply with all Federal statutes and implementing regulations relating to nondiscrimination ("Federal Nondiscrimination Authorities"). These include but are not limited to: • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., 78 stat 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin) and 49 CFR part 21; • The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal -aid programs and projects); • Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. 324 et seq.), and Title 1X of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683 and 1685-16861) (prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex); • Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability) and 49 CFR part 27; • The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age); • The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (Pub. L. 100-209), (broadens scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms "programs or activities" to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal aid recipients, subrecipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally -funded or not); • Titles 11 and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12131-12189) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation. and certain testing) and 49 CFR parts 37 and 38; • Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low - Income Populations (prevents discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, politics, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations); and • Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency (guards against Title VI national origin discrimination/discrimination because of limited English proficiency (LEP) by ensuring that funding recipients take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to programs (70 FR 74087-74100). The State highway safety agency— • Will take all measures necessary to ensure that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, disability, sex, age, limited English proficiency, or membership in any other class protected by Federal Nondiscrimination Authorities, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be othenvise subjected to discrimination under any of its programs or activities, so long as any portion of the program is Federally -assisted; • Will administer the program in a manner that reasonably ensures that any of its subrecipients, contractors, subcontractors, and consultants receiving Federal financial assistance under this program will comply with all requirements of the Non -Discrimination Authorities identified in this Assurance; • Agrees to comply (and require its subrecipients, contractors, subcontractors, and consultants to comply) with all applicable provisions of law or regulation governing US DOT's or NHTSA's access to records, accounts, documents, information, facilities, and staff, and to cooperate and comply with any program or compliance reviews, and/or complaint investigations conducted by US DOT or NHTSA under any Federal Nondiscrimination Authority; • Acknowledges that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under these Non -Discrimination Authorities and this Assurance: • Agrees to insert in all contracts and funding agreements with other State or private entities the following clause: "During the performance of this contract/funding agreement, the contractor/funding recipient agrees — a. To comply with all Federal nondiscrimination laws and regulations, as maybe amended from time to time; b. Not to participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by any Federal non- discrimination law or regulation, as set forth in appendix B of 49 CFR part 21 and herein; c. To permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as required by the State highway safety office, US DOT or NHTSA; d. That, in event a contractor/funding recipient fails to comply with any nondiscrimination provisions in this contract/fundingagreement, the State highway safety agency will have the rightto impose such contract/agreement sanctions as it or NHTSA determine are appropriate, including but not limited to withholding payments to the contractor/finding recipient tinder the contract/agrecmentuntil the contractor/funding recipient complies; and/or cancelling, terminating, or suspending a contract or fmzding agreement, in whole or in part; and e. To insertthis clause, includingparagraphs (a) through (e), in every subcontract and sub agreement and in every solicitation for a subcontract or sub -agreement, that receives Federal funds under this program. POLITICAL ACTIVITY (HATCH ACT) (applies to subrecipients as well as States) The State will comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 1501-1508), which limits the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds. CERTIFICATION REGARDING FEDERAL LOBBYING (applies to subrecipients as well as States) Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: 1. No Federal appropriated fiords have been paid or will be paid, by or oil behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence art officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, art officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; 2. if any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; 3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub -award at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grant, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. RESTRICTION ON STATE LOBBYING (applies to subrecipients as well as States) None of the fiords under this program will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a State or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., "grassroots") lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a State official whose salary is supported with NHTSA funds from engaging in direct communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary State practice, even if such communications urge Legislative officials to favor or oppose the adoption of a specific pending Legislative proposal. CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION (applies to subrecipients as well as States) Instructions for Primary Tier Participant Certification (States) I. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. 2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective primary tier participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary tier participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction. 3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default or may pursue suspension or debarment. 4. The prospective primary tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary tier participant learns its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. S. The terms covered transaction, civiliudgmient, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 6. The prospective primary tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment wider 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction. 7. The prospective primary tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled "Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification" including the "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion —Lower Tier Covered Transaction," provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. 8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website (https://ww�v.sam.«.ov/). 9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. 10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the department or agency may terminate the transaction for cause or default. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters -Primary Tier Covered Transactions (1) The prospective primary tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transaction by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or Local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default. (2) Where the prospective primary tier participant is unable to certify to any of the Statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification 1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. 2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. if it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal governinent, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment. 3. The prospective lower tier participant shal I provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 4. The terms covered transaction, civi [judgment, debarment. suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntari ly excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated. 6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled "Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification" including the "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion — Lower Tier Covered Transaction," without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. 7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4. debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website (https://www.sam.gov/). 8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. 9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion--LowerTier Covered Transactions: 1. The prospective tower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency. 2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. BUY AMERICA ACT (applies to subrecipients as well as States) The State and each subrecipient will complywith the Buy America requirement(23 U.S.C. 313) when purchasing items using Federal funds. Buy America requires a State, or subrecipient, to purchase with Federal funds only steel, iron and manufactured products produced in the United States, unless the Secretary of Transportation detenumes that such domestically produced items would be inconsistent with the public interest, that such materials are not reasonably available and of a satisfactory quality, or that inclusion of domestic materials will increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25 percent. In order to use Federal funds to purchase foreign produced items, the State must submit a waiver request that provides an adequate basis and justification for approval by the Secretary of Transportation. PROHIBITION ON USING GRANT FUNDS TO CHECK FOR HELMET USAGE (applies to subrecipients as well as States) The State and each subrecipient will not use 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 grant funds for programs to check helmet usage or to create checkpoints that specifically target motorcyclists. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES All subrecipient law enforcement agencies shalt comply with California law regarding profiling. Penal Code section 13519.4. subdivision (e), defines "racial profiling" as the "practice of detaining a suspect based on a broad set of criteria which casts suspicion on an entire class of people without any individualized suspicion of the particular person being stopped." Then, subdivision (t) of that section goes on to provide, "A law enforcement officer shall not engage in racial profiling." EXHIBIT 2 AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY OUTREACH SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 19th day of November, 2019, by and between Charitable Ventures of Orange County, Inc., as fiscal sponsor for Santa Ana Active Streets ("Consultant'), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. The Santa Ana Public Works Agency has been awarded a $100,000 grant from the State of California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) for a program to address bicycle and pedestrian safety through a series of bicycle safety education workshops and events. The goal of the program is to reduce the number of persons killed or injured in collisions involving bicycles. B. The City desires to retain a consultant to provide such a program. C. Consultant represents that it is able and willing to provide such services to the City. D. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terns and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant shall provide bicycle and pedestrian safety education services that are described in Exhibit A to this Agreement and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Consultant may provide such services through the community - based coalition known as "Santa Ana Active Streets" (SAAS). 2. COMPENSATION a. City agrees to pay and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services, the rates and charges identified in Exhibit B. The total sum to be expended under this Agreement shall not exceed $100,000. b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City. Page 1 of 10 rEENIFrW351 The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date stated above and continue through November 18, 2020, unless earlier terminated as set forth in Section 14, below. 4. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant shall during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the manner in which Consultant performs the services required by this Agreement. However, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's Social Security taxes, unemployment insurance, and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. S. OWNERSHIP OF REPORTS AND DOCUMENTS Upon completion of all work under this Agreement, ownership and title to all reports, documents, tracings, plans, specifications, estimates and maps prepared or obtained under the terms of this Agreement shall be delivered to, and become the property of City. Basic survey notes and sketches, charts, computations, and other data prepared or obtained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available upon request of the City without restriction or limitation on their use. Consultant shall furnish the City all necessary copies of data needed to complete the review and approval process. 6. CONFIDENTIALITY If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written infonmation, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. Page 2 of 10 WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right orremedy. No waiver of anybreach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 8. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Consultant shall, throughout the term ofthis Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination ofthis Agreement. 9. NON-DISCRIMINATION Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, relation, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or in connection with any activities under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 10. CONFLICT OFINTEREST CLAUSE Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services. 11. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance naming the City, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives as additional insured(s) and shall include, but not be limited to protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom and damage to property, resulting from any act or occurrence arising out of Consultant's operations in the performance of this Agreement, including, without limitation, acts involving vehicles. The Page 3 of 10 amounts of insurance shall be not less than the following: single limit coverage applying to bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage, in the total amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence, with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. Such insurance shall (a) name the City, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives as additional insured(s); (b) be primary with respect to insurance or self-insurance programs maintained by the City; and (c) contain standard separation of insureds provisions. b. Business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non -owned automobiles. C. Worker's Compensation Insurance. In accordance with the California Labor Code, Consultant, if Consultant has any employees, is required to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self-insurance. Prior to commencing the performance of the work under this Agreement, Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain any employer's liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 per accident. d. If Consultant is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer: Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per claim with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. C. The following requirements apply to the insurance to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this section: (i) Consultant shall maintain all insurance required above in full force and effect for the entire period covered by this Agreement. (ii) Certificates of insurance shall be furnished to the City upon execution of this Agreement and shall be approved by the City. (iii) Certificates and policies shall state that the policies shall not be cancelled or reduced in coverage or changed in any other material aspect, by consultant, without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. (iv) Consultant shall supply City with a fully executed additional insured endorsement. f If Consultant fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the City with required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, the City shall have the right, at the City's election, to terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not affect Consultant's right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. Consultant waives the right to receive Page 4 of 10 compensation and agrees to indemnify the City for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the City. 12 INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, consultants, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the operations of the Consultant or its Consultants, subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. 13. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Copies to: Public Works Agency -Executive Director City Hall -Ross Annex -4th Floor 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) SantaAna, California 92702 Page 5 of 10 To Consultant: Charitable Ventures of Orange County 1505 E. 17tb Street, Suite 101 Santa Ana, CA 92705 A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 14. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, th e Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 15. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS a. Consultant shall perform all requirements under this Agreement in strict observance and in compliance with all applicable environmental, traffic, safety and any other laws, regulations, ordinances, codes and any other legislative or statutory requirements. b. Consultant warrants that the performance of services under this Agreement shall be compliant with the current requirements of the Highway Safety Grant Management Manual and as itmaybe amended orupdated throughout the term of this Agreement. C. Consultant certifies that it shall comply with the following regulations, as required by the State of California Office of Traffic Safety: d Audit Records - With respect to all matters covered by this agreement all records shall be made available for audit and inspection by the City, the grant agency and/or their duly authorized representatives for a period of four (4) years from the termination of this Agreement. For a period of three years after final delivery hereunder or until all claims related to this Page 6 of 10 Agreement are finally settled, whichever is later, Consultant shall preserve and maintain all documents, papers and records relevant to the services provided in accordance with this Agreement, including the Attachments hereto. For the same time period, Consultant shall make said documents, papers and records available to City and the agency from which City received grant funds or their duly authorized representative(s), for examination, copying, or mechanical reproduction on or off the premises of Consultant, upon request during usual working hours. e. Consultant shall provide to City all records and information requested by City for inclusion in quarterly reports and such other reports or records as City may be required to provide to the agency from which City received grant funds or other persons or agencies. f. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 - All recipients of federal funds must comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (The Act). Therefore, the federal funds recipient pursuant to the requirements of The Act hereby gives assurance that no otherwise qualified handicapped person shall, solely by reason of handicap be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of or be subject to discrimination, including discrimination in employment, in any program or activity that receives or benefits from federal financial assistance. The Consultant agrees it will ensure that requirements of The Act shall be included in the agreements with and be binding on all of its contractors, subcontractors, assignees or successors. g. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 - (ADA) Consultant must comply with all requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as applicable. h. Political Activity - None of the funds, materials, property, or services provided directly or indirectly under this Agreement shall be used for any partisan political activity, or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for public office, or otherwise in violation of the provisions of the "Hatch Act". i. Civil Rights Compliance and Notification of Findings - Consultant, and all its contractors (or sub -recipients) will comply with the nondiscrimination requirements of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 USC 3789 (d), or Victims of Crime Act (as appropriate); Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1964, as amended; Subtitle A, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990); Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975; Department of Justice Non - Discrimination Regulations, 28 CPR Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G; and Department of Justice regulations on disability discrimination, 28 CPR Part 35 and 39. In the event a Federal or State court, Federal or State administrative Page 7 of 10 agency, or the Consultant makes a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability against a recipient of funds, the Consultant will forward a copy of the findings to the City which will, in turn, submit the findings to the Office of Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. j. Consultant, and all its contractors (or sub -recipients) will comply with all requirements of the Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CPR chapter 60), as applicable. k. Consultant, and all its contractors (or sub -recipients) will comply with all requirements of the Copeland "Anti -Kickback" Act (18 U.S.C. 874) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CPR Part 3), as applicable. 1. Consultant, and all its contractors (or sub -recipients) will comply with all requirements of the Davis -Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a to 276a-7) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CPR Part 5), as applicable. in. Consultant, and all its contractors (or sub -recipients) will comply with all requirements of Sections 103 and 107 of the Contract Work and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327-330) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CPR Part 5), as applicable. n. Consultant, and all its contractors (or sub -recipients) will comply with all applicable standards, orders or requirements issued under s e ction 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h)), Section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and the Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CPR part 15), as applicable. o. Consultant, and all its contractors (or sub -recipients) will comply with all requirements of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (Pub. L. 94-163, 89 Stat. 871), (53 FR 8078, 8087, Mar. 11, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 19639, 19645, Apr. 19, 1995), as applicable. P. Consultant, and all its contractors (or sub -recipients) will comply with all requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Community Development Block Grant Regulatory Code 24 CPR Part 570. q. Consultant agrees that the State of California Office of Traffic Safety shall have the authority to seek patent rights for any process, product, invention or discovery developed and paid for with funding through this Agreement. Page 8 of 10 r. Consultant may not copyright any books, publications or other materials developed in the course of or under this Agreement. The federal awarding agency, State Administrative Agency (SAA) and City reserve any rights to copyright, reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, for federal government, SAA or City purpose any work developed through this Agreement. 16. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant regarding the subject matter therein, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein. 17. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other consultants retained by City. 18. JURISDICTION -VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, Interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 19. FINES The Consultant shall be liable for all violation fines levied against the City by federal, state, or local agencies with regulatory authority related to Consultant provided services. Page 9 of 10 20. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All Attachments referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: HN M. FUNK Assistant City Attorney FOR APPROVAL: FUAD S. SWEISS, PE, PLS Executive Director Public Works Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager CONSULTANT NAME; i da- 1L t w, TITLE: C-oo Page 10 of 10 City of Santa Ana — Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program — Scope of Work I Safety Workshops Presentations and interactive workshops that will educate residents on bicycle and pedestrian safety strategies, including nationally recognized best practices and emerging successes from localities across California. Deliverables: 4 Safety Workshops 1b Bicycling Basics Bicycling Basics classes are geared towards new riders to teach basic skills and build confidence in riding a bicycle. All classes will be taught by trained League Cycling Instructors (LCIs). Deliverables: 3 Bici Basics Classes I Wrench and Ride Wrench and Ride is a nine -week program, hosted at The Bicycle Tree, in which participants learn about bicycle anatomy, bike safety, and maintenance. Deliverables: 3 Wrench and Ride Programs 2a Data Workshop Data workshops provide quantitative and/or qualitative data collection and collision data analysis for walking and biking. These sessions will help build understanding of community members of the needs that exist and safety concerns. Deliverables: 2 Data Workshops 2b Walk Assessment Community -led walking and biking assessments will outline potential challenges and opportunities to increase walking and biking. Pedestrian/bicycle counts to support the need for projects may also be included in the assessment. Deliverables: f Walking Audit 2c Action Planning Action planning sessions allow participants to identify infrastructure and non - infrastructure solutions to address their pedestrian and bicycle safety concerns and plan for the implementation of the project. Deliverables: 2 Action Planning Sessions 2d Open House Community open house events allow community members to share/present knowledge and experience gleaned from participation in walking and bicycling safety events. Presentations will be made to fellow residents and city staff Deliverables: 1 Open House Event 2e Stakeholder Meeting Stakeholder meetings will engage community members and key city stakeholders responsible for traffic safety improvements where participants will share their active transportation experiences, concerns, and needs. Deliverables: 2 Stakeholder Meetings 3a Pop -Up Demo Pop-up demonstrations of active transportation project or program will demonstrate what a permanent project or improvement could look like in real- time and provide safety education and encouragement of walking and biking. Deliverables: 1 Demonstration Event 3b Family Cycling The class merges the traditional Traffic Skills curriculum developed by the League of American Bicyclists with the basic skills taught to youth in a bike rodeo. Riders will learn the rules of the road for entering traffic at intersections and riding in the street. Deliverables: 4 Family Cycling Classes 3c Luces Vivas iLuces Vivas! is an education and night light distribution program intended to provide education and encouragement for riding bikes and walking in Santa Ana safely at night. Deliverables: 2 Luces Vivas Events 3d Traffic Safety Fair Traffic Safety Fair events teach students how to interact with the roadway and traffic. The class instruction on using the different intersection devices, bicycling in the roadway, bicycle safety inspections, and helmet fit. The course uses a combination of simulation and hands-on training to teach the student how to make safe decisions while walking or riding within the roadway. Deliverables: 2 Traffic Safety Fairs EXHIBIT B Task # Task Item Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost 1a Safety Workshops 4 $4,750.00 $19,000.00 1b Bici Basics 3 $4,100.00 $12,300.00 1c Wrench and Ride 3 $4,600.00 $13,800.00 2a Data Workshop 2 $1,800.00 $3,600.00 2b Walk Assessment 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 2c Action Planning 2 $1,600.00 $3,200.00 2d Open House 1 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 2e Stakeholder Mtg 2 $1,700.00 $3,400.00 3a Pop -Up Demo 1 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 3b Family Cycling 4 $3,000.00 $12,000.00 3c Luces Vivas 2 $2,300.00 $4,600.00 3d Traffic Safety Fair 2 $2,400.00 $4,800.00 Materials Helmets 548 $11.00 $6,028.00 Tail/Head Lights 543 $4.00 $2,172.00 TOTAL: $100,000.00 REQUEST FOR"Y`' COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT AND APPROVE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES' UNIT, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 721 (SEIU) (STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 7,4 & 6) /s/ Kristine Ridge CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 1st Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Approve an Appropriation Adjustment transferring $951,141 from General Fund Non - Departmental into the appropriate General Fund Accounting Units. 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Full -Time Employees' Unit, Service Employees International Union Local 721 (SEIU) for the period of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022, regarding wages and other terms and conditions of employment. DISCUSSION The City and the Full -Time Employees' Unit, Service Employees International Union Local 721 (SEIU) recently completed contract negotiations, resulting in a new Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) (Exhibit 2). The provisions of the agreement include: 1. Term: Effective July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. 2. Salary: The agreement provides a cost of living adjustment effective in each pay period which includes July 1, 2019, July 1, 2020, and July 1, 2021. Classifications covered by this MOU shall receive a base salary increase of seven (7) salary rate ranges (approximately 3.5%). The initial salary increase will be provided to those employees currently employed as of the date the MOU is adopted by Council and retroactively paid to the pay period including July 1, 2019. Agreement with SEIU 2019-2022 November 19, 2019 Page 2 3. Medical: Effective January 1, 2020, the City shall contribute an additional $50.00 allowance per month towards employee health insurance premiums. Effective January 1, 2021, the City shall contribute an additional $50.00 allowance per month towards employee health insurance premiums. Effective January 1, 2022, the City shall contribute an additional $50.00 allowance per month towards employee health insurance premiums. 4. Dental: Effective January 1, 2020, the City shall contribute an allowance of $100 per month per employee. Effective January 1, 2021, the City shall contribute an allowance of $105 per month per employee. Effective January 1, 2022, the City shall contribute an allowance of $110 per month per employee. 5. Long-term Disability (LID1. Effective January 1, 2020, the City shall increase the level of employer -paid benefit coverage from the current 130-day wait plan at $2,500 maximum benefit to a 60-day wait plan with a $5,000 maximum benefit. 6. Life: Effective January 1, 2020, the City shall increase the employer -paid Group Term Life benefit coverage from $30,000 to $50,000. 7. Holiday Closure: The City and SEIU have agreed to a mandatory City-wide winter holiday closure each year during the term of this MOU and shall sunset on June 30, 2022. This provision expires June 30, 2022, unless mutually agreed otherwise by the parties. 8. Holiday Accrual: The floating holiday provided will be equal to employee's regular shift hours. Employees on a 9/80 schedule shall receive 9 hours of holiday pay/credit for holidays falling on employee's alternating Friday off. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's effort to meet Goal #7 — Team Santa Ana, Objective #4, Establish employee compensation that attracts and retains a highly qualified workforce, objective #5, Create a culture of innovation and efficiency within the organization, objective #6, Provide a positive workplace environment that supports the health of its employees and celebrates its success, and objective #7 Develop a culture of motivated and innovative leaders in the organization. FISCAL IMPACT The non -departmental budget of the General Fund is adequate to support the FY 2019-20 compensation increase. The recommended appropriation adjustment will simply move the existing budget from non -departmental to the appropriate department budgets. The General Fund impact is estimated to be approximately $854,217. In addition, three grant funds will be unable to absorb the costs associated with the increases. Staff is recommending the General Fund absorb the costs Agreement with SEIU 2019-2022 November 19, 2019 Page 3 associated with these grant funds, estimated to be approximately $96,924. The total General Fund impact will be $951,141. For FY 2019-20 the agreement will result in a cost of $1,783,251 for all funds (within the various salary accounts 61000) during fiscal year 2019-20. In addition, the agreement has annual cost (all funds) of $3,907,443 during fiscal year 2020-21, and a cost of $5,763,472 during fiscal year 2021-22 for a total cost to the City of $11,454,166 during the term of the MOU. APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Steven V. Pham Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Executive Director Human Resources Department Finance and Management Services Agency Exhibits: 1. Fund Distribution — Accounting Units and Fund Categories 2. SEIU MOU July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022 N o o m o m m m o Irvn a m u °O n Irvo m .i ry voi m ri m co k6ri rQi ri m rci a 1O a n v v Ilmi ry ti ti Q ^� m .rvi m LL N� Z o m °° o °1 u> = +'- w vai o > v�i E c a c c .5 Ou G C N u Ii w0 w1 F c 0 '« — c .c a a c or n wf y w S o t y o o E Jn E o Q a U U= L Cy N N W w - a 't .a � i7 O a ° z ti � W Q `a a 2 O O O O O o 0 In O o m o In In o .. In g o o O� 0 0 0 o ry m o ry « m ry m�$ ry m In g o o ry ry m m In I° n n ry m In Io ry m Q Q .� C O N N N N Q Q Q �y} 1l1 1!1 VI VI VI Ill VI l0 lD lD lD CO O] OO 'i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c u � a �'�'�'�' Ll'ZZLLI' oaooao c c c c c c c c c c c �. Zi L a ¢ a a a a m m m m m m o ao QQQQ w w w w w w w w w w w w a a a aaa�wwwwww ccccEEEEEEEEEEEE w u a a a o 0 0 o m m m oo m m 08 08 Q Q E E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 v v u u u u v v v a u u u a a n a a a n a n a a a n U Y Y Y a a a a 6 6 6 6 = E E a a n E E O O U U 0 N O a t III t d f0 a Ifcd ti m n '^ " m ^ m 1L �o u w w a �ry a w= c w U° h '� W« '° aE c u E E ti �- u u ti 3 p c o U p Q 4 N V a B E E E o � v Z O O W m D] a l � Z O O pp N m 'I N O vl O vl O O] 3 « o a« O O O O O ti + ry O O ti ti ti ti ti N ry ry ti m m ry 0 0 ry ry 0 0 o m p m in 0 0 0 n m m m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v o a 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ ¢ ¢ v a Oap Oap Oap a Oap Oap Oap a a 0 o 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 n,`-�°' v°' v p n LL3333333333 0 0 0 o g d o c y m d o u u u u u ,u u u E E E E E a a a d a a O O d a 1 E O U E E 0' b b 0 CO M b CO N C1 r b m `i r a r b m CO b b O m p E b N o b m m o p r u+ v m r E O r ry v u+ m m r m r m m m b a vri ti m � " v ti ry '^ o6 'i ni m 1p vmi LL LL m C � c .5 y o= v01i 2« c 7.5 m °1 E a c LL 3 w 0 a u 'Y m w m° g o> m¢ E c w w a v> a— o c a m j v Q o u '� m a y c 0 9 a w+ E v o o y y u t 'o in E 3E x m 3 Eeau E E m y o u a u u W a i b b b b b b c b �n ry r r r r m m m C N N VI VI b b b b b b b b b b C N m r O r 0 o a b b a u u w w w a w a w w w w w a w Q E E E E E E E v E E E E E E E E a v a a a a a a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'o mE 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o LLLL333333333333 m 0 3�a°� d d 000g000 >E E E E E E aE E E E E E E u>u u> u>u>u 0 0 0 0 0 0 EXHIBIT 2 JULY 1, 2019 — JUNE 30, 2022 Iul"alu�7�Zi- OF UNDERSTANDING CITY OF SANTA ANA m FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES UNIT SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 721 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page ,/ MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND THE' FULL-TIKE, EMPLOYEES UNIT OF SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 721 JULY 1, 2019 — JUNE 30, 2022 Table of Contents ARTICLEI........................................................................................................................ 10 1.0 RECOGNITION.............................................................................I...,.......................... 10 ARTICLEH.. .................................. I ........ I ....................... — ....... I ............. I_- .................... 11 2.0'NON-DISCRIMINATION CLAUSE...............................................................................11 ARTICLEIII..................................................................................................................... 12 3.0 ATTENDANCE, WORKDAY & WORKVi7EEK............................................................. 12 3.1 Attendance.. ........................................ ............ ....................... ................ ....... 12 3.2 Hours of Work....................................................................................................... 12 3.3 Alternate Work Schedules....................................................................................... 12 3.4 Personal Hardship.................................................................................................. 14 3.5 Water Production Meal Breaks................................................................................ 15 ARTICLEIV..................................................................................................................... 16 4.0 SAI.ARIES.................................................................................................................... 16 4.1 Basic Compensation Plan.. ............................................ .................... .................... 16 4.2 Salary Schedule...................................................................................................... 16 4.3 Salaries..................................................................................................................17 4.4 Application of Basic Compensation Plan................................................................. 17 4.5 Probation............................................................................................................... 17 4.6 Beginning Rates.....................................................................................................17 4.7 Service.................................................................................................................. 18 4.8 Advancement within Ranges................................................................................... 18 201.9-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 2 4.9 Reduction in Salary Steps....................................................................................... 19 4.10 Promotion...........................................................................................................20 4.11 Demotion...........................................................................................................20 4.12 Reallocation of Salary Rate Ranges...................................................................... 20 4.13 Request for Classification Review........................................................................ 21 ARTICLEV.......................................................................................................................23 5.0 ASSIGNMENT & OTHER SPECIAL PAY ADDITIVES ................................................ 23 5.1 Assignment Pay Differential................................................................................... 23 5.2 Lead Pay................................................................................................................ 24 5.3 Bilingual Pay......................................................................................................... 25 5.4 Shift Differential.................................................................................................... 26 5.5 Standby Pay...........................................................................................................27 5.6 Call Back Duty ...................................................... ................................................. 28 5.7 Temporary Upgrade Assignment Pay...................................................................... 28 5.8 Authority for Assignments......................................................................................31 5.9 Career Development Incentives...._ . ......... ........ ­ .... ................ _ .................. ......... 31 5.10 Limitation on Career Development Incentive Pay ................................................. 35 5.11 Court Appearances.............................................................................................. 36 ARTICLEVI.....................................................................................................................38 6.0 OVERTiME..................................................................................................................38 6.1 General Policy for Overtime Work ..........................................................................38 6.2 Definition..............................................................................................................38 6.3 Computation of Forty (40) Hour Workweek............................................................38 6.4 Compensation for Overtime....................................................................................39 6.5 Compensatory Time...............................................................................................39 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 3 �ti� 6.6 No Effect on Other Benefits....................................................................................40 6.7 Overtime Work to be Minimized.............................................................................40 6.8 Overtime Work on a Holiday..................................................................................40 ARTICLEV1F.................................................................................................................... 41 7.0 TRAINING & EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM .......................................... 41 7.1 Purpose..................................................................................................................41 7.2 Eligibility...............................................................................................................41 7.3 Reimbursement......................................................................................................42 7.4 Procedures.............................................................................................................42 ARTICLEVIII.....................................................................................................I.......,.... 44 8.0 F1OLIDAYS...................................................................................................................44 8.1 City Holidays.........................................................................................................44 8.2 Holiday Bank.... ........ ................. ............... _ ... __ ............................ ..................... 45 9.3 Modified Holiday Schedule - Library.Employees.....................................................46 8.4 Requirements.........................................................................................................46 8.5 Use of HolidayTime ..............................................................................................46 8.6 Maximum Accumulation of Holiday....................................................................... 46 8.7 Winter Holiday Closure ..........................................................................................46 ARTICLEIX.......................................................................................I........................,,... 51 9.0 VACA AON.................................................................................................................. 51 9.1 Purpose..................................................................................................................51 9.2 Accrual..................................................................................................................51 9.3 Use of Vacation...................................................................................................... 52 9A Computation of Vacation Use................................................................................. 52 9.5 Continuous Service Requirement............................................................................53 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SETU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 4 2 �k 9.6 Vacation Cash -Out .................................................................................................53 9.7 Maximum Accumulation........................................................................................54 AR'11CLE X.......................................................................................................................57 10.0 OTHER LEAVES OF ABSENCE .................................................................................57 10.1 Sick Leave..........................................................................................................57 A. Definition...........................................................................................................57 B. Accrual...............................................................................................................57 C. Use of Sick L,eave............................................................................................... 57 D. L,imit..................................................................................................................58 E. Extended Use......................................................................................................58 F. Extension by Use of Accrued Compensatory Time Off and/or Vacation ................. 58 G. Notification of Use ............ .................. ___ ............ ........................................... 58 H. Denial................................................................................................................59 L Personal Necessity Leave........................................................................................ 59 J. Payment for Unused Sick Leave.............................................................................. 60 10.2 Bereavement Leave............................................................................................. 61 10.3 Military Leave....................................................................................................62 10.4 Examination Leave..... ...................... ............ ....................... ........................ 62 10.5 Unauthorized Absence........................................................................................62 10.6 Authorized Absences Without Pay - Short Term ................................................... 62 10.7 Authorized Absence Without Pay -Long Term ..................................................... 62 10.8 Industrial Leave..................................................................................................63 10.9 Pregnancy Disability Leave................................................................................. 63 10,10 Catastrophic Leave, .......... .............. ............................... ............ 6 3 ARTICLEX1..................................................................................................................... 66 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 5 �� 11.0 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE BENEFITS........................................................................ 66 11.1 Medical Health Insurance....................................................................................66 A. Health Plans....................................................................................................... 66 B. Contributions......................................................................................................66 C. Medical Waiver Option.... ............................... ................................................. - 67 11.2 Dental lnsurance.................................................................................................67 11.3 Long -Term Disability Inswunce.......................................................................... 67 11.4 Life Insur:mce..................................................................................................... 68 1.1.5 Benefits Advisory Committee ..... ......................................... ........ ....... ,................ 68 11.6 Retirement Health Savings (RIiS) Plan ................................................................ 68 H.7 Vision Insurance.................................................................................................69 ARTICLEXI.I....................................................................................................................70 12.0 RETIREMENT BENEFITS.......................................................................................... 70 12.1. CalPERS Retirement Plans.................................................................................. 70 12.2 Contributions ......................................................................................................70 12.3 CalPERS Benefit Options ........... ........................ ..... ............................. --- .... ... 71 ARTICLEXIII.................................................................................................................. 73 13.0 TOOLS........................................................................................................................73 13.1 Personal Tools.................................................................................................... 73 13.2 Tool Allowance..................................................................................................73 13.3 Lost or Stolen Tools............................................................................................ 73 ARTICLEYJV................................................................................................................... 74 14.0 UNIFORMS................................................................................................................. 74 14.1 Uniforms ............................................................................................................74 ARTICLEXV.................................................................................................................... 75 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Fill -Time Employees Unit Page 6 15.0 SAFETY ....... ...................................................................................................... I ...... ..75 15.1 Central Safety Conunittec.................................................................................... 75 15.2 SafetyShoes/Boots.............................................................................................75 ARTICLEXVI..............................................................................................................I_. 76 16.0 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE....................................................................................... 76 16.1 Definition of a Grievance .................................................................................... 76 16.2 Informal Process - First Step................................................................................ 76 16.3 Formal Process................................................................................................... 77 I6.4 Reservation of Rights.......................................................................................... 78 ARTICLE7CVII ................................................................................................................. 79 17.0 UNION RIGHTS.......................................................................................................... 79 1.7.1 Union Representatives......................................................................................... 79 17.2 Release Time......................................................................................................79 A. Geievances..........................................................................................................79 B. Union Business Leave.........................................................................................80 C. Chapter Chair/President's Leave..........................................................................80 D. Meet and Confer.................................................................................................82 F. Release Time Process..........................................................................................83 17.3 Worksite Access.................................................................................................83 17.4 Use of Bulletin Boards........................................................................................84 17.5 Use of City Facilities...........................................................................................84 17.6 Payroll Deductions..............................................................................................85 A. Union Deductions............................................................................................... 85 B. Remittance of Funds...........................................................................................85 C. Maintenance of Dues Payroll Deduction.............................................................. 85 tea. to 8c ;. 2019-2022 MrJU City of Santa Ana SF.IU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 7 D. Indemnification. ... ....... .................................................. ............................... ... 86 17.7 Reporting Requirements......................................................................................86 1.7.8 New Employee Orientations................................................................................86 ARTICLEXVIII................................................................................................................ 87 1.8.0 CITY RIGHTS.............................................................................................................87 18.1 Management Rights............................................................................................87 18.2 Meet and Confer on Impact................................................................................. 88 ARTICLEXIX.............................................................................................................I...._89 19.0 ANTI -STRIKE CLAUSE.....................................................................I.......................89 19.1 Prohibited Conduct.............................................................................................89 19.2 Union Responsibility...........................................................................................89 ARTICLEXX................................ ............ ........ ........................ ....... ..... I ....... ..,........ .........90 20.0 LAYOFFS .......................... ........... ............. ........... _........ ,.................. I ..... ,................. 90 20.1 Notice of Layoff.................................................................................................90 20.2 Order of Layoff................................................................................................... 90 20.3 Reemployment List.............................................................................................90 20.4 Temporary Appointment..................................................................................... 91 20.5 Contracting Out.................................................................................................. 91 ARTICLEXXI...................................................................................................................93 21.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS..............................................................................93 21.1 Joint Labor Management Teams.......................................................................... 93 21.2 Performance Appraisals....................................................................................... 93 21.3 Driving City Vehicles.......................................................................................... 93 ARTICLEXXII................................................ .......................... ..................... I ... .............. 95 22.0 FULL UNDERSTANDING, WAIVER & SEPARABILITY..........................................95 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 8 �\l 22.1 Intent of Agreement............................................................................................ 95 22.2 Rules and Regulations ......................................................................................... 95 22.3 Waiver of Bargaining.......................................................................................... 95 22.4 Emergency Waiver Provision..............................................................................95 22.5 Separability Provision.........................................................................................96 ARTICLEXXIIL............................................................................................................... 97 23.0 TERM OF MOU.......................................................................................................... 97 EXECUTION OF THE NEW AG EEMEN`l.................................................................... 98 SELU Local 721 Bargaining Committee .............................. EXHIBITA.......................................................................................................................100 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU FUII-Time Employees Unit Page 9 0 �16 ARTICLE I 1.0 RECOGNITION 1.1 Pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Mrfdaas-Brown Act, Government Code §3500, et seq., the City of Santa Ana (hereinafter called the "City") has recognized the Service Employees international Union, Local 721 (hereinafter called the "Union" or "SEIU") as the recognized representative of the bargaining unit which includes all full-time personnel employed by the City in classifications listed in Exhibit A of this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). 1.2 During the term of this MOU, no substantive issue of representation shall be raised contrary to this MOU, except as provided in the City's Employer -Employee Relations Resolution (EERR)No. 8I-75. 2019-2022 MOU C€ry of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 10 o�f� ARTICLE 11 2.0 NON-DISCRIMINATION CLAUSE 2.1 The City and the Union agree they shall not discriminate against any employee because of political affiliation, union activities, union membership, race, color, sex, age, national origin or alienage, sexual orientation, political or religious opinions or affiliations; religious creed, ancestry, physical disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, natural hair and hair styles associated with race, gender, gender identity, gender expression, military or veteran status, and other protected classifications as defined by the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEIIA). 2.2 The City and the Union shall reopen any provision(s) of this MOU for the purpose of complying with any order of a Federal or State agency or court of competent jurisdiction, if a modification or change in any provision(s) of this MOU is required to remain in compliance with State or Federal anti -discrimination laws. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 11 ,rt ARTICLE III 3.0 ATTENDANCE, WORKDAY & WORKWEEK 3.1 Attendance Employees covered by this MOU shall be in attendance at their work during hours prescribed by the Department Head or his/her designee(s) and shall not absent themselves without approval of the Department Head or his/her designee(s), 3.2 Hours of Work Eight (8) hours of work shall constitute a normal day and forty (40) hours of work shall constitute a minimum workweek, except for employees who have been approved for alternate work schedules as provided in this article by the City Manager. 3.3 Alternate Work Schedules A. 4/10 Work Schedule The Department head, with the approval of the City Manager, may assign Code Enforcement Officers, Police Department employees, and selected Fleet Services employees to a workweek consisting of four (4) ten (10) hour days, with an additional one-half (0.S) or one (1) hour for an unpaid meat break. The assigned employee shall work four (4) ten (10) hour days and shall have three (3) consecutive days off in a workweek. Upon mutual agreement between the supervisor and employee, the employee may waive his/her right to three (3) consecutive days off in a workweek. The regular workweek shall consist of forty (40) hours. A regular day off shall consist of ten (10) hours. B. 3/11.5 1/5.5. Alternate Work Schedule _-Correctional Records fitn ip oyees The Department Head, with the approval of the City Manager, may assign these employees to a workweek consisting of three (3) eleven and one-half (11.5) hour days and one (1) five and one-half (5,5) hour day, with an additional forty-five (45) minutes for an unpaid meal break. The assigned employee shall have three and one- half (3.5) consecutive days off in a workweek. Upon mutual agreement between the supervisor and employee, the employee may waive his/her right to three and one-half (3.5) consecutive days off in a workweek. The regular workweek shall consist of forty (40) hours. A regular day off shall consist of either eleven and one- half (11.5) hours or five and one-half (5.5) hours. C. 9/80 Work Schedule Employees shall be permitted to work a 9180 work schedule when authorized by the Department Idead and approved by the City Manager. A departmental work unit ;M;,;tca.:w:�.Tm__Fyy+ 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 12 r�1 will not be permitted to work this schedule if in the discretion of the Department Head and City Manager, the 9/80 work schedule may reduce service to the public. 1. Work Schedule The 9/80 work schedule shall be defined as working eighty (80) hours over nine (9) days in a two (2) week period. An employee shall work eight (8) days for nine (9) hours per day and one (1) day for eight (8) hours, excluding a one (1) hour unpaid meal break during each work shift, totaling forty (40) working hours in each FLSA work. week. 2. Work Week The FLSA work week shall be defined as the work week starting exactly four (4) hours after the start time of the employee's regularly scheduled shift on their alternating regular day off and ending exactly one hundred and sixty-eight (168) hours later. No employee working the 9/80 work schedule will be able to flex their alternating regular day off start time nor the time they take their mead break, which will occur after an employee has worked at least four (4) hours on his/her alternating regular day off. Modifications of the FLEA work week are not permitted unless authorized by the Executive Director of human Resources or his/her designee. 3. Schedule Changes Employees cannot change schedules without prior approval of their supervisor and Department head. The purpose of this authorization is to review the impact on staffing and overtime. Employees may change schedules at the beginning of any work week with supervisor and Department Head approval. 4. Emer ncles All employees on the 9180 work schedule are subject to be called to work any time to meet any and all emergencies or unusual conditions that, in the opinion of the City Manager, Department Head or designee, may require such service from any of said employees. 5. Leave Benefits When an employee is off on a scheduled workday under the 9/80 work schedule, then nine (9) hours of eligible leave per workday shall be charged against the employee's leave balance or eight (8) hours shall be charged if the day off is Ids/her alternating regular eight (8) hour work day. All leaves shall 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 13 continue under the current accrual, eligibility, request and approval requirements. a. Holidays i. For a recognized City holiday the hours (as stated in Article VIII) are earned for each holiday, except for the floating holiday. ii. If a holiday falls on an employee's alternating regularly scheduled day off, the employee must then take their holiday off before or after the regular holiday as their holiday off with supervisor and Department Head approval. If the employee cannot take their holiday off before or after the regular scheduled holiday off, the employee will bank the hours of holiday leave to be used at a later date with the supervisor's approval. D. It is the intent of the parties that no additional paid time off shall be gained or lost as a result of the implementation of an alternate work schedule. The City reserves the right to abandon alternate work schedules if, in the opinion of the concerned Department Head and the City Manager, the alternate work schedule has not produced the desired results. If this right is exercised, the City and SEIU shall meet and confer in good faith prior to abandoning any of these alternate work schedules. 3.4 Personal Hardshzyi Any employee who encounters a personal hardship with his/her work hours may request an accommodation from his/her Department Head, A hardship request will be limited to an employee's authorized hours of work. An accommodation will be considered only after the employee has exhausted all other personal options to resolve the hardship. If the employee is unable to resolve bis/her problem, the employee may request an accommodation from their Department Head by submitting a hardship claim. The Department Head may authorize an accommodation after reviewing said claim or assign a manager to investigate and recommend a resolution of the hardship claim. The recommendation of the manager will be limited to the following: 1. Approve an appropriate flex schedule that does not disrupt the department's ability to deliver its services or create disruption in the work unit. 2. Deny the employee's proposed solution to resolve the hardship. 3. Reassign the employee to a 5140 work schedule. The Department Head may accept any one of the manager's recommendations or advance r 2014-2022 MRU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 14 �)� his/her own to resolve the hardship. 3.5 Water Production Meal Breaks The Water Production staff who are assigned to work an eight (8) hour day shift covering Monday through Friday will be required to take a thirty (30) minute unpaid meat break during the shift. W3: 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 15 x 1�' ARTICLE IV 4.0 SALARIES 4.1 Basic Compensation.Plan There is an established basic compensation plan for all full-time personnel who are now employed or will in the future be employed in any of the designated classifications of employment represented by the Union as listed in this MOU and/or its exhibits. 4.2 Salary Schedule A. The basic salary and wage schedule, as periodically updated and published by the City, provides various salary rate ranges, each comprised of seven (7) steps or rates of pay. The respective rate ranges are identified by a three (3) digit number. The steps within each range are identified by the letters "AAA", "AA', and "A" through ,E" inclusive, with Step "AAA" being the lowest step in the range. Step "AAA." is the normal beginning pay rate. Step "AA" is an automatic increase after the completion of six (6) months of service in Step "AAA". Steps "A" through "D" are an automatic step increase after the completion of twelve (12) months of service. Step "E" is a performance based step increase which an employee may be eligible to receive after the completion of twelve (12) months of service in Step "D". The assignment of classifications to salary rate ranges is listed in the City's basic salary and wage schedule. B. During the term of this MOU, it is the City's intent to eliminate the salary matrix and create a salary schedule. The parties acknowledge and agree that elimination of the salary matrix and implementation of the salary schedule is a meet and confer issue. Once the City is ready to move forward with elimination of the salary matrix and creation of the salary schedule, it will provide its proposal to the Union and the parties agree to promptly meet and confer on the issue. No changes will be made until the negotiations process has been completed. The parties acknowledge that such a change will require modification to language in several provisions of this MOU. 2014-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 16 4.3 Salaries The base salary rate of each employee and classification shall be increased as follows: A. Effective in the pay period including July 1, 2019 - A base salary increase of seven (7) salary rate ranges, which is approximately three and one-half percent (3.5%). This salary increase shall be provided to those employees who are currently employed as of the date the MOU is approved by the City Council. B, Effective in the pay period including July 1, 2020 - A base salary increase of seven (7) salary rate ranges, which is approximately three and one-half percent (3.5%). C. Effective in the pay period including July 1, 2021 - A base salary increase of seven (7) salary rate ranges, which is approximately three and one-half percent (3.5%). 4A Application of Basic Compensation Plan The salary rate ranges contained in Section 42 of this article and the City's salary schedule are monthly salary rate ranges. All employees working in classifications of employment covered by this MOU shall be compensated at a monthly rate, except that an employee hired for temporary work in a position which has an anticipated duration of less than six (6) months shall be paid at a rate per hour for actual time spent in the performance of the duties of his/her employment. The regular rate of pay shall be computed as provided for by the FLSA. Any hourly rate of pay, defined as the regular hourly rate of pay, shall be computed by dividing the monthly salary rate by one hundred and severity -three point thirty-three (173.33). In determining the hourly rate as herein provided, computation shall be made to the nearest whole cent and a computation resulting in an even one-half ($0.005) cent shall fix the rate at the next higher whole cent, 4.5 Probation The probationary period shall be one (1) year from the date of appointment from an open eligible list (new hire) or a reappointment eligible list (rehire) or a promotional eligible list. 4.6 Beginn nZ Rates A new employee shall be paid the rate shown as Step "AAA" in the salary rate range allocated to the classification of employment for which he/she has been hired. In special instances where such new employee possesses unique and exceptional educational training and/or experience qualifications, the Department Head, under whom the employee wrill serve, may submit a written request and justification to the City Manager for authorization to place such new employee on Step "AA," "A," " B," "C; or "D" within 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 17 �i'1 the allocated salary rate range for the classification in which he/she is being hired. If approved, such new employee shall be assigned to a salary step upon the commencement of his/her service in the classification of employment to which the salary rate range applies and such assigrunent having once been made shall remain in effect until the said employee shall be entitled to advance to the next salary step in accordance with the further provisions of this article. 4.7 Service The word "service" as used in this MOT shall be deemed to mean continuous, full-time service in the classification in which the employee is being considered for salary advancement, service in a higher classification, or service in a classification allocated to the same salary rate range and having generally similar duties and requirements. Employees hired after the first (P) work day of the month shall not be credited with "time in service" for that month when determining the Iength of service required for salary step advancement. A lapse of service by an employee for a period of time longer than thirty (30) calendar days by reason of resignation, quit [i.e. less than two (2) weeks' notice], or discharge, shall serve to eliminate the accumulated length of service time of such employee for the purposes of this MOLJ, and such employee reentering the service of the City shall be considered as a new employee, except when he/she is being or will be reappointed within one (1) year and placed in the same salary step in the appropriate salary rate as he/she was at the time of termination of employment, "Resignation, quit, or discharge" for purposes of this section shall mean separating from full-time employment altogether, not leaving one (1) position to accept appointment to another position in an unrelated classification outside the career ladder. 4.8 Advancement within Ranges A. Length of Service Advancement After the salary of an employee has been first established, such employee shall be advanced from Step "AAA" to Step "AA," Step "AA" to Step "A," from Step "A" to Step "B," from Step "B" to Step "C," or from Step "C" to Step "D," whichever is the next higher step to that on which the employee has been previously paid. Each advancement shall be effective the first (h s day of the month following the date of completion of the length of service required for the advancement, as provided in Section 4.2 and the salary schedule. B. Merit Advancement An employee shall be, considered for advancement from Step "D" to Step "E" upon the completion of the required length of service as provided in Section 4.2 and the r='-'¢"¢.z"�'u^i'��Cr��. ._�._ .. .. _ �vnraaax �..., ..W_�.a3--•' S±+E•—^..r..-Ste'=ams'��s 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 18 1 % 0 salary schedule. The effective date of such merit increase, if granted, shall be on the first (1 ") day of the month following the completion of such required length of service. Advancement to Step "E" may be granted only for continued meritorious and efficient service and continued improvement by the employee in the efficient performance of the duties of his/her position. Such merit advancement shall require the following: 1. Human Resources shall keep on file in the office of the Executive Director of Human Resources, a copy of each performance appraisal report required to be made on the employee by the Civil Service Rules and. Regulations and/or the City Manager during the period of service time of such employee subsequent to his/her last salary advancement. 2. The Department Head, at least twenty (20) calendar days prior to the anticipated completion of such employee's required length of service, shall file with the City Manager a statement recommending the granting or denial of the merit increase and supporting such a recommendation with specific reasons therefore. The employee shall be notified by the Department Head as to such recommendations and of the reasons therefore. 3. No advancement in salary above Step "D" shall become effective until approved by the City Manager, except when placement on a salary step above Step "D" results from promotion under the provisions of Section 4.10 of this article. 4, Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this subsection to the contrary, a merit step advance shall be automatically granted ninety (90) days after the due date if no performance appraisal is completed. The effective date of such merit step advance shall be retroactive to the first (1 °) day of the month following the completion of the required length of service. C. Length of Service Required When Advancement Denied When an employee has not been approved for advancement to merit Step "E," he/she may be reconsidered for such advancement after the completion of three (3) months of additional service and shall be reconsidered for such advancement after the completion of six (6) months of additional service. This reconsideration shall follow the same steps and shall be subject to the same actions as provided in subparagraph B(2) and (3) of this section. 4.9 Reduction in Salary Steps Subject to the provisions in this section, any employee who is being paid at merit Step "E" may be reduced to Step "D" of the appropriate salary range, upon the recommendation of - Yw�°. "R9'S:'"" :::YE. ..... .•amp_mm .:r"_'.S'."_."6sY"19=5:'a` .r:Yl',_- ww._ kcS 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full Time Employees knit Page 19�( � 1� the Department Head, and the approval of the City Manager. The procedure for such reduction shall follow the same procedure as outlined for merit advancements in Section 4.8 above. Air employee reduced to Step "D" may be considered for re -advancement to Step "&" under the same provisions as contained in Section 4.8C above. 4.10 Promofion When an employee is promoted to a position in a higher classification from a position. in a lower classification in the same occupational career ladder, he/she shall be reassigned to Step "AAA" in the appropriate salary rate range for the higher classification; provided, however, that if the base salary step currently being paid such employee is already equal to or higher than said Step "AAA," he/she will be placed in the lowest step in the appropriate salary rate range as will grant that employee a minimum increase of one (1) salary step, approximately five percent (5.0%) over his/her current base salary step, inclusive of lead pay, and exclusive of any other assignment or special pay additive or additives such as bilingual pay, shift differential, special skill pay or the like, except when placement at "E" step will not be sufficient to provide a one (1) salary step, approximately five percent (5.0%) increase. 4.11 Demotion When an employee is demoted to a position in a lower classification, his/her salary rate shall be fixed in the appropriate salary rate range for the lower classification in accordance with the following provisions: A. The salary rate shall be reduced by at least one (1) salary step, which is approximately five percent (5.0%). B. The new salary rate must. be within the appropriate salary rate range. C. The new salary rate shall not be higher than the salary step to which the employee would have been entitled had his/her service time in the higher classification been spent in the lower classification. D. If the salary rate recommended by the Department Head is lower than the maximum step permissible under Subsection C above, such recommendation shall be considered a reduction in pay in addition to the demotion and shall be handled in accordance with the provisions for salary reductions in Section 4.9 above. 4.1.2 Reallocation of Salary Rate Ranges Any employee who is employed in a classification which is reallocated to a different salary rate range froth that previously assigned shall be retained in the same salary step in the new 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Pa'�'�-ge 20 r salary rate range as he/she had previously held in the prior rate range and shall retain credit for length of service in such step towards advancement to the next higher step. 4.13 Request for Classification Review A. Any employee who, for a period exceeding one (1) year, believes he/she is regularly and consistently performing duties and/or responsibilities not in conformance with their classification concept or, duties and/or responsibilities of another classification, may request a classification review of their position through their supervisor to the Department Bead. The employee must submit their request on a form specified by the Executive Director of Human Resources, outlining in writing how they believe their current duties and/or responsibilities differ from their classification concept. B. The Department Head will review the employee's submitted request and within sixty (60) calendar days will make one (1) of the following determinations: 1. Will support the employee's request. a. If the Department Bead supports the employee's request for a classification review, he/she will forward the request to the Executive Director of Human Resources along with justification for support of the employee's request. b. The Department Head will notify the employee that his/her request has been submitted to the Executive Director of Duman Resources. 2. Will not support the employee's request. a. I£ the Department Head does not support the employee's request for a classification review, he/she will notify the employee of this decision in writing and set forth the basis for the decision. b. If the Department Head does not support the employee's request, but agrees that some of the duties and/or responsibilities being performed by the employee are those of a higher level City classification, he/she can do the following: Return the employee to performance of the duties and/or responsibilities of their proper classification. s Eliminate the higher duties and/or responsibilities being performed by the employee, for which the City has agreed are those for which it will provide higher compensation. C. Any employee request for classification review approved by the Department Head will be forwarded to the Executive Director of Human Resources, the Executive 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Pull -Time Employees Unit Page 21 j t P ka ti 4� Director of Human. Resources will confirm. receipt of the request in writing to the employee. Within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of the request, the Executive Director of Human Resources will notify the employee and Department Head of the decision as to whether a study will be conducted. if the Executive Director of Human Resources determines that a study is appropriate, the Executive Director of Human Resources Mll so notify the employee and the Department Head in writing and will provide the employee and Department Head with an approximate start date for the study, D. Determinations of the Department Head and the Executive Director of Human Resources are not final. An appeal to the City Manager or his/her representative shall be presented within fifteen (15) working days of the notification of the findings by the Executive Director of Human Resources. The City Manager's decision is final. This process is not subject to the grievance provisions of this MOU. E. All studies and study findings will require City Manager approval before proceeding. F. All recommendations resulting from study findings require the approval of the City Council and will be implemented in accordance to the City's Civil Service rules. 20:19-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 22 r ARTICLE V 5,0 ASSIGNMENT & OTHER SPECIAL PAY ADDITIVES 5.1 Assignment Pay Differential A. C_ aleglaSi_on of Pay Differential Assignment pay differentials, as listed herein and throughout the MOU, will, in each case, be added individually and separately to the employee's base salary. In no event shall one (1) assignment pay differential be added to the employee's base salary as a basis for the calculation of an additional pay differential. B. 1, Iigibili Employees who were eligible for, assigned, and received assignment pay under this section prior to June 30, 2013, shall continue to receive said pay under the current assignment formulas provided they continue to meetthe qualifications described in the applicable assignment pay provisions of this article, Employees hired after August 31, 2010, or hired before August 3I , 2010, who did not receive assignment pay under this section prior to June 3% 2013, shall not be eligible to receive it. C. Fleet Services 1. Automotive Service Excellence Incumbents in the classifications of Fleet Services Technician 1, II and III who possess nationally recognized certifications for Automotive Service Excellence Master Certification (ASE) and ASE Alternative Fuel will be paid an assignment pay differential at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges, which is approximately (2.51/o) for each of the certifications, above their then current base monthly salary step. The restrictions set forth in Section 5.1 B do not apply to this provision. 2. Fire Certification The City and the SEW 721 agree to meet and confer to discuss the addition of Fire Certifications if the City agrees to enter into any agreement in which they service Fire Department vehicles. 3. Commercial Driver's License Personnel in the classifications of Fleet Services Technician I, II, III, and Fleet 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit page 23 Services Supervisor, who maintain a valid State of California Commercial Driver's License and are assigned to an area that requires the possession of either a Class "A," or Class "B" license in the course and scope of their work, shall be paid at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges, which is approximately two and one-half percent (2.5%) above their then current base monthly salary step. 4. Motorcygle License The City will reimburse employees in the classification of Fleet Services Technician 1, 11 or III for costs incurred for accredited motorcycle training courses, testing and Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) fees associated with obtaining the motorcycle (MI) license. D. Not= An employee that is required by a Department Head or their designee to perform the duties of a Notary Public for the City, in addition to regular duties, shall be paid a monthly differential of forty dollars ($40.00) above his/her then current base monthly salary step. The City will reimburse employees for costs incurred in association with obtaining or maintaining a California Notary Public license with Department Head approval. 5.2 Lead PM An incumbent who is regularly and continuously assigned to lead a functional unit which includes two (2) or more positions in the wane or lower classifications as the incumbent may be compensated for said duties upon mutual agreement of the City and SEIU and approval of the Department Head and the Executive Director of .Human Resources. This compensation shall be referred to as lead pay and shall be set at a rate ten (10) salary rate ranges, which is approximately five percent (5.0014) above his/her then current base monthly salary step. In addition, incumbents in the following classifications who are regularly and continuously assigned to perform lead supervisory responsibilities will receive Iead pay compensation at a rate set ten (10) salary rate ranges, which is approximately five percent (5.0%) above his/her then current base monthly salary step: • Buyer • Customer Service Representative • Information Services Representative • Librarian • Library Services Assistant • Parking Meter Technician 11 • Senior Systems Administrator • Graphics Designer 1I 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 24 • Senior Accounting Assistant • Housing Specialist II • Senior Librarian • Workforce Specialist Il • Workforce Specialist III An incumbent in the classification of Custodian who is regularly and continuously assigned to perform lead supervisory responsibilities will receive lead pay compensation at a rate set fifteen (15) salary rate ranges, which is approximately seven and one-half (7.5%) above his/her then current base monthly salary step. Any employees who have continuously received lead pay for leading the same functional group for five (5) years shall have their lead pay assignment made permanent. 5.3 Bilingual Pav An employee who is assigned by a Department Head or their designee to a position requiring bilingual capability in both English and any other language or in sign language, will be paid a monthly assignment pay differential in accordance with the criteria and amounts set forth below: A. Certification Certification by the Executive Director Human Resources as having satisfactorily demonstrated conversational fluency in both languages for any position requiring bilingual capacity. There shall be periodic recertification of such bilingual capability. B. Primary Bilingual Assignments Assigned positions where it has been determined by the Department Head that bilingual proficiency is essential to carry out duties and responsibilities of a critical and/or emergency nature without ready access to backup assistance, or positions where bilingual public contact is a major., essential, or integral element of the work being performed, will be designated as Primary Bilingual Assignments, A. qualified incumbent of such position will be paid a monthly differential of one hundred and seventy-five dollars ($175.00) above his/her base salary step for each full month of such assignment. C. Secondary a lin, g al Assignment Assigned positions where it has been determined by a Department Head that regular and frequent bilingual usage is necessary to the performance of duties, but not a major, essential or integral element of the work, will be designated as Secondary 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEN Full -Time Employees Unit Page 25� Bilingual Assignments. A qualified incumbent of such position will be paid a monthly differential of forty dollars ($40.00) above his/her base salary step for each full month of such assignment. D. Limits on Assignments The number of bilingual assignments shall be no larger than the requirements of the department, as determined by the Department Head and the City Manager. E. Limits on Bilin uag I Pav In no event shall an employee be eligible to earn more than one (1) bilingual pay differential. 5.4 Shift Differential A. Night Shift Differential An employee who is continuously and regularly assigned to a schedule of work which requires that he/she actually work a minimum of four. and one-half (4.5) hours between the hours of 5:00 p.m, mid 7:00 a.m., will be paid a shift differential for his/her entire work shift at a rate set ten (10) salary rate ranges, which is approximately five percent (5.0%) higher than his/her then current base salary step. This shift pay differential shall not be applicable to employees in the classification of Park Ranger and Supervising Park Ranger. 13. Library Shift Differential Employees hired and assigned to the Library prior to December 1, 1987, who work evening shifts until closing time, but who are not otherwise eligible for shift differential as provided under Subsection A above, shall receive special shift pay in an amount equal to one-half (0.5) of one (1) hour's pay for each day they work an evening shift until closing time. This special shift pay shall be computed on the hourly equivalent of the base monthly salary step. This half hour of shift pay shall not be counted toward the computation of overtime. Such special library shift pay differential shall not be applicable to library employees hired on or after December 1, 1987. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 26 �t°1 C. Early Morning Street Crew Differential A Street Maintenance employee who is assigned to traffic painting or downtown cleanup crews who is continuously and regularly assigned to a work schedule which requires that he/she actually work at least fifty percent (50%) of his/her normal daily work shift between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m., will be paid a shift differential for his/her entire work shift at a rate set ten (10) salary rate ranges, which is approximately five percent (5.0%) higher than his/her then current base salary step. 5.5 Standby Pa A. Standby Defnted An employee who is released from active duty, but is required by their department to leave notice where they can be reached and be available to return to active duty at any time other than their regularly scheduled working hours, shall be said to be on standby duty. B. Requirements of Standby Employees in the unit may be required to be on standby for many different reasons. Being on standby means that the employee is required to; • Be accessible by phone, email or text; • Promptly return to work. after being called, emailed or texted; • Remain fit for duty and able to respond. Employees are not permitted to drink alcohol while on standby duty. Employees on standby shall receive a cell phone from the City and will be required to respond to the call or text as quickly as possible. Upon responding to the call or text, the employee will be instructed as to whether he/she is required to return to work and will be informed of the location to which he/she must respond. Response time will generally be the employce's normal commute time to the City and the minimal time necessary for the employee to get ready to return to work. C. Coin ensation Rates for Standby, 1. Weekly Rate Each employee shall receive four hundred and fifty dollars ($450.00) per week when assigned to be on standby duty. 2. Daily Rate Employees who tirade days, or partial days, will have that time deducted from 2019-2022 MQU City of Santa Ana & SFIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 27� Ze their pay on a prorated daily rate, which may be prorated to an hourly rate of three dollars and fifty-two cents ($3.52), based on a seven (7) day week or one hundred and twenty-eight (128) hours. Employees who cover the day or hours shall be paid at the prorated rate. All trades must be approved by the Supervisor or Manager. In addition to Standby Pay, if an employee is able to handle the incident by phone or other electronic means without reporting to duty, he/she shall be entitled to overtime pay at the rate of fifteen (15) minutes or actual time spent per incident, whichever is greater, paid at time and one-half (1.5) per incident. D. Assi�nntent to Standby Duty Employees in the following departments shall be required to serve on standby duty: o Water Production • 'Water Maintenance • Public Works Maintenance • Building Maintenance • Information Services The City's preference will be to accomplish the above through volunteers; however, qualified employees may be directed to be on standby duty if the number of volunteers is insufficient. Additional standby programs may be implemented with the approval of the Department Head and City Manager. 5.6 Call Back Duty - Any employee who is recalled to active duty from off duty, shall be entitled to overtime pay at the rate of one and one-half (1'/) times the base hourly pay rate, or double times (2X) the base hourly pay rate for City observed holidays, for time actually worked after reporting to the place of duty, or three (3) hours pay at the base rate of pay, whichever is greater. 5.7 Temporary Uvarade Assignment Pay In order to provide an equitable method of compensating employees who are temporarily assigned to a vacant, full-time, budgeted, higher -level position the following shall apply: A. General Guidelines 1. Temporary upgrade (TUG) assignments shall be limited to the temporary filling of vacant, full-time, budgeted positions due to the termination, promotion or 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SFIU Full -Time Fmployees Unit Pagep28 gq v!,� \pplal authorized long-term absence of the incumbent, A temporarily vacant position need not be a position without an incumbent. 2, Each such assignment maybe terminated at anytime, but in no event shall such assignment continue beyond one hundred and eighty (180) days or nine hundred and sixty (960) hours each fiscal year, whichever comes first. Prior to recommending to the City Manager that a pay differential for a TUG assignment be granted, the Department Mead shall make the following determinations: a. The duties and responsibilities of the position to be filled are of such nature that they carmot remain unassigned pending the return to duty of the absent incumbent or preparation of an eligible list, whichever is applicable. b. It is not practical to assign the duties of the vacant position to any other amployee(s) in the same or higher classification. 4. The City, Manager or his/her designee must give written approval of all TUG assignments involving an increase in pay for the appointee. B. Eli ibili With the exception of Those described in Section 5.7B(3) below, regular, full- time employees shall receive TUG assignment pay if the following criteria are met: a. The work assumed encompasses the majority of the typical duties and responsibilities of the vacated position. b. To qualify for TUG assignment pay, employees must serve in an acting capacity in the higher level classification as follows: • Ten (10) consecutive working days of eight (8) hours each; or • Eight (8) consecutive working days of ten (10) hours each, for employees working on an alternative work schedule; or o Any combination of consecutive working days consisting of nine (9) hours each and one (1) working day consisting of eight (8) hours, for a total of 80 hours of work for employees working the 9/80 work schedule; or • Two (2) consecutive work weeks, consisting of three (3) eleven and one-half (11.5) hour days and one (1) five and one-batf (5.5) hour day for a total of eighty (80) hours of work for employees working on an 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 29 vp alternative work schedule. c, In computing qualifying service rendered, only full days of actual duty shall be included, and partial days shall not be combined to make full days unless they are normally granted holiday hours. Normally granted holidays will be included in computing actual duty days. d. Employees must re -qualify for a TUG if the employee has not worked in this specific TUG assignment for a period of eighteen (18) consecutive months. The employee shall only be considered to work in a higher classification if such work is duly and specifically authorized by the employee's Department (lead. 2. Whenever practicable, the appointing authority shall rotate TUG assignments among all qualified employees. Employees in tha following categories shall not be assigned to TUG work unless specifically authorized by the City Manager: a. Non -permanent employees (probationary, part-time. seasonal, etc.). b. Employees performing work above their regular classification in a training capacity. C. Payment On the eleventh (I Vh) consecutive working day an employee has been serving in a TUG assignment, and for each additional consecutive working day the employee so serves, he/she shall receive the beginning rate (Step "AAA") assigned to the higher classification or the lowest rate in that range which is at least ten (10) salary rate ranges, or approximately five percent (5.0%) higher than the current base salary rate he/she normally receives, (inclusive of lead pay and exclusive of any other assignment or special pay additive or additives) whichever is greater, except when placement at Step "E" will not be sufficient to provide the ten (10) salary rate range increase. If an employee has worked ten (10) consecutive days during the term of this MOU in a higher classification, the employee shall thereafter receive TUG pay for each day the employee is assigned to work in the higher classification during the term of this MOU. 2. Assignment or special pay additives, such as bilingual pay, shift differential, special skill pay, etc., paid to an employee prior to becoming eligible for TUG assignment pay, will not be considered in computing the amount of higher pay to which he/she is entitled in this section above. If the special circumstances upon which said additive is based are also applicable to the TUG assignment 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU full -Time Employees Unit Page 30 and the employee remains eligible for such pay while in the RJG position, this amount will be added to the new salary rate range. 3. TUG assignments which entail moving an employee into a classification represented by a bargaining unit other than that which represents his/her permanent classification shall not include any change in fringe benefits for the affected employee. 4. While working in a TUG assignment, an employee will continue to accrue, and have recorded, general, special or normal salary step increases in the employee's permanent position; however, such salary increases will be paid only to maintain the minimum five percent (5.0%) differential above the salary to which an employee is entitled in his/her permanent position. 5.8 Authority fQ,r Assignments All assignments of personnel to positions set forth in Sections 5.1 through 5.5 above shall be made or revoked at the discretion of the Department Head. 5.4 Career Development Incentives Employees appointed to a classification which requires an International Conference of Building Officials (1CBO), International Code Council (ICC), or other certificate(s) as a prerequisite to hiring, either upon appointment or by the time of the employee's completion of successful probation (regular appointment), shall not be eligible for career incentive pay for the prerequisite certificate(s). However, they will be eligible for career incentive pay for any other certificates approved for their classification. In no event shall the application of this Career Development Incentive Program result in an individual being eligible to earn more than twenty-five (25) salary rate ranges. which is approximately twelve and one-half percent (12.51/o) above his/her current monthly base salary step. A. An incumbent in one of the classifications listed below will be paid at a rate set ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately five percent (5.0%) above his/her then current base monthly salary step for each of the following: valid registration as a Registered Engineer by the State of California and valid registration as a Structural Engineer by the State of California (a total of twenty (20) salary rate ranges (approximately ten percent (10.0%) for possession of both). Additionally, said incumbents who possess a valid certificate issued by the ICBO, (or similar nationally recognized certificating organization) in the areas of accessibility/usability (one (1) specialty area), residential energy plan check, or non-residential energy plan check, shall be paid an incentive pay differential at a rate set above his/her then current base monthly salary step in accordance with the following schedule: One (1) certificate from one (1) specialty area: five (5) salary 2014-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana &c SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 31 rate ranges (approximately two and one-half percent (2.5%); an additional certificate from a second specialty area (total of two (2)): ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately five percent (5.0%)), an additional certificate fiom a third specialty area (total of three (3)): fifteen (15) salary rate ranges (approximately seven and one-half percent (7.5%)). o Assistant Engineer o Assistant Engineer -Transportation (T) o Associate Engineer o Civil Engineer (This is a newly added classification,, which is still subject to the eligibility limitations in Section 5.10 below) o Senior Civil Engineer o Senior Engineer o Senior Traffic Engineer o Assistant Plan Check Engineer I o Assistant Plan Check Engineer II o Associate Plan Check Engineer o Senior Plan Check Engineer o Senior Transportation Analyst B. An incumbent who was employed as of August 16, 1991 in the classification of Assistant Plan Check Engineer I or 11, Associate Plan Check Engineer, or Senior Plan Check Engineer and who, as of December 31, 1987, had possessed a valid Plan Examiner Certificate issued by the ICBO shall continue to be paid at a rate set ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately five percent (5.0°/n) above his/her then. current base salary step. However, effective January 1,1988, said ten (10) range differential shall be reduced to five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately two and one-half percent (2.5%), for any incumbent of said classifications who is issued his/her initial certificate on or after January 1,1988. C. An incumbent in one of the classifications listed below who possesses a valid certificate issued by the ICBO, (or similar nationally recognized certificating organization) in the area(s) of building inspection, combination inspection, electrical inspection, mechanical inspection, plumbing inspection, combination dwelling inspection, plan examining, accessibility/usability (one (1) specialty area), residential energy plan check, or non-residential energy plan check, shall be paid an incentive pay differential at a rate set above his/her then current base monthly salary step in accordance with the schedule listed below. Incumbents who possess a valid certificate issued by the ICBO in combination inspection may substitute this for building inspection or combination dwelling inspection; however, incumbents shall not receive incentive pay for more than two (2) of these three (3) certificates. 201.9-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -'time Employees Unit Page 32 One (1) certificate from one (1) specialty area: five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately two and one-half percent (2.5%), an additional certificate from a second specialty area (total of two (2)): ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately five percent (5.0%)); an additional certificate from a third specialty area (total of three (3)): fifteen (15) salary rate ranges (approximately seven and one-half percent (7.5%)); an additional certificate from a fourth specialty area (total of four (4)): twenty (20) salary rate ranges (approximately ten percent (10.0%)); and an additional certificate from the fifth specialty area (total of five (5)): twenty-five (25) salary rate ranges (approximately twelve and one-half percent (12.5%)). o Building Inspector o Electrical Inspector o Plumbing Inspector o Combination Building Inspector o Building Technician o Senior Plumbing and Mechanical Systems Specialist D. Incumbents in the classifications of: o Code Enforcement Associate o Code Enforcement Officer o Code Enforcement Supervisor o Senior Building Inspector o Senior Electrical Inspector o Senior Plumbing Inspector o Senior Combination Building Inspector o Senior Electrical Systems Specialist who obtain or possess a valid certificate issued by the IC.BO, I.CC, SCACEO (Southern California/Statewide Association of Code Enforcement Officers), CACEO (California Association of Code Enforcement Officers), or any similar nationally recognized certificating organization in any four (4) of the following Career Development Incentive areas shall receive incentive pay at a rate of five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately two and one-half percent (2.5%)) for each certificate, but not to exceed five (5) certificates, or a total of twenty-five (25) salary rate ranges (approximately twelve and one-half percent (12.5%)). If an incumbent has obtained four (4) such certificates from the menu below, he/she than shall be eligible to earn an additional five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately two and one-half percent (2.5%)) pay additive upon completion of both the SCACEO/CACEO Intermediate and SCACEO/CACEO Advanced Certifications: o Building Inspection o Electrical Inspection o Mechanical Inspection o Plumbing Inspection o Combo Dwelling Inspector o Plans Examiner o Zoning Inspection o Property Maintenance and housing 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 33 o PC 832 o Basic Module (SCACEO/CACEO) o Accessibility Inspector/Plans Examiner o Permit Technician o Coastal and Floodplain Construction Inspector o Disaster Response Inspector If an incumbent has already completed both the SCACEO/CACEO Intermediate and the SCACEO/CACEO Advanced certifications, upon completion of any other four (4) certificates from the menu above, said employee shall be eligible to receive the additional five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately two and one-half percent (2.5%) total) pay additive for the Intermediate/Advanced certifications. In no event shall the expansion of current certificate pay opportunities result in an employee being eligible to earn more than twenty-five (25) salary rate ranges (approximately twelve and one-half percent (12.5%)) in pay additives for Career Development Incentives above his/her then current base monthly salary step. E. An incumbent in one of the classifications listed below who possesses a valid certificate issued by the ICBO (or similar nationally recognized certificating organization) in the areas of reinforced concrete, structural masonry, structural steel/welding, electrical inspection, plumbing inspection, plans examiner, or C27 Iandscape contractors license, shall be paid an incentive pay differential at a rate set above his/her then current base monthly salary step in accordance with the following schedule: One (1) certificate from one specialty area: five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately two and one-half percent (2.5%)); an additional certificate from a second specialty area (total of two (2)): ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately five percent (5.0%)); an additional certificate from a third specialty area (total of three (3)): fifteen (15) salary rate ranges (approximately seven and one-half percent (7.5%)); an additional certificate from a fourth specialty area (total of four (4)): twenty (20) salary rate ranges (approximately ten percent (10.0%)); and an additional certificate from the fifth specialty area (total of five (5)): twenty- five (25) salary rate ranges (approximately twelve and one-half percent (12,5%)), o Construction Inspector o Senior Construction Inspector (Phis is a newly added classification, which is still subject to the eligibility limitations in Section 5.10 below) F. An incumbent in the classification listed below who possess a valid certificate issued by the ICBO (or similar nationally recognized certificating organization) in the areas of plumbing inspection, electrical inspection, plans examiner, C27 landscape contractors license, turf grass management, or certified arborist by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), shall be paid an incentive pay differential at a rate set above his/her then current base monthly salary step in accordance with the following schedule: One (1) certificate from one specialty area: five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately two and one-half percent (2.5%)); an 2014-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 34 f:b: . additional certificate from a second specialty area (total of two (2)): ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately five percent (5,0%)); an additional certificate from a third specialty area (total of three (3)): fifteen (15) salary rate ranges (approximately seven and one-half percent (7.51/o)); an additional certificate from a fourth specialty area (total of four (4)): twenty (20) salary rate ranges (approximately ten percent (10.0%)); and an additional certificate from the fifth specialty area (total of five (5)): twenty-five (25) salary rate ranges (approximately twelve and one-half percent (12.5%)). o Contracts Administrator C. An incumbent in one of the classifications listed below who possesses a valid certificate issued by the ISA as a certified arborist shall be paid at a rate of set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately two and one-half percent (2.5%)) above his/her then current base monthly salary step. o Projects Manager o Tree Maintenance Supervisor o Tree Trimmer o Maintenance Worker II (assigned to the tree crew) o PubIic Works Projects Specialist 11. An incumbent in the classification listed below who possesses a valid certificate issued by the ISA as a certified Tree Worker shall be paid at a rate of set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately two and one-half percent (2.5%)) above his/her then current base monthly salary step. o Maintenance Worker 11(assigned to the tree crew) 5.10 Limitation on Career Development Incentive Pay A. With the exception of the employee classifications listed in Subsection 5.10(B), employees already receiving career development incentive pay under Section 5.9 prior to June 30, 2012 and who continue to meet the qualifications described in the applicable career development incentive pay provisions of Section 5.9 shall continue to receive said pay under the current career development incentive pay formulas. Employees who did not receive career development pay prior to the June 30, 2012 shall not be eligible to receive it. B. The employee classifications listed below and already receiving career development incentive pay under Section 5.9 prior to June 30, 2013 and who continue to meet the qualifications described in the applicable career development incentive pay provisions of Section 5.9 shall continue to receive said pay under the current career development incentive pay formulas. Employees in the classifications listed herein below who have not received career development pay prior to the June 30, 2013 will not thereafter be eligible to receive it. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana &. SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 35 l t }V 6 • Assistant Engineer • Assistant Fngineer-Transportation (T) • Associate Engineer • Civil Engineer • Senior Civil Engineer • Senior Engineer • Senior Traffic Engineer C, Any employee hired after September 10, 2010 shall not be eligible to receive career development incentive pay under the career development incentive pay provisions of Section 59. 5.11 Court Appearances A. City_Susiness Compensation for court appearances due to City business shall be as follows: l . For each required court appearance (including but not limited to, depositions, meetings, and interviews) during an employee's off -duty time, said employee shall be paid overtime for the period of time from their arrival at court until they are released from court or the court session closes for that day. However, in no case shall an employee receive less than two (2) hours overtime for a court appearance, If separate court appearances are inade both in the morning and afternoon of a particular day, a minimum of two (2) hours overtime will be allowed for each session attended. If the employee is not released from a morning session and must remain available for afternoon court, the employee shall be paid overtime for all hours the court is in session that day. The employee must provide a copy of the subpoena requiring his/her attendance to initiate payroll procedures. 2, A subpoenaed employee scheduled to appear in court (including but not limited to depositions, meetings, and interviews) on City business during off -duty time may be placed in a standby status by the .Department Head or his/her authorized representative if the employee can respond to the court, if called, within sixty (60) minutes of the employee's notification. In the event such off -duty employee is on standby status during any court session and is not required to appear in court, such employee shall be compensated two (2) hours on a straight time basis, for each said court session. With the approval of the Department Head, the employee may elect, in lieu of 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 36 paid time, to take two (2) hours of compensatory time off for the standby time and not appearing in court. If such off -duty employee on standby actually appears in court, he/she shall be compensated as provided in Section 5.1 lA(1). B. Jury Duty r Witness 1. When an on -duty employee is called to serve as a juror or non-party witness in any court action, he/she shall be allowed to leave for the time actually required for such service without loss of pay. Each cn-duty employee called for such service steal I present his/her Department Head the jury summons or subpoena calling him/her to such service and shall pay into the City Treasury the fees collected for such service, excluding any reimbursement for mileage expenses. 2. If an employee is called to serve on jury duty during a normal day off or on a City holiday, then the jury duty shall be considered the same as having occurred during the employee's regular day off work; therefore, the employee will receive no added compensation. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 37U \ ARTICLE VI 6.0 OVERTIME, 6.1 General Poliev for Overtime Work When it shall be determined to be in the public interest for employees to perform overtime work, or in an emergency situation, the City Manager, the Department Head, or a duly authorized designee, may require an employee to perform overtime work. Employees are required to obtain supervisor authorization before working overtime. 6.2 Definition A. Overtime work is defined as authorized or required time worked in excess of forty (40) hours in the workweek schedule of an employee. B. A workweek is a fixed and regularly recurring period of one hundred and sixty- eighi (168) consecutive hours, consisting of seven (7) consecutive twenty-four (24) hour periods. C. The workweek for each employee is designated by the appointing authority. An employee's work schedule within the workweek shall not be changed for the purpose of avoiding payment of overtime; however, nothing shall abridge management's right to establish and change work schedules and assignments in accordance with Article XV111- City Rights. 6.3 Computation of Tort�(40Zlour Workweek in computing the forty (40) hour workweek, the following type of work hours in a paid status shall be included in the computation: e Actual hours worked ® Jury/witness leave s Bereavement leave Any combination of the hours in this section, in excess of forty (40) hours per workweek, shall entitle the employee to overtime. Any paid time off during the workweek for vacation leave, sick leave, holiday leave, Chapter Chair/President's Leave, LJnion Business Leave, and all unpaid leave (including furlough days) shall not be counted towards the hours worked in a workweek for the computation of payment for overtime, unless the hours in excess of forty (40) hours in a workweek (including the above listed time) are worked by the employee at the requirement of his/her supervisor or by management. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW hull -Time Employees Unit Page 38 (y?' For example An employee working a Monday through Friday work schedule who takes nine (9) hours of vacation leave, on Manday and works his/her normal thirty-one (31) hours Tuesdav through Friday, would not earn overtime for two (2) hours he/she volunteered to work extra on,Saturday. However, ij'thatsame employee had been required by his/her supervisor or management to work the two (2) hours on Saturday, as opposed to volunteering, the two (2) hours would he compensated as overtime, 6.4 Compensation for Overtime The City's preferred method by which overtime shall be compensated is by monetary payment, at one and one-half (1.5) times the employee's regular rate of pay, subject to the provisions of Section 6.5. 6.5 Comnsato r A. Overtime Conversion to Compensatoov Tune Should the Department Head determine that the best interests of the City will be served thereby, his/her designee may permit an employee to be compensated for overtime work by earning compensatory time off at the rate of one and one-half (1.5) hours for each overtime hour worked. 3. Maximum Accumulation of CompensatoryCompensatoLy Time Employees shall have the option, with Department Head approval, to earn up to a maximum of eighty (80) hours of compensatory time off. C. Use of Compensatory Time 1. Since compensatory time is earned at one and one-half (1.5) hours foreach hour of overtime worked, eighty (80) hours of compensatory time equates to fifty- three point thirty-three (53,33) hours of overtime worked. 2. Such compensatory time off shall be taken at the discretion of the employee when requested at least seventy-two (72) hours in advance, subject to the operational needs and staffing requirements of the department. 3. If the Department Head or his/her designee subsequently denies the requested compensatory time off-, the employee and department will mutually agree on a future date within. one (1) year when the employee can use the paid compensatory time off. If the requested compensatory time off is not used within that one (1) year, such compensatory time will be paid off in cash. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Pull -Time Employees Unit Page 39 C% \0 4. Compensatory- time off may be taken in increments as small as one-half (0.5) hour. 5. Compensatory time off may not be granted or taken in advance of the overtime work for which the time off compensates. Before compensatory time off.' may be taken, the overtime worked must have been recorded on official payroll records at or about the time the overtime work was performed. In the absence of such recording, no compensatory time off in excess of compensatory hours already banked will be permitted. U. Cash -Out of Compensatory Time Upon an employee's appointment to a position in which overtime may not be earned (FLSA exempt) or upon an employee's separation from employment, he/she shall be paid for all compensatory time accumulated prior to such promotion or separation from service. 6.6 No Effect on Other Benefits Overtime work shall not apply to the canting of employee benefits (retirement, holidays, vacation accrual., sick leave accrual, and employee insurance benefits), toward the completion of probationary period, or to progression within salary rate range. 6.7 Overtime Work to be Minimized To the extent that be/she is reasonably able to do so, the Department Head or his/her designee shall arrange work programs to minimize overtime work. Necessary overtime work shall be apportioned among amployees of like classification and assignment. 6.8 Overtime Work on a Holida Work on an observed holiday which would otherwise be a scheduled day off for dae employee will be paid as overtime. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit (VnPage 40 tV�t p71 } ARTICLE VII 7.0 TRAINING & EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRMM 7.1 Pu�pr ose A. To encourage employees to take college courses and special training courses which will better enable them to perform their present duties and prepare them for increased responsibilities. B. To provide financial assistance to eligible employees for education and training. C. To establish eligibility requirements, conditions and procedures whereby such assistance may be provided. 7.2 Eligibility A. Applications for tuition reimbursement will be considered only from permanent employees who have completed probation. B. Employees receiving financial assistance from other sources such as the G.1. Bill, scholarships, etc. shall be eligible for reimbursement, subject to Section 7.3C, in an amount not to exceed the difference between the cost of tuition and the amount of the other fmancial assistance received. C. Applications will be approved only for courses directly related to the employee's job or directly related to a promotional position in the employee's occupational specialty. D. Courses not ostensibly related to the employee's job, but which are required to qualify for a degree that is directly related to his/her job, may be reimbursable only after all required occupationally related courses have been completed. E. Prior to receiving tuition reimbursement, employees must submit documentary proof of having received a grade of not less than "C" for the course. For courses based on a pass/fail criterion, a pass must be received. If objective ratings are not rendered for a specific course, then a certificate of successful completion must be submitted. F. Approval will be limited to the following: 1. Courses given by accredited colleges and universities, city colleges or adult education courses under the sponsorship of a Board of Education. The accredited colleges and universities must come from one (1) of the six (6) regional accreditation bodies for the United States (as approved by the 2019.2022 MQU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 41 / Department of Education), including the Western Association of Schools and Colleges, the Northwest Association of Colleges and Universities, the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, the New England Association of Schools and Colleges, the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools, and the Southern Association of Schools and Colleges. 2. Workshops, seminars, conferences and similar activities, not identifiable as a formal course of instruction within the curriculum of a recognized educational institution, do not fall within the purview of this program but may be authorized and funded by the interested department without coordination with the Human Resources Department. G. When an employee is required by his/her Department Head to attend a particular course or seminar, the expense shall be borne entirely by the department. 7.3 Reimbursement A. Reimbursement will be based on the cost of tuition, required enrollment/registration fees, related miscellaneous fees (health, parking, student union fees, equipment, etc.), all required texts/eBooks, and related materials for each course. Additional expenses, such as meals and lodging are not reimbursable. B. Costs for required texts are eligible for one hundred percent (100%) reimbursement subject to the following conditions: 1. That a duplicate of the required text(s) was unavailable for loan from the departmental libraries prior to the commencement of course work; 2. That any textbook(s) purchased by the City shall be submitted to the employee's respective departmental library in order that such text(s) may be made available to all employees. C. The maximum tuition reimbursement is two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per fiscal year, which the employee may claim either as costs are incurred during the year or as a single lump sum. The maximum tuition reimbursement applies to any reimbursements provided in this article. 7.4 Procedures A. An employee who desires to seek tuition reimbursement under the provisions of this article must complete, in duplicate, an Application for Training and Educational Assistance Forin and submit it to his/her Department Head, including a course schedule or description, prior to the commencement the class(es) or the payment of fees for registration/tuition. B. The Department Head will recommend approval or disapproval based on 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full Time Employees Unit Page 42 Ali established criteria and budgetary constraints and then forward the application to the Executive Director of Human Resources. C. The Executive Director of Human Resources or his/her designee will approve or disapprove the application for the City Manager.. One (1) copy will be returned to the employee mud the duplicate will be retained by the Human Resources Department. Ct is advisable that the applicant accomplish the procedure so far described in order to ascertain the eligibility of the hntended course of instruction for reimbursement under the provisions of this policy prior to the inception of the course or disbursement of personal funds. D. The employee will submit his/her copy of the approved application to Human Resources Department within three (3) months after he/she has completed the course and received his/her final grade, The employee must include official verification of his/her final grade with appropriate receipts for tuition and textbook costs. These will be returned to the employee upon request. Applications not submitted to the Human Resources Department within three (3) months following completion of the course become void. 1i. Upon receipt of the application and required documentation, the.Human Resources Department will determine whether the completed course of instruction is compatible with the provisions of this article and will compute the amount of reimbursement, authenticate the application and forward it to the employee's Department Head. F. The Department Head will then authorize the Finance and Management Services Agency to reimburse the employee the approved amount out of the budget of the department concerned. 2019-2022 M©U City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 43 (6) ARTICLE VIII 8.0 HOLIDAYS 8.1. City holidays A. City paid holidays observed by the City are as follows: o January 1 - New Year's Day. o Third (31) Monday in January - In observance of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Birthday. o Third (3 d) Monday in February - In observance of President's Day. o Last Monday in May - In commemoration of Memorial .Day. o July 411- In observance of Independence Day. o First (11� Monday in September - In observance of Labor Day. o November I Ob - In observance of Veteran's Day, o Fourth (41) Thursday in November • In observance of Thanksgiving Day. o The Friday immediately following Thanksgiving Day. o Last working day before Christmas Day, unless Christmas Day falls on Thursday, in which instance, the day following Christmas Day shall be observed in lieu thereof. o December 251- In observance of Christmas Day. o One (1) Floating Holiday - Any workday selected by the employee with prior permission of the employee's supervisor. o Every day proclaimed by the Mayor of the City as a holiday for City employees. o Any holiday which falls on a Sunday will be observed on the following Monday. o Any holiday which falls on a Saturday will be observed on the Friday preceding the holiday. nx 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 44 B. Holiday Pay/Credit Each City holiday shall be paid, or credited, equivalent to the employees' regularly scheduled work shift. For example; • An employee assigned to a 4110 work schedule would receive ten (10) hours of holiday pay or credit./or each holiday. ® An employee assigned to a .9180 work schedule with alternating Fridays off' would receive nine (9) hours of holiday pay or credit for each holiday, even if the holidav fell on the employee's regular eight (8) hour Friday or scheduled FHday of C. Floatina Holidays 1. Floating holidays shall be credited to each employee's holiday bank on January 1" of each year. 2. A floating holiday shall be credited at a rate equivalent to the employee's regularly scheduled work shift. For example • An employee assigned to a 4110 workschedule would receive ten (10) hours of credit in their holiday bank for the floating holiday. • An employee assigned to a 9180 work schedule with alternating Fridays off would receive nine (9) hours of credit for the floating holidcol 8.2 Holidav Bank. Eligible employees shall be credited, in a manner consistent with Section 8.1, with hours for all holidays listed in this article. The hours shall be credited to the employee's holiday bank at the beginning of each calendar year in lieu of earning the paid holidays as they occur. 1. Eligible employees are: o Employees with regularly scheduled days off other than Saturday and Sunday. • Employees with alternative work schedules in: o Community Preservation. o Police .Records 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 45 s } ` o Correctional Records o Fleet Services Divisions e Employees on a 9/80 work schedule. If any employee working in the above referenced categories separates from employment prior to December 3 1 ' of any year and has exhausted hours of holiday time (listed in Section 8.1) over their annual accrual, the value of hours not yet accrued but used shall be deducted from the final paycheck. 3. Said substitute holidays maybe scheduled by the Department Head or his/her designee, normally during the same month that the holiday is observed by other City employees. An employee entitled to time off in lieu of holidays shall receive that time off in proportion to his/her service at full pay in such capacity during the year. 8.3 Modified Holiday Schedule - Library Employees Pull -time employees assigned to the Library Department shall, during the term of this MOU, observe holidays on the dates specified in Section 8.1 above. 8.4 Requirements A. Employees, including those separating from service, must be in a paid status on their workday both preceding the holiday and after the holiday in order to receive pay or credit for the holidays provided in Section 8.1 above. B. A newly appointed employee must complete six (6) months of continuous full-time service in order to earn the Floating Holiday listed in Section 8.1 above. Such employees can then use the Floating Holiday as early as the pay period following the completion of six (6) months in a paid status. 8.5 Use of Holiday Time Holiday time may be taken in increments of one-half (0.5) hour. 8.6 Maximum Accumulation of Holiday Holiday benefits may not be carried over from one (1) calendar year to the next. If an employee has any holiday leave remaining at the end of the calendar year it will be forfeited at the end of that calendar year. 8.7 Winter Holiday Closure A. Mandatory Closure tea. City Hall and all other City departments (with the exception of the Police 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 46` ik Department, Santa Ana Zoo, and select employees in Fleet Services Division of the Public Works Department) shall be closed for a mandatory winter holiday closure each year during the term of this MO1 J. Subject to consultation with the Union, the City Manager may exclude other worksites, departments/agencies, positions, classifications, and/or individuals from the mandatory closure. B. Dates of Closures 1. 2019 a. The closure shall run from Tuesday, December 24, 2019 through Wednesday, January 1, 2020. b. City Hall shall. re -open on Thursday, January 2, 2020 and employees scheduled to work on that day shall return to work. c. Employees shall observe the three (3) City paid holidays provided in Section 8.1 on: s Tuesday, December 24, 2019 (Last work day before Christmas Day) • Wednesday, December 25, 2019 (Christmas Day) • Wednesday, January 1, 2020 (New Year's Day) d. The City shall be dark. on Friday, December 27, 2019. 2. 2020 a. The closure shall run from Thursday, December 24, 2020 through Friday, January 1, 2021, b. City Hall shall re -open on Monday, January 4, 2021 and employees scheduled to work on that day shall return to work. c. Employees shall observe the three (3) City paid holidays provided in Section 8.1 on: • Thursday, December 24, 2020 (Last workday before Christmas Day) • Friday, December 25, 2020 (Christmas Day) o Employees whose regular day off is on Friday, December 251 will receive floating holiday hours for Christmas Day 2020, which may 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SFIU Full -Tame Employees Unit Page 47 `�i ��N be used to cover an additional regular day required by the closure. • Friday, January 1, 2021 (New Year's Day) o Employees whose regular day off is on Friday, January I` will receive floating holiday hours for New Year's Day 2021, which may be used to cover an additional regular day required by the 2020 closure. d. The City shall be dark on Friday, December 25, 2020. 3. 2021. a. The closure shall run from Friday, December 24, 2021 through Friday, December 31.2021. b. City Hall shall re -open on Monday, January 3, 2022 and employees scheduled to work on that day shall return to work. c. Employees shall observe the three (3) City paid holidays provided in Section 8.1 on: * Friday, December 24, 2021 (Last work day before Christmas Day) o Employees whose regular day off is on Friday, December 24" will receive floating holiday hours for Christmas Eve 2021, which may be used to cover an additional regular day required by the closure. • Monday*, December 27, 2021 (Christmas Day) * Since December 25`h falls on a Saturday in 2021 and Friday, December 24, 2021 is already a City observed holiday, the City shall observe the Christmas Day holiday in 2021 on the preceding Monday, December 27, 2021 instead. + Friday, December 31, 2021 (New Year's Day) o Employees whose regular day off is on Friday December 3I Ar will receive floating holiday hours for New Year's Day 2022, which may be used to cover an additional regular day required by the 2021 closure. d. The City shall be dark on Friday, December 24, 2021. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 48 C. Additional Days Off during a Closure 1. Employees will need to choose from the options in this subsection to cover any additional regularly scheduled work days which are not City observed holidays. 2. Employees may use any of the following accrued leaves they have available to cover any additional day(s) off which may be required by the closure: • Vacation • Compensatory Time Off Holiday 3. Employees are not pemvzted to use sick leave for a holiday closure day unless he/she produces a physician's certification for each day reported as sick leave. This additional certification is not required for employees with approved advance sick leave usage due to FMLA/CFRA/PDL (or any other protected leave). 4. Employees shall have the option of not using paid leave for any, or all, holiday closure day(s) and taking the day(s) off as an absence without pay. D. Standby, Assignments during a Closure An employee assigned to standby while using leave for the holiday closure shall receive the additional three dollars and fifty-two cents ($3.52) per hour, as per Section 5.5(C)(2), for each regularly scheduled work hour (i.e., during those hours of the day which cut across his/her regular work hours) he/she is using paid leave for, but is still assigned to standby. Such employee shall still adhere to the provisions of Section 8.7C to cover their regular shift while remaining in standby mode and available for callback, However, if an employee is recalled during their regular work hours, the time spent on the recall shall be deducted from the paid leave for that day. For example: An employee regularly scheduled to work 6: 30 a. m. — 4:00 p. M. on one (1) of the days during the closure uses nine (9) hours of accrued vacation to cover that day. If that employee is recalled from 8:00 a.m. —10:00 a.m. on that same day, he/she will only hm e seven (7) hours of vacation deducted from his/her vacation accrual for that day, E. Callbacks during a Closure An employee who is recalled to active duty on one of the winter holiday closure 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 49 %th'�5' j �J , days, regardless if recalled during his/her regularly scheduled work hours, or outside of his/her regularly scheduled work hours, or whether he/she has used paid leave during the defined FLEA. workweek, shall be paid at the callback rates defined in Section 5.6. R Sunset Clause This provision shall expire on June 30, 2022 and no additional mandatory winter holiday closures may be implemented after the 2021 winter holiday closure, unless mutually agreed to otherwise by the parties. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 50 t ARTICLE IX 9.0 VACATION 9.1 Purpose It is the policy of the City to grant employees vacation leave in order to provide them with a break in their regular work schedule and this purpose will be used as a guide in the administration of the provisions of this article. 9.2 Accrual A. Employees shall accrue vacation on a monthly basis each calendar year, based on completed continuous years of service, as set forth in the following table: Completed Service In ears Annual Accrual M hours Monthly Accrual Rate in hours 1-2 80 6.67 3-5 120 10.00 6 124 10.33 7 128 10.67 8 132 11.00 9 136 11.33 10 140 11.67 11 144 1.2.00 12 148 12,33 13 152 12.67 14 156 13.00 15 160 13.33 16 168 14.00 17 176 14.67 18 184 15.33 19 192 16.00 20 or more 200 16.67 B. Prorated Accrual in Year One An employee who has completed less than one (1) year of service during the calendar year shall receive a proportionate fraction in accordance with the amount of service to his/her credit during the year; provided, however, no employee shall be entitled to, or receive payment for, any vacation until he/she has completed six (6) months of continuous service. 2019-2022 MQU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 51 C� 11,����r♦4� C. Effect of Extended Sick Leave on Vacation Accrual Absence on sick leave for a period in excess of fifteen (15) consecutive calendar days shall not be considered as service time for vacation accrual purposes. 9.3 Use of Vacation A. Use of Vacation in First Year On or after the first (11) day of the month following completion. of six (6) months of continuous full-time service, an employee may be allowed to take all or a proportionate fraction of his or her earned vacation, subject to scheduling approval of the employee's supervisor. B. Rate of Usage Vacation time off may be taken in increments as small as one-half (0.5) hour, with fractional usage rounded upward to the next higher multiple of one-half (0.5) hour. C. Minimum Umv Upon the completion of. two (2) years of continuous service, each employee must take at least five (5) working days of vacation off each calendar year. d. Time of Usage The time at which an employee may take his/her vacation shall be determined by the Department Head, with due regard for the wishes of the employee and particular regard for the needs of the service. E. Limitation on Usa e With the exception of a retiring employee, no employee is granted, and no employee shall be allowed to take any vacation leave with pay in excess of fifty (50) working days or four hundred (400) hours in any one (1) calendar year. 9.4 Computation of Vacation Use A. Holidays during Vacation. Ira computing vacation, each City observed holiday that occurs during the vacation, and that falls on a day which the employee would have worked had he/she not been on vacation, shall be deducted from the computation so that one (1) additional day of vacation shall be allowed to the employee. t 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page S2 B. Sick. Leave during Vacation Should an employee suffer a sickness or injury while on authorized vacation, each full day of such sick leave, when confirmed by a physician's statement and approval of the Depalvnent Head, may be deducted from the computation of vacation expended and charged against the employee's accumulated sick leave as available. 9.5 Continuous Service Requirement A. A period of earlier service does not apply toward vacation accumulation when an employee has had a break in continuous service, unless the break in service is concluded by reappointment or reemployment from layoff within one (1) year. B. Leave of absences without pay, as provided in this MOU, do not constitute a break in continuous service as used in this section; however, the unpaid Leave of absence period shall not be applied toward the accumulation of vacation. C. Absences due to any statutorily protected leave (i.e. pregnancy disability, FMLAlCFRA, or military leave) shall not constitute a break in service even if the employee was not in a paid status. Such time counts as time in service and the period of absence shall be applied toward the accumulation of vacation. 9.6 Vacation Cash -Out A. Annual Buy Back 1. Through December 31, 2020 Employees shall have the option to receive cash for banked vacation leave, as follows: July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020: Up to one hundred (100) hours. o July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020: Up to fifty (50) hours. 2. Effective January 1 2021 and continuing every year thereafter a. If an employee wants to cash -out unused vacation leave they accrued during the calendar year, they must make an irrevocable election by December 150' of the prior calendar year (i.e. by December 15, 2020 for a cash -out in calendar year 2021). b. The irrevocable election must indicate the amount of vacation hours the employee intends to cash -out during that next calendar year. The number of hours to be cashed -out can not exceed the total number of 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 53 Vtti hours the employee will accrue during that same calendar year, or maximum of one hundred (100) hours, whichever is the lesser amount. c. Once the election form is submitted to Human Resources, the amount of hours to be cashed -out can not be changed for that calendar year. d. Fmployees may submit a request for cash -out up to two times (2X) per year — for payment in the pay period which includes July 1 and/or December 15. e. In the event an employee's vacation leave balance ('on either pay period when he/she can elect to cash -out) is less than the amount of hours the employee had previously elected to cash -out (in the prior calendar year), the employee will only receive payment for the amount of accumulated vacation leave remaining at the time of the cash -out in either July or December. f. If an employee makes an irrevocable election to cash -out vacation in the following calendar year and uses vacation leave during that subsequent calendar year, the vacation leave used will first come from vacation leave the employee had earned (if any) prior to January 1S1 of the calendar year the employee had elected to cash -out. The use of such earned, but unused, vacation leave accumulated from previous calendar years shall not result in a reduction in the amount of vacation hours the employee is eligible to cash - out. F. Separatignrim Service Per Labor Code §227.3, the parties agree that an employee who leaves City employment prior to completing six (6) months of service shall not receive any payment for vacation. Employees with at least six (6) months of service upon separation from service shall be paid for all accumulated, but unused, vacation leave. C. !fate of Payment Payments shall be made based on the employee's base rate at the time of the payment. 9.7 Maximum Accumulation A. The maximum vacation an employee may accumulate is what he/she could earn based on his/her completed years of service. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 54 U'j` B. An employee whose vacation bank is at the maximum of what he/she can accumulate shall not continue to accrue vacation until the amount of his/her vacation bank is reduced below the maximum cap. C. No employee may accumulate, or carry over from one (1) calendar year to the next, more than the maximum vacation hours as follows: Completed Service (in years) Max Accumulation Cap (in hours) 2 160 3 200 4 240 5 240 6 244 7 252 8 260 9 268 10 276 11 284 12 292 13 300 14 308 15 316 16 328 17 344 18 360 19 376 20 392 21 or more 400 D. Special Provision for 2019 Calendar Year I. Any employee with an accumulation of vacation hours in excess of his/her maximum accumulation cap shall be allowed to maintain such hours in his/her vacation bank througb December 31, 2019. 2. Employees who have "must use" vacation hours in calendar year 2019 will no longer accrue additional "must use" vacation hours after December 31, 2019. 3. Any employee with "trust use" vacation over the maximum accumulation caps, as defined in this section, on January 1, 2020 must use or cash -out the remaining 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 55 "must use" vacation hours they earned in 2019. Any employee with unused "must use" vacation hours as of January 2, 2020 will forfeit those hours. E. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any affected employee who is in jeopardy of losing vacation because of department staffing needs, may with the approval of the Department Head, Executive Director of Human Resources and City Manager, receive a thirty (30) day extension beyond the normal cutoff date so that such employee will not lose vacation time. 2019-2022 MQU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 56 ARTICLE X 10.0 OTHER LEAVES OF ABSENCE 1.0.1 Sick Leave A. Definition 'The City provides paid sick leave to eligible employees upon verbal or written request, within the parameters of the law, for the following purposes: • Diagnosis, care, or treatment of an existing health condition, or preventative care of, an employee of an employee's qualified family member; • Specified purposes for an employee who is a victim or domestic violence, sexual assault, or, stalking. B. Accrual Each employee shall be entitled to, and shall earn eight (8) hours of sick leave for each full calendar month of service in which he/she is employed by the City with full pay; provided, however, any absence on sick leave for a period of time greater than fifteen (15) consecutive calendar days in any one (1) calendar month shall not be considered to be service entitling an employee to earn sick leave as aforesaid. C. Use of Sick Leave 1. Authorization for Use Use of sick leave shall be authorized as follows: a. Sick leave is not a right which an employee may use at his/her discretion, but shall be allowed only in cases of necessity and actual sickness or disability, as authorized in this article. b. When an accepted industrial illness or injury has caused an employee's absence, for which benefits are required under the State Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Act, paid sick leave will be processed during the first three (3) consecutive days of the statutory waiting period. If the employee does not have sufficient accumulated sick leave at the commencement of such industrial illness or injury, they will be advanced sick leave for this purpose. Subsequently, the City will deduct an equal amount previously advanced from any sick leave accrued by the employee until the total amount is recovered. if the employee terminates before recovery of all advanced sick leave, the City will deduct the unrecovered cost of sick leave from such terminated employee's final paycheck, to the 201.9-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 57 a extent possible. If the employee remains off work longer than fourteen (14) days due to the same workers' compensation related illness or injury, the employee will have the three (3) sick days used re -credited back to his/her account. The City pays the employee workers' compensation benefits for such illness or injury starting on the fourth (411) day. c. The City may authorize employees to use sick leave, vacation, or compensatory time for approved workers' compensation medical appointments as specified herein. The City may authorize use of such leave for City approved medical appointments whenever such appointments cannot be secured outside the employee's regular workday, and salary continuation or workers' compensation benefits are not available. D. Limit Sick accrual will be capped at sixteen hundred (1600) hours. Sick leave usage shall be charged in minimum increments of a half (0.5) hour. Fractional usage under a half (0.5) hour shall be rounded up to the next higher multiple of a half (0.5) hour. E. Extended Use The City Manager may grant medical leave of up to six (6) months without pay to an employee who has exhausted all of his/her accumulated sick leave if a licensed physician indicates that the employee will be sufficiently recovered to return to his/her employment within a six (6) month period. Prior to the expiration of the additional time, the employee may return to his/her position provided that the employee has a medical certificate from a licensed physician stating that the employee is able to return to work and perform all the duties of his/her position without work restrictions. In addition to the above, the City Manager may grant an additional extension not to exceed a total of one (1) year without pay. Extensio b Use of Accrued Compensatory Time Off and/or Vacation After an employee's sick leave has been exhausted, he/she may be granted permission to first use any unused accumulated compensatory time off benefits and then any unused accumulated vacation leave. G. Notification of Use An employee taking sick leave shall notify his/her immediate supervisor prior to the time he/she is scheduled to report for duty, or as otherwise established by his/her department, 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 58 'When. the absence is for more than three (3) consecutive working days, upon return to work: the employee must present to his/her Department Head a physician's certificate stating that the employee could not report to work because of such illness or injury, and advising that the employee is sufficiently recovered to safely return to work. Such certificate shall be forwarded to the Executive Director of Human Resources. Upon written request by a Department .Head or designee, a physician's certificate, or other satisfactory written evidence of the need for qualified sick leave usage, may be required after any future absence of any duration less than three (3) days. Such written notice shalt be approved by the Department Head or designee and the stated reason therefore. ICI. Denial No employee shall be entitled to sick leave with pay while absentfrom duty because of sickness or injury purposely self-inflicted or caused by willful misconduct; or because of sickness or injury sustained while engaged in employment, other than employment by the City, for monetary gain or other compensation; or due to other reasons resulting from engaging in any business or activity for the purpose of personal monetary gain or other compensation. Personal Necessity Leave Each employee shall be afforded the opportunity to use up to forty-eight (48) hours of sick leave per calendar year, on a non -cumulative basis, as personal necessity leave. 1. Fantily Sick Leave a. Personal necessity leave may be used to attend to an 'illness of a family member. b. A "family member" means any of the following: • A child, which for purposes of this article means a biological, adopted, or foster elvld, stepeluid, legal ward, or a child to whom the employee stands in loco parentis. This definition of a child is applicable regardless of age or dependency status. • A biological, adoptive, or foster parent, stepparent, or legal guardian of an employee or the employee's spouse or registered domestic partner, or a person who stood in loco parentis when the employee was a minor child. • A spouse • A registered domestic partner 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 59� �t� t`i • A grandparent • A grandchild A sibling c. A "household member" means: Any member of the employees' household related by blood or marriage; any other relative of the employee by blood or marriage, where it can be established by the employee that the employee's presence is required to handle emergency arrangements and/or other matters. 2. Personal necessity leave may also be used, as follows: • To attend to a serious accident to members of the employee's immediate family • Childbirth • To cope with imminent danger to the employee's family, home, or other valuable property • When the existence of external circumstances beyond the employee's control make it impossible for him/her to report for duty • Attend to medical or dental appointments for members of the employee's household or family member as defined above. Payment for Unused Sick Leave 1. Except in cases of disability retirement, upon non -disciplinary termination of employment and at least ten (10) years of cumulative full-time service with the City, an employee shall be entitled to receive a portion of their total accumulated and unused sick leave balance upon the effective date of such termination, at the rate of pay effective on the date of such termination. Upon termination of employment with the City, all employees must deposit one hundred percent (100%) of their accumulated, but unused sick leave hours into their Retirement Health Savings (RHS) account, based on the criteria below: • For employees who had less than ten (10) years of service with the City as of September 30, 2010, the maximum sick leave eligible, after ten (10) years of full -tine service, shall be equal to one third (1 /3) of the total sick leave accumulated, up to a maximum of three hundred and twenty-five (325) hours. 2019-2022 MOU City of San Full- to Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 60 n•�� ` , \ For employees who have at least ten (10) years of full-time service with the City prior to October 1, 2010, the maximum sick leave eligible, after ten (10) years of full-time service, shall be equal to one third (1/3) of the total sick, leave accumulated, up to a maximum of four hundred and twenty-seven (427) hours. For employees who have at least fifteen (15) years of full-time service with the City, the maximum sick leave eligible shall be equal to two-thirds (2/3) of the total sick leave accumulated, up to a maximum of one thousand and sixty-seven (1067) hours. 2. A lump sum payment of the amount shall be made to the beneficiaries of any eligible employee whose death occurs while such employee is an active employee of the City. Such payment shall be in the amount as described above and at the rate of pay in effect on the date of death. 10.2 Bereavement Leave A. An employee shall be granted up to three (3) working days per incident of paid bereavement leave in case of death of a member of the employee's immediate family. B. "Immediate family" as used in this section is limited to: 1. Any member of the employee's household related by blood or marriage; 2. A parent, parent -in-law, stepparent, spouse, registered domestic partner, child, stepchild, brother, stepbrother, sister, stepsister, grandparent, grandparent -in- law, or grandchild of the employee, regardless of residence; 3. Subject to the discretion of the Executive Director of Human Resources, any other relative of the employee by blood or by marriage where it can be established by the employee that as a result of such relative's death, the employee's presence is reqquired to handle funeral arrangements and/or matters of estate. Cl. Upon request, an employee may use up to two (2) additional work days of leave charged to their Personal Necessity Leave balance when authorized by their Department Head. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 61 \1� 10.3 Military Leave A. Proof of Orders and Reinstatements An employee shall be granted military leave if he/she furnishes the Executive Director of Human Resources satisfactory proof of his/her order to report for duty. Upon raturn and upon showing of proof of actual service pursuant to such orders, he/she will be reinstated as provided in Section 143 of the City's Civil Service Rules and Regulations. B. Temporary Leave Members of the reserve forces of the United States or the National Guard granted temporary leave when ordered to duty will be granted leave with pay not to exceed thirty (30) working days in each calendar year after one (1) year of service with the City upon presenting satisfactory proof of orders to and from such temporary active duties. 10.4 Examination Leave Employees participating in examinations conducted during their normal working hours for positions in the competitive service of the City will be granted Ieave with pay for the time actually required without loss of any accrued paid leave. 1.0.5 Unauthorized Absence Unauthorized absence from duty for any duration of time may be considered cause for dismissal. Absence from duty without approved leave for five (5) consecutive working days shall be deemed a resignation from the service; provided, however, if the employee returns to work and provides an explanation for such absence which his/her Department Head finds satisfactory, the Department Head may restore the employee to his/her position, with the City Manager's approval. 10.6 Authorized Absences Without pay -Short Term Absence without pay not to exceed five (5) consecutive work days may be authorized by the Department Head. Absence without pay up to fifteen (15) calendar days may be authorized by the Department Head with the approval of the City Manager. Such an absence may be authorized only if in the judgment of the Department Head it serves the best interest of the City. 10.7 Authorized Absence Without Pay -Long Term Upon receipt of a written request from an employee having permanent status and recommendation of approval by the Department Head, the City Manager with recommendation from the Executive Director of Human Resources may grant a leave of 201.9-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 62 4,1 absence without pay for up to six (6) months. Additionally, the City Manager with recommendation from the Executive Director of Human Resources may grant an unpaid leave of absence extension of up to one (1) year. An employee returning to duty with the City from such leave of absence shalt infonn the Department Head and the Executive Director of Human Resources of his/her intention at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the expiration of the leave of absence. Upon receipt of such notice, the Department Head will take steps necessary to restore the employee to his/her former position. 10.8 Industrial Leave Any period of time during which an employee is required to be absent from his/her position by reason of an industrial injury or industrial illness for which he/she is entitled to receive compensation shall not be considered a break in continuous service for the purpose of hisr'her right to salary adjustments or to the accrual of vacation and seniority. 10.9 Pregnancy Disability heave Employees may take an unpaid leave of absence during pregnancy disability consistent with the Pregnancy Disability Law (PDL), Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and/or California Family Rights Act (CFRA). A pregnant employee is entitled to a reasonable leave of absence without pay for any temporary disability resulting from pregnancy, miscarriage, childbirth or recovery therefrom. Such reasonable leave of absence shall not exceed four (4) months. However, an employee may be granted up to an additional two (2) months of leave, at the discretion of the City Manager with recommendation from the Executive Director of Human Resources, 'for a total of up to six (6) months in which to recover from the disability. As with all other temporary disabilities, a physician's certificate is required to verify the extent and duration of the temporary disability. An employee who plans to take pregnancy leave must give reasonable notice of at least four (4) weeks before the commencement of the leave and include the estimated duration of the leave. The City will continue to contribute towards the employee's health insurance coverage in accordance with state and federal legislation. The employee will be required to pay a cash premium to continue coverage while on a leave of absence without pay. 10.10 Catastrophic Leave In order to assist employees otherwise granted a leave of absence without pay by the City Manager due to a catastrophic, non -industrial medical condition or injury, the City shall maintain a Catastrophic Leave Donation Program. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 63 _ Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter City policies and procedures as provided in the Charter or ordinances of the City or other provisions of this MOU with regard to granting Luipaid leaves of absence. For the purpose of this program, a "catastrophic" condition shall mean any significant personal tragedy such as a life -threatening illness or severe non -industrial illness or injury lasting more than two (2) weeks, which requires the employee to need personal time off beyond the amount of leave time he/she has accrued. Maternity leave or elective surgery, absent significant unplanned complications preventing the employee's return to work, are not considered catastrophic. The Catastrophic Leave Donation Program shall cover the uncompensated time prior to the employee's becoming eligible for the LTD benefits. A. Guidelines It shall be understood that all donations under this procedure are voluntary and subject to taxation for the recipient. 1. EmpIoyees may donate vacation, compensatory time, or one (1) floating holiday to the eligible employee. In no event shall sick leave be donated. 2. Employees shall be provided a two (2) week period to submit donations. Donations received after this two (2) week period shall not be processed. The two (2) week period for each case shall be selected by the Department Head or his/her designee. 3. All donations must be, made in two (2) hour increments, except for floating holiday donations which must be made in Rill days (to be credited to recipient based on the donor's amount of hours for the floating holiday). 4. Any authorization of donations not made in accordance with the procedures outlined in Section 10.1 OC(2) will not be processed. S. All donations shall be irrevocable. 6. In the event the recipient returns to work before leave donations have been exhausted, any balance on the books shall be accrued by the recipient and designated as sick leave and may be used pursuant to Article X. B. Eligibility Regular employees shall be eligible for catastrophic leave donations if the following criteria are met: 1. When it is reasonably foreseeable that all accumulated time on the books, such \iJ 2019 2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Pa e 64 as sick leave, compensatory time, holiday and vacation, will be exhausted and the employee's absence will continue past the time when the employee will be on paid status. 2. The employee's Department Head or his/her designee must approve a written request for donations accompanied by a medical statement from the employee's attending physician. The attending physician's statement must verify the employee's need for an extended medical leave and an estimate of the time the employee will be unable to work. C. Procedure 1. Upon receipt of a valid request for donations from an eligible employee, the Department Head or his/her designee shall post a notice within forty-eight (48) hours of receipt of the eligible employee's need for donations via email and on bulletin boards accessible to employees. No confidential medical information shall be included in the posted notice. 2. Employees wishing to donate time to an eligible employee must sign his/her authorization of the transfer of such donated time and provide: • His/her name, department name, and employee number. • The number of hours of compensatory, holiday or vacation time to be donated, within the limitations of Section 10,10A(3); • The name, department and employee number of the recipient; • A statement indicating that the donor understands such donation of time is irrevocable. 3. At the close of the donation period, the department shall verify that each donating employee has accrued vacation, holiday, and/or compensatory time balances sufficient to cover the designated donation. 4. The department shall submit all approved donation authorizations for an eligible employee at one time for processing. No donation authorizations for the eligible employee will be processed after this period. However, employees who receive donations under this procedure and who exhaust all donated hours may request an additional donation period subject to the provisions of Section 10.10A. S. The City shall add the donated time to the recipient's sick leave bank. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Pate 65 loi`� ARTICLE XI 11.0 EMPLOYEE INSURANCE BENEFITS 11.1 Medical Health Insurance A. Health Plans The City contracts with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) for the provision of health insurance per the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA). The City shall make contributions toward the payment of medical health insurance premiums for employees and their eligible dependents enrolled in a medical health insurance plan offered through. CalPERS. The City may choose to offer new medical health plans, other than CalPERS, if they will provide substantially similar or improved coverage and benefits. B. Contributions 1. The City's monthly contribution for medical health insurance shall be based on the plan coverage chosen by the employee, up to the listed maximums: a. Through December 31, 2019 SINGLE (Employee Only) $ 654.00 2-PARTY (Employee+ 1) $1,307.00 FAMILY (Employee+ all dependents) $1,700.00 b. Janugry 1, 2020 through December 31.2020 SINGLE (Employee Only) $ 704.00 2-PARTY (Employee+ 1) $1,357.00 FAMILY (Employee + all dependents) $1,750.00 c. Jpnuary 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 SINGLE (Employee Only) $ 754.00 2-PARTY (Employee + 1) $1,407.00 FAMILY (Employee+ all dependents) $1,800.00 d. Effective January 1, 2022 and continuing t reafter SINGLE (Employee Only) $ 804.00 2-.PARTY (Employee+ 1) $1,457.00 .. _ _ \ 201.9-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 6 yl J FAMILY (Employee + all dependents) $1,850.00 The above amounts are inclusive of the CalPFRS statutory minimum amount which CalPERS determines and publishes each year, 2. Any contribution necessary to maintain benefits under said medical health plans in excess of the amounts set forth above shall be borne entirely by the employee. C. Medical Waiver Option An employee who has primary coverage under another non -City sponsored group medical health plan and voluntarily waives, in writing, their City paid medical health insurance coverage shall receive a cash payment each month in an amount equal to fifty percent (501/4) of the total monthly premium amount for the City's lowest cost single "employee -only" medical health plan. If an employee opts out of medical insurance, he/she must be able to demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that he/she has mhiimurn essential coverage, as defined by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), through another source other than coverage in the individual market (whether or not obtained through Covered California). 11.2 Dental Insurance A. The City offers two (2) types of dental insurance plans. One (1) is a Dental Health Maintenance Organization (DIIMO) plan and one (1) is a Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) plan. B. The City shall contribute a maximum amount of up to ninety dollars ($90.00) per month [which will increase to one hundred dollars ($100,00) effective January 1, 2020, and then to one hundred and five dollars ($105.00) effective January 1, 2021, and then to one hundred and ten dollars ($110,00) effective January 1, 2022] for each employee toward the payment of premiums for denial insure -nee plans provided by the City for employees and their eligible dependents. C. Any contribution necessary to maintain benefits under said dental plans in excess of the amounts set forth above shall be borne entirely by the employee. 11.3 Lone -Term Disability Insurance A. The City shall contribute up to ten dollars and thirty-nine cents ($10.39) per month for each employee enrolled in the one hundred and thirty (130) day elimination period long-term disability (LTD) plan. The LTD plan provides a maximum benefit of two-thirds (2/3) of the employee's salary up to twenty-five hundred dollars ($2500.00) per month. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page, 67 \ v1�b�t`�pl�l v11 1 For employees who elect to upgrade their LTD benefit coverage to a sixty (60) day elimination period plan, the City will contribute up to eleven dollars ($11.00) per month. This plan provides a maximum benefit of two-thirds (2/3) of the employee's salary up to five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) per month. Any amount necessary to maintain benefits under the LTD insurance plans provided by the City in excess of these amounts shall be borne by the employee. B. Effective January 1., 2020 and continuing thereafter, the City shall increase the LTD benefit plan coverage to a sixty (60) day elimination period. with a Five thousand dollar ($5,000.00) per month maximum benefit, for all employees. The City shall provide each employee with this upgraded LTD plan at no cost to the employee. 11.4 Life I surance A. The City shall provide each employee with a thirty thousand dollar ($30,000) group term life insurance policy and a thirty thousand dollar ($30,000) Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D). B. Effective January 1, 2020, the City shall increase both the group term life insurance policy and the AD&D coverage to fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for each employee. C. The City shall provide these life insurance benefits at no cost to the employee. 1.1.5 Benefits Advisor Committee When there is a need to discuss matters relating to employee insurance benefits and the City believes it would be beneficial to involve a Benefits Advisory Committee (BAC), each party (the Union and the City) shall have an equal ntnnber of representatives on such a committee to meet as necessary. 11.6 Retirement Health Savings XIjKpig, Employees participate in the ICMA-RC "Vantage Care" RHS Plan subject to the following: One and one-halfpercent (1.50%) will be deducted from each employee's base pay and deposited into his/her individual RHS account each pay period. This contribution shall be made on a pre-tax basis. 2. Upon an employee's termination of employment, the cash value of their eligible sick leave balances will be deposited into the individual' s RHS account, based on the criteria in Section 10. tJ and the RHS Plan adoption agreement to provide the 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEICJ Full -Time Employees Unit Pg e 6B l" �\ employee and his/her designated eligible dependents, if any, with benefits under any health insurance program including, but not limited to, the program maintained by the City. 3. Upon retirement, the balance of an employee's accumulated, but unused sick leave, after eligible IMS payments are made, will be converted into CaIPFRS Service Credit per Section 12.3A and Government Code §20965, 11.7 Vision lnsurance A. The City shall offer employees a vision insurance plan. B. For employees who choose vision coverage, all premium costs shall be paid by the employee through a pre-tax payroll deduction. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 69 l ARTICLE XiI 12.0 RETIREMENT BENEFITS 12.1 CalPERS Retirement Plans A. The terms of the existing miscellaneous plan contract between the City and CaIPERS govern retirement benefits for employees are incorporated by reference herein. B. The California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) went into effect on January I, 2013. Based on consideration of various eligibility factors, PEPRA defines each employee as either a "classic" or "new" member of CalPERS. I . "Classic" Members An employee who qualifies as a "classic" member receives a retirement benefit formula of 2.7% @ 55, with no social security coverage. The final average compensation period for a "classic" member is the single highest consecutive twelve (12) months (Government Code §20042). 2. 'New" Members An employee defined as a "new' member (Government Code §7522.20a) receives a retirement benefit formula of 2% @ 62. The final average compensation period for a "new" member is the highest average compensation earned during any consecutive thirty-six (36) month period (Government Code §7522.32a). 12.2 Contributions The City shall continue to make contributions to CalPERS on behalf of each individual employee as follows: A. City Contributions 1. "Classic" Members The City shall continue to each employee's member contribution and report it to CalPERS as compensation eamable [Government Code §20636(C)(4)). This contribution is Imown as the Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC), which is equal to eight percent (8.0%) of compensation earnable. Such payments are not increases in base salary and no salary rate range 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 70 l�� applicable to any employee shall be changed or deemed to have been changed by reason thereof. As a result, the City will not treat these payments as ordinary income and, thus will not withhold Federal or State income tax from said payments. The City has received an opinion or ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) confirming that these payments are deferred compensation, not ordinary income. 2. "New" Members As required by PEPRA, the City shall participate in equal cost sharing by paying fifty percent (50%) of the normal cost, as established by CaIPERS in its annual valuation report. B. Employee Contributions "Classic" Members The employee contribution rate shall be eight percent (8.0%) of compensation earnable. All employee contributions are paid towards the employer portion of the City's CaIPERS contribution. This payment shall be paid in accordance with Government Code §20516(f) as cost sharing. 2. "Nev' Members As required by PEPRA, the employee contribution rate shall be fifty percent (50%) of the normal cost, as rounded to the nearest quarter of a percent by CalPERS in its annual valuation. C. Pre -Taxable Benefit To the extent permitted by CaIPERS and IRS regulations, the City shall make any employee contributions as a pre-tax deduction. 12.3 CalPERS Benefit Options The City contracts with CalPERS to provide the following additional optional benefits: A. Credit for Unused Sick Leave (Government Code &209651 Upon retirement, an employee may have accumulated, but unused, sick leave converted to additional service credit at the rate of 0.004 years of service credit for every eight (8) hours of unused sick leave up to a maximurn of sixteen hundred (1.600) hours. The City must report only those days of unused sick leave that were accrued by the employee during the normal course of employment. This section applies to 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 71 0 CaIPERS members whose effective date of retirement is within four (4) months of separation from employment. B. MiliW Service Credit as Public Service (Government Code 421024) An employee may elect to purchase up to four (4) years of service credit for any continuous active military or merchant marine service prior to employment. The employee must contribute an amount equal to the contribution for current and prior service that the employee and the employer would have made with respect to that period of service. C. Pre -Retirement Death Benefits 1, Optional Settlement 2W Death Benefit (Government Code §21548) The spouse of a deceased employee, who is eligible to retire from service at the time of death, may elect to receive a Pre -Retirement Optional Settlement 2W Death Benefit. The benefit is a monthly allowance equal to the amount the employee would have received if they had retired from service on the date of death and elected Optional Settlement 2, the highest monthly allowance an employee can leave a spouse. 2. Fourth Level 1959 Survivors Benefit (Government Code 421574) D. Post -Retirement Death Benefits Post -Retirement Survivor's Allowance (PRSA) for continuation of benefits even after remarriage (Government Code §21624, 21626 and 21628). E. Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) (Government Code §21329.) Up to a maximum of a two percent (2.0%) COLA as determined by CaIPERS each year. �---...•�. .�59:,:?K�,x„""__ ... 3 . roc-.as..^e:'ea. ,-- 2019 2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 72 ) li\l tia�°1 ARTICLE XIII 13.0 TOOLS 13.1 Personal Tools Employees in the following classifications shall provide their own personal tools which are ordinarily used in their trade: • Fleet Services Technician I • Fleet Services Technician I1 • Fleet Services Technician III • Fleet Services Supervisor 13.2 Tool Allowance The City will provide at least one (1) vendor account for each employee who has at least one (1) year of service in one of the classifications listed in Section 13.1 above. These employees shall be allowed up to eleven hundred dollars ($1100) per fiscal year in order to purchase tools which, in the sole determination of the Fleet Services Manager, are necessary for the performance of such employees' job duties. Employees will either be reimbursed for their tool purchases or they may purchase tools from the vendor who will then bill the City for the purchases. Employees will be allowed to carry over their unused tool allowances for not more than two (2) consecutive fiscal years. 13.3 Lost or Stolen Tools The City shall bear no liability or responsibility in replacing lost or stolen tools, except as provided in this article. 2019-2022 MQU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit �Pagp_73, ARTICLF XlV 14.0 UNIFORMS 14.1 Uniforms A. Uniform Maintenance 1. All employees who are required by the City to wear a uniform while on duty shall continue to be provided with seven (7) sets of clean uniforms every two (2) weeks at no cost to the employees. 2. All field/yard maintenance, custodial and equipment repair employees shall be provided with eleven (11) clean sets every two (2) weeks at no cost to the employees. 3. Any employee who wishes to be provided with one (1) or more additional clean sets per week, above the amounts specified in this section, will be required to pay the extra cost incurred for such additional set(s). B. All Police Records Personnel and the Senior Office Assistants assigned to the traffic window shall be provided withthree (3) sets of uniforms and one (1) sweater. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 74 `ll ARTICLE XV 15.0 SAFETY 15.1 CentralSafes Committee The Union may designate two (2) representatives and two (2) alternates, who may attend only in either of the representatives' absences, to serve on the City's Central Safety Committee. 15.2 Safe , 5_b oes/I3ogLs A. The City agrees to pay up to three hundred dollars ($300) per fiscal year per employee, for the purchase and/or repair of approved safety shoes/boots. The option of purchase and/or repair shall be at die sole discretion of each employee. The employee may purchase their safety shoes/boots from either a City approved vendor or any outside vendor of their choice. B. Employees will be allowed to use this allowance to purchase insoles or other shoe/boot related accessories. C. Code Enforcement employees who are regularly assigned to work involving confiscation or retrieval of evidence or who must regularly enter dangerous or abandoned properties will be eligible for a safety shoe/boot allowance. Code Enforcement employees will be allowed to use this allowance to purchase uniform shirts as approved by the department manager or his/her designee. D. All safety shoes/boots purchased under this program must have steel reinforced toes, insteps and bear the official stamp of approval from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). E. If a particular classification is designated by the City's Risk Manager as requiring its incumbents to wear safety shoes/boots, then it will be mandatory for all incumbents of that classification to wear the type of safety shoes/boots (boot or low -quarter) deemed to be appropriate by the Department Head. Some exemptions may be allowed, on a case -by -case basis, depending on the type and amotmt of exposure to hazardous conditions in a particular position and subject to the approval or disapproval of the City's Risk Manager. F. The procedure necessary to be followed for the implementation and operation of this program shall be in accordance with the existing policies and procedures as previously established by the City. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Pa e 75 ARTICLE XVl 16.0 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 16.1 Definition of a Grievance A grievance shall be defined as a timely complaint by an employee, or group of employees, or the Union concerning the interpretation or application of specific provisions of this MOU, or of the rules and regulations governing personnel practices or working conditions of the City, except, however, those matters specifically assigned to the jurisdiction of the City Personnel Board by those provisions of the City Chatter and the Civil Service Rules and Regulations. Employees may dispute any written reprimand filed in their official personnel file through the grievance procedure. 16.2 Informal Process - First Step A. An employee and/or his/her designated representative must first attempt to resolve the grievance on an informal basis through discussion with his/her immediate supervisor without undue delay, but in no case, beyond a period of fifteen (15) working days after the occurrence of the alleged incident giving rise to the grievance, or when the grievant knew or should have reasonably become aware of the facts giving rise to the grievance. B. Every effort shall be made to find an acceptable solution to the grievance through this informal means at the most immediate level of supervision. C. In order that this informal procedure may be responsive, both parties involved shall expedite this process. If, within fifteen. (15) working days, a mutually acceptable solution has not been reached at the informal level, the employee and/or the employee's designated representative shall then set forth the grievance in writing, indicate the specific MOU provision, rule or regulation allegedly violated, the nature of the action desired, sign it, and submit it in duplicate to the employee's Department Ilead. At this point, the grievance review process becomes formal. Should the grievant fail to file a written grievance, and in the manner specified above, within fifteen (15) working days after first discussing the grievance with the employee's irmmediate supervisor, the grievance shall be barred and waived. D. Any resolution of the grievance at the informal stage by any person other than a middle manager or above shall not become precedence or be used to establish past practice regarding implementation, interpretation, or application of this MOU. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 76 16.3 Formal Process A. Second Step — Department Head Review The Department Bead or his/her designated representative shall meet with the employee and/or the employee's designated representative within fifteen (15) working days after the grievance has been submitted to the Department Head. If the Union is filing the grievance itself, it may start the grievance procedure at this step, but must do so within the same time limit as provided for in Step One above. The Department Bead, or his/her designated representative, shall review the grievance and may affirm, reverse or modify the disposition made at the First Step and shall deliver his/her answer to the employee and/or the employee's designated representative within ten (10) working days after said meeting. B. Third Step —City Manager Review If the grievance is not satisfactorily resolved at the Second Step, the employee and/or the employee's representative (or the Union itself) may submit the grievance in writing to the City Manager or his/her designated representative within thirty (30) calendar days of being informed of the disposition made at the Second Step. Failure of the grievant and/or his/her designated representative to take this action will constitute a waiver and bar to the grievance, and the grievance will be considered settled on the basis of the disposition made at the Second Step. The City Manager or his/her designated representative shall meet with the employee and/or the employee's designated representative (or the chosen union representative if filed by the Union itself) within fifteen (15) working days after submission of the grievance. The City Manager or his/her designated representative, after careful review, may affirm, reverse, or modify the disposition made at the Second Step and his/her decision, shall be delivered in writing, to the employee and/or the employee's designated representative within fifteen (15) working days after said meeting. A copy of the written grievance to the City Manager, or his/her duly authorized representative, and of the City Manager's or his/her representative's written decision, shall be maintained in the Human Resources Department. C. Fourth Step — Advisory Arbitration If the grievance is not resolved at the Third Step, the Union may request that the grievance be submitted to advisory arbitration for issuance of a recommendation. The Union must advise the Human Resources Department within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of the decision from the City Manager at Step 3 of its desire to request to have the matter considered by an arbitrator. Upon request to submit the matter to arbitration, unless the parties can agree on an arbitrator to hear the grievance, the City will request a list of seven (7) arbitrators from the State 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 77 � �� Mediation and Conciliation Service. Upon receipt of the list, the parties will strike names, with the Union striking first. Once an arbitrator is selected, he/she will conduct a hearing regarding the grievance. The cost of the arbitrator shall be equally shared between SEW and the City. Once the arbitrator issues his/her advisory recommendation to the parties, the recommendation shall be, submitted to the City Manager who will make a final decision on the grievance within twenty (20) calendar days of his/her receipt of the recommendation. The decision of. the City Manager shall be the final and binding administrative decision on behalf of the City. 16.4 Reservation of Rights After the procedures set forth in this article have been exhausted, the grievant, the Union, and the City shall have all rights and remedies to pursue said grievance under the law. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Pa e 78 �� ARTICLE XVff 17.0 UNION RIGHTS 17,1 Union Representatives A. The Union shall have the right to appoint/elect a reasonable number of employee representatives who are recognized by the City as union officers, work site leaders, or stewards, Such reasonable number of work site leaders and stewards recognized by the City shall be limited to eighteen (18) employees. B. The City's Employee Relations Manager shall be provided with a list of the names and classification titles of the Union's officers, work site leaders, stewards, and other union representatives. The Union agrees to inform the City in writing of any changes in said list within ten (10) calendar days of date of change. 17.2 Releaso i A. Grievances During the term of this MOU, the City agrees to grant a reasonable amount of City time, without loss of pay or benefits, to enable the union officers, worksite leaders, and stewards to assist other bargaining unit employees in processing grievances under Article XVI. Union officers, worksite leaders, and stewards shall make advance arrangement with their supervisors prior to absenting themselves for such purpose. The union officers, worksite leaders, and stewards shall be required by the City to record and report to their supervisors the work time spent in assisting other bargaining unit employees pursuant to this provision of the MOU. Any unauthorized or unapproved time used by a union officer, worksite leader, or steward to investigate, discuss, process or meet in conjunction with pursuing a grievance or complaint shall be charged to that employee's vacation or comp time leave bank. The Union shall limit the number of union officers, worksite leaders, or stewards who participate in the investigation or appear at hearings on City time to one (1) representative and one (1) Chapter Board member, 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 79 B. Union Business Leave in addition to the above time, union officers, worksite leaders, and stewards shall be granted three hundred (300) hours of release time per fiscal year. This leave is cumulative, meaning the total amount of hours allowed each fiscal year is to be shared by all eligible employees in the unit and is not an individual annual allotment of hours for each employee. The purpose of this additional three hundred (300) hours per fiscal year shall be to enable the union officers, worksite leaders, and stewards to participate in union activities which may include conventions, seminars and meetings that are otherwise not covered by this MOU. Such time shall be paid by the Union who will reimburse the City for the hours used by employees of the unit. Such union officers, worksite leaders, or stewards shall provide at least forty-eight (48) hours' advance notice and make arrangements with their supervisors prior to absenting themselves for such purposes. The union officers, worksite leaders, and stewards shall be required by the City to record and report to their supervisors on the work time spent on Union business, Any unauthorized or unapproved time used by a union officer, worksite leader, or steward to conduct union business shall be charged to that employee's vacation or comp time leave bank. Time spent by the Union's Chapter Chair/President, officers worksite leaders, or stewards on Chapter Chair/President's Leave and/or Union Business Leave, under this section, shall not be considered time worked for computation of overtime according to the FLSA. C. Chapter Chair/Presidecrt's Leave 1. During the term of this MOU, the City agrees to grant the I-Won's Chapter Chair/President (President) half ofhis/her workweek as paid release time which shall be reimbursed to the City by the Union. Such release time is subject to the following terms and conditions: a. The President will conduct any union business performed during the half of his/her work week while on release time under this section off the worksite. However, the President may conduct union business on worksites pursuant to Section 17.3 - Worksite Access. b. The Department Director of the President may approve additional time off for the President to attend union seminars and other business on a prescheduled basis. Such additional time off shall be paid for by the Union or deducted from the President's vacation or compensatory time bank. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 80 c. Upon written request of the Union, the Department Director of the President will schedule the President to be offsite for half of each workday to conduct union business. The Department Director shall schedule the President to be onsite working on City business each half day of each normal work week. The Department Director may change the schedule of the President upon reasonable notice to the employee. d. During the period of time the President is performing City work, he/she shall receive no union -related phone calls or visitors. 'Persons who call or wish to see the President regarding union -related matters during his/her work time shall be referred to the Union's offsite office. e. Time spent by the President on Chapter Chair/President's Leave shall not be considered time worked for the computation of overtime according to the FLSA. f. The Union shall reimburse the City for one hundred percent (100%) of the employee's salary, including any premium payments and benefit costs, for the Chapter Chair/President's Leave time. The Union agrees to pay for Union Business Leave and Chapter Chair/President's Leave within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the bill from the City. The bill will be sent on a monthly basis. If the bill is not paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt, the City shall deduct such amount from the union dues collected from the employees on behalf of the Union. In the event a portion of the bill is rightfully contested, the City shall only deduct the non -contested portion from the union dues, Any issues related to the bill must be brought to the attention of the Executive Director of Human Resources within fifteen (15) calendar days of its receipt and must be resolved within the remaining fifteen (15) calendar days, so that the bills are paid in a timely manner or within thirty (30) calendar days of its receipt. 2. Evidence ofInu nee a. The Union shall provide an insurance policy or policies, or certificate of such insurance, naming the City, its officers and employees as insured or additional insured which provides coverage against liability for any and all claims and/or suits for damages or injuries to persons or property resulting from or arising out of any act or omission of said union representative. Said policy or policies of insurance shall provide coverage for both bodily injury and property damage not less than the following minimum amounts: one 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 81 {� million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit or its equivalent. Said policy or policies shall also contain a provision that no termination, cancellation or change of coverage of insured or additional insured shall be effective until after thirty (30) business days' notice has been given in writing to the City. b. The Union shall provide the City with an insurance carrier certifying that it carries primary workers' compensation insurance on behalf of said union representative and the policy shall not be canceled not coverage reduced until after ten (10) business days' notice has been given in writing to the city. 3. Indemiu Clause 'I'he Union shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers and employees from and against any and all damage to property or injuries to or death of any person or persons, including property and employees or agents to the City. The Union shall defend, indemnify, and save harmless the City, its officers and employees from any kind and all claims to demands, suits, actions or proceedings of any kind or nature, including, but not by way of limitations, workers' compensation claims, resulting from or arising out of the negligent acts, errors, or omissions, arising out of the intentional or malicious acts of the union's representatives. 4. Duty Requirements The Union and the City agree that the President will not be required to carry out any City duties during the time they are on Chapter Chair/President's Leave for half of the normal work week. The President will be required to comply with the rules and regulations of the City as they apply to off -duty employees, except such President will not be required to report to work for any purpose during the half of the normal work week designated as Chapter Chair/President's Leave time. 5. Return to Duty Upon return to full-time City duty from Chapter Chair/President's Leave of half of the normal work week, the President shall be restored to the same position without loss of any benefits as he/she would have occupied or accrued if there had been no disruption in duty status. D. Meet and Confer 1. In the event the Union is formally meeting and conferring with representatives of the City on matters within the scope of representation during regular City 2014-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full-T€me Employees Unit Page 82 business hours, a reasonable number of union officers, employee representatives, or other union officials shall be allowed reasonable time off without any loss of compensation or other benefits. 2. Such union officers and employee representatives shall not leave their duty/work station or assignment without the prior knowledge oftheir supervisor or manager. 3. Such meetings are subject to scheduling in a manner consistent with City operating needs and work schedules, E. Release Time Process I . Release of employees for Union Business Leave shall be done on the same basis as employees who are released from duty for vacation leave, except that requests for Union Business Leave shall not unreasonably interfere with the operation of the City department and shall be approved by the employee's Department Head. 2. The Department head shall not unreasonably withhold permission to utilize Chapter Chair/President's Leave and/or Union Business Leave from any employee who has been duly authorized by the Union to take such leave. 3. The President shall have half of the normal work week, or one thousand and forty (1,040) hours per year, of time off to conduct union business. Such time shall be paid by the City and reimbursed to the City by the Union. 4, Release time used under this section must be appropriately coded into the City's payroll system. each pay period, so that it can be properly tracked by the City. The City shall provide separate payroll codes for the different types of release time. 17.3 Works Lie Access A. Union officers, worksite leaders, stewards and/or union staff shall be permitted to visit break and lunch areas designated by the City, before or after work, or during designated lunch periods for the purpose of discussing union business, provided that arrangements are made in advance with the manager responsible for the worksite. B. Such visits shall not disrupt the work of City employees or interfere with the normal operations of the department, or with established safety and security requirements. Where any such problems arise, the Union and the City will agree on an alternate meeting/conference facility for the purpose of providing a place for the Union to hold meetings before or after work or during lunch periods. If the alternate meeting site is a City facility during non -working hours, its scheduling and use shall be 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit nPage 83 41. ` �h `1p�tll governed in accordance with regulations pertaining to the use of public meeting rooms at City facilities. C. Solicitations of membership and all activities concerned with the internal management of the Union, such as collecting dues, holding membership meetings, preparation of petitions, preparation of proposals, campaigning for office, conducting elections and distributing literature, shall not be conducted during working hours. U. Employees may voluntarily perform those duties assigned to them by the Union, but in no event shall they have the right to interfere with the performance of work of any other employee or interfere with City operations. 17.4 Use of Bulletin Boards Space shall be made available to the Union on the City's existing employee bulletin boards for the purpose of posting notices pertaining to Union business, subject to the following conditions A. Material posted by the Union shall not include campaign material on municipal election matters, including elections for City Council, other City positions, or other municipal. political matters. B. Material posted shall not be derogatory to the City, City employees or other employee organizations. C. All materials shall be dated, identify the 'Union and bear the signature of the authorized representative(s) of the Union validating the posting. D. The City reserves the right to determine what reasonable portion of employee bulletin boards are to be allocated to union materials. E. If the Union does not abide by these provisions, it will forfeit its right to have materials posted on the City's employee bulletin boards. F. The Union shall not be permitted to post any material that is prohibited by State law or the City Charter. 17.5 Use of Citv Facilities The City shall allow the Union to conduct meetings in the City's public meeting rooms during non -working hours provided such meetings are scheduled in accordance with regulations governing the use of public meeting rooms at City facilities. The Union shall not be permitted to use such City facilities to discuss or present any matter that is prohibited by State law or the City Charter. 2019.2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 84 NP4n 1 ' 17.6 Payroll Deductions A. Union Deductions The City shall make deductions on a regular basis each pay period from the pay of each employee who voluntarily authorizes such union deductions in writing. The City shall provide a separate dedicated payroll code for this deduction. B. Rez " taztce of Funds The Union shall provide the City with an authorized deduction report each pay period which includes a list of the employees who have authorized union deductions and the amount of such deductions. The City shall make the applicable deductions from the employee's paychecks and electronically remit such funds to the Union via Electronic Funds 'Transfer (EFT) following their deduction. The City shall also send an itemized report, in Excel format, to the Union at dues@seiu721.org. The report shall include a list of all union members in the bargaining unit and include the following information on each union member: first name, last name, employee identification number, employment status (i.e. active or on an unpaid leave of absence), base salary earned in the pay period, salary step, total hours in a paid status for the pay period, and the amount remitted on behalf of the employee. The remittance of funds and itemized report shall be sent to the Union semi- monthly. C. Maintenance of Dues Payroll Deduction Any employee who has authorized union dues deductions on the effective date of this MOU, or at any time subsequent to the effective date of this MOU, shall continue to have such dues deduction made by the City during the term of this MOU, provided, however; that any employee may revoke such dues deductions in the last twelve (12) months of this MOU during the twenty-one (21) calendar day period preceding the employee's date of hire anniversary, by notifying the Union of their revocation of union dues deductions. Such notification shall be in writing and contain the following information: employee name, employee identification number, job classification, department name, bargaining unit, and name of the employer from which such dues deductions are to be cancelled. Upon request, the Union will inform the union member of his/her dues deduction revocation date. The Union will provide the City with the appropriate documentation to process these dues revocations within ten (10) business days after the close of the withdrawal period. 2019-2022 MOU CI of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time me Employees Unit Page,S >� \� D. Indemnification The Union shall indemnify and hold the City, its officers and employees, harmless from any and all claims, demands, suits, or any other action arising from this section. In no event shall the City be required to pay from its own funds, union dues, which the employee was obligated to pay, but failed to pay, regardless of the reasons. 17.7 Reporting Requirements The City agrees to provide the Union with an updated employee list every sixty (60) days, which includes the following information on each employee: first name, last name, employee identification number, date of hire, bargaining unit (i.e. full-time employees unit), job classification, change in employment status (i.e. separated from service, retired, promoted, demoted, etc.), effective date of change in employment status, physical home address, home mailing address (if different), home phone number, personal cell phone number, personal email address (if known), work location, work phone number, salarystep, and current rate of pay. The City shall send these reports, in Excel format, to the Union at dues@seiu721.org. An employee shall retain his/her right to opt -out of providing personal information to the Union. 17.8 New Employee Orientations The City agrees to distribute union membership pamphlets to bargaining unit employees at the new employee orientation sessions conducted by the City, if such sessions are conducted. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 96� y �h ARTICLE XVIII 18.0 CITY RIGHTS 18.1 Manaeement Riehts The, City reserves, retains, and is vested with, solely and exclusively, all rights of management which have not been expressly abridged by specific provision of this MOU or by law to manage the City, as such rights existed prior to the execution of this MOU. The sole and exclusive rights of management, as they are not abridged by this MOU or by law, shall include but not be limited to the following rights: A. To manage the City generally and to determine the issues of policy. B. To determine the existence or nonexistence of facts which are the basis of the management decision. C. To determine the necessity of organization of any service or activity conducted by the City and expand or diminish services. D. To determine the nature, manner, means, and technology, and extent of services to be provided to the public. L. To determine methods of financing. F. To determine types of equipment or technology to be used. G. To determine and/or change the facilities, methods, technology, means, and size of the workforce by which the City operations are to be conducted. H. To determine and change the number of locations, relocations, and types of operations, processes, and materials to be used in carrying out all City functions, including but not limited to the right to contract for or subcontract any work or operation of the City. 1. To assign work to and schedule employees in accordance with requirements as determined by the City, and to establish and change work schedules and assignments. To relieve employees from duties for lack of work or similar non -disciplinary reason,. subject to the provisions of the City Charter, Municipal Code, Federal and State law and this MOU. K. To establish and modify productivity and performance programs and standards. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 87 L. To discharge, suspend, demote, or otherwise discipline employees for proper cause in accordance with the provisions set forth in the City Charter and Santa Ana Municipal Code, M. To determine job classifications and to reclassify employees. N. To hire, transfer, promote and demote employees for non -disciplinary reasons in accordance with this MOU. O. To determine policies, procedures, and standards for selection, training and promotion of employees. P. To establish employee performance standards including but not limited to quality and quantity standards and to require compliance of such standards. Q. To maintain order and efficiency in its facilities and operations. R. To establish and disseminate and/or modify rules and regulations to maintain order and safety in the City which are not in violation with this MOU. S. To take any and all necessary action to carry out the mission of the City in emergencies, 18.2 Meet: and Confer on Impact Except in emergencies, or where the City is required to make changes in its operations because of the requirements of law, whenever the contemplated exercise of management's rights shall impact on a significant number of employees of the bargaining unit, the City agrees to meet and confer in good faith with representatives of the Union regarding the impact of the contemplated exercise of such rights prior to exercising such rights, unless the matter of the exercise of such rights is provided for in this MOU. �.._._ — 2019-202?. MOU City of Santa Ana & SElU Full -Time Employees Unit Page V n v\ V ARTICLE XIX 19.0 ANTI-STIZJKE CLAUSE 19.1 Prohibited Conduct A. The Union, its officers, agents, representatives, and/or members agree that during the term of this MOU, they will not cause or condone any unlawful strike, walkout, slowdown, sick-out, or any other unlawful job action by withholding or refusing to perform services. B. There shall be no lockouts by the City during the term of this MOU. C. Any employee who participates in any conduct prohibited in Subsection A above shall be subject to suspension, demotion or dismissal by the appointing authority without right of appeal to the Personnel Board in accordance with City Charter Section 1014, 19.2 Union Responsibility In the event that the Union, its officers, agents, representatives, or members engage in any of the conduct prohibited in Section 19,1 A above, the Union shall immediately instruct any persons engaging in such conduct that their conduct is in violation of this MOU and unlawful, and they must immediately cease engaging in the prohibited conduct and return to work. 2019 2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Pull -Time Employees Unit Page 89 IV \ ARTICLE XX 20.0 LAYOFFS 20.1 Notice of Layoff It is the hope of the City not to separate any employee(s) from employment because of a reduction in the workforce during the term of this MOU. However, circumstances arising during the term of this MOU may require such separation(s). In that event, the City will provide reasonable notice to the Union of the details of the separation(s) in order to meet and exchange information, opinions and proposals regarding the consequence(s) of the separation(-,) on the employee(s). This provision in not intended to be a waiver of any other rights the parties may have under this MOU. 20.2 Order of Lavoff A. The principles of seniority (length of service) shall govern layoffs as described herein, except in the event that more than one (1) employee has the same seniority date, in which case performance also shall be considered. The City's determination of performance shall not be arbitrary or capricious in nature. C. Any dispute over the application of the principles outlined in this article shall be subject to the grievance procedure. D. Classification seniority is defined as length of service in the classification, and shall begin on the first date worked by the employee in that classification. Whenever a position within a classification is to be eliminated, resulting in the layoff of an employee, seniority shall govern the order of layoff. The employee with the lowest seniority in the affected classification shall be laid off first, E. In lieu of layoff, an employee may elect to work in a lower classification, in which he/she has served, providing that classification is within the same job family/career ladder. In that event, the employee's length of service in the next lower classification will be added to his/her length of service in the affected classification, and said combined seniority shall be used to bump down into the next lower classification. This method of combining seniority shall be applied to subsequent lower classifications. 20.3 Reemployment List The reemployment list shall be valid for one (1) year from the date or its establishrnent. Reemployment shall be in reverse order of layoffs. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 90 �x 20.4 Temporary Appointment An employee who is laid off from full-time City employment pursuant to this article, may be granted a temporary appointment to a vacant position in any classification for which there is no eligible list and for which said employee meets the minimum qualifications established for the classification and possesses the requisite knowledge, skills and abilities to satisfactorily perform the work of the classification. Such temporary appointment will be terminated upon the establishment of a new eligible list for the classification or one (1) year following the initial day of such temporary appointment, whichever occurs first. 20.5 Contracting Out If it is decided to contract out work currently being performed by employees of this bargaining unit and it is projected that no employee covered by this MOLT is to be laid off, receive a reduction in hours worked, or receive a loss in pay due to said contracting out, the City shall provide the Union reasonable notice of the decision to contract out, will meet with the Union upon the Union's request over the impact of the decision to contract out, and will consider reasonable alternatives provided by the Union. If the City determines to replace employees covered by this MOU by contracting out the work it will expeditiously notify the Union of its intentions. Upon request by the Union the City will schedule meetings with the union leadership to discuss this objective and give the Union the opportunity to present information before any final decision. The City and union leadership agree to commence meeting with each other when practicable for a period not to exceed forty-five (45) calendar days, unless mutually agreed to meet longer. At the end of the agreed upon time and if the parties have not achieved satisfactory resolution, the issues will be resolved per the impasse process). Notwithstanding the above paragraph, if any bargaining unit member is laid off as a result of a decision by the City to contract out work, the City shall make a reasonable effort to cause the affected employee(s) to become employed by the company or entity with which the City contracted for the applicable services. Prior to bringing any requests for proposal (RFP) to the City Council which would result in the contracting out of bargaining unit work, and prior to any such requests being issued seeking such proposals, the parties agree to the following: A. The City will inform SEIU in writing of its intent to submit such request to the City Council for approval. B. The City will inform SEIU in the same writing of its right to request to meet to discuss the proposed R.FP prior to bringing it to the City Council or seeking such proposals to give SEIU the opportunity to discuss its position regarding the RFP with the City. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana &x SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 91 ��)\ C. The City agrees to meet with SEIU (at its request) at least twice within twenty (20) working days of the written notification of the RFP to consider SElU's positions regarding the RFP. The City agrees that upon mutual agreement of the parties, it will agree to meet more than twice prior to bringing the RFP to the City Council and upon mutual agreement may agree to give SEIU more than twenty (20) working days in which to conduct the meetings with the City representatives. D. The City also agrees that if the existing employees who will be impacted by the contracting out (Le. those employees whose work will be contracted out if there is an RFP accepted by the City) wish to bid for the work by submitting a response to the RFP, the City will consider such response along with the other responses received. E. After the City receives the bids and identifies the most responsible bidder, the City will notify the Union, who will have five (5) calendar days to submit information to the City as to why it believes the City should keep the work in house and how the employees in this unit can perform the work. 2019-2022 MQU City of Santa Ana&. SEIU Full -Time Employees unit Pate 92 ARTICLE XXI 21.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 21.1 Joint Labormana.gement Teams The City and the Union agree to form Joint Labor Management teams for the purpose of exploring issues of mutual concern, including discussions on job family/career ladders. Each team shall be comprised of an equal number of labor and management employees and shall be chaired by the Employee Relations Manager. In no case shall the activity of a team create a delay or hindrance to the ongoing operation of the City. The City and the Union shall hold a meeting upon the City's or the Union's written request to meet. 21.2 Performance Appraisals Non -probationary performance appraisals not completed within six (6) months of the due date shall be stayed and the employee shall next become subject to evaluation upon the end of the evaluation period next following. Provided that merit advance performance appraisals shall be completed in accordance with Section 4.8 — Advancement Within Ranges. 21.3 Driving City Vehicles A. Driver's Alert Decal -Based Monitoring Program By identifying high -risk driving behavior and drivers who engage in unsafe driving acts, the purpose of this program is to intervene quickly to correct and control these risk factors and high -risk activities. Driver's Alert SMART RISK"' identifies the, specific drivers who are at high risk to cause an at -fault crash, so it can be prevented. Reporting is done via 1 (800) number and an identification number on "How Am I Driving?" decals affixed to City vehicles. Reports will be transmitted to the impacted manager and can include complaints or compliments regarding a driver's activity. There is currently no discipline or reward policy in place that would impact employees being reported by this program. B. Automatic Vehicle Location (AVQ System The automatic vehicle location (AVL) system is a means for automatically determining the geographic location of a vehicle and transmitting information to a requestor. Reporting information from AVL will include route, vehicle operations, destination and idle times. The information will be used to monitor the location and usage of a 2019.2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 93 vehicle to ensure the most energy and time -efficient routing and operation of vehicles. AVL database information may only be accessed and subsequently used by supervisory and management employees in participating division operations. The AVL system is not intended to monitor employee behavior; however, it may provide, but not prove to be the sole basis, for disciplinary action if data indicates employee failure to provide efficient and productive service throughout the workday. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 94 ARTICLE XXII 22.0 FULL, UNDERSTANDING, WAIVER & SEPARABILITY 22.1 Intent of Aereement It is understood and agreed that the parties to this MOU are subject to all current and future applicable Federal and California laws, the City of Santa Ana Charter and Municipal Code, as well as the City's EERR (01-75). The provisions of this MOU shall supersede all prior agreements and MOD's, or contrary salary and/or personnel rules and regulations or achninistrative codes, provisions of the City, oral or written, express or implied between the parties, and shall govern the entire relationship and shall be the sole source of any and all rights which may be asserted hereunder. This MOU is not intended to conflict with Federal or State law or the City Charter. 22.2 Rules and Regulations Notwithstanding the abovementioned language, City personnel rules and regulations and departmental rules and regulations exist. These rules and regulations shall be continued to the extent they do not breach specific provisions of this MOU. Such rules and regulations may, from time to time, be changed by the City. If these changes affect wages, hours, and/or other terms and conditions of employment, the City shall meet and confer with the Union; provided, further, however, no provision of the rules and regulations shall be changed to breach specific provisions of this MOU. 22.3 Waiver of Bar aig nin Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, this MOU fully and completely incorporates the understanding of the parties regarding the provisions contained in this MOU. Neither party shall, during the term of this MOU, demand any change to the MOU, except that nothing shall prohibit the parties from changing the terms of the MOU by mutual agreement and in writing signed by the parties. 22.4 Emergency Waiver Provision In the event of circumstances beyond the control of the City, such as acts of God, fire, flood, insurrection, civil disorder, national emergency, or similar circumstances, provisions of this MOU or the Personnel Rules or Resolutions of the City, which. restrict the City's ability to respond to these emergencies, shall be suspended for the duration of such emergency. After the emergency is declared over, this MOU will be reinstated immediately. The Union shall have the right to meet and confer with the City regarding the impact on employees of the suspension of the provisions in the MOU during the course of the emergency. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 95 �� 04 22.5 Separability Provision Should any provision of this MOU be found to be inoperative, void, or invalid by state or federal law, or by a court of competent jurisdiction, all other provisions of this MOU shall remain in full force and effect for the duration of this MOU, provided that if any such affected provisions invalidate or void any benefits of employees covered hereunder, the parties shall forthwith commence negotiations to replace the invalidated benefits with benefits of comparable value. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 96 �( EXECUTION OF THE NEW AGREEMENT On November 7, 2019, this MOU was ratifiedby a simple majority vote of unit employees who are .in full-time classifications represented by the Union. On November 19, 2019, this MOU was approved by a vote of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on agenda itemN , Following its execution by the parties hereto, the City Council shall implement its terms and conditions by appropriate lawful action. In witness thereof, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed this _ day of November 2019. PARTIES TO THEAGREEMENT ATTEST: Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council LEGAL COUNSEL FOR CITY OF SANTA ANA 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 98 ^+� onl V ARTICLE XXIII 23.0 TERM OF MOU 23.1 The term of this MOLJ shall be from July I, 2019 through June 30, 2022. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full Time Employees Unit Page 97 SEIU Local M Bargaining Committee Angel Agosto Public Works -- Water Robert Aguirre Public Works — Engineering Tony Carrillo Fleet Services Richard "Rick" Charbeneau Public Works — Water Robert Gonzales Public Works — Water Dora Holguin Community Development Teresa "Terri" Ibarra Library Jaime V. Lopez Community Development Jorge "George" Navarro Public Works - Water Robert Strong Police Department Jonathan Vargas Public Works - Water Paula Wood Police Deparment 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 99 EXHIBIT A LIST OF REPRESENTED FULL-TIME CLASSIFICATIONS Accountant I Accountant 11 Accounting Assistant Accounting Assist-anUSysterns Technician Accounts Payable Supervisor Active Transportation Coordinator Arts & Culture Specialist Asset Management Analyst Assistant Buyer Assistant Engineer Assistant Fleet Services Technician Assistant Instrument Technician Assistant Librarian Assistant Parks/Landscape Planner Assistant Plan Check Engineer I Assistant Plan Check Engineer II Assistant Planner I Assistant Planner I1 Assistant Traffic Operations Engineer Associate Engineer Associate Park and Landscape Planner Associate Plan Check Engineer Associate Planner Bibliographic Technician Building Inspector Building Maintenance Aide Building Maintenance Supervisor Building Maintenance Technician Building Technician Business Tax Collector/Inspector Buyer Buyer/Systems Technician Central Services Supervisor Civil Engineer Code Enforcement Associate Code Enforcement Officer Code Enforcement Supervisor Combination Building Inspector Community Development Analyst Community Development Commission Secretary ...y....z^.-�:�ma_'.�..�„'ma:uue�ame-�np"-u:-�nr�T's__, ..._,.—,..�_.._.�.._ '"—•"°"«"^�"u a,:-ww...:aw..w.w-e......m.,a 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 100 . S(} �h Community Development Technician Community Events Supervisor Community Liaison Community Services Supervisor Computer Operator Computer Programmer Computer Systems Analyst/Programmer Construction Inspector Contracts Administrator Correctional Records Specialist Correctional Records Supervisor Custodial Aide/Porter Custodian Custodian Supervisor Customer Service Representative Data Entry Office Assistant Data Entry Operator Data Entry Specialist Deputy Clerk of the Council DNA Coordinator Economic Development Aide Economic Development Specialist I Economic Development Specialist II Economic Development Specialist III Electrical Inspector Engineering Aide Engineering Technician Equipment Operator Equipment Operator - Water Services Facilities Supervisor Fleet Parts Specialist Fleet Services Supervisor Fleet Services Technician I Fleet Services Technician Il Fleet Services Technician Ill General Maintenance Aide General Maintenance Leader General Maintenance Supervisor General Maintenance Worker GIS Administrator GIS Systems Analyst/Programmer Graphics Designer I Graphics Designer II 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit page 101 ��1014,cN Housing Authority Aide Housing Authority Analyst Housing Authority Coordinator Housing Authority Operations Supervisor Housing Programs Aide Housing Programs Analyst Housing Programs Coordinator Housing Specialist I Housing Specialist 11 Information Services Representative Instrument Technician Lead Accounting Assistant Lead Correctional Records Specialist Lead Police Records Specialist Librarian Library Aide Library Services Assistant Loan Specialist Mail Clerk/Messenger Maintenance Assistant Maintenance Worker I Maintenance Worker II Meter Reader Collector Micro System Programmer Micro Systems Technician Neighborhood Improvement Projects Specialist Network Engineer Network Specialist/WAN Systems Administrator NPDES Manager Office Assistant Office Specialist Office Supervisor Park Maintenance Aide Park Ranger Park Services Inspection Supervisor Park Services Inspector I Park Services Inspector1I Parking Meter Operations Supervisor Parking Meter Technician I Parking Meter Technician II Pennit Services Processor Permit Services Supervisor Permit Services Technician 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 102 Planning Assistant Planning Commission Secretary Plumbing inspector Police Fiscal Officer Police Fiscal Services Supervisor Police Records Specialist Police Records Supervisor Police Systems Support Analyst Principal Librarian Principal Programmer Analyst Programmer Analyst Projects Manager Property Control Specialist Public Works Crew Leader Public Works Dispatcher Public Works Project Manager Public Works Projects Specialist Public Works Safety Coordinator Purchasing Assistant Purchasing Specialist Purchasing Supervisor Receptionist Records Specialist Recreation Leader Recreation Program Coordinator Reprographic Equipment Operator Residential Construction Specialist Revenue and Contract Compliance Auditor Revenue and Contract Compliance Examiner Revenue Processing Assistant Revenue Supervisor Sanitation Inspector I Sanitation Inspector II Secretary Security Electronics Technician Senior Accountant Senior Accounting Assistant Senior Accounting Assistant/Systems Technician Senior Building Inspector Senior Civil Engineer Senior Combination Building Inspector Senior Community Development Analyst 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 113ny `` Senior Community Planner Senior Construction Inspector Senior Correctional Records Specialist Senior Deputy Clerk of the Council Senior Electrical Inspector Senior Electrical Systems Specialist Senior Engineer Senior Fleet Services Supervisor Senior Grading Specialist Senior Housing Specialist Senior Land Surveyor Senior Librarian Senior Library Technician (T)* Senior Office Assistant Senior Office Specialist Senior Park Services Inspection Supervisor Senior Plan Check Engineer Senior Planner Senior Plumbing Inspector Senior Plumbing/Mechanical Systems Specialist Senior Police Records Specialist Senior Programmer Analyst Senior Receptionist Senior Residential Construction Specialist Senior Systems Administrator. Senior Traffic Engineer Senior Transportation Analyst Senior Water Services Supervisor Senior Water Systems Operator Stock Clerk Storekeeper Stores & City Yard Property Specialist Stormwater Coordinator Street Lighting Maintenance Worker Street Maintenance Supervisor Street Painter Supervising Accountant Supervising Buyer Supervising Library Services Assistant Supervising Park Ranger Survey Parry Chief Survey Party Technician I Survey Party Technician II 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 104 NP1� Systems Administrator Systems Support Analyst Systems Technician Telecommunications Coordinator Telecommunications Customer Service Representative Tenant Services Technician Treasury Services Specialist Treasury Services Supervisor Tree Maintenance Supervisor Tree Trimmer Utilities Billing/Systems Technician Utilities Customer Service Supervisor Video Technician Water Services Crew Leader Water Services Meter Repairer I Water Services Meter Repairer 11 Water Services Production Supervisor Water Services Quality Coordinator Water Services Quality Inspector Water Services Quality Supervisor Water Services Supervisor Water Services Utility Inspector Water Services Worker I Water Services Worker 11 Water Systems Electrician Water Systems Operator I Water Systems Operator H Water Systems Operator III Web Systems Technician Website Entry Specialist Work Center Coordinator Workforce Specialist I Workforce Specialist II Workforce Specialist III Workforce Specialist IV Youth Services Supervisor Youth Services Technician Zoo Animal Registrar Zoo Curator Zoo Curator of Education Zoo Education Specialist Zoo Keeper Aide Zoo Keeper 1' 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEIU Full -Time Employees Unit Page 105 h Zoo Keeper 11 Zoo Operations Coordinator * The (T) designates a terminal classification. A position classification that has been designated as terminal by formal City Council action will be deleted from the City's Basic Classification and Compensation Plan when vacated by its last remaining incumbent. No new appointments may be made to a classification that has been so assigned. 2019-2022 MOU City of Santa Ana & SEW Full -Time Employees Unit Page 106 (1 REQUEST FOR�=Y COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: APPROVE APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT AND PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENTS PER RFP 19-026 GENERATING $8,104,200 IN REVENUE FOR BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS (PROJECT NO. 11-6741) (NON -GENERAL FUND) (STRATEGIC PLAN NOS. 6, 1 G; 3, 2C) CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 1st Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase and sale agreement with Southwest Group Properties LLC, for the sale of City -owned property located at APN's 405-252-21 and 405-252- 22 in the amount of $1,100,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase and sale agreement with Merchant Star International General Trading, for the sale of City -owned property located at APN's 405-272- 11, 450-272-12, 405-272-13, 405-272-14, 405-272-15, 405-272-16, 405-272-17, 405-272-18, and 405-272-21 in the amount of $2,605,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase and sale agreement with Merchant Star International General Trading , for the sale of City -owned property located at APN's 004-123- 48 and 004-123-52 in the amount of $1,025,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 4. Authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase and sale agreement with Merchant Star International General Trading, for the sale of City -owned property located at APN's 015-194-37 and 015-194-40 in the amount of $1,050,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 5. Authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase and sale agreement with IAS Management, for the sale of City -owned property located at APN 399-085-11 in the amount of $127,700, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. Real Property Purchase Agreements per RFP 19-026 November 19, 2019 Page 2 6. Authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase and sale agreement with IAS Management, for the sale of City -owned property located at APN 004-122-39 in the amount of $257,700, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 7. Authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase and sale agreement with IAS Management, for the sale of City -owned property located at APN's 405-073-14 and 405-073-15 in the amount of $188,700, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 8. Authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase and sale agreement with IAS Management, for the sale of City -owned property located at APN's 405-073-16, 405-073-17, and 405-073-18 in the amount of $287,700, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 9. Authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase and sale agreement with IAS Management, for the sale of City -owned property located at APN's 008-231-24, 008-231-26, and 008-231-27 in the amount of $237,700, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 10.Authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase and sale agreement with IAS Management, for the sale of City -owned property located at APN's 008-231-23 and 008-231-29 in the amount of $237,700, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 11.Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute a purchase and sale agreement with Dustin Do, for the sale of City -owned property located at APN's 008-232-31 and 008-232- 34 in the amount of $192,800, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 12.Authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase and sale agreement with Dustin Do, for the sale of City -owned property located at APN 010-022-09 in the amount of $184,800, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 13.Authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase and sale agreement with IAS Management, for the sale of City -owned property located at APNs 010-183-01, 010-183-42, 010-183-43, and 010-183-44 in the amount of $357,700, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 14.Authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase and sale agreement with IAS Management, for the sale of City -owned property located at APN's 010-183-40, 010-183-41, and 010-183-42 in the amount of $251,700, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. Real Property Purchase Agreements per RFP 19-026 November 19, 2019 Page 3 15. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing revenue in the amount of $5,498,000 in Select Street Construction Fund revenue account for Fiscal Year 2019-20 from the sale of City -owned property located at various locations and appropriating the same to the OCTA Bristol Street Corridor Improvements expenditure account. Receipt of Measure M Street Construction proceeds in the amount of $2,606,200 will be disbursed to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). DISCUSSION The City is the owner of substantial real property assets and interests that were specifically acquired for various street widening projects. Approval of recommended actions will allow the City to sell such City -owned vacant property acquired with Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Right -of -Way restricted grant funds, and return proceeds of sale to Bristol Street Improvement Project, and funding agency, proportionally based on match requirements, consistent with Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program (CTFP) Cooperative Agreement C-6-0069 between respective agencies. On April 2, 2019, the City issued Request for Proposals (RFP) 19-026 that solicited the sale and development of eighty-eight (88) individual properties that were grouped into twenty-two (22) combined properties with discreet parcel identification numbers (Parcel IDs) and detailed in Exhibit 1 and the table below. These parcels were combined into larger residential (10 parcels), commercial (9 parcels), and professional office (3 parcels) lots to provide the greatest public benefit and to ensure that the lots met the minimum development standards based on zoning. The properties that are the subject of the RFP are leftover parcels from full parcel acquisitions that were originally made for street -widening projects now completed. The full parcel acquisitions were made following the City's environmental analysis that the project impacts could not be adequately mitigated if only partial acquisitions were made. When full acquisitions are made under these circumstances, some leftover land ordinarily results. These parcels have remained vacant since project completion, and have always been held for the purpose of exchange only. To provide an opportunity for all interested parties to submit proposals, RFP was solicited electronically via the City's web -based electronic procurement system, PlanetBids. Through the PlanetBids online portal, vendors may register to receive notifications on all current and future City projects, as well as download RFP documents, receive project updates, and submit proposals electronically. A total of 147 vendors were notified of the project via PlanetBids, and 51 prospective bidders downloaded the RFP document. On May 29, 2019, 47 proposals were received, accompanied by $260,459 in deposit checks (approximately 1 % of proposed bid amounts) from 11 vendors. Out of the RFP's 22 parcel IDs, six (6) combined properties did not receive proposals. During the Evaluation process, one proposal was deemed non -responsive based on zoning requirements delineated in the RFP. The proposals were evaluated and ranked by a review committee comprised of representatives from Public Works Agency, Community Development Agency, Planning and Building, and Finance Management Services. Ranking criteria included Project Team, Experience, Proposed Development Concept, and Financial Capacity; Bid Amount and Deposit Verification; Fiscal and Real Property Purchase Agreements per RFP 19-026 November 19, 2019 Page 4 Economic Benefit Analysis; and Community Benefit for both Commercial / Professional and Residential zoned proposals. The ranking of the firms is as follows: Parcel ID Entity Proposed Development Purchase Price 1 C-1 Southwest Group Properties Retail Drive-thru (Starbucks) $1,100,000 2 C-2 Merchant Star International General Trading Multi -Tenant Restaurant $2,605,000 3 C-3 Merchant Star International General Trading Restaurant $1,025,000 4 C-6 Merchant Star International General Trading Multi -Tenant Restaurant $1,050,000 6 R-1 IAS Management Single Family Residence $127,700 7 R-2 IAS Management Single Family Residence + ADU $257,700 8 R-3 IAS Management Single Family Residence $188,700 9 R-4 IAS Management Duplex $287,700 10 R-5 IAS Management Single Family Residence + ADU $237,700 11 R-6 IAS Management Single Family Residence + ADU $237,700 12 R-7 DVD Construction Single Family Residence $192,800 13 R-8 DVD Construction Single Family Residence $184,800 14 R-9 IAS Management Triplex $357,700 15 R-10 IAS Management Single Family Residence + ADU $251,700 Total $8,104,200 Distribution of Funds Estimated Proceeds for Bristol Improvements $5,498,000 Estimated Proceeds to be Returned to Funding Agency (OCTA) $2,606,200 The top -scoring proposals demonstrated necessary capacity and presented a diverse mix of development concepts consistent with current zoning as required by RFP. The bid offers received were reasonable and within industry standard and the above -recommended proposals were found to provide the best value for the City of Santa Ana, both in the short-term and long-term benefits. Approval of Recommended Actions No. 1-15 will enhance community satisfaction with reduction in neighborhood blight, revitalize neighborhoods, and reduce liability to the City and community in general. The estimated economic development benefits that will occur as a result of activation of these vacant lots will promote revenue generating developments, create new local jobs, and generate new sales tax revenues. Disposing of these properties will generate sustainable City general fund revenues with increased property tax rolls and additional utility user taxes collected on an annual basis in perpetuity. The following table summarizes key statistics: Real Property Purchase Agreements per RFP 19-026 November 19, 2019 Page 5 KEY PROJECTED STATS Estimated Construction Cost $10,338,787 Estimated Jobs Created (Construction) 72 Estimated Property Value for Tax Purposes $21,410,844 Estimated Taxable Sales Revenue (annual) $14,087,499 Estimated Taxable Revenue Annual Property Tax Value (1.1%) $228,092 x 10 years $2,141,084 Annual Sales Tax Value (9.25%) $1,303,094 x 10 years $13,030,937 Total Estimated 10-Year Taxable Revenue $15,172,021 *A portion of the taxable revenue amount will be allocated to the City of Santa Ana based on property and sales tax formulas If approved, the escrow period will commence Wednesday, November 20, 2019 and projected to close on or before end December 20, 2019. Conditions will be imposed in the Sale Agreements for each property requiring each successful bidder to complete the proposed improvements within 36 months from close of escrow for commercial developments and 18 months for residential. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #6 — Community Facilities & Infrastructure, Objective #1 (establish and maintain a Community Investment Plan for all City assets), Strategy G (develop and implement the City's Capital Improvement Program in coordination with the Community Investment and Deferred Maintenance Plans). Approval of this item also supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #3 — Economic Development, Objective #2 (create new opportunities for business/job growth and encourage private development through new General Plan and Zoning Ordinance policies), Strategy C (support business development and job growth along transit corridors through the completion of critical transit plans/projects). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In 1990, City Council approved the Bristol Street Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR No. 89-01). On June 3, 2014, the City Council approved an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act to account for several minor design modifications in Phase IIIB. FISCAL IMPACT Real Property Purchase Agreements per RFP 19-026 November 19, 2019 Page 6 The revenue generated will be used to reimburse project expenditures and replenish grants used on acquisition costs, as well as fund additional public improvements along Bristol Street. The sale of these properties would lead to other significant economic activity spurred from the development of various projects on each parcel ID, such as creating local jobs, sales tax boosts, and increased property tax that will be realized by the City in perpetuity. In addition, the City will be relived from the continued maintenance, clean up, and liability from owning these vacant parcels. Approval of the recommended Appropriation Adjustment (Recommended Action No. 15) will recognize receipt of $5,498,000 into the Select Street Construction Fund revenue account (No. 05917002-57071) and appropriate the same into the OCTA Bristol Street Corridor Improvements Fund expenditure account (No. 05917661-66220). These funds will be available for expenditure on the Bristol Street Improvement Project. The remaining proceeds of $2,606,000 will be received in the Measure M Street Construction Fund (Account No. 03201001-20215) for disbursement to OCTA, consistent with Cooperative Agreement C-6-0069. The table below summarizes the sales price, Bristol revenue and payments to OCTA. Parcel ID Sale Price Bristol Improvement Fund (Account# 05917661-66220) Reimburse Funding Agency (Account# 03201001-20215) C-1 $1,100,000 $352,000 $748,000 C-2 $2,605,000 $833,600 $1,771,400 C-3 $1,025,000 $1,025,000 C-6 $1,050,000 $1,050,000 R-1 $127,700 $40,864 $86,836 R-2 $257,700 $257,700 R-3 $188,700 $188,700 R-4 $287,700 $287,700 R-5 $237,700 $237,700 R-6 $237,700 $237,700 R-7 $192,800 $192,800 R-8 $184,800 $184,800 R-9 $357,700 $357,700 R-10 $251,700 $251,700 $8,104,200 $5,498,000 $2,606,200 Real Property Purchase Agreements per RFP 19-026 November 19, 2019 Page 7 APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Fuad S. Sweiss, PE, PLS Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Executive Director Public Works Agency Finance and Management Services Agency FSS/EWG/JG/ST/HG Exhibits: 1. RFP 19-026 — Sale of City Owned Vacant Properties 2. Purchase and Sale Agreement — APN 405-252-21 and 405-252-22 3. Purchase and Sale Agreement — APN 402-272-11 to 402-272-18; and 402-272-21 4. Purchase and Sale Agreement — APN 004-123-48 and 004-123-52 5. Purchase and Sale Agreement — APN 015-194-37 and 015-194-40 6. Purchase and Sale Agreement — APN 399-085-11 7. Purchase and Sale Agreement — APN 004-122-39 8. Purchase and Sale Agreement — APN 405-073-14 and 405-073-15 9. Purchase and Sale Agreement — APN 405-073-16 to 405-073-18 10. Purchase and Sale Agreement — APN 008-231-24 to 008-231-26 11. Purchase and Sale Agreement — APN 008-231-23 and 008-231-29 12. Purchase and Sale Agreement — APN 008-232-31 and 008-232-34 13. Purchase and Sale Agreement — APN 010-022-09 14. Purchase and Sale Agreement — APN 010-183-42 to 010-183-44; and 010-193-01 15. Purchase and Sale Agreement — APN 010-183-40 to 010-183-42 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR SALE OF CITY OWNED VACANT PROPERTIES RFP NO.: 19-026 CITY OF SANTA ANA Santa Ana Public Works Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Jason Gabriel Project Manager VA for Release: Sweiss, PE, PLS ,ecutive Director c Works Agency KEY RFP DATES (Subiect to change at discretion of Ci Issue Date: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Pre -Proposal Meeting: April 16, 2019 at 1:30 PM (Location to be posted on PlanetBids) Deadline for Submitting Questions: April 24, 2019 Proposal Due Date: May 29, 2019; at 4:00 PM Projected Award Date: Varies EXHIBIT 1 NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Santa Ana will receive Proposals from qualified individuals or entities (Proposers) for the development of various vacant properties in the City of Santa Ana. Responses to this Request for Proposals (RFP) must be submitted electronically to the PlanetBids system no later than May 29, 2019 at 4:00 PM. Proposals received after this date/time will not be considered. It is the responsibility of the Proposer to ensure that any Proposals submitted have sufficient time to be received by the City of Santa Ana prior to this Proposal due date and time. Respondents are invited and encouraged to attend an optional pre -submittal meeting. The date and time of the meeting is April 15, 2019 at 1:30 PM. Additionally, it is a requirement that hard copy Proposals shall also be sent by courier service or hand delivered in an enclosed sealed envelope and marked clearly with the following information formatted exactly as shown below on or before the deadline: "SEALED PROPOSAL FOR SALE OF CITY OWNED VACANT PROPERTIES RFP NO. 19-026 IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DO NOT OPEN WITH REGULAR MAIL." CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTN.: SEAN THOMAS PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY; M-36 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA SANTA ANA, CA 92701 For further instructions regarding hard copy submission Proposals and Deposits, refer to PlanetBids. All notifications, requests for information, updates and addenda will be posted online on PlanetBids at https://www.planetbids.com/portal/vortal.cfm?CompanvID-20137. Proposers shall be responsible for monitoring the site to obtain information regarding this solicitation. Failure to respond to required updates may result in a determination of a nonresponsive qualification. City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION II. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS A. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES B. PROPOSER RESPONSIBILITIES C. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION D. ADDENDA E. PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING r'. CITY RIGHT TO REJECT G. BID PROTESTS III. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS A. GENERAL B. PROPOSAL CONTENTS C. CONDITIONS 1 2 3 IV. PROPOSAL REVIEW 9 A. EVALUATION AND RATING B. SELECTION V. PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT A. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT B. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION VI. PUBLIC RECORDS VII. CITY INFORMATION VIII. APPENDIX ATTACHMENT 1: PROJECT LOCATION EXHIBITS ATTACHMENT 2: PROPERTY BID FORM ATTACHMENT 3: SAMPLE RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT ATTACHMENT 4: SAMPLE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT 9 10 10 City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Page iii L INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. NATURE OF WORK The City of Santa Ana is seeking qualified individuals or entities (Proposers) for the purchase and development of 22 vacant properties (Attachment 1) in the City of Santa Ana. B. BACKGROUND The City's remnant parcels (Attachment 1) for disposition associated with this RFP were all acquired for various public transportation improvement projects using Federal and State grants. These properties are considered exempt per the California Surplus Lands Act (SLA) as explained herein. For purposes of the SLA, surplus land means "land owned by any local agency, that is determined to be no longer necessary for the agency's use, except property being held by the agency for the purpose of exchange." All of the properties listed under this RFP are remnant parcels from right-of-way transactions that have never been put to any municipal or other use, and were being held solely for purposes of exchange. The proceeds from the sale of these properties are considered as restricted funds and must be used to reimburse the granting agencies, and/or to fund further improvements within the same or similar project. There are eighty-eight (88) individual parcels that have been combined into twenty-two (22) combined parcels. These parcels were combined into these larger residential (10 parcels), commercial (9 parcels), and professional office (3 parcels) lots to provide the greatest public benefit and to ensure that the lots met the minimum development standards based on zoning. Proposals for developing each parcel listed in this RFP will be accepted provided that they are generally consistent with the existing zoning for each site. Proposal's content should be complete and reflect the specific ownership, financing, and land use features of each proposed project. Property zoning and size (sq. ft.) for each site is shown on the Property Location Exhibits in Attachment 1. C. PROPOSER RESPONSIBILITY Each Proposer must be capable of providing experienced, knowledgeable and professional team to deliver a complete project. The Proposer shall be responsive and fulfill all requirements of the RFP. The Proposer shall provide adequate staffing levels for each project at all times and adhere to established schedules. The Proposer shall be knowledgeable of and comply with federal, state and local laws, including the Santa Ana Municipal Code, as it applies to their Proposal. D. NUMBER OF PROPOSALS AND SIGNATURE A complete Proposal package shall be submitted on PlanetBids on or before the deadline listed on the cover of this REP. Additionally, five (5) hard copies of the electronic submission on PlanetBids shall be delivered to the City of Santa Ana to the location noted on the Notice Inviting Proposals. Hard copy Proposals and Deposits shall be submitted per instructions on PlanetBids. City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Page 1 One of the hard copies shall be marked as "ORIGINAL" and shall be wet signed by a company official with the power to bind the company and submitted to the City of Santa Ana. Please be explicit in identifying the appropriate contractual person with legal authority to bind the company for contract execution purposes. The Proposal shall be limited to a maximum of (10) double -sided pages (excluding front and back covers, section dividers and attachments such as resumes, forms, and exhibits). Font size shall be minimum 11-point Arial. Proposal exhibits shall be maximum 11" x 17". Proposers may submit Proposals for a single or multiple properties. However, a separate Proposal is required for each parcel. E. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND RATING The criteria for evaluating the Proposals submitted will take into consideration the following: Scoring Criteria Commercial / Professional Residential Project Team, Experience, Proposed Development Concept, & Financial Capacity 30% 30% Bid Amount and Deposit Verification 40% 60% Fiscal and Economic Benefit Analysis 20% N/A% Community Benefit 10% 10% TOTAL: 100% 100% Staff shall review all Proposals to determine if the RFP Process requirements, as outlined in this document, are met. All Proposals that meet the requirements will be deemed responsive and will be evaluated by a Review Panel. The Review Panel will include representatives from various City Departments, such as the Public Works Agency, Planning and Building Agency, Community Development Agency, and Finance and Management Services Agency. The Review Panel will evaluate Proposals based on the responsiveness to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined directions, format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth above and in Section III of this REP. II. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS A. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The City will provide information in its possession relevant to preparation of required information in RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and documentation specifically referred to herein. City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Page 2 B. PROPOSER RESPONSIBILITIES Point of Contact: The selected Proposer will assume responsibilities for all services in its Proposal. The selected Proposer shall identify a sole point of contact with the greatest knowledge in regard to the required service operations and contractual matters, including payment of any and all charges resulting from the Agreement. C. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION All questions or requested clarifications shall be made only in writing to the Q&A section located in PlanetBids no later than date listed on the cover of the REP. No verbal requests or responses will be accepted. Significant interpretations or clarifications will be addressed via addenda to this REP. D. ADDENDA Any changes in RFP from the date of release to the date of submittal of inquiries/questions will be summarized in an addendum or amendment to the REP. Notification of such addendum or amendment shall be posted on PlanetBids at httys://www.planetbids.com/portal/portal.cfm?CompanvID-20137 as set forth in the Notice Inviting Proposals. Addenda shall become part of the agreement documents. E. PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING There will be a non -mandatory pre -Proposal meeting. The meeting date and time are listed on the cover page of this RFP and the location will be posted on PlanetBids. The meeting will include discussion of the project scope and a question- and -answer session. It is highly recommended that the Proposer's key team members attend this meeting. Attending the meeting is not mandatory. Any significant interpretations or clarifications will be addressed via addenda to this RFP, as described above in "Section D: Addenda." F. CITY RIGHT TO REJECT The City reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals submitted and no representation is made hereby that any Purchase and Sale Agreement will be entered into pursuant to this RFP or otherwise. G.BID PROTESTS City staff will endeavor to expedite the review and evaluation of Proposals. Proposals will be evaluated and ranked according to the criteria described in this REP. Each Proposer will receive a notification in PlanetBids from the City whether their Proposal was accepted or rejected. Proposers with concerns or rebuttal of any staff determination of non -responsiveness may submit, in writing within five (5) business days, to the Project Manager, any concerns regarding the RFP processor staff determination. Such writing shall be considered by the City Manager or his designated representative, and may be acted upon within five (5) business days. If no action is taken within such time, there shall be no change to the staff determination. All successful Proposals will be presented to the City Council along with staff recommendations for final approval. City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Page 3 III. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS A. GENERAL L The number of Proposal Copies is specified in: RFP SECTION I - INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION. IL Deadline: Proposals are due to the City of Santa Ana at the date, time, and location specified in the Notice Inviting Proposals. B. PROPOSAL CONTENTS The Proposal format and page limitation, if any, is specified in: RFP SECTION I - INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION. The information being requested by this RFP is necessary for the City to adequately evaluate the Proposals. Failure to supply the requested information may result in rejection of the Proposal. ➢ Project Narrative & Preliminary Site Plan for Proposed Development 1. A cover page that includes the following information: a. Proposer's name and mailing address b. Proposer's current legal status: corporation, partnership, sole proprietor, non-profit, etc. c. Contact person's name, title, phone number and e-mail address d. Signature of authorized corporate officer for each entity proposing as a partnership or team shall be signed by a company official with the power to bind the company 2. A Letter of Introduction — Include a summary of the respondent's basic qualifications, experience, past projects of similar nature and size, and reasons for interests in this opportunity. The letter must be signed by an individual authorized to make legally binding commitments for the entity. 3. Identify the entities that will be involved, including the following information: a. An organizational structure that describes roles each entity will play (e.g., developer, architect, building owner, property manager, tenant, professional consultant). b. A summary of the developmentteam's past experience in working together to develop similar projects, including location, type of development, Proposer's role(s), cost of project, funding sources, status of project, and information about any continued financial or operating interest in each. c. Include specific previous relevant experience with public entities, especially within Orange County, including reference contact information. The City may ask for supporting documentation substantiating claims of previous experience. City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Page 4 d. The purchase and sale agreement shall be in the Proposers name submitted in the bid Proposal. During the agreement period, the Proposer/buyer may not assign its rights or obligations under an agreement without the prior written consent of the City, which consent may be withheld in the sole discretion of City. The Proposer may assign its rights and obligations to 1) a partnership of which the Proposer or an affiliate entity is the general partner, 2) to a limited liability company of which the Proposer or an affiliate entity is the managing member and which the Proposer or an affiliate entity directly or indirectly holds an ownership interest, or 3) any other entity in which Proposer directly or indirectly has an ownership interest and is responsible for managing the day to day activities of such entity. 4. A detailed and concise project description of the proposed development including narrative, preliminary site plan and renderings if available (e.g., size of building and square footage of specific components, nature of improvements, number of parking spaces, development plan, anticipated materials and design style, circulation patterns, loading/service provisions) to be built on the site. Information should be included about the anticipated type of tenants expected. For all projects, the narrative must also address the development concept for the site, current zoning, and anticipated development costs. 5. A letter of intent from tenants or other information documenting the demand for the proposed space, if available. 6. A proposed timeframe for the development, including identification of any conditions that must be met before the Proposal can become a reality. The schedule should include the time needed to obtain financing, complete design and secure permits and entitlement approvals, prepare the site, start and complete construction, and start and complete occupancy and/or lease -up. 7. Provide evidence of sufficient financial strength to undertake and successfully complete a project of this scale. The preferred evidence is recent financial statements for respondent with an accompanying letter from a certified public accountant verifying that the financial statements were prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The City, at its sole discretion, may consider alternative evidence of sufficient capacity to undertake a development of the proposed scope: (NOTE: alternative evidence must be approved by the City prior to respondent's submission of a response to this REP. 8. A description of proposed project financing structure and anticipated return (e.g. anticipated sources and proportions of debt/equity and financial return threshold required by respondent). 9. Please indicate whether fundraising to finance all or a portion of development costs is proposed, and if so, in what amount. City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Page 5 10. Identification of any projects/financings upon which the respondent team or its members has collectivity or individually defaulted. For any Proposal that is selected for recommendation to City Council, additional information including complete financial statements for the last three years for all team members who will retain an ownership interest in the project may be required. 11. Any other information that would help City staff understand and evaluate the concepts proposed. ➢ Bid Amount and Deposit Verification A completed Property Bid Form (Attachment 2). Proposals that do not include an executed Property Bid Form, including initials acknowledging each page, shall be considered incomplete which will be grounds for rejection of the entire Proposal. It is not required that the bid amount match or exceed the "Appraised Amount" listed on the Property Bid Form. 2. Each bid must be accompanied by a deposit in the form of a cashier's check, treasurer's check or bank draft of any state or national bank, payable to the City of Santa Ana, in the amount of One Percent (1%) of the total bid amount for each parcel. If bidding on multiple properties, multiple deposit checks will be required. These deposits shall be submitted at the same time as the hard copy Proposals. ➢ Fiscal and Economic Benefit Analysis (Commercial and Professional Office Proposals Only) 3. A development budget showing the detailed sources and uses of all funds (including debt, equity and other funding sources) to acquire and develop the site. Ensure that the capital pro forma breaks out project costs to indicate all developer and professional fees. Information as to the status of securing those funds should be included, and inclusion of a conditional financing commitment is strongly encouraged. If the project includes multiple uses, the development budget should be broken down by the component uses (commercial, office, etc.). An electronic and editable copy of the development budget and pro forma including all underlying assumptions and equations in .xls format shall be provided if requested by the City. 4. An estimate of the taxable value upon completion and annual real estate taxes. Also include a description of the additional benefits that will result from the development, such as the jobs created or retained (including the estimated number, type and wage levels of both full time and part time positions within the first five years of development). City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Page 6 ➢ Community Benefit 5. Describe how the proposed development will serve the local community. Community benefits may be achieved through developing or increasing access to the following: • Affordable housing, with a focus on community -controlled, permanently affordable housing, for example a community land trust; • Affordable, healthy food retail; • Community gardens / pocket parks, children's playground, etc; • Community health clinics; • School facilities; • Renewable energy infrastructure; • Public transportation; • Green space, parks and recreation centers; • Affordable childcare; • Youth and senior facilities and services; • Community agriculture; • Development of land by a community land trust; • Hiring Local workforce for construction and ongoing operations; 6. Identify any other business or property holdings in the greater Santa Ana Region and participation in any local business, business partnerships, or community based partnerships in this area C. CONDITIONS All information contained in this RFP are believed to be accurate; however, no representation or warranty is made with respect thereto. 1. Additional Deposit: The development team whose Proposal is ultimately selected by the City Council must make the required down payment of Ten Percent (10%)to the selected escrow company within Ten (10) days of City Council Approval. After the deposit of Ten Percent (10%) is made, the initial One Percent (1%) deposit will be returned. Additionally, the City will return the One Percent (1%) deposit submitted from all Proposers who are not selected by City Council for award. 2. Escrow: Following City Council approval of the sale of the property, escrow shall commence. The remainder of the bid amount shall be due prior to close of escrow. Closing on the property sale must be completed within thirty to forty- five (30 - 45) days of escrow opening or the Ten Percent deposit (10%) may be forfeited. Upon opening of escrow, the buyer will agree in writing to forfeit and release the deposit money to the City in the event of buyer default. The purchaser shall pay all escrow related fees, including the seller's portion as well as documentary fees, surtaxes, and all recording fees, etc. City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Page 7 3. Due Diligence Period: Potential bidders may arrange for contractors, consultants, architects and others they deem necessary to inspect the properties they would like to submit bids for. Bidders are inspecting the properties at their own risk, and they are fully responsible and liable for their personnel, investors, inspectors, guests and invitees of all types while at the properties. Bidders agree to accept this liability at all times during any property inspection. Inspections are recommended but not mandatory. Potential bidders shall conduct their own due diligence at their own cost prior to submitting a bid. In order to conduct a site investigation, a no -fee Right of Entry Permit shall be required (Attachment 3). If desired, submit form to PWAPrope , Sale ,santa- ana.or. 4. Warranties of Bum Buyer will warranty a commitment of milestones for the entitlement process, as well as construction of proposed development to be specified in the actual purchase and sale agreement. Refer to Sample Agreement (Attachment 4) for specific provisions. 5. Withdrawal of Bids: Proposers may withdraw their Proposals at any time prior to the deadline for Proposal submittal. After the deadline, the Proposal will constitute an irrevocable offer for a period of 180 days. Once opened, Proposals become a record of the City and will not be returned to the Proposer. Any Proposers that withdraw bids after the deadline but prior to council award shall forfeit their initial One Percent (1%) deposit. 6. Bid Postponement / Cancellation: The City may, at its sole and absolute discretion, reject any bids that are not submitted in accordance with the terms in this Bid Solicitation. The City may re -advertise this Bid; postpone or cancel, at any time during this Bid process; or waive any irregularities in this Bid or in the Proposals received as a result of this Bid. 7. Costs Incurred by Proposers: All expenses involved with the preparation and submission of bids to the City, or any work performed in connection therewith, including participating in any presentations or negotiations related to this REP, shall be borne by the Proposer(s). No rights of ownership will be conferred until title of the property is transferred to the successful bidder. All fees for copying and reproduction services for items listed herein are nonrefundable. 8. Business Entity Registration: It is the responsibility of the Proposer to update information concerning any changes, such as new address, telephone number, etc. 9. Oral Presentations: The City does not anticipate that oral presentations will be required of Proposers. The committee reserves the right to interview any Proposer, begin City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Page 8 negotiations and enter into an agreement without interview or further discussions. 10. Pronerty Records: The properties were acquired as part of various City improvement projects and are being sold "AS IS". The City of Santa Ana does not provide an abstract of title or survey of the property. Interested parties are able to review all available property records, by appointment. 11. Broker Fees: The City intends on negotiating directly with Proposers on the sale of these properties. Proposers may employ and compensate brokers at their own expense. IV. PROPOSAL REVIEW A. EVALUATION AND RATING The criteria for evaluating the Proposals are specified in: RFP SECTION I - INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION. B. SELECTION The committee may interview the top ranking Proposers. Staff will recommend authorization of a purchase and sale agreement to the Proposer who best meets the scoring criteria. V. PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT A. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT The submitted Proposal will be the basis for any negotiation of final terms which will lead to a completed agreement ready for execution based on the sample Agreement attached herein as Attachment 4 in the Appendix. B. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Following evaluation and rating by the Proposal review committee, the Project Manager will bring forth the recommended Proposals to City Council for authorization. VI. PUBLIC RECORDS All data, documents and other products used, developed, or produced during response preparation of the RFP will become property of the City. All responses to the RFP shall become property of the City. Proposer information identified as proprietary information shall be maintained confidential, to the extent allowed under the California Public Records Act. City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Page 9 VIL CITY INFORMATION BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS The majority of the parcels are located on Bristol Street. Within the City of Santa Ana, Bristol Street is classified as a north -south Major Arterial per the City's General Plan Circulation Element (GPCE) and the County of Orange's Master Plan of Arterial Highway (MPAH). Due to growth experienced during the late 1980's resulting in traffic congestion and safety concern with lack of bike lane, the City of Santa Ana proposed to improve Bristol Street providing adequate vehicular capacity and adding bike lanes from Warner Ave. to Memory Lane. The proposed improvements have been designed utilizing Complete Streets principals to provide safe, comfortable, and convenient travel for all users — pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and motorists. Safety: The narrow travel lanes and raised median will deter speeding through the project segment; Landscape parkways will provide a safe buffer between pedestrians and motorists; Bicyclists will travel in a designated bike lane instead of mixing flow with vehicles and pedestrians; longer raided median and cul-de-sac streets are potentially reduced controlled left turn movements and improved traffic flow. Accessibility: Installation of wider sidewalks, ADA compliant curb ramps, and bike lanes will greatly improve accessibility for pedestrians and bicyclists. Traffic Flow: Improving the remaining phases of Bristol Street will complete the ultimate roadway cross section with six lanes between Warner Ave to 17th St. Ultimately, the proposed Bristol Street improvements will provide safe mobility for all users while improving traffic flow. Development along the Bristol Street Corridor must adhere the Bristol Street Specific Plan. The document can be accessed via the following link: httns://www.santa-ana.org/yb/nlanning- division/zoning-documents TRANSIT ZONING CODE Some of the parcels are within the boundaries of the Transit Zoning Code, it is adjacent to the boundaries where the code impacts future development of the Downtown. In 2010, the City adopted Specific Development 84 (Transit Zoning Code), a comprehensive land use plan that incorporates approximately 450 acres extending from Grand Avenue to the City's downtown core. The Transit Zoning Code (TZC) is designed to provide the zoning necessary to supportthe long-term development of a successful transit program. The completed document can be viewed in its entirety at: httn://www.ci.santa-ana.ca.us/nba/nlanning/Transit Zoning Code.asn The Transit Zoning Code encourages transit -oriented development containing a mix of residential, commercial, and professional uses to achieve the City's and the region's goals of establishing housing adjacent to transit. The Transit Zoning Code area is primed for increased growth given its proximity to major transit systems and its adjacency to existing residential communities, creating amenity -enriched connections between the government center and rail station, and improving area -wide walkability. City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Page 10 OCSTREETCAR The cities of Santa Ana and Garden Grove in cooperation with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) are constructing a fixed guideway/streetcar transportation system between the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) and Garden Grove. The system will provide transit services for commuters travelling from the train station to employment and activity centers in the heart of Orange County and for residents and visitors alike travelling to destinations throughout the area. The OC Streetcar will increase transportation options and provide greater access along its 4.15- mile route (in each direction) along Santa Ana Boulevard, 4th Street, and the Pacific Electric right-of-way to Harbor Boulevard in Garden Grove. The OC Streetcar will provide the some of the sites with easy access to both the Civic Center and downtown. More information regarding the OC Streetcar can be viewed at http://www. octa. net/Proi ects-and-Programs/All-Projects/Rail-Prof ects/OC-Streetcar/ City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Page 11 Appendix ATTACHMENT PROJECT LOCATION EXHIBITS 0 i Y i Miles City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment i F(-,FNn P _ EXISTING ARCEL C1 PROPERTY LINE COMBINED ZONING APPROX. AREA PARCEL COMMERCIAL 18,290 SF H W W J 0 Ir EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED PARCEL WASHINGTON AVENUE ; PARCEL C2 ZONING APPROX. AREA COMMERCIAL 48,597 SF 1.1 AC 9TH STREET CIVIC CENTER DRIVE i F(-,FNn P _ EXISTING ARCEL C3 PROPERTY LINE COMBINED ZONING APPROX. AREA PARCEL r - POTENTIAL EDISON COMMERCIAL 24,176 SF L _ I EASEMENT WILLITS STREET EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED PARCEL CAMLE STREET PARCEL C4 ZONING APPROX. AREA COMMERCIAL 48,287 SF 1.1 AC 720 ST. 109 HIGHLAND STREET _..8._.. Sr i) am aw 34 8= S S. I F(;FNF) EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED PARCEL `yam.,. •� �IRT_ r PARCEL C5 ZONING APPROX. AREA COMMERCIAL 49,403 SF 1.13 AC BROOK STREET N Z _ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED PARCEL PARCEL C6 ZONING I APPROX. AREA COMMERCIAL 1 17,415 SF EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PARCEL C7 EDCOMBINED ZONING PARCEL COMMERCIAL APPROX.AREA 12,734 SF I F(;FNI): _ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED PARCEL \ 3RD STREET -kimL-- I -TT PARCEL C8 ZONING APPROX. AREA COMMERCIAL 21,313 SF u lame {� CIVIC CENTER DRIV 724 RISTOL ST. 05-074dffi Y 1 — 715 N•BRIS LST. - ` I 465- -17 _ 712N RISTOLST. Ire 05-074-18 F f T � . i 0L 704 BRISTOL ST. 1 405-07419 r - "1JIlh Cf) - f m ff B 7TH STREET 41r X All N I F(;FNI): EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED PARCEL r iPOTENTIAL EDISOI EASEMENT PARCEL P1 ZONING APPROX. AREA PROFESSIONAL 17,164 SF Aw who PINE STREET F(;FNF)PARCEL P2 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED ZONING APPROX. AREA PARCEL 36,504 SF PROFESSIONAL 0.84 AC r EXISTING PROPERTY LINE ElCOMBINED PARCEL 10TH STREET fmmobt AA..a6d"ift AM AWOL Y PARCEL P3 ZONING I APPROX. AREA PROFESSIONAL 1 11,868 SF EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED PARCEL 18TH STREET �io-o J co Lo 00 m O Z rn � , co W N H LjIL � I PARCEL R1 ZONING I APPROX. AREA RESIDENTIAL 1 4,365 SF M rI%AE I J 0 �" ce) I co zo co m um 9TH STREET F(;FNF)PARCEL R2 _ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED ZONING APPROX. AREA PARCEL RESIDENTIAL 7,755 SF .J 0 Fr 00 7TH Sl EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED PARCEL PARCEL R3 ZONING I APPROX. AREA RESIDENTIAL 1 5,949 SF EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PARCEL R4 EDCOMBINED ZONING PARCEL RESIDENTIAL APPROX.AREA 9,355 SF EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED PARCEL PARCEL R5 ZONING I APPROX. AREA RESIDENTIAL 1 6,513 SF I F(;FNF) _ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED PARCEL _iw CHESTNUT AVENUE PARCEL R6 ZONING APPROX. AREA RESIDENTIAL 6,469 SF I F(;FNF) EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED PARCEL _>` CHESTNUT AVENUE PARCEL R7 ZONING I APPROX. AREA RESIDENTIAL 1 4,701 SF I RAYMAR STREET I F(;FNF) EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED PARCEL PARCEL R8 ZONING APPROX. AREA RESIDENTIAL 4,595 SF F(;FNF)P _ EXISTING ARCEL R9 PROPERTY LINE COMBINED ZONING APPROX. AREA PARCEL RESIDENTIAL 12,071 SF m I F(;FNI): EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED PARCEL 1) 711 S. ISTOL 010-183 2 S. tBRIS L ST.013-40 STREET PARCEL R10 ZONING APPROX. AREA RESIDENTIAL 8,492 SF Appendix ATTACHMENT PROPERTY BID FORM Each row must be completed with either a bid amount or a ✓ indicating no bid is placed for that property. Print and Sign name below. For each property in which a bid amount is extended, all submittal requirements apply. PARCEL ZONING LOT SIZE APPRAISED BID NO BID ID (SQ. FT) AMOUNT (USD $)* AMOUNT (USD $) Cl Commercial 18,290 $1,095,000 $ C2 Commercial 48,597 $2,915,000 $ C3 Commercial 24,176 $1,450,000 $ C4 Commercial 48,287 $2,800,000 $ C5 Commercial 49,403 $2,865,000 $ C6 Commercial 17,415 $1,180,000 $ C7 Commercial 12,734 $635,000 $ C8 Commercial 21,313 $1,385,000 $ C9 Commercial 25,139 $1,355,000 $ P1 Professional 17,164 $995,000 $ P2 Professional 36,504 $1,970,000 $ P3 Professional 11,868 $590,000 $ Rl Residential 4,365 $150,000 $ City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment 2 PROPOSER INITIAL PARCEL ZONING LOT SIZE APPRAISED BID NO BID ID (SQ. FT) AMOUNT (USD $)* AMOUNT (USD $) (� R2 Residential 7,755 $300,000 $ R3 Residential 5,949 $235,000 $ R4 Residential 9,355 $325,000 $ R5 Residential 6,513 $260,000 $ R6 Residential 6,469 $255,000 $ R7 Residential 4,701 $160,000 $ R8 Residential 4,595 $160,000 $ R9 Residential 12,071 $410,000 $ R10 Residential 8,492 $305,000 $ *The "Appraised Amount' is an estimate of the market value per an appraisal report prepared by a California licensed appraiser. It is not required that the bid amount match or exceed the "Appraised Amount' listed hereon. Name of Firm Name of BIDDER Signature of BIDDER Title (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co- partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof) City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment 2 PROPOSER INITIAL Appendix ATTACHMENT SAMPLE RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT RIGHT OF ENTRY [Property Address] The City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California, does hereby grant to NAME OF GRANTEE ("Grantee"), the right to enter the parcel described as PARCEL X adjacent to ADDRESS, Santa Ana, County of Orange, as more particularly shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("Property"), for the following purposes: The right to enter and use the Property for the purpose of conducting site investigations Grantee agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City, its officers, agents, representatives, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all actions, suits, claims, demands, judgments, losses, expenses, or liabilities, injuries and damages to persons and property, including death, arising out of or related to Grantee's use of the Property or the entry by any Grantee party on the Property, including without limitation, Grantee's guests and invitees. Grantee further agrees to repair any damage to the Property caused by the exercise of this Right of Entry at its sole cost and expense and to restore said property to the state in which it existed prior to its use. Grantee shall maintain commercial general liability insurance which shall include, but not be limited to, protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom and damage to property, resulting from any act or occurrence arising out of its use of the Property, including, without limitation, acts involving vehicles. The amounts of insurance shall be not less than the following: single limit coverage applying to bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage, in the total amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate. Such insurance shall (a) name the City, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives as additional insured(s); (b) be primary and not contributory with respect to insurance or self-insurance programs maintained by the City; and (c) contain standard separation of insureds provisions. The rights herein granted to Grantee are exclusive, and Grantee agrees not to assign, transfer, lease, pledge, or otherwise dispose of this Right of Entry without the prior express written approval of the City. This instrument conveys no right of entry to existing buildings, if any. This Right of Entry shall expire on DATE, unless otherwise terminated earlier or extended by written agreement between the parties. THE CITY OF SANTA ANA A charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California. City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment 3 Steven Mendoza Acting City Manager Date: NAME OF GRANTEE APPROVED AS TO FORM: John M.Funk Assistant City Attorney City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment Appendix ATTACHMENT SAMPLE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): THIS California AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement'), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and ('Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APNs) I located at in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for APNs , filed with the County of Orange as Document No. [INSERT DOCUMENT NUMBER], is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and is incorporated herein by this reference. C. The subject Property was acquired by Seller in IYear(s)l as part of the IProiect Name(s)l . These parcels are vacant and are not needed for public use or improvements. D. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. FACIN=I =ILril4L,kl The parties therefore agree as follows: f�1�1:ZN:/GF9q Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment 4 purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyerwill remit into escrow a deposit of ten percent (10%) of the purchase price, or ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Escrow Deposit and by the proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(b) being herein called the "Closing Payment"). (c) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Percent (1 %) of the purchase price, or ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") (Duration) business days subsequent to the Effective Date of this Agreement or as soon as possible thereafter. City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment 4 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment") binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closing Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment 4 conditions: (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have fifteen (15) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete any additional due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies not performed during the proposal period ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyerwith reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within ten (10) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment 4 Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment 4 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) To Seller's actual knowledge, no litigation and no governmental, administrative or regulatory act or proceeding regarding the environmental, health and safety aspects of the Property is pending, proposed or threatened; and (c) Sellerwill not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (d) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (e) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Proposed Use defined in this section within [Duration (months)l following the Close of Escrow. The proposed operation of an [Proposed Use(s)l by Buyer on the Property is critical to the Seller's decision to sell the Property to Buyer. The [Duration (months)l timeframe shall be tolled by any delays directly attributable to the actions or inactions of the Seller or Tenant, by any natural causes outside the control of either party ("Force Majeure"), or by mutual agreement of the parties. If Buyer does not comply with this guarantee within the timeframe provided, the Seller may opt to nullify the sale of the Property, at which time the Property shall be returned to the Seller, including any and all improvements to the Property completed by Buyer, in exchange for payment by the Seller to Buyer of eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price. (b) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment 4 contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (c) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FULL BENEFITS By execution of this Agreement, Seller hereby acknowledges that this Agreement provides full payment for the acquisition of the Property by Buyer, and Seller hereby expressly and unconditionally waives any claim for damages, interest, loss of goodwill, severance damages, or any other compensation or benefits other than as already expressly provided for in this Agreement, it being understood that this is a complete and full settlement of all acquisition claims, liabilities, or benefits of any type or nature whatsoever relating to or in connection with the acquisition of the Property. C7AdiIAQ1:11 If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. 6. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. ln�GF96YK67►1QIIEel ►1 Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment 4 Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 8. MISCELLANEOUS 8.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Executive Director, PWA Facsimile: E-mail: Buyer: Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment 4 be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 8.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 8.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the Executive Director of Public Works Agency shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 8.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 8.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 8.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 8.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 8.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment 4 instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 8.9 No Merger All warranties, representations, acknowledgements, releases, covenants and obligations contained in this Agreement shall survive delivery and recordation of the grant deed. 8.10 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 8.11 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation 21 Steven A. Mendoza Acting City Manager ATTEST: 0 Norma Mitre Acting Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: in John M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: 21 City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described as follows: City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment EXHIBIT "B" ORANGE COUNTY RECORDER DOCUMENT NO. [INSERT DOCUMENT NO.I [attached behind this page] City of Santa Ana RFP 19-026 Attachment AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 406-252-21, 406-252-22 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement'), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and Southwest Group Properties, LLC("Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 405-252-21, 405-252-22 located at 1601 - 1607 N Bristol St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. AGREEMENT The parties therefore agree as follows: 1. PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: EXHIBIT 2 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $1,100,000 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment'). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 2 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment') binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closing Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have fifteen (15) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 0 Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Sellerwill not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 36 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the 2 open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Retail Drive-thru (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (d) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 7 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) 0 Buyer: Southwest Group Properties, LLC 714 S. Plymouth Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90005 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 9 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 405-252-21, 405-252-22 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation M Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST: By: Daisy Gomez -"; Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: � 7g, -f.L (John M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] Exhibit A In the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, being Lots 3, 5, and 7, of a Surveyors Map, per map filed in book 3 page 12, of Record of Surveys, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, Except that Land described in a Deed as Instrument 20 H 0 ooq IU S, official records of said County. Containing 18290 square feet, more or less. Subject to all Covenants, Conditions, Reservations, Restrictions, Rights of Way and Easements of record, if any. The bearing used for Bristol Street is North 10 32' 07" East; per Record of Survey 2011-1081 filed in book 253, pages 1.7 through 20, of Records of Survey, in the Office of said County Recorder of Orange County. All as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Prepared by me, or under my direction on jo ( / John M. Gonzales, PLS 9065 Id" SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEVENTEENTH I STREET ----- -------- --�— - _ _ _ 5 89°11 43 - E - - - - - uJ i /90< 1 93, Sri 85.00' EAST z OF C.L. s 89°11'43" E I N i 6g =3,e L1 15 .' 1 BS �W C2 I o I. I C 1 ILLLLLJI I LLI v ti d i I r w 0 Z � I I I i 5 89011'43" E v.64.00' EAST OF C.L.. A= 10' EASEMENT PER INST.1 1918 BK 4156 PG 413 B= 10' EASEMENT PER INST.! 12214'BK 3785 PG 22_ 1 C1 C2 C3 C= 10' EASEMENT PER ( e = 21428'58" A = 1°48'45" R 100.007O" BK 3631 PG 214. R = 100.00' R = 100.00 t ) = PER RS 2011-1061 L = 37.50' L = 3.16' L = 37,46' RSB 253/17-20. 1 L1 = N 24949'50" E, 11.87 = RSB 3/12. oNp) LQN�s Go/v WASHINGTON AVE. (W) I - ------------ - - WASHINGTON AVE. No.9065 s STREET R/W PER INST. NO 2olloyo�tiUj EXHIBIT "B" GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instrument to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXES APPROVED AS TO APPROVED BY DESCRIPTION DISCRIPTION AP R/WMAP PARCEL FORM BY ATTY. DIRCTI WRTTTENBY CHECKEDK NDMBER NDMBER NDMBER 405-252-21 & 22 Ct DEED NIiALBER 1601 & 1607 N. BRISTOL STREET 8735 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: Southwest Group Properties, LLC, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. described as follows: See Exhibit "A' attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Dated: By: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] , � 0 � � 2 (D CL 0 U) (D | (D r) o- E O E o > U a) < $ _0 w a) U U) 0 O 0 O CL n PARCEL�] \ ƒ k � � � « AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 405-272-11, 450-272-12, 405-272-13, 405-272-14, 405-272-15, 405-272-16, 405-272-17, 405-272-18, 405-272-21 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement"), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and Merchant Star International General Trading ("Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 405-272-11, 450-272-12, 405-272-13, 405-272-14, 405-272- 15, 405-272-16, 405-272-17, 405-272-18, 405-272-21 located at 1303 to 1411 N Bristol St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. AGREEMENT The parties therefore agree as follows: 1. PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing EXHIBIT 3 otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $2,605,000 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment"). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 4 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment") binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closinq Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 5I Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Seller will not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 36 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the A open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Multi -Tenant Restaurant (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (d) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 7 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) Buyer: Merchant Star International General Trading 701 Park Center Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governina Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 9 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 405-272-11, 450-272-12, 405-272-13, 405-272-14, 405-272-15, 405-272-16, 405-272-17, 405-272-18, 405-272-21 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation By: Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST. By: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: lit'- ohn M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: Merchant S International General Trading By: 1 ✓`-� 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] Exhibit A In the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, being .L,ots 12 through 20, of Tract Map 863, per map recorded in Book. E, page 30 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the Office of the County .Recorde.r of said County, Except that land described in a Deed as Instrument number ZQ aaa'official records of said County Together with that land described in a Deed as Instrument number 2017000525166 official records of said County. Described.as a 'whole. Subject to all Covenants, Conditions, Reservations, Restrictions, Rights of Way and Easements of record, if any. Containing 49,079,0 square feet, more or less. All as shown on Exhibit 8, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, Prepared by me, or under my direction on ( ohn M. Gonzales, PI.S 9065 OHN M. GONZALES *� No..9065 OF -A1: Page 1 of 2 ' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION . ! <� <y | SEE PAGE 2 OF 3 = u/ x_ F CD ________________-_~_______��. Z | � | | ` ] / ~ ' l ^ ~ +� r \� --____�_________��_______ | �* | L------------------------------------------ S89"14/38" E -- a_.�-.-�-_~_'. --'-----^--'-----'-----'--'_-.--'--'--.—_--'-----,--.--'-- | � `WASHINGTON AVE. (E) C1 C2 � " ^ " Zl= 327 = , 11 R. = 12~ ' J3� R=2».VV L = 6.96' L= 16.65, Ll = N "14' " . 0. 1 L2 = N �5'1U'27* W. 9.17° L3 = N �3^45^23° W. 33.82~ 72.00' - ` RT. �L 8RnSTnL 53^99' LTCLWASHlNGTON (E) = 88.92' RT° CL~ 8RlSTOL J?.00^ LT. CL W4$HlNGTON (E) [ l = PER TRACT 863~ M.M. 26/30. ( ) = PER R5 2011-1081, RS8 253/17-20. STREET R.W. PER INST. NO JOHN M. GONZALES Ll PAGE 1 OF 3 EXHIBIT ° SEE PAGE 3 OF 3 64.00, ' *v ... �Jzc 0D�~ iuu� ] . {)~' .r Ln <�| / |4 U- on on co Lo | ' (D =WEST 10' OF LOT 18 | EASEMENT TO THE 8ANTA N4A BK' 4132 P5.432' | ��~EAST 10' OF THE WEST 20' OF LOT 18 ' EASEMENT TO THE SANTA ANA PER INST. 82-202192 | PER TRACT 863. N.N. 26/30. } = PER RS 2011-1081, RSB 253/17-20. VwASNM \� C3/C4 �/ \ ' " E � 89"14 38 _ /1 = 9^08^35" �—'---'^—'I�'--'--'--'--'----'--'-----'-- R = 50.00' | ,~-`~. .�~.~.. AVE.~~ | &�� ��� L = 7.99' . . | STREET R.W. DATA PER INST. 2 OF ° EXHIBITB' <\ 4 ' m \'- | | iJ ! . /��| /\\,�� � . �___----_���----------__-____-__-----_---- �_ /�n'1 S 8B"��'38" E [�44.71/l ~ � /- __ /--��-�T °°/ -1 -- ---------- | ' ` | | / m � |-- � �- . '- -------- . .| ' | / � m w =| i-- /- w `�^~* . � | o / m � o m | �r* ------ - - ------- r`. � �- | | - / | -_/ m ~ �� [3O'] / / p z � . � L --- � /-- � m - ---------- | | �� uu / III ��--'.---y��------[--U | S 89"14 ' " � �� " . �8 | | � L� _/ -� . E'C. L/ | SEE Sm ' [144.&8^) PAGE 2 OF 3 � C = EASEMENT PER BK 4115. PG 336O.R. ' D = EASEMENT PER BK 4156, PC 359 O.R. E = EASEMENT PER BK 4134, P8 566 D.R. ' «» F = EASEMENT PER BK 13734, PC 1430 O.R. � o = PER TRACT 863. NI~ M^ 26/30' | -~ . [ ) = PER RS 2011-1081^ RSB 253/17-20, | ' STREET R.W.DATA PER lNST | ^ V&ASK(W) -'-----'-- (a' |/ \ S 88^14'38" E '--'--'-----'_'_-'--'_'--'--' | � | ^~~~' ~`~~'~~'` AVE. ��� ~~' (c�" °~ PAGE 3 OF 3 GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instrument to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXES APPROVED AS TO APPROVED BY DESCRIPTION DISCRIPTION A.P. R/W MAP PARCEL FORM BY ATTY. DIRCTOR WRITTEN BY CHECKED O.K. NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER 405-272-11, 12, 13,14, 15 16 17 18 & 21 C2 DEED NUMBER 1303 - 1411 N. BRISTOL STREET 8736 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: Merchant Star International General Trading, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: By: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C" INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] 'lrF�i� ■ r w z 00 f Fir onnFe T?Irtu - - BRISTOL STREET i1TE SL'M�5/i6P' - P,E AURAr7T 1Yi M!4 PitOSy ! 111p7a 3,1. �eF�ueAR+fh 1,aawsr. TO1xleW;ti1++lS Aefx S,ICO S.f. 1Y�C04iRAGF 16eU1L ief% sn COWRAGEPLI tau% eAP,j -ig SL'M YiAR-f •;0UTAUDAtIT yAD;At1�F D_ C71wED • TREI'DM ?AND $rAcn SPACO N"CwAAC04pFeQ•F W um tfoom t0j" eomcd e t%4AM 1 OpCM4F, 1f 11 (LISlY O7�Oc vv.ca7 iMme". tv'wou- !A 24 aa50lLO1]*C ' U vAC#57 IOfX 11 ,' R� C2 �f#, MERCHANT STAR INTERNATIONAL WAS M 3"MET APM WA;'-00TOM AVENLF— aA ITA ANA, CA 4? W ""�fAon oar. 6tiM�i9 eXi• p I'. M OPTION #2 `�"�i' SlE?}!i . Wic sa geaysmea Page 60 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 004-123-52, 004-123-48 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement'), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and Merchant Star International General Trading ("Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 004-123-52, 004-123-48 located at 828 N Bristol St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. /eLMV44Jtl4J1111 The parties therefore agree as follows: 1. PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: 1 EXHIBIT 4 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $1,025,000 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit'). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit'). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment'). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ('Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 2 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment") binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closing Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Dilioence Period 12 Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Sellerwill not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 36 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the 'Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the n. open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Restaurant (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) Buyer acknowledges that the Seller is coordinating the undergrounding of utilities along Bristol Street and a future twenty-five (25) foot by twenty- five (25) foot easement for Southern California Edison shall be required at the northeast corner of the site as detailed in the Seller Request for Proposal No. 19-026 and Buyer's proposed site plan (Exhibit C). The limits of the easement shall be determined concurrent with the Approvals. Buyer shall ensure that the Intended Improvements shall not be in conflict with the proposed easement. No compensation shall be provided for the easement. (d) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (e) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive 7 remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Buyer: Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) Merchant Star International General Trading 701 Park Center Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors 9 in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 004-123-52, 004-123-48 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation By: Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST By: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By 7VV, -.', Jbfin M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: Merchant Star International General Trading By. �n' ez5 _ 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] Exhibit A In the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, being those portions of Parcel 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 79-905, per Parcel Map Book 150, pages 12 and 13, filed in the Office of the County Recorders of said County, Except that land described Ina Deed per Instrument Number 7_01!Wpn4ynj , official records of said county, Containing 25 000.0 square feet, more or less. Subject to all Covenants, Conditions, Reservations, Restrictions, Rights of Way and Easements of record, if any. All as shown on Exhibit &, attached hereto and by this "reference made a part hereof. Prepared by me, or under my direction on John M. Gonzales, PLS 9065 f` JOHN M. GONZALES _ � V* \ No.. 9065 / * Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT 'B' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Y-- / I C1 �-< % 4 PCl I �r o ;.' 9 TH STREET Q z �� C7 '`ap1^pp R. y ti 2 in¢w M.b30 a WWOp.O OPe¢LL IA U� ysobo cZe � Jp Q] V IJQYP N 89'31' Wl PRC Q 4°48'23" R = 2000.00' L = 167.78' ---- -----'---------------- Lu ----- I o DEED BK .591. PA�. 169. x; . 24.21' I _ 783 z i I �w/ I u C3 - PRC lRA81 }� m. 1 C4 i I BC. 64'CONCENTNIC 1p t Lu -64` PARALLEL BC iJ POL. I �t } -i�•} N I —Iy j}1 VI 24. 21' t`LLI _ -- --� w 'I o I � I •- C1 C2 PLL 2 I V!N- 4 a^•�� �I a I i Z t ws a / ` f s � I RADIAL BEARINGS B1. =.N 19°08'48" E B2 = N 27'43'44 E B3 = S 45017'05" E 64 = N 81.37'42" E C3 1 I t t I — -- (8 TH STREET) j_-- CMC CENTER DR -.II' I C4 I = 14°53'08" A = 83.41'23" A = 141.50'42" = 0`39'34" R = 95.00' R = 43:00' R = 5.00' R = 2064.0W L = 24.68' L = 62.81' L = 12.3V L = 23.76' W CO E ( I PER PM 79-905. PMB 15012-13. (( )) = PER DEED BK. 591. PC, 109, O = STREET R. W. PER INSTRUMENT NO. ?,QLRQQO jy 3 /'�- PAGE 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT "B" GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instrument to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE TAXES APPROVED AS TO .APPROVED BY DESCRIPTION DI,(RIPTION A.P. R/NMAP PARCEL FORMBY \TTY_ DIRCTOR WRITTENBY CHECKED O.K. NUMBER LUMBER NLMBER 004-123-48 & 52 C3 DEED NUMBER 828 N. BRISTOL STREET 8737 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: Merchant Star International General Trading, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: See Exhibit "A° attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C" INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] L COM4iERC1Af. — I .. RESIDENTIAL j— LU ¢ a — � C � 1 �.s BRISTOL STREET m sym, Pt PARgNO SL'M y-CStAU lm VA'd1 EPLYA RQ Vl4E.IlIUy •rMV. • IMMV.C, 1](Yf,JT'i 31�fl31. •�.p YwGtl ,�Y •[QWW mOymp NJMIO •Jlpll]Y!. \]ri1. {]y],y,.y/ YI(d L. ► q Yt G[N�l.�l lGlUfll 11J]i ♦mn%41COY .Y PAib1 1!r! 3m <w[.wl snn rnw C3 �((�� � MERCHANT STAR INTERNATIONAL sln s:a�t]ums OPTION M3 �.F �stnEr.sAr,A.lwaans .«..�; wn, ocswm Page 60 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 015-194-37, 015-194-40 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement'), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller') and Merchant Star International General Trading ("Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 015-194-37, 015-194-40 located at 2235 S Bristol St. and 1211 W Warner Ave. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. AGREEMENT The parties therefore agree as follows: PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder'), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: 1 EXHIBIT 5 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $1,050,000 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment"). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 2 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment') binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closing Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 0 Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Sellerwill not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 36 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the 0 open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Multi -Tenant Restauraunt (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (d) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 7 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) 0 Buyer: Merchant Star International General Trading 17702 Mitchell North Irvine, CA 92614 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 0 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 015-194-37, 015-194-40 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation By: Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST: By: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: Assistant City Attorney BUYER: Merchant Star International General Trading By: C \ ✓" rc�ns�/i-5�v- nw\ GRMcr.� 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOTS 183, 184, 185 AND 186 OF TRACT MAP NO. 1192 AS PER THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 39, PAGE 17 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LOTS 184, 185 AND 186 GRANTED IN FEE FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 2 o 19 000 H N f3'�) 18 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. CONTAINING A TOTAL AREA OF 17,564 SQUARE FEET. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND ANY OTHER RIGHTS OF RECORD. EXHIBIT "B° ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION: PAGE 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT //B" PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION ................................................ LOT 182 N®° I�4 j LOT 187 NORTHERLY: LINE \U ! 105.01 ' N89°52'10"E _ i LLJ LLJ POOF LOT 183 1 I o o m I Q I] STREET a' F- - R/W LI WE m Z 77' 108.91' I C ~ S89°52'10"W s S89°52'10"W i Z w L1IF PO. OF Cl 30' �Q POR. OF Q m LOT 184 Q 17 2 LOT 185 ti M °_ L4 LINE z L3 95ET R/RWE.97' N89°52'10"E C� PUBLIC STREET PER INSTRUMENT NUMBER v wN00o l 8 3l6 B.R. 1 j — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — N — — — — — — —---------------------------------------J 288.27' S89°52'10"W ( WARNER AVENUE PARCEL LIMITS PUBLIC STREET R/W PER INST. NO. Z O0 ODD 'Hi 3 CURVE TABLE N0. RAOI US DELTA LENGTH Cl 964. 84' 01 °1 B'08" 21 .93' C2 964.84' 03 °21'45" 56.62' C3 1030.00' 1 00°12'06" 1 3.63 LINE TABLE N0. BEARING DISTANCE L1 500°10'45"W 1 12.27' L2 944°59 20 E 35.46 L3 N89°52'10"E 53.09' 14 N39°49 31-El 20.23 C3 l= PAGE 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT "B" GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instrument to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXLS %PPROALEAS 10 APPROVLDBY DLSCRIPI ION DISCRIPI ION AP. RAVM PARCLL I'ORM BY AI IY. DIRCIOR V:RII ILNBY CHLIXLDO.K. NUMBER NUMBER NGMBLR 015-194-37 & 40 C6 DEED?TMEER 2235 S. BRISTOL STREET & 1211 W. WARNER AVENUE GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: Merchant Star International General Trading, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: See Exhibit "A' attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Dated: By: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] lu- - - —� - - -- - L! I--- J g m - -- WARNERAVENUE - AW -_ sin lwm *• aAartrio sl;MM/Afr-afSTmulr us ANA xai .a,n+u. .m u.ce sr.ta •P r.....c:•..ne � uie,n u[A Sro,r. Ew wxn9 raae.e �cA vECONfwI,[TYII iILA .6 fr.WNe Yi{'AL. A [f.)psbiCv yvwCOi C6 MERCHANT STAR INTERNATIONAL �a�+.rn nw �% t Of'1'ION #3 �- 9rW^10LSnK.AN�,INPRRA4MJl.^ 7&AW U9TW 5110'P.A1 KRFe PARCEL C6 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 399-085-11 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement'), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and IAS Management(" Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 399-085-11 located at 1725 N Bristol St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. File] N=I =IJi14.kI The parties therefore agree as follows: PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: 1 *3:113rr11 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $127,700 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment'). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 2 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment') binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closing Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 0 Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Sellerwill not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 18 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the 0 open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Single Family Residence (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (d) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 7 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) 0 Buyer: IAS Management 25 Brookline Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 0 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 399-085-11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation 0 Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST: By: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Afin M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: IAS Management 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT PORTION OF LOT 25 TRACT MAP NO. 1572 AS PER THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 48, PAGE 16 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LOT 25 GRANTED IN FEE FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER IW Ova � 1l 9163 , OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. CONTAINING AN APPROXIMATE AREA OF 4,521 SQUARE FEET. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND ANY OTHER RIGHTS OF RECORD. EXHIBIT 'B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION: PAGE 1 OF 1 EXIBIT B SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION i EIGHTEENTH STREET L------ ------------------------------------------ N 890 49 50" E Lo L I L 2 (40') 0.: W 51 o Ln U) 64. 00' co PARALLEL t4) cc rr) 0 00 0 czto m i oC3 (40') L 16. 'L L4 PUBLIC STREET R/W PER INST. NO-2-0/9 OD(24�16 36 3 ( ) = TRACT MAP 1572, M.M. 48/16. Ll = N 450 16' 56" E, 16.00' L2 = N 890 49' 50" E, 26.75' L3 = N 000 30' 10" E. 120.02' 14 = S 890 51' 40" W, 38.42' RIGHT OF WAY IS BASED ON CITY OF SANTA ANA BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS 06-1500. 0 z PAGE 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT "B" GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instrument to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXLS %PPROALDAS 10 APPROVLDBY DI SCRIPI ION DISCRIPI ION AP. R/WMAP PARCLL I'ORNI BY AI IY. DIRCIOR V:RIIILNBY CHLCK LD NUMBER NUMBER NGMBLR 399-08511 RI DEED?TMEER 1725 N. BRISTOL STREET 8739 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: IAS Management, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: See Exhibit "A' attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Dated: By: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] x aoyza'tla•�alGb�nia � loaG•ce�•vlc DAtlVMO'I014004 102Z6 VD V'S IS .4 A 061 °a 4,11i .p.. Z54�4Zq>4L? 'DNI S1N9W1S9ANJ V�V3O9V] N81S9a9NVONJ.Uvla 1008�Eas W4) '7111N3W3DVNVW SVI SGnaHWV9ya 'V?'VNVViNVG .. ... Ntlld9L6pg w 9 M3NOIGaa 1018171G'N 5ZL4 *Al sllaN a � $ A � � N as 101S.RI8 , La Z 1d.a-sos e i� a e i z a I I w m — 'id .L'+Gii is 10lsias .__.-.-.-.-..-._.._._...�-._._.'Id_9�BG4 O $� �e N N U5 _.idea -sip • N PARCEL R1 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 004-122-39 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement'), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and IAS Management(" Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 004-122-39 located at 908 N Bristol St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. File] N=I =IJi14.kI The parties therefore agree as follows: PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: 1 *000114111011 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $257,700 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment'). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 2 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment') binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closing Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 0 Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Sellerwill not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 18 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the 0 open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Single Family Residence + ADU (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (d) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 7 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) 0 Buyer: IAS Management 25 Brookline Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 0 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 004-122-39 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation By: Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST: By: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By. !ry. AM M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: IAS Management By: 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] Exhibit A In the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, being that portion of the South 8 feet of the East 120 feet of Lot 1, of Tract 933 per Map filed in book 33, page 1of Miscellaneous Maps, in the Office of the County Recorders of said County, Together with those portions of the South half of Lot 3, and all of Lots 4 and 5 of Tract 671 filed in book 24, page 32 of Miscellaneous Maps records of said County, Except that land described in a Deed as instrument Number )-ollooap N8 36-2- 1 official records of said County. Containing 7608.0 square feet, more or less. Subject to all Covenants, Conditions, Reservations, Restrictions, Rights of Way and Easements of record, if any. All as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Prepared by me, or under my direction on John M. Gon ales, PLS 9065 Page 1 of I EXHISIT 'B' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION w PRC � II a I I I 933 -------71-20' (30' ) 1 I W M _Z I•p 1!! ! ;a 6V • u11I O I V7 o C:} O 11CD ~ Nn � I II W ----------------a ----- `� - I ! W ,pv oio J N M Pi N 64 CONCENTRIC I 1 ! N I I °a. i Z ca \aF Ain\\ cz� g3' It II t�1 (50') \ d Q fYl 1(30'186. I RC tRAO! W C3 ! O AWl � � ♦Q6, I \1 �PQ qqp �s•+,r 140.92' —_ s-,� j -----------------------••--__..- �: ----- --- --- N 89031 ' 30 W 9 TH STREET 24.21' I BC! I PARCEL LIMITS PURL I C S TREE T R/W PER INS T. No. 2-c l9 voo t9 V B U z. C1 A = 7°01'55" R = 95.00' L = 11.66' C2 A = 88043'57" R = 43,00' L = 66.59' ( ) = PER TRACT 671, MM 24/32. C3 R - 5.04' L = 12.38' BASIS OF BEARING = BRISTOL STREET WIDENING PHASE 3 PROJECT 13-•6792. PAGE 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT "B" GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instrument to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXLS %PPROALEAS 10 APPROVLDBY DLS(RIP I ION DISCRIPIION AP. RAVM PARCLL I'ORM BY AI IY. DIRCIOR V:RIIILNBY CHLCRLD NUMBER NUMBER NGMBLR 004-122-39 R2 DEED?TMEER 908 N. BRISTOL STREET 8740 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: IAS Management, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: See Exhibit "A' attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Dated: By: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] PARCEL R2 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 405-073-14, 405-073-15 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement'), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and IAS Management(" Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 405-073-14, 405-073-15 located at 622 - 624 N Bristol St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. File] N=I =IJi14.kI The parties therefore agree as follows: PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: 1 EXHIBIT 8 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $188,700 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment'). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 2 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment') binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closing Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 0 Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Sellerwill not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 18 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the 0 open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Single Family Residence (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (d) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 7 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) 0 Buyer: IAS Management 25 Brookline Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 0 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 405-073-14, 405-073-15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation By: Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST: 0 Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: K 7g, -f.-L J n M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: .mop� /0M WA 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] r#'i:II7MT In the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, being those portions of Lots 1 through 3 of Tract 662, per map filed in Book 24, page 17 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the Office of the County Recorders of said County, Except that land described in Deed as Instrument Number 20 igogo Y83 Y official records of said County. Containing 5,955.0 square feet, more or less. Subject to all Covenants, Conditions, Reservations, Restrictions, Rights of Way and Easements of record, if any. All as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Prepared by or under my direction on e \�//201 John M. Gonzales, PLS 9065 PIS 9065 DEED INS 20120000 EXIHEBIT B SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEE OETAYL M1 hQ Ln Ln N In LOT 2� 07 1 V I caS 50.35' 7TH STREET ,po,•' S ptf,' o 3 p t { lL WJ ' 0 N N �Oa .N- f O W. C] 100.00' PARALLEL , i 120.42' I PARCEL LIMITS. PUBLIC STREET R/W PER INST. NO. 2-011 oo o 9 3(o V CURVE 1 0 73, 33' 51" RADIAL 1 L = 55.20' S 27°,38'27 W R = 43.00' (RAD.1 o CURVE-93' 40' 44" RADIAL 245z20" E �GJC'p�NdS�p/�� L = 1.64' R = 1 .00' " ( RAD. ) '� JOHN M. O DEED 2, 10' EASEMENT GONZALES DEED BK 3352, PG 76. DEED 1- 10' EASEMENT DEED BK 3352, PG 78. * No.9065 TRACST �P (( ) l )= TRACT T1152 M.M. 38/9. gr�OF CAUFQ�� BASIS OF BEARING PER BRISTOL STREET PROJECT 08-1700 z 0 H z Z (30' ) 1 Deta i —_— C.L. 7 TH ST. O v O M M R.W. PER TRACT 662 c2 R.W, PER BRISTOL ST. PROD. 08-1700 EXHIBIT "B" GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instrument to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXLS %PPROALDAS 10 APPROVLDBY DLS(RIP I ION DISC RIPI ION AP. R/WMAP PARCLL I'ORNI BY AI IY. DIRCIOR V:RIIILNBY CHLIXLo0_K. NCMBLR NUMBER NGMBLR 405-073-14 & 15 R3 DEED?TMEER 908 N. BRISTOL STREET 8741 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: IAS Management, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: See Exhibit "A' attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Dated: By: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] A 'VJbNVV.UM 101$ltig'N 4Z8 s H a id l."ZI ( NISI R IS3AWSII C'MVDW1 NI I °J I + IQ I S '�Nf S1NSW1S8AN1 YJVa08V) Iltd_ � 'J111NaW8`JVNVW SVI NVId �Nr §1. '18 '10181me PARCEL R3 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 405-073-16, 405-073-17, 405-073-18 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement'), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and IAS Management(" Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 405-073-16, 405-073-17, 405-073-18 located at 602 - 610 N Bristol St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. File] N=I =IJi14.kI The parties therefore agree as follows: PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: 1 EXHIBIT 9 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $287,700 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment'). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 2 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment') binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closing Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 0 Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Sellerwill not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 18 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the 0 open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Duplex (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (d) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 7 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) 0 Buyer: IAS Management 25 Brookline Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 0 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 405-073-16, 405-073-17, 405-073-18 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation By: Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST: By: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: !w. hn M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: IAS Managem nt By: 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] EXHIBIT A In the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, being those portions of Lots 9 through 11 of Tract 1152, per map filed in Book 38, page 9 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder in said County, Except that land described in a Deed as Instrument Number' op Y% )&5, official records of said County. Containing 9132.0 square feet, more or less, Subject to all Covenants, Conditions, Reservations, Restrictions, Rights of Way and Easements of record, if any. All as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Prepared by me, or under my direction on - dQ. CI John M. Gonzales, PLS 9065 EXIHIBIT B SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION M 7TH STREET (30') . .......... ........ .... : ( ( 40' ) I I I :W 100.00, PARALLEL: 4c), I 59, 801 ------------------------- Ci ----------- 6TH STREET PARCEL LIMITS PUBLIC STREET R/W PER INST. NO. 2oM000 H V 0 36 5- TRACT 662 M.M. 24/17. TRACT 1152 M.M. 38/9. BASIS OF BEARING PER BRISTOL STREET PROJECT 08-1700 joHN M. GONZALES nt -9� No. 9065 OF EXHIBIT "B" GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instrument to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXLS %PPROALDAS 10 APPROVLDBY DI SCRIPI ION DISC RIPI ION AP. R/W MAP PARCLL I'ORNI BY AI IY. DIRCIOR V:RIIILNBY CHLCKLo O_K. C NMBLR NUMBER 1 NGMBLR 405-073-16, 17 & 18 R4 DEED?TMEER 602 - 610 N. BRISTOL STREET 8742 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: IAS Management, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: See Exhibit "A' attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Dated: By: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] N 60926 O'901MAR4 'IAVVM0lp188OS ' OS°YLL ._... t0LZ6 V� YS';S axs'M 06t 'ONI n: -' m x5 �. ztbE tZLlro1Q QN8WMANI YJVUOSV'� ^!F N01S300NVONI1dVH0 LIIOS-FM Ibtd) '7111N3W3"0VNVW SVI 4 3S110H WV9N0 'VO'VNVVJNVS Nyld 3LS # 119N0IS30 loaltlS'N ZOO :OdNI S.U9NM0 R IS 10lsias 1d.O-.t94 I I _._._ __._._,...._._._._.—._._._......_.....-- —_.._....._.—.._._._.—.-----._..x. � I I p � Aax Aul a 1 1� N I^ N I � I I AID I I S I ld.Vd9t IS a0lsiae la.a,t9t ------ _._.—._._.—._._--------------- ._._.----- .--- N .—.—.—.—._..._._._.__._._.—. It 6^ s^ I O Aex I X I a r F Z? 1 N lei 8 B j m Z FFF-- N 1 i g & �. .itt .. I I I All, � Id 4.3st ........ I A g y� S pp tl gg 3 0 PARCEL R4 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 008-231-24, 008-231-27, 008-231-26 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement'), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and IAS Management(" Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 008-231-24, 008-231-27, 008-231-26 located at 303 - 309 S Bristol St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. File] N=I =IJi14.kI The parties therefore agree as follows: PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: 1 EXHIBIT 10 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $237,700 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment'). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 2 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment') binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closing Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 0 Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Sellerwill not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 18 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the 0 open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Single Family Residence + ADU (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (d) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 7 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) 0 Buyer: IAS Management 25 Brookline Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 0 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 008-231-24, 008-231-27, 008-231-26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation By: Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Jdhn M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT PORTION OF LOTS 12,13 AND 14, BLOCK 0, OF TRACT 610 AS PER THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 19, PAGE 12 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LOTS 12,13 AND 14 GRANTED IN FEE FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER '7 c 1 QOO 114 0 `i OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. CONTAINING AN APPROXIMATE AREA OF 6,350 SQUARE FEET. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND ANY OTHER RIGHTS OF RECORD. EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION: CHRYSOSTOMO, L.S. 9216 DN PAGE 1 OF 1 PINE STREET ------- fL--- i Ill cc CURVE Q ,L = 71 * 00' 31 R = 45.00' L = 55.77' F:O SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PINE STREET East) 0 32. 11 J PERPENDICULAR (30' PORTION OF LOT 12 51.60' 40' I NOS.. o PORTION Orr o c� N LOT la C) 0 0 51.60' 'ORT[,--,tl 40' LOT 14 51.60' (30' 1 '97. 00' PARALLEL ------------- �o INSTRUMENT # zz 2009000042037 PARCEL LIMITS SQUARE FEET = 6,350 + / - PUBLIC STREET R/W PER INST. NO. 2-007 000 111R 1-1 / A I I = TRACT 1363, M.M 42/32. RADIA- LINE 1 = S 44'28'11" W RADIAL LINE 2 = S 26'32'20" E 10' EASEMENT GRANTS TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DEED I = BK 2216, PG 312 OC RECORDS. DEED 2 = BK 2221, PG 33 OC RECORDS. DEED 3 = BK 2200, PG 326 OC RECORDS. DEED 4 = BK 2101, PG 620 OC RECORDS RIGHT OF WAY IS BASED ON CITY OF SANTA ANA BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS 06-1500. K PAGE 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT "B" GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instrument to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXLS %PPROALDAS 10 APPROVLDBY DLSCRIPI ION DISCRIPI ION YI, R/W MAP PARCLL I'ORNI BY AI IY. DIRCIOR V:RII ILNBY CHL(RLDO.R NCMBLR NUMBER NGMBLR 008-231-24, 26 & 27 RS DEED?TMEER 303 - 309 S. BRISTOL STREET 8743 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: IAS Management, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: See Exhibit "A' attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Dated: By: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] b x n t� r AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 008-231-23, 008-231-29 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement'), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and IAS Management(" Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 008-231-23, 008-231-29 located at 313 - 323 S Bristol St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. File] N=I =IJi14.kI The parties therefore agree as follows: PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: 1 EXHIBIT 11 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $237,700 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment'). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 2 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment') binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closing Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 0 Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Sellerwill not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 18 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the 0 open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Single Family Residence + ADU (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (d) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 7 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) 0 Buyer: IAS Management 25 Brookline Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 0 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 008-231-23, 008-231-29 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation By: Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST: By: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: t4 i6fin M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: IAS Manageme By: 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] EXHIBIT "A77 LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT PORTION OF LOTS 15,16 AND 17, BLOCK C, OF TRACT 610 AS PER THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 19, PAGE 12 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LOTS 15,16 AND 17 GRANTED IN FEE FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 20 I anp Ll 19 W I OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. CONTAINING AN APPROXIMATE AREA OF 9,124 SQUARE FEET. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND ANY OTHER RIGHTS OF RECORD. EXHIBIT "B ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION: CHRYSOSTOMO, L.S. 9216 DA PAGE 1 OF 1 *I1MII-3Is-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION I PUBLIC STREET I 97.00' PARALLEL ' (30') . j -_—_—_—_—_ j .. 'Lu W I ...... :.; . i 4 3 40' ( 118.60' l� W O 51.60' O M PORTION OP., (� M j O j o I..vT 15 0 9 ^� L11 3 P Q J O o O j oI ... I —_-- -— —� j z N INST. NO. orw jZoMjomiNtii�lq 0 = o POIiTIOtd OF o e LOTI6 40/ LLJ Qi j 51.60' POi?TIOi•I OF , l Qj m LOT 17 W P> m m ( 30' ): o ° OM 35.13' PERPENDICULAR L `Op c L.__—___________—__-__— { 3 { o I INSTRUMENT # 2008000405164. I I CHESTNUT AVENUE PARCEL LIMITS c� PUBLIC STREET R/W PER INST. NO. '2-01 ODD�i I8 ) ( ) = TRACT 610, M.M. 19/12. (( )) = TRACT 1363, M.M. 42/32. RADIAL LINE 1 = N 38°37' 42" W RADIAL LINE 2 = N 31°28' 34" E 10' EASEMENT GRANTS TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DEED 1 = BK 2200, DEED 2 = BK 2228, DEED 3 = BK 2101, DEED 4 = BK 2200, PG 341 CC RECORDS. PG 522 OC RECORDS. PG 620 OC RECORDS. PG 326 OC RECORDS. RIGHT OF WAY IS BASED ON CITY OF SANTA ANA BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS 06-1500. CURVE Q L = 70006'16" R = 45.00' L = 55.06' SO.FT.= 9.124 +/— O M zz PAGE IOF1 EXHIBIT "B" GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instnmient to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXES APPROVED AS TO APPROVED BY DESCRIPTION DISCRPTION AP. RRMAT PARCEL FOFAIDY ATTY. DIRCTOR BRIT TEN BY CFIECKED OK TLI- ER TLI- ER ➢LI- ER 008-231-23 & 29 R6 DEED ATA DER 313 - 323 S. BRISTOL STREET 8744 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: IAS Management, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: See Exhibit "A' attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Dated: By: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] 809ZS'VMOIO a3nla - --- 3AVVMOlOL 960E IOLLb t7V'S'�S aa£'M ObI aa r S1pL`IZLIpI!) WRF:: SE VW ONI S1N3W1S3ANItlOV40 IV J r—m NOIS30ONVONUAVa0 Vd0'VNVV1.NVS 'MIINSW90VNVW SVI y p4 3 nw WN0I$ 0�0 101SIa8'S EiE I ;09NI S�a3NM0 I NV'1d 3116 I d $ B N :Ls ioisiaa PARCEL R6 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 008-232-31, 008-232-34 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement'), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and Dustin Do("Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 008-232-31, 008-232-34 located at 401 - 407 S Bristol St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. File] N=I =IJi14.kI The parties therefore agree as follows: PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: 1 EXHIBIT 12 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $192,800 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment'). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 2 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment') binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closing Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 0 Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Sellerwill not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 18 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the 0 open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Single Family Residence (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (d) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 7 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) 0 Buyer: Dustin Do 6500 E. Carnegie Ave Anaheim, CA 92807 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 0 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 008-232-31, 008-232-34 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation By: Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST: By: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: 7�r. TV�L hn M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: Dustin Do 1 By: ` > 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] EXHIBIT "Ayl LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT PORTION OF LOTS 12,13 AND 14, BLOCK D, OF TRACT 610 AS PER THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 19, PAGE 12 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LOTS 12, 13 AND 14 GRANTED IN FEE FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER W I `l ®any W 8 11.0 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNT`!. CONTAINING AN APPROXIMATE AREA OF 4285.0 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND ANY OTHER RIGHTS OF RECORD, EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION; PAGE 1 OF 1 �� ma : sm. SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHESTNUT AVENUE _ - --------F------------.-.---.-----._._ 35.32' o PERPENDICULAR �0 O ..............tv......... S5.06.....,. j(30')io Q j^ iwi INSTRUMENT # I� n; o 's...i;:'"I' Ec.'. �' 2008000273140. 0 :...............® ................ j o 40'' O :..I. :i co hj z ......................... 51.60° �W j INSTRUMENT # i97.00' 2007000246364. I N:PARALLEL " to J ;w, o:... ,.. 40' rr m �(30'Ji I PARCEL LIMITS PUBLIC STREET R/W PER INST. NO.2201` 000 �l y�,�7-0 CURVE AQ A = 7Q°06' 16" R = 45.00' L = 55.06' SO.FT.= 4285.0 ( > = TRACT 610. M.M. 19/12. (( )) = TRACT 1363, M.M. 42/32. RADIAL LINE 1 = S 38°16'40" W 10' EASEMENT GRANTS TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DEED 1 = BK 2231, PG 591 OC RECORDS. DEED 2 = BK 2246, PG 338 OC RECORDS. ZQ Z RIGHT OF WAY IS BASED ON CITY OF SANTA ANA BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS 06-1500. PAGE OF EXHIBIT "B" GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instnnnent to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXES APPROVED AS TO APPROVED BY DESCRIPTION DISCRIPTION AP R/WMAP PARCEL FORM BY ATTY. DIRCTI WRTTTENBY CHECKEDK NDMBER NDMBER NDMBER 008-232-31 & 34 R7 DEED NIiALBER 401 - 407 S. BRISTOL STREET 8745 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: DVD Construction, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Dated: By: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] ORIGINAL COPY 3b. Development Team's Past Experience The same group of companies in the organizational chart above just completed a 2-story 1,600 sf new construction residential house together in Long Beach. The property is currently in escrow and is estimated to close on May 31st, 2019. The development teams' expertise in residential construction eased the process with experience and hard work. I was the owner/investor of the project and self -funded with cash savings from working for another contractor, that is how I funded the project. The cash from this sale will be used to pay for the expenses incurred on this project. 3c. No previous experience with public entities within Orange County. 3d. Dustin Do will be the one to purchase the land, develop, and pay for all expenses as a personal investment. The only reason DVD Construction was included in the proposal was because I am registered in Planet Bids under my company name "DVD Construction". The buyer in the contract will be Dustin Do, not DVD Construction. 4. Project Description New construction of a 2-story single family residence that matches the style and texture of the existing neighborhood using the City of Santa Ana residential guidelines. The idea is to avoid a box -link structure and to have architectural details to beautify the neighborhood and provide cost effective housing for local residents. Around 2,000 sf of living space with 4 bedrooms and 4 baths will provide a comfortable living situation for a growing family. 2-car garage with 2 cars available to park on the driveway and 1 on the street if needed. Energy efficient materials and sustainable design components will be utilized for long term sustainability on the project. Current zoning of R-1 provides the necessary tools to build a single-family residence that will increase the value of land in Santa Ana. Development cost of $215,000 will cover everything from start to finish. 5. No letter of intent from tenants, however there are tons of people who would like to own their own house in Santa Ana and they deserve a chance to be a homeowner too. PARCEL 7 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 010-022-09 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement'), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and Dustin Do("Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 010-022-09 located at 1306 W Raymar St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. Five] C7=I =Ikyil=Izr11 The parties therefore agree as follows: 1. PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: Imo:/:113r�rc3 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $184,800 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment'). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 2 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment') binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closing Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 0 Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Sellerwill not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 18 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the 2 open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Single Family Residence (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (d) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 7 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) 0 Buyer: Dustin Do 6500 E. Carnegie Ave Anaheim, CA 92807 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 9 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 010-022-09 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation By: Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST: 0 Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: 6 )(- J n M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: Dustin Do By: 1 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT PORTION OF LOT 29 OF TRACT MAP NO. 1457 AS PER THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 53, PAGE 2 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS; OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LOT 29 GRANTED IN FEE FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 2z-") pv yq 9 "1 Z 1 , OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. CONTAINING AN APPROXIMATE AREA OF 4600 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS; RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND ANY OTHER RIGHTS OF RECORD. EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION; JOHN M. GONZALES No. 9065 % * OF PAGE 1 OF 1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION C.L. PROLONGATION RAYMAR STREET - -.................................� 20 o I 59,16, 0 PERPENDICULAR �• I A vK7^ --- A,• I 4?gyp• o I " I l3.35 , ...... OIL i- `. 'A I lw ?' a 21, O Iz O f•l O m 103. 00' j PARALLEL PARCEL LIMITS PUBLIC STREET R/W PER INST. NO. Z012000 ham/ B "1 7-1 CURVE 3QA CURVE QB 4 = 6° 3'26" 0 = 86050'52" R = 45.00' R = 45,00' L = 5.14' L = 68,21' ( ) = TRACT 1457, M.M. 53/2 RADIAL LINE 1 = S 290 30' 56" E RIGHT OF WAY IS BASED ON CITY OF SANTA ANA BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS 06-1500. it z z PAGE 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT "B" GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instrument to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXES APPROVED AS TO APPROVED BY DESCRIPTION DISCRIPTION AP R/WMAP PARCEL FORM BY ATTY. DIRCTI WRTTTENBY CHECKEDK NDMBER NDMBER NDMBER 010-022-09 R8 DEED NIiALBER 1306 W. RAYMAR STREET 8746 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: DVD Construction, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. described as follows: See Exhibit "A' attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Dated: By: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] ORIGINAL COPY 3b. Development Team's Past Experience The same group of companies in the organizational chart above just completed a 2-story 1,600 sf new construction residential house together in Long Beach. The property is currently in escrow and is estimated to close on May 3111, 2019. The development teams' expertise in residential construction eased the process with experience and hard work. I was the owner/investor of the project and self -funded with cash savings from working for another contractor, that is how I funded the project. The cash from this sale will be used to pay for the expenses incurred on this project. 3c. No previous experience with public entities within Orange County. 3d. Dustin Do will be the one to purchase the land, develop, and pay for all expenses as a personal investment. The only reason DVD Construction was included in the proposal was because I am registered in Planet Bids under my company name "DVD Construction". The buyer in the contract will be Dustin Do, not DVD Construction. 4. Project Description New construction of a 2-story single family residence that matches the style and texture of the existing neighborhood using the City of Santa Ana residential guidelines. The idea is to avoid a box -link structure and to have architectural details to beautify the neighborhood and provide cost effective housing for local residents. Around 2,000 sf of living space with 4 bedrooms and 4 baths will provide a comfortable living situation for a growing family. 2-car garage with 2 cars available to park on the driveway and 1 on the street if needed. Energy efficient materials and sustainable design components will be utilized for long term sustainability on the project. Current zoning of R-1 provides the necessary tools to build a single-family residence that will increase the value of land in Santa Ana. Development cost of $215,000 will cover everything from start to finish. 5. No letter of intent from tenants, however there are tons of people who would like to own their own house in Santa Ana and they deserve a chance to be a homeowner too. PARCEL R8 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 010-183-01, 010-183-42, 010-183-43, 010-183-44 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement'), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and IAS Management(" Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 010-183-01, 010-183-42, 010-183-43, 010-183-44 located at 701 - 711 S Bristol St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. File] N=I =IJil4.rI The parties therefore agree as follows: PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: 1 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $357,700 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment'). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 2 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment') binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closing Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 0 Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Sellerwill not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 18 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the 0 open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Triplex (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (d) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 7 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) 0 Buyer: IAS Management 25 Brookline Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 0 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 010-183-01, 010-183-42, 010-183-43, 010-183-44 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation By: Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST: By: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: 14 Ig" T JUhn M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: [AS Managem nt By: 11 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] EXHIBIT "All LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 3, AND ALL OF LOTS 1 AND LOT 2 OF TRACT MAP NO, 228 AS PER THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 13, PAGE 19 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 GRANTED IN FEE FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 26 19 oo.0 41 `1 P H 22 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. CONTAINING AN APPROXIMATE AREA OF 11,880 SQUARE FEET, SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND ANY OTHER RIGHTS OF RECORD. EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION: CHRYSOSTONIO, L.S. 9216 PAGE 1 OF 1 RICHLAND STREET (E) 2g'3o 0 0 �- j 00 94.00' 88.00' (50) PARALLEL -� I N ... i�• m(30') coo .5...'.:.. OD N I Ib cr INST. NO. c _ °' I I 88.00, — I I i I m ;., O N I Q I I ...... G'' O N L0 C I I I O O I Z Z 88.00' I i o :.: ::+ .....;.. 2, o O it: ---- - - - - -- �• I -_ " I I I uj I I I I I I 1 W I 1 W �I I co I (30) ® 1 I I I m I I I ...... CQ 3 h.i j.... in M O Z PARCEL LIMITS PUBL I C STREET R/W PER I NST. NO. 2 01 2. Z ® = DOCUMENT REFERENCE 1 = DEED BOOK 2219, PAGE 377 O.R. 2 = DEED BOOK 12252, PAGE 325 O.R. 3 = DEED BOOK 2219. PAGE 129 O.R. 4 = DEED BOOK 2198, PAGE 329 O.R. 1 ) = TRACT MAP 228, M.M. 13/29. 5 = DEED BOOK 2243, PAGE 376 O.R. ........... = LOT LINES PER TRACT 228. 6 = INSTRUMENT NO. 93-062253. EXIBIT B SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PAGE 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT "B" GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] I FC;FNII _ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE COMBINED PARCEL RICHLAND STREET r 11 S. BRISTOL ST. 010-183-01 s 7 PARCEL R9 ZONING APPROK AREA RESIDENTIAL 12,071 SF U EXHIBIT "All LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 3, AND ALL OF LOTS 1 AND LOT 2 OF TRACT MAP NO, 228 AS PER THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 13, PAGE 19 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 GRANTED IN FEE FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NUMBER 26 19 oo.0 41 `1 P H 22 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. CONTAINING AN APPROXIMATE AREA OF 11,880 SQUARE FEET, SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND ANY OTHER RIGHTS OF RECORD. EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION: CHRYSOSTONIO, L.S. 9216 PAGE 1 OF 1 RICHLAND STREET (E) 2g'3o 0 0 �- j 00 94.00' 88.00' (50) PARALLEL -� I N ... i�• m(30') coo .5...'.:.. OD N I Ib cr INST. NO. c _ °' I I 88.00, — I I i I m ;., O N I Q I I ...... G'' O N L0 C I I I O O I Z Z 88.00' I i o :.: ::+ .....;.. 2, o O it: ---- - - - - -- �• I -_ " I I I uj I I I I I I 1 W I 1 W �I I co I (30) ® 1 I I I m I I I ...... CQ 3 h.i j.... in M O Z PARCEL LIMITS PUBL I C STREET R/W PER I NST. NO. 2 01 2. Z ® = DOCUMENT REFERENCE 1 = DEED BOOK 2219, PAGE 377 O.R. 2 = DEED BOOK 12252, PAGE 325 O.R. 3 = DEED BOOK 2219. PAGE 129 O.R. 4 = DEED BOOK 2198, PAGE 329 O.R. 1 ) = TRACT MAP 228, M.M. 13/29. 5 = DEED BOOK 2243, PAGE 376 O.R. ........... = LOT LINES PER TRACT 228. 6 = INSTRUMENT NO. 93-062253. EXIBIT B SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PAGE 1 OF 1 When recorded, please mail this Instnmient to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXES APPROVED AS TO APPROVED BY DESCRIPTION DISCRIPTION AP. RR'MAP PARCEL FORNIHY ATTY. DIRCTOR BRIT TEN HY CFIECKED OK TTlffiER TLI- ER ➢LI- ER 010-183-01, 42, 43 & 44 R9 DEED ATA DER 701 — 711 S. BRISTOL STREET 8747 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: IAS Management, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: See Exhibit "A' attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Dated: By: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] k 609L6NWROISHMIN 3AVVNIOtO18609 �- 61 lOLL6 YJ V7S PeE iN 06l 'S ':)NISLIOWMANI °' r LL6ILMOW VaWOSVZ NO'IS3OONVONUwUO WRS-WOVIL) 'j111N3WSOVNVW SVI '$ 9 MON IVVSNO 'VO VNVV.WVS ,,,��. NV1d 3113 HSN61630 10161UG'S 104 !OdNI%NaWA0 •ls •Lolslas -- i � I k J 1 6R I gg € 8 y 0 8 �za R .7 I I � I P I I 8 j j I I c j i $I ) ,A� I _.._.__.._._._._._._J 8 <m PARCEL R9 � AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 010-183-40, 010-183-41, 010-183-42 THIS AGREEMENT of Purchase and Sale ("Agreement'), dated , 2019, is entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation ("Seller") and IAS Management(" Buyer") for the acquisition by Buyer of certain real property described below. RECITALS A. Seller owns certain real property commonly known as Orange County Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 010-183-40, 010-183-41, 010-183-42 located at 711 - 717 S Bristol St. in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California. Buyer desires to purchase a fee interest in such real property owned by Seller as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made part hereof ("Property"), and Seller desires to sell the Property. B. A copy of the Grant Deed for the Property in executable format, by which Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer upon the Close of Escrow (as defined below) is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by this reference. C. The parties desire by this Agreement to provide the terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of the Property. File] N=I =IJi14.kI The parties therefore agree as follows: PURCHASE Buyer agrees to buy, and Seller agrees to sell and convey, the Property for the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. ESCROW Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties, the parties shall open an escrow ("Escrow") with Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Escrow Holder"), whose address is 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for the purpose of consummating the purchase and sale of the Property, as described herein. The date on which Escrow is opened with Escrow Holder shall be referred to as the "Effective Date." The parties shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder such escrow instructions prepared by Escrow Holder, as may be required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. If there is any inconsistency between such instructions and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control unless the parties expressively agree in writing otherwise. The Escrow instructions shall include the following terms and conditions of sale: 1 acu 3rSW 2.1 Purchase Price The total purchase price for the Property shall be the sum of $251,700 ("Purchase Price"). (a) Escrow Deposit. Within three (3) business days following the Effective Date, Buyer will remit into escrow a deposit equal to nine percent (9%) of the Purchase Price ("Escrow Deposit"). Such Escrow Deposit shall be fully refundable until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and as otherwise set forth herein. Such Escrow Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price paid to Seller as provided in this Agreement. (b) Proposal Deposit. As part of the proposal submitted for this site, Buyer paid to Seller a proposal deposit equal to one percent (1 %) of the Purchase Price ("Proposal Deposit"). The Proposal Deposit shall be retained by the Seller and credited to the Buyer towards the Purchase Price. (c) Closing Payment. The Purchase Price, as adjusted by the application of the Proposal Deposit, Escrow Deposit and by any proration and credits specified herein, shall be paid by Buyer to Seller in cash at the Close of Escrow (the amount to be paid under this Section 2.1(c) being herein called the "Closing Payment'). (d) Independent Consideration. Escrow Holder shall pay a portion of the Escrow Deposit in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) ("Independent Consideration") to Seller upon the earlier to occur of the Close of Escrow (as defined below) or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Independent Consideration constitutes bargained -for consideration for this Agreement and Buyer's rights under Section 2.6(d) and is expressly acknowledged to be adequate. The obligation of Buyer to pay the Independent Consideration to Escrow Holder, and the obligation of Escrow Holder to pay the same to Seller, are unconditional and shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 2.2 Close of Escrow If Buyer does not exercise its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 2.6(d) prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (as defined below), then Escrow shall close ("Close of Escrow") on or before December 20, 2019. If Escrow is not in a condition to close by such date, Escrow shall be closed as soon as possible thereafter. 2 2.3 Condition of Title to Property Seller shall cause the conveyance of title to the Property to Buyer as evidenced by an ALTA Owner's Policy of Title Insurance covering the Property and any easements appurtenant thereto ("Title Policy") issued by Commonwealth Land Title Company ("Title Company") in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. During the Due Diligence Period, Buyer shall have the right to obtain and examine: (i) an ALTA title commitment (the "Title Commitment') binding the Title Company to issue the Title Policy to Buyer; and (ii) an ALTA/ACSM survey of the Property. The Title Policy shall show as exceptions with respect to the Property only matters approved in writing by Buyer, which approval shall be delivered in writing by Buyer to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. Buyer shall in addition have approved in writing the legal description of the Property to be set forth in the Title Policy prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall cause all standard title exceptions typically appearing on an ALTA title insurance policy, including the gap exception, the exception relating to parties in possession, the survey exception, and all exceptions related to mechanics liens to be deleted from the Title Commitment. 2.4 Escrow and Closing Costs Buyer shall pay the cost of the Title Policy, the Escrow Fees and all documentary transfer fees and recording fees, as may be applicable, and all other costs and expenses incurred related to the purchase of the Property by Buyer (collectively, "Closing Costs"). Seller shall pay all other costs and expenses incurred by Seller related to the sale of the Property. 2.5 Deposit of Funds and Documents (a) Prior to Close of Escrow, Buyer shall deposit into Escrow (i) the Escrow Deposit, (ii) all escrow and Closing Costs as described above; (iii) the Closing Payment; and (iv) such other documentation as is necessary to close Escrow; provided, however, that Buyer shall not be required to deposit the Closing Payment until Buyer has been notified by Escrow Holder that (i) Seller has delivered to Escrow Holder each of the documents and instruments to be delivered by Seller in connection with the sale of the Property, (ii) Title Company is irrevocably and unconditionally committed to issue and deliver the Title Policy, and (iii) the only impediment to Close of Escrow is delivery of such amount by or on behalf of Buyer. (b) Prior to the Close of Escrow, Seller shall deposit into Escrow (i) the properly executed grant deed for conveyance of the Property to Buyer and (ii) such other documents and sums, if any, as are necessary to close Escrow in conformance herewith. 2.6 Buyer's Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow The obligation of Buyer to purchase the Property as contemplated by this Agreement and the Close of Escrow is subject to satisfaction of each of the following conditions: 3 (a) All representations and warranties of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date of the Close of Escrow. (b) Seller shall timely perform all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement to be performed by it. (c) The irrevocable and unconditional written agreement of Title Company to record the grant deed at the Close of Escrow and to issue to Buyer the Title Policy, effective as of the date and time the deed is recorded. (d) Buyer shall have seven (7) calendar days, from the opening of escrow ("Due Diligence Period"), within which to perform and complete all of Buyer's due diligence examinations, reviews and inspections of all matters pertaining to the Property, including all leases and service contracts, all physical, environmental and compliance matters and conditions respecting the Property, and satisfy its contingencies ("Due Diligence Investigations"). During the term of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property, as further set forth below. Within three (3) days following the Effective Date, Seller shall deliver to Buyer true and complete copies of any environmental reports, title documents and any other agreements, documents, or information pertaining to the Property to the extent in Seller's possession or reasonably obtainable by Seller. Seller will make every effort to provide all pertinent documents, but Seller's inability or failure to provide any document shall not be considered a violation subject to termination of the Agreement. At any time on or before the last day of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer may, in its absolute and sole discretion, for any reason or no reason, give written notice ("Termination Notice") to Seller electing to terminate this Agreement, whereupon a condition to Buyer's obligation to close shall not be satisfied, the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement, and the obligations of the parties hereunder, shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement). In the event of termination by Buyer pursuant to this section, the Proposal Deposit shall be nonrefundable and shall be retained by Seller. If Buyer fails to deliver the Termination Notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Buyer shall have no further right to terminate this Agreement and have the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) returned to Buyer except as otherwise set forth herein. (e) No material adverse physical change to the Property, including those caused by condemnation and/or casualty, shall have occurred subsequent to the Effective Date and on or prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.7 Seller Conditions Precedent to Close of Escrow For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow shall be conditioned upon the timely performance by Buyer of all obligations required by the terms of this Agreement. 2.8 License to Enter Property During Due Diligence Period 0 Seller licenses the Buyer and its contractors to enter the Property for the purpose of undertaking the Due Diligence Investigations as the Buyer deems necessary and appropriate. The license given in this Section 2.8 shall only be effective until the earlier of: (i) the Close of Escrow, (ii) the termination of this Agreement, or (iii) the date of any Termination Notice provided hereunder. The Buyer shall conduct all Due Diligence Investigations during the Due Diligence Period at its sole cost and expense. The Buyer shall abide by any reasonable condition(s) of entry onto the Property required by Seller, whether or not set forth in this Agreement. Any Due Diligence Investigations by the Buyer shall not unreasonably disrupt any then -existing use or occupancy of the Property. (a) Limitations. The Buyer shall not conduct any intrusive or destructive testing of any portion of the Property, other than low volume soil samples, without Seller's prior written consent. Following the conduct of any Due Diligence Investigations on the Property, the Buyer shall restore the Property to substantially its condition prior to the conduct of such Due Diligence Investigations. (b) Indemnity. Buyer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller, and its officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against all actual damages, judgments, costs, expenses and fees arising from or related to any act or omission of Buyer in performing its Due Diligence Investigations under this Agreement (excluding discovery of any pre-existing conditions at the Property), except to the extent arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of Seller, its officers, employees or agents. (c) Insurance. Prior to any entry upon the Property by or on behalf of Buyer, Buyer (at Buyer's sole cost and expense) shall provide Seller with a certificate of Buyer's liability insurance policy designating Seller as an additional insured. The foregoing certificate shall evidence that Buyer has obtained a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against loss, damage or liability for injury to or death of any person, or loss or damage to property occurring in or about the Property. Such insurance shall include comprehensive general liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and shall include automobile liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage in the amount of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit. The foregoing policy or policies shall contain a provision that such policy or policies will not be cancelled, reduced in coverage, renewed or otherwise amended in any manner until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to Seller. Buyer shall see that insurance coverage as provided in this paragraph is maintained throughout the duration of Buyer's right of entry onto the Property. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARTIES 3.1 Representation and Warranties of Seller Seller makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow: 5 (a) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller, Seller's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Seller is at present a party or by which Seller is bound; and (b) Sellerwill not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of the Buyer; and (c) Seller, as a government agency, has not been subject to real property tax assessment on the property. Transfer of title to Buyer at the Close of Escrow will subject the Property to an assessment from the Orange County Office of the Assessor and shall be the obligation of the Buyer henceforth; and (d) Seller is aware of its obligation under California Health and Safety Code Section 25359.7 to disclose any knowledge which they may have regarding any release of Hazardous Substances (as defined by applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations) upon or under the Property. Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that Seller is not aware that any such Hazardous Substances have been generated, stored or disposed of upon or under the Property. 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Buyer Buyer makes the following representations and warranties with respect to the Property, each of which shall survive Close of Escrow. (a) Subject to Permitted Delay (as defined herein), Buyer hereby represents and guarantees that it will complete construction and development of the Property for the Intended Use (defined below) within 18 months following the Close of Escrow ("Project Deadline"). If Buyer does not comply with the Project Deadline, Seller may elect to repurchase the Property from Buyer (the "Repurchase Right") pursuant to the terms and conditions in this section. Seller shall provide written notice to Buyer of its exercise (the "Exercise Notice") within one hundred eighty (180) days following the Project Deadline (the "Exercise Window"). The Exercise Notice shall propose a date for closing that is no less than thirty (30) days following the date of the Exercise Notice, with such closing then occurring on a date mutually convenient to both Seller and Buyer (the "Repurchase Closing Date"). If Seller fails to deliver its Exercise Notice to Buyer within the Exercise Window, then the Repurchase Right shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect. The repurchase deed shall be identical in form to the deed by which title to the Property was conveyed by Seller to Buyer and shall be free and clear of any and all mortgage liens or other evidence of indebtedness. The purchase price to be paid by Seller to Buyer for the Property shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Purchase Price paid by Buyer to Seller under this Agreement. As used herein, the term "Permitted Delay" shall refer to any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief; inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the 0 open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Buyer); lockouts; action of labor unions; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Buyer's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability of Buyer constitute Permitted Delay. (b) Buyer shall obtain all final approvals, including, without limitation, the building permit and all related municipal approvals (the "Approvals") necessary for developing the Property in substantial conformance with the site plan that was included with Buyer's proposal for the Property submitted in response to City's Request for Proposal No. 19-026 (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "C", (the "Intended Improvements") appropriate for the operation of a Single Family Residence + ADU (the "Intended Use"), such that immediately following the acquisition of the Approvals, Buyer shall be entitled to commence construction of the Intended Improvements. Nothing in this agreement shall constitute Approvals by Seller, and Buyer acknowledges that it must comply with all of Seller's development standards, guidelines and procedures that are applicable to the Intended Improvements and the Intended Use. (c) The execution and delivery of the Agreement by Buyer, Buyer's performance hereunder, and the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby will not constitute a violation of any order or decree or result in the breach of any contract or agreement to which Buyer is at present a party or by which Buyer is bound; and (d) No other action by Buyer is requisite to the valid and binding execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 4. REMEDIES If Seller defaults under this Agreement, then Buyer may either: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller, whereupon the Escrow Deposit (less the Independent Consideration) shall be immediately returned by the Escrow Holder to Buyer, and this Agreement and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement); or (ii) bring an action for specific performance of this Agreement. If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller's written notice of default to Buyer, then Seller may, as Seller's sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement by reason of such default, terminate this Agreement by written notice to Buyer, whereupon the obligations of the parties hereunder shall terminate (other than those obligations that expressly survive a termination of this Agreement) and the Escrow Deposit shall be delivered to Seller as full compensation and liquidated damages under and in connection with this Agreement, and in such event, Buyer shall not be liable to Seller for monetary damages except for full payment of the amount of the Escrow Deposit due at the time of termination and forfeiture of said Escrow Deposit to the Seller. Under no circumstances shall Buyer be entitled to a refund of the Proposal Deposit, which shall be retained by Seller. 7 5. RIGHT OF POSSESSION Seller hereby grants Buyer and its representatives, agents, consultants and contractors, physical and legal possession of the Property effective as of the Close of Escrow. 6. AS IS CONDITION Buyer shall rely solely and exclusively upon the results of its Due Diligence Investigations of the Property with regard to any physical condition or state of the Property. By completing the purchase of the Property following its Due Diligence Investigations, Buyer evidences its unconditional acceptance of the condition of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "AS -IS," "WHERE -IS" basis. Buyer is not offering to purchase the property based on any representation by Seller or Seller's agent except those expressly set forth in Section 3.1. Buyer hereby acknowledges that the purchase of the Property is without warranties of any kind from Seller, expressed or implied, except as expressly set forth in Section 3.1, as to the condition of the Property or its improvements, if any, including, without implied limitation, soils, access to the Property or to utilities, appliances, structure utility systems, roof, foundation, landscaping or any other component of the Property. Seller does not warrant that the Property conforms with any ordinances, including, without implied limitation, zoning or building ordinances. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Notice Any notice to be given or other document or documents to be delivered to either party by the other hereunder may be delivered (a) in person, (b) by overnight courier, (c) by facsimile or as a PDF or similar attachment to an email (provided that such facsimile or email attachment shall be followed within one (1) business day by delivery of such notice pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (d)), or (d) by United States Mail in the State of California, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: Seller: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attn: Clerk of the Council Copy to: Executive Director of Public Works Agency (at same address) 0 Buyer: IAS Management 25 Brookline Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Any notice or other document sent by personal delivery, overnight courier or registered or certified mail as aforesaid shall be considered to have been effectively served or delivered on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused) as evidenced by printed confirmation if by facsimile or email (provided that if any notice or other communication to be delivered by facsimile or email attachment as provided above cannot be transmitted because of a problem affecting the receiving party's facsimile machine or computer, the deadline for receiving such notice or other communication shall be extended through the next business day), as shown by the addressee's return receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided, however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a non -business day, then such notice or communication so made shall be deemed effective on the first business day after the day of actual delivery. 7.2 Time of Essence Time is of the essence with respect to each and every provision hereof. 7.3 Assignment Neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, shall be assignable by any party without prior written consent of the other, non -assigning party hereto. For Seller, the City Manager or designee shall have the authority to review and approve or deny any request for assignment. 7.4 Governing Law All questions with respect to this Agreement, and rights and liabilities of the parties hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in the County of Orange. 7.5 Inurement Subject to the restrictions against assignment as herein contained, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon, the assigns, successors in interest, personal representatives, estates, heirs and legatees of each of the parties hereto. 7.6 Attorney's Fees In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable expenses, attorney fees and costs. 0 7.7 Entire Agreement The Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter contained in this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. 7.8 Additional Documents All parties hereto agree to execute any and all additional documents and instruments necessary to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 7.9 Authority to Execute Agreement The persons executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced herein on behalf of Buyer and Seller hereby represent and warrant that such persons have the right, power and authority to bind Buyer and Seller, respectively. 7.10 Counterparts This Agreement may be signed in counterpart or duplicate copies, and any signed counterpart or duplicate copy shall be equivalent to a signed original for all purposes. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 10 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): 010-18340, 010-183-41, 010-183-42 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. SELLER: CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California charter city and municipal corporation By: Kristine Ridge City Manager ATTEST: By: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: 14 7g, hn M. Funk Assistant City Attorney BUYER: IAS Management By: 11 Type text here EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY All right, title and interest of Seller in and to that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, Orange County, California, described in the following exhibit A & B: [attached behind this page] EXHIBIT A In the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, being those portions of the South half of Lot 3, Lot 4, and Lot 5, of Tract Map 228, per map recorded in Book 13, page 19 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, Except that land described in a Deed as Instrument Number � 0)9000 q jgg Z3 official records of said County, Also Except the Easterly 20.00 feet of said Lots, Containing 8,121.0 square feet, more or less. Subject to all Covenants, Conditions, Reservations, Restrictions, Rights of Way and Easements of record, if any. All as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Prepared by me, or under my direction on 1 j , l John M. Gonzales, PLS 9065_ JOHN M. GONZALES No.9065 %* ,F EXIBIT B SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY 94.00' PARALLEL I I I I (30') I :... •..:: 3:x I LL, ' 4 LLI �I N N I co I M^1 \v J W i :.............. . ...3. QQ °- I N . I I I Z .i o.... O ' {. ........... ..... Z I I = I — I (30') 3 ........... :iS 2.0 o * _ N in ^ O Ca N (o N Ln 4l O � � h O ?O m: 73.85' J o INST. NO. I �O PARCEL LIMITS 20' ...................... .... 0 ------------------------------------------- HIGHLAND STREET PUBLIC STREET R/W PER INST. N0. 2ol� occg'1 B y2 3 ( ) = TRACT MAP 228, M.M. 13/29. ........... = LOT LINES PER TRACT 228. ® = 10' EASEMENTS TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA 4 = DEED BOOK 2198, PAGE 229 D.R. 5 = DEED BOOK 2243, PAGE 376 O.R. 6 = DEED BOOK 2158, PAGE 634 D.R. CURVE DATA = 93°15'53" R = 45.00' L = 73.25' ® = 0°22'26" R = 95.00' L = 0.60' 31 = N 56058' 12" W RIGHT OF WAY IS BASED ON CITY OF SANTA ANA BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS 06-1500. PAGE 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT "B" GRANT DEED (TO BE EXECUTED) [attached behind this page] When recorded, please mail this Instrument to: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30 Santa Ana, California 92701 Free recording requested by The City of Santa Ana per Government Code Section 6103, 27383. USE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S TAXLS %PPROALEAS 10 APPROVLDBY DLS(RIP I ION DISCRI PI ION AP_ R/WMAP PARCLL I'ORNI BY AI IY. DIRCIOR KRII ILN BY (LL'ELDOE IL MBLR NUMBER NGMBLR 010-183-40, 41 & 42 RIO DEED?TMEER 711 — 717 S. BRISTOL STREET GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The CITY OF SANTA ANA, a Charter City and Municipal Corporation duly organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California hereby GRANT(s) to: IAS Management, the real property in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: See Exhibit "A' attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto reference only. Dated: By: Kristine Ridge City Manager, City of Santa Ana Attested by: Dated: By: Daisy Gomez City Clerk, City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT "C INTENDEDIMPROVEMENTS [attached behind this page] ffi 909Z3'V0'9413L9AU1 3AtltlMO1O19693 2tVE•tZL(VlL) t00ETbE 16tLI Iwo lo�l tOLL6 VD V'S'JS wPM O6t '7NI S1N3W1S3ANI h'OV809V7 g j! T. NO199OONVONudwa 'VO'vNvvINV9 ':)111N3W3'JVNVW SVI aw 99t1OH VAMM 1O191tl6'S 44 ..., -U, , ^:OdN1 $ gg U9NOI89O ;. S,S9NN1O Wnd 311E SS 8 1d,6yEZt I _ I 6 W yy R y J a i I i.._.........._............._._._. ._ _ ._._._._._._._._._._._.. -_...-...-_. _.._._._._._._._._. 1d."Vt IS 1O1SIa® PARCEL R10 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE AWARD A CONTRACT TO LANDSCAPE WEST MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. FOR WEED AND DEBRIS REMOVAL SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,282,000 FOR A TWO YEAR TERM NON -GENERAL FUND (SPECIFICATION NO. 19-091) {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 6,21 CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 111 Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2ntl Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION Award a contract to Landscape West Management Services, Inc. for weed and debris removal services for a two-year period expiring November 30, 2021, with provisions for two, two-year renewals exercisable by the City Manager, in an annual amount not to exceed $641,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION The Public Works Agency Maintenance Services Division is responsible for performing weed and debris removal services in over 12 miles of channels, approximately 100 vacant lots, 60 miles of alleys, 400 miles of streets and 800 miles of sidewalks annually. In order to perform this service consistently, as -needed contractual services for weed and debris services are required. As - needed and on -call contract weed and debris services has proven to be productive, cost-effective and a best practice for the City for over twenty-five years. In addition, this service will be used to supplement staff roadway cleaning operations with the removal of illegally dumped items, which averages over 10,000 service requests annually, and provide support in the efforts of homeless services. Removing the weeds and debris from the City supports neighborhood vitality and will enhance the safety, appearance and livability of the community. Approval of the recommended action will allow the City to continue to provide these critical services. The Notice Inviting Bids was advertised on September 13, 2019, on the City's online bid management and publication system. A summary of the Invitation for Bids and bids received is as follows: Award Contract for Weed and Debris Removal Services November 19, 2019 Page 2 436 Vendors notified 19 Santa Ana vendors notified 29 Vendors downloaded the bid packet 5 Bids received 0 Bids received from Santa Ana vendors Five Bids were received and opened on October 8, 2019, and evaluated. Four of the five bids received were determined to be responsive. Bid results for responsive bids are as follows: Bidder Location Extended Total Price Landscape West Management Services, Inc. Anaheim, CA $ 484,600 So Cal Land Maintenance, Inc. Anaheim, CA $ 552,000 Naranjo Landscape, Inc. Silverado, CA $ 620,000 DeAn elo Brothers, Inc. Ontario, CA $ 820,860 The bid received from Landscape West Management Services, Inc. was lowest, responsive to specifications and meets the City's requirements. The extended total price annual amount is based on staffs projections of the annual hourly labor costs for the upcoming fiscal year's expenditures. Staff conducted reference verifications with other cities and confirmed the contractor has met their performance goals. Additionally, the contractor has provided median landscape maintenance services with the City since July 2019 and has performed effectively. The total award amount includes the cost of $156,400 for rubbish disposal costs and for additional as -needed and on -call services such as heavy equipment back -hoes, loader vehicles, equipment operators and weed mitigation spraying control. Outreach Efforts The Purchasing Division advertised this project on the City's online bid management and publication system, which directly notified 19 Santa Ana vendors. No Santa Ana vendors downloaded nor submitted a bid packet for consideration. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Strategic Plan Goal #6 — Community Facilities & Infrastructure, Objective #2 (address deferred maintenance on City buildings and equipment). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. Award Contract for Weed and Debris Removal Services November 19, 2019 Page 3 FISCAL IMPACT Funding for the initial two-year term, FY 2019-20 through FY 2020-21, and two subsequent two- year renewal periods will be budgeted and made available in the account specified below: Accounting Account Unit, Account FY 2019- FY FY 2021- Unit- Fund Description 2020 221 021 2022 Account No. (7 Months) (5 Months) 06817640- Environment/ 62300 Sanitation Sanitation, Contract $228,258 $391,300 $163,042 Services - Professional 06817641- Roadway Cleaning, 62300 Sanitation Contract Services - $25,200 $43,200 $18,000 Professional 0571 Fed Clean Water NPDContract $87,500 $150,000 $62,500 6230000 protection Servicess - -Professional Measure M- Measure M2 Local 0321 Street Fairshare St, $14,583 $25,000 $10,417 6622200 Construction Im rovements Other p Than Building 03217663- Measure M- Measure M2 Competitive 66220 Street Street, Improvements $583 $1,000 $417 Construction Other Than Building 05917663- Select HUTA 2103 Gas Tax, 66220 Street Improvements Other $1,458 $2,000 $1,042 Construction Than Building Water UTY Water Prod & 06017640- Water Supply, Maintenance & $5,833 $10,000 $4,167 62320 Repair Buildings & Ground 60718810- Housing Housing Asset Admin, 62300 Asset LMHF Contract Services, $8,750 $15,000 $6,250 Professional 67018843- COSA RDA Admin, 62300 COSA RDA Contract Services - $1,750 $3,000 $1,250 Professional Total per Fiscal Year (Initial Two Year Term) $373,917 $641,000 $267,083 Award Contract for Weed and Debris Removal Services November 19, 2019 Page 4 Accounting Account Unit, FY 2021- FY 2022- FY 2023- FY 2024- FY 2025- Unit- Fund Account 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Account No. Description (7 Months) (5 Months) Environment/ 06817640- Sanitation, 62300 Sanitation Contract $228,258 $391,300 $391,300 $391,300 $163,042 Services - Professional Roadway 06817641- Cleaning, 62300 Sanitation Contract $25,200 $43,200 $43,200 $43,200 $18,000 Services - Professional Fed Clean NPDES, 0571 Water Contract $87 500 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $62,500 6230000 Protection Services - Professional Measure M2 Measure M- Local Fairshare 03217662- Street Street, $14,583 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $10,417 66220 Construction Improvements Other Than Building Measure M2 Measure M- Competitive 03217663- Street Street, $583 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $417 66220 Construction Improvements Other Than Building HUTA 2103 Gas 05917663- Select Tax, 66220 Street Improvements $1,458 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $1,042 Construction Other Than Building Water Utility Water Prod & 06017640- Water Supply, $5,833 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $4,167 62320 Maintenance & Repair Buildings & Ground Housing Asset 60718810- Housing Admin, Contract $8,750 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $6,250 62300 Asset LMHF Services, Professional COSA RDA 67018843- Admin, 62300 COSA RDA Contract $1,750 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $1,250 Services - Professional Total per Fiscal Year (Renewal Terms) $373,917 $641,000 $641,000 $641,00 $267,083 Award Contract for Weed and Debris Removal Services November 19, 2019 Page 5 Fuad S. Sweiss, PE, Executive Director Public Works Agency APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: PLS Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Finance and Management Steven Mendoza Executive Director Community Development Agency qua_ Services Agency REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT IN THE AMOUNT OF $608,956, FOR EDINGER AVENUE REHABILITATION FROM RAITT STREET TO BRISTOL STREET PROJECT ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $761,196 (PROJECT NO. 19-6946) {STRATEGIC PLAN NOS. 6, 1C; 1G} CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on V1 Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2n° Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION Award a contract to All American Asphalt, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $608,956, for construction of the Edinger Avenue Rehabilitation from Raitt Street to Bristol Street Project, for the term beginning upon execution of the contract and ending upon project completion, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $761,196, which includes $608,956 for the construction contract; $91,344 for contract administration, inspection and testing; and a $60,896 project contingency (approximately 10% of the construction contract amount), paid with Select street Constriction Fund: Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account. DISCUSSION The City's Pavement Management Program identified Edinger Avenue from Raitt Street to Bristol Street as a high priority for street rehabilitation (Exhibit 1). Based on the adopted Pavement Management Program, the pavement has deteriorated due to weather, age, and wear -and -tear from heavy usage vehicles. The improvements include the removal and replacement of failed asphalt pavement and the replacement of damaged concrete curb, gutters, sidewalks, curb ramps, and installation of traffic loops, traffic stripes and pavement markings. Once completed, these improvements will enhance the ride quality and visual appearance of the street, and comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act standards. Public Outreach and Contractor Participation To provide an opportunity for local vendors to submit bids, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on September 18 and 25, 2019, and bids were received Award Contract to All American Asphalt for Edinger Avenue Rehabilitation From Raitt Street to Bristol Street Project November 19, 2019 Page 2 electronically via the City's web -based electronic bidding system, PlanetBids, on October 3, 2019. Through the PlanetBids online portal, vendors may register to receive notifications on all current and future City projects, as well as download contract documents, receive project updates and submit bids electronically. A total of 838 vendors, including 48 located in the City of Santa Ana, were notified of the project via PlanetBids. 36 vendors requested bidding documents and 6 bids were received. None of the bids received were from Santa Ana contractors. Bid Results Summary RANK BIDDER'S NAME LOCATION BASE BID 1 All American Asphalt Corona $608,956 2 EBS General Engineering Inc. Corona $695,027 3 Vido Samarzich, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga $635,694 4 Hardy & Harper, Inc. Lake Forest $719,402 5 Excel Paving Co Long Beach $718,885 6 R.J. Noble Company Orange $633,438 All 6 bids were responsive and All American Asphalt submitted the lowest responsive bid in the amount of $608,956 (Exhibit 2). Based on the bid analysis and a contractor's reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to All American Asphalt in the amount bid (Exhibit 3). Project Delivery To deliver a complete project, in addition to the construction contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project includes construction administration, inspection, and testing, along with an allowance for contingencies to account for unexpected or unforeseen conditions. Construction administration and inspection includes construction management; implementation of the City's Community Workforce Agreement requirements; inspection of the Contractor's work to ensure contract compliance, workmanship, and quality; and material testing. As indicated in the Cost Analysis (Exhibit 4) and as summarized in the table below. the estimated total construction delivery cost of the Droiect is $761.196. Construction Contract $608,956 Construction Administration, Inspection, and Testing $91,344 Contingencies 1 $60,896 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST 1 $761,196 These amounts will cover all staffing costs for delivery of this capital project and no additional funding will be used. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #6 — Community Facilities & Infrastructure, Objective #1 (establish and maintain a Community Investment Plan for all City assets), Strategy C (invest resources and technology to extend the service life of existing Award Contract to All American Asphalt for Edinger Avenue Rehabilitation From Raitt Street to Bristol Street Project November 19, 2019 Page 3 infrastructure to protect the City's investment and support a high quality of life standard) and Strategy G (develop and implement the City's Capital Improvement Program in coordination with the Community Investment Plan). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER-2019-54 was filed for the project. FISCAL IMPACT As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $761,196, which includes the construction contract, contract administration, inspection, testing, and project contingency. The following table summarizes the funds budgeted to deliver construction of this project: Fiscal Year Accounting Unit- Fund Description Accounting Unit, Amount Account # Account Description Road Maintenance and FY 2019-20 05917665-66220 Select Street Rehabilitation Account, $761,196 July - June (19-6946) Construction Fund Improvements Other Than Building All funds are scheduled for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2019-20. Fuad S. Sweiss, PE, PLS Executive Director Public Works Agency FSS/TC/MO Exhibits: 1. Location Map 2. Bid Proposal 3. Construction Contract 4. Cost Analysis Total: $761,196 APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency LEGEND -PROJECT LOCATION RAITT STREET BRISTOL STREET Exhibit 1 ,JAJWAV=Mm- �N OR9NCe SANTA ANA o0 ir PWA 1 Project No. 19-6946: Edinger Avenue It Rehabilitation From Raitt Street To Bristol Street e! POBM WORKS AGENCY I® City of Santa Ana Page 1 Edinger Avenue Rehabilitation: Raitt Street to Bristol Street (19-6946), bidding on October 3, 2019 2:00 PM (Pacific) Printed 10/08/2019 EXHIBIT 2 Bid Results Bidder Details Vendor Name All American Asphalt Address 400 E. Sixth Street Corona, CA 92879 United States Respondee Jim McGee Respondee Title Project Manager Phone 951-736-7600 Ext. 205 Email publlcworks@allamedcanasphait.com Vendor Type CADIR License # 267073 CA DIR Bid Detail Bid Format Electronic Submitted October 3, 2019 1:59:49 PM (Pacific) Delivery Method Bid Responsive Bid Status Submitted Confirmation # 191246 Ranking 0 Respondee Comment Buyer Comment Attachments File Title File Name File Type --- _ General General Attachment_0009.pdf General Forms Ownership Affidavit Ownership Affidavit.pdf Ownership Affidavit (Notary Public) - REQ Original Hard Copy Submittal in Addition Bid Bond Executed Bid Bond.pdf Bid Bond Guaranty (Notary Public) - REQ Original Hard Copy Submittal In Addition Non -Collusion Non-Colluslon.pdf Non -Collusion Affidavit (Notary Public) - REQ Original Hard Copy Submittal in Addition Line Items Type Rem Code UOM oty Unit Price Line Total Comment Base Bid Items 1 Unclasslfled Excavation CY 220 $187.00 $41.140.00 2 Cold Mill (0-2") SF 182000 $0.23 $41,860.00 PlanetBids, Inc. City of Santa Ana Page 2 Edinger Avenue Rehabilitation: Raitt Street to Bristol Street (19-6946), bidding on October 3, 2019 2:00 PM (Pacific) Printed 10/08/2019 Bid Results Type Item Code UOM city Unit PAW Llne Total Comment 3 AC Pavement TN 150 $160.00 $24,000.00 4 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix TN 2000 $103.00 $206.000.00 5 ARAM SY 20300 $5.46 $110,838.00 8 PCC Sidewalk (4") SF 1355 $8.20 $11,111.00 7 PCC Crass Grafter SF 376 $16.00 $6,625.00 a PCC Crab Ramp SF 5518 $11.50 $83,457.00 9 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type A-2-8) SF 538 $45.00 $2010.00 10 Root Shave EA 4 $370.00 $1,480.00 11 Fumish and Install New Water Valve Frame and Cover to Finished Grade FA 27 $875.00 $23,625.00 12 Adjust Sewer and Drainage Manhole to Finished Grade EA 22 $850.00 $18,700.00 13 Furnish and Install New #6 Pull Box EA 15 $710.00 $10,650.00 p ., 14 Temporary Construction Sign FA 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 15 Project Advertisement Sign EA 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 16 Labor Agreement Oversight EA 1 $10,0W.00 $10,000.00 17 Adjust Water Meter to Finished Grade EA 2 S800.00 $1,600.00 18 PCC WALKWAY (PRIVATE PROPERTY) SF 240 $9.00 $2,160.00 PlanetBids, Inc. City of Santa Ana Edinger Avenue Rehabilitation: Raitt Street to Bristol Street (19-6946), bidding on October 3, 2019 2:00 PM (Padflc) Bid Results Type Item Code u0m Oty UnK Prim 19 REGRADING AND IRRIGATION ADJUSTMENT (PRIVATE PROPERTY) LS 1 $6,500.00 Subtotal 20 21 22 Add Alternative Bid One - NOT part of Base Bid Calculation Signing and Striping (Entire Project) Page 3 Printed 10/08/2019 Line Total Comment $6.500.00 6e06,956.00 LS 1 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 Subtotal $80,000.00 Base Bid Asterisk Notes per P4 of Specifications - NOT part of Base Bid Calculation = The quantity for this bid Item Is shown for bid comparison only. This bid Item shall not be subject to the "25%" limit as stated in Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications. as 0 0 0 t = This bid item Is considered a Specialty Item per Section 2-3.2 of the Standard Specifications. as 0 0 0 Subtotal 0 Total $688,956.00 PlanetBlds, Inc. CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. BID PROPOSAL TO: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FROM: All American Asphalt REQUIREMENT: The undersigned bidder declares that they have carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that they have examined the Contract Documents in its entirety and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said plans (if any) and the specifications for the unit price(s) or lump sum(s) set forth in the following schedule: Item Description Qty Unit I Unit PriceffAmount1 Unclassified Excavation 220 CY $ 18l 2 Cold Mill (0-2") 182,000 SF $ 96 0- 3 AC Pavement 150 TN $ 4 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix 2,000 TN $ $ I 0 3' 'LDbooO 5 ARAM 20,300 SY $ $ b 1 8- 6 PCC Sidewalk (4") 1,355 SF $ $ �•20 ll t1l 7 PCC Cross Gutter 375 SF $ $ 15 ��z5 8 PCC Curb Ramp 5,518 SF $ Ii.SD $ [p345�' 9 PCC Curb & Gutter (Type A-2-8) 538 SF $ $ 5- 24210� 10 Root Shave 4 EA $ $ 310 - I o- 11 Fumish and Install New Water Valve 27 EA $ $ Frame and Cover to Finish Grade 12 Adjust Sewer and Drainage Manhole to Finished Grade 22 EA $ u $ Igloo — 13 Furnish and Install New #6 Pull Box 15 EA $ $ "Ilo- D(oSDr P-1 ofP-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. Item Description QtY Unit Unit Price Amount 14 Temporary Construction Sign 2 EA $ $ 60o 360 - 15 Project Advertisement Sign 2 EA $ $ Icon b 16 Labor Agreement Oversight 1 EA $10,000 $10,000 17 Adjust Water Meter to Finished 2 EA $ $ Grade G O O� D I lX ' ^ D /V)- 18 PCC WALKWAY (PRIVATE 240 SF $ $ PROPERTY) Ot _ n to o- L 19 REGRADING AND IRRIGATION 1 LS $ $ADJUSTNIE PROPERTYNT(PRIVATE DUN)- TOTAL BASE BID I $ ADD ALTERNATE BID 1 �Og�Sb= Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 20 Signing and Striping (Entire Project) 1 LS $ $ 1Il7f& y '1 111 ;l 11 P-2 of P-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected based on the total base bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add -alternate bid items (if any). * The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the "25%" limit as stated in Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly. t This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 2-3.2 of the Standard Specifications. TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within number 90 workine days after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $1,070 per calendar day. Name of Firm All American Asphalt Signature of BIDDER Title Edward J. Carlson, Vice President (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) Corporation -All American Asphalt Mark Luer- President Edward J. Carlson- Vice President Michael Farkas- Secretary P-3 of P-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. BIDDER'S STATEMENT BIDDER understands and agrees that this Bid Proposal, Contract Documents and subsequent Construction Contract Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between BIDDER and the AGENCY only after it has been accepted by the City Council, endorsed by the Clerk of the Council with her signature and official seal noting hereon the action of approval of the Council, signed by the Public Works Agency Executive Director or his/her duly authorized agent, and signed by the City Attorney, denoting his approval of the form of this document, and its execution, and when it or an exact copy of it has been either delivered to BIDDER or deposited with the United States Postal Service properly addressed to the BIDDER with the correct postage affixed thereto. BIDDER further agrees that upon delivery (as defined above) of the accepted agreement he/she will furnish AGENCY all required bonds and certificate of liability insurance within ten (10) business days or the funds, check, draft, or BIDDERS bond substituted in lieu thereof accompanying this proposal shall become the property of the AGENCY and shall be considered as payment of damages due to the delay and other causes suffered by AGENCY because of the failure to furnish the necessary bonds and because it is distinctly agreed that the proof of damages actually suffered is difficult to ascertain; otherwise said funds, check, drafts, or BIDDER'S bond substituted in lieu thereof shall be returned to the undersigned. BIDDER understands that a bid is required for the entire work, the estimated quantities set forth in the bid schedule are solely for the purpose of comparing bids, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed. The BIDDER also certifies that the bid is a balanced bid. In accordance with Section 7028.15 of the California Business and Professions Code, the undersigned certifies under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Name of Firm All American Asphalt Signature of BIDDER Title Edward J. Carlson, Vice President (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) Corporation -All American Asphalt Mark Luer- President Edward J. Carlson- Vice President Michael Farkas- Secretary P-4 of P-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSING AND REGISTRATION STATEMENT The undersigned contractor, or corporate officer, declares under penalty of perjury that he/she and all his/her subcontractors are registered with the State of California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), and that the following is true and correct. Contractor's Name: AIIAmerican Business Address: 400 E. Sixth Street Corona, CA 92879 Business E-Mail Address: publicworks@allamericanasphalt.com Telephone: 951-736-7600 State Contractor's License No. and Class: License Expiration Date: 1-31-2020 State Dept. of Industrial Relations (DIR) Registration No.: State Dept. of Industrial Relations (DIR) Registration Expiration Date: Signed: 267073 Class A, C-12 1000001051 6-30-2020 Title: Edward J. Carlson, Vice President P-i of P-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. PREVAILING WAGE COMPLIANCE AND MONITORING STATEMENT Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16,000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Since the services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and since the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Contractor with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor's principal place of business and at the project site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The undersigned certifies that the foregoing is true and correct. Name of Firm All American Asphalt Signature of BIDDER Title Edward J. Carlson, Vice President (if an individual, so state) Corporation -All American Asphalt Mark Luer- President Edward J. Carlson- Vice President Michael Farkas- Secretary P-6 of P-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. OWNERSHIP AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA I COUNTY OF"j"" F Riverside I SS: CITY OF 91"#FOrr"tA Corona I Edward J. Carlson , being duly sworn, deposes and says: ❑ INDIVIDUAL That he/she is the party making the foregoing proposal: ❑ PARTNERSHIP That he/she is a member of the co -partnership firm designated as: and who has been and is duly vested with the authority to make and execute instruments for the co -partnership by: who constitute the other members of the co -partnership. ®CORPORATION That he is of.. Vice President of All American Asphalt a corporation which is making the foregoing proposal: ❑ JOINT V ENTURE That he is of: one of the parties making the foregoing proposal as ajoint venture, and the he/she has been and is duly vested with the authority to execute instruments for an on behalf of the parties making said bid who are: that such a bid is genuine and not collusive or sham, and has not in any manner sought by collusion to secure any advantage against the City of Santa Ana or any person interested in the proposed contract, for himself or person. Signof/Bidder Edward J. Cdrl, VirreNPrgsid 1 Subscribed and swom V before mVeuthhi�s{� ��/ day of 20 'Please See Attached Signature of officer Administerin')%,Qath (Notary Public) P-7 of P-17 CALIFORNIA JURAT GOV CODE § 8202 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness. accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of Riverside COURTNEY CHAPAS Notary Public - California 6 Riverside County a z zcb Commission # 2172984 p 'J.My Comm. Expires Nov 20. 2020 r Place Notary Seal Above Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this 26th day of September, 2019 Date Month By (1) Edward J. Carlson Name of Signer Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence be the person who appeared before me (.) (,) (2) (And Name of Signer Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence be the person who appeared before me.) Signature U�M' W Signat r of Notav Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to person relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Further Description of Any Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Ownership Affidavit Document Date: 9-26-2019 Number of Pages: 1 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: None Top of thumb here Top of thumb here Bond No.08597423 CITY OF SANTA ANA Bid Date: 10/03/2019 PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. KNOW ALL PRESENT that, All American Asphalt as BIDDER, and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland as SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF SANTA ANA, as AGENCY, in the penal sum of _ Ten Percent of Total Amount Bid-- Dollars ($10% of Bid------- ), which is ten percent (10%) of the total amount bid by BIDDER to AGENCY for the above -stated project, for the payment of which sum, BIDDER and SURETY agree to be bound, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITIONS OF THIS OBLIGATION ARE SUCH that, whereas BIDDER is about to submit a bid to AGENCY for the above -stated project, if said bid is rejected, or if said bid is accepted and a contract is awarded and entered into by BIDDER in the manner and time specified, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect in favor of AGENCY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have set their names, titles, hands, and seal this 24th day of September , 2019, BIDDER* All American Asphalt - 400 East Sixth Street Corona, CA 92879 - Phone (951) 736-7600 Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland - 777 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3900, Los Angeles, CA 90017 David Wei (213) 270-0600 R)&�&Z A Q �QLOb�4J-GA Rebecca Haas -Bates, Attorney -in -Fact Subscribed and swom to before me "Please See Attached" this _ day of Signature: 20_. -g1ga see Alfoichd Notary Public in and for the Cou of State of _ * Provide BIDDER/ SURETY name, a ess, and telephone number and the name, title, address, and telephone number of authorized repr ntative. P-8 of P-17 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached. and not the truthfulness. accuracv. or validity of that document. State of California County of Riverside On September 26, 2019 before me, Courtney Chagas, Notary Public Date Nero Insert name and Title of the Of ,w personally appeared Edward J. Carlson Name(s) of Signers) COURTNEY CHAPAS . Notary Public - California z2 0 Riverside County > Commission # 2172984 M Comm. Ex ires Nov 20, 2020 who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shekhey executed the same in his/heFAI; r authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/heNtheir signature(la) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(&) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the forgoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand arW official seal Signature V 'v-0 Place Notary Seal Above Signa 7 of NotaV Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to person relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document Bid Bond Document Date: September 24, 2019 Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: None Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signers Name: Edward J. Carlson o Individual X Corporate Officer —Title(s): Vice President ❑ Partner F o Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fad ❑ Trustee Tap of thumb here ❑ Other: Signers Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer —Title(s): _ ❑ Partner E o Limited o General ❑ Attorney in Fad ❑ Trustee ❑ Other: is Representing: Top of thumb here CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California ) County of Orange ) On 09/24/2019 before me, Liliana Gomez, Notary Public Date Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared Rebecca Haas -Bates Name(�k),of Signerl`sl who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(* whose narri is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in hWher/their authorized capacity(i*, and that by hic(her/their signatureZ *on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the persons) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. LILIANA GOMEZ WITNESS my hand and official se I. Notary PubliC - California ' Orange County Commission B 2243726 Signature My Comm. Expires May 20, 2022 Signature of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Bid Bond Document Date: 09/24/2019 Number of Pages: One I Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: All American Asphalt Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Rebecca Haas -Bates ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual RAttorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator F1 Other: Signer Is Representing: G\.GCv�ti +/<(�f'• .t\ fCe! -. G\ G(�q.•/GL�.' hKG<✓.A 0.. ��h."vf'.v.. ��iN'. <a'7\ 02014 National Notary Association - www.NationaiNotary.org - 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item#5907 EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF THE COMPANIES "Article V. Section 8, Attorneys -in -Fact. The Chief Executive Officer, the President, or any Executive Vice President or Vice President may, by written instrument under the attested corporate seal, appoint attorneys -in -fact with authority to execute bonds, policies, recognizances, stipulations, undertakings, or other like instruments on behalf of the Company, and may authorize any officer or any such attorney -in -fact to affix the corporate seal thereto; and may with or without cause modify of revoke any such appointment or authority at any time." CERTIFICATE h the undersigned, Secretary of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney is still in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and 1 do further certify that Article V, Section 8, of the By - Laws of the Companies is still in force. This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 15th day of December 1998. RESOLVED: "That the signature of the President or a Vice President and the attesting signature of a Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the Seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile on any Power of Attorney. -Any such Power or any certificate thereof bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Company." This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 5th day of May, 1994, and the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the I Oth day of May, 1990. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced seal of the company and facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Vice -President, Secretary, or Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seals of the said Companies, this 24th day of September , 2019 . By: Brian M. Hodges Vice President TO REPORT A CLAIM WITH REGARD TO A SURETY BOND, PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE CLAIM INCLUDING THE PRINCIPAL ON THE BOND, THE BOND NUMBER, AND YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION TO: Zurich Surety Claims 1299 Zurich Way Schaumburg, It. 60196-1056 www. reports fc lai ms(cDzurichna.com 800-626-4577 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of the State of New York, the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, a corporation of the State of Illinois, and the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND a corporation of the State of Illinois (herein collectively called the "Companies"), by Robert D. Murray, Vice President, in pursuance of authority granted by Article V. Section 8, of the By -Laws of said Companies, which are set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the date hereof, do hereby nominate, constitute. and appoint William SYRKIN, Rebecca HAAS-BATES, Sergio D. BECHARA and Richard ADAIR, all of Irvine, California, EACH, its true and lawful agent and Attomey-in-Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver, for, and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: any and all bonds and undertakings, and the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents. shall be as binding upon said Companies, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at its office in New York, New York., the regularly elected officers of the COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY at its office in Owings Mills, Maryland., and the regularly elected officers of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at its office in Owings Mills, Maryland., in their own proper persons. The said Vice President does hereby certi6, that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article V. Section 8, of the By -Laws of said Companies, and is now in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice -President has hereunto subscribed his/her names and affixed the Corporate Seals of the said ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this I Ith day of June, A.D. 2019. :>•.� ;o- ZSEAL e, ��. ar•��✓° '^ Aar ATTEST: ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY COLONIAL AMERICAN CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND BY: Robert D. Murray Vice President Rv. Umttt F. Brown Secretan State of Maryland County of Baltimore On this t Idt day of June, A.U. 2019. before the subscriber, a Notary Public ol'the State ul' Maryland duly commissioned and qualified Robert D. Murray, Vice President and Dawn L. Brown, Secretary ol'the Companies, to me personally known to be the individuals and ollicers described in and who executed the Preceding instrument, and acknowledged the execution ol'saine. and being by me duly sworn. depuseth and suilh, that he/she is the said officer of the Company aforesaid, and that the seals atlixed to the preceding insmunew are the Corporate Seals of said Companies, and that the said Corporate Seals and the signature as such officer were duly alined and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporations. IN'ms,nMONY WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and alliced my Official Seal the day and year first above written. `s . Constance A. Dunn, Notary Public I r>ni;{µ. My Commission Expires: July 9, 2023 n l,;, 9, CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. LIST OF SUB -CONTRACTORS Section 4100 et. seq. of the Public Contract Code requires listing of all subcontractors with the bid for all subcontract work exceeding the following amount: Streets, highways including bridge projects: %% of the bid or $10,000, whichever is greater Buildings, parks, or other projects: V2% of the bid Section 1725.5 of the Public Contract Code requires all Subcontractors be registered with the State Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). BIDDER proposes to subcontract certain portions of the work to the firms listed below: Name mS License #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. I PODa102!) I Location ^M, M0A65tD Phone I. /U1) 511- 1211 Type Of Work Amount$ la, uAO. 0U Name License DIR Reg License Location Phone Type Of Amount Name License #/Exp DIR Reg. #/Exp. 10 D D 311 U pti License # Ig3�1D1 Location act puen�r, Phone L l09 81D� 1338 Type Of Work 1.aran ni-w # In plillbux Amount $ 1 (Z5D I 3. 00 Signafure of Blidder Edward J. Carlson, Vice President Name 1 c Trafh L License #/Exp. S11 U?b DIR Reg. #/Exp. 1000 4D75101 Location Phone (-114) 4 j190 Type Of Work Amount $ Name License #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. License # _ Location _ Phone Type Of Work Amount $ Name License #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. License # Location Phone Type Of Work Amount $ P-9 of P-17 DESIGNATION/CERTIFICATION OF ASPHALT -RUBBER BINDER APPLICATOR(S) BIDDER proposes to have Asphalt -Rubber BINDER for ARAM (application) applied by: American Pavement Systems 1012 11th Street Suite 1000 Modesto, CA 95354 Name/Address This section shall be completed even if the bidder plans to apply Asphalt -Rubber binder with its own equipment and labor forces. Name above must be the actual company applying the Asphalt -Rubber binder on the roadway. Bidder shall attach to this form copies of all required local air pollution control district or air quality management district final permit to operate (PTO) documents (not temporary, experimental, research, and/or authority to construct (ATC)) which allow the operation of the specific equipment to be used to control emissions during the application of Asphalt -Rubber binder on the roadway (the Application). The Application, in a manner conforming with these project specifications, has been indisputably determined to be in non-compliance with California air quality regulations limiting opacity of emissions, unless a permitted emission control device is used during the Application to directly remove emissions occurring during the Application. It is for that device, which may be described as an air filter, custom air pollution control system, portable air pollution control, opacity control unit, emission control unit consisting of collection hood and 3-stage oil mist filter system, or other similar description for which a copy of a final PTO must be provided from the local air pollution control district or air quality management district. If the bidder fails to fully complete this portion of the bid and provide the foregoing documentation, the bid is non -responsive and shall be rejected. CERTIFICATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I have read and understand the requirements contained in this form. I further certify that all information provided in response to this form is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. David Pimley, Chip Seal Division Manager Title Signature of Bidder o/z/( Date =0 DESIGNATION/CERTIFICATION OF ASPHALT-RUBBERAND AGGREGATE MEMBRANE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR(S) Bidder proposes to have the ARAM installed by: American Pavement Systems 1012 11th Street Suite 1000 Modesto, CA 95354 This section shall be completed even if the apparent low bidder plans to produce and install ARAM with its own forces. Name of Contractor and/or Subcontractor(s) shall be the actual company(ies) applying the binder and aggregate. For any bid to be considered responsive, performance criteria must be demonstrated on five separate projects performed by the same contractor or subcontractor(s) designated above, and with equivalent aggregate and binder proposed for the ARAM in this bid. Two years shall have elapsed since completion of the ARAM surface on each project and the projects shall be located in Southern California. To be considered a valid representative project, bidder must submit the name of the project, owner agency, agency representative's name and phone number, and a list of streets with limits totaling at least I mile (based on full width) in length for each project and the date the project was actually performed. A project will be considered a valid representative project if an asphalt emulsion spray application was originally placed with or without an application of sand, within 15 calendar days of the application of ARAM. Any other cover coat or course on the ARAM will cause the ARAM to be considered invalid as a representative project. ARAM on all projects must show insignificant raveling (loss of rock) and insignificant flushing (binder migration to the surface) at time of inspection by the Agency. Bidder shall verify any proposed representative projects prior to listing a subcontractor with such projects, or the bid will be considered non -responsive. If the Bidder cannot list in the space provided five projects that meet the criteria specified herein that were performed by the proposed ARAM contractor or subcontractor(s), the bid shall be considered non -responsive. Representative ARAM Projects Name of Project No.I Caltrans 11-2M4404 - Route 111 Date Completed 2015 Agency Caltrans Agency Contact Daniel Hernandez Phone 760-355-8666 Approx. Length of ARAM (Full width) 2.4 miles Name ofProjectNo.2 Caltrans 11-2M7804 - Route 8 Date Completed 2016 Agency Caltrans Agency Contact Daniel Hernandez Phone 760-355-8666 Approx. Length of ARAM (Full width) 12.9 miles Nameof ProjectNo.3 Caltrans 11-2M6504-Route 86 Date Completed 2016 Agency Caltrans Agency Contact Daniel Hernandez Phone 760-355-8666 Approx. Length of ARAM (Full width) 24.7 miles NameofProject No.4 Caltrans 11-2M8604-Route 78 Date Completed 2016 Agency Caltrans Agency Contact Daniel Hernandez Phone 760-355-8666 Approx. Length of ARAM (Full width) 30.7 miles Name o£Project No. 5 Caltrans 11-2M9604 -Route 78 Date Completed 2017 Agency Caltrans Agency Contact Daniel Hernandez Phone 760-355-8666 Approx. Length of ARAM (Full width) 26.7 miles paµ,. 6!L,f.P.ey Chip Seal Division Manager /1(9/zL/ /s Signature of Bidder Title Date END OF CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION OF QUALIFICATION South Coast C� Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 (909) 396-2000 • www.aqmd..gov EQUIPMENT LOCATED AT: VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN SCAQMD CORONA,CA 92879 LEGAL OWNER CO. ID: 173474 OR OPERATOR AMERICAN PAVEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. 1012. 11TH ST SUITE 1000 MODESTO,CA,95354 PERMITIAPPLICATION RENEWAL PERMIT/ EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION - APPL NBR BILLING YEAR: 2019 G24559 Asphalt -Rubber Spraying G24560 Asphalt -Rubber Spraying G41967 ASPHALT BLENDING G41968 HEATERIFURNACE (�5.MMBTU/HR) GAS -LPG DATE- n714919n10 46 NEXTRENEWAL DATE 07/1612020 07/16/2020 07/16/2020 07/16/2020 a SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT rnp I r =, I 21865 Copley Diivc, Diamond Bar. CA 91765 I I c ass PERMIT TO OPERATE I 'tIN 1.6-M-1-'- - 1 hi> initial PerMl( Masi IV teneued A\;:LL\LLY unless the equipment I, moved, ur chatr_c. uunerehip. Irthe billing ror the: annual renewal fee (Rule 3111.1) is not received by the expiration data cnnmct the Okiric I. lxenl Osmer ID 173.174 or Operator: AAILAIC'AN PAVEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. 1012 I I TlI ST. Sill fit I ow aR)Di-mTO. CA 45354 Equipment Lon.liln: VARIOUS LOCA"I IONS IN SCAQPdD Cquipmeul Description NAUABLE RLIUBURIZCD ASPI IACr SPHADER NO. 2 CONSIS I INU OI': I. IiOLDING TANK, RUI ULRIZED ASPIIAIABINDER, 3,100 GALLON CAPACII Y.1\'I 111'1 flRlili 711913INI•: A-IIXI3RS, 20 H.P. EACH, A I IYDRAULIC MRTERING Pl1MP, 20 I I.P.. AND TWO PROPANE FIRED RANSOMF ni IRNERS, MODEL B-I, 800,000 ❑TU PER I IOUR'l OI AI.. 2. HOUBERIZEII ASPI IAL'f BINDER SPRAT' nAR, ino- W. 3. ASH IALT SPREADER 1`II.1 RA -PION ENCLOSURE, 8'-0" W. X 7'-0" L. X ('-n" H., WI fH 14 1:11a ER CART ODOES, f:ACI I Y-0" W. X 3'-0" 1.. X 0%4" D.. AND 12 FILTER CARTRIDGES. EACI12,-0- \V. X 2'-l/" L. N I'd." 1), 3,060 SQ. FT. TOTAL FILTER AREA. 1 WO 1 UHI'AXIAI. PANS, AND A CAPTURE 1I00O. 8'4D" W. X 0--10" 1 Conditions : I. OPLRAI 1UN CIFTHIS 1(QUII'AIh.N I SHALL, BE CONDUCTED IN AC'C'ORDANC'1. WI I'll ALL UA'IA AND SI'P('IfICA'1'10\1.g SUBhiITTFD \P(TII THr: APPI.It'N-I'ION LINDL•I( \VIII('11 I I -IN I'1•.I(AII1 IS 1551. FD I N. FM 0111 FR \wISI.1Ili I L•I) BLLOW. �. I HIS LQUIPMLN I SI IAI I Sr. PROPIM 1' MAIN7 AINED AND KEPT IN (1001) I II'I.kA 1I\G CONDO ION A'I ALi,'1 INIES. EQLIIPhIr:N T SI IAI.I. BC OPERATED 1\ A MAk'NER TO MINIM 17.1I lkl ISSIONS INN O T I IF A'f hIOSPIIEPV TO I Ill- MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIHI.1-. I. HILAPPL1CA110NTESIPFRA111R6.01 IIIL1ZLINIERIJ_EDASNIAII BINDIA SIIALL NOT F\(9lEU 400 DF(iREFS FAFl iibi2llL•I I CC1hIPLIAN('F. \YITII TI Ilti CU\UI I I(1N i\ir\Y BE OTC+.sdl h\�; I Lt;:l I�.0 111' i ' MONITORIN01 I I I: -I EMPERA III RL OP THE RUBDFRIUM ASPI1A IJ IN' l I IL 1101.1)IN) TANK OR A[ ' I HL ?'11i1 FRING .. I III! OI'L•RATOR MIALI INS I ALL AND \MAINTAIN A rl:11IPrRAi vRi; .mo.vi I ORINU DEVICE IY) DPA.It141'IRn'I'P ('UA11'I.IANCE \VFfll TIIF 1 F',41P1'IG1'I UkE 1.11•II I' IN CONDI HON NO. •I. ORIGINAL, SOUTH COAST AIit QUAEIIY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar. CA 91765 PERMIT TO OPERATE hip, I 14onll N. 6N559 TI I AMOUNT OF RUBBERIZI:1) AS 11HA LT HINDER vitticIiSSED AY'CI IIS EQUINAIEN-I SI IALL NO LXCEL1) 121 TONS IN AN)' ONE OPERATINO DAY, I III•. AMOUNT OF PROPANE USED'f0 FIRE I 1p I311IftfRS IN'1 HIS I:QI III'M EN ISi IALL NOT FXCECD 5,080 GALLONS IN' ANY ONF CALENDAR MUNT11 PIJRCI b15L• RECORO.S SI le\Ll. Ill•. lltiliU 70 Dli,\ IDNI fi(A7 Is COPoIP L I)\NCIi ly I I I I 't I IIS C ON I.)ITION. "I I IL IIOLDIN(i 1'+1NK CI )VERIS) SI IAi.I. RHAIAIN CLOSf.0 F(IK ALI. O!'I•ItA'i Il7NS I'.Xl'RP I DtIRIN0 1 Hi: OPERA Oft SHALL CL'ASL. OPH(AT'ION OF PHIS Iif)IIII'AIFNT IF TI IE VISIBLE LAIISSIONS F.XC'EF:D TIIE LLlill' IN kUl.li d01. A MECHANICAL CIAlIGI: SHALI, 13E INSTALLED AND AIAIN'I"AINLD 10 INDICA'I F. 1N INCI IES OF 5VA'I EK COI.I ININ, THE STATIC PRESSURL DII'NEIti:N I IAL ACROSS TIIE FIIJER CARTRIDGES. 1d'HLNFIrEIt 11113 F.Ql11PAlL•Ni IS IN 0111i1iAl IUN.'1 FIR 51 A'I IC PILE5Sl1JLE C7IFPFRL\'Tir\I. r1CK(7SS 'TIIE FILTER C'AKT R IDGI-S SFIALI. NOT EXC'L• ED 3.1 INCIIES OF \VA I'L•It COI.(IAI?:. 12. ILLCOKDS SHAI.L BH MAIN DII\ED 70 DLMONSI RA-1 F COMPLIANC'L WITH TIIE ABOVE PERMIT CONDITIONS. TIM RECORDS SHALI. Ill: RFPT IN TI IE ASPHALT SPREADER VI;HI('I.1: FOR A I I EAST lilt, LAS'1 T\VO YP.ARS AND SI1:1LL BE A1AUP. AVAl1.AllLF. TO OISTRII' I I'F.kSOSNI:L. 1'Pt )N 10QUES7. 13. CPON 111E• FIl• III DAY At 111( PLACEMENT OF I HIS 1100111NIEN I IN 10 011FRA TION AT A SITE. TIIE DIS I RIC T SHALI. Bf NOTirmt) VIA ITI.I:PIIONI• A I" 1-877.8111-(.995 OF TIIE FXAC'I' NA I t'RI OF 1 HI' PROJECT AS FOLLOWS: A TIIF PL'RMI I Nt IMIILR OF T lilt PORTABL E F.QUII'AIIiN 1'. N. 'INI• NA\II: AND NIONL NOM ER Of A t ON IACT PERSON. (. "I [It'. LOVA 11ON (VIIFR6711F PORl AIII L LQ1111'\1NN I IS 011FRATED. 1) 1HE E•SI IAIA'IL1) 1 IME. I HF PORT"ADLC: LQI dI'Ail:\ I'%VIl 1.@F 1.(K:ATLO AT IIIE SITU. F. DhSCRIPI ION OF I)IF 11ROJECI, AND 1. I1,LCX':\ILL714IIIWF IFSSI'lMN1'IAlll.l: ill; 'IIll. NTARI'..SFSL•:NSITI%TRL(LPIOR LAO IN1-D AS LOXG I LIVO I II.AI- I LI CARE FA('Hl LIES. RHIABILI I A I ION (']A\ I F:RS. CONVALESC I;N1I ('I NI His. RE'1 IREMEN I' 11011E1;, I(PSII)liNl'F.S, SCI IUULS, NI A1'(7ROWNDS. CIIILDCARL•' CLNI'I;RS, AND ATHLETIC 1-AC 11.11 IFS. ORICINAI, SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT `-. 21865 Copley Drive. Diamond Bar, CA 91765 m'.. PERMIT TO OPERATE NOTICE rN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 206. rms PI mrr TO OPERATE OR COPY SI U\LL GE POSIT— OrtOR 14/IT1I IN R MI: mu OPTNC r#(;UIPNICNT TIIIS PERMIT DOP 140T AUTHORIZE THI VNIISSION OF AIR CORIAMIINANTS IA OF TI IOSC ALLOWED i Oly!I,S'10,�126 OF TIIL' IMALT.II4ND SAFETY CODE OF TI IP'STA1%01 CAU I, •. IA OR TH I� RULES OP PHr AIR QUAI IVY ?vIAi'uii IVIENT 0ISTRICT.'II(IS Pl RNIIT CANNOT DC LCTP.h41tS1.Rr,D,'AS PERMISSION rO VIOLATC ESIS'riNO LAWS, ORDINANCES, RECULATIMts OR STATUTM 017 Yrl i-Wi t GOVERNNIENTACI.h 029. I;XECIrl IVE OF11CCR 13}' DoRIFIYI.IJRIIF•1P()3 iQ,2Rl} ORIGINAL j SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMLNT DISTRICT i rk. d 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 c'.tsau IT PERMIT TO OPERATE °).NbNi — -- I his initial pemtil must he renewed ANNUALLY unless the equipmern is moved, or changes ossneniryl. I I the billing for the annual renewal fee (Rule 30I.0 is not received by the expirition char, contact the Dls(rict IU 173-174 Legal Omw or. Opemlor. AAIF.RICANPAVEMITISYSIENIS,INC 1012 1 In I ST. SUITE 1000 h10DISl'0, CA 95354 Equipment LociBan: VARIOUS LOCATIONS r,d SCAQZID Equipment Deseriptlon : 1'OICI ABLE ItUDBEI<IZED ASPHA1.1 SPIU:ADER NO. I C'ONSISI ING OF: IiOLDIN(i'rAN1C.RtIBBERIZEDASPIIAI:I RLNDRR,3.IDOGALLONCr\PACIIY,WITIITIIREE 'IURDINE NUXERS, 20 H.P. EACH, A HYDRAULIC is4C•TL-RINO PUNIP, 20 1 I.P., AND 'r Wo 1'ItOPANB FIRED RANSOJ4E BURNERS, ibIUDFt. B4, gOD.DOD UI'll PC•R FIOUR TOI'AL. 2. RUBSERIZFDASPIIACI 111NDERSPRAY BAR 12'4" W. ASPI IA1.1 S110ADER r•II:I ILMON ENCLOSURE, 8'-n" W. X 7--6" I.. X (, -0" II.. WITH 24 FILTER CARTfUDGES, EACH 2'-0" W. X 2'-O" L. X D'-4" D., AND 12 FILTER CARTI<IDCiES, EACH T-0" W. X'_'-0" i,. X 1'-0" D.. 3,OOD SQ. FT.-rUl Al, FII:I'ER AREA.1 WO I5.1I.P. TUBI:AXIAL FANS, AND A VAPI'URE HOOD, s'•D" W. X O'-10" L. Conditions: I, OPF'RAI ION OI"I HIS L•QUIP,\Ir.NT SIIALL BE CONDOC I"ED IN ACCORDANCE \VITI I ALL DATA ARID SPECIFIC'A (IONS SIIRSIITTI9) iYI'I H TFIE APPLICATION I I NDI'R WHICH PHIS PL'R41rr IS IS5I IISD IINLFti., (j1I1FRlVIS1; NOTED BELOW. _. THIS CQUINMFN I SI IAI.I. BF. 111t0I'I-ALY MAINTAINED AND KVP I IN GOOD OPERATING C.'ONDI 1108 t; I AT ALL TIhIBS. 3. 'rUIS I,*QUwmrN I SIIALL I1F OI'LRA MI) IN A NIANNER 1 O hIINI\II7E L,VIISSIONS INTO TIIf, AlAIDSPIILRI: TOME MAXI,\IUM IiXll-:NI' POSSIBLE. •I THE APPLIC'AIION It-N1PERA'MI(P OF IIIE RUBBRIMEDASPHAI,1 BINDER SHALLNOTI.XCFED •10R ULGI(I(LS I:AIIRENIIEIT. C'OMPLIANC'li \vl III TI IIS CONDITION MAY Illl DI\dONSI RA"rLD BY MO'41TU(tIN(i'IFII:'I'I•:i�,1PI•RA t I IRL Dr TLIE RI.ID13F.R12EU ASPIL\LT IN l I IP I I(11.DW (i I ANK Olt A I I'fit: NIEI ERING PUMP. i THE OPL•II-AIOlt SHALL INS IALI, AND MAINTAIN A'1EMPERATURLNIONITORIN(iDFVI('I.1(1 DH\IONS I ItAI E COMPHANCE WlT'll I HE1 IibIPERATHRE LIMIT IN L'UNm rioN NO. •I. ORIGINAL SOUTH COAST AIRQUALITYMANAGEMENT DIS[RICI 21865 Copley Drive. Diamond Mr. CA 91765 rvnno N.,. =! PERMIT TO OPERATE A N 11WI G I IIF AMouNT OF RUDDE[(IZED ASP] L\LT BINDER PROCFSSEO BY THIS FQUIP41ENT SHALL NO-[ EXCEED 12S'I ONS IN ANY ONE OPERATINO UAY. 7. fill; AMOI INI OF PROPANE USED-1 O FIRE THP. PORNFRS IN THIS EQUIPMENT SHAI.I"NOI' FXCEED S.OS6 GALLON'S IN ATI\' O?:[: CALL\U,41t AiOi4 rl I. PURC'i WE IWCOIWS SI ]ALL DE USED 10 OI :MONS I RAI L COMPLIANdCf. W1 I WHIPS CONUI'I ION. L'. 111E IIOI.UINC! I ANI( l'(7VFRIS) SHALI. RFVIAIN CLOSED I'OIC AL1.01'FtCAl7h?Iti ESCFI'I" DIMING CHAR( ING. ?. I"HL' OI)FRATOR SHALL CEASE OPERATION OF THIS EQUII'MENI tF'I I IL VISIBLE EMISSIONS F.XCEEO "f11E• llhll'1' IN Itl!LC •I(11. If) ANIECIt.\NICAL GA(1(!Ii SFIAI 1.REINSIAL1.1•DANU hL11(dl"AINI•:O TO INOICK11'. IN IN('IJIfS OF 1VAI ER C'OI.IIM.N. I III' STATIC PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL ACROSS THE FILTER CARTRIDGES. it. Will .\EVER THIS EQUIPMENT IS (N OI)Lltb\-I IC)N. '1.111i SI'A HC PRBSSIIRI: UII.11'REN I IAL ACROSS 'TIIr. FII.I LR CAN I RII7( I:S SHAI.I. NOIF.XCI+D 3.1 INCI(ES OF \YATEIt C OM IIVIN. 12. RhC'OKOSSHA LLnEMAINTAIN ED TO DENIONSIRATF MMI'LIANCL'\YIIIII I I E ADOVE'VERN I I I' CONDITIONS THE RECORDS SHALL DE KII,F IN I HE AS PHAIA SI'Itl'.A I*K VF[IICI.F FOR A I' LEASE IIIE I.ASI 'I WO YF•ARS .AM) SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO DISTRICT PERSONNEL UPON REQUEST. b UPON I IIL• I11. 111 DAY Al- I LR PLACH-11:91' 01• *11113 EQUIPMENT INTO 01117RA HON AT A SI FF., 'I III` UISI KIM SI IALI. RE NOTIFIED VIA T ELEPHONE AT 1-877-8 I0-6905 01' Il II' FXAC I' NA "I I IRI- OF I HE PROJECT :IS FOLLOWS: A. I] IE• P130IITNIfill DER O1:1'1 If: PORTAnI ): FQUIPMENT, If. I IIF NAIMF ANO PII('1NJIf NIINIIiFat (1P A C'ONL\(' 1 PFR5ON C, I'111- I UCA I ION WIIERF TIIE PORTABLE rQCIPI\IW F IS OPL'IM I LU, U. IIIE• LSTEM 1 I:01 I II I III; PORT MILE F:QUII'I\IFN I WILL [tl' 1.0( ATE) AT II Ir sit I'. E I)I;S('ItIP I ION OF T Ill; PRUJLt'1, AND I'. 11' L(H.A 11+1) Wl I [IN I.FSS I IIAN h•1 MILE 01' 1111. NFAKI S I SENSI I IVh RC("h.l'I'OR DFFINFU AS LO:•:G I lilt\I MAI.I I I CARli FMA1.1I IGS, ItHIAHII.11 A I ION ( EN I FRS. CONY'ALGSCFN I' t'F\'I'F KS. R ETIREOINT HOMES, RI:SIOLNCLS, SCI IDOLS. PI.AI'(;R0(INDS, CIIILDC,\ItL CLFII'IiRS. ANUATHLF:I W FAC'II.I [IFS. ORICINA1, Sol I ltl COAST AIR QUAL[IY MANAUPAENT D7ISTltlCf Zl$f+5 Cnp)ry Gr(vr. Dlantoncl liar. CA 41(i5 PERMIT TO OPERATE NOTICE - -- 1\ Aft i)RDA NCG V. Il°FI Rtll.li 1114,'f111\ PI:ItN TIT 7(t t)1'fRATL nR Pl)Pl' SIIALI. RG PUS'I1tD fYi+7 OIt W'I1 HiN 5 \ih 11.ItS f�P Tllli f:<7VIP{ii C•N 1'. '1I IIS PL•.RN(Il' tJgliti NOT All I'HORIZE TIIR VNIISSIM Of A.IIt CONTAri•)INAN1'S IN EXXISS C)1' 1116)SI? AlIu1YI-Dl3+( DIYISIDWI6 OF "I FI I. III'Ahfi1 AND SAtI;'tYCOh1i:UF TFII RUL1.ti OI' nil-. AIR Q;AI Il l4 THIS PIR+II I 1ti('IA';PtU(TO13CL 1MIU1AFRUF.DI; T-A}tlS NSIRPCRUISSION TC) VIOLAIL PTISHNO LAWS. ORDIPANC%S, REGRAT)VIER • ( l)VI•ItNtrllTNl AGFNCIISS f\IeCUtYS(IeOFYiCCR - II) Dorri4.H.1lallcy'N(P0) 54.U?p 13 011KIINAL CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for THREE public agencies for which the BIDDER has performed similar work within the past three years. 1. City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name and Address of Owner. Romeo David (909) 477-2740 Name and Telephone Number $1,130,470.00 Contract Amount of person familiar with project. Pavement Rehabilitation Type of Work 2 City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 07/2017 Date Completed Name and Address of owner. William Becerra (951) 694-6444 Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. $2,577,770.00 Pavement Rehabilitation 11/2017 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3 Town of Apple Valley-14955 Dale Evans Parkway Apple Valley, CA 92307 Name and Address of owner. Rich Berger (760) 240-7000 Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. $849,182.00 Contract Amount Road Rehabilitation Type of Work 11/2017 Date Completed The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all brokers and sureties from whom BIDDER intends to procure insurance and bonds. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (Broker Surety) 777 S. Figueroa Street #3900 Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 270-0600 Owen M. Brown Insurance Millennium Corporate Solutions (Agent) 5530 Trabuco Road Irvine, CA 92620 (949) 857-4500 Edgewood Partners Insurance Center (insurance) 3633 Inland Empired Blvd. Suite 640 Ontario, CA 91764 (714) 937-4270 P-10 ofP-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. ADDITIONAL REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for THREE public agencies for which the BIDDER or Subcontractor has performed similar work in the past five years. 1. City of Victorville 14343 Civic Dr. Victorville, CA 92392 Name and Address of Owner. Carlos Seanez (760) 955-5162 Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. $251.008.00 Paving Project Contract Amount Type of Work 2. City of Santee 10601 Magnolia Avenue Building 4 Santee, CA 92071 06/2017 Date Completed Name and Address of owner. Toby M. Espinola (619) 258-4100 Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. $285,061.90 Slurry Seal 10/2017 Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed 3. City of Yucaipa- 34272 Yucaipa Blvd. Yucaipa, CA 92399 Name and Address of owner. John LaRose (909) 797-2489 Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. $252,379.06 Micro -Surfacing Contract Amount Type of Work 08/2017 Date Completed The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all brokers and sureties from whom BIDDER intends to procure insurance and bonds. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (Broker Surety) 777 S. Fiqueroa Street #3900 Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 270-0600 Owen M. Brown Insurance Millennium Corporate Solutsions (Agent) 5530 Trabuco Road Irvine, CA 92620 (949) 857-4500 Edgewood Partners Insurance Center (Insurance) 3633 Inland Empire Blvd. Suite 640 Ontario, CA 91764 (714) 9374270 P-11 of P-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) In conformance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the BIDDER declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER or any other BIDDER, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. Note: The above Non -collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. BIDDERS are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution. Signed J. Carlson, Vice President State of California County of Subscribed and sworn to or affirmed) before me on this day of , 20_, by oved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me *Please See Attached Notary Public Signature \ Notary Public Seal P-12 of P-17 CALIFORNIA JURAT GOV CODE 6 8202 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness. accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of Riverside COURTNEY CHAPAS Notary Public - California Z Y Riverside County > `z Commission # 2172984 My Comm. Expires Nov 20, 2020 Place NOGry Seal Above Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this 26th day of September, 2019 Date Month By (1) Edward J. Carlson Name of Signer Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence be the person who appeared before me (.) (,) (2) (And Name of Sianer Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence be the person who appeared before me.) Signature Signal r of Notay Pubic OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to person relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Further Description of Any Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Non -Collusion Affidavit Document Date: 9-26-2019 Number of Pages: 1 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Top of thumb here Top of thumb here CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATE The undersigned contractor or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: 1. The Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Contractor shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Contractor shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Contractor shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Contractor's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Contractor shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Contractor shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 6. In the event of the Contractor's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. P-13 ofP-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. The Contractor shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Contractor may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, no discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any contractor of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter. Signed: Title: Edward J. Carlson, Vice President Firm: All AmericanAsphalt Q Date: I �AVI 1a P-14 of P-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. STATEMENT REGARDING APPRENTICESHIP REQUIREMENTS The undersigned BIDDER is familiar with the requirements of Section 1777.5 of the State Labor Code regarding employment of apprentices, and understands that contractors on contracts exceeding $30,000 or 20 working days shall: 1. Apply to the joint apprenticeship committee administering the apprenticeship standards of the craft or trade in the area of the site of the public work for a certificate approving the contractor under the apprenticeship standards for the employment and training of apprentices in the area or industry affected. 2. Employ the number of apprentices or the ratio of apprentices to journeymen stipulated in the apprenticeship standards. 3. Contribute to the fund or funds in each craft or trade in which he/she employs journeymen or apprentices on the public work, in the same amount or upon the same basis and in the same manner as the other contractors, except contractors not signatory to the trust agreement shall pay a like amount to the California Apprenticeship Council. Signed: Title: Edward J. Carlson, Vice President Firm: All American Asphalt Date: IIr),W Ia�gi9 P-15 of P-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. STATEMENT REGARDING "ANTI -KICKBACK" REQUIREMENTS The undersigned is submitting this proposal for performing by contract the work required by these bid documents, agrees to comply with the Copeland "Anti -Kickback" Act (18 USC 74) as supplemented in the Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR, Part 3). This act provides that each contractor or subcontractor shall be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he/she is otherwise entitled. Signed: Title: Edward J. Carlson, Vice President Finn: All American Asphalt Date: glaIIV19 P-16 of P-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 19-6946 EDINGER AVE. REHABILITATION: RAITT ST. TO BRISTOL ST. PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 10162 QUESTIONNAIRE In conformance with Public Contract Code Section 10162, the BIDDER shall complete, under penalty of perjury, the following questionnaire: Has the BIDDER, any officer of the BIDDER, or any employee of the BIDDER who has a proprietary interest in the BIDDER, ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a federal, state, or local government project because of a violation of law or a safety regulation? Yes No X If the answer is yes, explain the circumstances in the following space P-17 of P-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA EXHIBIT 3 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PROJECT 19-6946 EDINGER AVENUE REHABILITATION FROM RA1TT STREET TO BRISTOL STREET PROJECT This CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT is made and entered into this 19" day of November, 2019 by and between the City of Santa Ana, California, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "CITY"), and All American Asphalt (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR"). WITNESSETH: The CITY and the CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1. CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all the work and furnish all the materials at its own cost and expense necessary to construct and complete in a good and workmanlike manner and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the CITY, the Edinger Avenue Rehabilitation from Raitt Street to Bristol Street Project (hereinafter referred to as the "WORK OF IMPROVEMENT") identified in and in accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by the City's Public Works Agency and approved by the City Council. 2. The complete Constntction Contract consists of the "Contract Documents" as defined by the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and which include the following: • Notice Inviting Bids • hiformation to Bidders • Bid Proposal • Bid Bond • Contract Form • Contract Bonds • General Provisions • Special Provisions • Technical Provisions and Project Plans • Community Workforce Agreement • Appendices In case of conflict between the Contract Documents, the precedence of documents shall be as established in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. 3. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT the sum total amount not to exceed Six Hundred Eight Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty-six Dollars and No Cents ($608,956.00), as set forth and identified in the BID PROPOSAL, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A." The BID PROPOSAL contains a schedule of unit price(s) or lump sum(s) based on approximate quantities only, and the City does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or advisable. mi. 09/0 1/2017 Page 1 of 3 4. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT within the time specified in the Time for Completion of Improvements section of the BID PROPOSAL (Exhibit "A") including commencing construction within the timeftanre therein specified after issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 5. The CONTRACTOR will pay, and will require all subcontractors to pay, all employees on the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT a salary or wage at least equal to the prevailing salary or wage established for such work as set forth in the wage determinations for this work in accordance with applicable State and Federal law. 6. If applicable, the CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the CITY'S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA), a pre -hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA may be found on the City's website at: http://www.santa-ana.org/pwa/documents/CWA.pdf 7. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish two bonds to be approved by the CITY, one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price, to guarantee the faithful performance of the work (Performance Bond), and one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price to guarantee payment of all claims for labor and materials furnished (Payment Bond). This Contract shall not become effective until such bonds are supplied to and approved by the CITY. 8. CONTRACTOR shall, prior to the release of the performance and payment bonds or the retention payment, fiumish a warranty performance and payment bond (Warranty Bond). Said Warranty Bond shall also be required as a condition of project acceptance. For projects up to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or Twenty Percent (20%) of the final contract price. For projects above Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or Ten Percent (10%) of the final contract price. 9. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish Certificates of Liability Insurance and Worker's Compensation Insurance as outlined in the General Provisions, to be approved by the CITY. Page 2 of 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Construction Contract on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: U/ '�'. -f. 4' J N FUNK Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: FUAD SWEISS, PE, PLS Executive Director Public Works Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager CONTRACTOR: All American Asphalt NAME: EdlUQ1►L G41r6Qn' TITLE: V1Ce wdow Page 3 of 3 COST ANALYSIS CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT NO. 19-6946: EDINGER AVENUE REHABILITATION FROM RAITT STREET TO BRISTOL STREET PROJECT Construction Contract $ 608,956 Contract Administration $ 39,644 Inspection and Testing $ 51,700 Contingencies $ 60,896 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 761,196 EXHIBIT 4 REQUEST FOR K•Y. t COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO CIVIC CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES IN THE AMOUNT OF $379,916, FOR THE CARL THORNTON PARK RESTROOM PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN THE KIWANIS BARRIER FREE PLAYGROUND ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $476,907 (PROJECT NO. 16-2654) (STRATEGIC PLAN NOS. 6, 1C & 1G) /s/ Kristine Ridae CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 181 Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2od Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Award a contract to Civic Construction Associates, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $379,916, for construction of the Carl Thornton Park Restroom Project, for the term beginning upon execution of the contract and ending upon project completion, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract subject to non - substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $476,907, which includes $379,916 for the construction contract; $56,009 for contract administration, inspection and testing; and a $40,003 project contingency (approximately 10% of the construction contract amount), paid with Parks, Recreation and Community Services Acquisition & Development and General Funds. DISCUSSION The Kiwanis Barrier Free Playground is located on the north side of Carl Thornton Park, adjacent to McFadden Intermediate School (Exhibit 1). The barrier -free playground is a place where children with special needs can play alongside their neurotypical peers, while not being held back by the normal "barriers" that may exist in other playgrounds. Currently, children enjoying the barrier -free playground must cross the larger Carl Thornton Park to reach a restroom. The lack of accessible on -site restrooms in the barrier -free playground creates an additional challenge for children to enjoy the area. The project scope includes adding a new restroom building to the Kiwanis Barrier Free Playground and providing water, sewer, and electric services to the new building. Award Contract to Civic Construction Associates for Carl Thornton Park Restroom Project November 19, 2019 Page 2 Public Outreach and Contractor Participation To provide an opportunity for local vendors to submit bids, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on June 7 and 12, 2019, and bids were received electronically via the City's web -based electronic bidding system, PlanetBids, on July 3, 2019. Through the PlanetBids online portal, vendors may register to receive notifications on all current and future City projects, as well as download contract documents, receive project updates and submit bids electronically. A total of 788 vendors, including 46 located in the City of Santa Ana, were notified of the project via PlanetBids. 44 vendors requested bidding documents and 5 bids were received, including one from a Santa Ana contractor. Bid Results Summary RANK BIDDER'S NAME LOCATION BASE BID 1 Civic Construction Associates Camarillo $379,916 2 Metro Builders & Engineers Group, Ltd. Newport Beach $412,943 3 iBuild Spectrum Santa Ana $474,989 4 Green Giant Landscaping, Inc. La Habra $524,000 5 Aid Builders, Inc. Los Alamitos $673,621 All 5 bids were responsive and Civic Construction Associates submitted the lowest responsive bid in the amount of $379,916 (Exhibit 2). Based on the bid analysis and a contractor's reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Civic Construction Associates in the amount bid (Exhibit 3). Project Delivery To deliver a complete project, in addition to the construction contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project includes construction administration, inspection, and testing, along with an allowance for contingencies to account for unexpected or unforeseen conditions. Construction administration and inspection includes construction management; implementation of the City's Community Workforce Agreement requirements; inspection of the Contractor's work to ensure contract compliance, workmanship, and quality; and material testing. As indicated in the Cost Analysis (Exhibit 4) and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $476,907. Construction Contract 1 $379,916 Construction Administration, Inspection, and Testing $56,988 Contingencies $40,003 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $476,907 Award Contract to Civic Construction Associates for Carl Thornton Park Restroom Project November 19, 2019 Page 3 These amounts will cover all staffing costs for delivery of this capital project and no additional funding will be used. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #6 — Community Facilities & Infrastructure, Objective #1 (Establish and maintain a Community Investment Plan for all City assets), Strategy C (invest resources and technology to extend the service life of existing infrastructure to protect the City's investment and support a high quality of life standard) and Strategy G (Develop and implement the City's Capital Improvement Program in coordination with the Community Investment Plan). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER-2017-57 was filed for the project. FISCAL IMPACT As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $476,907, which includes the construction contract, contract administration, inspection, testing, and project contingency. The following table summarizes the funds budgeted to deliver construction of this project: Fiscal Year Accounting Unit- Fund Accounting Unit, Amount Account # Description Account Description Residential Residential Development District 4 FY 2019-20 31413260-66200 Development Acquisition & $254,907 July -June (16-2654) District 4 Fund Development, Improvements Other Than Building Parks, Recreation & FY 2019-20 01113250-66200 Community Services July -June (16-2654) General Fund Park Facilities, $222,000 Improvements Other Than Building Total: $476,907 All funds are scheduled for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2019-20. Award Contract to Civic Construction Associates for Carl Thornton Park Restroom Project November 19, 2019 Page 4 Fuad S. Sweiss, PE, PLS Executive Director Public Works Agency APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency Lisa Rudloff Executive Director Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency FSS/TC/RA Exhibits: 1. Location Map 2. Bid Proposal 3. Construction Contract 4. Cost Analysis ADAMS AT 3 a n MD PROJECT LOCATION INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL HEMLOCK WY OPLU O� HEMLOCK WY O SAN LO RENZO AV r w SALORENZO AV w GP w w a J r a � cn w � MCHANDLERV � o a w a w SEGERSTROM AVE EXHIBIT 1 sANTA ANA PROJECT NO. 16-2654 P W A THORNTON (KIWANIS BARRIER FREE PARK) �/ RESTROOM FACILITY aueuc WORKS AGENCY PAGE 1 OF 1 City of Santa Ana Thornton Park Restroom RE -BID (16-2654), bidding on July 3, 2019 2:00 PM (Pacific) Bid Results Bidder Details Vendor Name Civic Construction associates Address 79 Daily Drive, #171 Camarillo, CA 93010 United States Respondee Timothy Hall Respondee Title CEO Phone 805-551-5211 Ext. Email ccamayfair@yahoo.com Vendor Type SBE License # 994455 CA DIR Bid Detail Bid Format Electronic Submitted July 3, 2019 1:36:21 PM (Pacific) Delivery Method Bid Responsive Bid Status Submitted Confirmation # 183771 Ranking 0 Respondee Comment Buyer Comment Attachments File Title File Name Bid does cca-thortonElectronicBiddocsScanned.pdf ownership cca-thortonownershipSCANNED.pdf bid bond cca-thortonBidbondSCANNED.pdf noncollusion cca-thorntonAffidavitSCanned.pdf Line Items Type Item Code Base Bid Proposal 1 Restroom Building (Pre -Fabricated) 2 Grading* UOM Qty LS 1 CY 730 3 Unclassified Excavation* CY 440 Unit Price $175,000.00 $50.00 $30.00 Page'. EXHIBIT 2 File Type General Forms Ownership Affidavit (Notary Public) - REQ Original Hard Copy Submittal in Addition Bid Bond Guaranty (Notary Public) - REQ Original Hard Copy Submittal in Addition Non -Collusion Affidavit (Notary Public) - REQ Original Hard Copy Submittal in Addition Line Total Comment $175,000.00 $36,500.00 $13,200.00 PlanetBids, Inc. City of Santa Ana Page 2 Thornton Park Restroom RE -BID (16-2654), bidding on July 3, 2019 2:00 PM (Pacific) Printed 1012112019 Bid Results Type Item Code UOM Qty Unit Price Line Total Comment 4 Import Suitable Fill Material* CY 475 $60.00 $28,500.00 5 Import 3/4-inch Aggregate Rock Fill Material* CY 70 $300.00 $21,000.00 6 4-Inch PVC Sewer Pipe (Open Trench)* LF 400 $50.00 $20,000.00 7 PCC Cross Gutter* SF 80 $40.00 $3,200.00 8 Asphalt Concrete Pavement* TONS 58 $200.00 $11,600.00 9 4-Inch PCC Sidewalk* SF 488 $15.00 $7,320.00 10 Furnish and Install 3" Conduit* LF 318 $12.00 $3,816.00 11 Furnish and Install Pull Box EA 2 $800.00 $1,600.00 12 Water System (Including 2-inch PVC) LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 13 Remove Existing Wrought Iron (Ornamental) Fence LF 30 $30.00 $900.00 14 Furnish and Install 8-Foot Wrought Iron (Ornamental) Fence* LF 30 $200.00 $6,000.00 15 Construct PCC Mow Strip* LF 30 $20.00 $600.00 16 Disconnect and Re -Connect Irrigation Controller to new Building Electrical Board LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 17 Construct 6-Inch PCC Walkway* SF 1459 $20.00 $29,180.00 18 Project Advertisement Sign EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 19 Sewer Lift Station (Sewer Pump System) LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 PlanetBids, Inc. City of Santa Ana Page 3 Thornton Park Restroom RE -BID (16-2654), bidding on July 3, 2019 2:00 PM (Pacific) Printed 10/21/2019 Bid Results Type Item Code UOM Qty Unit Price Line Total Comment 20 Labor Agreement Oversight LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Subtotal $379,916.00 Add Alternative One 21 Pedestrian Wooden Bridge SF 150 $200.00 $30,000.00 22 Irrigation and landscape Modification SF 7500 $5.00 $37,500.00 23 Rock Swale* SF 480 $12.00 $5,760.00 24 XiO Cloud SCADA Water Control System LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 Subtotal $76,260.00 Asterisk Notes (Per P-3 of Specifications) - NOT part of Total Bid Calculation 25 = The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the "25%" limit as stated in Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications. ea 1 0 0 Subtotal 0 Total $456,176.00 PlanetBids, Inc. RE -BID CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM BID PROPOSAL TO: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FROM: Civic Constuction Associates REQUIREMENT: The undersigned bidder declares that they have carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that they have examined the Contract Documents in it-, entirety and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said plans (if any) and the specifications for the unit price(s) or lump sum(s) set forth in the following schedule: Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount t Restroom Building (Pre -Fabricated) 1 LS $ 175,000 S 175,000 2 Grading* 730 CY S $ 50.00 36,500.0 3 Unclassified Excavation 440 CY S30.00 S 13,200.0 4 import Suitable Fill Material + 475 CY S S 60.00 28,500.0 5 Import %-inch Aggregate Rock Fill 70 CY S S Material+ 300.00 21,000.0 6 4-Tnch PVC Sewer Pipe (Open Trench)* 400 LF S 50.00 S 20,000.0 7 PCC Cross Gutter* 80 SF 40.00 3,200. 8 Asphalt Concrete Pavement* 58 TONS S200.00 $ 11,600. 9 4-Tnch PCC Sidewalk* 488 SF S S 15.00 7,320.0 10 Furnish and Install 3" Conduit* 319 LF S 12.00 S 3,816.01 11 Famish and install Pull Box 2 EA S S 800.00 1,600.00 12 Water System (including 2-inch PVC) I LS S 1040.X S z eo0-cV 13 Remove Existing Wrought Tron 30 LF $30.00 S 900.00 (Ornamental) Fence 14 Furnish and Install 9-Foot Wrought Iron 30 LF S 200.00 S 6,000.00 (Ornamental) Fence* 0 0 P-1 ofP-17 RE -BID CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM Item Description Qty Unit UnitPrice Amount 15 Construct PCC Mow Strip' 30 LF S 20.00 s 600.00 16 bisconnect and Re -Connect Irrigation Controller to new Building Electrical 1 LS $ OD or ell $ 2000-00 Board 17 Construct 6-Tnch PCC Walkway' 1,459 SF S 20.00 S 29,180.0 18 Project Advertisement Sign 1 EA s °` LSDD S o 0 ySDO _ 19 Sewer Lift Station (Setter Pump System) I LS s oe S eo 6DOO 5000 '- 20 Tabor Agreement Oversight I LS $10,000 s10,000 TOTAL BASE BID 5 �791%4417 ADD ALTERNATTVE A 21 Pedestrian Wooden Bridge 150 SF $ tr S 501000-er LO0 22 Irrigation and landscape Modification 7,500 SF $ 5.00 $ 37 , 500 . 23 Rock Swale' 490 SF S 12.00 $ 5760.0 24 XiO Cloud SCADA Water Control System I LS S -00 e 3 S DO 30Gb TOTAL. ADD ALTERNATIVE A $ 7 to Z60 00 TOTAL BASE BID + ADD ALTERNATIVE A s 0 14 S6` l `76 P-2 of P-17 C CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected based on the Total Base Bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add-altemate bid items (if any). • The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the " 25%" limit as stated in Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly. f This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 2-3.2 of the Standard Specifications TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within one -hundred (160) working days after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $1,500 per calendar day. Civic Construction Associates Name of Firm IA _ Signature of BIDDF. Timothy Pr dent /CEO/Secretary, Treasurer- Serves as sole officer and Title Hall shareholder (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) P-3 ofP-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM BIDDER'S STATEMENT RE -BID BIDDER understands and agrees that this Bid Proposal, Contract Documents and subsequent Construction Contract Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between BIDDER and the AGENCY only after it has been accepted by the City Council, endorsed by the Clerk of the Council with her signature and official seal noting hereon the action of approval of the Council, signed by the Public Works Agency Executive Director or his/her duly authorized agent, and signed by the City Attorney, denoting his approval of the form of this document, and its execution, and when it or an exact copy of it has been either delivered to BIDDER or deposited with the United States Postal Service properly addressed to the BIDDER with the correct postage affixed thereto. BIDDER further agrees that upon delivery (as defined above) of the accepted agreement he/she will furnish AGENCY all required bonds and certificate of liability insurance within ten (10) business days or the funds, check, draft, or BIDDERS bond substituted in lieu thereof accompanying this proposal shall become the property of the AGENCY and shall be considered as payment of damages due to the delay and other causes suffered by AGENCY because of the failure to furnish the necessary bonds and because it is distinctly agreed that the proof of damages actually suffered is difficult to ascertain; otherwise said funds, check, drafts, or BIDDER'S bond substituted in lieu thereof shall be returned to the undersigned. BTDDER understands that a bid is required for the entire work, the estimated quantities set forth in the bid schedule are solely for the purpose of comparing bids, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed. The BIDDER also certifies that the bid is a balanced bid. In accordance with Section 7028.15 of the California Business and Professions Code, the undersigned certifies under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Name of Firm civic Signature of BIDDER Title Prear sident/CEO/Secrety, Treasure Timothy [call serves as sole 9€€}eer asA (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-paKwjj14®O4wjing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) P-4 of P-17 • �' CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM CONTRACTOR'S LICENSING AND REGISTRATION STATEMENT The undersigned contractor, or corporate officer, declares under penalty of perjury that he/she and all his/her subcontractors are registered with the State of California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), and that the following is true and correct. Contractor's Name: Civic Construction Associates Business Address: 79 Daily Drive, #171, Camarillo, CA Business E-Mail Address: ccamayfair@yahoo.com 805-551-5211 Telephone: State Contractor's License No. and Class: 7/31/2020 License Expiration Date: State Dept. of Industrial Relations (DIR) Registration No.: State Dept. of Industrial Relations (DIR) Registration Expiration D Title: CEO/President 93010 994455 "A" and "C-27" 1000411013 06/30/2021 P-5 ofP-17 .a CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM PREVAILITIG WAGE COMPLIANCE AND MONITORING STATEMENT Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, ct seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16,000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Since the services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and since the total compensation is S1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Contractor with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor's principal place of business and at the project site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. The undersigned certifies that the foregoing is true and correct. Name of Firm CIVIC CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATES Signature of BIl Title (if an individual, so state) P-6 of P-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO,: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RF.STROOM OWNERSHIP AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 COUNTY OF ORANGE 1 SS: CITY OF SANTA ANA / /,w o 2w y �) 4 - /%y f L being duly sworn, deposes and says: ❑ INDMDUAL That he/she is the party making the foregoing proposal: ❑ PARTNERSHIP That he/she is a member of the co -partnership fine designated as: and who has been and is duly vested with the authority w make and execute instruments for the co -partnership by: who constitute the other members of the co -partnership. That he is of 1 ItCORPORATION L7'e L�L- %A.USj'rP u['F-)'.I 14f Sa C-ici R" f _���1�C�[Jc �r CEb a corporation which is making the foregoing proposal: ❑ JOINT VENTUR E That he is of. one of the parties making the foregoing proposal as a joint venture, and the he/she has been and is duty vested with the authority to execute instruments for an on behalf of the parties making said bid who are: that such a bid is genuine and not collusive or sham, and has not in any manner sought by collusion to secure any advantage against the City of Santa Ana or any person interested in the proposed contract, for himself or any other person. Ignature of Bidder Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 20 Signature of officer Administering Oath (Notary Public) P-7 ofP-17 CALIFORNIA NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT For An Individual Acting In His/Her Own Right: A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California ) ss. `r\l'� County of _ ) Wk r On bpra mf� Notary Public, personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal ear Molise er JUAN GONZALEZ VILLASENOn COMM. #2123498 P NOTM7 rUenG-"VffOMIAU 'I1 MYLbmmlaan EapnYe1t 19 ter lrr err Isar ra lralrr lrrlararaalr liver My commission expires: HEL6850CA (I / 15 ) A4:1.1XIVIr RE -BID CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL Boni No.: CMGB0005271 PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM KNOW ALL PRESENT that. Civic Construction Associates as BIDDER, and Argonaut Insurance Company as SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto the CITY OF SANTA ANA, as AGENCY, in the penal sum of Ten Percent of Their Greatest Amount Bid Dollars (S 10% of G.A.B ), which is ten percent (10%) of the total amount bid by BIDDER to AGENCY for the above -stated project, for the payment of which sum, BIDDER and SURETY agree to be bound, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITIONS OF THIS OBLIGATION ARE SUCH that, whereas BIDDER is about to submit it bid to AGENCY for the above -stated project, if said bid is rejected, or if said bid is accepted and a contract is awarded and entered into by BIDDER in the manner and time specified, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise it shall remain in fWl force and effect in favor of AGENCY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have set their names, titles, hands, and seal this 18th day of June , 2019 . -131DDER• Civic Com SURETY June 79 Daily Drive -Insurance Company, Ventura Blvd., Ste 426, Woodland CA 9301 CA No.: (805)551-1006 Hope Shear, Attorney -in -Fact d and Sworn to before me Stephanie Hope Shear this 18th day of , 2019 . Signature: ** See Attached Document ** Notary Public in and for the County of Los Angeles , State of California ' Provide BIDDER/ SURETY name, address, and telephone number and the name, title. address, and telephone number of authorized representative. CALIFORNIA NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT For An Individual Acting In His/Her Own Right: A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California ) ) ss. County of ) , 1 �AC-X �r On I�Jt — bgfore tt)" wCw��r1t"4� _ Notary Public, personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capaciry(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(&) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal �nmwmunn 1lnuununu xsnu N()fi �-- LLASF at turd` `.^ _ �� i / I 11R COMM.,1212ygag l * 'c� b�^�r r+orury Print Name &,t�uru� ou�nrv°�'a IIII/IUgli nl�l .e qil l�i�m nlnnr My commission expires HEL6850CA (1/15) Bond No.: CMGBOOM71 Argonaut Insurance Company Premium: $0.00 Deliveries Only: 225 W. Washington, 24th Floor Chicago, IL 60606 United States Postal Service: P.O. Box 469011, San Antonio, TX 78246 POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the Argonaut Insurer= Company, a Corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and having its principal of min the County of Cook, Illinois does hereby nominate, constihde and appoint: Gabriella Grady. Shilo Lee Losino Stephanie Hooe Shear Elizabem Santos i atanva Taylor. Stacey Garcia Their true and lawful agent(s) and attorney(s}in-fact, each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above, to make, execute, seal and dellver for and on its behalf as surety, and n its act and deed any and all bonds, contracts, agreements of indemnity and other undertakings in suretyship provided, however, that the penal stem of any one such instrument executed hereunder shall not exceed the sum of. S15.000.000.00 This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of Argonaut Insurance Company: MRSOLVED, That the President, Senior Vice President, Vice President, Assistant Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and each of them hereby is authorized to execute powers of anomey, and such authority can be executed by use of facsimile signature, which may be attested or acknowledged by any officer or attorney, of the Company, qualifying the attorney or attorneys named in the given power of attorney, to execute in behalf of, and acknowledge n the act and deed of the Argonaut Insurance Company, all bond undertakings and cwtnr'ts of suretyship, and to affix the corporate scat dve a o." nce IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Argonaut InsuraCompany has caused its official aeaPlto be hereunto affixed and these presents to be signed by its duly authorized officer on the 8th day of May, 2017. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF HARRIS SS: 0,SLjRAVC _ c-aT; 0. O;SEALI aj�,. swa by: Y' ............. Argonaut Insurance Company Joshua C. Betz, Senior Vice President On this gth day of May, 2017 A.D., befine me, a Notary Public of the State of Texas, in and for the County of Hams, duly commissioned and qualified, came TIE ABOVE OFFICER OF THE COMPANY, tome personally known to be the individual and officer described in, and who executed the preceding instrument, and he ackrmwtedged the cxecuion of some. and being by me duly swom, deposed and said that he is the officer of the said Company aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company, and the said Corporate Seal and his signature as officer were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said corporation, and that Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of said Company, referred to in the preceding instrument is now in force. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand, and affixed my Official Seal at the County of Harris, the day and year fast above written. A/ rU s%M NYIJAAs (Notuy Public) 1, the undersigned Officer of the Argonaut Insurance Company, Illinois Corporation, do hereby certify that the original POWER OF ATTORNEY of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy is still in full force and effect and has not been revoked. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand, and affixed the Seal of said Company, on the 19th day of June _ 12019 r r✓ James Blutnrd , Vice President -Surely THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID UNLESS THE WORDS ARCO POWER OF ATTORNEY ARE IN BLUE. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ON AUTHENTICITY OF THIS DOCUMENT CALL (210) 321- 8" CALIFORNIA JURAT WITH AFFIANT STATEMENT GOVERNMENT CODE § SM M Sae Attached Document (Notary to cross out lines 1-0 below) Ll See Statement Below (Lines 1-6 to be completed only by document signegs], not Notary) Signature of Document Signer No. 1 Signature of Document Signer No. 2 (if any) A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the Identity of the Individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of Los Angeles $HI R LEY GIGGLES GmycommNotary Pub;m - California Los Angeles CountymMComission 2163817 Er was Sep 7. 2020 r Place Notary Seat Above Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this -6A day of U P-- 2oL by Date Month year (and Stephanie Hope Shear Name(s) of Signers) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who appeared before me. Signature Si re of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though this section Is Optfortal, completing this Information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Number of Pages: ___ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Document Date: 020116 National Notary Association - www.NatiomiNotary.org • 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item 85910 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM LIST OF SUB -CONTRACTORS Section 4100 et. seq. of the Public Contract Code requires listing of all subcontractors with the bid for all subcontract work exceeding the following amount: o Streets, highways including bridge projects: Ys% of the bid or S10,000, whichever is greater o Buildings, parks, or other projects: '/a% of the bid Section 1725.5 of the Public Contract Code requires all Subcontractors be registered with the State Department of industrial Relations (DIR). BIDDER proposes to subcontract certain portions of the work to the firms listed below: Name Public Reetroom License #/Exp. 322966 DIR Reg. #/Exp. 1000000303 Location , Name License #/Exp. DTR Reg. #/Exp. Location ii�Rdeft, NV 89423 Phone 888-888-20b0 Phone _ Type Of Work As,t ,m rnstal 1 /rkrchasType Of Work Amount $125,000.00 Amount$ Name License #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. License # Location _ Phone Type Of Work Amount S _ Name License #/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. License # _ Location _ Phone Type Of Work Amount S Signature of Bidder Name License #/Exp. DTR Reg. #/Exp. License # Location Phone Type Of Work Amount $ Name License ff/Exp. DIR Reg. #/Exp. License # Location Phone Type Of Work Amount $ P-9 of P-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM REFERENCES RE -BID The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for THREE public agencies for which the BIDDER has performed similar work within the past three years. City of Westlake Name and Address of Mike Busto, P.E. 8- vaephone Contract Amount 23100 Project Managerl-805-279-6870 of rsop familiar with pro"ect. "Shade7�r'Structure, �000 CY Earthwork, 10000 SF Foundation, Landsvcp0in�r2rrigation, DG patKstC COrttpbelt�d 2. United Water Conservation Coro 106 8th Street. Santa Paula. Ca Name and Address of owner. Andrian Quiroz P E Project Engineer 805-535-5746 Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. 380,000 Asphalt, BLock, Structurl COncrete/Steel Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed Earthwork, Asphalt, Sidewalks, Utilities 2018 3. Long Beach Airport 4100 Donald Douglas Long Beach, CA Name and Address of owner. Brooke Corney, Project Engineer 909-583-1159 Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project 410,000 Contract Amount Monument, Demolition, Landscaping 2019 Type of Work Completed Earthwo , grading, drains, atrucl omP The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all brokers and sureties from whom BIDDER intends to procure insurance and bonds. Andrew Synyn - Artisan Bonding and Argonaut Bonds 1-949-292-3353 P-10 of P-17 RE -BID CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM ADDITIONAL REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for THREE public agencies for which the BIDDER or Subcontractor has performed similar work in the past live years. 3. and Address of Owner. Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. Contract Amount Type of Work Name and Address of owner. Date Completed Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed Name and Address of owner. Name and Telephone Number of person familiar with project. Contract Amount Type of Work Date Completed The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all brokers and sureties from whom BIDDER intends to procure insurance and bonds. P-11 ofP-17 N01003M CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) In conformance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the BIDDER declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER or any other BIDDER, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are trite; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. Note: The above Non -collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. BIDDERS are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal State of California County of yewri'/1iJ Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this _ day of . 20_, by , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me Notary Public Signature Notary Public Seal P-12 of P-17 CALIFORNIA NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT For An Individual Acting In His/Her Own Right: A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California ) ) ss. County of Se _ ) 1 On 1541) 14 pgforerr�;,l`�/ fl:i , ( Notary Public, personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal as INN (MatiYNtl/N19lMl1J•uuu was JUAN 0014ZM YIL ASENOn COMM. #2123aaB veuruaacoumr as �� ,/,. rumbnEmnr B'�NA18 i ;,III@oils 11INN sell IIIII IIIIIt1111111! My commission expires: n H EL6850CA (1 / 15 ) CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATE The undersigned contractor or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: 1. The Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Contractor shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following; employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Contractor shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Contractor shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Contractor's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Contractor shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Contractor shall famish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 6. in the event of the Contractor's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. P-13 of P-17 RE -BID CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM The Contractor shall include the portion of the sentence ilnlnediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Contractor may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Slats. 1939, and as amended, no discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any contractor of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter. Signed: Title: CEO/President Pam: Civic Construction Associates Date: July 3, 2019 P-14 of P-17 RE -BID CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM STATEMENT REGARDING APPRENTICESHIP REQUIREMENTS The undersigned BIDDER is familiar with the requirements of Section 1777.5 of the State Labor Code regarding employment of apprentices, and understands that contractors on contracts exceeding $30,000 or 20 working days shall: 1. Apply to the joint apprenticeship committee administering the apprenticeship standards of the craft or trade in the area of the site of the public work for a certificate approving the contractor under the apprenticeship standards for the employment and training of apprentices in the area or industry affected. 2. Employ the number of apprentices or the ratio of apprentices to journeymen stipulated in the apprenticeship standards. 3. Contribute to the fund or funds in each craft or trade in which he/she employs journeymen or apprentices on the public work, in the same amount or upon the same basis and in the same manner as the other contractors, except contractors not signatory to the trust agreement shall pay a like amount to the C apprenticeship Council. Signed: � �y Title' CEO/President Firm: Civic Construction Associates Date: July 3, 2019 P-15 ul'P-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM STATEMENT REGARDING "ANTI -KICKBACK" REQUIREMENTS The undersigned is submitting this proposal for performing by contract the work required by these bid documents, agrees to comply with the Copeland "Anti -Kickback" Act (18 USC 74) as supplemented in the Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR, Part 3). This act provides that each contractor or subcontractor shall be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he/she is otherwise entitled, Title: CEO/President Firm: Civic Construction Associates Date: July 3, 2019 P-16 of P-17 ` C � CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 10162 OUESTI In conformance with Public Contract Code Section 10162, the BIDDER shall complete, under penalty of perjury, the following questionnaire: Has the BIDDER, any officer of the BIDDER, or any employee of the BIDDER who has a proprietary interest in the BIDDER, ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a federal, state, or local government project because of a violation of law or a safety regulation? Yes No -'"'"'""- If the answer is yes, explain the circumstances in the following space. P-17 of P-17 CITY OF SANTA ANA EXHIBIT 3 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PROJECT 16-2654 THORNTON PARK RESTROOM This CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT is made and entered into this 5th day of November, 2019 by and between the City of Santa Ana, California, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "CITY"), and Civic Construction Associates (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR"). WITNESSETH: The CITY and the CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1. CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all the work and furnish all the materials at its own cost and expense necessary to construct and complete in a good and workmanlike manner and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the CITY, the Thornton Park Restroom Project (hereinafter referred to as the "WORK OF IMPROVEMENT") identified in and in accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by the City's Public Works Agency and approved by the City Council. 2. The complete Construction Contract consists of the "Contract Documents" as defined by the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and which include the following: • Notice Inviting Bids • Information to Bidders • Bid Proposal • Bid Bond • Contract Form • Contract Bonds • General Provisions • Special Provisions • Technical Provisions and Project Plans • Commin ity Workforce Agreement • Appendices In case of conflict between the Contract Documents, the precedence of documents shall be as established in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Constriction. 3. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT the sum total amount not to exceed Three Hundred Seventy -Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Sixteen Dollars and No Cents ($379,916.00), as set forth and identified in the BID PROPOSAL, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A." The BID PROPOSAL contains a schedule of unit price(s) or lump sum(s) based on approximate quantities only, and the City does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or advisable. tay. 09/01/2017 Page 1 of 3 4. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT within the time specified in the Time for Completion of Improvements section of the BID PROPOSAL (Exhibit "A") including commencing construction within the timeframe therein specified after issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 5. The CONTRACTOR will pay, and will require all subcontractors to pay, all employees on the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT a salary or wage at least equal to the prevailing salary or wage established for such work as set forth in the wage determinations for this work in accordance with applicable State and Federal law. 6. If applicable, the CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the CITY'S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA), a pre -hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA may be found on the City's website at: http://www.santa-ana.org/pwa/documents/CWA.pdf 7. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish two bonds to be approved by the CITY, one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price, to guarantee the faithful performance of the work (Performance Bond), and one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price to guarantee payment of all claims for labor and materials furnished (Payment Bond). This Contract shall not become effective until such bonds are supplied to and approved by the CITY. S. CONTRACTOR shall, prior to the release of the performance and payment bonds or the retention payment, furnish a warranty performance and payment bond (Warranty Bond). Said Warranty Bond shall also be required as a condition of project acceptance. For projects up to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or Twenty Percent (20%) of the final contract price. For projects above Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or Ten Percent (10%) of the final contract price. 9. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish Certificates of Liability Insurance and Worker's Compensation Insurance as outlined in the General Provisions, to be approved by the CITY. Page 2 of 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Construction Contract on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney HN FUNK Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: FUAD SWEISS Executive Director Public Works Agency KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager CONTRACTOR: Civic C onstruction Associates TITLE: 4, Page 3 of 3 City of Santa Ana Thornton Park Restroom RE -BID (16-2654), bidding on July 3, 2019 2:00 PM (Pacific) Bid Results Bidder Details Vendor Name Civic Construction associates Address 79 Daily Drive, #171 Camarillo, CA 93010 United States Respondee Timothy Hall Respondee Title CEO Phone 805-551-5211 Ext. Email ccamayfair@yahoo.com Vendor Type SBE License # 994455 CA DIR Bid Detail Bid Format Electronic Submitted July 3, 2019 1:36:21 PM (Pacific) Delivery Method Bid Responsive Bid Status Submitted Confirmation # 183771 Ranking 0 Respondee Comment Buyer Comment Attachments File Title File Name Bid does cca-thortonElectronicBiddocsScanned.pdf ownership cca-thortonownershipSCANNED.pdf bid bond cca-thortonBidbondSCANNED.pdf noncollusion cca-thorntonAffidavitSCanned.pdf Line Items Type Item Code Base Bid Proposal 1 Restroom Building (Pre -Fabricated) 2 Grading* UOM Qty LS 1 CY 730 3 Unclassified Excavation* CY 440 Unit Price $175,000.00 $50.00 $30.00 Page 1 File Type General Forms Ownership Affidavit (Notary Public) - RED Original Hard Copy Submittal in Addition Bid Bond Guaranty (Notary Public) - RED Original Hard Copy Submittal in Addition Non -Collusion Affidavit (Notary Public) - REQ Original Hard Copy Submittal in Addition Line Total Comment $175,000.00 $36,500.00 $13,200.00 PlanetBids, Inc. City of Santa Ana Thornton Park Restroom RE -BID (16-2654), bidding on July 3, 2019 2:00 PM (Pacific) Bid Results Type Item Code UOM Qty 4 Import Suitable Fill Material* CY 475 5 Import 3/4-inch Aggregate Rock Fill Material* CY 70 6 4-Inch PVC Sewer Pipe (Open Trench)* LF 400 7 PCC Cross Gutter* SF 80 8 Asphalt Concrete Pavement* TONS 58 9 4-Inch PCC Sidewalk* SF 488 10 Furnish and Install 3" Conduit* LF 318 11 Furnish and Install Pull Box EA 2 12 Water System (Including 2-inch PVC) LS 1 13 Remove Existing Wrought Iron (Ornamental) Fence LF 30 14 Furnish and Install 8-Foot Wrought Iron (Ornamental) Fence* LF 30 15 Construct PCC Mow Strip* LF 30 16 Disconnect and Re -Connect Irrigation Controller to new Building Electrical Board LS 1 17 Construct 6-Inch PCC Walkway* SF 1459 18 Project Advertisement Sign EA 1 19 Sewer Lift Station (Sewer Pump System) LS 1 Unit Price Line Total Comment $60.00 $28,500.00 $300.00 $21,000.00 $50.00 $20,000.00 $40.00 $3,200.00 $200.00 $11,600.00 $15.00 $7,320.00 $12.00 $3,816.00 $800.00 $1,600.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $30.00 $900.00 $200.00 $6,000.00 $20.00 $600.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $20.00 $29,180.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Page 2 PlanetBids, Inc. City of Santa Ana Page 3 Thornton Park Restroom RE -BID (16-2654), bidding on July 3, 2019 2:00 PM (Pacific) Bid Results Type Item Code UOM Qty Unit Price Line Total Comment 20 Labor Agreement Oversight LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Subtotal $379,916.00 Add Alternative One 21 Pedestrian Wooden Bridge SF 150 $200.00 $30,000.00 22 Irrigation and landscape Modification SF 7500 $5.00 $37,500.00 23 Rock Swale* SF 480 $12.00 $5,760.00 24 XiO Cloud SCADA Water Control System LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 Subtotal $76,260.00 Asterisk Notes (Per P-3 of Specifications) - NOT part of Total Bid Calculation 25 = The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the "25%" limit as stated in Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications. ea 1 0 0 Subtotal 0 Total $456,176.00 PlanetBids, Inc. COST ANALYSIS CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT NO. 16-2654: THORNTON PARK (KIWANIS BARRIER FREE PARK) RESTROOM Construction Contract $ 379,916 Contract Administration $ 33,013 Inspection and Testing $ 23,975 Contingencies $ 40,003 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 476,907 EXHIBIT 4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH VACANT PROPERTY SECURITY, LLC TO INCREASE THE AGREEMENT AMOUNT BY $55,000 FOR A TOTAL OF $170,000, EXTEND THE TERM TO DECEMBER 4, 2020 AND ADD A ONE- YEAR RENEWAL OPTION ENDING ON DECEMBER 4, 2021 TO BE FUNDED BY THE GENERAL FUND {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5,4) /s/ Kristine Ridaf CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on V1 Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CKiP►IIIto] =1all C6 FILE NUMBER Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement amendment with Vacant Property Security, LLC for the placement of metal security doors, screens and other security equipment on buildings that will increase the agreement amount by $55,000 for a total of $170,000, extend the term to December 4, 2020 and add a one-year renewal option ending on December 4, 2021 exercisable by the City Manager and City Attorney to be funded by the General Fund, subject to non - substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION On December 5, 2017, the City Council awarded an agreement to Vacant Property Security, LLC. for $115,000 for one year with a one-year renewal option for services to secure buildings using metal doors and screens. The City has found this product to be very effective in the prevention of building intruders and is an asset to the Planning and Building Agency when Code Enforcement red -tags a building. The Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency also uses the service to secure the property located at 625 South Cypress Avenue. The extended use of this service will allow the City appropriate time to divest of this property. Therefore, the City wishes to continue the service by amending the agreement to increase the total amount by $55,000, extending the term to December 4, 2020 and adding a one-year renewal option. The total agreement amount is $170,000 for a total of four years, with all the renewal periods. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item allows the City to meet Goal #5 — Community Health, Livability, Engagement & Sustainability, Objective #4 (Support neighborhood vitality and livability). Agreement Amendment with Vacant Property Security, LLC for the Placement of Security Doors, Screens, and Other Security Equipment November 19, 2019 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available for the first added renewal period in the following accounts for the current fiscal year and will be budgeted and made available for the following fiscal year: Fiscal Accounting Fund Accounting Unit, Account Amount Year Unit -Account # Description Description Planning & Building Agency - FY 19-20 01116540-62300 General Fund Community Preservation, $14,585 Contractual Services -Professional PRCSA-Park Facilities, FY 19-20 01113250-62320 General Fund Maintenance & Repair, Bldg. & $17,500 Grounds Planning & Building Agency - FY 20-21 01116540-62300 General Fund Community Preservation, $10,415 Contractual Services -Professional PRCSA-Park Facilities, FY 20-21 01113250-62320 General Fund Maintenance & Repair, Bldg. & $12,500 Grounds Total $55,000 If the agreement amount has not been exhausted by December 4, 2020, the balance will be made available for the period December 5, 2020 to December 4, 2021. Lisa Rudloff Executive Director Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency Minh Thai Executive Director Planning and Building Agency Exhibit: 1. Agreement APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency FIRST AMENDMENT TO MASTER EQUIPMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH VACANT PROPERTY SECURITY LLC THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is entered into this 19th day of November, 2019, by and between Vacant Property Security, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("VPS"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. On December 5, 2017, the City entered into Agreement 4A-2017-332 ("Agreement') with VPS to provide the placement of metal security doors, screens, and other security equipment on buildings as directed by the City. The term of the Agreement was for a one-year period until December 4, 2018, with an option for the parties to extend for an additional year. B. On December 4, 2018, the term of the Agreement was extended for an additional year by operation of an extension letter (A-2017-332-01). The term of the Agreement is still current and set to expire on December 4, 2019. C. The parties seek to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the agreement and increase the overall compensation to compensate for needed City security services during the extended term. THE PARTIES THEREFORE AGREE: Purpose and Understanding, Section 2.2, shall be amended to extend the term of said Agreement for an additional one (1) year period until December 4, 2020. The parties shall have the option to agree to a one-year extension, exercisable by a writing by the City Manager, the City Attorney, and VPS. 2. Prices & Payment, Section 4.10, shall be amended to increase compensation by $55,000. Therefore, the total amount of the Agreement shall not exceed $170,000 to pay for the additional services during the extended term. Except as hereinabove modified, the terms and conditions of said Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect. [signature page to follow] Page 1 of 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney 4;2� C Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Lisa Rudloff Executive Director Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager VACANT PROPERTY SECURITY, LLC Anthony oN -ago Pco" W,o-V-n[ Pm"s m �,, LLCou. Pocorobba —i"� ombbV�,�eo ,—US ome: iman.M06a s-MW By: Anthony Pocorobba Title: Vice President Page 2 of 2 FIRST AMENDMENT TO MASTER EQUIPMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH VACANT PROPERTY SECURITY LLC THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is entered into this 19th day of November, 2019, by and between Vacant Property Security, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("VPS"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. On December 5, 2017, the City entered into Agreement #A-2017-332 ("Agreement') with VPS to provide the placement of metal security doors, screens, and other security equipment on buildings as directed by the City. The term of the Agreement was for a one-year period until December 4, 2018, with an option for the parties to extend for an additional year. B. On December 4, 2018, the term of the Agreement was extended for an additional year by operation of an extension letter (A-2017-332-01). The term of the Agreement is still current and set to expire on December 4, 2019. C. The parties seek to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the agreement and increase the overall compensation to compensate for needed City security services during the extended term. THE PARTIES THEREFORE AGREE: 1. Purpose and Understanding, Section 2.2, shall be amended to extend the term of said Agreement for an additional one (1) year period until December 4, 2020. The parties shall have the option to agree to a one-year extension, exercisable by a writing by the City Manager, the City Attorney, and VPS. 2. Prices & Payment, Section 4.10, shall be amended to increase compensation by $55,000. Therefore, the total amount of the Agreement shall not exceed $170,000 to pay for the additional services during the extended term. 3. Except as hereinabove modified, the terms and conditions of said Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect. [signature page to follow] Page 1 of 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney JE�C' Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Lisa Rudloff Executive Director Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager VACANT PROPERTY SECURITY, LLC D,1 ,,!, edbv Anth-,Pocombbz 1 Anthony .--An1honyP—mbbz,o=a-nt Prnpe, Sec-, LLC, ou, Pocorobba �r bba�pS360,,rn.�S Dave: zoiv.n oeo6495 -05 oo By: Anthony Pocorobba Title: Vice President Page 2 of 2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA - CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE SOLUTIONS FOR CONGESTED CORRIDORS PROGRAM TO SECURE GRANT FUNDING WITH A FUNDING MATCH IN THE AMOUNT OF $197,000 FOR WARNER AVENUE CLASS II BIKEWAY PROJECT {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 6B) /s/ Kristine Ri CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 151 Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO 9I111 to] i•I 101Z Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with the State of California - California Transportation Commission to secure grant funds from the Solutions for Congested Corridors Program in an amount not to exceed $19.917 million, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION In December 2017, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) adopted guidelines for the Solutions for Congested Corridor Program (SCCP). The SCCP funds multi -modal projects that make specific performance improvements in highly -traveled corridors by providing more transportation choices such as walking, biking and transit. In February 2018, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) submitted the Orange County Central Corridor Improvement Project (OC-CCIP) for funding consideration. The OC-CCIP is a multi -modal package of projects designed to relieve congestion along State Route 55 from Interstate 405 to Interstate 5. In partnership with the City of Santa Ana, the OC-CCIP includes the Warner Avenue Class II Bikeway Project in the City of Santa Ana. The Warner Avenue Class II Bikeway Project consists of painted bike lanes that will include signage and bicycle traffic signal detection from Wright Street to Red Hill Avenue. Agreement with CTC and Resolution Approving the Warner Avenue Bikeway Project November 19, 2019 Page 2 In May 2018, the CTC adopted the SCCP program, and allocated $19.917 million for the OC-CCIP projects for implementation by OCTA and other Orange County agencies. The approved OC-CCIP umbrella of projects includes the Warner Avenue Class II Bikeway Project to which the CTC awarded $1.43 million of the SCCP program total of $19.917 million. The City of Santa Ana will be the lead agency for this project. A baseline agreement for this multi -jurisdictional project for the total program in the amount of $19.917 million is required as part of the project delivery, and requires approval by CTC, Caltrans, and the cities of Tustin and Santa Ana (Exhibit 1). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. Individual environmental review will be conducted for Warner Avenue Class II Bikeway Project at the time of implementation. These types of projects typically qualify for Categorical Exemptions, which can be done by staff. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #5 — Community Health, Livability, Engagement & Sustainability, Objective #6 (Focus projects and programs on improving the health and wellness of all residents), Strategy B (Incorporate the improvement of walking and biking lanes as well as the development of a citywide bike master plan into the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan). FISCAL IMPACT A 12% match in the amount of $197,000 will be required. The City will add this project and the corresponding matching fund in the FY 2020-21 Capital Improvement Program. Fuad S. Sweiss, PE, PLS Executive Director Public Works Agency Exhibits: 1. Agreement APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency STATE OF CALIFORNIA - CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CTC-0001 (NEW 05/2018) ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 PROJECT BASELINE AGREEMENT Resolution (will be completed by CTC) 1. FUNDING PROGRAM ❑ Active Transportation Program ❑ Local Partnership Program (Competitive) ® Solutions for Congested Corridors Program ❑ State Highway Operation and Protection Program ❑ Trade Corridor Enhancement Program 2. PARTIES AND DATE 2.1 This Project Baseline Agreement (Agreement) for the, effective on, (will be completed by CTC), is made by and between the California Transportation Commission (Commission), the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Project Applicant, Orange County Transportation Authority , and the Implementing Agency, City of Tustin and City of Santa Ana , sometimes collectively referred to as the "Parties". 3. RECITAL 3.2 Whereas at its December 5, 2018 meeting the Commission approved the Solutions for Congested Corridors Program, and included in this program of projects the , the parties are entering into this Project Baseline Agreement to document the project cost, schedule, scope and benefits, as detailed on the Project Programming Request Form attached hereto as Exhibit A and the Project Report attached hereto as Exhibit B, as the baseline for project monitoring by the Commission. 3.3 The undersigned Project Applicant certifies that the funding sources cited are committed and expected to be available; the estimated costs represent full project funding; and the scope and description of benefits is the best estimate possible. 4. GENERAL PROVISIONS The Project Applicant, Implementing Agency, and Caltrans agree to abide by the following provisions: 4.1 To meet the requirements of the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Senate Bill [SB] 1, Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) which provides the first significant, stable, and on -going increase in state transportation funding in more than two decades. 4.2 To adhere, as applicable, to the provisions of the Commission: ❑ Resolution Insert Number , "Adoption of Program of Projects for the Active Transportation Program", dated ❑ Resolution Insert Number , "Adoption of Program of Projects for the Local Partnership Program", dated ® Resolution Insert Number , "Adoption of Program of Projects for the Solutions for Congested Corridors Program", dated ❑ Resolution Insert Number , "Adoption of Program of Projects for the State Highway Operation and Protection Program", dated ❑ Resolution Insert Number , "Adoption of Program of Projects for the Trade Corridor Enhancement Program", dated Project Baseline Agreement Pagel of3 4.3 All signatories agree to adhere to the Commission's Solutions for Congested Corridors Program, Guidelines. Any conflict between the programs will be resolved at the discretion of the Commission. 4.4 All signatories agree to adhere to the Commission's SB 1 Accountability and Transparency Guidelines and policies, and program and project amendment processes. 4.5 The OCTA, City of Tustin, City of Santa Ana agrees to secure funds for any additional costs of the project. 4.6 The OCTA, City of Tustin, City of Santa Ana agrees to report to Caltrans on a quarterly basis; after July 2019, reports will be on a semi- annual basis on the progress made toward the implementation of the project, including scope, cost, schedule, outcomes, and anticipated benefits. 4.7 Caltrans agrees to prepare program progress reports on a quarterly basis; after July 2019, reports will be on a semi-annual basis and include information appropriate to assess the current state of the overall program and the current status of each project identified in the program report. 4.8 The OCTA, City of Tustin, City of Santa Ana agrees to submit a timely Completion Report and Final Delivery Report as specified in the Commission's SB 1 Accountability and Transparency Guidelines. 4.9 All signatories agree to maintain and make available to the Commission and/or its designated representative, all work related documents, including without limitation engineering, financial and other data, and methodologies and assumptions used in the determination of project benefits during the course of the project, and retain those records for four years from the date of the final closeout of the project. Financial records will be maintained in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. 4.10 The Transportation Inspector General of the Independent Office of Audits and Investigations has the right to audit the project records, including technical and financial data, of the Department of Transportation, the Project Applicant, the Implementing Agency, and any consultant or sub -consultants at any time during the course of the project and for four years from the date of the final closeout of the project, therefore all project records shall be maintained and made available at the time of request. Audits will be conducted in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards. 5. SPECIFIC PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS 5.1 Project Schedule and Cost See Project Programming Request Form, attached as Exhibit A. 5.2 Project Scope See Project Report or equivalent, attached as Exhibit B. At a minimum, the attachment shall include the cover page, evidence of approval, executive summary, and a link to or electronic copy of the full document. 5.3 Other Project Specific Provisions and Conditions Attachments: Exhibit A: Project Programming Request Form Exhibit B: Project Report Project Baseline Agreement Page 2 of 3 SIGNATURE PAGE TO PROJECT BASELINE AGREEMENT Resolution Darrell E. Johnson Chief Executive Officer, Orange County Transportation Authority Project Applicant Implementing Agency Ryan Chamberlain District Director California Department of Transportation Laurie Berman Director California Department of Transportation Susan Bransen Executive Director California Transportation Commission Date Date Date Date Date Project Baseline Agreement Page 3 of 3 Additional Signature Page for City of Santa Ana Signatures Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 CITY OF SANTA ANA ATTEST Kristine Ridge City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney J#n M. Funk Assistant City Attorney Project Baseline Agreement Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Fuad S. Sweiss, PE, PLS Executive Director Public Works Agency EXHIBIT A STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST DTP-0001 (Revised July 2017) General Instructions Amendment (Existing Project) No I Date: 10/7/19 District EA Project ID PPNO MPO ID Alt Proj. ID 12 County Route/Corridor PM Bk PM Ahd Project Sponsor/Lead Agency ORA Warner N/A N/A City of Santa Ana MPO Element SCAG Local Assistance Project Manager/Contact Phone E-mail Address Cory Wilkerson 714 647-5643 cwilkerson santa-ana.or Project Title Warner Avenue Class II Location (Project Limits), Description ( Scope of Work) This project will construct an approximately 0.65 mile long Class II Bikeway along Warner Avenue, from Wright Street, over State Route 55 (SR-55), to Red Hill Avenue. The Warner Avenue project will bridge a gap between funded future bikeways west of Wright Street in the City of Santa Ana, and existing facilities east of Red Hill Avenue in the City of Tustin. Component PA&ED Implementing Agency City of Santa Ana PS&E City of Santa Ana Right of Way N/A Construction City of Santa Ana Legislative Districts Assembly: 1 69 Isenate7 1 34 ICongressional7 1 46 Project Benefits The project will close a gap in bikeways since the City of Santa Ana has a funded project to provide Class II bike lanes between Main Street and Wright Street. The proposed project will extend Class II bike lanes easterly from Wright Street, over SR-55 and to Red Hill Avenue where on -street bike lanes exist on Warner Avenue. Additionally, funding for on -street bike lanes are proposed for Red Hill Avenue so this project component will link to existing bike lanes on either side of SR- 55 and to the parallel roadway (Red Hill Avenue). The new crossing of SR-55 is needed in this area to better serve access to City of Tustin jobs at Tustin Legacy and City of Santa Ana residential uses west of SR-55. Purpose and Need _ Orange County has one of the highest rates of bicycle and pedestrian injuries in the State of California. OCTA is currently completing the OC Active, a countywide active transportation plan. The preliminary results show high concentrations of bicycle and pedestrian needs in and around the Central County Corridor. Category Outputs/Outcomes Unit Total Local Streets and Roads Bicycle lane/ sidewalk miles Miles 0.65 ADA Improvements No Bike/Ped Improvements Yes Reversible Lane analysis No Includes Sustainable Communities Strategy Goals Yes Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions Yes Project Milestone Existing Proposed Project Study Report Approved N/A Begin Environmental (PA&ED) Phase N/A Circulate Draft Environmental Document IlDocument Type ICE N/A Draft Project Report N/A End Environmental Phase (PA&ED Milestone) N/A Begin Design (PS&E) Phase 7/1/2020 End Design Phase (Ready to List for Advertisement Milestone) 6/30/2021 Begin Right of Way Phase N/A End Right of Way Phase (Right of Way Certification Milestone) N/A Begin Construction Phase (Contract Award Milestone) 12/31/2021 End onstructPhase (Construction Contract Acceptance Milestone) CCloseouiont 12/30/2023 Begin Phase 12/30/2023 End Closeout Phase (Closeout Report) 6/30/2024 ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654-3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST DTP-0001 (Revised July 2017) Date: 10f7/19 District — County Route EA Project ID PPNO Alt Pro" ID 12 ORA I Wamer 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Project Title: lWarner Avenue Class 11 Existing Total Project Cost (000's) Implementing Agency Component Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24+ Total E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/W SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Total Project Cost ($1,000s) Notes Component Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24+ Total E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/W SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 1,640 0 0 0 1,640 TOTAL 0 0 0 1,640 0 0 0 1,640 Fund No. 1: Isolutions for Congested Corridors - Local Share Program Code Existing Funding ($1,000s) Component Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24+ Total Funding Agency E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/W SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Funding ($1,000s) Notes Component Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24+ Total E&P (PA&ED) 0 PS&E 0 R/W SUP (CT) 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 R/W 0 CON 1,443 1,443 TOTAL jig 0 0 0 1,443 0 0 0 1,443 Fund No. 2: ICity Funds Program Code Existing Funding ($1,000s) Component Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24+ Total Funding Agency E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/W SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Funding ($1,000s) Notes Component Prior 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24+ Total Pending approval E&P (PA&ED) 0 PS&E 0 R/W SUP (CT) 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 R/W 0 CON 197 197 TOTAL ME 0 0 0 197 0 0 0 197 STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST DTP-0001 (July 2017) this naae for amendments only Date: 10/07/19 SECTION 1 - All Proiects Project Background N/A Programming Change Requested N/A Reason for Proposed Change N/A If proposed change will delay one or more components, clearly explain reason the delay, cost increase related to the delay, and 3 how cost increase will be funded N/A Other Significant Information SECTION 2 - For TCRP Projects Only Alternative Project Request (Please follow Instructions at http:/Avww.dot.ca.govAcrp/LETTERguidelines) Letter Of NO Prejudice (LONP) (Please follow Guidelines at http:/Am.dot.ca.govAcrp/docs/042706.pdf) SECTION 3 - All Projects Approvals I hereby certify that the above information is complete and accurate and all approvals have been obtained for the processing of this amendment request.* Name Print or Type) Si nature Title Date Attachments 1) Concurrence from Implementing Agency and/or Regional Transportation Planning Agency 2) Project Location Map STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PROGRAMMING REQUEST DTP-0001 (REV. 3/08) Date: 10/07/19 County _ CT District PPNO Alt Project No. EA ORA 12 0 0 0 Project Title: lWarner Avenue Class 11 Existing Total Project Cost Implementing Agency Component Prior 18/19 1920 2021 2122 2223 2324+ Total E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/W SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R/W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net Change E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 01 01 0 0 0 0 PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 1,640 0 0 0 1,640 TOTAL 0 0 0 1,640 0 0 0 1,640 Proposed New Result E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 1,640 0 0 0 1,640 TOTAL 0 0 0 1,640 0 0 0 1,640 Fund No. 1: Isolutions for Congested Corridors- Local Share Program Code Existing Funding 0 Component Prior 18/19 1920 2021 2122 2223 2324+ Total Funding Agency E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Change Notes E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 01 01 0 0 0 0 PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 1,443 0 0 0 1,443 TOTAL 0 0 0 1,443 _ 0 0 0 1,443 Proposed Funding E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 1,443 0 0 0 1,443 TOTAL 0 0 0 1,443 0 0 0 1,443 Fund No. 2: ICity Funds Program Code Existing Funding 0 Component Prior 18/19 1920 2021 2122 2223 2324+ Total Funding Agency E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Change Notes E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 01 01 0 0 0 0 PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 197 0 0 0 197 TOTAL MEk-0 0 0 Proposed Funding 0 0 0 197 E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pending approval PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 197 0 0 0 197 TOTAL 0 0 0 197 0 0 0 197 Fund No. 3: 10 Program Code Existing Funding 0 Component Prior 18/19 1920 2021 2122 2223 2324+ Total Funding Agency E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Change Notes E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 01 01 0 0 0 0 PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN 0 0 0 j00 L000 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EM-00 0 Proposed Funding 0 0 0 E&P (PA&ED) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Caltrans Programming Fiscal Year may be different PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON SUP (CT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EXHIBIT B MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Juan Villages Ix X , COUNCIL MEMBERS `- - Cecilia Iglesias David Penaloza`` Vicente Sarmiento Jose Solorlo CITY OF SANTAANA PLANNING & BUILDING AGENCY 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-20) P.O. BOX 1988. Santa Ana, California 92702 (714) 667-2700 • Fax (714) 973-1461 www.santa-ana.org NOTICE OF EXEMPTION CITY MANAGER Kristine Ridge CITY ATTORNEY Sonia R. Carvalho CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Delay Gomez From the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Fee Exemption per California Government Code Section 6103 To: COUNTY CLERK From: City of Santa Ana County of Orange Planning & Building Agency P.O. Box 238 20 Civic Center Plaza M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Project Title: Warner Avenue Class II Bike Lanes Date of Approval: 03/31/2020 Project Number(s): PWA-2019-1646-CITY Project Location: 1 CityWide (Partial) City: Santa Ana County: Orange ER Number: ER-2019-104 Project Description: The proposed project will Install Class II bike lanes On Warner Avenue from Wright Street to Red Hill Avenue. The work will consists of some median narrowing, signing and striping. Applicant Name: Zdenek Kekula, City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency Applicant Address: 20 Civic Center Plaza M-43 SANTA ANA, CA 92702 Name of Public Agency Approving Project City Council Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: Kekula, Zdenek Exempt Status: ❑ Ministerial (Sec. 15268) ❑ Declared Emergency (Sec. 15269 (a)) ❑ Emergency Project (Sec. 15269 (b through a)) ❑ General Rule (Sec. 15061(b)(3)/(5)) ❑ Statutory Exemption: IZ Categorical Exemption: 16301(c) Reason(s) Why Project is Exempt From CEQA: 15301(c) consists of the operation, repair, maintenance or minor alternation of existing public facilites such as streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails. City Contact: Zdenek Kekula Signature: Telephone: (714) 647-5606 Title: SANTA ANA CITY COUNCIL Miguel A. Pulido Juan Vllegas Vincente Sarmiento Jose Solorlo Mayor Mayor Pro Tem, Wards Ward Ward moulido05ania-ana or ! I III as Santa a era vsarmlentorlsantaana ore I5olor'o0ea ta- Date: Vacant David Penaloza Cecilia Iglesias Ward4 WardI Ward duenaiozaoaanta-an...rgeigiesl 5ftant - naor REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $105,000 FOR HVAC AND LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE FOR A TOTAL AGREEMENT AMOUNT OF $323,942 {STRATEGIC PLAN NOS. 6, 1 C; 6, 1 G} CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 1"Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2ntl Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment to the agreement with Siemens Industry, Inc., to extend the term of the agreement from April 30, 2020, through June 30, 2020, and to increase the not -to -exceed expenditure by $105,000 during the extended term, to provide HVAC and lighting control system maintenance on -call services, bringing the total amount of the agreement to $323,942, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney. DISCUSSION In February 2003, the Public Works agency entered into an agreement with Siemens Industry, Inc., for several energy management projects. The original agreement contained provisions for a Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC), and lighting control system, which support the energy efficiency initiatives of the city's Building Maintenance division. The control system integrated multiple building systems regardless of the manufacturer or installer. On May 5, 2015, the City Council approved the execution of a three-year agreement for a not -to - exceed amount of $218,942 with two one-year renewal options with Siemens Industry, Inc., to provide HVAC and lighting controls technical support on Siemens proprietary building systems. Currently, the second and final extension is scheduled to expire on April 30, 2020. When the agreement was executed, a funding amount was not identified for the renewal options. At this time, staff is requesting an amendment to increase the contract amount by $105,000. Of the requested increase, $52,420 is for routine monthly maintenance and the remainder is a contingency amount not to exceed $52,580, for on -call services, for an as -needed basis. In the spirit of managing facility utility usage with best management practices, staff recommends execution of an amendment to continue providing technical support for Siemens proprietary Agreement Amendment with Siemens Industry, Inc. November 19, 2019 Page 2 building automation control systems that regulate HVAC equipment and lighting at City Hall, Ross Annex, Ross Annex garage, Main Library, City Yard, El Salvador Center and SARTC. In addition, to coincide with the ending of the fiscal year, staff is requesting extending the agreement termination date from April 30, 2020 to June 30, 2020. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #6 Community Facilities & Infrastructure, Objective #1 (establish and maintain a Community Investment Plan for all City assets), Strategy C (invest resources and technology to extend the service life of existing infrastructure to protect the City's investment and support a high quality of life standard) and Strategy G (develop and implement the City's Capital Improvement Program in coordination with the Community Investment and Deferred Maintenance Plans). FISCAL IMPACT Funding in the amount of $52,420, for monthly routine maintenance, is available in the Public Works Agency FY 2019-20 Building Maintenance, Contract Services -Professional expenditure account (No. 07317100 62300). Prior to utilizing this vendor's services for on -call, as -needed services, Public Works staff must receive Finance & Management Services Agency approval of funding and accounts to ensure that funds are available under the authorization and the contingency aggregate limit of $52,580 is available. Upon successful completion of this fiscal review, a corresponding Notice to Proceed containing specific scope and maximum expenditure for the task order will be issued. Fuad S. Sweiss, PE, PLS Executive Director Public Works Agency FSS/TC/GPL Exhibit: 1. Agreement APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director of Finance and Management Services Agency EXHIBIT 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE HVAC AND LIGHTING CONTROLS TECHNICAL SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to the above -referenced agreement is entered into on November 19, 2019, by and between Siemens Industry, hrc. ("Consultant"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City" ). RECITALS A. The patties entered into Agreement No. A-2015-078, dated May 5, 2015, by which Consultant agreed to provide HVAC and lighting controls technical support and maintenance services ("Agreement" ). B. The original term of the Agreement was for three years, with provision for extension, and the term has been extended for the final one-year period ending April 30, 2020. C. The patties now wish to amend the Agreement to further extend the term of the Agreement and to increase the amount to be expended during the final extension period. The Parties therefore agree: L Section 3, Term, is amended to further extend the term of the Agreement through June 30, 2020. 2. Section 2, Compensation, is amended to increase the not -to -exceed expenditure by $105,000 during the extended term ending on June 30, 2020. This sum is comprised of (1) $52,420 for routine maintenance services and (2) $52,580 for additional services on an as -needed basis at the sole discretion of the City- 3- Except as modified by this First Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the patties hereto have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement on the date and year first written above. ATTEST CITY OF SANTA ANA DAISY GOMEZ KRISTINE RIDGE Clerk of the Council City Manager -- s;gnatures coot; nued on next page -- Page 1 of2 APPROVED AS TO FORM SOMA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: W 7g, -f—L J4qR M.FUNK Assistant City Attorney CONSULTANT c C� N e:Jam\e SlyC- itle: SA12s NI c{r\CA Tr RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Dirk Dir?at t of finance FUAD S. SWEISS, PE, PLS Executive Director Public Works Agency Pagc 2 of 2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE ADOPT A RESOLUTION AND AUTHORIZE THE CARRY OVER OF GRANT FUNDS TO THE 2021 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AS REQUIRED BY FUNDING AGENCY {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 6, 1G} /s/ Kristine Rid( CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 1" Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2i1 Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Authorize the City Manager to submit selected projects to the Orange County Transportation Authority for inclusion into the 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program. 2. Adopt a resolution certifying that the City has the resources to fund the projects submitted for inclusion into the 2021-2026 Federal Transportation Improvement Program, and confirming the City's commitment to implement all projects submitted to the program. DISCUSSION The recommended action would authorize the City Manager to request the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to carry over federally funded projects or projects subject to a federally required action, including regionally significant projects, from the current Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) to the 2021 FTIP. The federal fund sources for those projects include Active Transportation Program (ATP); Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation (HBRR); Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ); and Demonstration (DEMO) grant funds. The FTIP is the primary programming and implementation process for projects identified in the Regional Transportation Plan (RFP), administered by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The FTIP lists projects and identifies funding sources for every transportation project that receives federal or state funds, and are regionally significant projects. The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) requested that all agencies countywide carry over all federally funded projects from the existing FTIP to the Fiscal Year 2021 FTIP if project completion occurs after 2019. The FTIP carry-over occurs at the end of every two-year cycle, and marks the adoption of the new cycle updated biennially; 2021 will require the next FTIP update. Resolution to Carry Over Existing Funds to the 2021 FTIP November 19, 2019 Page 2 In order to maintain the eligibility of allocated federal funds, the City must adopt a Resolution (Exhibit 1) listing projects to be included or amended in the FTIP and submit to OCTA by the FTIP deadline of November 29, 2019. Additionally, in order to receive California Transportation Commission allocation approval, the City must provide documentation that the project is programmed in the FTIP. Staff is requesting authorization to carry over the following projects for the FTIP: CITY OCTA GRANT PROJECT PROJECT CARRY-OVER PROJECTS FUNDING NO. ID TYPE 17-6880 ORA151502 Santa Ana Blvd. & 5th St. Protected Bike Lanes ATP 17-6885 ORA151503 Edinger Ave. Protected Bike Lanes ATP 19-6944 ORA170802 City of Santa Ana -First Street Pedestrian ATP Improvements 19-6948 ORA170803 City of Santa Ana -West Willits Street Protected ATP Bicycle Lanes 16-2653 ORA170804 City of Santa Ana-SRTS Davis Elementary ADA ATP Compliance 11-6740 ORA150005 Bristol Street Improvements: Washington CTFP Avenue to 17th Street 18-6906 ORA152210 Bristol Street -Edinger Avenue Class II Bike CMAQ Lanes 18-6908 ORA152212 Bristol Street Protected Bicycle Lanes CMAQ 18-6912 ORA152213 Citywide Bike Racks CMAQ 18-6903 ORA152214 Hazard Avenue Protected Bike Lanes CMAQ 11-6741 ORA150003 Bristol Street Improvements: Warner Avenue to DEMO St. Andrew Place 15-6827 ORA170007 Fairview Bridge (Bridge #55C0513) and Street HBRR Improvements 13-6792 ORA150004 Bristol Street Improvements: Civic Center Drive DEMO to Washington Avenue TBD ORA190901 Fremont Elementary and Spurgeon ATP Intermediate SRTS TBD ORA190915 Bristol Street Protected Bike Lanes: Phase II CMAQ Warner Avenue to St. Andrew Place TBD ORA190916 Bristol Street Protected Bike Lanes: St. Andrew CMAQ Place to Edinger Avenue TBD ORA190917 Bristol Street Protected Bike Lanes: Civic CMAQ Center Drive to Washington Avenue TBD ORA190918 Bristol Street Protected Bike Lanes: First Street CMAQ to Civic Center Drive TBD ORA190919 Warner Avenue Protected Bike Lanes CMAQ Resolution to Carry Over Existing Funds to the 2021 FTIP November 19, 2019 Page 3 STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #6 — Community Facilities & Infrastructure, Objective #1 (establish and maintain a Community Investment Plan for all City assets), Strategy G (develop and implement the City's Capital Improvement Program in coordination with the Community Investment and Deferred Maintenance Plans). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Matching funds for the referenced projects have either already been budgeted and are available for expenditure or they are programmed to be budgeted in future fiscal years. The projects are in varying stages of completion and for some projects the City Match requirement has been fulfilled. A summary of the remaining City Match obligation for the projects to be carried over to the FY 2021 FTIP is as follows: See Exhibit 2 for City Match details by project. Fuad S. Sweiss, PE, PLS Executive Director Public Works Agency FSS/EWG/JG/KN/HG Exhibits: 1. Resolution 2. City Match Detail by Project APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency jmf 10/23/19 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY HAS THE RESOURCES TO FUND THE PROJECTS IN THE 2020/21- 2025-26 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND AFFIRMING THE CITY'S COMMITMENT TO mvl��avlarrr_����:za�x�ryl►�r:I��:zzH:�_uv, I :� � r r, :� ��.»•� a.>.:�-� r : I �� r �-�K.m ► �y I s.» r : I xy r �-�.»y_v r r_�_v r_�_�� I7.]111.1TJM9I Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A. The City of Santa Ana is located within the six -county metropolitan planning boundaries of the Southern California Association of Governments ("SCAG"). B. SCAG is required under both federal and state law to develop a Federal Transportation Improvement Program ("FTIP") for this region in partnership with the six respective county transportation commissions, including the Orange County Transportation Authority, which administers the FTIP in Orange County. The FTIP is a comprehensive listing of all surface transportation projects proposed over a six -year period that will receive federal funding or are subject to a federally required action. C. The City Council has authorized project submittals to the Orange County Transportation Authority for inclusion in the FTIP, where the City is the lead agency for such projects, and will comply with applicable local, state, and federal provisions, including but not limited to the Federal Transportation Improvement Program, California Environmental Quality Act, National Environmental Policy Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, and Buy America. D. All local agency projects must be carried over to the 2021 FTIP if they will be completed after 2019. E. The City agrees to construct Transportation Control Measures projects where applicable. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby certifies that the City has the resources to fund the projects submitted in the 2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program and affirms the City's commitment to implement these projects, which are as follows: Resdution No. 2019-XXX EXHIBIT 1 Page 1 of jmf 10/23/19 CITY OCTA GRANT FUNDING PROJECT PROJECT CARRY-OVER PROJECTS NO. ID TYPE 17-6880 ORA151502 Santa Ana Blvd. & 5th St. Protected Bike Lanes ATP 17-6885 ORA151503 Edinger Ave. Protected Bike Lanes ATP 19-6944 ORA170802 City of Santa Ana -First Street Pedestrian Improvements ATP City of Santa Ana -West Willits Street Protected Bicycle 19-6948 ORA170803 ATP Lanes City of Santa Ana-SRTS Davis Elementary ADA 16-2653 ORA170804 ATP Compliance Bristol Street Improvements: Washington Avenue to 11-6740 ORA150005 CTFP 17th Street 18-6906 ORA152210 Bristol Street -Edinger Avenue Class 11 Bike Lanes CMAQ 18-6908 ORA152212 Bristol Street Protected Bicycle Lanes CMAQ 18-6912 ORA152213 Citywide Bike Racks CMAQ 18-6903 ORA152214 Hazard Avenue Protected Bike Lanes CMAQ Bristol Street Improvements: Warner Avenue to St. 11-6741 ORA150003 DEMO Andrew Place Fairview Bridge (Bridge #55C0513) and Street 15-6827 ORA170007 HBRR mprovements Bristol Street Improvements: Civic Center Drive to 13-6792 ORA150004 DEMO Washington Avenue TBD ORA190901 Fremont Elementary and Spurgeon Intermediate SRTS ATP Bristol Street Protected Bike Lanes: Phase II Warner TBD ORA190915 CMAQ Avenue to St. Andrew Place Bristol Street Protected Bike Lanes: St. Andrew Place TBD ORA190916 CMAQ to Edinger Avenue Bristol Street Protected Bike Lanes: Civic Center Drive TBD ORA190917 CMAQ to Washington Avenue Bristol Street Protected Bike Lanes: First Street to Civic TBD ORA190918 CMAQ Center Drive TBD ORA190919 I Warner Avenue Protected Bike Lanes CMAQ Resdution No. 2019-XXX Page 2 of 3 jmf 10/23/19 Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of 12019. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: K 7g, -f.L John M. Funk Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers /_1:1y-11_11►11111111154Zd M, I1Laiil04 F, Is] =I:iIIy197er1141•1yelW11*1relIICkiwel.1exelNMIlkFe11 11r'1 I, Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council, do hereby certify the attached Resolution No. 2019 - to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , 2019. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resdution No. 2019-XXX Page 3 of 3 k C� \ \ \\�\\ \ \ \ \ \ a > ) \ Z I Z ) ) ) ) \ ' C� \ \ � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ n ! ) REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MASTER PAY SCHEDULE IN CONFORMANCE WITH TITLE 2 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS SECTION 570.5 AND THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CALPERS) {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 7,4 & 61 /s/ Kristine CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 1" Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2i1 Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Adopt a Resolution to approve a Master Pay Schedule for all represented and unrepresented employee classifications of the City of Santa Ana covered by a City adopted Classification and Compensation Plan to conform with Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations Section 570.5 listing all employee pay rates on a publicly available master pay schedule approved and adopted by City Council. DISCUSSION CalPERS, pursuant to their interpretation of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations Section 570.5, recommends all California Public Employees' Retirement System (CaIPERS) employers to maintain their compensation levels in one publicly available document, approved and adopted by the governing body, which must meet all of the following requirements: 1) Has been duly approved and adopted by the employer's governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public meetings laws; 2) Identifies the position title for every employee position; 3) Shows the pay rate for each identified position, which may be stated as a single amount or as multiple amounts within a range; 4) Indicates the time base, including, but not limited to, whether the time base is hourly, daily, bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or annually; 5) Is posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible and available for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on the employer's internet website; 6) Indicates an effective date and date of any revisions; 7) Is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years; and 8) Does not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the pay rate. Resolution City's Master Pay Schedule November 19, 2019 Page 2 Currently, the City maintains the salary information in the City's Classification and Compensation Plan adopted by the City Council and through approval of Memorandums of Understanding with various labor organizations representing City employees. Following City Council approval of periodical amendments to the City's Classification and Compensation Plan, individual salary agreements, and/or approved salary changes through the collective bargaining process, the approved salary pay rates are incorporated into one master salary schedule. However, this master salary schedule has customarily not been approved by Council as a single document, even though it contains the collective salary information derived from individual Memorandums of Understandings (MOU), individual employment agreements, and/or amendments to the City's Classification and Compensation Plan, which have all been approved by the City Council. CalPERS interprets California Code of Regulations Section 570.5 to require that the City list compensation levels for all positions on one document duly approved and adopted by the City Council. Adoption of this Resolution (Exhibit 1) will comply with CaIPERS' interpretation of the requirements of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5 by affirming the single Master Salary Schedule already on the City's website and publically available and representing all previously approved actions on individual employee classifications set forth as part of the salary schedule. Going forward, the Master Salary Schedule will be submitted to the City Council for approval each time any collective bargaining unit MOU, employment agreement or Resolution amending or restating the City's Classification and Compensation Plan is brought to the City Council for approval. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's effort to meet Goal #7 — Team Santa Ana, Objective #4, Establish employee compensation that attracts and retains a highly qualified workforce, objective #6, Provide a positive workplace environment that supports the health of its employees and celebrates its success, and objective #7 Develop a culture of motivated and innovative leaders in the organization. FISCAL IMPACT Adoption of a Master Salary Schedule has no fiscal impact to the City for preparation or distribution, as the actions already occur. If this Resolution is not adopted, the potential fiscal impact for retiring employees could be significant because CalPERS has stated that if an agency cannot provide a document meeting the requirements of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations Section 570.5, then CalPERS must determine that the pay amount fails to meet the definition of pay rate. Steven V. Pham Executive Director Human Resources Department Exhibit: 1. Resolution EXHIBIT 1 RESOLUTION NO, 2019-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO, 2019-XXX TO APPROVE A MASTER SALARY SCHEDULE IN CONFORMANCE WITH TITLE 2 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, SECTION 570.5 AND THE CALIFORNIA EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CALPERS) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL_ OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The City Council hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The California Public Employees' Retirement System (CaIPERS), has requested that all CaIPERS employers list their compensation levels on one document, approved and adopted by the governing body, in accordance with Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations section 570.5, and meeting all of the following requirements thereof: 1) Has been duly approved and adopted by the employer's governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public meetings laws; 2) Identifies the position title for every employee position; 3) Shows the pay rate for each identified position, which may be stated as a single amount or as multiple amounts within a range; 4) Indicates the time base, including, but not limited to, whether the time base is hourly, daily, bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or annually; 5) Is posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible and available for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on the employer's internet website; 6) Indicates an effective date and date of any revisions; 7) Is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years; and 8) Does not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the pay rate. Resolution 2019-xxx Page 1 of 3 Section 2: The Master Salary Schedule was previously prepared, publically available, and compiled from information that was already approved and adopted by the City Council pursuant to previous Resolutions Amending and/or Restating the City's Classification and Compensation Plan, employment agreements, and Memorandums of Understanding with various labor organizations representing City employees. Section 3: The City of Santa Ana now desires to formally affirm, adopt and approve the City's "Master Salary Schedule" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution. Section 4: This Resolution is operative from and after the date upon which it is adopted. The effective dates of the pay ranges for each title and job category identified in the Master Salary Schedule are indicated therein. ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 2019. APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: 6 11 hw k. Z Laura A. Rossini Senior Assistant City Attorney AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Miguel A. Pulido Mayor Resolution 2019-XXX Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-XXX to be the original Resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on November 19, 2019. Date: Daisy Gomez, CIVIC Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution 2019-xxx Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT CITY OF SANTA ANA BASIC MASTER SALARY AND WAGE SCHEDULE FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 The City's basic salary and wage schedule provides for a number of ranges of pay rates (salary rate ranges), each comprised of pay steps or rates. The salary rate ranges are identified by a three -digit number and the steps by the letters AAA to E inclusive. Not all salary rate ranges are comprised of seven steps. For non -management employees the purpose of each step and the length of service required for advancement within the rate range are summarized as follows: For non -management employees, represented by SEIU: AAA Step Normal beginning pay rate. AA Step Automatic Increase - After 6 months' service in next lower step. Also optional hiring rate. A Step Automatic Increase - After 12 months' service in next lower step. Also optional hiring rate. B Step Automatic Increase - After 12 months' service in next lower step. Also optional hiring rate. C Step Automatic Increase - After 12 months' service in next lower step. Also optional hiring rate. D Step Automatic Increase - After 12 months' service in next lower step. Also maximum hiring rate. E Step Merit Rate - After 12 months' service in next lower step. For non -management employees, represented by CASA: AA Step Normal beginning pay rate. A Step Automatic Increase - After 6 months' service in next lower step. Also optional hiring rate. B Step Automatic Increase - After 12 months' service in next lower step. Also optional hiring rate. C Step Automatic Increase -After 12 months' service in next lower step. Also optional hiring rate. D Step Automatic Increase -After 12 months' service in next lower step. Also optional hiring rate. E Step Merit Rate - After 12 months' service in next lower step. Also optional hiring rate. For non -management employees, represented by POA: A Step Normal beginning pay rate. B Step Automatic Increase - After 6 months' service in next lower step. Also optional hiring rate. C Step Automatic Increase - After 12 months' service in next lower step. Also maximum hiring rate. D Step Automatic Increase - After 12 months' service in next lower step. E Step Merit Rate -After 12 months' service in next lower step. NOTE: Certain management classes in Police Services have been designated as "Represented Management" (RM). Such classes are assigned to five (5) step salary rate ranges, the effective range of rates for personnel represented by the Police Management Association (PMA) is five (5) steps, "A" through "E," of the assigned range. Additionally, employees of said classes may be initially appointed at any of the first three steps, Step "A," Step "B," or Step "C" within their applicable rate range, and the length of service required for advancement to the next higher step is one (1) year. For SEIU Part Time Civil Service see Memorandum of Understanding 07/01/2017-12/31/2018 Section 4.2 Step Advancement and Exhibit B list of job titles and rate ranges. In the salary schedule matrix found on page 2, each salary range is identified by a three -digit number. The first two digits are listed in the first vertical column on the left and the third digit is listed horizontally across the top and identifies the appropriate column. This three -digit range number locates the starting step ("AAA, AA" or "A") of the range depending on whether the class has been assigned 5, 6 or 7 steps and the subsequent steps ("AA, A," "B," "C," "D" and "E") are found in the column directly below the starting step. For example, "AAA" step of Range No. 501 is found to be $2402 by moving down the left column (Range No.) to the number 50 (the first two digits of the Range No.), then horizontally to column 1 (the third digit of the Range No.). The "AAA" step of $2402 has the remaining steps shown directly below; thus the full, seven -step range is 2402-2523-2650-2782-2921-3067-3221. In the same manner, Range No. 555isfound to be 3129-3285-3449-3622-3803-3994-4194. SALARY SCHEDULE MATRIX 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 45 1874 1883 1892 1902 1911 1921 1930 1940 1950 1960 46 1968 1977 1987 1997 2007 2017 2027 2037 2048 2058 47 2066 2076 2086 2097 2107 2118 2128 2139 2150 2160 48 2169 2179 2190 2201 2212 2223 2234 2246 2257 2268 49 2277 2288 2299 2311 2322 2334 2346 2357 2369 2381 50 2391 2402 2414 2427 2439 2451 2463 2475 2488 2500 51 2511 2523 2536 2548 2561 2574 2587 2600 2613 2626 52 2637 2650 2663 2676 2690 2703 2717 2730 2744 2758 53 2769 2782 2796 2810 2824 2838 2853 2867 2881 2896 54 2907 2921 2936 2950 2965 2980 2995 3010 3025 3040 55 3052 3067 3082 3098 3113 3129 3144 3160 3176 3192 56 3205 3221 3237 3253 3269 3285 3302 3318 3335 3352 57 3365 3381 3398 3415 3432 3449 3467 3484 3501 3519 58 3533 3550 3569 3586 3604 3622 3640 3658 3676 3695 59 3710 3728 3747 3765 3784 3803 3822 3841 3861 3880 60 3896 3915 3935 3954 3974 3994 4014 4034 4054 4074 61 4091 4111 4132 4152 4173 4194 4215 4236 4257 4278 62 4296 4317 4339 4360 4382 4404 4426 4448 4470 4493 63 4511 4533 4556 4579 4601 4624 4648 4671 4694 4718 64 4741 4764 4787 4810 4834 4858 4882 4906 4930 4954 65 4978 5002 5026 5051 5076 5101 5126 5151 5176 5201 66 5226 5252 5278 5304 5330 5356 5382 5408 5434 5461 67 5488 5515 5542 5569 5596 5623 5650 5678 5706 5734 68 5762 5790 5818 5847 5876 5905 5934 5963 5992 6021 69 6050 6080 6110 6140 6170 6200 6230 6260 6291 6322 70 6353 6384 6415 6446 6478 6510 6542 6574 6606 6638 71 6670 6702 6735 6768 6801 6835 6869 6903 6937 6971 72 7005 7039 7073 7107 7141 7176 7211 7247 7283 7319 73 7355 7391 7427 7463 7499 7535 7571 7609 7647 7685 74 7723 7761 7799 7837 7875 7913 7951 7989 8029 8069 75 8109 8149 8189 8229 8269 8309 8349 8389 8431 8473 76 8515 8557 8599 8641 8683 8725 8767 8809 8853 8897 77 8941 8985 9029 9073 9117 9161 9205 9250 9296 9342 78 9388 9434 9482 9529 9577 9625 9673 9721 9770 9819 79 9857 9906 9955 10005 10055 10105 10156 10207 10258 10309 80 10350 10401 10453 10506 10558 10611 10664 10717 10771. 10825 81 10868 10922 10976 11031 11086 11142 11198 11254 11310 11366 82 11411 11468 11525 11583 11640 11699 11757 11816 11875 11934 83 11982 12041 12102 12162 12223 12284 12345 12407 12469 12532 84 12581 12643 12707 12770 12834 12898 12963 13027 13093 13158 85 13210 13275 13342 13409 13476 13543 13611 13678 13748 13816 86 13871 13939 14009 14079 14150 14220 14292 14362 14435 14507 87 14565 14636 14709 14783 14858 14931 15007 15080 15157 15232 88 15293 15368 15444 15522 15601 15678 15757 15834 15915 15994 89 16058 16136 16216 16298 16381 16462 16545 16626 16711 16794 90 16861 16943 17027 17113 17200 17285 17372 17457 17547 17634 91 17704 17790 17878 17969 18060 18149 18241 18330 18424 18516 92 18589 18680 18772 18867 18963 19056 19153 19247 19345 19442 Page 2 of 25 N M t0 f0 m M M M O M N n O W M M IO (O (O O (p N m N N M O M N N N �J W r^^ N N 2 W M O M `O O N (7 O V O M O O O (O O O 01 O (O n N 1n a IO M h M (9 n N M t0 n N c N N` Z O O N a W n M �n r r n In OI N O N M r O M O O O m N w❑ h m d' m 0 O O M M O N. . . . . . . O n N r M O t0 M �O O N W Y U O O r A r n N M (rp N O r N m m m 0 tm0 O O N (r0 ID m M V O C�J O O OaI O V O m O O N M m n n co ro M m m O N r W t 'C � r m W a t0 O O fD O tp In f0 ({f r J S �n M (O fD f0 t0 m V m (p O m V (D n f0 (O r M Mm Om NM mN (D M ZQ 0 O W (Op mO mtD mN m r N M M f0 (O N N m V n fD N r N N N (V M O �n <51 V V m 4J t0 V m M tD O O In (O V W M M O O O O O (O V V V In n M tp m m M M r V of w m r M O h n m N h m m M V m M M (p m r M In r M M Q N O m W O O O V O N O m O M O O N ID m N (0 r oo]] y r N (V N N N N N n W N O (p M (p M h N M M 00, <o co co m 0 4a ¢ ¢ w ¢ m W O O O N V t0 O N O O V V N N} N (O M (O t0 M O O �(l M O O N N m N (p m OJ N n N N V N N N N N r m N O (O M M M N N M M o Z m m m �o co co iv m n co m co w m co �o r <o co r r r a g n K i ¢ a w l s Q `2 Q _ U W W N K K _ a w? z w w z U O W O (� o Q w U Z Z m Z Z w o m z¢ z— w z M w a � z S w a w W w w O w U w Z r❑r ❑ O Q z U z a w w z w z a o > O}� z K F N >� W O C Q W W Q ~= Wa Z Z O Q O U N W Z Q W a' K a J J W W W U a (n Z U~ fn w w y K Z a Z zd z z W g Q¢ w m F�> u v N v¢ Z < 2 a g� w w z Z C)i �_= o a N 4�i Z m¢ U a' LL LL W W O LL O z ¢ �- W W LL LL F- S a O U LL S a m W g J 2 2 W z+ U O W Z M N N (n O O M U M W Q LL LL LL LL LL Z F O K (n U U Z Z U W LL Z Q m fn ¢ ¢ O W W W W} w W W O O O O O W Z Z Z Z J S LL Z Z Z Z Z a z F- z z? m U U cJi o 0 0 0 o w? a a a a a 0 w ¢ Q to 0 0 Z F F F H F- I- F- FF h I- F- F H F- H H F F F W W F- Z Z Z Z Z �' ~ h N~ F U Z Z Z z z z z Z Z z Z z z Z z z z Z F- F- m0 O O O O O W Z Z J J U U ot1 F I- h I< F F- F- Q F< F F I- 9 h I- F F F 9 h h F U U > 0 0 0 0 0 0> '� J J w w rn m tow w 0to 0 0 to to w m m m m., Q N N N 0 0 U U U U U U F- 2 2 a s I- fn N N N w N w w co w N Fn N N N w N N M y !n N h m m E m O O > U O O rO rO tMOp MO MO OO] mVO OO MN N M MN OV OO M O O O O O O O O N O O O OO N N mh O N O O no O O O N N O V O O O OOVO OON OOO Owo O O O z z z U 7 9 z z N 41 Z z Z z z z z z 2 z w <o co co m �o Z Z Z Z �o co co U m �o co so m m M co Z �o co co F❑ 7 O❑>> ❑ Q Q O O W O O❑❑❑❑ :J O 7 O J>❑ 0 0 0 0 O z 0 w w w w W W U o o❑ 0 w w w xx w w w w w w w w w❑ w w w O 0 0 0 0 w� fn fn O� 6 a Q Q w 0 In � W������ M N M N y M w N M¢� w y y in M N r u� m v �n co m m co in a M co M M o (/J n V M M O (O m N �O M d) �(J O M (41 n V V O N N N h O M r m 10 O M m tp N (O (O O OJ N W W h W [O M N M^ M r O {p M n O 10 OJ o (O h h r o O O F Z w❑ O W t0 � V� r � O (h0 y O V � M �f1 of N t0 � � i N V � n M N O] o M � n N M � fD O) tO O O N 0 O h r M QJQ U O1 001 N o M N N M �p o V M O O 1p o O n 10 O O N o O w O W O N V O [O m Z Q M [NO VM N V(O V r M a r W O tOpl (O Irk MO W nW W N r W (O O W O 1 n O N N N m N OMJ N o W OmI (00 O Q Z Oh d' N f0 N M N Oy tm d N r M N O M O O W N O 4) tND f00 (0n0 V m [NO N n M N O �O M mVO] M M y ON N M1 M W N a W O D7 y M t0 M N M In V V �O h V W V o 10 10 M M � m N (O V h h Ut O V h a> V f0 (U (p M1 r N N t0 (O N M M N V M N t0 N CO tD 10 h Of N N W M N O N (O M n Z o_ 9 2 a w w ¢ m w O 4 o h O m N M O O2 w M v V a 10 0 10 N m M M Ve 1p N 10 tD (O m h M1 N m �O O� 0 10 M CO n N m V tp tp V h n N N (9 (9 N M M N V M N (O N W f0 h m N N W M N O N t0 N nZ z r n m in m m m �n m co co co <n <n co r iv m m m `c� m m m m m r w m m Q ¢¢ 2 w i w 2 ¢ K Fa- w K K w w w m w « U Z g z �QQ (9 ¢ w Z c ? O W O W U K w Q�Q w W 3 0 } m a W o O>�¢ z m o 0 Z Z C9 K Z 2 a p w p Iw- K J 0 H LL 2 z U 0 w N d g w x? m m 3 w w a 5 w 0 Z 0 w 0 �> w ¢ O Q L« Q m w CW7 a0 U w 0> w O z LL Z w 0 w¢ U� F K 5 w } _ O m d Z U Z Z Z Z W = d. J Y U x x w W W �- Z d Q Z K J N LL K W W W W d W W d. I- d 2 U UCCu��� K w Z Z Z� Z w U W 0 F� O d f� Z w d a M a m w w o� m z Z Z U F fJ W o o w w w Z y CWJ O W> W Z O 2� m o Z W 0 0 0 F z0 F- W ZZ O g g ❑ 2 a w a z z z w x> Q o Lu w w rL w w w w w m o> g w w w o m N N p❑ d a a 'd 0 N~ Y N xi o' LL z o 0 0 0 0 z 9 r r r r r��� x�w g Q0�LLgwwwWZZZZZZw�a�<�G �W�Wwwww�>>>>>>>>>55� -, O O Y W U' O U' U' O O O O Z w W F. LL LL j a } F J �y W w W W W N a m d w 0 U Z J O ❑ ❑ ❑ J J J J J J N } Y z w W F F F_ > W ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � � � � � � � � � � � 2 cL G¢ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m U O O O O U U G H OU OU H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C w m❑ U N N f0 0 O O O O OOOO OO O N O O O O O O O O V OO O O O mm m h O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O OOO O O O O O O O O O O O V O Z Z Z Fi w m m Z m Z Z o m m m m m co co m C5 0 0 �D O 2 w <o <o m <o m m co m 20 w w 0 w U U❑❑ w w w w w w w w w �( a a W W W❑ w❑ w w O w w❑ w w w❑ w w w w 0 0 w m a 0❑ m a Q m w m m� m m Ow m m� W Q¢� 0 Q M 5 m Q m 0 d wo wo m m 00 0 to m N N (O � M O T O h^ tD (9 N (O M M (p cp (n O f0 M m M (O Ol M M N (O W M h N M (O M M N M N O m tp V N O F W h w h t0 N N N W Z O M M O O h OI N h d f0 O M o M W M N M1 M r O (O M W h O h h h h M h O T N w M W M M �p w p t0 M r M N r o r V W N y N d r r r yy r r m O r M N O h M l(1 d N (MO r r � M M In N V d V �0 V M h W OI c0 M M u> u1 N (O M N h l0 O In (D In h M N h M N 4 O h V M1 O h N tD N m N M h N O M M M O [p O N M h h d d g O O h d M OM V1(� N M (O Yl M M pOM1 M N M M1 M O1 W p N M O M �M�pp h m N M m M m U [D O (NO M N O d {O n M M V V V V V eh- y N- N N V h O r W OMi (O M N 1� IM N M M M In M N O N W h M h O o] m o M M N N J = N d W W M O t0 M M O I[ MN OO1 01 M1 a Oyy 0ZQ(2NN9�0O N O Nm 0yy Oddh(p MIn !p (O N V (Nq �0fWM1 V(qJ (pO) O To dOMJ �M0 N hd Nh (OcpO dMMM V dpMM� ' ON MM Mh Mh h ¢ MVM O N O o o M (O h t0 0�0I (O O W O M M W [00 Ohto Qg V V d P V tOV 4 OO�rr aN0 ((�� W r N n h o h O rn OOi N 60i r ^ N O r ( mom 00i (W� �0 HMO cJ V N M d d M M tM+I V M V N tOD I� �O d V V 'V 0) W O O [O N N N M d N W t0 N M M M W M m M N N m O w d W w O M N O O M ^ d O d L(J N O Z h M1 h Ur . [O N g h t0 M N N M N N M O O h M h N M N N N N N O M N M V tO N N N V M M M (O (O (0 10 (f1 h m t0 o_ m w O N O O M d V d O Z (D (O (O N M M1 t0 M N N W M N �0 O O h fp h N N N N N N O M N W d t0 V N N N Q M M M O (O w (O (O h h (O h f0 t0 ID t0 (O 2 www � w w w a m w w K w w w K w Z w z fwll (D w U M O W W K a' W N W N o t Z Q w o C U F W ? w CD w S w M z_ o o a a a ❑ M w LL w nw. K W U O F- F- �w U U U K ❑❑ O o:w� ap�w¢ m zU ww paaa °o �y <w ❑ M V € a a Of 0 a w M 4 Q 0 ¢�¢ pp M N a w M W o s o o❑ m z 3 u w z U K U (Q7 w CL K Z U W w y Q p f~_A W w K W fyyq�� m My M W W W W W Q O z d N LL Z LL OU OU d M p Z K j W W~¢ Q w w (J F CL CL d d d d d < 0 0 Z Z p LL W w s m M Q Q O �[ U U z O O O O K U ¢~ = F- I44- Q OU w= O CC o: O w w w 2 Z a w ¢ U O O Z a O O O � OII Ow O w K w U K p °¢ a a a Q JQ Q JQ a> 5 m K O D w 0 0 fwA 6 w OY U U U U Q>> J>> N 0 6 Fw- d d M K K K ¢ Q tl1 M Y) K J J J J Z W w 111 W w z O 0 (D O O M F- U F- r O O o 0 0 w N w w M Z Z C1 K K K F H 0 m m mO j ❑❑WOO U U U Q U Z Z F F- w W❑ O�w J J J w w ¢¢ w F F- H U U U U m a a a (� z K K z z>>>> m K U U � U U ❑ o o z z z w w w w w r F F F 0 w�°w wwwwzzzww00oowww000000��zzaa>>>> z Z K o: w K w>>> y y H F tQ- a a a a a a a m¢ O O O O O w W 0 U' >> w w w w O O O O O O O O O O O D U U cpi cpi c=i o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w w w w w w w w w w Uw w w w w o � w O 7 Y U L m❑ O �0 rp0 O O O O O O _O M O CdOCd�� O O_ O O O O O O O N O yp0yp �0 O O O O ❑ 0 Nd m h O M (0 l0 m V M 0 O O d' 0 d d 1 N 0 mO h 1 N d O M O N 0 0 0 N N N N O V O N M M 10 N V o h h O o O M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z M M tll Z U y N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z M Z Z Z w m c0 Z Z w t0 Z Z Z N❑ 7 p Q Q Fu Q p 0 0 0 W W U w w w ❑_ O w ❑_ ❑_ ❑_ ❑ 7 7 ¢' W w w Z O W w `2 O W W O U O O O W W W W w w w x W W W W W W W O W W W W V coo Mo N M m V M N N O d N N O N M .- M d u`i o N m o � N n rel o M m M M <o r n N m ui o fO m h m M o o n 0 o N M mM n co n r p� n m o m m � N M ti t0 l0 ` m^ r h OJ (9 N n In O r 000000 a n d t0 M1 O N h 41 (O � V r O ` V M O O O In n h O� Z MM N � Mp N O M O N m N O n 1'n (m0 M Or N 0 0 0 'n W m M 0 (mD d 0 In yM MV M V M el O W❑ F N O V N O N yNM V r h M n M V N m N V th+I C� M n a- d O CO, ((pO m O O W a V M N N O N (mO M VJ W r N h tMD 01 N r V I( (MO N r N z Or CM1J w a n O � V d �[l 2 O V W JJJQ M d M (O (O M O m O N d M O n M N c m M [O m tp m 1p m (O n t0 (O r m } 00 io n cMo mrzm in v`�i m rn o m n o 2 P2 J M N N m 0 O Z M1 N (O O M N h OJ O W n IMn N t0 m (O O N ( mp n h N N m N h O M1 In (O M M h N M m p Q r N m m [O (00 tN0 r �(l n (d0 [Y N �hf1 �(1 (NO M N S V M1 d h M (O m V W d d d d d r an d N (O m O d W cOp M N h M 41 d N V O M d m d (O V1 V d M N h (O M (p r M d m W U, o MM cy� cy� N N N M1 (O M M N N V (O f0 M O r to n O M N d (O N n d m N m m V O N M (p M M O NZ Z r f0 (O h (9 IO O r C W W W Q 'a O K m W h N O O N� M N O M M d' M N O N 0 In M m O aJ N h d N M m N O m M d M m M U, o M d y N N N r tD M N OJ N V (O [O O] O n M M1 O M N d (D N h d m N m m d O N M fU N W O NZQ Z 2 m co r� co m n co <o co o M r w n N m �o �o h co co w N co r co N co r co w N m N N n n w W _ N yy W Z Y W u w w ¢ kk-- LL W CQ7 j N U gZg W U G ¢ z a ¢ J W J w w 0 W % K N a' w oil ❑ z a Q U' - w N ¢�¢ a g z OF F U j Z U Q i W Z d a' __= f� W K y K W F O 2 F L ? f 1 Z¢ K U U~ F ❑ Q U Q¢ Q ❑_ W❑Q a p U' C7 Y❑~ tt to to I- J fp Z U W O Z W 2 F. W j U U U a ¢ -� w ?i a' z w 0 (9 w 6 0 z J a' O F Y z J y y § U U X U N U' W z z Z n_= w w w w a _ ❑ O a¢¢❑ Z O Q U W N F, Z Z O 0 w x x x N F F 0 0 0 U-- ¢ ¢ U O Z¢¢ U_-❑ w a} a a a Q w �Z ¢Z N � a U U U 0 0 w Z Z¢ z� N w a m N< m r ¢¢ M N U LL LL LL W W J W W fn Z W O F F F U J Q z 0 Q z z w w a a a Z G J J M N M N N 000w LLzz W ga Mmy>cgi O Iw ww-Iw-ww-O z cD C>0000200000 g 5 w w w z Q Q¢ g m U U U U U w w w z z z z qa ¢ O M W x x x x w ❑❑❑ p❑ ❑❑❑ v1 0 Z u� N W a a F f/� w W F F F F O O O W W F W W W W WW ¢ N Q F 7 7� J J y) f� N fn ❑❑ M>>>>> K K a' a a N o 0 0 0 DO F F F F W W W W Q a f� M N N (� f/1 N f/J ¢J¢ ¢J¢ ¢J¢ aJa U U_ W U' U' U' U' U' U' U' U' U' U' w a' W a' x O ❑❑❑❑❑ F F �_ ~ U w F F F F F Z Z Z K CG K K❑} 2 2 J Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z d d d d Z uj w w w w w w Q U a a w m M m N m m m m X W W W X X X x Q Q Q Q W J J J J J J W W W W V% o O O O ❑ 7 1LLLL111111 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 N N N as W m❑ O O O N O (O nNOV 03 O �Om 0 aO3Oa O pp O O O O O Op n M1 M1 NNO O m O O O O pmj -�U NNN no 0`0`'`0 orodgo0000000000000000000000o bo0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z z Z z z z Z z f/1 z CS CS C� Z �' co Z Z oo co o M z Z Z m 0 m m . N . o z M m co co co co co co m F- ❑ ww xw xWx p❑ Q❑ Q Q Q 7 J 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 O J ❑ UU W W W>> ¢ N 0 d N Q Owl N N lw/1 °a m d N N M M 0 f N N Q IN 0 tw/J N 0 w N fw/J 0� m D D 0 M N f0 MN N N r OM O(Np 01N() NnN M(O N o(p o Nfp m m Nm O M Mr- N O O WW N NN [n9 W fInD tM0 {Ny Of M ra (NO M N n M [p N N N M M h M M M 0 M N w h V In N Z M N M M r N O yy N [V ryry W M M n M h M h O N M M O Vl N M W M O w❑ W � M N N M O M O O M N , N In M �(J OI {+J pJ N 'O C � m W N M W W W M� Ol V O O e} N F N �(l M M N N M V N tp M M In M M M M V M n n V h W h M r M M M N N N M r V N M E W O M M M O r 0 0 fn0 r M M O M OOhJJ r N O O r O tp O M v h N tD N M1 N M M [[ M O 1(J M c M V N M V M M m M` N M M M V V M r r V r M n W h NWMMM M M N I(l fV N (O V tp V N O J � z O ( O(pp M Op p h �p r W ( M� (Mp M M M N M dry] M r V O O O n M O N O N ^ M y N M M M O M M O¢ N V O V N O m M In N M M O V W. OD (O+l ('J M V M(J (MO (M9 V tMD M N (MO !� CJ M V In N h M M M M N M N V N O O M O V N M O] M M M M M M O M O M O M f0 h h V' O� In 1p(JI Q r M N V M M N (f�0 M N O N N IM t+M1 N NO �N NM wmM V n N rnM M j O O 0 tMO NM M n tMr M N M M_ W 4 M V V N (MV V V 0 O_ O W W N V W N M MM M ` y M M �- n M O N V M N M M W N O M M M M N M N W M O O N V M M O V M V In M M M h M (O (O m m N M M O N M N N N M n n N N N Z Z M M _o M W O (j N M N A M M M V M q ` M O N V V N N M M M M 0 O M O M M N M N O M M M ((V O M 'ci in M N M NZ Z M m M `� co M <n in �n M �n �n co g W n N 0 J O w U x w t- a m N Z > F n O 60 P U j W N Z w y N a w w a W 0 w w w w z V❑ w z U Q z w« ? U Q N N z« zZ z-_« o w >2¢ ? W o 0 0 W F U U U 0� 0 6 j N N— z a F W Wy D V! F WJ C7 2 0 F Q W W W LL W>>= O Q 0L N Z Q❑ Q Z 0�� Q�Q N J o W a w V! h a w N la/1 fa/� O mw w U Z O C) N K W W N I- 0 y 0 0❑ Z N OU a F, � Z s� Z� 0y � Z Z Z Z p W U IW- U K i¢ hQ- U U M N w¢ ¢ Q¢ w 0 z w w F > w (n W W J O z z F w n Wr1 w v '�' w��¢ W2 a () 0 z o w w 0 z a 0� C) w w w cc-) 5 cWi Z FO O z O K" LL w z¢ O 0 rwn z W 4 za ¢ zQ z2Q w N w wY vYyi ¢Z ai a ¢ z O> >> 00 W F F- W z Q O Z Z Z W W W W' r}q r}q O K C §¢ vJ M U— Z w w 0 0 0 0 N }}}} a w w w w 0 m z w❑ Q U a K K K K K 1- M J w w w f447 t447 f447 K K m o o W w W w t/l to m Z O O Q❑ Q❑ ❑Q 6 JQ 'U Z J z z z Z Z Z O W K K U' z2F w U U U ¢ J¢ y yy SLL LL N W W W U U Q } F- U U W❑ LL LL LL K w W K w w fL Z Z Z¢ J J J J J m m m m m J OJ 2 Z IIIz Z Z O O O a a o. ¢a a a a N W Y Y Y p 6 m❑ O O O O O N N MtD O O O O h O M O O O O O O O O N O OO N O NO N O OO O Mh h O MN O O M w M M M M U O N M M n r r r r �[1 n 0 0 n h n O V V O M O O V M N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N o 0 0 0 0 o N N o o N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a N o 0 0 0 0 0 W N N W M M Z M ❑ ❑ > > > > > > > ❑ W '> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ¢ Z O U W W g L w W W U U W ❑ o w 2 w w a 0 0 0>> 0 W W U W W W W W U U U O W W W W W W W W W W U W W W W W O m 2 w ❑ w h o 0 w>>> u 0 0 W w w w w 0 w w w 0 0 0 0 0 a O h N O n M ffJ O M O t0 m O m M h n b y N In O h M (O O N y CO n O M [O r M W N O m m M O (p n O m 0 N p n O N IO m wF ❑ i(J � Ill O O N V n m(O p(L) Ihn i n(O (MO N ONJ r � M� m n Ow m w m M O (O M N m h m r M N V M V N Il) (O N 0 M W N m M 01 O «J h N O O m V n O V W � O h N N t0 In M N M M U N O O tp f0 N O r N 4J N N h h N h N (O b N M 0 N 0 In h 0 t0 M D7 n m N to N � n co o h co In m n <o in to m m to to a ul to o vl m N I� .- �i ¢ M N h N O] t0 O 0 N m N O 0` O O M M (p n n n (O (O OJ O M M (V In Ill o M m M f0 r o h tp [0 0) h h i[1 Ill V V 0 i O 0 M 0 M 6) J � ¢ �1p0 M V m I� Ill V l0 «J 10 O O Ih ' O N a Vc Q7 n I() h I(J (0 h V It) c r 10 N M N 1l1 6J I(1 «1 � 1� o OJ t0 W Q O V C MS m h I� M N n I MF m m 0 m O r c m� It) OM m O) O m W� n N N O N N W (0 o O W tp M V M r M O 10 M W M n N M M o W W V V I() O f0 N n N y � M M N O N Ol W 1(J V N N fU O) N h a h N h VJ r T t0 O r M M n n r M M r I() M N N M n M o ¢ w ¢ ¢ M W d O M N M N O O M V M n M O 1(J M [O M r N It) (n O M M m 0 (p 10 h N NZ Z umi co Q pr .oil w c� w w w E n w m t°io w coo cro m Iho m cwo w cmo n m qa w 2 ¢ ¢ 0 Q p « w w M F O > MEkf W Y K of ❑O w m U w a w ¢ W U' W ¢ w M M M w w ~ U g ¢ J ¢ y M w w z w f7 J z m M}} W m¢ � z w w w M Z Z I- O 0 5 w ❑ w J J a M ¢ W F O W ¢ W J¢ o 5 3 m E Mn > U w w M U a d N w w« U❑ .M7 M U w F' K ¢z¢ QU U t Y 0 w w 2 O m t vl m> 7 O a w Q> o: F w w O fL z z i z >>>« O O w M K w K N w❑ U w w¢ O O w O Z W U V a Q z w 0 w z w 0 F" 1QQ- U F- F- >MY z z U j =O > O z a j LL a Z W Z w w U M M M F fN/-1 U K< w U V F¢¢ LL w M F Z >>¢ M M F LL❑ o Z Q 5 a W W W W W w¢¢ F- M M z O M M M J K Z W W W MQzq F- S U U U y 2 Z a N w z w>> n Z Z J Z F- z w w O H W W 25 w w w ¢ OU S a w❑❑ U U g w 7 uLL 0 0 OU U U w M M U S m F W W Y W 0Ii� JJ JJ m O M w J J M M M Z Z Z Z Q¢¢ U U O O O W W LL u 2? J O Q a� w M M M M M Q Q�¢ Z z Z 0 0 0~~~ z z z m W W w W W W W W W W W W W W w W W w W W w w w w w w a a a a U U U U U U U U U U U U Z Z z z w w Z Z Z J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J a a a d a a ow. nw. g g g n a 0a a a a a oa a a a 0 a a 0a oa 0a a a a a a 0a a a a a a m wa w z N N W W N a d O D 0 0 0 0 0 o O O [O M O O O O M b N O N [O M O [0 0) r M M N O O) m O I� O O O N M r O O CO M h N 1[J O❑ M O V V V N N N p M Il) M f0 M M M h h m N N N h w N m N N c0 M U N h O n n n r N N O n N N O O M M M M (O O O O h O M M O h r M M M M N (O N Ip O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z z K w � K K 5 5 CD M a a ¢ a > > 0�0 > > O > M Q > 0Zz M M M 2: M M M M� ?M M M� M M M o Z Z Z M Z Z Z Z Z mmz w z z Z Z Z Z Z z zo U o 0 0 0 wo w o U m M 0¢>> M M M M M 0 m ma m a a a M M O a a a a a M M a a a a a M¢ M¢ M N OJ M N N M W h W fit h O m (O O V n_ M M M M M F9a M m N N W m m M M O mtD M t 0 0 t0 m O n y m m N N N n h V W W ^ M N M n N t0 y n m V y M tp M m m O M � Z W p O f0 M V M� `✓qF- �_ M n N M O tD V` r n V V m VV N V (O n n V f0 (O V m N N SD V n n W O M OJ h e r N O { mp N tD O O (MO M N m ry a 0r a MO Ony N0 M M M1 N M M n M 1MM�� MM to (mq O [p J � N m N In M M V tp I() cp M m M N M O N O V M O h h fD M �_ O h O h V V N M N ff1 N O W W f0 O N N [O N m V N p m N M O r m n IN to MM r fMO W N �il N O n W ( Np ( Np lnO M h a M O hM O M O N (O dq' V yM M O O O N r M iipp N V (O (O �OVn a O O a M h O m W m W O m V On1 O a n t0 r V V M tD O M V 1p M y M M y M O O W M N W m O O OOI fMJ m W W n N N O W N M O t0 N m m M W M M N O W r (9 M CO r r m (p M r CO N N N M r M p O M 0 N m M M m W Q M O m M mM f0 fq (� N m V M r m O O VJ tp M M fp f0 OJ r M N r N (V N I() M M h M N O W m O Z n (O g n M [O «l 49 40 M f0 n (0 M N i(1 t0 h 40 f0 t0 N M 40 N tD 1 (O (O N (O 40 t0 SD 1 h f9 f41 a Q Q Q Q M W O O In V O M M M Ill N N O O M N h V M M O M fp N M (y N O M (O V M m 1!) of r (U t0 (� ❑ (O M M W N M [I M M n OJ n M O O N tp M M f0 (O M W I� t!) M n N N N m t0 n m N m [O M NZ Z � n m� h� n ro M n fo fo ul m r o fn m in 0 h m m o in m fo ul � m� co `ca m m m m fo m� m m� m Q ¢ ¢ Z U w Z O z_ U w W W x W O U m 0 O� Q z z : Q Z j a a U Q Q F- E U Q w g WZ Z w w N O O O o a °- nJ. a zQ U a' Z U' Z z z K* C9 a z j z o O z LL 3 0 W m o O O O OU OU m m Q > U a W N m a 0 WO w~ 2 m 0 W F F F- m } K Z __ }�% (1(�-� N w 6 F- I- ❑ a N z fall M J FU- W W� Q m O � a= U U (7 K qZ N a U K Q TQ W f1 pm w a 2 ¢ w O� W N O O LL In U W J W¢ O N Z Z m m F- I- I- I- OU OU w O Q Z Z F Z Z Z C) Z o aZa Q Z SZ-il U❑ w a SQn N a V W K U o OU OU U w w w w w m Sail ~ U z Z Z¢ a Z Z z w g W� g z a O K 2 m m m m¢ m m w F w a= U❑ p p a w w w w w?? w 0 0 0 i~i_l O W m a JC i LL o 0 0 0 o z z z fFq Z N o_ _o a 3 Q Q a N (� O (7 (7 U' Z Z}} W U U U 0❑ d =' 0 Q F m m m O m Q a o o rc} o o m>> >_ o m w a U o m a 3 3 3 3 3¢ a F p~~ c7 z>>>> �Z �Z z z aZ F F¢ F¢¢¢¢ m m❑ U W w w v v U U v v 2 x w arc ug O W z z z z ¢¢ w W Of w of W w w O D U 0�� a J i J � J J U U U O w O m z K❑ w w w w h H O O O O O O O O O Z Z O O O O m m m m m m f W K Z U U U O a ro W> W W> Y Y Y Y Y Z Z U U U Z Z Z z z Z Z z w w w w W W W w m m m m m a Q W W W W W W W W W W W a m a a m a a m a a a a a a a m rc m �a �a m m m K K a a K w m M m M w M w w m m M m m w a n O❑ O O� 00 O� NmN 0 0 O o o O O o 0 o O M o O M M m O O O ON N [D (O r O V V V h h m 0 0� h N r N W Mh n O n n r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z z z zFi FL -- O (7 (7 U' (7 (�7 m n Z 2 Z Z fo m Z m fo Z o o fo m fo M m o Z M m m m ro ro fo m fo m Z m m m Z m fo M m z w m m W > > > > g > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > g > > > g > > > > g > 20 o w w o w w o w w w w w w IL w U w w w w w w uJ w w w U U❑ U ❑ w w w a w w w w ❑ W w w o U a 0 m¢ m m¢ 0 0 m M m m m m a m m m m m m m m m m>>¢ p n 0 0 0¢ 0 0 M m¢ 0 0 0 W W M M m O r OI O d (O ^ N (O t9 w N W M OJ M d OI m (q f0 f0 01 M O W r O O r N W O O M O1 r d f0 h� N OI W I� h W N (O N M d O [p O M M V V r W In ff1 ` O r n �t1 m N� W c N OJ r M N Z W M (O b N m M h f0 d �(1 tp O O 1(J In O W M M d N M to O In [O M h M W N N w❑ [O op h V h b (O r (O N O m r M VI�l ((qq m O V IsI��i yry M (O N M tD h n to M N O b NM OM1 n V V(O M1 n W r lm0 W h tM0 N M V h IMO NM W V m n W (� d O0i r Mn V r V c r V' O N V r M h h ryry ttqq M W N O N M M h (p W n I� N N O W O n O M N N d 01 O } O W W N V N O o M a CO O b h N V M M N N N n M M M N O N N O t0 M M d W O n r N O N O (O M m h 4 O V JQQ 01 h m r r W O CO 01 N O M r ry N r N M N N d (O (9 m n n O O O M M O r Ill O N . V r M M W r O N h h O M In V Ol o n. M ffJ 1p OI d I(j N M } n M (O d I[I t0 tD O M r (� J 1n W f0 V N O M d M f0 py� (Vp V O 0 op N N y m M M �q c� h d In V O V d M ul t�i t0'l O O O n M r h Q r M m v l't'n tM0 (MD m r h tM0 M I� Q �M[I O n M d �(J d r h M M (NO r N O W N fM9 V I� V l0 (00 m n h c d Q M O e- O 0 0� O W Q tM0 n tN0 M N 9 (O Q M II((��J d f4l V N It) M O M d Ill M M Ip V N N N N Il) O N d QQ tVp I� N M N N N W t4 0 lh0 «J V M M tVp W n �p I( M N II(J N W W tNp h M O Wd M W W h O n V h N N N n O I!) Of h n M M M V It1 O O M NV M tOJ OM Ip m W W r r O IOp M m O O Z h n t0 I[l fp (Mp O Cp (D N O V M W n I� h Ip (O O V t� ' n fp fp (O tp n tO Il) (O f0 (O <O Ip Ip (O n tp (D n t0 tp N h b (O tp r r n (O 1 2 IYLL Q Q Q 2W _O pl WO d OM ww M Mh 2 MO r rO O n N N r O I() OJ n n M M M V 1� ry tp t0 O op Ip n O M M tD r d N� Z r r cp M cp cp tp r h h m m n o m h 1p In m m m o o In o m r m m r r m m In h In m cp r I� � W U a $ a � U OM 0 w J z« a a w w Ow z 5 a i- ¢ ci w 0 a a to D w « m y Z ? z W t Y w O I N o z uai z a w M Z ? v LL a J o Ca0L -¢]' w �a Z N W~ O W Q n N N N Z ? Q r d (/w1 w a Z o Z tan aZYQ N �- a¢ N a w w g z Q� ° y > w Q 6 K K w W Q Q Z Q Q 6 W�[ lU K Z Z w= 0 ZQ O Z W O W O I2- ❑ a O Qz a? ul z U w w =O 00 0] O W FW�!+�"J; 2 F H N W W Z U W twn w o w F- U Z 1- U w O F V U U a Q W N twn W W W z LL W z Iw- �. N a Q K O~ w O C7 O O g Q W a W} Z >> a U K K w M Z Z K a a] O m a] w w Q w w O 2 W Z Z a Z U d M M Q �- w F F Z U F Z Z Z M J J J a a IJ O W W fn Z O U Z tl] G] w w W W IL In a s (n W 2 Z a' M U U zQ W❑ M ❑ Q Q Q Q Q U U Y Y a Z Z V O w O F LL Z w w Z a a W W U W ❑ Z O O O Z Z Li. LL a a] w w J O U N In O O O O w J J Z? J O n n> Q W W w w w LL LL Q Q Q Q J J O a W W} W Q Q M w p U U U U❑ w W W LL LL U' S M 2 2 J J J J J J 0 0 a a a a a a a a a a C a 0 it a (t a of a of fY a w a w a 0' a a of w w a a' a' a JQ Y 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 U Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z W O w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w a M M M M M N M M M M M M M M N M M M M M M M N Vl N N M M N M M M M M N M M M M M M M N M c W 0❑ V O OO E O 0 O O Od O W O N O O O O 0 000 0 0 0 0 00 M O to fr0 Od m O n th M M M tO M N V M V M V M d (O n M N n N r M U r r N r r N N N O o N h O N N r r Ip Ip O t0 h n (p n O N N N h ry o N n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 Z Z Z FL (9 0 0 (9 O (9 t0 (O (O t0 (O M t0 (fl Z Z (O (O f0 Z tp l0 t0 M t0 (D t0 t0 M t0 tp tp [p z t0 w w D w w w w w w M OU fwn 0 N N M N N N Q N fWn y 0 0 0 M 0 D D N N Q 0 N N 0 M d J M 0 to M 0 N N M M w N N M w 0 O Q 2 I W m a 00 U H wa O ' O O (O N M m M N W � N O O OJ M N i[1 tM0 W a a M (MO (MO r Y01 N (NO (00 (NO IM N r N (MD (hO h (00 V h n OOi O (Ol O�1 W N N M I� (rp N n W OMi N W N m O y�y O C� n N N ON O u0i r OOi N M m In O In M N O O O M M M M O O m V CCpp O �0 r h r O O O In O h yy V M O O M 4 V O V V M m h O m V V r V V M N M (f1 01 m NM M M h h o n (p O 01 N N M M M M N M O N N m m n o m M m r� m m r M m m M� h v .� � � w 01 t0 V O T N O N r O V M M r M M M M M M O V M M M O m m m to NO O M M M O V m n M O O M M N V N} O M 1 (O W M N N N N N r N N N N m (O V M r V [O OM1 r [gyp 1 V 'cf N M Vn D (O V V N O O m M V (O In M a N O o N M py M� M M N M M m M O o 0 M M M�0 C NCD� pp?J O M M N N M O Oo1 ON1 N O O m^ m M m W N h N r V t00 V a N n W T m N 10[J (O d' N m N V V (NO (MO b tM0 fM0 m M V V M M N (O V M M V M o o 1 h1�0 M 10 M M� M M N M V V M V M V O N O n M M O) b N M (0 10 h r MM MM r C MS M V r N M M n r h M M M M M M O O O h r O V��0 N N m OI M M O C m N N O M O O M M M N N O Vp N m M M N p V m W M0 V (( Opp M O V a 0 W c Mc�� O tN0 m m 00 r m�0 CM, V N N m M h M N W N t�D Q m N l0 N M m m m r O O N N N C0') N (hO (D [0 (VO (MO N (ND tn0 (O (00 (n0 (n0 tm0 N N N 01 m c O V M V M 0 O M N m h 0 m N h m N �y O V O M m M n V M 10 m m 0 0 m 0 N 0 0 0 0 h O Q F v7 � ¢ ? a a W m K m a O O w K U w w Q ? d K 0 aZ U f9 - a< 0 p Z W w- OZ (9gQ>w K Z 7 Z U U� Z wD noW Z > O Zay O w Yy Z S W w V 0 OU Z W W U n m Q w U I- 1- Z O Z Q w v 0 owoP F F Q m d o m u z Z 'r' U U' Z Z Z Z Z Z w' a_' �' a W O W Q Y n O WaaaaaK0 0 0 K K K K w Q K o w of Zz > O Q� 0 fY w U J W o 2>O a? U oCNQ>F 0 o 0 W C) w O Z z p N 0 O w w o f w Y �% fu r F- O Q Q Q a J� F m Z Z f/1 W W W } 0 W W K 0 0 0 a F O m Q � m w w U� U V UO K Z w 0 w w w w w w w0=ww w _a W w 0 m m C7 O K K rp M W M to w w vwi N vwi w Q Iwi z Z Z Q Q Q W w J J O W W W W W W W w w w Zw � 9 1I�LL w LLLL�11 w� j j w 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 O L O V1 N m O O O O 0 m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O m 0 O O m m m O m O m O m c m N M n N m m m 0 m m^^ M M M N O M 0 0 0 V O r M M N N O O M O N a h O 0 0 0 0 m h N N N N O m O r N O O h V O m h h n r IIn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m z F 2 O M M m m m m m m m M m M m Z m m m m m m m m m Z :�: 2 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O 7 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 7>>> Q' 7 O 2 O 2 2 a 0 0 0 O 7 7 7>> w w w w w w w w w w a w w w w w w w w w O U❑❑ a w w w w w w w w w w w w W w w w w I L-O Z O D U M N V 001 M N m N^ O O h O M w w V MS M t0 O f0 W W O N w r N w o M to w 00 V N V o (O r N M � h [O O h w w V rm M M r MV O w N M F� Y0N O N N M r l(l 10 (NO In V 1 � N N �p w o w V M OJ M N w M MpJ Z6 0 V O O D) (V(pp p hp M ( V(pp N M m r myy t0 O o MM� M e- w V N V (MO V N N V V m V N N ti h C� M m V M V V O N o w N A M N h N M N M m O V r h M w N M r m w d' H V N V CM') MW C A N cwo cMo V V h uJ V N M V ONi V M O M N V m N V a- w Ct O O— N w M 0 0— V o M C In M N V N V M V N N M ry fO O N N N � M M V r M M (O N N N N O> a O 0 m O O N W pp VN N t`M') tm+J b M V N M M V O m O N V m (MO V OM] N V OM1 m W O N m M w` h O N N M M w w w M N r I[l w (fl ffJ w N tD wM M m w o tMp O N d' m w m N V m m W O h m O r O N N af QO f4 it af of y(Ur QK ¢QK aCL U¢ �GN y y t~i1 Ow= xU OOZ > - wU U Owaaa=w <_w w 0 0 0 wO<<< w Owwww w W wQ w Zw UO Z O w K ?KOU W K a O Q-- 0_ O > F r 1 w w w w w w U C1 U (wj w w Q O O Q w w w a a a a w w qa qa U a m a< w w w m w w w W 0 0 0 0 w w O W W W Z W w W W W W w N U W Y W�__¢ U U w w Y Y 0 Q Q Q Q Q w w 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y Y O O O O O w H O N M V N M O C 0C� O O O O O O wwO h Q O O V N w CO w M N 1n N M �[l O N O N In M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w Z Owl w w w w N w 0 0 w N lW 0 fw/� N N N N N (w/) w o w Z W O J a W W F- � N U w F%F > U W W LL J W � W U W W Z z Z LL W oa w_ 3 � J C7 7 F p o2 U 0 0 Z no W W w IL K 0 N H w a 0 a W w h N 5 U ulr � hh�N Mc-O MNNN M'-N N (ew(p M V ONO 0 O rN d L ow—M ON O M— O r (ONOr�(R UI OR Un M lO OR r M M(O. Mr V W MO�NMr V I�r MO7M tO C' N q M Md rMM (O Oci N M N O M (O N M M 4l O N M I N (O M f O t g q� O O N O O N r M O N (O M N N (D d O O h M N N f D^ m N M (OO M M r (O a p r r M M M r O d M M M OM M M M N N f O M NOW N CDN! � r N r J W Y V W NmN7 W V 7� W ORMM((q MIr? W 70OI dd'r0 W N V N L,�NM N 7 O((q((q rO M((9 N M N 7 (MO N N N---- N--- m M N N N N N N N N N N N- m N m N N- N N- —N N at (D (p r M M 0 N d M O M M M N d N r M r (o (r M r r d N V �(! O rNOO(p rN 1n Yl r � O 00 d' N 01N -N rn rnrnmm N NNN N MNNNnOWVNWWNM NoqMVmM OV (CmNM�N(O W W OR 'N MNOOM W mN(pMMN.N�N��� OMM W fON�oNNtr W �� N V r N d( oO M M N W M M M 0 M N (O (O O M f O N f 0 (O N M N r M r M M r N r r r O M W N r r M M O( D N N N N M N N N N N N N M N N NN N N N M N N N N N N M N N N N N N tN+1 00 ZZ 7 7 O� Wo Z Z J gWg W J W W > N O U N z Q R W F KJZKJOf"a_aJ¢w WJ¢¢Za h fNFdZQQ—=K4-¢WQU¢W� ZQ W ON ~OQU Q W WaW hKWZWWYK W WWZ W U w —OY WZ ZW YYW -UW zZS>W M > W h--woWJ W ¢wzIOOaf d� W UWwoZ Y U)y QFN U F-K 00QQww¢O ¢wWK JQ Zown22�0 W z ZNQ¢Zw WWWz�Z��Z hpz=�t�����L�z Fw ww0JaQ¢�V5ac¢W�YYY�Z2900��a0—iZJ �222W7Q¢7Zamp000ZZWW:N0007QCLOmWmm¢w07QQOOOKKK 7¢¢¢¢¢¢¢mooOooUOUow(9x?���������aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa w F' N000� N h0000000000001(JO000001(10100 OONOM N N 00 O 0001A p V dr0�(o (O�d IDMMOOMONdfONNrMOO�M O W rM V O��-�OMNM d' (01n (D M U OOrOOMMN0000 W �(p r.-.-�rr�-��NNN NNrN rM(DMM N�MM M �MM d' 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 W ❑hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhF-F-hhhh F-hhh hF-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-hhh h p aaaaaaaaaaa a a a a(L asm mm asaaaaammmm .n.mm alas U 777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 ZWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW a N O V N m l0 a w O M M M M N C C l0 (O A A M (O m N N W M M O f O O N (D N A N M N M M O O m� 6 M W OOa-MC M Mlp M MN MC; MC a M� M(O (O C)M M MM MM C M( O M M F N-- m--- N P N N M F- N o m� N� M N� M� � I N N M ll� cli m m a Norco r'ro uoiv.MMUMimco lM�'olM(iaro avlA�. . ..�. . . . .w� uAi n FN--M---- N-----NM— - F m m } J WMNe-MN�-N�- � (n = m z Z ° W R MNCMN MMN fO V OCO MCA F:. ❑ a W W W OAM W (.OMM C m W V K W N N m M m l0 0 d' 1� h m m Mj m 'o W fn N rn N ~ a m M m U m O W N C7 d O ¢ N •- N �- O C O M M M M M N M M A f O N W S> C C 5QO � MOf MO Ml0 M m MNM O AC7 M - MNOAM 41 NM W COrMNM M M ON M lV ttM��J A N0 w O 0 m C M M N M N N LL Z W 0 Of J W Z W Uw O wQ m O Z O M M C N M M A O m N M C M V lq A O= W Z N M M A M MMONMWMN M M M 2 F' MA MNMMC C([J �()((JN Y J NMN h y N F ° Q (/j A M O�AA A AA AAA A AAO A Q uj AEON �-N O AA A A O A A Z R�� ° N M MMNNN NNNNNNNNM N W f/) R� ° NMMM M M MM NN N M M M (h N M N N LL w m W m 00 w F- a w3 3 2} Qm } °K o3 rc a W U 7 ax gz x U U > J U wa ¢ a° a Z m H F Z J m N Z W OO W Q0 K O w K d K W 7 LL U J W U x Z rc Wza of—= WW W W oW m rc0 �° c=iQLL _ zQQo¢o� QQw ❑W WF- Wwz Z Z o o O Z WQ O W wLUwo J J J W m F- m W OW rZIaa¢1 QO QOZ 000� 0 Q D .�- W w1- Q jZ W fl~� V z Z W W W U' Z J 0 Z m Y J=� ; .0 W W F¢-QQ3i0 I- J❑ o I-LLU) 00'K=U u)- Of W W W W w Q Z W W W U Hm QQfnmm UUUa www Q > Z} W -O> m mF-� W c)< F" W W w W w (D U)> a~ UI�-) U CL O > OZ W N Z OMQ�Z K } Z- 0 Z Z 0 0 0 Q W a W m > K K Z Q Z w J D o F. F- w w w w¢ Z K W C9zQ-E ww zzzJ w0 m QaO hPow z0E-QOa zw wwww U? F-w zo ��p �°a' w w� IW-Fw-Fw-¢fY QN O N N LL w �O=za W RU WQ W U w w w w tan O m �- Q Q Q O¢ 0 w J J Z Z Z U 0 U K LL J F- U O- I- ZZ z 3 H xw �KK¢Qm HZC W Duwwo, 0 fY w f NJ�W U W wfY zzl- � w w w w w w w M z O F- Uw=000UU7: �U) of w Ow wY 3: F'z YC70 tr ZwWQF'000 UUUUUU w QCl U Q O O W W W W w wK KK R fY fYO� �¢ w w O 10 -UOJ fY 30 QL2 J�z J J J J J _I J O O wQ0 J OOz¢ wOOZ_ O DQa Q O O 000000 t m w K(n(nu)mm(nmmmmmmm N 0 m -¢ Q W W OU W ELu Y,g2 w R m a a w w fL m m w = w ~FQJ 0 0 NOMlt) 000000000000000000000O0N 0 °O OOM m U 0 UOMM MNAOM Mt0M0MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMAM 0 NOSA l(JOOM WOM W(Mfl MM`WAM WMM wOM Wmm 0000M ° OC OMMN OO OOMM 0¢H 00000Ooo o oo o O Oo o a0000 o a U - Q a w W wZQ aaaa aaa as as aaaaaa a a F— F- F- F- F- F F- F- F- F- I- N J W m J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O as asaaaaaaaaaaaaaa w QQQQQ¢QQQQQQq QQz¢¢¢ Q Q ¢�¢ U ���������������� �� F- F- zz zzzzz zz zzz z z z z z z Z z F- WWWwWWWWWWWW WW WWWW m0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a j mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ma} ¢am¢QaQmmQmmmmmmQmam0m0 nwa(0U))�mw(wnvww )wwww`0�U)U)vw)`00wV))U)vw) ;E;G 2§ §; ()§##m% ;!R k� M ,@:@ , % . 8 «: w <lee2Ga G § §w § b © b �2 00 ®^ m§ (9 (wa (©7! (9`°�!(I))/ §2�§` §)§^ _ §�\w§ 22ww B; §§§§: §k[§,m5;// � LU W UJ:z w w )/\me j§�, i� 0}2, - k(\ k§� \�\ u<xD 000 Qbo ■ 00z !gig g§2 ) w< g w § _ §§ _ k) )< \� j °( °/ a\Q< ` w\ w\ !�U) - ° - -r:»!E§ /D (§})( , , \) \\ \((()([ } \ 00 )F- F-I- SPECIAL COMPENSATION PROVISIONS Lower case letters appearing next to certain occupational code numbers in the above listing refer to special compensation provisions, shown below, that may be applicable to certain incumbents of the classes of employment so identified. Note: SEIU MOU Article V section 7 Limitation on Assignment Pay Differentials Employees hired after 8/31/2010 or hired before August 31, 2010, who did not receive assignment pay under section 5.1 of this article prior to June 30, 2013, shall not be eligible to receive it. SEIU MOU Article V section 9 Limitation on Career Development Incentive Pav With the exception of employee classifications listed below*, employees covered by this MOU and already receiving career development incentive pay under section 5.8 prior to June 30, 2012 and who continue to meet the qualffications described in the applicable career development incentive pay provisions of section 5.8 shall continue to receive said pay under the current career development incentive pay formulas. Employees who have not received career development pay prior to June 30, 2012 shall not be eligible to receive it. The employee classifications listed below covered by this MOU and already receiving career development incentive pay under section 5.8 prior to June 30, 2013 and who continue to meet the qualificaflons described in the applicable career development incentive pay provisions of section 5.8 shall continue to receive said pay under the current career development incentive pay formulas. Employees in the classifications listed below who have not received career development pay prior to June 30, 2013 will not thereafter be eligible to receive it. *Associate Engineer, Senior Civil Engineer, Senior Engineer, Senior Traffic Engineer. (a) (Reserved) (b) Incumbents in the classifications of Fleet Services Technician I, II and III who possess nationally recognized certifications for Automotive Service Excellence Master Certification (ASE) and ASE Alternative Fuel, will be paid an assignment pay differential at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) for said certification above their then current base monthly salary step. The restrictions set forth in Section 5.7 do not apply to this provision. (SEIU MOU Article V Section 1 C) (c) (Reserved) (d) An incumbent in the class of Police Services Dispatcher who is continuously and regularly assigned to and actually performing in a lead supervisory and trainer capacity over an assigned shift of Police Services Dispatchers will be paid at a rate set ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5.0%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (POA MOU Article V Section 1A) (a) Personnel in the classifications of Fleet Services Technician I,'II, III, and Fleet Services Supervisor, who maintain a valid State of California Commercial Driver's License and are assigned to an area that requires the possession of either a Class "A" or Class "B" license in the course and scope of their work shall be paid at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above their then current base monthly salary step. (SEIU MOU Article V Section 1 D) (f) (Reserved) (g) (Reserved) (h) Incumbents in the classifications of: Code Enforcement Associate, Code Enforcement Officer, Code Enforcement Supervisor who obtain or possess a valid certificate in any of four Career Development Incentive areas shall receive incentive pay worth five salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) for each certificates not to exceed five (5) certificates or a total of twenty-five salary rate ranges (approximately 12.5%). If an incumbent has obtained four (4) certificates from list, he or she than shall be eligible to earn an additional five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) pay additive upon completion of both the SCACEO/CACEO Intermediate and SCACEO/CACEO Advanced Certifications. (SEIU MOU Article V Section 8D) (i) Incumbents in the classifications of Senior Office Assistant, Secretary, Executive Secretary, or Planning Commission Secretary who are assigned by a Department Head with the prior approval of the City Manager, to a position requiring the ability to take dictation at a rate of 70 wards per minute or better on a regular basis or as an essential or integral element of the work of the position will be paid a monthly differential of sixty dollars ($60) above his or her base monthly salary step for each full month of such assignment. (SEIU MOU Article V Section 1A and Council Resolution No. 88-38, as amended by Resolution No. 99-023) Page 16 of 24 (j) Incumbents in the class of Police Officer who are continuously and regularly assigned to and actually performing duties of a Corporal will be paid at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. If a Corporal is assigned to lead a work unit without a Sergeant, he or she will be paid an additional five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above his or her base monthly salary step for such assignment At the present time, Directed Patrols and Civic Center Patrol units are examples of such assignments. (POA MOU Article V Section 1 C) (k) Incumbents regularly and continuously assigned to lead a functional unit which includes two (2) or more positions in the same or lower classifications as the incumbent may be compensated at a rate set ter (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (SEIU MOU Article V Section 2), and/or (Council Resolution No. 82-110 Section 3.1, as amended by Resolution No. 91-103), and/or (Resolution No. 99-023) and (POA MOU Article V Section 1 N) (1) An incumbent in the classification of Senior Office Assistant who is continuously and regularly assigned to operate and who actually operate a two-way radio communications base station will be paid at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (SEIU MOU Article V Section 1 B) (m) Incumbents in the classifications of Associate Engineer, Senior Civil Engineer, Senior Engineer, Senior Traffic Engineer, Assistant Plan Check Engineer I or 11, Associate Plan Check Engineer, Senior Plan Check Engineer, or Senior Transportation Analyst will be eligible for career incentive pay for any certificates approved for their classification at a rate set of ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step for valid registration(s) as a Registered Engineer by the State of California or as a Structural Engineer by the State of California (a total of twenty (20) salary rate ranges (approximately 10%for both). Additionally, said incumbents who possess a valid certificate issued by the ICBO (or similar nationally recognized certificating organization) in the areas of accessibility/usability (one specialty area), residential energy plan check, or non-residential energy plan check, shall be paid an incentive pay differential at a rate set above his or her then current base monthly salary step in accordance with the following schedule: One certificate from one specialty area: five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%); an additional certificate from a second specialty area (total of two): ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5%); an additional certificate from a third specialty area (total of three): fifteen (15) salary rate ranges (approximately 7.5%). (SEIU MOU Article V Section 8A) and/or (as amended by Resolution No. 97-028) In no event shall the application of this Career Development Incentive Program result in an individual being eligible to earn more than twenty (25) salary rate ranges (approximately 12.5%) above his or her current monthly base salary step. (SEIU MOU Article V Section 8) (n) An incumbent who was employed as of August 16, 1991 in the classification of Assistant Plan Check Engineer I or 11, Associate Plan Check Engineer, Senior Plan Check Engineer and who as of December 31, 1987 had possessed a valid Plan Examiner Certificate issued by the ICBO shall continue to be paid at a rate set ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5%) above his or her then current base salary step. However effective January 1, 1988 said ten (10) range differential shall be reduced to five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) for any incumbent of said classifications who is issued his or her initial certificate on orafter January 1, 1988. (SEIU MOU Article V Section 8B) (o) (Reserved) (p) (Reserved) (q) An incumbent in one of the classifications of: Building Inspector, Senior Building Inspector, Electrical Inspector, Senior Electrical Inspector, Plumbing Inspector, Senior Plumbing Inspector, Combination Building Inspector, Senior Combination Building Inspector, Building Technician, Senior Plumbing/Mechanical Systems Specialist, or Senior Electrical Systems Specialist who possess a valid certificate issued by the ICBO (or similar nationally recognized certificating organization) in relevant areas (see MOU for full details) shall be paid an incentive pay differential at a rate set above his or her then current base monthly salary step as follows: One certificate from one specialty area: five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%); an additional certificate from a second specialty area (total of two): ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5%); an additional certificate from a third specialty area (total of three): fifteen (15) salary rate ranges (approximately 7.5%); an additional certificate from a fourth specialty area (total of four): twenty (20) salary rate ranges (approximately 10%); an additional certificate from the fifth specialty area (total of five): twenty-five (25) salary rate ranges (approximately 12.5%). (SEIU MOU Article V Section 8C) Page 17 of 24 (r) (Reserved) (a) An incumbent in the classification of Maintenance Worker II (assigned to the tree crew) who possesses a valid certificate issued by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) as a certified Tree Worker shall be paid at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (SEIU MOU Article V Section 8H) (t) (Reserved) (u) An incumbent in the classification of Construction Inspectorwho possess a valid certificate issued by the ICBO (or similar nationally recognized certificating organization) in the areas of reinforced concrete, structural masonry, structural steel/welding, electrical inspection, plumbing inspection, plans examiner, or C27 landscape contractors license, shall be paid an incentive pay differential at a rate set above his or her then current base monthly salary step as follows: One certificate from one specialty area: five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%); an additional certificate from a second specialty area (total of two): ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5%);an additional certificate from a third specialty area (total of three): fifteen (15) salary rate ranges (approximately 7.5%); an additional certificate from a fourth specialty area (total of four): twenty (20) salary rate ranges (approximately 10%); and an additional certificate from the fifth specialty area (total of five) twenty-five (25) salary rate ranges (approximatelyl2.5%). (SEIU MOU Article V Section 8E) (v) (Reserved) (w) An incumbent in the classification of Contracts Administrator who possess a valid certificate issued by the ICBO (or similar nationally recognized certificating organization) in the areas of plumbing inspection, electrical inspection, plans examiner, C27 landscape contractors license, turf grass management, or certified arborist (ISA), shall be paid an incentive pay differential at a rate set above his or her then current base monthly salary step as follows: One certificate from one specialty area: five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%); an additional certificate from a second specialty area (total of two): ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5%); an additional certificate from a third specialty area (total of three): fifteen (15) salary rate ranges (approximately 7.5%); an additional certificate from a fourth specialty area (total of four) twenty (20) salary rate ranges (approximately 10%); and an additional certificate from the fifth specialty area (total of five): twenty-five (25) salary rate ranges (approximately 12.5%). (SEIU MOU Article V Section 8F) (x) (Reserved) (y) Incumbents in the class of Forensic Specialist I, who are regularly and continuously assigned to and actually performing duties in a 'lead" supervisory capacity over a primary functional unit of Forensic Specialist I employees, will be paid at a rate set ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5.0%) above their then current base monthly salary step. (POA MOU Article V Section 1 B) (z) (Reserved) (aa) (Reserved) (bb) Incumbents in one of the classifications of Projects Manager, Tree Maintenance Supervisor, Tree Trimmer, Maintenance Worker II (assigned to the tree crew), Public Works Projects Specialist, or Landscape Development Associate who possess a valid certificate issued by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) as a certified arborist shall be paid at a rate of set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (SEIU MOU Article V Section 8G) (cc) An incumbent in the classification Data Entry Operator who, at the discretion of the appointing authority, is regularly and continuously assigned to serve in a limited lead capacity including assigning and monitoring data entry work, will be paid an additional five salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above the current base monthly salary step to which he or she would otherwise be entitled. (Council Resolution No. 82-110 Section 3.1 [cc], as amended by Resolution No. 91-103) (dd) An employee who is continuously and regularly assigned as a Training Officer working in either Field Operations, the Detention facility, or as a Forensic Specialist II will be paid at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (POA MOU Article V Section 1F as amended by Ninth Side LetterAmendment to the Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Santa Ana and the Santa Ana POA) Page 18 of 24 (ee) An employee who is continuously and regularly assigned to and actually performing duties of an Internal Affairs Officer will be paid at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (POA MOU Article V Section 1 G) (ff) The incumbent of the classification Senior Deputy Clerk of the Council designated by Resolution 91-073 as third in command in the Clerk of the Council's office with full signature authority for the Clerk in the clerk and Assistant Clerk's absence, will be paid an additional ten salary rate ranges (approximately 5%) above the current base monthly salary step to which he or she would otherwise be entitled. (Council Resolution No.82-110 Section 3.1 [ff], as amended by Resolution No. 91-103) (gg) The incumbent in the class of Accountant II who, at the discretion of the appointing authority, is regularly and continuously assigned electronic data processing (EDP) systems coordination responsibilities, will be paid an additional ten salary rate ranges (approximately 5%) above the current base monthly salary step to which he or she would otherwise be entitled. (Council Resolution No.82-110 Section 3.1 [gg], as amended by Resolution No. 92-034) (hh) An incumbent in the class of Equipment Operator who, at the discretion of the appointing authority, is regularly and continuously assigned, on a full-time basis, to operate a Motor Grader, will be paid an additional ten salary rate ranges (five percent) above the current base monthly salary step to which he or she would otherwise be entitled. (Council Resolution No. 82-110 Section 3.1[hh], as amended by Resolution No. 92-034 (ii) (Reserved) (jj) (Reserved) (kk) (Reserved) (11) (Reserved) (mm) (Reserved) (nn) (Reserved) (oo) Incumbents in the classification of Correctional Officer who are continuously and regularly assigned to and actually performing duties of a Correctional Supervisor will be paid at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (PDA MOU Article V Section 1 D) (pp) An employee who is continuously and regularly assigned to perform training functions as a Parking Control Officer will be paid at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (POA MOU Article V Section 1 H) (qq) (Reserved) (rr) Incumbents in the classification of Police Officer who are continuously and regularly assigned as a Canine Officer will be paid at a rate set ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (POA MOU Article V Section1l) (ss) Incumbents in the classification of Police Officer who are continuously and regularly assigned to and actually performing duties of a Motor Officer assigned to the Traffic Division will be paid at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (POA MOU Article V Section1J) (tt) An incumbent, identified by the Police Department, who is continuously and regularly assigned to and actually performing duties of a Detective/Investigator assigned to the Investigations Division or Special Investigations Units as well as Police Investigative Specialist, Background Investigator, Collision Investigator, and Graffiti Task Force Investigator, will be paid at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (POA MOU Article V Section 1 K) (uu) Incumbents in the classifications of Correctional Officeror Correctional Supervisor, who are continuously and regularly assigned to either the 207(k) 7/12.5 Detention Work Schedule, or the 4110.5 Detention Administration Work Schedule, shall be paid at a rate set six (6) salary rate ranges (approximately 3%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (PDA MOU Article V Sectionl L) Page 19 of 24 (vv) (Reserved) (ww) Incumbents in the classification of Firearms Examiner who are regularly and continuously assigned to and actually performing duties in a "lead" supervisory capacity over a primary functional unit, will be paid at a rate set ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5.0%) above their then current base monthly salary step. (PDA MOU Article V Section 1 M and Council Resolution No. 2005-026) (xx) Reserved (yy) Incumbents in the classifications of Forensic Specialist I and Forensic Specialist II who are continuously and regularly assigned as a Tenprint - AFIS Technician will be paid at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above their then current base monthly salary step. (POA MOU Article V Section 10) (zz) Incumbents in the classifications of Forensic Specialist I and Forensic Specialist 11 who are continuously and regularly assigned as a Fingerprint Analyst will be paid at a rate set five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%) above their then current base monthly salary step. (POA MOU Article V Section 1P) OTHER PAY ADDITIVES: BILINGUAL PAY. Qualified personnel in the below -listed representational categories who meet the required criteria specified in the Memorandum of Understanding (or Pay Plan) covering their job classification will receive a monthly pay differential above their current base monthly salary step in the amounts specified below by representational category: (a) SEIU (Service Employees International Union 5.313C) SAMA (Santa Ana Management Association 6.1 B. C), Unrepresented Management CAS A (Confidential Association of the City of Santa Ana MOU 6.313, C): • Primary Bilingual Assignments: $175.00 per month. • Secondary Bilingual Assignments: $40.00 per month. (b) PDA (Police Officers Association): (POA MOU Article V Section 3C D E F) • Sworn: Street Level Proficiency. The amount equal to the product obtained by multiplying the step "E" base salary rate of Police Officer by five (5) salary rate ranges (approximately 2.5%). • Sworn: Complex Level Proficiency. The amount equal to the product obtained by multiplying the step "E" base salary rate of Police Officer by ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5%). • Non Sworn: Secondary Level Proficiency: $40.00 per month. • Non Sworn: Primary Level Proficiency: $175.00 per month. (c) PMA (Santa Ana Police Management Association): (PMA MOU Article 5.1 • Primary Bilingual Assignments: $175.00 per month. 2. SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL. (a) SEIU. Generally. An employee in a classification represented by SEIU who is continuously and regularly assigned to a schedule of work which requires that he or she actually work a minimum of four and one-half (4 112 hours) between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. will be paid a shift differential for his or her entire work shift at a rate set ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5%) higherthan his or herthen current base monthly salary step except however such shift pay differential shall not be applicable to employees in the classification of Park Ranger and Supervising Park Ranger. (SEIU MOU Articic V Soction 4A) (b) Library Department Employees. Employees hired and assigned to the Library prior to December 1, 1987 who work evening shifts until closing time, but who are not otherwise eligible for shift differential as provided under Subsection (a) above, shall receive as special shift pay, an amount equal to one-half (112) of one hour's pay for each day they work an evening shift until closing time. Said special shift pay shall be computed on the hourly equivalent of the base monthly salary step. Such half-hour's pay shall not be counted toward the computation of overtime. Such special library shift pay differential shall not be applicable to library employees hired on or after December 1, 1987. (SEIU MOU Article V Section 413) Page 20 of 24 (c) Early Morning Street Crews. A Street Maintenance employee who is assigned to traffic painting or downtown cleanup crews who is continuously and regularly assigned to a schedule of work which requires that he or she actually work at least fifty percent (50%) of his or her normal daily work shift between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. will be paid a shift differential for his or her entire work shift at a rate set ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5%) higher than his or her then current base monthly salary step. (SEIU MOU Article V Section 4C) (d) Standby Pay. Employees who are released from active duty but who are required by their department to leave notice where they can be reached and be available to return to active duty when required by the department at any time other than their regularly scheduled working hours, shall be said to be on standby duty. Employees shall receive four hundred fifty dollars ($450) per week when assigned to be on standby duty. Employees who "trade" days will have that time deducted from their pay on a prorated daily rate based on a seven (7) day week. Employees who cover the day shall be paid at the daily rate. All trades must be approved by the Supervisor or Manager. Water Production, Water Maintenance, Public Works Maintenance, Building Maintenance, and Information Technology Department and staff shall be required to serve on standby duty and receive standby pay as defined above. The City's preference will be to accomplish the above through volunteers; however, qualified employees may be directed to be on standby if the number of volunteers is insufficient. In addition to Standby Pay, if an employee is able to handle the incident by phone or other electronic means without reporting to duty, he shall be entitled to overtime pay at the rate of 15 minutes or actual time spent per incident whichever is greater, paid at time and one-half (T 112) per incident. Additional Standby Pay programs may be implemented with the approval of the Department Head and City Manager. (SEIU MOU Article V Section 4D) (a) (POA) Police Officers Association Incumbents in the classification of Animal Service Officer I or 11, Forensic Specialist I or 11, Crime Research Analyst, Police Communications Supervisor, Police Investigative Specialist, Police Property & Evidence Specialist, Police Service Officer, Police Evidence and Supply Specialist, Police Services Dispatcher, Communications Services Officer, Correctional Officer, Correctional Supervisor, and Parking Control Officer who are continuously and regularly assigned to a schedule of work which require that he or she actually work a minimum of four and one- half (4 1/2) hours between the hours of 5:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. will be paid a shift differential at a rate set ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5.0%) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (POA MOU Article V Section 2) Effective July 1, 2017 each Sworn employee who is continuously and regularly assigned to a schedule of work that requires that he or she actually work a minimum of four and one-half (4'/2) hours between the hours of 5:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. will be paid a shift differential at a rate set at 2.5% above his or her base monthly salary. (POA MOU Article V Section 2) (f) (CASA) Confidential Association of the City of Santa Ana An employee in a classification represented by CASA who is continuously and regularly assigned to a schedule of workwhich requires that he or she actually work a minimum of four and one-half (4'/z) hours between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., shall be paid a shift differential for his or her entire work shift at a rate set ten (10) salary rate ranges (approximately 5%) higher than his or her then -current base monthly salary step. (CASA MOU Article 6 Section 4A) (g) Standby Pav Employees who are released from active duty but who are required by their department to leave notice where they can be reached and be available to return to active duty when required by the department at any time other than their regularly scheduled working hours, shall be said to be on standby duty. Effective no later than the first (1s') day of the second (2n,) payroll period following Council approval, such employees shall receive two hundred dollars ($200) per week when assigned to be on standby duty. (CASA MOU Article 6 Section 4B) 3. NOTARY PUBLIC (a) SEIU (Service Employees International Union) An employee that is required by a Department Head or their designee to perform the duties of a Notary Public for the City, in addition to regular duties shall be paid a monthly differential of forty dollars ($40) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (SEIU MOU Article V Sectiord E), (b) (CASA) Confidential Association of the City of Santa Ana Full-time incumbents in any classification who are required by a Department Head or their designee to perform the duties of a Notary Public for the City, in addition to regular duties, shall be paid a monthly pay premium of forty dollars ($40) above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (CASA MOU Article 6 Section 1 B) Page 21 of 24 4. CONFIDENTIAL PREMIUM (a) (CASA) Confidential Association of the City of Santa Ana An employee who is routinely and consistently assigned to sensitive positions by a Department Head, involving labor negotiations which require trust and discretion, in accordance with Government Code section 3507.5, will be paid at a rate set 2.5%, above his or her then current base monthly salary step. (CASA MOU Article 6 Section 6) FOOTNOTES: (EM) designates unrepresented "Executive Management" personnel, and as such, are eligible to receive certain employee benefits which are different from and/or greater than those available to non -management personnel. (MM) designates "Middle Management". (RM) designates "Represented Management". (AM) designates "Administrative Management". (UC) designates "Confidential". (T) designates a "terminal" class. A position classification that has been designated as "terminal" by formal City Council action will be deleted from the City's Basic Classification and Compensation Plan when vacated by its last remaining incumbent. No new appointments may be made to a class that has been so designated. Employee groups and City Council appointed employees are designated as follows: "ADMIN MGMT-NS", MID M-NS denotes classifications defined as Administrative Management (AM) under the terms of the Four -Year Contract Extension to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Santa Ana Management Association (SAMA) for January 1, 2019-June 30, 2022; "APPOINT" denotes City Manager; City Attorney, and Clerk of the Council; "EXEC-NS", EXEC -SWORN denotes classifications defined as "Executive Management" under the terms of Santa Ana City Council Resolution No. 2015-026; "PMA-NS", PMA-SWORN denotes classifications covered by the Three -Year Contract Extension to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and Santa Ana Police Management Association (PMA) for fiscal years 2018-2021; "POA-NS", POA-SWORN denotes classifications covered by the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Santa Ana Police Officers Association (PDA) for fiscal year 2018-2021; "PT CS SEIU 6" denotes classifications defined as "Part -Time Civil Service" under the terms of the Letter of Agreement between the City and the Service Employees International Union Local 721 Chapter 1939, AFL-CIO, (SEIU) for July 1, 2017- December 31, 2018; "SEIU 6" denotes classifications covered by the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Service Employees International Union Local 721 Chapter 1939, AFL-CIO, (SEIU) for fiscal years July 1, 2017-June 30, 2019; "SEIU PT" denotes regular, long-term part-time classes covered by the Memorandum of Understanding MOU between the City and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Local 721 Chapter 1939, AFL-CIO, Part-time Employees' Representation Unit for fiscal years 2015-2017; "UC" denotes classifications covered by the Momorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Confidential Association of the City of Santa Ana (CASA) for January 1, 2019-June 30, 2022 Page 22 of 24 0 W CO n W O n N M O 0 M N 0 0 O V n (0 N O O N W V V n 0 n _ V O W M W M M O (O N M 0 0 V 0 0 M M 0 V M M M r O O O O N V n N N N M M M M d0' V V 1 M 40j 0 M� r� W W W M O O r r .-- r .- .- .- r r .- r r r N N N 0 0 W W n O O n N M O 0 M N m 0 0 (D V n 0 N O O N M �{ 0 0 n V M M M M M 0 t0 N M 0 0 V 0 CO M OD W W 01 r p) V O W N V n O M 0 0 M CO 0 M n O ;8 V W N 0 0 V 0) Cl) M n N n r .- .- .- .- r r r r r r r N N 0 W N W W V O M M M M M O M M 7 0 M M V O M W 0 (00 0 CO N /00 0 00 W M O M 0 0 M 0 M n O V W N O 0 V 0) M M n N M M O O O O c N` N M M M V V V 0 0 0 0(0 n n n M M M M N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r O C n 0 0 W W n rn O) n N M O N D) N O 0 O n 0 N O O N N N 2 V O n V O) M W W d) M 0 .- O N W O 0 V 0 W m V O >_. V M m V O N V n O M O O M O O M m n O V 0 N 0 O V W M W M n p_ T O O rn 0 0 0 0 0 r r N N N M M M r r r �- r r r r �- r r r — V V — r V 0 0 0 0 O n n n M M 0 d) r r — r r O i s D) n O 0 W M n O) d) n N M O 0 W N 0 0 0 V n W N O O O M n W M V O M O M M N O 7 N O 7 W M w W cM- M M V OV) c nW (OD M O O O O Z O w (00 M W r r P N N N M M M V V V 0 l0 (0 W W n n n W W O) N 07 M N M O 0 0 n 0 M N 0 0 0 V n 0 N O /0 l6 N W O I� V O W M M D7 M O N M 0 0 V 0 0 a) M W V O W 0 0 W W d) O O O O r c N M M M V V W M 0 0 0 0 0 n n n N H mU = m� = V 0 0) N V n O M O O M 0 0 M n O V 0 N 0 0 V i 4 r M W N W M O O O O r r< N N M M M M 0 0 00 0 n n N 0 (d > W E ON W Qf U (6 a) ca O N N M n 0 0 W W n O) O) n N M O 0 d) N 0 0 0 V n 0 N O C O r 0 0 0 0 M I� 0 n V O) W 0 W V O m N V n O M 0 M M 0 m N W 0 0 N 0 O W M M M O M n O V W N W O V O) W O c 0 n M M O) 0 N V 0 W N NN O) d) O) d) O O O O P M M MV V V 0 0 0 O 0 n n n r� W a 0 W M n O) m n N M O 0 W N 0 0 0 V n 0 W 0 0 M M O) O) O) O O O O r r c N M M V V V 0 0 0 0 O n n M M O N N M n O 0 M O n m W n N M O 0 m N 0 0 0 V n W M V 0 0 W O M n 0 n V M M M 0 0 M 0 W N M 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 O M 0 n 0 N V O V 0 W N V n O O M 0 M 0 M n O V W N 0 0 W W W W W mW O m Q) O O O c r� cN c0 c M V V V 0 0 0 O 0 n 0 0 W W n 0) O) n N M O 0 M N 0 0 0 V n M M V 100 (NO M O M N 0 n V O) M M M 0 to In V W M M 0 N W O n W W W W W d) W a) O) O O O r r r r N N N M M M- V V 0 0 0 0 r r �-- `- r �- r r r r r r n W W M O N N d) n O M M N V O M M O M N W W W V O V M M V 0 0 M O M n V 0 O) V n 0 (00 (O N (00 0 M 0 0 M 0 O n O) M 0 n O) N V 0 0 N O 0 M n O V W N n W W M 0 N N M n 0 0 W W n O) O) n N M O 0 M N O 0 O) 0 O V co co V 0 co co O M W M M CO W N W W 0 O 0 n W M 0 n m N V 0 m 0 0 0 v n m r- N N 0 M ').-.-rrrrr nnnmW 0 OWMrnrnrno)rrrrrrrr.- rN- o0d0' l00 (v IWO N- r M n M M M O N N M n 0 0 M M n M O n N M O 0 M N (00 O n ( V 0 0 M O M I� 0 n V M M M M� 0 M 0 ( N 0 M 0 o M 0 n D) M 0 n Q) N V 0 V O O) N V n O M 0 M 0 M n O V M n CO M M O N N 0 n W 0 M M n O) a) n N M O 0 m N 0 M T n O V M M V 0 0 0 0 M n 0 n V 0) W 0 0 M O N M O M 0 n O) M 0 n O) N V O a) V 0 Q) N V n O M 0 0 M 0 0 m M n 0 n N M n W W 0 O N N M n 0 0 M M n O n V M M n N M W W W W O 0 M W M O N CO N O) O O n M 0 V o n M M V 0 O 0 D) M 0 n O) 0 M n N V O d) V 0 d) N V n O M O O M O O M n W n M n W W M O N N M n O to M W n 0) m n N M O 0 W N V M n (O V M 0 V 0 ID O M n O n V M M W M M M 0 (D O M O M o n O) n M 0 O) V 0 m V 0 N O) N V n O M O O m 0 0 M 0 n I� n n n 1-m Wm M W m m 0 mO O O O r N N N M M M It V O — N M V 0 O n M M O r N M V 0 0 n M M O r N M V 0 0 n W M O r N N N N N N N N N N M M PM M M P) M M M M v N (5 Cl) N N (0 a O CO M M N W N N h M W W W W h 0 LO N N N M 0 W W 0 W h M W h LO V M� W h OJ M h N W LO M N N M N M N h M O O W W N O O O N LO W N M M M V V V W W N W N N In (h0 I� r W W W N N O N << r r r r r r r<<<< r r r r r r r r r<<< r r N N N N r 0 W M M N W N N h M LO W W W h W N N N N M LO W O) h M h M W h O) M h N W - M N N M, W N h M O M W 0 tM N V h M N LO 4 W W h O M h 0 h LO O M h W O V W M W 7 O O O O N N N M M M It -Yt V' W N N W W h h W W W M W 0 0 0 0 r r< r r r r r r r r r<< r r r r r r r r r r r r< r N N N W h M h LO M N h O M h N W N M N N M to W N h M O M W W W N 7 h O) M N N M W h O M h O V h N m M h N 0 7 d) 7 W M W N W a r 0 W M M N W It N N h M W W W W h W 0 N N N M M W It N h W M h N W N M N N M LO w N h M O M W h W W M h W O d M d' W M M M 7 It W W N (O W h h W W W m O O r r r r r< r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N a) r M m d' r 0 W CO M N W '�tN N h M 0W W W h W LO N N N M LO C W W h M W h u7 V' M V' O h O M h N W W M N N M N W N h M 0 0) N� d' O h M O MO N V O h O 0 u7 W h M h M 0 d' �� h N O) ll') M(0 N O V d) V W W r r r r r r r N r N c N r Cl)0 r r r r N r N r r< W W r h r h r W r W r W r< m 0 r O n M M m �t r 0 W M ML00 N W -yIt� N N hpi� M 0W W W h W M N N r N M M N VW' r M N V r W � N M M d' r O p M r 0 dN' W N W M r W N 0 W V i_. W m W m dh' O O r r r r r r<<< r r r r r r r r r r r< r r r r r< W N N WO W M M O 4t r 0 W M M N W V N N h M LO W W W h W W h N N M 07 W N M W W h M to h M 7 M d' LO h W M h N W LO M N N W N W N h M C W ti O N V h O N Vt h W N W W It h O M h 0 �t h In T M h O d' m m m M M W O W O O O O N N N` M M V' V' �tLo 0W W W h h W W W U�O r r r r r r r < <<<< r r r r r r r r r r r pp N (V W = m C O Ln W M M O) d' < O W M M N W N N h M LO W W W h W M N N N m ^ O W N O W N W V h W m N h 'Ith M m m h N W W V W M N h h O O) M M h h 0 N y� W h LO M LO N W N M M, h W W N h �tW 0 M M M m 0 0 0 0 N N N M M M V d' d' LO LO W W W h h O W W 'I r— r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r O> llx� ro � U m m C N p W l0 M M OJ V < O W M M N W N N h M N W W W h W W N N R W O N N W W W h M m h W M Ln h M h N W W M N N M N M N w W O N h m N h m N W M W h O M M h O V h N M h t0 O O�c M W W W W M O) Ql O) O 0 O O O r r r N N N M M M V d' V' to N M W W N N U h W O N W W W h M W h N M W N W W W O O) N O) 7 W h m W W N O O 0 h O D) O c N W M N� d' h N O M M M M h M O 'd' V' V h d' Ln O M h LO U X r r r r r r r r r r r r r r W M r W r W r< W h P- r r (1) W W O W O) W W LLJ M M O It r 0 W M M N W V N N h M LO W W W N W W N N h h W O N LO W W h M 0 h m 7 M V W N m M h N W W M N N M N r r r r< r r<<< r r r r r r r r<< r r M W W W N W M M OJ V r O W M M N W V' N N h M W W W W h W N N h h h W O N W W W h M W h W V' m 't L0 h m M h N W LO M N N M W W W M M M 0 0 0 O r - - M W M 0 r r r r r r r N r N r N r M r M r r< V 7 r dt r LO r 0 r LO r W M r< p O M W W W W 10 M M M Vt r 0 W M M N W d' N N h M LO W M W h W M W h h h W O N W W W h M M h LO 7 M d' 0 h W M h N W LO M N N r r W W W M m W M W 0 0 0 W 0 r r r r r r r N r N r<< N M M r M r V r V r 7 r M r W r< N W r p N O M W W M LO LO M M W V r O W M M N W 't N N N M W W W W h W Wh M h M W O N V M V N m N W W M N O Wh W LWO 4 h N dam' M N O V W W p h N O M W W W W N M M W a' r 0 W M M N W 7 N N h M W W W W h N N W W W M m M 0 0 W W W m m 0 0 N N N M M M V V LO LO N N N N N NNNN N M M M M M M M M M q' q' q' W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N 0 O N N N IL REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 2019-01 AND DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT NO. 2019-01 TO FACILITATE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FOURTH AND MAIN MIXED -USE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 114 AND 117 EAST FIFTH STREET {STRATEGIC PLAN NOS. 3, 2; 5,31 /s/ Kristine Ri CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 111 Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2ntl Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO �1��►1�1�1:3q:7 1. Adopt a resolution adopting an addendum to the Environment Impact Report for the Transit Zoning Code Project (SCH NO. 2006071100) and re -adoption of a mitigation monitoring and reporting program. 2. Adopt a resolution adopting Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 as conditioned and Density Bonus Agreement Application No. 2019-01. 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Density Bonus Agreement with Toll Brothers Apartment Living or assignees for a 55-year term, for the development of a mixed -use residential and commercial development with up to 220 residential rental units, including 11 residential rental affordable units, at 114 and 117 East Fifth Street, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Michael McCann, representing Toll Brothers Apartment Living, is requesting approval of a site plan review (SPR) and a density bonus agreement (DBA) to allow the construction of a mixed -use development consisting of two separate buildings located on two development sites at 114 (Site A) and 117 (Site B) East Fifth Street, respectively, which would contain a total of up to 220 residential rental units and 12,350 square feet of commercial space. As proposed, the project requires approval of one waiver from the Transit Zoning Code's development standards through the density bonus agreement pursuant to California Government Code sections 65915 through 65918 and Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Section 41-1600. Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 — Fourth and Main Mixed -Use Residential and Commercial Development November 19, 2019 Page 2 Staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request due to the project's satisfaction of meeting the intent of the Transit Zoning Code to promote a pedestrian -oriented environment with a mix of land uses. The project will also provide additional affordable rental housing stock to an underserved segment of the region's population. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION On September 23, 2019 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the project. The project was continued to October 28, 2019 to provide ample time to address four areas of concern: onsite amenities, the requested density bonus agreement, historic preservation options, and parking. Following the September 23 public hearing, the developer met with local historic preservation group representatives and City staff to discuss options to preserve and incorporate any intact fagade and interior building components into the project. At a work-study session on October 14, 2019, City staff presented additional details on the four areas of concern, and the public provided additional input on the project, voicing general support but expressing a strong desire to incorporate any intact, historic elements into the project. One week later on October 21, 2019, the developer presented a project alternative that includes an option to preserve two portions of the underlying building into the project, which was received positively by most historic preservation groups in attendance. Additional details are provided in the "Option to Preserve Onsite Building Facades" subsection on Page 5 of this report. On October 28, 2019, following identification of the fagade preservation option and conditions of approval crafted to ensure an open and transparent demolition process to determine feasibility of the fagade preservation option, the Planning Commission voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend that the City Council approve the project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project includes demolition and removal of the former and now largely -vacant First American Title Company headquarters building at 114 East Fifth Street, and removal of a surface parking lot at 117 East Fifth Street. However, a careful and phased demolition of the site is intended to reveal whether portions of the existing structures onsite can be incorporated into the overall project through fagade preservation. Additional details are provided in the "Option to Preserve Onsite Building Facades" subsection on Page 5 of this report. Once the onsite buildings are dismantled and the sites are cleared, the applicant proposes to construct a mixed -use development community on two development sites, Site A and Site B, containing up to 220 residential units, 12,350 square feet of leasable commercial area, and 332 onsite parking spaces. Table 1: Project and Location Information Item Information Pro ect Address 114 and 117 East Fifth Street Nearest Intersection Fifth and Main streets and Fifth and Bush streets General Plan Designation District Center (DC) Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 — Fourth and Main Mixed -Use Residential and Commercial Development November 19, 2019 Page 3 Item Information Zoning Designation Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84), Downtown sub -zone Surrounding Land Uses Commercial North Mixed -Use and Parkin East Commercial South Commercial and Parkin West Site Size 2.78 acres combined Site A: 2.31, Site B: 0.47 acres Existing Site Development Site A contains a largely -vacant commercial/office building and a surface parking lot; Site B contains a surface parking lot. Use Permissions Mixed -use projects permitted by Section 41-2006 and Section 41-2007 of the SAMC. Zoning Code Sections Affected Uses Table 2A, SAMC Sec. 41-2007. SPR required pursuant to SAMC Sec. 41-2007, DBA required pursuant to SAMC Sec. 41-1600. Development Standards Transit Zoning Code, SAMC Sec. 41-2011 and 41-2023 Residential and Commercial Components Site A will contain 196 residential units, 12,350 square feet of commercial space, a resident and leasing lobby, site amenities, a bicycle storage room, and 309 parking spaces. The structure will contain seven stories and one basement level for parking. Resident amenities will include a large courtyard and pool, a rooftop amenity deck overlooking Fourth Street, and a large plaza at the corner of Fourth and Bush streets that can be programmed with outdoor dining and seating areas. The building has been designed with modern and traditional architectural elements that pay homage to the former Montgomery Ward Building, which was demolished to accommodate the current parking lot on the site. Site B is designed as a purely residential building and will contain 24 residential units and 23 onsite parking spaces. The building will also feature a lobby with resident amenities and is designed with a traditional architectural style with brick and contemporary elements such as steel and metal canopies, as well as metal and glass balconies on certain plan types of the one- and two -bedroom units. Of the development's maximum 220 units, approximately 45 will be studios (20 percent), 101 will be one -bedroom (46 percent), and 74 will be two -bedroom (34 percent). Units will range in average sizes from 570 square feet for the studio units, 625 to 800 square feet for the one - bedroom units, and 1,250 square feet for the two bedroom units. The overall parking proposed for the project, 332 spaces, provides a ratio of 1.51 parking spaces per residential unit. Based on the bedroom count, this ratio provides one parking space per bedroom in the development, with a surplus of 38 parking spaces (11 percent) that can be utilized for guest, employee, and/or onsite management parking. The applicant has also drafted a parking management plan that is described and evaluated in the Project Analysis section of this re po rt. Architecture and Amenities Both sites in the development have been carefully designed to be integrated within the existing development pattern in Downtown Santa Ana. Storefront widths, window heights, setbacks, and other architectural features have been carefully evaluated to ensure a seamless transition from Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 — Fourth and Main Mixed -Use Residential and Commercial Development November 19, 2019 Page 4 existing buildings to the new project. Site A's elevations feature articulation, multiple volumes, and varied architectural styles to mimic the appearance of multiple buildings rather than a solid, massive structure. A corner element facing the intersection of Fourth and Main streets will pay homage to the former Montgomery Ward building at the site; this element will feature a projected tower component and up -lighting. Site B's elevations have been carefully designed to resemble an older structure to complement other structures in Downtown, with contemporary elements in place. Both structures will feature durable metal siding, brick, glass, smooth stucco finishes, metal canopies, and textured blocks. The development will feature amenities commonly found at other upscale mixed -use developments in the region. These include a large courtyard with pool, spa, clubroom, fitness room, and landscaping in the center of Site A; an amenity deck overlooking Main Street on Site A; a clubroom and roof terrace on the 7th floor of Site A overlooking Fourth and Bush streets; a leasing office and lounge in Site A; a bike locker in Site A; and a ground -floor lobby and resident amenity area in Site B. The roof deck has been designed to accommodate future expansion in the event it can comply with Building and Fire codes, and is designed to accommodate a potential commercial tenant such as a cafe or lounge in the event separate plans for improvements are submitted. In addition, the project will feature enhanced sidewalks along the buildings' base, and the large, public ground -level courtyard at the corner of Fourth and Bush streets will feature paving materials and patterns that will match existing conditions on Fourth Street to ensure a seamless transition from the public right-of-way to the project. Additional amenity space may be incorporated into the project within the ground floor mezzanines and/or the roof top amenity deck. This concept will be included as a condition of approval and will be implemented when the project is submitted into building plan check. Site and Area Background The Transit Zoning Code was adopted in July 2010 and provides a framework for mixed -use, residential, commercial, and limited industrial activities in a large section of central Santa Ana loosely bound by Flower Street, the Santa Ana (1-5) Freeway, Civic Center Drive, Grand Avenue, and First Street. The plan area contains six sub -zones that allow various types and ranges of intensity, as well as two industrial overlay districts where industrial uses in place at the time of the code's adoption are allowed to continue. The Downtown sub -zone in which the project is proposed allows a variety of mixed -use developments that are intended to contribute to creating a dynamic, transit -oriented area for residents, business owners, and visitors, and to lessen the need for automobile dependence. Amendments to the Transit Zoning Code in July 2019 modernized certain sections of the code and further the goals and vision of the plan area. The original First American Title Company headquarters buildings (now connected as one) were constructed in 1931 and 1949; subsequent additions and remodels in 1966, 1976, and 1977 resulted in large portions of the building being concealed behind contemporary additions and fagade remodels. In 1960, the original Montgomery Ward building at the northeast corner of Fourth and Main streets was vacated as the department store relocated to the new Honer Plaza (now Bristol Marketplace) at Bristol and 17th streets; the building was later demolished in 1974 for the construction of the site's current surface parking lot. In August 2018, the applicant submitted the Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 — Fourth and Main Mixed -Use Residential and Commercial Development November 19, 2019 Page 5 proposed mixed -use development, which is the first major mixed -use, mixed -income development proposed in Downtown Santa Ana since the Transit Zoning Code was adopted in 2010. Since submitting the application, the applicant has met with nearby neighborhood associations, business leaders, historic preservation groups, and other interested parties. A full list of neighborhood outreach efforts and details on the Sunshine Ordinance community meeting is provided in Table 2 of this report. Option to Preserve Onsite Building Facades Following extensive input by local historic preservation groups and coordination among historic preservation groups, the developer, historic preservation advocates, and the City, the applicant has agreed to a careful and phased demolition of the buildings. Specifically, the applicant will remove fagade additions to the Orange County Title Company building, which was constructed in the early 1930s, in order to determine the integrity of the original fagade and interior components. Once removed, the applicant will employ consultants and historic preservation architects to prepare a report determining the feasibility of preserving the underlying facades and incorporating them into the project. Should portions of the Orange County Title Company building be intact and it is determined to be feasible to incorporate fagade portions into the project, the applicant has prepared an alternative to the proposed project that would preserve up to 50 feet of the Main Street and Fifth Street facades of the Orange County Title Company building to serve as the fagade and entry to the leasing office for Site A. This change would result in minor changes to the project, including the loss of two (2) residential units and their associated parking spaces. In addition, the developer has agreed to preserve intact interior building elements into the alternative, including decorative items and building components. Exhibits 7a and 8a in the Planning Commission staff report illustrate the fagade preservation alternative. Housing Opportunity Ordinance Compliance The City's inclusionary housing ordinance, known as the Housing Opportunity Ordinance (SAMC Sec. 41-1900 et seq.) applies to housing projects proposing five or more units that are also requesting an increase in allowable density or are in certain sections of the City that were "up - zoned" to allow additional residential development pursuant to an overlay zone or after November 28, 2011. As the proposed project is located in a section of the Transit Zoning Code area that was zoned for mixed -use development in July 2010 and is not in an overlay zone, and as the project does not propose an increase in allowable density, the Housing Opportunity Ordinance requirements of production of affordable housing do not apply to the proposed development. Conformance to Transit Zoning Code Development Standards The California Density Bonus law allows developers proposing five or more residential units to seek increases in base density for providing on -site housing units in exchange for providing affordable units on site. To help make constructing on -site affordable units feasible, the law allows developers to seek up to three incentives/concessions and an unlimited number of waivers, which are essentially variances from development standards that would help the project be built without significant burden and without detriment to public health. The first version of the Density Bonus Law Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 — Fourth and Main Mixed -Use Residential and Commercial Development November 19, 2019 Page 6 was adopted in 1979 and has since been amended at various times. Recent revisions allow affordable housing developers to request incentives/concessions and/or waivers for 100-percent affordable developments, even if they do not require a numerical density bonus. Moreover, in early 2017, the law was amended to restrict the ability of local jurisdictions to require studies to "justify" the density bonus and requested incentives/waivers and places the onus on local jurisdictions to prove that the incentives/concessions or waivers are not financially warranted. The project has been designed to conform to the development standards in the Transit Zoning Code, with the exception of the proposed onsite parking. However, pursuant to State of California Government Code Section 65915(p)(1) and 65915(p)(4), residential developments providing five - percent onsite affordable housing units at very -low income levels are entitled to provide onsite parking at the ratio of 1 stall for studio or one -bedroom units, and 2 stalls for two- to three - bedroom units. The applicant has elected to exercise the option to provide this parking ratio pursuant to the California Government Code through execution of a density bonus agreement. A full description of conformance to development standards is provided in Exhibit 10 to the Planning Commission staff report. Although the project is proposing a total number of units (220) that is below the maximum City - prescribed density for the project site based on its acreage, the developer is able to seek the parking standards incentive in the California Government Code because it is providing onsite affordable units. Pursuant to California Government Code sections 65915 (d)(1) and 65915 (e)(1), a local jurisdiction is limited in its ability to deny the requested parking ratio and is preempted from denying the Density Bonus Agreement application. Analysis Section 41-2005 of the SAMC requires developments proposing over four stories in height to apply for a Site Plan Review (SPR) with the Planning Commission. As the buildings in the proposed development contain five and seven stories, approval of a SPR application is required by the Planning Commission. In addition, the project is seeking approval of a density bonus agreement to commit five percent (11 units) of the residential component to very -low income households. Through this agreement, the applicant is seeking to exercise rights afforded under the California Government Code to allow a reduced parking ratio for the project. Pursuant to SAMC Section 41-1600, density bonus agreement applications that also request a "deviation" from development standards require Planning Commission review and approval prior to City Council approval of the density bonus agreement itself. State Density Bonus Law Under the State's Density Bonus Law, developers of affordable family -oriented housing projects may request a numerical density bonus up to 35 percent from base density. The proposed development is to construct 11 very -low income affordable units, which does not require approval of a numeric density bonus but makes the project eligible to seek parking incentives pursuant to the California Government Code. Pursuant to SAMC Sec. 41-1600, the purpose of the City's Density Bonus for Affordable Housing Ordinance is "to provide increased residential densities to developers who guarantee that a portion of their residential development will be available to low income, very low-income, or senior (also known as "qualified") households." SAMC Sec. 41- Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 — Fourth and Main Mixed -Use Residential and Commercial Development November 19, 2019 Page 7 1602(c)(5) requires that affordable units provided as part of a density bonus be "comparable" to any market rate units in the project. The proposed project complies with both the California Density Bonus Law and the City's Density Bonus for Affordable Housing Ordinance. As such, a Density Bonus Agreement has been prepared (Exhibit 4). The Developer has paid the City's Density Bonus Setup fee in the amount of $65,128.47 to prepare this agreement. Key Items in the Density Bonus Agreement The following is a list of key items agreed upon in the Density Bonus Agreement: • Affordable Units. The Project shall have eleven (11) affordable units which shall be comprised of three (3) studio units, (4) one -bedroom units, and four (4) two -bedroom units. The affordable units shall be restricted to use and occupancy by eligible households for a total period of no less than fifty-five (55) years including: o The affordable units in the Project shall at all times during the term of the Agreement be rented to very low-income tenants at 50% Area Median Income (AM I ). • Affordable Rent Schedule. The affordable rents shall be created in accordance with the Orange County, California Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area ("PMSA") as published by the California Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD"), adjusted for family size, and shall be updated no less than annually. • Marketing and Resident Selection Plan. Developer shall prepare and obtain City's approval a marketing program and resident selection plan for the leasing of the affordable units at the project prior to occupancy. • Selection of Tenants. The Developer shall give preference in leasing units to households that live and/or work in the City of Santa Ana or who have an active Housing Choice Voucher issued by the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Ana or any other Public Housing Authority. Implementation of the preference will be monitored by staff in the Community Development Agency. • Monitoring. Developer agrees to pay a reasonable fee for the City's obligation to monitor Owner's compliance with the affordability restrictions contained in the Agreement. • Rental Lease Agreement. Developer shall prepare and obtain City's approval of a rental Tease agreement consistent with the terms contained in this Density Bonus Agreement. • Onsite Parking Management Plan. Developer has provided a parking management plan attached to the agreement. The Density Bonus Agreement has been signed by the Developer to acknowledge their acceptance of the terms. The Agreement is not considered final until the City Council has reviewed and approved the Agreement and the Agreement is executed by all parties. Onsite Parking The City has identified the Transit Zoning Code area for high -intensity, mixed use development in order to reduce demands for parking and traffic impacts. To address community concerns regarding Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 — Fourth and Main Mixed -Use Residential and Commercial Development November 19, 2019 Page 8 the requested parking incentive pursuant to State Housing Law, the applicant prepared a parking study and parking management plan (PMP). As a result of the parking reduction requested, staff coordinated with the applicant to explore alternate options for providing additional offsite parking spaces, maximizing onsite parking spaces, and/or reducing parking demand on the project site. In response, Toll Brothers prepared a PMP that addresses incentives for reducing vehicle ownership, encouraging transit ridership, providing valet services onsite to maximize parking areas, and providing offsite parking spaces through long-term agreements with the City in nearby parking structures. The parking management plan indicates that, if needed, valet service for on -site vehicle stacking could create an additional 80 parking spaces, raising the total onsite parking spaces from 332 to 412. In addition, the PMP indicates that an additional 70 offsite parking spaces at a nearby City -owned parking structure could be leased on a long-term basis. When implemented, this results in an effective parking ratio of 1.83 parking spaces per residential unit with the onsite valet service, and 2.19 spaces per unit with the additional 70 offsite spaces, which exceeds the 2.15 per unit parking space requirement of the TZC. The proposed 1.51 initial, and 1.83 and 2.19 potential, parking space ratios are analyzed by a parking study submitted for the project. The parking study indicates that both parking rates will result in surplus parking onsite due to a variety of factors, including the project's: 1. Proximity to existing and future mass transit, which include standard bus service, high- capacity/express bus service, the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, and the under -construction OC Streetcar (light rail); 2. Location within a high ly-amen itized, mixed -use environment with shopping and major employment centers nearby; and 3. Proximity to nearby existing parking facilities, including parking structures, parking lots, and on -street parking. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT The proposed development required preparation of studies relating to shade and shadow, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions, cultural resources, traffic, parking, noise and vibration, Phase I environmental site assessment, hydrology, a preliminary water quality management plan, and sewer capacity. In addition, a fiscal impact and economic impact analysis was prepared by RSG, Inc. and The Concord Group. All studies evaluate the changes of the proposed revisions as compared to the existing entitlements and were reviewed for content and accuracy by the City. The technical studies evidenced that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Addendum to the previously -certified 2010 EIR is the appropriate CEQA document to evaluate and disclose the project's impacts. An addendum to a previously certified EIR is prepared when a lead agency is asked to approve modifications to an existing project for which an EIR has already been certified. An addendum evaluates the requested modifications and determines whether subsequent EIR review is Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 — Fourth and Main Mixed -Use Residential and Commercial Development November 19, 2019 Page 9 required. Pursuant to CEQA case law, an addendum applies the same thresholds as the original, certified EIR. (Citizens Against Airport Pollution v. City of San Jose (2014) 227 Cal.AppAth 788.) Moreover, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15162, when an EIR has been certified for a project, the City shall not require a subsequent or supplemental EIR or negative declaration for the project unless the lead agency determines that one or more of the following conditions are met: 1. Substantial project changes proposed that would result in new or substantially more severe impacts than disclosed in the previous EIR; 2. Substantial changes in circumstances that would result in new or substantially more severe impacts than disclosed in the previous EIR; or 3. Significant new information has come to light that shows there will be new or substantially more severe impacts than disclosed in the previous EIR. If some changes or additions to the previously prepared EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions specified above are met, the lead agency shall prepare an Addendum. In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, since none of the conditions specified in section 15162 are present, an Addendum to the previously -certified 2010 EIR is the appropriate form of environmental review for the First American project. The Addendum focuses on the potential environmental impacts associated with the project that might cause a change in the conclusions of the certified 2010 EIR, including changes in circumstances or new information of substantial importance that would substantially change those conclusions. The Addendum considers whether the project results in new or substantially more severe impacts than were disclosed in the 2010 EIR and finds that no supplemental or subsequent EIR is required for the proposed development. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15164(b), an addendum to a previously -certified EIR is not circulated for public review. The Addendum is included with this staff report as Attachment 9. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15164(d), the City Council must consider the Addendum together with the 2010 EIR before making a decision on the project. Previous CEQA Documentation The 2010 EIR (SCH No. 2006071100) was prepared to evaluate the potential impacts associated with the adoption of the Transit Zoning Code, which is anticipated to result in potential development of approximately 4,075 residential units, 387,000 sf of retail development, and an additional 15.5 acres of open space within the City. The 2010 EIR considers the environmental impacts relating to aesthetics; air quality; biological resources; cultural resources; hazards and hazardous materials; hydrology and water quality; land use; noise; population, housing, and employment; public services; transportation and traffic; utilities and service systems; and climate change. A mitigation monitoring and reporting program, findings of fact, and a statement of overriding consideration were adopted with the 2010 EIR. As part of the 2019 Addendum to the 2010 EIR, the original mitigation monitoring and reporting Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 — Fourth and Main Mixed -Use Residential and Commercial Development November 19, 2019 Page 10 program must be readopted by the Planning Commission; no changes to the mitigation measures were identified as necessary through review and preparation of the 2019 Addendum. Addendum Conclusions The First American Project Addendum concludes no new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed development when compared to those identified in the 2010 EIR. To fully evaluate the proposed project's impacts on the site's existing structures, a cultural resources study was prepared. Preparation of the cultural resources study for the proposed project was not required based on the fact that the site and its building are not eligible for listing as an historic resources and that the sites comprising the development are not within the boundaries of the Downtown National Historic Districts. The cultural resources study concludes that demolition of the building and clearing the sites will not result in any new, significant impacts or the need for new mitigation measures, and that due to the various additions and remodeling projects to the site's building, the building continues to be ineligible for listing on any local or national register of historic properties. Several past analyses reached similar conclusions, namely: 1. The site was not identified for inclusion in the Downtown National Historic Districts when established in December 1984; 2. The site was not identified as requiring special consideration or protection when the Transit Zoning Code was adopted in 2010 and the 2010 EIR was certified; and 3. The 2019 EIR Addendum's cultural resources study revisited the site and concluded, similar to the 1984 and 2010 analyses, that the site was ineligible for listing on any local or national historic register. Therefore, the 2010 EIR's MMRP will continue to mitigate or lessen any impacts already identified by the 2010 EIR. Following public input at the September 23, 2019 Planning Commission public hearing on the project, the cultural resources study was updated to enhance discussion of the onsite buildings and their historic prominence in Santa Ana. Moreover, two conditions of approval are proposed in order to establish a careful demolition process, public notification, fagade preservation opportunities, interior building element preservation and salvage opportunities, and provide photo -documentation. PUBLIC OUTREACH A community meeting was held on June 18, 2018 at 5:30 p.m. at the project site in accordance with the provisions of the City's Sunshine Ordinance. Invitations/notices were mailed to property owners and occupants/tenants in a 500-foot radius from the project site. Approximately 17 members of the public attended, as well as 4 City staff. The applicant provided all the required information to the City after the meeting. Details from the community meeting were posted to the project's webpage at https://www.santa-ana.orq/pb/planning-division/major-planning-proiects- and-documents/first-american-title-co-site-downtown. In addition, Planning Commission public hearings were held for the project on September 23 and on October 28, 2019. A work-study session was subsequently held on October 14, 2019, during Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 — Fourth and Main Mixed -Use Residential and Commercial Development November 19, 2019 Page 11 which members of the community expressed general support for preserving onsite structures to the extent possible and for the overall mixed -use development. Finally, the applicant met with seven interested groups, neighborhoods, and/or individuals between June 2018 and October 2019. Meetings include those with: • Downtown, Lacy, French Park, and Logan neighborhood associations; • Downtown business owners, Santa Ana Business Council, and Downtown Inc.; and • Local historic preservation representatives STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #3 - Economic Development, Objective #2 (create new opportunities for business/job growth and encourage private development through new General Plan and Zoning Ordinance policies). Approval of this item also supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #5 - Community Health, Livability, Engagement & Sustainability; Objective #3 (facilitate diverse housing opportunities and support efforts to preserve and improve the livability of Santa Ana neighborhoods). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with approval of these actions. Minh Thai Executive Director Planning and Building Agency Steven A. Mendoza Executive Director Community Development Agency AP la SRFCA\11-19-19\First American\PBA SPIR 19-01 DBA 19-01 First American 11192019. docx Exhibits: 1. Resolution — El Addendum 2. Resolution — Site Plan Review and Density Bonus Agreement 3. Planning Commission Staff Report, including Exhibits 4. Density Bonus Agreement *:1:111111i1 LS 10.28.19 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2019-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE PROJECT (SCH NO. 2006071100) FOR THE FIRST AMERICAN MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT 114 EAST FIFTH STREET AND 117 EAST FIFTH STREET, AND RE -ADOPTION OF THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM WHEREAS, Michael McCann, representing Toll Brothers Apartment Living (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant'), is requesting approval of Site Plan Review No. 2019-01, as conditioned, and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01, as conditioned, to allow the construction of a new mixed -use residential and commercial development containing up to 220 residential units at 114 and 117 East Fifth Street; and WHEREAS, the subject Property contains 2.78 acres containing two sites at 114 and 117 East Fifth Street, currently developed with a commercial office building and surface parking lots; and WHEREAS, the Transit Zoning Code was adopted in 2010 as a result of interest in developing mixed -use residential and commercial projects in its project area. The Transit Zoning Code was amended in 2019 to modernize and refine development standards to further these interests. The regulating plan, which establishes land uses and development standards, allows a variety of housing and commercial projects, including mixed -use residential communities, live/work units, hotels, and offices; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana certified the Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2006071100) and adopted a mitigation monitoring reporting program for the Transit Zoning Code, which allows a mixture of residential, commercial, and industrial land uses; and WHEREAS, the entitlements sought for the proposed mixed -use development project include a Site Plan Review application and a Density Bonus Agreement application; and WHEREAS, in 2010, the City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report ("2010 EIR") for the Transit Zoning Code Project ("Originally Approved Plan"), which analyzed the potentially significant environmental impacts of a mixed -use plan area consisting of new residential, commercial, and industrial development; and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 1 of 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to the 2010 EIR, the subject site may be developed with a mixed -use development consisting of residential and commercial land uses; and WHEREAS, when compared against the Originally Approved Plan, the proposed mixed -use development will not result in any new or intensified significant impacts; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public, Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15000 et seq.), the City is the Lead Agency for the proposed development; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA, when taking subsequent discretionary actions in furtherance of a project for which an EIR has already been certified, the Lead Agency is prohibited from requiring a subsequent or supplemental EIR unless at least one of the circumstances identified in Public Resources Code section 21166 or State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 are present; and WHEREAS, City staff has evaluated the proposed project and considered whether, in light of the impacts associated with its development, any supplemental or subsequent environmental review is required pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 or State CEQA Guidelines section 15162; and WHEREAS, the analysis contained in the First American Title Company EIR Addendum ("2019 Addendum") concluded that none of the circumstances described in Public Resources Code section 21166 or State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 have occurred, and thus no supplemental or subsequent EIR is required; and WHEREAS, on September 23, 2019 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and continued the matter to October 28, 2019 and held a work- study session on the item on October 14, 2019; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019 at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the 2019 Addendum when recommending that the City Council approve the Project; and WHEREAS, on November 19, 2019 at a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council considered the 2019 Addendum and Mitigation Monitoring And Reporting Program; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 2 of 7 Section 2. State CEQA Guidelines section 15164 requires lead agencies to prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions to the project are necessary, but none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR are present. The City Council has reviewed and considered the 2010 EIR and the 2019 Addendum, and finds that these documents taken together contain a complete and accurate reporting of all of the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed development. The City Council further finds that the 2019 Addendum has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The City Council further finds and determines that the Addendum reflects the City's independent judgment. Section 3. Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not limited to the 2010 EIR and the 2019 Addendum, the City Council finds that an addendum is the appropriate document for disclosing the changes to the subject property, and that none of the conditions identified in Public Resources Code section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 requiring subsequent environmental review have occurred, because: (a) The proposed development does not constitute a substantial change that would require major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. (b) There is not a substantial change with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed development will be developed that would require major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects. (c) New information of substantial importance has not been presented that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the 2010 EIR was certified or adopted, showing any of the following: (i) that the modifications would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the earlier environmental documentation; (ii) that significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the earlier environmental documentation; (iii) that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the applicant declined to adopt such measures; or (iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed previously would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but which the applicant declined to adopt. Section 4. The City Council hereby finds that mitigation measures identified in the 2010 EIR remain applicable to the Transit Zoning Code. These findings are laid out Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 3 of 7 more specifically in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") attached hereto as Exhibit A. The City Council therefore hereby re -adopts those mitigation measures identified as remaining applicable to the Transit Zoning Code, through the MMRP attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Section 5. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the 2019 Addendum, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. Section 6. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. Section 7. The City Council directs staff to prepare, execute and file a CEQA Notice of Determination with the Orange County Clerk's Office within five (5) working days of City Council approval of the First American Mixed -Use Development Project. Section 8. The 2010 EIR and the 2019 Addendum, and any other documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which these findings have been based are on file, are incorporated herein by reference and are available for public review at Santa Ana City Hall, Planning and Building Agency, M20, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701. The custodian of these records is Daisy Gomez, City Clerk for the City. Section 9. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this resolution. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 4 of 7 ADOPTED this day of 2019. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on 12019. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM The 2010 Transit Zoning Code EIR Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is available online at: https://www. santa-ana.org/transit-zoning-code-environmental-impact-report Or by visiting: Planning and Building Agency — Planning Division Public Counter 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 6 of 7 *4: 11 '.111 A FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY EIR ADDENDUM The First American Title Company Project EIR Addendum and Technical Appendices are available online at: https://www.santa-ana.org/pb/planning-division/major-planning-projects-and- documents/fi rst-american-title-co-site-downtown Or by visiting: Planning and Building Agency — Planning Division Public Counter 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 7 of 7 *:1:11-31111V LS 10.28.19 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2019-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 2019- 01 AS CONDITIONED AND APPROVING DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT NO. 2019-01 AS CONDITIONED FOR A NEW MIXED -USE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 114 EAST FIFTH STREET (SITE A) AND 117 EAST FIFTH STREET (SITE B) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Michael McCann, representing Toll Brothers Apartment Living (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant'), is requesting approval of Site Plan Review No. 2019-01, as conditioned, and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01, as conditioned, to allow the construction of a new mixed -use residential and commercial development containing up to 220 residential units at 114 and 117 East Fifth Street. B. The Transit Zoning Code was adopted in 2010 as a result of interest in developing mixed -use residential and commercial projects in its project area. The Transit Zoning Code was amended in 2019 to modernize and refine development standards to further these interests. The regulating plan, which establishes land uses and development standards, allows a variety of housing and commercial projects, including mixed -use residential communities, live/work units, hotels, and offices. C. The California Density Bonus law allows developers to seek increases in base density for providing on -site housing units in exchange for providing affordable units on site. To help make constructing on -site affordable units feasible, the law allows developers to seek incentives/concessions or waivers that would help the project be built without significant burden and without detriment to public health. D. On September 23, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing and at that time considered all testimony, written and oral, and continued the matter to October 28, 2019 while holding a work-study session on the matter on October 14, 2019. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 1 of 11 E. On October 28, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing and at that time considered all testimony, written and oral, and recommended that the City Council approve Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 as conditioned, and recommended City Council approval of Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 as conditioned. F. On November 19, 2019, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing and at that time considered all testimony, written and oral. G. Sections 41-2007 and 41-593.5 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) requires a review by the Planning Commission of all plans for developments of over four stories within the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84) to ensure the project is in conformity with the overlay zone plan. H. The zoning designation for the subject property is Specific Development No. 84, Downtown sub -zone. The City Council determines that pursuant to SAMC Sections 41-2007 and 41-593.5, the project is in compliance with all applicable development standards outlined within the Specific Development Plan (SD No. 84/Transit Zoning Code), with the exception of required on -site residential parking, which, pursuant to the California Government Code sections 65915 through 65918, may be reduced through approval of the requested Density Bonus Agreement application. J. The City Council hereby determines that the following findings, which must be established in order to grant this Density Bonus Agreement pursuant to SAMC Section 41-1607, have been established for Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 to allow construction of the proposed project: 1. That the proposed development will materially assist in accomplishing the goal of providing affordable housing opportunities in economically balanced communities throughout the city. The proposed development will provide up to 209 market - rate rental units and 11 very -low income affordable units, contributing toward the City's rental housing stock to serve the needs of diverse and underserved populations. The area in which the project is proposed, the Transit Zoning Code plan area, currently contains several entitled or constructed affordable and market -rate residential communities. The construction of this project will contribute toward an economically balanced community by providing housing for Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 2 of 11 different demographic and income levels in an area rich with employment opportunities, commercial development, and market -rate housing. 2. That the development will not be inconsistent with the purpose of the underlying zone or applicable designation in the general plan land use element. The project site is located in an area already identified in both the City's Zoning Code (the Transit Zoning Code) and General Plan (the Land Use and Housing elements) for new residential communities. Moreover, the proposed densities of 84 and 50 units per acre on Site A and Site B, respectively, is consistent with the anticipated development intensity of 90 units per acre in the General Plan Land Use element, and is below the density bonus provisions in the California Density Bonus Law for family -oriented projects (35-percent density bonus) and in the City's Housing Opportunity Ordinance (35- percent density bonus). 3. That the deviation is necessary to make it economically feasible for the Applicant to utilize a density bonus authorized for the development pursuant to section 41-1603. The proposed project requires one deviation through incentives/concessions for a reduction in required on -site (off-street) parking. The deviation is described as follows: Constructing 2.0 parking spaces per residential unit and 0.15 guest parking spaces per residential unit on the project site would require the developer to construct an additional level of parking either above- or below -grade, resulting in increased construction costs and/or a loss of an entire level of residential units. The City has identified the Transit Zoning Code area for high -intensity, mixed -use development in order to reduce demands for parking and traffic impacts. To address the parking reduction requested by the Applicant pursuant to State Housing Law, the Applicant prepared a parking study and parking management plan (PMP). The PMP adequately outlines measurable means to provide additional parking through additional onsite valet parking, off - site parking, or a combination thereof, raising the effective parking ratios to a minimum of 2.15 parking spaces per residential unit if fully implemented. As a result of the parking reduction requested, staff coordinated with the Applicant to explore alternate options Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 3 of 11 for providing additional off -site parking spaces, maximizing on -site parking spaces, and/or reducing parking demand on the project site. In response, Toll Brothers prepared a PMP that addresses incentives for reducing vehicle ownership, encouraging transit ridership, providing valet services on -site to maximize parking areas, and providing off -site parking spaces through long-term agreements with the City in nearby parking structures. Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not limited to the 2010 EIR and the 2019 Addendum, the City Council finds that an addendum is the appropriate document for disclosing the changes to the subject properties, and that none of the conditions identified in Public Resources Code section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 requiring subsequent environmental review have occurred, because: A. The project does not constitute a substantial change that would require major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. B. There is not a substantial change with respect to the circumstances under which the project will be developed that would require major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects. C. New information of substantial importance has not been presented that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the 2010 EIR was certified or adopted, showing any of the following: (i) that the modifications would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the earlier environmental documentation; (ii) that significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the earlier environmental documentation; (iii) that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the Applicant declined to adopt such measures; or (iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed previously would Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 4 of 11 substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but which the Applicant declined to adopt. Section 3. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. Section 4. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and recommends approval of Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 as conditioned in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth herein. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Council Action dated November 19, 2019, and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this resolution. ADOPTED this day of , 2019. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 5 of 11 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on 12019. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 6 of 11 EXHIBIT A Conditions for Approval for Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 are approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with applicable sections of the Santa Ana Munic;pal Code, the California Administrative Code, the California Building Standards Code, and all other applicable regulations. In addition, it shall meet the following conditions of approval: The Applicant must comply with each and every condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by this site plan review. The Applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the development project. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the site plan review. A. Planning Division 1. All proposed site improvements must conform to the Development Project Review approval of DP No. 2018-20. 2. Any amendment to this site plan review, including modifications to approved materials, finishes, architecture, site plan, landscaping, unit count, mix, and square footages must be submitted to the Planning Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief is available or if the site plan review must be amended. 3. A residential property manager shall be on site at all times that the project is occupied and the developer and on -site management shall at all times maintain a 24-hour emergency contact and contact information on file with the City. 4. All mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from public and courtyard areas. 5. A final detailed amenity plan must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of any building permits. The plan shall include details on the hardscape design, lighting concepts and outdoor furniture for amenity, plaza, or courtyard areas as well as an installation plan. The exact specifications for these items are subject to the review and approval by the Planning Division. 6. Prior to installation of landscaping, the Applicant shall submit photos and specifications of all trees to be installed on the project site for review and approval by the Planning Division. Specifications shall include, at a minimum, the species, box size (24 inches minimum), brown trunk height (10-foot minimum), and name and location of the supplier. 7. After project occupancy, landscaping and hardscape materials must be maintained as shown on the approved landscape plans. 8. A Resident Storage Plan shall be provided for the project prior to occupancy. Storage shall be available at no cost to the residents. 9. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit a construction schedule and staging plan to the Planning Division for review and approval. The plan shall include construction hours, staging areas, parking and site security/screening during project construction. 10. Prior to any structural modification activities, including removal of the 1970s-era First American Title fagade, the Applicant shall retain, at its sole expense, a professional who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualifications Standards ("Professional"). The Professional should have experience in architectural historic preservation and adaptive re -use of historic structures. The Professional shall be onsite to monitor the controlled removal of the 1970s-era First American Title fagade from the exterior of the west building at First American Square. The exterior shall be removed in such a way as to determine if any original materials or features from the 1930s-era building remain underneath the current exterior of the building. The Professional shall assess the structural integrity of the building and whether it can be incorporated into the Project in the manner depicted in Applicant's Preservation Alternative. After removal of the First American Title fagade, no further structural demolition or construction shall occur until the Professional has prepared a report addressing the structural integrity of the building and whether it can be safely incorporated into the Project as depicted in the Applicant's Preservation Alternative ("Recommendation Report"). If the Professional concludes that the 1930s-era building can be safely and feasibly incorporated into the Project as depicted in the Applicant's Preservation Alternative, the Applicant shall implement said Alternative. If the Professional concludes that the 1930s-era building cannot be safely incorporated into the Project, the Professional shall submit the Recommendation Report to the City to document the results of the assessment. The Professional's Recommendation Report shall also address whether any exterior or interior building materials and/or features warrant further documentation prior to demolition, and shall document those materials and/or features in accordance with the requirements of the Historic American Building Survey. Archival copies of these photographs and the Professional's Recommendation Report documenting these efforts shall be submitted to the Santa Ana History Room so that they may be archived and available to the public. The Applicant may commence construction activities, including building demolition, thirty (30) days after completion and submittal of the Recommendation Report to the City, subject to compliance with the notice and meeting requirements of Condition 10A, below. 10A. Five (5) calendar days prior to removing the 1970s-era First American Title fagade, the Applicant shall provide written and electronic notice of the start date for the removal work to the following organizations and the City: Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency, Santa Ana Planning Commission, Santa Ana Historic Resources Commission, Santa Ana Historical Preservation Society, and Preserve Orange County. Notice shall be provided via email if available and in writing and delivered by overnight delivery to the address on record with the City for each named organization. Upon completion of the fagade removal work and the Recommendation Report described in Condition 10, the Applicant shall provide a copy of the Recommendation Report to the above -named organizations and the City, and shall schedule a meeting of all recipients of the Recommendation Report to discuss the findings of said report and the Applicant's decision whether it can implement the Applicant's Preservation Alternative. The meeting shall be held at least seven (7) calendar days after delivery of the Recommendation Report but no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after delivery of the Recommendation Report. 11. The Project shall include a publicly -accessible amenity area available to the public non-profit organizations four (4) times per calendar year, upon agreement by the non-profit organization(s) and Applicant. Any revisions to the proposed projects to include said amenity area, or any required modifications to accommodate said amenity area, shall be reviewed for substantial conformance during Building Division plan check. 12. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy issuance, public art shall be installed on the project site at a value of one -tenth of one percent (0.10%) of the total valuation of both buildings. The art may be installed on one or both of the project sites (Site A and/or Site B). The selection, design, and installation of the art shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning and Building Agency, the Community Development Agency, and the Applicant. 13. Residents of both development sites in the Project (Site A and Site B) shall have access to resident amenities and open space areas in both sites in perpetuity. 14. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a Property Maintenance Agreement must be recorded against the property. The agreement will be subject to review and applicability by the Planning and Building Agency, the Community Development Agency, the Public Works Agency, and the City Attorney to ensure that the property and all improvements located thereupon are properly maintained, Developer (and the owner of the property upon which the authorized use and/or authorized improvements are located if different from the Applicant) shall execute a Maintenance Agreement with the City of Santa Ana which shall be recorded against the property and which shall be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney. The Maintenance Agreement shall contain covenants, conditions and restrictions relating to the following: (a) Compliance with operational conditions applicable during any period(s) of construction or major repair (e.g., proper screening and securing of the construction site; implementation of proper erosion control, dust control and noise mitigation measura; adherence to approved project phasing etc.); (b) Compliance with ongoing operational conditions, requirements and restrictions, as applicable (including but not limited to hours of operation, security requirements, the proper storage and disposal of trash and debris, enforcement of the parking management plan, and/or restrictions on certain uses, (c) Ongoing compliance with approved design and construction parameters, signage parameters and restrictions as well as landscape designs, as applicable; (d) Ongoing maintenance, repair and upkeep of the property and all improvements located thereupon (including but not limited to controls on the proliferation of trash and debris about the property; the proper and timely removal of graffiti; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of damaged, vandalized and/or weathered buildings, structures and/or improvements; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of exterior paint, parking striping, lighting and irrigation fixtures, walls and fencing, publicly accessible bathrooms and bathroom fixtures, landscaping and related landscape improvements and the like, as applicable); (e) If Developer and the owner of the property are different (e.g., if the Applicant is a tenant or licensee of the property or any portion thereof), both the Applicant and the owner of the property shall be signatories to the Maintenance Agreement and both shall be jointly and severally liable for compliance with its terms. (f) The Maintenance Agreement shall further provide that any party responsible for complying with its terms shall not assign its ownership interest in the property or any interest in any lease, sublease, license or sublicense, unless the prospective assignee agrees in writing to assume all of the duties, obligations and responsibilities set forth under the Maintenance Agreement. (g) The Maintenance Agreement shall contain provisions relating to the enforcement of its conditions by the City and shall also contain provisions authorizing the City to recover costs and expenses which the City may incur arising out of any enforcement and/or remediation efforts which the City may undertake in order to cure any deficiency in maintenance, repair or upkeep or to enforce any restrictions or conditions upon the use of the property. The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any unreimbursed costs and/or expenses incurred by the City to cure a deficiency in maintenance or to enforce use restrictions shall become a lien upon the property in an amount equivalent to the actual costs and/or expense incurred by the City. (h) The execution and recordation of the Maintenance Agreement shall be a condition precedent to the issuance of final approval for any construction permit related to this entitlement. *:1:11-31111111110 REQUEST FOR Planning Commission Action PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 2019 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING — SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 2019-01 AND DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT APPLICATION NO. 2019-01 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT AT 114 AND 117 EAST FIFTH STREET {STRATEGIC PLAN NOS. 3, 2; 5, 3) Prepared by Ali Pezeshkpour Executive Director RECOMMENDED ACTION PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Set Public Hearing For DENIED ❑ Applicant's Request ❑ Staff Recommendation CONTINUED TO Plan'King tanager 1. Recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution approving and adopting an addendum to the Environment Impact Report for the Transit Zoning Code Project (SCH NO. 2006071100) and re - adoption of a mitigation monitoring and reporting program. 2. Recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 as conditioned. 3. Recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution recommending City Council approval of Density Bonus Agreement Application No. 2019-01. Executive Summary Michael McCann, representing Toll Brothers Apartment Living, is requesting approval of a site plan review (SPR) and a density bonus agreement (DBA) to allow the construction of a mixed -use development consisting of two separate buildings located on two development sites at 114 (Site A) and 117 (Site B) East Fifth Street, respectively, which would contain a total of up to 220 residential rental units and 12,350 square feet of commercial space. As proposed, the project requires approval of one waiver from the Transit Zoning Code's development standards through the density bonus agreement pursuant to California Government Code sections 65915 through 65918 and Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Section 41-1600. Staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request due to the project's satisfaction of meeting the intent of the Transit Zoning Code to promote a pedestrian -oriented environment with a mix of land uses and because the project will provide additional affordable rental housing stock to an underserved segment of the region's population. SPR No. 2019-01/DBA No. 2019-01 — First American Title Co. Development October 28, 2019 Page 2 Table 1: Protect and Location Information t Project Address 114 and 117 East Fifth Street Nearest Intersection Fifth and Main streets and Fifth and Bush streets General Plan Designation District Center (DC) Zoning Designation Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84), Downtown sub - zone Commercial North Surrounding Land Uses Mixed -Use and Parkin East Commercial South Commercial and Parkin West Site Size 2.78 acres combined Site A: 2.31; Site B: 0.47 acres Existing Site Development Site A contains a largely -vacant commercial/office building and a surface parking lot; Site B contains a surface parking lot. Use Permissions Mixed -use projects permitted by Section 41-2006 and Section 41-2007 of the SAMC. Zoning Code Sections Affected Uses Table 2A, SAMC Sec. 41-2007. SPR required pursuant to SAMC Sec. 41-2007; DBA required pursuant to SAMC Sec. 41-1600. Development Standards Transit Zoning Code, SAMC Sec. 41-2011 and 41-2023 Planning Commission Action On September 23, 2019 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the project. The project was continued to October 28, 2019 to provide ample time to address four areas of concern: onsite amenities, the requested density bonus agreement, historic preservation options, and parking. Following the September 23 public hearing, the developer met with local historic preservation group representatives and City staff to discuss options to preserve and incorporate any intact fagade and interior building components into the project. At a work-study session on October 14, 2019, City staff presented additional details on the four areas of concern, and the public provided additional input on the project, voicing general support but expressing a strong desire to incorporate any intact, historic elements into the project. One week later on October 21, 2019, the developer presented a project alternative that includes an option to preserve two portions of the underlying building into the project, which was received positively by most historic preservation groups in attendance. Additional details are provided in the "Option to Preserve Onsite Building Facades" subsection on Page 4 of this report. Project Description The project includes demolition and removal of the former and now largely -vacant First American Title Company headquarters building at 114 East Fifth Street, and removal of a surface parking lot at 117 East Fifth Street. However, a careful and phased demolition of the site is intended to reveal whether portions of the existing structures onsite can be incorporated into the overall project through fagade preservation. Additional details are provided in the "Option to Preserve Onsite Building Facades" subsection on Page 4 of this report. SPR No. 2019-01/DBA No. 2019-01 — First American Title Co. Development October 28, 2019 Page 3 Once the onsite buildings are dismantled and the sites are cleared, the applicant proposes to construct a mixed -use development community on two development sites, Site A and Site B, containing up to 220 residential units, 12,350 square feet of leasable commercial area, and 332 onsite parking spaces. Residential and Commercial Components Site A will contain 196 residential units, 12,350 square feet of commercial space, a resident and leasing lobby, site amenities, a bicycle storage room, and 309 parking spaces. The structure will contain seven stories and one basement level for parking. Resident amenities will include a large courtyard and pool, a rooftop amenity deck overlooking Fourth Street, and a large plaza at the corner of Fourth and Bush streets that can be programmed with outdoor dining and seating areas. The building has been designed with modern and traditional architectural elements that pay homage to the former Montgomery Ward Building, which was demolished to accommodate the current parking lot on the site. Site B is designed as a purely residential building and will contain 24 residential units and 23 onsite parking spaces. The building will also feature a lobby with resident amenities and is designed with a traditional architectural style with brick and contemporary elements such as steel and metal canopies, as well as metal and glass balconies on certain plan types of the one- and two -bedroom units. Of the development's maximum 220 units, approximately 45 will be studios (20 percent), 101 will be one -bedroom (46 percent), and 74 will be two -bedroom (34 percent). Units will range in average sizes from 570 square feet for the studio units, 625 to 800 square feet for the one -bedroom units, and 1,250 square feet for the two bedroom units. The overall parking proposed for the project, 332 spaces, provides a ratio of 1.51 parking spaces per residential unit. Based on the bedroom count, this ratio provides one parking space per bedroom in the development, with a surplus of 38 parking spaces (11 percent) that can be utilized for guest, employee, and/or onsite management parking. The applicant has also drafted a parking management plan that is described and evaluated in the Project Analysis section of this report. Architecture and Amenities Both sites in the development have been carefully designed to be integrated within the existing development pattern in Downtown Santa Ana. Storefront widths, window heights, setbacks, and other architectural features have been carefully evaluated to ensure a seamless transition from existing buildings to the new project. The buildings' architecture is designed to lessen the massing of the project. Site A's elevations feature articulation, multiple volumes, and varied architectural styles to mimic the appearance of multiple buildings rather than a solid, massive structure. A corner element facing the intersection of Fourth and Main streets will pay homage to the former Montgomery Ward building at the site; this element will feature a projected tower component and up -lighting to enhance the prominence of the building at the intersection. Site B's elevations have been carefully designed to resemble an older structure to complement other structures in Downtown, with contemporary elements in places. Both structures will feature durable metal siding, brick, glass, smooth stucco finishes, metal canopies, and textured blocks. The development will feature amenities commonly found at other upscale mixed -use developments in the region. These include a large courtyard with pool, spa, clubroom, fitness room, and landscaping in the center of Site A; an amenity deck overlooking Main Street on Site A; a clubroom and roof terrace on the 7th floor of Site A overlooking Fourth and Bush streets; a leasing office and lounge in Site A; a bike locker in Site A; and a ground -floor lobby and resident amenity area in Site B. The roof deck has been designed to accommodate future expansion in the event it can comply with Building and Fire codes, and is designed to accommodate a potential tenant such as a cafe or lounge in the event separate plans for improvements are submitted. In addition, the project will feature enhanced sidewalks along the buildings' bases, and the large, public ground - level courtyard at the corner of Fourth and Bush streets will feature paving materials and patterns that will match existing conditions on Fourth Street to ensure a seamless transition from the public right-of-way to the project. Additional amenity space may be incorporated into the project within the ground floor mezzanines and/or the roof top amenity deck. This concept will be included as a condition of approval and will be implemented when the project is submitted into building plan check. Option to Preserve Onsite Building Facades Following extensive input by local historic preservation groups and coordination among historic preservation groups, the developer, historic preservation advocates, and the City, the applicant has agreed to a careful and phased demolition of the buildings onsite. Specifically, the applicant will remove fagade additions to the Orange County Title Company building, which was constructed in the early 1930s, in order to determine the integrity of the original fagade and interior components. Once removed, the applicant will employ consultants and historic preservation architects to prepare a report determining the feasibility of preserving the underlying facades and incorporating them into the project. Should portions of the Orange County Title Company building be intact and it is determined to be feasible to incorporate fagade portions into the project, the applicant has prepared an alternative to the proposed project that would be constructed instead. The alternative would preserve up to 50 feet of the Main Street and Fifth Street facades of the Orange County Title Company building to serve as the fagade and entry to the leasing office for Site A. This change would result in minor changes to the project, including the loss of two (2) residential units and their associated parking spaces. In addition, the developer has agreed to preserve intact interior building elements into the alternative, including decorative items and building components. Exhibits 7a and 8a illustrate the fagade preservation alternative. SPR No. 2019-01/DBA No. 2019-01 — First American Title Co. Development October 28, 2019 Page 5 Housing Opportunity Ordinance Compliance The City's inclusionary housing ordinance, known as the Housing Opportunity Ordinance (SAMC Sec. 41-1900 et seq.) applies to housing projects proposing five or more units that are also requesting an increase in allowable density or are in certain sections of the City that were "up - zoned" to allow additional residential development pursuant to an overlay zone or after November 28, 2011. As the proposed project is located in a section of the Transit Zoning Code area that was zoned for mixed -use development in July 2010 and is not in an overlay zone, and as the project does not propose an increase in allowable density, the Housing Opportunity Ordinance requirements of production of affordable housing do not apply to the proposed development. However, in an effort to respond to local housing needs based on the City's 2014 Housing Element, the applicant is voluntarily proposing to dedicate five percent (11 units) of the development to be attainable for very -low income households. The applicant will enter into a voluntary density bonus agreement (DBA), described and analyzed in the Project Analysis section of this staff report, to ensure the units are dedicated to such affordability levels for a period of a minimum of 55 years. Conformance to Transit Zoning Code Development Standards The California Density Bonus law allows developers proposing five or more residential units to seek increases in base density for providing on -site housing units in exchange for providing affordable units on site. To help make constructing on -site affordable units feasible, the law allows developers to seek up to three incentives/concessions and an unlimited number of waivers, which are essentially variances from development standards that would help the project be built without significant burden and without detriment to public health. The first version of the Density Bonus Law was adopted in 1979 and has since been amended at various times. Recent revisions allow affordable housing developers to request incentives/concessions and/or waivers for 100-percent affordable developments, even if they do not require a numerical density bonus. Moreover, in early 2017, the law was amended to restrict the ability of local jurisdictions to require studies to "justify" the density bonus and requested incentives/waivers and places the onus on local jurisdictions to prove that the incentives/concessions or waivers are not financially warranted. The project has been designed to conform to the development standards in the Transit Zoning Code, with the exception of the proposed onsite parking. However, pursuant to State of California Government Code Section 65915(p)(1) and 65915(p)(4), residential developments providing five - percent onsite affordable housing units at very -low income levels are entitled to provide onsite parking at the ratio of 1 stall for studio or one -bedroom units, and 2 stalls for two- to three -bedroom units. The applicant has elected to exercise the option to provide this parking ratio pursuant to the California Government Code through execution of a density bonus agreement. A. full description of conformance to development standards is provided in Exhibit 10 to this staff report. Although the project is proposing a total number of units (220) that is below the maximum City - prescribed density for the project site based on its acreage, the developer is able to seek the parking standards incentive in the California Government Code because it is providing onsite affordable units. SPR No. 2019-01/DBA No. 2019-01 — First American Title Co. Development October 28, 2019 Page 6 Pursuant to California Government Code sections 65915 (d)(1) and 65915 (e)(1), a local jurisdiction is limited in its ability to deny the requested parking ratio and is preempted from denying the Density Bonus Agreement application. Project and Site Background The Transit Zoning Code was adopted in July 2010 and provides a framework for mixed -use, residential, commercial, and limited industrial activities in a large section of central Santa Ana loosely bound by Flower Street, the Santa Ana (1-5) Freeway, Civic Center Drive, Grand Avenue, and First Street. The plan area contains six sub -zones that allow various types and ranges of intensity, as well as two industrial overlay districts where industrial uses in place at the time of the code's adoption are allowed to continue. The Downtown sub -zone in which the project is proposed allows a variety of mixed -use developments that are intended to contribute to creating a dynamic, transit -oriented area for residents, business owners, and visitors, and to lessen the need for automobile dependence. Amendments to the Transit Zoning Code in July 2019 modernized certain sections of the code and further the goals and vision of the plan area. The original First American Title Company headquarters buildings (now connected as one) were constructed in 1931 and 1949; subsequent additions and remodels in 1966, 1976, and 1977 resulted in large portions of the building being concealed behind contemporary additions and fagade remodels. In 1960, the original Montgomery Ward building at the northeast corner of Fourth and Main streets was vacated as the department store relocated to the new Honer Plaza (now Bristol Marketplace) at Bristol and 17th streets; the building was later demolished in 1974 for the construction of the site's current surface parking lot. In August 2018, the applicant submitted the proposed mixed -use development, which is the first major mixed -use, mixed -income development proposed in Downtown Santa Ana since the Transit Zoning Code was adopted in 2010. Since submitting the application, the applicant has met with nearby neighborhood associations, business leaders, and other interested parties. A full list of neighborhood outreach efforts and details on the Sunshine Ordinance community meeting is provided in Table 2 of this report. Analysis of the Issues Section 41-2005 of the SAMC requires developments proposing over four stories in height to apply for a Site Plan Review (SPR) with the Planning Commission. As the buildings in the proposed development contain five and seven stories, approval of a SPR application is required by the Planning Commission. In addition, the project is seeking approval of a density bonus agreement to voluntarily commit five percent (11 units) of the residential component to very -low income households. Through this voluntary commitment, the applicant is seeking to exercise rights afforded under the California Government Code to allow a reduced parking ratio for the project. Pursuant to SAMC Section 41- 1600, density bonus agreement applications that also request a "deviation" from development standards require Planning Commission review and approval prior to City Council approval of the density bonus agreement itself. SPR No. 2019-01/DBA No. 2019-01 — First American Title Co. Development October 28, 2019 Page 7 State Density Bonus Law Under the State's Density Bonus Law, developers of affordable family -oriented housing projects may request a numerical density bonus up to 35 percent from base density. The proposed development is to construct 11 very -low income affordable units, which does not require approval of a numeric density bonus but makes the project eligible to seek parking incentives pursuant to the California Government Code. Pursuant to SAMC Sec. 41-1600, the purpose of the City's ordinance is "to provide increased residential densities to developers who guarantee that a portion of their residential development will be available to low income, very low-income, or senior (also known as "qualified") households." Moreover, "The regulations are intended to...provide a balance of housing opportunities for low income, very low-income, and senior households throughout the city." Mixed -income housing developments provide a "portion" of affordable units in an integrated, mixed - income development unless it is financially or physically infeasible to do so, in which case a developer may pay an in -lieu fee to facilitate construction of affordable housing developments offsite. The City's Housing Opportunity Ordinance's furthers this goal, stating that is purpose is to "encourage the development of housing that is affordable to a range of households with varying income levels" (SAMC Sec. 41-1900). The proposed mixed -use and mixed -income community satisfies these goals by providing onsite affordable units in a highly-amenitized development and in Downtown, reducing the need for automobile dependence and encouraging transit ridership, cycling, and walking. Onsite Parking The City has identified the Transit Zoning Code area for high -intensity, mixed use development in order to reduce demands for parking and traffic impacts. To address community concerns regarding the requested parking incentive pursuant to State Housing Law, the applicant prepared a parking study and parking management plan (PMP). As a result of the parking reduction requested, staff coordinated with the applicant to explore alternate options for providing additional offsite parking spaces, maximizing onsite parking spaces, and/or reducing parking demand on the project site. In response, Toll Brothers prepared a PMP that addresses incentives for reducing vehicle ownership, encouraging transit ridership, providing valet services onsite to maximize parking areas, and providing offsite parking spaces through long-term agreements with the City in nearby parking structures. The parking management plan indicates that, if needed, valet service for on -site vehicle stacking could create an additional 80 parking spaces, raising the total onsite parking spaces from 332 to 412. In addition, the PMP indicates that an additional 70 offsite parking spaces at a nearby City -owned parking structure could be leased on a long-term basis. When implemented, this results in an effective parking ratio of 1.83 parking spaces per residential unit with the onsite valet service, and 2.19 spaces per unit with the additional 70 offsite spaces, which exceeds the 2.15 per unit parking space requirement of the TZC. The proposed 1.51 initial, and 1.83 and 2.19 potential, parking space ratios are analyzed by a parking study submitted forthe project. The parking study indicates that both parking rates will result in surplus parking onsite due to a variety of factors, including the project's: SPR No. 2019-01/DBA No. 2019-01 — First American Title Co. Development October 28, 2019 Page 8 1. Proximity to existing and future mass transit, which include standard bus service, high- capacity/express bus service, the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, and the under - construction OC Streetcar (light rail); 2. Location within a highly-amenitized, mixed -use environment with shopping and major employment centers nearby; and 3. Proximity to nearby existing parking facilities, including parking structures, parking lots, and on -street parking. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The proposed development required preparation of studies relating to shade and shadow, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions, cultural resources, traffic, parking, noise and vibration, Phase I environmental site assessment, hydrology, a preliminary water quality management plan, and sewer capacity. In addition, a fiscal impact and economic impact analysis was prepared by RSG, Inc. and The Concord Group. All studies evaluate the changes of the proposed revisions as compared to the existing entitlements and were reviewed for content and accuracy by the City. The technical studies evidenced that an EIR Addendum to the previously -certified 2010 EIR is the appropriate CEQA document to evaluate and disclose the project's impacts. An addendum to a previously certified EIR is prepared when a lead agency is asked to approve modifications to an existing project for which an EIR has already been certified. An addendum evaluates the requested modifications and determines whether subsequent EIR review is required. Pursuant to CEQA case law, an addendum applies the same thresholds as the original, certified EIR. (Citizens Against Airport Pollution v. City of San Jose (2014) 227 Cal.App.4th 788.) Moreover, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15162, when an EIR has been certified for a project, the City shall not require a subsequent or supplemental EIR or negative declaration for the project unless the lead agency determines that one or more of the following conditions are met: 1. Substantial project changes proposed that would result in new or substantially more severe impacts than disclosed in the previous EIR; 2. Substantial changes in circumstances that would result in new or substantially more severe impacts than disclosed in the previous EIR; or 3. Significant new information has come to light that shows there will be new or substantially more severe impacts than disclosed in the previous EIR. If some changes or additions to the previously prepared EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions specified above are met, the lead agency shall prepare an Addendum. In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, since none of the conditions specified in section 15162 are present, an Addendum to the previously -certified 2010 EIR is the appropriate form of environmental review for the First American project. The Addendum focuses on the potential environmental impacts associated with the project that might cause a change in the conclusions of the certified 2010 EIR, including changes in circumstances or new information of substantial importance that would substantially change those SPR No. 2019-01/DBA No. 2019-01 — First American Title Co. Development October 28, 2019 Page 9 conclusions. The Addendum considers whether the project results in new or substantially more severe impacts than were disclosed in the 2010 EIR and finds that no supplemental or subsequent EIR is required for the proposed development. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15164(b), an addendum to a previously -certified EIR is not circulated for public review. The Addendum is included with this staff report as Attachment 9. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15164(d), the Planning Commission must consider the Addendum together with the 2010 EIR before making a decision on the project. Previous CEQA Documentation The 2010 EIR (SCH No. 2006071100) was prepared to evaluate the potential impacts associated with the adoption of the Transit Zoning Code, which is anticipated to result in potential development of approximately 4,075 residential units, 387,000 sf of retail development, and an additional 15.5 acres of open space within the City. The 2010 EIR considers the environmental impacts relating to aesthetics; air quality; biological resources; cultural resources; hazards and hazardous materials; hydrology and water quality; land use; noise; population, housing, and employment; public services; transportation and traffic; utilities and service systems; and climate change. A mitigation monitoring and reporting program, findings of fact, and a statement of overriding consideration were adopted with the 2010 EIR. As part of the 2019 Addendum to the 2010 EIR, the original mitigation monitoring and reporting program must be readopted by the Planning Commission; no changes to the mitigation measures were identified as necessary through review and preparation of the 2019 Addendum. Addendum Conclusions The First American Project Addendum concludes no new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed development when compared to those identified in the 2010 EIR. To fully evaluate the proposed project's impacts on the site's existing structures, a cultural resources studywas prepared. Preparation of the cultural resources studyforthe proposed project was not required based on the fact that the site and its building are not eligible for listing as an historic resources and that the sites comprising the development are not within the boundaries of the Downtown National Historic Districts. The cultural resources study concludes that demolition of the building and clearing the sites will not result in any new, significant impacts or the need for new mitigation measures, and that due to the various additions and remodeling projects to the site's building, the building continues to be ineligible for listing on any local or national register of historic properties. Several past analyses reached similar conclusions, namely: 1. The site was not identified for inclusion in the Downtown National Historic Districts when established in December 1984; 2. The site was not identified as requiring special consideration or protection when the Transit Zoning Code was adopted in 2010 and the 2010 EIR was certified; and SPR No. 2019-01/DBA No. 2019-01 —First American Title Co. Development October 28, 2019 Page 10 The 2019 EIRAddendum's cultural resources study revisited the site and concluded, similar to the 1984 and 2010 analyses, that the site was ineligible for listing on any local or national historic register. Therefore, the 2010 EIR's MMRP will continue to mitigate or lessen any impacts already identified by the 2010 EIR. Following public input at the September 23, 2019 Planning Commission public hearing on the project, the cultural resources study was updated to enhance discussion of the onsite buildings and their historic prominence in Santa Ana. Moreover, two conditions of approval are proposed in order to establish a careful demolition process, public notification, fagade preservation opportunities, interior building element preservation and salvage opportunities, and provide photo -documentation. Economic Development A fiscal and economic impact analysis prepared by RSG, Inc. and The Concord Group was submitted for the project. The analysis estimates that the proposed development will result net positive fiscal impacts to the City, the Business Improvement District, and in almost 900 new temporary or permanent jobs. Specifically, the analysis estimates the following impacts: $12.8 million net positive new General Fund revenues associated with the project over a 25- year period, resulting from: o $4 million in City permit fees, $16.9 million in revenues, and $156,000 additional property tax revenues over a 25-year period, and o $4.1 million in General Fund expenditures associated with the project over a 25-year period • 892 direct, indirect, or induced new jobs resulting from the project, of which 68 would be permanent • Approximately $204,000 in Business Improvement District (BID) funds Table 2: Strategic Plan Alignment and Public Notification & Community Outreach Plan A community meeting was held on June 18, 2018 at 5:30 p.m. at the project site in accordance with the provisions of the City's Sunshine Ordinance. Invitations/notices were mailed to property owners and occupants/tenants in a 500-foot radius from the project site. Approximately 17 members of the public attended, as well as 4 City staff. The applicant provided all the required information to the City after the meeting. Details from the community meeting were posted to the project's webpage at httl)s://www.santa- ana.org/pb/planning-division/major-planning-projects-and-documents/first-american- title-co-site-downtown . In addition, a public hearing was held on the project on September 23, 2019. A work- study session was subsequently held on October 14, 2019, during which members of the community expressed general support for preserving onsite structures to the extent possible and for the overall mixed -use development. :ion by mail was mailed to all property owners, occupants, and c within 500 feet of the project site in accordance with SAMC SPR No. 2019-01/DBA No. 2019-01 —First American Title Co. Development October 28, 2019 Page 11 Strate5 lic Plan Alignment, Public Notification, and Community Outreach each Newspaper posting was published in the Orange County Register in accordance with SAMC requirements. Additional Measures The applicant met with seven interested groups, neighborhoods, and/or individuals between June 2018 and October 2019. Meetings include those with: • Downtown, Lacy, French Park, and Logan neighborhood associations • Downtown business owners, Santa Ana Business Council, and Downtown Inc. • Local historic preservation representatives, as recently as October 21, 2019 Conclusion Based on the analysis provided within this report, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement Application No. 2019-01 as conditioned. Ali Pezeshkpour, AICP Senior Planner IM W01 S:\Planning Commission\2019\First American Development\SPR19-1 DBA19-1 First American Devi 10282019.pc Exhibits: 1. Resolution (EIR Addendum) 2. Resolution (Site Plan Review and Density Bonus Agreement) 3. Vicinity Zoning and Aerial Map 4. Site Photos 5. Site Plan 6. Unit Floor Plans 7. Building Elevations 7a. Building Elevations for Fagade Preservation Alternative 8. Building Perspectives 8a. Building Perspectives for Fagade Preservation Alternative 9. Landscape Plans 10. Conformance to Development and Parking Standards 11. 2019 EIR Addendum and Technical Appendices 12. 2010 Transit Zoning Code EIR 13. Parking Study and Parking Management Plan 14. Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis 15. Draft Density Bonus Agreement 16. Public Comments This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 1 This page left blank intentionally. I&Rur2:2F1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2019-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE TRANSIT ZONING CODE PROJECT (SCH NO. 2006071100) FOR THE FIRST AMERICAN MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND RE - ADOPTION OF A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM WHEREAS, Michael McCann, representing Toll Brothers Apartment Living (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant'), is requesting approval of Site Plan Review No. 2019-01, as conditioned, and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01, as conditioned, to allow the construction of a new mixed -use residential and commercial development containing up to 220 residential units at 114 and 117 East Fifth Street; and WHEREAS, the subject Property contains 2.78 acres containing two sites at 114 and 117 East Fifth Street, currently developed with a commercial office building and surface parking lots; and WHEREAS, the Transit Zoning Code was adopted in 2010 as a result of interest in developing mixed -use residential and commercial projects in its project area. The Transit Zoning Code was amended in 2019 to modernize and refine development standards to further these interests. The regulating plan, which establishes land uses and development standards, allows a variety of housing and commercial projects, including mixed -use residential communities, live/work units, hotels, and offices; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana certified the Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2006071100) and adopted a mitigation monitoring reporting program for the Transit Zoning Code, which allows a mixture of residential, commercial, and industrial land uses; and WHEREAS, the entitlements sought for the proposed mixed -use development project include a Site Plan Review application and a Density Bonus Agreement application; and WHEREAS, in 2010, the City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report ("2010 EIR") for the Transit Zoning Code Project ("Originally Approved Plan"), which analyzed the potentially significant environmental impacts of a mixed -use plan area consisting of new residential, commercial, and industrial development; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the 2010 EIR, the subject site may be developed with a mixed -use development consisting of residential and commercial land uses; and WHEREAS, when compared against the Originally Approved Plan, the proposed mixed -use development will not result in any new or intensified significant impacts; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15000 et seq.), the City is the Lead Agency for the proposed development; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA, when taking subsequent discretionary actions in furtherance of a project for which an EIR has already been certified, the Lead Agency is prohibited from requiring a subsequent or supplemental EIR unless at least one of the circumstances identified in Public Resources Code section 21166 or State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 are present; and WHEREAS, City staff has evaluated the proposed project and considered whether, in light of the impacts associated with its development, any supplemental or subsequent environmental review is required pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 or State CEQA Guidelines section 15162: and WHEREAS, the analysis contained in the First American Title Company EIR Addendum ("2019 Addendum") concluded that none of the circumstances described in Public Resources Code section 21166 or State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 have occurred, and thus no supplemental or subsequent EIR is required; and WHEREAS, on September 23, 2019 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and continued the matter to October 28, 2019 and held a work- study session on the item on October 14, 2019; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019 at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the 2019 Addendum when recommending that the City Council approve the Project; and WHEREAS, on November 19, 2019 at a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council considered the 2019 Addendum and Mitigation Monitoring And Reporting Program; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. State CEQA Guidelines section 15164 requires lead agencies to prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions to the project are necessary, but none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR are present. The City Council has reviewed and considered the 2010 EIR and the 2019 Addendum, and finds that these documents taken together contain a complete and accurate reporting of all of the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed development. The City Council further finds that the 2019 Addendum has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The City Council further finds and determines that the Addendum reflects the City's independent judgment. Section 3. Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not limited to the 2010 EIR and the 2019 Addendum, the City Council finds that an addendum is the appropriate document for disclosing the changes to the subject property, and that none of the conditions identified in Public Resources Code section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 requiring subsequent environmental review have occurred, because: (a) The proposed development does not constitute a substantial change that would require major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. (b) There is not a substantial change with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed development will be developed that would require major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects. (c) New information of substantial importance has not been presented that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the 2010 EIR was certified or adopted, showing any of the following: (i) that the modifications would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the earlier environmental documentation; (ii) that significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the earlier environmental documentation; (iii) that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the applicant declined to adopt such measures; or (iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed previously would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but which the applicant declined to adopt. Section 4. The City Council hereby finds that mitigation measures identified in the 2010 EIR remain applicable to the Transit Zoning Code. These findings are laid out more specifically in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") attached hereto as Exhibit A. The City Council therefore hereby re -adopts those mitigation measures identified as remaining applicable to the Transit Zoning Code, through the MMRP attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Section 5. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the 2019 Addendum, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. Section 6. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. Section 7. The City Council directs staff to prepare, execute and file a CEQA Notice of Determination with the Orange County Clerk's Office within five (5) working days of City Council approval of the First American Mixed -Use Development Project. Section 8. The 2010 EIR and the 2019 Addendum, and any other documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which these findings have been based are on file, are incorporated herein by reference and are available for public review at Santa Ana City Hall, Planning and Building Agency, M20, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92701. The custodian of these records is Daisy Gomez, City Clerk for the City. Section 9. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this resolution. ADOPTED this day of 2019. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney m Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers C�7�:71rI�N7_�r�i7y_��r��r_�r[�7►I_1►1�Z�7:7[e11►/9��rt'1 I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on 12019. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM The 2010 Transit Zoning Code EIR Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is available online at: https://www.santa-ana.org/transit-zoning-code-environmental-impact-report Or by visiting: Planning and Building Agency — Planning Division Public Counter 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 EXHIBIT B FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY EIR ADDENDUM The First American Title Company Project EIR Addendum and Technical Appendices are available online at: https://www.santa-ana.orq/pb/planning-division/major-planning-projects-and- documents/first-american-title-co-site-downtown Or by visiting: Planning and Building Agency — Planning Division Public Counter 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 2 This page left blank intentionally. LS 10.28.19 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2019-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 2019- 01 AS CONDITIONED AND APPROVING DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT NO. 2019-01 AS CONDITIONED FOR A NEW MIXED -USE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 114 EAST FIFTH STREET (SITE A) AND 117 EAST FIFTH STREET (SITE B) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Michael McCann, representing Toll Brothers Apartment Living (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant'), is requesting approval of Site Plan Review No. 2019-01, as conditioned, and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01, as conditioned, to allow the construction of a new mixed -use residential and commercial development containing up to 220 residential units at 114 and 117 East Fifth Street. B. The Transit Zoning Code was adopted in 2010 as a result of interest in developing mixed -use residential and commercial projects in its project area. The Transit Zoning Code was amended in 2019 to modernize and refine development standards to further these interests. The regulating plan, which establishes land uses and development standards, allows a variety of housing and commercial projects, including mixed -use residential communities, live/work units, hotels, and offices. C. The California Density Bonus law allows developers to seek increases in base density for providing on -site housing units in exchange for providing affordable units on site. To help make constructing on -site affordable units feasible, the law allows developers to seek incentives/concessions or waivers that would help the project be built without significant burden and without detriment to public health. D. On September 23, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing and at that time considered all testimony, written and oral, and continued the matter to October 28, 2019 while holding a work-study session on the matter on October 14, 2019. E. On October 28, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing and at that time considered all testimony, written and oral, and recommended that the City Council approve Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 as conditioned, and recommended City Council approval of Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 as conditioned. F. On November 19, 2019, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing and at that time considered all testimony, written and oral. G. Sections 41-2007 and 41-593.5 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) requires a review by the Planning Commission of all plans for developments of over four stories within the Transit Zoning Code (Specific Development No. 84) to ensure the project is in conformity with the overlay zone plan. H. The zoning designation for the subject property is Specific Development No. 84, Downtown sub -zone. The City Council determines that pursuant to SAMC Sections 41-2007 and 41-593.5, the project is in compliance with all applicable development standards outlined within the Specific Development Plan (SD No. 84/Transit Zoning Code), with the exception of required on -site residential parking, which, pursuant to the California Government Code sections 65915 through 65918, may be reduced through approval of the requested Density Bonus Agreement application. J. The City Council hereby determines that the following findings, which must be established in order to grant this Density Bonus Agreement pursuant to SAMC Section 41-1607, have been established for Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 to allow construction of the proposed project: That the proposed development will materially assist in accomplishing the goal of providing affordable housing opportunities in economically balanced communities throughout the city. The proposed development will provide up to 209 market - rate rental units and 11 very -low income affordable units, contributing toward the City's rental housing stock to serve the needs of diverse and underserved populations. The area in which the project is proposed, the Transit Zoning Code plan area, currently contains several entitled or constructed affordable and market -rate residential communities. The construction of this project will contribute toward an economically balanced community by providing housing for different demographic and income levels in an area rich with employment opportunities, commercial development, and market -rate housing. 2. That the development will not be inconsistent with the purpose of the underlying zone or applicable designation in the general plan land use element. The project site is located in an area already identified in both the City's Zoning Code (the Transit Zoning Code) and General Plan (the Land Use and Housing elements) for new residential communities. Moreover, the proposed densities of 84 and 50 units per acre on Site A and Site B, respectively, is consistent with the anticipated development intensity of 90 units per acre in the General Plan Land Use element, and is below the density bonus provisions in the California Density Bonus Law for family -oriented projects (35-percent density bonus) and in the City's Housing Opportunity Ordinance (35- percent density bonus). 3. That the deviation is necessary to make it economically feasible for the Applicant to utilize a density bonus authorized for the development pursuant to section 41-1603. The proposed project requires one deviation through incentives/concessions for a reduction in required on -site (off-street) parking. The deviation is described as follows: Constructing 2.0 parking spaces per residential unit and 0.15 guest parking spaces per residential unit on the project site would require the developer to construct an additional level of parking either above- or below -grade, resulting in increased construction costs and/or a loss of an entire level of residential units. The City has identified the Transit Zoning Code area for high -intensity, mixed -use development in order to reduce demands for parking and traffic impacts. To address the parking reduction requested by the Applicant pursuant to State Housing Law, the Applicant prepared a parking study and parking management plan (PMP). The PMP adequately outlines measurable means to provide additional parking through additional onsite valet parking, off - site parking, or a combination thereof, raising the effective parking ratios to a minimum of 2.15 parking spaces per residential unit if fully implemented. As a result of the parking reduction requested, staff coordinated with the Applicant to explore alternate options for providing additional off -site parking spaces, maximizing on -site parking spaces, and/or reducing parking demand on the project site. In response, Toll Brothers prepared a PMP that addresses incentives for reducing vehicle ownership, encouraging transit ridership, providing valet services on -site to maximize parking areas, and providing off -site parking spaces through long-term agreements with the City in nearby parking structures. Section 2. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. Section 3. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not limited to the 2010 EIR and the 2019 Addendum, the City Council finds that an addendum is the appropriate document for disclosing the changes to the subject properties, and that none of the conditions identified in Public Resources Code section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15162 requiring subsequent environmental review have occurred, because: A. The project does not constitute a substantial change that would require major revisions of the 2010 EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. B. There is not a substantial change with respect to the circumstances under which the project will be developed that would require major revisions of the 2010 El due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects. C. New information of substantial importance has not been presented that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the 2010 EIR was certified or adopted, showing any of the following: (i) that the modifications would have one or more significant effects not discussed in the earlier environmental documentation; (ii) that significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the earlier environmental documentation; (iii) that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the Applicant declined to adopt such measures; or (iv) that mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed previously would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but which the Applicant declined to adopt. Section 4. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. Section 5. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and recommends approval of Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 as conditioned in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth herein. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Council Action dated November 19, 2019, and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 6. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this resolution. ADOPTED this day of 2019. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney 21 Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on 12019. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana EXHIBIT A Conditions for Approval for Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 and Density Bonus Agreement No. 2019-01 are approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the California Building Standards Code, and all other applicable regulations. In addition, it shall meet the following conditions of approval: The Applicant must comply with each and every condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by this site plan review. The Applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the development project. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the site plan review. A. Planning Division All proposed site improvements must conform to the Development Project Review approval of DP No. 2018-20. 2. Any amendment to this site plan review, including modifications to approved materials, finishes, architecture, site plan, landscaping, unit count, mix, and square footages must be submitted to the Planning Division for review. At that time, staff will determine if administrative relief is available or if the site plan review must be amended. 3. A residential property manager shall be on site at all times that the project is occupied and the developer and on -site management shall at all times maintain a 24-hour emergency contact and contact information on file with the City. 4. All mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from public and courtyard areas. 5. A final detailed amenity plan must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of any building permits. The plan shall include details on the hardscape design, lighting concepts and outdoor furniture for amenity, plaza, or courtyard areas as well as an installation plan. The exact specifications for these items are subject to the review and approval by the Planning Division. 6. Prior to installation of landscaping, the Applicant shall submit photos and specifications of all trees to be installed on the project site for review and approval by the Planning Division. Specifications shall include, at a minimum, the species, box size (24 inches minimum), brown trunk height (10-foot minimum), and name and location of the supplier. 7. After project occupancy, landscaping and hardscape materials must be maintained as shown on the approved landscape plans. 8. A Resident Storage Plan shall be provided for the project prior to occupancy. Storage shall be available at no cost to the residents. 9. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit a construction schedule and staging plan to the Planning Division for review and approval. The plan shall include construction hours, staging areas, parking and site security/screening during project construction. 10. Prior to any structural modification activities, including removal of the 1970s-era First American Title fagade, the Applicant shall retain, at its sole expense, a professional who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualifications Standards ("Professional"). The Professional should have experience in architectural historic preservation and adaptive re -use of historic structures. The Professional shall be onsite to monitor the controlled removal of the 1970s-era First American Title fagade from the exterior of the west building at First American Square. The exterior shall be removed in such a way as to determine if any original materials or features from the 1930s-era building remain underneath the current exterior of the building. The Professional shall assess the structural integrity of the building and whether it can be incorporated into the Project in the manner depicted in Applicant's Preservation Alternative. After removal of the First American Title fagade, no further structural demolition or construction shall occur until the Professional has prepared a report addressing the structural integrity of the building and whether it can be safely incorporated into the Project as depicted in the Applicant's Preservation Alternative ("Recommendation Report"). If the Professional concludes that the 1930s-era building can be safely and feasibly incorporated into the Project as depicted in the Applicant's Preservation Alternative, the Applicant shall implement said Alternative. If the Professional concludes that the 1930s-era building cannot be safely incorporated into the Project, the Professional shall submit the Recommendation Report to the City to document the results of the assessment. The Professional's Recommendation Report shall also address whether any exterior or interior building materials and/or features warrant further documentation prior to demolition, and shall document those materials and/or features in accordance with the requirements of the Historic American Building Survey. Archival copies of these photographs and the Professional's Recommendation Report documenting these efforts shall be submitted to the Santa Ana History Room so that they may be archived and available to the public. The Applicant may commence construction activities, including building demolition, thirty (30) days after completion and submittal of the Recommendation Report to the City, subject to compliance with the notice and meeting requirements of Condition 10A, below. 10A. Five (5) calendar days prior to removing the 1970s-era First American Title fagade, the Applicant shall provide written and electronic notice of the start date for the removal work to the following organizations and the City: Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency, Santa Ana Planning Commission, Santa Ana Historic Resources Commission, Santa Ana Historical Preservation Society, and Preserve Orange County. Notice shall be provided via email if available and in writing and delivered by overnight delivery to the address on record with the City for each named organization. Upon completion of the fagade removal work and the Recommendation Report described in Condition 10, the Applicant shall provide a copy of the Recommendation Report to the above -named organizations and the City, and shall schedule a meeting of all recipients of the Recommendation Report to discuss the findings of said report and the Applicant's decision whether it can implement the Applicant's Preservation Alternative. The meeting shall be held at least seven (7) calendar days after delivery of the Recommendation Report but no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after delivery of the Recommendation Report. 11. The Project shall include a publicly -accessible amenity area available to the public non-profit organizations four (4) times per calendar year, upon agreement by the non-profit organization(s) and Applicant. Any revisions to the proposed projects to include said amenity area, or any required modifications to accommodate said amenity area, shall be reviewed for substantial conformance during Building Division plan check. 12. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy issuance, public art shall be installed on the project site at a value of one -tenth of one percent (0.10%) of the total valuation of both buildings. The art may be installed on one or both of the project sites (Site A and/or Site B). The selection, design, and installation of the art shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning and Building Agency, the Community Development Agency, and the Applicant. 13. Residents of both development sites in the Project (Site A and Site B) shall have access to resident amenities and open space areas in both sites in perpetuity. 14. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a Property Maintenance Agreement must be recorded against the property. The agreement will be subject to review and applicability by the Planning and Building Agency, the Community Development Agency, the Public Works Agency, and the City Attorney to ensure that the property and all improvements located thereupon are properly maintained, Developer (and the owner of the property upon which the authorized use and/or authorized improvements are located if different from the Applicant) shall execute a Maintenance Agreement with the City of Santa Ana which shall be recorded against the property and which shall be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney. The Maintenance Agreement shall contain covenants, conditions and restrictions relating to the following: (a) Compliance with operational conditions applicable during any period(s) of construction or major repair (e.g., proper screening and securing of the construction site; implementation of proper erosion control, dust control and noise mitigation measure; adherence to approved project phasing etc.); (b) Compliance with ongoing operational conditions, requirements and restrictions, as applicable (including but not limited to hours of operation, security requirements, the proper storage and disposal of trash and debris, enforcement of the parking management plan, and/or restrictions on certain uses, (c) Ongoing compliance with approved design and construction parameters, signage parameters and restrictions as well as landscape designs, as applicable; (d) Ongoing maintenance, repair and upkeep of the property and all improvements located thereupon (including but not limited to controls on the proliferation of trash and debris about the property; the proper and timely removal of graffiti; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of damaged, vandalized and/or weathered buildings, structures and/or improvements; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of exterior paint, parking striping, lighting and irrigation fixtures, walls and fencing, publicly accessible bathrooms and bathroom fixtures, landscaping and related landscape improvements and the like, as applicable); (e) If Developer and the owner of the property are different (e.g., if the Applicant is a tenant or licensee of the property or any portion thereof), both the Applicant and the owner of the property shall be signatories to the Maintenance Agreement and both shall be jointly and severally liable for compliance with its terms. (f) The Maintenance Agreement shall further provide that any party responsible for complying with its terms shall not assign its ownership interest in the property or any interest in any lease, sublease, license or sublicense, unless the prospective assignee agrees in writing to assume all of the duties, obligations and responsibilities set forth under the Maintenance Agreement. (g) The Maintenance Agreement shall contain provisions relating to the enforcement of its conditions by the City and shall also contain provisions authorizing the City to recover costs and expenses which the City may incur arising out of any enforcement and/or remediation efforts which the City may undertake in order to cure any deficiency in maintenance, repair or upkeep or to enforce any restrictions or conditions upon the use of the property. The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any unreimbursed costs and/or expenses incurred by the City to cure a deficiency in maintenance or to enforce use restrictions shall become a lien upon the property in an amount equivalent to the actual costs and/or expense incurred by the City. (h) The execution and recordation of the Maintenance Agreement shall be a condition precedent to the issuance of final approval for any construction permit related to this entitlement. EXHIBIT 3 This page left blank intentionally. 915=19 SPR No. 2019-01 & DBA No. 20 114 an "First American Title Co. Development" Zane Description vngaen.mlM p+sb.na 0TwmP.mdv pagvrce fngurwn nparsmvm M9n�plt++mih g9eadm[t ■ ivSb+nlnl E+Yn ■ Commarcl+I4n�tlenbnl ip.nfi[ nbn fHaM I]...I.pm.nt ■ il+n�Mtl £APPPInE C+nyr Scum M+m i.ea cemmererx Dmnct cnmmnnnw cemm.rc.l.mn.«�m om[In � cemmunnv Eommuo.l . Arf M.1 £pmgtrGnl G.n.m Cammaod ogM a.oP4r�+l M9rvv ind,nc +l ?.rnlvfnauut Gawmmtnt C.nn. Gp.n ip.[e ■ G+nenl?t^[uhm+l no an M a AN ® 2019 Dinitml Man Aeductr_ All nehts reserved_ apes.spatialstreammm/productbnldashboarEVB& 1CurrentBuildlhtmIReporting.html 111 This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 4 This page left blank intentionally. N m . . m 16 This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 5 This page left blank intentionally. z < \) � , ^~ ! , \ y� � \ II |:: | q |:^ \ \ �q �} This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 6 This page left blank intentionally. 140 W m F VJ.. ...... .. VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ W Z Qmu�u� amm<<ow waa�o �o u�«< W Q f N Td J F VJ VJ VJ Qm(Jgm� WWIL l9S—�d� � J 00 WYY Q m rcrc m rc Q rcrc m a � m m mm m m a mm m m f- sW � IO _ s� k°o �e sw° m_ pF $m o g ME z Z J 0 O m Z z J 0 0 m e e e Y 0 0 00 00000000 W m ZN.. ...... ....... W Z m u�u� amm<<ow '111 o D Q W � d J � OOVJ QOOdw� WWw.t9S —�0.� W •• � 5 OJ a N m mm m m e ee z mm m T n 2 JJ 00 JJJ 000 1` Z S z z e e e Y 0 0 00 00000000 W W m W F mu�u� dmm<<oN '111 o D Q W d J � 00VJ 000dw� WWw.t9r��d.� 1 1 W • • � 5 0 J a N m mm m m N W00 WYY U o K ¢ mrc m a mm m C i J E - C i r z • e ee z T n ��1 r ri ETED s^ e e e Y 0 0 00 ........ W Ft�.. ...... .... F mu�u� dmm<<oN Ndd�o to u�«< Q W Q Td J F VJ VJ VJ Qm C!dmJ WWIL.l9S—�d.� F � N J 00 WYY U U o K o Q m aw rc Q m� m a m m a mm m C 4 .w e � E4 Y 0 0 00 00000000 W W m F VJ.. ...... .. VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ W F mu�u� dmm��oN Nda�o to u�«< Q W Q Td J F VJ VJ OJ Q.O C!dmJ WWIL t9r�id.� F � N J 00 W:YY •� • U U Q � m rcrc m rc Q rcrc m a � m mm m m a mm m e e e W W m W F mu�u� dmm<<oN Naa�o �o u�«< Q W � d J � 00VJ 000dw� WWIL.l91S —�d.� W � Q � m rcrc m rc a N m mm m m Q . . �� WY .. ........ `1 t� ww .. ...... Z F mu�u� amm<<ow waa�o �o u�«< as maa N Q w d Q f N Wf VJ VJ VJ Q.0 (J 0.0� WWIL l9S—�d� � W 00 W:YY • 0 J 0 Q J m mm m m Q mm m a � m mm m m a mm m N 4 M M M Q . . .. �� WY ........ `1 m Ft�.. ...... I.. Z Q mu�u� amm��ow waa�o �o u�«< as road W Q Q )d WF VJ VJ OJ Q.0 (J 0.0� WWIL l9��id.� F � N W 00 W:YY F � Q J m mm m K Q mm m a � m mm m m a mm m ur, • Y 0 0 00 ........ W W m Q JJJ JJJJJJ JJJJJJJJJ F VJ.. ...... .. VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ W Z Qmu�u� amm<<ow waa�o �o u�«< W Q F N )d WF VJ VJ UJ �mU d.O� WWIL l9 S. �d� � W 00 WYY Q J m mm m m Q mm m a � m mm m m a mm m r z Y 0 0 00 00000000 W W m F was almost VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ W F mu�u� dmm��oN Nda�o to u�«< Q W )d N W F awl Q..ULIJ W WLLl9�� i21 p W 00 W:YY • 0J 0 Q J m mm m K Q mm m a � m mm m m a mm m a 9 z. + : � /�\ # 71 Y iq 0 00 00000000 W m F VJ.. ...... .. VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ W m Z Qmu�u� amm<<ow waa�o �o u�«< e e e Z mm m T n 00 000 r �m W Q F N )d WF VJ VJ VJ �mUdmJ WWIL l9S—�d� � W 00 WYY • Q J m mm m m Q mm m a � m mm m m a mm m ao m� Y F O Z W J Q 2 Z J � Z w U Hw ¢O �d I e e e Y . 0 00 ........ W m F VJ.. ...... .. VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ W m )W ««««< F mu�u� d'm m<<oN Ndd�o to u�«< Q e e e Z T n �m W Q F N )d WF VJ VJ UJ Qm:JdmJ WWIL l9S—�d� � W 00 WYY • w J O 0 Q J m mm m m Q mm m a � m mm m m a mm m I J A nn n nniin li li�lll N i i N Z S z e e e Y 0 0 00 ........ W m F VJ.. ...... .. VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ W F mu�u� d'm m<<oN Ndd�o to u�«< Q e e e Z T n �m W Q F N )d WF VJ VJ UJ �mUdmJ WWIL l9S—�d� � W 00 WYY • Q J m mm m m Q mm m a � m mm m m a mm m Z S z z J This page left blank intentionally. kiA This page left blank intentionally. O Q HERS ERS M1 ERS M1 "I ':lapse 1i 11ri1 HIri1 wri 1rHII � �Y�_ � �I nERYY Mil rY rY I= I... ®a� r r 1� eaH aH � �n Y.1 MI ER1 r1 ERI MI � i, M1 M1 M1 nr rrr r qrl rrrrY rY rY ERY ppppp,,___,, i ERY ERY ERY N ur r II 1 1 Y Y ■ 1 nr r r r man4 li r r r r mM III nrm rm rm Milli rill Ill W. II Mill MiII Mill Mill Mill W P!r M1 M1 M1 M1 IIII NMin N Mill mill Mill Mill o !in MI M1 M1 MI OT Mil IERY IERY IERI EMI rrr rr Mil M ERN ERN ERN rY Mil iERY IERY IERY EMI wini Mil r�I ERN � '� rill Milli rill 'F Ilrlll will MITI MIIII rill" HIRED MiII Mill Mill Mill al 11 M1 ER1 ER1 =j •I� NEW MiII Ell! Mill Mill ur 01 r I. Ml M1 MI IMI .I NO•4._ _ _ _ _ cll IIERI ERY ERY I= rY Ii Mil r11� Y 1 MI iM1 IMI IMI EMI F' " '" >tl •tw I nERl r1 ERS rS ERY 1 I1 r rrr r Mill III -•r` Yr .� r MER SER — III 11 i� r nMlu MIIu Mm Mun MnI Ij 111 * NNIIII Mill MilMill MIII I� � nMiu Milo coll Sul Mill nERl rS ERY ERY r1 ,. a YERI ER1 r ERS ERS I� nr r r ME 11111111 .•Mr ur r r r r I� I it =-,II rill MITI MIIII mill Milli 11 HIRED MIIII MIII MIIII MIII II Mill: Mill Mill Mill MIII,I NNIN ME MIN NIT Mil j— niiu Min', Mill Mill Mill �^ - New Milo one Sul Im 1� _�__ NMI F nERl r1 M1 all ERY f ur MY rY MY M1 Y' IN r r r r I Mil l lit W =0 1Mi0 Ni na sty � W Mer1 MY r1 r'( IIII urm, Mlol Mn4 Mun Mm 11� Irrr ra Ir rrrr III nMil Milo Mill EIII Miol Ii so Mio Min Min 1� M1rMrrrrrMlirMr�e IIII �� nMM r r r r ..,, I� rin rnu rml Mn r.r -;I .III III El�I ���- Ei, IIII IIA III All III I i . _n _ii .t r ti r ._III Mull rill au _m .III ® IEIII .III .III .III fill .III ■. �� �■ �■ _. M.III MITI al Mill Mill .III 1IK ..�,, _. -mI ........ r - Jim, r r r r r Milli� 11-m_.I=M 1�_.IN Comm .■ .. .■ .■ _._r Illlrriiii F �' _� M. M■ Milli _m _III .ml _I I III r r III MITI .III .III M I I .III .III .III .II I� ■ millon rrrrr ___.-_IIII in in in no rrrrr rr it li (. IIII [ MEm'._■s _ _ r r _IA _III MIY _III _I .IIR MITI .III .III MI Mlo Mlo .m .m .I I r r r r r rrrrr =■ M.■�.■cm rrrrr e.MmM�r i IIII i i E IIII i iiiiiiii iiiiiiii ._.. Eli — ��� ���.m� 11l_mSIN _m1 ��_n�i � III ■ ■ ■ .kof �I MIII MITI Mill MI I M Mi -mill Mill-m1n -mi1 r!� ■ ■ ■ r r r r ■ •`�' I� M ....... -mill . n _ ma I`I E_Z c r mw .. III IIII III�iMe' N _Q o� U� U1 FQ NO N W O Q mow- _ III Ylo 1EY5 naY rY a• pill rY f Y r nr r r r r c Elm .. Ilk - -. - Il Mil pill a• r\ rY i nri r r r r mi �� pi• pill pi• w+ n urr pit o rY r1 pi 1� pi1 r1 r1 � n r r r r r 1 •� 9rl pill a• pill pill "(jam a• pill pill v ur rrrr pi• pill pill ar. rpi�%- npil • • • • nr ill ill ill ill 1� -� pi• pill pill pill •nr �nr pi• pill pill pill _r.• MMin Miu Mill mill Mir I� II'BII 'Bill I'll 'BII 'Bill Ys 'Bill pi• r• r• r1 Y'BII 'Bill 'Bill rI 'Bill pill pill pill pill pill Mil Ipi1 Ipi1 mil MO r, r— r1 r1 r1 rY �.1 Mil Ipi• Im �r• In, o,m' . Mil•rill r•1 Mil 1 x rlll rill r11 pill Il rlll rill rlll rill rlll i'BII 'Bill 'BII 'Bpl r, r� Il pil �_ m m r m j= n'BII'Bill'Bill rI null "OR ur rrrr Im 1 rill r_rf •r r r r r I� Mil Ipi• ipi• r• ipill � rE Il pil • • piY piY c Ilr r r r r -MIi �'B nrn rru rm pill min 7Mil pill C Ig Eli Eli oil nrI rl'Bn'B1l pill 1' Ilrl pi• • pi• pill 4 i Yrl pill pill pill rY nr r r r r I� -�. 1� ism rw rill rill rm rrn r nrn rin rm pin pin II pill pill Mil pill'Bln, n®I'Bn 'Bn'Bnl Mil II �11 'Bill 'Bill'BII 'Bill �I"' Nr 'BII'BII'B11 pin nrl s li� el!pill nr ill ill m m �. pill pill pill pill r1r r r rY V—I r1 pi• r Y Y 1 II urn rillrillpin pilien N 0 3.= ! ISImll'BillpiI'BII'BII Mil fil I� �II ' .I11 .II .III .111..■ M. • on on . i MilII l .IilI EmlEmil MIEmIIn M11 Emil, III . Eli .III ■II .II .II Em. .•. •I.1 IiM Em. mill al mill Mn Mll EmlEmil Emm Emil' mill .III .III .II .II .II MEMMI1I11Mil wl �� ill ri i .I _I Emil EmII. EmII � �;� III mill .III .111 I Ell MU Mill I NIP. .II .Ili .� HIS IL. !• 0 .I � `I IIN..11 .11.N All., 1 MINE lips �G me .1 ----- IIII �m___ tt This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 8 This page left blank intentionally. O Q Oe wee ��e SEE ONE WINE moomMa VIES NEW �WJ �YMIXYI �IIIAIII �Ami pie ME e■ �� Me ME :e' =0 a -- ME Ae' tee' M■ ele iFer t, �� �e �■ �e ie � ►► a' 11 ®� se �■ �e ee � �� � oe tee' ter• �-'d � �' Ge ,s '+�eee s eee ees 4 ew s eee ee� .a Me Me o■ M■ eN& smi mus minii IiuiiiiillV ®16- B ml LE-IIIII 11 46- WS mmal lkj •¢._ � �XMMx �IAllllll ..41 ➢II IIIIpIIIIIIIWI IYOIRNYII .t +�`= l .x..- I 4...Y.7 so Ma aka ME Ma ON - lb-- E1 AV am mm mm ■ flF,.. Ii` lvmw MEN mom mum Im@ONid. FAER ■ AM AM MMa IBM mrclwl ewwm _sm.vn eermmuu �ee®mm M■ ML M■ ■ E I mw ME ME ME Him ol ME ME ME ME ME MIN MIN Effilfiri Am on mm I1mil ANN M AM MR ice'AMR 7 — MM -- IMEM■ ■ ■er�wsw:. _: rr■■I rw■■�. .1 ■ ■IIIIIII ■IIIII111 ����.„., � "-'��IIIIIII IIIIIII ®IIIIIII �R �i � I�I�III 1 d�lllllll 111�1�11 d�llllllll 1-FIiG ■6lilin � �111111 i�llllll I�I�I �III11 11�111 ■dllllll �_ rqlll Ael iL-�ILIpI IU-y1l9UU u�11p 'u �il]Clli r. rlF—lrrq -liltF 111 I Ili __A ,�jm■amm Mil M■ �w U ■ moll ■ ■■I M■ m no WE M■ m M■ m =I ■ EIIIIIIIII ■llllllll Mlllll'I MIIIIIIII Mllllll elllll is 1 11111 ■iiiiiiii ■iiii l ■iiiiiii mill ■iiiilll IIII O�IIIIIIIII �lillllli ■IIINIi ■IIIIIII ■IIIII I i■IIII ilwe ■ moll ■ ■®0 ON m■■ m■ll -■ m■■I :..,a' 91i f■ ■ 1 II m■■ � _ ��1 i ill III �■ ■ 1 c �31 YI oil ■_ -el 4 ■ ■ ul ti_ u J■I ell A AV AVA _A= AUM MWA AWA AW AV ,ff r� A Ar Ar�Ar �AF �ff �MF ,ff ,ff � Ar MELLI =I W-4 M Ar� iVR ArAw� �AF �AF �M �ff lff� Art MEM TAM w WE WM ,am w M ILW 06 16 -lob NNW, Imw lwmw """ *�' "ll N wd it, �Ip' VIM ML Alf �m ZIA: � Z11 ma =a uk in UK wa un WN Wag mm um IBM %W- vw W—W wm W59 far, R I �sr �wno� MF yam ®nwrr1F r'NvF' �9N N:N^.7®®'� —AF �W A M MM6 P mow- .mv„w, rremu rram ewe mow=.. �Lm urnnmi"': IY imw M 'tl��Lid'—R! WIIFIA NIm �h9MI wmrvn¢ Welm i i R Me'ixLtY I7MEN ma i �69Ynn�_. r RIMS .,z Mumi,'Mn Mmw AIAN7M4 m i�Gw, RMUNTAP FEW teener wnwnam wwunnune !/ M/ MIM ME y, �'SAf �1QuM� �iAl11�Ni R��� Y S-il�N�' MW ME NOW RON me ME we MR RON m m RISE � a � 1 � r I a � W r f� V I V a r I-- r I �. ■ ■IIIIIIIII MIIIIIIII Mui nn Q°"nn'Illllll milli MIIIIIIII'I 'WV- - rennin n ■111111111 II innni ■IIIIIIII n ■ IIIIIIII ,rnmi i nmll IIIII �ni i■IIII jI nnni 1111llllll11l IW„ � ��IIIII -II�Iw�ll MEf�n11i11 ILIIIII Ism— M flik_J MI M■ M1. ii i IM■ ■Ile T fl ■ ■IIIIIIIII MIIIIlii1 Illlliilili f�liiillllll !�IIIIIII ��iilliil � � � n ■II!!o!7 �III� ®■_ MIII��I Mai IMI M �- �` ;� r• 11 I ■ n■II MIN to M■ M■ ■ ■■1 m 1 m m ■ ■11111111111 Mlllllllll 111111111In11 MIIIIIIII Mllllllllljl Milli nniiiii11 ■iiiiiiiii ■iiiiiii ■iiiiiiii ■iiiiiiiijl mill 1 nliiiiiiiiii ■iiiiiiiii ■iiiuii ■iiiiiili ■iiiiiiii�l ■�lii ■ MI ■ ■■1 M■ MI, _ ■ ., ■ 11111 M M� �-1 ■ I III M■ WE mill MI W'_ ■1 11 M ■_ ■ LA ■ Lamm AF ,ff � AF� Ar Ar �AF Ar M — � Ar Ar �AF �AF Ar� F � m lie EXHIBIT 9 This page left blank intentionally. . E rcl,l z: =o a§ f9 _ \ ox \ ."4 �} - „T i33ais Hsm A3tliS NIVW C t v L a 3 a 3 a L m o a o > o o 3 O O O a a N w O o > c O T c � c c c c a.- c > m G a m m a r « O m o M0110 illtl15 H5nu This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 10 This page left blank intentionally. Conformance to Development and Parking Standards Required by the Transit Zoning Code Provided Lined Block Building Type Height (Table DT-1): 5 to 7 Stories 1. Minimum - 2 stories 2. Maximum - 10 Stories Parking Driveway Width (Table DT-5): 2-Way Driveway: Project's driveway width varies from 2-Way Driveway: 20'0" minimum and 25'0" maximum. 23'0" to 25'0". Parking (Table DT-6): Residential: 301 stalls (Per Affordable Housing Plan, State 1. Standard: 2 stalls per unit minimum and 0.15 stalls per of Califomia Government Code Section 65915(p)(1) and unit guest, and 1/400 square feet of commercial 65915(p)(4)): space. • Zero to 1 bedroom — 1 stall o Results in 473 residential and 31 commercial • 2 to 3 bedrooms — 2 stalls parking spaces required (504 total) Commercial: 31 Stalls (1/400 sf) (7 extra onsite parking spaces provided) — Approval of a Density Bonus Agreement Waiver/Concession Required • Results in 332 total onsite parking spaces (1.51 per unit onsite parking ratio) • Per Parking Management Plan, up to 412 onsite parking spaces may be provided (1.87 per unit onsite parking ratio) • Per Parking Management Plan, up to 60 additional parking spaces available offsite (2.15 per unit parking ratio Setbacks (Table DT-2): Complies; never more than 10'0" maximum- 1- Front Yard — 0'0" min, 0'0" max 2. Street Side — 0'0" min, 10'0" max 3. Side Yard — 0'0" min, no max 4. Rear Yard — 15'0" min, no max 5. Alley Yard — 3'0" min no max Frontage Type (Table DT-4): Main : 100% Shopfront, 12% Forecourt 1. Arcade — Min 50% of Frontage 4'h St.: 100% Shopfront, 38% Forecourt 2. Gallery — Min 50% of Frontage Bush St.: 31% Stoop 3. Shopfront— Min 75% of Frontage 5'h St.: 18% Stoop 4. Forecourt — Max 50% of Frontage (remainder of frontage per permitted types) 5. Stoop — Max 50% of Frontage Building Types Allowed (Table BT-1): Lined Block Flex Block, Lined Block, Stacked Dwellings, Courtyard Housing, Live -Work, Tuck Under Lined Block Width and Depth (Table BT-1): 1. Width — 250'0" 1. Width —Min 125'0" and Max 300'0" 2. Depth — 250'0" 2. Depth —Minimum 100'0" Lined Block Access Standards (Sec. 41-2023): All requirements met and shown in plan sheets- 1- The main entrance to each ground floor shall be directly from the street. 2. Entrance to residential portions of the building shall be through a dedicated street level lobby, or through a dedicated podium lobby accessible from the street of through a side yard- 3- Access to each unit above the second level, not accessed through a podium, shall be through an interior corridor of at least 6'0" with recessed doors or seating alcoves/offsets at least every 100'0". 4. Each level of the building shall have access to the garage via an elevator. Lined Block Parking Standards (Sec. 41-2023): The building provides parking via an underground and above -ground garage. All dwellings will have indirect access to parking stalls. l:11msn5c1111) Required by the Transit Zoning Code Provided 1. All parking shall be in an underground or above- ground garage, tuck under parking, or combination thereof. 2. Dwellings shall have indirect access to their parking stall(s)- Lined Block Open Space Standards (Sec. 41-2023): Site A & Site B: 1. The common open space shall be designated as a courtyard, or in the front as a forecourt. This area 1. Required (Common + Private): 11,250 SF shall be equal to 15% of the lot and shall be open to 2- Provided (Common + Private): 40,860 SF the sky. 2. Minimum courtyard width of 20'0" when running EW All requirements met and shown in plan sheets. and 15'0" when running NS. 3. 20'0" wide courts only permit architectural projections on two opposing sides- 4- Private open space for each dwelling unit and no less than 50 SF and not less than 6'0" in each direction- 5- Private open space can be substituted for common open space or common interior space at an equivalent square footage. The minimum dimension of this space shall be 15'0" in each direction. Lined Block Landscape Standards (Sec. 41-2023): 1. N/A 1. If a front yard is present, one 24" box tree per 25'0" 2. Complies lineal feet shall be provided. 3. Complies 2. Six (6) 5-gallon shrubs and ten (10) 1-gallon size 4. N/A shrubs or ground cover per required tree. 5. Complies 3. Courtyards located above garages shall avoid the 6. N/A sensation of forced podium hardscape. 7. N/A 4. Trees in the front yard may not exceed 12-15' in height at maturity and must be suitable for built in concrete planters or containers with a 36-inch width- 5- One 36" box tree is required per courtyard that meets the minimum dimensions. For courtyards that exceed minimum dimensions, two or more 24-inch box small size trees may be substituted. 6. If a rear yard is present, at least one (1) 36" box tree per 30'0" lineal feet shall be planted- 7- If a side yard is present, at least one (1) 24" box tree per 30'0" lineal feet shall be provided - Lined Block Frontage Standards (Sec. 41-2023): All requirements met and shown in plan sheets. Entry door oriented to street/courtyard when fronting to one. Service rooms -oriented backing to corridors. Building Size and Massing Standards (Sec. 41-2023): Building Height Ratios: 1-4 (Standards Noted and Met) 5. Max Height Ratios: 1. Ground Floor— 100% a.Ground Floor — 100% 2. Level 2 — 97% b. Level 2 — 100% 3. Level 3-6 — 81 % c. Level 3-5 — 85% 4. Level 7 — 71 % d. Level 6 — 85% 1:17i11:II1 ii[i) EXHIBIT 11 This page left blank intentionally. SPR No. 2019-01 & DBA No. 2019-01, "First American Title Co. Development" 114 and 117 East Fifth Street The 2019 EIR Addendum and Technical Appendices are available online at: https://www.santa-a na.org/pb/pla n n i ng-d ivision/maio r-pla n n i ng-proiects-and-documents/fi rst- a me rica n-title-co-site-downtown Physical copies are also available by visiting the Planning Division public counter located at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Exhibit 11— 2019 El Addendum and Technical Appendices This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 12 This page left blank intentionally. SPR No. 2019-01 & DBA No. 2019-01, "First American Title Co. Development" 114 and 117 East Fifth Street The 2019 EIR Addendum and Technical Appendices are available online at: https://www.santa-a na.org/transit-zon i ng-code-enyi ro n mental-i m pact -report Physical copies are also available by visiting the Planning Division public counter located at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Exhibit 12 —2010 Transit Zoning Code EIR This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 13 This page left blank intentionally. PARKING STUDY AND PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN FIRST AMERICAN PLAZA 4T" + MAIN APARTMENTS Santa Ana, California September 16, 2019 Engineers & Planners Traffic Trarsportation Parking September 16, 2019 Engineers& Planners Traffic Transportation Parking Mr. Michael McCann Toll Brothers Apartment Living Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 200 Spectrum Center Drive, Suite 300 2 Executive Circle Irvine, CA 92618 Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92614 LLG Reference: 2.18.3984.1 949.825.6175r 90225.6173 F Subject: Parking Study and Parking Management Plan for the `NwwIlgengineers.cam First American Plaza - 4th + Main Apartments Santa Ana, California Pasadena Irvine San Diego Woodland Hills Dear Mr. McCain: As requested, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this Parking Study for the proposed First American Plaza — 4th + Main Apartments Project (hereinafter referred to as Project) in the City of Santa Ana, California. It is our understanding that the project is located in downtown Santa Ana which provides alternative modes of travel which results in the need to justify the use of a lower parking ratio than what is documented in the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code and the City's Transit Zone Code. The Transit Zoning Code ("TZC") establishes a minimum off -site parking requirement of 2 spaces per unit and 0.15 space per unit for guest parking. Non-residential development is to be parked at a ratio of 1 space per 400 square feet (TZC Table DT-6.). However, based on research of adopted parking standards for other jurisdictions with similar projects in a downtown, transit oriented district setting, lower parking ratios more appropriately reflect future parking demand for the Project. Further yet, given 5% of the Project's residential units are designated as very low affordable units, the parking ratios for affordable housing developments specified in the California Government Code Section 65915 were applied to the Project's residential component. Philip M. Linscon, PEpea4-oral Pursuant to our coordination efforts with City of Santa Ana staff and understanding Jack M. Greenspan, PE na, of the City's requirements, the preparation of a Parking Study, inclusive of a Parking William A. Law, PE(Rd I Paul W. Wilkinson, PE Management Plan (PMP) is required to ensure adequate parking for all Project John F. Keating, PE tenants, employees and guests, and reduce or eliminate any impacts on the DWdS Shearer, PE surrounding neighborhoods. This PMP is intended to be used to ensure that parking, John A. Daemon, PE as required for an affordable housing development such as the Project, will be Clare M. Look -Jaeger, PE sufficient to accommodate the Project's actual parking demand. Richard E.Earretto,PE Karl D. Maberry, PE ML62w13Company Famed IMS PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND MULTIMODAL SETTING The Project site occupies two separate parcels of land totaling 1.72-acres. The main parcel is a square shaped parcel of land that is currently developed with 113,000 SF of office space that previously served as the First American Title Company corporate offices. It is located east of Main Street, between 4d' Street and 5d' Street, and is addressed at 421 North Main Street in the City of Santa Ana, California. The second parcel is a square shape parcel of land that is currently developed as a parking lot, located on the northwest corner of Bush Street at 5d' Street. The Project site is zoned Downtown ("DT Zone") by the City's Transit Zone Code (TZC) which accommodates a mix of uses. Figure I is an existing aerial photograph of the Project site. The proposed Project includes the development of two buildings with a total of 220 apartment units and 12,350 SF of retail/commercial space, with a proposed parking supply of 332 spaces, inclusive of 8 handicap accessible stalls and 56 tandem (2°d access) stalls. Table 1 summarizes the proposed Project development totals for the site. Building 1, located east of Main Street between 5d' Street and 4d' Street, includes the development of a seven -story 196-unit apartment podium, consisting of 45 studio units, 89 one -bedroom units, and 62 two -bedroom units, with 12,350 SF of retail/commercial space on the ground floor over a 311-space parking garage (1 basement + 2 levels above grade). Building 2, located on the northwest corner of Bush Street at 5d' Street, includes the development of a five -story, 24-unit apartment building, consisting of 12 one -bedroom units and 12 two -bedroom units, over a 21- space parking garage, inclusive of one handicap accessible stall. Existing on -street (paid) parking along the project's 4d' Street frontage will be maintained Figure 2 presents the proposed site plan, prepared by MVE + Partners. Project's Pedestrian Connections Pedestrian circulation would be provided via existing public sidewalks along Main Street, Bush Street, 5d' Street and 4d' Street within the vicinity of the project frontage, which will connect to the project site. The project will protect the existing sidewalk along project frontage, and if necessary, repair or reconstruct sidewalks along the project frontage per the City's request. The existing sidewalk system within the project vicinity provides direct connectivity throughout downtown Santa Ana, inclusive of the Santa Ana Metrolink Station located on Santa Ana Boulevard east of Santiago Street, as well as the City's public parking structures located to the east and west of the subject property along 5d' Street. From the project site, it would take approximately 10 minutes to walk to the Santa Ana Metrolink Station that is 0.65 miles from the site. Project's Proximity to Public Transit Public transit bus service is provided in the project area by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Five (5) OCTA bus routes operate within the vicinity of the project site on Main Street, Santa Ana Boulevard, 5`s Street, and First Street, which consists of the following • OCTA Route 53: The major route of travel is Main Street. Nearest to the project site are bus stops on Main Street — northbound and southbound east and west of the intersection with 4s' Street. Route 53 operates on approximate 30-minute headways during weekdays and 20-minute headways on weekends • OCTA Route 55: The major routes of travel include Main Street and First Street. Nearest to the project site are bus stops on First Street — eastbound and westbound west of the intersection with Main Street. Route 55 operates on approximate 30- minute headways on the weekdays and weekends. • OCTA Route 64: The major route of travel is First Street. Nearest to the project site are bus stops on First Street — eastbound and westbound south of the intersection with Main Street. Route 64 operates on approximate 30-minute headways on the weekdays and 25-minutes on the weekends. • OCTA Route 83: The major routes of travel include Main Street, Santa Ana Boulevard, 5s' Street, and Mortimer Street. Nearest to the project site are bus stops on 5s' Street — eastbound and westbound south of the intersection with Main Street. Route 83 operates on approximate 35-minute headways on the weekdays and 45-minute headways on the weekends. • OCTA Route 462: The major routes of travel include Santa Ana Boulevard and 5s' Street. Nearest to the project site are bus stops on 5s' Street — eastbound and westbound south of the intersection with Main Street. Route 462 operates on approximate 20-minute headways on the weekdays. Figure 3 graphically illustrates the transit routes of OCTA within the vicinity of the project. Figure 4 identifies the locations of the existing bus stops in proximity to the Project site. In addition to the above OCTA lines, it is our understanding that the City of Santa Ana and Garden Grove have partnered with OCTA to develop the "OC Streetcar" which will further enhance mobility throughout Downtown Santa Ana, beyond the current transit opportunities that are now availability. Figure 5 presents the anticipated transit route for the OC Streetcar. Project's Proximity to Bicycle Facilities The City of Santa Ana promotes bicycling as a means of mobility and a way in which to improve the quality of life within its community. The Bikeway Master Plan recognizes the needs of bicycle users and aims to create a complete and safe bicycle network throughout the City. Currently, not many bicycle facilities exist in the study area, with the exception of a Class H bike lane along Civic Center Drive, between Flower Street and Broadway. However, review of Figure 6, which presents the City's Bikeway Master Plan, shows that bicycle lanes are proposed to be built throughout the study area. As shown in Figure 6, Class II bike lanes are proposed to be integrated along Civic Center Drive, Santa Ana Boulevard, and Main Street. Notwithstanding the requirements of City Code, the actual parking demand for multifamily residential uses in transit oriented downtown districts have been found to be significantly less. The City's TZC EK for instance, recognized that "residential transit oriented developments, similar to those anticipated/planned under the Transit Zoning Code" have an average level of parking availability of 1.42 spaces per residential unit. (TZC EIR at 4.11-110.) The TZC EIR likewise noted that the TZC "is anticipated to provide parking in excess of the anticipated level of demand." (TZC EIR at 4.11-110.) The Downtown District was also anticipated to have a surplus of on -street parking spaces that would ensure adequate parking capacity within the TZC area. (TZC EIR at 4.11-110.) LLG's previous field studies of actual parking demand at existing sites similar to the project also show that parking demand at the project would be lesser than the requirements of the TZC. The Trio Apartments located at 44 N. Madison Avenue, Pasadena has an actual observed parking demand ratio of 1.22 spaces per DU. This site is located in an area where on -street parking is generally permitted. Further, several paid public parking lots are located nearby, including on the west side of Madison Avenue and a few south of Colorado Boulevard. Existing bus stops are located at the intersection of El Molino Avenue/Union Street, as well as various bus stops located Colorado Boulevard. An existing Park & Ride lot is located about 0.5 miles to the northwest of Trio Apartments, near the intersection of Marengo Avenue/Walnut Street. Further, existing Metro Light Rail stations are located at Lake Street/I-210 Freeway (about 0.5 miles from Trio Apartments) and near Raymond Avenue/Holly Street (about 0.5 miles from Trio Apartments). The adjoining land uses to Trio Apartments consist of mostly office and commercial uses. Additional locations have been surveyed which are not located in a downtown setting but have shown to have lower parking ratios than typical City code. These include the following: Site city Address Size Parking Demand Ratio per DU Adagio on the Green Mission Viejo 2660 Oso Parkway 256 Unit 1.45 Skye at Laguna Niguel Laguna Niguel 28100 Cabot Road 142 Unit 1.49 Apex Laguna Niguel Laguna Niguel 27960 Cabot Road 284 Unit 1.28 Furthermore, as discussed below, parking demand/empirical ratio compilations from other sources, including nearby jurisdictions with similar transit oriented districts, demonstrate that the City Code's parking ratio requirements are substantially higher than actual demand. Table 2 presents a comparison of the residential parking ratios from the City as included in the City's TZC and the City's Municipal Code, plus other sources which located in a similar downtown setting with multiple modes of travel. These additional parking codes include: 1. City of Long Beach Downtown Plan: The City of Long Beach Downtown Plan embraces a "park once" philosophy that focuses on walkability and transit options, and encourages high -density, transit -oriented development as a means to minimize overall trips. Like the TZC, the Long Beach Downtown Plan Area is served by multiple transit options, including bus lines (as a central feature of the downtown area) and train lines, and pedestrian movements include substantial walking and biking shares. Source, City of Long Beach Downtown Plan dated January 2012 prepared by AECOM. 2. Proposed City of San Diego Municipal Code Parking Ratios for Transit Areas: The City of San Diego is proposing changes to its parking ratios for transit priority areas, which are areas within one-half mile of a major transit stop. A major transit stop includes the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods. To determine appropriate parking rates, the City undertook testing of multifamily sites. The City found that 89% of the sites sampled had lower demand than the tested ratio.' For projects in the downtown area, 100% of the sample sites had lower parking demand than one space per unit. Conservatively the ratios identified in Table ' Seethe City of San Diego Planning Department's Transit Priority Area (TPA) Multifamily Parking Update (available at https://www.smdiego.gov/sites/default/files/ppt_-_tpa_parking_program_overview_cpc.pdt). 2 are based on San Diego Municipal Code Chapter 142.0525 Multiple Dwelling Unit Residential Uses — Required Parking Ratios for Transit Area or Transit Priority Area. As discussed above, the TZC area is replete with transit options (bus and train service) that reduce overall parking demand by emphasizing alternative forms of transit. Per the Southern California Association of Governments, the TZC and downtown Santa Ana area are located within a Transit Priority Area.' Therefore, the City of San Diego's study materials are relevant to the TZC. Along with the Codes discussed above, additional parking codes representative of transit -oriented and pedestrian friendly downtown districts are provided in Table 2. Those codes include (1) the City of Santa Monica's Parking Zoning Ordinance Update parking ratios for transit -oriented and mixed uses, (2) the TCRP Report 128 and City of Los Angeles Code for transit -oriented developments (TODs), and (3) the City of Sacramento Zoning Code Parking Regulations for their Traditional District and Urban District. The Institute of Transportation Engineers provide parking rates for residential uses similar to the project that are significantly lower than the TZC requirements. ITE's Parking Generation Manual, for instance, notes that multifamily mid -rise housing has a parking demand ratio that ranges between 1.13 spaces per unit to 1.2 spaces per unit for Center City Core and Dense Multi -Use Urban settings. As applied to the project, those rates would generate demands of approximately 242 to 264 spaces. Table 2 also presents the application of the parking ratios from each source to the project. A "blended" parking ratio (i.e., resident + guest spaces versus the 220 total units) was derived in each column. Going from the left-hand columns of Table 2 to the right-hand columns, it can be seen that the residential ratios are reduced significantly, even in comparison between the City's TZC and Municipal Code. This trend is indicative of what more jurisdictions are now doing, which is rethinking minimum parking standards to meet sustainability goals and encourage transit use, bicycling, and walking. It embraces the notion that the common practice of requiring a large amount of off-street parking spaces (as what typically results from the direct application of city code ratios) leads to inefficient land use and underutilized spaces, while placing unnecessary design and financial burden on new development projects. Households in developments located in or near downtowns, that can easily access transit stations or public parking, typically own fewer vehicles, reducing the demand for residential parking in these areas. It is evident from Table 2 that the City's Code ` See bttp://gisdata-scag.opmdata.ucgis.com/datasets/c9249b6bbaOf49829b67celO4f8lef2O Pgeometry= 117.896 % 2C33.743%2 C-117.814 / 2C33.756. 3 Sowee: TrE Parking Generation Manual, P Edition. parking requirements, especially the TZC, far exceed the parking needs for a downtown setting. Therefore, to help encourage mobility and make use of available public parking in the area, a reduction to the City's parking standards is needed. This type of Project is consistent with the mixed -use nature of the area, proximity to regional transit facilities and bus routes (i.e., Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center), and extensive bicycling by City of Santa Ana residents. The parking requirement for the retail component is based on City TZC ratio 1 space per 4000 square feet (SF) would result in a parking requirement of 31 spaces. The retail component of this Project is anticipated to utilize the nearby City -owned parking garages which are located on the southwest comer of 5t' Street at Main Street (7-levels, 400 spaces), and on 5d] Street at Spurgeon Street, directly east of Bush Street (4-levels, 700 spaces). Figure I also highlights the location of the city owned parking garages with respect to the proposed Project. The table below provides a summary of parking surplus (available spaces) data provided by City staff for these two City -owned parking garages during the weekday hours of 11:00 AM and 2:00 PM. Based on review this information, a minimum of 527 spaces were available during the 11:00 AM hour, whereas a minimum of 638 spaces were available at the 2:00 PM hour. Date 5th at Spurgeon Available Spaces 5° at Main Available Space Total Available Spaces HAM 2PM HAM 2PM HAM 2PM Monday, October 1, 2018 561 577 117 169 678 746 Tuesday, October 2, 2018 547 559 126 158 673 717 Wednesday, October 3, 2018 507 570 140 152 647 722 Thursday, October 4, 2018 537 581 129 120 666 701 Friday, October 5, 2018 569 573 140 100 709 673 Thursday, November 1, 2018 449 560 78 160 527 720 Friday, November 2, 2018 471 587 120 188 591 775 Monday, December 3, 2018 518 584 144 159 662 743 Tuesday, December 4, 2018 547 571 127 153 674 724 Wednesday, December 5, 2018 540 590 85 170 625 760 Thursday, December 6, 2018 554 556 107 116 661 672 Friday, December 7, 2018 485 544 89 94 574 638 Additionally, Figure 4 further highlights the hourly parking demand profile for both locations during a typical weekday, based on an evaluation of parking data provided by the City for Wednesday December 5, 2018. Review of the tabular information provided above (parking surpluses), combined with a review of Figure 4 shows that during the peak midday period there is more than 500 available spaces within the two nearby parking garages which could easily accommodate the parking needs for the retail component and/or guest parking; during the evening period the parking available would be even more (see Figure 4 bar chart). In the event that additional overflow residential parking were needed it is anticipated the parking garages would have more than adequate surpluses to accommodate the late evening/early morning period, although the Project would have to seek City Council approval and request permission from the City to lease spaces for the Project's residents. PARKING REQUIREMENTS City TZC Parking Requirement Table 2 summarizes the parking requirements of the Project based on application of the City's TZC ratios of 2 spaces per DU and 0.15 guest spaces per DU for residential uses, and 1 space per 400 SF of retail floor area. As shown, the Project would require 504 spaces, comprised of 473 spaces for the residential component, inclusive of guest parking, and 31 spaces for the retail component. Comparing this parking requirement against a proposed parking supply of 332 parking spaces results in a parking deficit of 172 spaces. Parking Requirement for Affordable Housing Based on the application of the affordable housing ratios listed above to the Project's residential component and City TZC code retail ratio to the commercial component, the Project would require 325 spaces, comprised of 294 spaces for the residential component, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking, and 31 spaces for the retail component. Comparing this parking requirement against the parking supply, the 325- space parking requirement is satisfied and there is an additional surplus of 7 spaces. Table 3 summarizes the resulting parking demand estimates based on the affordable housing ratios applied to the Project's residential component. As shown, the Project is designed to meet these requirements, with one parking space per bedroom provided for the residential component of the Project. The assignment of parking spaces to the various users of the Project is documented in the following Parking Management Plan. /AI ■■ moll Jill oil Ili I[N 11 li li I�I A�31 �II �' ■ ■ ■ ■ " d 1 !II III �! II �� II I'« hI I! It I,I� III 11 �� 1 I. ■ I� I 1 i j '_ _- i i I : _ - I ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 u I - I `I� a II II I li �i IP $ol III I I I ■ ■ ■ ■ I t on me M I I III III re a r VV ■ ■ ■ ■` s ' 1 11 n• ■ I!I J4■� �' " IN !I m — I , u r i it III III I II II - ■ ■ .. I s,��E'— � � i� �I IN lei NMI IIII Jill if I 11■ dew a �■r Amp ali pill 14 PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP) To ensure adequate parking is provided for both tenants, employees and guests of the Project, it is recommended that when the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company deems it necessary, the following key Parking Management Strategies be implemented by the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company: PMP Measures The following measures are available to the Project to mitigate any parking impacts or deficiencies in the event the proposed onsite parking supply is determined to be greater than the allocated one parking space per bedroom rate. 1. Property Owner/Property Management Company shall assign one (1) parking space to every unit. Additional spaces may be purchased and assigned to any unit that requests additional assigned spaces. These additional purchased spaces will be assigned to the 2°d access/tandem spaces. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall determine the allocation of parking spaces for resident tenants, guests, retail customers and employees, inclusive of spaces designated and signed for prospective resident tenants and/or short-term parking (1-hour) for retail customers. Figure 8 depicts the potential location of the five (5) spaces designated and signed for prospective resident tenant and/or 1-hour short-term parking for retail customers, subject to approval of the Property Owner/Property Management Company. 2. If the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company determine that the actual parking demand for the site exceeds the State Code's affordable housing parking requirement, the Property Owner/Property Management Company shall restrict parking on -site to only residential tenants. The only exception to this would be that the five (5) spaces designated and signed for prospective resident tenants and/or short-term parking for retail customers would remain. All retail customers and resident guests would be required to park in one of the near -by public parking structures or utilize on -street parking. The two (2) closest public parking structures are located on the southwest corner of Main Street/5d' Street and on 5d' Street at Spurgeon Street directly east of Bush Street. Figure 9 highlights the two (2) public parking structures. Based on information provided by the City, there is an excess of 500 spaces available during peak operating hours within the two (2) public parking structures. If the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company determine that offsite parking is required for the Project, the Property Owner/Property Management Company shall execute an agreement with the City of Santa Ana to acquire the rights to lease spaces on behalf of the retail employees. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall secure up to 10 spaces for employees/staff of the Project's retail component as part of the agreement, which would allow the Project employees to access the designated parking structure(s) 24-hours a day seven (7) days a week. 3. If the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company further determines, even after implementation of above -mentioned PMP measures, that offsite parking is required for the Project's residential tenants, residential tenants may purchase additional parking within the near -by public parking structure via the agreement that the Property Owner/Property Management Company established with the City Finance Department. To facilitate this PMP measure, the Property Owner/Property Management Company would seek City Council approval and upon Council approval, execute an agreement with the City of Santa Ana to acquire the rights to lease spaces on behalf of the Project's residents. Pursuant to communications with the Finance Department, the Property Owner/Property Management Company would secure up to 60 spaces for residents of the Project's apartment component as part of the agreement, which would allow the Project residents to access the designated parking structure(s) 24-hours a day seven (7) days a week. Based on information provided by the City Finance Department, the current availability for City -owned parking is within one parking structure located at 5s' street and Spurgeon Street (Fiesta Parking Structure), where 450 spaces are available for lease. As shown in Figure 2, this City -owned structure is located within walking distance to the subject property, across Bush Street. Primary vehicular access is provided at the intersection of 5s' Street and Spurgeon Street, with gated pedestrian access provided via entries on 5th Street and Bush Street, as well as French Street. 4. In lieu of PMP Measure No. 4, the Property Owner/Property Management Company, if deemed necessary, may implement an on -site valet -assist program. Figure 10 presents the detailed valet plan which shows up to 80 additional spaces could be accommodated. To implement the valet operation, the Property Owner/Property Management Company would engage the services of a well -established valet operations company. A few of the valet operators that are currently being contacted are ABC Valet, PPS Parking and Elite Valet Services. 5. The parking conditions will be reviewed/monitored on a quarterly basis by the Property Owner/Property Management Company and appropriate actions detailed above will be taken to ensure that the necessary PMP measures are being implemented. Through this monitoring and cooperation with the tenants as a result of the quarterly review/monitoring, a partnership will be formed to ensure that residential tenants and retail employees and Management Company personnel on the property work together to ensure adequate parking is available. Table 4 provides a summary of the Project's composite parking supply ratio with implementation of the above -recommended PMP measures. A review of Row A of Table 4 shows that the Project's parking ratio calculates to 1.51 spaces/unit (332 spaces - 220 units). With implement of PMP measures No. 2 and No. 3, which would be attained by leasing up to 70 off -site parking spaces within the City -owned parking structure, the Project's parking supply ratio would increase to 1.55 spaces/unit (342 spaces - 220 units) and 1.83 spaces/unit (402 spaces - 220 units), respectively (See Row B and Row C of Table 4). The Project's composite parking supply ratio further increases with implementation of PMP measure no. 4, which would add an additional 80 spaces via implementation of a valet parking program. As shown in Row D of Table 4, the Project's composite parking ratio calculates to 2.19 spaces/unit (482 spaces - 220 units) with the implementation of PMP measures No. 2, No. 3 and No. 4, which exceeds the Project's residential parking requirement of 2.15 space/unit based on the City's TZC. Figure 11 is a bar chart of the Project's composite parking supply ratio with implementation of the above -recommended PMP measures, and in comparison to the City's TZC parking requirement. CONCLUSIONS The composite parking ratio for the proposed Project is 1.51 spaces per unit (332 provided spaces divided 220 apartment units). Comparing this ratio to what is required by other similar cities shows that the Project provides 10% to 67% more parking spaces than other apartment projects located in a downtown setting. Since the Project falls within the downtown setting and provides the opportunity for alternative modes of travel along with public on -street parking and near -by public structured parking, the proposed Project's parking supply will be sufficient (ample) to support its needs. Further yet, given 5% of the Project's residential units are designated as very low affordable units, the parking ratios for affordable housing developments specified in the California Government Code Section 65915 were applied. From this calculation, the Project would require 325 spaces, comprised of 294 spaces for the residential component, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking, and 31 spaces for the retail component (using the City's TZC retail ratio of I space per 400 SF). When compared to a supply of 332 spaces, the 325-space parking requirement is satisfied and results in a surplus of 7 spaces. Nevertheless, to ensure adequate parking is provided for both tenants, employees and guests of the Project, the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company, if they deem it necessary, would implement the appropriate Parking Management Strategy recommended in this Parking Management Plan to mitigate any parking impacts or deficiencies. * * * * * * * * * * * We appreciate the opportunity to provide this analysis. Should you have any questions, please call us at 949.825.6175. Respectively submitted, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers z C 9D. 2006 O x _ w., 6130121 Richard E. Barretto, P.E. Principal Attachments cc: Shane Green, P.E., Transportation Engineer III I � � I c `� I` � I I I T :•Itl, - I p: ti— I Cb -- - 4 =-n r j _ m -- SOURCE: MVE + PARTNERS FIGURE 2 �NO SCALE PROPOSED SITE PLAN FIRST AMERICAN PLAZA, SANTA ANA Os 6LOz—Z1-60 CZ'19M JOI 6mP'O—p t86SVbmp dwdV6mpAouo Djuos roz,d uo ws }say — t96221ZV0062Vs I IIIII�II ����.. ���� ��i{ �i • 1 r Jf n Ifff7lff� Z aNda9 O a ? IfIff11ff111/f R a Q �.. 1 1 1 1 1 �i'ti■ f;�. f1 I��ff, •1J ' ¢ aat/aNVJ a : LffflfffP NIdW a Z 83MO13 ■ 10151l18 Z z Q N w o M31AU I VJ LL V • n t c �q W k�� w pprlar Sr A d N Mln ler Si t N1 d G A w w m FsI L Q yt e'er u' T c c g m w _ t J y i41 u ® v a&4 W w R�rM SA French 31 a J\ F'mch 51 li A Y✓' y x oi 0- o g Ym 27 m u N d w E m > R a� E3 o n VI N V rTj } ww 4 " G l c Q 9 N Bus 5r� ...rL 4 1 d d Main Street Mdin Street 3 } ��•�/j�/ 66 p 06d 'c NSysamwa St B' R w 0 ®N d lam` CP�� G¢ e N Broadway R 9 9 alp ? � w c � 'o N Birch St i C to tu3 x G F— } � Y 51 rm mRe. 5l ro a �Tj a � a n do m. 2 G a Skilr4ory 5r w Q 75 aldeW U d' 4 � w GA V Orange Ave � N Spurgeon 5r � w ,Wpress Ave NBnans U a y_ � N � w w El U O s 1 19 ry 3 E3 'w m � � a N Sycamore St 6SYcamnre 5l 3 � L'Y � � K•J U C ry G N Birch S¢ 5 Bird Sr y Cl) Q V z z o Q W Ha U a p n aQ _ N W O Q H z � U_ i11 Of w Q E, — n a � o w � NJ r r } I z w o lJ Y U d f- � II II o � r u J Q U N U mz Ds 6LOZ—Z1-60 9b'£5M d0I 6mp'S—p t86SV6mp dwdV6mpAouo oluos 'oz,d uo wo ;say — t96£81ZV006£Vuu �o �a �y boa SY � pr M.0 wo 6 �6• ))Y� •• 4 �Oaii • OONFO • • a • p m a i a • rca ZO �° w Z< o a • 0,0 OYi f U � awl OV N � V t� ZW N ZQ nrpw n. w �n n. w0 ¢ 2 D¢ zE 0 3s • �v�i 0 u m o� 1 T 1 1 �bbH. b b1Nby. • 0 � w ¢_ �z au 0 p p w o0 0 • 6 V 0 C a i $ as o 00 6LOZ-ZL-60 OZ:99:90 dOl 6.p'9-V 096C\6"P dwd\6MP\oUD oluos •ozold uoouawo W!V - V96MZ\006C\:u S y F t Wig' $j�AO 00 � MY �4 fldrk/ s ss — On �9 wptl 1_ * ka6 e.aaa++x r LL i O en t s g V V Y a ¢ M � O CCQ a J P N iaf L � ¢jTi p ii f1 oD 61Dz—z1-60 csesaD dm 6MP d—i a2KA^^P dwdVbmpAono oiuDs °DzDld uo , wD awu — +264YLzVDws A:u �g I I P �m I WIQ a al al - u NaI Z a ~JI I �o I I I I i2 I I Ig `g yuewa� e —12 'II, 1 I Y I� '� e I pp II I, I 1 �I 1 a 1 1� I --- n1 / �xv / fl nml SIX STREET naoz "� aw I G I �I�II 1pal Tel Ex l ------------ I x A Vi4 rl any ' � naoz � I .. I' I I x� 3 N I ix r I e v1Y t 1 I' '1 1 I I l..x I 1 w I * III I �I I11 �11 k 4 IIT i I w l — — — — � 12-1 i �NO SCALE SOURCE: MVE + PARTNERS FIGURE 8 = PROSPECTIVE RESIDENT TENANT AND SHORT—TERM PARKING FOR RETAIL PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN FIRST AMERICAN PLAZA, SANTA ANA G�Ot-aVsVV so am emp m.-i se62V61v eweAc„aAlll I... ...Id wu - Ve6ts A000<V., a Cp= - �`y£W.'wi 1�� MIYw a v 'iy it i a= _-=- w r � ♦ ♦�,�, a ww 0 w� D r Z Q ®® U U Uo > [ NY U_ U U W S LL Q Q N VI J J Z H m O o H H d ¢VIZ �Z pU p J 51 r z r z s C s C uo �< z : z ♦'s VA � ww VA m ,9 jwlww;lw`wwj ®®® ® ®®m A -- a �;. � � a —A ww ww ♦ ww w > � ww it iw+r ir• � ,- 0o 6IO—n-60 z<ae.oL day dMwu—d a2KA^^n dwdVbmPAono Dios 'DzDO uo , wD awu — +2649LzVDO6£V° rn 00 LO CQ co N d' 0 C'J m 02 � m 0 E L Cn rl Cu It CO a --I LO r-I 02 co CO c Q m m hjddn58upied N ~ ~ rl O Q Q zE,Q z a WaQ N � ova � Q Q U U � w r TABLE 1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY4 Project Land Use / Project Description Development Totals e +Main Apartments ❑ Studio Units 45 Units ❑ 1 Bedroom Units 101 Units ❑ 2 Bedroom Units 74 Units Total Residential Units: 220 Units ❑ Large Retail Suite 9,750 SF ❑ Small Retail Suite 2,600 SF Total Retail Space: 12,350 SF Parking Supply by Level ❑ Subterranean Level o Handicap Parking 3 spaces o Resident Parking — I' Access 145 spaces o Resident Parking — 2"d Access/ Tandem 13 spaces ❑ Level o Handicap Parking 5 spaces o Resident Parking — I' Access 55 spaces o Resident Parking — 2°d Access/Tandem 9 spaces o GuestParking/Leasing 5 spaces ❑ Leve12 o Resident Parking — I' Access 63 spaces o Resident Parking — 2"d Access/Tandem 34 spaces Parking Supply Allocation: o Handicap Parking 8 spaces o Resident Parking —I' Access 263spaces o Resident Parking —2ndAccess/Tandem 56spaces o Guest Parking/Leasing 5spaces Total Parking Supply 332 spaces a Source: MVE+Partners, 08/08/2019. 50 ) ::;_! , !§ B • ; ,:._! • E§ B . 222) TABLE 3 PARKING REQUIREMENTS BASED ON THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TRANSIT ZONING CODE Spaces Project Description Size Parking Ratio Required 4u + Main Project Retail 12,350 SF 1 space per 400 SF 31 Residential Units ( DU) Studio/l Bedroom Units 146 2 spaces per DU 292 2 Bedroom Units 74 2 spaces per DU 148 Guest Parking 220 0.15 spaces per DU 33 Subtotal 473 Total Parking Requirement: 504 Proposed Parking Supply: 332 Parking Surplus/Deficiency (+/-): -172 Residential Use Composite Parking Demand Ratio (sp/du) 2.15 TABLE 4 PARKING REQUIREMENTS BASED ON CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65915 FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING Spaces Project Description Size Parking Ratio Required e +Main Proiect Retail 12,350 SF 1 space per 400 SF 31 Affordable Housing Units ( DU) Studio/l Bedroom Units 146 1 spaces per DU 146 2 Bedroom Units 74 2 spaces per DU 148 Parking Requirement: 325 Proposed Parking Supply: 332 Parking Surplus/Deficiency (+/-): +7 TABLE 5 PROJECT PARKING SUMMARY -COMPOSITE PARKING SUPPLY RATIOS Project Description Size Parking Ratio Spaces Required e + Main Project Retail Affordable Housing Units ( DU) Studio/l Bedroom Units 2 Bedroom Units 12,350 SF 146 74 1 space per 400 SF 1 spaces per DU 2 spaces per DU 31 146 148 Parking Requirement: 325 Proposed On -site Parking Supply: 332 A. Composite Parking Supply Ratio (sp/du) 1.51 Proposed On -site Parking Supply + 10 off -site employee spaces: 342 B. Composite Parking Supply Ratio (sp/du) 1.55 Proposed On -site Parking Supply + 70 total off -site spaces: 402 C. Composite Parking Supply Ratio (sp/du) 1.83 Proposed On -site Parking Supply + 70 total off -site spaces + 80 valet spaces: 482 D. Composite Parking Supply Ratio (sp/du) 2.19 EXHIBIT 14 This page left blank intentionally. O RSG BETTER COMMUNITIES. BOLDER FUTURES. August 30, 2019 Michael Reynolds, Principal THE CONCORD GROUP 369 San Miguel Drive, Suite 265 Newport Beach, CA 92660 4TH + MAIN MIXED -USE PROJECT, DOWNTOWN SANTA ANA DEVELOPMENT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Dear Mr. Reynolds: 17872 GILLETTE AVE. 714 541 4585 SUITE 350 INFO@WEBRSG.COM IRVINE, CA 92614 WEBRSG.COM Via Electronic Mail RSG, Inc. ("RSG") was retained by The Concord Group ("TCG") to perform a fiscal and economic impact analysis for the development of a proposed mixed -use apartment and retail project ("Project") in downtown Santa Ana, California. TCG obtained this analysis on behalf of the property owner/developer, Toll Brothers Apartment Living ("Developer"), which recently applied for redevelopment with the City of Santa Ana's ("City") Planning and Building Services Department. The Project site spans several parcels on either side of 51h Street for a total Project area of 2.78 acres. The parcels are located at 111 East 4th Street, 117 East 5th Street, and 119 East 5th Street. The larger site is the vacant First American office building property, which is 2.31-acres, and the smaller site is 0.47-acres. The Developer proposes to demolish the existing First American office building and construct one seven -story residential apartment building surrounding a two-story parking structure and including a retail component on the 41h Street side. On the smaller parcel, the developer proposes one five -story residential apartment building with parking on the first level (see Figure 1 on page 12). The Project consists of 220 units for both buildings, 209 market rate and 11 affordable units restricted to very -low income. This letter describes our analysis, methodology, and anticipated recurring fiscal impacts resulting from development of the Project. As is typical at this stage, our conclusions could evolve as the application moves forward through the design and environmental review process. In addition to the developer's estimated $4.0 million in City fees, RSG anticipates the following fiscal outcomes over a 25-year forecast period, presented in both nominal and real value (2019$) discounted at a 4 percent discount rate: Approximately $16.9 million ($9.7 million in 2019$) in additional City General Fund revenue, including construction period revenues, recurring site -specific tax, and other Project revenues. Approximately $167.1 thousand (2019$) in property tax revenue per year, as opposed to the current $11.1 thousand (2019$). The site development would generate approximately $6.7 million ($3.8 million in 2019$) after 25 years. 113MIJ e17:1Ng11:l Over the same 25-year period, the City General Fund expenditures associated with the Project total $4.1 million ($2.2 million in 2019$). As a result, the net new General Fund revenue is projected to be approximately $12.8 million ($7.4 million in 2019$) from the acquisition and development of the Project. The following table summarizes the estimated fiscal impacts attributed to the Project. Year -by year projections are included as an exhibit on page 11 of this report. NET NEW RECURRING GENERAL FUND FISCAL IMPACTS 4th + Main 25-Year Recurring Revenue Category Nominal NPV 4.0% Property Tax $ 6,682,574 $ 3,806,030 Property Tax In -Lieu 4,356,360 2,481,145 Utility User Tax 1,301,574 708,274 Resident -Derived Sales Tax (Regular) 696,477 38,832 Resident -Derived Sales Tax (2018 Increase) 520,471 - Retail -Derived Sales Tax (Regular) 1,722,085 379,000 Retail -Derived Sales Tax (2018 Increase) 1,286,898 339,687 Business Tax 307,552 167,360 Total Revenues $ 16,873,991 $ 9,658,495 Less City Expenditures $ (4,061,138) $ (2,209,938) NET NEW REVENUE TOTAL $ 12,812,853 $ 7,448,558 Sources: City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, California State Board of Equalization, ESRI Business Analyst Online, and RSG, Inc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project site is located on several parcels in downtown Santa Ana where the vacant First American Office building stands, directly across Bush Street from Santa Ana's Fourth Street Market. The site also includes a parcel across from the First American building on 51h Street, so the development will include two individual apartment buildings, the larger of which will sit on the current First American building site, including retail along 41h and Main and a plaza area on the corner of 41h and Bush. Both buildings will include parking, the larger a two-story structure wrapped by the residential building, and the smaller a ground -level garage. There will be 220 units between the two apartment buildings, the majority of which will be market rate units (209), with the remainder being affordable to very -low income tenants (11). The following chart shows the unit breakdown by size. 4th +Main Unit Breakdown Studio 1 Bd_ 2 Bd. Studio 2 Bd_ 45 74 Spume: Toll Brothem Aperfr nt Owing Central Orange County has seen a recent growth of infill luxury and market rate apartment construction, particularly in areas where office and other commercial uses are no longer viable. In this case, the Project entails development of 209 market -rate apartments and 11 affordable apartments, with 332 parking spaces, and amenities comparable to what is found among many newer apartment complexes built in area. As a part of the application for development with the City, the developer has been asked to provide a fiscal impact analysis of the proposed Project. The City's fiscal concerns are reasonable given the slow recovery of the Santa Ana General Fund coming out of the Global Financial Crisis. ONE-TIME FEES TO CITY AND SAUSD Based on information from the project budget, the developer anticipates the Project fees due to the City may total $4.0 million, or approximately $18.1 thousand per unit. This includes City development impact fees for transportation, traffic, parks, water and sewer, plan check and permit fees, OCFA fees, and engineering and public works fees. RSG did not include these fees in the forecast of recurring fees. RECURRING FISCAL IMPACTS Property Tax Revenue RSG utilized the current City property tax share as reported by the County of Orange ("County") Auditor Controller to estimate the City's share of property tax that would result from development of the Project. The property tax revenues presented in this report are net of any current revenues received from the site (estimated at $5.9 million in 2018-19). The net new assessed value as a result of the Project development is approximately $87.8 million (2019$). The estimated annual property tax revenue upon completion of construction is approximately $167,111 (2019$). PROPERTY TAX REVENUE 4th + Main Current Assessed Valuation (2018-19) $ 5,858,264 Proposed Project 93,693,331 Net New Value $ 87,835,067 City Property Tax Rate 0.190255615 Property Tax Revenues $ 167,111 Source: County of Orange Auditor Controller, RSG, Inc. RSG assumed 2 percent inflation on property tax revenues over the 25-year projection period, resulting in $6.7 million ($3.81 million in 2019$) in net new property tax revenues for the City General Fund. Please note discounted projections throughout this report reflect the net present value, or NPV, at a 4 percent discount rate. Property Tax in -lieu of Motor Vehicle License Fee Revenue The City receives property tax in -lieu of motor vehicle license fee ("MVLF") revenues, as calculated by the County Auditor -Controller. Property tax in -lieu is based on a growth rate in assessed value between 2004-05 and the current year. The City's growth rate during this period is approximately 56.597 percent. The growth rate is then applied to the City's MVLF 2004-05 base year value of $19.8 million. As a result of these calculations, the City's 2018-19 property tax in - lieu is estimated as $31.0 million. The Project is expected to increase the City's assessed value by approximately 0.42 percent, likely resulting in an increase in net new property tax in lieu of MVLF revenues of approximately $130,132; $4.4 million ($2.5 million in 2019$) over the 25-year projection period. PROPERTY TAX IN -LIEU OF MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE FEES 4th + Main 2004-05 City Assessed Value $ 15,979,631,532 2013-14 City Assessed Value 25,023,667,349 Growth 56.597% Santa Ana 2004-05 VLF $ 19,819,113 Santa Ana 2018-19 VLF 31,036,191 Project Assessed Value ' $ 105,486,333 Increase in Assessed Value 0.42% Property Tax In -lieu Revenue $ 130,832 ' Inflated pursuant to the construction schedule Source: County of Orange Auditor Controller, RSG, Inc. 0 Utility User Tax The City assesses a utility user tax of 5.5 percent on electricity, gas, water, and telephone revenues generated within Santa Ana. Utility costs were estimated by RSG based on a review of similar projects and utility costs in Orange County. Assumed annual utility expenditures subject to the City's UUT consist of: Gas at $270 annually ($240 in 2019$), water at $540 annually ($480 in 2019$), electric at $1,351 annually ($1,200 in 2019$), and phone at $878 annually ($780 in 2019$). Based on these assumptions, RSG estimates Project will be approximately $35,699 per year the 25-year projection period. that utility user tax revenues generated by the or $1.3 million ($708.3 thousand in 2019$) over UTILITY USER TAX REVENUE 4th + Main Energy Expenditures per Household $ Number of Households 2,950 220 Total Residential Energy Expenses $ 649,080 City Tax Rate 6% City Tax Revenues $ 35,699 Sources: City of Santa Ana Energy Information Administration, RSG, Inc Resident -Derived Sales Tax The additional residential households in Santa Ana are expected to result in increased sales for retailers and restaurants within the city. RSG obtained average annual household expenditures for households within a 5-minute driving radius of the Project from ESRI Business Analyst Online. By adjusting the household expenditures based on taxable and non-taxable sales, RSG estimates that each household generates approximately $17,000 in taxable sales per year. RSG adjusted this figure to 50 percent as the Project is in close proximity to several significant shopping centers, including Bristol/Sunflower Plaza, Bristol Marketplace, Mainplace Mall, and Downtown Santa Ana, among others, which lie within Santa Ana, however, many other shopping destinations exist in other cities nearby (Orange, Tustin, Garden Grove, Anaheim, Irvine, and Costa Mesa). In 2018, Santa Ana Voters approved a local transactions and use tax, increasing the current 7.75% sales tax by 1.5% until 2029, and then by 1 % until 2039, when the tax will expire. The initiative, which was referred to on the ballot as Measure X, was titled the "Santa Ana Neighborhood Safety, Homeless Prevention and Essential City Services Enhancement Measure," and is expected to generate approximately $60 million dollars annually until 2029, and $40 million dollars annually until 2039. RSG took this increase into consideration when analyzing the affects the new residents will have on the general fund. The total residential derived sales tax revenue from the regular tax rate is approximately $19,103; or $696 thousand ($379 thousand in 2019$) over 25 years. On top of this, the residential derived sales tax revenue from the Measure X increase is $28,654, or $520 thousand ($340 thousand in 2019$) over 25 years. RESIDENT -DERIVED SALES TAX REVENUE 4th + Main Taxable Household Expenditures $ 17,366 Number of Households 220 Estimated Transactions within City of Santa Ana 50% City Share of Sales Tax 1 % 2018 Sales Tax Increase 1.5% Resident -Derived Sales Tax Revenues (Regular) $ 19,103 (2018 Increase) $ 28,654 Source: California State Board of Equalization, RSG, Inc Retail -Derived Sales Tax The Project also includes 12,500 square feet of retail space. The new businesses operating in this space will also bring in sales tax revenues for the City. Since the Developer does not yet know the exact types of retail tenants that will fill the space, RSG estimated an average of $350 of sales per square foot, which equates to estimated annual sales generated by the new space of $4.3 million (2019$). Retail -derived sales tax is estimated to bring in $1.7 million after 25-years ($937 thousand in 2019$) under the regular City share of sales tax, and an additional $1.3 million ($840 thousand in 2019$) under the Measure X increase. RETAIL -DERIVED SALES TAX REVENUE 4th + Main Annual Sales General Retail $ 4,322,500 $ 4,322,500 City Share of Sales Tax 1 % 2018 Sales Tax Increase 2% Retail -Derived Sales Tax Revenues (Regular) $ 47,233 (2018 Increase) $ 70,850 Source: California State Board of Equalization, RSG, Inc. Business Tax The City assesses a business tax on retail, restaurant, and multi -family management companies. Retail and restaurant business taxes are assessed based on annual sales while management company business taxes are assessed based on a base tax rate plus a rate and surcharge per unit. The combined business tax revenues are approximately $7,571, or $308 thousand ($167 thousand in 2019$) over 25 years. BUSINESS TAX REVENUES 4th + Main Multifamily Business Tax Basic Tax Rate $ 56 Disability & Education Fee 4 Registration Fee 31 Per Unit Tax Rate 11 Per Unit Rental Surcharge 23 Number of Units 220 Multifamily Business Tax Revenues $ 7,571 Sources: City of Santa Ana, RSG, Inc CITY EXPENDITURES RSG utilized the additional population that will stem from people moving into the Project to estimate the total added expenditures to the City General Fund for servicing the Project. Consistent with other recent analyses prepared by RSG on projects in Santa Ana, RSG assumed that each studio would house 1.20 residents, each one -bedroom unit would house 1.75 residents, each two -bedroom unit would house 3 residents, and each three -bedroom unit would house 4.25 residents. Overall, this works out to an average household size of approximately 2.06 residents per unit, which we consider supportable given the unit mix that is more heavily weighted towards one -bedroom configurations. While Santa Ana has a much higher average household size, many of the denser residents live south of 171h Street. By comparison, within a 1-mile radius of this site, average household sizes are approximately 4.56 persons', which includes both single family and multifamily housing, and an overall larger unit sizes with two or more bedrooms. Rent levels and bedroom sizes are often a driver of occupancy, as the market rate units are expected to rent at the top end of the Santa Ana rental market, we anticipate renters to be more affluent and smaller households than what is found elsewhere in Santa Ana, and more like what exists in newer complexes being constructed today. RSG gathered data from the US Census and ESRI Business Analyst Online to estimate the equivalent full-time residents of the Project. Approximately 13 percent of Santa Ana residents work within Santa Ana, which, in effect means that the City is servicing these resident -employees 100 percent of the time. Thirty-three percent of Santa Ana residents work outside the city. Assuming the residents that work outside of the city are outside City limits from 9 am to 5 pm, Santa Ana is servicing these residents approximately 73 percent of the time. The city's remaining residential population (about 54 percent), is serviced by the City 100 percent of the time. Accounting for all residents and employees based on the percent of time spent in the city, the Project will generate a daily (24/7) population of 411 persons. RSG identified variable costs, as opposed to fixed costs, by department in the City of Santa Ana FY 2018-19 Adopted Budget. Variable costs are expenditures by the City that increase or decrease based on the residential and employee population. The City Manager and City Attorney offices, for example, are fixed costs that will not vary based on population. Meanwhile, Police and Parks and Recreation departments will experience service increases due to the added population. Source: Housing Profile, ESRI Business Analyst, 2018 Projections 7 RSG estimated the added City expenditures as a result of the Project at approximately $111,388. Over a 25-year projection period, the Project will add $4.1 million ($2.2 million in 2019$) in City expenditures. SUMMARY OF RECURRING CITY EXPENDITURES' CITY OF SANTA ANA 4th + Main Current City Project -derived Total City Percent City Department Expenditures City Expenditures Expenditures' Increase City Manager's Office $ 2,703,450 $ - $ 2,703,450 0.00% Non -Departmental & Interfund Transfers 15,645,238 - 15,645,238 0.00% Clerk of the Council Office 1,648,822 25 1,648,847 0.00% City Attorneys Office 3,070,448 - 3,070,448 0.00% Personnel Services 1,766,698 90 1,766,788 0.01% Finance & Management Services 5,894,409 213 5,894,622 0.00% Bowers Museum Corporation 1,476,130 - 1,476,130 0.00% Parks, Recreation and Community Services 21,173,178 794 21,173,972 0.00% Police Department 130,482,534 70,774 130,553,308 0.05% Fire Services 52,129,291 28,547 52,157,838 0.05% Planning & Building Agency 12,054,462 23 12,054,485 0.00% Public Works Agency 8,166,538 - 8,166,538 0.00% Community Development Agency 980,107 - 980,107 0.00% Total in FY 2018-19 $ 257,191,306 $ 100,466 $ 257,291,771 0.04% Total in 2022-23 $ 111,388 1 For this analysis, RSG identified departmental costs in the City of Santa Ana FY 2018-19 Budget that are variable costs, as opposed to fixed costs. Variable costs are expenditures by the City that increase or decrease based on the residential and employee population in the City. For example, City Council and Human Resources salaries and wages generally are fixed costs that don at vary based on population. Meanwhile, the Fire Services and Parks & Community Services departments will likely experience service cost increases due to the added population. 2 Current expenditures are based on adopted expenditures in the City of Santa Ana's FY 2018-19 Budget. 3 Sum of current City expenditures and project -derived City expenditures. Sources: City of Santa Ana, RSG, Inc., US Census Bureau EMPLOYMENT Development and ongoing operation of the Project will generate employment opportunities, add labor income to the market area, and add value to the gross regional product. For the purpose of this analysis, RSG used the IMPLAN model to measure the economic impacts of the Project using zip code -based data for the city and county. IMPLAN is an input-output analysis software tool that tracks the interdependence among various producing and consuming sectors of the economy. According to MIG, Inc., the creators of IMPLAN, the software measures the relationship between a given set of demands for final goods and services and the inputs required to satisfy those demands. IMPLAN publishes countywide data on an annual basis; this analysis utilized the 2017 County of Orange dataset to calculate direct, indirect, and induced impacts. The IMPLAN inputs are investment or operating costs of the Project and the resulting outputs are economic impacts, including employment generation, labor income, and gross regional product. Jobs are the primary impacts calculated by IMPLAN. RSG analyzed both temporary and permanent economic impacts. The Developer's total Project cost ($86,115,870), which includes hard and soft costs and excludes the land purchase price, was used to determine temporary economic impacts resulting during construction of the Project. These costs were attributed to residential development, which corresponds to IMPLAN Sector 60, "Construction of new multifamily residential structures." RSG analyzed the direct, indirect, and induced effects both during the construction phase (Temporary Impacts) and operations phase (Permanent Impacts). The various types of effects are described below: • Direct Effects — Refers to the direct effects that occur on the Project site resulting from development costs and operational sales revenue. • Indirect Effects — Changes in sales, jobs, and/or income within the businesses that supply goods and services to the Project. Indirect effects do not occur directly on the Project -site but are an indirect effect to surrounding or related businesses. • Induced — Regional changes resulting from additional spending earned either directly or indirectly from the Project. The IMPLAN analysis concludes that the temporary construction component of the Project will result in 420.5 new direct full-time and part-time jobs, 186.4 indirect full-time and part-time jobs, and 216.9 induced full-time and part-time jobs within Santa Ana. The total temporary construction jobs attributed to the Project total nearly 824 full-time and part-time jobs. The permanent impacts attributed to the Project are 68 full-time and part-time jobs related to the operations of both the residential building itself, as well as the retail component of the Project. This includes 49.8 direct full-time and part-time jobs, 7.3 indirect full-time and part-time jobs, and 10.8 induced full-time and part-time jobs within Santa Ana. The following table outlines the full-time and part-time jobs within the City and County boundaries. PROJECTED EMPLOYMENT 4th + Main Temporary (Construction) Jobs Direct 420.5 Indirect 186.4 Induced 216.9 Subtotal 823.8 Permanent Jobs Direct 49.8 Indirect 7.3 Induced 10.8 Subtotal M] Total Temporary & Permanent Jobs Direct 470.3 Indirect 193.7 Induced 227.7 Total 892 Source: IMPLAN E NON -GENERAL FUND FISCAL IMPACTS Business Improvement District Downtown Santa Ana was established as a Business Improvement District (BID) in 1984. BIDS are assessment districts in which business owners pay special levies that go toward various improvements and promotions of the district, in this case, downtown Santa Ana. The City collects the funds and provides them to Downtown Inc. and Santa Ana Business Council, which coordinate events such as First Saturday Artwalk, Savor Santa Ana, Boca De Oro Literary Festival, Santa Ana Media Summit, Outdoor Cinema Series, and the Santa Ana Sidewalk Sales, events that advertise the downtown area and bring foot traffic for local businesses. The Project is located within the BID, so it will be charged BID fees like the other businesses in the area. Businesses are levied according to the following guidelines: • Retail Sale of Goods, Hotel and Motels, Theaters, and Food Establishments, shall pay an amount equal to one and one- half times their annual business license fee. • Commercial Rental Property, Rental Property, Residential and Rooming Houses shall pay an amount equal to one -quarter times their annual business license fee. All other businesses, including Professions, Trades and Services shall pay an amount equal to their annual business license fee. Based on the City's business license fee schedules, the business license for the apartments, excluding registration fees, are estimated to be $2,698 annually, 0.25 times of which is $675. The business license for all the retail combined is estimated to be $2,003 annually, excluding registration fees, 1.5 times of which is $3,005. While these funds don't directly benefit the general fund, they will increase funding going towards these downtown events and promotions, which does ultimately help the City. BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FEES 4th + Main Project Annual Fees Residential Rentals 675 Retail Sales 3,005 Total $ 3,680 2019 Total BID Estimates $ 200,000 Added by Project 3,680 % Added 1.8% Total BID Revenues $ 203,680 Source: Santa Ana Business License Tax Fee Schedules, Toll Brothers 10 t0 V (ONOO(O V O�i0 i0Oi0 i0 (OM NOS MODS Mi0 V NM M OD ~ O cyOcy cymcy 6 N NM V (O ODO N6666 N OD 3 N V V V V V V V V V V N N N N N V V V N N N N U! if OD Z N f. U! Y D N O X W (» fA fA U! N� 0 06 N O) V M N (O (O (V V (O (O N I, V O I, M OD C7 � ro m EA fA fA X N W W W O O O r r N N N M M M V V N N (O (O r r C N co m EA fA fA X 0 C N EA fA fA X� A N fz EA fA fA XOF — EA fA fA M (O (O V O N O W N M M M N N N V N r M N f� O ' X� O I� N r O V=M W N I� VM N W (O N I� Nm O M O O M f� O U! (O M � H EA fA fA D X OD U a � X N N C r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N N N M V O V N LL O z K X V O A N I W O O r M M M V V V M N O O N V I N M O r O f� M r N N N N N. N N N N N. N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M (O OD O. (p M O w w z W N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M V V V V V V V O Z 000000000000000000000000000 O } + } � N M H 1 iO L i i i O r N M V N (O I M W O r N M V O a N V U U U r N M V N (O I S M W r rrr rrr rrr N N N N N H Z co 0 O O co 0 O N 0 O N Figure 1 — Site Plan _ f " I Source: Toll Brothers Apartment Living 12 EXHIBIT 15 This page left blank intentionally. RECORDING REQUESTED BY: AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Santa Ana Clerk of the Council 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 Attention: Clerk of the Council This DENSITY into this Free Recording pursuant to Government Code 27383 DENSITY BONUS HOUSING AGREEMENT 2019 ("Effective Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation of the Inc;, a Pennsylyama corporation (Developer". Ci collectively as the "Parties" and individually as a 13 Developer is the owner r County of Orange, State of ( Ana, California, and legally herein by this reference as if B. De-v development consi 12,350 square feet Bonus Application C. anent"), made and entered tween the City of Santa ty"), and` toll Bros.; sometimes referred to Gated within the City of Santa Ana, as 114 and 117 East Fifth Street, Santa xhibit A attached hereto and incorporated ,nstruct a mixed use commercial and residential ,-hundred and twenty (220) residential rental units and n the Property, as more particularly set forth in Density mite Plan Review No. 2019-01 ("Project'). Affordable Housing"), and California Bonus Law"), set forth a process to concessions, or waivers to property owners who guarantee that a portion of their residential development will be available to low income, very low-income, or senior (also known as "qualified") households. These regulations are intended to materially assist the housing industry in providing adequate and affordable housing for all economic segments of the community and to provide a balance of housing opportunities for very low-income, low income and senior households throughout the city. ode sections 41-1600, et seq. ("City Density Bonus for Govermnent Code sections 65915, et seq. ("State Density provide increased residential densities and/or incentives, D. Although the Project is proposing a total number of units (220) that is below the maximum density prescribed by the Transit Zoning Code for the Property based on its acreage, the Developer is able to seek an onsite parking standards incentive in the California Government Code because it is providing onsite affordable units. Specifically, pursuant to California Government Code sections 65915(p)(1) and 65915(p)(4), the Developer is seeking to provide onsite parking at the ratio of one (1) stall for studio or one -bedroom units, and two (2) stalls for two- to three - bedroom units. E. For the purpose of implementing this State Density Bonus Law onsite parking standards incentive, Developer has agreed to restrict five percent (11 units) in the Project to very low income households. F. The Project complies with the affordable housing requirements set forth in the State Density Bonus Law and City Density Bonus for Affordable Housing. For purposes of this Agreement, the Project shall be the "housing development" as defined in the State Density Bonus Law. G. In light of the purpose of the State Density Bonus and City Density Bonus for Affordable Housing, and the express provisions of Govermr. section 65915(p), the City has determined to grant Developer's application for densi I related onsite parking standards incentive. Ale H. This Agreement, and the exhibits atta' ncorporated herein by reference, are intended to set forth the terms and cc liti. , to-' ementation of the Project's requirement to provide affordable housing ur, xch receiving the density bonus incentive set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consi,' ecitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference, and of the m ained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and s s hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS AY—� AN 1.1 Defini on to the terms that may be defined elsewhere in this Agreement, the following te. n used in this Agreement shall be defined as follows: 1.1.1 "Adjus ed for family size appropriate to the unit" shall have the meaning set forth by Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5(h). . 1.1.2 "Affordable Rent" means the maximum Monthly Rent that may be charged to and paid by an Eligible Household for the Affordable Units, as required by the terms of this Agreement. The Affordable Rent shall be adjusted to reflect a reasonable utilities allowance for utilities paid by the household using the Santa Ana Housing Authority Multi -Family Housing Utility Allowance Schedule, and shall be updated no less than annually. 1.1.3 "Affordable Rent Schedule" means a rent schedule established as of the date of issuance of an occupancy permit (exclusive of tenant utility payments or security deposits) for the required number/percentage of the total number of units in the Project which are to be rented or available for rent to very low income tenants. Said Affordable Rent Schedule shall be N established at the time of the issuance of the occupancy permit ("Initial Rent Schedule") and shall be created in accordance with the Orange County, California Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area ("PMSA") as published by the California Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD"), adjusted for family size, and shall be updated no less than annually. 1.1.4 "Affordable Units" means eleven (11) units, which shall be comprised of three (3) studio units, four (4) one -bedroom units, and four (4) two -bedroom units for Very Low Income Tenants. Any change to the number or distribution of Affordable Units is subject to City Manager approval. 1.1.5 "Agreement" means this Density Bonus Housing Agreement. 1.1.6 "City" means the City of Santa Ana, California 1.1.7 "City Council" means the City( 1.1.8 "City Attorney" means the City 1.1.9 "City Manager" means the 1.1.10 "City's Planning Com* City of Santa Ana. 1.1.11 "Density which this Agreement shall be in City of Santa Ana. I of Santa Ana. of Santa Ana. Planning Commission for the lent Term" means the period during s provided for in Section 6.1 below. 1.1.12 "DeveY oi., Incw a Pennsylvania corporation, and its permitted successors and 'o a' part of the Property. "Developer" may also be referred to as "Owner"' r, aghout the Agreement. 1.1.13 means the date the City Council of City approves this Agreement and from the)eement shall be in full force and effect. 1.1.14 "Eligibl'e Household" means a Household whose income does not exceed the qualifying limit for a "very -low income tenant" as defined herein, which means persons and families whose income does not exceed the qualifying limit for very -low income households. 1.1.15 "Household" means all persons residing in a Unit. 1.1.16 "Median Income" means the Orange County, California area median income, adjusted for family size appropriate to the unit, as periodically published by HCD. 1.1.17 "Monthly Rent" means the total of monthly payments for (a) use and occupancy of each Affordable Unit and land and facilities associated therewith, (b) any separately charged fees or service charges assessed by Developer which are required of all tenants, other than security deposits, application fees or credit check fees (c) a reasonable allowance for an adequate level of service of utilities not included in (a) or (b) above, including garbage collection, sewer, water, electricity, gas and other heating, cooking and refrigeration fuels, but not including telephone or cable service, and (d) possessory interest, taxes or other fees or charges assessed for use of the land and facilities associated therewith by a public or private entity other than Developer. In the event that certain utility charges are paid by the landlord rather than the tenant, no utility allowance shall be deducted from the rent for that type of utility charge. 1.1.18 "Project" means that certain mixed use commercial and residential development as more particularly described in Recital B and Section 2 of this Agreement. 1.1.19 "Property" means that certain real property more particularly described in the legal description in Exhibit A and improvements thereon. 1.1.20 "State Density Bonus Law" means seq., as they exist on the Effective Date. 1.1.21 "Unit" means a residential constructed by Developer pursuant to this 1.1.22 "Unrestricted Units" nice - by Developer to a Household without restrictir 1.1.23 "Very Low Incor does not exceed fifty (50%) of the are, - adjusted for household size, as pubj^ 1.2 Exhibits. The part of, this Agreement- 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 Code sections 65915, et the Project to be .ie Project to be constructed arsons and families whose income Orange County, California PMSA, are attached to, "and by this reference made a of the Property -nant Verification mival Tenant Recertification 1.2.4 Exhibit D — Annual Rental Housing Compliance Report 1.2.5 Exhibit E —Notice of Affordability Restrictions on Transfer of Property 1.2.6 Exhibit F — Unit Mix and Location Map of First Eleven Affordable Units 1.2.7 Exhibit G — Parking Management Plan 2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY 0 2.1 Project. Developer shall develop, operate, and maintain the Property as a two - hundred and twenty 220) Unit mixed use commercial and residential development, with eleven 01) Affordable Units for Very Low Income Tenants. 2.2 Density Bonus. The Project shall have two -hundred and twenty(220) Units, including eleven 11 Affordable Units, to be rented, occupied, operated, and maintained pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Developer understands and agrees that Developer is not utilizing a density bonus increase provided by the State Density Bonus Law or City Density Bonus for Affordable Housing. However, Developer is only proposing two -hundred and twenty 220 Units, so Developer shall not construct or develop, or otherwise claim a right to construct or develop any additional State and/or City Density Bonus Units on the Property. 2.3 Development Incentive. As set forth in the City entitlements, Developer petitioned for and was granted the following reduced parking ratios as pro, id4 for in Government Code Sec. 65915(p)(1) as part of the approval of Site Plan Review No. 20y `or the Project: 2.3.1 The onsite parking standards for t parking spaces per unit to 1.51 spaces per unit pursuant t, 65915(p)(1) and 65915(p)(4), which provides onsit , e reduced from 2.15 ,mment Code sections f one (1) stall for studio or one -bedroom units, and two (2) stalls for two-' 'ln oe% its, for a total of 332 onsite panting spaces for the Project. 2.4 No Further Concessions r cE '_'PS. _Nper acknowledges and agrees that the incentive set forth in section 2.3 al- 'y , 'tip y duty City may have under the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the Density 'B^nus < y other law or regulation to provide any development incentive or to wai- f ' ig, zoning, or other requirement in return for providing Affordable Units. F' , th. greement, Developer releases any and all claims Developer may have against City i- may , to or arising from City's obligation to waive requirements of or prov' �101 'nt . ,iatives pursuant to any state, federal, or local law, rule, or regulation applicad lek 2.5 Unrestric he Project, for purposes of this Agreement, may have no more than two -hundred and nine Unrestricted Units comprised of forty-two (42) studio units, ninety-six (96) one -bedroom nits and seventy-one (71) two -bedroom units. Any change to the unit distribution of the Unrestricted Units may affect the comparability of the Affordable Units and is subject to City Manager approval. 2.6 Affordable Units. The Project, for purposes of this Agreement, shall have no less than eleven 11 Units, which shall be comprised of three (3) studio units, four (4) one -bedroom units, and four (4) two -bedroom units, designated as Affordable Units pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The Affordable Units shall be consistent with all City approvals, comparable in bedroom distribution and amenities to the Unrestricted Units, and shall be located throughout the Project as required under Santa Ana Municipal Code section 41-1602(c)(6). 2.7 Minnmun Development Standards for Affordable Units. The Affordable Units shall be constructed with the same exterior appearance and interior features, fixtures, and amenities, and shall use the same type and quality of materials as provided for any Unrestricted Units. 2.8 Permits and Processing Compliance with Laws. Developer, at its sole cost and expense, shall secure or cause to be secured any and all permits that may be required by City or any other federal, state, or local governmental entity having or claiming jurisdiction over the Property or Project. Upon securing any and all permits, Developer shall carry out and perform the development, operation, and maintenance of the Project in conformity with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations, and all conditions of approval issued by the City Council and City's Planning Commission for the Project. Any changes to the Project shall be reviewed by the City to determine compliance with this Agreement. If any changes to the Project shall materially alter the ability of Developer to comply with any terms of this Agreement in City's sole determination, then City shall have the option to declare this Agreement null and void in its sole discretion. 2.9 Relocation Prior to Development of Project. If re# -i is required prior to the completion of development of the Project, Developer s' sole and exclusive responsibility for providing relocation assistance and payir, is as maybe required to comply with applicable federal and state laws and reg, Ison to any other indemnity provided by Developer under this Agreement, Del, 4op, iaP iy, defend (with counsel of City's choosing and the consent of Developer sh- unreasonably withheld, and which may be joint defense counsel upon Cites lop consent), and hold harmless City and all of its officials, officers, employees ire --tati., 4unteers and agents from any and all alleged or actual claims, causes of P 'ia. .rt,* -rid damages from any third party for relocation assistance, benefits and- pr, th pletion of the development of the Project. 2.10 Local Sourcing ees to make a good faith effort to encourage contractors and suppliers tr ally, to the extent that it is cost effective and does r� not delay the overall piedule. 2.11 Mech mnification. Developer shall take all actions reasonably necessary to remove mechanic's liens or other similar liens (including design professional liens) against perty or Project, or any part thereof, by reason of work, labor, services, or materials supplie or claimed to have been supplied to Developer or anyone holding the Property or Project, or any part thereof, through or under Developer. Prior to the recording of this Agreement (or memorandum thereof) pursuant to Section 4.1 below, Developer shall provide evidence from the Title Company of any new recordings against the Property or Project. City hereby reserves all rights to post notices of non -responsibility and any other notices as may be appropriate upon a filing of a mechanic's lien. In addition to any other indemnity provided by Developer under this Agreement, Developer shall indemnify, defend (with counsel of City's choosing and the consent of Developer, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, and which may be joint defense counsel upon City's and Developer's consent), and hold harmless City and all of its officials, officers, employees, representatives, volunteers and agents from any and all alleged or actual claims, causes of action, liabilities, and damages from any third party by reason of a mechanic's lien or work, labor, services, or materials supplied or claimed to have been supplied to 6 Developer or anyone holding the Property or Project, or any part thereof, through or under Developer. 3. AFFORDABILITY 3.1 Total Affordability Tenn. Each Affordable Unit shall be restricted to use and occupancy by an Eligible Household for a total period of no less than fifty-five (55) years ("Total Affordability Tenn"). The Total Affordability Term for an Affordable Unit shall commence on the date that the building in which the Affordable Unit is located receives all required occupancy pen -nits from the City. 3.2 Memorializing Commencement of Total Affordability T . Developer shall keep detailed records of the commencement date of the Total Affordability Tenn for each Affordable Unit. City shall have the right to review and verify said records to sure that the commencement date specified by Developer for an Affordable Unit coinci h the date that the initial Affordable Unit received all permits from City required for f the Unit. In the event that a conflict exists between the date specified by Devel ricement of the Total Affordability Term for an Affordable Unit and the date nuance of all required permits for occupancy of the Unit, the date specifie , all required permits for occupancy of the Unit shall control. 3.3 Levels of Affordability. 3.3.1 Very Low Incor 11 Affordable Units in the Project sh^" at, Term be rented to, or held vacant , aj Tenants, at a rent that does r . ea d flftv County, California PMSA d allowance for utilitie� hat no less than eleven -ie. ag the Density Bonus Housing Agreement `or, .mmediate occupancy by Very Low Income (5/o) of the area median income for the Orange ;,hold size, as published by HCD, including an 4. OWNERSHIPS ]I .ON OF THE PROJECT BY OWNER 4.1 Recording otiients. No later than issuance of building permits for the Project, Developer and the City shall record or cause to be recorded in the Official Records for Orange County, California, an executed original of this Agreement. City shall cooperate with Developer in promptly executing in recordable form this Agreement. Upon the date of recording, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and run with the Property and the Project. It is the express intent and agreement between the Parties that this Agreement shall remain binding and enforceable against the Property, the Project, and the Units to ensure compliance with the State Density Bonus Law and City Density Bonus Law, and to ensure the continued supply of Affordable Units in the Project. 4.2 Rental of Units. Upon the completion of construction of the Project and receipt by Developer of all required permits for the occupancy of the Units, Developer shall rent or cause to be rented each Affordable Unit for the Total Affordability Term for such Affordable Unit in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, which provide among other 7 terms and conditions for the rental of each Affordable Unit at an Affordable Rent to an Eligible Household for the Total Affordability Tenn. 4.3 Location of Affordable Units. During the Density Bonus Housing Agreement Term, the Affordable Units shall be dispersed throughout the Project in accordance with the terns and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Affordable Units shall be permitted to float among all two hundred twenty (220) apartment units in the Project. Initially, the first eleven Affordable Units to be occupied will occur at the locations identified on Exhibit F "Unit Mix and Location Map of First Eleven Affordable Units." 4.4 Occupancy Levels. The number of persons permitted to occupy each Affordable Unit shall not exceed the occupancy permitted pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 50052.5(h). In the event that a household residing in an Affordable Unit exceeds the permitted number of persons, then that household shall be placed on a waiti list for the appropriate -sized unit and be eligible for transfer when an appropriate -sized unit -s available. The household will be placed on the waiting list for up to one -hundred and days. If an appropriate - sized unit does not become available during the 180 Will have grounds to terminate that household's lease. If the household re l' appropriate -sized unit then the Developer will also have grounds to termin ase. 4.4.1 Written Notification. informing the household that: it is ovi to one -hundred and eighty (180) d for terminating the lease. A wr; hundred and twenty (120) applicable. Nprovide written notification .,en placed on a waiting list for up *e of the waiting list; and the terms 1 be provided to the household at one- .,s, sixty (60) days and thirty (30) days if 4.5 Use of the ' , conducted on the Property, including, without limitation, all activities veloper pursuant to this Agreement, shall conform to all applicable provisi unicipal Code and other applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and rrcject shall at all times during the term of this Agreement be used as an apartment r none of the Affordable Units in the Project shall at any time be utilized on a transient ba shall the Property or any portion thereof ever be used as a hotel, motel, dormitory, fraternity or orority house, rooming house, hospital, nursing home, sanitarium or rest home, or be converted to condominium ownership. All of the community facilities and any social programs provided to the Project's residents shall be available on an equal, nondiscriminatory basis to residents of all Units at the Project. 4.6 Maintenance. Owner shall, at all times during the term of this Agreement, cause the Property and the Project to be maintained in a decent, safe and sanitary manner, regardless of cause of the disrepair. Owner shall be fully mid solely responsible for costs of maintenance, repair, addition and improvements. City, and any of its employees, agents, contractors or designees shall have the right to enter upon the Property at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner to inspect the Project. H 4.7 Marketing and Resident Selection Plan. Each Affordable Unit shall be leased to Eligible Households selected by Developer who meet all of the requirements provided herein. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, Developer shall prepare and obtain City's approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, of a marketing program and resident selection plan for the leasing of the Affordable Units at the Project ("Marketing Program"). The leasing of the Affordable Units shall thereafter be marketed in accordance with the Marketing Program as the same may be amended from time to time with City's prior written approval, which approval shall not unreasonably be withheld. Upon request, Developer shall provide City with periodic reports with respect to the leasing of the Housing Units. 4.7.1 The Marketing Program shall include, but is not limited to, marketing and community outreach activities, proposed tenant selection criteria, occupancy standards, income requirements, timeline and details for outreach and marketing, data collection, record keeping and monitoring, procedures for complain and compliance assessment. Components of the resident selection plan shall inc ut are not limited to, the application process, interview procedure, apartm d assignment, rejected applications, and wait list management. All �F "orth herein shall be incorporated in the Marketing Program. 4.8 Rental Lease Agreement. which approval shall not be unreasonat Agreement"). All Lease Agreements must household who will occupy the Affordabl the Affordable Unit is subject to comr' family size appropriate to the unit, as be consistent with the terms contai, .id obtain City's approval, .cal lease agreement ("Lease and ages of all members of the Wan at the Household's right to occupy Income requirements, adjusted for .red by HCD. All Lease Agreements must Bonus Agreement. 4.8.1 Prohir as the Lease Agreement may not contain any of the following provi (a) A 'e Agreement by the tenant to be sued, to admit to guilt, or b a _ ; i avor of the owner in a lawsuit brought in connection with the leasgy� (b) Treatmer� Fro ert. Agreement by tenant that the owner may take, hold, or sell person property of household members without notice to tenant and a court decision on the rights of the parties. This prohibition, however, does not apply to an agreement by the tenant concerning disposition of personal property remaining in the housing unit after the tenant has moved out of the unit. The Developer may dispose of this personal property in accordance with State law; (c) Excusing Developer of Responsibility. Agreement by the tenant not to hold the Developer of the Developer's agent legally responsible for any action or failure to act, whether intentional or negligent; (d) Waiver of Notice. Agreement of the tenant that the Developer may institute a lawsuit without notice to the tenant; (e) Waiver of Legal Proceedings. Agreement by the tenant that the owner may evict the tenant or household members without instituting a civil court E proceeding in which the tenant has the opportunity to present a defense, or before a court decision on the rights of the parties; (f) Waiver of a Jury Trial. Agreement by the tenant to waive any rights to a trial byjury; (g) Waiver of Right to Appeal Court Decision. Agreement by the tenant to waive the tenant's right to appeal, or to otherwise challenge in court, a court decision in connection with the lease; and (h) Tenant Chargeable with Cost of Legal Action Regardless of Outcome. Agreement by the tenant to pay attorney's fees or other legal costs even if the tenant wins in a court proceeding by the owner against the tenant. The tenant, however, may be obligated to pay costs if the tenant loses. 4.9 Selection of Tenants. 4.9.1 Developer shall be responsible for the select,* -)f tenants for the Affordable Units in compliance with lawful and reasonable criteria and the re,, ents of this Agreement. 4.9.2 Local preference for Santa Ana resi,' in tenant selection for the Affordable Units shall be a requirement of t}te T It, ***to applicable laws and regulations governing nondiscrimination and prey n, in occupancy required by the State of California, the Developer shall giw -enc ;ing the Affordable Units to households that live and/or work in the Citv of o ._ 101 _J have an active Housing Choice Voucher issued by the Housing Authorit- 7 ti "ity o. 4a Ana or any other Public Housing Authority. . ® - 4.9.3 All app created from a lottery generat track applicant name and initial lottery), househo deemed necessary. by the City of Santa and "lotterized." A waiting list will be f rental applications. The waiting list will number (or designated number after the s of application, and any other information as an electronic file and available for audit lection procedures as set forth herein. 4.9.4 Priorental or lease of an Affordable Unit to a tenant(s), Developer shall require the tenant(s) toe ecute a written lease and to complete a Tenant Income Verification Form (in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B) certifying that the tenant(s) occupying the Affordable Unit is/are an Eligible Household and otherwise meet(s) the eligibility requirements established for the Affordable Unit. Developer shall verify the income of the tenant(s) as set forth herein. 4.10 Income Verification and Certification. Developer agrees to make a good faith effort to verify that the income and asset statement provided by an applicant in an income certification is accurate by taking, at a minimum, at least one of the following steps as a part of the verification process: (1) obtain three months consecutive pay stubs for the most recent pay period, (2) obtain an income tax return for the most recent tax year, (3) obtain an income verification form from the applicant's current employer, (4) obtain an 10 income verification form from the Social Security Administration and/or the California Department of Social Services if the applicant receives assistance from either of such agencies, or (5) if the applicant is unemployed and has no such tax return, obtain another form of independent verification. 4.10.1 Gross Household Income. Gross household income means all income from whatever source from all Adult Household members, which is anticipated to be received during the 12-month period following the date of the determination of Gross Household Income. The applicable sources of income are defined in California Code of Regulations Title 25 Housing and Community Development Section 6914. 4.10.2 Annual Recertification. Developer agrees to recertify household eligibility annually. Notification of Annual Tenant Recertification shall be sent to the household in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit C, n Annual Rental Housing Compliance Report ("Annual Compliance Report") shal t to the City in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit D. The Annual � eport shall be due to the City within 30 days of the anniversary of the con- e Total Affordability Term, which is the date that each building rec ' ,upancy permits from the City. 4.10.3 Continued Income Qua" 11' a' ed Affordable Units. If the annual recertification demonstrates thav,a us. ,igible tenant's gross household income exceeds the Median Incor- it Afio.. 'Unit, the pertinent actions from the following list must be taken: (a) The Develop , the unit to the previously, but no longer, Eligible Hr i. as � tricted Unit without any limitations on rental rates. J- -ase veloper must then make available for rent to an Eligib'�nsc_ '4 a_ .er unit within the Project that meets the size and locaN rei `s' for Affordable Units under this Density Bonus A he , are no vacant units meeting those requirements, then the next a anic within the Project which does meet those requirements must be rente to an Eligible Household. (b) If the no longer Eligible Household either moves to another Unrestricted Unit within the Project or leaves the Project altogether, then the vacated Affordable Unit or, at Developer's election any other Unrestricted Unit within the Project which meets the size and location requirements for Affordable Units under this Density Bonus Agreement and has the same number of bedrooms as the vacated unit shall be rented as an Affordable Unit to an Eligible Household. 4.11 Monitoring and Recordkeeping. Throughout the Term of this Agreement, Developer shall annually complete and submit to City a Certification of Continuing Program Compliance in the form provided by City. Owner agrees to pay a reasonable fee, as set by City resolution, for the purpose of paying the actual costs associated with the City's obligation to monitor Owner's compliance with the affordability restrictions contained in this Agreement related 11 to the Affordable Units, not to exceed monitoring costs for up to 11 Affordable Units. Representatives of City shall be entitled to enter the Property if necessary after review of above documentation, upon at least forty-eight (48) hour notice, to monitor compliance with this Agreement, and shall be entitled to inspect the records of the Project relating to the Affordable Units and to conduct an independent audit or inspection of such records at a location within the City that is reasonably acceptable to the City. Developer agrees to cooperate with City in making the Property and the records of the Project relating to the Affordable Units available for such inspection or audit. Developer agrees to maintain each record of the Project for no less than five (5) years after creation of each such record. Developer shall allow the City to conduct annual inspections of each of the Affordable Units on the Property after the date of construction completion, with reasonable notice. Developer shall cure any defects or deficiencies found by the City while conducting such inspections within ten (10) Business Days of written notice thereof, or such longer pe od as is reasonable within the sole discretion of the City. 4.12 Notice of Affordability Restrictions on 'O erty. In the event Developer wishes to sell or transfer the Project during the' y Term, the City and the Developer shall execute and deposit into escrow ability Restrictions on Transfer of the Property as contained herein (Exh' L, _ ne ansfer of the Property shall not be effective unless and until the City and +' -fern e the documents necessary to transfer the Density Bonus Agreement oblig .;loper to the transferee. 4.13 [Intentionally Reserved' 4.14 Alternative Tran > a NcAource, Resource Conservation and LEED Certification. While not a cow the nrojeWs Density Bonus, in recognition of the City's desire to optimize the enerp , nc eject, Developer agrees to consult with the project design team, a CABEC -4 2� Ce. od Energy Analyst, a LEED AP Homes (low-rise and mid -rise), LEED AP "isk rational Green Building Standard (NGBS) Green Verifier, or GreenPoint Rater a) ,:eet both of these latter qualifications) early in the project design process to evala di.,ig energy model analysis and identify and consider energy efficiency or generation me w es. Prior to the meeting, the energy analyst shall complete an initial energy model based on either current T24 standards or, if the project is eligible, the California Utility Allowance Calculator using best available information on the project. To the extent financially feasible for the project, Developer agrees to incorporate and optimize energy efficient building materials, methods, and amenities. 4.16 Emergency Evacuation Plan. Developer shall submit and obtain approval of an Emergency Evacuation Plan (the EEP) from City Police and Fire Protection agencies prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Up-to-date 24-hour emergency contact information for the on -site personnel shall be provided to the City on an ongoing basis and the approved EEP shall be kept onsite and also be submitted to the following City Agencies: (a) Police Department (b) Fire Department (c) Planning and Building Agency 12 (d) Community Development Agency 4.17 Crime Free Housing. Developer shall work with City staff to develop a crime free housing policy, procedure, and design plan (the "CFH Plan"). Developer shall submit and obtain approval from the PBA the CFH Plan meeting the requirements of this Subsection 4.17 prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The approved CFH Plan shall be implemented and administered by Property Management. 4.18 Parking Management Plan. Developer has provided a parking management plan ("PMP"), attached herewith as Exhibit G and incorporated herein by reference, which indicates that, if needed, valet service for on -site vehicle stacking could create an additional 80 parking spaces, raising the total onsite parking spaces from 332 to 412. In addition, the PMP indicates that an additional 70 offsite parking spaces at a nearby City -owned parking structure could be leased on a long term basis. The PMP shall be adhered to and be enfor ed by the Project at all times. Additionally, the City may enforce the provisions of the PMPy, the Developer in the City's sole discretion. 5. 31 [INTENTIONALLY RESERVED] TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT 6.1 Tenn. The term of this Ag shall continence on the Effective Date an,' after the City issues the last certificate is located. DEFAULT AND TER nus Housing Agreement Term") ie date that is fifty-five (55) years Zing in which the Affordable Unit 7.1 Default. any Party to perform any term or provision of this Agreement, which is y (30) days after receipt of notice from the other Party specifying the defau period specifically provided herein), constitutes a default under this Agreement; p ever, if such default is of the nature requiring more than thirty (30) days to cure, the defau rty shall avoid default hereunder by commencing to cure within such thirty (30) day period, a thereafter diligently pursuing such cure to completion within an additional sixty (60) days following the conclusion of such thirty (30) day period (for a total of ninety (90) days). Except as required to protect against further damages, the injured Party may not institute proceedings against the Party in default until the time for cure has expired. Failure or delay in giving such notice shall not constitute a waiver of any default, nor shall it change the time of default. 7.2 Rights and Remedies Cumulative. The rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative, and the exercise by either Party of one or more of its rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party. 13 7.3 Indemnification. In addition to any other indemnity specifically provided in this Agreement, Developer agrees to defend (with counsel of City's choosing and the consent of Developer, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, and which may be joint defense counsel upon City's and Developer's consent) indemnify and hold harmless City and its respective officers, officials, agents, employees, representatives, and volunteers (collectively, "Indemnitees") from and against any loss, liability, claim, or judgment arising from any act or omission of Developer in connection with its obligations under this Agreement, except to the extent caused by the active negligence or willful misconduct of Indemnitees. 8. ASSIGNMENT; COVENANTS RUN WITH THE LAND 8.1 Assignment by Developer. 8.1.1 Prohibited Transfers or Assignments. Exce as authorized in Section 8.1.2 below, Developer shall not sell, transfer, or assign the Propert eject in whole or in part, or transfer or assign Developer's rights and obligations in this A 4thout City's prior written approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld ("Perri° ` In connection with Permitted Transfer, Developer shall: (i) notify City in wri' insfer, or assignment of all or any portion of the Property, and (ii) delive, nment and assumption agreement (or other agreement) in a form approv b .tv ® uted by Developer and its transferee/assignee pursuant to which Develop, —lbr ee assumes all of Developer's covenants and obligations set forth herein witn -) t,_ operty or the portion thereof so transferred. Any request for transfer or a, rtn. -t of L._ ' eement by Developer shall require the payment of fees or a deposit to cr rtt ne '" for approximate expenses incurred by Developer to City, as applicable, for the r, of the request. Upon the delivery of the assignment and assumption agre ' pi Foi ,00ve for a Permitted Transfer, or in the event of a sale of the Property as p-iL. or in,rn 8.1.1, Developer shall be released from any future obligations under thi Amer 8.1.2 >R *caner agrees and declares that the Property and the Project shall be held, in ,ged, encumbered, leased, rented, used, occupied, operated, sold, and approved subl obligations set forth or incorporated in this Agreement, all of which are for the purpose o i,nancing and protecting the value and attractiveness of the Property and the Project. All of the obligations set forth or incorporated in this Agreement shall constitute covenants which run with the land and shall be binding on Owner and its successors and assigns, and all parties having or acquiring any right, title or interest in, or to any part of the Property or Project. Owner further understands and agrees that the Density Bonus permit approvals received for this Project have been made on the condition that Owner and all subsequent owners, or other successors and assigns of the Property and/or Project lease and rent the Affordable Units in accordance with the terms and conditions stipulated in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of this Agreement for a term of 55 consecutive ycars commencing upon the date that the Project is first occupied. 8.1.3 Subsequent Assignment. As used in this Agreement, the term "Developer" shall be deemed to include any such transferee or assignee after the date such sale, transfer, or assignment occurs in compliance with this Agreement. 14 8.1.4 Unpermitted Assignments Void. Any sale, transfer, or assignment made in violation of this Agreement shall be null and void, and City shall have the right to pursue any right or remedy at law or in equity to enforce the provisions of the restriction against unpermitted sales, transfers, or assignments. 8.2 Covenants Run with the Land. The Property shall be held, sold, conveyed, hypothecated, encumbered, used, occupied and improved subject to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions set forth herein. The covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, equitable servitudes, liens and charges set forth in this Agreement shall run with the Property and shall be binding upon Developer and all persons having any right, title or interest in the Property, or any part thereof, their heirs, and successive owners and assigns, shall inure to the benefit of City and its successors and assigns, and may be enforced by City and its successors and assigns. The covenants established in this Agreement shall, without regard to technical classification and designation, be binding for the benefit and in favor of City and its uccessors and assigns, and the parties hereto expressly agree that this Agreement and the cov herein shall run in favor of City, without regard to whether City is or remains an owner o . - interest therein to which such covenants relate. However, all such covenants and res'-i -seemed to run in favor of all real property owned by City which real property sh- oenefited property of such covenants and this Agreement shall create equitab' venants appurtenant to all real property owned by City and running with -4c . = eri ,rdance with the provisions of Civil Code Section 1468. Furthermore, a' ',e C conditions, and restrictions contained herein shall also constitute easements ._ -ur,. , in favor of City. City is deemed the beneficiary of the terms and provisio- f , Agr,._ 4 and of the covenants running with the land, for and in its own right and fr q ec "- ,*tecting the interests of the community and other parties, public or private, in vh(, vo .or whose benefit this Agreement and the covenants ruining with the land ha In lei Developer hereby declares its understanding and intent that the burden of P- ce, Ants kww,h herein touch and concern the land and that the Developer's interest in the 4v iF .i less valuable thereby. Developer hereby further declares its understanding ,_ a ira. �ha, oenefit of such covenants touch and concern the land by enhancing and increj -nj ent and use of the Property by the citizens of City and by furthering the health, sal, el .e of the residents of City. 9. MISCELLANEO 9.1 Entire Agreement. This Agreement and all of its exhibits and attachments set forth and contain the entire understanding and agreement of the parties, and there are no oral or written representations, understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements which are not contained or expressly referred to herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations, understandings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the terns or conditions of this Agreement. 9.2 Amendment. Any alteration, change or modification of or to this Agreement, in order to become effective, shall be made in writing and in each instance approved by the City Council and signed on behalf of each party. Any requested alteration, change or modification of the Agreement by Developer shall require the payment of fees or deposit by Developer to City, as applicable, for the City's review of the request. Each alteration, change, or modification to this 15 Agreement shall be recorded against the Property in the Official Records of Orange County, California. 9.3 Notices. 9.3.1 Delivery. As used in this Agreement, "notice" includes, but is not limited to, the communication of notice, request, demand, approval, statement, report, acceptance, consent, waiver, appointment or other communication required or permitted hereunder. All notices shall be in writing and shall be considered given either: (i) when delivered in person to the recipient named below; or (ii) on the date of delivery shown on the return receipt, after deposit in the United States mail in a sealed envelope as either registered or certified mail with return receipt requested, and postage and postal charges prepaid, and addressed to the recipient named below; or (iii) two (2) days after deposit in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, first class mail and postage prepaid, and addressed to the recipient named below; or (iv one (1) day after deposit with a known and reliable next -day document delivery service (s Federal Express), charges prepaid and delivery scheduled next -day to the recipient na 'rovided that the sending party receives a confirmation of delivery from the deli ider; or (v) the first business day following the date of transmittal of ,red confirmation of successful transmittal is retained by the sending Part addressed as follows: If to City: With a copy to: City of Santa Anr Community Dt 20 Civic CP P.O. Box Santa Ana, lk Atter' Ise of ('it) -Sm. ma ':iN -enter Plaza, 7th Floor (M-29) 3 i .a, California 92702 If to Developer: Bros., Inc. o Toll Bros., Inc 250 Gibraltar Road Horsham, PA, 19044 Attn: Yolanda Rodriguez, Esquire, Vice President and Counsel 9.3.2 Change of Address. Either Party may, by notice given at any time, require subsequent notices to be given to another person or entity, whether a party or an officer or representative of a party, or to a different address, or both. Notices given before actual receipt of notice of change shall not be invalidated by the change. 16 9.4 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be determined invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby to the extent such remaining provisions are not rendered impractical to perform, taking into consideration the purposes of this Agreement. 9.5 Interpretation and Governing Law. This Agreement and any dispute hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California without regard to conflict of law principles. This Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the objectives and purposes of the Parties hereto, and the rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement, all Parties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation hereof. 9.6 Section Headings. All section hAintei dings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any constructithis Agreement. 9.7 Singular and Plural. As used herein,-d includes the plural, and vice versa, as context so dictates. Masculine, fes of any word include the other as context so dictates. 9.8 Joint and Several Obligations. V +1�7 ne term of this Agreement the Property and/or Project is owned, in whole or in r_ 101, an one Developer, all obligations of such Developer under this Agreement 11 rim sveral, and the default of any such Developer shall be the default of all stv to srF 9.9 Time of Essence r. es, ,nce in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement as to which tir ,a _111 9.10 Com uuttatio•- -rDa Ui. otherwise specified in this Agreement or any Exhibit attached hereto, use of fl 'ay '1911 mean calendar days. For purposes of this Agreement and all Exhibits att4p, 9 .mess days" shall mean every day of the week except Saturdays, Sundays, officia holidays as recognized in Government Code Section 19853(a) or successor statute, and any days in which Santa Ana City Hall is closed for business. 9.11 Waiver. Failure by a Party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other Party, or the failure by a Party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other Party, shall not constitute a waiver of such Party's right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other Party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter. 9.12 Non -Discrimination. In performing its obligations under this Agreement, Developer shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other related activities. Developer affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 17 9.13 Third Party Beneficiaries. No person or entity, other than City and Developer shall have any right of action based upon any provision of this Agreement. 9.14 Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be deemed to be in default where failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement is caused by floods, earthquakes, other Acts of God, fires, wars, riots or similar hostilities, strikes and other labor difficulties beyond the Party's control (including the Party's employment force), court actions (such as restraining orders or injunctions), or other causes beyond the Party's control, including delays by any governmental entity (although the City may not benefit from this provision for a delay that results from City's failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement), or an insurance company of either party. If any such events shall occur, the term of this Agreement and the time for performance by either Party of any of its obligations hereunder may be extended by the written agreement of the Parties for the period of time that such events prevented such performance. 9.15 Mutual Covenants. The covenants contained her mutual covenants and also constitute conditions to the concurrent or subsequent perfo � Party benefited thereby of the covenants to be performed hereunder by such bene 9.16 Successors in Interest. The burdens of t' e "W11 be binding upon, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, all r nn, sr in interest to the Parties to this Agreement. All provisions of this AgreemF ' be ,te as equitable servitudes and constitute covenants running with the land. Eac._-it . ., or refrain from doing some act hereunder with regard to development off' 'rn -fv: ta, 4 the benefit of and is a burden upon every portion of the Property; (b) runs Pry ; er' -+each portion thereof, and (c) is binding upon each Party and each succes ` t ved pursuant to this Agreement during ownership of the Property or an^ 9.17 Countemart- may be executed by the Parties in counterparts, which counterparts shal or and have the same effect as if all of the Parties had executed the same i 9.18 Jurisdicti , Any action at law or in equity under this Agreement or brought by a Party hereto IWurpose of enforcing, construing or determining the validity of any provision of this Agreem nt shall be filed and tried in the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, and the Parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for the filing, removal or change of venue to any other court. 9.19 Project as a Private Undertakine. It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the Parties hereto that the development of the Project is a private development, that neither Party is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and that each Party is an independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement. No partnership, joint venture or other association of any kind is formed by this Agreement. The only relationship between City and Developer is that of a government entity regulating the development of private property and the Developer of such property. m 9.20 Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the Parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Agreement. Upon the request of either Party at any time, the other Party shall promptly execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit if reasonably required, and file or record such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary under the terms of this Agreement to carry out the intent and to fulfill the provisions of this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. City hereby authorizes City Manager to take such other actions and negotiate and execute any additional agreements as may be necessary or proper to fulfill the City's obligations under this Agreement. The City Manager may delegate her or his powers and duties under this Agreement to an authorized management level employee of the City. 9.21 Estoppel Certificate. Within ten (10) business days ollowing a written request by any of the Parties, the other Party shall execute and deliver to questing Party a statement certifying that (i) either this Agreement is unmodified and ' and effect or there have been specified (date and nature) modifications to the Agre wins in full force and effect as modified; and (ii) either there are no knowr , defaults under this Agreement or that the responding Party alleges that per re) defaults exist. The statement shall also provide any other reasonable fc 'ti ,Led. The failure to timely deliver this statement shall constitute a conclus ump" his Agreement is in full force and effect without modification, except as ,enL .,y the requesting Party, and that there are no uncured defaults in the prr -westing Party, except as may be represented by the requesting Party. _ 9.22 No Subordinatio f the necessary land use entitlements that authorize Developer to develr1k AWOMWTtain the Project was based upon Developer's obligation to provide the Af' I th .ant to the State Density Bonus Law, City Density Bonus for Affordable . ''e i, and conditions of this Agreement. For the Tenn of the Density Bonus ee. t'this Agreement shall have priority over any and all mortgages, deeds of 4e similar forms of secured financing recorded against the Property or any portion t evoloper expressly understands and acknowledges that state law requires preservation of a odbility covenants in connection with the approval of this density bonus project. 9.23 Attorneys' Fees and Costs. If either Party to this Agreement commences an action against the other Party to this Agreement arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness fees, costs of investigation, and costs of suit from the losing Party. 9.24 Authority to Execute. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of each Party warrants and represents that he or she/they have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of his or her/their corporation, partnership or business entity and warrants and represents that he or she/they has/have the authority to bind the Party to the performance of its obligations hereunder. 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Density Bonus Housing Agreement to be executed on the date set forth at the beginning of this Agreement. ATTEST: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM Sonia R. Ca City Attorn( By: Ryan C Assistant Ci RECOMM_ Steven A. M Executive D Community 20 CITY OF SANTA ANA Kristine Ridge City Manager )S., INC. EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY 21 EXHIBIT B TENANT VERIFICATION 22 TENANT INCOME VERIFICATION FORM Head of Household (Print Name): Address: Telephone Number: Home: Work: Cell: Date of Birth: Social Security #: List additional household members on a separate sheet of paper. Tenant Income Verification Form Page 1 Santa Ana, California August 8, 2014 TENANT INCOME VERIFICATION FORM Monthly Gross Income " List All Sources of Income of All Household Members Living in the Inclusionary Unit Part 1: Earned Income Other Adult Head of Household Household Members Total 1. Gross amount, before payroll deductions of wages, $ $ $ salaries, overtime pay, commissions, fees, tips and bonuses. Net income from business. $ Social security, annuities, insurance policies, 2. $ 3. $ pension/retirement funds, disability or death benefits received periodically. Payment in lieu of earnings, such as $ $ 4. unemployment, disability compens ' compensation and severance p Public assistance, welfare r $ $ Alimony, child suppo ances $ $ Regular pay, special pay ices of $ $ 5. $ 6. 7. $ members of the Armed Force 8. Other $ $ $ Subtotal: Monthly Earned Income $ Total Monthly Earned Income x 12 = $ Total Annual Household Gross Earned Income I enant Income VeriTc Santa Ana, California August 8, TENANT INCOME VERIFICATION FORM Gross Income * List All Sources of Income of All Household Members Living in the Inclusionary Unit Part 2: Investment Income Interest paid on Bank and Savings accounts 2. Dividends and other payments from stocks and bonds 3. Income from real property (i.e. rental property) 4. Other (describe) I Subtotal: Monthly Investment Income: Total Monthly Investment Income E Head of Household Other Adult Household Members Household Investment Income Total Annual Household Investment Income *Note: The following items are ed income: casual or sporadic gifts; amounts specifically for or in reimbursement of medical expenselWp sum payments such as inheritances, insurance payments, capital gains and settlement for personal or property losses; educational scholarships paid directly to the student or educational institution; special pay to a serviceman head of family away from home and under hostile fire; relocation payments under federal, state or local law; foster child care payments; value of coupon allotments for purpose of food under Food Stamp Act of 1964 which is in excess of amount actually charged the eligible household; payments received pursuant to participation in the following programs: VISTA, Service Learning Programs, and Special Volunteer Programs, SCORE, ACE, Retired Senior Volunteer Program, Foster Grandparent Program, Older American Community Services Program, and National Volunteer Program to Assist Small Business Experience. Tenant Income Verification Form Page 3 Santa Ana, California August 8, 2014 TENANT INCOME VERIFICATION FORM Assets ** List the Current Value of All Assets of All Household Members Living in the Inclusionary Unit If the Asset generates income, that income must be specified In Part 2 above Head of Household Value 1. Bank and Savings accounts 2. Stocks and bonds 3. Real property (i.e. rental pro Utner (describe) Total Asset Value $ Other Adult Household Members Total Value of Assets **Note: Necessary items, such as' re ar*r miles, used for personal use are excluded from household assets. Collections of it—ns i� obi vestment or business purposes must be included in household assets. If the total yr lus Id assets exceeds $5,000, the calculation of the household's annual income shall include the5 tt actual amount of income, if any, derived from all of the household assets; or 10% of the ,ue of the assets Tenant Income Verification Form Page 4 Santa Ana, California August 8, 2014 TENANT INCOME VERIFICATION FORM If the total asset value exceeds $5,000, perform the calculations in the following table. If the total asset value is less than $5,000, the amount of investment income to be included in annual household income is $0. Income to be Included in Annual Household Income 1. I Total Annual Household Investment Income 2. 1 Total Asset Value $ x 10% The Greater of #1 or #2 = Investment Income to be Included in Annual Household Income Calculation 's Total Total Annual Household Gross Earned Income Total Investment Income to be Included ir" Total Household Income stubs from periods Employment verification Income tax return Social security verification Alimony/child support verification Other (Describe) imentation Relevant Documents Listed Below pay Bank/Savings account verification Self-employment verification Unemployment verification Welfare verification Disability income verification Santa Ana, California August 8, 2014 AFFIDAVIT This Affidavit is made with the knowledge that it will be relied upon by the City of Santa Ana, our landlord and the owner of our apartment building, to determine maximum income for eligibility. (1/we) warrant that all information set forth in this document is true, correct and complete and based upon information (1/we) deem reliable and based upon such investigation as (1/we) deemed necessary. (I/We) acknowledge that (1/we) have been advised that the making of any misrepresentation or misstatement in this affidavit will constitute a material breach of (my/our) rental agreement with the property owner to rent the unit and will additionally enable the property owner to initiate and pursue all applicable legal and equitable remedies with respect to the unit and to me/us. (I/We) do hereby swear under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct and that this affidavit has been executed as of the date specified below by ea ember of the household which � 'nta Ana, California. ' intends to occupy an Inclusionary Unit located at Signature Printed Executed at ,alifomia Date Santa Ana, California Affidavit Page 6 Santa Ana, California August 8, 2014 EXHIBIT C ANNUAL TENANT RECERTIFICATION 23 ANNUAL TENANT RECERTIFICATION CITY OF SANTA ANA AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING PROGRAM Date: Tenant Name: Unit Address: Dear In accordance with the requirements imposed by the City'r the City requires that we review your income and family ), and your lease, year. To complete our review, the Property Owner or Property Mana, sing with you to receive the necessary information. When you attend the meeting with the Pr, rt� -�unei erty Manager you must bring documents that verify the income of a" tlt .ier' of your household. This information can include income tax returns, e°me rif I, wage statements, interest statements, and/or unemployment compensate ce Cooperation with the recerI , re:, It is a condition of continuing tenancy in an Inclusionary Unit. You nor, � re Aired information to enable the Property Owner to process the recertifi� Sincerely, Property Manager / Property Owner Annual Tenant Recertification Form Page 1 Santa Ana, California August 8, 2014 EXHIBIT D ANNUAL RENTAL HOUSING COMPLIANCE REPORT 24 C! a A d a c EXHIBIT E NOTICE OF AFFORDABILITY RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER OF PROPERTY 25 EXHIBIT E NOTICE OF AFFORDABILITY RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER OF PROPERTY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California, has entered into a Density Bonus Agreement with , a ("Property Owner"). The Density Bonus Agreement imposes income and affordability covenants on designated Affordable Units with the Project located at Santa Ana, Orange County, Assessor's Parcel Number and further described in the legal description provided in Exhibit A to the Density Bonus Agreement. The Density Bonus Agreement was recorded as Document/Inst ` Number and shall remain in effect until 120 (Insert date of the termination of the Affordability Period nus Agreement imposes the following income and affordability restric ' .e Units. Number of Bedrooms Very-L, Low Inc, Income H Households Studio Units One -Bedroom Units Two -Bedroom Units Three -Bedroom Ur' Four-Bedroo In the event the Propert es to sell or transfer the Project during the Affordability Period, the City and the P1 wner shall execute and deposit into escrow this Notice of Affordability Covenants on fer of the Property. The sale or transfer of the Property shall not be effective unless and until the City and transferee execute the documents necessary to transfer the Density Bonus Agreement obligations from the Property Owner to the transferee. This Notice of Affordability Covenants on Transfer of the Property in no way modifies the provisions of the Density Bonus Agreement. In the event of any conflict between this Notice of Affordability Covenants on Transfer of the Property and the Density Bonus Agreement, the terms of the Density Bonus Agreement shall prevail. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have duly executed this Notice of Affordability Restrictions on Transfer of Property as of the dates set forth below. (Signatures on Following Pages] SIGNATURE PAGE TO NOTICE OF AFFORDABILITY RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER OF PROPERTY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL IN Assistant City CITY: CITY OF SANTA ANA A California Charter City and Municipal Corporation L►mttf l Its: V SIGNATURE PAGE TO NOTICE OF AFFORDABILITY RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER OF PROPERTY PROPERTY OWNER: V EXHIBIT F UNIT MIX AND LOCATION MAP OF FIRST ELEVEN AFFORDABLE UNITS 26 EXHIBIT G PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN 27 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Santa Ana Clerk of the Council 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 Attention: Clerk of the Council Free Recording pursuant to Govemment Code 27383 DENSITY BONUS HOUSING AGREEMENT This DENSITY BONUS HOUSING AGREEMENT ("Agreement'), made and entered into this day of 2019 ("Effective Date"), by and between the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation of the State of California ("City"), and Toll Bros., Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation ("Developer"). City and Developer are sometimes referred to collectively as the "Parties" and individually as a "Party." RECITALS A. Developer is the owner of certain property located within the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, commonly known as 114 and 117 East Fifth Street, Santa Ana, California, and legally described as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full ("Property"). B. Developer is proposing to construct a mixed use commercial and residential development consisting of no more than two -hundred and twenty (220) residential rental units and 12,350 square feet of commercial space on the Property, as more particularly set forth in Density Bonus Application No. 2019-01 and Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 ("Project'). C. Santa Ana Municipal Code sections 41-1600, et seq. ("City Density Bonus for Affordable Housing"), and California Government Code sections 65915, et seq. ("State Density Bonus Law"), set forth a process to provide increased residential densities and/or incentives, concessions, or waivers to property owners who guarantee that a portion of their residential development will be available to low income, very low-income, or senior (also known as "qualified") households. These regulations are intended to materially assist the housing industry in providing adequate and affordable housing for all economic segments of the community and to provide a balance of housing opportunities for very low-income, low income and senior households throughout the city. D. Although the Project is proposing a total number of units (220) that is below the maximum density prescribed by the Transit Zoning Code for the Property based on its acreage, the Developer is able to seek an onsite parking standards incentive in the California Government Code because it is providing onsite affordable units. Specifically, pursuant to California Government 1 Code sections 65915(p)(1) and 65915(p)(4), the Developer is seeking to provide onsite parking at the ratio of one (1) stall for studio or one -bedroom units, and two (2) stalls for two- to three - bedroom units. E. For the purpose of implementing this State Density Bonus Law onsite parking standards incentive, Developer has agreed to restrict five percent (11 units) in the Project to very low income households. F. The Project complies with the affordable housing requirements set forth in the State Density Bonus Law and City Density Bonus for Affordable Housing. For purposes of this Agreement, the Project shall be the "housing development" as defined in the State Density Bonus Law. G. In light of the purpose of the State Density Bonus Law and City Density Bonus for Affordable Housing, and the express provisions of Government Code section 65915(p), the City has determined to grant Developer's application for density bonus and related onsite parking standards incentive. H. This Agreement, and the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, are intendedto set forth the terms and conditions forthe implementation ofthe Project's requirement to provide affordable housing units in exchange for receiving the density bonus incentive set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference, and of the mutual covenants contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS 1.1 Definitions. hi addition to the terms that may be defined elsewhere in this Agreement, the following terms when used in this Agreement shall be defined as follows: 1.1.1 "Adjusted for family size appropriate to the unit" shall have the meaning set forth by Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5(h). . 1.1.2 "Affordable Rent" means the maximum Monthly Rent that may be charged to and paid by an Eligible Household for the Affordable Units, as required by the terms of this Agreement. The Affordable Rent shall be adjusted to reflect areasonable utilities allowance for utilities paid by the household using the Santa Ana Housing Authority Multi -Family Housing Utility Allowance Schedule, and shall be updated no less than annually. 1.1.3 "Affordable Rent Schedule" means a rent schedule established as of the date of issuance of an occupancy permit (exclusive of tenant utility payments or security deposits) for the required number/percentage of the total number of units in the Project which are to be rented or available for rent to very low income tenants. Said Affordable Rent Schedule shall be 2 established at the time of the issuance of the occupancy permit ("Initial Rent Schedule") and shall be created in accordance with the Orange County, California Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area ("PMSA") as published by the California Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD"), adjusted for family size, and shall be updated no less than annually. 1.1.4 "Affordable Units" means eleven (11) units, which shall be comprised of three (3) studio units, four (4) one -bedroom units, and four (4) two -bedroom units for Very Low Income Tenants. Any change to the number or distribution of Affordable Units is subject to City Manager approval. 1.1.5 "Agreement" means this Density Bonus Housing Agreement. 1.1.6 "City" means the City of Santa Ana, California 1.1.7 "City Council" means the City Council of the City of Santa Ana. 1.1.8 "City Attorney" means the City Attorney for the City of Santa Ana. 1.1.9 "City Manager" means the City Manager for the City of Santa Ana. 1.1.10 "City's Planning Commission" means the Planning Commission for the City of Santa Ana. 1.1.11 "Density Bonus Housing Agreement Term" means the period during which this Agreement shall be in full force and effect, as provided for in Section 6.1 below. 1.1.12 "Developer" means Toll Bros., Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, and its permitted successors and assigns to all or any part of the Property. "Developer" may also be referred to as "Owner" interchangeably throughout the Agreement. 1.1.13 "Effective Date" means the date the City Council of City approves this Agreement and from then on this Agreement shall be in full force and effect. 1.1.14 "Eligible Household" means a Household whose income does not exceed the qualifying limit for a "very -low income tenant" as defined herein, which means persons and families whose income does not exceed the qualifying limit for very -low income households. 1.1.15 "Household" means all persons residing in a Unit. 1.1.16 "Median Income" means the Orange County, California area median income, adjusted for family size appropriate to the unit, as periodically published by HCD. 1.1.17 "Monthly Rent" means the total of monthly payments for (a) use and occupancy of each Affordable Unit and land and facilities associated therewith, (b) any separately charged fees or service charges assessed by Developer which are required of all tenants, other than security deposits, application fees or credit check fees (c) a reasonable allowance for an adequate level of service of utilities not included in (a) or (b) above, including garbage collection, sewer, water, electricity, gas and other heating, cooking and refrigeration fuels, but not including telephone or cable service, and (d) possessory interest, taxes or other fees or charges assessed for use ofthe land and facilities associated therewith by apublic or private entity otherthan Developer. In the event that certain utility charges are paid by the landlord rather than the tenant, no utility allowance shall be deducted from the rent for that type of utility charge. 1.1.18 "Project" means that certain mixed use commercial and residential development as more particularly described in Recital B and Section 2 of this Agreement. 1.1.19 "Property" means that certain real property more particularly described in the legal description in Exhibit A and improvements thereon. 1.1.20 "State Density Bonus Law" means Government Code sections 65915, et seq., as they exist on the Effective Date. 1.1.21 "Unit" means a residential dwelling unit within the Project to be constructed by Developer pursuant to this Agreement. 1.1.22 "Unrestricted Units" means the Units within the Project to be constructed by Developer to a Household without restriction. 1.1.23 "Very Low Income Tenant" means persons and families whose income does not exceed fifty (50%) of the area median income for the Orange County, California PMSA, adjusted for household size, as published by HCD. 1.2 Exhibits. The following documents are attached to, and by this reference made a part of, this Agreement: 1.2.1 Exhibit A —Legal Description of the Property 1.2.2 Exhibit B — Tenant Verification 1.2.3 Exhibit C — Annual Tenant Recertification 1.2.4 Exhibit D — Annual Rental Housing Compliance Report 1.2.5 Exhibit E —Notice of Affordability Restrictions on Transfer of Property 1.2.6 Exhibit F — Parking Management Plan 2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY 2.1 Project. Developer shall develop, operate, and maintain the Property as a two - hundred and twentv (220) Unit mixed use commercial and residential development, with eleven Affordable Units for Very Low Income Tenants. 4 2.2 Density Bonus. The Project shall have two -hundred and twenty (220) Units, including eleven (11) Affordable Units, to be rented, occupied, operated, and maintained pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Developer understands and agrees that Developer is not utilizing a density bonus increase provided by the State Density Bonus Law or City Density Bonus for Affordable Housing. However, Developer is only proposing two -hundred and twenty (220) Units, so Developer shall not construct or develop, or otherwise claim a right to construct or develop any additional State and/or City Density Bonus Units on the Property. 2.3 Development Incentive. As set forth in the City entitlements, Developer petitioned for and was granted the following reduced parking ratios as provided for in Government Code Sec. 65915(p)(1) as part of the approval of Site Plan Review No. 2019-01 for the Project: 2.3.1 The onsite parking standards for the Project shall be reduced from 2.15 parking spaces per unit to 1.51 spaces per unit pursuant to California Government Code sections 65915(p)(1) and 65915(p)(4), which provides onsite parking at the ratio of one (1) stall for studio or one -bedroom units, and two (2) stalls for two- to three -bedroom units, for a total of 332 onsite parking spaces for the Project. 2.4 No Further Concessions or Incentives. Developer acknowledges and agrees that the incentive set forth in section 2.3 above fully satisfies any duty City may have under the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the Density Bonus Law, or any other law or regulation to provide any development incentive or to waive any building, zoning, or other requirement in return for providing Affordable Units. By this Agreement, Developer releases any and all claims Developer may have against City in any way relating to or arising from City's obligation to waive requirements of or provide development incentives pursuant to any state, federal, or local law, rule, or regulation applicable to the Project. 2.5 Unrestricted Units. The Project, for purposes of this Agreement, may have no more than two -hundred and nine (209) Unrestricted Units comprised of forty-two (42) studio units, ninety-six (96) one -bedroom units and seventy-one (71) two -bedroom units. Any change to the unit distribution of the Unrestricted Units may affect the comparability of the Affordable Units and is subject to City Manager approval. 2.6 Affordable Units. The Project, for purposes of this Agreement, shall have no less than eleven (11) Units, which shall be comprised of three (3) studio units, four (4) one -bedroom units, and four (4) two -bedroom units, designated as Affordable Units pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The Affordable Units shall be consistent with all City approvals, comparable in bedroom distribution and amenities to the Unrestricted Units, and shall be located throughout the Project as required under Santa Ana Municipal Code section 41-1602(c)(6). 2.7 Minimum Development Standards for Affordable Units. The Affordable Units shall be constructed with the same exterior appearance and interior features, fixtures, and amenities, and shall use the same type and quality of materials as provided for any Unrestricted Units. 5 2.8 Permits and Processimz: Compliance with Laws. Developer, at its sole cost and expense, shall secure or cause to be secured any and all permits that may be required by City or any other federal, state, or local governmental entity having or claiming jurisdiction over the Property or Project. Upon securing any and all permits, Developer shall carry out and perform the development, operation, and maintenance of the Project in conformity with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations, and all conditions of approval issued by the City Council and City's Planning Commission for the Project Any changes to the Project shall be reviewed by the City to determine compliance with this Agreement. If any changes to the Project shall materially alter the ability of Developer to comply with any terms of this Agreement in City's sole determination, then City shall have the option to declare this Agreement null and void in its sole discretion. 2.9 Relocation Prior to Development of Project. If relocation is required prior to the completion of development of the Project, Developer shall have the sole and exclusive responsibility for providing relocation assistance and paying all relocation costs as may be required to comply with applicable federal and state laws and regulations. hi addition to any other indemnity provided by Developer under this Agreement, Developer shall indemnify, defend (with counsel of City's choosing and the consent of Developer, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, and which may be joint defense counsel upon City's and Developer's consent), and hold harmless City and all of its officials, officers, employees, representatives, volunteers and agents from any and all alleged or actual claims, causes of action, liabilities, and damages from any third party for relocation assistance, benefits and costs prior to the completion of the development of the Project. 2.10 Local Sourcing Plan. Developer agrees to make a good faith effort to encourage contractors and suppliers to hire and procure locally, to the extent that it is cost effective and does not delay the overall project development schedule. 2.11 Mechanic's Liens: Indemnification. Developer shall take all actions reasonably necessary to remove any future mechanic's liens or other similar liens (including design professional liens) against the Property or Project, or any part thereof, by reason of work, labor, services, or materials supplied or claimed to have been supplied to Developer or anyone holding the Property or Project, or any part thereof, through or under Developer. Prior to the recording of this Agreement (or memorandum thereof) pursuant to Section 4.1 below, Developer shall provide evidence from the Title Company of any new recordings against the Property or Project. City hereby reserves all rights to post notices of non -responsibility and any other notices as may be appropriate upon a filing of a mechanic's lien. In addition to any other indemnity provided by Developer under this Agreement, Developer shall indemnify, defend (with counsel of City's choosing and the consent of Developer, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, and which may be joint defense counsel upon City's and Developer's consent), and hold harmless City and all of its officials, officers, employees, representatives, volunteers and agents from any and all alleged or actual claims, causes of action, liabilities, and damages from any third party by reason of a mechanic's lien or work, labor, services, or materials supplied or claimed to have been supplied to Developer or anyone holding the Property or Project, or any part thereof, through or under Developer. 6 3. AFFORDABILITY 3.1 Total Affordability Term. Each Affordable Unit shall be restricted to use and occupancy by an Eligible Household for a total period of no less than fifty-five (55) years ("Total Affordability Term"). The Total Affordability Term for an Affordable Unit shall commence on the date that the building in which the Affordable Unit is located receives all required occupancy permits from the City. 3.2 Memorializing Commencement of Total Affordability Term. Developer shall keep detailed records of the commencement date of the Total Affordability Term for each Affordable Unit. City shall have the right to review and verify said records to ensure that the commencement date specified by Developer for an Affordable Unit coincides with the date that the initial Affordable Unit received all permits from City required for occupancy of the Unit. hi the event that a conflict exists between the date specified by Developer for the commencement of the Total Affordability Term for an Affordable Unit and the date specified by City's issuance of all required permits for occupancy of the Unit, the date specified by City's issuance of all required permits for occupancy of the Unit shall control. 3.3 Levels of Affordability. 3.3.1 Very Low Income Tenants. Developer covenants that no less than eleven Affordable Units in the Project shall at all times during the Density Bonus Housing Agreement Term be rented to, or held vacant and available for immediate occupancy by Very Low Income Tenants, at a rent that does not exceed fifty (50%) of the area median income for the Orange County, California PMSA, adjusted for household size, as published by HCD, including an allowance for utilities. 4. OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION OF THE PROJECT BY OWNER 4.1 Recording of Documents. No later than issuance of building permits for the Project, Developer and the City shall record or cause to be recorded in the Official Records for Orange County, California, an executed original of this Agreement. City shall cooperate with Developer in promptly executing in recordable form this Agreement. Upon the date of recording, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and run with the Property and the Project. It is the express intent and agreement between the Parties that this Agreement shall remain binding and enforceable against the Property, the Project, and the Units to ensure compliance with the State Density Bonus Law and City Density Bonus Law, and to ensure the continued supply of Affordable Units in the Project. 4.2 Rental of Units. Upon the completion of construction of the Project and receipt by Developer of all required permits for the occupancy of the Units, Developer shall rent or cause to be rented each Affordable Unit for the Total Affordability Term for such Affordable Unit in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, which provide among other terms and conditions for the rental of each Affordable Unit at an Affordable Rent to an Eligible Household for the Total Affordability Term. 7 4.3 Location of Affordable Units. During the Density Bonus Housing Agreement Term, the Affordable Units shall be dispersed throughout the Project in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Affordable Units shall be permitted to float among all two hundred twenty (220) apartment units in the Project. The units shall be evenly distributed among all levels of the project in both buildings that comprise the Project. Developer shall submit a unit mix and location map of the first eleven Affordable Units. The location of the first eleven Affordable Units to be occupied will be subject to the City's final approval of the floor plans. 4.4 Occupancv Levels. The number of persons permitted to occupy each Affordable Unit shall not exceed the occupancy permitted pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 50052.5(h). hi the event that a household residing in an Affordable Unit exceeds the permitted number of persons, then that household shall be placed on a waiting list for the appropriate -sized unit and be eligible for transfer when an appropriate -sized unit becomes available. The household will be placed on the waiting list for up to one -hundred and eighty (180) days. If an appropriate - sized unit does not become available during the 180 days, the Owner will have grounds to terminate that household's lease. If the household refuses to transfer to an appropriate -sized unit then the Developer will also have grounds to terminate that household's lease. 4.4.1 Written Notification. Developer shall provide written notification informing the household that: it is over -occupancy; has been placed on a waiting list for up to one -hundred and eighty (180) days; the expiration date of the waiting list; and the terms for terminating the lease. A written status update will be provided to the household at one - hundred and twenty (120) days, ninety (90) days, sixty (60) days and thirty (30) days if applicable. 4.5 Use of the Property. All uses conducted on the Property, including, without limitation, all activities undertaken by the Developer pursuant to this Agreement, shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and other applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations. The Project shall at all times during the term of this Agreement be used as an apartment complex and none of the Affordable Units in the Project shall at any time be utilized on atransient basis, nor shall the Property or any portion thereof ever be used as a hotel, motel, dormitory, fraternity or sorority house, rooming house, hospital, nursing home, sanitarium or rest home, or be converted to condominium ownership. All of the community facilities and any social programs provided to the Project's residents shall be available on an equal, nondiscriminatory basis to residents of all Units at the Project. 4.6 Maintenance. Owner shall, at all times during the term of this Agreement, cause the Property and the Project to be maintained in a decent, safe and sanitary manner, regardless of cause of the disrepair. Owner shall be fully and solely responsible for costs of maintenance, repair, addition and improvements. City, and any of its employees, agents, contractors or designees shall have the right to enter upon the Property at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner to inspect the Project. 4.7 Marketing and Resident Selection Plan. Each Affordable Unit shall be leased to Eligible Households selected by Developer who meet all of the requirements provided herein. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, Developer shall prepare and obtain City's approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, of a marketing program and resident selection plan for the leasing of the Affordable Units at the Project ("Marketing Program"). The leasing of the Affordable Units shall thereafter be marketed in accordance with the Marketing Program as the same may be amended from time to time with City's prior written approval, which approval shall not unreasonably be withheld. Upon request, Developer shall provide City with periodic reports with respect to the leasing of the Housing Units. 4.7.1 The Marketing Program shall include, but is not limited to, marketing and community outreach activities, proposed tenant selection criteria, occupancy standards, income requirements, timeline and details for outreach and marketing, data collection, record keeping and monitoring, procedures for complaints, and compliance assessment. Components of the resident selection plan shall include, but are not limited to, the application process, interview procedure, apartment offer and assignment, rejected applications, and wait list management. All requirements set forth herein shall be incorporated in the Marketing Program. 4.8 Rental Lease Agreement. Developer shall prepare and obtain City's approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, of a rental lease agreement ("Lease Agreement"). All Lease Agreements must 1) identify the names and ages of all members of the household who will occupy the Affordable Unit; and 2) state that the Household's right to occupy the Affordable Unit is subject to compliance with the Median Income requirements, adjusted for family size appropriate to the unit, as periodically published by HCD. All Lease Agreements must be consistent with the terms contained in this Density Bonus Agreement. 4.8.1 Prohibited Lease Terms. The Lease Agreement may not contain any of the following provisions: (a) Agreement to be Sued. Agreement by the tenant to be sued, to admit to guilt, or to a judgment in favor of the owner in a lawsuit brought in connection with the lease; (b) Treatment of Property. Agreement by tenant that the owner may take, hold, or sell personal property of household members without notice to tenant and a court decision on the rights of the parties. This prohibition, however, does not apply to an agreement by the tenant concerning disposition of personal property remaining in the housing unit after the tenant has moved out of the unit. The Developer may dispose of this personal property in accordance with State law; (c) Excusing Developer of Responsibility. Agreement by the tenant not to hold the Developer of the Developer's agent legally responsible for any action or failure to act, whether intentional or negligent; (d) Waiver of Notice. Agreement of the tenant that the Developer may institute a lawsuit without notice to the tenant; (e) Waiver of Legal Proceedings. Agreement by the tenant that the owner may evict the tenant or household members without instituting a civil court proceeding in which the tenant has the opportunity to present a defense, or before a court decision on the rights of the parties; (f) Waiver of a Jury Trial. Agreement by the tenant to waive any rights to a trial by jury; 9 (g) Waiver of Right to Appeal Court Decision. Agreement by the tenant to waive the tenant's right to appeal, or to otherwise challenge in court, a court decision in connection with the lease; and (h) Tenant Chargeable with Cost of Legal Action Regardless of Outcome. Agreement by the tenant to pay attorney's fees or other legal costs even if the tenant wins in a court proceeding by the owner against the tenant. The tenant, however, may be obligated to pay costs if the tenant loses. 4.9 Selection of Tenants. 4.9.1 Developer shall be responsible for the selection of tenants for the Affordable Units in compliance with lawful and reasonable criteria and the requirements of this Agreement. 4.9.2 Local preference for Santa Ana residents and workers in tenant selection for the Affordable Units shall be a requirement of the Project. Subject to applicable laws and regulations governing nondiscrimination and preferences in housing occupancy required by the State of California, the Developer shall give preference in leasing the Affordable Units to households that live and/or work in the City of Santa Ana or who have an active Housing Choice Voucher issued by the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Ana or any other Public Housing Authority. 4.9.3 All applicants will be screened and "lotterized." A waiting list will be created from a lottery generated from the initial pool of rental applications. The waiting list will track applicant name and contact information, lottery number (or designated number after the initial lottery), household income, household size, status of application, and any other information deemed necessary. The waiting list will be maintained as an electronic file and available for audit by the City of Santa Ana in accordance with resident selection procedures as set forth herein. 4.9.4 Prior to the rental or lease of an Affordable Unit to a tenant(s), Developer shall require the tenant(s) to execute a written lease and to complete a Tenant Income Verification Form (in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B) certifying that the tenant(s) occupying the Affordable Unit is/are an Eligible Household and otherwise meet(s) the eligibility requirements established for the Affordable Unit. Developer shall verify the income of the tenant(s) as set forth herein. 4.10 Income Verification and Certification. Developer agrees to make a good faith effort to verify that the income and asset statement provided by an applicant in an income certification is accurate by taking, at a minimum, at least one of the following steps as apart of the verification process: (1) obtain three months consecutive pay stubs for the most recent pay period, (2) obtain an income tax return for the most recent tax year, (3) obtain an income verification form from the applicant's current employer, (4) obtain an income verification form from the Social Security Administration and/or the California Department of Social Services if the applicant receives assistance from either of such agencies, or (5) if the applicant is unemployed and has no such tax return, obtain another form of independent verification. 10 4.10.1 Gross Household Income. Gross household income means all income from whatever source from all Adult Household members, which is anticipated to be received during the 12-month period following the date of the determination of Gross Household Income. The applicable sources of income are defined in California Code of Regulations Title 25 Housing and Community Development Section 6914. 4.10.2 Annual Recertification. Developer agrees to recertify household eligibility annually. Notification of Annual Tenant Recertification shall be sent to the household in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. An Annual Rental Housing Compliance Report ("Annual Compliance Report") shall be sent to the City in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit D. The Annual Compliance Report shall be due to the City within 30 days of the anniversary of the commencement of the Total Affordability Term, which is the date that each building receives all required occupancy permits from the City. 4.10.3 Continued Income Qualification and Vacated Affordable Units. If the annual recertification demonstrates that a previously eligible tenant's gross household income exceeds the Median Income for the Affordable Unit, the pertinent actions from the following list must be taken: (a) The Developer may offer to rent the unit to the previously, but no longer, Eligible Household as an Unrestricted Unit without any limitations on rental rates. hi that case, the Developer must then make available for rent to an Eligible Household another unit within the Project that meets the size and location requirements for Affordable Units under this Density Bonus Agreement. If there are no vacant units meeting those requirements, then the next available unit within the Project which does meet those requirements must be rented to an Eligible Household. (b) If the no longer Eligible Household either moves to another Unrestricted Unit within the Project or leaves the Project altogether, then the vacated Affordable Unit or, at Developer's election any other Unrestricted Unit within the Project which meets the size and location requirements for Affordable Units under this Density Bonus Agreement and has the same number of bedrooms as the vacated unit shall be rented as an Affordable Unit to an Eligible Household. 4.11 Monitoring and Recordkeeping. Throughout the Term of this Agreement, Developer shall annually complete and submit to City a Certification of Continuing Program Compliance in the form provided by City. Owner agrees to pay a reasonable fee, as set by City resolution, for the purpose of paying the actual costs associated with the City's obligation to monitor Owner's compliance with the affordability restrictions contained in this Agreement related to the Affordable Units, not to exceed monitoring costs for up to 11 Affordable Units. Representatives of City shall be entitled to enter the Property if necessary after review of above documentation, upon at least forty-eight (48) hour notice, to monitor compliance with this Agreement, and shall be entitled to inspect the records of the Project relating to the Affordable 11 Units and to conduct an independent audit or inspection of such records at a location within the City that is reasonably acceptable to the City. Developer agrees to cooperate with City in making the Property and the records of the Project relating to the Affordable Units available for such inspection or audit. Developer agrees to maintain each record of the Project for no less than five (5) years after creation of each such record. Developer shall allow the City to conduct annual inspections of each of the Affordable Units on the Property after the date of construction completion, with reasonable notice. Developer shall cure any defects or deficiencies found by the City while conducting such inspections within ten (10) Business Days of written notice thereof, or such longer period as is reasonable within the sole discretion of the City. 4.12 Notice of Affordabilitv Restrictions on Transfer of Provertv. In the event Developer wishes to sell or transfer the Project during the Total Affordability Term, the City and the Developer shall execute and deposit into escrow a Notice of Affordability Restrictions on Transfer of the Property as contained herein (Exhibit E). The sale or transfer of the Property shall not be effective unless and until the City and the transferee execute the documents necessary to transfer the Density Bonus Agreement obligations from the Developer to the transferee. 4.13 [Intentionally Reserved] 4.14 Alternative Transportation and Energy Source. Resource Conservation, and LEED Certification. While not a condition of the project's Density Bonus, in recognition of the City's desire to optimize the energy efficiency of the project, Developer agrees to consult with the project design team, a CABEC certified 2016 Certified Energy Analyst, a LEED AP Homes (low-rise and mid -rise), LEED AP BD+C (high rise), National Green Building Standard (NGBS) Green Verifier, or GreenPoint Rater (one person may meet both of these latter qualifications) early in the project design process to evaluate a building energy model analysis and identify and consider energy efficiency or generation measures. Prior to the meeting, the energy analyst shall complete an initial energy model based on either current T24 standards or, if the project is eligible, the California Utility Allowance Calculator using best available information on the project. To the extent financially feasible for the project, Developer agrees to incorporate and optimize energy efficient building materials, methods, and amenities. 4.16 Emergencv Evacuation Plan. Developer shall submit and obtain approval of an Emergency Evacuation Plan (the EEP) from City Police and Fire Protection agencies prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Up-to-date 24-hour emergency contact information for the on -site personnel shall be provided to the City on an ongoing basis and the approved EEP shall be kept onsite and also be submitted to the following City Agencies: (a) Police Department (b) Fire Department (c) Planning and Building Agency (d) Community Development Agency 4.17 Crime Free Housing. Developer shall work with City staff to develop a crime free housing policy, procedure, and design plan (the "CFH Plan"). Developer shall submit and obtain 12 approval from the PBA the CFH Plan meeting the requirements of this Subsection 4.17 prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The approved CFH Plan shall be implemented and administered by Property Management. 4.18 Parking Management Plan. Developer has provided a parking management plan ("PMP'), attached herewith as Exhibit F and incorporated herein by reference, which indicates that, if needed, valet service for on -site vehicle stacking could create an additional 80 parking spaces, raising the total onsite parking spaces from 332 to 412. In addition, the PMP indicates that an additional 70 offsite parking spaces at a nearby City -owned parking structure could be leased on a long term basis. The PMP shall be adhered to and be enforced by the Project at all times. Additionally, the City may enforce the provisions of the PMP against the Developer in the City's sole discretion. 5. [INTENTIONALLY RESERVED] 6. TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT 6.1 Term. The term of this Agreement ("Density Bonus Housing Agreement Term") shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue until the date that is fifty-five (55) years after the City issues the last certificate of occupancy for the building in which the Affordable Unit is located. 7. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION; INDEMNIFICATION 7.1 Default. Failure or delay by any Party to perform any term or provision of this Agreement, which is not cured within thirty (30) days after receipt of notice from the other Party specifying the default (or such other period specifically provided herein), constitutes a default under this Agreement; provided, however, if such default is of the nature requiring more than thirty (30) days to cure, the defaulting Party shall avoid default hereunder by commencing to cure within such thirty (30) day period, and thereafter diligently pursuing such cure to completion within an additional sixty (60) days following the conclusion of such thirty (30) day period (for a total of ninety (90) days). Except as required to protect against further damages, the injured Party may not institute proceedings against the Party in default until the time for cure has expired. Failure or delay in giving such notice shall not constitute a waiver of any default, nor shall it change the time of default. 7.2 Rights and Remedies Cumulative. The rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative, and the exercise by either Party of one or more of its rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party. 7.3 Indemnification. In addition to any other indemnity specifically provided in this Agreement, Developer agrees to defend (with counsel of City's choosing and the consent of Developer, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, and which may be joint defense counsel upon City's and Developer's consent) indemnify and hold harmless City and its respective officers, officials, agents, employees, representatives, and volunteers (collectively, "Indemnitees") from 13 and against any loss, liability, claim, or judgment arising from any act or omission of Developer in connection with its obligations under this Agreement, except to the extent caused by the active negligence or willful misconduct of Indemnitees. 8. ASSIGNMENT; COVENANTS RUN WITH THE LAND 8.1 Assignment by Developer. 8.1.1 Prohibited Transfers or Assignments. Except as authorized in Section 8.1.2 below, Developer shall not sell, transfer, or assign the Property or Project in whole or in part, or transfer or assign Developer's rights and obligations in this Agreement, without City's prior written approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld ("Permitted Transfer"). In connection with Permitted Transfer, Developer shall: (i) notify City in writing of the sale, transfer, or assignment of all or any portion of the Property, and (ii) deliver to City an assignment and assumption agreement (or other agreement) in a form approved by City and executed by Developer and its transferee/assignee pursuant to which Developer's transferee/assignee assumes all of Developer's covenants and obligations set forth herein with respect to the Property or the portion thereof so transferred. Any request for transfer or assignment of the Agreement by Developer shall require the payment of fees or a deposit to compensate the City for approximate expenses incurred by Developer to City, as applicable, for the City's review of the request. Upon the delivery of the assignment and assumption agreement as proved for above for a Permitted Transfer, or in the event of a sale of the Property as provided for in Section 8.1.1, Developer shall be released from any future obligations under this Agreement. 8.1.2 Sale of Property. Owner agrees and declares that the Property and the Project shall be held, conveyed, mortgaged, encumbered, leased, rented, used, occupied, operated, sold, and approved subject to all obligations set forth or incorporated in this Agreement, all of which are for the purpose of enhancing and protecting the value and attractiveness of the Property and the Project. All of the obligations set forth or incorporated in this Agreement shall constitute covenants which run with the land and shall be binding on Owner and its successors and assigns, and all parties having or acquiring any right, title or interest in, or to any part of the Property or Project. Owner further understands and agrees that the Density Bonus permit approvals received for this Project have been made on the condition that Owner and all subsequent owners, or other successors and assigns of the Property and/or Project lease and rent the Affordable Units in accordance with the terms and conditions stipulated in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of this Agreement for a term of 55 consecutive years commencing upon the date that the Project is first occupied. 8.1.3 Subsequent Assignment. As used in this Agreement, the term "Developer" shall be deemed to include any such transferee or assignee after the date such sale, transfer, or assignment occurs in compliance with this Agreement. 8.1.4 Unpermitted Assignments Void. Any sale, transfer, or assignment made in violation of this Agreement shall be null and void, and City shall have the right to pursue any right or remedy at law or in equity to enforce the provisions of the restriction against unpermitted sales, transfers, or assignments. 14 8.2 Covenants Run with the Land. The Property shall be held, sold, conveyed, hypothecated, encumbered, used, occupied and improved subject to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions set forth herein. The covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, equitable servitudes, liens and charges set forth in this Agreement shall run with the Property and shall be binding upon Developer and all persons having any right, title or interest in the Property, or any part thereof, their heirs, and successive owners and assigns, shall inure to the benefit of City and its successors and assigns, and may be enforced by City and its successors and assigns. The covenants established in this Agreement shall, without regard to technical classification and designation, be binding for the benefit and in favor of City and its successors and assigns, and the parties hereto expressly agree that this Agreement and the covenants herein shall run in favor of City, without regard to whether City is or remains an owner of any land or interest therein to which such covenants relate. However, all such covenants and restrictions shall be deemed to run in favor of all real property owned by City which real property shall be deemed the benefited property of such covenants and this Agreement shall create equitable servitudes and covenants appurtenant to all real property owned by City and running with the Property in accordance with the provisions of Civil Code Section 1468. Furthermore, all of the covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained herein shall also constitute easements in gross running in favor of City. City is deemed the beneficiary of the terms and provisions of this Agreement and of the covenants running with the land, for and in its own right and for the purposes of protecting the interests of the community and other parties, public or private, in whose favor and for whose benefit this Agreement and the covenants running with the land have been provided. Developer hereby declares its understanding and intent that the burden of the covenants set forth herein touch and concern the land and that the Developer's interest in the Property is rendered less valuable thereby. Developer hereby further declares its understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants touch and concern the land by enhancing and increasing the enjoyment and use of the Property by the citizens of City and by furthering the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of City. 9. MISCELLANEOUS 9.1 Entire Agreement. This Agreement and all of its exhibits and attachments set forth and contain the entire understanding and agreement of the parties, and there are no oral or written representations, understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements which are not contained or expressly referred to herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations, understandings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this Agreement. 9.2 Amendment. Any alteration, change or modification of or to this Agreement, in order to become effective, shall be made in writing and in each instance approved by the City Council and signed on behalf of each party. Any requested alteration, change or modification of the Agreement by Developer shall require the payment of fees or deposit by Developer to City, as applicable, for the City's review of the request. Each alteration, change, or modification to this Agreement shall be recorded against the Property in the Official Records of Orange County, California. 15 9.3 Notices. 9.3.1 Delivery. As used in this Agreement, "notice" includes, but is not limited to, the communication of notice, request, demand, approval, statement, report, acceptance, consent, waiver, appointment or other communication required or permitted hereunder. All notices shall be in writing and shall be considered given either: (i) when delivered in person to the recipient named below; or (ii) on the date of delivery shown on the return receipt, after deposit in the United States mail in a sealed envelope as either registered or certified mail with return receipt requested, and postage and postal charges prepaid, and addressed to the recipient named below; or (iii) two (2) days after deposit in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, first class mail and postage prepaid, and addressed to the recipient named below; or (iv) one (1) day after deposit with a known and reliable next -day document delivery service (such as Federal Express), charges prepaid and delivery scheduled next -day to the recipient named below, provided that the sending party receives a confirmation of delivery from the delivery service provider; or (v) the first business day following the date of transmittal of any facsimile, provided confirmation of successful transmittal is retained by the sending Party. All notices shall be addressed as follows: If to City: City of Santa Ana Community Development Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-26) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 Attention: Housing Manager With a copy to: Office of the City Attorney City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, 7th Floor (M-29) Santa Ana, California 92702 If to Developer: Toll Bros., Inc. c/o Toll Bros., Inc 250 Gibraltar Road Horsham, PA, 19044 Attn: Yolanda Rodriguez, Esquire, Vice President and Counsel 9.3.2 Change of Address. Either Party may, by notice given at any time, require subsequent notices to be given to another person or entity, whether a party or an officer or representative of a party, or to a different address, or both. Notices given before actual receipt of notice of change shall not be invalidated by the change. 9.4 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be determined invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby to the extent such remaining provisions are not rendered impractical to perform, taking into consideration the purposes of this Agreement. 16 9.5 Interpretation and Governing Law. This Agreement and any dispute hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California without regard to conflict of law principles. This Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the objectives and purposes of the Parties hereto, and the rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement, all Parties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation hereof. 9.6 Section Headings. All section headings and subheadings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement. 9.7 Singular and Plural. As used herein, the singular of any word includes the plural, and vice versa, as context so dictates. Masculine, feminine, and neuter forms of any word include the other as context so dictates. 9.8 Joint and Several Obligations. If at any time during the term of this Agreement the Property and/or Project is owned, in whole or in part, by more than one Developer, all obligations of such Developer under this Agreement shall be joint and several, and the default of any such Developer shall be the default of all such Developers. 9.9 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement as to which time is an element. 9.10 Computation of Days. Unless otherwise specified in this Agreement or any Exhibit attached hereto, use of the term "days" shall mean calendar days. For purposes of this Agreement and all Exhibits attached hereto, "business days" shall mean every day of the week except Saturdays, Sundays, official State holidays as recognized in Government Code Section 19853(a) or successor statute, and any days in which Santa Ana City Hall is closed for business. 9.11 Waiver. Failure by a Party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other Party, or the failure by a Party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other Party, shall not constitute a waiver of such Party's right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other Party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter. 9.12 Non -Discrimination. In performing its obligations under this Agreement, Developer shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other related activities. Developer affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 9.13 Third Party Beneficiaries. No person or entity, other than City and Developer shall have any right of action based upon any provision of this Agreement. 9.14 Force Maieure. Neither Party shall be deemed to be in default where failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement is caused by floods, 17 earthquakes, other Acts of God, fires, wars, riots or similar hostilities, strikes and other labor difficulties beyondthe Party's control (includingthe Party's employment force), court actions (such as restraining orders or injunctions), or other causes beyond the Party's control, including delays by any governmental entity (although the City may not benefit from this provision for a delay that results from City's failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement), or an insurance company of either party. If any such events shall occur, the term of this Agreement and the time for performance by either Party of any of its obligations hereunder may be extended by the written agreement of the Parties for the period of time that such events prevented such performance. 9.15 Mutual Covenants. The covenants contained herein are mutual covenants and also constitute conditions to the concurrent or subsequent performance by the Party benefited thereby of the covenants to be performed hereunder by such benefited Party. 9.16 Successors in Interest. The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, all permitted successors in interest to the Parties to this Agreement. All provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitudes and constitute covenants running with the land. Each covenant to do or refrain from doing some act hereunder with regard to development of the Property: (a) is for the benefit of and is a burden upon every portion of the Property; (b) runs with the Property and each portion thereof, and (c) is binding upon each Party and each successor in interest approved pursuant to this Agreement during ownership of the Property or any portion thereof. 9.17 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the Parties in counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all of the Parties had executed the same instrument. 9.18 Jurisdiction and Venue. Any action at law or in equity under this Agreement or brought by a Party hereto for the purpose of enforcing, construing or determining the validity of any provision of this Agreement shall be filed and tried in the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, and the Parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for the filing, removal or change of venue to any other court. 9.19 Project as a Private Undertaking. It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the Parties hereto thatthe development of the Project is a private development, that neither Party is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and that each Party is an independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement. No partnership, joint venture or other association of any kind is formed by this Agreement. The only relationship between City and Developer is that of a government entity regulating the development of private property and the Developer of such property. 9.20 Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the Parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Agreement. Upon the request of either Party at any time, the other Party shall promptly execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit if reasonably required, and file or record such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary under the terms of this 18 Agreement to carry out the intent and to fulfill the provisions of this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. City hereby authorizes City Manager to take such other actions and negotiate and execute any additional agreements as may be necessary or proper to fulfill the City's obligations under this Agreement. The City Manager may delegate her or his powers and duties under this Agreement to an authorized management level employee of the City. 9.21 Estoppel Certificate. Within ten (10) business days following a written request by any of the Parties, the other Party shall execute and deliver to the requesting Party a statement certifying that (i) either this Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect or there have been specified (date and nature) modifications to the Agreement, but it remains in full force and effect as modified; and (ii) either there are no known current uncured defaults under this Agreement or that the responding Party alleges that specified (date and nature) defaults exist. The statement shall also provide any other reasonable information requested. The failure to timely deliver this statement shall constitute a conclusive presumption that this Agreement is in full force and effect without modification, except as may be represented by the requesting Party, and that there are no uncured defaults in the performance of the requesting Party, except as may be represented by the requesting Party. 9.22 No Subordination. City's approval of the necessary land use entitlements that authorize Developer to develop, operate, and maintain the Project was based upon Developer's obligation to provide the Affordable Units pursuant to the State Density Bonus Law, City Density Bonus for Affordable Housing, and the terms and conditions of this Agreement. For the Term of the Density Bonus Housing Agreement, this Agreement shall have priority over any and all mortgages, deeds of trust, and other similar forms of secured financing recorded against the Property or any portion thereof. Developer expressly understands and acknowledges that state law requires preservation of affordability covenants in connection with the approval of this density bonus project. 9.23 Attorneys' Fees and Costs. If either Party to this Agreement commences an action against the other Party to this Agreement arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness fees, costs of investigation, and costs of suit from the losing Party. 9.24 Authority to Execute. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of each Party warrants and represents that he or she/they have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of his or her/their corporation, partnership or business entity and warrants and represents that he or she/they has/have the authority to bind the Party to the performance of its obligations hereunder. (Signatures on following page) 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Density Bonus Housing Agreement to be executed on the date set forth at the beginning of this Agreement. ATTEST: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney 9A� By: an Hodge Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Steven A. Mendoza Executive Director Community Development Agency Kristine Ridge City Manager BUY{IFR: TOLL BROS., INC. talue: Crmrles Elliott Title: President Signature Page -Density Bonus Agreement EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY 21 Attachment A 1. Legal Description PARCEL ONE: ALL OF BLOCK 15 OP THE TOWN OF SANTA ANA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK.2, PAGE 51 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL TWO: BEING ALL OF LOTS I AND 41N BLOCK I81N THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON THE PLAT OF THE TOWN OF SANTA ANA AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGESi OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTIC'ULARILY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATTHU SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT I, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FIFTH STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT; THENCE.•. SOUTH 90°00100" WEST 125.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE. TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 1: THENCE NORTH 00°00100" WEST 100.00 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS I AND 4 -I'D THE NORTHWESTERLY C,'ORNER OF SAID LOT-1; THENCE NORTH 9VOO'00" EAST 125.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY i,1N£ OF SAID L,OT4TO A POINT ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OI' WAY LINE OF BUSH STREET, AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 00"00'00" EAST 100.00 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LIN E TO SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FIFTI"I STREET ANDTHE, POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS SURVEY AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION ARE THE SAME AS THAT SHOWN ON A TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY FIRST AM ERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, G.F. NO.: NCS-8260U-SA 1, EFFECTIVE DATE NOVEMBER 28, 2016, EXHIBIT B TENANT VERIFICATION 22 TENANT INCOME VERIFICATION FORM Head of Household (Print Name): Address: Telephone Number: Home: Work: Cell: Date of Birth: Social Security #: Household Composition List All Household Members Living in the Inclusionary Unit Dependent Name Sex Age (Y/N) Social Security # List additional household members on a separate sheet of paper. TENANT INCOME VERIFICATION FORM Monthly Gross Income " List All Sources of Income of All Household Members Living in the Inclusionary Unit Part 1: Earned Income Other Adult Head of Household Household Members Total 1. Gross amount, before payroll deductions of wages, $ $ $ salaries, overtime pay, commissions, fees, tips and bonuses. 2. Net income from business. $ $ $ 3. Social security, annuities, insurance policies, $ $ $ pension/retirement funds, disability or death benefits received periodically. 4. Payment in lieu of earnings, such as $ $ $ unemployment, disability compensation, worker's compensation and severance pay. 5. Public assistance, welfare payments $ $ $ 6. Alimony, child support, other periodic allowances $ $ $ 7. Regular pay, special pay and allowances of $ $ $ members of the Armed Forces 8. Other $ $ $ Subtotal: Monthly Earned Income $ Total Monthly Earned Income x 12 = $ Total Annual Household Gross Earned Income TENANT INCOME VERIFICATION FORM Monthly Gross Income " List All Sources of Income of All Household Members Living in the Inclusionary Unit Part 2: Investment Income Total Other Adult Household Head of Household Investment Household Members Income 1. Interest paid on Bank and Savings accounts $ $ $ 2. Dividends and other payments from stocks and $ $ $ bonds 3. Income from real property (i.e. rental property) $ $ $ 4. Other (describe) $ $ $ Subtotal: Monthly Investment Income: $ Total Monthly Investment Income x 12 = $ Total Annual Household Investment Income "Note: The following items are not considered income: casual or sporadic gifts; amounts specifically for or in reimbursement of medical expenses; lump sum payments such as inheritances, insurance payments, capital gains and settlement for personal or property losses; educational scholarships paid directly to the student or educational institution; special pay to a serviceman head of family away from home and under hostile fire; relocation payments under federal, state or local law; foster child care payments; value of coupon allotments for purpose of food under Food Stamp Act of 1964 which is in excess of amount actually charged the eligible household; payments received pursuant to participation in the following programs: VISTA, Service Learning Programs, and Special Volunteer Programs, SCORE, ACE, Retired Senior Volunteer Program, Foster Grandparent Program, Older American Community Services Program, and National Volunteer Program to Assist Small Business Experience. TENANT INCOME VERIFICATION FORM Assets "" List the Current Value of All Assets of All Household Members Living in the Inclusionary Unit If the Asset generates income, that income must be specified In Part 2 above Head of Household Other Adult Household Members Total Value of Value Value Assets 1. Bank and Savings accounts $ $ $ 2. Stocks and bonds $ $ $ 3. Real property (i.e. rental property) $ $ $ 4. Other (describe) $ $ $ Total Asset Value $ "Note: Necessary items, such as furniture and automobiles, used for personal use are excluded from household assets. Collections of items for hobby, investment or business purposes must be included in household assets. If the total value of household assets exceeds $5,000, the calculation of the household's annual income shall include the greater of the actual amount of income, if any, derived from all of the household assets; or 10% of the total value of the assets. TENANT INCOME VERIFICATION FORM If the total asset value exceeds $5,000, perform the calculations in the following table. If the total asset value is less than $5,000, the amount of investment income to be included in annual household income is $0. Calculation of Investment Income to be Included in Annual Household Income 1. Total Annual Household Investment Income $ 2. Total Asset Value $ x 10% $ The Greater of #1 or #2 = Investment Income to be Included in Annual Household Income $ Calculation of the Household's Total Annual Income Total Annual Household Gross Earned Income Total Investment Income to be Included in Annual Household Income Total Household Income Documentation Attach True Copies of the Relevant Documents Listed Below Paycheck stubs from two most recent pay periods Employment verification Income tax return Social security verification Alimony/child support verification Other (Describe) Bank/Savings account verification Self-employment verification Unemployment verification Welfare verification Disability income verification AFFIDAVIT This Affidavit is made with the knowledge that it will be relied upon by the City of Santa Ana, our landlord and the owner of our apartment building, to determine maximum income for eligibility. (1/we) warrant that all information set forth in this document is true, correct and complete and based upon information (1/we) deem reliable and based upon such investigation as (1/we) deemed necessary. (Mle) acknowledge that (1/we) have been advised that the making of any misrepresentation or misstatement in this affidavit will constitute a material breach of (my/our) rental agreement with the property owner to rent the unit and will additionally enable the property owner to initiate and pursue all applicable legal and equitable remedies with respect to the unit and to me/us. (Mfe) do hereby swear under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct and that this affidavit has been executed as of the date specified below by each adult member of the household which intends to occupy an Inclusionary Unit located at Signature Date Printed Name Executed at , Santa Ana, California Signature Printed Name Date Executed at , Santa Ana, California ,Santa Ana, California. EXHIBIT C ANNUAL TENANT RECERTIFICATION 23 ANNUAL TENANT RECERTIFICATION CITY OF SANTA ANA AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING PROGRAM Date: Tenant Name: Unit Address: Dear In accordance with the requirements imposed by the City of Santa Ana (City), and your lease, the City requires that we review your income and family composition every year. To complete our review, the Property Owner or Property Manager will set up a meeting with you to receive the necessary information. When you attend the meeting with the Property Owner or Property Manager you must bring documents that verify the income of all the adult members of your household. This information can include income tax returns, employment verification, wage statements, interest statements, and/or unemployment compensation statements. Cooperation with the recertification requirement is a condition of continuing tenancy in an Inclusionary Unit. You must report the required information to enable the Property Owner to process the recertification by Month/Day. Sincerely, Property Manager / Property Owner EXHIBIT D ANNUAL RENTAL HOUSING COMPLIANCE REPORT 24 S m � y V Y d d o a a` E O d t V Y t O a •• Y d d cc $ E N d d Z •o -o E O 'F 6 Q V 6 IIIIIIIIIIII ■IIIIIIIIIIII EXHIBIT E NOTICE OF AFFORDABILITY RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER OF PROPERTY 25 EXHIBIT E NOTICE OF AFFORDABILITY RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER OF PROPERTY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California, has entered into a Density Bonus Agreement with , a ("Property Owner"). The Density Bonus Agreement imposes income and affordability covenants on designated Affordable Units with the Project located at , Santa Ana, Orange County, Assessor's Parcel Number and further described in the legal description provided in Exhibit A to the Density Bonus Agreement. The Density Bonus Agreement was recorded as Document/histrument Number , and shall remain in effect until 120 (Insert date of the termination of the Affordability Period). The Density Bonus Agreement imposes the following income and affordability restrictions on the Affordable Units. Number of Bedrooms Very -Low Low Income Income Households Households Studio Units One -Bedroom Units Two -Bedroom Units Three -Bedroom Units Four -Bedroom Units In the event the Property Owner wishes to sell or transfer the Project during the Affordability Period, the City and the Property Owner shall execute and deposit into escrow this Notice of Affordability Covenants on Transfer of the Property. The sale or transfer of the Property shall not be effective unless and until the City and transferee execute the documents necessary to transfer the Density Bonus Agreement obligations from the Property Owner to the transferee. This Notice of Affordability Covenants on Transfer of the Property in no way modifies the provisions of the Density Bonus Agreement. In the event of any conflict between this Notice of Affordability Covenants on Transfer of the Property and the Density Bonus Agreement, the terms of the Density Bonus Agreement shall prevail. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have duly executed this Notice of Affordability Restrictions on Transfer of Property as of the dates set forth below. [Signatures on Following Pages] SIGNATURE PAGE TO NOTICE OF AFFORDABELITY RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER OF PROPERTY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: By: Ryan O. Hodge Assistant City Attorney CITY: CITY OF SANTA ANA A California Charter City and Municipal Corporation Name: Kristine Ridge Its: City Manager Date: SIGNATURE PAGE TO NOTICE OF AFFORDABILITY RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER OF PROPERTY PROPERTY OWNER: 1:1 Name: Its: Date: EXHIBIT F PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN 26 w , 1■A IN"■ _ "KIit r: �� pl 1 III n Inli Ili i �• III 5 -_ :.. 1 q II�1 I! III i�t III 1 ■ ■ ■ II t Kill ��i l■1 I III I I I I l ■ i ■ 1 r 1 ■ ICI I I � � 11 ■ I III _ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 11 i_I! In III! I I I I I I I 1 1 1 10 .i.LN111L I. I! pR, l Ili m., - Ir - ,mb 1 1 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN engineers Mr. Michael McCann September 16, 2019 Page 9 PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP) To ensure adequate parking is provided for both tenants, employees and guests of the Project, it is recommended that when the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company deems it necessary, the following key Parking Management Strategies be implemented by the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company: PMP Measures The following measures are available to the Project to mitigate any parking impacts or deficiencies in the event the proposed onsite parking supply is determined to be greater than the allocated one parking space per bedroom rate. 1. Property Owner/Property Management Company shall assign one (1) parking space to every unit. Additional spaces may be purchased and assigned to any unit that requests additional assigned spaces. These additional purchased spaces will be assigned to the 2°d access/tandem spaces. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall determine the allocation of parking spaces for resident tenants, guests, retail customers and employees, inclusive of spaces designated and signed for prospective resident tenants and/or short-term parking (1-hour) for retail customers. Figure 8 depicts the potential location of the five (5) spaces designated and signed for prospective resident tenant and/or 1-hour short-term parking for retail customers, subject to approval of the Property Owner/Property Management Company. 2. If the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company determine that the actual parking demand for the site exceeds the State Code's affordable housing parking requirement, the Property Owner/Property Management Company shall restrict parking on -site to only residential tenants. The only exception to this would be that the five (5) spaces designated and signed for prospective resident tenants and/or short-term parking for retail customers would remain. All retail customers and resident guests would be required to park in one of the near -by public parking structures or utilize on -street parking. The two (2) closest public parking structures are located on the southwest corner of Main Street/5t' Street and on 5t' Street at Spurgeon Street directly east of Bush Street. Figure 9 highlights the two (2) public parking structures. Based on information provided by the City, there is an excess of 500 spaces available during peak operating hours within the two (2) public parking structures. N:g3900218399!- FntAmaicen Plaza, Same Anal eportlRevizdFir4Amaicen Pleze Perking Study&Perking Management Plan 09-162019.docz Mr. Michael McCann September 16, 2019 Page 10 If the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company determine that offsite parking is required for the Project, the Property Owner/Property Management Company shall execute an agreement with the City of Santa Ana to acquire the rights to lease spaces on behalf of the retail employees. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall secure up to 10 spaces for employees/staff of the Project's retail component as part of the agreement, which would allow the Project employees to access the designated parking structure(s) 24-hours a day seven (7) days a week. 3. If the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company further determines, even after implementation of above -mentioned PMP measures, that offsite parking is required for the Project's residential tenants, residential tenants may purchase additional parking within the near -by public parking structure via the agreement that the Property Owner/Property Management Company established with the City Finance Department. To facilitate this PMP measure, the Property Owner/Property Management Company would seek City Council approval and upon Council approval, execute an agreement with the City of Santa Ana to acquire the rights to lease spaces on behalf of the Project's residents. Pursuant to communications with the Finance Department, the Property Owner/Property Management Company would secure up to 60 spaces for residents of the Project's apartment component as part of the agreement, which would allow the Project residents to access the designated parking structure(s) 24-hours a day seven (7) days a week. Based on information provided by the City Finance Department, the current availability for City -owned parking is within one parking structure located at 5t' street and Spurgeon Street (Fiesta Parking Structure), where 450 spaces are available for lease. As shown in Figure 2, this City -owned structure is located within walking distance to the subject property, across Bush Street. Primary vehicular access is provided at the intersection of 5t' Street and Spurgeon Street, with gated pedestrian access provided via entries on 5th Street and Bush Street, as well as French Street. 4. In lieu of PMP Measure No. 4, the Property Owner/Property Management Company, if deemed necessary, may implement an on -site valet -assist program. Figure 10 presents the detailed valet plan which shows up to 80 additional spaces could be accommodated. To implement the valet operation, the Property Owner/Property Management Company would engage the services of a well -established valet operations N:g3900218399!- Fnt Amaicen Plaza, Same Anal eportlRevizdFir4Amaicen Pleze Perking Study&Perking Management Plan 09-162019.docz Mr. Michael McCann September 16, 2019 Page 11 company. A few of the valet operators that are currently being contacted are ABC Valet, PPS Parking and Elite Valet Services. 5. The parking conditions will be reviewed/monitored on a quarterly basis by the Property Owner/Property Management Company and appropriate actions detailed above will be taken to ensure that the necessary PMP measures are being implemented. Through this monitoring and cooperation with the tenants as a result of the quarterly review/monitoring, a partnership will be formed to ensure that residential tenants and retail employees and Management Company personnel on the property work together to ensure adequate parking is available. Table 4 provides a summary of the Project's composite parking supply ratio with implementation of the above -recommended PMP measures. A review of Row A of Table 4 shows that the Project's parking ratio calculates to 1.51 spaces/unit (332 spaces - 220 units). With implement of PMP measures No. 2 and No. 3, which would be attained by leasing up to 70 off -site parking spaces within the City -owned parking structure, the Project's parking supply ratio would increase to 1.55 spaces/unit (342 spaces - 220 units) and 1.83 spaces/unit (402 spaces - 220 units), respectively (See Row B and Row C of Table 4). The Project's composite parking supply ratio further increases with implementation of PMP measure no. 4, which would add an additional 80 spaces via implementation of a valet parking program. As shown in Row D of Table 4, the Project's composite parking ratio calculates to 2.19 spaces/unit (482 spaces - 220 units) with the implementation of PMP measures No. 2, No. 3 and No. 4, which exceeds the Project's residential parking requirement of 2.15 space/unit based on the City's TZC. Figure 11 is a bar chart of the Project's composite parking supply ratio with implementation of the above -recommended PMP measures, and in comparison to the City's TZC parking requirement. N:g3900@18399!- FntAmaicen Plaza, Same Anal eportlRevizdFir4Amaicen Pleze Perking Study&Perking Management Plan 09-162019.docz Mr. Michael McCann September 16, 2019 Page 12 CONCLUSIONS The composite parking ratio for the proposed Project is 1.51 spaces per unit (332 provided spaces divided 220 apartment units). Comparing this ratio to what is required by other similar cities shows that the Project provides 10% to 67% more parking spaces than other apartment projects located in a downtown setting. Since the Project falls within the downtown setting and provides the opportunity for alternative modes of travel along with public on -street parking and near -by public structured parking, the proposed Project's parking supply will be sufficient (ample) to support its needs. Further yet, given 5% of the Project's residential units are designated as very low affordable units, the parking ratios for affordable housing developments specified in the California Government Code Section 65915 were applied. From this calculation, the Project would require 325 spaces, comprised of 294 spaces for the residential component, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking, and 31 spaces for the retail component (using the City's TZC retail ratio of 1 space per 400 SF). When compared to a supply of 332 spaces, the 325-space parking requirement is satisfied and results in a surplus of 7 spaces. Nevertheless, to ensure adequate parking is provided for both tenants, employees and guests of the Project, the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company, if they deem it necessary, would implement the appropriate Parking Management Strategy recommended in this Parking Management Plan to mitigate any parking impacts or deficiencies. + + + + + + + + + + + We appreciate the opportunity to provide this analysis. Should you have any questions, please call us at 949.825.6175. Respectively submitted, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers V� TINL}' 2006 0 5 6/30/21 Richard E. Barretto, P.E. Principal Attachments cc: Shane Green, P.E., Transportation Engineer III N:g3900218399!- FntAmaicen Plaza, Same Anal eportlRevizdFir4Amaicm Pleze Perking Study&Perking Management Plan 09-162019.docz SOURCE: MVE + PARTNERS FIGURE 2 ®NO SCALE PROPOSED SITE PLAN FIRST AMERICAN PLAZA, SANTA ANA 00 6LOZ-ZL-60 CZ: f:90 dal 6-PT-1 t96f\6mp dwd 6mp ouo oluos •ozold uoopawo Lsn, \ \ 1 - 096f9 LZ\OOfif\:u 1 11h .. All 1111111 • :::: ssa :.►��� 1lnuur� • [RAO • Z aNVUE) ° a 1 11 11 �ti`tfIZ� a Ll 011111 Z -a ■ Q lm�IOJ.Slue Z Q N r M31AHIVJ 'Willis NIVW aat/aNVJ -•- H3MO13 aw' w A �G w y N Mln ler SY r= � C W W r q a rti ❑ a y �0 2 u' t V a W w Fr.Ch 5R fientJ9 S i L F1211Ch 51 r d Y R] a m a w 9WOGll a %I UA 0 a w y Y� c o v d y N itu en Sr � '-N9W2ptiL . O � F a m Mam Street Mair}Street N a4 o�i a I U A Q6 W za s N s � U `w Z 4 i LZ W © � '0 N S7Gamora St u' a' m 0 OTC C] o ry C N ereadw:�,• R U U C J a N u w f Y N � b e Neuch St U S O n N i ¢ m r: j Y o F a y 3 u L 51 m N reuse. Si a u � u a w d shill. Li w 1 N Spu rpenn $1 W 1s aldeh I: pm. Av e N 9u-A m _a T y i 19 N Sycamare St S SYFamme SS Si � ON n Y N � � G �i Q N eka Sr i � s o,"j, :..a,=,__d.d\__ _ ___-_ � 00 2 . `� / { } / ■ � Z � � � •—l—�.% . � , �lp Q.A IMfg— _ t o ,� | � !!\ } / )) } } ||�f' ■■ 00 6LOZ-ZL-60 MCC:90 dal 6mp G-) 696f\6mp dwd\6mp\ouo oµos •ozold UOoIJ6wo )sll) - 496S9 LZ\006C\:u e:. f A3]3 J1 SOURCE: MVE + PARTNERS KEY FIGURE 8 = PROSPECTIVE RESIDENT TENANT AND SHORT-TERM PARKING FOR RETAIL TNO SCALE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN FIRST AMERICAN PLAZA, SANTA ANA a jai—a�—so ssss eo am amp m—i seocV6^v eweAc„aA— .—Id ... wu — seees wV000c0 t� a Cp= _ 8. :E zz 00 a ¢ W � D r ®® > U W of < IIII e < ¢�ZO= x N a¢ r ¢ r u J a �A >III Li PII r s C s N�� C uo �< z : z rc In, .1 0 ar � Ii J. ILit �= � es 6LOZ-ZL-60 Zb:ZS:OL dal 6mp LL-1 V96f\6mp dwd\6mp\ouo oµos •dzold uooiiewo )s111 - 496SB LZ\006C\.0 rn cv N 'o. q CV Qe) LN- d' 0 c CQ z" 0 0 E yJ 4 to # rl r-I r-I c c m m AlddnS eupAed N .. TABLE 1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY4 Project Land Use / Project Description Development Totals e +Main Apartments ❑ Studio Units 45 Units ❑ 1 Bedroom Units 101 Units ❑ 2 Bedroom Units 74 Units Total Residential Units: 220 Units ❑ Large Retail Suite 9,750 SF ❑ Small Retail Suite 2,600 SF Total Retail Space: 12,350 SF Parking Supply by Level ❑ Subterranean Level o Handicap Parking 3 spaces o Resident Parking — 1't Access 145 spaces o Resident Parking — 2"d Access/ Tandem. 13 spaces ❑ Level o Handicap Parking 5 spaces o Resident Parking — 1't Access 55 spaces o Resident Parking — 2"d Access/Tandem 9 spaces o Guest Parking/Leasing 5 spaces ❑ Level o Resident Parking — 1't Access 63 spaces o Resident Parking — 2"d Access/Tandem 34 spaces Parking Supply Allocation: o Handicap Parking 8 spaces o Resident Parking —I' Access 263 spaces o Resident Parking — 2" Access/Tandem 56 spaces o Guest Parking/Leasing 5 spaces Total Parking Supply 332 spaces 4 Source: MVE+partners, 08/08/2019. N:g3900@18399!- Fnt Ameican Plaza, Same Anal eportlRevised FirstAmeicen Plaza Parking Study&Perking Management Plan 09162019. docz E o n y o v .. .. •+ c O m C " m u o o c o m v ti ti N 1 n 0 o m A o ss� 3 � E u° a a _ _ N E M � Ifo TABLE 3 PARKING REQUIREMENTS BASED ON THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TRANSIT ZONING CODE Spaces Project Description Size Parldng Ratio Required 4� +Main Project Retail 12,350 SF 1 space per 400 SF 31 Residential Units (DU) Studio/l Bedroom Units 146 2 spaces per DU 292 2 Bedroom Units 74 2 spaces per DU 148 Guest Parking 220 0.15 spaces per DU 33 Subtotal 473 Total Parking Requirement: 504 Proposed Parking Supply: 332 Parking Surplus/Deficiency (+/-): -172 Residential Use Composite Parking Demand Ratio (sp/du) 2.15 N:14900@183981- Fnt Ameican Plaza, Same Anal eportlRevised FirsLAmeicen Plaza Parking Study&Perking Management Plan 09-162019. docz TABLE 4 PARKING REQUIREMENTS BASED ON CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65915 FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING Spaces Project Description Size Parking Ratio Required e +Main Project Retail 12,350 SF 1 space per 400 SF 31 Affordable Housing Units (DU) Studio/1 Bedroom Units 146 1 spaces per DU 146 2 Bedroom Units 74 2 spaces per DU 148 Parking Requirement: 325 Proposed Parking Supply: 332 Parking Surplus/Deficiency (+/-): +7 N:14900@183981- Fnt Ameican Plaza, Same Anal eportlRevised FirsLAmeicen Plaza Parking Study&Perking Management Plan 09-162019. docz REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: APPROVED ELECTION OF MAYOR PRO TEM 2018-2020 {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 1} As Recommended As Amended Ordinance on 1st Reading Ordinance on 2nd Reading Implementing Resolution Set Public Hearing For__________ CONTINUED TO /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. The Mayor calls for nominations for Mayor Pro Tem position. 2. Close nominations for position. 3. The Mayor declares the result of the election. DISCUSSION On December 11, 2018, the Council nominated and elected Juan Villegas as Mayor Pro Tem serving the period of 2018 through 2020. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2019-058, Council called a Special Municipal Election to fill the vacant Ward 4 council member office held on November 5, 2019. The ROV provided the certified election results for the newly elected Ward 4 Councilmember Phil Bacerra. Pursuant to Santa Ana Charter Section 405, “in the first meeting of the City Council following any general or special election at which members of the City Council are elected, the City Council shall elect a mayor pro tem who shall act as mayor during the absence from the City or disability of the mayor, or during any vacancy in the office of mayor.” In the same manner, Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 2-101, the council shall elect a mayor pro tem by a majority vote of the council. Election of Mayor Pro Tem November 19, 2019 Page 2 STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City’s efforts to meet Goal #5 - Community Health, Livability, Engagement & Sustainability, Objective #1 (Establish a comprehensive community engagement initiative to expand access to information and create opportunities for stakeholders to play an active role in discussing public policy and setting priorities). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. ___________________________ Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council TABLE 5 PROJECT PARKING SUMMARY— COMPOSITE PARKING SUPPLY RATIOS Project Description Size Parldng Ratio Spaces Required 4� +Main Project Retail Affordable Housing Units (DU) Studio/l Bedroom Units 2 Bedroom Units 12,350 SF 146 74 1 space per 400 SF 1 spaces per DU 2 spaces per DU 31 146 148 Parking Requirement: 325 Proposed On -site Parking Supply: 332 A. Composite Parking Supply Ratio (sp/du) 1.51 Proposed On -site Parking Supply + 10 off -site employee spaces: 342 B. Composite Parking Supply Ratio (sp/du) 1.55 Proposed On -site Parking Supply + 70 total off -site spaces: 402 C. Composite Parking Supply Ratio (sp/du) 1.83 Proposed On -site Parking Supply + 70 total off -site spaces + 80 valet spaces: 482 D. Composite Parking Supply Ratio (sp/du) 2.19 N:g3900@18399!- Fnt Ameican Plaza, Same Anal eportlRevised FirsLAmeicen Plaza Parking Study&Perking Management Plan 09-162019. docz REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: APPROVED ELECTION OF MAYOR PRO TEM 2018-2020 {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 1} As Recommended As Amended Ordinance on 1st Reading Ordinance on 2nd Reading Implementing Resolution Set Public Hearing For__________ CONTINUED TO /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. The Mayor calls for nominations for Mayor Pro Tem position. 2. Close nominations for position. 3. The Mayor declares the result of the election. DISCUSSION On December 11, 2018, the Council nominated and elected Juan Villegas as Mayor Pro Tem serving the period of 2018 through 2020. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2019-058, Council called a Special Municipal Election to fill the vacant Ward 4 council member office held on November 5, 2019. The ROV provided the certified election results for the newly elected Ward 4 Councilmember Phil Bacerra. Pursuant to Santa Ana Charter Section 405, “in the first meeting of the City Council following any general or special election at which members of the City Council are elected, the City Council shall elect a mayor pro tem who shall act as mayor during the absence from the City or disability of the mayor, or during any vacancy in the office of mayor.” In the same manner, Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 2-101, the council shall elect a mayor pro tem by a majority vote of the council. Election of Mayor Pro Tem November 19, 2019 Page 2 STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City’s efforts to meet Goal #5 - Community Health, Livability, Engagement & Sustainability, Objective #1 (Establish a comprehensive community engagement initiative to expand access to information and create opportunities for stakeholders to play an active role in discussing public policy and setting priorities). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. ___________________________ Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: APPROVE THE ANNUAL CALENDAR OF REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS FOR 2020 {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 11 CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 11' Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2"tl Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For rK•�►nutri�.>rc. /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER IN* LTAILTAIA►lr1Ar1FARI M LlI 1. Review calendar of regularly scheduled City Council Meetings in 2020. 2. Cancel the regularly scheduled City Council meeting for January 7, 2020; August 4, 2020; and November 3, 2020. 3. Direct staff to post Notice of Cancellation(s). The City Council hereby waives notice of said meetings as required by the government code. DISCUSSION Consistent with past practice, the City Council has cancelled the first meeting of the year, election night, and a meeting during the summer months. If the City Council cancels any regularly scheduled meeting, they will resume consideration of agenda items at their next regular scheduled meeting. The City Council reserves the right to cancel any other meetings and notify the public as legally required. The 2020 Master Calendar and agendas for all regular and special meetings will be posted on the City's website at: https://www.santa-ana.org/cc/city-meetings. City Council Meetings are typically held in the Council Chamber, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana and Council Committee meetings at City Hall, Ross Annex, Room 1600, Santa Ana or as otherwise noted on the agenda. STRATEGIC PLAN Approval of this agreement allows us to meet Goal #5. Community Health, Livability, Engagement & Sustainability, Objective #1 (Establish a comprehensive community engagement initiative to expand access to information and create opportunities for stakeholders to play an active role in discussing public policy and setting priorities). 2020 Regularly Scheduled Meetings November 19, 2019 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council Exhibits: 1. List of Scheduled Meetings in 2020 2. Calendar of City Council Meetings EXHIBIT 1 LIST OF SCHEDULED CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS IN 2020 Tuesday, January 7, 2020 (Traditionally first meeting in January canceled) Tuesday, January 21, 2020 Tuesday, February 4, 2020 Tuesday, February 18, 2020 Tuesday, March 9, 2020 Tuesday, March 23, 2020 Tuesday, April 7, 2020 Tuesday, April 21, 2020 Tuesday, May 5, 2020 Tuesday, May 19, 2020 Tuesday, June 2, 2020 Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Tuesday, July 7, 2020 Tuesday, July 21, 2020 Tuesday, August 4, 2020 (Canceled) Tuesday, August 18, 2020 Tuesday, September 1, 2020 Tuesday, September 15, 2020 Tuesday, October 6, 2020 Tuesday, October 20, 2020 Tuesday, November 3, 2020 (Traditionally canceled — Election Day) Tuesday, November 17, 2020 Tuesday, December 1, 2020 Tuesday, December 8, 2020 (Installation Meeting) Tuesday, December 15, 2020 \tr:: /}N�\\\ }N\\\:}\\\\: \} :: ®z:: \{ \ q fj !j © :\\� 0 Q ° § o \) / § / ` § § §{ !: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING — RESOLUTION ADJUSTING CITY WATER AND SEWER RATES (NON -GENERAL FUND) {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 6, 1H} CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 1"Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2ntl Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION Hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution adjusting the City water and sewer rates effective January 1, 2020; July 1, 2020; July 1, 2021; July 1, 2022; and July 1, 2023. DISCUSSION The City owns and operates a water distribution system and a sewer collection system that provides services to a community of nearly 350,000 residents and 5,000 businesses. The City water system consists of approximately 4 miles of mains, 10 reservoirs, 7 pumping stations, and 20 active wells. The City sewer system consists of 398 miles of main, 8,000 manholes, and 2 lift stations. On February 5, 2018, the City Council directed staff to perform a comprehensive rate study for both the water and sanitary sewer enterprises. A prior such study had been performed in 2014. On July 3, 2018, upon completion of a competitive bid process, the City awarded a contract to Stantec to develop a financial plan, cost of service, and rate structure analyses for water, recycled water, and sewer rates. The objectives of the study were to ensure the financial stability of both water and sewer enterprises, while ensuring that the rates are in compliance with applicable law (namely California's Proposition 218 requirements). On October 1, 2019, Council received the report (Exhibit 2) and authorized staff to notify property owners of the proposed rate adjustments considered here. Capital Improvement Program The City's Water Resources Division has identified that both the water and sewer utilities need significant investment in the repair and rehabilitation of its aging infrastructure. The Water Enterprise has completed a Water Master Plan which identifies critical projects that will average nearly $15 million in annual capital spending for the next 20 years. Over the past 4 years the City has spent an average of almost $4 million annually on water -related CIP projects. The water and sewer systems are already showing signs of distress. In the past year alone the systems PUBLIC HEARING — Resolution Adjusting City Water and Sewer Rates November 19, 2019 Page 2 experienced 21 water main breaks, 173 water service leaks, 132 sewer laterals repaired, and 2 pump stations and 6 groundwater wells downed due to mechanical and/or electrical failures. While the Public Works Agency has excelled in making cost-effective repairs and rehabilitations, continued deferral of capital project investment will eventually result in the complete failure and loss of critical assets. The proposed projects predominately focus on groundwater well improvements, pipe replacement, and a major Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Project. With this increase in capital spending, the Water Enterprise will require a higher level of staffing to manage the projects (as many as an additional 8 full-time positions). Planned capital spending for the Sewer Enterprise includes pipe replacement at a rate of 4 miles of aging pipe per year, and the construction of a new $7 million pump station (which will be paid for with developer fees). This signifies an increase in average annual capital spending from under $1 million to over $6 million for the next 20 years. With this increase in capital spending, the Sewer Enterprise will require a higher level of staffing to manage the projects (as many as an additional 3 full-time positions). Financial Plan The rate study proposes to primarily cash finance the above re -investments in critical water and sewer infrastructure, with the exception of the AMI project. Cash financing is more appropriate to pay for average/typical capital spending levels. Cash financing avoids the cost of interest and ensures that a utility is not creating undue burden on future ratepayers through the accumulation of debt. For the AMI Project, some grant funding has already been secured and additional debt financing is being sought. Debt financing is appropriate for one-time, large capital projects (such as the AMI Project) that are anomalies compared to normal capital spending levels. Debt financing in those cases allows the utility to avoid unnecessary "rate shock" and helps spread the cost of large projects over a longer period. It also ensures that future ratepayers who benefit from the project will also pay for the project. As part of the analysis, existing reserve levels were examined. Recommended reserves include an Operating & Maintenance Reserve target equal to 90 days (3 months) of annual operating expenses; an Emergency Reserve set at $4 million (for both the Water and Sewer Enterprises); and a Repair, Renewal, and Replacement Capital Reserve equal to 50% of average annual projected capital spending. Rate Design Over the past decade the legal requirements surrounding utility rate setting in California have evolved. Namely the courts have made rulings with respect to California Constitution Article XIII C and D (commonly known as Proposition 218) that have created a higher "cost of service" standard for rate setting than has historically been practiced by public utilities. Simply put, the burden of proof is on utilities to demonstrate that all aspects of water and sewer rates are directly proportionate to the cost of providing service. This means aligning fixed revenue (fixed charges) with fixed costs, and variable revenue (usage rates) with variable costs. In addition, Stantec looked at opportunities to strengthen revenue stability for both utilities, which were found to rely too heavily on usage rates, making the utilities susceptible to revenue volatility. Currently, the City's water PUBLIC HEARING — Resolution Adjusting City Water and Sewer Rates November 19, 2019 Page 3 utility recovers approximately 17% of revenues through the fixed base charge while the sewer utility collects approximately 13% through fixed charges. These rates were found to not be aligned with the utilities' actual fixed costs, which were closer to 40% for the water utility and nearly 100% for the sewer utility. The proposed water rates are structured to directly align the water utility's variable costs (i.e., water purchases and electricity) with the water usage rates ("Water Usage Charge"). By extension, the water utility's fixed costs (i.e., salaries, capital spending, maintenance, and overhead) will be aligned with the fixed water charges ("Water Utility Charge"). Sewer rates ("Sewer Utility Charge") are proposed to be fixed for all customers based on the size of their meter and the type of customer, since some customers (e.g., commercial accounts) return a larger percentage of their water to the sewer than others (e.g., single-family residences) which have higher irrigation needs. The Fats Oils and Grease (FOG) Charge for food service accounts will increase by 68% in order to better reflect the cost of the FOG Control Program. Establishment of Reserve Targets As the study identifies, the policy target for reserves is an important component when developing a multi -year financial plan, as utilities rely on the reserves for financial stability. Additionally, credit rating agencies evaluate utilities in part on their adherence to formally adopted reserve targets. The study expands on current reserve targets in place since 2014 and recommends the following reserve policies: 1) Operating and Maintenance Reserve with a target minimum balance equal to 90-days of annual operating expenses, 2) Emergency Reserve of $4 million for both water and sewer enterprises, 3) Repair, Renewal and Replacement (3R) Capital Reserve equal to 50% of the average annual capital spending over each enterprise's 10-year capital spending projections. Typical Bill Impact The financial impact of the proposed revenue adjustments and rate structure changes on the typical customer was carefully evaluated. The overall increase in the combined typical bill of a single- family residential customer will be $4.92 per month (based on the average 1,257 cubic feet of water used per month by typical single-family residences). When compared to neighboring cities, the typical Santa Ana customer will continue to pay a similar amount, on average, for water and sewer services as compared to its neighboring cities such as Garden Grove, Brea, Fullerton and Orange. Public Hearing Notification As required by the provisions of Proposition 218, notices of a public hearing for adjusting water and sewer rates were mailed to all property owners within the City of Santa Ana water service area on or before October 5, 2019 (Exhibits 3 and 4). PUBLIC HEARING — Resolution Adjusting City Water and Sewer Rates November 19, 2019 Page 4 STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #6 — Community Facilities & Infrastructure, Objective #1 (establish and maintain a Community Investment Plan for all City assets), Strategy H (complete water/waste water rate study to ensure adequate resources to capture critical long-term capital needs). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT The proposed rates are designed to meet the cost of service requirements of Proposition 218 and support the recommended Capital Improvement Project (CIP) plans and allow both water and sewer enterprises to meet their respective financial goals. A net increase in water and sewer rate revenue as outlined in the table below is proposed: The proposed rates are estimated to produce additional rate revenue as follows: PUBLIC HEARING — Resolution Adjusting City Water and Sewer Rates November 19, 2019 Page 5 Water services revenues are received in the Public Works Water Revenue Fund (Accounting Unit 06017002-53712, 06017002-53714, 06017002-53735, and 06017002-54736) and sewer services revenues are received in the Sanitary Sewer Service Fund (Accounting Unit 05617002-53902). As projects are identified in future budgets and CIP plans, funds will be transferred to and expended from the respective enterprise capital improvement accounts (Nos. 06617647-66301 and 05417647-66220). Fuad Sweiss, PE, PLS Executive Director Public Works Agency FSS/NS/RR APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Kathryn Downs, CPA Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency Exhibits: 1. Resolution 2. Water and Sewer Rate Study 3. Proposition 218 Compliant Notice of Public Hearing 4. Notice of Rate Adjustment Proof of Mailing jmf 11/5/19 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ADJUSTING RATES FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA WHEREAS, Chapter 39 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Article ll, Sections 39- 19 and 39-36, authorize the City to set and charge fees for the provision of water and recycled water to customers within the City of Santa Ana and to establish those fees by resolution; and WHEREAS, Chapter 39 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Article III, Sections 39-55.1, 39-55.2, and 39-55.4, authorize the City to set and charge fees for the provision of sewer services to customers; and WHEREAS, this Resolution adjusting water, recycled water, and sewer service rates shall apply only to Chapter 39 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Water and Sewers; and WHEREAS, the City previously retained Stantec and Hildebrand Consulting, independent financial consultants, to review the City's water, recycled water, and sewer utilities to determine whether rates for service charges are sufficient to meet increased costs of service, and to prepare a cost of service analysis and rate study (the "Study'); and WHEREAS, based on the results of the Study (a copy of which is available for inspection at the City and was also posted on the City's website), increases to the rates for water, recycled water, and sewer service fees and charges are necessary; and WHEREAS, the proposed water rate structure includes a variable water usage charge and a fixed monthly water utility charge, both billed on a bimonthly basis. The proposed water usage charge is based on the amount of water consumed, measured in dollars per hundred cubic feet ("CCF") of water delivered to the property. The fixed monthly water utility charge is independent of the amount of water used and is determined based on the size of the meter serving the property, as measured in inches; and WHEREAS, the proposed water rate structure also includes a pass -through adjustment mechanism providing for increases to the water usage charge based on increases in the cost of purchasing potable and/or recycled wholesale water needed to supply the City's water system that may be imposed on the City by the Orange County Water District or the Metropolitan Water District; and WHEREAS, the proposed sewer utility charge is a fixed, monthly charge billed on a bimonthly basis, based on the size of the meter serving the property, as measured in inches; and Resolution No. 2019-XXX Page 1 of 5 EXHIBIT 1 jmf 11/5119 WHEREAS, the proposed rate structures are for a period of four and one-half years, and are proposed to take effect January 1, 2020, and to increase each July 1 thereafter commencing July 1, 2020, through and including July 1, 2023; and WHEREAS, the proposed potable water, recycled water, and sewer service fees (collectively, the "Fees") are property -related fees within the meaning of article XIII D of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, the revenues derived from the Fees will not exceed the funds required to provide the services for which the Fees are imposed, and will be used exclusively for the operation and maintenance of the City's potable water, recycled water, and sewer systems; and WHEREAS, the Fees are equitable to all customer classes; and WHEREAS, the amount of the Fees will not exceed the proportional cost of the service attributable to each parcel upon which they are proposed for imposition; and WHEREAS, the Fees will not be imposed on a parcel unless the service for which such Fees are imposed, is actually used by, or immediately available to, the owner of the parcel; and WHEREAS, the Fees will not be imposed for general governmental purposes, but only for the costs of operation and maintenance of the City's potable water, recycled water, and sewer systems; and WHEREAS, article XIII D, section 6 of the California Constitution ("Article XIII D") requires that prior to imposing any increase to the Fees, the City shall provide written notice (the "Notice") by mail of the new or increased Fees to the record owner of each parcel upon which the Fees are proposed for imposition and any tenant directly liable for payment of the Fees, the amount of the Fees proposed to be imposed on each parcel, the basis upon which the Fees were calculated, the reason for the Fees, and the date time and location of a public hearing (the "Hearing") on the proposed Fees; and WHEREAS, on October 4, 2019, the City distributed notices as required by Article XIII D regarding the City Council's consideration of the proposed rate adjustments to the Fees at the November 19, 2019, public hearing to all owners of record and utility customers in accordance with Article XIII D, Section 6(a)(1) of the California Constitution and Government Code Section 53755; and WHEREAS, on November 19, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Fees contained in this Resolution, and at that time invited oral and written comments from the public; and Resolution No. 2019-XXX Page 2 of 5 jmf 11/5/19 WHEREAS, upon close of said public hearing, the City did receive written protests to the proposed Fees and therefore there has been no majority protest; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to establish rates for the Fees, effective January 1, 2020, at the rates and subject to increases on the dates set forth in the schedules included as Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana as follows: Section 1. The adoption of this Resolution falls within a statutory exemption from environmental review pursuant to sections 15273, 15060(c)(2) of the State Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which pertain to the establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval of rates and charges by public agencies which the public agency finds are for the purpose of meeting operating expenses, and pertain to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect change to the environment and that are not defined as a project under CEQA Regulations. Section 2. After considering the material presented in the Study, the City Council hereby finds as follows: (a) Revenues derived from the Fees do not exceed the funds required to provide the property related service; (b) Revenues derived from the Fees shall not be used for any purpose other than for which the Fees or charges is imposed; (c) The amount of the Fees imposed upon any parcel or person does not exceed the proportional cost of service attributable to the parcel; (d) The Fees are imposed for services that are actually used by, or immediately available to, the owner of the property upon which the Fees are imposed; and (e) The Fees will not be imposed for general governmental purposes, but only for the costs of operation and maintenance of the City's potable water, recycled water, and sewer systems. Section 3. After receiving public comment and testimony on the new fee structure for water, sewer and recycled water services provided, and absent a majority protest to the proposed fee increases, the new fee schedule for water, sewer and recycled water fees and charges is hereby approved as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. The new fee schedule for water, sewer and recycled water services shall be implemented beginning January 1, 2020, and shall be increased on July 1, 2020 and annually thereafter, up to the maximum rates set forth in Exhibit A. The scheduled adjustments authorized by this Section may be made by the City Manager or Resolution No. 2019-XXX Page 3 of 5 jmf 11/5/19 designee, without conducting another public hearing or any action on the part of the City Council. Section 5. Pursuant to the City's pass -through policy, for Fiscal Years 2020- 2021 through 2023-2024, the water usage charge component of the water service rates may be further adjusted by the City in an amount equal to any increase in the cost of purchasing potable and/or recycled wholesale water needed to supply the City's water system that may be imposed on the City by the Orange County Water District or the Metropolitan Water District. The increase in rates may not exceed the cost of providing water service. The adjustments authorized by this Section may be made by the City Manager or designee, without conducting another public hearing or any action on the part of the City Council. However, the City shall provide written notice to all affected owners and customers of record not less than thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of the rate increase, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53756. Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. To the extent any other resolution of the City conflicts with the provisions set forth herein, it is the explicit intent of the City Council that the provisions of this Resolution shall supersede. ADOPTED this day of 2019. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: V AL A^- %11/. ohn M.Funk Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Resolution No. 2019-XXX Page 4 of 5 jmf 11/5/19 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council, do hereby certify the attached Resolution No. 2019 - to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on 2019. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2019-XXX Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT A Water Service Rates Water Usage Charge (dollars per hundred cubic feet Tier 1* $2.03 $2.17 $2.31 $2.36 $2.41 Tier 2** $4.79 $5.13 $5.46 $5.57 $5.68 Recycled Water $2.15 $2.30 $2.45 $2.50 $2.55 * See Tier 1 Water Allocation table below ** Tier 2 is any amount of water used over the amount allocated in Ter 1 Tier 1 Monthly Water Allocations (CCF) 5/8" X 3/4" 3/4" 1" 11/2" 10.50 16.00 26.00 52.50 31.00 46.50 77.50 155.00 8.5 per Dwelling Unit 2" 84.00 248.00 3" 184.00 542.50 4" 331.00 976.50 6" 682.50 2,015.00 8" 1,260.00 3,720.00 Water Utilitv Charge (bv meter 5/8" X 3/4" $20.51 $21.94 $23.37 $23.84 $24.31 3/4" $30.76 $32.91 $35.05 $35.75 $36.47 1" $51.27 $54.85 $58.42 $59.59 $60.78 1 1/2" $102.53 $109.70 $116.83 $119.17 $121.55 2" $164.04 $175.52 $186.93 $190.67 $194.48 3" $358.84 $383.96 $408.92 $417.10 $425.44 4" $645.91 $691.12 $736.04 $750.76 $765.78 6" $1,332.83 $1,426.12 $1,518.82 $1,549.20 $1,580.18 8" $2,460.60 $2,632.84 $2,803.97 $2,860.05 $2,917.25 Monthly Sewer Utility Charge (by meter size) Residential 5/8" X 3/4" $5.60 $5.88 $6.41 $6.99 $7.62 3/4" $7.93 $8.33 $9.08 $9.90 $10.79 1" $12.59 $13.22 $14.41 $15.71 $17.12 1 1/2" $24.23 $25.44 $27.73 $30.23 $32.95 2" $38.20 $40.11 $43.72 $47.65 $51.94 3" $82.43 $86.55 $94.34 $102.83 $112.08 4" $147.62 $155.00 $168.95 $184.16 $200.73 6" $303.61 $318.79 $347.48 $378.75 $412.84 8" $559.71 $587.70 $640.59 $698.24 $761.08 10" $885.66 $929.94 $1,013.63 $1,104.86 $1,204.30 Multi -family Residential Effective Jan. Effective July Effective July Effective July Effective July Meter Size 1,2020 1,2020 5/8" X 3/4" $8.40 $8.82 $9.61 $10.47 $11.41 3/4" $12.12 $12.73 $13.88 $15.13 $16.49 1" $19.57 $20.55 $22.40 $24.42 $26.62 1 1/2" $38.20 $40.11 $43.72 $47.65 $51.94 2" $60.55 $63.58 $69.30 $75.54 $82.34 3" $131.32 $137.89 $150.30 $163.83 $178.57 4" $235.63 $247.41 $269.68 $293.95 $320.41 6" $485.21 $509.47 $555.32 $605.30 $659.78 8" $894.97 $939.72 $1,024.29 $1,116.48 $1,216.96 10" $1,416.49 $1,487.31 $1,621.17 $1,767.08 $1,926.12 Non -Residential 1,2021 1,2022 5/8" X 3/4" $9.33 $9.80 $10.68 $11.64 $12.69 3/4" $13.52 $14.20 $15.48 $16.87 $18.39 1" $21.90 $23.00 $25.07 $27.33 $29.79 1 1/2" $42.85 $44.99 $49.04 $53.45 $58.26 2" $68.00 $71.40 $77.83 $84.83 $92.46 3" $147.62 $155.00 $168.95 $184.16 $200.73 4" $264.96 $278.21 $303.25 $330.54 $360.29 6" $545.74 $573.03 $624.60 $680.81 $742.08 8" $1,006.73 $1,057.07 $1,152.21 $1,255.91 $1,368.94 10" $1,593.43 $1,673.10 $1,823.68 $1,987.81 $2,166.71 FOG Customers $40.92 $42.97 $46.84 $51.06 $55.66 �i Stantec HIILSULTI ANC HL B City of Santa Ana, CA 2019 Water, Recycled Water, & Sewer Rate Study Report FINAL October 24, 2019 Stantec October 24, 2019 Mr. Nabil Saba Water Resource Manager City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency 220 S. Daisy Avenue, Santa Ana, CA 92703 Subject: 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study HILDEBRAND CONS LT I NG Dear Mr. Saba, Stantec Consulting and Hildebrand Consulting are pleased to provide you with this final report of the findings for the 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study (Study) that we completed for the City of Santa Ana (City). We appreciate the fine assistance provided by you and all of the members of the City staff who participated and contributed to the Study. If you or others at the City have any questions, please do not hesitate to call either point of contact, listed below: Mark Hildebrand Project Manager mhildebrand@hildco.com (510)316-0621 Matthew Freiberg Project Consultant matthew.freiberg@stantec.com (925) 286-7401 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the City of Santa Ana and look forward to the possibility of doing so again in the near future. Sincerely, IL AF1i7:ACi7.7i-1. 'iT:l Project Manager Enclosure Matthew Freiberg Project Consultant 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Executive Summary presents an overview of the results of the 2019 Water, Recycled Water and Sewer Rate Study (Study) that was conducted for the City of Santa Ana ("City") by Stantec Consulting and Hildebrand Consulting. The primary objectives of this Study are to: i. Develop a multi -year financial management plan that provides for the City's Water and Sewer Enterprise capital funding needs, ii. Identify future rate adjustments to water, recycled water (included as part of the water enterprise fund), and sewer rates that will ensure adequate revenues to meet the respective enterprises' ongoing financial requirements, iii. Determine the cost of providing water, recycled water, and sewer service to customers using industry accepted methodologies, and iv. Recommend specific rate structures that equitably recover the cost of service while minimizing the financial impact to ratepayers and comporting with industry practices and legal requirements. The following describes the drivers that initiated the need for this Study, and a general description of the solutions that were used to address those challenges. Driver: The rate schedules adopted based upon the past 2014 rate study had a planning period that ended during this current fiscal year (2018/2019). Solution: Update the Water & Sewer Enterprise Fund financial plans and rates to meet the revenue needs over the next five years. Driver: The City has recently updated its Water and Sewer Master Plans which provide guidance for capital spending over the next planning period. Solution: Adopt a capital spending plan from the respective Master Plans that provides the enterprises with the needed level of service and maintains the utilities' assets in good working condition, and benefit rate payers by making timely re -investments in critical infrastructure. Driver: The legal environment in California over the past 5 years (namely Proposition 218) has significantly increased the burden of proof required of public utilities to demonstrate that the rates being charged for utility service are proportionate to the cost of providing the utility services. Solution: Conduct a full cost -of -service allocation analysis and make rate structure modification to ensure inter- and intra-class equity in rates charged to water, recycled water, and sewer customers. City of Santa Ana Stantec I ES-1 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Executive Summary This Study used methodologies that are aligned with industry standard practices for rate setting as promulgated by the American Water Works Association (AWWA), the Water Environment Federation (WEF), and all applicable law, including California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 6(b) (for water, recycled water, and sewer rates) commonly known as Proposition 218. This Study consisted of the following phases: 1. Revenue SufficiencyAnalysis (RSA) —The Study developed multi -year financial forecasting models for the City's Water and Sewer Enterprises to determine the level of annual rate revenue required to satisfy projected annual operating costs, debt service expenses, and capital cost requirements while maintaining adequate financial reserves. In the RSA, the Stantec team evaluated the financial requirements of each Enterprise over a 10-year projection period and made recommendations for rate revenue adjustments over a 5-year period. Input data and key assumptions were reviewed with City staff, and several alternative capital spending scenarios were evaluated by staff during the RSA. This process generated a recommended financial plan and corresponding annual rate increases. While our analysis provides 10-year rate revenue increases, it is recommended that they City conduct an updated analysis in the next 2 — 5 years, as many of the assumptions used in this analysis may change in this time period, which may result in over or under collection of revenues from customers. Like many utilities around the state and country, the City's water and sewer utilities are currently facing challenges of aging infrastructure. According to City Staff, the City's infrastructure is generally in good working condition, however, about 20% of the City's water distribution system has already exceeded the theoretical useful life (some of which date back to before the 1930s). This number is expected to jump to 70% by 2040 if no pipe replacements are made. In addition, many of the Water Enterprise's wells, pump stations, and reservoirs have reached the end of their useful service life. The City has completed Water and Sewer Master plans which both recommend a material increase in capital spending to address critical infrastructure repairs. As part of the RSA, multiple capital spending scenarios were considered to balance the need for infrastructure re -investment while limiting the financial impact to utility rate payers. The Study also made recommendation for targeted cash reserves, which is an important component of an enterprise's financial stability and maintaining a strong credit rating. Recommended reserves include an Operating & Maintenance Reserve target equal to 90-days (3 months) of annual operating expenses, an Emergency Reserve set a $4 million (for both the Water and Sewer Enterprises), and a Repair, Renewal, and Replacement (3R) Capital Reserve equal to 50% of average annual projected capital spending. The target levels of the above policies are consistent with 1) the Stantec team's industry experience for similar systems, 2) the findings of reserve studies conducted by the AWWA, and 3) a healthy level of reserves for a municipal utility system per the evaluation criteria published by the municipal utility rating agencies (e.g. Fitch, Moody's, and Standard & Poor's). Due to the different financial needs for the Water and Sewer Enterprises, respectively, this Study is recommending different rate increase schedules for each enterprise. As presented in Table ES-1, rate City of Santa Ana Stantec I ES-2 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Executive Summary increases are being recommended for the next five fiscal years for both enterprises, with the fiscal year (FY) 2019/20 increase scheduled for January 1, 2020, and all subsequent increases at the beginning of each respective fiscal year on July 1. Rate increases for recycled water will be tied to the proposed rate increases for the water enterprise. It is important to note that, while in Year 1 rate revenues across all customer classes will increase on average by 7.0% for the water utility and 3.0% for the sewer utility. However, the proposed rate structure adjustments (discussed further below) will result in single-family residential accounts with average water usage, experiencing an increase of $4.46 per month (or just under ten percent) in their water bill and a decrease of $1.51 per month (or just over twenty one percent) in their sewer bill. Results will vary among different customers due to the proposed rate structure adjustments. To be clear, due to the rate structure adjustments, some customers' bills will increase by more than the average rate revenue adjustment for Year 1, while other customers' bills will increase by less. Starting in Year 2 (FY 2020/21) and continuing thereafter, all customers will experience the same uniform percentage change to their bill. Table ES-1 Proposed Water & Sewer Enterprise Rate Revenue Increases 2. Cost -of -Service Analysis (COSA) — Using the revenue requirements from the RSA for FY 2019/20, the Stantec team performed a detailed COSA based upon principles outlined by the AWWA, WEF, and other generally accepted industry practices, in order to determine the proper distribution of costs and corresponding revenue requirements. The purpose of a COSA is to determine the cost of providing water and sewer service so that the revenue requirements of the utility may be equitably collected through rates. The Study employed methods promulgated in AWWA's Manual M1: Principles of Water Rates, Fees, and Charges (M1) for the water and recycled water rates and WEF's Financing and Charges for Wastewater Systems, Manual of Practice No. 27 for the sewer rates. The COSA included the following steps: ➢ Step 1: Allocate costs to the appropriate activities/functions ➢ Step 2: Allocate the costs assigned to each function to specific system parameters ➢ Step 3: Credit non -rate revenue as a reduction of assigned costs ➢ Step 4: Distribute resulting costs to customer classes City of Santa Ana Stantec I ES-3 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Executive Summary 3. Rate Structure Analysis —The Study developed specific rate schedules to recover the identified level of required rate revenue as identified by the COSA analysis from the appropriate customers. The recommended rate schedules were designed to: ➢ Fairly and equitably recover costs through rates, ➢ Conform to accepted industry practice and legal requirements, and ➢ Provide fiscal stability and recovery of fixed costs of the system. The existing water rates have a two-part structure comprised of a fixed service charge that is assessed based on meter size and a consumption -based rate (as measured in hundred cubic feet or "CCF") that is assessed based on the total amount of water that is used during the billing period. Additional details that describe the current rate structure are included in the full report. This Study recommends implementing the following changes to the existing water rate structure: 1. Update the meter equivalency schedule, 2. Establish four Customer Classes: Single Family, Multi -Family, Non -Residential, and Recycled Water, 3. Enhance the connection between water rates and the cost to provide water service by primarily recovering water supply costs through the Water Usage Charge as well as calculating the tiered rates based on the cost of the Water Utility's two sources of water supply, 4. Update the Tier 1 water allocation for each customer class to enhance the connection of water use in each tier to reflect the Water Enterprise's utilization of each source of supply, and 5. Update the Pass -Through Adjustment Policy, which updates Water Usage Charges based on actual changes to water supply costs. This Study recommends implementing the following changes to the existing sewer rate structure: 1. Create three customer classes: Single Family, Multi -Family, and Non -Residential based on their respective "Return -to -Sewer Factors", and 2. Establish a single fixed Sewer Utility Charge to replace the existing rate structure. Tables ES-2 through ES-5 indicate the proposed rates for FY 2019/20 through FY 2023/24. Note that the Pass -Through Adjustment Policy would adjust rates in addition to the proposed rate revenue increases shown in Table ES-1 City of Santa Ana Stantec I ES-4 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Executive Summary Table ES-2 Proposed Water Usage Charges ($/CCF) ier 1 $2.03 $2.17 $2.31 $2.36 $2.41 ier 2 $4.79 $5.13 $5.46 $5.57 $5.68 ecycled Water $2.15 $2.30 $2.45 $2.50 $2.55 Table ES-3 Proposed Monthly Water Utility Charges 5/8" X 3/4" $20.51 $21.94 $23.37 $23.84 $24.31 3/4" $30.76 $32.91 $35.05 $35.75 $36.47 1" $51.27 $54.85 $58.42 $59.59 $60.78 11/2" $102.53 $109.70 $116.83 $119.17 $121.55 2" $164.04 $175.52 $186.93 $190.67 $194.48 3" $358.84 $383.96 $408.92 $417.10 $425.44 4" $645.91 $691.12 $736.04 $750.76 $765.78 6" $1,332.83 $1,426.12 $1,518.82 $1,549.20 $1,580.18 8" $2,460.60 $2,632.84 $2,803.97 $2,860.05 $2,917.25 Table ES-4 Proposed Monthly Sewer Utility Charges SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 5/8" X 3/4" $5.60 $5.88 $6.41 $6.99 $7.62 3/4" $7.93 $8.33 $9.08 $9.90 $10.79 V. $12.59 $13.22 $14.41 $15.71 $17.12 11/2" $24.23 $25.44 $27.73 $30.23 $32.95 2" $38.20 $40.11 $43.72 $47.65 $51.94 3" $82.43 $86.55 $94.34 $102.83 $112.08 4" $147.62 $155.00 $168.95 $184.16 $200.73 6" $303.61 $318.79 $347.48 $378.75 $412.84 8" $559.71 $587.70 $640.59 $698.24 $761.08 10" $885.66 $929.94 $1.013.63 $1.104.86 $1.204.30 City of Santa Ana Stantec I ES-5 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Executive Summary MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 5/8" X 3/4" $8.40 $8.82 $9.61 $10.47 $11.41 3/4" $12.12 $12.73 $13.88 $15.13 $16.49 V. $19.57 $20.55 $22.40 $24.42 $26.62 11/2" $38.20 $40.11 $43.72 $47.65 $51.94 2" $60.55 $63.58 $69.30 $75.54 $82.34 3" $131.32 $137.89 $150.30 $163.83 $178.57 4" $235.63 $247.41 $269.68 $293.95 $320.41 6" $485.21 $509.47 $555.32 $605.30 $659.78 8" $894.97 $939.72 $1,024.29 $1,116.48 $1,216.96 @101000*1Ul=10Ill 0l_1q 5/8" X 3/4" $9.33 $9.80 $10.68 $11.64 $12.69 3/4" $13.52 $14.20 $15.48 $16.87 $18.39 V. $21.90 $23.00 $25.07 $27.33 $29.79 11/2" $42.85 $44.99 $49.04 $53.45 $58.26 2" $68.00 $71.40 $77.83 $84.83 $92.46 3" $147.62 $155.00 $168.95 $184.16 $200.73 4" $264.96 $278.21 $303.25 $330.54 $360.29 6" $545.74 $573.03 $624.60 $680.81 $742.08 8" $1,006.73 $1,057.07 $1,152.21 $1,255.91 $1,368.94 City of Santa Ana Stantec I ES-6 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ExecutiveSummary......................................................................................................1 1. Introduction...........................................................................................................4 1.1 Utility Background.......................................................................................................................4 1.2 Objectives................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Study Drivers...............................................................................................................................5 1.4 Study Methodology.....................................................................................................................5 2. Financial Plan........................................................................................................7 2.1 Description..................................................................................................................................7 2.2 Data and Assumptions................................................................................................................7 2.2.1 Beginning Fund Balances....................................................................................................7 2.2.2 Customer Growth & Volume Forecast.................................................................................7 2.2.3 Rate Revenues....................................................................................................................8 2.2.4 Non -Rate Revenues............................................................................................................9 2.2.5 Operation, Maintenance and Existing Debt Service Expenditures......................................9 2.2.6 Cost Escalation..................................................................................................................10 2.2.7 Capital Improvement Plan.................................................................................................11 2.2.8 Interest Earnings on Invested Funds.................................................................................13 2.2.9 Proposed Debt Strategy....................................................................................................13 2.2.10 Reserve Targets................................................................................................................14 2.3 Proposed Rate Revenue Increases..........................................................................................15 3. Cost -of -Service Analysis...................................................................................17 3.1 Process.....................................................................................................................................17 3.1.1 Step 1: Allocate Costs to System Functions......................................................................19 3.1.2 Step 2: Assign Functionalized Costs to Cost Groups........................................................20 3.1.3 Step 3: Credit Non -Rate Revenue to Cost Groups............................................................22 3.1.4 Step 4: Distribute Costs to Customer Classes.................................................................. 23 4. Rate Structure.....................................................................................................26 4.1 Current Rates............................................................................................................................ 26 4.2 Proposed Rate Structure Changes...........................................................................................28 4.3 Rate Structure Cost Categories................................................................................................28 4.4 Calculation of Fixed Utility Charges..........................................................................................30 4.4.1 Water Utility Costs.............................................................................................................30 4.4.2 Sewer Account Costs........................................................................................................ 31 City of Santa Ana Stantec 11 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Table of Contents 4.4.3 Sewer Utility Costs.............................................................................................................31 4.5 Calculation of Variable Water Usage Charge...........................................................................32 4.5.1 Purchased Water Costs..................................................................................................... 32 4.5.2 Water Usage Charges.......................................................................................................32 4.6 Pass -Through Adjustment Policy..............................................................................................34 4.7 FOG Charge..............................................................................................................................35 5. Summary of Proposed Rates............................................................................. 36 Appendix A Water Financial Plan Schedules Appendix B Sewer Financial Plan Schedules Appendix C Water Cost of Service Schedules Appendix D Sewer Cost of Service Schedules Appendix E Water and Recycled Water Rate Schedules Appendix F Sewer Rate Schedules City of Santa Ana Stantec 12 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study List of Acronyms List of Acronyms AMI Advanced Metering Infrastructure AWWA American Water Works Association CCF hundred cubic feet CIP capital improvement plan COSA cost of service analysis CPI construction price index DCR debt service coverage ratio EM equivalent meter FAMS-XL Financial Analysis and Management System model FOG Fats, Oils and Grease (program) FTE full-time equivalent (employee) FY fiscal year (which ends on June 30 for the City) G&A general and administrative MWD Metropolitan Water District of Southern California O&M operations and maintenance OCSD Orange County Sanitation District OCWD Orange County Water District RSA revenue sufficiency analysis WEF Water Environment Federation City of Santa Ana Stantec 13 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 1. Introduction 1. INTRODUCTION Stantec Consulting and Hildebrand Consulting have been retained by the City of Santa Ana (City) to conduct a Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study (Study). This report describes the detailed assumptions, procedures, and results of the Study, including our conclusions and recommendations. 1.1 UTILITY BACKGROUND The City of Santa Ana is located in Orange County, with a population of approximately 343,000. The City owns and maintains an extensive water and recycled water system that are managed by the Water Enterprise, and a sewer collection system that is managed by the Sewer Enterprise. The infrastructure of the Water Utility includes water production and distribution facilities that deliver potable water to retail customers within the City. The Water Utility consists of 20 active groundwater wells, 8 reservoirs, 7 water connections to Metropolitan Water District (MWD), 16 interconnections witl- neighboring water utilities, and 478 miles of water mains. The Water Utility currently depends on two sources of supply — pumped groundwater managed by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and purchased surface water from the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). The Water Utility limits its groundwater use to meet no more than 75% of its retail water demands, in conformance with OCWD regulations. The Water Utility also provides recycled water to customers where available. The Water Enterprise acts in a retail capacity and obtains all recycled water supplies from OCWD. The transmission and distribution infrastructure for recycled water is owned and maintained by the OCWD, however, any expansion of the existing distribution pipeline network must be funded by the City's Water Enterprise. The Sewer Enterprise owns and maintains an extensive system of sanitary sewer infrastructure that includes approximately 390 miles of sanitary sewer, 9,000 manholes, 48,500 sewer laterals, and 2 sewer lift stations. All sewage is conveyed to the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) for treatment. 1.2 OBJECTIVES The primary objectives of this Study are to: i. Develop a multi -year financial management plan that provides for the Water and Sewer Enterprise operational and capital funding needs, ii. Identify future rate adjustments to water, recycled water, and sewer rates that will ensure adequate rate revenue to meet the Water and Sewer Enterprise's ongoing financial requirements, iii. Determine the cost of providing water, recycled water, and sewer service to customers using industry accepted methodologies, and City of Santa Ana Stantec 14 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 1. Introduction iv. Recommend specific rate structures that equitably recover the cost of service from each customer class, while minimizing the financial impact to ratepayers and comporting with industry practices and legal requirements. This report has been organized into the revenue sufficiency analysis (financial plan), cost of service/rate design, and rate recommendations. 1.3 STUDY DRIVERS The following describes the drivers that initiated the need for this Study, and a general description of the recommended solutions that were used to address those challenges. Driver: The rate schedules adopted by the 2014 rate study had a planning period that ended during this current fiscal year (2018/2019). Solution: Update the Water & Sewer Enterprise financial plans and rates to meet the revenue needs for the next five years. Driver: The City has recently updated its Water and Sewer Master Plans which provide guidance for capital spending over the next planning period. Solution: Adopt a capital spending plan from the respective Master Plans that provides the enterprises with the needed level of service and maintains the utilities' assets in good working condition, and benefit rate payers by making timely re -investments in critical infrastructure. Driver: The legal environment in California over the past 5 years (namely Proposition 218) has significantly increased the burden of proof required of public utilities to demonstrate that the rates being charged for utility service are proportionate to the cost of providing the utility services. Solution: Conduct a full cost -of -service allocation analysis and make rate structure modification to ensure inter- and intra-class equity in rates charged to water, recycled water, and sewer customers. 1.4 STUDY METHODOLOGY This Study applied methodologies that are aligned with industry standard practices for rate setting as promulgated by the American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Environment Federation (WEF), and all applicable law, including California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 6(b), commonly known as Proposition 218. The Study began with development of a multi -year financial management plan that determined the level of annual rate revenue required to cover projected annual operating expenses, debt service (including coverage targets), and capital cost requirements, while maintaining adequate reserves. This portion of the Study was conducted using the revenue sufficiency and financial planning module of Stantec's City of Santa Ana Stantec 15 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 1. Introduction proprietary Financial Analysis and Management System (FAMS-XL) modeling system. The model was customized to reflect the Water and Sewer Enterprises' financial dynamics and latest available data for the water, recycled water, and sewer utility's operations in order to develop a long-term financial management plan, inclusive of projected annual revenue requirements and corresponding annual rate adjustments. Revenue requirements calculated during the revenue sufficiency analysis (RSA) for fiscal year ending June 30, 2020 (FY 2019/20) were then used to perform a detailed cost -of -service allocation (COSA) analysis. The COSA analysis and rate structure design were conducted based upon principles outlined by the AWWA, WEF, legal requirements (Proposition 218) and other generally accepted industry practices to develop rates that reflect the cost of providing service. City of Santa Ana Stantec 16 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 2. Financial Plan 2. FINANCIAL PLAN 2.1 DESCRIPTION This section presents the financial management plan and corresponding plan of water, recycled water, and sewer rate revenue adjustments developed in the RSA, including a description of the source data, assumptions, and policies reflected in the RSA. Appendix A and B include detailed schedules supporting the Water Enterprise and Sewer Enterprise financial plans, respectively, discussed herein. During the RSA, the Stantec team reviewed alternative multi -year financial management plans through several interactive work sessions with City staff. As a result of this process, the Study has produced proposed financial plans that will allow the Water and Sewer Enterprises to meet their respective revenue requirements and financial performance objectives throughout the projection period while striving to minimize rate increases. 2.2 DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS The City provided historical and budgeted financial information associated with operation of the water, recycled water, and sewer systems, including a multi -year capital improvement plan (CIP), and outstanding debt service obligations and covenants. City staff also assisted in providing other data, assumptions and policies, such as water demands and customer growth, debt service coverage requirements, operating and capital reserve targets, earnings on invested funds, and escalation rates for operating costs (all of which are described in the following subsections). The following sections present the key source data relied upon in conducting the RSA. 2.2.1 Beginning Fund Balances The ending cash balances for FY 2017/18 were used to establish the FY 2018/19 beginning balances, as outlined in Schedule 1 of Appendix A for the Water Enterprise and Schedule 6 of Appendix B for the Sewer Enterprise. 2.2.2 Customer Growth & Volume Forecast Forecasting the future usage of water is a perennial challenge for water utilities. Figure 1 below presents a three-year history of the City's water usage, as tracked from pumping records and water purchases. Water production from the two sources of supply is illustrated by the black (groundwater) and orange (surface water purchased from MWD) shading. This figure shows water usage over the last three years has held fairly constant, with a slight uptick in usage in FY 2017/18. This data is consistent with the general water industry assumption there will be little "rebound" in water usage after the decline in usage during the recent California drought. As such, this Study assumes that the growth in water usage will City of Santa Ana Stantec 17 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 2. Financial Plan track with general population growth, which was assumed to be about 1 % per year according to City Staff, and as evidenced by recent growth patterns. 40,000 35.000 30,000 v 25.000 ILL a 20,000 15,000 10.000 5,000 0 WMi - afw "Iu17,691111E[OZOPNT1�1 Figure 1: Historical Water Production from MWD and OCWD Water Purchases Regarding recycled water usage, the City expects to add five new accounts over the next ten years. Given the relatively small size of the recycled water utility and the relatively large size of each account, those five accounts represent an annual growth rate of about 2%. 2.2.3 Rate Revenues Rate revenue is the revenue generated from customers for water and sewer service. The City receives rate revenue in the form of fixed bi-monthly charges (hereafter referred to as the Sewer Utility Charge and Water Utility Charge, respectively) and consumption -based charges (hereafter referred to as the Water Usage Charge for water and recycled water and "Commodity Charge" for sewer). The water rate revenue in the financial plan is based on FY 2017/18 actual revenue, adjusted for FY 2018/19 by the percent rate increase in that year, and then adjusted annually to reflect assumed customer growth and any applicable rate revenue adjustments that are proposed by this Study. Recycled water rate revenue is a new item in the City's Budget, and as such, is based off of FY 2018/19 budgeted amounts and adjusted thereafter to reflect the assumed customer growth and rate revenue adjustments proposed by this Study. Details of the budgeted and projected revenues are listed in detail in Schedule 2 of Appendix A for the Water Enterprise and Schedule 7 of Appendix B for the Sewer Enterprise. City of Santa Ana Stantec 18 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 2. Financial Plan 2.2.4 Non -Rate Revenues In addition to rate revenue, the Water and Sewer Enterprises receive a limited amount of non -rate revenue. The Water Enterprise collects revenues related to miscellaneous service fees, fire line service, cell tower rental revenues, rental of property, and interest revenue on investments. The Sewer Enterprise collects a very small amount of revenue from penalties and service charges and other miscellaneous recoveries. Projections of all non -rate revenues were based on FY 2018/19 budgeted revenues, with the exception of interest income which was calculated annually based upon projected average fund balances and assumed interest rates (see Section 2.2.8). Budgeted and projected non -rate revenues are listed in detail in Schedule 2 of Appendix A for the Water Enterprise and Schedule 7 of Appendix B for the Sewer Enterprise. 2.2.5 Operation, Maintenance and Existing Debt Service Expenditures The Water & Sewer Enterprises' operating expenses include all salaries, benefits, maintenance, internal transfers, utility costs and other miscellaneous costs. The Water Enterprise also incurs water purchases costs and debt service expenses on an existing, outstanding loan (see Section 2.2.9). For both the Water and Sewer Enterprises the financial plan started with actual expenditures from FY 2017-18 (as opposed to budget values) and escalated those costs for future years (see Section 2.2.6). Current and projected operating and debt expenses are provided in detail in Schedule 3 of Appendix A for the Water Enterprise and Schedule 8 of Appendix B for the Sewer Enterprise. Actual expense categories for FY 2017/18 are depicted in Figure 2-1 and Figure 2-2. Debt Service 2% Clean Water Compliance 2% Other Variable O&M 1% Fixed Operations & Maintenanoe Costs 17% Figure 2-1: FY 2017/18 Water Expense Categories City of Santa Ana Stantec 19 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 2. Financial Plan Capital Expenditures 3.8% Fixed Ot 10.: Minor Capital Outlay 3.6% Figure 2-2: FY 2017/18 Sewer Expense Categories 2.2.6 Cost Escalation Future operating expenses were in large part projected based upon the actual expenditures from FY 2017/18, with a few exceptions for expenses that are new in the FY 2018/19 budget, and any additional staff that has been recommended from the financial planning process to deliver upcoming capital projects. All expenses starting in FY 2019/20 were adjusted for inflation. Annual cost escalation factors for the various types of expenses were developed based upon a review of historical inflation trends, published inflation forecasts, industry experience, and detailed discussions with City staff. Table 2-1 summarizes the cost escalation factors used to project assumed increases across all expense categories for both the Water and Sewer Enterprises. This Study assumes that the City will adopt a dynamic Pass -Through Adjustment Policy, which will annually adjust the Water Usage Charge in accordance with actual changes in water supply costs (see Section 4.6). City of Santa Ana Stantec 110 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 2. Financial Plan Table 2-1: Cost Escalation Factors for Water Analysis Salaries 0% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% Benefits 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% Pension 13.7% 13.7% 13.7% 13.7% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% Fuel 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% Electricity 0% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% Consumer 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% Price Index MWD Water Purchases' -0.4% 4.7% 4.7% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% OCWD Pumping 10.2% 8.00% 5.4% 8.6% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% Charges' Green Acres Recycled Water 3.7% 0.0% 3.6% 0.0% 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Purchases Capital 0% 0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% Imorovement The decrease in MWD Water Purchase costs in FY 2018/19 is due to an anticipated decrease in water purchase from MWD in that year. The decrease in MWD water is offset by an increase in OCWD Pumped water. 2.2.7 Capital Improvement Plan Like many utilities around the state and country, the City's water and sewer utilities are currently facing challenges of aging infrastructure. In 2016 and 2017, the City completed updated Master Plans for the Sewer and Water utilities respectively. Each Master Plan provided 30-year Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) for the utilities which laid out a plan for re -investing in each utilities' aging infrastructure. As part of this Study, the project team and City staff have evaluated multiple capital spending scenarios and identified the CIP that allows the Water and Sewer Enterprises to maintain its infrastructure in good working order, while limiting the impacts to rate payers. Below we discuss the recommended capital spending strategy over the planning period. Water Enterprise The City's Water enterprise serves all of Santa Ana's residents and businesses over its 27.2 square mile service area. The City's existing infrastructure includes 21 ground water wells, 7 import water connections, 7 pump stations, 10 reservoirs, and -480 miles of transmission and distribution mains. The City's infrastructure is generally in good working condition, however, about 20% of the City's distribution City of Santa Ana Stantec 111 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 2. Financial Plan system has already exceeded the theoretical useful life (some of which date back to before the 1930s). This number is expected to jump to 70% by 2040 if no pipe replacements are made. The City's CIP has prioritized building resilience in the City's water supply by building new wells in places where infrastructure has been damaged, adding on demand generators to critical wells to maintain water supply even during power outages, and the systematic rehabilitation of the City's wells, reservoirs, pump stations, and water distribution system to keep the City's infrastructure in good working order. The City is also installing new Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AM 1), which will allow the City personnel and customers access to real-time water consumption data. As part of this Study, the project team and City staff reviewed the recommended and limited CIP options from the 2017 Master Plan, updated the project scheduling for the 10-year planning period, based upon which projects have already been completed, and what is currently scheduled. The final CIP totaled approximately $154.9M (in current dollars) over the period of FY 2018/19 through FY 2029/30, averaging $12.9M per year. This capital plan reflects a material increase from the historic capital spending for the Water Enterprise, which has averaged $3.4M per year over the past four years. In conjunction with this increase in capital spending, the Water O&M budget assumes that the Water Enterprise will require 8 additional full-time equivalent (FTEs) staff. A detailed list of repair and replacement projects and associated costs for the Water Enterprise is provided in Schedule 4 of Appendix A. It should be noted that capital spending forecasts beyond a 5-year planning horizon have less certainty than near -term planning. As a result, this Study is primarily concerned with the capital spending forecasts within the next five years. Since capital spending estimates are provided in current dollars, the water RSA includes an annual cost escalation factor for capital costs (see Section 2.2.6). Sewer Enterprise The City's Sewer enterprise serves all of the City of Santa Ana, portions of Garden Grove, Orange, and Tustin that discharge wastewater into the City's sewer system. The City's sewer collection system, consists of approximately 450 miles of sewer mains, including 60 miles of trunk sewers that are currently owned by OCSD. The collection system operates largely by gravity and discharges into gravity trunk sewers that convey wastewater to the OCSD Treatment Plant Number 1. The majority of the City's sewers were built in the 1950s and 1960s, and are now over 60 years old, but portions of the system date back to the 1920s. OCSD recently transferred ownership of 8.7 miles of trunk sewer to the City, along with $23 million to pay for the future repairs and rehabilitation of the trunk sewer. Similar to the Water Enterprise, this Study proposes a financial plan for materially increasing the annual level of capital reinvestment in the sewer utility. Historically the Sewer Enterprise has made efforts to replace and repair the older portions of the sewer main network that has capacity issues. However, due to financial shortfalls, the City's pipe replacement schedule has been limited to about 0.5 miles of pipe per year. Capital spending plan assumed for this Study established a miles -of -pipe replacement approach with the goal of ramping up from 0.5 miles of pipe per year to 3.5 miles of pipe per year by FY City of Santa Ana Stantec 112 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 2. Financial Plan 2022/23, with a couple years of enhanced replacements to address the most critical infrastructure needs in FY 2020/21 and 2021/22. In addition to pipe replacement, the City also has one pump station rebuild scheduled for FY 2019/20. The final CIP totaled approximately $73.6M (in current dollars) over the period of FY 2018/19 through FY 2029/30. In conjunction with this increase in capital spending, the Sewer O&M budget assumes that the Sewer Enterprise will require 3 additional FTEs by FY 2021-22. A detailed list of repair and replacement projects and associated costs for the Sewer Enterprise is provided in Schedule 9 of Appendix B. It should be noted that capital forecasts beyond a 5-year planning horizon have less certainty than near -term planning. As a result, this Study is primarily concerned with the capital spending forecasts within the next five years. Since capital spending estimates are provided in current dollars, the sewer RSA includes an annual cost escalation factor for capital costs (see Section 2.2.6). 2.2.8 Interest Earnings on Invested Funds An interest earning rate of 1.36% and 2.34% for invested funds have been used for the Water and Sewer Enterprises respectively. The percentages are based on prior interest earnings from each Enterprise's actual revenue statements and have been approved by City Staff as representative of what they expect for interest earnings moving forward. The Study assumes that all interest earnings will be retained within their respective funds. 2.2.9 Proposed Debt Strategy Existing Outstanding Debt The Water Enterprise's outstanding debt includes a 2014 Series Revenue Bond that will be fully repaid in FY 2031/32. The corresponding annual debt service for the 2014 Series Revenue Bond is provided in Schedule 5 of Appendix A. The City's Sewer Enterprise does not carry any existing debt. Future Borrowing Assumptions This Report proposes that the enterprises cash finance all of their ongoing capital replacements, with exception of the Water Enterprise's AM project, which has already been approved for debt financing. The assumed financing terms for the AMI project, were as follows: • 30-year term • 2.0 percent cost of issuance • Fixed interest rate of 5.0 percent • A 1-year debt service reserve requirement The existing 2014 Water Revenue Bond has a debt service coverage ratio (DCR) requirement of 1.20. Based on recently published guidance from Fitch Ratings, utility systems with mid -range financial profiles City of Santa Ana Stantec 113 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 2. Financial Plan should maintain a DCR greater than 1.50 times annual debt service. As such, the Stantec team ensured that a DCR of at least 1.50 was maintained throughout the projection period to enable the City to access favorable terms from the debt market, should the need arise. The forecasted debt service for the AMI project is provided in Row 18 of Schedule 5 (Appendix A). 2.2.10 Reserve Targets Targeted cash reserves for utilities are balances retained for specific cash flow needs. The policy target for reserves is an important component when developing a multi -year financial plan as utilities rely on the reserves for financial stability. Credit rating agencies evaluate utilities in part on their adherence to formally adopted reserve targets, and lending agencies require utilities to maintain specific debt reserves for outstanding loans. While the City has not adopted a formal reserves policy for either enterprise, the City's Finance Department, in practice, has been following the reserve targets established by the 2014 Comprehensive Water Rate Study Update. The current Study expands upon the same recommendations, and recommends the following reserve policies: • An Operating & Maintenance Reserve sets a target minimum balance equal to 90-days (3 months) of annual operating expenses. This reserve ensures continuity of service regardless of short-term changes in cash flow or sudden increases in operating costs. Because this reserve target is set relative to the City's operating budget, the target will change as the expenses change. The Water Enterprise FY 2018/19 budget for O&M expenses totals $50.4 million, resulting in an Operating Reserve balance of about $12.4 million. The Sewer Enterprise FY 2018/19 budget for O&M expenses totals $5.0 million, resulting in an Operating Reserve balance of about $1.2 million. • An Emergency Reserve establishes a reserve for the urgent repair of a piece of infrastructure that fails unexpectedly. The previous rate study recommended a $1 million reserve be set aside for each enterprise. This report recommends increasing these reserves based on the value of a critical piece of infrastructure. A reserve of $4 million is recommended for both the Water and Sewer Enterprises, which is approximately the cost of replacing a production well or a pump station. It is recommended that the Emergency Reserve be adjusted annually to track with the Construction Price Index (CPI). • Repair, Renewal, and Replacement (3R) Capital Reserve is currently set at one year of annual depreciation of capital assets. Given that the purpose of the 3R capital reserve is to smooth out volatility in capital spending, this Study recommends modifying the 3R Capital Reserve to be equal to 50% of the average capital spending over the respective Enterprise's 10-year capital spending projections. This updated approach would establish a Water 3R Capital Reserve of $6.6 million in FY 2019/20 and a Sewer 3R Capital Reserve of $3.1 million in FY 2019/20. While this report has made projections of how the 3R Capital Reserve may increase over time (tracking with City of Santa Ana Stantec 114 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 2. Financial Plan CPI), in reality any adjustments to the 3R Capital Reserves should be based on changes to capital spending projections. The target levels of the above policies are consistent with 1) the Stantec team's industry experience for similar systems, 2) the findings of reserve studies conducted by the AWWA, and 3) a healthy level of reserves for a municipal utility system per the evaluation criteria published by the municipal utility rating agencies (e.g. Fitch, Moody's, and Standard & Poor's). This Study recommends that the Operating and Maintenance Reserve as well as the Emergency Capital reserve targets be adopted by the City as formal minimum fund balance policies, with the addition of the 3R Capital Reserve as a target reserve policy. Once the reserve targets are established, they should be reviewed annually during the budgeting process to monitor current levels and assure conformance with stated policies and practices. Decisions can be made to maintain, increase, or spend down reserve balances, as appropriate, depending upon the impact of such decisions to the upcoming budget period. The total reserve targets by year are shown in Schedule 5 (Row 28) of Appendix A for the Water Enterprise and Schedule 10 (Row 26) of Appendix B for the Sewer Enterprise. 2.3 PROPOSED RATE REVENUE INCREASES All of the above information, including the significant increase in capital spending as described in Section 2.2.7, was entered into Stantec's FAMS-XL interactive modeling system. This module of FAMS-XL produced a ten-year projection of financial requirements for each enterprise, which formed the basis for a financial strategy of needed rate adjustments over the next 5 years for both the Water and Sewer Enterprises. It is important to note that the above rate increases for the Water Enterprise do not include the Pass -Through Adjustment Policy, as described in Section 4.6. On the surface, rate increases may seem un-necessary for the Sewer Enterprise given the recent receipt of $23 million from OCSD (see Section 2.2.7), however this Study is recommending a "spike" in capital spending in FY 2020/21 and FY 2019/20 to draw down on those reserves and address the Sewer Enterprise's most critical infrastructure needs. Once those reserves are spent down to target levels, the Sewer Enterprise will transition to a more sustainable level of capital spending. Both rate revenue adjustment schedules have been detailed in Table 2-2. City of Santa Ana Stantec 115 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 2. Financial Plan Table 2-2: Recommended Water and Sewer Rate Revenue Increases Rate Adjustment Water Rate Revenue Sewer Rate Revenue Date Adjustment Adjustment January 1, 2019 7.0% 3.0% July 1, 2020 7.0% 5.0% July 1, 2021 6.5% 9.0% July 1, 2022 2.0% 9.0% July 1, 2023 2.0% 9.0% The revenues, expenses, recommended rate revenue increases, and resulting fund balances with relation to the recommended minimum and target fund balances and resulting DCR are summarized in Schedule 5 (Appendix A) for the Water Enterprise and Schedule 10 (Appendix B) for the Sewer Enterprise. These schedules show that the minimum reserve target is maintained over the duration of the planning period and each enterprise meets the target reserve by the end of the planning period. City of Santa Ana Stantec 116 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 3. Cost -of -Service Analysis 3. COST -OF -SERVICE ANALYSIS The Cost -of -Service Allocation (COSA) analysis is intended to evaluate the cost of providing water, sewer and recycled water service, and to allocate those costs to respective customer classes and rate structure components to ensure the proposed rate structure is aligned with costs to provide such service. This is done in order to be equitable among the City's ratepayers and to comply with Proposition 218, which requires water rates to be proportionate to the cost of providing water service. This Study employed well - established industry practices as recognized by the AWWA, WEF, and other accepted industry standards. The following section presents a detailed description of the COSA methodology and corresponding results. The water and recycled water rate study employed a method that is consistent with the "commodity - demand" COSA methodology promulgated in AWWA's Manual M1: Principles of Water Rates, Fees, and Charges (M1). With this approach, costs are functionalized to system activities, allocated to two functional categories: Source of Supply Costs and Utility Costs, and then distributed to different customer classes based on their usage behavior. Unit costs are then used to distribute system costs to the various components of the rate structure (see Section 4). Similarly, the sewer rate study followed principles promulgated in WEF's Financing and Charges for Wastewater Systems, Manual of Practice No. 27 and allocated to two functional categories: Account Costs and Utility Costs. 3.1 PROCESS Both the water and sewer COSAs were conducted based upon the City's FY 2019/20 annualized expenditure and revenue requirements per the RSA. The water COSA included the steps illustrated in Figure 3-1. Likewise, the sewer COSA included the steps illustrated in Figure 3-2. City of Santa Ana Stantec 117 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 3. Cost -of -Service Analysis Summary Test Year Costs (FY 2019/20) Operating Expenses Debt Costs Cash Funded Capital Step 1 Allocate Costs to System Functions Step 2 Assign Functionalized Costs to Cost Groups Source of Supply Utility Account Step 3 F Step 4 Credit Non -Rate Distrbute Costs to Revenue to Unit Customer Costs Classes Interest Income Other Operating Revenue Private Fire Protection Figure 3-1: Summary of the Water Cost -of -Service Analysis Methodology Step 1 Step 2 Summary Test Allocate Assign Year Costs Costs to nized LFuctlonal (FY 2019/20) System Costs to Cost Functions Groups Operating Expenses Collection IMIKOM- V Utility General & Cash Funded Adminstrative Capital 1 Customer Service Account Step 3 Credit Non -Rate Revenue to Unit Costs E Other Operating Revenue FOG Revenue Single Family Multi -Family Non Residential Recycled Water Step 4 Distrbute Costs to Customer Classes Figure 3-2: Summary of the Sewer Cost -of -Service Analysis Methodology Single Family Multi -Family Non Residential The following sub -sections give a detailed description of the COSA methodology and summary results, while Appendix C and D (for water and sewer, respectively) include detailed schedules of cost allocations that support those results. City of Santa Ana Stantec 118 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 3. Cost -of -Service Analysis 3.1.1 Step 1: Allocate Costs to System Functions The operating expenses, debt service, and cash -funded capital requirements were distributed to specific functional components within each respective enterprise. While many costs can be allocated directly to a functional component (e.g. Water Purchase costs are allocated to the Water Purchase function), some costs are divided among multiple functional components. For example, costs that are best allocated based on the proportionate value of the system's assets, such as capital costs and debt service, were allocated based on the book value of existing assets ("Fixed Assets"). A summary of cost functionalization (for water and sewer, respectively) are presented in Table 3-1 and Table 3-3. Subsequently, each line item in the budget is assigned one of the cost categories shown in Table 3-1 (for water) and Table 3-3 (for sewer). These assignments are detailed in Appendix C (Schedule 11) for water and Appendix D (Schedule 12) for sewer. The summary results from those assignments (by budget category) are provided in Table 3-2 and Table 3-4. Table 3-1: Allocation of Water System Costs to Functional Components vvawi rUIUIIax iwio - - - - - - - - - Production and Supply - 1uu% - - - - - - - - Pumping Electricity - - 100% - - - - - - - Tr.afm.nf_ nc.mi,a lc _ _ _ 1nnO Treatment - - 100% - - - - - Transmission & Distribution - - - - - 100% - - - - Storage - - - - - - - 100% - - General & Administrative - - - - - - - - 100% - Recycled Water - - - - - - - - - 100% Fixed Assets 5.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 67.3% 3.8% 18.4% 4.7% 0.2% Table 3-2: Summary of Water Cost Functional ization by Budget Category City of Santa Ana Stantec 119 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 3. Cost -of -Service Analysis Table 3-3: Allocation of Sewer System to Functional Components Functional Component System Function Utility Account . i - Customer 100.0% Indirect 90.6% 9.4% Staff FTE Allocation 90.0% 10.0% 100.0% Table 3-4: Summary of Sewer Cost Functional ization by Budget Category O&M Expenses $4,849,392 $504,244 Capital $3,090,000 $0 Interfund Transfers $281,805 $0 Change in Fund Balance-$786,244 $0 TOTAL: $7,434,954 $504,244 3.1.2 Step 2: Assign Functionalized Costs to Cost Groups Next the costs associated with each functional component were designated to specific Cost Groups in order to create the foundation for developing rates that are directly aligned with the cost to provide service (as required by Proposition 218). Step 2 - Water For the Water Enterprise, the Functionalized expenses are allocated to two cost components: Commodity Costs (which is further designated as either Potable Water or Recycled Water) and Utility Costs (see Table 3-5 for the percent allocations and Table 3-6 for the dollar results). The Potable Water Commodity Costs include all variable operation expenses such as purchased water expenses, water pumping electricity, treatment expenses and some general and administrative (G&A) expenses (see below). The Recycled Water Commodity Cost is strictly the purchase costs of Green Acre recycled water from OCWD. The Utility Costs are all remaining Water Enterprise expenses, which are predominately fixed costs such as salaries, benefits and capital expenses. G&A costs are allocated between the Potable Water Commodity Costs and Utility Costs using the indirect method based on operating expenses. City of Santa Ana Stantec 120 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 3. Cost -of -Service Analysis Table 3-5: Water Functionalization to Cost Group Allocation Factors Water Purchase 100.0% Production and Supply 100.0% Pumping Electricity 100.0% Treatment - Chemicals 100.0% Treatment 100.0% Transmission & Distribution 100.0% Meters & Services 100.0% Storage 100.0% General & Administrative 67.9% 32.1 % Recycled Water 100.0% Table 3-6: Water Cost Group Allocation Water Purchase $24,571,080 $0 $0 $24,571,080 Production and Supply $0 $0 $4,403,257 $4,403,257 Pumping Electricity $1,687,746 $0 $0 $1687746 Treatment -Chemicals $1,423 $0 $0 $1423 Treatment $0 $0 $2,761,878 $2,761,878 Transmission & Distribution $0 $0 $7,015,412 $7 015 412 Meters & Services $0 $0 $104,503 $104 503 Storage $0 $0 $499,391 $499 391 General & Administrative $14,484,413 $0 $6,839,691 $21,324,105 Recycled Water $0 $278,614 $0 $278,614 TOTAL $40,744,662 $278,614 $21,624,132 $62,647,408 Step 2 - Sewer For the Sewer Enterprise, the functionalized expenses already coincide with the two Cost Groups: Account Costs and Utility Costs (see Table 3-7 and Table 3-8). As such, no further allocations are necessary. City of Santa Ana Stantec 121 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 3. Cost -of -Service Analysis Table 3-7: Sewer System Cost Allocation Factors Utility Costs Account Costs 100.0% Table 3-8: Sewer Cost Group Allocation 100% Utility $7,434,954 $0 Account $0 $504,244 TOTAL: $7,434,954 $504,244 3.1.3 Step 3: Credit Non -Rate Revenue to Cost Groups The next step of the COSA is to calculate the rate revenue requirement for each Cost Group by crediting other sources of revenue. Non -rate revenue is used to offset costs that would otherwise need to be recovered through rates. Non -rate revenue includes interest income, other operating revenue (such as miscellaneous fees), fats, oils, and grease (FOG) program revenue for the Sewer Enterprise, and private fire protection revenue for the Water Enterprise (see Schedule 2 for Water and Schedule 7 for Sewer). For the Water Enterprise non -rate revenue is allocated equitability among the Cost Groups in proportion to their relative value, while non -rate revenue is credited to the Utility Costs for the Sewer Enterprise. These credits are shown below in Table 3-9 and Table 3-10, which show the total rate revenue requirement for water and sewer respectively. Table 3-9: Water Rate Revenue Requirement Calculation Total Costs $40,744,662 $278,614 $21,624,132 $62,647,408 Non -Rate Revenue ($1,415,204) ($9,677) ($751,081) ($2,175,962) Revenue Requirement $39,329,459 $268,937 $20,873,051 $60,471,446 City of Santa Ana Stantec 122 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 3. Cost -of -Service Analysis Table 3-10: Total Sewer Rate Revenue Requirement Calculation Summary Total Costs $7,434,954 $504,244 $7,939,197 Non -Rate Revenue ($1,443,194) ($1,443,194) Revenue Requirement $5,991,759 $504,244 $6,496,003 3.1.4 Step 4: Distribute Costs to Customer Classes Finally, rate revenue requirements are then distributed to customer classes based on the customer class units of service characteristics with regard to each Cost Group. The units of service are measured in terms of number of accounts, water usage (for water only), and equivalent meters (which are explained below). A meter equivalency schedule is an industry -standard factor used to represent the relative capacity associated with different types and sizes of meters. A meter equivalency schedule allows for indexing of each meter size in terms of multiples of the lowest common denominator (in this case a 5/8" x 3/4" meter). The existing meter equivalency schedule, that is inferred from the Water Enterprise's current Basic Water Service Charge, is not recognized by the Stantec team as a published or calculated equivalency schedule. This Study recommends that it be replaced with a standard meter equivalency table from AWWA's M22 manual as shown in Table 3-11. Table 3-11: Proposed Meter Equivalency Schedule 3/4" Turbine Class 1 30 1.50 1" Turbine Class 1 50 2.50 1 1/2" Turbine Class 1 100 5.00 2" Turbine Class 1 160 8.00 3" Turbine Class 1 350 17.50 4" Turbine Class 1 630 31.50 6" Turbine Class 1 1,300 65.00 8" Turbine Class 2 2,400 120.00 10" Turbine Class 2 3,800 190.00 (a) Source: Table 6-1 AW WA meter Standards, AWWA M22 Manual, 2nd Ed Therefore, a single 5/8" x 3/4" meter is equal to one equivalent meter (EM), while an 8" meters is equal to 120 EMS. City of Santa Ana Stantec 123 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 3. Cost -of -Service Analysis Step 4 - Water For the Water Enterprise, the Potable Water Commodity Costs are distributed across customer classes based on each customer classes' total use of water use of potable water, Recycled Water Commodity Costs are allocated 100% to the recycled water customers, and Utility Costs are allocated to each respective customer class based on their respective number of equivalent meters (see Table 3-12 and Table 3-13). For example, in Step 3 we calculated the revenue requirement for Potable Water Commodity Costs to be $39,339,769 (see Table 3-9). Single Family customers account for 37.34% of the total annual potable water use (see Table 3-12) and therefore are charged for that percentage of the potable water revenue requirement, totaling $14,692,083 (see Table 3-13). Table 3-12: Water Customer Class Units of Service Multi -Family Residential 4,257,723 29.4% 3,713 8.2% 44,254 12,542 14.8% Non -Residential 4,812,323 33.2% 5,672 12.5% 5,672 29,810 35.1% Recycled Water 124,997 NA— 25 0.1% 25 489 0.6% 'Values are based off of FY 2018 water use data '-` Recycled water use is not considered in the allocation of retail water use among retail customers. Table 3-13: Water revenue requirement allocation to each customer class Single Family Residential $14,688,232 $10,330,420 $25,018,652 Multi -Family Residential $11,567,253 $3,086,399 $14,653,652 Non -Residential $13,073,974 $7,335,955 $20,409,929 Recycled Water $268,937 $120,276 $389,213 TOTAL: $39.329.459 $268.937 $20.873.051 $60.471.446 Step 4 - Sewer For the Sewer Enterprise, the Account Costs are distributed across customer classes by the proportional number of accounts served by the Sewer Enterprise and Utility Costs are allocated by the percent of the overall adjusted (as explained below) EMS in each customer class (Table 3-14 and Table 3-15). While an EM is a good proxy for the capacity demand of an account on a water utility, the size of the meter is only an indirect measure for sewer use since not all water use returns to the sewer in the same proportion for different types of sewer customers. To account for this difference in sewer usage, a "return - to -sewer" factor is applied to the EM calculation for each customer class (provided by City staff based on their understanding of their customer's water usage). This adjusted EM calculation allows for costs to be allocated to each customer class, respective to their relative demand they may put on the sewer collection system. City of Santa Ana Stantec 124 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 3. Cost -of -Service Analysis Table 3-14: Sewer Customer Class units of service Single Family 35,915 80.8% 41,886 50.0% 20,943 39.1% Multi -Family 3,712 8.3% 12,537 80.0% 10,030 18.7% Non -Residential 4,848 10.9% 25,159 90.0% 22,643 42.2% 44,475 54,423 53,616 Table 3-15: Sewer revenue requirement allocation to each customer class Single Family $2,340,428 $407,194 $2,747,622 Multi -Family $1,120,879 $42,090 $1,162,969 Non -Residential $2,530,452 $54,960 $2,585,412 Total: $5,991,759 $504,244 $6,496,003 The manner in which the Cost Groups are used in the rate design will be described in Section 4 City of Santa Ana Stantec 125 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 4. Rate Structure 4. RATE STRUCTURE Upon completion of the COSA, rate structure analyses were performed to evaluate rate structure modifications and calculate specific water, recycled water, and sewer rate schedules for implementation in FY 2019/20. The rate structures proposed by this Report are designed to: • Fairly and equitably recover costs through rates, • Conform to accepted industry practice and legal requirements, and • Provide fiscal stability and recovery of system fixed costs. Revenue requirements allocated to the Cost Groups discussed in Section 3.1.4 were allocated to the customer classes and rate components based on the units of service. The following sub -sections describe the basis for the recommended rate structure and a specific 5-year rate schedule for implementation on January 1, 2020 (for FY 2019/20) and adjusted every July 1st thereafter. The recommended rate schedules are designed to ensure each customer pays its proportionate share of the cost to provide service. 4.1 CURRENT RATES The current water, recycled water, and sewer rates follow a common industry practice with a two-part structure that are comprised of a fixed service charge and a consumption -based rate. Water Rates The fixed portion of the current water rates (currently referred to by the City as the "Basic Water Service Charge") is based on the meter size for all customer classes, except for Multi -Family customers which are charged on a per dwelling unit basis (see Table 4-1). The fixed charges currently recover approximately 16% of rate revenues. City of Santa Ana Stantec 126 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 4. Rate Structure Table 4-1: Current Fixed Charges 5/8" x 3/4" $6.95 3/4" $15.10 V $28.65 11/2" $44.93 2" $82.90 W $137.15 4" $272.78 V $435.53 Multi -Family Residential The current consumption -based rate (currently referred to by the City as the "Metered Water Rate") is a tiered rate assessed based on actual water usage. All retail customers pay the same tiered rate while recycled water customers are charged a lower uniform rate (Table 4-2). All water customers received an allocation of 22 CCF of Tier 1 water per month, with exception of Multi -Family accounts which received an allocation of 22 CCF for each dwelling unit. Table 4-2: Current Consumption -Based Rate 1 $3.02 22 CCF $2.42 2 $3.59 (not applicable) (not applica The consumption -based rates posted here have been shaped over time by "pass -through adjustments" based on increases (or theoretical decreases) in the cost of water supply obtained from OCWD and MWD. Sewer Rates The sewer rates have a two-part fixed charge (currently referred to as the "Sewer Service Charge") which is the same for all customers, a Capital Recovery Charge and a Lateral Repair Program Charge. An additional (fixed) FOG Program Charge is applied to restaurants and other food service accounts. The current fixed charges currently recover approximately 13% of sewer rate revenues. Table 4-3: Current Fixed Sewer Charges Capital Recovery $1.40 Charge Lateral Repair $1.96 Program A sewer "Commodity Charge" of $0.426 per CCF is assessed based on actual water usage. A single uniform rate is used for all retail customers. City of Santa Ana Stantec 127 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 4. Rate Structure 4,2 PROPOSED RATE STRUCTURE CHANGES This Study recommends implementing the following changes to the water rate structure. Refer to the fixed water charge as the Water Utility Charge (replacing "Basic Water Service Charge"), 2. Refer to the consumption -based rate as the Water Usage Charge (replacing "Metered Water Rate"), 3. Establish three distinct retail customer classes: a. Single Family Residential b. Multi -Family Residential c. Non -Residential 4. Identify specific costs that are designated to be recovered through fixed Water Utility Charge revenue vs. variable Water Usage charge revenue (see Section 4.3), 5. Scale the Water Utility Charges based on an updated meter equivalency schedule (see Section 3.1.4), 6. Reflect the cost of the Water Enterprise's water supply costs through the tiered Water Usage Charges (see Section 4.5), and 7. Update the formula used to calculate the annual pass -through cost adjustments (see Section 4.7). This Study recommends implementing the following changes to the City's sewer rate structure. 1. Establish three distinct retail customer classes: a. Single Family Residential b. Multi -Family Residential G1•►GTi1l:Zmr:m, in 2. Shift all cost recovery to a fixed Sewer Utility Charge (thereby eliminating the sewer Commodity Charge), 3. Scale the Sewer Utility Charges based on an updated meter equivalency schedule, 4.3 RATE STRUCTURE COST CATEGORIES Water Rates As will be explained in detail in the following sections, the proposed water rate structure is divided into components based on two cost categories: the utility's Commodity Costs and Utility Costs. The Commodity Costs will be recovered through the Water Usage Charge (based on water usage) and the City of Santa Ana Stantec 128 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 4. Rate Structure Utility Costs will be recovered through the Water Utility Charge. The details of this rate structure are presented in Figure 4-1. Commodity Costs Driven by the volume of water sold • Water Purchases • Pumping Electricity 1 Water Usage Charge (variable) 1p Utility Costs Driven by the size of the utility infrastructure Figure 4-1: Water Rate Structure Cost Categories Sewer Rates • Operations • Maintenance • Capital 1 Water Utility Charge (fixed) The proposed sewer rate structure is a single fixed Sewer Utility Charge, which is comprised of an Account Cost component and a Utility Cost component. This recommendation is being made to reflect the fact that nearly 100% of the Sewer Enterprise expenses are fixed. The details of this rate structure are presented in Figure 4-2. Account Costs (7%) Driven by the cost of managing accounts Billing Customer Service 0 Meter Costs Driven by the size of the collection system infrastructure J* Sewer Utility Charge Figure 4-2: Sewer Rate Structure Cost Categories • Operations • Maintenance • Capital City of Santa Ana Stantec 129 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 4. Rate Structure 4A CALCULATION OF FIXED UTILITY CHARGES Water Rates As summarized in Section 3.1.2, the COSA allocated costs to the Cost Groups of Potable Water Commodity Costs, Recycled Water Commodity Costs, and Utility Costs. Of those groups, the Utility Costs are fixed, therefore, those costs are proposed to be collected through the fixed Water Utility Charge. The total Utility Costs from all customer classes make up for 34% of the revenue requirement, yielding a significant increase from the current percentage of fixed revenue (approximately 16%). The remaining 66% of costs are variable and are proposed to be collected through the Water Usage Charge. 4.4.1 Water Utility Costs As discussed in Section 3, the Utility Costs are made up of expenses such as capital spending, salaries, maintenance, and other fixed operating costs. These costs are driven by the size (i.e. capacity) of the utility. As such, these costs are allocated to customers based on the demands that they place on the system, which is measured based on the size of the customer's meter. As summarized in Section 3.1.4, the revenue requirement designated as Utility Costs, after non -rate revenue was discounted, totaled $10,330,420 for Single Family Residential. Given the meter equivalency schedule described in Section 3.1.1, there are 41,979 equivalent meters in the system which yields a charge of $20.511 per equivalent meter per month for each customer class. Since the Utility costs were allocated to customer classes on an Equivalent Meter basis, the Utility Cost is the same for all customer classes. Table 4-4 provides the scaled Utility Cost by meter size which makes up the fixed Water Utility Charge. The proposed schedules of Water Utility Charges for the planning horizon are presented in Schedule 13 through Schedule 17 of Appendix E. Table 4-4: Monthly Water Utility Charge (FY 2019/20) 5/8" x 3/4" 1.00 $20.51 3/4" 1.50 $30.76 V 2.50 $51.27 11/2" 5.00 $102.53 2" 8.00 $164.04 W 17.50 $358.84 4" 31.50 $645.91 V 65.00 $1,332.83 8" 120.00 $2,460.60 1 Minor variations may exist due to rounding City of Santa Ana Stantec 130 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 4. Rate Structure Sewer Rates As summarized in Section 3.1.3, the COSA allocated costs to the Cost Groups of "Account" and "Utility," both of which are fixed costs and will be collected through a fixed Utility Charge. The sum of these two groups accounts for 100% of the revenue requirement, yielding a significant increase from the current percentage of fixed revenue (approximately 17%). 4.4.2 Sewer Account Costs Account Costs include costs such as billing, customer service, and account management. These costs are proportionate to the number of accounts in the system regardless of the size of the account. As such, the $407,194 allocated to Single Family accounts are divided by the utility's 35,915 accounts (and divided by 12 months) to give a per account charge of $0.94 per month. Similar to the Water Utility costs, Sewer Account Costs were allocated to customer classes on an Account basis, as such the Account Cost is the same for all customer classes. 4.4.3 Sewer Utility Costs As discussed in Section 3, the Utility Costs are made up of expenses such as capital spending, salaries, maintenance, and other fixed operating costs. These costs are driven by the size (i.e. capacity) of the utility. As such, this Study recommends that these costs be allocated to customers based on the demands that they place on the system, which is measured based on the size of the customer's meter. As summarized in Section, the revenue requirement designated as Utility Costs, after non -rate revenue was discounted, totaled $2,340,428 for Single Family Residential Customers. Given the meter equivalency schedule described in Section 3.1.1, there are 41,886 equivalent meters in the system for Single Family Residential Customers. Dividing the revenue requirement by the equivalent meters and again by 12 yields a monthly base charge of $4.66 per equivalent meter for Single Family customers. The difference in the fixed charges for each customer class is due to the return -to -sewer factors assigned to each customer class (see Table 3-14). Table 4-5 provides the scaled Utility Cost by meter size which, combined with the account charge makes up the fixed Sewer Utility Charge. The full schedules of Sewer Utility Charges for the planning horizon are presented in Schedule 18 through Schedule 22. City of Santa Ana Stantec 131 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 4. Rate Structure Table 4-5: Monthly Sewer Utility Charge (FY 2019/20) 5/8" x 3/4" $5.60 $8.40 $9.33 3/4" $7.93 $12.12 $13.52 V $12.59 $19.57 $21.90 11/2" $24.23 $38.20 $42.85 2" $38.20 $60.55 $68.00 W $82.43 $131.32 $147.62 4" $147.62 $235.63 $264.96 6" $303.61 $485.21 $545.74 8" $559.71 $894.97 $1,006.73 10" $885.66 $1,416.49 $1,593.43 4.5 CALCULATION OF VARIABLE WATER USAGE CHARGE The following section explains how the proposed Water Usage Charges were developed based on the cost of water supply. 4.5.1 Purchased Water Costs The $39,329,459 in Potable Water revenue requirements (see Section 3.1.3) is largely made up of water purchase costs, and to a lesser extent water production electricity and treatment. The City has two potable water sources: 1. Groundwater Supply: The City pays OCWD for the right to pump groundwater, which makes up approximately 75% of the City's water supply. Between the payments to OCWD and pumping energy costs, this groundwater composes approximately 56% of the City's water supply costs. 2. Imported Water: Water purchased from MWD makes up the remaining 25% of the City's water supply and accounts for 44% of the City's water supply costs. A final element of the City's water portfolio is the revenue requirement for Recycled Water ($268,937 per Section 3.1.3) which the City purchases from OCWD and provides to its 25 recycled water customers. 4.5.2 Water Usage Charges The potable water rates that are proposed in Year 1 (FY 2019/20) for single family residential, multi -family residential, and non-residential accounts are designed to be recovered through two tiers by assigning the proportionate share of supply volume and supply costs to each tiered allocation and rate, respectively. The Tier 1 rate is designed to recover the cost of OCWD rates for groundwater extraction, the electrical costs of water production, the electrical costs of distributing that volume of water, a portion of the CIP, and a portion of the G&A costs. The Tier 2 rate is designed to recover the costs of purchasing imported City of Santa Ana Stantec 132 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 4. Rate Structure water from MWD, the electrical costs for distributing that volume of water, a portion of the CIP, and a portion of the G&A costs. The allocation of water in each tier is based on the amount of water supply that is available from each respective source. As previously stated in Section 1.1, 75% of the Water Enterprise's water supply comes from groundwater. Tier Width Allocations For single family residential accounts, 75% of the water usage by that customer class occurs below the water consumption level of 10.7 CCF per EM per month. As such the recommended Tier 1 threshold for single family residential customers is set at 10.7 CCF per EM per month. However, due to limitations in the City's billing software, the City currently bills in whole CCF on a bi-monthly basis. To account for this, the tier thresholds is rounded to the nearest CCF. Tier 1 will drop down from 10.7 CCF to 10.5 CCF per month. The remaining water consumption (above 10.5 CCF per month) is designated as MWD purchased water costs. The same approach was utilized for non-residential customers yielding 31.1 CCF per month (rounded down to 31 CCF). Tier width allocation for the multi -family customer class used the same methodology as was used for single family and non-residential customer classes, however, the allocation was based off of the number of dwelling units rather than meter equivalence. 75% of the water usage by that customer class occurs below 8.4 CCF (rounded up to 8.5 CCF) per dwelling unit per month. As such, this level of consumption became the Tier 1 allocation threshold for this customer class, with the remaining consumption above 8.5 CCF per unit per month charged at Tier 2 rates. Recycled water customers only have one source of supply, as such all of the consumption will be charged in one tier. Unit Cost of Water ($/AF) Volume (AF) Tier 1 Tier Recycled Water Figure 4-3: Tiered Rate Cost and Flow Allocations Water Usage Charge Calculation City of Santa Ana Stantec 133 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 4. Rate Structure The cost recovery target for each customer class shown in Table 3-13, was allocated between tiers 1 and 2 for potable water use based on the percentage of the source of supply costs for each tier. OCWD and pumped water costs total 55.9% of the source of supply cost, with MWD costs making up the remaining 44.1 %. The unit cost per CCF was calculated by dividing the revenue requirement by the volume of water consumed in each tier for each customer class. Table 4-6 shows how these steps and the resulting unit rate for each tier for each customer class. Table 4-6: Tier Unit Rate Calculation (FY 2020/21) �AbLllllel Class and me I ell le Recovery Percent Allocation V1 d1el Allocation Percent Allocation Calculated — Unit Rate* Tier Single Requirement $14,688,232 (CCF) 5,406,506 Family Tier 1 $8,210,722 55.9% 4,053,677 75.0% $2.03 Tier $6,477,510 44.1% 1,352,829 25.0% $4.79 Multi- $11,567,253 4,257,723 Family Tier 1 $6,466,094 55.9% 3,190,058 75.0% $2.03 Tier $5,101,159 44.1% 1,067,665 25.0% $4.79 Non- $13,073,974 4,812,323 Residential Tier 1 $7,308,351 55.9% 3,608,602 75.0% $2.03 Tier $5,765,622 44.1% 1,203,721 25.0% $4.79 Recycled $268,937 100% 124,997 100% $2.15 Water * The calculated unit rate is developed using the non -rounded recommended tier allocations discussed above The Water Usage Charges for the planning horizon are presented in Appendix E (Schedule 13 through Schedule 17). 4.6 PASS -THROUGH ADJUSTMENT POLICY In addition to the recommended increases in revenues shown in Section 2.3, this Study proposes to modify the existing Pass -Through Adjustment Policy in order to offset any changes in water supply costs through changes to the Water Usage Charges. The pass -through calculation does not apply to FY 2019/20 because revenue requirements and cost recovery were calculated based on the projected FY 2019/20 water supply costs. As illustrated in Figure 4-4, tiered rates are adjusted based on the unit price increase corresponding to the water source allocated to each tier. Tier 1 rates are increased (or decreased perhaps) by the change in the unit cost of the groundwater supply cost. This is calculated by adding the OCWD water purchase costs and dividing that cost by the volume of groundwater (in CCF) used by the Water Enterprise. Tier 2 rates are increased (or decreased) by the change in the unit cost charged by MWD (see OCWD example above). City of Santa Ana Stantec 134 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 4. Rate Structure Tiered Rates Tier 1 Rate Adjustment \ccF/ = Change in OCWD Unit CostsG—CITl ) Tier 2 Rate Adjustment (cIF/ = Change in MWD Unit Costs(ccF/ Recycled Water Rates Tier 2 Rate Adjustment (ccF) = Change in OCWD Green Acres Unit Costs (ccF) Figure 4-4: Pass -Through Adjustment Formulas Rate Adjustment Notification and Publication - This report advises the City that, pursuant to Government Code 53756, the City must give notice to ratepayers of any pass -through adjustment to water rates at least 30 days prior to the effective date of the adjustment. This can be done on the ratepayer's invoice (for example in the "notes" section of the invoice). It is also important to note that, due to the Pass - Through Adjustment Policy, the Water Usage Charges that are charged by the City in FY 2020/21 through FY 2023/24 are likely to be different from rates shown in Schedule 13 through Schedule 17 (for those same years). Each year, the actual rate schedule will be a function of the pass -through adjustments effectuated in the prior years. As such, the Study recommends that the City continue with its existing practice of posting rate schedules at the time that they are effective (as adjusted per the Pass - Through Adjustment Policy), while meeting the 30-day notification requirements stated above. This recommendation is preferred to posting Schedules 13 through Schedule 17 as they are shown in this report, due to the dynamic nature of the annual pass -through adjustments (which may create confusion for rate payers). 4.7 FOG CHARGE The Sewer Enterprise has a Fats, Oils & Grease (FOG) Program in order to manage the sewer accounts whose discharges are the most problematic for sewer collection system clogging (which are predominantly food preparation establishments). The calculation of this charge is simply based on the cost of the program divided evenly amount the FOG accounts. This study has found that the annual consulting costs are $400,000 and Sewer Enterprise staff time (2 FTEs of Water Quality Inspectors) is approximately $273,000. There currently are 1,372 FOG accounts, which results in a charge of $40.92 per month ($673,000 divided by 1,372 divided by 12 months). The FOG Charge will increase at the same percent rate increases as the sewer service rates (see Appendix F). City of Santa Ana Stantec 135 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study 5. Summary of Proposed Rates 5. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED RATES This Report used methodologies that are aligned with industry standard practices for rate setting as promulgated by AWWA, WEF, and all applicable laws, including California's Proposition 218. The proposed annual adjustments to the rates will allow the City to continue to provide reliable service to customers while addressing critical infrastructure deficiencies. The modifications to the rate structure will provide revenue stability, improve the defensibility of the water rates, and continue to equitably and proportionately recover costs from the customers. The complete schedules of rates over the planning period are summarized in Appendix E (Schedule 13 through Schedule 17) for the Water Enterprise and Appendix F (Schedule 18 through Schedule 22) for the Sewer Enterprise. It is important to note that, while in Year 1 rate revenues across all customer classes will increase on average by 7.0% and 3.0% for water and sewer respectively, the proposed rate structure adjustments (discussed further below) will result in single-family residential accounts with average water usage experiencing an increase of $4.46 per month (or just under ten percent) in their water bill and a decrease of $1.51 per month (or twenty one percent) in their sewer bill. Results will vary among different customers due to the proposed rate structure adjustments. To be clear, some customers' bills will increase by more than the average rate revenue adjustment for Year 1, while other customers' bills will increase by less. Starting in Year 2 (FY 2020/21) and thereafter, all customers will experience the same uniform percentage change to their bill. City of Santa Ana Stantec 136 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Disclaimer Disclaimer This document was produced by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. ("Stantec) for the City of Santa Ana and is based on a specific scope agreed upon by both parties. In preparing this report, Stantec utilized information and data obtained from the City of Santa Ana or public and/or industry sources. Stantec has relied on the information and data without independent verification, except only to the extent such verification is expressly described in this document. Any projections of future conditions presented in the document are not intended as predictions, as there may be differences between forecasted and actual results, and those differences may be material. Additionally, the purpose of this document is to summarize Stantec's analysis and findings related to this project, and it is not intended to address all aspects that may surround the subject area. Therefore, this document may have limitations, assumptions, or reliance on data that are not readily apparent on the face of it. Moreover, the reader should understand that Stantec was called on to provide judgments on a variety of critical factors which are incapable of precise measurement. As such, the use of this document and its findings by the City of Santa Ana should only occur after consultation with Stantec, and any use of this document and findings by any other person is done so entirely at their own risk. City of Santa Ma Stantec 137 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Appendix A: Water Financial Plan Schedules Appendix A: Water Financial Plan Schedules Schedule 1 Beginning Balances Schedule 2 Capital Improvement Plan Schedule 3 Projection of Cash Inflows Schedule 4 Projection of Cash Outflows Schedule 5 Forecast of Net Revenues and Debt Service Coverage for Water Enterprise Fund City of Santa Ana Stantec l A-1 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Appendix A: Water Financial Plan Schedules Final Report Water Enterprise FY 2019 Beginning Balances Schedule 1 FUND BALANCES: Total Cash Assets Restricted Reserves FUND 60 - Water O&M Cash and Cash Equivalents $33,440,786 Misc. $16,039 Account Receivable -Utility Sys Only $4,414,761 Water Customer Deposits $823,935 FUND 66 - Water Capital Cash and Cash Equivalents $6,288,983 Bond Proceeds $95,169 TOTAL ASSETS $44,255,737 $823,935 FUND 60 - Water O&M Accounts and Contracts Payable-$345,408 Accrued Compensated Absences-$195,615 FUND 66 - Water Capital Accounts and Contracts Payable-$142,601 Prior Year Carry Forward-$2,293,949 TOTAL LIABILIITIES-$2,977,573 $0 REVENUE FUND BALANCE $41,278,164 $823,935 City of Santa Ana Stantec IA-2 }}\} \ \\\\ \ \ ( \ ] (( § \\\\ { }}\\ \ { ] (oIlo ( \ ( NONI \ ] (( § \\\\ \ \\\\ \ \ \ }\\\ \ \ ] (( 0-1 0O \ \\\\ / \\\} \ $ ] (( \ \ \ ] / \ y�� w \\�\ \ }}\} } ( ] (( \ OINI \ / }, ] \_ , ] 00 ° } }/\\ \ \ ] (( ) 01 INN III IN, N \ ] / ) 3��\ ��\�\ \ k] IN � \;\\ \ ! " ! - 0 : \\/\\\ 0 / \ \ M — W 5� nn.n... PQP�nQNArta-�nPe�annn,ae%aoae��aeP°�oP�n�=�o�e�e¢aPPaaeoee 6 °u N a n o v Nv m _^FZ'hh�NQh hh a�NNP�NmPNm—aN N—N `m mGz'Gz'm O LL LL v L N Uw w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w o.� non=neQ,2oeon�000ennnan�e� �n,ne�oeQaa� �;R ����n=P %a �"-'.a ,a C° o pN uO Tn No O � o 0 LLLL N 0 n�n�n�n�nnaa��nna�nnnP�eo�eenn=neao,a��i�ennoe,nnnneo�nnnna�eao��%ua v�oNo,-nohNmnh-Po,mmNh viNONPmoo,MMaa_�h�nhhM��--NNh��o v�o o, �n LLLL N N - NP nonee�c, -O-1aa P�e�nae�ane�an�ee nnn�ooQe�o�nnn��Pea ^_nnan�P�n pN uO N y N Po P N `o M N a0 M N N P M M LL LL v N N O 0 0 0 PN rn b b O P P 0 0 0 I N 0�N b I I P I I N I 0 0 0 1 v e 1 1 o 1 1 1 LLg` N vu one,a o �n,a��$aa I . na.ne n I I I�n$e eannn noenn%a n=oonoeneoN ane-%an 0 m 6�hv hP RV¢,a,aeo�PoannnM'��a1'Qo`vNeeoaenoon�%uenaao�nNnnnaa�aa N-N-P IN NP _M m v OON� mmv r`�iP w wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww 0 n��n,a,ao=ao,aQPoon=n�NePaeenn=naQennnn�nQQQOQ,2PoanQ;R,2�Qa,2oNoo v° o noP nCmV Pvo �n�e�oe�Po�n�n=oN=nee%a�nePnNeIk e N I,NNQN ,�PenaoP^��Peae N,N PP hP I N- N e I LLLL - - NP IN w' e1 10_1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o PP aP o e �onona�aeae��nn=,eaNe,a ,eenNne�nae"-'Qao n�ea�eone�noe ,ea Ne N DI NQNPP hP -a --N N- N h N- N-N M N a w O m O Nv O E E U) U_ 2— czar ar ar m o m m m m m o m m m m o °> `m O o O `o _sa o -vmvar° mo 'o 9_sa E mo E o vvO °.o �¢ �¢ �_a W o 2 _a m E 2 m o o 2 o O -° z 22 _ m m a -° z ° m_ _ m o `o_ o 0 0 0 0 E `m m o `o_ n o 0 0 o E _a - a a a m m E m` m - L a a m m E o U ° Q p o n-6 E o a `d n �' ° Q o o n E° a `d a Z `d U> n° o' o' `° `o O n —°n-o `° a d o a O a n-o 5 `° E E d o n w° °� n �5 �5 �5 `° `° Q o ar ar ° `° `° Q `° O `o w n t o� ° E O d N s m m m o E v o �' m t m o W ° E o o a,� m m° $ U «° O `m o U ` o U m °o U m O U m o U m o°° `° o U m p m Q= m O m `° r d o w m m m m o m m E n° o m m m m j°° j "' ° n `o ° m- m° m o m` E n° m m m„ ° n i `o `° s _m m o o g o o E `o O ° - -6 y E o ° °` °` o -° ° g o _ E 44 44 0 - -o A _0 4q° o qq qq qq o q o °°° m ° u 2 2 i O a S S 2 O U a m (7 � U0222 �(7 Q2 —2 Q �U� U Q m — O O C 3 �N�n P u�o�mrn����������NNNNNNNNNN�n in in in in in in in in �nPPPPPPPPPPu�u�u�u�u�u�u�u�u�u�o o N LL U o� $2 oP °N°o,e`2�`2PooN.,he^o`2a��o e rEe viNUOP�o��roNO�U�'U�Pri� oriO ri rEa dd u o a o e ci $ N P VV�� ryry ryry N LL LL W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W .............. Vl W O O O V� �u2 u2�o°.,�Ro^RP M�'E�'ER Oo.(YR-PPO�'E vE R o`O., (Y o°.,e R��'EPePuE OP P (YR pNp u Ou � 2p p O p N P h b O mO mO O � h h ONO N M a W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N W S1 Ou� aP'=Q�nn�P��nQn��nnha`YQ`e�oaePo�e�P,aa "-'�"i^o o�o�v�' nn � d LLLL �O OOOOO W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ............. N W N oo: u2�P�vu2vorn�u2 r2rn u2 o°.,PIr2o^Po,Iv NON rya IN, PM hN 1� NP oO O O M h N h P M h b M N P rn P O P O P P v ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai ai Vl O rvR o 2 m N U°2POa°2 "N —t gIIINM�POrnh�o.^ o oOPPo.�v2 °2 �2 II NON ON N A P h N h M I N P rn a0 I N. 00 LL LL — — 2 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ............. N W om m o"Qeeeen¢nn�nnaaen¢Q¢¢e�e�¢�a¢P�n�¢nQ=n�nP�nn w$Nao�a`1Nh-N`N "'"I . e`IPa�NNeoaP� � __ a o 7S LLLL _ w wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww............ w w o� v I N P 11 "INN, - m - I ^ __ m m 1 o o O o o = °c v1Nt 'n rtv LLLL _ Nnon w wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww w w o$ $ S °u NIc II -,I, r�ryP �'Eoo^vPrl�o °o o�.'rovP���ho`°�v,q oo�0 ooOo11 Nv� hNP M� �N rn �itZP a0 u2OP4 LL LL M N O N W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ............. YN1 Y1 W O m m �vo�e°Q�aoa�aQ��nP�eeo%a��,2�enonea�o%a �Qeaeo�n=omOm wu�`o aeohNQOM�Q�e�ah�$Na�Naoeho�hha_Nohe`u3$Nh°g v n_n w wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww............ w w m om a?N ^ aOa o O U LL Q 0-0 O Q W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W NNW a ��enne�eooea� on��PN=oonen onen�n%aa�en��$ $ �� 0 0 O O N v N N LL Q W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ............. W m v a 6 v U ar O K N N U m C w m m N m N U m m N C m 0 m O� O U m O m O d o m o o E `m o `o m o' o o E u m o E c � o U m � o � m m o U �'o m b xo E -ram og_v _ o m _ ° ° a "m 9 m m E °� `m m ° �_B ° n m m E m 0 m2 m a QUO° On Eoa `d n Qo'�O Qho"'�n EIa `d- am w o�� ys� O m0 O °O N 5 N O Q 0 a N O r c a W O C a 0 d N 5 Q d C O Q N p O O N O O Q E 0 o I m` mom z I a U°" m B> O c H o 0 o R `m o m m Z m o U Y O m m. 0 o o a m U m `o m m` m o U m O U m m m U m I e o° o b U m a o o m m o m E m nm H a m �5 o n o o E- m° E g m` E m nm H m m �5 o n o 0 0 °_ o 0 0 g o m o E-_m E` o° o o` o` O—b o E E` o u S n `D ° m`-O -o m a ,3 0 i �u° uo 0@E<oI-O 000¢� i�u° a D��¢N_�'�-9¢�o0° °-wC C O a U1 3 00 000 O O O O O N O 00 00 O O 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 v O O i i i i O i i i i O O i i i i i i i i O d N 00 O 00 O N h O 0 0 N N O O O 00 O „ O O O O O N N O O O 00 00 O N P N N p O O O O „ 0 0 0 O N 4 O 00 00 4 N h O O O „ N O O 00 �o 4 0 OZ N_ h_ O 00 O O O h 0 0 0 0 O O p O O O O O O � O N N �2 d O O O O O O „ 4 0 0 0 O 0 0 N O O O O 00 1 4 N N_ v 00 O O O O N T p p i i i i I p i p i i i i i i i p i i i p i I N 00 O 0 O 00 m O O O O 00 O O M O O i 0 i i i i 0 0 i i i i i i i i i 0 i i 0 i i I Wl C� 00 O 00 O O O N 1 O N 00 O O O O d 00 O O O O O P O O P 4 p P N 0 N � Q h O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 00 00 O O N O O O O 0 0 O O O O m �o 0 0 o 0 o m o 0 T 0 3 N a o O N w U > w` �' a U ��m U 0- U 0U 0Q0 v u0�>�E UUUUUU o^ U U Zo�UUU UU D UUUU�UUUUUUUUU TUU o c U 7 - �o aoa ��EE2io o U Q Q o o 0 0 o 2i 2i 2i 2i 2i 2i 2i 2i 2i z o 2i 2i o? 'o & E �_ rn 2 N P N ro a a� a � � ro ro a a a ro ro ro ro ro ro a a ro a L� U� m g N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N o O O O O N d Q C a3: 0 0 0 w N3: U O 0 m P O N N N N gg - rvJoaO� o>o a m L p P m U W ul W �yp� 0�ndP�R uu11 bMNO�udi NN O>� N O t�V 1.4 ty �N'l LL - N "A to .y r P� � � � d m Otto W < ¢ LL N n P w w w�M O&VN O n iO 3 ANM ndmry0� OA M NOpS 00 ^MOS�nMIa a��m 1 R P ra HUM P� n M -M ^� 8 N n d o� O^ � M W ME a � o I P u-Mi � a &F �M��ih Pf mo� ry d 00 6o o d i. 0 as rywn � N�yo oPAW o"^' M � 1 M� 11 R I E1 ^ $ �Md �d a OnP N w N w w ? -v�OR NOS n nmm OP O O wl� -- N ry y� N V W < - O^ a N - - W aUQo IN H IUR 1 a od -oN Pna r s <� No boa o r n -1 so 0M� o- M-" 90 3 -- •� LL N •o w Q 5� oS��� 8 IRS 1 9 �gM a a R 15 A M PP a •u � N P � o _ „ <S� = c = � O m � c � O m � o�U04 vital; o � m Y S rc�aOco°� °dOLLuu � i �z °UUUU m rc o00 0 O O oNMd PoW,NT, NLL - NMdu�n�W P - - --� N N NNN N U 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Appendix B: Sewer Financial Plan Schedules Annendix B. Sewer Financial Plan Schedules Schedule 6 Beginning Balances Schedule 7 Capital Improvement Plan Schedule 8 Projection of Cash Inflows Schedule 9 Projection of Cash Outflows Schedule 10 Forecast of Net Revenues and Debt Service Coverage for Water Enterprise Fund City of Santa Ana Stantec l B-1 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Final Report Appendix B: Sewer Financial Plan Schedules Sewer Enterprise FY 2019 Beginning Balances Schedule 6 FUND BALANCES: Unrestricted Cash Assets Sewer Connection Fees FUND 54 - Sewer Capital Recover Cash and Cash Equivalents $1,526,620 Account Receivable -Utility Sys Only $346,448 FUND 55 - Sewer Connection Fee Cash and Cash Equivalents $9,848,639 FUND 56- Sanitary Sewer Service Cash and Cash Equivalents $6,701,561 Misc. $1,700 Account Receivable -Utility Sys Only $222,632 Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents $8,798,961 $9,848,639 FUND 56- Sanitary Sewer Service Accounts and Contracts Payable-$22,958 Prior Year Carry Over $0 Accrued Compensated Absences-$71,801 TOTAL LIABILIMES-$94,759 $0 ;T�9q�U1�1U�I�1:L11_V L�Tq $8,704,202 $9,848,639 City of Santa Ana Stantec I B-2 0 (h 0 P P M s N L 'Q N O O O �O 4 N N N �„fl P U O � U t?t?N fR fR TN t?N N N y d "'mn oo � n M co m 0 U N O E E 00 O `� P O O h YI Q C N O, O, O YI YI N � u LL fR fRN fR fR tqN t?N N N n N O 4 Q P Q P L O N P N m N O O O P 4 N Q � fR fRN fR fR fRN t?N N N O N O P O h O� 4 I� VJ Q h O 00 O N N O M �Nf1 0 Q P N N O, O, O YI N YI N t?t?N fR t?fRN TN N M OO NO N Q O h P N O' Q O N 00 O, O, O O N h O N P `� N � d C� M O_ N_ N_ fR fRN fR fR tqN t?N N O n 00 O n n P N N N 00 0 u O P fR fRN fR fR fRN t?N N P O O N N C� M Q 4 O QO O O p d„ N Q N O N O O O, O, O O 4 N N N h O P —, 0 0 O t?t?N fR t?fRN TN N 10, O h YI N m NON CZ P O N h'Z s r 4 Q N O O O N `Q N M YI O u O P O_ fR fRN fR fR tqN t?N N O d O O^ O N O O O, O, O O � P 11 M C V h YI M u O P fR fRN fR fR fRN t?N N N O O 4 Q N N N Q 0 p P N N O M M ON N O O O 1 0 p h „ u O fR fRN fR fR tqN TN N N O l O P N d N N p N N O O O n 0 O N M -Q N 0 �Ofl O O C fR fRN fR fR TN t?N N O O m m m m � L d P � YI 00 N N O o � N � � m C O O E O WWN WtRWN tRN N w O L O OJ J O E C O O C N C O O W U O C O U C N« E > ry J N N J O O O N N N J N J C J C O O r J C ¢ C w C C O C 0 O_ ry O U 'c > U `� > d Y v r r v N > v rc O r v N O -6 J O N 0 N N O N C O Q m N a� 00 �z0 �U ° O m° (�(� m°> ° O C O— 4 I IN I m m = Ro O U N � �co L LL LL C U W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W � N a — m N O O N N LL LL C LL w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w N — N � N O O co N N Ii] LL LL N X C O — d F 0 Q N O `o N N I I NI I N h N h 2 LL LL N d F N P N N yLL�LL N O O U N N N (Y h M M P N h LL LL N O N o N LL LL o � N N m LL n � N _ ryLL N O OU N N LL LL F N N N P� LL pLL N O N N N N P, LL LL w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w T � O p v N E N1 m 0 m 0 wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww wwwwwwwwww w o ) z Q U � oI @ m m - O U - m m = `m -° `m o °[ O `m o o s � m m o°t moo Umm W `° °`o Q o E o o-0 2i OI o `° I o -o O mo a m z m` o o a o o -`° E E@ m N 1 m m-o p m m m -0 d m` o m m o 4) o@ O 0 z0 m m E o p m m 1 `@' o E —, O T O E p m p` d°� � UII `m a I@ z m n m s o o f° o a `m I o m m - W¢ U O U m m U o U o o o Y m °� xm ° o o o U m' `m `m w o o m m m m m m m°€ m °� E U m ar o Ep ° m o m¢ UI E °°°° i I I° D I Q i- E o 0 0 0 1� U° U m 3 2 2i 2i 2i m O C N I IN N N NN N Nan in mI m O� T - O o E �E N p N 66 S d L UEd N Q E N d m�iOE U O a3EE E OE 0 N O > £ > >N a 20 O E m o U = N N F o 22 Tas U 4 mEm <E N N O N UmQ _ m — m O C-cvmvmm�m N LL 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Appendix C: Water Cost of Service Schedules Appendix C: Water Cost of Service Schedules Schedule 11 Water System Revenue Requirements City of Santa Ana Stantec I C-1 O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 N ' O V N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' N t7 . m O N N 0 h t7 O N t7 m N V N 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V r ' r 0 N O h N O t7 N m h t7 h N t7 N h 0 m O t7 O N t7 m ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' � N C 0 N 0 t7 O t7 0 t7 0 0 m O N h t7 t7 m N N O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r r O N N N 0 t2 O O h N O t7 N m h N t7 h N t7 O N h 0 m 0 t7 O N O t7 m N t7 m O N N 0 h t7 O N t7 m N V N 0 � � h m 0 � 0 0 m N N t7 N N N 0 N V N � N N 0 0 � 0 0 t7 V N N yy 0 N 0 V O t7 h 0 t7 0 0 O m O' N h t7 t7 O m N N N 0 0 0 0 0 y O N 0 t7 N V N V V r N N N V O N 0 V V' O N V N V N V V V h 0 N N h V (° N N N O N N 0 N N z t7 O a n a n 6 — w 6 w u U ° m m m m `w u U u O m rn v `w m e o ° w ° a a EmQ -om _ m m m y o °m❑ m`m`m`mv 'o Uv `�3mvw c `o`0r'�� mua =°E v w m om9wUv'w nocEuo! v uE mnm N E N ooo0 ux 0Nm .v v o E N 5v V`x UE E E rE o x Ewc E 2 uawc! m E w Ewc E m 'o uo u° ° m ° ° 0°a0 n uwoa0 w _io � cww c ww w wm m u`m°v wmmnv> ° `U' ``E E` E r r mm^�um'mmm"° mm mmmwomamoo .^Q U 0 7KQ NN NNQ K�2 NNN Q w x w w w' ' U N E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n N (O O O 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' h m h O m O N O N N N N N h O V h h t7 t2 V O N m 0 V N 0 N V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O h 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V 0 h m ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 0 W O m N N h N t7 m m N m V .. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' t7 O h N O 0 t7 v o m m � N 0 t7 t7 N (O 0 h (O � •� N' � ' N V' t7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O h o (O 0 0 m m m O m N N h N t7 m m N m h V (O (O m h O m O N O N N N N N h m h V y m N �2 t' m N V W W p u m ry T ow N O u m w T w O ow w w E ° F m w U w c w E ° W O m N0 c Z .c Z ° c.o_�aom o U-E ° ` W °w E -a 0 x w uu uaQ°a L c rw o0n w wmm w W noy? O Y uu E ° o > �w 0 0x aw w Ewa E � .� w m E E m°Ucj Occc a0Uc wa ow.rw wEQ w w w wcv w EEm u ry °Oiw. w ``a E`cm cm E E 'c" '_Nwow owa w= 02w wm mmwO w 0 w0wm oUN 0 K u N N N Q K 2 O F U N E M U m N 1V O 0 N y N 0 V y Wy C V O O V N D M O 0 t7 V U1 rn� 0 0' V N N 0 N N V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N E h N 0 V m N N N (D N 0 O m o of 0 h 0 t7 N N N h O h N t7 t7 h N N N m O O O O h O N 0 t7 t7 Fli 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Appendix D: Sewer Cost of Service Schedules Annendix D: Sewer Cost of Service Schedules Schedule 12 Sewer System Revenue Requirements City of Santa Ana Stantec I D-1 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Appendix D: Sewer Cost of Service Schedules DRAFT Report Sewer System Cost Allocation to Functional Components Schedule 12 Salaries Regular $1,124,633 $1,012,170 $112,463 Salaries Part -Time $22,443 $20,199 $2,244 Salaries Overtime $91,318 $82,186 $9,132 Accrual Compensated Absences -$58,842 -$52,958 -$5,884 Retirement -Employer Normal Cost $351,450 $316,305 $35,145 Medicare Insurance $18,814 $16,932 $1,881 Health Insurance $249,659 $224,693 $24,966 Worker Compensation Insurance $131,108 $117,997 $13,111 Communications $2,198 $1,978 $220 Training, Transportation, Meeting $23,277 $20,950 $2,328 Membership, Subscription & Dues $19,292 $17,363 $1,929 Contract Services -Professional $1,832,066 $1,648,859 $183,207 Maintenance & Repair Machinery & Equipment $1,000 $900 $100 Miscellaneous Operating Expenses $324,111 $291,700 $32,411 Gas & Diesel $29,052 $26,147 $2,905 Rental City Equipment $154,939 $154,939 $0 Equipment Replacement Charges $110,828 $110,828 $0 Accident Repair & Replacement $2,855 $2,855 $0 Public Works Administrative Charges $437,446 $396,238 $41,207 Indirect Costs $104,919 $95,036 $9,883 Machinery & Equipment $191,734 $173,672 $18,061 Additional Staff $189,336 $170,402 $18,934 TOTAL O&M EXPENDITURES $5,353,636 $4,849,392 $504,244 Allocation 90.6% 9.4% CAPITAL COST ALLOCATIONS Capital Costs Cash Funded Capital Transfers Change in Fund Balance $3,090,000 $281,805 -$786,244 $3,090,000 $281,805 -$786,244 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS $2,585,562 $2,585,562 $0 Allocation 100.0•0 0.0% TOTAL ALLOCATION $7,939,197 $7,434,954 $504,244 Allocation 93.6% 6.4% City of Santa Ana Stantec I D-2 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Appendix E: Water Rate Design Schedules Aaaendix E: Water Rate Design Schedules Schedule 13 Schedule 14 Schedule 15 Schedule 16 Schedule 17 Proposed Rates Effective January 1, 2019 Proposed Rates Effective July 1, 2020 Proposed Rates Effective July 1, 2021 Proposed Rates Effective July 1, 2022 Proposed Rates Effective July 1, 2023 City of Santa Ana Stantec l E-1 m06 E N � a t' o U Cu U 0o U a Q m 0 0 0 0 0 0oo LLiU) U) 0.00 (0 I- In 6 N (0 N0. M 'IT I�Ul) 'IT 'IT O r N In O N (6 O o 0 0 0 M M M O O U)o o U)o O (O (O N V 00 m co M N N In 00 A] V M N %< M N M V (0 00 00 LO 0 r� M V V M O In r N In 0 00 M 00 M O O � N V 00 In N O � M• 6% M 0 M V (» (» V M - N %< M N M V (0 00 00 LO o � `n N V N 6% 6% (A N N N 0) H H U r.. ommqqqqqq In 00 N (OLO 0 N M V r LO 'IT 'ITr� O r N In O N M In O O In O O O InO _ O O (O N In o0 00 M o0 M M (O V M N %< M N M V (O o0 00 LO O) O) 00 r- In O) N 00 N V M In M (O N EA EA EA EA N (» 69 V M N %< M N M V (O CO 00 LO L r- m O (» (» (» U N O N r.. ommqqqqqq In 00 N (p 04 In O M V r LO V V I- O r N In O) N 0') In O O In O O O In O (O (O N V 00 M M N N In 00 V M - (V %< M N M V (O 00 00 LO I- In N M M N V N I- m O V 00 m m O 00 m 6 In 6 6 6 00 6 6 6 � � � 00 � � In W EA EA EA EA 7 N (» (» V M - N %< M N M V (O 00 00 LO A] U %0 7 13 4) t u VN N O N r.. T a) U) cu 0 cc (6LL + O U Q Q Q U ' U o.MmggqMLij In 00 N 0 M V r LO 'IT 'ITr� O N In d) N In O O In O O O In O (0 N In 00 00 M 00 M (0 c M - (V x M N M V (0 00 00 LO V In d) r- r O (0 O In 00 I- LO (O r N O (`') In d) d) O r r V O d) O W EA EA EAV vi , N (» 69 V M - N %< M N M V (0 CO 00 LO m LO LO C� ui C� N N 0) 0) cu H H U � 0) U T OI � f�6 t U w rn f6 N W w U 13 4) s u VN 000990099 r_ In OD N (O In 04 O � 'IT 'IT I- O r N In O N M In O O In O O O In O (O (O N V 00 M M N N In W V M - N N M V (O OD 00 LO I� 00 In 00 V 00 00 In M V r� In V V r� N V 6 O � V In In O r � � � V � LO O (» (» V M - N %< M N M V (O OD 00 0 A] LO c (00o LO � � 69 U 2019 Water, Recycled Water, and Sewer Rate Study Appendix F: Sewer Rate Design Schedules Appendix F: Sewer Rate Design Schedules Schedule 18 Schedule 19 Schedule 20 Schedule 21 Schedule 22 Proposed Rates Effective January 1, 2019 Proposed Rates Effective July 1, 2020 Proposed Rates Effective July 1, 2021 Proposed Rates Effective July 1, 2022 Proposed Rates Effective July 1, 2023 City of Santa Ana Stantec l F-1 O O N r- v U N O LO O N (O V (M (M LO 0') 00 CD(O � r� r� V (M , N 00 V Lo (o (M N V (.0 V (.0V O 0) ER ER ER ER N Lf) O Lr N r� O LO N (M , r� LO N LO CO 0 N m N m 00 CD Lo Lo V! " (M o m m 00 m, CO M CO O CO N , , (O M LO N N V 0 0 r� M I� N V 00 N I� co, M, L(i ER N (M 00 V O LO M ER ER ER ER M LO M ER ER ER ER N _ MN CO V (O co N m 0 v i O N O N r- v U O O O 0 0 CO 1� O N O O V O N O O V co V I W) OO (M r� C ) N V r� LO � � Lo 1� Eft Eft ER ER N O (O ER ER ER ER ER M LO , M M::V �r , r� LO , LO CO V I� m N CD CD r� O O r- ER ER ER ER N LO O V ER ER ER ER ER CO N V, LO O O O V (M N V , LO O r� r� O cf? N V M LO , M N ER ER ER ER M LO O ER ER ER ER N _ MN CO V (O co m LL U N (6 U) i 0 N N 7 N t U h r N 0 N r- v U 00r�19TMLOLOo00 V O O 00 0') N (O N (O W) W) 0) � 00 c) V N c) N V I� (.0 O N Lo N (f3 (f3 &Di &Di , M um a0 693 ER ER (f3 (f3 00 O N O O 00 N 0 I� 00 V � (M (M (.0C ) N (M N c) 0) CD0-)Lo V N V (.0 LO (.0Lo N N (f3 (f3 (f3 &Di , N O (O �&D���� �69� 00 , (M N V LO 00 0') (M O V r� r� m m V LO M 6 V I� (-i V 00 I� O P')' ER , N v M 0 T V ER ER ER ER , M 0 O 69� 69� 69� 69 N _ MN M gT (O 00 N R U 0 O LL _a E r O a U U) i N N O N r- v U r� (M LO (M (O V (O LO M M OO l(') OO M N CM O O � N l(') OO OO M ER ER ER ER � M (O N O ER ER ER (f3 (f3 M N LO V m LO O OO m V (O LO OO O M V O (» (» (» (» N � N (O I� �69� O M LO M (O l(i V (O O N M M, [�- N M O L6 O N V aO aO V ER , (M V O M r� O O ER ER (f3 , , M 0 69� 69� 69� 69� 69 N _ MN cM V (O aO M O LO N R L U 0 O LL _a E r O a U U) i N N N 7 N t U h M N O N r- 7 N V 4) LU v U rnrnmmMrnOov� 00 O LO N O O N 00 0 N In 0 N M V M, ER ER ER ER N 6- 6- M c ER ER ER 7 N (f3 (f3 O N V V r� � aO (O N V (O 0') (M LO V I� O (O (O 1 N 00 O O M M N LO M r� N LO, N (f3 (f3 ER ER , M 0 N O (f3 (f3 O N LO V 00 (M V 00 O I� 0 0 0 r� 00 O M O I� N, N O N, V (f3 (f3 (f3 (f3 , N V I�- N (f3 (f3 (f3 (f3 (f3 N MN cM V (O 00 M M LO LO (f3 N R L U 0 O LL _A E r O a U U) i NOTICEOF PUBLIC - Concerning proposed changes to the City of Santa Ana water and sewer rate structure and adjustments to water service, sewer service and consumption charges. The Santa Ana City Council will hold a public hearing at the time, date, and location specified above to consider a proposed five-year schedule of increases to the City's water rates and sewer charges. If adopted, proposed rate increases and charges will become effective on January 1, 2020; July 1, 2020; July 1, 2021; July 1, 2022; July 1, 2023, respectively. The public hearing will be conducted per California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 6 (also known as "Proposition 218"). This notice is being sent to all owners and customers of record whose parcels receive water and/or sewer service from the City of Santa Ana, who would be subject to the proposed rates and charges. All members of the public are invited to attend the public hearing. Additionally, under California State Law, owners and customers of record may submit a written protest to the proposed rate changes. Only one protest per parcel is permitted. Please refer to the "How Can I Participate?" section of this document for instructions on submitting a formal written protest against the proposed action. You may also appear at the public hearing at the date and time specified above. More information, including a rate estimator, is available online at: www.santaanautilityrates.com. The City of Santa Ana is proposing changes to its water and sewer rate structures and charges. The City of Santa Ana is required to provide water and sewer service to its customers at rates that do not exceed the cost of service, while maintaining essential water and sewer infrastructure. To demonstrate that the proposed rates comply with this rule, the City hired an independent, third -party consultant to determine that cost of service. A cost of service study is available for public review at the City and on the City's website (see next page). Customers who would be impacted by these changes are receiving this notice. r, EXPIRING RATE SCHEDULE $ $ $ The City's existing 5-year rate schedule was established in O 2014. A new schedule of rates is needed to ensure the City is recovering the costs of providing service, using industry best practices and meeting legal requirements. AGING SYSTEM The City of Santa Ana maintains a complex system of Opipelines and facilities to provide water and sewer service to customers. As the system ages, additional resources are needed to keep these assets in good working condition and benefit rate payers by making timely re -investments in infrastructure. FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS The City of Santa Ana's Public Works Agency must ensure adequate revenue to meet its financial requirements, including bond repayments and maintaining cash reserves for a strong credit rating. The City of Santa Ana welcomes your participation and input throughout the process as the City Council considers the rate adjustments explained in this Notice. If you have questions or comments about the proposed rates, you can: GALL OR VISIT. The cost -of -service study and other information on the proposed adjustments and increases are available for review at the City's Public Works Department and on our website: www.Santa-Ana. org/pw/Water-and-Sewer. WRITE. Written protests maybe mailed to The City of Santa Ana, Attention: City Clerk, P.O. Box 1988, M30, Santa Ana, CA92701, or delivered in -person to City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana. Written protests shall include the name, property address and signature of the person submitting the protest. Oral protests and protests submitted by email or other electronic means do not count as formal written protests. ATTEND THE PUBLIC HEARING: Written protests may also be submitted at the Public Hearing on November 19, 2019 at 5:45 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All members of the public will have an opportunity to speak and give testimony regarding the proposed water, recycled water and sewer rate adjustments at the Public Hearing; however, only written protests will count toward a majority protest. Written protests must be received before the conclusion of the Public Hearing. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSE The proposed rate structure for water service has four customer classes: single-family residential, multi -family residential, non-residential, and recycled water users. The proposed sewer rate structure also has four customer classes: single-family residential, multi -family residential, non-residential, and FOG customers. WHAT WOULD CHANGE? WATER RATE STRUCTURE The proposed water rate structure is comprised of two components: a fixed monthly service charge (the "Water Utility Charge"), and the variable water consumption charge (the "Water Usage Charge"). Four customer classes would be established — Single Family, Multi -Family, Non -Residential and Recycled Water users. Commodity costs would be distributed among them based on each customer classes' total water use. Commodity costs for recycled water would be allocated 100 percent to those customers. Utility costs would be allocated to each respective customer class based on meter size. Water usage charges would have two tiers based on the source of the water and its availability. The Tier 1 rate would recover the cost of groundwater extraction, the electricity for producing and distributing that water, and some other costs. Tier 2 would recover the costs of purchasing imported water and the electrical costs for distributing that volume of water. The allocation of water in each tier would be based on the amount of water supply that is available from each respective source. SEWER RATE STRUCTURE The variable Sewer Commodity Charge and fixed Service Charge would be replaced by a single fixed Sewer Utility Charge, based on the size of the water meter and customer class. FIXED CHARGES are independent of the amount of water used. They cover non -fluctuating costs such as capital projects, transmission, distribution, meters and service. VARIABLE CHARGES are calculated based on the amount of water moving through a customer's meter. These charges cover expenses such as purchased water, electricity and treatment chemicals. iED RATE STRUCTURES If the proposed rate changes are approved by the City Council, all water and sewer services will be billed at the rates set forth in the tables on the following pages: s 1 Current Effective L Rate January 1, Effective Effective Effective Effective (Per CCF*) 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2021 July 1, 2022 July 1, 2023 TIER 1** $3.02 $2.03 $2.17 $2.31 $2.36 $2.41 TIER 2*** $3.59 $4.79 $5.13 $5.46 $5.57 $5.68 RECYCLED $242 $215 $2.30 $2.45 $2.50 $2.55 WATER *1 CCF=748 Gallons **See tier allocation table. *** Tier 2 is any amount of water used over the amount allocated in Tier 1 Meter Current Size Allocation 5/8" x 3/4" 3/4" 1,r 1 1/2" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8„ 0-22 CCF O-22 CCF 0-22 CCF O-22 CCF O-22 CCF 0-22 CCF O-22 CCF O-22 CCF 0 - 22 CCF Proposed Single Family Residential Allocation 0 - 10.50 CCF 0-16 CCF 0 - 26 CCF 0-52.5 CCF 0-84 CCF 0 - 184 CCF 0 - 331 CCF 0 - 682.5 CCF 0 - 1,260 CCF Proposed Non -Residential Customer Allocation 0-31 CCF 0 - 46.5 CCF O - 775 CCF 0-155 CCF O - 248 CCF O - 542.5 CCF O - 976.5 CCF O - 2,015 CCF 0 - 3,720 CCF Proposed Multi -Family Customer Allocation 0 - 8.5 CCF per Dwelling Unit Meter Size 5/8" x 3/4" 3/4" I 1„ 1 1/2" 2„ 3" 4" 61, 8" Current Effective Janu20 ary 1, Effective Effective Effective Effective Charges 20 July 1, 2020 July 1, 202 - y 1, 2022 July 1, 2023 $6.95 $20.51 $21.94 $23.37 $23.84 $24.31 $15.10 $30.76 $32.91 $35.05 $35.75 $36.47 1 $28.65 1 $51.27 $54.85 $58.42 $59.59 $60.78 $44.93 $102.53 $109.70 $116.83 $119.17 $121.55 $82.90 $164.04 $175.52 $186.93 $190.67 $194.48 $137.15 $358.84 $383.96 $408.92 $417.10 $425.44 $272.78 $645.91 $691.12 $736.04 $750.76 $765.78 $435.53 $1,332.83 $1,426.12 $1,518.82 $1,549.20 $1,580.18 $435.53 1 $2,460.60 $2,632.84 $2,803.97 $2,860.05 $2,917.25 Current Multi -Family Residential Charge Per Unit: $4.75 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Current Effective Meter Size Charges January 1, 2020 5/8" x 3/4" 3/4" 1" 1 1/2" 3" 4" 6" $1.68 + (Number of CCF x 0.426) (1 CCF = 748 gallons) $5.60 $7.93 $12.59 $24.23 $38.20 $82.43 $147.62 $303.61 Effective Effective Effective Effective July 1, 2020 July 1, 2021 July 1, 2022 July 1, 2023 $5.88 $6.41 $6.99 $7.62 $8.33 $9.08 $9.90 $10.79 $13.22 $14.41 $15.71 $17.12 . (\'/J•J $25.44 $27.73 $30.23 $32.95 $40.11 $43.72 $47.65 $51.94 , $86.55 $94.34 $102.83 $112.08 A $155.00 $168.95 $184.16 $200.73 _I $318.79 $347.48 $378.75 $412.84 - MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Meter Size Current Effective January 1, Effective Effective Effective Effective Gherges 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2021 July 1, 2022 July 1, 2023 5/8" x 3/4" $8.40 $8.82 $9.61 $10.47 $11.41 3/4" $12.12 $12.73 $13.88 $15.13 $16.49 1" $19.57 $20.55 1 $22.40 1 $24.42 $26.62 $1.68 + 11/2" (Number $38.20 $40.11 $43.72 $47.65 $51.94 of CCF x 2" 0.426) $60.55 $63.58 $69.30 $75.54 $82.34 3" $131.32 $137.89 $150.30 $163.83 $178.57 (1 CCF 4" = 748 $235.63 $247.41 $269.68 $293.95 $320.41 gallons) 6" $485.21 $509.47 $555.32 $605.30 $659.78 8" $894.97 $939.72 $1,024.29 $1,116.48 $1,216.96 10" $1,416.49 $1,487.31 $1,621.17 $1,767.08 $1,926.12 Meter Size a urrenc January 1, tffecuve tffecuve tffecuve tffecuve Charges 202o July 1, 2020 July i, 2021 July 1, 2022 July 1, 2023 t- 5/8" x 3/4" $9.33 $9.80 $10.68 $11.64 $12.69 3/4" $13.52 $14.20 $15.48 $16.87 $18.39 1" $21.90 $23.00 $25.07 $27.33 $29.79 $1.68 + 11/2" (Number $42.85 $44.99 $49.04 $53.45 $58.26 of CCF x 2„ 0.426) $68.00 $71.40 $77.83 $84.83 $92.46 d - 3" $147.62 $155.00 $168.95 $184.16 $200.73 (1 CCF 4" = 748 $264.96 $278.21 $303.25 $330.54 $360.29 gallons) 61, $545.74 $573.03 $624.60 $680.81 $742.08 8" $1,006.73 $1,057.07 $1,152.21 $1,255.91 $1,368.94 10" $1,593.43 $1,673.10 $1,823.68 $1,987.81 $2,166.71 $266 + FOG (Num.0ber $40 92 $42 97 $46.84 $51.06 $55.66 Customers of CCF x 0.426) rl ANA w 0 Respecto de los cambios propuestos a la estructura de tarifas de agua y alcantarillado, y ajustes a los cargos de consumo, servicio de agua y servicio de alcantarillado de la Ciudad de Santa Ana. El Consejo de la Ciudad de Santa Ana Ilevara a cabo una audiencia publica a la hora, an la fecha y an el lugar especificados anteriormente pare considerar un cronograma propuesto de cinco anos pare aumentar las tarifas de ague y los cargos de alcantarillado de la Ciudad. Si se adopta, los aumentos de tarifas y los cargos propuestos entraran an vigencia el 1 de enero de 2020; el 1 de julio de 2020; el 1 de julio de 2021; el 1 de julio de 2022; el 1 de julio de 2023, respectivamente. La audiencia publica se Ilevara a cabo segun el Articulo XIII D de la Constituci6n de California, Secci6n 6 (tambien conocido como "Proposici6n 218"). Este aviso se envia a todos los propietarios y clientes del registro cuyas parcelas reciben servicios de ague o de alcantarillado de la Ciudad de Santa Ana qua estarian sujetos a las tarifas y cargos propuestos. Todos los miembros del publico estan invitados a asistir a la audiencia publica. Ademas, de acuerdo con la ley estatal de California, los propietarios y los clientes del registro de la ciudad pueden presentar una protesta por escrito contra los cambios de tarifa propuestos. Solo se permite una protesta por parcela. Consulte la Secci6n ";Como puedo participar?" de este documento Para conocer las instrucciones pare presenter una protesta por escrito formal an contra de la acci6n propuesta. Tambien puede comparecer an la audiencia publica an la fecha y hora antes especificadas. Encontrara mas informaci6n, incluida una calculadora de tarifa, en Ifnea en: www.santaanautilityrates.com. La Ciudad de Santa Ana propone cambios en sus tarifas y estructuras de tarifas de agua y alcantarillado. La Ciudad de Santa Ana debe proporcionar un servicio de agua y de alcantarillado para sus clientes a tarifas que no excedan el costo del servicio, a la vez que mantengan la infraestructura esencial de agua y alcantarillado. Para demostrar que las tarifas propuestas cumplen con esta regla, la ciudad contrato a un consultor externo a independiente para determinar el costo del servicio. Un estudio de costo del servicio esta disponible Para la revision del publico en la alcaldia y en el sitio web de la ciudad (consulte la pagina siguiente). Los clientes que podrian verse afectados por estos cambios reciben pste aviso. VENCIMIENTO DEL CRONOGRAMA DE TARIFAS $ $ El cronograma actual de tarifas de 5 anos de la Ciudad se establecio en 2014. Se necesita un nuevo cronograma de Otarifas para garantizar que la Ciudad recupere los costos de proporcionar servicios, utilizando las mejores practicas de la industria y cumpliendo los requisitos legales. SISTEMA ENVEJECIDO La ciudad de Santa Ana mantiene un complejo sistema Ode tuberias a instalaciones para proporcionar servicios de agua y alcantarillado a los clientes. A medida que el sistema envejece, se necesitan recursos adicionales para mantener estos activos en buenas condiciones de trabajo y beneficiar a los pagadores de tasas al realizar reinversiones oportunas en infraestructura. REQUISITOS FINANCIEROS La Agencia de Obras Publicas de la Ciudad de Santa Ana debe garantizar ingresos suficientes para cumplir con sus requisitos financieros, incluidos los reembolsos de bonos y el mantenimiento de reservas en efectivo para una calificacion crediticia solida. La Ciudad de Santa Ana agradece su participacidn y aporte durante todo el proceso mientras el Concejo de la Ciudad considera los ajustes de tarifas explicados en este Aviso. Si tiene alguna pregunta o comentario sobre las tarifas propuestas, puede: LLAMA R O CONSU LTAR EN LI N EA. EI estudio del costo del servicioyotra informacion sobre los ajustes y aumentos propuestos estan disponibles Para su revision an el Departamento de Obras Publicas de la Ciudad y �© en nuestro sitio web: www.Santa-Ana.org/pw/Water-and-Sewer. ESCRIBIR. Las protestas escritas pueden enviarse por correo a la Ciudad a de Santa Ana. Atencion: Secretaria de la Ciudad, P.O. Box 1988, M30, Santa Ana, CA 92701, o entregarse en persona al Ayuntamiento, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana. Las protestas por escrito deben incluir el nombre, la direccion de la propiedad y la firma de la persona qua envia la protesta. Las protestas orales y las protestas enviadas por correo electronico u otros medics electronicos no cuentan como protestas escritas formales. 4n ASISTIR A LA AUDIENCIA PUBLICA: Las protestas escritas tambien pueden entregarse an la audiencia publica el 19 de noviembre de 2019 a las 5:45 p. m. an las Salas del Concejo de la Ciudad an 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Todos los miembros del publico tendran la oportunidad de hablar y dar testimonio con respecto a los ajustes propuestos Para las tarifas de agua, de agua reciclada y de alcantarillado an la audiencia publica; sin embargo, solo las protestas por escrito se consideran an una protesta mayoritaria. Las protestas por escrito deben recibirse antes del final de la audiencia publica. DESCRIPCION DE LAS ESTRUCTU La estructura tarifaria propuesta para el servicio de agua tiene cuatro clases de clientes: usuarios residenciales unifamiliares, residenciales multifamiliares, no residenciales y de agua reciclada. La estructura de tarifas de alcantarillado propuesta tambien tiene cuatro clases de clientes: clientes residenciales unifamiliares, residenciales multifamiliares, no residenciales y FOG. , LA ESTRUCTURA DE LA TARIFA DE AGUA La estructura de la tarifa de agua propuesta consta de dos componentes: un cargo fijo mensual por servicio (el "Cargo de servicios publicos de agua") y el cargo variable por consumo de agua (el "Cargo por use de agua"). Se establecerran cuatro clases de clientes: usuarios unifamiliares, multifamiliares, no residenciales y de agua reciclada. Los costos del producto se distribuirran entre ellos en funcion del use total de agua de cada clase de cliente. Los costos del producto basico para el agua reciclada se asignarran al 100 por ciento a esos clientes. Los costos de servicios publicos se asignarran a cada clase de cliente respectiva en funcion del tamano del medidor. Los cargos por use de agua tendrian dos niveles basados en la fuente del agua y su disponibilidad. La tarifa de Nivel 1 recuperarra el costo de la extraction de agua subterranea, la electricidad para produciry distribuir esa agua, y algunos otros costos. El Nivel 2 recuperarra los costos de comprar agua importada y los costos electricos para distribuir ese volumen de agua. La asignacion de agua en cada nivel se basarra en la cantidad de suministro de agua disponible de cada fuente respectiva. LA ESTRUCTURA DE LA TARIFA DE ALCANTARILLADO El cargo variable por producto basico de alcantarillado y el cargo fijo por servicio se reemplazarran por un unico cargo por servicios publicos de alcantarillado, basado en el tamano del medidor de agua y la clase de cliente. LOS CARGOS FIJOS son independientes de la cantidad de agua utilizada. Cubren costos no fluctuantes como proyectos de capital, transmision, distribution, medidores y servicio. LOS CARGOS VARIABLES se calculan en funcion de la cantidad de agua clue pasa a traves del medidor de un cliente. Estos cargos cubren gastos tales como agua comprada, electricidad y productos quimicos de tratamiento. URAS DE TARIFAS PROPUESTAS Si los cambios de tarifas propuestos son aprobados por el Concejo de la Ciudad, todos los servicios de aqua y alcantarillado se facturaran segun las tarifas establecidas en las tablas en las siguientes paginas: s +, Tarifa A partir del A partir del A partir del A partir del A partir del Actual 1 de enero 1 de julio de 1 de julio de 1 de julio de 1 de julio de (Per CCF*) de 2020 2020 2021 2022 2023 J NIVEL 1** $3.02 $2.03 $2.17 $2.31 $2.36 $2.41 NIVEL 2*** $3.59 $4.79 $5.13 $5.46 $5.57 $5.68 RECICLADA $242 $215 $2.30 $2.45 $2.50 $2.55 AGUA *1 CCF=748 Galones **Consultar tabla de asignacion de niveles. "** El Nivel 2 es cualquier cantidad de agua utilizada por encima de la cantidad asignada en el Nivel 1 i r Asignacion Asignacion - Tama no del Asignacion propuesta pare propuesta ' Actual cliente residencial pare cliente no medidor unifamiliar residencial 5/8" x 3/4" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 10.50 CCF 0 - 31 CCF 3/4" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 16 CCF 0 - 46.5 CCF 1" 0-22 CCF 0-26 CCF 0-77.5 CCF 1 1/2" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 52.5 CCF 0 - 155 CCF 2" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 84 CCF O - 248 CCF 3" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 184 CCF 0 - 542.5 CCF 4" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 331 CCF 0 - 976.5 CCF 6" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 682.5 CCF 0 - 2,015 CCF 8" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 1,260 CCF 0 - 3,720 CCF Asignacion propuesta pare cliente residencial multifamiliar 0 - 8.5 CCF por unidad de vivienda Tamano del Cargos A partir del A partir del A partir del A partir del A partir del medidor Actuales 1 de enero 1 de Julio 1 de Julio 1 de Julio 1 de Julio de 2020 de 2020 de 2021 de 2022 de 2023 5/8" x 3/4" $6.95 $20.51 $21.94 $23.37 $23.84 $24.31 3/4" $15.10 $30.76 $32.91 $35.05 $35.75 $36.47 1" $28.65 $51.27 $54.85 $58.42 $59.59 $60.78 11/2" $44.93 $102.53 $109.70 $116.83 $119.17 $121.55 2" $82.90 $164.04 $175.52 $186.93 $190.67 $194.48 3" $137.15 $358.84 $383.96 $408.92 $417.10 $425.44 4" $272.78 $645.91 $691.12 $736.04 $750.76 $765.78 6" $435.53 $1,332.83 $1,426.12 $1,518.82 $1,549.20 $1,580.18 8" $435.53 $2,460.60 $2,632.84 $2,803.97 $2,860.05 $2,917.25 Cargo residencial multifamiliar actual por unidad: $4.75 RESIDENCIAL UNIFAMILIAR Tamano del } r medidor - 5/8" x 3/4" 3/4" 1" 11/2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" Cargos A partir del A partir del A partir del A partir del A partir del Actuales 1 de enero 1 de Julio 1 de Julio 1 de Julio 1 de Julio de t de 2020 de 2020 de 2021 de 2022 2023 $5.60 $5.88 $6.41 $6.99 $7.62 $7.93 $8.33 $9.08 $9.90 $10.79 r ] $12.59 $13.22 $14.41 $15.71 $17.12 $1.68 + (Cantidad $24.23 $25.44 $27.73 $30.23 $32.95 (1 de CCF x 0.426) $38.20 $40.11 $43.72 $47.65 $51.94 r $82.43 $86.55 $94.34 $102.83 $112.08 (1 CCF = 748 $147.62 $155.00 $168.95 $184.16 $200.73 galones) $303.61 $318.79 $347.48 $378.75 $412.84 $559.71 $587.70 $640.59 $698.24 $761.08 $885.66 $929.94 $1,013.63 $1,104.86 $1,204.30 J RESIDENCIAL MULTIFAMILIAR Tamano del medidor 5/8" x 3/4" 3/4" 1'• 1 1/2" 2" 3" 4„ 8" 10" Tamano del medidor 5/8" x 3/4" 3/4" 1" 1 1/2" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8„ 10" Cargos A partir del A partir del A partir del A partir del A partir del Actuales 1 de enero 1 de Julio de 1 de Julio 1 de Julio 1 de Julio de 2020 2020 de 2021 de 2022 de 2023 $8.40 $8.82 $9.61 $10.47 $11.41 $12.12 $12.73 $13.88 $15.13 $16.49 $19.57 $20.55 1 $22.40 1 $24.42 $26.62 $1.68 + (Cantidad $38.20 $40.11 $43.72 $47.65 $51.94 de CCF x 0.426) $60.55 $63.58 $69.30 $75.54 $82.34 $131.32 $137.89 $150.30 $163.83 $178.57 (1 CCF = 748 $235.63 $247.41 $269.68 I $293.95 $320.41 galones) $485.21 $509.47 $555.32 $605.30 $659.78 ^ $894.97 $939.72 $1,024.29 $1,116.48 $1,216.96 $1,416.49 $1,487.31 $1,621.17 $1,767.08 $1,926.12 / Cargos Act uales $1.68 + (Cantidad de CCF x 0.426) (1 CCF = 748 galones) $26.06 + Clientes (Cantidad FOG de CCF x 0.426) A partir del A partir del A partir del A partir del A partir del 1 de enero 1 de Julio de 1 de Julio 1 de Julio 1 de Julio de 2020 2020 de 2021 de 2022 de 2023 $9.33 $9.80 $10.68 $11.64 $12.69 A $13.52 $14.20 $15.48 $16.87 $18.39 $21.90 1 $23.00 $25.07 $27.33 $29.79 . $42.85 $44.99 $49.04 $53.45 $58.26 $68.00 $71.40 $77.83 $84.83 $92.46 $147.62 $155.00 $168.95 $184.16 $200.73 $264.96 $278.21 $303.25 $330.54 1 $360.29 $545.74 $573.03 $624.60 $680.81 $742.08 $1,006.73 $1,057.07 $1,152.21 $1,255.91 $1,368.94 $1,593.43 $1,673.10 $1,823.68 $1,987.81 $2,166.71 $40.92 $42.97 $46.84 $51.06 $55.66 Id A sir dung va ntxbc thoat cua Thanh pho Santa Ana va chinh ve dich vu cap ntxbc, dich vu thoat ntxbc va le ii do"i v&i ca cau mOc gia ntxbc nhirng dieu phi tieu thu. Hoi d6ng thanh pho Santa Ana se to chirc mot buoi dieu tran cling chung vao ngay gib, dia diem n@u tr@n de duyet qua lich trinh de nghi tang muc gia nuybc sir dung va nrvbc thoat cua Thanh pho trong nam nam. Neu duac thong qua, mixc gia va le phi gia tang s6 co hieu luc vao ngay 1 thong 1 nam 2020, 1 thong 7, 2020, 1 thong 7, 2021, 1 thong 7, 2022, 1 thong 7, 2023, theo thin try. Buoi di@u tran cong chung drvac thuc hien theo Di@u XI I I D, Muc 6 (con goi la "Ludt 218") cua Hien phap California. Thong bao nay drvac gixi den tat ca cac so hixu chu va khach hang hien co trong h6 so six dung dich vu va co nhixng 16 dat dang nhan dich vu nrvbc six dung va/hoac dich vu thoat nrvbc qua Thanh pho Santa Ana va Ia nhixng nguFai s6 bi anh hrvbng bbi sup thay doi mixc gia nrvbc va Ie phi de nghi nay. Moi thanh phan cong chung drvac mai tham dLF buoi di@u tran cong chung nay. Ngoai ra, theo Luat Tieu bang California, so hixu chu dat dai va khach hang hien co trong h6 so six dung dich vu co quyen g6ri thin viet tr@n giay chong doi nhixng thay doi ve mixc gia drvac de nghi. Moi mot 16 dat chi drvac mot thin chong doi. Vui long xem phan "Toi tham dLP bang cach nao?" trong tai lieu nay de drvac hrvbng dan ve cach viet thin chinh thixc tr@n giay chong doi nhixng thay doi da de nghi. Quy vi cung co the truc tiep tham dui buoi dieu tran cong chung nay vao ngay gib n@u tr@n. Thong tin chi tiet, gom ca cong cu rvbc tinh mixc gia, drvac trinh bay tr@n trang mang: www.santaanautilityrates.com. Thanh pho Santa Ana dang du a ra nhCrng de- nghi s0a d-i ke-t cau mOc gib va le phi dich vu nu'bc sO dung va dich vu thoat nu,bc. Thanh pho Santa Ana bat buoc phai cung cap dich vu nu'bc sO dung va thoat nu'bc cho khach hang v&i mOc gib khong vu'at qua chi phi dich vu nhu ng cung luc van duy tri ca s& ha tang nu'(rc va cong ranh. Be- chOng t6 rang cac mOc gib de- nghi tuan dung quy Binh nay, Thanh pho da tuye-n mot co van de tam Man doc lap de xac dinh chi phi dich vu nay. Ket qua cong cuoc xac dinh chi phi dich vu duac cong bo tai T6a thi chinh va tren trang mang cua Thanh pho (xin xem trang kb). Khach hang nao c6 the bi anh hu'ang bai nhOng thay do' i nay nhan du�ac thong bao nay. LICH TRINH MIYC GIA SAP HET HAN $ $ $ Lich trinh mOc gib nam nam hien tai cua Thanh pho da du'ac O du,a ra tU nam 2014. Do do Thanh pho can mot lich trinh gib m&i de bao dam la Thanh pho, qua su'sO dung cac thong le tot nhat trong nganh va dap Ong moi d61 h6i phap ly, thu lai du'ac chi phi cung cap dich vu. HE THONG CO KY Thanh pho Santa Ana hien c6 mot he thong du'ang ong va ca O✓ s& phOc tap d- cung cap dich vu nu'bc sO dung va dich vu thoat nu'bc cho khach hang. Vi he thong tang ngay tang cu va vi muon tie-p tuc hoat dong mot cach hoan hao va mang lai ich den cho khach hang, Thanh pho can nguon tai chanh de dau tu, lai kip thai vao ca s& ha tang. DOI HOI VE TAI CHANH Sb Cong chinh cua Thanh pho Santa Ana phai c6 du doanh thu de dap Ong cac nhu cau tai chanh cua ca quan, gom ca thanh town na trai phie-u va du'trCr tie-n mat de du'ac xep hang tin dung cao. Thanh ph6 Santa Ana han hanh chao don su' tham gia va d6ng g6p y kie-n cua quy vi trong suot tie-n trinh nay trong luc Hoi dung thanh pho cOu xet nhirng !hay doi du'ac giai thich trong Th6ng bao nay. Neu quy vi c6 dieu gi that mac hoac c6 nhan xet gi ve mOc gia de- nghi, quy vi c6 the: GOI DIEN THOAI HOAC TRU'C TIEP DEN VAN PHONG. Quy vi c6 the xem thong tin ve cbng trinh nghi@n cipu ve chi phi dich vu va nhixng thong tin khac ve cac dieu chinh va tang le phi de nghi tai Sb Cbng chinh Thanh pho va tr@n trang mang cua chung tbi: www.Santa-Ana.org/pw/Water- and-Sewer. GUI THU. Quy vi c6 the giai thu chong doi ve The City of Santa Ana, Attention: City Clerk, P.O. Box 1988, M30, Santa Ana, CA 92701, hoac tan tay mang den t6a thi trupbng City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana. Thry chong doi viet tr@n giay phai c6 ten, dia chi cua dat dai/nha cixa va chix ky cua ngupbi giai thu chong doi. Chong doi bang mieng va cac thu chong doi giai qua email hoac cac phrvong tien dien tip khac khbng drvoc xem la thu chong doi chinh thipc viet tr@n giay. THAM DU BUOI DIEU TRAN CONG CHUNG: Thry chong do viet tr@n giay cung c6 the drvoc n6p trong Buoi dieu tran cbng chung, ngay 19 thong 11 nam 2019, luc 5 gibs 45 chieu tai Nghi trupbng Hoi d6ng thanh pho tai 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Tat ca moi ngupbi trong cling d6ng s6 c6 ca h6i phat bieu va trinh bay li@n quan Mn de nghi dieu chinh mipc gia nrvbc, nrvbc tai six dung va nrvbc thoat trong Buoi dieu tran cbng chung, tuy nhi@n, chi c6 thu chong doi viet tr@n giay chinh thipc mbi drvoc tinh vao trupbng hop da so chong doi. Thry chong doi viet tr@n giay phai drvoc nhan trubc khi Buoi dieu tran cbng chung ket thuc. JFMO TA CO' CAU MUC GIA 7� Ca cau m be gib de- nghi cho nu'ac sir dung gom co hai thanh phan: 16 phi dich vu co dinh hang thbng (" Le phi tien ich nurac") va le phi tieu thy nu'ac thay doi (' Le phi sir dung nurac"). Bon hang khach hang du'ac thanh lap - Ngu'ai dung nu'ac thuoc mot gia Binh rieng, nhieu gia Binh, cc sa khong phai nha a va nu'ac tbi sir dung. Chi phi tien nghi se du'ac phan phoi trong nhirng hang nay can cir tren tong so lu'ang nu'ac m6i hang khach hang sir dung. Chi phi tien ich cho nu'ac tbi sir dung se du'ac phan phoi 100% cho khach hang trong hang nay. Chi phi tien ich se du'ac phan phoi cho moi hang khach hang theo ca cua long ho. D • CO' CAU MCPC GIA NU'O'C SLP DUNG Ca cau mixc gia de nghi cho nrvoc sie dung gom c6 hai thanh phan: le phi dich vu cc dinh hang thang ("L(§. phi tien ich nubc") va le phi ti@u thy nu6c thay doi ("L(§ phi sie dung nrvbc"). Bon hang khach hang ducc thanh lap - Ngubi dung nu6c thu6c mot gia Binh ri@ng, nhieu gia Binh, cc sb khong phai nha a va nu6c tai sie dung. Chi phi tien nghi s6 ducc phan phoi trong nhixng hang nay can cup tr@n tong so luang nu6c moi hang khach hang sie dung. Chi phi tien ich cho nu6c tai sie dung s6 ducc phan phoi 100% cho khach hang trong hang nay. Chi phi tien ich s6 ducc phan phoi cho moi hang khach hang theo c5 cua d6ng h6. Gia le phi s v dung nu6c s@ co hai bac t y theo ngu6n nu6c va luang n vac san co. MOPc gia Cap 1 by dung de thy lai chi phi khai thac nu6c ngam, chi phi dien de san xuat va phan phoi nu6c do va mot so chi phi khac. MOPc gia Cap 2 ap dung de thy lai chi phi mua nu6c nhap vao t0P ben ngoai. chi phi dien cho viec phan phoi khoi luang nu6c do. Viec phan phoi nu6c cho moi cap s6 can cuptr@n muc cung cap nu6c co san t0P moi ngu6n twang Ong. CO' CAU MCPC GIA NU'O'C THOAT Gia le phi tien ich cho nu6c thoat thay doi va gia le phi dich vu co dinh s6 ducc thay the voi chi mot gia le phi tien ich nrvoc thoat co dinh, can cup theo c5 cua d6ng h6 nrvoc va hang khach hang. GIA LE PHI CO DINH doc lap vai so luang nudc sir dung. Nhivng le phi nay dung de thanh town cac chi phi cc dinh, khong thay doi nhu cac dui an von, tai nudc, phan phoi, long ho nudc va dich vu. GIA LE PHI THAY D6I duac tinh theo so luang nudc di ngang qua long ho cua khach hang. Nhivng chi phi nay dung d- thanh town cho nhivng chi phi nhu tie-n mua nudc, dien va h6a chat loc nudc. NGHI Neu de nghi thay doi mirc gia disc Hoi dong thanh pho chap thuan, tat ca cac dich vu nir&c va nu&c thoat se duo'c lap hda dan theo mire gia neu trong cac bang & nhUng trang sau. 4 d k;wMUC gia Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay hien tai 1 gieng 1, 1 *hang 7, 1 *hang 7, 1 *hang 7, 1 *hang 7, (Moi CCF*) 2020 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAP 1** $3.02 $2.03 $2.17 $2.31 $2.36 $2.41 CAP 2*** $3.59 $4.79 $5.13 $5.46 $5.57 $5.68 NU'O'C TAI $2 42 $2.15 $2.30 $2.45 $2.50 $2.55 SLY DUNG *1 CCF=748 ga-long (khoang 4 lit) * Xem bang Iuang nuac phan phoi cua moi cap. *** Cap 216 Iuang nuac sir dung mot qua Iuang nuac duac phan phoi & Cap 1 Luang oust Luang nuac phan Luang nuac phan Luang nuac phan Ca - phan phoi phoi de nghi cho phoi de nghi cho phoi de nghi cho v'l � ong d"ho hien tai nha to nhan mot co,sa khong phai khu nha a gia dinh nha to nhan nhi6u gia din X 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 10.50 CCF 0 - 31 CCF 3/4 3/4" 3/4" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 16 CCF 0 - 46.5 CCF V. 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 26 CCF 0 - 775 CCF 1 1 /2" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 52.5 CCF 0 - 155 CCF 0 - 8.5 CCF 2" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 84 CCF 0 - 248 CCF moi dan vi a 3" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 184 CCF 0 - 542.5 CCF 4" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 331 CCF 0 - 976.5 CCF 6" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 682.5 CCF 0 - 2,015 CCF 8" 0 - 22 CCF 0 - 1,260 CCF 0 - 3,720 CCF DE NGHI kich th0'o'c • HANG • THANG Le phi Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay met hies tai 1 gieng 1, 1 thong 7, 1 thong 7, 1 thong 7, 1 thong 7, 2020 2020 2021 2022 2023 5/8" x 3/4.. $6.95 $20.51 $21.94 $23.37 $23.84 $24.31 3/4" $15.10 $30.76 $32.91 $35.05 $35.75 $36.47 1 V. 1 $28.65 1 $51.27 1 $54.85 $58.42 $59.59 $60.78 1 1/2" $44.93 $102.53 $109.70 $116.83 $119.17 $121.55 2" $82.90 $164.04 $175.52 $186.93 $190.67 $194.48 3" $137.15 $358.84 $383.96 $408.92 $417.10 $425.44 4" 1 $272.78 1 $645.91 $691.12 $736.04 $750.76 $765.78 6" $435.53 $1,332.83 $1,426.12 $1,518.82 $1,549.20 $1,580.18 8" $435.53 $2,460.60 $2,632.84 $2,803.97 $2,860.05 $2,917.25 Gia le phi hien tai cua moi don vi cua khu nha 6, nhieu gia dinh: $4.75 NHA TU NHAN MOT GIA DINH kich thvdc Le phi met hien tai 5/8" x 3/4" 3/4" V. 11/2" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" $1.68 + (SS of CCFx 0.426) (1 CCF = 748 ga-long) Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay 1 gieng 1, 1 thong 7, 1 thong 7, 1 thong 7, 1 thong 7, 2020 2020 2021 2022 2023 $5.60 $5.88 $6.41 $6.99 $7.62 $7.93 $8.33 $9.08 $9.90 $10.79 $12.59 $13.22 $14.41 1 $15.71 1 $17.12 $24.23 $25.44 $27.73 $30.23 $32.95 $38.20 $40.11 $43.72 $47.65 $51.94 $82.43 $86.55 $94.34 $102.83 $112.08 ^r L-AMIW: $147.62 $155.00 $168.95 $184.16 $200.73 $303.61 $318.79 $347.48 $378.75 $412.84 $559.71 $587.70 $640.59 1 $698.24 1 $761.08 $885.66 $929.94 $1,013.63 $1,104.86 $1,204.30 KHU NHA d NHIEU GIA DINH kich th U'o'c Le phi Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay met hien tai 1 gieng 1, 1 thong 7, 1 thong 7, 1 thong 7, 1 thong 7, 2020 2020 2021 2022 2023 5/8" x 3/4" $8.40 $8.82 $9.61 $10.47 $11.41 3/4" $12.12 $12.73 $13.88 $15.13 $16.49 V. $19.57 $20.55 $22.40 $24.42 $26.62 11/2" $1.68+ $38.20 $40.11 $43.72 $47.65 $51.94 (So of CCF 2^ x 0.426) $60.55 $63.58 $69.30 $75.54 $82.34 3" (1 CCF $131.32 $137.89 $150.30 $163.83 $178.57 = 748 4 ga-16ng) $235.63 1 $247.41 $269.68 $293.95 1 $320.41 $485.21 $509.47 $555.32 $605.30 $659.78 8" $894.97 $939.72 $1,024.29 $1,116.48 $1,216.96 10" $1,416.49 $1,487.31 $1,621.17 $1,767.08 $1,926.12 CO' SO' K$IONG PH(kI NHA CY fr kich th U'o'c Le phi Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay Hieu luc ngay met hien tai 1 gieng 1, 1 thong 7, 1 thong 7, 1 thong 7, 1 thong 7, 2020 2020 2021 2022 2023 5/8" x 3/4" $9.33 $9.80 $10.68 $11.64 $12.69 3/4" $13.52 $14.20 $15.48 $16.87 $18.39 V. $21.90 $23.00 $25.07 $27.33 $29.79 $1.68 + 1 1/2" (SS of $42.85 $44.99 $49.04 $53.45 $58.26 CCFx 2 0.426) $68.00 $71.40 $77.83 $84.83 $92.46 3" $147.62 $155.00 $168.95 $184.16 $200.73 (1 CCF 4" = 748 $264.96 $278.21 $303.25 $330.54 $360.29 ga-long) 6" $545.74 $573.03 $624.60 $680.81 $742.08 8" $1,006.73 $1,057.07 $1,152.21 $1,255.91 $1,368.94 101, $1,593.43 $1,673.10 $1,823.68 $1,987.81 $2,166.71 Khach hang $26.06+ I (So CCF x $40.92 $42.97 $46.84 $51.06 $55.66 FOG USPS PostalOne! Page 1 of 1 Company Detai Company Name INFOSEND INC Address 4240 E LA PALMAAVE ANAHEIM, CA 92807-1816 Contact Name MATT SCHMIDT Phone Number (714)993-2690 Profit Indicator P PS Form 3607R - Mailing Transaction Receipt Account Holder Account Number 9000012400 Account Holder Permit Number 146 Account Holder Permit Type PI Account Holder CRID 8536585 Post Office of Permit ANAHEIM CA92899-9301 Post Office of Mailing ANAHEIM CA92899-9301 Post Office of Permit Cost Center 050222-0218 Post Office of Mailing Cost Center 050222-0218 Mailing Agent Name INFOSEND Mailing Agent CRID 20292842 Mail Owner Name INFOSEND Mail Owner CRID 20292842 JOB ID _ 89506 Customer Reference ID 89506 CAPS Transaction Number N/A Class of Mail USPS Marketing Mail Processing Category Letters Postage Statement ID 355606163 Mailing Group ID 251279781 Mailer's Mailing Date 10/042019 Mailer Declared Total Pieces 45,852 pcs. Mailer Declared Total Weight 4,919.9196 lbs. Mailer Declared Weight of a single -piece 0.1073 lbs. USPS Determined Total Pieces 45,852 pcs. USPS Determined Total Weight 4,919.9196 lbs. USPS Determined Weight of a single -piece 0.1073 lbs. Total Number of Containers 227 Total Adjusted Postage Payment Date and Time Payment Transaction Number Adjustment Transaction Number Mailer Figures Adjusted? Person authorizing adjustment Name Phone Number Acceptance Site Mailer ID Clerk Initials Mail Arrival Date and Time $ 8,515.27 10/042019 14:57 201927716574648M1 No AHG 10/042019 14:14 EXHIBIT 4 https://www.uspspostalone.com/PostageProcessingWeb/receipt.do?popup=yes&pstg_stmt ... 10/07/19 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE PUBLIC HEARING — RESOLUTION AND ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE UPDATED CALIFORNIA AND INTERNATIONAL BUILDING AND FIRE CODES WITH AMENDMENT AND REQUISITE FINDINGS {STRATEGIC PLAN CO. 3, 31 CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 111 Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2ntl Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION Adopt a resolution setting forth findings for required amendments, modifications and changes with respect to the local climatic, geographical and topographical conditions within the City of Santa Ana to the California Building, Residential, Green Standards, Energy, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Fire Codes as amended by the State of California. 2. Adopt an ordinance amending Chapters 8 and 14 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code adopting the State Building Regulations, including the 2018 International Property Maintenance Code, and certain modifications and changes with respect to local climatic, geographical and topographical conditions with the City of Santa Ana to the California Building, Existing Building, Residential, Green Standards, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Energy, and Fire Codes as amended by the State of California. DISCUSSION The State's Health and Safety Code (Section 17958) mandates that the California Building Standards Commission adopt and publish the California Building Standard Code (Title 24 California Code of Regulations) every three years. The 2019 Edition of the California Code of Regulations Title 24, which incorporates the model codes, becomes effective statewide on January 1, 2020. This Ordinance would amend Santa Ana Municipal Code Sections by repealing references to the prior editions of the Construction Codes. Resolution and Ordinance Adopting Updated California and International Building and Fire Codes November 19, 2019 Page 2 The Construction Codes proposed for adoption by reference with amendments include the following: 1. 2019 California Building Code 2. 2019 California Residential Code 3. 2019 California Green Building Standards Code 4. 2019 California Electrical Code 5. 2019 California Mechanical Code 6. 2019 California Plumbing Code 7. 2019 California Energy Code 8. 2019 California Fire Code 9. 2019 California Existing Building Code 10. 2018 International Property Maintenance Code The Planning & Building Agency and Orange County Fire Authority are recommending that certain changes and modifications be made to the 2019 Editions of the California Building, Residential, Green Standards, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical, Fire, and Existing Building Codes that are reasonably necessary due to local conditions in the City of Santa Ana. Other modifications are of an administrative or procedural nature and concern themselves with subjects that are not covered by the Codes or are reasonably necessary to safeguard life and property within the City of Santa Ana. There are a total of seventy-one (71) findings in the Resolution which address twelve (12) amendments to the Residential Code, forty-nine (49) amendments to the Fire Code, and ten (10) amendments to the Building Code (Exhibit 1). The changes to the 2019 California Codes as adopted by the State include revisions to enhance clarity and consistency in the application of the Codes. For example, the structural engineering requirements of the building code has been aligned with major revisions to national standards for structural steel and masonry construction, which stem from research studies from recent seismic and high wind events. In the Green Building standards, electric vehicle charging infrastructure will be required for new parking areas. Also, the California Energy Commission has adopted new requirements for the mandatory installation of solar photovoltaic systems on new homes. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Minh Thai Executive Director Planning and Building Agency MF:rb mflreports\Building Code Update RFCA 11.19.2019 Jim Henery Division Chief Orange County Fire Authority Exhibits: 1. Ordinance California Building Standards Code Amendments 2. Resolution Code Adoption Findings *:1:11-3III i1 LS 11.19.19 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTERS 8 AND 14 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT AND AMEND THERETO THE MOST RECENTLY ENACTED CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE, AND INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Section 8-43 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended such that it reads as follows: Sec. 8-43. Adoption by reference. There is adopted by the city that certain code known as the California Building Code, 2016 2019 Edition, based on the 2415 2018 International Building Code as published by the International Code Council, (hereinafter referred to in this article as the "Building Code," "building code," or "California Building Code"), consisting of "Volume 1", "Volume 2" and the 2,0U 2019 California Existing Building Code (together with subsequent supplements or amendments to any volume, each of which shall become effective, adopted, and incorporated by reference into this Code on the date specified by the state building standards commission, unless otherwise specified), of which not less than one (1) copy of said Code has been and is now on file in the office of the clerk of the council of the city pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 18942(d)(1) and are made available for public inspection. The building code is adopted and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth at length herein as provided for in section 419 of the Charter of the city, except for the changes to the building code set forth in this chapter that specifically amends the Building Code. Any previously enacted, unrepealed provision of the Santa Ana Municipal Code that amended a pre 2016 2019 edition of the "Building Code" shall also be construed as amending the applicable provision of the 2 W 2019 or later edition of the building code. The building code, as thus amended, together with all other provisions of this article, shall be known as the city building code. Appendices which are adopted pursuant to this section are as follows: Appendix I, Patio Covers Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 1 of 36 Appendix J, Grading SECTION 2: Section 8-93 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended and added such that it reads as follows: Secs. 8-92—,8-93. - Reserved. Sec. 8-93. Permit expiration (Volume 1, Chapter 1, Division II, Section 105.5). Chapter 1, Division II, Section 105.5 of the building code is amended to read as a follows: Sec. 105.5 Expiration. Every permit issued shall become invalid unless the work on the site authorized by such permit is commenced within 12 months after its issuance, or if the work authorized on the site by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after the time the work is commenced. The building official is authorized to grant in writing, one or more extensions of time for periods not more than 180 days each. The extension shall be requested in writing and justifiable cause demonstrated. SECTION 3: Section 8-85 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby added such that it reads as follows: Chapter 5, Section 506.4.3 of the California Existing Building Code is amended by adding the following paragraph thereto: The conversion of any portion of an existing building to residential use shall be analyzed for 75 percent of the Design Earthquake Ground motion, as defined in Section 1613.2 of the California Building Code, but in no event shall there be a reduction in the capacity of the seismic force resisting system where such system provides a greater level of protection than the minimum requirements established by this code. Performance - based engineering analysis and design procedures may be used to evaluate the existing structure and the design of strengthening elements when approved by the Building Official. All new structural elements shall meet current detailing requirements of Section 1604 of the California Building Code. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 2 of 36 SECTION 4: Section 8-290 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended such that it reads as follows: Sec. 8-290. Adoption by reference. There is adopted by the city that certain code known as the California Plumbing Code, 2016 2019 Edition, including the following appendices thereto: A, B, D, I and J, (hereinafter referred to in this article as the "Plumbing Code"), together with subsequent supplements or amendments, which shall become effective, adopted and incorporated by reference into this Code on the date specified by the state building standards commission, unless otherwise specified. The plumbing code is adopted and incorporated by reference as fully set forth at length herein as provided for in section 419 of the Charter of the city, except for the changes to the plumbing code set forth in this chapter of this Code that specifically amend the plumbing code. Any previously enacted, unrepealed provision of this Code that amended a pre-2816 2019 edition of the "Plumbing Code" shall also be construed as amending the applicable provision of the 201-6 2019 or later edition of the plumbing code. The plumbing code as amended, together with all other provisions of this article, shall be known as the city plumbing code. SECTION 5: Section 8-340 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended such that it reads as follows: Sec. 8-340. Underground Installation (California Plumbing Code Section 313.5). Section 313.5 of the Plumbing Code is amended to read as follows: 313.5. Underground Installation. Piping in the ground shall be laid on a firm bed for its entire length. Building drains, sewers and storm drain piping systems in the ground, and designed and approved at less than one (1) percent grade, shall be laid on a continuous firm bed, certified by a registered soils engineer as having a compaction level of not less than ninety (90) percent density. Where support is otherwise provided, it shall be approved per Section 301.2 of this code. SECTION 6: Section 8-556 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended such that it reads as follows: Sec. 8-556. Adoption by reference. There is adopted by the city that certain code known as the California Mechanical Code, 2016 2019 edition (hereinafter referred to in this article as the "California Mechanical Code" "Mechanical Code" or "mechanical code"), together with subsequent supplements, amendments, or editions, which shall become effective, adopted, and incorporated by reference into this Code on the date specified by the state building standards commission, unless otherwise specified. The mechanical code is adopted Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 3 of 36 and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth at length herein as provided for in section 419 of the Charter of the city, except for the changes to the mechanical code set forth in this chapter of this Code that specifically amend the mechanical code. Any previously enacted, unrepealed provision of this Code that amended a pre 2016 2019 edition of the "Mechanical Code" shall also be construed as amending the applicable provision of the 204-6 2019 or later edition of the mechanical code. The mechanical code as amended, together with all other provisions of this article, shall be known as the city mechanical code. SECTION 7: Section 8-570 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby removed in its entirety. - - .. ' - fAILNI!I -. � . mDAIIIIIIIIIIIIII rr-MvIrr... Z Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 4 of 36 271111 „- - - -Sec. 8-570. Reserved. SECTION 8: Section 8-667 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended such that it reads as follows: Sec. 8-667. Adoption by reference. There is adopted by the city that certain code known as the California Electrical Code 2016 2019 Edition and the administrative provisions set forth herein, (hereinafter referred to in this article as the "Electrical Code") together with subsequent supplements, amendments, or editions, which shall become effective, adopted, and incorporated by reference into this Code on the date specified by the state building standards commission, unless specifically adopted prior to that date, of which not less than one (1) copy of said Code has been and is now on file in the office of the clerk of the council of the city pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 18942(d)(1) and are made available for public inspection. The electrical code is adopted and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth at length herein as provided for in section 419 of the Charter of the city, except for the changes to the electrical code set forth in this chapter of this code that specifically amend the electrical code. Any previously enacted, unrepealed provision of this Code that amended a pre 201-6 2019 edition of the "Electrical Code" shall also be construed as amending the applicable provision of the 2016 2019 or later edition of the electrical code. The electrical code as amended, together with all other provisions of this article, shall be known as the city electrical code. Annex which are adopted pursuant to this section are as follows: Informative Annex A, Product Safety Standards SECTION 9: The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares that adoption of section 8-942 amending California Electrical Code Section 334.12 is necessary because earthquakes are a common occurrence in the local area; Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 5 of 36 that, unlike wire installed in conduit or raceways, non-metallic sheathed cable does not provide the degree of protection that is needed in the event of an earthquake; that exposed non-metallic sheathed cable is particularly hazardous; and that this amendment is necessary to assure that adequate protection is provided in the workplace and in other places of public gathering. SECTION 10: Section 8-2000 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended such that it reads as follows: Sec. 8-2000. Adoption by reference. There is adopted by the city that certain code known as the 2016 2018 International Property Maintenance Code (hereinafter referred to as the "Property Maintenance Code"), together with subsequent supplements, amendments, or editions, which shall become effective, adopted, and incorporated by reference into this Code on each new official publication date of the International Property Maintenance Code, of which not less than one (1) copy of said Code has been and is now on file in the office of the clerk of the council of the city pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 18942(d)(1) and are made available for public inspection. The said Code is adopted and incorporated as fully as if set forth at length herein as provided for in section 419 of the Charter of the city, except for the changes to the property maintenance code set forth in this chapter of this Code that specifically amends the property maintenance code. Any previously enacted, unrepealed provision of this Code that amended a pre 2015 2018 edition of the 'Property Maintenance Code" shall also be construed as amending the applicable provision of the 2016 2018 or later edition of the property maintenance code. The property maintenance code, as thus amended, together with all other provisions of this article, shall be known as the city property maintenance code. SECTION 11. Section 8-2800 is added to Chapter 8 of the Santa Ana Municipal code to read in full as follows: Sec. 8-2800. Adoption by reference. There is adopted by the city that certain code known as the California Residential Code, 2016 2019 Edition, based on the 2045 2018 International Residential Code as published by the International Code Council, (hereinafter referred to in this article as the "Residential Code" or "California Residential Code"), (together with subsequent supplements or amendments shall become effective, adopted, and incorporated by reference into this Code on the date specified by the state building standards commission, unless otherwise specified), of which not less than one (1) copy of said Code has been and is now on file in the office of the Clerk of the Council of the city pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 18942(d)(1) and are made available for public inspection. The Residential code is adopted and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth at length herein as provided for in section 419 of the Charter of the city, except for the changes to the Residential code set forth in this chapter that specifically amends the Residential Code. The Residential code, as thus amended, Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 6 of 36 together with all other provisions of this article, shall be known as the city Residential code. Appendices which are adopted pursuant to this section, are as follows: Appendix H, Patio Covers Appendix J, Existing Buildings and Structures SECTION 12: Section 8-2810 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended such that it reads as follows: Sec. 8-2810. Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria (Table R301.2(1)). Table R301.2(1) is revised to read: TABLE R301.2(1) CLIMATIC AND GEOGRAPHIC DESIGN CRITERIA GROUND SNOW LOAD WIND DESIGN SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY ' SUBJECT TO DAMAGE FROM WINTER DESIGN TEMP- ICE BARRIER UNDERLAY- MENT REQUIREDh FLOOD HAZARDS a AIR FREEZING INDEXi MEAN ANNUAL TEMPI Speed d mph) Topo- graphic effects" Special indborn Weathering L12-24"He2v wind debris zone- re ion' Zero 110 No No No Ds or E Ne II ible Al No See Exhibit B 0 60 For SI: 1 pound per square foot = 0.0479 kPa, 1 mile per hour = 0.447 m/s. a. Weathering may require a higher strength concrete or grade of masonry than necessary to satisfy the structural requirements of this code. The weathering column shall be filled in with the weathering index (i.e., "negligible," "moderate" or "severe") for concrete as determined from the Weathering Probability Map [Figure R301.2(3)]. The grade of masonry units shall be determined from ASTM C 34, C 55, C 62, C 73, C 90, C 129, C 145, C 216 or C 652. b. The frost line depth may require deeper footings than indicated in Figure R403.1(1). The jurisdiction shall fill in the frost line depth column with the minimum depth of footing below finish grade. C. The jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table to indicate the need for protection depending on whether there has been a history of local subterranean termite damage. Cl. The jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with the wind speed from the basic wind speed map [Figure R301.2(A)].Wind exposure category shall be determined on a site -specific basis in accordance with Section R301.2.1.4. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 7 of 36 e. Temperatures shall be permitted to reflect local climates or local weather experience as determined by the building official. f. The jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with the seismic design category determined from Section R301.2.2.1. g. The jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with (a) the date of the jurisdiction's entry into the National Flood Insurance Program (date of adoption of the first code or ordinance for management of flood hazard areas), (b) the date(s) of the Flood Insurance Study and (c) the panel numbers and dates of all currently effective FIRMS and FBFMs or other flood hazard map adopted by the authority having jurisdiction, as amended. h. In accordance with Sections R905.2.7.1, R905.4.3.1, R905.5.3.1, R905.6.3.1, R905.7.3.1 and R905.8.3.1, where there has been a history of local damage from the effects of ice damming, the jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with "YES." Otherwise, the jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with "NO." i. The jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with the 100-year return period air freezing index (BF -days) from Figure R403.3(2) or from the 100-year (99%) value on the National Climatic Data Center data table "Air Freezing Index- USA Method (Base 32°)" at www.ncdc.noaa.gov/fpsf.htrnl. j. The jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with the mean annual temperature from the National Climatic Data Center data table "Air Freezing Index -USA Method (Base 32°F)" at www.ncdc.noaa.gov/fpsf.html. k. In accordance with Section R301.2.1.5, where there is local historical data documenting structural damage to buildings due to topographic wind speed-up effects, the jurisdiction shall fill in this part of the table with "YES." Otherwise, the jurisdiction shall indicate "NO" in this part of the table. SECTION 13. Section 8-2900 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended such that it reads as follows: Sec. 8-2900. Adoption by reference. There is adopted by the city that certain code known as the California Green Building Standards Code, 2046 2019 Edition, as published by the International Code Council, (hereinafter referred to in this article as the "California Green Building Standards Code"), (effective, adopted, and incorporated by reference into this Code on Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 8 of 36 the date specified by the state building standards commission, unless otherwise specified), of which not less than one (1) copy of said Code has been and is now on file in the office of the clerk of the council of the city pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 18942(d)(1) and are made available for public inspection. The Green Building Standards code is adopted and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth at length herein as provided for in section 419 of the Charter of the city. The California Green Building Standards code, as thus amended, together with all other provisions of this article, shall be known as the city Green Building Standards code. SECTION 14: Section 8-3000 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby added such that it reads as follows: Sec. 8-3000. Adoption by reference. There is adopted by the city that certain code known as the California Energv Code, 2019 Edition, as published by the International Code Council, (hereinafter referred to in this article as the "California Energy Code'), (effective, adopted, and incorporated by reference into this Code on the date specified by the state buildinq standards commission, unless otherwise specified), of which not less than one (1) copy of said Code has been and is now on file in the office of the clerk of the council of the city pursuant to Health and Safetv Code Section 18942(d)(1) and are made available for public inspection. The California Energy Code is adopted and incorporated by reference as though fully set forth at length herein as provided for in section 419 of the Charter of the city. The California Energy Code, as thus amended, together with all other provisions of this article, shall be known as the city Energy code. SECTION 15: Section 14-1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby amended such that it reads as follows: Sec. 14-1. Adoption by reference. There is adopted by the city that certain code known as the California Fire Code 2448 2019 Edition, based on the 2015 2018 International Fire Code as published by the International Code Council, (hereinafter referred to in this article as the "California Fire Code' or "fire code") and the whole thereof including the Appendices therein, errata issued during and after the publishing date, save and except such portions as are hereinafter deleted or amended, of which code not less than one (1) copy has been and is now on file in the office of the clerk of the council of the city pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 18942(d)(1) and are made available for public inspection. Said code is adopted and incorporated as fully as if set forth at length herein and, subject to all amendments set forth in this article, shall be in effect within the city from the effective date of this article. Any provision of this article amending the above mentioned codes shall be construed as amending the 2015 2018 and 2OU 2019 editions thereof including such provisions enacted prior to this adoption of the said 2015 2018 and 2-OU 2019 editions and not thereafter repealed. The International Fire Code, 2015 2018 Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 9 of 36 edition and the California Fire Code 241-6 2019 edition, as thus amended, together with all other provisions of this article, shall be known as the "Fire Code of the City of Santa Ana." SECTION 16: Section 14-3.1 is hereby amended and revised as follows: Sec. 14-3.1. - Violation penalties (Section 109 4 110.4). Section 109 4 110.4 Violation penalties. 110.4 Violation penalties. Persons who shall violate a provision of this code or shall fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof or shall fail to comply with any issued orders or notices or who shall erect, install, alter, repair or do work in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the fire code official, or of a permit or certificate used under provisions of this code, shall be subject to penalties assessed as prescribed in the OCFA Prevention Field Services adopted fee schedule. Each day that a violation continues after due notice has been served shall be deemed a separate offense. (a) Section 109.4.2110.4.2 Infraction and misdemeanor is hereby added as follows: 1013 42110.4.2 Infraction and misdemeanor. Persons operating or maintaining any occupancy, premises or vehicle subject to this code that shall permit any fire or life safety hazard to exist on premises under their control shall be guilty of an infraction. Persons who fail to take immediate action to abate a fire or life safety hazard when ordered or notified to do so by the chief or a duly authorized representative are guilty of a misdemeanor. Secs.14-4-14-9. Reserved. SECTION 17: Section 14-21 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 14-21. - Definitions (Section 202). Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 10 of 36 Chapter 2 Definitions is adopted in its entirety with the following amendment: Section 202 General Definitions is hereby revised by adding "OCFA," sky ' a and "Spark Arrester" as follows: 202 General Definitions OCFA- Orange County Fire Authority, fire authority having jurisdiction. Wall N*W SPARK ARRESTER- A listed device constructed of noncombustible material specifically for the purpose of meeting one of the following conditions: Removing and retaining carbon and other flammable particles/debris from the exhaust flow of an internal combustion engine in accordance with California Vehicle Code Section 38366. Fireplaces that burn solid fuel in accordance with California Building Code Chapter 28. SECTION 18: Section 14-22 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 14-22. - General requirements (Chapter 3). Chapter 3 General Requirements. Adopt Chapter 3 in its entirety, with the exception of Sections 308.1.4, 311.5 through 311.5.5, 318, and 319, and with the following amendments: (a) Section 0, .1.2 Vegetation. Type, arneuRt, 9F aFraRgernent of weeds, grass, Vines OGGUpant of the pmn.s in accordance with OCFA Guideline G 05 WegetatieR ._ Weeds, arass. vines or other arowth that is capable of beina ianited and endangering property, shall be cut down and removed by the owner or occupant of the premises. Vegetation clearance requirement in urban-wildland interface areas shall be in accordance with Chapter 49. Type, amount, arrangement, and maintenance of vegetation in a fuel modification area, interior slope, or similarly hazardous area shall be in accordance with OCFA Guideline C-05 "Vegetation Manaaement Guideline —Technical Desian for New Construction. Fuel Modification Plans, and Maintenance Program." Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 11 of 36 (b) Section 305.6 Hazardous Conditions is hereby amended as follows: Hazardous305.6 Outdoor fires burning wood or other solid fuel are not allowed when any of the following conditions applies: 1. when predicted sustained winds exceed 8 MPH and relative humidity is less than 25%, or a red flag condition has been declared 2. when an official sign was caused to be posted by the fire code official, or a public announcement is made No outdoor fires using any fuel type are permitted when predicted sustained winds exceed 20 MPH or when such fires present a hazard as determined by the fire code official. (c) Section 305.7 Disposal of rubbish is hereby added as follows: 305.7 Disposal of rubbish. Rubbish, trash or combustible waste material shall be burned only within an approved incinerator and in accordance with Section 307.2.1. (d) Section 307 OPEN BURNING, RECREATIONAL FIRES AND PORTABLE OUTDOOR FIREPLACES is hereby revised as follows: SECTION 307 OPEN BURNING, RECREATIONAL FIRES, FIRE PITS, FIRE RINGS, AND PORTABLE OUTDOOR FIREPLACES Section 307 307.6 Outdoor Fireplaces, fire Pits, Fire Rings, or similar devices used at Group R Occupancies is hereby added as follows: 307.6 Outdoor Fireplaces, Fire Pits, Fire Rings, or similar devices used at Group R Occupancies. Outdoor fireplaces, fire pits, fire rings, or similar exterior devices used at Group R shall comply with this section. Exception: Barbeques, grills, and other portable devices intended solely for cooking. 307.6.1 Gas -fueled devices. Outdoor fireplaces, fire pits and similar devices fueled by natural gas or liquefied -petroleum gas are allowed when approved by the Building Department and the device is designed to only burn a gas flame and not wood or other solid fuel. At R-3 occupancies, combustible construction Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 12 of 36 shall not be located within three feet of an atmospheric column that extends vertically from the perimeter of the device. At other R occupancies, the minimum distance shall be ten feet. Where a permanent Building Department approved hood and vent is installed, combustible construction may encroach upon this column between the bottom of the hood and the vent opening. Where chimneys or vents are installed, they shall have a spark arrester as defined in Section 202. Section 307.6.2 Devices using wood or fuels other than natural gas or liquefied -petroleum gas is hereby amended as follows: 307.6.2 Devices usina wood or fuels other than natural aas or liauefied- . • nnra„11. _ ME Permanent outdoor fireplaces burning wood or other solid fuel shall be constructed in accordance with the California Building Code with clearance from combustible construction and building openings as required therein. Fires in a fireplace shall be contained within a firebox with an attached chimney. The opening in the face of the firebox shall have an installed and maintained method of arresting sparks. The burning of wood or other solid fuel in a device is not allowed within 25 feet of combustible structures, unless within an approved permanent fireplace. Conditions which could cause a fire to spread within 25 feet of a structure or to vegetation shall be eliminated prior to ignition. Fires in devices burning wood or solid fuel shall be in accordance with Sections 305, 307, and 308. Exceptions: 1. Portable fireplaces and fire rings/pits equipped with a device to arrest sparks shall be located at least 3' from combustible construction at R-3 occupancies, 2. Portable fireplaces, and fire pits/rings equipped with a device to arrest sparks shall be located at least 15 feet from combustible structures at other R occupancies. Section 307.6.2.1 Where prohibited is hereby amended as follows: Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 13 of 36 The burning of wood and other solid fuels shall not be conducted within a fuel modification zone, Wildfire Risk Area (WRA), Wildland-Urban Interface Area (WUI), or in locations where conditions could cause the spread of fire to the WRA or WUI. Exceptions: 1. Permanent fireplaces that are not located in a fuel modification zone 2. Where determined by the Fire Code Official that the location or design of the device should reasonably prevent the start of a wildfire. (e) Section 308.1.6.3 Sky lanterns is hereby revised as follows: 308.1.6.3 Sky lanterns. A person shall not ignite, release, or cause to be released aq untet, cth`red sky lantern. (f) Section 309,21 309.3.1 Indoor charging of electric carts/cars is hereby removed. (g) Section 320 321 Fuel Modification Requirements for New Construction is hereby amended as follows: 320 321 Fuel Modification Requirements for New Construction. All new structures and facilities adjoining land containing hazardous combustible vegetation shall be approved and in accordance with the requirements of OCFA Guideline C- 05 "Vegetation Management Guideline — Technical Design for New Construction Fuel Modification Plans and Maintenance Program." Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 14 of 36 (h) Section 324 322 Clearance of brush or vegetation growth from roadways is hereby amended as follows: 324 322 Clearance of brush or vegetation growth from roadways. The fire code official is authorized to cause areas within 10 feet (3048 mm) on each side of portions of highways and private streets which are improved, designed or ordinarily used for vehicular traffic, to be cleared of flammable vegetation and other combustible growth. Measurement shall be from the flow -line or the end of the improved edge of the roadway surfaces. Exception: Single specimens of trees, ornamental shrubbery or cultivated ground cover such as green grass, ivy, succulents or similar plants used as ground covers, provided that they do not form a means of readily transmitting fire. (i) Section 322 323 Unusual Circumstances is hereby amended as follows: 322 323 Unusual circumstances. The fire code official may suspend enforcement of the vegetation management requirements and require reasonable alternative measures designed to advance the purpose of this code if determined that in any specific case that any of the following conditions exist: 1. Difficult terrain. 2. Danger of erosion. 3. Presence of plants included in any state and federal resources agencies, California Native Plant Society and county -approved list of wildlife, plants, rare, endangered and/or threatened species. 4. Stands or groves of trees or heritage trees. 5. Other unusual circumstances that make strict compliance with the clearance of vegetation provisions undesirable or impractical. (j) Section 323 324 Use of Equipment is hereby added as follows: 323 324 Use of equipment. Except as otherwise provided in this section, no person shall use, operate, or cause to be operated in, upon or adjoining any hazardous fire area any internal combustion engine which uses hydrocarbon fuels, unless the engine is equipped with a spark arrester as defined in Section 202 maintained in effective working order, or the engine is constructed, equipped and maintained for the prevention of fire. Exception: 1. Engines used to provide motor power for trucks, truck tractors, buses, and passenger vehicles, except motorcycles, are not subject to this section if the exhaust system is equipped with a muffler as defined in the Vehicle Code of the State of California. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 15 of 36 2. Turbocharged engines are not subject to this section if all exhausted gases pass through the rotating turbine wheel, there is no exhaust bypass to the atmosphere, and the turbocharger is in good mechanical condition. (k) Section 323 1 324.1 Use of Equipment and Devices Generating Heat, Sparks or Open Flames is hereby amended as follows: 323.1 324.1 Equipment and devices generating heat, sparks or open flames. During any time of the year within Wildfire Risk Areas, within or immediately adjacent to any forest- or brush -covered land or non -irrigated grass -covered land, no person shall use or operate any welding equipment, cutting torches, tar pots, grinding devices, or other tools or equipment that may produce a spark, fire, or flame that could result in a wildfire without doing the following: 1. First clearing away all flammable material, including snags, from the area around such operation for a distance of 30 feet or other approved method to reduce fire spread into the wildlands. If 30 foot clearing cannot be achieved then an alternate method shall be approved by the AHJ prior to work starting. 2. Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46) inches and one backpack pump water -type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready for use at the immediate area during the operation. 3. Stop work when winds are 8 MPH during periods when relative humidity is less than 25%, or a red flag condition has been declared or public announcement is made, when an official sign was caused to be posted by the fire code official, or when such fires present a hazard as determined by the fire code official. 4. Keep a cell phone nearby and call 911 immediately in case of a fire. (1) Section 323 2 324.2 Spark Arresters is hereby added as follows: 3232 324.2 Spark arresters. Spark arresters shall comply with Section 202, and when affixed to the exhaust system of engines or vehicles subject to Section 323 324 shall not be placed or mounted in such a manner as to allow flames or heat from the exhaust system to ignite any flammable material. SECTION 19: Section 14-23 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 14-23. - Emergency planning and preparedness (Chapter 4). Chapter 4: Emergency Planning and Preparedness. Only the following Sections listed below are adopted: Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 16 of 36 2 401.3.4 3. 401.0 4. 402 5. 403 7. 407 1. 401 — 401.9 2. 402 3. 403.2 4. 403.5 — 403.5.4 5. 403.10.2.1.1 6. 403.13 — 403.13.3 7. 404.5 — 404.6.6 8. 407 SECTION 20: Section 14-24 is hereby amended as follows Sec. 14-24. - Fire service features (Chapter 5). Chapter 5 Fire Service Features is adopted in its entirety with the following amendments: (a) SECTION 501.1 Scope is revised to read as follows: Fire service features for buildings. structures and Dremises shall comply with this chapter and, where required by the fire code official, with OCFA Guideline B-09, "Fire Master Plan for Commercial & Residential Development." Fire service features for buildings, structures and premises located in State Responsibility Areas, and Local Responsibility Areas designated as Very High Hazard Fire Severity Zone shall also comply with OCFA Guideline B-09a, "Fire Safe Development in State Responsibility Areas, and Local Responsibility Areas designated as Very High Hazard Fire Severity Zone". (b) Section 505.1 Address Identification is revised as follows Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 17 of 36 505.1 Address identification. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Where required by the fire code official, address numbers shall be provided in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Address numbers shall be Arabic numbers or alphabetical letters. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches (101.6 mm) high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inch (12.7 mm) for R-3 occupancies, for all other occupancies the numbers shall be a minimum of 6 inches high with a minimum stroke width of 1 inch. Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other sign or means shall be used to identify the structure. Address numbers shall be maintained. (c) Section 510.1 Emergency responder radio coverage in new buildings is revised to read as follows: 510.1 Emergency responder radio coverage in new buildings. All new buildings shall have approved radio coverage for emergency responders within the building based upon the existing coverage levels of the public safety communication systems of the utilized by the jurisdiction measured at the exterior of the building. This section shall not require improvement of the existing public safety communication systems. The Emergency Responder Radio Coverage System shall comply with the Orange County Sheriff's Department, Communications and Technology Division guidelines and specifications and, where the functionality or performance requirements in the California Fire Code are more stringent, this code. Exceptions: rWarn IIIIIIIU rim Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 18 of 36 3. Strusta;es that arethree Stories OF less without subte, raneaR sterage e paFkiRg and that do not exceed 50,000 squaF8 feet on any single stefy-. 4. Weed wastwcted residentai Structures fouste; eS eF less i.A.futheut subterranean storage o aPkinn that a not h 'It integral to an above pro, end multi stery parkin str n4 r e. 5. Qheuld n nstr ot'on that 's three stories or loos that does not exceed 50,000 squaFe foot OR aRy SiRgle Sten, 'n..lu de subterranean storage n narking then this ontinanse hall apply only to the subterranean areas. In buildings or structures where it is determined by the fire code official that the radio coverage system is not needed, including but not limited to the following: a. Existinq buildings or structures, unless required by the Building Official and OCFA for buildings and structures undergoing extensive remodel and/or expansion. b. Elevators. c. Structures that meet all of the following: i. Three stories or less, and ii. Do not have subterranean storage or parking, and iii. Do not exceed 50,000 square feet on any single story. d. Structures that meet all of the following: i. Residential structures four stories or less, and ii. Constructed of wood, and iii. Do not have subterranean storage or parking, and iv. Are not built integral to an above ground multi -story parking structure. Should a structure that is three stories or less and 50,000 square feet or smaller on any single story include subterranean storage or parking then this ordinance shall apply only to the subterranean areas. 2. In facilities where emeraencv responder radio coveraae is reauired and such systems, components or equipment required could have a negative impact on the normal operations of the facility, the fire code official shall have the authoritv to accept an automaticallv activated emeraencv radio coverage system (d) Section 510.2 Emergency responder radio coverage in existing buildings is deleted without replacement. (e) Section 510.3 Permit required is deleted without replacement. (ef) Section 510.4.2.2 Technical Criteria is revised to read as follows: adopted without amendment. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 19 of 36 (fg) Section 510.5.1 Approval prior to installation is adopted without amendment.. (9h) Section 510.5.2 Minimum qualification of personnel is removed without replacement. system designer and lead installation per-sGnnel shall 'RGlude beth ef the fellc)WiRg� 1. A valid F=CG issued general radio operator's license. 2. GeFtiftat'Gn of in building system training issued by a Patienally F8GGgRized Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 20 of 36 without 1 GGverage system is required, and upon completion of installatieR, the buildiRg GWRGF shall have the Fadwo system tested to- ens-w-m- that tv.re- Way GOVeFagele m manh finor of the building us RGt less thaR •• - 91-�T-T37 ■ ml• 1 adopted without We Will Z __ ■ • ■ Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 21 of 36 SECTION 21: Section 14-30 is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 14-30. - Fire protection and Life Safety Systems (Chapter 9). Chapter 9 Fire protection and Life Safety Systems is adopted in its entirety with the following amendments: (a) Section 903.2 Where required is hereby amended as follows: 903.2 Where required. Approved automatic sprinkler systems in buildings and structures shall be provided when one of the following conditions exists: 1. New buildings: Notwithstanding any applicable provisions of Sections 903.2.1 through 903.2.19, an automatic fire -extinguishing system shall also be installed in all occupancies when the total building area exceeds 5,000 square feet (465 m2) as defined in Section 202, regardless of fire areas or allowable area, or is more than two stories in height. Exception: Subject to approval by the Fire Code Official, open parking garages in accordance with Section 406.5 of the California Building Code. 2. Existing Buildings: Notwithstanding any applicable provisions of this code, an automatic sprinkler system shall be provided in an existing building when an addition occurs and one of the following conditions exists: a. When an addition is 33% or more of the existing building area, and the resulting building area exceeds 5000 square feet (465 m2) as defined in Section 202; or b. When an addition exceeds 2000 square feet (186 m2) and the resulting building area exceeds 5000 square feet (465 m2) as defined in Section 202; or c. An additional story is added above the second floor regardless of fire areas or allowable area. Exception: Group R-3 occupancies shall comply with Section 903.2.8. (b) Section 903.3.5.3 Hydraulically calculated systems is hereby added as follows: 903.3.5.3 Hydraulically calculated systems. The design of hydraulically calculated fire sprinkler systems shall not exceed 90% of the water supply capacity Exception: When static pressure exceeds 100 psi, and required by the Fire Code Official, the fire sprinkler system shall not exceed water supply capacity specified by Table 903.3.5.3 Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 22 of 36 SECTION 22: Section 14-31 is hereby amended and added to read as follows: Sec. 14-31. — Energy Systems (Chapter 12). Chapter 12 Energy Systems is adopted in its entirety with the following amendments added: 1201.1.1 Other Systems Where required by the fire code official, other systems and operations including but not limited to battery systems assembly, battery reconditioning and storage, research and development of battery storage systems, electric vehicle manufacturing and testing and battery charging systems for cars and carts inside of buildings or structures, shall comply with this chapter. SECTION 23: Section 14-32 is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 14-32. — Construction requirements for Existing Buildings (Chapter 11). Chapter 11 Construction Requirements for Existing Buildings: Only the following Sections and Subsections are adopted: 1103.7 1103.7.3 1103.7.3.1 1103.7.8 — 1103.7.8.2 1103.7.9 — 1103.7.9.10 1103.8 — 1103.8.5.3 1103.9.1 1107 1113 1114 1115 1116 SECTION 24: Section 14-33 is hereby removed as follows: Ayintann Farmlit0es (Chapter ten` Sec. 14-33. RESERVED. SECTION 25: Section14-34 is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 14-34. - Lumber Yards and Agro-Industrial, Solid Biomass and Woodworking Facilities (Chapter 28). Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 24 of 36 Chapter 28 Lumber Yards and Agro-Industrial. Solid Biomass and Woodworking Facilities is adopted in its entirety with the following amendments: (a) Section 2801.2 Permit is hereby amended ; adding the fe!!e ing stateMert ,e the lasts sentence revised as follows: 2801.2 Permit. Permits shall be required as set forth in Section 105.6. €er M'SGe"aReGUS Ge^ b st;b!e Stwaap Pe.^ gee Seetie^ and 105.6.29. (b) Section 2808.2 Storage site is hereby amended revised as follows 2808.2 Storage site. Storage sites shall be level and on solid ground, elevated soil lifts or other all-weather surface. Sites shall be thoroughly cleaned and approval obtained from the fire code official obtained before transferring products to the site. (c) Section 2808.3 Size of piles is hereby amendpd revised as follows: 2808.3 Size of piles. Piles shall not exceed 15 feet (457FnrR) in height, 50 feet 45 '^� in width and 100 feet (30-480-mm) in length. Exception: The fire code official is authorized to allow the pile size to be increased where a fire protection plan is provided for approval that includes, but is not limited to, the following: 1. Storage yard areas and materials -handling equipment selection, design and arrangement shall be based upon sound fire prevention and protection principles. 2. Factors that lead to spontaneous heating shall be identified in the plan, and control of the various factors shall be identified and implemented, including provisions for monitoring the internal condition of the pile. 3. The plan shall include means for early fire detection and reporting to the public fire department; and facilities needed by the fire department for fire extinguishment including a water supply and fire hydrants. 4. Fire apparatus access roads around the piles and access roads to the top of the piles shall be established, identified and maintained. 5. Regular yard inspections by trained personnel shall be included as part of an effective fire prevention maintenance program. Additional fire protection called for in the plan shall be provided and shall be installed in accordance with this code. The increase of the pile size shall be based upon the capabilities of the installed fire protection system and features. (d) Section 2808.4 Pile Separation is hereby added as follows: Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 25 of 36 2808.4. Pile separation. Piles shall be separated from adjacent piles by -a minimum distance of 20 feet. Additionally, piles shall have a minimum separation of 100 feet from combustible vegetation. (ee) Section 2808.7 Pile fire protection is hereby revised as follows: 2808.7 Pile fire protection. Automatic sprinkler protection shall be provided in conveyor tunnels and combustible enclosures that pass under a pile. Combustible conveyor systems and enclosed conveyor systems shall be equipped with an approved automatic sprinkler system. Oscillating sprinklers with a sufficient projectile reach are required to maintain a 40% to 60% moisture content and wet down burning/smoldering areas. (fg) Section 2808.9 Material -handling equipment, is hereby revised as follows: 2808.9 Material -handling equipment. All material handling equipment operated by an internal combustion engine shall be provided and maintained with an approved spark arrester. Approved material -handling equipment shall be available for moving wood chips, hogged material, wood fines and raw product during fire -fighting operations. (gh)Section 2808.11 Temperature control, is hereby added as follows: 2808.11 Temperature control. The temperature shall be monitored and maintained as specified in Sections 2808.11.1 and 2808.11.2. (hi) Section 2808.11.1 Pile temperature control, is hereby added as follows: 2808.11.1 Pile temperature control. Piles shall be rotated when the internal temperature readings are in excess of 165 degrees Fahrenheit. (ij) Section 2808.11.2 New material temperature control, is hereby added as follows: 2808.11.2 New material temperature control. New loads delivered to the facility shall be inspected and tested at the facility entry prior to taking delivery. Material with temperature exceeding 165 degrees Fahrenheit shall not be accepted on the site. New loads shall be monitored to verify that the temperature remains stable. (jk) Section 2808.12 Water availability is hereby added as follows: 2808.12 Water Availability. Facilities with over 2500 cubic feet shall provide a water supply. The minimum fire flow shall be no less than 500 GPM @ 20 psi for a minimum of 1 hour duration for pile heights up to 6 feet and 2 hour duration for pile heights over 6 feet. If there is no water purveyor, an alternate water supply with storage tank(s) shall be provided for fire suppression. The water supply tank(s) shall provide a minimum capacity of 2500 gallons per pile (maximum 30,000 gallons) for piles not exceeding 6 feet in height and 5000 gallons per pile (maximum 60,000) for piles exceeding 6 feet in height. Water tank(s) shall not be used for any other purpose unless the required fire flow is left in reserve within the tank at all times. An Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 26 of 36 approved method shall be provided to maintain the required amount of water within the tank(s). (kl) Section 2808.13 Tipping area is hereby added as follows: 2808.13 Tipping areas shall comply with the following: 1. Tipping areas shall not exceed a maximum area of 50 feet by 50 feet. 2. Material within a tipping area shall not exceed 5 feet in height at any time. 3. Tipping areas shall be separated from all piles by a 20 foot wide fire access lane. 4. A fire hydrant or approved fire water supply outlet shall be located within 150 feet of all points along the perimeter of the tipping area. 5. All material within a tipping area shall be processed within 5 days of receipt. (tm)Section 2808.14 Emergency Contact is hereby added as follows: 2808.14 Emergency Contact. The contact information of a responsible person or persons shall be provided to the Fire Department and shall be posted at the entrance to the facility for responding units. The responsible party should be available to respond to the business in emergency situations SECTION 26: Section 14-35 is hereby added to read as follows: Chapter 49 Requirements for Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Areas Chapter 49 Requirements for Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Areas is adopted in its entirety with the following amendments: Section 4906.3 Requirements is hereby revised as follows: 4906.3 Requirements. Hazardous vegetation and fuels around all applicable buildings and structure shall be maintained in accordance with the following laws and regulations: 1. Public Resources Code, Section 4291. 2. California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 1.5, Chapter 7, Subchapter 3, Section 1299 (see guidance for implementation "General Guideline to Create Defensible Space"). 3. California Government Code, Section 51182. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 27 of 36 4. California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 Chapter 7, Subchapter 1, Section 3.07. 5. OCFA Guideline C-05 "Vegetation Management Guideline — Technical Design for New Construction Fuel Modification Plans and Maintenance Program." Section 4908 Fuel Modification Requirements for New Construction is hereby added as follows: 4908 Fuel Modification Requirements for New Construction. All new buildings to be built or installed in a Wildfire Risk Area shall comply with the following: 1. Preliminary fuel modification plans shall be submitted to and approved by the fire code official prior to or concurrently with the approval of any tentative map. 2. Final fuel modification plans shall be submitted to and approved by the fire code official prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 3. The fuel modification plans shall meet the criteria set forth in the Fuel VUIUGIII It: — I CGI II IR:c71 VCSILj and Maintenance Program." 3.1 The fuel modification plan shall include provisions for the maintenance of the fuel modification in perpetuity. 4. The fuel modification plan may be altered if conditions change. Any alterations to the fuel modification areas shall have prior approval from the fire code official. 5. All elements of the fuel modification plan shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plan and are subject to the enforcement process outlined in the Fire Code. SECTION 27: Section 14-39 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 14-39. - Flammable and combustible liquids (Chapter 57). Flammable and Combustible Liquids (Chapter 57) is adopted in its entirety with the exception of Section 5707 and with the following amendment: Section 5701.1.1 On -Demand Mobile fueling is added as follows: SECTION 28: Section 14-40 is hereby added as follows: Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 28 of 36 Sec. 14-40. — Flammable Gases and Flammable Cryogenic Fluids (Chapter 58) Chapter 58 Flammable Gases and Flammable Cryogenic Fluids is adopted with the exception of section 5809, in its entirety and with the following amendment: Section 5801.1 Scope is revised as follows: Section 5801.1 Scope. The storage and use of flammable gases and flammable cryogenic fluids shall be in accordance with this chapter, NFPA 2 and NFPA 55. Compressed gases shall also comply with Chapter 53 and cryogenic fluids shall also comply with Chapter 55. Flammable cryogenic fluids shall comply with Section 5806. Hydrogen motor fuel -dispensing stations and repair garages and their associated above -ground hydrogen storage systems shall also be designed, constructed and maintained in accordance with Chapter 23. Mobile fueling of gaseous and liquid hydrogen, compressed natural gas (CNG), and liquefied natural gas (LNG) into the fuel tanks of vehicles is prohibited. Exceptions: 1. Gases used as refriaerants in refriaeration systems (see Section 6 2. Liquefied petroleum gases and natural gases regulated by Chapter 61. 3. Fuel -gas systems and appliances regulated under the California Mechanical Code and the California Plumbing Code other than gaseous hydrogen systems and appliances. 4. P_yrophoric gases in accordance with Chapter 64. SECTION 29: Section 14-41 is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 14-41. - Referenced standards (Chapter 80). (a) NFPA 13, 2016 Edition, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems is hereby amended as follows: (1) Section 6.7.3 is hereby amended as follows: Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 29 of 36 Fire department connections (FDC) shall be of an approved type. The location shall be approved and be no more than 150 feet from a public hydrant. The FDC may be located within 150 feet of a private fire hydrant when aporoved by the fire code official. The size of piping and the number of 2'/2" inlets shall be approved by the fire code official. If acceptable to the water authority, it may be installed on the backflow assembly. Fire department inlet connections shall be painted OSHA safety red or as approved. When the fire sprinkler density design requires more than 500 qpm (including inside hose stream demand), or a standpipe system is included, four 2'/2" inlets shall be provided. (2) Section 8.3.3.1 is hereby amended as follows: 8.3.3.1. When fire sprinkler systems are installed in shell buildings of undetermined use (Spec Buildings) other than warehouses (S occupancies), fire sprinklers of the quick -response type shall be used. Use is considered undetermined if a specific tenant/occupant is not identified at the time the fire sprinkler plan is submitted. Sprinklers in light hazard occupancies shall be one of the following: Quick -response type as defined in 3.6.4.8 2. Residential sprinklers in accordance with the requirements of 8.4.5 3. Quick response CMSA sprinklers 4. ESFR sprinklers 5. Standard -response sprinklers used for modifications or additions to existing light hazard systems equipped with standard -response sprinklers 6. Standard -response sprinklers used where individual standard -response sprinklers are replaced in existing light hazard systems (3) Section 8.15.1.2.7 is hereby added and revised as follows: 8.15.1.2.7 Concealed spaces filled with noncombustible insulation shall not require sprinkler protection when approved by the fire code official. (.3 4) Section 11.1.1.1 is hereby added as follows: 11.1.1.1 When fire sprinkler systems are reauired in buildinas of undetermined use other than warehouses, they shall be designed and installed to have a fire sprinkler density of not less than that required for an Ordinary Hazard Group 2 use, with no reduction(s) in density or design area. Warehouse fire sprinkler systems shall be designed to Figure 16.2.1.3.2 (d) curve "G". Use is considered Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 30 of 36 undetermined if a specific tenant/occupant is not identified at the time the sprinkler plan is submitted. Where a subsequent occupancy requires a system with greater capability, it shall be the responsibility of the occupant to upgrade the system to the required density for the new occupancy. (4 5) Section 11.2.3.1.1.1 is hereby added as follows: 11.2.3.1.1.1 The available water supply for fire sprinkler system design shall be determined by one of the following methods, as approved by the Fire Code Official: 1) Subtract the project site elevation from the low water level for the appropriate pressure zone and multiply the result by 0.433; 2) Use a maximum of 40 psi, if available; approved third party licensed in the State of California. NFPA 13D 2016 Edition. Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two -Family Dwellings and Manufactured Homes is hereby amended as follows: Section 7.1.2 is hereby revised as follows: 7.1.2 The sprinkler system piping shall not have separate control valves installed unless supervised by a central station, proprietary, or remote station alarm service one of the following methods: (1) Central station, proprietary, or remote station alarm service. (2) Local alarm service that causes the sounding of an audible signal at a constantly attended location. (3) Valves that are locked open. NFPA 14, 2013 Edition, Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems is hereby amended as follows: Section 7.3.1.1 is hereby is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows: 7.3.1.1 Class I and III Standpipe hose connections shall be unobstructed and shall be located not less than 18 inches or more than 24 inches above the finished floor. Class II Standpipe hose connections shall be unobstructed and shall be located not less than 3 feet or more than 5 feet above the finished floor Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 31 of 36 Section 6.2.8.1 is hereby added as follows: 6.2.8.1 All indicating valves controlling fire suppression water supplies shall be painted OSHA red. Exceptions: 1. Brass or bronze valves on sprinkler risers mounted to the exterior of the building may be left unpainted. 2. Where OS&Y valves on the detector check assembly are the only control valves, at least one OS&Y valve shall be painted red. Section 6.2.9 is hereby amended as follows: All connections to private fire service mains for fire protection systems shall be arranged in accordance with one of the following so that they can be isolated: (1) A post indicator valve installed not less than 40 ft (12 m) from the building (a) For buildings less than 40 ft (12 m) in height a post indicator valve shall be permitted to be installed closer than 40 ft (12 m) but at least as far from the building as the height of the wall facing the post indicator valve. (2) A wall post indicator valve (3) An indicating valve in a pit, installed in accordance with Section 6.4 (4) A backflow preventer with at least one indicating valve not less than 40 ft (12 m) from the building (a) For buildings less than 40 ft (12 m) in height, a backflow preventer with at least one indicating valve shall be permitted to be installed closer than 40 ft (12 m) but at least as far from the building as the height of the wall facing the backflow preventer. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 32 of 36 (raMontrol valves installed in a fire -rated room accessible from the exterior. (-76)Control valves in a fire -rated stair enclosure accessible from the exterior. Section 10.1.5 is hereby added as follows: 10.1.5 All ferrous pipe and joints shall be polyethylene encased per AWWA C150, Method A, B, or C. All fittings shall be protected with a loose 8- mil polyethylene tube or sheet. The ends of the tube or sheet shall extend past the joint by a minimum of 12 inches and be sealed with 2 inch wide tape approved for underground use. Galvanizing does not meet the requirements of this section. Exception: 304 or 316 Stainless Steel pipe and fittings Section 10.4.1.1 is herebv revised as follows: 10.4.1.1 All bolted joint accessories shall be cleaned and thoroughly coated with asphalt or other corrosion -retarding material after installation. Exception: Bolted joint accessories made from 304 or 316 stainless steel. Section 10.4.1.1.1 is hereby added as follows: 10.4.1.1.1 All bolts used in pipe -joint assembly shall be 316 stainless steel. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 33 of 36 Section 10.4.3.2 is herebv deleted and replaced as follows 10.4.3.2 Where approved private fire service mains supplying systems within the building shall be permitted to extend more than 10 ft. under the building when all of the requirements of 10.4.3.2.1 through 10.4.3.2.4 are met. Where fire service mains enter the building adjacent to the foundation, the pipe may run under a building to a maximum of 24 inches, as measured from the interior face of the exterior wall to the center of the vertical pipe. The pipe under the building or building foundation shall be 304 or 316 stainless steel and shall not contain mechanical ioints or it shall comply with 10.4.3.2.1 through 10.4.3.2.4. SECTION 30: Section 14-47 is hereby amended to read as follows Sec. 14-47. Appendices. Appendix A is deleted in its entirety without amendments. Appendix B is adopted in its entirety witheat amendments outlined in Guideline B-09. Appendix BB is adopted in its entirety without amendments. Appendix C is adopted in its entirety without amendments. Appendix CC is adopted in its entiretv without amendments Appendix D is deleted in its entirety without amendments. Appendix E is deleted in its entirety without amendments. Appendix F is deleted in its entirety without amendments. Appendix G is deleted in its entirety without amendments. Appendix H is deleted in its entirety without amendments. Appendix I is deleted in its entirety without amendments. Appendix J is deleted in its entirety without amendments. Appendix K is deleted in its entirety without amendments. Appendix L is deleted in its entirety without amendments. Appendix M is deleted in its entirety without amendments. Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 34 of 36 Appendix N is deleted in its entirety without amendments. Appendix O is deleted in its entirety without amendments. SECTION 31: All provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal Code which are repeated herein are repeated solely in order to comply with the provisions of Section 418 of the City Charter. Any such restatement of existing provisions of the Code is not intended, nor shall it be interpreted, as constituting a new action or decision of the City Council, but rather such provisions are repeated for tracking purposes only in conformance with the Charter. SECTION 32: Neither the adoption of this ordinance nor the repeal hereby of any ordinance shall in any manner affect the prosecution for violation or ordinances, which violations were committed prior to the effective date hereof, nor be construed as affecting any of the provisions of such ordinance relating to the collection of any such license or penalty or the penal provision applicable to any violation thereof, nor to affect the validity of any bond or cash deposit in lieu thereof, required to be posted, filed or deposited pursuant to any ordinance and all rights and obligations there under appertaining shall continue in full force and effect. SECTION 33: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. ADOPTED this _ day of November, 2019 Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: Lish Storck Assistant City Attorney Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 35 of 36 AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS-XXXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on November_, 2019 and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 36 of 36 *:1:11-11111V LS 11.19.19 RESOLUTION NO.2019-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO LOCAL CONDITIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA WHICH JUSTIFY CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS AND CHANGES TO THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE, AND INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AS AMENDED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A. Health and Safety Code Section 17958 provides that the City of Santa Ana shall adopt Ordinances and regulations imposing the same or modified or changed requirements as are contained in the regulations adopted by the State pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 17922. B. The State of Califomia is mandated by Health and Safety Code Section 17922 to impose the same requirements as are contained in the most recent edition of the Califomia Building Code, Califomia Existing Building Code, the Califomia Plumbing Code, the Califomia Mechanical Code, California Energy Code, and the California Electrical Code (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Codes"). C. Health and Safety Code Section 17958.5(a) permits the City to make modifications or changes to the Codes, which are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geographic or topographic conditions. D. Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 requires that the City Council, before making any modifications or changes to the Codes, shall make an express finding that such changes or modifications are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geographic or topographic conditions. Section 2: The Planning and Building Agency and the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) have recommended that changes and modifications be made to the Codes and have Resolution No. 2019- Page 1 of 8 advised that certain said changes and modifications to the California Building Code, 2019 Edition, the California Existing Building Code, 2019 Edition, the California Plumbing Code, 2019 Edition, the California Mechanical Code, 2019 Edition, the California Electrical Code, 2019 Edition, the California Existing Building Code, 2019 Edition, California Energy Code, 2019 Edition, and the California Fire Code, 2019 Edition, are reasonably necessary due to local conditions in the City of Santa Ana. Section 3. Amendments to the 2019 Edition of the California Building Code, the 2019 Edition of the California Existing Building Code, the 2019 Edition of the California Residential Code, and the 2019 Edition of the California Fire Code as recommended by the Planning and Building Agency and the Orange County Fire Authority are hereby found to be reasonably necessary based upon the following findings: I. Climatic Conditions A. The jurisdiction of Santa Ana is located in a semi -arid Mediterranean type climate. It annually experiences extended periods of high temperatures with little or no precipitation. Hot, dry (Santa Ana) winds, which may reach speeds of 70 M.P.H. or greater, are also common to the area. These climatic conditions cause extreme drying of vegetation and common building materials. Frequent periods of drought and low humidity add to the fire danger. This predisposes the area to large destructive fires (conflagration). In addition to directly damaging or destroying buildings, these fires are also prone to disrupt utility services throughout the County. Obstacles generated by a strong wind, such as fallen trees, street lights and utility poles will greatly impact the response time to reach an incident scene. B. The climate alternates between extended periods of drought and brief flooding conditions. Flood conditions may affect the Orange County Fire Authority's ability to respond to a fire or emergency condition. Floods also disrupt utility services to buildings and facilities within the County. C. Water demand in this densely populated area far exceeds the quantity supplied by natural precipitation; and although the population continues to grow, the already -taxed water supply does not. California is projected to increase in population by nearly 10 million over the next quarter of a century with 50 percent of that growth centered in Southern California. Due to storage capacities and consumption, and a limited amount of rainfall future water allocation is not fully dependable. This necessitates the need for additional and on -site fire protection features. D. These dry climatic conditions and winds contribute to the rapid spread of even small fires originating in high -density housing or vegetation. These fires spread very quickly and create a need for increased levels of fire protection. The added protection of fire sprinkler systems and other fire Resolution No. 2019- Page 2 of 8 protection features will supplement normal fire department response by providing immediate protection for the building occupants and by containing and controlling the fire spread to the area of origin. Fire sprinkler systems will also reduce the use of water for firefighting by as much as 50 to 75 percent. II. Topographical conditions A. Natural; slopes of 15 percent or greater generally occur throughout the foothills of Orange County. The elevation change cause by the hills creates the geological foundation on which communities with Orange County is built and will continue to build. With much of the populated flatlands already built upon, future growth will occur steeper slopes and greater constraints in terrain. B. Traffic and circulation congestion is an artificially created, obstructive topographical condition, which is common throughout Orange County. C. These topographical conditions combine to create a situation, which places fire department response time to fire occurrences at risk, and makes it necessary to provide automatic on -site fire -extinguishing systems and other protection measures to protect occupants and property. III. Geological Conditions The Orange County region is a densely populated area that has buildings constructed over and near a vast and complex network of faults that are believed to be capable of producing future earthquakes similar or greater in size that the 1994 Northridge and the 1971 Sylmar earthquakes. Earthquake faults run along the northeast and southwest boundaries of Orange County. The Newport -Inglewood Fault, located within Orange County was the source of the destructive 1933 Long Beach earthquake (6.3 magnitude) which took 120 lives and damaged buildings in an area from Laguna Beach to Marina Del Rey to Whittier. In December 1989, another earthquake occurred in the jurisdiction of Irvine at an unknown fault line. Regional planning for reoccurrence of earthquakes is recommended by the State of California, Department of Conservation. A. Previous earthquakes have been accompanied by disruption of traffic flow and fires. A severe seismic event has the potential to negatively impact any rescue or fire suppression activities because it is likely to create obstacles similar to those indicated under the high wind section above. With the probability of strong aftershocks there exists a need to provide increased protection for anyone on upper floors of buildings. The October 17, 1989, Santa Cruz earthquake resulted in one major fire in the Marina District (San Francisco). When combined with the 34 other fires locally Resolution No. 2019- Page 3 of 8 and over 500 responses, the department was taxed to its fullest capabilities. The Marina fire was difficult to contain because mains supplying water to the district burst during the earthquake. This situation creates the need for both additional fire protection and automatic on -site fire protection for building occupants. State Department of Conservation noted in their 1988 report (Planning Scenario on a Major Earthquake on the Newport -Inglewood Fault Zone, page 59), "unfortunately, barely meeting the minimum earthquake standards of building codes places a building on the verge of being legally unsafe." B. Road circulation features located throughout the County also make amendments reasonably necessary. Located through the County are major roadways, highways and flood control channels that create barriers and slow response times. Hills, slopes, street and storm drain design accompanies with occasional heavy rainfall, causes roadway flooding and landslides and at times may make an emergency access route impassable. There are areas in Orange County that naturally have extended emergency response times that exceed the 5 minute goal. C. Soils throughout the County possess corrosive properties that reduce the expected usable life of water services when metallic pipes in contact with soils are utilized. Due to the topographical conditions of sprawling development separated by waterways and narrow and congested streets and the expected infrastructure damage inherent in seismic zone described above, it is prudent to rely on automatic fire sprinkler systems to mitigate extended fire department response time and keep fires manageable with reduced fire flow (water) requirements for a given structures. Additional fire protection is also justified to match the current resources of firefighting equipment and personnel within the Orange County Fire Authority. Section 4. The following specific amendments to the sections of the 2019 Edition of the California Building Code as recommended by the Planning and Building Agency and the Orange County Fire Authority are reasonably necessary based upon the corresponding findings in Section 3 of this resolution as listed below: BUILDING CODE SECTION TITLE (Clarification) FINDINGS I,II,III 105.1 Permits required Admin 105.3.2 Time Limitation of Application Admin 105.5 Permit Expiration Admin 111 Certificate of Occupancy Admin 202 r2O2 General definitions (Spark Arrester) Admin Resolution No. 2019- Page 4 of 8 903.2 Where required (Sprinklers) II & III-B 903.2.8 Group R (Sprinklers) II-B & III-B 903.3.5.3 Hydraulically calculated systems I & II J103.2 Grading Permit Exemption Admin, II & III 506.4.3 (CEBC) Seismic Loads (California Existing Building Code) II & III Section 5. The following specific amendments to the sections of the 2019 Edition of the California Residential Code as recommended by the Planning and Building Agency and the Orange County Fire Authority are reasonably necessary based upon the corresponding findings in Section 3 of this resolution as listed below: RESIDENTIAL CODE SECTION TITLE (Clarification) FINDINGS I,II,III R202 General definitions (Spark Arrester) Admin R301.9 Development on or near land containing or emitting toxic, combustible or flammable liquids, gases or vapors III R309.6 Fire sprinkler attached garages, carports with habitable space above III R313.1 Townhouse automatic fire sprinkler systems III R313.2 One- and two-family dwellings automatic fire sprinkler system III R313.3.6.2.2 Calculation procedures III R337.1.3 Application Admin, II & III R1001.13 Outdoor Fireplaces, Fire Pits, Fire Rings I & II R1001.13.1 Gas -fueled devices I & II R1001.13.2 Devices using wood I & II R1001.13.3 Devices using wood, where prohibited I & II Chapter44 Reference Standards 2016 NFPA 13-D (Single Family Sprinkler Systems) II & III Section 6. The following specific amendments to the sections of the 2019 Edition of the California Fire Code as recommended by the Planning and Building Agency and the Orange County Fire Authority are reasonably necessary based upon the corresponding findings in Section 3 of this resolution as listed below: Resolution No. 2019- Page 5 of 8 FIRE CODE SECTION TITLE (Clarification) FINDINGS I,II,III 110.4 Violation penalties Administrative 110.4.2 Infraction & Misdemeanor Administrative 202 General definitions Administrative 304.1.2 OCFA Vegetation Management 1 305.6 Hazardous conditions I & II 305.7 Disposal of rubbish I & II 307 Open burning, recreational fires, fire pits, fire rings, and outdoor fireplaces Administrative 307.6 Fire Pits, Fire Rings, & Outdoor Fireplaces Administrative 307.6.1 Gas -fueled devices I & II 307.6.2 Devices using wood or fuels other than natural gas or LPG I & 11 307.6.2.1 Where prohibited I & II 308.1.6.3 Sky lanterns I & III 321 Fuel modification requirements for new construction I 322 Clearance of brush or vegetation growth from roadways I 323 Unusual circumstances Administrative 324 Use of equipment 1 324.1 Use of equipment and devices generating heat, sparks or open flames I 324.2 Spark arresters I 407.5 Hazardous material inventory statement I & II 501.1 Scope Administrative, I, II & III 510.1 Emergency responder radio coverage Administrative 903.2 Where required (Sprinklers) I, II & III 903.2.8 Group R (Sprinklers) I, II & III 903.3.5.3 Hydraulically calculated systems I & II 1201.1.1 Energy systems, battery charging devices I & II 2801.2 Permit Administrative 2808.2 Storage site Administrative 2808.3 Size of piles I 2808.4 Pile separation I 2808.7 Pile fire protection I 2808.9 Material -handling equipment I 2808.11 Temperature control I 2808.11.1 Pile temperature control I Resolution No. 2019- Page 6 of 8 2808.11.2 New material temperature control 1 2808.12 Water availability for piles I 2808.13 Tipping area I 2808.14 Emergency contact Administrative 4906.3 OCFA Vegetation Management Guideline 1 4908 Fuel modification requirements for new construction I 5001.5.2 Hazardous materials inventory statement Administrative 5003.1.1.1 Extremely hazardous substances 1 & III 5608.2 Retail fireworks Administrative 5608.3 Application for permit Administrative 5701.1.1 On -Demand Mobile Fueling N/A 5801.1 Scope N/A Chapter 80 Reference Standards N/A 2016 NFPA 13 (Sprinkler Systems) Administrative, II & III 2016 NFPA 13-D (Single Family Sprinkler Systems) I & II 2013 NFPA 14 (Standpipe Systems) Administrative 2016 NFPA 24 (Underground Water Supply Systems) Administrative & III Section 7. The aforementioned amendments have been incorporated in detail in Ordinance NS- Section 8. Additional amendments have been made to the relevant California Building Code, California Existing Building Code, Electrical Code, Mechanical Code, Plumbing Code, Energy Code, Existing Building Code, Residential Code, Green Building Standards Code, Fire Code, and International Property Maintenance Code. On the recommendation of the Planning and Building Agency and the Orange County Fire Authority, such amendments are hereby found to be either administrative or procedural in nature or concern themselves with subjects not covered in the aforementioned Codes. The changes made include provisions making each of said Codes compatible with other Codes enforced by the City. Section 9. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby approves and authorizes the Planning and Building Agency to file copies of Resolution 2019- and Ordinance NS- with the California Building Standards Commission as required by Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7. Section 10. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption. Resolution No. 2019- Page 7 of 8 ADOPTED this day of 2019. Miguel Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Counci NOT PRESENT: Counci CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on 2019. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2019- Page 8 of 8 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING — ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-10 TO ALLOW THE SALE OF DISTILLED SPIRITS FOR ON - PREMISE CONSUMPTION AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-11 TO ALLOW AFTER HOURS OPERATIONS FOR MARISCOS HECTOR #1 LOCATED AT 1801 SOUTH MAIN STREET, UNITS D AND E {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 3,21 CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on I" Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2ntl Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CKs]►111►Lei 011rC01 /s/ Kristine Ridge FILE NUMBER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION It is recommended that the City Council take one of the following actions: 1 a. Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10 as conditioned for a Type 47 Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License and allow the sale of distilled spirits in addition to the beer and wine currently sold on the premises; and 1 b. Continue Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-11 to allow after-hours operation to April 27, 2020 for Planning Commission consideration; or 2a. Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10 with added conditions for a Type 47 Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License and allow the sale of distilled spirits in addition to the beer and wine currently sold on the premises; and 2b. Continue Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-11 to allow after-hours operation to April 27, 2020 for Planning Commission consideration; or 3. Adopt a resolution denying Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-11. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Mark Gaughan, representing Mariscos Hector #1, is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2019-10 to upgrade an existing alcoholic beverage control license (ABC) from a Type Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10, 1801 South Main Street, Units D and E November 19, 2019 Page 2 41 to a Type 47 license to allow the sale of distilled spirits in addition to beer and wine currently available for on premise consumption. In addition, the applicant is proposing to expand the existing restaurant and is requesting approval to sell alcoholic beverages within the added floor area. The restaurant is currently selling alcohol under Land Use Certificate No. 1988-15, with the proposed license upgrade requiring the filing of an application for a conditional use permit. In addition, the applicant is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-11, which is a request to allow the restaurant to operate until 1 a.m. on weekends and holidays. The Planning Commission voted to continue the after-hours request until early next year. Planning Commission Background and Action In April 2019, the Planning Commission held the first public hearing on this item. During the hearing, several speakers raised concerns with the existing operation of the restaurant. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Commission elected to continue the item and asked staff to follow- up with the community in an effort to obtain solutions to the issues raised during the public hearing. On June 24th, 2019, a community meeting was held with the Madison Park Board, City staff and representatives from Mariscos Hector. During this meeting, several issues were raised, including concerns that tequila shots were being served in violation of Mariscos Hector's current ABC license, concerns with the operation of the existing restaurant at McFadden and Standard Avenues, loud noise coming from the restaurant, economic incentives for upgrading the ABC license, and a perceived overconcentration of ABC licenses in the area. The applicant responded that hard liquor (tequila) was not being served but an agave wine product, that the applicant for this project (Ms. Sebold) is in the process of obtaining control over the majority of the Mariscos Hector restaurants in an effort to resolve issues at each restaurant, and that the ABC upgrade would ensure the restaurant remains competitive with similar restaurants in the area. At the conclusion of the meeting, the participants agreed to meet again to continue their dialogue. On July 29th, 2019, a follow-up meeting was held that also included interested groups including Santa Ana Healthy Neighborhood Alliance, Wilshire Square and Memorial Park Neighborhood representatives. Further discussion ensued on identifying additional ways to outreach to the community, the creation of a Google Does tool for residents to report incidents/impacts from the restaurant in -lieu of contacting the Police Department, and the need to transition the restaurant to one that caters to families. The applicant responded that changes such as revised hours of operation and incorporating breakfast items into the menu are being considered by the applicant. Following the July 29th community meeting, the Google Does tool was implemented to be used by interested community members to document restaurant related issues. Google Does also allowed the applicant and City staff to provide updates to the issues that were noted in the document. In reviewing the document, members of the community raised several concerns directly to staff between July 30th to August 20th. Of these concerns, only three were related to Mariscos Hector, with the other four concerning an adjacent restaurant and possible brothel. The Mariscos Hector complaints included possible after-hours activities being conducted without approval, drug sales occurring on the premises, and an unpermitted expansion. Staff has investigated these items and was not able to find supporting evidence substantiating the allegations. Staff requested Police Department assistance to determine if after-hours operations were occurring on the premises. A Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10, 1801 South Main Street, Units D and E November 19, 2019 Page 3 Police Department site visit in mid -September at 12:30 a.m. verified that the restaurant was closed per City regulations. Further, an updated records search of Police activity identified two calls for service at this location since the April Planning Commission meeting. One call for service was for disturbing the peace (music related), with the other call a report of a stolen vehicle. Finally, Code Enforcement records have been reviewed to identify any recent activity. There have not been any recent complaints at Mariscos Hector. On October 14, 2019, a second public hearing was held by the Planning Commission regarding this application. During the public hearing, the Commission received extensive testimony from both the applicant and neighborhood on the proposed ABC license upgrade and restaurant expansion. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission, by a vote of 3:1, concurred with the staff recommendation and approved the CUP. The Commission determined that the applicant had been working to address neighborhood concerns since the April hearing. However, to incorporate additional measures intended to address community concerns, the Commission added two additional conditions of approval that requires the applicant to replace the existing storefront with a new storefront that is soundproof and to require a six-month review of the premises to be conducted by staff in order to ensure compliance with the approved conditions of approval. Finally, the Commission voted to continue the after-hours request until April 27, 2020. This would allow staff the ability to monitor the site to ensure compliance with the conditions of approval and to ensure no adverse impacts were generated from the restaurant. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Mariscos Hector #1 currently occupies an 1,850 square foot tenant space within a 6,650 square foot retail center on South Main Street. The applicant has acquired the rights to a full alcoholic beverage license from ABC and is now requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits for on -premise consumption. In conjunction with this request, the applicant is proposing to expand into an adjacent 600 square foot tenant space (Unit D) and sell alcoholic beverages within this new floor area. A conditional use permit is required since the ABC license is being upgraded to allow for the sale of distilled spirits and alcohol will be sold in an expanded area, while Land Use Certificate No. 1988-15 only allowed the sale of beer and wine for on premise consumption within the original restaurant floor area. If approved, the conditional use permit will incorporate and supersede LUC No. 1988-15. In conjunction with the ABC upgrade and expansion request, the applicant was requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-11 to allow the restaurant to operate until 1 a.m. on weekends and holidays. Based on feedback from the neighborhood, the Planning Commission and staff, the applicant has elected to continue the after-hours request until April 2020. Table 1: Project and Location Information Item Information Project Address 1801 S. Main Street, Units D and E Nearest Intersection Main Street and East Saint Andrew Place General Plan Designation General Commercial (GC) Zoning Designation South Main Commercial District (C-SM) Surrounding Land Uses North I Commercial Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10, 1801 South Main Street, Units D and E November 19, 2019 Page 4 Item Information East Residential South Commercial West Commercial Property Size 20,038 s . ft. Existing Site Development The site is developed with a 6,650 square -foot commercial building. Use Permissions Allowed with a conditional use permit CUP Zoning Code Sections Affected Uses I Section 41-196 & 41-521 SAMC Operational Standards I Section 41-196 (g) SAMC PROJECT BACKGROUND AND CHRONOLOGY In 1986, a five -unit, 6,650 square foot commercial building was constructed on the site. In 1988, Mariscos Hector replaced the former restaurant within Unit E and began selling beer and wine for on premise consumption as allowed by Land Use Certificate No. 1988-15. The current owner of Mariscos Hector #1 has been operating the South Main Street restaurant since 2005. There are three other Mariscos Hector restaurants in the City that the owner is affiliated with. Two are wholly owned by the applicant, with the applicant having majority control of the third establishment. In 2014, a conditional use permit application was submitted to expand the restaurant and beer and wine sales into the adjacent tenant space (Unit D); however, the applicant elected to withdraw the application prior to scheduling the item for a Planning Commission public hearing. In early 2017, the applicant received authorization from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) to upgrade from a Type 41 to a Type 47 alcoholic beverage license and allow the sale of distilled spirits in addition to beer and wine. Around the same time, the adjacent 600 square foot space (Unit D) became vacant, with the restaurant leasing the space for future expansion. In response, the applicant submitted a conditional use permit application to the Planning Division. In March 2017, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-03. After receiving public testimony on the application, the Commission denied the request to upgrade the license. The denial was based on feedback from the community that included concerns with noise, crime, on -site disturbances, on operational issues occurring at the restaurant. Since the denial, the applicant has secured a new management team and has submitted a new application for the ABC license upgrade. PROJECT ANALYSIS Conditional use permit requests are governed by Section 41-638 of the SAMC. Conditional use permits may be granted when it can be shown that the proposed project will not adversely impact the community. If these findings can be made, then it is appropriate to grant the conditional use permit. Conversely, the inability to make these findings would result in a denial. The purpose of regulating establishments that sell alcoholic beverages is to set forth operating practices and procedures, and to minimize impacts to surrounding areas. In analyzing the applicant's request, staff analyzed several specific elements, including a review of the site to Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10, 1801 South Main Street, Units D and E November 19, 2019 Page 5 ensure it was in compliance with City operational standards, a review of the amount and type of code enforcement activity occurring on the site, analysis of the type and volume of Police related calls for service to both the restaurant and site, and a review of compliance with State ABC standards. Staff has reviewed the applicant's request to upgrade the alcoholic beverage control license to allow for sale of distilled spirits in addition to beer and wine and has determined that approval of the conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the community. As proposed, the restaurant will continue to operate as a sit-down bona -fide eating establishment and is proposing to increase in size to 2,450 square feet by expanding into an adjacent 600 square foot space. The other commercial uses located on the property are a mix of retail and office uses. The subject site is not located within immediate proximity to parks, playgrounds, or schools. The closest school facilities are Edison Elementary and St. Anne School which are over 1,000-feet away and there are two churches within 500-feet of the subject site. There are residential properties to the east that abut the restaurant use. Mariscos Hector #1 is an established restaurant which provides a dining service to the community and visitors of the City. The license upgrade will allow the restaurant to remain competitive with similar establishments and economically viable. In addition, the on -site sale of alcohol to customers is an ancillary service to the primary restaurant use. The subject site does not conform to the City's off-street parking regulations as the parking requirement for restaurant uses has changed since the structure was constructed. Regardless, since a restaurant has been at this location since the building was constructed, the restaurant may continue as a nonconforming use. And, per Section 41-1309.1 of the SAMC, the 600 square foot expansion area is exempt from complying with the higher restaurant parking standard as this Code section allows tenant spaces less than 2,500 square feet in size (the expanded restaurant will be 2,450 square feet) to continue to be parked at the lower retail rate. Conditions of approval are proposed that will bring the window signage into conformance with the Municipal Code. Table 2: Operational Standards Standards Required by SAMC Proposed Eating Establishment Type Bona -Fide Bona -Fide Hours of Operation 5:00 am to 12:00 am 8:00 am to 1:00 am Window Display 25% of Window Coverage Complies Live Entertainment Entertainment Permit Applicant in process of obtaining a new permit Alcohol Storage and Display 5% of G.F.A 1.6% of G.F.A Exterior Telephone Prohibited None Parking Required 38 stalls 34 stalls As part of the application process, the application was reviewed by the Police Department and Code Enforcement Division which have no issues of concern regarding the license upgrade. The restaurant is currently in compliance with all applicable regulations and conditions imposed on an Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10, 1801 South Main Street, Units D and E November 19, 2019 Page 6 eating establishment selling beer, wine and distilled spirits pursuant to Chapter 41 of the SAMC. Furthermore, the operational standards for on -sale establishments and periodic monitoring will ensure that the use will not deviate from the planned operation reviewed under this application and will mitigate any potential impacts created by such use. Table 3: Police Department Analysis and Criteria for Recommendation Police Department Analysis and Criteria for Recommendation Police Grid No. and Rank Police Grid No. 188; ranked 5 out of 103 Police Reporting Grids (4rd percentile) Threshold for High This reporting district is above the 20 percent threshold established by the Crime State for high crime. Police Department The Police Department contends that the operational standards applicable to Recommendation on -premise ABC licenses will mitigate any potential impacts to the surrounding community and therefore does not oppose the granting of a CUP. For on -sale licenses, the Police Department analyzes the crime rate in the area using standards and definitions contained in the Business and Professions Code Section 23948.4(c) (2), which also are utilized by the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). This section defines "reported crimes" as criminal homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny theft, and motor vehicle theft, combined with all arrests for other crimes, both felonies and misdemeanors, except traffic citations. The Police Department then compares the number of such crimes in the reporting district as compared to the number of crimes in other reporting districts. In keeping with the standard used by State ABC and Business and Professions Code, should the Police Department determine that the reporting district has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes than the average number found in all reporting districts, the Police Department will consider this information in making its recommendation. After reviewing the applicant's proposal, and reviewing the crime statistics for the area for the past year, the Police Department has no concerns and is supportive of the applicants CUP request for a Type 47 ABC license. Table 4: CEQA and Public Notification & Community Outreach CEQA and Public Notification & Community Outreach CEQA CEQA Type General Rule [Section 15061 (b) (3)] Reason(s) This exemption applies to projects where it can be seen with certainty that there Exempt or Analysis is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The project proposes to allow the operation of a Type 47 alcoholic beverage control license to sell beer, wine, and distilled spirits at an existing bona -fide restaurant and to allow the restaurant to expand into an adjacent 600 square foot vacant space. The City has determined that the use will not create any adverse impacts such as noise, traffic, or safety concerns. Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10, 1801 South Main Street, Units D and E November 19, 2019 Page 7 CEQA and Public Notification & Community Outreach Public Notification & Community Outreach Required Measures A public notice was posted on the project site on November 8, 2019. Notification by mail was mailed to all property owners and occupants within 500 feet of the project site on November 8, 2019. Newspaper posting was published in the OC Reporter on November 9, 2019. Additional The presidents of the Madison and Memorial Park Neighborhood Association Measures were contacted regarding this application. Concerns were raised regarding noise, adverse impacts the compatibility of the restaurant with the adjacent community. CONCLUSION Based on the analysis provided within this report, staff has determined that the proposed project is in compliance with the City's operational standards for uses with alcoholic beverages. Further, the project site has no open code enforcement violations and is compliant with State ABC regulations. The Police Department has analyzed crime statistics for the site for the past year and did not identify any issues with the restaurant. Finally, staff and the applicant have met with the community on two occasions to understand and address their concerns. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal No.3 (Economic Development) Objective No. 2 of creating new opportunities for business/job growth and encourage private development through new General Plan and Zoning Ordinance policies. FISCAL IMPACT The project will generate additional sales tax revenue, increase the number of permanent jobs and will provide additional dining options for the community. In addition, the expansion of the restaurant into an adjacent and vacant tenant space will require that permit and inspection fees be paid to the City. It is estimated that a slight increase in sales volume will occur from the enlarged restaurant with additional seating areas and from the sales of distilled spirits. Minh Thai Executive Director Planning and Building Agency MT: of 5/RFCA/11-19-19/CUP 2019-10 Exhibits: 1. Resolution for approval 2. Resolution for denial Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10, 1801 South Main Street, Units D and E November 19, 2019 Page 8 3. Vicinity Map 4. Site Plan 5. Floor Plan *:1:11-3Yi1 LS 11.19.19 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-10 AS CONDITIONED TO ALLOW THE SALE OF DISTILLED SPIRITS FOR ON -PREMISES CONSUMPTION AT MARISCOS HECTOR #1 RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 1801 SOUTH MAIN STREET, UNITS D AND E BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Mark Gaughan ("Applicant'), representing Mariscos Hector #1, is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10 to allow the sale of distilled spirits in addition to the currently allowed beer and wine sales for on premises consumption for the property located at 1801 South Main Street, Unit E. Applicant is proposing to expand into an adjacent tenant space, Unit D, and is requesting approval to sell alcoholic beverages within the additional floor area. B. In 1988, Land Use Certificate No. 1988-15 was transferred from Senor Pollo to Mariscos Hector restaurant to allow for the sale of beer and wine for on -premises consumption. C. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-196 requires approval of a conditional use permit for establishments selling alcoholic beverages for on- or off -premise consumption. D. On April 22, 2019, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing for Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10. At the conclusion of this hearing, the Commission continued the item to allow staff, the Applicant, and the interested neighborhood groups the ability to address potential impacts from the restaurant. E. On October 14, 2019, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing for Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10. At the conclusion of this hearing, the Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10 subject to modified conditions of approval. F. On October 15, 2019, a request was made by a Councilmember to have the item be presented to Council for further consideration at a future meeting. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 1 of 7 G. On November 5, 2019, the City Council discussed Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10 and 2019-11 and voted 4:1 to have the items presented to the City Council for a de novo public hearing. H. On November 19, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing for Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2019-10 and 2019-11. The City Council determines that the following findings, which must be established in order to grant this Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code ("SAMC") Section 41-638, have been established for Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10 to allow the sale of distilled spirits for on -premises consumption at Mariscos Hector #1 at 1801 South Main Street, Units D and E: 1. That the proposed use will provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or community. The proposed sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premises consumption at this location will provide an ancillary service to the restaurant's customers by allowing them the ability to purchase alcohol with their meal. This will thereby benefit the community by providing a restaurant with an additional and complementary food related amenity. Operational standards applicable to the alcoholic beverage control license will mitigate any potential impacts created by the use and ensure that the use will not negatively affect the surrounding community. 2. That the proposed use will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. The proposed sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premises consumption at this location will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity because the operational standards applicable to the alcoholic beverage control license will address any potential negative or adverse impacts created by the use. Mariscos Hector #1 is a bona -fide restaurant and the addition of alcohol will be ancillary to the main use. All of the operational standards identified in SAMC Sec. 41-196 will apply to this establishment. Finally, the sale of alcohol in the restaurant will be incidental to the primary use as a bona fide eating establishment and will occur within the premises. 3. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the present economic stability or future economic development of properties surrounding the area. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 2 of 7 The proposed use will not adversely affect the economic stability of the area, but will instead allow the restaurant to compete with other nearby restaurants that offer a full selection of alcoholic beverages for sale to their customers. Moreover, the offering of alcoholic beverages will allow Mariscos Hector #1 to remain economically viable and competitive with nearby full -service restaurants in the local vicinity and contribute to the overall success of the City of Santa Ana, attracting visitors and residents to the area. 4. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions specified in Chapter 41 for such use. The proposed conditional use permit will be in compliance with all applicable regulations and operational standards imposed on a restaurant selling alcoholic beverages for on - premises consumption pursuant to Chapter 41 of the SAMC. The facility will be maintained as a full -service, bona -fide eating establishment, having suitable kitchen facilities and supplying an assortment of foods. Additionally, the restaurant will utilize less than five (5%) percent of the gross floor area for display and storage of alcoholic beverages, which is the maximum threshold established by the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Operational standards will ensure the project remains in compliance with all applicable codes and regulations related to alcohol sales to ensure that the use does not impact neighboring properties or create an attractive nuisance. 5. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the General Plan of the city or any specific plan applicable to the area of the proposed use. The proposed sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premises consumption at this location will not adversely affect the General Plan or any specific plan. The granting of this conditional use permit supports several policies contained in the General Plan. Policy 2.2 of the Land Use Element encourages land uses that accommodate the City's needs for goods and services. Providing a variety of full -service restaurants that provide alcoholic beverages as part of their menu offers additional dining options for Santa Ana residents and visitors. Policy 2.9 supports developments that create a business environment that is safe and attractive. The property maintenance condition of approval will maintain a safe and attractive environment in the community. Further, operational standards for the proposed ABC license will maintain a safe and attractive environment in the Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 3 of 7 neighborhood. Policy 5.5 of the Land Use Element encourages development that is compatible with and supporting of surrounding land uses. Mariscos Hector #1 is located within a commercial shopping center and its operation is compatible with the surrounding commercial businesses. Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the recommended action is exempt from CEQA per Section 15061(b) (3). This exemption applies to projects where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The project proposes to allow the on -premises sale of alcoholic beverages at a full -service restaurant and minor interior tenant improvements. There is no reasonable possibility that the project will have a significant effect on the environment due to the facility having the necessary infrastructure to operate the proposed use and no new expansion of the existing building is proposed. Section 3. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, referendum, and other proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily. incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. Section 4. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana after conducting the public hearing hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10 as conditioned in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein, for the alcoholic beverage control license for the sale of alcohol for on -premises consumption for the project located at 1801 South Main Street, Units D and E. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for City Council Action dated November 19, 2019, and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 4 of 7 ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 2019. AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: ABSTENTIONS: Councilmembers: Miguel Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By:�: fi Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on November 19, 2019. Date: City Clerk City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT A Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10 Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10 for on -premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with all applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), the California Building Standards Code and all other applicable regulations. The Applicant must comply in full with each and every condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by this conditional use permit. The Applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the conditional use permit. Failure to comply with each and every condition may result in the revocation of the conditional use permit. 1. The sales, service, and consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be permitted in accordance with the operational standards for on -sale establishments pursuant to Section 41-196(g) of the SAMC and in accordance with the provisions of a Type-47 alcohol license by the State Alcohol Beverage Control Board (ABC). 2. Prior to release of the ABC license, the window tinting shall be removed to be in compliance with the Municipal Code. 3. Prior to release of the ABC license, a new entertainment permit shall be applied for and be approved. 4. If off -site parking is proposed, the lot shall comply with the City's Building Security Ordinance (i.e. parking lot lighting). 5. Prior to release of the ABC license, a Property Maintenance Agreement must be recorded against the property. The agreement will be subject to review and applicability by the Planning and Building Agency, the Community Development Agency, the Public Works Agency, and the City Attorney to ensure that the property and all improvements located thereupon are properly maintained, Applicant (and the owner of the property upon which the authorized use and/or authorized improvements are located if different from the Applicant) shall execute a maintenance agreement with the City of Santa Ana which shall be recorded against the property and which shall be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney. The maintenance agreement shall contain covenants, conditions and restrictions relating to the following: (a) Compliance with operational conditions applicable during any period(s) of construction or major repair (e.g., proper screening and securing of the construction site; implementation of proper erosion control, dust control and noise mitigation measure; adherence to approved project phasing etc.); Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 6 of 7 (b) Compliance with ongoing operational conditions, requirements and restrictions, as applicable (including but not limited to hours of operation, security requirements, the proper storage and disposal of trash and debris, enforcement of the parking management plan, and/or restrictions on certain uses, (c) Ongoing compliance with approved design and construction parameters, signage parameters and restrictions as well as landscape designs, as applicable; (d) Ongoing maintenance, repair and upkeep of the property and all improvements located thereupon (including but not limited to controls on the proliferation of trash and debris about the property; the proper and timely removal of graffiti; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of damaged, vandalized and/or weathered buildings, structures and/or improvements; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of exterior paint, parking striping, lighting and irrigation fixtures, walls and fencing, publicly accessible bathrooms and bathroom fixtures, landscaping and related landscape improvements and the like, as applicable); (e) If Applicant and the owner of the property are different (e.g., if the Applicant is a tenant or licensee of the property or any portion thereof), both the Applicant and the owner of the property shall be signatories to the maintenance agreement and both shall be jointly and severally liable for compliance with its terms. (f) The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any party responsible for complying with its terms shall not assign its ownership interest in the property or any interest in any lease, sublease, license or sublicense, unless the prospective assignee agrees in writing to assume all of the duties, obligations and responsibilities set forth under the maintenance agreement. (g) The maintenance agreement shall contain provisions relating to the enforcement of its conditions by the City and shall also contain provisions authorizing the City to recover costs and expenses which the City may incur arising out of any enforcement and/or remediation efforts which the City may undertake in order to cure any deficiency in maintenance, repair or upkeep or to enforce any restrictions or conditions upon the use of the property. The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any unreimbursed costs and/or expenses incurred by the City to cure a deficiency in maintenance or to enforce use restrictions shall become a lien upon the property in an amount equivalent to the actual costs and/or expense incurred by the City. 6. Prior to issuance of the ABC license to the State Board of Alcoholic Beverages, the Applicant shall obtain building permits to replace the existing restaurant storefront with a soundproof storefront. 7. A six-month review of the CUP shall be conducted by staff to ensure compliance with City codes and the conditions of approval. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 7 of 7 *:1:11-31111V LS 11.19.19 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) NO. 2019-10 AND CUP NO. 2019-11 TO NOT ALLOW THE SALE OF DISTILLED SPIRITS FOR ON - PREMISES CONSUMPTION AND TO DENY AFTER HOURS OPERATIONS AT MARISCOS HECTOR #1 RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 1801 SOUTH MAIN STREET, UNITS D AND E BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Mark Gaughan ("Applicant"), representing Mariscos Hector#1, is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10 to allow the sale of distilled spirits in addition to the currently allowed beer and wine sales for on premises consumption. In addition, the Applicant is requesting to remain open until 1 a.m. on weekends and holidays at the property located at 1801 South Main Street, Unit E. Applicant is proposing to expand into an adjacent tenant space, Unit D, and is requesting approval to sell alcoholic beverages within the additional floor area and remain open after hours. B. In 1988, Land Use Certificate No. 1988-15 was transferred from Senor Polio to Mariscos Hector restaurant to allow for the sale of beer and wine for on -premises consumption. C. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-196 requires approval of a conditional use permit for establishments selling alcoholic beverages for on- or off -premises consumption. D. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-522(e) requires approval of a conditional use permit for eating establishments open anytime between the hours of midnight and 5 a.m. which are located within 150 feet of residential properties. E. On October 14, 2019, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing for Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2019-10 and 2019-11. At the conclusion of this hearing, the Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10 subject to modified conditions of approval and continued the after-hours request until April 27, 2020. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 1 of 4 F. On October 15, 2019, a request was made by a Councilmember to have the item presented to Council for further consideration at a future meeting. G. On November 5, 2019, the City Council discussed Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10 and 2019-11 and voted 4:1 to have the items presented to the City Council for a de novo public hearing. H. On November 19, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing for Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2019-10 and 2019-11. In regard to the Conditional Use Permits, required findings 1, and 2 of Section 41-638 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the City Council finds: 1. That the proposed use will not provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or community. The sale of distilled spirits for on -premises consumption at Mariscos Hector #1 at 1801 South Main Street, Units D and E will not provide a service to the community that is necessary at this time. Under Land Use Certificate No. 1988-15 patrons who visit the restaurant will still have the opportunity to purchase beer and wine with their meals. In addition, a total of six (6) restaurants that sell beer, wine and distilled spirits are located within a one and a half (1.5) mile radius of the property to serve residents and the community. In addition, due to numerous noise and other nuisance related complaints, the after-hours operations of the restaurant would not contribute to the well-being of the neighborhood. 2. That the proposed use will, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. The sale of distilled spirits for on -premises consumption at this location will impact the safety and general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity. The Police Department reported 25 field activity incidents and five reportable disturbances at the location within the last five years. The subject site is immediately adjacent to residential uses and neighborhoods; at the Planning Commission public hearing several residents, representing neighborhood associations, expressed concerns of safety and welfare. Additionally, the proposed after-hours operations may result in an increase in Police and Code Enforcement related calls for service, which would be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 2 of 4 J. In regard to Conditional Use Permit findings 3, 4 and 5 of Section 41-638 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the City Council makes no specific findings. These findings relate to compliance with the regulations and conditions specified in Chapter 41 for on -sale establishments, economic stability of the properties surrounding the area, and affect on the General Plan. K. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) the recommended action is exempt from CEQA per Section 15061(b)(4) as the City Council denied Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2019-10 and 2019-11. Section 2. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, referendum, and other proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana after conducting the public hearing hereby denies Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-10 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-11 for the project located at 1801 South Main Street, Units D and E. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Council Action dated November 19, 2019, and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 3 of 4 ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 2019. AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: ABSTENTIONS: Councilmembers: Miguel Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on November 19, 2019. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 4 of 4 4/10/2019 EXHIBIT 3 Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2019-10 and 2019-11„ Mariscos Hector #1 1801 South Main Street Units D and E R2 - R1 R1 a � R1 CSM -,-� CSM R1 I L. CSM IT E� Santa Ana Boundary Zoning G5M Irene oeIprlar n Slog,,-lama,Ae,laen.e -CSM. .�! Y �— iwo-faml4y neuaemx ' ■ Suhuihan Apanmmt ■ Multiple-fam�ty Nesidexe '■Pesltlentlal Esme � ■ Commercial Residenilal '■ Specific Plan ■ Specific development �■PWnnetl S.,ping 0-n r f, South Mai 11—ICmnmertial Olstrict cn nGn Ldw :mla!-mu—!D'rnja '■Art -Ifnm cl - Ge ICa el i gh I I R2 GSM �C W ■ He vy lntlushlal Illllla all ■Pmfe real m 106mremmem ceme. E open spas General Agrrta+hural ��Ss. i Exhibit 3 - Vicinity Zoningant .a apps. spatialstream.com/production/dash board/8/9/0/Cu rrentBuild/html/Reportin g.html# V R1 8 a16 31%LK feet N (c) 2019 Diaital Mao Products. All rights reserved. 1 /1 Z O e � V EXHIBIT 4 c �i $�A i3 mgg� Q ° JI IL g� atsi� s € k 2Y �Y3Y I ll l��� M i 3a aioo m N y9� Rl .YiYL �5 2 n 1 d b 0 0 ® ® W � 0 Q 4 L i § �— ggji ------------- uio O g1 p �I K 2 N K a N N L1 m� L fa U i y i H a0uj �y al I _ al m�nln K movoxarvanlm pl � p S Mae" E-133?J1S A313�1213H� eY¢°��I WWRWFR C0- 19 5'aQgr. 1I�1 EXHIBIT 5 Q W Ln x W Z O 's e kmd uo z 'P ffi N �O� a s af: se? 9au Q U N z 3 4 2 e = � 0 02 ova u� 2 in � 5 O? OF 03 �' — R S m Ef D X hit US 3 " In hot oil F € % a y � Y s A xA xu x s % x.% B � Y Hill F 0 11 e &� Z a a y = F'% k "fl HIM R x x V 9 F e� R �,R R aR RA. a % e rA F� WHO; ' Rk a F a° Q Z er ill Y.A.' %° % A a% R10 F LL A. Q Qsaw iJ e% 8 O F R RS F Pill! f �x p$ 6 % g g% E, R ft8 x - F'. R i R uv x % Nfr RR n x n k % %5 % Rxv v s a s a % R % .Rc Rv eC,x - 8� n �3 s ,i'tp tc r Q � � Q O L I OI Il�fll II�LOJ��rnW1l II _ — I � I � � g V I I L =ae REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 2019 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING — FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 2018-01, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2018-01, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-06 AND AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2018-10 FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI- FAMILY DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 3,21 /s/ Kristine CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: U1a,CA1TA0 ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Ordinance on 1" Reading ❑ Ordinance on 2ntl Reading ❑ Implementing Resolution ❑ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER It is recommended that the City Council evaluate the modified project and consider one of the following options: OPTION 1. Adopt a resolution affirming the recommendation of the Planning Commission and deny the following applications: • Development Agreement No.2018-01; • General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06; and • Amendment Application No. 2018-10 establishing Specific Development No. 93. OPTION 2. Adopt a resolution certifying Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 (SCH No. 2018021031), adopting findings of fact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibit 2); Adopt an ordinance approving Development Agreement No. 2018-01 (Exhibit 3); Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06 (Exhibit 4); and Adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2018-10 for Specific Development No. 93 (Exhibit 5). EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street November 19, 2019 Page 2 DISCUSSION Jeremy Ogulnick, representing AC 2525 Main, LLC, is proposing to construct a 256-unit multi -family residential development (58 dwelling units per acre) on a 4.4-acre parcel of land at 2525 North Main Street. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to create a second parcel to build a 180-space surface level parking lot that is proposed to be used by the Discovery Cube on an adjacent 1.4- acre parcel. Actions required include the certification and adoption of the Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) for the development, which includes a Clarifications to the Final EIR document, a mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and a statement of overriding considerations. Entitlements needed for the development include the approval of a development agreement between the City and applicant/owner, a general plan amendment to redesignate the land use designation of the property from Professional and Administrative Office (PAO) to District Center (DC), and an amendment application to rezone the property from Professional (P) to Specific Development No. 93 (SD-93). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION At its regular meeting on October 28, 2019, and after receiving public testimony on the item, the Planning Commission voted 3:2 (Contreras -Leo, McLoughlin, Rivera; and Cano and Nguyen) to recommend that the City Council not certify the Final EIR, and deny the proposed development and all related entitlements (Exhibit 6). BACKGROUND In February 2019, the City Council was presented with a 476-unit residential development on the project site. After considering the project, the Council remanded the project back to the Planning Commission, staff and the neighborhood for reconsideration. In June 2019, the applicant submitted a revised project consisting of the following: • A reduction in the number of units to 347 units (formerly 476 units) • A reduction in the project density to 59 dwelling units per acre (formerly 80 du/ac) • A reduction in the total number of residential stories to a maximum of 4-stories (formerly 5- stories with mezzanines) o Tiering of the height of the northeast corner of the residential building to range from 2-4 stories o Tiering the height of the residential building along a portion of Edgewood Road to a tiered height of 3 to 4-stories • A reduction in the levels of the parking structure to 6-levels with one level below grade and five levels above grade (formerly 8-levels) • Relocated the project entry along Main Street to the northernmost section of the site that will be part of a redesigned intersection at Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive • Increased the setback on the east to 66 feet (formerly 40 feet) • Increased the parking to 1.85 parking spaces per unit and continuing to provide valet parking which would increase parking to 2.0 per unit (formerly 1.8 parking spaces) EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street November 19, 2019 Page 3 The North Santa Ana Preservation Alliance continued to voice opposition to the project and stated that they would support three development options: rehabilitation and reuse of the existing office building, redevelopment of the site with a new office building built in compliance with the Professional zoning standards, or a residential project at a maximum density of 15 dwelling units per acre (89 dwelling units). The first two options would be feasible under the existing zoning and general plan. The third option would require a zone change to Two -Family Residential (R2) and a general plan amendment to Medium Density Residential (MR-15) General Plan land use designation. The applicant has indicated that the three development options proposed would make the residential development project infeasible. At its regular meeting on August 12, 2019, and after receiving public testimony on the item, the Planning Commission vote resulted in an impasse on the proposed 347-unit residential development. The project was scheduled for a City Council public hearing; however, in September the applicant advised staff that they would be making further modifications to the project to address the comments received at the August 12th Planning Commission meeting. The modifications to the project were substantially different than the project reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 12, 2019, and therefore, must be reviewed by the Planning Commission for a recommendation prior to returning to the City Council. Modified Project On September 5, 2019, a meeting between the applicant and neighborhood was held to discuss another series of modifications to the project that could include a reduction the number of units, reduction in project density and intensity, an increase in the parking ratio, and an additional increase in the building setbacks. The applicant expressed that their goals in making these modifications were to address community input and concerns, create an opportunity for additional parking for the Discovery Cube and the proposed development, to maintain as much of the existing development pattern and existing parking lot as feasible, and to minimize changes to the neighborhood at the project's edge. The modifications to the project to date represent a significant reduction from previous submissions. However, the modified project remains inconsistent with the development options that the North Santa Ana Preservation Alliance expressed they would support. In early October, the applicant formally submitted a modified project that consists of the following elements: • A reduction in the number of units to 256 units (formerly 347 units) • A reduction in the project density to 58 dwelling units per acre (formerly 59 du/ac) • An increase in the building setback on the east to 90 feet (formerly 66 feet) • An increase in the building setback on the south to 134 feet (formerly 15 feet) • The addition of residential surface level parking (104 spaces) along the east property line • The addition of a surface level parking lot with shared parking with the Discover Cube along the south property line (180 spaces) • An increase in parking to 2.0 parking spaces per unit and 2.7 spaces per unit when utilizing the shared parking lot (formerly 1.85 parking spaces per unit with 2.0 valet) EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street November 19, 2019 Page 4 • A reduction in the amount of common open space (exterior and interior) • Revised development agreement terms Protect Location and Site Description The subject site is a 5.93-acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Main Street and Edgewood Road. Regional access to the site is provided from the Santa Ana (1-5) Freeway via Main Street, a 6-lane arterial roadway, and via the State Route 22 (SR-22) Freeway. The properties immediately adjacent to the site include Santiago Park to the north, single-family residential homes to the south and east and the Discovery Cube across Main Street to the west. The project site is located on North Main Street, an urban corridor within the City. The site is also located at a main entry point to the Park Santiago Neighborhood, a residential neighborhood predominantly comprised of detached single-family dwellings. The site is currently improved with an 81,172 square foot, two-story office building with 442 parking spaces and associated mature trees and landscaping. The building has been vacant since summer 2017 and was last occupied by Wells Fargo. The Discovery Cube leases the parking lot for employee and overflow parking. Table 1: Proiect Location Information Item Information Project Address 2525 North Main Street Nearest Intersection Main Street and Edgewood Road General Plan Designation Existing: Professional & Administrative Office PAO Proposed: District Center (DC) Zoning Designation Existing: Professional (P) Proposed: Specific Development No. 93 SD-93 Surrounding Land Uses North Santiago Park — Open Space East Single -Family Residential — R1 South Single -Family Residential — R1 West Discovery Science Center — SD-65 Property Size 5.93 acres (258,310 square feet) Existing Site Development The site contains a two-story, 81,172 square footoffice building with 442 parking spaces Applicable Zoning Code Sections Existing: SAMC Chapter 41, Article III, Division 8 (Professional) Proposed: SAMC Chapter 41, Article III, Division 26 (Specific Development) Entitlements SAMC Chapter 41, Article V, Division II (Amendments and Change to District Boundaries) SAMC Chapter 27, Articles I and 11 (Planning) EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street November 19, 2019 Page 5 ANALYSIS OF THE ISSUES Project Description The applicant proposes to demolish the existing office building and develop a 256-unit multi -family residential development and surface level parking on the site. The modified project includes a lot line adjustment to create two separate lots. The residential lot will be approximately 4.4 acres in size with the shared parking lot parcel being 1.4 acres. The lot line adjustment is a ministerial process, with no Planning Commission or City Council action required. The residential project is proposed at a density of 58 dwelling units per acre which is derived by calculating the number of units by the net size of the residential property (4.4 acres). This project would result in approximately 444,534 square feet of development (277,281 square feet of residential building and 167,253 square feet of parking structure). The maximum floor area ratio for the subject site will be 1.43 which is derived by calculating the square footage of the gross building square footage (residential development and common open space rooms, excluding the parking structure square footage) by net size of the property. The modified project includes surface level parking lots along the eastern and southern sections of the site. A new driveway on Main Street will provide access to the parking lots with right -in and right -out only turn movements. The east parking lot will be dedicated to the residential development (104 spaces) and is accessible either through the parking structure or via a rolling gate that separates the two lots. The parking structure, in conjunction with the surface parking lot, results in a parking ratio of 2 spaces per unit. The south parking lot is proposed to be used by the Discovery Cube (180 spaces). Use of the south parking lot is not required to satisfy the parking demand for the project but is considered to be surplus parking. Use of the parking lot would be managed through a shared parking and reciprocal access agreement. The proposed hours of use for the Discovery Cube southern parking lot are 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. with residents being able to utilize the spaces after 7 p.m. The unit mix is a maximum of 70 percent studio and one -bedroom units and 30 percent two and three -bedroom units. The project proposes 21 different floor plans with an average unit size of 763 square feet. The unit breakdown can be found on Table 2 below. Table 2: Unit Mix and Unit Square Footage Unit Type Number of Units (%) Square Footage of Units Studios 74 29% 556 - 592 One -Bedrooms 103 40% 633 - 930 Two -Bedrooms 75 29% 909 - 1,179 Three -Bedrooms 4 2% 1,362 Total 256 100 556-1,362 The residential portion of the building will tier from 2-stories in height (24-feet 8-inches) to 3-stories in height (36-feet 9 inches) to 4-stories (49-feet 5-inches) in height along the eastern edge of the EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street November 19, 2019 Page 6 project. The remainder of the residential buildings are a maximum of 4-stories (49-feet 5-inches). The parking structure is 1-level below grade and 5-levels above grade with an outdoor amenity deck on level 6 (60-feet 7-inches). The tallest element of the building is the elevator tower on the amenity deck which reaches a maximum height of 74 feet, 5 inches. One level of the parking structure and amenity deck would extend approximately 10-feet above the residential portion of the building. However, the four-story residential building wraps around the parking structure to minimizes views of the parking structure from the street level. The applicant is proposing an elongated four-way intersection be constructed at Main Street and Santiago Park/Walkie Way. Modifications to the existing intersection would include relocating the southern signal and crosswalk 90 feet to the south, removing the northern crosswalk and closing the eastern crosswalk and leg of the road by installing a new sidewalk. This will result in an off -set intersection design, alterations to the northbound left -turn pocket for the Discovery Cube, and modifications to the traffic flow on Main Street. Modifications will be made to the existing raised center median on Main Street (from Edgewood Road to Santiago Park/Walkie Way) to provide turn pockets of approximately 200 feet, which is more than the 150-foot long turn pockets that currently exist. All improvements to the intersection, median and the closure of the Santiago Park entrance on Main Street will be the responsibility of the applicant. The modified project no longer proposes to use a portion of Santiago Park for access. The existing park vehicular entrance on Main Street will be closed permanently with new curb gutter and sidewalk. Access to the park and the project will be from the modified Main Street/Santiago Park intersection. Project residents and park users would enter and exit the site via Main Street at the intersection. Residents would veer south to enter the parking structure; park users would continue north to the park access road. The entrances to both the park and the project will be on private property, with park access provided via an onsite public access easement allowing park patrons access to the park site. The parking structure is 5-levels above grade and 1-level below grade and is topped by an amenity deck at the 6th level. A total of 407 parking spaces are proposed within the parking structure with another 104 surface level stalls provided on the east site. A total of 511 parking spaces are proposed for a ratio of 2.0 spaces per unit. No tandem parking is proposed. The project may also potentially enter into a shared use arrangement with the ultimate owner of the 1.4-acre parcel to the south which could increase the parking ratio to 2.7 spaces per unit for the project. However, the shared parking arrangement is not counted as part of the 2.0 required parking for the project. Table 3 below provides a breakdown of the proposed parking for the project. Table 3: Applicant Proposed Parking Unit Type/Use Units Rate Space Proposed Studios 74 1.00 74 One -Bedroom 103 1.00 103 Two -Bedrooms 75 2.00 150 Unit Type/Use Units Rate Space Proposed Three -Bedrooms 4 3.00 12 EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street November 19, 2019 Page 7 Guest Parkin .25 64 Leasing Office 4 Surface Level Stalls East 104 Total Residential Spaces 256 2.00 511 Use Units Rate Spaces Proposed Surface Level Parking South 180 spaces Valet Parkin N/A Total with Shared Parking 256 2.7 691 spaces The project has retained a contemporary architectural design. Elements such as stone and brick veneers, metal panels, ceramic tile, metal canopies, flat and metal seamed roofs all assist in conveying a modern design. The color scheme encompasses earth tones of tans, browns and greys. Courtyards are provided along Main Street, Edgewood Road and the internal east elevation to break up massing and create distinct building sections. A total of 25,947-square feet of common open space will be dispersed throughout the project. These areas will consist of 4 ground level courtyards with amenities such as seating areas, tables and chairs, shade trellises, fire pits, and enhanced landscaping. A 9,281-square foot rooftop amenity deck will also be provided that will include a pool and spa, cabanas, fire pits, lounge chairs, shade structures and stairwells, an elevator tower and restrooms. The rooftop deck is surrounded by parapet walls to minimize views into the neighborhood and is approximately 240-feet from the east property line. The club room and fitness center provide residents with opportunities for on -site services and entertainment space. In addition, private open space in the form of patios or balconies will be provided for each unit. The balconies and patios range from 53 to 77 square feet in size. As proposed, there are 46 studio unit which do not have a private patio or balcony; however, the Specific Development requires that all units have a balcony or similar private open space, a bike repair room and a bike storage component. The missing balconies and bike rooms will be incorporated and verified during the plan check process. Prior project amenities such as a dog wash room, Amazon lockers, and business services room have been eliminated from this proposal. The applicant is proposing to retain all healthy trees along the east and southern property lines. An arborist report was prepared that included mitigation measures that will ensure the trees remain in a healthy condition both pre and post -construction. The report also identified 8 trees (7 Sweet Gum trees and 1 Cypress tree) along the eastern property line that are in an unhealthy condition and are proposed to be removed. Additional trees of a similar size and type as the mature trees will be planted to fill in those areas where trees have been removed or are missing. This proposal will also require two existing Palm Trees on Edgewood Road to be removed in order to accommodate an emergency access road at the east end of the site. This tree removal will require review from the Environmental and Transportation Advisory Committee, which will occur at a later date. However, the applicant has been working with the Orange County Fire Authority in an effort to utilize an existing driveway on Edgewood Road as the emergency access point; thereby allowing the mature Palm Trees to remain. Finally, the applicant is proposing to raise the height of the wall adjacent to the single-family dwellings on the east property line from six feet to eight feet in height. EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street November 19, 2019 Page 8 This project is required to comply with the City's Housing Opportunity Ordinance (HOO). To satisfy the provisions of the HOO, applicant is proposing to pay an in -lieu fee in excess of $3,000,000. See Table 4 below for a preliminary breakdown of the proposed HOO fee. Table 4: Housing Opportunity Fee Summary Habitable Square Inclusionary Housing Estimated Previous Project Footage Fee Fee 205,865 $15 per square foot $3,087,975 $4,236,900 (282,460 SF 'As measured from the exterior walls of the residential units. This calculation does not include exterior hallways, common areas, landscape, open space or exterior stairways' Environmental Impact Report The applicant submitted a development proposal that requires the approval of several discretionary applications. Given the size and location of the project, as well as the proposed zoning and general plan modifications, extensive environmental review was needed. After completion of the Initial Study, it was determined that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) required the preparation and certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) for this project. The purpose of an EIR is to identify the significant effects on the environment of a project, to identify alternatives to the project, and to indicate the manner in which those significant effects can be mitigated or avoided. To determine what potential effects would be caused by the project, the EIR analyzed issues related to Aesthetics; Air Quality; Biological Resources; Cultural/Historic Resources; Greenhouse Gas Emissions; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Land Use and Planning; Noise; Population and Housing; Public Services; Transportation and Circulation; Tribal Cultural Resources; Utilities and Service Systems; and Energy. On February 12, 2018, the Initial Study and Notice of Preparation were released to solicit comments regarding the scope and content of the Draft EIR (DEIR). A scoping meeting was held on March 1, 2018 with approximately 164 people in attendance. A total of 163 written comment letters were received at the conclusion of the 30-day public comment period. The comments were reviewed and additional areas of analysis and studies were added to the scope of the Draft EIR as appropriate. The comments are included as Appendix A of the Draft EIR. The Draft EIR analyzed the direct and indirect impacts resulting from construction and operation of the originally proposed 496-unit project. In addition to analyzing fourteen environmental topic areas, the EIR also evaluated three options for access and egress to the project. The analysis included Main Street access only as proposed (Option A), access from Main Street plus a secondary access/egress driveway at the Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park intersection (Option B), and access/egress from both Main Street and Edgewood Road (Option C). Three project alternatives were also analyzed within the document. These included a no build alternative, where the existing office building would remain and be reoccupied by an office use (Alternative 1); a reduced multi -family project consisting of a 30 percent reduction in density EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street November 19, 2019 Page 9 (Alternative 2); and build out of the site under the existing Professional zoning district development standards, which could result in an approximately 390,000 square foot office building (Alternative 3). The Draft EIR determined that the originally proposed project would require mitigation related to aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, hazardous materials, construction noise and vibration, interior noise, and tribal resources. Aesthetic impacts would remain significant and unavoidable after mitigation. On August 7, 2018, the Draft EIR was circulated for review and comment to public, City Council, Planning Commission, local, regional and state agencies, and interested parties for a 45-day public comment review period. In addition, a Planning Commission public hearing was held on August 27, 2018 where staff presented the EIR process and environmental information to the Planning Commission and pubic and received public comments on the DEIR. To allow for additional time for public review and comment, and at the request of the North Santa Ana Preservation Alliance, the City extended the DEIR public comment period by an additional two weeks. At the close of the review and comment period on October 4, 2018, a total of 44 comment letters were received on the Draft EIR. The City has evaluated the comments received from persons and agencies on the Draft EIR and completed detailed Response to Comments, revisions to the Draft EIR including clarifications and/or corrections to typographical errors, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). The response to comments, MMRP and Final EIR were published on November 15, 2018 for public review. The Draft EIR, responses to comments document, and revisions to the Draft EIR consist of the Final EIR for the project. Clarifications to the Final EIR Clarifications to the Final EIR (October 2019) have been prepared to determine if any new or additional environmental impacts would result from the October modified project. The analysis concludes that the October modified project, which reduces the number of units from 496 to 256 (48.3 percent reduction), reduces the height of the structures, revises the vehicular entry to the project, incorporates surface level parking lots to increase building setbacks along the east and south property lines, and creates a separate parcel of land for parking purposes would not result in any new adverse environmental impacts from those that were previously disclosed and discussed in the Final EIR. As previously concluded, aesthetics remains a significant and unavoidable impact after mitigation. The modified projected population is estimated to be 502 residents, which is a reduction of 453 residents from the original 496-unit project. In addition, the number of daily trips is projected to be reduced from 2,698 trips to 1,512 trips, or 1,186 trips less than the 496-unit project. Expected water demands will be reduced by over half, or approximately 62.44 acre feet per year. Based on the fact that the October modified project did not have or create any impacts that were not previously studied and disclosed, recirculation of the EIR is not required for the modified project pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5. The EIR identified one significant and unavoidable impact associated with the originally proposed project, which pertains to aesthetics. Based on the City's visual criteria related to scale, height EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street November 19, 2019 Page 10 and setbacks, it was determined that the project would result in a substantial change in views from existing conditions and would result in a significant and unavoidable impact to the aesthetics. The October Modified Projectwould have similar aesthetic impacts compared to the originally proposed project. As this impact cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations is required before the City Council can approve the project. A Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared and is the process through which decision makers balance the economic, legal, social, and technological or other benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental impacts. Development Agreement Due to a reduction in the size of the project and the elimination of the need for a land exchange with the City, the applicant is proposing to amend the terms of the development agreement. The agreement is a legal contract between the developer and the City that defines the terms and nature of development proposed for the project site. Highlights of the revised DA include: 1. Term of Agreement. The terms of the agreement remain the same. The right to build the project as entitled for a period of four years, with an opportunity for up to two, consecutive one-year extensions. Extensions shall be subject to approval by both the Owner and the City Manager. Prior to granting an extension, the Owner shall pay $50,000 to the City's General Fund to compensate the City for lost revenue to be received by the City had the project been completed within the first four years. 2. Public Art. The inclusion of public art remains the same. The Owner shall create, install, and maintain a public art project with a value equivalent to 0.5% of the total construction cost of the project. The work(s) of art shall be in place prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the project and shall be maintained in perpetuity by the property owner. 3. Modification to the Santiago Park Improvement. The term to construct park improvements up to $1,400,000 remains. However, the terms have been modified to propose that the City and developer equally share in the cost of the Santiago Park improvements. The developer will be responsible to front the cost of construction and construct the park improvements and contribute up to 50% of the estimated construction cost ($700,000). The City's 50% portion would be repaid over a period of three years. These park improvements include, but are not limited to, installation of irrigation, landscaping, security lighting and bike trail enhancements to Santiago Park. 4. Modification to the Park Santiago Neighborhood Benefits Package. The developer has eliminated the on -site Amazon lockers from the benefit package. The developer has retained the terms to provide Park Santiago Neighborhood residents with access to on - site amenities and 24-hour roving security patrol within the Park Santiago Neighborhood and Santiago Park as shown on Exhibit H to the Development Agreement for a 55-year period unless determined during an annual review that the term shall end earlier. EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street November 19, 2019 Page 11 5. Elimination of Historic District Application. The developer has eliminated the term to contribute up to $150,000 towards the costs and expenses associated with processing the application for historic district consideration, including reimbursing the City for costs incurred conducting the survey and any environmental review. 6. Modification to Park Santiago Public Improvements. The developer has eliminated the term to install neighborhood entry monuments at three locations. The developer has retained the terms to provide traffic calming at up to three locations, street lighting enhancements in the Park Santiago neighborhood, and a street light, and themed decorative pavement at Main Street/Walkie Way and Main Street/Santiago Park Drive at the direction of the Public Works Agency. The agreement also includes provisions for an overcrowding management plan, parking management plan, live work preference plan, local sourcing plan, construction management, and property maintenance plans. The development agreement has been signed by the applicant indicating agreement to the terms. The agreement is not considered final until the City Council has reviewed and approved the agreement and the agreement is executed by all parties. General Plan Amendment To allow for the construction of a multi -family residential development on this parcel, a general plan amendment is still required. Currently, the land use designation for this site is Professional and Administrative Office (PAO) with a maximum floor area ratio of 1.5, which applies to areas that are predominately professional offices and/or administrative offices or areas where such development is encouraged. The modified project will require an amendment to the Land Use Element to amend the General Plan Land Use designation of the site to District Center (DC) with a density of 58 dwelling units per acre or a floor area ratio of 1.43. The modified project is consistent with the existing allowable floor area ratio of 1.5. District Centers are major activity areas of the City. Currently, several areas to the northwest, northeast, south of the Santa Ana 1-5 Freeway and along Main Street north of Seventeenth Street are designated as District Centers. District Centers are designed to serve as anchors to the City's commercial corridors and to accommodate higher density development projects. These areas are to be developed with an urban character that includes a mixture of high-rise offices, commercial and multi -family residential uses which provide shopping, business, cultural and housing opportunities within close proximity to each other, close to transportation opportunities and in prime development focus areas. Residential development within these areas is allowed at a density of up to 90 acres. If approved, the project could support several goals and policies of the Housing Element. First, the project would be consistent with Goal 2, which encourages diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that accommodate Santa Ana's residents and workforce of all household types, income levels and age groups to foster an inclusive community. Second, the project would support Goal 4, to provide adequate rental and ownership housing opportunities and supportive services. Further, the project would be consistent with Policy HE-2.2 to create EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street November 19, 2019 Page 12 District Centers with high intensity, mixed -use urban villages and pedestrian oriented experiences. Finally, the project would be consistent with Policy HE-2.4 to facilitate diverse types, prices and sizes of housing. The project would also be consistent with goals of the Land Use Element, including Goal 1 to promote a balance of land uses to address basic community needs, and Goal 6 to reduce residential overcrowding to promote public health and safety. The proposed project will provide additional market rate housing in the City, thereby assisting in addressing the shortage of available housing within the region. The project will also provide additional housing options for those seeking housing within the jobs rich northern area of the City. The upscale multi -family development will also support Urban Design Element Goal 1 to improve the physical appearance of the City through development of a district that projects a sense of place, positive community image, and quality environment. Amendment Application Currently, the zoning designation for this site is Professional (P), which permits a variety of business uses that aim to create a professional business environment and prohibits residential uses. To allow the construction of a multi -family residential development and parking on this parcel, an amendment application (zone change) to change from Professional (P) to a Specific Development No. 93 (SD-93) designation is required. The proposed SD designation will break the site into two distinct zones: Zone 1 will allow the residential development and a surface parking lot for the project, while Zone 2 will only allow surface parking. This action will ensure consistency between zoning and the General Plan, assuming the associated general plan amendment is approved. The Specific Development No. 93 (SD-93) will be established for the purpose of protecting and promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the City and its residents. If the zone change is approved, a series of site -specific objectives and development standards will guide the development of the project. Specifically, the SD-93 document includes a menu of development standards which establish permitted and conditional uses and regulate density, circulation, open space, setbacks, parking, height and landscape requirements and includes provisions for construction and maintenance to allow the exclusive entitlement of the residential project. Approval of the proposal would allow for the construction of a high density residential development in an urbanized setting that is within close proximity to neighborhood services and amenities. When considering a zone change it is important to look at the surrounding land uses and economic factors. The jobs to housing balance is evaluated by comparing project -generated jobs and housing units to forecasts of employment and housing. An imbalance in the ratio, either too much housing or too many jobs, can result in longer commutes and air quality and traffic problems associated with commuting. Based on SCAG profiles and projections, Santa Ana is a jobs rich area with 2.06 jobs per housing unit. SCAG considers an area as balanced when the jobs -housing ratio is 1.36; therefore, providing more housing would reduce the ratio to 2.05. Furthermore, in the second quarter of 2019, the City's office occupancy rate was 12.72 percent, which remains higher than the neighboring central cities of Orange (10.64%) and Tustin (10.37%) and the County as a whole (11.4%), with the exception of Anaheim which currently has a higher vacancy rate (16.34%). EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street November 19, 2019 Page 13 Therefore, the change from Professional to Specific Development would not be a significant impact to professional office districts. In addition, use of the site for residential development is supported as the location has elements to make the site a viable residential development. The elements include having regional access to freeway and transportation systems, the site is within close proximity to educational, cultural activities, employment centers, and retail and commercial shopping opportunities are found nearby. Furthermore, several nearby properties are designated as Specific Developments. The property would be developed at a higher density than the nearby single-family residential uses. However, multi -family uses are often used in planning and zoning practice to buffer higher intensity uses like commercial or industrial uses from single-family residential uses and multi -family and single-family uses are more compatible in nature to each other. If approved, the zone change would need to be approved in conjunction with the proposed general plan amendment. This would result in a project that is consistent with the goals and objectives of City's General Plan land use designation of District Center. The project will promote an urban development where office, retail and residential activities would coexist in close proximity and in a mixed -use setting. Further, the project will contribute towards the improvement of the character of the northern section of the City. Finally, the development, through the construction of the proposed public improvements and site amenities, will contribute to the enhancement of the area and serve as a buffer between commercial and high intensity uses and the lower density residential area. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS The proposed project would convert an office development into a residential development. A fiscal and economic impact analysis was prepared by RSG, Inc. A memorandum was provided based on the proposed 256-unit project. In addition to the financial contributions included in the Development Agreement, RSG anticipates the following fiscal outcomes over a 25-year forecast period: • Approximately $16.6 million in revenue to the City's General Fund (construction period revenues, recurring property tax revenue, utility user tax, residential sales tax and business tax) (formerly $22.5 million) • Approximately $5.0 million in expenditures from the City General Fund (public services) (formerly $6.7 million) The updated net General Fund impact from the acquisition and development of the Project is projected to be approximately $11.6 million ($16.6 million revenue, less $5.0 million expenditures) over the next 25 years, or an average of $464,000 per year. Table 5: Public Notification Public Notification & Community Outreach Required Measures A Sunshine Ordinance Community Meeting was held on November 15, 2017 from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. The sign in sheet included 263 names. EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street November 19, 2019 Page 14 Required Measures Notification by mail was mailed on November 8, 2019 to all property owners and occupants within 500 feet of the project site and notification was provided to all interested parties that have requested to receive a notice with contact information on file with the City. Newspaper posting was published in the Orange County Register on November 8, 2019. CONCLUSION The modified project has been reduced in density and height in response to comments received from the community. Further, no new or additional environmental impacts would result from the modified project. General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06 and Amendment Application No. 2018- 10 support redevelopment of the site with a residential project that will provide new market -rate housing in a prime location that is accessible to retail and employment opportunities with multimodal transportation options. Additionally, public benefits from the Development Agreement will lead to new public art and a long-term security patrol of the residential neighborhood and Santiago Park. The project will also enhance the City's economic and fiscal viability through the increase in property tax values as well as an increase in sales tax generated from the residents. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal No. 3 Economic Development, Objective No. 2 (create new opportunities for business/job growth and encourage private development through new General Plan and Zoning Ordinance policies). Minh Thai Executive Director Planning and Building Agency Exhibits: 1. City Council Resolution Denying the Project 2. City Council Resolution adopting the CEQA Findings of Fact, certifying the Final EIR and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations & Exhibits 3. Ordinance approving the Development Agreement & Exhibits (Legal Description and Development Agreement) 4. Resolution approving the General Plan Amendment & Exhibits (General Plan Land Use Map and Text Amendments) 5. Ordinance Approving the Amendment Application & Exhibits (Zoning Map and Text Amendments) 6. October 28, 2019 Planning Commission Staff Report *:1:111111i1 LS 11.19.19 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING THE CERTIFICATION OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 2018-01 (SCH #2018021031), AND DENYING AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2018-10, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2018-01, AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-06 FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AT 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: WHEREAS, Jeremy Ogulnick, representing AC 2525 Main LLC ("Applicant'), is requesting that the City Council certify Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 2018-01 and adopt the findings of fact, statement of overriding considerations, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the proposed project. Further, the applicant is requesting approval of Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 to allow the construction of a 256-unit multi- family apartment project and surface level parking at the property located at 2525 North Main Street; and WHEREAS, the site contains a two-story, 81,000 square foot office building that has been vacant for several years. The Applicant proposes to redevelop the site with a residential use; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-two (62) speakers expressed opposition and two (2) expressed support of the project. In addition, ninety-eight (98) individuals submitted comments with ninety-four (94) in opposition and four (4) in support; and WHEREAS, after hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the Applicant, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission by a vote of 3:2, voted to recommend denial of the project. Since the entitlements require final action by the City Council, the actions were forwarded to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2019, the City gave public notice of a City Council public hearing for consideration of Environmental Impact Report No. Resolution No. 2019-xx EXHIBIT 1 Page 1 of 2018-01 (State Clearinghouse Number #2018021031), Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 by advertising in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation, and by mailing to owners of property and residents within 500 feet of the Project; and WHEREAS, on November 19, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018- 01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the Applicant, the public and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted to not certify the EIR, adopt the findings, the statement of overriding considerations and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program and deny the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana agrees with the Planning Commission recommendation of denial and determines that all of the findings required for certifying Final EIR No. 2018-01 and the findings of fact, statement of overriding considerations, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the proposed project could not be made. Further, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana agrees with the Planning Commission recommendation to deny the project and the determination that all of the findings required for approval of Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 could not be made. The City Council does hereby find and determine that the following finding has been established for the project: 1. That the proposed use, under the circumstances of the particular case, will not result in good planning practice and will be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of persons residing and working in the vicinity; will create a significant and unavoidable aesthetic impact to the existing environment and physical surroundings that cannot be mitigated due to the massing and the height of the residential and parking structures. The residential units and parking structure range from 2 to 4 levels in height. Even with mitigations, the aesthetics of the height and the massing of the structures were found to be incompatible with the adjacent one and two-story single family homes to the east and south of the project site within the Park Santiago neighborhood; and at 58 dwelling units per acre, the proposed project will create a significantly higher residential density and development intensity and is incompatible with the density of the residential developments to the east and south currently developed at 7 dwelling units per acre within the Park Santiago neighborhood. WHEREAS, the City Council, after due notice as required by law, conducted a full and fair public hearing to consider Final EIR No. 2018-01, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 2 of 4 and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 to allow for a 256-unit multi -family apartment project at the property located at 2525 North Main Street on November 19, 2019 at which time, all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and present evidence. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing and based upon the finding and determination articulated in Section 1 above, hereby: a. Does not certify Final EIR No. 2018-01 and does not adopt the findings of fact, the statement of overriding considerations, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the proposed project. b. Denies Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Council Action dated November 19, 2019, the Request for Planning Commission Action dated October 28, 2019, and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. ADOPTED this day of November, 2019. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By:_ Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: ABSTENTIONS: Councilmembers: Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 3 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on November 19, 2019. Date: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT 2 LS 11.19.19 RESOLUTION NO, 2019-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA (1) ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, (2) CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH #2018021031), (3) ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT, (4) ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND (5) APPROVING THE PROPOSED ADDINGTON MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AT 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: WHEREAS, AC 2525 Main, LLC ("Applicant") seeks to develop the Addington Multi -Family Residential Project ("proposed Project"), originally proposed as a 496-unit multi -family residential project on a 5.93-acre site at 2525 North Main Street in Santa Ana, California ("Project Site"); and WHEREAS, during the entitlement and environmental review process, and in response to comments and concerns raised by the public and the City's elected officials, the Applicant has proposed modifications to the original proposal; and WHEREAS, the Project as currently proposed now entails, among other things, (1) demolition of the existing 81,172 square foot vacant two-story office building and 442-space surface parking lot on the Project Site; (2) redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 284 space surface level parking lot for residential and commercial parking; (3) approval of Development Agreement No. 2018-01 between the City of Santa Ana ("City") and Applicant; (4) approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, which would change the Project Site's existing land use designation of Professional & Administration Office (PAO) to District Center (DC); and (5) approval of Amendment Application No. 2018-10, which would change the zoning of the Project Site from Professional (P) to Specific Development No. 93 (SD-93) designation; and WHEREAS, the proposed Project has been submitted and requires review and certification of an Environmental Impact Report (the "EIR") (SCH# 2018021031) (Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01), and approval of Development Agreement Resolution No. 2019-xx EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 10 No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10; and WHEREAS, the Project Site is located at the northeast corner of North Main Street and Edgewood Road and the properties immediately adjacent to the site include Santiago Park to the north, single-family residential homes to the south and east and the Discovery Science Center of Orange County across Main Street to the west. The Project Site is located on North Main Street, an urban corridor within the City. The Project Site is also located at a main entry point to the Park Santiago Neighborhood, a residential neighborhood predominantly comprised of detached single-family dwellings; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 21067 of the Public Resources Code, and section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, § 15000 et sec.), the City of Santa Ana is the lead agency for the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines section 15063, the City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the Project may have a significant effect on the environment and to evaluate whether an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was required; and WHEREAS, after conducting the Initial Study, the City determined that an EIR should be prepared to evaluate the proposed Project's potential to have a significant effect on the environment in the following areas: Aesthetics, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Land Use and Planning, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation/Traffic, and Utilities; and WHEREAS, based on the Initial Study, the City further determined that impacts to Aesthetics regarding scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway; to Agriculture and Forestry Resources regarding farmland; agricultural land, forest land timberland or conversion of; to Biological Resources regarding wetlands, conflicts with a tree preservation policy or ordinance, conflicts with a Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan; to Geology and Soils regarding a known earthquake fault, landslides, or soils incapable of adequately supporting septic tanks or waste water disposal; to Hazards regarding sites listed on a hazardous materials site, an airport land use plan, private airstrip or wildland fires; to Hydrology and Water Quality regarding housing within a 100-year flood hazard area; to Land Use and Planning regarding conflicts with a Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan; to Mineral Resources regarding loss of a mineral resource to the region or locally; to Noise regarding conflicts with an airport land use plan or private airstrip; Population and Housing regarding displacing existing housing necessitating replacement housing or displacing substantial number of persons necessitating construction of replacement housing; to Transportation/Traffic regarding a change in air traffic patterns; to Utilities and Service Systems regarding federal, state and local solid waste regulations would have no impact or be less than significant and thus need not be analyzed further in the EIR; and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 2 of 10 WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines section 15082, on February 12, 2018, the City sent to the Office of Planning and Research and each responsible and trustee agency a Notice of Preparation ("NOP") - which was also published in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation - stating that an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number #2018021031) would be prepared; and WHEREAS, during the public comment period, copies of the Initial Study were available for review and inspection at City Hall (20 Civic Center Plaza), on the City's website, and at the Santa Ana Public Library (26 Civic Center Plaza); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083.9 and State CEQA Guidelines sections 15082(c) and 15083, the City held a duly noticed Scoping Meeting on March 1, 2018, to solicit comments on the scope of the environmental review of the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, one hundred and sixty-three (163) comment letters were received in response to the NOP; and WHEREAS, a Draft Environmental Impact Report ("Draft EIR") was prepared for the proposed Project, addressing comments received in response to the NOP and evaluating the proposed Project's potentially significant environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR concluded that the proposed Project would have a significant and unavoidable impact to Aesthetics with the implementation of mitigation measures regarding the existing visual character of the Project Site and its surroundings, as implementation of the proposed Project would result in a significant and unavoidable change in visual scale, height, and setbacks from Santiago Park, Edgewood Road, and North Bush Street; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR further determined that mitigation measures were required to mitigate impacts to a less than significant level for the following resource areas: Air Quality, Biological Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources; and WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines section 15085, a Notice of Completion was prepared and filed with the Office of Planning and Research on August 7, 2018; and WHEREAS, as required by State CEQA Guidelines section 15087(a), the City provided a Notice of Availability of the Draft EIR to the public - and published the Notice of Availability in the Orange County Register - at the same time that the City sent a Notice of Completion to the Office of Planning and Research on August 7, 2018; and WHEREAS, during the public comment period, copies of the Draft EIR and technical appendices were available for review and inspection at City Hall (20 Civic Center Plaza), on the City's website, and at the Santa Ana Public Library (26 Civic Center Plaza); and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 3 of 10 WHEREAS, during the public comment period, on August 27, 2018, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to receive comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15087(i); and WHEREAS, in response to a request from Chatten-Brown & Cartens LLP, on behalf of the North Santa Ana Preservation Alliance, the City extended the Draft Environmental Impact Report public review and comment period to October 4, 2018 to allow additional time for public review and input; and WHEREAS, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines section 15087(e), the Draft EIR was circulated for a 59-day review period, from August 7, 2018 to October 4, 2018; and WHEREAS, during the 59-day public comment period, the City consulted with and requested comments from all responsible and trustee agencies, other regulatory agencies, and others pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15086; and WHEREAS, the City received forty-four (44) written comment letters and six (6) verbal comments on the Draft EIR at the August 27, 2018 public hearing, including a written acknowledgement from the State Clearinghouse that the City has complied with CEQA environmental review requirements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21092.5, on November 15, 2018, the City provided copies of its responses to commenting public agencies and interested organizations and parties more than ten (10) days prior to the City's consideration of the Final EIR; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2018, the City released the Final EIR ("Final EIR"), which consists of the Draft EIR, all technical appendices prepared in support of the Draft EIR, all written comment letters received on the Draft EIR, written responses to all written comment letters received and verbal comments received on the Draft EIR, revisions to the Draft EIR and technical appendices, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and WHEREAS, on November 26, 2018, the Planning Commission continued a duly noticed public hearing for the project to January 14, 2019 and held a second study session to overview the Project and fifty-eight (58) verbal comments were received (twenty-five (25) in support; thirty (31) in opposition and two (2) neutral) and eleven (11) written comments were received (two (2) in support and nine (9) in opposition); and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, seventy-nine (79) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty (30) speakers supported the project, forty-eight (48) opposed it and one speaker was neutral. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council not certify the EIR or adopt the findings, the statement Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 4 of 10 of overriding considerations and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program and deny the Project; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-one (61) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty-eight (38) speakers supported the project, twenty (20) speakers opposed it and three (3) speakers were neutral and the public hearing was continued to the next regular adjourned City Council meeting on February 19, 2019; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, the City Council continued to conduct the duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, one hundred and thirty-one (131) members of the public spoke on the item, twenty-six (26) speakers supported the project and one hundred and five (105) speakers opposed it. Furthermore, one hundred and sixty-six (166) written comments were received with nine (9) in support and one hundred and fifty-seven (157) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted that the applications go back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration after further consultation with the community; and WHEREAS, in June 2019, the applicant submitted a revised plan consisting of development 347 multi -family units (59 dwelling units per acre), with 642 parking spaces (1.85 parking spaces per unit) and parking capacity at 2.0 spaces per unit, within a 4- story residential building wrapped around a five -level parking structure with an amenity deck on the sixth -level, private open space, and redesigned the intersection of Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive to provide access to the project on a 5.93- acre site (the "June Revised Plan"); and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the June Revised Plan. At the meeting, seventy- seven (77) members of the expressed opposition; nine (9) supported the project, and one speaker was neutral. In addition, one -hundred (100) written comments were received with six (6) in support and ninety-four (94) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission vote resulted in an impasse; and WHEREAS, in October 2019, in response to comments received the applicant submitted a further revised plan including redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 284 space surface level parking lot which also reduced the Project's height, increased the Project's setbacks, and modified the Project entrance ("October Modified Project"); and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 5 of 10 WHEREAS, the City has prepared "Clarifications to the Final EIR" to determine if the October Modified Project would result in new or substantially increased environmental effects than those analyzed in the EIR such that the EIR would require recirculation prior to its certification; and WHEREAS, the Clarifications to the Final EIR include detailed analysis, based upon substantial evidence, that demonstrate that the Modified Project would not result in any new or substantially greater impacts than are disclosed in the EIR, no new mitigation measures beyond those identified in the EIR are required, and no additional feasible alternatives or mitigation measures considerably different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-two (62) expressed opposition and two (2) in expressed support the project. In addition, ninety-eight (98) individuals submitted comments with ninety-four (94) in opposition and four (4) in support; and WHEREAS, after hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission by a vote of 3:2, voted to recommend denial of the project. Since the entitlements require final action by the City Council, the actions were forwarded to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2019, the City gave public notice of a City Council public hearing for consideration of Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 (State Clearinghouse Number #2018021031) by advertising in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation, and by mailing to owners of property and residents within 500 feet of the Project; and WHEREAS, on November 19, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and at which hearing members of the public were afforded an opportunity to comment upon Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted to certify the EIR, adopt the findings, the statement of overriding considerations and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program and approve the October Modified Project; and WHEREAS, the "EIR" consists of the Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, and all attachments and appendices to both the Final EIR and the Clarifications to the Final EIR, as well as the Draft EIR and its attachments and appendices (as modified by the Final EIR); and WHEREAS, all potentially significant adverse environmental impacts were sufficiently analyzed in the EIR; and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 6 of 10 WHEREAS, as contained herein, the City Council has endeavored in good faith to set forth the basis for its decision and recommendations on the Project; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of the Public Resources Code and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City in connection with the preparation of the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Project have been adequately evaluated; and WHEREAS, all of the findings and conclusions made by the City Council pursuant to this Resolution are based upon the oral and written evidence presented to it as a whole and the entirety of the administrative record for the Project, which are incorporated herein by this reference, and not based solely on the information provided in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Project's significant environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level even with the incorporation of all feasible mitigation measures, as identified in the EIR, are described in Section 7 of the CEQA Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Project's environmental impacts that are less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation measures, as identified in the EIR, are described in Section 8 of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit "A": and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that environmental impacts that are identified in the EIR as less than significant and do not require mitigation are described in Section 9 of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the cumulative impacts of the Project identified in the EIR are described in Section 9.17 of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the potential significant and irreversible environmental changes that would result from the proposed Project identified in the EIR and set forth herein, are described in Section 10 of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as "Exhibit A"; and WHEREAS, the existence of any growth -inducing impacts resulting from the proposed Project identified in the EIR and set forth herein, are described in Section 11 of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, alternatives to the proposed Project that might further reduce the proposed Project's environmental impacts are described in Section 12 of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, prior to taking action, the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed and considered all of the information and data in the administrative record, including but not limited to the EIR, and all oral and written evidence presented to it during all meetings and hearings; and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 7 of 10 WHEREAS, the EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City Council and is deemed adequate for purposes of making decisions on the merits of the Project; and WHEREAS, no comments made in the public hearing conducted by the City Council and no additional information submitted to the City have produced substantial new information requiring recirculation of the EIR or additional environmental review of the Project under Public Resources Code section 21092.1 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred: and NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City Council hereby finds that it has been presented with the EIR, which it has reviewed and considered, and further finds that the EIR is an accurate and objective statement that has been completed in full compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and that the EIR reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City. 2. The City Council declares that no evidence of new significant impacts or any new information of "substantial importance", as defined by State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5, has been received by the City after circulation of the Draft EIR that would require recirculation of the EIR. NOW THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY: 1. Adopts the Findings of Fact, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A." 2. Certifies the EIR based on the entirety of the record of proceedings 3. Adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", after balancing the significant and unavoidable aesthetic impacts of the Project against the benefits of the Project. 4. Adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C", consistent with Public Resources Code section 21081.6; make implementation of the Mitigation Measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program a condition of approval of the Project; and find that in the event of any inconsistencies between the Mitigation Measures set forth herein and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program shall control. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 8 of 10 5. Directs City staff to cause a Notice of Determination to be filed and posted with the County of Orange Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and the State Clearinghouse within five (5) working days of the City Council's final Project approval. Section 2. INDEMNIFICATION. The Applicant has agreed to and shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the Project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. Section 3. EXECUTION OF RESOLUTION. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the Clerk of the Council shall attest and certify to the adoption thereof. ADOPTED this day of 12019. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By:seel` Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 9 of 10 AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xxx to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on November 19, 2019. Date: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT A CEQA FINDINGS, FACTS IN SUPPORT OF FINDINGS FINAL FIR FOR THE MAGNOLIA AT THE PARK MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT STATE CLEARINGHOUSE No: 2018021031 City of Santa Ana: DP No. 2017-34 1.0 1.1 Statutory Requirements for Findings The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that written findings be made by the lead agency in connection with certification of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prior to approval of the Project (Sections 15091 and 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21081 of the State of California Public Resources Code). CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 states: a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings are: 1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. 2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can or should be adopted by such other agency. 3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. b) The findings required by subdivision (a) shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. c) The finding in subdivision (a)(2) shall not be made if the agency making the finding has concurrent jurisdiction with another agency to deal with identified feasible mitigation measures or alternatives. The finding in subdivision (a)(3) shall describe the specific reasons for rejecting identified mitigation measures and project alternatives. d) When making the findings required in subdivision (a)(1), the agency shall also adopt a program for reporting on or monitoring the changes which it has either required in the project or made a condition of approval to avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental effects. These measures must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. e) The public agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other materials The CEQA Guidelines are codified in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing at section 15000. Resolution No. Page 1 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR which constitute the record of the proceedings upon which its decision is based. f) A statement made pursuant to Section 15093 does not substitute for the findings required by this section. CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 provides that: a) CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits of a proposed project, against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, or a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." b) When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final FIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final FIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section 15091. The City of Santa Ana, as lead agency, having received, reviewed and considered the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Magnolia at the Park Multi -Family Residential Project (currently known as "The Addington") (Project), the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), and the Clarifications to the Final FIR (Clarifications), SCH No. 2018021031, as well as all other information in the record of proceedings on this matter, hereby adopts the following Findings and Facts in Support of Findings (Findings) and Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC). These Findings set forth the environmental basis for the discretionary actions to be undertaken by the City of Santa Ana for the development and operation of the Project. This action includes the approval of the DEIR SCH No. 2018021031. 1.2 Organization/Format of Findings These Findings have been organized into the following sections: • Section 1.0: Introduction, provides the organization and records information for these Findings. • Section 2.0: Project Location, provides a summary of the location of the Project. • Section 3.0: Project Description, provides a summary of the Project, including an overview of the discretionary actions required for Project approval and a statement of the Project objectives. • Section 4.0: Discretionary Actions, provides a list of the discretionary approvals that are required by the Project. • Section 5.0: Statement of Project Objectives, provides the statement of objective sought by the Project. Resolution No. Page 2 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR • Section 6.0: Environmental Review and Public Participation provides a description of the CEQA process conducted for the Project. • Section 7.0: Significant Effects that Cannot be Mitigated to a Less than Significant Level, provides the Findings for the impacts that would remain significant and unavoidable after implementation of regulations that reduce impacts and project -specific mitigation measures. • Section 8.0: Effects Determined to be Mitigated to Below a Level of Significance, provides the Findings for impacts that can feasibly be mitigated to a less than significant level through implementation of regulations that reduce impacts, Project Design Features (PDFs), and mitigation measures. • Section 9.0: Effects Determined Not to be Significant, provides the Findings regarding the environmental impacts that were determined to be less than significant as a result of the Initial Study/Notice of Preparation (NOP) and/or analysis within the EIR. • Section 10.0: Significant Irreversible Environmental Change and Energy Use. • Section 11.0: Growth Inducing Effects, provides the Findings regarding the CEQA-required analysis for growth inducement. • Section 12.0: Alternatives, provides Findings regarding project alternatives. 1.3 Record of Proceedings For purposes of CEQA and these Findings, the Record of Proceedings for the Project consists of, but is not limited to, the following documents and other evidence, at a minimum: • The NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the Project • The DEIR, including all technical studies included in the appendices for the Project • All written comments submitted by agencies or members of the pubic during the public review comment period on the DEIR • The reports and technical memoranda included or referenced in the Response to Comments • All written and verbal public testimony presented during a noticed public hearing for the proposed Project • The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program • All documents, studies, EIRs or other materials incorporated by reference in the DEIR and FEIR including Clarifications • The Resolutions adopted by the City of Santa Ana in connection with the Project and all documents incorporated by reference therein • Matters of common knowledge to the City, including but not limited to federal, state and local laws and regulations • Any documents expressly cited in these Findings • Any other relevant materials required to be in the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code Section 21167.6(e) Resolution No. Page 3 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR • The Final FIR for the Project, including the "Clarifications to the Final EIR" 1.4 Custodian and Location of Records The documents and other material that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City of Santa Ana, Planning Division Counter at 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20 Santa Ana, California, 92701. The custodian for these documents is the City of Santa Ana. Copies of these documents which constitute the record of proceedings are and at all relevant times have been and will be available upon request at the City of Santa Ana. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(e). 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION The Project is located at 2525 North (N.) Main Street, in the northern portion of the City of Santa Ana approximately 500 feet east of Interstate (I)-5. The site is located on the northeast corner of N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. Regional access to the Project site is provided by I-5 and the N. Main Street exit; and local access to the Project site is provided by N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. The Project site consists of 6 contiguous parcels that include Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 003-010- 028, 003-010-01, 003-010-03, 003-010-025, 003-010-026, 003-010-030 and is located within the U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) Orange County 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Quadrangle. 3.0 3.1 Originally Proposed Project As originally proposed and as described and analyzed in the EIR, the Project would redevelop the 5.9- acre Project site to provide 496 for -rent multi -family residential units. The residences would be provided within approximately 572,075 square feet of residential structures. The development would be 5 stories and be topped with mezzanines reaching approximately 65-feet 8-inches in height. The development would tier down to 2-stories (slightly over 20-feet in height) on the eastern portion of the site. The residential units would be wrapped around a 358,630 square foot central parking/fitness center/club room structure with a roofline of approximately 90 feet from the ground surface, which is the highest point of the Project. The Project would result in approximately 930,705 square feet of development and a density of 84 dwelling units per acre, and would provide a mix of studio, one -bedroom, two -bedroom, and three - bedroom units, as shown in Table 1. Table 1: Residential Unit Summary (Originally Proposed Project) Unit Type Number of Units Square Footage of Units Percentage' Studio 73 590 — 740 15% 1 Bedroom 307 610 — 1,090 62% 2 Bedroom 88 910 — 1,470 18% 3 Bedroom 28 1,360 — 1,520 6% Total 496 100% 'Rounded to the nearest oereentme. As originally proposed and as described and analyzed in the EIR, the residential units would be setback a minimum of 40 feet from the cement block wall that forms the eastern Project site boundary and would be separated by 4 courtyards and landscaped areas. The central parking structure would have 9 levels of parking, one of which would be underground; thus, 8 levels of parking would be above ground. The Resolution No. Page 4 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR parking structure would provide direct access to the leasing office and walkways to residential units, a bicycle parking/sharing station, and 904 parking spaces, which is an average of 1.8 spaces per residential unit. The parking spaces would include 122 tandem spaces, 25 electric vehicle charging stations, and 21 spaces compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The parking structure would also provide direct access to the fitness center, club room, and amenity deck located on top of the western portion of the structure. As originally proposed and as described and analyzed in the EIR, the Project would provide open space and recreation facilities that includes approximately 34,300 square feet of exterior open space and recreation facilities and 6,960 square feet of indoor recreation facilities that would contain: 5 recreational courtyard areas, a rooftop amenity deck and fitness center on the roof of the parking structure, community room, and a wellness center. hi addition, each residential unit includes a private patio or balcony area. The open space, recreation areas, and other amenities are listed in Table 2. Table 2: Summary of Project Open Space / Recreation Amenities (Originally Proposed Project) Open Space Approximate Square Footage Open Space Recreational Courtyards 1-5 22,900 Wellness Center 1,600 Community Room 4,700 Resident Services Business Center 3,900 Bic cle Repair Room 280 Dog Wash Room 40 Fitness Center 5,400 Amenity Deck not including Fitness Center 11,400 As originally proposed and as described and analyzed in the EIR, the Project would provide vehicular access via a driveway on N. Main Street that would guide vehicles to the parking structure that provides direct access to the residential units, guest parking, and the leasing office. The Project was also originally proposed to implement a secondary access from either Santiago Park (Option B) or Edgewood Road (Option C). Additionally, separate emergency access would be provided from Edgewood Road by knoxbox-gated entrances and onsite emergency lanes that meet the City's Fire Code requirements. As originally proposed and as described and analyzed in the EIR, the Project would connect to the existing water, sewer, and drainage infrastructure in the N. Main Street and Edgewood Road right-of-ways. • Water Infrastructure: The Project would install new water infrastructure on the Project site that would connect to the existing 16-inch water pipelines in N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. The new onsite water system would be compliant with the CalGreen Plumbing Code (Title 24) for efficient use of water. Wastewater Infrastructure: Wastewater from the Project site currently discharges into existing City -owned 6- and 12-inch sewer lines within Edgewood Road. The Project would install a new onsite sewer system that connects to the existing sewer lines in Edgewood Road. Drainage Infrastructure: Surface runoff from the site is conveyed within onsite curb and gutters to an existing catch basin in N. Main Street and sheet flows to an existing drain inlet at the south- west corner of the parking lot. In addition, sheet flows on the north side of the building flow to the existing 10-inch storm water drain that conveys unfiltered runoff to Santiago Creek. The Project would cap this existing 10-inch storm water drain. It would remain in place but would no longer Resolution No. Page 5 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR be used. All of the runoff from the site would be conveyed to infiltrating landscaping areas, catch basins, and storm water drains that would be installed as part of the Project and would be sized to meet the Project's needs. The onsite system would connect to the existing City drain system in N. Main Street and Edgewood Road, which discharges to Santiago Creek. 3.2 Modified Project Subsequent to the circulation of the Draft EIR and preparation of the Final FIR for the Project, the Project applicant submitted a revised development proposal to the City (Modified Project). The Modified Project proposes reducing the number of residential units by 48 percent, reducing the scale of the structures, surface level parking and revising the vehicular access to the site. Specifically, the Modified Project would development the Project site with 256 multi -family residential units surrounding a central parking garage. The residential units are proposed to be provided within approximately 277,281 square feet of residential structures that range between 2 and 4 stories in height. The 2-story residential structures (24- feet, 8-inches in height) would be located on the eastern portion of the site, and be setback a minimum of 90-feet from the eastern boundary of the site with the inclusion of a surface level parking lot. The 3-story residential structures (36-feet, 9-inches in height) would be located both behind the 2-story structures. The remainder of the residential structures would be 4-stories (49-feet, 5-inches in height). The setback of the building along the southern boundary (Edgewood Road) has been increased from 13 feet to approximately 134-feet, with inclusion of a surface parking lot. The residential units would be developed around a 167,253-square foot central parking structure that would have one level of parking underground and 5 levels of parking aboveground. The structure would be centrally located on the site, and be approximately 59-feet in height. The highest point of the Modified Project would be the top of the elevator tower to the amenity deck on top of the parking structure, which would be approximately 75 feet from the ground. Table 1: Proposed Project Modifications Project Characteristic Original PrQiect (per EIR) Modified Project Change Number of Units 496 units 256 units -240 units Density of Residential 84 units per acre 58 units per acre* -26 units per acre* Development Area Residential Unit Mix Studio: 73 units — 15% Studio: 74 units — 29% Studio: +1 units 1 bdr: 307 units — 62% 1 bdr: 103 units — 40% 1 bdr: -204 units 2 bdr: 88 units — 18% 2 bdr: 75 units — 29% 2 bdr: -13 units 3 bdr: 28 units — 6% 3 bdr: 4 units — 2% 3 bdr: -24 units Residential Unit Sizes Studios: 590 — 740 SF Studios: 560 — 590 SF Average unit size is 1 bdr: 610 — 1,090 SF 1 bdr: 630 — 930 SF smaller 2 bdr: 910 — 1,470 SF 2 bdr: 910 — 1,180 SF 3 bdr: 1,360 —1,520 SF 3 bdr: 1,360 SF Stories of Residential 2 to 5 stories with 2 to 4 stories -1 story Structures mezzanines Maximum Height of 65-feet 8-inches 49-feet 5-inches -16-feet 3-inches Residential Structures Height of Parking Structure 90 feet (7 above -ground 59 feet (5 above -ground -31 feet Roofline levels) levels Highest Structure Fitness Center Roofline on Elevator Tower Roofline -15 feet 5 inches Western portion of the towards western portion Amenity Deck — 90 feet of site — 74 feet 5-inches. Resolution No. Page 6 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Project Characteristic Original Project erEIR Modified Project Change Building Setback from 40 foot minimum 90 foot minimum +50 feet Eastern Side Boundary Building Setback from Between 10 feet and 13 feet 134 feet 6-inches +121 feet Southern Side Boundary 4 inches Size of Subterranean Parking 1 level 40,000 square feet 1 level 26,700 square feet -13,300 square feet Parking — Total 904 total spaces 511 spaces dedicated -393 dedicated spaces 691 including shared parking Spaces Per Unit 1.8 2.0 dedicated +0.2 dedicated 2.7 w/ shared parking +0.9 w/ shared arkin Tandem Spaces 122 0 122 Electric Vehicle Sp aces 1 25 15 -10 ADA Spaces 1 21 12 -9 Notes: bdr — bedroom, SF — square feet; w/ — with; w/o — without s not including the OC Discovery Cube shared parking area of 1.42 acres As shown, the proposed Modified Project would reduce the development by 240 units; from 496 units to 256 units, a 48 percent reduction. The proposed Modified Project's residential structures would be one- story lower in height and eliminate mezzanines (approximately 16-feet lower), reduce the residential density by 26 units per acre, and be separated from the eastern side of the site by an additional 50 feet in increased setback when compared to the Project as originally proposed. The height of the centrally located parking structure would be reduced by approximately 31 feet and the highest point of the proposed structures would be 15 feet lower. The Modified Project would provide 12,920 square feet of exterior open space and recreation facilities; this is a reduction of 9,980 square feet from the 22,900 square feet of exterior open space that was included in the Original Project. The types of exterior recreational amenities proposed for the Modified Project are similar to those described in the FIR and includes 3 open space courtyards, and a rooftop amenity deck. The Modified Project also reduces interior amenities by 12,799 square feet, as a result of removing the originally proposed Wellness Center, Community Room, Resident Services/Business Center, Bicycle Repair Room, Dog Wash Room, and reducing the size of the Fitness Center. Consistent with the Original Project, the proposed Modified Project would provide vehicular access by a driveway on N. Main Street that would guide vehicles to the parking structure and provide direct access to the residential units, guest parking, and the leasing office. An optional access was proposed at the intersection of Walkie Way and Main Street. However, the Modified Project proposes to created a single shared access for Santiago Park and the Project. To do this the intersection of Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive will be redesigned. Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive will shift to the south creating an off -set intersection. Santiago Park and the Project will share access from the relocated street. The existing gated vehicular entry along Main Street to Santiago Park would be permanently closed. The proposed emergency access to the Project site would continue to be provided from Edgewood Road by a knoxbox gated entrance and onsite emergency lanes that meet the City's Fire Code requirements. 3.3 Project Design Features A reduction in the number of electric vehicle charging stations are proposed. The Original Project included at least 25 electric vehicle charging stations and the Modified Project includes at least 15 electric vehicle charging stations. No other changes in Project Design Features (PDFs) are proposed. The Project has been Resolution No. Page 7 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR designed to incorporate the following Project Design Features (PDFs) that would prevent or lessen potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the Project. These PDFs will be implemented in the same manner as mitigation measures. PDF-1: The landscape plan will incorporate the existing mature trees located along the eastern Project site boundary and to the extent feasible protect and preserve the existing mature trees within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary that were identified as healthy by the Arborist Report. PDF-2: The Project will include at least 15 electric vehicle charging stations. PDF-3: The Project will include installation and maintenance of air filtration systems with efficiencies equal to or exceeding a Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) 16 as defined by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 52.2 within all buildings. PDF-4: Outdoor trash receptacles will be provided throughout the common areas of the site, including the dog park area, for the tenants to dispose of their refuse in a proper manner. Property maintenance will provide trash and waste material removal, including dog feces disposal bags, to maintain a trash -free property. All wastes shall be collected and properly disposed of off -site. PDF-5: The Project will include safety design features for security, such as low -intensity security lighting, key pads for building access, security cameras, and 24-hour security personnel. 3.4 Construction Activities and Schedule The Project would be developed over an 18-month period, in one construction phase that includes the following stages: (1) demolition of existing building, pavement, removal of infrastructure and some landscaping; (2) grading and excavation; (3) construction of drainage, utilities, and subgrade infrastructure; (4) building construction; and (5) paving and application of architectural coatings. No units will be leased until construction of the entire Project is completed and occupancy permits have been received from the City. Construction activities would be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday and excluding Sundays and federal holidays, which would be consistent with the City's Noise Ordinance (Municipal Code Section 18-314; Special Provisions). However, typical construction activities would occur Monday through Friday, generally 20 days a month. Initial site preparation would include demolition of the existing building and several areas of asphaltic concrete pavements. Demolition would remove all subsurface remnants, including foundations, floor slabs, and any utilities that will not be reutilized with the new development. It is anticipated that a maximum of 120 construction workers would be onsite at one time, which would occur during the building construction phase. Resolution No. Page 8 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR 4.0 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS Implementation of the Project requires several actions by the City, including: Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 201802103 1). Certification of the Final FIR (SCH No. 2018021031) evaluating the environmental impacts resulting from the Project, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), as amended (Pubic Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000 et seq.). The Final FIR provides additional environmental information to responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and other public agencies that may be required to grant approvals and permits or coordinate with the City as part of Project implementation. The Final FIR includes "Clarifications to the Final EIR" which describes the Modified Project and analyzes the potential of the Modified Project to result in new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. • General Plan Land Use Amendment. The Project requires City approval of General Land Use Amendment, which would change the General Plan Land Use designation of the Project area from PAO (Professional & Administration Office) to District Center (DC), which allows residential uses to a maximum density of 90 dwelling units per acre. Amendment Application for a Zone Change. The Project requires approval of an Amendment Application from the City for a zone change a c from Professional (P) to Specific Development (SD). The SD zone provides site specific development standards. • Development Agreement. To guide development and services as described in the Project Description previously pursuant to a contract between the City of Santa Ana and Project Applicant. 5.0 STATEMENT OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES The following objectives support the project's underlying purpose to develop multi -family residential uses on the project site and assist with meeting the City's housing needs: • Redevelop existing underutilized parcels to implement development of new high -quality housing. • Increase high -quality housing near existing employment centers. • Promote an improved jobs/housing balance by locating attractive new housing in proximity to employment centers. • Provide housing in close proximity to commercial areas, freeways, and transit. • Redevelop existing land uses that would utilize existing infrastructure, including: water, sewer, arterial roadways, transit, and freeways. • Implement capital investment to enhance the City's economic and fiscal viability pursuant to the City of Santa Ana Strategic Plan. • Provide a safe, high -quality, modern residential community with open space and various recreation amenities. Resolution No. Page 9 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION In conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City conducted an extensive environmental review of the Project. • The City circulated a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Initial Study for a 30-day public review period, which commenced on February 12, 2018, and ended on March 13, 2018. The NOP was distributed to all public agencies, trustee agencies, and the State Office of Planning and Research; posted in the OC Register, posted at the Orange County Clerk -Recorder's office and on the City's website; and provided for public review at the Santa Ana Public Library and at the City's Planning Division counter. • Based on the Initial Study and Environmental Check List Form (CEQA Guidelines Appendix G), the City staff determined that an EIR should be prepared for the Project. A scoping meeting was held during the NOP review period to allow public agencies, local residents, and interested persons an opportunity to review the Project and provide input on issues to be addressed in the FIR. The scoping meeting was held on March 1, 2018 from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. at the First Congressional Church of Santa Ana, located at 2555 Santiago Street. Notice of the scoping meeting was sent to state and local agencies, cities, individuals who expressed interest in the Project and notice of the meeting was also included in the Notice of Preparation. • The scope of the DEIR was determined based on the City's Initial Study, comments received in response to the NOP, and comments received at the scoping meeting conducted by the City. Section 2.4, Areas of Controversy of the DEIR summarizes the issues identified for analysis. • The DEIR was originally made available for a 45-day public review period from August 7, 2018 to September 20, 2018. The public review period was then extended to 59-days (an additional 2 weeks to October 4, 2018) in response to a request from the public. The Notice of Completion was sent to all interested persons, agencies, cities and organizations and notice posted at the Orange County Clerk -Recorder's office and in the OC Register. The Notice of Completion was also sent to the State Clearinghouse for distribution to additional public agencies. Copies of the DEIR were made available on the City's website at: http://santa- ana.org/pba/planning/2525mainresidentialdevelopment.asp, and at the following locations: o City of Santa Ana, Planning Division Counter, 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20, Santa Ana, CA 92701 o City of Santa Ana Public Library, 26 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 • On August 27, 2018, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to receive comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report. Notice of the meeting was posted in the OC Register and mailed to property owner and occupants within 500 feet. • On November 15, 2018, the City released the Final FIR which consists of the Draft FIR, all technical appendices prepared in support of the Draft EIR, all written comment letters received on the Draft FIR, written responses to all written comment letters received, revisions to the Draft FIR and technical appendices, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. • On November 26, 2018, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing for the project to January 14, 2019. • On January 14, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicit further comments on the FIR. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council not certify the EIR, adopt the findings, the Resolution No. Page 10 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR statement of overriding considerations and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program and deny the Project. • On February 5, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EK Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicit further comments on the FIR. The public hearing was continued to the next regular adjourned City Council meeting on February 19, 2019. • On February 19, 2019, the City Council continued a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicit further comments on the EIR. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted that the project be taken back to the Planning Commission after further consultation with staff, Applicant and community to address comments and concerns raised. • After further consultation with the public, the Applicant submitted the Modified Project to the City, which reduced the total number of proposed multi -family dwelling units to 256 and include surface level parking, and also reduced the Project's height, increased the Project's setbacks, and modified the Project entrance. • The City then prepared "Clarifications to the Final FIR" (October 2019) which included detailed analysis, based upon substantial evidence, that demonstrate that the Modified Project would not result in any new or substantially greater impacts than are disclosed in the EK no new mitigation measures beyond those identified in the FIR are required, and no additional feasible alternatives or mitigation measures considerably different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the Project. 7.0 SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE MITIGATED TO A LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVEL The City hereby finds that, despite the incorporation of Mitigation Measures identified in the FIR, in the and in this document, the following environmental impact cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level. A Statement of Overriding Considerations is therefore required. The following summary describes the adverse impacts of the Project that would remain significant and unavoidable after implementation of standard regulatory requirements, PDFs, and all feasible mitigation measures. 7.1 Aesthetics 7.1.1 Visual Character Threshold: Would the Project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Findings: Significant and Unavoidable. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-16 through 4.1-26.) Facts in Support of Finding: As described in Section 4.1, Aesthetics, of the DEIR, with implementation of the Project, views of the Project site from the adjacent Santiago Park area would change from setback views of the existing 2-story office building partially screened by mature landscaping to that of forefront views of the 5-story residential building, with a landscaped tree buffer directly adjacent to the park. This would result in a significant and unavoidable change in views of the Project site from the park. The difference in scale and height, due to the Project's location adjacent to the park, and limited visual setback buffer with the proposed landscaping, would result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property Resolution No. Page 11 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR setbacks that is considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria related to the visual character of the site in comparison to the park. Thus, the visual change in height, scale, and setbacks from Santiago Park would be significant and unavoidable. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-16 through 4.1-26.) In addition, implementation of the Project would result in a significant and unavoidable change in visual scale, height, and setbacks from Edgewood Road and N. Bush Street. The background views of urban buildings would become forefront views, and the proposed size and scale of the Project would substantially increase the overall visual density of the built environment. The difference in visual scale and height with the proposed structure adjacent to the roadway and limited of visual setback buffer, would be substantial and considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria Thus, the visual change related to the height, scale, and setback from Edgewood Road and N. Bush Street would be significant. (DEK pp. 4.1-21.) The Project includes the following PDF that would reduce the visual impacts of the Project: • PDF-1: The landscape plan will incorporate the existing mature trees located along the eastern Project site boundary and to the extent feasible protect and preserve the existing mature trees within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary that were identified as healthy by the Arborist Report. (DEIR, p. 3-18.) In addition, Mitigation Measure AES-1 require measures be implemented to retain and protect the trees along the eastern and southern Project site boundary and would reduce these impacts. Mitigation Measure AES-I provides: Mitigation Measure AES-1: Construction plans and specifications shall state that the following measures shall be implemented by the construction contractor to protect the trees along the eastern Project site boundary and to the extent feasible protect and preserve the existing mature trees within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary that are planned for preservation during construction of the proposed Project pursuant to the 2018 Arborist Report: • If the wall along the eastern boundary of the Project site cannot be heightened in -place and must be replaced, it shall be reconstructed with a precast concrete fence or a wall without a continuous footing. • Before finalizing construction plans, a contractor with an AirSpade or AirKnife shall explore the locations adjacent to the preserved trees to locate large lateral roots. The root locations shall be marked, and a survey provided to update the construction plans to avoid cutting any significant large roots. The cutting of small roots shall be planned for late spring or winter and made with clean cuts. No pruning paint or sealants shall be used. • Any grade changes near the preserved trees or pruning of trees to provide clearances for construction equipment shall be coordinated with a Registered Consulting Arborist before construction begins, and precautions pursuant to the arborist's recommendations shall be taken to mitigate potential tree injuries. • Prior to construction, a one -pound soil sample shall be taken from the top 18-inches of soil in each area where trees will be preserved. The samples shall be sent to an appropriate laboratory for analysis and soil supplement recommendations. Fertilization of the preserved trees shall be completed pursuant to the laboratory analysis' soil supplement recommendations. • Prior to construction, augur 6-inch diameter holes about 3 feet deep at a 3-foot spacing between large roots in the more compacted and crowded spaces. Avoid large visible roots, relocating the Resolution No. Page 12 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR holes as needed. Start augur holes at three times the trunk diameter, i.e. 6-feet from a 24-inch tree. Back fill with amended soil, based on an agronomic lab's testing and recommendations. • Prior to construction, mulch all exposed soil areas using a topical application of a well -composted, coarse -texture mulch, without manure or bio-solids, e.g. Aguinaga Forest Floor'/2 to 11/2" particle size. Apply it 2-inches deep, but not against the tree trunks. • Deep water before construction and check soil moisture monthly during construction by means of a soil test probe. Slow water with a soaker hose or water spike for 12 hours, or as long as necessary to reach 4-feet deep. • Rinse tree foliage at the end of each work week, using a strong stream of water from a high- pressure nozzle. • During construction in areas without pavement near the preserved trees, 3 or more inches of coarse mulch or tree chips under 1-inch plywood for light vehicle parking and steel plates for larger vehicles is required to prevent compaction and protect surface roots. • Protection Barrier: A protection barrier shall be installed around the trees to be preserved. The barrier shall be constructed of durable fencing material, such as chain link fencing. The barrier shall be placed as far from the base of the tree(s) as possible and shall be maintained in good repair throughout the duration of construction, and shall not be removed, relocated, or encroached upon without permission of the Project arborist. o Storage of Materials: There shall be NO storage of materials or supplies of any kind within the area of the protection barriers. Concrete and cement materials, block, stone, sand and soil shall not be placed within the drip -line of the tree. o Fuel Storage: Fuel storage shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of any tree to be preserved. Refueling, servicing and maintenance of equipment and machinery shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of the protected trees. o Debris and Waste Materials: Debris and waste from construction or other activities shall NOT be permitted within protected areas. Wash down of concrete or cement handling equipment, in particular, shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of protected trees. • Any damages or injuries should be reported to the Project arborist as soon as possible. Severed roots shall be pruned cleanly to healthy tissue, using proper pruning tools. Broken branches or limbs shall be pruned according to International Society of Arboriculture Pruning Guidelines and ANSI A-300 Pruning Standards. However, even with implementation of the PDF-I and Mitigation Measure AES-1, the Project would still result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks that is considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria. As a result, impacts related to existing visual character or quality of the site would be significant and unavoidable. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-16 through 4.1-26.) Consistent with the methodology in the EIR, photo -simulations were also prepared to demonstrate the degree of visual change that would result from implementation of the Modified Project. The photo - simulations show that, as described in the FIR, the Modified Project would alter the existing views by development of forefront residential buildings that would result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks that is considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria related to visual character from specific viewpoints. However, the Modified Project would be lower in height and smaller in scale than the Original Project. The contrast in views that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project is less than what would occur from the Original Project. Thus; although impacts related to specific viewpoints would remain significant and unavoidable, no new or greater impacts would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. (Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final EK Section 3.1.) Resolution No. Page 13 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR 8.0 FINDINGS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS MITIGATED TO A LEVEL OF LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT. The City hereby finds that feasible Mitigation Measures have been identified in the DEIR and this Resolution that will avoid or substantially lessen the following potentially significant environmental impacts to a less than significant level. Compliance with existing laws, codes and statutes, PDFs, and the identification of feasible mitigation measures have reduced potential impacts to a level of less than significant as determined by the City. All of the PDFs and mitigation measures will be included in a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in order to ensure compliance with all conditions adopted by the City. Where potentially significant impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels through adherence to PDFs or existing regulations that reduce environmental impacts, the FIR and these Findings specify how those impacts were reduced to an acceptable level. The potentially significant impacts, and the Mitigation Measures that will reduce them to a less than significant level, are as follows: 8.1 Air Quality 8.1.1 Exposure of Substantial Pollutant Concentrations to Sensitive Receptors Threshold: Would the Project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.2-17 through 4.2-18.) Facts in Support of Findings: As detailed in the DEIR, the Project has the potential to exceed the SCAQMD's localized significance thresholds for emissions of PMlo during construction activities. Therefore, SCAQMD Rules 403(4), 1113, and 1186 to reduce particulate matter and Mitigation Measure AQ-1 requiring the construction contractor to use off -road diesel construction equipment that complies with EPA/GARB Tier 3 emissions standards, would be implemented to reduce construction emissions below a level of significance. With implementation of SCAQMD Rules 403(4), 1113, and 1186 and Mitigation Measure AQ-1 that would be confirmed through the City's permitting process for the Project, localized construction emissions of PMto would be below SCAQMD thresholds and reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure AQ-1: Construction plans and specifications shall state that the construction contractor shall use off -road diesel construction equipment that complies with EPA/GARB Tier 3 emissions standards and shall ensure that all construction equipment be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. With the implementation of the mitigation measure identified above (MM-AQ-1), the Project's impact in Air Quality would be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.2-17 through 4.2-18.) Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would generate air quality emissions from construction and operation of the proposed multi -family residential units. However, the same construction Resolution No. Page 14 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR mitigation would reduce impacts to a less than significant level and the Modified Project would constitute growth that is consistent with the AQMP. In addition, because the Modified Project is 48 percent smaller than the Original Project, it would result in fewer stationary source and vehicular related emissions. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final FIR, Section 3.2.) 8.2 Biological Resources 8.2.1 Movement of Fish or Wildlife Threshold: Would the Project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.3-3 through 4.3-4.) Facts in Support of Findings: Section 4.3, Biological Resources, of the DEIR identified that the Project could impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. The 180 mature ornamental trees on the Project site provide potentially suitable foraging and breeding habitat for nesting migratory birds and raptor species associated with urban areas such as red-tailed hawk, red -shouldered hawk, and Cooper's hawk. The Project includes removal of many of the existing trees on the Project site that could disrupt nesting birds and raptors if vegetation is removed or construction begins during the nesting season (February 1 to August 31). Disruption of migratory nesting birds and raptors is prohibited by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code. Therefore, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 is included to require a nesting bird survey to be conducted by a qualified biologist within 3 days prior any disturbance of the site during nesting season, including: vegetation removal, disking, demolition activities, and grading. With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1, potential impacts related to nesting birds and raptors would be reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure BI0-1: Construction plans and specifications shall state that vegetation clearing during nesting season (February 1 through September 15) shall be avoided, if feasible. If avoidance of the nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified biologist shall be required to conduct a nesting bird survey within 3 days prior any disturbance of the site, including disking, demolition activities, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around nests at an appropriate distance that is a minimum of 250 feet for raptors and 100 feet for non -raptors. The buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied, and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. With the implementation of the mitigation measure identified above (MM-BIO-1), the Project's impact on Biological Resources would be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.3-3 through 4.3-4.) Consistent with the determinations of the EIR, the Modified Project would avoid potential impacts through implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 and compliance with the City's Municipal Code. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. Because the Modified Project increases the distance of the building footprint from nesting sites in the existing trees and Resolution No. Page 15 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR vegetation on site, it would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final FIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.3.) 8.3 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 8.3.1 Accident Conditions Involving the Release of Hazardous Materials Threshold: Would the Project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous material into the environment? Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.6-7 through 4.6-8.) Facts in Support of Findings: Impacts related to hazards were evaluated in Section 4.6, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the DEIR. As described, due to the existence of hazardous materials within on - site soils, ground disturbing activity has the potential to result in the accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment. The contaminated soils would need to be excavated and removed as required by DTSC, California Integrated Waste Management Board, RWQCB, OCFA, and the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). As a result, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 has been required to reduce the potential risks related to accidental release and exposure of people and the environment to the contaminated soils. Due to the existence of hazardous materials within on -site soils, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 would be implemented to reduce the potential risks related to accidental release and exposure of people and the environment to these hazardous materials. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 requires that a qualified consultant prepare a Soil Management Plan (SMP) to be used by construction workers to remove and dispose of the areas of arsenic impacted soil. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 requires excavation of contaminated soils be completed pursuant to existing DTSC and RWQCB requirements, soils sampling ensure all contaminated soils are removed, and that a certified hazardous waste hauler remove and transport all arsenic impacted soil and other potentially hazardous materials per California Hazardous Waste Regulations to a landfill permitted by the state to accept hazardous materials. Excavated soil containing hazardous substances would be classified as a hazardous waste if they exhibit the characteristics of ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity (CCR, Title 22, Division 4.5, Chapter 11, Article 3). The SMP would detail hazardous materials excavation and disposal methods and requirements pursuant to the regulation of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations (CaIOSHA) and Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) that regulates the removal, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste to protect human health and the environment. With implementation of Mitigation Measure Haz-1 impacts related to hazards of the onsite contaminated soils would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Soil Management Plan (SMP) shall be prepared by a qualified hazardous materials consultant and shall detail procedures and protocols for excavation and disposal of onsite hazardous materials, including: • A certified hazardous waste hauler shall remove all potentially hazardous soils. Excavation of contaminated soils shall be to the depth of approximately 0.5 feet below the existing ground surface in areas identified as having arsenic impacted soils. In addition, sampling of soil shall be conducted during excavation to ensure that all arsenic impacted soils are removed, and that residential Resolution No. Page 16 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for residential uses are not exceeded. Excavated materials shall be transported per California Hazardous Waste Regulations to a landfill permitted by the state to accept hazardous materials. • Any subsurface materials exposed during construction activities that appear suspect of contamination, either from visual staining or suspect odors, shall require immediate cessation of excavation activities. Soils suspected of contamination shall be tested for potential contamination. If contamination is found to be present per the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) or Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) ESLs for residential uses, it shall be transported and disposed of per California Hazardous Waste Regulations to an appropriately permitted landfill. • A Health and Safety Plan (HSP) shall be prepared for each contractor that addresses potential safety and health hazards and includes the requirements and procedures for employee protection. The HSP shall also outline proper soil handling procedures and health and safety requirements to minimize worker and public exposure to hazardous materials during construction. • All SMP measures shall be printed on the construction documents, contracts, and Project plans prior to issuance of grading permits. With the implementation of the mitigation measure identified above (MM-HAZ-1), the Project's potential impacts relating to hazards and hazardous materials would be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.6-7 through 4.6-8.) Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would involve handling of hazardous materials and implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, which would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level such that no new or greater impacts related to hazardous materials would occur. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.6.) 8.4 Noise 8.4.1 Noise Levels in Excess of Established Standards Threshold: Would the Project result in exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-10 through 4.8-13.) Facts in Support of Findings: The Project would not result in generation of noise levels in excess standards established bythe City's Municipal Code. Per Section 18-314 (Special Provisions) of the City's Municipal Code noise sources associated with construction activities are exempt from the established noise standards as long as the activities do not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. The Project's construction activities would occur pursuant to these regulations. Thus, the Project would be in compliance with the City's construction related noise standards. Resolution No. Page 17 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR However, the Project has the potential to result in exposure of persons to noise levels in excess of relevant standards as a result of increased traffic -related noise. As discussed in the DEIR, traffic along the roadways near the Project site would generate noise that could exceed interior noise standards within some of the Project units. Thus, some of the residential units would require upgraded windows and sliding glass doors with increased Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings to meet the interior noise standards. As described in Section 4.8, Noise, of the DEIR, the residential units along N. Main Street would require upgraded windows and sliding glass doors with minimum STC ratings of between 27 and 30 to meet the interior noise standards. Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would ensure that the appropriate windows and doors are installed, which would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-10 through 4.8-13.) Mitigation Measure N0I-1: The Project plans and specifications shall include the following construction requirements to be implemented and verified prior to provision of occupancy permits: • Windows/Glass Doors: Residential units adjacent to N. Main Street (all floors) require upgraded windows and sliding glass doors (all windows/doors on all floors) with minimum STC ratings of 30; and all other buildings require standards windows and sliding glass doors with a minimum STC rating of 27. • Exterior Doors (Non -Glass): Exterior doors facing N. Main Street (all floors) require upgraded exterior doors with minimum STC ratings of 30 and shall be well weather-stripped; and all other residential building exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped and have minimum STC ratings of 27. Well -sealed perimeter gaps around the doors are essential to achieve the optimal STC rating. • Walls: At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtight seal. • Ventilation: Residential exterior vents shall be oriented away from I-5 and N. Main Street. If such an orientation cannot be avoided, then an acoustical baffle shall be placed in the attic space behind the vents. With the implementation of the mitigation measure identified above (MM-NOI-1), the Project's potential impacts relating to noise levels would be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-10 through 4.8-13.) Consistent with the Original Project, the construction generated by the Modified Project would generate temporary noise and vibration that would require mitigation to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Also, due to the location of the proposed residential units, mitigation is required to ensure that interior noise is within City standards. With implementation mitigation identified in the EIR, potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final FIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.8.) 8.4.2 Groundborne Vibrations Threshold: Would the Project result in exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Resolution No. Page 18 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-16 through 4.8-17.) Facts in Support of Findings: Construction activities for of the Project would generate short-term vibration levels that would exceed the distinctly perceptible vibration standard at receiver locations within 50 feet of large bulldozers usage. Therefore, Mitigation Measure NOI-2 is included to prohibit the use of large mobile equipment (greater than 80,000 pounds) and loaded trucks within 50 feet of the residences to the east of the Project site. With implementation of this measure, vibration impacts at the nearby sensitive receptors would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure N0I-2: The Project plans and specifications shall include the following requirements: • Large loaded trucks and mobile equipment, such as bulldozers (greater than or equal to 80,000 pounds) shall not be used within 50 feet of the eastern boundary of the Project site. Instead, smaller, rubber -tired mobile equipment (less than 80,000 pounds) or equivalent alternative equipment shall be used within this area during Project construction. • All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the Project site. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receivers nearest the Project site during all construction. With the implementation of the mitigation measure identified above (MM-NOI-2), the Project's potential impacts relating to groundborne vibration and noise levels would be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.8- 16 through 4.8-17.) Consistent with the Original Project construction activities for of the Modified Project would generate short-term vibration levels that would exceed the distinctly perceptible vibration standard at receiver locations within 50 feet of large bulldozers usage. Therefore, like the Original Project, Mitigation Measure NOI-2 would be required to reduce vibration impacts to a less than significant level. No new or greater impacts related to vibration would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. (Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.8.) 8.4.3 Temporary Increase in Ambient Noise Threshold: Would the Project result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project? Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-22 through 4.8-24.) The City hereby makes Finding 2 that "changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment." Mitigation Measure NOI-3 has been included to minimize and/or avoid the Project's potential impacts relating to temporary increases in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity. Resolution No. Page 19 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Facts in Support of Findings: Construction of the Project would generate short-term periodic increases in ambient noise levels at sensitive receptors in the Project vicinity. With implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-2, noise from operation of large mobile construction equipment (greater than 80,000 pounds) and loaded trucks would be reduced; and Mitigation Measure NOI-3 is included to require installation of a temporary noise barrier that would be a minimum 11-feet high, constructed of frame - mounted materials such as vinyl acoustic curtains or quilted blankets, and attached to the masonry wall along the eastern Project site boundary or temporary fence posts. In addition, due to the location of existing sensitive receptors, Mitigation Measures NOI-2 and NOI-3 would require a 50-foot setback for use of large mobile construction equipment and require installation of a temporary noise barrier, which would reduce the temporary and intermittent increase in noise from construction to a less than significant level. With implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI-2 and NOI-3 temporary and periodic construction noise level increases at receiver locations would be reduced to below the 10 dBA Leq temporary noise level increase threshold. Therefore, with implementation of mitigation, impacts related to periodic temporary increases in noise would be less than significant. To ensure that the Project's potential impacts relating to temporary increases in ambient noise levels are mitigated to a less than significant level, in addition to Mitigation Measure NOI-2, discussed above, the following mitigation measure has been identified: Mitigation Measure N0I-3: The Project plans and specifications shall include the requirement to install a minimum I I -foot high temporary construction noise barrier along the Project site eastern boundary for the duration of Project construction. The noise control barriers shall have a solid face from top to bottom and shall meet the following height and constructed requirements: • The temporary noise barrier shall provide a minimum transmission loss of 20 dBA (Federal Highway Administration, Noise Barrier Design Handbook). The noise barrier shall be constructed using an acoustical blanket (e.g. vinyl acoustic curtains or quilted blankets) attached to the construction site perimeter fence or temporary fence posts. • The noise barrier shall be maintained, and any damage promptly repaired. Gaps, holes, or weaknesses in the barrier or openings between the barrier and the ground shall be promptly repaired; • The noise control barrier and associated elements shall be completely removed, and the site appropriately restored upon the conclusion of the construction activity. With the implementation of the mitigation measures identified above (MM-NOI-2 and MM-NOI-3), the Project's potential impacts relating to temporary increases in ambient noise levels would be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-16 through 4.8-17.) The Modified Project would involve the same types of construction equipment that would be operated in similar locations as the Original Project. However, the building setback along the eastern side of the project site would be 50 feet greater. Thus, construction of building structures would be farther from the residences located to the east of the Project site. However, consistent with the Original Project, Mitigation Measures NOI-2 and NOI-3 would be required to prohibit the use of large mobile equipment and loaded trucks within 50 feet of the residences to the east of the Project site and install a temporary noise barrier to reduce the temporary increase in ambient noise to a less than significant level. No new or greater impacts Resolution No. Page 20 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR related to temporary construction noise would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. (Final EK Clarifications to the Final FIR, Section 3.8.) 8.5 Tribal Cultural Resources 8.5.1 Impact on Significant Tribal Cultural Resource Threshold: Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code section 5024.1? Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.12-4 through 4.12-5.) Facts in Support of Findings: The Project site has been heavily disturbed to substantial depths in various portions of the Project site. The Project involves excavation and no substantial evidence exists that tribal cultural resources are present in the Project site. However, during the SB 18/AB 52 consultation, the Gabrieleho Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation stated that the Project lies within its ancestral tribal territory within a sensitive area. Therefore, to avoid potential adverse effects to unknown tribal cultural resources, Mitigation Measure TCR-I has been included to provide for Native American resource sensitivity training and to prescribe activities should any inadvertent discoveries of tribal cultural resources be unearthed by Project construction activities. Additionally, California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered at the Project site, disturbance of the site shall halt and remain halted until the coroner has conducted an investigation. If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR-1 and the existing regulations, impacts to tribal cultural resources would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure TCR-I: Inadvertent Discoveries. The Project's grading and construction plans and specifications shall state that prior to commencement of any excavation activities, a Native American shall be contacted to conduct a Native American Indian Sensitivity Training for construction personnel. The training session includes a handout and focus on how to identify Native American resources encountered during earthmoving activities and the procedures followed if resources are discovered. In the event that tribal cultural resources are inadvertently discovered during ground -disturbing activities, work must be halted within 50 feet of the find until it can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist in cooperation with a Native American monitor to determine if the potential resource meet the CEQA definition of historical (State CEQA Guidelines 15064.5(a)) and/or unique resource (Public Resources Code 21083.2(g)). Construction activities could continue in other areas. If the find is considered a "resource" the archaeologist, in cooperation with a Native American monitor shall pursue either protection in place or recovery, salvage and treatment of the deposits. Recovery, salvage and treatment protocols shall be developed in accordance with applicable provisions of Public Resource Code Section 21083.2 and State CEQA Guidelines 15064.5 and 15126.4. If unique a tribal Resolution No. Page 21 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR cultural resource cannot be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state, recovery, salvage and treatment shall be required at the Project Applicant's expense. All recovered and salvaged resources shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation in an established accredited professional repository. With the implementation of the mitigation measure identified above (Mitigation Measure TCR-1), the Project's potential impacts relating to temporary increases in ambient noise levels would be less than significant. (DEK pp. 4.12-4 through 4.12-5.) Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would involve excavation and disturbance of onsite soils and Mitigation Measure TCR-1 would be required to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. With Mitigation Measure TCR-I no new or greater impacts related to tribal cultural resources would occur. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final FIR, Clarifications to the Final FIR, Section 3.12.) 9.0 FINDINGS REGARDING LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS NOT REQUIRING MITIGATION Consistent with Public Resources Code section 21002.1 and section 15128 of the CEQA Guidelines, the FIR focused its analysis on potentially significant impacts, and limited discussion of other impacts for which it can be seen with certainty there is no potential for significant adverse environmental impacts. CEQA Guidelines section 15091 does not require specific findings to address environmental effects that an FIR identifies as "no impact" or a "less than significant" impact. Nevertheless, the City hereby finds consistent with Chapter 4.0, Environmental Setting and Impact Analysis, of the DEIR and the Initial Study (Appendix A of the DEIR) that the Project would either have no impact or a less than significant impact to the following resource areas: 9.1 Aesthetics 9.1.1 Scenic Vistas Threshold: Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.1-9 through 4.1-16.) Facts in Support of Findings: The Project site and surrounding areas are urbanized and do not contain any sensitive scenic vistas. (DEIR, p. 4.1-3, 4.1-9.) Moreover, as described in Section 4.1, Aesthetics of the DEIR, implementation of the Project would change the character of the site to more closely align with the General Plan Scenic Corridors Element designation as a Major City Entry and the Urban Design Element identification of the site as within the Main Street Concourse node. Additionally, it would align with the Scenic Corridors Element designation of Santiago Creek as an Inter -City Corridor. Hence, the Project would result in a substantial change, but this change would not result in an adverse effect to a scenic vista, and impacts related to a scenic vista would be less than significant. This conclusion also Resolution No. Page 22 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.1.2 Scenic Resources within State Scenic Highways Threshold: Would the Project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway and/or local scenic road? Finding: No impact. (Initial Study, pp. 14-15.) Facts in Support of Finding: There are no officially designated state highways or County -designated scenic highways in the vicinity of the proposed Project. (Initial Study, pp. 14-15.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.1.3 Light and Glare Threshold: Would the proposed Project create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? Finding: Less than significant impact. (Initial Study, pp. 15-16.) Facts in Support of Finding: All outdoor lighting would be hooded, appropriately angled away from adjacent land uses, and would comply with the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 8-210 and Section 41- 611.1 that provides specifications for shielding lighting away from adjacent uses and relate to intensity of security lighting. (Initial Study, p. 15.) Moreover, the Project would be required to comply with the City's lighting regulations and such compliance would be verified during the permitting process. The lighting increase in light that would be generated by the Project would not adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area and would be less than significant. (Initial Study, pp. 15-16.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.2 Agriculture and Forest Resources 9.2.1 Farmland Conversion Threshold: Would the Project result in the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural land use? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 18.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is developed for urban uses and located in an area that is completely developed for urban uses. The Project site and vicinity are void of agricultural uses and the Project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use because no important farmland exists within the Project site and the site is designated as Urban and Built -Up land. (Initial Study, p. 18.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.2.2 Agricultural Zoning Resolution No. Page 23 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Threshold: Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 18.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site and vicinity is void of agricultural uses. No agricultural zoning is located in the vicinity of the Project area and no parcels within the Project vicinity have Williamson Act contracts. The Project would not conflict with a Williamson Act contract. The Project site also does not contain any lands that are subject to Williamson Act contracts, either active or in nonrenewal. (Initial Study, p. 18.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.2.3 Forestland Zoning Threshold: Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 18.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not conflict with existing zoning, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g)) because no forest land or timberland exists within the Project site and the Project site is zoned for Professional (P) uses. (Initial Study, p. 18.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.2.4 Loss of Forest Land Threshold: Would the Project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non - forest use? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 18.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site and vicinity is void of forestland or timberland. (Initial Study, p. IS.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.2.5 Conversion Threshold: Would the Project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 18.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion forest land to non -forest use because there is no existing farmland or forest land within or adjacent to the Project site. No other changes to the existing environment would occur from Resolution No. Page 24 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR implementation of the Project that could result in conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use of forest land to non -forest use. (Initial Study, p. 18.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.3 Air Quality 9.3.1 Applicable Air Quality Plans Threshold: Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.2-14.) Facts in Support of Finding: As discussed in the DEIR, Projects that are consistent with the regional population, housing, and employment forecasts identified by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are considered to be consistent with the AQMP. Here, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the SCAQMD's 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which is the applicable air quality plan for the Project, because the Project is consistent with SCAG's population, housing, and employment forecasts. Notably, the 496 new multi -family units resulting from the Project would constitute a 0.6 percent increase in the total number of residential units in the City, and a 2 percent increase in the number of the multi -family residential units (5+ units) within the City. The Project's multi -family units would be within the SCAG projected growth. The housing added by the Project would also help to meet housing demands from projected employment growth in the City while maintaining a healthy vacancy rate. (DEIR, pp. 4.2-14 through 4.2-15.) Moreover, the Santa Ana and City of Orange areas are jobs -rich. The existing jobs -housing ratio is 2.06 in Santa Ana and is projected to be 2.13 in 2040. The Project would reduce the jobs -housing ratio slightly to 2.05; and to 2.11 in 2040, as shown in Section 4.9, Population and Housing, of the DEIR. The balance of jobs and housing and the bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure implemented by the Project would reduce vehicle miles traveled and the related air quality emissions, as employees could easily travel to employment opportunities within the Santa Ana and City of Orange areas. Thus, the Project would support AQMP objectives to reduce trips, promote infill development, and balance jobs and housing, and would not conflict with implementation of the AQMP. (DEIR, p. 4.2-15.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Further still, as discussed in the DEIR, the Project would not exceed any air quality standards. (DEIR, p. 4.2-15.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.3.2 Air Quality Standards Threshold: Would the Project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.2-15 through 4.2-16.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. As detailed in DEIR Section 4.2, Air Quality, the maximum daily construction and operational emissions would not exceed any of SCAQMD's daily Resolution No. Page 25 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR significance thresholds. Thus, the construction and operation of the Project would not result in a violation of an air quality standard or substantially contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. (DEIR, p. 4.2-15 through 4.2-16.) Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would generate air quality emissions from construction and operation of the proposed multi -family residential units. However, the same construction mitigation would reduce impacts to a less than significant level and the Modified Project would constitute growth that is consistent with the AQMP. In addition, because the Modified Project is 48 percent smaller than the Original Project, it would result in fewer stationary source and vehicular related emissions. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final FIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.2.) 9.3.3 Cumulative Increase of Criteria Pollutant Threshold: Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.2-16 through 4.2-17.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (DEIR, p. 4.2-16 through 4.2-17.) SCAQMD's cumulative air quality methodology provides that if an individual project results in air emissions of criteria pollutants that exceed the SCAQMD's daily thresholds for project -specific impacts, then the project would also result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutant(s) for which the project region is in non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. As shown in the DEIR, implementation of the Project would not exceed SCAQMD's applicable thresholds. Therefore, impacts related to a cumulatively considerable net increase of a criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non -attainment would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.2-16 through 4.2-17.) Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would generate air quality emissions from construction and operation of the proposed multi -family residential units. However, the same construction mitigation would reduce impacts to a less than significant level and the Modified Project would constitute growth that is consistent with the AQMP. In addition, because the Modified Project is 48 percent smaller than the Original Project, it would result in fewer stationary source and vehicular related emissions. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final FIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.2.) 9.3.4 Objectionable Odors Threshold: Would the Project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Resolution No. Page 26 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 22.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. The Project must comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which seeks to prevent odor nuisances (Initial Study, p. 22.) Moreover, odors resulting from the temporary construction of the Project are not likely to affect a substantial number of people due to the fact that construction activities do not usually emit offensive odors. Additionally, the Project would only involve residential uses, which are not land uses that are typically associated with the generation of objectionable odors such as large commercial or industrial uses. (Initial Study, p. 22.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.4 Biological Resources 9.4.1 Candidate, Non -listed Sensitive, or Special -Status Animal and Plant Species Threshold: Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.3-4.) Facts in Support of Finding: As described in DEIR Section 4.3, Biological Resources, the Project site and adjacent Santiago Park areas consist of developed or ornamentally landscaped areas that do not contain native habitat, special -status habitat, or special -status plants and none are expected to occur due to a lack of suitable habitat. As described by the DEIR, the site could be used by one special -status wildlife species, the western mastiff bat, that has a low potential to roost in the large trees and palms. However, its typical habitat involves conifer and deciduous woodlands, coastal scrub, grasslands, and chaparral, which do not occur on the Project site, within Santiago Park, or in the adjacent areas. Therefore, potential impacts to the western mastiff bat from implementation of the Project would be less than significant. No other candidate, sensitive, or special status species have the potential to occur on or adjacent to the Project site. Therefore, impacts from implementation of the proposed Project would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.3-4.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.4.2 Riparian Habitat Threshold: Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Finding: No Impact. (DEIR, pp. 4.3-4 through 4.3-5.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site and adjacent areas do not contain native habitat or special - status habitat, including riparian habitat, wetlands, or other sensitive natural community. Therefore, the Project would not result in impacts related to these types of biological resources. (DEIR, pp. 4.3-4 through 4.3-5.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Resolution No. Page 27 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR 9.4.3 Wetlands Threshold: Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Finding: No impact. (DEK p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 24.) Facts in Support of Finding: Wetlands are defined under the federal Clean Water Act as land that is flooded or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that normally does support, a prevalence of vegetation adapted to life in saturated soils. Wetlands include areas such as swamps, marshes, and bogs. The Project area is developed and does not contain natural wetlands. While Santiago Creek is located approximately 130 feet to the north of the Project site, the creek area is separated from the Project site by a roadway within Santiago Park, and the Project would not extend into the park area. Therefore, the Project would not result in impacts to wetlands. (Initial Study, p. 24.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.4.4 Local Policies and Ordinances Protecting Biological Resources Threshold: Would the Project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Finding: No Impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 24) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. Trees in the public right-of-way in Santa Ana are protected under Chapter 33, Article VII of the Municipal Code, which regulates the planting, maintenance, and removal of trees in public locations in Santa Ana. The Project would not remove any existing healthy street trees, and the additional street trees installed by the Project would be planted in compliance with the Municipal Code regulations. Moreover, the existing ornamental trees on the Project site are on private property and are not subject to the Municipal Code regulation. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not conflict with local polices or ordinances protecting trees and no impact would occur. (Initial Study, p. 24) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.4.5 Adopted Habitat Conservation Plans Threshold: Would the Project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 25) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site does not contain any lands that are subject to an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Therefore, the Project would not result in impacts to biological habitat plans. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.5 Cultural Resources Resolution No. Page 28 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR 9.5.1 Historical Resources Threshold: Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.4-9 through 4.4-15) Facts in Support of Finding: As described in DEIR Section 4.4, Cultural/Historic Resources, the Project would not impact any historic resources. The DEIR describes the viewsheds of the properties listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties near the Project site as already significantly affected by urban and modern structures that are taller than the Project's tallest structure, the proposed 8-level above ground parking structure. As a result, the setting has changed and no longer provides an aesthetic sense of a particular period of history. The Historic Review, referenced in the DEIR, also describes that tall trees throughout Park Santiago screen views toward the Project site, and that many of the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties in Park Santiago are not within the viewshed of the Project site. Overall, as detailed in the Historic Review referenced in the DEIR, due to the existing built environment, location of the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties, and the existing viewsheds, the integrity of the historic setting and feeling aspects of properties in Park Santiago would not be reduced by construction of the proposed Project. Accordingly, a reduction in the historic significance of the properties would not occur from implementation of the Project. (DEIR, p. 4.4-9 through 4.4-15) Due to the reduced height and scale of the Modified Project, the existing built environment, and location of the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties, the integrity of the historic setting and feeling aspects of properties in Park Santiago would not be reduced by implementation of the Modified Project. Thus, consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would not result in a reduction in the historic significance of properties. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.4.) 9.5.2 Archaeological Resources Threshold: Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, pp. 26-27.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site has been disturbed various times for different uses and developments. This includes excavation to depths for installation and removal of the previous gas station tanks, and septic tanks, and utility lines from previous developments in the southern portion of the site. In addition, the Property Condition Report referenced in the Initial Study describes that the foundation of the existing building in the northern portion of the site is developed on a 4-inch thick concrete slab on top of 24-inch diameter, 20-36-foot-deep piles. Thus, previous excavation in the area of the existing building reaches 20-36 feet deep, and excavation in other areas of the site were deep enough to provide for utilities, septic tanks, and gasoline tanks. Also, as described in the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation prepared for the site (referenced in the Initial Study), up to 5.5 feet of fill soils were observed in soil borings. Due Resolution No. Page 29 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR to the extent and depth of previous ground disturbances throughout the site, the potential for archaeological resources to be on site is low. hi addition, the Project is anticipated to involve grading and excavations to depths of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface, which would not extend below previous excavations into native soils. As a result, potential impacts related to archaeological resources would be less than significant. (Initial Study, pp. 26-27.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.5.3 Paleontological Resources or Geologic Feature Threshold: Would the Project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 27) Facts in Support of Finding: Soils beneath the subject site are mapped as Quaternary Alluvium deposited by the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek. Quaternary alluvial materials in Orange County are assigned a low paleontological resource sensitivity due to their relatively recent age. As described above, the Project site has been extensively disturbed to various depths across the site, and the Project will involve grading and excavations to depths of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface, which would not extend below previous excavations into native soils. As a result, potential impacts related to paleontological resources would be less than significant. (Initial Study, p. 27). In addition, the Project site is developed with a building, parking areas, and landscaping, and no unique geologic feature exists on the Project site. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.5.4 Human Remains Threshold: Would the Project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 27) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site has been extensively disturbed, as described above, and has not been previously used as a cemetery. Thus, impacts related to human remains are less than significant. However, in the unanticipated event that human remains are found during Project construction activities, compliance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 will ensure that human remains will be treated with dignity and as specified by law, which will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. As specified by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, if human remains are found on the Project site, the County Coroner's office shall be immediately notified and no further excavation or disturbance of the discovery or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code 5097.98. If the Coroner recognizes the remains to be Native American, he or she shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC will make a determination as to the Most Likely Descendent. Ultimately, compliance with the existing California Health and Safety Code regulations will ensure impacts related to potential disturbance of human remains are less than significant. (Initial Study, p. 27) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6 Geology and Soils Resolution No. Page 30 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR 9.6.1.1 Exposure to Potential Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death — Earthquake Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 29-30) Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of the Project would have no impact related to the exposure of people or structures to the rupture of a known earthquake fault. There are no Alquist-Priolo fault zones or other faults mapped on or adjacent to the Project site. The closest major active faults are the Elsinore Fault Zone, which is 10 miles northeast of the Project site, and the Newport -Inglewood -Rose Canyon Fault Zone, which is located 10 miles to the southwest. Thus, the Project will not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects from rupture of a known earthquake fault that is delineated on an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map or any other known fault. (Initial Study, pp. 29-30) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6.1.2 Exposure to Potential Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death — Seismic Ground Shaking Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving strong seismic ground shaking? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 30) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is located within the seismically active region of Southern California. The principal seismic hazard that could affect the site is ground shaking resulting from an earthquake occurring along several major active or potentially active faults in Southern California. As discussed above, the closest active faults are the Elsinore Fault and the Newport -Inglewood -Rose Canyon Fault Zone that are both located approximately 10 miles from the Project site. Movement along these faults, or other regional faults, could result in seismic ground shaking on the Project site. However, structures built in the City are required to be built in compliance with the California Building Code (CBC [California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2]), as included in the City's Municipal Code as Chapter 8, Article 2, Division 1, which regulates all building and construction Projects within the City and implements a minimum standard for building design and construction that includes specific requirements for seismic safety, excavation, foundations, retaining walls and site demolition. Because the Project must be constructed in compliance with the CBC and the City's Municipal Code, which would be verified through the City's plan check and permitting process, the proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact related to strong seismic ground shaking. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6.1.3 Exposure to Potential Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death — Seismic -Related Ground Failure, Including Liquefaction Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? Resolution No. Page 31 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 30-31) Facts in Support of Finding: Soil liquefaction is a phenomenon in which saturated, cohesionless soil layers, located within approximately 50 feet of the ground surface, lose strength due to cyclic pore water pressure generation from seismic shaking or other large cyclic loading. During the loss of stress, the soil acquires "mobility" sufficient to permit both horizontal and vertical movements. Soil properties and soil conditions such as type, age, texture, color, and consistency, along with historical depths to ground water are used to identify, characterize, and correlate liquefaction susceptible soils. Soils that are most susceptible to liquefaction are clean, loose, saturated, and uniformly graded fine-grained sands that lie below the groundwater table within approximately 50 feet below ground surface. Lateral spreading is a form of seismic ground failure due to liquefaction in a subsurface layer. The California Geological Survey Seismic Hazard Zones Orange Quadrangle map shows the Project site is within a liquefaction zone. However, exploratory borings at the Project site identified groundwater at approximately 110 feet below the ground surface, and borings on the Project site did not encounter groundwater to the maximum depth of 85 feet that was explored. Likewise, the groundwater wells that are located near the Project site identify groundwater levels at 110 feet below the ground surface and 143 feet below the ground surface. In addition, borings on the Project site in 2017 identified that soils consist of silty fine to medium sands with local layers of fine to coarse sands with gravel size rock and some larger rock fragments, which are not the uniform fine-grained sand that typically liquefies. In addition, the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation (Geo 2017) prepared for the Project site conducted liquefaction analysis and determined that thin layers of onsite soils have the potential for liquefaction; however, these soils are confined by less permeable soils that would prevent the manifestation of liquefaction. Thus, because the groundwater level is far below 50 feet below the ground surface and soils are not uniformly graded fine-grained, the potential for liquefaction and related lateral spreading or ground failure to occur on the Project site is low. In addition, as described above, the proposed Project would be required to be constructed in compliance with the CBC and the City's Municipal Code, as detailed in the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation (Geo 2017) prepared for the Project site, which would be verified through the City's permitting process. (Initial Study, pp. 30-31) For the aforementioned reasons, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to liquefaction, lateral spreading, and ground failure. (Initial Study, pp. 30-31) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6.1.4 Exposure to Potential Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death — Landslides Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving landslides? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 31) Facts in Support of Finding: Landslides and other slope failures are secondary seismic effects that are common during or soon after earthquakes. Areas that are most susceptible to earthquake induced landslides are steep slopes underlain by loose, weak soils, and areas on or adjacent to existing landslide deposits. As described above, the Project site is located in a seismically active region subject to strong ground shaking. However, the Project site is not located within or adjacent to an earthquake -induced landslide area. (Initial Study, p. 31.) In addition, the Project site is located in a flat developed urban area Resolution No. Page 32 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR that does not contain or is adjacent to large slopes, and the Project would not generate large slopes. Furthermore, as stated in the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation prepared for the Project site, the Project site is not at risk for earthquake induced landslides. For the foregoing reasons, implementation of the Project would not expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects involving landslides, and impacts related to landslides would not occur. (Initial Study, p. 31.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6.2 Soil Erosion Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 31-32.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is largely impervious, as it is generally covered by pavement or the building structure. However, small areas of landscaping exist within the parking area, along the site boundary, and adjacent to the existing building. The Project would redevelop the site for multi -family residential uses, which would include areas of landscaping that would surround the proposed structures and be located along the site boundary, similar to the areas of landscaping that currently exist. The new paved areas and landscaping from the Project would not result in soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. In addition, Section 18-156 of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code states that all significant redevelopment within the City, such as the Project, shall be undertaken in accordance with the County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). The DAMP requires construction sites to implement control practices that address erosion and sedimentation (DAMP Section 8.0). Additionally, the Statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for General Construction Activity requires implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), by a Qualified SWPPP Developer. The SWPPP is required to be consistent with the County DAMP, address site -specific conditions related to sources of sediment, and implement erosion control and sediment control Best Management Practices to reduce or eliminate sediment during construction. The Project is required to adhere to a City approved SWPPP, which would be verified prior to the issuance of a demolition or grading permit; this will ensure that potential erosion associated with construction activities would constitute a less than significant impact. (Initial Study, pp. 31-32.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6.3 Soil Stability Threshold: Would the Project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 32.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site does not contain unstable soils or unstable geologic units. As discussed above, the Project site is located in a flat, developed urban area that does not contain, and is not adjacent to, large slopes; moreover, the Project would not generate large slopes. Accordingly, impacts related to landslides would not occur as a result of the Project. Also, as discussed above, the depth to groundwater and the types of soils onsite result in a low potential for liquefaction and related lateral spreading or ground failure. In addition, as further discussed above, the Project would be required to have building foundations and pavement areas and must be constructed in compliance with the CBC and the Resolution No. Page 33 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR City's Municipal Code, which requires appropriate back fill, compaction of soils, and foundation design to ensure stable soils. For the aforementioned reasons, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to unstable soil or geologic units. In addition, the Project is not located on a geological unit or soil that would become unstable as a result of subsidence. Subsidence is a general lowering of the ground surface over a large area that is generally attributed to lowering of the groundwater levels within a groundwater basin. Subsidence or settlement of the ground can occur as a result of earthquake motion in an area where groundwater in a basin is lowered. Because the Project does not involve groundwater pumping, impacts related to subsidence will not occur as a result of the Project. (Initial Study, p. 32.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6.4 Soil Expansion Threshold: Would the Project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 32-33.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not be located on expansive soil. Expansive soils contain certain types of clay minerals that shrink or swell as the moisture content changes. As described above, the Project site soils consist of silty fine to medium sands with local layers of fine to coarse sands with gravel size rock and some larger rock fragments, which have a low expansion potential. (Initial Study, p. 32.) In addition, as noted above, the Project would be required to have building foundations and pavement areas constructed in compliance with the CBC and the City's Municipal Code, which requires appropriate back fill, compaction of soils, and foundation design to ensure stable soils. Thus, the Project's impacts related to expansive soils would be less than significant. (Initial Study, p. 33.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6.5 Septic Tanks Threshold: Would the Project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Finding: No impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 33.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is currently connected to the City's sewer system, and the Project would also connect to existing sewers and would not use septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. As a result, impacts related to septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems would not occur from implementation of the Project. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 9.7.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Threshold: Would the Project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Resolution No. Page 34 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.5-9 through 4.5-10.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not generate significant amounts of GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that would have a significant impact on the environment. As further detailed in the DEIR, construction and operation of the Project would generate greenhouse gas emissions that are below the SCAQMD's threshold for greenhouse gas emissions. (DEIR, pp. 4.5-9 through 4.5-10.) In particular, as detailed in the DEIR, the Project's total net annual GHG emissions would be approximately 4.30 metric tons per year per service population, which would be less than the SCAQMD Tier 4 Option 3 threshold of 4.80 metric tons per year per service population. (DEIR, pp. 4.5-9 through 4.5-10.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Consistent with the determinations of the EIR, the Modified Project would generate GHG emissions from construction and operation of the proposed multi -family residential units. However, because the Modified Project is 48 percent smaller than the Original Project it would result in fewer stationary source and vehicular related GHG emissions. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final EK Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.5.) 9.7.2 Conflict with Applicable Plan, Policy, or Regulation Threshold: Would the Project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gasses? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.5-10 through 4.5-13.) Facts in Support of Finding: As detailed in the DEIR, the Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. Indeed, the Project is consistent with the AB 32 Scoping Plan, SB 375, and the Santa Ana Climate Action Plan. Moreover, the Project would comply with state and federal programs that are designed to improve energy efficiency and reduce GHG emissions, including the California Title 24, California Energy Code, and the CALGreen Code. In complying with these measures and standards (including Title 24 standards relating to insulation, use of energy -efficient heating, ventilation and air condition equipment, solar -reflective roofing materials, energy -efficient indoor and outdoor lighting systems, reclamation of heat rejection from refrigeration equipment to generate hot water, among other things), the Project would be implementing regulations that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Also, Project Design Feature PDF-2 would provide a minimum of 25 electric vehicle charging stations to promote usage of electric vehicles. For these reasons, and as further detailed in the DEIR, the Project would be consistent with existing plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. (DEIR, p. 4.5-10 through 4.5-13.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Consistent with the determinations of the EK the Modified Project would generate GHG emissions from construction and operation of the proposed multi -family residential units. However, because the Modified Project is 48 percent smaller than the Original Project it would result in fewer stationary source and Resolution No. Page 35 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR vehicular related GHG emissions. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final FIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.5.) 9.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 9.8.1 Hazardous Materials Sites Threshold: Would the Project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 36.) Facts in Support of Finding: Operation of the Project includes activities related to the multi -family residential uses of the Project, which involve use of hazardous materials including solvents, cleaning agents, paints, pesticides, batteries, fertilizers, and aerosol cans. These types of materials are not acutely hazardous and would only be used and stored in limited quantities within the Project area. The normal routine use of these hazardous materials products pursuant to existing regulations set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) that include Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) (Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 261.4) would not result in a significant hazard to people or the environment in the vicinity of the Project. Therefore, the Project would not result in a significant hazard to the public or to the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous waste, and impacts would be less than significant. (Initial Study, p. 36.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.8.2 Hazards within One -Quarter Mile of an Existing or Proposed School Threshold: Would the Project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 36.) Facts in Support of Finding: The closest existing school to the Project site is the Hoover Elementary School, which is located approximately 0.5 miles away from the Project site at 408 East Santa Clara Avenue. Thus, the Project site is not within one -quarter mile of a school and impacts would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 36.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.8.3 Site Location Threshold: Would the Project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Resolution No. Page 36 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 36-37.) Facts in Support of Finding: Neither the Project site nor any adjacent properties are included on the list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 36-37.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.8.4 Public Airports Threshold: For a Project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 37.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within 2 miles of an airport. The closest airport to the Project site is John Wayne Airport, which is located over 6 miles to the south of the Project site. In addition, the Fullerton Municipal Airport is located approximately 9.35 miles to the northwest of the Project site. Therefore, the Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area. (Initial Study, p. 37.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.8.5 Private Airstrips Threshold: For a Project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 37.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip and would not result in safety hazards related to an airstrip. (Initial Study, p. 37.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.8.6 Emergency Response Plans Threshold: Would the Project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 37.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Direct access to the Project site is, and will continue to be, provided from N. Main Street (to the south) and Edgewood Road (to the east), which are adjacent to the Project site. In addition, fire lanes are proposed for the northern and western boundaries of the Project site. Resolution No. Page 37 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Construction activities would occur within the Project site and would not restrict access of emergency vehicles to the Project site or adjacent areas. In addition, travel along surrounding roadways would remain open and would not interfere with emergency access in the site vicinity. Moreover, the Project must comply with Section 503 of the California Fire Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Part 9) and the City of Santa Ana Fire Code included as Municipal Code Chapter 14. As such, for the reasons discussed herein and in the Initial Study, the Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and impacts would be less than significant. (Initial Study, p. 37.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.8.7 Wildland Fires Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Finding: No impact. (DEIIZ, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 38.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is located within an urban developed area and is not located within an identified wildland fire hazard area and is not an area where residences are intermixed with wildlands. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 38.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9 Hydrology and Water Quality 9.9.1 Water Quality Standards Threshold: Would the Project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 40.) Facts in Support of Finding: Section 18-156 of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code states that all new development and significant redevelopment within the City shall be undertaken in accordance with the County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). Accordingly, both construction and operational Best Management Practices (BMPs) would be required to be implemented as part of permitting of the Project. Adherence to a City -approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that includes Low Impact Development (LID) features, which would be verified prior to the issuance of a demolition or grading permit, would ensure that potential water quality degradation associated with construction and operational activities would be minimized to a level of less than significance. For the foregoing reasons and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 40-41.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Resolution No. Page 38 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR 9.9.2 Groundwater Supplies Threshold: Would the Project substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 41.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or lowering of the local groundwater table level. The Project site does not currently provide for groundwater recharge. Moreover, the Project will not result in a substantial increase in impervious surfaces, and thus groundwater recharge would not be affected. Furthermore, groundwater within the Project region is managed by the Orange County Water District (OCWD). To ensure the Basin is not overdrawn, OCWD monitors water levels and recharges the Basin with local and imported water. Continued management of the groundwater basin by OCWD will ensure that substantial depletion of groundwater supplies would not occur. (Initial Study, p. 41.) For the foregoing reasons and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 41.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9.3 Drainage Pattern Threshold: Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 41.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site does not include a stream, river, creek, or other water body, and will not alter the course of any such body of water in a manner that would result in erosion or siltation. The closest body of water is the Santiago Creek, which is located approximately 130 feet to the north of the site within Santiago Park; Santiago Park would not be disturbed by the Project. Moreover, the Project would not substantially alter the drainage pattern onsite. The Project would cap the existing drain to the creek and provide infiltration basins in the northern portion of the Project area. The remainder of the site would have the same type of onsite drainage that currently exists. The Project thus would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern on the site or in the area. Moreover, as to construction activities that would involve excavation and grading of soils, Section 18-156 of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code states that all significant redevelopment within the City, such as the Project, shall be undertaken in accordance with the DAMP, which requires construction sites implement control practices that address erosion and sedimentation. Additionally, the Statewide NPDES Permit for General Construction Activity requires implementation of a SWPP that is required to be consistent with the DAMP and implement erosion control and sediment control BMPs to reduce or eliminate erosion during construction. Adherence to a City approved SWPPP, which would be verified prior to the issuance of a demolition or grading permit, would ensure that potential erosion associated with construction activities would be minimized. (Initial Study, pp. 41-42.) Resolution No. Page 39 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR For the foregoing reasons and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 41-42.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9.4 Flooding Threshold: Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off -site? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 42.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site does not include a stream, river, creek, or other water body. The closest water body is the Santiago Creek, which is located approximately 130 feet to the north of the site within Santiago Park, and would not be disturbed by the Project. The Project site is largely impervious, as it is generally covered by pavement or the building structure. Redevelopment of the site would provide for a similar amount of impervious surface; thus, the rate or amount of surface runoff would not substantially increase with implementation of the Project. In addition, the Project includes redevelopment of the existing onsite drainage system to provide infiltration basins, storm drains, and catch basins that would retain and filter runoff prior to discharge into the existing storm drains in N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. Thus, the Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern on the site or in the area, or substantially increase the rate or amount of runoff that could result in flooding. For the foregoing reasons and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 41-42.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9.5 Water Runoff Threshold: Would the Project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, pp. 42-43.) Facts in Support of Finding: As discussed above, the Project site is largely impervious, and redevelopment of the site would not substantially increase impervious areas, such that an increase in runoff would occur. In addition, the Project would redevelop the existing onsite storm water drainage system, which would convey runoff from buildings and paved areas to infiltration basins, storm drains, and catch basins that would retain and filter storm water prior to discharge into the existing storm drains in N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. Overall, redevelopment of the Project site would not result in an increase in runoff that would exceed the capacity of the existing City storm drain system. For the foregoing reasons and the reasons discussed in the DEER and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 41-42.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Resolution No. Page 40 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR 9.9.6 Degradation of Water Quality Threshold: Would the Project otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, pp. 40-43.) Facts in Support of Finding: For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, the Project would not otherwise substantially degrade water quality. (Initial Study, pp. 41-42.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9.7 Flood Hazard Area Zones Threshold: Would the Project place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 43.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) for the Project site and vicinity (FEMA FIRM number 06059C0163) shows that the site is shown adjacent to, but not part of, a 100-year flood zone associated with Santiago Creek (Zone AE21). The Project site is identified on the FEMA map as "Zone X" and is not depicted within a 100- of 500- year flood zone. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 43.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9.8 Structures That Impede or Redirect Flows Threshold: Would the Project place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 43.) Facts in Support of Finding: As discussed above, the Project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area, and it will not place any structure within a 100-year flood hazard area. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 43.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9.9 Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death as a Result of Flooding Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 43.) Resolution No. Page 41 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of the Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a dam. As shown in the General Plan Public Safety Element, Exhibit 4, the Project site is not located within the dam inundation area. Moreover, the site is located 130-feet up -gradient from Santiago Creek, which is generally dry, unless conveying storm flows. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 43.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9.10 Inundation by Seiche, Tsunami, or Mudflow Threshold: Would the Project have significant effects relating to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 43.) Facts in Support of Finding: A seiche—a surface wave created when a body of water is shaken by earthquake activity is not likely to impact the Project area. The Geotechnical Engineering Investigation prepared for the Project site provides that no bodies of water are close enough to the Project site to result in a sieche impact. Therefore, no seiche impacts would occur. (Initial Study, p. 43.) A tsunami is not likely to impact the Project area since the Project area is approximately 11.5 miles from the Pacific Ocean, outside of the Tsunami Hazard Zone identified by the California Emergency Management Agency. Therefore, impacts related to tsunamis would not occur. (Initial Study, p. 43.) A mudflow is a landslide composed of saturated rock debris and soil with a consistency of wet cement. The Project area is flat and not near any hillsides that could be susceptible to mudflow. Thus, no mudflow impacts would occur. (Initial Study, p. 43.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 43.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.10 Land Use and Planning 9.10.1 Divide a Community Threshold: Would the Project physically divide an established community? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 44.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is developed with a vacant two-story office building that was used by the Wells Fargo bank. The site is adjacent to the south and the east by a single-family residential community, the north by a park, and by a museum and motel to the west across N. Main Street. Implementation of the proposed Project would change the site from an office building to multi -family residential uses, which would extend the residential uses in the community. The existing residential community would not be physically divided by the Project. Rather, the Project would be located at the Resolution No. Page 42 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR edge of the residential community and would extend the community. In addition, the Project would redevelop only the Project site and would not change roadways or areas outside of the Project site. Thus, the Project would result in less than significant impacts related to physical division of an established community. (Initial Study, p. 44.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 44.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.10.2 Conflict with Plans Threshold: Would the Project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, pp. 4.7-16 through 4.7-34.) Facts in Support of Finding: As discussed in Section 4.7, Land Use and Planning, of the DEIR, the Project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The Project would be consistent with the SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Notably, the Project would implement many of the SCAG policies related to high -density, infill development, improvement of the job/housing balance, and use of green building measures, such as water efficiency and Low Impact Development features. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not result in conflict with SCAG policies, and impacts would not occur. Regarding General Plan designations, the Project would require a General Plan Land Use Amendment to change the land use designation from PAO (Professional & Administration Office) to District Center (DC) to allow for the proposed multi -family uses. The General Plan Land Use Element states that DC designation includes the major activity areas in the City and that District Centers are to be developed with an urban character. The proposed DC designation is consistent with the existing DC land uses to the north of Santiago Park and to the southwest across the I-5 freeway. The General Plan also designates the site as the Main Street Concourse node. The proposed DC land use designation and the Project would implement the Main Street Concourse node designation by providing an architecturally cohesive development with a maximum structure height of 90 feet from the ground surface (height intensive) within a regional activity center. The General Plan identifies that the Project is within the Main Street at I-5 Freeway Gateway (Figure 10 of the Urban Design Element) and provides that gateways are located at the City's entry points to help define boundaries and enhance the City's identity, while reinforcing a sense of place. The proposed DC land use designation, along with the proposed height, architecture, and landscaping of the development Project would provide distinctive features that reinforce the sense of place already provided by the Discovery Cube and numerous other urban structures along N. Main Street. Thus, the Project would align with the General Plan's intent for the Main Street at I-5 Freeway Gateway. In addition, although the development under the proposed DC designation would result in a different type Resolution No. Page 43 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR and higher intensity of residential units than the adjacent LR-7 designated Park Santiago neighborhood area, the Project provides a transition through wall heights, landscaping, building plan, and an eastern setback, such that the taller multi -family structures, vehicle parking, and circulation are not sited adjacent to single -story single-family residences. Also, designating lands for multi -family residential uses would be more consistent with the adjacent single-family residential uses, than the existing office uses because high density residential land uses adjacent to low density residential land uses have more similar and consistent activities than office building uses adjacent to low density residential. Furthermore, the proposed land use designation change from PAO to DC would not conflict with a policy or plan adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The Project would also be consistent with the relevant goals, policies, and objectives of the City's General Plan that avoid or mitigate environmental impacts, and impacts related to conflict with a General Plan policy related to an environmental effect would be less than significant. The Project includes a zone change that would change the existing zoning designation change from P (Professional) to a Specific Development (SD) to implement the proposed multi -family residential project. As required by the Zoning Code, the Project's development plans would be reviewed by the City to ensure consistency with development standards. Furthermore, the SD zoning designation would be consistent with the existing SD zoned areas to the north beyond Santiago Park and to the west across N. Main Street. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not result in an impact related to conflict with a plan or policy adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, pp. 4.7-16 through 4.7-34.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.10.3 Habitat Conservation Plans Threshold: Would the Project conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Finding: No impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 46.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is developed and located within an urban and developed area. The project site is not subject to an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Thus, impacts related to such a plan would not occur from the Project. (Initial Study, p. 46.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 46.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.11 Mineral Resources 9.11.1 Known and Locally Important Resources Threshold: Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Resolution No. Page 44 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Threshold: Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 47.) Facts in Support of Finding: No active mining operations exist in the City of Santa Ana. The mapping by the California Geological Survey does not indicate that any significant mineral deposits are present within the City. The Project area is developed with urban office uses and has no history of mining. Implementation of the Project would not cause the loss of availability of mineral resources valuable to the region or state. Moreover, the Project site and its surrounding vicinity is not in or near a mining site identified by the City of Santa Ana General Plan. (Initial Study, p. 47.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 47.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.12.0 Noise 9.12.1 Long Term Noise Threshold: Would the Project result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.8.17 through 4.8-22.) Facts in Support of Finding: While the Project's operation would generate some traffic -related noise, such noise would not constitute a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project. Pursuant to the Noise Impact Analysis (Exhibit H to the DEIR), the Project would generate an increase of less than one dBA CNEL on the study area roadway segments, which is less than the relevant threshold. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.8.17 through 4.8-22.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.12.2 Public Airports Threshold: For a Project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? Finding: No Impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, pp. 49-50.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within 2 miles of an airport. The closest airport to the Project site is John Wayne Airport, which is located over 6 miles to the south of the Project site. In addition, the Fullerton Municipal Airport is located approximately 9.35 miles to the northwest of the airport. Therefore, the Project would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels related to airports. (Initial Study, pp. 49-50.) Resolution No. Page 45 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 49-50.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.12.3 Private Airstrips Threshold: For a Project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? Finding: No Impact. (DEK p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 50.) Facts in Support of Finding: The proposed Project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip and would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels related to an airstrip. (Initial Study, p. 50.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 50.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.13 Population and Housing 9.13.1 Population Growth Threshold: Would the Project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.9-7 through 4.9-10.) Facts in Support of Finding: As described in Section 4.9, Population and Housing, of the DEK the Project would not induce substantial population growth. SCAG anticipates a population increase of 8.4 percent by 2040 or an average annual increase of 0.4 percent throughout the County. The anticipated population that would result from the Project would be 0.28 percent of the City's population, and thus, within the projected population growth. Similarly, SCAG anticipates the number of housing units would increase 6.3 percent or an average annual increase of 0.3 percent through 2040. Thus, the 496 new multi- family units would also be within the SCAG projected growth. Furthermore, the infrastructure improvements needed to serve the Project would be sized to specifically serve the development and excess capacity would not be developed that could generate additional growth. Thus, impacts related to growth would be less than significant. (DEK p. 4.9-7 through 4.9-10.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.9-7 through 4.9-10.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.13.2 Displacement of Housing Threshold: Would the Project displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Resolution No. Page 46 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 51.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is currently developed for office uses and is void of any existing residential development. As such, the Project would not displace any existing housing and would not result in the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 51.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.13.3 Displacement of Persons Threshold: Would the Project displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 51.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project is currently developed for office uses and does not include any residential uses. The Project would replace the existing office building with multi -family residential uses. The Project would not displace any residents and would not result in the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Moreover, the Project's portion of the cumulative increase in residential units is 9.9 percent, and the remainder of the cumulative projects would generate over 90 percent of the cumulative increase. Thus, the Proj ect's contribution to the cumulative growth in housing is limited. Furthermore, the total cumulative housing growth from all of the cumulative projects identified in the DEIR would equal 7.4 percent, which is consistent with SCAG growth estimates that anticipate an 8.4 percent increase. Thus, cumulative impacts related to population and housing would be less than significant. The cumulative addition of housing within the Santa Ana and City of Orange N. Main Street corridor area would have a favorable effect on the jobs -housing balance, which could reduce environmental effects of long commute trips, such as air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 51.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.14 Public Services As described in Section 4.10, Public Services, of the DEIR, the Project would not result in adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered service facilities. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.14.1 Fire Protection Services Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order Resolution No. Page 47 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection services? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.10-4 through 4.10-5.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is within 2.5 miles of 4 existing fire stations and the Project would not result in the need to construct a new fire station or expand an existing station. In addition, Chapter 8-46 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code requires a fire facilities fee be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of buildings exceeding 2 stories in height, such as the Project. The purpose of the fire facilities fee is to improve fire stations in the City and provide revenue for equipment needed to fight fires in buildings over 2 stories in height. The Project would be required to provide funding to assist in improvement of existing fire facilities and provision of needed equipment. Implementation of the Project would not require new or physically altered fire department facilities. (DEIR, p. 4.10-4 through 4.10-5.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.10-4 through 4.10-5.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.14.2 Police Services Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for police protection? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.10-8 through 4.10-9.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would result in an incremental increase in demands on law enforcement services but would not be significant when compared to the current demand levels. The residential population of the Project would be approximately 0.27 percent of the City's population and based on the Police Department's 2016 staffing of 1.04 officers per thousand population, the Project would require less than one additional officer. In addition, the Police Department headquarters are 2.5 miles from the Project and within response distance. Furthermore, typical police operations within the Department's Northeast District deploys coverage to be able to respond to calls from services throughout the area. The addition of one officer on patrol would not require the construction or expansion of the City's existing policing facilities. Therefore, the Project would not result in the need for new or physically altered police protection facilities. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.10-8 through 4.10-9.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.14.3 Education Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or a need for new or physically altered Resolution No. Page 48 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8; Initial Study, p. 54.) Facts in Support of Finding: As described in the Initial Study, the Project is required to pay fees for the provision of school services pursuant to state law AB 2926. This fee would contribute to a fund that would pay for new or expanded buildings, faculty, or equipment. Under state law, payment of school impact fees constitutes mitigation for school facility impacts of projects and such payments are deemed to provide full and complete school facilities mitigation. (Initial Study, p. 54.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 54.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.14.4 Parks Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.10-12 through 4.10-13.) Facts in Support of Finding: As described in Section 3.0, Project Description, the Project includes 34,300 square feet of onsite exterior open space and recreation facilities that includes 5 recreation courtyard areas that total 22,900 square feet and an 11,400-square foot amenity deck on the roof of the parking structure. hi addition, interior recreation facilities include a 5,397-square foot fitness center and a 1,566 square foot wellness pavilion. These onsite amenities are anticipated to meet many of the park and recreation needs of Project residents. The new residential population that would be generated from the Project is also anticipated to utilize existing off -site park and recreation facilities. There is currently 93.8 acres of Santa Ana parkland within 3-miles of the Project site. Based on the existing amount of park and recreation facilities in the vicinity of the Project site, the recreation facilities that would be provided as part of the Project, and the number of residents at full capacity of the Project, the Project is not anticipated to require the provision of new or physically altered park facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios. In addition, the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 35-108 requires that residential development fees be paid for the acquisition, construction, and renovation of park and recreation facilities to preserve an appropriate balance between the demand by residents for use of park and recreational facilities and the availability of such facilities. Thus, by payment of the required park fees, the Project would provide funding to offset any increased usage at other park and recreation facilities. Overall, the Project would not result in substantial physical deterioration of park and recreation facilities. (DEIR, p. 4.10-12 through 4.10-13.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.10-12 through 4.10-13.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Resolution No. Page 49 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR 9.14.5 Existing Recreational Facilities Threshold: Would the Project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.10-13 through 4.10-14.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would provide onsite open space and recreational facilities for residents, which is anticipated to reduce the Project's impact on off -site recreational facilities. Moreover, based on the existing amount of park and recreational facilities in the Project site's vicinity, the recreational facilities that would be provided as part of the Project, and the anticipated number of residents at the Project, the Project is not anticipated to increase the use of existing parks and recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would be accelerated. In addition, the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 35-108 requires that residential development fees be paid for the acquisition, construction, and renovation of park and recreation facilities to preserve an appropriate balance between the demand by residents for use of park and recreational facilities and the availability of such facilities. Thus, by payment of the required park fees, the Project would provide funding to offset any increased usage at other park and recreation facilities. Overall, the Project would not result in substantial physical deterioration of park and recreation facilities For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.10-13 through 4.10-14.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.14.6 New Recreational Facilities Threshold: Does the Project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.10-14.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project includes recreational facilities that would be constructed and operated as part of the proposed Project. In addition, access Option B includes repaving the Walkie Way entrance to Santiago Park and the addition of landscaping that includes trees and ground cover in the park and Project site entrance. The impacts of development of the recreational amenities and access options are considered part of the impacts of the Project as a while and are analyzed throughout the various sections of the DEIR. Moreover, the Project would not require the construction or expansion of other recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEM, p. 4.10-14,) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.14.7 Other Public Facilities Resolution No. Page 50 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for other public facilities? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8; Initial Study, pp. 54-55.) Facts in Support of Finding: As described in the Initial Study, other public facilities include libraries. The City of Santa Ana Public Library includes two branches within 5 miles of the site. Library service needs are changing with increasing resources being available online and the availability of high-speed internet services and the new residences on the Project site do not necessarily result in an incremental need for library facilities. A majority of the residential units would be equipped with internet access, which provides access to many of the same resources provided by the library and would limit the increased need for library services and resources. (Initial Study, pp. 54-55.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 54-55.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.15 Transportation and Traffic 9.15.1 Conflict with Applicable Circulation Plan or with Applicable Congestion Management Program Threshold: Would the Project conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Threshold: Would the Project conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 4.11-12 through 4.11-32.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, including the Orange County Congestion Management Program, Caltrans Measures of Effectiveness, City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, and the City of Orange General Plan Circulation Element. Based on the thresholds identified in these plans, the Project would result in a less than significant impact, as further explained in the DEIR. Notably, the vehicular trips that would be generated by the Project would not cause an exceedance of any traffic level of service threshold at any intersection or roadway segment. (DEM, p. 4.11-12 through 4.11-32.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.11-12 through 4.11-32.) Resolution No. Page 51 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR To evaluate the potential traffic impacts related to the Modified Project, a Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis (included as Attachment B to the Clarifications to the Final FIR) was prepared and peer reviewed by a City -selected independent traffic engineer and the City's traffic engineering staff. The Supplemental Traffic hnpact Analysis evaluates operation of 278 multi -family units, which is 22 more units than the Modified Project that consists of 256, and therefore, provides an overstated and conservative analysis of potential impacts. The analysis determined that the Modified Project would develop 48 percent fewer residential units than the Original Project, which would result in 79 fewer a.m. peak hour trips, 96 fewer p.m. peak hour trips, and 1,186 fewer daily trips than the Original Project. Thus, no new impacts related to the volume of vehicular trips would occur from the Modified Project. Additionally, the Modified Project would implement changes to the Main Street and Walkie Way intersection geometries that would result in less than significant impacts to study area intersections, roadway segments, and vehicle queues; which is consistent with the impacts of the Original Project as detailed in the FIR. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final FIR, Section 3.11.) 9.15.2 Air Traffic Patterns Threshold: Would the Project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8, Initial Study, p. 58.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project does not propose any uses that would affect air traffic patterns or air traffic levels. No portion of the Project would change air traffic patterns by extending into airspace. The closest operating airport is over 6 miles south of the Project site. The Project would not result in a change in air traffic patterns. (DEIR, p. 2-8, Initial Study, p. 58.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 2-8, Initial Study, p. 58.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.15.3 Design Feature Hazards Threshold: Would the Project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, pp. 4.11-33.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not result in hazards related to a design feature or incompatible use. The Project driveways include direct access to the parking structure, and access from N. Main Street would be restricted to right -turn ingress/right-turn egress to provide for safe and effective circulation. As noted in the Traffic hnpact Analysis referenced in the DEIR, motorists entering and exiting the Project site would be able to do so comfortably, safely, and without undue congestion. Moreover, and as noted by the Traffic hnpact Analysis, the neighborhood intersections and roadway have adequate capacity to support the Project. (DEIR, pp. 4.11-33.) Resolution No. Page 52 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, pp. 4.11-33.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.15.4 Emergency Access Threshold: Would the Project result in inadequate emergency access? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-8; Initial Study, pp. 58-59.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not result in inadequate emergency access. Direct access to the Project site is, and will continue to be, provided from N. Main Street and Edgewood Road, which are adjacent to the Project site. In addition, fire lanes for emergency access are proposed for the northern and western boundaries of the Project site. Construction activities would occur within the Project site and would not restrict access of emergency vehicles to the Project site or adjacent areas. In addition, travel along surrounding roadways would remain open and would not interfere with emergency access in the site vicinity. Moreover, the Project is required to design and construct internal access to conform to OCFA standards to ensure adequate emergency access pursuant to the requirements in Section 503 of the California Fire Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Part 9) and the City of Santa Ana Fire Code included as Municipal Code Chapter 14. (Initial Study, pp. 58-59.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 58-59.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.15.5 Alternative Transportation Threshold: Would the Project conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8; Initial Study, pp. 58-59.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project and would not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting public transit, bicycle, pedestrian or other alternative transportation systems. Notably, the Project would not conflict with existing bus routes or sidewalks, and it would implement new onsite sidewalks to connect to offsite sidewalks and onsite bicycle facilities. (Initial Study, p. 59.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 59.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.16.1 Utilities and Service Systems 9.16.1 Wastewater Treatment Requirements Threshold: Would the Project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Resolution No. Page 53 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8; Initial Study, pp. 63-64.) Facts in Support of Finding: The multi -family residential land uses proposed by the Project are not anticipated to discharge wastewater that contains harmful levels of toxins that are regulated by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and all effluent would comply with the wastewater treatment standards of the RWQCB. (Initial Study, pp. 63-64.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 63-64.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.16.2 New Infrastructure and Adequate Capacity Threshold: Would the Project result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities, or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.13-6 through 4.13-7.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities, or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. As discussed in Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, of the DEIR, the Project would receive water supplies through the existing 16-inch water lines located within the N. Main Street and Edgewood Road rights -of -way that have the capacity to provide the increased water supplies needed to serve the Project; no extensions or expansions to the water pipelines that convey water to the Project site would be required. Redevelopment of the existing onsite water distribution lines would only serve the Project and would not provide water to any off -site areas. (DEIR, p. 4.13-6 through 4.13-7.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.13-6 through 4.13-7.) 9.16.3 Storm Water Drainage Requirements Threshold: Would the Project result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8; Initial Study, p. 64.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is largely impervious, as it is generally covered by pavement or the building structure, and small areas of landscaping surround the development. The Project would redevelop the site for multi -family residential uses, which would include areas of landscaping that would surround the proposed structures and be located along the site boundary, similar to the areas of landscaping that currently exist. Redevelopment of the site would provide for a similar amount of impervious surface; thus, the rate or amount of surface runoff would not substantially increase with implementation of the Project. hi addition, the Project includes redevelopment of the existing onsite drainage system that would accommodate runoff with infiltration basins, storm drains, and catch basins Resolution No. Page 54 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR that would retain and filter runoff prior to discharge into the existing storm drains in N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. Thus, the Project would not increase the rate or amount of runoff that could result in the need for new or expanded offsite drainage facilities. (Initial Study, p. 64.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 64.)This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.16.4 Water Supply Threshold: Would the Project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.13-7 through 4.13-8.) Facts in Support of Finding: The City's Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) anticipates a supply and demand increase of 8.2 percent (3,028 acre feet per year) relating to water. The Project would result in an increase in demand for water supplies that is between just 2.7 and 4.2 percent of the UWMP's anticipated increase. Accordingly, the City would have water supplies available to serve the Project from existing entitlements. (DEIR, p. 4.13-7 through 4.13-8.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.13-7 through 4.13-8.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.16.5 Wastewater Treatment Capacity Threshold: Would the Project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the Project, that ithas adequate capacityto serve the Project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.13-11.) Facts in Support of Finding: Based on results of the sewer flow monitoring and the City's Design Criteria wastewater generation rates, the Sewer Study identified that the existing sewer lines that serve the Project site would be able to adequately handle the additional wastewater flows from the Project. Additionally, the existing wastewater treatment facilities have adequate capacity to accommodate the increase in wastewater flow from full occupancy of the Project. As a result, implementation of the Project would not result in inadequate capacity of the wastewater treatment plant to serve the Project's demand in addition to existing service commitments. (DEIR, p. 4.13-11.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.13-11.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.16.6 Solid Waste Facilities Threshold: Would the Project be served by a landfill with insufficient permitted capacity to Resolution No. Page 55 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR accommodate the Project's solid waste disposal needs? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8; Initial Study, p. 65.) Facts in Support of Finding: The existing landfills that serve the project region have sufficient capacity to accommodate the Project's solid waste needs. (Initial Study, p. 65.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 65.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 65.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.16 Energy Resources As discussed in Section 4.14, Energy, of the DEIR, the Project would not result in an increase in overall or per capita energy consumption, or in a wasteful or unnecessary consumption of energy, or require or result in the construction of new sources of energy supplies or additional energy infrastructure capacity, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects, or conflict with applicable energy efficiency policies or standards. The Project would be developed pursuant to the California Green Building Standards Code (24 California Code of Regulations [CCR] Part 11 [CALGreen Code]), which would provide for sustainable construction and operational practices, including energy efficiency. (DEK pp. 4.14-5 through 4.14-7.) The City's administration of the Title 24 requirements and the City's Climate Action Plan includes review of design components and energy conservation measures ensures that all requirements are met. Typical Title 24 measures include insulation; use of energy -efficient heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment (11VAC); solar -reflective roofing materials; energy -efficient indoor and outdoor lighting systems; reclamation of heat rejection from refrigeration equipment to generate hot water; and incorporation of skylights, etc. In complying with the Title 24 standards, impacts to peak energy usage periods would be minimized, and impacts on statewide and regional energy needs would be reduced. In addition, the Project would represent an urban infill development because it would occur on a currently developed site, and would be located near existing off -site employment, commercial, residential, and retail destinations and in proximity to existing public bus stops and freeways, which would result in reduced vehicle trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) in comparison to a project of similar size and land without close access to employment, service, and retail, destinations; in addition to public transit and freeways. The land use characteristics of the Project are consistent with the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) guidance related to a reduction of vehicle trip distances that would achieve a reduction in associated transportation -related fuel demand. Also, the Project site is within an area where existing infrastructure would provide for efficient delivery of electricity and natural gas to the Project and the Project would not inhibit the development of other alternative energy sources. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, pp. 4.14-5 through 4.14-7.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.17 Findings Regarding Cumulative Environmental Impacts Resolution No. Page 56 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Consistent with CEQA's requirements, the FIR for the Project includes an analysis of cumulative impacts. As discussed throughout Chapter 4.0, Environmental Setting and Impact Analysis, of the DEIR, the DEIR's cumulative evaluation focuses on whether the impacts of the Project are cumulatively considerable within the context of impacts caused by other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. As described, different types of cumulative impacts occur for different environmental resources that affect different geographic areas. The geographic scope of the cumulative air quality analysis, where cumulative impacts occur over a large area, is different from the geographic scope considered for cumulative analysis of aesthetic resources, for which cumulative impacts are limited to specific viewsheds. Thus, in assessing aesthetic resources impacts, only development within and immediately adjacent to the Project area that would contribute to a cumulative visual effect is analyzed, whereas cumulative traffic impacts are based upon all development within the traffic study area of roadways and intersections. Therefore, the DEIR describes the cumulative geographic scope, and the potential cumulative impacts included in the geographic scope. As detailed in Section 4.0, Environmental Setting and Impact Analysis, of the DEIR, the cumulative evaluation in the DEIR determined that the cumulatively considerable impacts from implementation of the Project would be less than significant with implementation of the PDFs and mitigation measures that would reduce the potential of project level impacts to become cumulatively significant. Overall, cumulative impacts from implementation of the Project would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.14-7 through 4.14-8.) Specifically, the City hereby finds as follows: 9.17.1 Aesthetics The closest cumulative project is the 2700 North Main Street residential development that is located 0.2 miles north of the Project site and is visible from the site because it is currently developed with an 1I- story office building. This related project involves development of multi -family residences on the site, which would be similar to the character to the proposed Project. The two projects would provide similar multi -family development and would not combine to result in cumulatively considerable impacts. The other cumulative projects are similar to the proposed Project, providing multi -family residential uses that would be consistent with the existing urban, developed character of the viewshed area. As a result, cumulative impacts related to scenic views and visual character and site quality would be less than significant. Cumulative impacts related to shade and shadow would occur when development projects are sufficiently close that shadows from individual buildings combine to create areas of consecutive shading of shadow - sensitive areas. The DEIR details that shadows of the Project do not combine with shadows of other projects to create consecutive shading of any shadow -sensitive areas. Thus, the shading from the Project would not cumulatively combine with other projects, and cumulative impacts related to shade and shadow would be less than cumulatively significant. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative aesthetic effects would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-26 through 4.1-27.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.2 Air Quality Resolution No. Page 57 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR SCAQMD's cumulative air quality methodology provides that if an individual project results in air emissions of criteria pollutants that exceed the SCAQMD's daily thresholds for project -specific impacts, then the project would also result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutant(s). As shown in the DEIR, implementation of the Project would not exceed SCAQMD's applicable thresholds. Therefore, impacts related to a cumulatively considerable net increase of a criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in non -attainment would not be cumulatively considerable and would be less than significant. For these reasons, also discussed previously in Section 9.3.3 of these Findings, and in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects on air quality would not be cumulatively considerable. (DEIR, pp. 4.2-7.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.3 Biological Resources The Project site is developed and located within an urban area of the City. The site provides limited areas for natural habitat and wildlife species; but does include mature trees that could be used by birds that are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) for nesting. Thus, implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would provide for nesting bird surveys that would reduce the potential of the Proposed Project to impact nesting migratory birds or raptors, which would also avoid the potential of the Project to contribute to cumulative effects. As detailed in the DEIR, the Project would result in less than significant impacts to all other candidate, sensitive, or special status species. Therefore, therefore with Mitigation Measure BIO-1, the proposed Project would not contribute to cumulative impacts that could potentially occur from other development projects. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects on biological resources would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.3-5.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.4 Cultural Resources As detailed in DEIR Section 4.4, Cultural/Historic Resources, due to the existing built environment, location of the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties of properties in Park Santiago, and the existing viewsheds, impacts related to the setting and feeling aspects of integrity of historic properties would not be reduced by implementation of the proposed Project; and the Project would not materially alter any physical characteristics of a historic resource that convey its historical significance. Therefore, the Project would not contribute to cumulative impacts that could potentially occur from other development projects throughout the region, and a cumulatively considerable impact would not occur. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects on cultural resources would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.4-15.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.5 Geology, Soils and Seismicity Geologic and soils related impacts occur in a local or site -specific context, such as immediately adjacent cumulative development. Thus, the scope of analysis for cumulative impacts associated with geology and soils encompasses the Project vicinity. The closest cumulative project is the 2700 North Main Street residential development that is located 0.2 miles north of the Project site. The Project would be required Resolution No. Page 58 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR to comply with CBC building codes, which reduces impacts to a less than significant level. All other projects are also subject to the same CBC building codes to reduce potential effects related to seismic events. As a result, cumulative impacts related to geology and soils would be less than significant. Also, as discussed in the Initial Study, the Project is not located on a site with potential for significant effects related to geology, soils, or seismicity. (Initial Study, pp. 29-33.) Accordingly, the Project will not have cumulative effects on geology, soils, and seismicity, even when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions All GHG emissions are assessed in a cumulative context because no single project can cause a discernible change to climate. AB 32 recognizes the significance of the statewide cumulative impact of GHG emissions from sources throughout the state and sets a performance standard for mitigation of that cumulative impact. Therefore, analysis of GHG emission impacts under CEQA contained in the FIR effectively constitutes an analysis of a project's contribution to the significant cumulative impact of GHG emissions. As described in DEIR Section 4.5 Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the estimated GHG emissions from construction and operation of the proposed Project would be lower than the AQMD Tier 4 Option 3 threshold of 4.8 MTCO2e per year per service population. Therefore, the Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact related to GHG emissions, and cumulative impacts would be less than significant. For these reasons discussed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects on greenhouse gas emissions would not be cumulatively considerable. (DEIR, pp. 4.5-13.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hazard related impacts typically occur in a local or site -specific context versus a cumulative context combined with other development projects; although it is possible for combined effects of hazards to occur by adjacent cumulative development that involves hazardous risks. The closest cumulative project is the 2700 North Main Street residential development that is located 0.2 miles north of the Project site. Due to this distance, the potential from hazards to cumulatively increase is limited. In addition, compliance with the relevant federal, state, and local regulations during the construction and operation of related projects would ensure that cumulative impacts from hazardous materials would be less than significant. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, implementation of the Project would not result in the release of hazardous materials into the environment; and therefore, would not result in a cumulative contribution to a hazardous materials impact. Therefore, cumulative impacts related to hazardous materials during construction would be less than significant. In addition, the nearby projects provide residential and commercial uses, that would use the same type of limited hazardous materials as the proposed Project. With regular use and storage of these commonly used household products, such as would occur on the Project site, cumulative impacts would not occur. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to hazards and hazardous materials would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.6-8 through 4.6-9.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.8 Hydrology and Water Quality Resolution No. Page 59 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR The Initial Study (DEIR Appendix A) details that Section 18-156 of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code requires all new development and significant redevelopment within the City be undertaken in accordance with the County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), including but not limited to the development project guidance; and any conditions and requirements established by City agencies related to the reduction or elimination of pollutants in storm water runoff from the Project site, which are verified prior to the issuance by the City of a grading permit or building permit. The DAMP requires implementation of site design, source control and treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs). In addition, because the proposed Project is a priority project as it would replace more than 5,000 square feet of impervious surface on an already developed site, it would be required to implement a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that includes Low Impact Development (LID) features and BMPs to limit the potential for pollutants to enter surface water, such as storm water runoff. With implementation of these requirements, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to hydrology and water quality. In addition, all of the cumulative projects would be required to adhere to these State and County regulations, which would reduce cumulative impacts to a less than significant level. Also, as discussed in the Initial Study, the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to hydrology and water quality. (Initial Study, pp. 39-44.) Accordingly, the Project will not have cumulative effects relating to hydrology and water quality, even when considered with past, current, and future probable projects, and cumulative effects would be less than cumulatively considerable. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.9 Land Use and Planning A large portion of the cumulative projects in the vicinity of the Project consist of multi -family residential development. In addition, the cumulative projects include mixed -uses, retail commercial, hotel, and services. These related projects are similar, consistent, and complementary to the proposed SD zone and multi -family residential development. DEIR Section 4.7, Land Use and Planning, describes that the Project would not result in conflicts with existing land use or zoning designations and would not conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project, which has the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, including applicable regulations, policies, and standards of the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and the SCAG RTP/SCS. Thus, the Project would not cumulatively contribute to such an impact that could occur from related projects. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to land use and planning would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.7-34.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.10 Noise Construction noise is localized in nature and decreases substantially with distance. Consequently, in order to achieve a substantial cumulative increase in construction noise levels, more than one source emitting high levels of construction noise would need to be in close proximity to the proposed Project. The nearest related project to the Project site is the 2700 North Main Street residential development project is located 0.2 miles north of the Project site and is in the site plan review stage of development approval. Thus, it is likely that these projects would not be constructed simultaneously. hi addition, should construction of the projects overlap, the distance between the sites and the numerous intervening structures located between Resolution No. Page 60 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR the sites that would serve to reduce construction -related noise levels, a substantial increase in combined construction noise levels would not occur. Therefore, cumulative noise impacts associated with construction activities would be less than significant. Cumulative construction could also result in the exposure of people to or the generation of excessive groundborne vibration. As described above, the nearest related project to the proposed Project is 0.2 miles north of the project site. Due to this distance, and the rapid attenuation of groundborne vibration, the proposed Project and this related project are not in close enough proximity to each other such that vibration levels generated during construction could potentially affect the same sensitive receptor should construction of this related project occur at the same time as the proposed Project. Only receptors located in the immediate vicinity of each construction site would be potentially impacted by each development. As such, cumulative impacts associated with groundborne vibration from construction activities would not be cumulatively considerable and would be less than significant. Additionally, cumulative traffic -generated noise impacts have been assessed based on the contribution of the proposed Project in the Project opening year (2020) and the year 2040 cumulative base traffic volumes on the roadway segments in the Project vicinity. The noise levels associated with these traffic volumes with the proposed Project would increase local noise levels by a maximum of 0.3 dBA CNEL, which is lower than 5 dBA, cumulative impact threshold for traffic noise. For the reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to noise would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-24 through 4.8-25.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.11 Population and Housing The Project's portion of the cumulative increase in residential units is 9.9 percent, and the remainder of the cumulative projects would generate over 90 percent of the cumulative increase. Thus, the Project's contribution to the cumulative growth in housing is limited. Additionally, the total cumulative housing growth from all of the cumulative projects identified in the DEIR would equal 7.4 percent, which is consistent with SCAG growth estimates that anticipate an 8.4 percent increase. Thus, cumulative impacts related to population and housing would be less than significant. Furthermore, the cumulative addition of housing within the Santa Ana and City of Orange N. Main Street corridor area would have a favorable effect on the jobs -housing balance, which could reduce environmental effects of long commute trips, such as air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. For these reasons that are detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to population and housing would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.9-10.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.12 Public Services and Recreation Fire Protection Fire protection service is provided by Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) staffed Fire Stations that are owned by the City of Santa Ana. There are several proposed projects within Santa Ana in the Project vicinity that would combine to generate additional demands for OCFA services. Like the proposed Project, the related projects would be reviewed by City and OCFA staff prior to permit approval and would be Resolution No. Page 61 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR required to implement fire protection design features per California building and fire code regulations that would reduce potential fire hazards. Cumulative increased demands for services would also be offset by the City of Santa Ana fire facilities fee that is required for each development project. As detailed in DEIR Section 4.11, Transportation and Traffic, the Project would not result in cumulative traffic impacts in both years 2020 and 2040. The roadway segments and intersections near the Project site and Fire Stations 70 and 71 would continue to operate at satisfactory LOS. Therefore, the vehicular trips generated by operation of the proposed Project would not result in a substantial increase in emergency response times that could cumulatively combine with other development projects in the City, and impacts related to emergency response times from Fire Stations 70 and 71 would be less than cumulatively considerable. Because 4 of the City's 10 existing fire stations exist within 2.5 miles of the Project site, and related projects would be subject to the same impact fees that provide funding for additional equipment and staffing, and fire safe construction requirements, impacts related to fire services from the proposed Project would not combine with other related projects to result in a cumulative impact related to the need for new or physically altered fire service facilities. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to fire protection services would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.10-5.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Police Services The Project would result in an incremental increase in demands on law enforcement services and based on the Police Department's 2016 staffing of 1.04 officers per thousand population, the proposed Project would require one additional officer for the Department's Northeast District that serves all areas of the City north of First Street and East of Flower Street. In addition, the DEIR estimates that the cumulative projects would require an additional 3 officers to maintain the City's existing officers to population ratio. The addition of less than 1 officer from the proposed Project and 2 officers from the other projects within the Police Department's Northeast District would not require the need for, new or physically altered police protection facilities. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to police services would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEK pp. 4.10-8 through 4.10-9.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Parks and Recreation The proposed Project would provide onsite recreational facilities for residents that would meet many recreation and park needs of Project residents. In addition, the Project would be required to pay park fees to offset usage of existing park and recreation facilities. The cumulative projects within the City of Santa Ana would also be required to provide park and recreational facilities and/or pay in -lieu fees as required by each city, which are implemented to preserve an appropriate balance between the demand by residents for use of park and recreational facilities, and as a result reduce cumulative effects of each project. Thus, because the proposed Project would provide the open space and recreation facilities and would provide Resolution No. Page 62 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR payment of the required park fees, the Project's impact would not be cumulatively considerable, and cumulative impacts related to park and recreation facilities would be less than significant. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to parks and recreation would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.10-14.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.13 Transportation and Traffic As detailed in DEIR Section 4.11, Transportation and Traffic, the proposed Project would not result in impacts in the cumulative 2020 and 2040 conditions pursuant to the Caltrans, City of Santa Ana, and City or Orange thresholds and methodology. (DEIR, pp. 4.11-10 and 4.11-11.) As detailed in DEIR Tables 4.11-9 through 4.11-36, the proposed Project would not conflict with or result in an exceedance of a threshold by any of the following: the Orange County Congestion Management Program, Caltrans Measures of Effectiveness, City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, and the City of Orange General Plan Circulation Element. In addition, the Traffic Impact Analysis details that the capacities of the Park Santiago neighborhood intersections and roadways are substantially higher than the daily trip generation of the proposed Project. As such, cumulative impacts related to neighborhood traffic would be less than cumulatively significant. Also, the DEIR details that Project access locations and circulation around the Project site would be adequate, and cumulative impacts related to queuing would be less than cumulatively considerable. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to transportation and traffic would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.11-41.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.14 Utilities and Service Systems Water The Project would install new water lines to serve the proposed buildings and connect to the existing system that is adjacent to the Project site. The water system has been designed the proposed Project and would be served by existing infrastructure. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in the requirement for new or expanded off -site water infrastructure that could combine with other water infrastructure needs to result in an environmental impact. Thus, potential cumulative impacts from off -site water system expansions would not occur from the proposed Project. The Water Supply Assessment (WSA) that was prepared for the Project describes that the 2015 MWD UWMP details the ability to meet the demands of its member agencies, including the City of Santa Ana, through 2040. In addition, the City of Santa Ana 2015 UWMP confirmed the ability of the local supplies and the OC Basin to meet the growing demands of the City in multiple climate scenarios. Also, as described previously the increased water demand from the proposed Project would be between 2.7 and 4.3 percent of the 2015 UWMP anticipated increase. Thus, the City would have water supplies available to serve the Project from existing entitlements, and cumulative water supply needs would be able to be met as detailed by the MWD and City's UWMPs. As a result, the proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable increase in water supply demands that would require new or expanded entitlements. Resolution No. Page 63 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to water supplies would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.13-8.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Wastewater DEIR Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, the existing sewer system has sufficient capacity to handle the increased flows resulting from implementation of the proposed Project. Additionally, the OCSD reclamation facilities have an average flow of 184 mgd and a treatment capacity of 462 mgd (OCSD, 2017). Due to this volume of excess capacity that is designed by OCSD to accommodate future regional growth, the increase in wastewater flow from the proposed Project that would require 0.04 percent of this remaining capacity would not significantly impact the OCSD reclamation facilities. As a result, impacts related to cumulative projects wastewater treatment and conveyance capacity would be less than significant. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to wastewater treatment and conveyance would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.13-12.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Drainage and Water Quality All projects in the watershed are required to implement measures to comply with the LID, MS4 Permit, DAMP requirements for implementation of SWPPPs and WQMPs. These requirements were developed to reduce the cumulative impacts to water quality, and to ensure that the incremental effects of individual projects do not cause a substantial cumulative impact related to water quality. Implementation of the proposed Project would include compliance with all required laws, permits, and plans, through implementation of a SWPPP and WQMP that would be approved by the City prior to construction and operational permits and have been designed to reduce impacts associated with drainage and water quality. The proposed Project would result in a decrease in impervious surfaces due to the increase in landscape and open space areas. Additionally, the DAMP required runoff volume would be filtered through the detention and drywell systems prior to discharge off -site to manage stormwater drainage and protect water quality. The detention and drywell treatment systems have high removal effectiveness for all storm water pollutants of concern. Thus, the runoff volume that would result from the proposed Project would not increase, and the proposed treatment systems would remove pollutants from onsite runoff. Therefore, the proposed Project would not generate volumes of stormwater flows or polluted runoff that could combine with other projects to be cumulatively considerable. As a result, cumulative impacts from implementation of the proposed Project would be less than significant. For the reasons discussed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to drainage and water quality would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.13-19.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 10.0 FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES AND ENERGY USE Resolution No. Page 64 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR The CEQA Guidelines require that EIRs reveal the significant environmental changes that would occur as a result of a proposed Project. CEQA also requires decision makers to balance the benefits of a project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve a project. This section addresses non-renewable resources, the commitment of future generations to the proposed uses, and irreversible impacts associated with the Project. The Project would result in or contribute to the following irreversible environmental changes: • Lands in the Project area that are currently developed with office uses would be committed to multi -family residential uses once the proposed buildings are constructed. Secondary effects associated with this irreversible commitment of land resources include: o Changes in views associated with construction of the new buildings and associated development (see Section 4.1 of the DEIR, Aesthetics). o Increased traffic on area roadways (see Section 4.11 of the DEIR, Transportation and Traffic). o Emissions of air pollutants associated with Project construction and operation (see Section 4.2 of the DEIR, Air Quality). o Consumption of non-renewable energy associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project due to the use of automobiles, lighting, heating and cooling systems, appliances, and the like (see Section 4.14 of the DEIR, Energy). o Increased ambient noise associated with an increase in activities and traffic from operation of the Project (see Section 4.8, Noise). • Construction of the Project as described in Section 3.0 of the DEIR, Project Description, would require the use of energy produced from non-renewable resources and construction materials. In regard to energy usage from the proposed Project, the Project would not involve wasteful or unjustifiable use of non-renewable resources, and conservation efforts would be enforced during construction and operation of proposed development. The proposed development would incorporate energy -generating and conserving project design features, including those required by the California Building Code, California Energy Code Title 24, which specify green building standards for new developments. In addition, the Project includes project design features that result in additional energy - efficiency. (DEIR, p. 5-4.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 11.0 GROWTH INDUCING EFFECTS Section 15126(d) of the CEQA Guidelines requires a discussion of a proposed project's potential to foster economic or population growth, including ways in which a project could remove an obstacle to growth. Growth does not necessarily create significant physical changes to the environment. However, depending upon the type, magnitude, and location of growth, it can result in significant adverse environmental effects if it requires new development or infrastructure to support it. The Project's growth effects would be considered significant if they could result in significant physical effects in one or more environmental issue areas. As discussed in Section 5.0, Mandatory Findings of Significance, of the DEIR, the limited number of jobs generated by the Project would represent a small portion of the estimated job growth that would be within, and not exceed, SCAG's population forecast. As such, the Project would result in direct employment growth at a level that is already anticipated in regional projections; and thus, would be less than significant. The Project would not remove obstacles to growth, e.g., through the construction or extension of major Resolution No. Page 65 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR infrastructure facilities that do not presently exist in the Project area, or by expansion of public services in the Project area. The infrastructure needed to serve the Project would be sized to specifically serve the site and excess capacity would not be developed that could generate additional growth; and the Project would not create a demand for public services beyond what is already contemplated. Additionally, as described in Section 5.0, Mandatory Findings of Significance, of the DEIR, SCAG projections show that the jobs — housing ratio is anticipated to increase to 1.65 by 2040; and that the Project would reduce the jobs -housing ratio slightly to 2.05; and to 2.11 in 2040. This would be a beneficial effect of providing multi -family housing on the Project site, where employees can easily travel to employment opportunities within the Santa Ana and City of Orange areas, which are jobs -rich. Thus, the Project would provide additional housing to support the regionally forecasted increase in economic activities. In addition, the provision of housing on the Project site would not result in economic activity that would cause the need for additional off -site housing. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, growth inducing impacts from implementation of the Project would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 5-1 through 5-3.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 12.0 FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES 12.1 Background Where significant impacts are identified, section 15126.6 of the CEQA Guidelines requires EMS to consider and discuss alternatives to the proposed actions. Subsection (a) states: (a) An FIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. An FIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project. Rather it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decision -making and public participation. An FIR is not required to consider alternatives which are infeasible. The lead agency is responsible for selecting a range of project alternatives for examination and must publicly disclose its reasoning for selecting those alternatives. There is no ironclad rule governing the nature or scope of the alternatives to be discussed other than the rule of reason. Subsection 15126.6(b) states the purpose of the alternatives analysis: (b) Because an EIR must identify ways to mitigate or avoid the significant effects that a project may have on the environment (Public Resources Code Section 21002.1), the discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be more costly. In subsection 15126.6(c), the State CEQA Guidelines describe the selection process for a range of reasonable alternatives: Resolution No. Page 66 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR (c) The range of potential alternatives to the proposed project shall include those that could feasibly accomplish most of the basic objectives of the Project and could avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the significant effects. The EIR should briefly describe the rationale for selecting the alternatives to be discussed. The EIR should also identify any alternatives that were considered by the lead agency but were rejected as infeasible during the scoping process and briefly explain the reasons underlying the lead agency's determination. Additional information explaining the choice of alternatives may be included in the administrative record. Among the factors that may be used to eliminate alternatives from detailed consideration in an EIR are: (i) failure to meet most of the basic project objectives, (ii) infeasibility, or (iii) inability to avoid significant environmental impacts. The range of alternatives required is governed by a "rule of reason" that requires the EIR to set forth only those alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice. The EIR shall include sufficient information about each alternative to allow meaningful evaluation, analysis, and comparison with the proposed Project. Alternatives are limited to ones that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the Project. Of those alternatives, the EIR need examine in detail only the ones that the lead agency determines could feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the Project. However, when a project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts, the lead agency has no obligation to consider the feasibility of alternatives to lessen or avoid environmental impacts, even if the alternative would reduce the impact to a greater degree than the proposed Project. (Pub. Res. Code § 21002; Laurel Hills Homeowners Association v. City Council (1978) 83 Cal.App.3d 515, 521; Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 692, 730-731; Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of the University of California (1988) 47 Ca1.3d 376, 400-403.) Here, a range of feasible alternatives to the proposed Project was developed to provide additional information and flexibility to the decision -makers when considering the proposed Project. (DEIR, pp. 6- 1 through 6-26.) 12.2 Project Objectives The following Project objectives support the Project's underlying purpose to develop multi -family residential uses on the Project site and assist with meeting the City's housing needs: • Redevelop existing underutilized parcels to implement development of new high -quality housing. • Increase high -quality housing near existing employment centers. • Promote an improved jobs/housing balance by locating attractive new housing in proximity to employment centers. • Provide housing in close proximity to commercial areas, freeway, and transit. • Redevelop existing land uses that would utilize existing infrastructure, including: water, sewer, arterial roadways, transit, and freeways. • Implement capital investment to enhance the City's economic and fiscal viability pursuant to the City of Santa Ana Strategic Plan. • Provide residents with a safe, high -quality, modern residential community with open space and various recreational amenities. (DEIR, pp. 6-2 through 6-3.) Resolution No. Page 67 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR 12.3 Alternatives Considered and Rejected During the Scoping/Project Planning Process An EIR must briefly describe the rationale for selection and rejection of alternatives. The lead agency may make an initial determination as to which alternatives are potentially feasible, meet most of the project objectives, and avoid significant environmental effects that would occur from the project, and therefore, merit in-depth consideration. Alternatives that are remote or speculative, are infeasible, or the effects of which cannot be reasonably predicted, need not be considered (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(f), (t)(3)). The following alternatives were considered but rejected as part of the environmental analysis for the Project. Alternative Site Alternative An alternative site was considered but eliminated from further consideration. CEQA specifies that the key question regarding alternative site consideration is "whether any of the significant effects of the project would be avoided or substantially lessened by putting the project at another location." In addition, an alternative site need not be considered when implementation is "remote and speculative," such as when the alternative site is beyond the control of a project applicant. The Project Applicant is the owner of the Project site, and the Project site building is vacant, and the site is underutilized in the existing condition. The Project objectives are to redevelop an existing underutilized parcel and implement new high -quality multi -family housing near employment centers to promote an improved jobs/housing balance, provide housing near existing transportation, and utilize existing infrastructure, all of which are consistent with the opportunities provided by the Project site. In addition, due to the urban and built out nature of the City, development of 496 multi -family residential units on another 5.9-acre site at a different location would likely require demolition of existing structures, require similar mitigation, and have similar impacts as the Project. CEQA specifies that the key question regarding alternative site consideration is "whether any of the significant effects of the project would be avoided or substantially lessened by putting the project at another location." Given the size and nature of the Project and the Project objectives, it would be infeasible to develop and operate the Project on an available alternative site with fewer environmental impacts. Therefore, the Alternative Site Alternative was rejected from further consideration. No Project/Vacant Building Alternative An alternative where the building would remain vacant and underutilized was eliminated from further consideration. Because the Project site is located within a completely developed and highly used urban corridor, near freeways and transit, and contains an existing useable structure, it is not reasonable due to the need for new residential and employment space in the area or financially feasible for the existing site owner for the site to remain vacant and underutilized in the long-term. Therefore, the No Project/Vacant Building Alternative would be remote and infeasible. In addition, this alternative would not meet any of the Project objectives. As described previously, alternatives that are remote, infeasible, and do not meet Project objectives, do not need to be considered. Thus, the No Project/Vacant Building Alternative was rejected from further consideration. 12.4 Alternatives Selected for Further Analysis In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, "An EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project ..." including the "No Project' alternative. The following alternatives have Resolution No. Page 68 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR been determined to represent a reasonable range of alternatives to supplement the access alternatives presented in the DEIR. The alternatives presented have been determined to be physically feasible and have the potential to avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the significant effects of the Project. The Alternatives include: • Alternative 1: No Project/No Build • Alternative 2: Reduced Project Alternative • Alternative 3: Build Out of the Existing Zoning Alternative 12.5 Evaluation of Alternatives Selected for Analysis Alternative 1: No Project/No Build Description: Pursuant to Section 15126.6(e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, the FIR is required to "discuss the existing conditions at the time the Notice of Preparation is published, or if no notice of preparation is published, at the time the environmental analysis is commenced, as well as what would be reasonably expected to occur in the foreseeable future if the Project were not approved, based on current plans and consistent with available infrastructure and community services." Therefore, under this alternative, no development would occur on the Project site and it would remain in its existing condition. However, as described in Section 6.4 of the DEIR, the Project site is located within a completely developed and highly used urban corridor, near freeways and transit, and contains an existing useable structure, and it is not reasonable to assume that the Project site would remain vacant and underutilized in the long-term. In the No Project/No Build condition, it is reasonably expected that the existing 81,172 square foot office building would be re -occupied. Hence, this alternative compares impacts of the Project with re -occupation at full capacity of the existing office building. (DEK p. 6-4.) Environmental Effects: The No Project/No Build Alternative would avoid the significant and unavoidable aesthetic impact that would result from the Project and all of the potential construction impacts. Additionally, operational impacts would be reduced and the mitigation measures that are identified in Chapter 4.0, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, of the Final EIR which include measures related to aesthetics, biological resources, hazards and hazardous materials, noise and vibration, and tribal cultural resources would not be required. (DEIR, pp. 6-6 through 6-11.) However, the environmental benefits of the Project would also not be realized, such as improvements to storm water quality, removal of contaminated soils, improvements to the jobs/housing balance, and the potential to reduce vehicle miles traveled. The No Project/No Build Alternative would not install storm water filtration features in accordance with DAMP and LID design guidelines that would filter and slow the volume and rate of runoff; the arsenic contaminated soils would remain onsite; and this alternative would provide for the projected employment growth but would not improve the jobs to housing balance within the region and could generate more vehicle miles traveled. Ability to Achieve Project Objectives: The No Project/No Build Alternative would not meet any of the Project objectives. (DEIR, p. 6-11.) The site would not be redeveloped into new high -quality housing near existing employment centers, commercial areas, freeways, and transit. Capital investment related to the Project site to enhance the City's economic and fiscal viability pursuant to the City of Santa Ana Strategic Plan would not occur, and a safe, high -quality, modern residential community with open space and various recreation amenities would not be implemented by this alternative. Overall, this alternative would not meet any of the objectives of the Project. (DEIR, p. 6-11.) Resolution No. Page 69 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Finding: The No Project/No Build Alternative would avoid the significant and unavoidable aesthetic impacts and would avoid the need for mitigation to ensure impacts to various environmental resources would not occur. Additionally, this alternative would not require a General Plan amendment or zone change. However, the No Project/No Build Alternative would not achieve the Project objectives and the environmental benefits of the Project would not be realized. Therefore, the City hereby rejects the No Project/No Build Alternative. Alternative 2: Reduced Project Alternative Description: Under this alternative, described in further detail in the DEIR (DEIR, p. 6-12), a 30 percent reduction in the number of residential units would be built, which would result in increased setbacks and reduced building heights. Like the Project, 77 percent of the units would be studio or one -bedroom units, 18 percent would be 2-bedroom units, and 6 percent would be 3-bedroom units. This alternative would develop and operate 347 multi -family residential units on the 5.9-acre site, which would result in 59 dwelling units per acre, which is a 149-unit (and 25 unit per acre) reduction compared to the Project. Reducing these units from the Project would eliminate 51 units along the eastern portion of the Project site to provide a 90-foot building setback from the eastern boundary of the site; and the 5th floor residential units along the eastern side would be eliminated to provide a maximum of 4-stories adjacent to the 90- foot setback. Under the Reduced Project Alternative, the development would be 3-stories in height along Santiago Park and Edgewood Road, and would be 5 stories in height along N, Main Street and adjacent to the parking structure. To support the 347 multi -family residential units under this alternative 625 parking spaces (an average of 1.8 spaces per unit consistent with the Project) would be provided within a 6-level parking structure, that would have 5 levels above ground and one level underground. Like the Project, the residential units would be wrapped around the parking structure. Under the Reduced Project Alternative, the Wellness Room and Community Rooms would not be developed (as they are planned to be located within the 90-foot setback) and the recreation amenities would also be reduced by 30 percent. Thus, approximately 4,870 of indoor recreation facilities would be provided by this alternative. However, the 90-foot setback would create a large open space area (approximately 54,000 square feet) along the eastern side of the Project site that could be used for open space recreation. Like the Project, this alternative would require a General Plan Amendment from the existing land use designation of PAO (Professional and Administrative Office) to District Center (DC), and a Zone change from P (Professional) to a Specific Development (SD) designation. Environmental Effects: As further discussed in the DEIR (DEIR, pp. 6-12 through 6-17), the Reduced Project Alternative would result in a 90-foot building setback from the eastern boundary of the site resulting in an open space area that could be used for recreation. In addition, views of the Project site would be visually less dense and structure heights would be lower from several viewpoints. Also, the shade and shadow generated from the Reduced Project Alternative would be less than the Project and would extend into fewer off -site areas. However, the same mitigation to protect the trees to remain onsite would be necessary to ensure views of the Project site are screened, and (although less) this alternative would also result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks in comparison to the existing views of the site that is considered significant pursuant to the City's aesthetics criteria. Thus, this Alternative does not eliminate a significant and unavoidable impact. Resolution No. Page 70 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR This alternative would also require the same types of construction activities and related mitigation measures as the proposed Project. Therefore, although the Reduced Project Alternative would be lower in height, scale, and mass, generate fewer greenhouse gas and air quality emissions, require fewer services, result in less traffic trips, and create a large open space area on the eastern portion of the Project site, it would not reduce the need for mitigation or the level of impact significance compared to the Project. Finding: The Reduced Project Alternative would reduce impacts in comparison to the proposed Project; however, the alternative would not reduce significant unavoidable aesthetic impacts to a less than significant level and would continue to require the same mitigation measures that would be implemented for the Project. Therefore, the City hereby rejects the Reduced Project Alternative. (DEIR, p. 6-18.) Alternative 3: Build Out of the Existing Zoning Alternative Description: Under this alternative described in further detail in the DEIR (DEIR, pp. 6-18 through 6- 24), the Project site would be redeveloped for new professional office uses as allowed bythe City's Zoning Code Sections 41-312 through 41-323. The Project site has a Zoning designation of P (Professional), which allows buildings up to 3-stories or 35-feet in height. The building setbacks required in the P zone include a 15-foot setback from the front and side property lines, and a 50-foot rear setback when the site backs to residential areas. The maximum office building structure that could be developed under the existing zoning code requirements would be 3-stories high and 387,465 square feet (floor area ratio of 1.5), which would require 1,161 parking spaces (per the P zone requirement of 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet). The office building would be surrounded by drought tolerant ornamental landscaping. Under this alternative, the existing onsite development would be demolished, removed, and replaced to provide a new building structure that would be developed pursuant to current building requirements, such as energy efficient power systems, drought tolerant landscaping, storm water filtration, and other Low Impact Development (LID) requirements. This alternative would be consistent with the existing land use designation, which is PAO (Professional and Administrative Office) and P zoning designation. (DEIR, p. 6-18.) Environmental Effects: The Build Out of the Existing Zoning Alternative would result in a lower building height than the Project, and a 10-foot larger setback from the eastern boundary of the site; but would be 4.77 times larger than the existing 81,172 square foot 2-story building, and like the Project, this alternative would substantially change the scale, height, and setbacks in comparison to existing views of the Project site, which would result in a significant impact pursuant to the City's aesthetics criteria. Furthermore, the character of the office building under this alternative would be less visually consistent with the adjacent single-family residential than the proposed multi -family residential. (DEIR, p. 6-23.) The Build Out Under the Existing Zoning Alternative would result in approximately 1,275 employees at full capacity and generate approximately 3,774 vehicle trips per day, which is 40 percent more daily trips than the proposed Project. As a result, impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas, traffic noise, and traffic congestion would be increased in comparison to the Project. Similarly, construction of this alternative would require the same construction related mitigation measures that are required for the Project. Overall, the Build Out Under the Existing Zoning Alternative would result in greater impacts than the Project. (DEIR, p. 6-23.) Ability to Achieve Project Objectives: The Build Out of the Existing Zoning Alternative would not meet Resolution No. Page 71 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR a majority of the Project objectives. The site would not be redeveloped into new high -quality housing near existing employment centers, commercial areas, freeways, and transit. It would not promote an improved jobs/housing balance, and would not provide residents with a safe, high -quality, modern residential community with open space and various recreation amenities. Although the Project would meet the objectives of redeveloping land uses that would utilize existing infrastructure and would implement capital investment related to the Project site to enhance the City's economic and fiscal viability pursuant to the City of Santa Ana Strategic Plan, a majority (5 out of 7) of the Project objectives would not be met. (DEIR, pp. 6-23 through 6-24.) Finding: The Build Out of the Existing Zoning Alternative would continue to result in a significant unavoidable aesthetic impact, would continue to require the same mitigation measures that would be implemented for the Project, and would result in greater impacts to other environmental topics than the Project. In addition, the Existing Zoning Alternative would not meet a majority of the Project objectives. Therefore, the City hereby rejects the Existing Zoning Alternative. 12.6 Environmentally Superior Alternative The Environmentally Superior Alternative for the Project is the No Project/No Build Alternative. The No Project/No Build Alternative would avoid the significant and unavoidable impact of the Project and all of the potential construction impacts, reduce many of the operational impacts, and would not be required to implement the mitigation measures that are identified in Chapter 4.0 of this EIR that are related to: aesthetics, biological resources, hazards and hazardous materials, noise and vibration, and tribal cultural resources. However, this alternative would not improve the storm water runoff quality that runs directly into Santiago Creek, not remove the contaminated soils from the site, not improve the jobs/housing balance and the related reduction in vehicle miles traveled. (DEIR, pp. 6-24 through 6-25.) CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(3)(1) states that if the environmentally superior alternative is the "no project" alternative, the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives. The Environmentally Superior Alternative among the other alternatives is Alternative 2: Reduced Project Alternative, which would develop 30 fewer units than the Project. (DEIR, p. 6-24.) The potential impacts from this alternative are less than the Project because the residential structure under this alternative would be lower in height, at a lower density, and be sited at least 90-feet from the eastern property line resulting in a large open space area that could be used for recreation. However, the Reduced Project Alternative would result in a significant and unavoidable aesthetics impact related to a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks in comparison to the existing views of the site and the alternative would not reduce the need for mitigation compared to the proposed Project. (DEIR, p. 6-24.) Furthermore, the Reduced Project Alternative would result in a reduced beneficial effect; providing fewer multi -family housing units on the Project site that would result in a reduced improvement to the City's 3.2 percent vacancy rate, fewer residents traveling to local employment opportunities, a reduced improvement to the jobs -housing balance, and is not as reflective of the General Plan Major City Entry and Main Street Concourse node designations as the Project. In addition, the Reduced Project Alternative would not meet the Project objectives to the same extent as the Project. The site would be redeveloped for new high - quality housing near existing employment centers, commercial areas, freeways, and transit; however, fewer residential units would be provided and a reduced improvement to the jobs -housing balance would occur. Additionally, fewer residents would be accommodated by the safe, high -quality, modern residential Resolution No. Page 72 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR community with open space and various recreation amenities on the Project site. (DEIR, pp. 6-24 through 6-25.) CEQA does not require the City to choose the environmentally superior alternative. Instead CEQA requires the City to consider environmentally superior alternatives, explain the considerations that led it to conclude that those alternatives were infeasible from a policy standpoint, weigh those considerations against the environmental impacts of the proposed Project, and make findings that the benefits of those considerations outweighed the harm. Resolution No. Page 73 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT B Statement of Overriding Considerations STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS MAGNOLIA AT THE PARK MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT STATE CLEARINGHOUSE No: 2018021031 CITY OF SANTA ANA: DP No. 2017-34 Introduction The City of Santa Ana is the Lead Agency under CEQA responsible for preparation, review and certification of the Final EIR for the Magnolia at the Park Multi -Family Residential Project (Project). As the Lead Agency, the City is also responsible for determining the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action and which of those impacts are significant and can be mitigated through imposition of mitigation measures to avoid or minimize those impacts to a level of less than significant. CEQA then requires the Lead Agency to balance the benefits of a proposed action against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in determining whether or not to approve the Project. In making this determination, the City is guided by CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 which provides as follows: 15093. Statement of Overriding Considerations. a) CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." b) When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section 15091. In addition, Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) requires that where a public agency finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in an EIR and thereby leave significant unavoidable effects, the public agency must also find that overriding economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects of the project. Resolution No. Page 74 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Statement of Overriding Considerations Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the City has balanced the benefits of the Project against the following unavoidable adverse impacts associated with the Project and has adopted all feasible mitigation measures with respect to these impacts. The City also has examined alternatives to the Project, most of which do not meet the Project objectives and are environmentally preferable to the Project for the reasons discussed in the Findings and Facts in Support of Findings. The City of Santa Ana, the Lead Agency for this Project, having reviewed the DEIR for the Project and reviewed all written materials within the City's public record and heard all oral testimony presented at public hearings, adopts this Statement of Overriding Considerations, which has balanced the benefits of the Project against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in reaching its decision to approve the Project. Overriding Considerations The City, after balancing the specific economic, legal, social, technological and other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits of the Project, has determined that the unavoidable adverse environmental impact identified above may be considered acceptable due to the following specific considerations which outweigh the unavoidable, adverse environmental impact of the Project, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 2108I(b) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15093. Each of the benefits identified below provides a separate and independent basis for overriding the significant environmental effects of the Project. The specific economic, legal, social, technological and other benefits of the Project are as follows: 1. The Project would implement capital investment to enhance the City's economic and fiscal viability pursuant to the City of Santa Ana Strategic Plan. 2. The Project would implement the General Plan Scenic Corridors Element Major City Entry designation along N. Main Street at the Project site. 3. The Project would implement the General Plan Urban Design Element Main Street at I-5 Freeway Gateway designation. 4. The Project would provide consistency with the General Plan Scenic Corridors Element Inter - City Corridor designation along the Santiago Creek area at N. Main Street. 5. The Project would provide needed multi -family rental housing to improve the City's 3.2 percent vacancy rate and provide a variety of housing options for existing and future residents. 6. The Project would reduce the jobs -housing ratio, providing a beneficial effect of providing multi- family housing in a jobs -rich area so that employees can easily travel to employment opportunities. 7. The Project would result in a potential reduction of vehicle miles traveled and the related traffic congestion, air quality, and greenhouse gas emissions from the provision of housing near regional shopping areas and employment, and by improving the jobs -housing balance. Resolution No. Page 75 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Statement of Overriding Considerations 8. The Project would provide additional multi -family housing to support the regionally forecasted increase in economic activities and employment increases. 9. The Project would redevelop an underutilized parcel to implement high -quality multi -family housing with recreation amenities, near transportation facilities and utilizing existing infrastructure capacity. 10. The Project would improve storm water filtration, such that unfiltered runoff would no longer be conveyed to Santiago Creek. All of the runoff from the site would be conveyed to infiltrating landscaping areas and catch basins that would improve the existing storm water quality that conveys to the creek. 11. The Project would install additional 24- and 36-inch box trees and tree wells along the Edgewood Road and N. Main Street right-of-way, providing additional public street trees. 12. The Project would result in the creation, installation, and maintenance of a public art project with a value equivalent to one-half of one percent of the total construction cost of the Project, pursuant to a development agreement entered into between the City and the Project Applicant, AC 2525 Main St., a California limited liability company ("Project Applicant'). 13. The Project would result in the Project Applicant constructing park improvements including, but not limited to, installation of irrigation, landscaping, security lighting and bike trail enhancements to Santiago Park pursuant to a development agreement entered into between the City and the Project Applicant, AC 2525 Main St., a California limited liability company ("Project Applicant'). 14. The Project would result in providing benefits to the Park Santiago neighborhood for a period of 55-year (subject to annual review) including access to on -site amenities, private 24-hour roving security patrol of Santiago Park and the Park Santiago Neighborhood pursuant to a development agreement entered into between the City and the Project Applicant, AC 2525 Main St., a California limited liability company ("Project Applicant. 15. The Project would result in the Applicant preforming the analysis, design, engineering, construction, and inspection/administration of (1) Santiago Park neighborhood improvements at up to three locations on Edgewood and/or Bush Street to achieve traffic calming and traffic diversion. Improvements may be based on input from the Santiago Park Neighborhood Association and may include, but not be limited to, bulb -outs, traffic circles and medians within the neighborhood streets. (2) Street lighting enhancements within the Santiago Park Neighborhood. (3) A street light at the Santiago Park Drive / Main Street intersection. (4) Decorative concrete pavement within the intersection of Main Street/Walkie Way and Main Street/Santiago Park Drive pursuant to a development agreement entered into between the City and the Project Applicant, AC 2525 Main St., a California limited liability company ("Project Applicant'). Resolution No. Page 76 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR Waal 3rt1IN 2525 N. MAIN STREET MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 1.1 Introduction The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead or public agency that approves or carries out a project for which an Environmental Impact Report has been certified which identifies one or more significant adverse environmental effects and where findings with respect to changes or alterations in the project have been made, to adopt a "...reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment' (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21081, 21081.6). A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is required to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are successfully implemented for the 2525 N. Main Street Multi -Family Residential Project (project). The City of Santa Ana is the Lead Agency for the proposed project and is responsible for implementation of the MMRP. This report describes the MMRP for the project and identifies the parties that will be responsible for monitoring implementation of the individual mitigation measures in the MMRP. 1.2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program The MMRP for the project will be active through all phases of the project, including design, construction, and operation. The attached table identifies the mitigation program required to be implemented by the City for the project to avoid or reduce potentially significant impacts on the environment. The table identifies the timing of implementation, and the responsible party or parties for monitoring compliance. The MMRP also includes a column for the compliance monitor (individual responsible for monitoring compliance) to document when implementation of the measure is completed. As individual mitigation measures are completed, the compliance monitor will sign and date the MMRP, indicating that the required mitigation measure has been completed. The project includes specific Project Design Features (PDFs) that are incorporated to avoid and/or minimize potential environmental impacts. In addition, the EIR analysis describes the existing regulations that effectively avoid or reduce environmental impacts. The PDFs and the existing regulations that are implementable actions related to project construction and operation activities are included in the following MMRP table to ensure implementation and appropriate monitoring of each, in the same manner as the mitigation measures. City of Santa Ana October 2019 N � dd� 0 U m c c c c c c N N N N N t0 m w w w w w w w N �_ C �_ C �_ N - C � .O � .O � .O p- OI d N N N N N N N N N N N N N C O O O O O �iO. T U U .L' U ..T. U ,T. U U ocf O_ c C O O O- C O aO Y U 'C 2 ao o = w J O C N T t0 ((JJa ((JJa N T� N y Jc OV OC - co OC y U. c o o 0 N o c 0 = c 0 c 0 0 o o. s E .o N a$ o w.m m o a t0 a o 'o •' b= cr cr o N L O N U C_ d N y O O N O NOI N $ � >` N LVOi N N a y 0¢ H Oj O7 !0 w L P; O lOR0 CnN N O UC Q^ ,0 O ' RE ON c E N UOOO w= _ (O O ... O- y ¢ � nL+ ¢ O N L g � N M lO O w0 U " m L A i= p_ y 'S 1E c c� t E £ m w E o c oa S' c .�. m .0 �i c_ E o U O y L 0 O U y U c `m y a p o y o — d E_ O N E12 O ry _ OI N N -O ~ N bz O C N T y d N 0) N Cl L O_ ti= N o N a o_ .00 H Y N " C d aL• 0 w E E m8 E E o o y O O y£ a u V O E 2 N L N O y U m .((JJ -O O_ N 0 OI iJ y C 0 d N N y R a+ � � C O U m m U w C N C a E 0 U m � � � N C y C W O1 C E f 0 O C N N 6 E fS0 d N CISQ L E O C C 0 E R R` 3$ 0 0' L 0 y ~ y N O co d 0) _ L a S N y O d Q U c y N 0 O C O Y y H U Q V I c N O . _O m O 67 ON ON C Fa > W. O O NU YO C C EQ ryy C aE d U -O E y E ' y R R p_ OI b .> O N 'O Q .� y y .R E_ LL o +.. C O Gi N 'O y N N �[ FLU, U 'O C O N w a 0 R y R N R -O T' y m U L L y O C C R y R E OI N C y C y R m y a c -O O Off— d c O +L,,. c O S O N y d y > d O U a R .� S C E E E 2 R R w ROLRmoE aO Rcpj . —P $R R� wFpN UOcQ E E CO R"N -cm aNOc. SE_?iC LEC L6Ry oO Lai NUR d UE 0 0 O RNS ECo ayyON _CRO LNO 'yO —ytOOn R LOSR O I O N O '0 N E yd -¢OryyypN '- W. m ydd E mN N O0 Z N N N cZa N i N .a O` R y O .0 a (O O _O EO— R j .0 C `yam O_ ORy� O -O d NCO. C -O 00�. OE Nc.L.. o�� LEN R o.'S E �S OI c N R_ R 0 UU. 'VOEa� 23p OO SO0o m yT o Oc Oo . 0 To oo m. 8 Jot gOc' O y a 3 � Z LR m SN OO O O 4 p E C c O t -0mN c R Q N N R R o 0 y N A a+ � � C O U m d OI 'C OI OI w {Cp a T a T C y c c d C. O C QdI C QdI CO .N y C '5 .o (TI .N '5 .o CO .N d OI d y lY y� j9 N c � y N O N 2i � � � O O to to to to N to y O O O o W U U 4. U U U 0 o c 4 c c � i i d m p S o a a a t5 c 0 ``oa c 0 `o m c `O `o c 4 y 0 .o c c c_ c 0 o c o .o a � a � yi c J c N y. b J OO m e OU. b O N O a O p CJ N '� U ccp �i' y U O N O p h O C m m m m b w - CON_ J ON_ ON. Z Oi y O �ij C Q p_ y ca C y N " N L N y g C C c '� N N C N O U !0 U E N y C '� O !0 N N c Q Q N N E O T Y !0 w O E M N L c Q c a m a 3 w O E �� y N oa9 c w .3 t5 N o'o y .w � o a'� 'o o y '--o O O y b O U N O N M N ~ U y O N N Of s E c c O 'N & O C a0" N S .O O +LO„ U N y y C r O O N O. p y '> a� N y 8 ¢ w c L a 6% d L ~ 2 P .� ems' E - c4 0 3 d �i e O E O O �- o_ g 2 2 L C2 O 02 U O Z E �' � 2i 3 Q' x— y iJ y .� .ry -O Ft .� P O y O O U N as O o o a m' 8 o' 2 `� a v >oE = cyi O 0 o M r N �� � ¢Z ?� L Q � � C) N y L_ .C_ N (n s '=� E y .= M t0 f+f y MOsvl R T O Of t0 6 w C y L_ L 3 N N Z O L Q N O O �-. U E Q O O P C O. O O C N O Q L 0 O C! cc U LJ C 'O !0 N N L a Eay 'O N O O T N t0 C C N O O U c O O 0 TO E N G O 'C 6 O O c c '� UO O U O Q 1- L • N tO O N a:y� E a a m 6 Q o M N N N A a+ N N N O C E o O U m m m w m m U w C w C E = m C 6 O CO .N CO .N N C CO N �Uk Qom, Qom, yo '> Qom, y(n N (n N N U) O C O O rile. O U U U - - c a m c m � m E€ aEi c r m a m o a m o o m S c a S= a c a Z a o N '� m '`0 2 m if E E y CO Q O Q o- CS U U — CS -m U m .2 'O N I,j 'c 'y N S 82 O O 0 C3 F O -O C N O> E 0 mUF C O L 4 m O d y C !0 0 Q L d O - U N Of O U !0 C a O N O d U O C (n '> L a) H U¢ U> m N N c O C C~ N (n Q U .� O `.nO m ri > Lm3 w. y m m -N — c Wp � x3 m > b m m Cm o pI N c=O a m w NNNy CEy E E= 0 m .002 y o Sm oEa t6 m 8 O E E = N O om3 CyLg -Zw O C Om 0 O o o : asoy c 2 ca > "m' O -OO L19 E' N N N E E 0 0 !0 C T O Nl C .4- f6 E 'u c NN U N c N E2 E N aLN+ N p_ -CO OI- OS m 0 C- c N m U N V N N -O N 42 Of N E m E D- d O L O L y N E N 0 N O CO i O .cc E ON_W� O. 0 0 42 O ON U m m 0_ N '4U" E y 0 U L i N i O !0 C L 3 O C i C N E -2 O C O_I !0 = N m O lO P; o N N C m -Q N am. L E m m y m E E C t O O. m 4 C-e Z .rN. .0 2 E fa fp !p N E m m d N 2` L S L N o N T U Q O O L aU. !0 O C O O OI 'L C co)m 'p aj C f0 N nT+ '� O D U L y .4 m O -O p .Pi O E N U OI m y 4 0 O_ t0 C N O Ip -0 i +L.. N c� 41 L C= N RI 3 YS d O O. N O O d p c N m N p O y 0 N O q -J m= 'O = C O E > 45 a {• �j !p C p N O -p C Et0 ?`_ rL LNm CNC ^2 L w E O O m C o ¢NU N U U N • y m X. � NO .0 N N O_ 3 f/1 .0 N O_ 'd O �' R1 L 'O aL. N Of N N .0 2 9 N N A a+ E o O U m c m m U w C_ a E'� m > G U Q a Ol N O N N C > C !0 N C W O _T U U m N 0_ E E p U N OU ~ $ C o a o y .E ma E a a E � o O c U N 0mN. .UO 0Tmw" mp6 '' S OC Nom? +LaNm• -�mm SNc O N .OcNN.. 0 NW O N CN a �L: O m m = N .�Uy N7 - Ea U0 E o c `m S S E U p o m o N o LE g ac > " E o T' N 8 .c o N E LE O N d E m O .L.. -O O E y N O m m m O O m '� OL$ -O -O !LO U Of -O +N.. -BOO�O 'O 'm .0 ,a U T ry N O C% t0 m m o 'E '�� O i m a 2• o �Noi m E 'E " m e 'm o Ti m $ i ':OOyc O o OOo ZN'c 0--`y E JS -oo 16 ' OyO`mm O o o yNU 2cc o .�No 0 m> O O $aO � c U O O o a U_C o pi ma o 8i'aE m c— 'OO O b ¢ y y .y O. N C O a •G N fn y0 O S y O O O T U m N m g W to O O O O N i3 — '> .y N U m= N O c m m -i — a s O 'O y 'O E 'O „m. N O c m V am :° w 0_ t0 N E H a N m Eco � m a� N N y� 0 � 0 > y U N O m wm� m N N ` OWf O ca O O L-O O LL m -OLm 3m Cc 20 N $ N m ~ Z7 �_o Ncm 6 Z IN 0 OE y 'm I m C Op1-8 a n o o.o m -co a 'm N m t0 S-cmo mm ` v C U T C d 03 d • • • '� 'a�J Q K dy dd� 0 U m m w w = w a _ 5.0 cU Q� Q o>_ Q� Q p� R y Ry O R �y N U U N U a c .� c a E a r O y U= O= of = O= R O y O= O 9 c g -o_ c a$ o'o 2 a z 0'� 2 c t0 UN U y a o a o U C U O N = 2C '0 O +�+ c '0 O O a d O TO O !0 C � `ry R = 2 N � 0 m Of N Ley Of N c c o d O O LL s R y d s 6 S to O _O = O C O N '_ � .N � y .O O. R �p N O V a0. � _ _ O a NT 0 Q N E O R O O ;F O R R _id Uy_ U N E Y E C O N U R N tp R U C 2 O_ f0/_l !0 O O_ N O S.J y m R -O O O m 'O T� C C Cp Z c U pE '� C U!0 O O -O R m -O 0= 2 d �Uj y lo U O y wc 0O a yg5 R= 2 Cy No Of N SR G� 'O C p� E OE7, _ d o� m 8 o N c 2 E a� d oothO= 0 coNi wC O p RC Oid .L c X o Em OLE U O N O =3 p O R¢ R N E ton o- U =O y C U E .o tp O E0 N !0 R m R ty O'J E o = N o S O Y L N U c Ln tg U N U tLn '� tLn U N � Ln = C O_ ry Z N C y= N t0 O O N '� E -¢m w EO0 0P f/y1 otn 2 S2 a y ".RT c N y ENg 'No at e aT N E E _ .� R '� N +0., 'RO +o. 2 U c y .� c O O L O L �i O L iP R = U C ia N O O L p= Z L N d ii L d U N d= R S O pO J O_ tEii m Q E O_ N F-' -O d O S H S U R H+ H R � Ot OI �+ Ol'� �O, • • • U � 'p N N jQ O U m p d pf O 01 p1 of U 0 U m S c R a _ 'o `o_ J3 .f3 R S c€ a a 2 € c a a o.o a 'E5 O O m N C7 C O t z L .0 R ._ E. .0 > 15 U O yO R p O R = 0� C 'N c 5 c .� O p >> p' S S r _p R Z R O R ry U y O w �0 N A ,lam R O p p O C~ E''c p N O z.J N O LL M N N N > E E Q '00>_ O R p Z N p O N c Y 7:c U . ON O NE R 8 N¢ L0RR O E NOp .pZ Q 0pN OL 0 z p > U d L_ N ¢ RE w , R i W a+ o0 .-OO N y U Cp.J pW ts U O N-,a 'O "2 O_ o(h m d o Ei (O N N W 9 O O O 'Z ` 'o_ �3 O U O U a? m U p m ? -po U N R .� 'p&' .N y a N N d 6 S 6 p =O D =O _� U C N y m O U O S O E >O d a N> N > > O- C a $or, a d La y N R a+ N n C � � C O U m m m m w m L E m m m m c U Q T Q T Q y> Q T R C N C C N _ � C yn {`Op � y O C O O O 4. O W U 41 U U U U S $ $ S � $ O c pi O c R GN � as as as T `c°a a c7 tO ma a .O E O n-QyUj m -QyUj m -QyUj O C m yEy O o m 7 o .o Z CK C d� _ 3 c m �' = c c4 m aci aci ox E c m U N '�. U m = N N C S CD y c a ti E Ya E .°.� m c m d� `m a a o N m C a C ntF W N L ^.g p $ fG U t0 O O O c C ct6 O y C O N (O(Jt N SO 2$ V_ N w J N N y a U N y p d N N y +0 N N c N c R N c N p` N no 3 R c.y .0 n •V � ry c ry c U .E m .� z O-Z EXHIBIT D ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The Draft Environmental Impact Report, Final Environmental Impact Report, Clarifications to the Final Environmental Impact Report (October 2019), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Technical Appendices are available at the following locations: Online: https://www.santa-ana.org/pb/planning-division/mamor-planning-protects-and- documents/2525-n-main-residential-development Paper Copies: Planning and Building Agency Planning Counter, First Floor 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Santa Ana Public Library 26 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT LINK 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET EIR NO. 2018-01, DA NO. 2018-01, GPA NO. 2018-06, AA NO. 2018- EXHIBIT E CLARIFICATION TO THE 2525 N. MAIN STREET (MAGNOLIA AT THE PARK) MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse Number: 2018021031 City of Santa Ana: DP No. 2017-34 Prepared for: City of Santa Ana October 2019 Prepared by: RE Consulting RE Consulting Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose and Scope......................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Environmental Procedures...........................................................................................................................1 1.3 Summary of CEQA Analysis.........................................................................................................................1 1.4 Project Location............................................................................................................................................2 1.5 Project Objectives.........................................................................................................................................2 MODIFICATIONS TO THE ORIGINAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION......................................................................3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS...............................................................................................13 3.1 Aesthetics...................................................................................................................................................14 3.2 Air Quality ...................................................................................................................................................27 3.3 Biological Resources..................................................................................................................................28 3.4 Cultural/Historic Resources........................................................................................................................29 3.5 Greenhouse Gas Emissions.......................................................................................................................30 3.6 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.............................................................................................................31 3.7 Land Use and Planning..............................................................................................................................33 3.8 Noise..........................................................................................................................................................35 3.9 Population and Housing.............................................................................................................................41 3.10 Public Services...........................................................................................................................................43 3.11 Transportation and Traffic..........................................................................................................................45 3.12 Tribal Cultural Resources...........................................................................................................................61 3.13 Utilities and Service Systems.....................................................................................................................62 3.14 Energy........................................................................................................................................................64 Tables Table 1: Proposed Project Modifications...................................................................................................................3 Table 2: Comparison of Open Space / Recreation Areas..........................................................................................5 Table N-1: Reference Noise Levels.........................................................................................................................37 Table N-2: Project Operational Noise Levels...........................................................................................................37 Table N-3: Project Operational Noise Level Compliance.........................................................................................40 Table P-1: Comparison of Residents at Full Occupancy.........................................................................................42 Table P-2: City of Santa Ana Jobs — Housing Balance Comparison.......................................................................42 Table T-1 Comparison of Vehicular Trip Generation...............................................................................................46 Table T-2: Existing Condition with Modified Project- Intersection Levels of Service ...............................................47 Table T-3: Existing Condition with Modified Project — Roadway Segment Levels of Service..................................48 Table T4 Existing Condition with Modified Project Queuing..................................................................................49 Table T-5: Existing Condition with Modified Project Freeway Segment Levels of Service......................................51 Table T-6: Opening Year (2020) with Modified Project - Intersection Levels of Service..........................................52 Table T-7: Opening Year (2020) with Modified Project — Roadway Segment Levels of Service .............................53 Table T-8: Opening Year (2020) with Modified Project Queuing.............................................................................54 Table T-9: Year 2040 with Modified Project - Intersection Levels of Service...........................................................55 Table T-10: Year 2040 with Modified Project — Roadway Segment Levels of Service ............................................56 Table T-11: Year 2040 with Modified Project Queuing............................................................................................57 Table T-12: Year 2040 with Modified Project Freeway Segment Levels of Service................................................58 Table T-1I Parking Demand Per the ITE Rates.....................................................................................................59 Table T-14: Parking Survey Data Summary ............................................................................................................60 Table U-1: Comparison of Water Demands.............................................................................................................63 Figures Figure 1: Modified Project Site Plan..........................................................................................................................4 Figure 2: Modified Project Open Space Plan.............................................................................................................6 Figure 3: Modified Project Site Access......................................................................................................................8 Figure 4: Modified Project North and West Building Elevations.................................................................................9 Figure 5: Modified Project South and East Building Elevations...............................................................................10 Figure 6: Modified Project Conceptual Renderings.................................................................................................11 Figure 7: Visual Simulation Viewpoint Locations....................................................................................................15 Figure 8: N. Main Street View Simulations..............................................................................................................17 Figure 9: Eastbound Santiago Park View Simulations.............................................................................................18 Figure 10: Westbound Santiago Park View Simulations..........................................................................................19 Figure 11: N. Spurgeon Avenue View Simulations..................................................................................................21 Figure 12: Edgewood Road at N. Bush Street View Simulations............................................................................22 Figure 13: Original Project Shade and Shadow.......................................................................................................24 Figure 14: Modified Project Shade and Shadow......................................................................................................25 Figure 15: Modified Project Operationals Noise Source and Receiver Locations....................................................39 Attachment A: Supplemental Operational Noise Analysis Attachment B: Supplemental Traffic Analysis Attachment C: Parking Analysis Acronyms AFY acre feet yearly APNs Assessor Parcel Numbers AQMP Air Quality Management Plan ASHRAE American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resource Board CCR California Code of Regulations CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level DAMP Drainage Area Management Plan DEIR Draft Environmental Impact Report DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control EIR Environmental Impact Report EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESLs Environmental Screening Levels GHG greenhouse gas gpd gallons per day HOV High Occupancy Vehicle HSP Health and Safety Plan HVAC heating, ventilation and air conditioning I Interstate ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers LID Low Impact Development LOS Level of Service MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MERV Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value OCFA Orange County Fire Authority OCHA Orange County Health Care Agency OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PDF Project Design Feature PM Particulate Matter RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SMP Soil Management Plan STC Sound Transmission Class SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan USGS United States Geologic Survey UWMP Urban Water Management Plan VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled WQMP Water Quality Management Plan 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Scope This document is a Clarification to the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Magnolia at the Park Multi - Family Residential Project (Original Project) (SCH Number: 2018021031) located at 2525 N. Main Street in the City of Santa Ana. The Draft EIR (DEIR), Final EIR, in conjunction with this Clarification, serve as the environmental review for the proposed Modified Project. Subsequent to circulation of the Draft EIR and preparation of the Final EIR for the Original Project, but prior to certification of the Final EIR, the Project applicant has revised the development proposal to the City. This Clarification document evaluates the revised development proposal (Modified Project), as described herein. The Modified Project proposes reducing the number of residential units by 48.4 percent, reducing the scale of the structures, and revising the vehicular parking and access to the site. This Clarification evaluates these modifications to determine if any new or substantially more severe environmental impacts would occur from implementation of the Modified Project that were not identified in the EIR. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.) (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, Section 15000 et sec.), the City is the Lead Agency charged with deciding whether or not to approve the Project with or without the proposed modifications. This Clarification addresses the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Modified Project and will be considered by the City during the Project approval process, in tandem with the Draft EIR, the Final EIR, all oral and written comments presented to the City, and all other documents comprising the Project's administrative record. 1.2 Environmental Procedures This Clarification to the Final EIR, which will be incorporated into the Final EIR, has been prepared to determine if the proposed Modified Project would result in new or substantially increased environmental effects than were originally identified in the EIR, and to determine if any of the conditions triggering the need to recirculate the EIR are present. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5, a Lead Agency is required to recirculate an EIR when significant new information is added to the EIR after public notice is given of the availability of a draft EIR for public review, but before the EIR is certified. `New information" includes changes in the proposed project or environmental setting, as well as additional data or other information. CEQA considers new information to be "significant" when it deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect. CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5(a) specifies that "Significant new information" related to impacts that requires recirculation include: (1) A new significant environmental impact would result from the project or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be implemented, or (2) A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result unless mitigation measures are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance. In addition, CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5(e) states that a decision not to recirculate an EIR must be supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record. Therefore, this Clarification considers whether the proposed Modified Project would result in a new significant environmental impact, or a substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact previously identified in the EIR. 1.3 Summary of CEQA Analysis In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, and as detailed herein, the City of Santa Ana completed a comprehensive analysis of the proposed Modified Project and found that none of the conditions specified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 are present. Accordingly, recirculation of the EIR is not required prior to the City's consideration of the Modified Project, and no new or substantially more severe adverse environmental effects would occur from implementation of the Modred Project. Pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, this Clarification focuses on the potential environmental impacts associated with the Modified Project that might cause a change in the conclusions of the EIR, including significant new information related to new or increased adverse environmental effects. In other words, this document compares the environmental effects of the Project as evaluated in the EIR to those of the Modified Project and considers whether the proposed modifications would result in new or substantially more severe impacts than was disclosed in the EIR. Specifically, this document analyzes whether a reduction of 240 residential units (a 48.4 percent reduction), a reduction in the height of the proposed structures, and a re -design of the proposed site entrance (as detailed below), the addition of surface level parking, and a lot line adjustment would result in the new or substantially more severe impacts than were identified in the EIR. As detailed herein, implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in any new or substantially greater impacts and no new mitigation measures are required. On the basis of these findings and the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, no recirculated EIR is required for the modified multi -family residential project. As required by CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5(e) the analysis throughout this Clarification provides substantial evidence to support these findings. 1.4 Project Location The Project is located at 2525 North (N.) Main Street, in the northern portion of the City of Santa Ana approximately 500 feet east of Interstate (1)-5. The site is located on the northeast comer of N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. Regional access to the Project site is provided by 1-5 and the N. Main Street exit, and local access to the Project site is provided by N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. The Project site consists of 6 contiguous parcels that include Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 003-010-028, 003- 010-01, 003-010-03, 003-010-025, 003-010-026, 003-010-030 and is located within the U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) Orange County 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Quadrangle. 1.5 Project Objectives The Project objectives have not been modified. As described by the EIR, the following objectives support the Project's underlying purpose to develop multi -family residential uses on the Project site and assist with meeting the City's housing needs: • Redevelop existing underutilized parcels to implement development of new high -quality housing. • Increase high -quality housing near existing employment centers. • Promote an improved jobs/housing balance by locating attractive new housing in proximity to employment centers. • Provide housing in close proximity to commercial areas, freeways, and transit. • Redevelop existing land uses that would utilize existing infrastructure, including: water, sewer, arterial roadways, transit, and freeways. • Implement capital investment to enhance the City's economic and fiscal viability pursuant to the City of Santa Ana Strategic Plan. • Provide a safe, high -quality, modem residential community with open space and various recreation amenities. 2 MODIFICATIONS TO THE ORIGINAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Modified Project would reduce the height, size, and scale of the Project that was analyzed in the EIR. The Modified Project would redevelop the 5.9-acre Project site to provide 256 for -rent multi -family. The residential units would be provided within approximately 277,281 square feet of residential structures that range between 2 and 4 stories in height. The 2-story residential structures (24-feet 8-inches in height), located on the eastern portion of the site, and be setback a minimum of 90-feet from the eastern boundary of the site, as shown in Figure 1, Modified Project Site Plan. The 3-story residential structures (36-feet 9-inches in height) would be located behind the two-story structures on the eastern portion of the site. The remainder of the residential structures would be 4-stories with a roofline of approximately (49-feet 5-inches in height). The setback of the building along the southern boundary (Edgewood Road) has been increased from 13 feet to approximately 134-feet, with inclusion of a surface parking lot. The residential units would be developed around a 167,253 square foot central parking structure that would have one 26,700 square foot level of underground parking and 5 levels of aboveground parking. The parking structure would be centrally located onsite and would be approximately 59-feet in height. The highest point of the proposed development would be the top of the elevator tower to the amenity deck on top of the parking structure, which would be approximately 74 feet 5 inches from the ground surface. Table 1 provides a comparison between the Original Project as evaluated in the EIR and the proposed Modified Project. Table 1: Proposed Project Modifications Project Characteristic Original Project(per EIR Modified Project Change Number of Units 496 units 256 units -240 units Density of Residential 84 units per acre 58 units per acre` -26 units per acre` Development Area Residential Unit Mix Studio: 73 units —15% Studio: 74 units — 29% Studio: +1 units 1 bdr: 307 units — 62% 1 bdr: 103 units — 40% 1 bdr: -204 units 2 bdr: 88 units —18% 2 bdr: 75 units — 29% 2 bdr: -13 units 3 bdr: 28 units — 6% 3 bdr: 4 units — 2% 3 bdr: -24 units Residential Unit Sizes Studios: 590 — 740 SF Studios: 560 — 590 SF Average unit size is 1 bdr: 610 —1,090 SF 1 bdr: 630 — 930 SF smaller 2 bdr: 910 —1,470 SF 2 bdr: 910 —1,180 SF 3 bdr: 1,360 —1,520 SF 3 bdr: 1,360 SF Stories of Residential Structures 2 to 5 stories with mezzanines 2 to 4 stories -1 story Maximum Height of Residential 65-feet 8-inches 49-feet 5-inches -1 6-feet 3-inches Structures Height of Parking Structure 90 feet (7 above -ground levels) 59 feet (5 above -ground -31 feet Roofline levels Highest Structure Fitness Center Roofline on Elevator Tower Roofline -15 feet 5 inches Western portion of the Amenity towards western portion of Deck — 90 feet site — 74 feet 5-inches. Building Setback from Eastern 40 foot minimum 90 foot minimum +50 feet Side Boundary Building Setback from Southern Between 10 feet and 13 feet 4 134 feet 6-inches +121 feet Side Boundary inches Size of Subterranean Parking 1 level 40,000 square feet 1 level 26,700 square feet -13,300 square feet Parking — Total 904 total spaces 511 spaces dedicated -393 dedicated spaces 691 including shared parking Spaces Per Unit 1.8 2.0 dedicated +0.2 dedicated 2.7 w/ shared parking +0.9 w/ shared parking Tandem Spaces 122 0 -122 Electric Vehicle S aces 25 15 -10 ADA Spaces 21 12 -9 Notes: bdr = bedroom, SF = square feet, w/ = with, w/o = without `not including the OC Discovery Cube shared parking area of 1.42 acres mU Via¢ m V e r �Nr m } F •� Ef f� i 4 E� p 'ate �� sa `m � U � C f IL C O O 0 O O N j o 1 0 As shown in Table 1, the proposed Modified Project would reduce the development by 240 units, from 496 units to 256 units, a 48.4 percent reduction. This would result in a residential density of 58 units per acre, not including the OC Discovery Cube shared parking area of 1.42 acres (described below). The proposed Modified Project's residential structures would be one-story lower in height and eliminate mezzanines (approximately 16-feet lower) and would be separated from the eastern side of the site by an additional 50 feet in increased building setback compared to the Original Project. The height of the centrally located parking structure would be reduced by approximately 31 feet and the highest point of the proposed structures (the roof elevator shaft) would be 15.5 feet lower. Additionally, the level of subterranean parking would be reduced in size by 13,300 square feet from approximately 40,000 square feet for the Original Project to approximately 26,700 square feet for the Modified Project. Open Space, Recreation, and Other Amenities The Modified Project would provide 3 open space recreational courtyards totaling 12,920 square feet of exterior open space and recreation facilities, this is a reduction of 9,980 square feet from the 22,900 square feet of exterior open space within 5 open space recreational courtyards that were included in the Original Project. The open space areas are shown in Figure 2, Modified Project Open Space Plan. The types of exterior recreational amenities proposed for the Modified Project are the same as those provided for the Original Project and include outdoor kitchens/barbeques, fire pits, water features, seating areas, tables, and trellis covered patios. The Modified Project would also provide a rooftop amenity deck with a pool, spa, restrooms, poolside seating, and other amenities, however, the amenity deck would be 2,119 square feet smaller (Table 2). The interior residential amenities would also be reduced in comparison to the Original Project. As shown in Table 2, the Modified Project would not include the originally proposed Wellness Center, Community Room, Resident Services/Business Center room, Bicycle Repair Room, and Dog Washroom. In addition, the size of the Fitness Center would be reduced by 2,279 square feet. Table 2: Comparison of Open Space / Recreation Areas Amenity Original Project Modified Project Change Open Space Recreational Courtyards 22,900 SF 12,920 SF -9,980 Wellness Center 1,600 SF 0 -1,600 SF Community Room 4,700 SF 0 - 4,700 SF Resident Services /Business Center 3,900 SF 0 -3,900 SF Bicycle Repair Room 280 SF 0 SF -280 SF Dog Wash Room 40 SF 0 SF -40 SF Fitness Center 5,400 SF 3,121 SF -2,279 SF Amenity Deck 11,400 SF 9,281 SF -2,119 SF Notes: SF square feet Parking The Modified Project would provide onsite parking in both a central parking structure and a surface parking lot that would be located on the eastern and southern portions of the site, as shown in Figure 1. The central parking structure would provide 407 spaces that would be dedicated to the onsite residential uses. The surface parking lot would contain 284 parking spaces, of which 104 would be dedicated to the onsite residential uses and 180 would be shared with the OC Discovery Cube that is located across N. Main Street from the Project site and currently utilizes the site for 180 parking spaces. Edgewood Road � � m IIIIIIIIIIII .............................., _ N 0 3 R w N N \ M A ® 0 .. U N AV 0 U 5 N 5 N ca a i L UUL W \ CN E , a C N J a R U N m o. c m c s N O c Q - Q 4 LL O The Modified Project would share the 180 spaces provided in the southern portion of the site. The parking spaces would be used by the OC Discovery Cube from %00 a.m. to HO p.m. daily and would be available for the onsite residences between HO p.m. to %00 p.m. daily. A rolling gate would separate the onsite residential and OC Discovery Cube parking areas and be opened and closed for management of onsite parking. As part of the agreement for use of the space for OC Discovery Cube parking, the Modified Project includes a perpetual easement of the shared surface lot area. The number of parking spaces for the residential units would be increased to provide 2.0 parking spaces per unit that are dedicated to the onsite residences, which would increase onsite parking capacity in comparison to the Original Project. In addition, the Modified Project would include 180 shared parking spaces that would be available for residential uses after HO p.m. daily, which results in 2.7 parking spaces per units between HO p.m. to %00 p.m. daily. Site Access and Circulation The proposed Modified Project would provide vehicular access to the site from two driveways along N. Main Street. The southern driveway would provide right -in and right -out access to the parking area to be used by the OC Discovery Cube. The northern driveway would be used for the residential uses and would guide vehicles to the parking structure and provide direct access to the residential units, guest parking, and the leasing office. The residential parking on the east side of the site would also be accessed through the parking structure. The northern driveway would also include a public use access easement to Santiago Park, and the existing gated access at the east leg of the N. Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive intersection would be removed. To provide for left -turn vehicular access into and out of the Project site, the southern leg of the intersection of N. Main Street at Walkie Way (including the pedestrian crossings and signals) would be moved approximately 80 to 90-feet to the south. The north leg of the N. Main Street crosswalk would be removed, the south leg of the crosswalk would connect the Project site and the Discovery Cube, and the median would be modified during construction of the Modified Project. The proposed site access is shown on Figure 3, Modified Project Site Access. The intersection signalization of Walkie Way (going east and west into and out of the site) would be modified to operate with split - phasing' and the N. Main Street northbound and southbound left -turn lanes (into and out of the site) would operate with lead/lag phasing2. Architecture and Design No changes to the architecture style and aesthetic design of the Project are proposed. As described in the EIR, the Project's architectural design would integrate the proposed structures, landscaping, and open space courtyard areas and also provide varied building heights and projections. Conceptual building elevations showing the Modified Project are provided in Figures 4 and 5 and conceptual renderings of the Modified Project are provided in Figure 6. The architecture retains vertical variations, horizontal roof elements, and various setbacks. The exterior color palate remains the same including various earth toned colors, such as beige, brown, and grey with black and metal accents, as well as stone veneer, stucco, sand plaster finishes, and wood facade accents. Walls and Fencing No changes to the walls and fencing are proposed. As detailed in the EIR, the existing 6-foot high masonry wall along the eastern portion of the site would be raised to 8-feet in height, and the existing fence along the northern boundary of the site would be replaced with a 6-foot-high tubular steel fence, which, along with landscaping, would delineate the Project site from the Santiago Park area. In addition, the fire lane entrances would be secured with a decorative tubular steel gate with a knoxbox for emergency access. I Split phasing is a signal that gives a green phase for all vehicle movements of one direction (e.g., northbound through, right, and left) followed by a phase for all movements of the opposite direction (e.g., southbound through, right, and left). 2 Lead/lag phasing is a signal sequence where the green left turn arrow is either before or after the oncoming thru green. T N « I m3 y5 n No mU I xt a2 my I y n ¢ 6 N 20 R d0. dU IT -- - -- - - I '1 I kll W 3 : w m m p O a fa« N J O. d3' . O I h'aro . y U N m m a U m N O y :+ 0 ° t 813: ° o � o a OfY �k C U ... m n e U y o C ` \$ b J .:� a T T O > ~ y OW �01 06 m OA N 0 W W fA \ \ \ \ 0 m O 2 N � N" a-2 O� a`� LL 71 c 0 17 3 v �e e`�rE LL UOIIUA013 43noS y d y � W LL 1. View At Main Street & Edgewood Road Looking East 3. View On Main Street Looking At Leasing Center 5. View On Main Street Looking Southeast 7. View At Edgewood Road Looking West SOURCE: Architects Orange, 2019 2. View On Main Street Looking Northeast 4. View On Main Street Looking Southeast 6. View At Northeast Comer Looking West 6 7 KeyMap U� I 5 4A ? 21 3 Figure 6: Modified Project Conceptual Renderings Landscaping and Lighting No changes to lighting are proposed, however, due to the provision of surface parking on the site, the amount of landscaping would be reduced from approximately 0.94 acre of landscaping to approximately 0.48 acre of landscaping on the site. The landscaped areas would be located throughout the site and additional street trees would be planted along N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. The residential building would be adjacent to landscaped courtyards. Many of the existing mature trees that line the eastern and southem site boundary would remain, however, trees that are located throughout the remainder of the site, within construction areas, or are in poor or declining health would be removed. New ornamental landscaping would be installed throughout the site that would include a variety of 24- through 48-inch box trees, 1 — 5-gallon shrubs, and ground covers. Additional trees ranging in size from 24- to 48-inch box trees would be added to the eastern property line to fill in gaps in the mature landscaping to screen views between the site and adjacent residential areas. The Project would also install 24- and 36-inch box trees and tree wells along Edgewood Road and N. Main Street and may replace existing street trees. New plant species used in the landscaping would be drought -tolerant, non-invasive, and compliant with the City of Santa Ana's landscaping requirements. Likewise, the new irrigation installed onsite would meet the City's requirements for water efficiency (Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-1503, Landscape Water Use Standards). As described in the EIR, new exterior lighting onsite would be provided for security and to accent the landscaping, Project signage, light walkways, and parking areas. The new lighting would be focused on the Project site, shield offsite areas, and would be compliant with the City's lighting regulations (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 8-210 and Section 41-611.1). Infrastructure No changes to the proposed infrastructure connections are proposed, and these connections would include the following: • Water Infrastructure: As detailed in the EIR, the Project would install new water infrastructure on site that would connect to the existing 16-inch water pipelines in N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. The new onsite water system would be compliant with the CalGreen Plumbing Code (Title 24) for efficient use of water. • Wastewater Infrastructure: Wastewater from the Project site currently discharges into existing City -owned 6- and 12-inch sewer lines within Edgewood Road. As detailed in the EIR, the Project would install a new onsite sewer system that connects to the existing sewer lines in Edgewood Road. • Drainage Infrastructure: As detailed in the EIR, the existing 10-inch storm water drain that conveys unfiltered runoff to Santiago Creek would be capped and all of the runoff from the site would be conveyed to new infiltrating landscaping areas, catch basins, and storm water drains that would be sized to meet the Project's needs. The onste system would connect to the existing City drain system in N. Main Street and Edgewood Road, which discharges to Santiago Creek. Project Design Features A reduction in the number of electric vehicle charging stations are proposed. The Original Project included at least 25 electric vehicle charging stations and the Modified Project includes at least 15 electric vehicle charging stations. No other changes in Project Design Features (PDFs) are proposed. The following PDFs would prevent or lessen environmental impacts and would be implemented in the same manner as mitigation measures: • PDF-1: The landscape plan will incorporate the existing mature trees located along the eastern Project site boundary and to the extent feasible protect and preserve the existing mature trees within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary that were identified as healthy by the Arborist Report. 0 PDF-2: The Project will include at least 15 electric vehicle charging stations. • PDF-3: The Project will include installation and maintenance of air filtration systems with efficiencies equal to or exceeding a Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) 16 as defined by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 52.2 within all buildings. • PDF-4: Outdoor trash receptacles will be provided throughout the common areas of the site, including the dog park area, for the tenants to dispose of their refuse in a proper manner. Property maintenance will provide trash and waste material removal, including dog feces disposal bags, to maintain a trash -free property. All wastes shall be collected and properly disposed of off -site. PDF-5: The Project will include safety design features for security, such as low -intensity security lighting, keypads for building access, security cameras, and 24-hour security personnel. Construction Activities and Schedule No changes to the proposed construction schedule are proposed. The Modified Project would be developed within the 18-month period evaluated by the EIR and involve one construction phase that includes: (1) demolition of existing building, pavement, removal of infrastructure and some landscaping, (2) grading and excavation, (3) construction of drainage, utilities, and subgrade infrastructure, (4) building construction, and (5) paving and application of architectural coatings. No units will be leased until construction of the entire Project is completed and occupancy permits have been received from the City. As described in the EIR, construction activities would be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday and excluding Sundays and federal holidays, which would be consistent with the City's Noise Ordinance (Municipal Code Section 18-314, Special Provisions). However, typical construction activities would occur Monday through Friday, generally 20 days a month. Initial site preparation would include demolition of the existing building and several areas of asphaltic concrete pavements. Demolition would remove all subsurface remnants, including foundations, floor slabs, and any utilities that will not be reutilized with the new development. It is anticipated that a maximum of 120 construction workers would be onsite at one time, which would occur during the building construction phase. General Plan Land Use and Zoning Amendments The Modified Project would require City approval of the same General Plan Land Use and zoning amendments that are required by the Original Project. These amendments would change the land use designation of the site from Professional & Administration Office (PAO) to District Center (DC) and an Amendment Application (zone change) from Professional (P) to Specific Development (SD) to provide site specific development standards. 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The evaluation of environmental impacts in this Clarification summarizes conclusions made in the EIR and compares them to the impacts of the proposed Modified Project. Mitigation measures referenced are from the EIR Mitigation Monitoring Program and would be applied to proposed Modified Project. This comparative analysis has been undertaken pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, to provide the factual basis for determining whether potential impacts related to the proposed Modified Project requires recirculation of the Draft EIR. As discussed in further detail in Section 1.2, Environmental Procedures, of this Clarification, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5, a recirculated EIR is not required unless the Lead Agency determines that one or more of the following conditions related to environmental impacts are met: 1) a new significant environmental impact would result from the project or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be implemented, and/or 2) a substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result. 3.1 Aesthetics Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Viewshed Impacts Section 4.1, Aesthetics, of the DEIR describes that with implementation of the Project, views of the Project site from the adjacent Santiago Park area would change from setback views of the existing 2-story office building partially screened by mature landscaping to that of forefront views of the 5-story residential building, with a landscaped tree buffer directly adjacent to the park. This would result in a significant and unavoidable change in views of the Project site from the park. The difference in scale and height, due to the Projects location adjacent to the park, and limited visual setback buffer with the proposed landscaping, would result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks that is considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria related to the visual character of the site in comparison to the park. Thus, the EIR determined that the visual change in height, scale, and setbacks from Santiago Park would be significant and unavoidable. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-16 through 4.1-26.) In addition, the EIR describes that implementation of the Project would result in a significant and unavoidable change in visual scale, height, and setbacks from Edgewood Road and N. Bush Street. The background views of urban buildings would become forefront views, and the proposed size and scale of the Project would substantially increase the overall visual density of the built environment. The difference in visual scale and height with the proposed structure adjacent to the roadway and limited visual setback buffer, would be substantial and considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria. Thus, the EIR determined that the visual change related to the height, scale, and setback from Edgewood Road and N. Bush Street would be significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-21.) The EIR describes that PDF-1 that would incorporate the existing mature trees located along the eastern Project site boundary and to the extent feasible protect and preserve the existing mature trees within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary that were identified as healthy by the Arbonst Report. This was determined to reduce the visual impacts of the Project. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-18.) The EIR also included Mitigation Measure AES-1 that requires measures be implemented to retain and protect the trees along the eastern and southern Project site boundary. This measure was determined to reduce visual impacts. However, even with implementation of PDF-1 and Mitigation Measure AES-1, the EIR determined that the Project would still result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks that was considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria. As a result, impacts related to existing visual character or quality of the site were determined to be significant and unavoidable. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-16 through 4.1-26.) Shade and Shadow Impacts Section 4.1, Aesthetics, of the DEIR describes that the Original Project would not exceed the City's thresholds for shade and shadow impacts. The EIR determined that shadow -sensitive use areas (where sunlight is important to its function) would not be shaded by project -related structures for more than 3 hours between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. between fall and spring, or for more than 4 hours between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. between spring and fall compared to existing conditions. Because these City's thresholds were not exceeded, impacts related to shade and shadow were determined to be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-24 through 4.1-26.). Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Viewshed Impacts Consistent with the methodology in the EIR, photo -simulations were prepared to demonstrate the degree of visual change that would result from implementation of the Modified Project. The photo -simulations have been utilized to depict, at a realistic yet conceptual level of detail, the proposed conditions from public locations after construction and with 5-years maturity of the proposed landscaping. Figure 7 provides the public viewpoint locations for each of the visual simulations. Figure 7: Visual Simulation Viewpoint Locations SOURCE: Wenjie Studio, 2019 Viewpoint A: N. Main Street. Figure 8 provides a comparison of the existing northbound view of the Project site along, N. Main Street at Edgewood Road, the change to the view as described in the EIR, and the change to the view that would occur from the Modified Project. As shown, and described in the EIR, in the existing condition, the predominant visual feature on the site from this viewpoint is a large parking lot that is partially screened behind mature ornamental landscaping of various species. Similar to the change detailed in the EIR, the Modified Project would alter the existing view by development of forefront structures that would be larger in height and scale than the existing office building on the site. However, the Modified Project would be lower in height and smaller in scale than the Original Project structures, and the existing prominent structures along the N. Main Street view corridor, such as the OC Discovery Cube and the 10-story office buildings would remain the visual focal point. The structures proposed by the Modified Project along the N. Main Street frontage would be 4-stories with a roofline that is approximately 49-feet 5-inches; this is 16-feet lower in height than the Original Project's 5-story, plus mezzanine structure that had a roofline of approximately 64 feet high along N. Main Street. The parking structure for the Modified Project is proposed to be approximately 59-feet high, which would be 31 feet lower than the 90-foot high parking structure that was evaluated in the EIR. Likewise, the highest point of the Modified Project in the western portion of the site is 15 feet 5 inches lower than the highest point of the Original Project. Figure 8 shows that the smaller buildings constructed by the Modified Project would have greater screening by landscaping and would be less prominent than the structures developed by the Original Project. As shown, the contrast in views that would occur from the Modified Project is less than what would occur from the Original Project. Thus; no new or greater impact related to changes to views along N. Main Street would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Viewpoints B and C: Santiago Park. Figures 9 and 10 provide comparisons of the existing views of the Project site from the adjacent Santiago Park area, the change to the views as described in the EIR, and the change to the views that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. As shown, and described in the EIR, the existing features in Santiago Park adjacent to the Project site include an asphalt bike trail, scattered landscaping, weedy vegetation, tree stumps, and limited groundcover. Similar to the changes detailed in the EIR, the Modified Project would alter the existing views by development of forefront residential buildings adjacent to Santiago Park that would be greater in scale, height, and closer than the existing office building and would be partially screened by new trees on the site. The development would change views from middle ground views of a 2-story office building to forefront views of a modern urban development. Thus, like the Original Project, the Modred Project would also result in a significant and unavoidable impact because the difference in scale and height, due to the developments location adjacent to the park, and limited visual setback buffer with the proposed landscaping, would result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks that is considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria related to visual character. However, the Modified Project would be lower in height and smaller in scale than the Original Project structures. The structures proposed by the Modified Project along the Santiago Park frontage would be 4-stories with a roofline that is approximately 49-feet 5-inches. This is more than 16-feet lower in height than the Original Project's 5-story, plus mezzanine structure that had a roofline of approximately 65-feet along the northern elevation (as shown in Figure 4). In addition, the Modified Project includes a 10-foot minimum landscaped setback between Santiago Park and the residential structures (shown in Figure 2, Modified Project Open Space Plan), which is slightly larger than the 7-foot minimum setback provided by the Original Project (see, DER, Figure 3-5). Figures 9 and 10 show that the smaller buildings constructed by the Modified Project and increased landscaped setback along Santiago Park would result in greater landscape screening and the views of the Modified Project would be less prominent than those of the Original Project. As shown, the contrast in views that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project is less than what would occur from the Original Project. Thus, although impacts Existing View Draft EIR Project Proposed Modified Project Figure 8: Viewpoint A: N. Main Street SOURCE: Wenjie Studio, 2019 Existing View Draft EIR Project Proposed Modified Project Figure 9: Viewpoint B: Santiago Park at N. Main Street and Walkie Way SOURCE: Wenjie Studio, 2019 Existing View Draft EIR Project Proposed Modified Project Figure 10: Viewpoint C: Santiago Park toward N. Main Street SOURCE: Wenjie Studio, 2019 would remain significant and unavoidable, no new or greater impacts related to changes to views from Santiago Park would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Viewpoint D: N. Spurgeon Street. Figure 11 provides a comparison of the existing view of the Project site from N. Spurgeon Street, the change to the view as described in the EIR, and the change to the view that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. The Modified Project includes a minimum of a 90-foot building setback from the eastern boundary of the Project site and buffered by landscaping. This is an increased setback of 50-feet in comparison to the Original Project, which included a 40-foot minimum setback. As shown on Figure 1, Modified Project Site Plan, and Figure 5, Modified Project Conceptual Building Elevations, the proposed 4-story (approximately 49-foot 5-inch high) structures would be set behind the 2-story (approximately 24-feet high) and 3-story (approximately 36 feet high) portions of the Project. The 4-story structure would be more than 16 feet lower in height than the approximately 65-foot high structures that were previously proposed. As shown in Figure 11, with implementation of Mitigation Measure AES-1 and Project Design Feature PDF-1, which would increase landscaping along the eastern boundary through installation of new trees ranging in size from 24- to 48-inch box trees and protection of the existing healthy trees, a large majority of the Project structure rooflines generated by the Modified Project would not be seen from N. Spurgeon Street. The 50-foot increased setback and lower structures would screen views of the buildings developed by the Modified Project. Limited views of the Modified Project could occur at some points along N. Spurgeon Street. However, these views would be less than what would occur by the Original Project, under which views of some of the 5th floor units would be visible from N. Spurgeon Street, as shown in Figure 11. Also, due to the planned location of the parking structure in the central portion of the Project site, it would not be visible from N. Spurgeon Street. The trajectory of views from the viewpoint along N. Spurgeon Street are shown on Figure 11. The design of the Project in combination with line -of -sight from N. Spurgeon result in the parking structure being screened from view. Any potential views of the parking structure from other locations to the east of the Project site would be within background views, which would be similar to, but lower in height than, views of the Original Project. Therefore, the Modified Project would result in reduced visual impacts from N. Spurgeon Street compared to the Original Project, and no new or greater impacts related to changes to views from N. Spurgeon Street would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Viewpoint F: Edgewood Road at N. Bush Street. Figure 12 provides a comparison of the existing view of the Project site from Edgewood Road at N. Bush Street, the change to the view as described in the EIR, and the change to the view that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. The Modified Project would change views from Edgewood Road at N. Bush Street from that of a vacant surface parking lot to views of a multi -story residential building set behind a surface parking lot that provides a building setback of approximately 134 feet. The background views of urban buildings would become middle ground views, and forefront views would be of the surface parking lot. The size and scale of the proposed structures would increase the overall visual density of the built environment. The difference in visual scale and height with the proposed structure, would be substantial and considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria. Thus, the visual change related to the height, scale, and setback from the Modified Project at the Edgewood Road and N. Bush Street viewpoint would continue to be significant and unavoidable. However, the Modified Project would be lower in height and smaller in scale than the Original Project. The structures proposed by the Modified Project on the southern portion of the Project site near Edgewood Road at Bush Street would be 4-stories with a rootline of approximately 49-feet 5-inches from the ground surface (shown on Figure 5 [south elevation]). The buildings along Edgewood Road at Bush Street would be between 16-feet 3-inches lower in height than the approximately 65-foot high 5-story Original Project buildings in the southern portion of the site and would be set behind the surface parking lot, providing greater visual distance and less visual density (as shown in Figure 12). The 59 foot high parking structure (that would be 31 feet lower than the Original Project parking structure) would not be visible from this viewpoint/trajectory, as it would be located behind the 4-story residential building, but it could be visible in background views from other locations farther back from the Project site that may allow for a higher/taller view perspective. Existing View Draft EIR Project Proposed Modified Project Figure 11: Viewpoint D: N. Spurgeon Street SOURCE: Wenjie Studio, 2019 NBC 7*1�.. y� a" i As shown, the change in Viewpoint F that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project is similar in character to the change from the Original Project. However, the smaller buildings constructed by the Modified Project would result in reduced visual scale, as they would be set behind the surface parking lot. Thus, the views of the Modified Project would be visually less dense and provide a greater visual setback than those of the Original Project. As shown, the contrast in views that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project is less than what would occur from the Original Project. Thus, although impacts from the Modified Project to Viewpoint F would be significant and unavoidable due to a substantial visual contrast from existing conditions, no new or greater impacts related to changes to views from Edgewood Road at N. Bush Street would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Shade and Shadow Impacts Consistent with the methodology applied in the EIR, shade/shadow diagrams were developed by using three- dimensional massing models of the Modified Project and software that induces sunlight conditions to illustrate the shadow effects of the proposed structures. The shadows shown are the summer/winter solstices and the spring/autumnal equinoxes as they show the longest and shortest shadows. Further, the time periods of 9:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., and 3:00 p.m., show the shade pattern throughout the day. In addition, the spring and autumn (March/September) shadow patterns are similar in nature, and are therefore grouped together. As described previously, the structures developed by the Modified Project would be between 16 and 31 feet lower in height than the structures described in the EIR. In addition, the setback on the east has increased to 90-feet from 40- feet and the setback along the south has increased from 13 feet to approximately 134-feet, with inclusion of a surface parking lot. Figures 13 and 14 show that the shade and shadow that would be generated by the Modified Project is very similar to, but slightly less than the shade and shadow that would be generated by the Original Project. In both project conditions, shadow from the proposed structures would encroach into N. Main Street and Santiago Park. However, the shadows from the Modified Project would not encroach into the adjacent residential areas. Figure 14 shows that shadows from the Modified Project at 3:00 p.m. during the winter solstice would be limited to the Project site. The shadows on the adjacent residential areas would be limited to shadows from the existing walls, fencing and residential structures. Thus, shadows from the Modified Project would be less than those generated by the Original Project. In both the Original Project and Modified Project conditions, shadows from the proposed development would not result in shadows to sensitive use areas (where sunlight is important to its function) for more than 3 hours between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. between fall and spring, or for more than 4 hours between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. between spring and fall. Therefore, similar to the Original Project, the Modified Project would not exceed the City's shade and shadow thresholds. Thus, no new or greater impacts related to shade and shadow would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Aesthetics As described in the EIR for the Original Project, the Modified Project would alter the existing views by development of forefront residential buildings that would result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks that is considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria related to visual character from specific viewpoints. However, the Modified Project would be lower in height and smaller in scale than the Original Project. The contrast in views that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project is less than what would occur from the Original Project. Thus, although impacts related to specific viewpoints would remain significant and unavoidable, no new or greater impacts would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. z T im II North March/September - gam North ....... June - 9am �NTI�0 PARK Spring/Autumn Equinox Sam Summer Solstice Ip y SAMIIGOYARF XT J LJ uj�Y�pJ ■ _ I- North III June-12pm Winter Solstice 1 I, North June - 3pm RA.AGOYMF �UUILI R9l! I% 1 lil 7. EOD ID � fW � O�R�. � North ,,,n„ �1 - {' _.If`^1 North ,n„ it Ti III North lI�OJI si C'"7 IF December I9am December - 12pm December - 3pm Figure 13: Original Project Project Shade and Shadow Source: DEIR Figure 4.1-13 Prepared By: RT Design, Ron Teitel March/September - 9am E North June - 9am December - 9am Source: Architects Orange, 2019 Prepared By: RT Design, Ron Teel Spring/Autumn Equinox March/September - 12pm Summer Solstice TI North; f June-12pm North March/September - 3pm Q � T 7i e� r'of m 111 North June - 3pm Winter Solstice December - 12pm December - 3pm Figure 14: Modified Project Shade and Shadow EIR Mitiaation Measure Mitigation Measure AES-1: Construction plans and specifications shall state that the following measures shall be implemented by the construction contractor to protect the trees along the eastern Project site boundary and to the extent feasible protect and preserve the existing mature trees within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary that are planned for preservation during construction of the proposed Project pursuant to the 2018 Arborist Report: • If the wall along the eastern boundary of the Project site cannot be heightened in -place and must be replaced, it shall be reconstructed with a precast concrete fence or a wall without a continuous footing. • Before finalizing construction plans, a contractor with an AirSpade or AirKnife shall explore the locations adjacent to the preserved trees to locate large lateral roots. The root locations shall be marked, and a survey provided to update the construction plans to avoid cutting any significant large roots. The cutting of small roots shall be planned for late spring or winter and made with clean cuts. No pruning paint or sealants shall be used. • Any grade changes near the preserved trees or pruning of trees to provide clearances for construction equipment shall be coordinated with a Registered Consulting Arborist before construction begins, and precautions pursuant to the arborist's recommendations shall be taken to mitigate potential tree injuries. • Prior to construction, a one -pound soil sample shall be taken from the top 18-inches of soil in each area where trees will be preserved. The samples shall be sent to an appropriate laboratory for analysis and soil supplement recommendations. Fertilization of the preserved trees shall be completed pursuant to the laboratory analysis' soil supplement recommendations. • Prior to construction, augur 6-inch diameter holes about 3 feet deep at a 3-foot spacing between large roots in the more compacted and crowded spaces. Avoid large visible roots, relocating the holes as needed. Start augur holes at three times the trunk diameter, i.e. 6-feet from a 24-inch tree. Back fill with amended soil, based on an agronomic lab's testing and recommendations. • Prior to construction, mulch all exposed soil areas using a topical application of a well -composted, coarse - texture mulch, without manure or bio-solids, e.g. Aguinaga Forest Floor %: to 11/ particle size. Apply it 2- inches deep, but not against the tree trunks. • Deep water before construction and check soil moisture monthly during construction by means of a soil test probe. Slow water with a soaker hose or water spike for 12 hours, or as long as necessary to reach 4-feet deep. • Rinse tree foliage at the end of each work week, using a strong stream of water from a high-pressure nozzle. • During construction in areas without pavement near the preserved trees, 3 or more inches of coarse mulch or tree chips under 1-inch plywood for light vehicle parking and steel plates for larger vehicles is required to prevent compaction and protect surface roots. • Protection Barrier: A protection barrier shall be installed around the trees to be preserved. The barrier shall be constructed of durable fencing material, such as chain link fencing. The barrier shall be placed as far from the base of the tree(s) as possible and shall be maintained in good repair throughout the duration of construction, and shall not be removed, relocated, or encroached upon without permission of the Project arborist. o Storage of Materials: There shall be NO storage of materials or supplies of any kind within the area of the protection barriers. Concrete and cement materials, block, stone, sand and soil shall not be placed within the drip -line of the tree. o Fuel Storage: Fuel storage shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of any tree to be preserved. Refueling, servicing and maintenance of equipment and machinery shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of the protected trees. o Debris and Waste Materials: Debris and waste from construction or other activities shall NOT be permitted within protected areas. Wash down of concrete or cement handling equipment, in particular, shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of protected trees. • Any damages or injuries should be reported to the Project arbonst as soon as possible. Severed roots shall be pruned cleanly to healthy tissue, using proper pruning tools. Broken branches or limbs shall be pruned according to International Society of Arboriculture Pruning Guidelines and ANSI A-300 Pruning Standards. 3.2 Air Quality Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Construction Impacts As detailed in the EIR, the Project has the potential to exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) localized significance thresholds for emissions of PMro during construction activities. Therefore, SCAQMD Rules 403(4), 1113, and 1186 to reduce particulate matter and Mitigation Measure AQ-1 requiring the construction contractor to use off -road diesel construction equipment that complies with Environmental Protection Agency/Califomia Air Resource Board (EPA/CARB) Tier 3 emissions standards, would be implemented to reduce construction emissions below a level of significance. With implementation of SCAQMD Rules 403(4), 1113, and 1186 and Mitigation Measure AQ-1 that would be confirmed through the City's permitting process for the Project, localized construction emissions of PM10 would be below SCAQMD thresholds and reduced to a less than significant level. (DEIR, p. 4.2-17.) Air Quality Plan Impacts As discussed in the EIR, Projects that are consistent with the regional population, housing, and employment forecasts identified by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are considered to be consistent with the AQMP. The EIR determined the Original Project is consistent with SCAG's population, housing, and employment forecasts because the 496 new multi -family units resulting from the Original Project would constitute a 0.6 percent increase in the total number of residential units in the City, and a 2 percent increase in the number of the multi -family residential units (5+ units) within the City, and within SCAG's projected growth. In addition, the EIR determined that the Original Project would support AQMP objectives to reduce trips, promote infill development, and balance jobs and housing. (DEIR, p. 4.2-15.) Operational Impacts As detailed in EIR Section 4.2, Air Quality, the maximum daily operational emissions would not exceed any of SCAQMD's daily significance thresholds. Thus, the construction and operation of the Project would not result in a violation of an air quality standard or substantially contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. (DEIR, p. 4.2-15 through 4.2-16.) Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Construction Impacts The Modified Project would be smaller and therefore require less overall construction activity than the Original Project. The Modified Project would develop 240 fewer multi -family residential units and a smaller parking structure with 13,300 square feet less of subterranean parking. However, it would require similar daily construction activities and use of machinery that have the potential to exceed the SCAQMD's localized significance thresholds for emissions of PM10 during construction activities. Therefore, SCAQMD Rules 403(4), 1113, and 1186 to reduce particulate matter and Mitigation Measure AQ-1 requiring the construction contractor to use off -road diesel construction equipment that complies with EPA/CARB Tier 3 emissions standards, would also be required to reduce construction emissions below a level of significance. No new or greater impacts related to construction air quality would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Air Quality Plan Impacts Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project is consistent with SCAG's population, housing, and employment forecasts because the 256 new multi -family units that would be developed by the Modified Project would constitute a 0.33 percent increase in the total number of residential units in the City, and a 1.0 percent increase in the number of the multi -family residential units (5+ units) within the City, which is within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) projected growth. In addition, the Modified Project would also support Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) objectives to reduce trips, promote infill development, and balance jobs and housing. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to air quality plans would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Operational Impacts As the Modified Project would reduce the number of multi -family residential units that would be developed on the site by 48.4 percent, the stationary source emissions that would be generated by the residences would also be reduced. Similarly, Section 3.11, Transportation and Traffic, of this document details that operation of 278 multi -family units, (which is 22 more units than the Modified Project's proposed 256 units and thus provides an overstated and conservative analysis of potential impacts), would result in 1,186 fewer daily vehicular trips than the Original Project. The reduction of vehicular trips would correlate directly to a reduction of vehicular emissions being generated by operation of the site. As described previously, the Original Project's maximum daily operational emissions would not exceed any of SCAQMD's daily significance thresholds. Thus, the Modified Project, which would result in 240 fewer residential units and 1,186 fewer daily vehicle trips would also not result in a violation of an air quality standard or substantially contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to operational air quality emissions would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Air Qualit Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would generate air quality emissions from construction and operation of the proposed multi -family residential units. However, the same construction mitigation would reduce impacts to a less than significant level and the Modified Project would constitute growth that is consistent with the AQMP. In addition, because the Modified Project is 48.4 percent smaller than the Original Project, it would result in fewer stationary source and vehicular related emissions. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure Mitigation Measure AQ-1: Construction plans and specifications shall state that the construction contractor shall use off -road diesel construction equipment that complies with EPA/CARB Tier 3 emissions standards and shall ensure that all construction equipment be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers specifications. 3.3 Biological Resources Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Section 4.3, Biological Resources, of the EIR describes that the 180 mature ornamental trees on the Project site provide potentially suitable foraging and breeding habitat for nesting migratory birds and raptor species. Removal of existing trees on the site could disrupt nesting birds and raptors 6 vegetation is removed or construction begins during the nesting season (February 1 to August 31). Disruption of migratory nesting birds and raptors is prohibited by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code. Therefore, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 was included to require a nesting bird survey to be conducted by a qualified biologist within 3 days prior any disturbance of the site during nesting season to ensure that impacts would not occur. In addition, the EIR describes that trees in the public right-of-way in Santa Ana are protected under Chapter 33, Article VII of the Municipal Code, which regulates the planting, maintenance, and removal of trees in public locations. Any street trees installed or removed are required to be in compliance with the Municipal Code regulations, which would be regulated as part of the City's project permitting procedures. Therefore, the EIR determined that implementation of the Original Project would not conflict with local polices or ordinances protecting trees. Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would include removal of many of the existing trees that could disrupt nesting birds and raptors if vegetation is removed or construction begins during the nesting season. However, the Modified Project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure BIO-1 to ensure that impacts to nesting birds would not occur. In addition, any street trees installed or removed by the Modified Project would also be required to be in compliance with the Municipal Code regulations. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to biological resources would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Biological Resources Consistent with the determinations of the EIR, the Modified Project would avoid potential impacts through implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 and compliance with the City's Municipal Code. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Construction plans and specifications shall state that vegetation clearing during nesting season (February 1 through September 15) shall be avoided, if feasible. If avoidance of the nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified biologist shall be required to conduct a nesting bird survey within 3 days prior any disturbance of the site, including disking, demolition activities, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around nests at an appropriate distance that is a minimum of 250 feet for raptors and 100 feet for non -raptors. The buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied, and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. 3.4 Cultural/Historic Resources Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR As described in DEIR Section 4.4, CuffurailHistoric Resources, the Original Project would not impact any historic resources. The EIR describes the viewsheds of the properties listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties near the Project site as already significantly affected by urban and modern structures that are taller than the Original Project's tallest structure. As a result, the setting has changed and no longer provides an aesthetic sense of a particular period of history. The EIR also describes that tall trees throughout Park Santiago screen views toward the Project site, and that many of the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties in Park Santiago are not within the viewshed of the Project site. Overall, as detailed in the EIR, due to the existing built environment, location of the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties, and the existing viewsheds, the integrity of the historic setting and feeling aspects of properties in Park Santiago would not be reduced by implementation of the Original Project. Accordingly, the EIR determined that an impact related to historic resources would not occur from implementation of the Original Project. (DEIR, p. 4.4-9 through 4.4-15) Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project As detailed previously in the discussion of aesthetics (Section 3.1), the structures developed by the Modified Project would be between 16 and 31 feet lower in height than the Original Project structures and would be setback 50 feet further from the eastern property line and 121 feet further from the southern property line than the Original Project structures. The lower building heights and increased setbacks would result in a reduction of views of the new development from historic properties. The views of surface parking areas would be similar to the surface parking areas that currently exist on the site. Therefore, the Modified Project would not result in an increased impact to the integrity of the historic setting in Park Santiago compared to the Original Project. Also, as described previously, views of the Project site are screened by many tall trees with dense leaves throughout the Park Santiago neighborhood and along boundary of the Project site. This landscape screening would remain with implementation of Mitigation Measure AES-1 and Project Description Feature PDF-1, which would increase landscaping along the eastern boundary through installation of new trees ranging in size from 24- to 48-inch box trees and protection of the existing healthy trees. In addition, the subterranean parking for the Modified Project would be 13,300 square feet smaller than the subterranean parking for the Original Project. Thus, less excavation would occur, and no potentially increased impacts related to archaeological resources would result from implementation of the Modified Project. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to cultural/historic resources would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Cultural/Historic Resources Due to the reduced height and scale of the Modified Project, the existing built environment, and location of the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties, the integrity of the historic setting and feeling aspects of properties in Park Santiago would not be reduced by implementation of the Modified Project. Thus, consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would not result in a reduction in the historic significance of properties. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to cultural/historic resources would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. 3.5 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR As described in DEIR Section 4.5, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the Original Project construction and operation of the Project would generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are below the SCAQMD's threshold for greenhouse gas emissions. (DEIR, pp. 4.5-9 through 4.5-10.) In particular, as detailed in the EIR, the Project's total net annual GHG emissions would be approximately 4.30 metric tons per year per service population, which would be less than the SCAQMD Tier 4 Option 3 threshold of 4.80 metric tons per year per service population, and therefore, less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.5-9 through 4.5-10.) The EIR also describes that projects in the City are required to comply with state and federal programs that are designed to improve energy efficiency and reduce GHG emissions, including the California Title 24, California Energy Code, and the CALGreen Code. In addition, Project Design Feature PDF-2 would provide a minimum of 25 electric vehicle charging stations to promote usage of electric vehicles. The EIR determined that the Project would be consistent with existing plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. (DEIR, p. 4.5-10 through 4.5-13.) Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project The Modified Project would reduce the number of multifamily residential units that would be developed on the site by 240 units, which is a 48.4 percent reduction. As a result, the stationary source GHG emissions that would be generated by the residences on the site would also be reduced. Section 3.11, Transportation and Traffic, of this document details that the Modified Project would result in 1,186 fewer daily vehicular trips than the Original Project. The reduction of vehicular trips would correlate directly to a reduction of vehicular emissions being generated by operation of the site. As described previously, the Original Project's GHG emissions would not exceed the significance thresholds. Thus, the Modified Project, which would result in 240 fewer residential units and 1,184 fewer daily vehicle trips would also not exceed the significance thresholds. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to GHG emissions would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Also, like the Original Project, the Modified Project would be required to comply with state and federal programs that are designed to improve energy efficiency and reduce GHG emissions, including the California Title 24, California Energy Code, and the CALGreen Code. In addition, Project Design Feature PDF-2 that provides for a minimum of 15 electric vehicle charging stations to promote usage of electric vehicles is included in the Modified Project. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to GHG emissions would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Consistent with the determinations of the EIR, the Modified Project would generate GHG emissions from construction and operation of the proposed multifamily residential units. However, because the Modified Project is 48.4 percent smaller than the Original Project it would result in fewer stationary source and vehicular related GHG emissions. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. 3.6 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Impacts related to hazards were evaluated in Section 4.6, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the DEIR. As described, due to the existence of hazardous materials within on -site soils, ground disturbing activity has the potential to result in the accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment. The contaminated soils would need to be excavated and removed as required by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), the California Integrated Waste Management Board, Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA), and the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). As a result, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 has been required to reduce the potential risks related to accidental release and exposure of people and the environment to the contaminated soils. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 requires that a qualified consultant prepare a Soil Management Plan (SMP) to be used by construction workers to remove and dispose of the areas of arsenic impacted soil. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 requires excavation of contaminated soils be completed pursuant to existing DTSC and RWQCB requirements, soils sampling ensure all contaminated soils are removed, and that a certified hazardous waste hauler remove and transport all arsenic impacted soil and other potentially hazardous materials per California Hazardous Waste Regulations to a landfill permitted by the state to accept hazardous materials. Excavated soil containing hazardous substances would be classed as a hazardous waste if they exhibit the characteristics of ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity (CCR, Title 22, Division 4.5, Chapter 11, Article 3). The SMP would detail hazardous materials excavation and disposal methods and requirements pursuant to the regulation of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations (CalOSHA) and DTSC that regulates the removal, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste to protect human health and the environment. The EIR determined that with implementation of Mitigation Measure Haz-1, impacts related to hazards of the onsite contaminated soils would be less than significant. Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Consistent with Original Project, the Modified Project would also involve demolition, excavation, and grading activities that would disturb existing hazardous materials on the site. However, the subterranean parking for the Modified Project would be 13,300 square feet smaller than the subterranean parking for the Original Project. Thus, less excavation would occur, and no potentially increased impacts related to hazardous materials in excavation soils would occur. The Modified Project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, which would ensure that excavation and disposal of contaminated soils and other potentially hazardous materials be completed pursuant to existing DTSC, RWQCB, CalOSHA, and other applicable requirements that would reduce potential impacts to humans and/or the environment from release of hazardous materials. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, impacts related to hazards of the onsite contaminated soils from construction of the Modified Project would be less than significant. No new or greater impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials would occur from implementation of the Modred Project. Conclusion for Hazards and Hazardous Materials Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would involve handling of hazardous materials and implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, which would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level such that no new or greater impacts related to hazardous materials would occur. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Soil Management Plan (SMP) shall be prepared by a qualified hazardous materials consultant and shall detail procedures and protocols for excavation and disposal of onsite hazardous materials, including: • A certified hazardous waste hauler shall remove all potentially hazardous soils. Excavation of contaminated soils shall be to the depth of approximately 0.5 feet below the existing ground surface in areas identified as having arsenic impacted soils. In addition, sampling of soil shall be conducted during excavation to ensure that all arsenic impacted soils are removed, and that residential Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for residential uses are not exceeded. Excavated materials shall be transported per California Hazardous Waste Regulations to a landfill permitted by the state to accept hazardous materials. • Any subsurface materials exposed during construction activities that appear suspect of contamination, either from visual staining or suspect odors, shall require immediate cessation of excavation activities. Soils suspected of contamination shall be tested for potential contamination. If contamination is found to be present per the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) or Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) ESLs for residential uses, it shall be transported and disposed of per California Hazardous Waste Regulations to an appropriately permitted landfill. • A Health and Safety Plan (HSP) shall be prepared for each contractor that addresses potential safety and health hazards and includes the requirements and procedures for employee protection. The HSP shall also outline proper soil handling procedures and health and safety requirements to minimize worker and public exposure to hazardous materials during construction. • All SMP measures shall be printed on the construction documents, contracts, and Project plans prior to issuance of grading permits. 3.7 Land Use and Planning Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR As discussed in Section 4.7, Land Use and Planning, of the DEIR, the Original Project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation that was adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The Original Project would be consistent with the SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Notably, the Original Project would implement many of the SCAG policies related to high -density, infill development, improvement of the job/housing balance, and use of green building measures, such as water efficiency and Low Impact Development (LID) features. Therefore, implementation of the Original Project would not result in conflict with SCAG policies, and the EIR determined that impacts would not occur. Regarding General Plan designations, the EIR described the Original Project as requiring a General Plan Land Use Amendment to change the land use designation from Professional & Administration Office (PAO) to District Center (DC) to allow for multi -family uses. The General Plan Land Use Element states that DC designation includes the major activity areas in the City and that District Centers are to be developed with an urban character. The proposed DC designation is consistent with the existing DC land uses to the north of Santiago Park and to the southwest across the 1-5 freeway. Although the Original Project under the proposed DC designation would result in a different type and higher intensity of residential units than the adjacent LR-7 designated Park Santiago neighborhood area, the EIR determined that the Project would provide a transition through wall heights, open space courtyard locations, structures tiering down to 2- stories along the eastern side, and a 40-foot eastern setback, such that the taller multifamily structures, vehicle parking, and circulation are not sited adjacent to single -story single-family residences. The EIR also determined that the proposed land use designation change from PAO to DC would not conflict with a policy or plan adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The Original Project was determined to be consistent with the relevant goals, policies, and objectives of the City's General Plan that avoid or mitigate environmental impacts, and that impacts related to conflict with a General Plan policy related to an environmental effect would be less than significant. The Original Project also required an Amendment Application (zone change) to change the existing zoning designation change from P (Professional) to a Specific Development (SD) to implement the multifamily residential project. As required by the Zoning Code, the development plans would be reviewed by the City to ensure consistency with development standards. Additionally, the SD zoning designation would be consistent with the existing SD zoned areas to the north beyond Santiago Park and to the west across N. Main Street. Therefore, the EIR determined that implementation of the Original Project would not result in an impact related to conflict with a plan or policy adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. (DEIR, pp. 4.7-16 through 4.7-34.) Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project The Modified Project would consist of the same uses as the Original Project and would require the same General Plan and zoning amendments for implementation. Like the Original Project, and although 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent) would be developed, the Modified Project would implement many of the SCAG policies related to high - density, infill development, improvement of the job/housing balance, and use of green building measures, such as water efficiency and LID features. Therefore, implementation of the Modified Project would also not result in conflict with SCAG policies. The Modified Project would also require a General Plan Land Use Amendment to change the land use designation from PAO (Professional R Administration Office) to District Center (DC) to allow for multi -family uses, which would continue to be consistent with the existing DC land uses to the north of Santiago Park and to the southwest across the 1-5 freeway. Although the Modified Project under the proposed DC designation would also result in a different type and higher intensity of residential units than the adjacent LR-7 designated Park Santiago neighborhood area, the Modified Project (that includes 58 units per acre, not including the OC Discovery Cube shared parking area of 1.42 acres) would be 26 units per acre lower in density than the Original Project that included 84 units per acre. The Modified Project would provide residences in structures that are a maximum of 4-stories high (one less story than the 5-story residential structures proposed by the Original Project). In addition, 2-story buildings would be located along the eastern side of the Project and 3-story buildings would be located behind the 2-story buildings to provide a transition between N. Main Street, the taller Project structures, and the existing single-family residential neighborhood on the east side of the site. Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would provide a transition through tiering up to taller structures, wall heights, open space courtyard locations on the east side of the site. However, the 90-foot minimum eastern setback for the Modified Project would be 50 feet wider than the 40-foot minimum setback that was included in the Original Project and the 134 foot southern building setback is 121 feet greater than that was included in the Original Project. Thus, providing a greater separation and transition between the proposed multi -family residences and the existing single-family residential neighborhood. Consistent with the findings of the EIR, the land use designation change from PAO to DC that would occur for the Modified Project would not conflict with a policy or plan adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The Modified Project would also require a zone change from P (Professional) to a Specific Development (SD) to implement multifamily residential development. As required by the Zoning Code, the development plans would be reviewed by the City to ensure consistency with development standards. Consistent with the Original Project, the SD zoning designation would be located near the existing SD zoned areas to the north beyond Santiago Park and to the west across N. Main Street and would not result in an impact related to conflict with a plan or policy adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to land use and planning would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Land Use and Planning The Modified Project would require the same General Plan land use and zoning designation amendments as the Original Project. Consistent with the determinations of the EIR, the Modified Project would not result in an impact related to conflict with a plan or policy adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to land use and planning would occur. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to land use and planning would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. 3.8 Noise Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Construction Noise Standards: The EIR determined that the Original Project would not result in generation of noise levels in excess standards established by the Citys Municipal Code. Per Section %314 (Special Provisions) of the City's Municipal Code noise sources associated with construction activities are exempt from the established noise standards as long as the activities do not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. The Original Project's construction activities would occur pursuant to these regulations. Thus, the Project would be in compliance with the City's construction related noise standards. (DEIR p. 4.8-11.) Temporary Increase in Ambient Noise: The EIR determined that construction activities would generate short-term periodic increases in ambient noise levels at sensitive receptors in the Project vicinity. Therefore, Mitigation Measure NO1-2 was provided to prohibit the use of large mobile equipment (greater than 80,000 pounds) and loaded trucks within 50 feet of the residences to the east of the Project site and Mitigation Measure NO1-3 was included to require installation of a temporary noise barrier that would be a minimum 11-feet high, constructed of frame -mounted materials such as vinyl acoustic curtains or quilted blankets, and attached to the masonry wall along the eastern Project site boundary or temporary fence posts. In addition, due to the location of existing sensitive receptors. The EIR determined that with implementation of Mitigation Measures NO1-2 and NO1-3 temporary and periodic construction noise level increases at receiver locations would be reduced to below the 10 dBA Leq temporary noise level increase threshold. Therefore, with implementation of mitigation, impacts related to periodic temporary increases in noise were determined to be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-16 through 4.8-17.) Groundborne Vibration: Construction activities for of the Original Project would generate short-term vibration levels that would exceed the distinctly perceptible vibration standard at receiver locations within 50 feet of large bulldozers usage. Thus, Mitigation Measure NO1-2 was included to prohibit the use of large mobile equipment and loaded trucks within 50 feet of the residences to the east of the Project site. With implementation of this measure, vibration impacts at the nearby sensitive receptors were determined to be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-16 through 4.8-17.) Operation Interior Noise: Section 4.8, Noise, of the DEIR, describes that traffic along the roadways near the Project site would generate noise that could exceed interior noise standards within some of the proposed residential units. Thus, some of the residential units would require upgraded windows and sliding glass doors with increased Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings to meet the interior noise standards. As described in Section 4.8, Noise, of the DEIR, the residential units along N. Main Street would require upgraded windows and sliding glass doors with minimum STC ratings of between 27 and 30 to meet the interior noise standards. Mitigation Measure NO1-1 would ensure that the appropriate windows and doors are installed, which would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-10 through 4.8-13.) Traffic Generated Noise: Section 4.8, Noise, of the DEIR, also describes that operation of the Original Project would generate a one dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) increase in traffic -related noise, which is less than the 3 dBA CNEL threshold for areas above 60 CNEL and less than the 1.5 dBA CNEL threshold for areas above 65 CNEL. Thus, the EIR determined that traffic noise impacts would be less than significant. Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Construction Noise Standards: Consistent with the Original Project, construction activities of the Modified Project are subject to the City Municipal Code regulations. Thus, the Modified Project would be in compliance with the City's construction related noise standards. No new or greater impacts related to temporary construction noise would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Temporary Increase in Ambient Noise: The Modified Project would be smaller and therefore require less overall construction activity than the Original Project. The Modified Project would develop 240 fewer multi -family residential units and a smaller parking structure with 13,300 square feet less of subterranean parking. The Modified Project would involve the same types of construction equipment that would be operated in similar locations as the Original Project. However, the building setback along the eastern side of the Project site would be 50 feet greater. Thus, construction of building structures would be farther from the residences located to the east of the Project site. Consistent with the Original Project, Mitigation Measures NO1-2 and NO1-3 would be required to prohibit the use of large mobile equipment and loaded trucks within 50 feet of the residences to the east of the Project site and install a temporary noise barrier to reduce the temporary increase in ambient noise to a less than significant level. No new or greater impacts related to temporary construction noise would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Groundborne Vibration: Consistent with the Original Project construction activities for of the Modified Project would generate short-term vibration levels that would exceed the distinctly perceptible vibration standard at receiver locations within 50 feet of large bulldozers usage. Therefore, like the Original Project, Mitigation Measure NO1-2 would be required to reduce vibration impacts to a less than significant level. However, the Modified Project would include a smaller parking structure with 13,300 square feet less of subterranean parking. Therefore, no additional vibration related to ground excavation for the parking structure would result, and overall, no new or greater impacts related to vibration would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Operation Interior Onsite Noise: Consistent with the conditions of the Original Project traffic along the roadways near the Project site would generate noise that could exceed interior noise standards within some of the proposed residential units. Thus, like the Original Project, Mitigation Measure NO1-1 would be required to ensure that the appropriate windows and doors are installed, which would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. No new or greater impacts related to interior noise would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Traffic Generated Noise: As described in Section 3.11, Transportation and Traffic, of this document, the Modified Project is estimated to generate 79 fewer a.m. peak hour trips, 96 fewer p.m. peak hour trips, and 1,186 fewer daily trips than the Original Project. The reduction of vehicular trips would also reduce traffic -related noise. Thus, consistent with the Original Project traffic related noise impacts would be less than significant, because fewer vehicular trips would be generated, no new or greater impacts related to traffic noise would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Project Generated Operational Noise: To evaluate the potential noise impacts from operation of the Modified Project, a Focused Noise Assessment (included as Attachment A) was prepared. This Focused Noise Assessment calculates the potential operational noise levels due to the Project's stationary noise sources including: roof -top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, pad -mounted transformers, parking lot vehicle movements, outdoor courtyard activity, outdoor pool/spa activity, and parking structure activities, at seven off -site receiver locations adjacent to the Project site. To estimate the Project operational noise impacts, the Focused Noise Assessment used reference noise level measurements from similar types of activities, which are provided in Table N-1. Table N-1: Reference Noise Levels Noise Source Duration (hh:mm:ss) Ref. Distance (Feet) Noise Source Height (Feet) Hourly Activity (M[nS)7 Reference Noise Level dBA 1.5o @ Ref. Dist. @ 50 Feet Roof -Top Air Conditioning Unit' 960000 5' 5' 39 74.4 54.4 Trash Enclosure Activit 2 000032 5' 5' 60 69.0 49.0 Pad -Mounted Transformer3 3 6' 5' 60 56.0 37.6 Parking Lot VehicleMovements4 010000 10, 5' 60 44.0 33.5 Courtyard Activit 5 00:08:00 10' 4' 60 73.8 59.8 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activi 00:10:00 5' 4' 60 68.7 48.7 Roof -To Parkin 4 00:10:00 5' 4' 60 68.7 48.7 Source: Urban Crossroads, 2019. Attachment A. As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 7/2712015 at the Santee Walmart located at 170 Town Center Parkway. 2 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 51312018 at a commercial and office park trash enclosure in the City of Costa Mesa. Source: NEMA TR 1-2013 Transformers, Step Voltage Regulators and Reactors, Table 2 sound level for a 500 kVA transformer. 4 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 8/24/2016 in the parking lot of the Windemere Apartment community in the City of Riverside. 5 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on Saturday night, September 21, 2019 in the City of Newport Beach. 6 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 71512017 at the Covenant Hill Clubhouse pool in Ladem Ranch. 7 Anticipated duration (minutes within the hour) of noise activity during typical hourly conditions expected at the Project site based on the reference noise level measurement activity. Table N-2 identifies that the operational noise from the Project would range from 31.4 to 46.9 dBA L5o at the sensitive off -site receiver locations. These operational noise level calculations are based on the reference noise level measurements in Table N-1 and include barrier attenuation provided by intervening structures between each noise source and the receivers, which are shown in Figure 15. These noise levels also assume the worst -case with the roof- top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, pad -mounted transformers, parking lot vehicle movements, outdoor courtyard activity, outdoor pool/spa activity and roof -top parking activities all operating simultaneously. In reality, the noise sources would most likely not occur simultaneously and would vary throughout the day. Table N-2: Project Operational Noise Levels Receiver Location Noise Source Project 0 erational Noise Levels dBA L50 30 mins L25 15 mins Le 5 mins L2 1 min Lm.. e1 min Air Conditioning Unit Roof -To 15.6 17.3 18.6 18.9 19.4 Trash Enclosure Activity 27.7 33.7 40.7 45.7 47.2 Pad -Mounted Transformer 14.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 20.4 23.4 31.4 37.4 45.0 R7 Courtyard Activity 36.8 39.0 41.5 43.9 46.6 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 28.1 31.1 34.4 37.5 42.9 Roof -Top Parking 9.4 12.4 20.4 26.4 34.0 Combined Noise Level: 37.9 40.7 44.8 48.7 51.8 Air Conditioning Unit Roof -To 20.7 22.4 23.7 24.0 24.5 Trash Enclosure Activity 13.4 19.4 26.4 31.4 32.9 Pad -Mounted Transformer 28.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 32.4 35.4 43.4 49.4 57.0 R2 Courtyard Activity 42.3 44.5 47.0 49.4 52.1 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 31.6 34.6 37.9 41.0 46.4 Roof -Top Parking 14.4 17.4 25.4 31.4 39.0 Combined Noise Level: 43.2 45.4 49.0 52.8 58.6 Air Conditioning Unit Roof -To 22.4 24.1 25.4 25.7 26.2 R3 Trash Enclosure Activity 14.4 20.4 27.4 32.4 33.9 Pad -Mounted Transformer 24.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Receiver Location Noise Source Project 0 erational Noise Levels dBA Lso 30 mins L25 15 mins Le 5 mins L2 1 min L.. <1 min Parking Lot Veh. Movements 32.7 35.7 43.7 49.7 57.3 Courtyard Activity 45.8 48.0 50.5 52.9 55.6 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 33.6 36.6 39.9 43.0 48.4 Roof -Top Parking 15.9 18.9 26.9 32.9 40.5 Combined Noise Level: 46.3 48.6 51.7 54.9 59.9 Air Conditioning Unit Roof -To 23.2 24.9 26.2 26.5 27.0 Trash Enclosure Activity 13.5 1 19.5 26.5 1 31.5 33.0 Pad -Mounted Transformer 25.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 32.2 35.2 43.2 49.2 56.8 R4 Courtyard Activity 46.5 48.7 51.2 53.6 56.3 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 33.2 36.2 39.5 42.6 48.0 Roof -Top Parking 17.6 20.6 28.6 34.6 42.2 Combined Noise Level: 46.9 49.1 52.1 55.3 59.9 Air Conditioning Unit(Roof-Top) 21.0 22.7 24.0 24.3 24.8 Trash Enclosure Activity 11.9 17.9 24.9 29.9 31.4 Pad -Mounted Transformer 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 33.5 36.5 44.5 50.5 58.1 R5 Courtyard Activity 30.0 32.2 34.7 37.1 39.8 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 30.6 33.6 36.9 40.0 45.4 Roof -Top Parking 16.6 19.6 27.6 33.6 41.2 Combined Noise Level: 36.7 39.4 45.7 51.2 58.5 Air Conditioning Unit Roof -To 18.1 19.8 21.1 21.4 21.9 Trash Enclosure Activity 11.6 17.6 24.6 29.6 31.1 Pad -Mounted Transformer 17.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 30.5 33.5 41.5 47.5 55.1 R6 Courtyard Activity 25.5 27.7 30.2 32.6 35.3 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 29.8 32.8 36.1 39.2 44.6 Roof -Top Parking 21.9 24.9 32.9 38.9 46.5 Combined Noise Level: 34.3 37.2 43.3 48.8 56.0 Air Conditioning Unit Roof -To 19.4 21.1 22.4 22.7 23.2 Trash Enclosure Activity 12.3 18.3 25.3 30.3 31.8 Pad -Mounted Transformer 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 19.6 22.6 30.6 36.6 44.2 R7 Courtyard Activity 24.6 26.8 29.3 31.7 34.4 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 28.4 31.4 34.7 37.8 43.2 Roof -Top Parking 22.9 25.9 33.9 39.9 47.5 Combined Noise Level: 31.4 34.2 39.0 43.6 50.3 Source: Urban Crossroads, 2019. Attachment A. As shown on Table N-3, the Project generated noise levels at the sensitive off -site receivers would not exceed the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code daytime and nighttime exterior noise level standards. Therefore, operation of the Modified Project would result in less than significant noise impacts. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to noise would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. 0 Receiver Locations Rooftop Air Conditioning Unit 6'' Existing Barrier Height (in feet) ♦ Trash Enclosure Existing Barrier Transformer -0 Distance from Receiver to Noise Source (in feet) SOURCE: Urban Crossroads, 2019 ❑ Parking Lot Vehicle Movements ® Courtyard Activity Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Figure 15: Operational Noise Source and Receiver Locations Table N-3: Project Operational Noise Level Compliance Receiver Location Land Use Noise Level at Receiver Locations dBA Threshold Exceeded? Lso 30 mins L2s 15 mins Ls 5 mins L2 1 min L.a, e1 min) Daytime Residential Standards 55 60 65 70 75 Nighttime 50 55 60 65 70 R1 Residential 37.9 40.7 44.8 48.7 51.8 No R2 Residential 43.2 45.4 49.0 52.8 58.6 No R3 Residential 46.3 48.6 51.7 54.9 59.9 No R4 Residential 46.9 49.1 52.1 55.3 59.9 No R5 Residential 36.7 39.4 45.7 51.2 58.5 No R6 Residential 34.3 37.2 43.3 48.8 56.0 No R7 Residential 31.4 34.2 39.0 43.6 50.3 No Source: Urban Crossroads, 2019. Attachment A. Conclusion for Noise Consistent with the Original Project, the construction generated by the Modified Project would generate temporary noise and vibration that would require mitigation to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Also, due to the location of the proposed residential units, mitigation is required to ensure that interior noise is within City standards. With implementation mitigation identified in the EIR, potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure NO1-1: The Project plans and specifications shall include the following construction requirements to be implemented and verified prior to provision of occupancy permits: • Windows/Glass Doors: Residential units adjacent to N. Main Street (all floors) require upgraded windows and sliding glass doors (all windows/doors on all floors) with minimum STC ratings of 30, and all other buildings require standards windows and sliding glass doors with a minimum STC rating of 27. • Exterior Doors (Non -Glass): Exterior doors facing N. Main Street (all floors) require upgraded exterior doors with minimum STC ratings of 30 and shall be well weather-stripped, and all other residential building exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped and have minimum STC ratings of 27. Well -sealed perimeter gaps around the doors are essential to achieve the optimal STC rating. • Walls: At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtight seal. • Ventilation: Residential exterior vents shall be oriented away from 1-5 and N. Main Street. If such an orientation cannot be avoided, then an acoustical baffle shall be placed in the attic space behind the vents. Mitigation Measure NO1-2: The Project plans and specifications shall include the following. requirements: • Large loaded trucks and mobile equipment, such as bulldozers (greater than or equal to 80,000 pounds) shall not be used within 50 feet of the eastern boundary of the Project site. Instead, smaller, rubber -tired mobile equipment (less than 80,000 pounds) or equivalent alternative equipment shall be used within this area during Project construction. • All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the Project site. The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receivers nearest the Project site during all construction. Mitigation Measure NO1-3: The Project plans and specifications shall include the requirement to install a minimum 11-foot high temporary construction noise barrier along the Project site eastern boundary for the duration of Project construction. The noise control barriers shall have a solid face from top to bottom and shall meet the following height and constructed requirements: • The temporary noise barrier shall provide a minimum transmission loss of 20 dBA (Federal Highway Administration, Noise Barrier Design Handbook). The noise barrier shall be constructed using an acoustical blanket (e.g. vinyl acoustic curtains or quilted blankets) attached to the construction site perimeter fence or temporary fence posts. • The noise barrier shall be maintained, and any damage promptly repaired. Gaps, holes, or weaknesses in the barrier or openings between the barrier and the ground shall be promptly repaired, • The noise control barrier and associated elements shall be completely removed, and the site appropriately restored upon the conclusion of the construction activity. 3.9 Population and Housing Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR As described in Section 4.9, Population and Housing, of the DEIR, the Original Project would not induce substantial population growth. SCAG anticipates a population increase of 8.4 percent by 2040 or an average annual increase of 0.4 percent throughout the County. The anticipated population that would result from the Original Project would be 0.28 percent of the City's population, and thus, within the projected population growth. Similarly, SCAG anticipates the number of housing units would increase 6.3 percent or an average annual increase of 0.3 percent through 2040. Thus, the 496 new multi -family units developed by the Original Project would also be within the SCAG projected growth. Furthermore, the infrastructure improvements needed to serve the Original Project would be sized to specifically serve the development and excess capacity would not be developed that could generate additional growth. Thus, the EIR determined that impacts related to population, housing, and related growth would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.9-7 through 4.9-10.) In addition, the EIR determined that addition of housing by the Project would have a favorable effect on the jobs -housing balance. (DEIR p. 4.9-9.) Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Housing and Population Growth As described previously, the Modified Project would develop 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent less) than the Original Project. As shown on Table P-1, the reduction in units and change in the unit type mix proposed by the Modified Project would result in 453 fewer residents at full occupancy. Table P-1: Comparison of Residents at Full Occupancy Unit Type Persons per Unit" Original Project Modified Project Number of Units Total Residents Number of Units Total Residents Studio 1.6 73 117 74 118 One -bedroom 1.6 307 491 103 165 Two -bedroom 2.7 88 238 75 203 Three -bedroom 3.9 28 109 4 16 Total 1 496 955 256 502 Reduction in Residential Units -240 Reduction in Residents at Full Occupancy -453 'Source: DEIR Table 4.M. The 502 residents at full occupancy of the Modified Project would constitute a 0.15 percent increase over the 2017 City of Santa Ana population of 341,341, which would be less than the 0.28 percent increase that would occur from the Original Project (DEIR p. 4.9-8). In addition, the 256 new multi -family units would constitute a 0.33 percent increase in the total number of residential units in the City, which is lower than the 0.64 percent increase that would occur from the Original Project, and a 1.0 percent increase in the number of the multifamily residential units (5+ unts) within the City, which is less than the 2 percent increase that would occur from the Original Project. Because the population from the Modified Project would be less than the Original Project, the anticipated population that would result from the Modified Project would also be within the SCAG projected growth. Thus, consistent with the impacts of the Original Project, the Modified Project would result in less than significant impacts related to induction of substantial population growth. Jobs -Housing Balance As described in the DEIR, the Santa Ana area is jobs -rich. The EIR describes that the existing jobs -housing ratio is 2.06 in Santa Ana and is projected to be 2.13 in 2040 (DEIR p. 4.9-6). The Modified Project would result in 240 fewer housing units within the employment rich area. However, Table P-2 shows that consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would result in a slight improvement to the jobs -housing balance, which is a beneficial effect of providing multi -family housing on a site where employees can easily travel to local employment opportunities. Table P-2: City of Santa Ana Jobs - Housing Balance Comparison Original Project I Modified Project Year Projected Employment Projected Housing Units Plus Project Jobs -Housing Ratio Projected Housing Units Plus Project Jobs -Housing Ratio 2015 159,459 77,477 + 496 = 77,971 2.05 77,477 + 256 = 77,733 2.05 2040 166,000 78,000 + 496 = 78,496 2.11 78,000 + 256 = 78,256 2.12 Source: DEIR Table 4.9-6. Conclusion for Population and Housing Consistent with the Original Project, the number of residential units and residents that would result from the Modified Project be within the SCAG projected growth forecast and would result in a slight improvement to the jobs -housing balance. Thus, the Modified Project would result in less than significant impacts related to population and housing. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to population and housing would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. 3.10 Public Services Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Fire Protection The EIR describes that the Project site is within 2.5 miles of 4 existing fire stations and the Original Project would not result in the need to construct a new fire station or expand an existing station. In addition, the EIR describes that Chapter &46 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code requires a fire facilities fee be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of buildings exceeding 2 stories in height, such as the Original Project. The purpose of the fire facilities fee is to improve fire stations in the City and provide revenue for equipment needed to fight fires in buildings over 2 stories in height. The EIR describes that redevelopment of the Project site would require fee payments to provide funding to assist in improvement of existing fire facilities and needed equipment. The EIR determined that implementation of the Original Project would not require new or physically altered fire department facilities. (DEIR, p. 4.10-4 through 4.10-5.) Police Services The EIR describes that the Original Project would result in an incremental increase in demands on law enforcement services but would not be significant when compared to the current demand levels. The residential population of the Original Project (955 residents at full occupancy) would be approximately 0.27 percent of the City's population and based on the Police Department's 2016 staffing of 1.04 officers per thousand population, the EIR determined that the Original Project would require less than one additional officer. In addition, the Police Department headquarters are 2.5 miles from the Project site, within response distance, and typical police operations within the Department's Northeast District deploys coverage to be able to respond to calls from services throughout the area. Furthermore, the EIR determined that the addition of one officer on patrol would not require the construction or expansion of the City's existing policing facilities. Therefore, the EIR determined that the Original Project would result in a less than significant impact related to police protection. Park and Recreation Services The Original Project planned 34,300 square feet of onsite exterior open space and recreation facilities that included 5 recreation courtyard areas that total 22,900 square feet and an 11,400-square foot amenity deck on the roof of the parking structure. In addition, interior recreation facilities include a 5,397-square foot fitness center and a 1,566 square foot wellness pavilion. In addition, the EIR describes that is currently 93.8 acres of Santa Ana parkland within 3-miles of the Project site and that based on the existing amount of park and recreation facilities in the vicinity of the Project site, the recreation facilities that would be provided as part of the Original Project, and the number of residents at full capacity, the Original Project would not require the provision of new or physically altered park facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios. In addition, the EIR describes that the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 35-108 requires residential development fees be paid for the acquisition, construction, and renovation of park and recreation facilities to preserve an appropriate balance between the demand by residents for use of park and recreational facilities and the availability of such facilities. Thus, the EIR determined that the Original Project would not result in substantial physical deterioration of park and recreation facilities. (DEIR, p. 4.10-12 through 4.10-13.) Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Fire Protection As detailed previously in Section 3.9, Population and Housing, of this document, the Modified Project would develop 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent less) than the Original Project, which would result in 453 fewer residents at full occupancy. The reduction in residents would equate to a reduced number of calls for service. As described in the EIR, service calls to OCFA are largely related to medical emergencies, which consist of 80 percent of service calls, while fire calls consist of 1.9 percent of OCFA service calls in Santa Ana (DEIR p. 4.10-4). Hence, fewer residents would equate to fewer calls for services. In addition, the maximum height of the tallest structures of the Modified Project would be 15-feet 5-inches lower in height than the Original Project. Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would be required to pay fees to provide funding for needed fire facilities and equipment and implementation of the Modified Project would not require new or physically altered fire department facilities. Thus, no new or greater impacts related to fire protection services would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Police Services As described previously, the Modified Project would develop 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent less) than the Original Project, which would result in 453 fewer residents at full occupancy. The reduction in residents would equate to a reduced number of calls for police services. Based on the staffing of 1.04 officers per thousand population, the Modified Project would require less than one additional officer, which is consistent with the needs of the Original Project. Therefore, consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would also result in a less than significant impact related to police protection. Park and Recreation Services As described previously, the Modified Project would develop 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent less) than the Original Project, which would result in 453 fewer residents at full occupancy, which would result in a reduced need for park and recreation services. The Modified Project would provide 12,920 square feet of open space and recreation facilities in courtyards, which is a decrease of 9,980 square feet over the 22,900 square feet of courtyard open space that was included in the Original Project. The Modified Project also includes a 9,281 square foot amenity deck that is 2,119 square feet smaller than the Original Project. Likewise, the fitness center would be 2,279 square feet smaller than the one included in the Original Project. Although the Modified Project would result in an overall decrease in exterior recreational space by 12,099 square feet in comparison to the Original Project, it would result in a 17 square foot increase in park and recreational space per residential unit. The Modified Project would also be required to pay park and recreation fees to `preserve an appropriate balance between the demand by residents for use of park and recreational facilities", as stated in Municipal Code Section 35-110. Due to the overall increase in open space and recreational space provided by the Modified Project and payment of required fees, the Modified Project would not require the provision of new or physically altered park facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios. Thus, consistent with the Original Project, impacts related to park and recreation from implementation of the Modified Project would be less than significant. In addition, the Modified Project does not utilize a portion of Santiago Park for access as was proposed by access Option B of the Original Project. Therefore, potential impacts related to acquisition of parkland would not occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Public Services The Modified Project would develop 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent less) than the Original Project, which would result in 453 fewer residents at full occupancy. The reduction in residents would equate to a reduced demand for services from the Project site, including police, fire, park, and recreational services. In addition, the total amount of park and recreation space onsite would be increased in comparison to the Original Project. Thus, consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would result in less than significant impacts related to public services. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to public services would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. 3.11 Transportation and Traffic Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR As detailed in DEIR Section 4.11, Transportation and Traffic, the Original Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, including the Orange County Congestion Management Program, Caltrans Measures of Effectiveness, City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, and the City of Orange General Plan Circulation Element. Based on the thresholds identified in these plans, the Original Project would result in a less than significant impact. Specifically, the vehicular trips that would be generated by the Original Project would not cause an exceedance of any traffic level of service threshold at any intersection or roadway segment. (DEIR, p. 4.11-12 through 4.11-32.) Moreover, and as detailed in the EIR, the Park Santiago neighborhood intersections and roadways have adequate capacity to support the Original Project and impacts to local street systems would also be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.11-33.) Also, the EIR details that Project access locations and circulation around the Project site would be adequate, and cumulative impacts related to queuing would be less than significant. Regarding parking, the Final EIR describes that the highest parking demand from the Original Project would be 799 spaces on a weekday pursuant to the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Edition) Land Use 221 - "Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise)" rates. As the Original Project is proposed to include 904 parking spaces within a central parking structure, the Project's parking would accommodate needs of the Project pursuant to the ITE rates, which indicates that impacts related to parking would be less than significant. In addition, the Final EIR included a comparison of actual parking demands at existing multi -family developments within the City, which determined that the Original Project would have sufficient parking and would not result in significant impacts related to parking. Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project As described previously, the Modified Project would develop 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent less) than the Original Project and would continue to provide onsite parking for use by the OC Discovery Center. The parking area for the OC Discovery Center would be accessed from a right -in right -out driveway on N. Main Street. The proposed residences would be served by another driveway adjacent to Santiago Park that would provide direct access to the parking structure and residential surface parking area. As described in Section 2, Modifications to the Original Project Description, and shown on Figure 3, Modified Project Site Access, to provide for left -turn vehicular access into the Project site, the southern leg of the intersection of N. Main Street at Walkie Way (including the pedestrian crossings and signals) would be moved approximately 80 to 90-feet to the south as part of the Modified Project. The relocated pedestrian crossing on N. Main Street would connect the Project site and the Discovery Cube, and the median would be modified. The intersection signalization of Walkie Way (going east and west into and out of the site) would be modified to operate with split-phasing3 and the Main Street northbound and southbound left -turn lanes (into and out of the site) would operate with lead/lag phasing4. The proposed northern driveway for the Modified Project would also provide an easement to Santiago Park for maintenance vehicles and the public who reserve park facilities, and the existing gated vehicular entry along N. Main Street to Santiago Park would be closed. To evaluate the potential traffic impacts related to the Modified Project, a Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis (included as Attachment B) was prepared and peer reviewed by a City selected independent traffic engineer and the City's traffic engineering staff. The Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis evaluates operation of 278 multi -family units, which is 22 more units than the Modified Project's proposed 256 units. Therefore, the Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis provides an overstated and conservative analysis of potential impacts. Consistent with the Project Traffic Impact Analysis (included in Appendix J of the DEIR) the roadway conditions that are evaluated in the Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis include the ongoing 1-5 from SR-55 to SR-57 High 3 Split phasing is a signal that gives a green phase for all vehicle movements of one direction (e.g., northbound through, right, and left) followed by a phase for all movements of the opposite direction (e.g., southbound through, right, and left). 4 Lead/lag phasing is a signal sequence where the green left turn arrow is either before or after the oncoming thru green. Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Improvement project that is planned to be completed in 2020. This project includes the addition of one continuous HOV lane in each direction along the northbound and southbound 1-5 between SR-55 and SR-57 and the 1-5 HOV northbound entrance and southbound exist ramps at the intersection of N. Main Street/Edgewood Road-1-5 Ramps have been removed. Project Trip Generation The vehicle trip generation rates are from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Edition) and are based on Land Use 221 - "Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise)", which is consistent with the EIR analysis. Table T-1 shows that 278 units (22 units more than the Modified Project of 256 units) is estimated to generate 79 fewer a.m. peak hour trips, 96 fewer p.m. peak hour trips, and 1,186 fewer daily trips than the Original Project. Table T-1 Comparison of Vehicular Trip Generation Land Use A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Dail tal In Out Total TripGeneration Rates 0.36 0.27 0.17 0.44 5.44 Or inal Project TripGeneration 496 units a461 179 JT10770 133 86 219 2,698 Modified Project Tri Generation 278 units 00 75 48 123 1,512 Reduction in Tri s 58 38 96 1,186 Source: Trans lutions, 2019. Attachment B. Because the Original Project resulted in less than significant traffic impacts, and the Modified Project would result in fewer peak hour and daily vehicular trips, the Modified Project would not result in any new or increased traffic impacts. Although the intersection of N. Main Street and Walkie Way would be modified to accommodate southbound left turns into the Project site, the traffic analysis modeling shows that the existing roadway network would be able to accommodate the change, as none of the traffic criteria thresholds would be exceeded, as detailed below. Therefore, no new or increased transportation, traffic, or circulation impacts would occur from implementation of the Modred Project. Existing Plus Modified Project Intersections: In the existing plus project with the Modified Project condition, Table T-2 shows that all of the study area intersections are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service except for the SR-22 eastbound ramps at Town and Country Road in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This intersection is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans and currently operates at an unsatisfactory LOS E in the a.m. peak hour and LOS F in the p.m. peak hour. With the addition of traffic from the Modified Project, the intersection would continue to operate at an unsatisfactory LOS E in the a.m. peak hour and LOS F in the p.m. peak hour. This is the same conditions that would occur by the Original Project, as shown in Table 4.11-9 of the DEIR. Therefore, like the Original Project, the Modified Project would not result in exceedance of the Caltrans criteria, and no impacts at other intersections would occur in the existing plus Modified Project condition. Thus, overall impacts would be less than significant. Roadway Segments: In addition, as shown in Table T-3, all study area roadway segments are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service and implementation of the Modified Project would not cause an exceedance of LOS criteria on any of the roadway segments in the traffic study area. Therefore, impacts to roadway segments in the existing plus Modified Project scenario would also be less than significant, which is consistent with the EIR findings identified in DEIR Table 4.11-10. Queueing: As described previously, the Modified Project would implement changes to the Main Street and Walkie Way intersection geometrics that would provide a left turn into the Project site. This would result in a reduction in the storage length for the northbound left turn and the northbound through lanes at the intersection of Main Street/Walkie Way -Driveway, and for the southbound through lanes at the Main Street/Edgewood Road intersection by approximately 90 feet. Table T-4 shows the queueing in the existing without and with Modified Project conditions. As 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O E ZZZZ ZZ ZZ Z Z ZZZ Z ZZ a a1Oi 'o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U a 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O Q m U U U U Q U �y J Y N N 6 N � O U Q m m Q U Q Q p, J O O O O O O O O O a` O Q m U 0 O m Q U 3 J O y m v a w a O O O N O Q m U U U U Q U LLL J A x d O In U� N (h N m N m y O m v a w a o o¢ m ¢¢ o¢ ¢ dQ O m N (O .pc O Q m U 0 O m Q U J x d O O N O M Q O N m N r Y N N G N Q O W Q Q Q Q � Q N O O W 0 W W 0 0 0 0 0 J A N oa m E 2 Q�LI. O 'gyp 'gyp 'N 'tO O O .� c E z O m N tD C d C m m m -p tO tO O m N (h p C> V O (O A N 17 V Lp d' (O I� (n W D) d' �_ � In � � � Q � ci � m m E U a C O O O O O O O O O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N V o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U> C C O O O O O O O O O O N O ¢ Q m¢ Q¢ p Q Q Q J U v o �n v co m o �n rn m > C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L_ N •N = (p (h N LL� ¢0 r fh r O O O Oi V M M M M N m Oi > N N O Q Q m Q Q Q p Q Q Q J y O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'o > > L_ d OyJ G> m C (h m (h N M N O m W O O O O O O O O O O U N m O o O u'� O in O in O in O in O u� O in O u� O in O J U o a a a a a a a a U C C D 0 0 0 0 0 N U c N A t0 J J J J J J J J (d (b (b (b � (O 4 (O C N O W p p W p p W p p W J {p N N � y d c O N s � J L R• j= O U N u O o - c (n VI O y E y E O S N c N c N C m c c O ti m mzF O O O c iq o S 3 >> m o > o m N c O Ed E U Table T-4: Existing Condition with Modified Project Queuing Without Project With Project Storage AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Length Hour Hour Hour Hour Queue Queue Queue Queue (In Intersection Movement Feet) Length' Length' Length' Length' Main Street/Memory Lane NBT 680 352 394 338 323 Main StreeWValkie Way NBL 150 31 45 45 58 NBT 390 193 390 214 196 SBL 80 1 1 32 64 EBL 70 8 19 11 27 EBR 150 0 0 8 61 WBL 100 - - 78 58 WBR 100 - - 60 43 Main StreeNEdgewood Road-1-5 Ramps NBL 175 59 148 55 122 NBT 690 140 289 42 215 SBL 150 91 113 90 127 SBR 130 0 0 0 38 EBTL 1353 27 64 23 44 EBR 150 11 1 0 0 WBTL 250 219 152 182 101 WBR 60 23 18 11 0 Main Street/Santa Clara Avenue-1-5 NB On -Ramp NBT 350 62 80 149 253 Source: Trans lutions, 2019. Attachment B. 'Queues reported are 95th Percentile queue lengths per movement in feet. EBL =eastbound left; EBTL=eastbound through -left tum; NBL = northbound left; NWR = northwest bound right; SBL = southbound left; SBT=southbound tum; SBT2 = southbound second tum; SER = southeast bound right tum; WBTL = westbound thoughaeft turn shown all queues are forecast to fit within the storage lengths at each location. Therefore, impacts related to queuing would not occur with implementation of the Modified Project in the existing condition. Freeway Segments: Freeway segments are under Caltrans jurisdiction. As shown in Table T-5, both with and without the Modified Project in the existing condition, all traffic study area freeway facilities would operate at unsatisfactory levels of service E or F except for the 1-5 southbound Broadway and Main Street off -ramps in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This is the same condition that would occur with implementation of the Original Project, as shown on DEIR Table 4.11-15. Thus, like the Original Project, the Modified Project would also result in less than significant impacts to freeway segments per Caltrans criteria. Opening Year (2020) Plus Modified Project Intersections: In the opening year (2020) plus Modified Project condition, all study area intersections are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service except for the Main Street/Santa Clara/1-5 NB On Ramp and the SR-22 eastbound ramps at Town and Country Road in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, as shown in Table T-6. With the addition of traffic from the Modified Project, the LOS at these locations would not be reduced. Therefore, like the Original Project, the Modified Project would not result in exceedance of the City or Caltrans criteria, and no impacts at other intersections would occur in the opening year (2020) plus Modified Project condition. Thus, impacts would be less than significant. Roadway Segments: As shown in Table T-7, all study area roadway segments are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service and implementation of the Modified Project would not cause an exceedance of LOS criteria on any of the roadway segments in the traffic study area. Therefore, impacts to roadway segments in this scenario would also be less than significant. Queueing: As described previously, the Modified Project would result in reducing the storage length along N. Main Street. Table T-8 shows the queueing in the opening year (2020) plus Modified Project condition. As shown all queues are forecast to fit within the storage length at each location. Therefore, impacts related to queuing would not occur with implementation of the Modified Project in the year 2020 condition. Year 2040 Plus Modified Project Intersections: As shown in Table T-9, in the year 2040 plus Modred Project condition, all study area intersections are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service except for: • N. Main Street and Santa Clara Avenue-1-5 northbound ramps in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, • N. Main Street and 17th Street in the a.m. peak hour, and • SR-22 eastbound ramps at Town and Country Road in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours (same as existing condition). These intersections would operate at an unsatisfactory LOS under 2040 both without and with project conditions, which would also occur by the Original Project, (DEIR Table 4.11-29). In addition, the LOS at these intersections would not change with implementation of the Modified Project in 2040 conditions. Therefore, the Modified Project would not result in a significant impact in the 2040 scenario, and impacts would be less than significant. Roadway Segments: As shown in Table T-10, all study area roadway segments are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service in 2040 with implementation of the Modified Project. Therefore, impacts to roadway segments in this scenario would also be less than significant. C O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z E 0 �J 11 LL LL LL jy LL LL p U LL LL LL LL LL LL x .. q C (O 67 (O O LL� N Q O a o a y N O O 3 J LL LL LL W U W W p U LL LL LL LL LL LL O co r N O r r a o Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N r (O 1� O r O) (O m (O (O (h LLn (O N � LL LL LL LL W LL LL p U LL LL LL LL LL LL r OJ LLn p 0_ d d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a y (`O') N ^ N m 'o O LL LL LL W (,J W W p U LL LL LL LL LL W O {Yp C N N LL� LL� D7 m (h 6 a o a y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (O O O m E m N T E E o m 0 00 0 m K S m O O O U O O CJ m} 0 C7 Q (n 9 N N c N (n i�3 O E O ¢ S O O E E E -p m 0 0 O O O N O O O O o o C c 0 0 0 N L N N N d N U U y O y M U O O y>> > LL' O m m m N N N N .0 N N>>> 3 L-1-5 O C NO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z d N O O O O O O O O O c a x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a V Q a Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O Q U U U iLL U Q U jy J x O N O N m N O N y N N N m � O U Q m m Q U Q Q d J D_ t N O Q U U U 0 m Q U LLL G O y A d y Q O O O O O O O O N O Q U U U LL U Q U L j N O (h �- 2 d O N O N m N O N In A N N a O U Q m m Q U Q Q d J O I}� to r M to m D_ tO Q U U U jyJ m Q U LLL q O O OJ O ^ N N d O N O M O m N m 2 � R d N � O W Q Q m Q O Q Q Q J a `m O � O W 0 0 W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 J {p N K m c c N O N m> m > Td C 3 U o m m c m c O N 3 N E F LL� w i C N Y_ (mJ N N C `,� 2 N m o O O Co m E U a C O O O O O O O O O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N O O O O O O O 0 O O U> C C O O O O O O O O O O f/1 O Q Q U Q m Q w Q m Q J Fl L_ N O ; O) (h (h (h (h th N N N O Q J y O O �} N Ln (NO OJ Q (NO p > L_ j O m m a N N O j pi v of (h N fh Zo (h (h in p (h '6 N in N yJ U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C) O - o � A t0 J J J J J J J J �-% N (O 10 (O (b 416 s} (b a N O D W 0 0 W J {p f/1 C O N t � c � cm (n N p p H E E O S N c N c N E � � pl S QCp (.J d z z d ° S S_ 3 Q -3o c m `o 0 o O c N c ubi v vbi m m m m m c 3 z Z Y � v c U c c c � c Cd E U Q ,(}} §!)lig2R=®eGG§§;S §GmG4)§��e0��g m«2m§«z I�� z {ƒ \ ) ^ \ E\) ) ) \) )( 0 z =m [E \\k }f]( \\ME \)() ! FL \\\\ C O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Y N N O O O O O O O O O L Q N O O O O O O O O O N O Q U U U LLL LL. J O O O 2 O N N N n a m N n Y R N D_ O O Q m U Q O Q Q O- J O O O O O O O O O 0_ L N 3 O Q U U U m Q U jy � Y N N a ow Q m m Q w Q Q O O O O O O O O N O Q U U U iLL U Q U L J i O (O m O p O LL (O O O 2 p In N N N n M m N n Y N N O. O- J a O L N O Q U U U uJ m Q U LLL x c O N M ^ m M OJ Y N N a Q J O O O O O O O O 9 N J {p pl O U waNmN� ` O O O Cd N E U L Q O O O O O O O O O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z E N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C N O Q Q U [0 [0 Q W Q [0 Q J p• C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s v •a N O Q Q U [D [D Q W Q [n Q J U O_ a in � co co u� a s (i LL� C C7 M M V N iv O O O u� O in O in O in O in O u� O in O u� O in U N A (O J J J J J J J J U J J tb td ni td v tb d' tb � N a N � J �p N N C N t N N y C y � N i j O O N C U N N u� O m m m d -o m y c c O O E � wo C a Q c 3 0 0 0 N N v iv -3o c m m 3 o E Z Z c o o > O m > N O c ra (h st LL� (O r N 0 O) W O J m E m Queueing: As described previously, construction of the Modified Project includes changes to the N. Main Street at Walkie Way intersection to provide a left turn into the Project site and changes to the median to provide adequate storage length. Table T-11 provides the queueing in the year 2040 plus Modified Project condition. As shown, all queues are forecast to fit within the storage length, except for the southbound left turn at Main Street and Edgewood Road in the p.m. peak hour with the existing median. An exceedance of the storage length by 11-feet is forecast to occur in the p.m. peak hour without the Modified Project. With Modified Project, the exceedance would increase by 3 feet in year 2040 conditions. As detailed in Section 2, Modifications to the Original Project, the median would be modified to accommodate these queues. Thus, operation of the Modified Project would result in a less than significant impact related to queuing. In addition, this operational condition is improved in comparison to the conditions that would occur from implementation of the Original Project Option A, which included one driveway to the Project site that was sited along N. Main Street, and resulted in a p.m. peak hour queue of 235 feet (71 feet greater than the queue of 164 feet shown in Table T-11). Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to queuing would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Table T-11: Year 2040 with Modified Project Queuing Without Project With Project AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Storage Length Hour Hour Hour Hour Queue Queue Queue Queue (In Intersection Movement Feet) Length' Length' Length' Length' Main Street/Memory Lane NBT 680 294 578 416 590 Main Street/Walkie Way NBL 150 44 53 44 62 NBT 390 305 381 266 305 SBL 80 0 1 32 64 EBL 70 8 19 11 27 EBR 150 0 0 8 64 WBL 100 0 1 75 58 WBR 100 1 0 1 1 57 43 Main Street/Edgewood Road-1-5 Ramps NBT 690 101 366 70 382 SBL 150 99 161 100 164 WBTL 250 183 114 183 113 WBR 60 50 23 50 22 Main Street/Santa Clara Avenue-1-5 NB On -Ramp NBT 350 132 151 157 230 Source: Translutions, 2019. Attachment B. Bold = Exceeds storage length 'Queues reported are 95th Percentile queue lengths per movement in feet. EBL =eastbound left; EBTL=eastbound through -left turn; NBL = northbound left; NWR = northwest bound night; SBL = southbound left; SBT= southbound turn; SBT2 = southbound second turn; SER = southeast bound night turn; WBTL = westbound though -left turn Freeway Segments: As shown in Table T-12, both with and without the Modified Project in Year 2040 condition, all traffic study area freeway facilities would operate at unsatisfactory levels of service E or F except for the 1-5 southbound Broadway and Main Street off -ramps in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This is the same condition that would occur with implementation of the Original Project, as shown on DER Table 4.11-28. Thus, like the Original Project, the Modified Project would also result in less than significant impacts to freeway segments per Caltrans criteria. C NO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N O LL LL LL LL LL LL LL p U W LL LL LL LL LL x (h O LLo a o a N N O L_ Q 3 J LL LL LL LL jy LL LL p U LL LL LL LL LL W O d � N� V M LL� 4 t0 t0 uY N M M R N N O J LL LL LL LL jy LL LL p U LL LL LL LL LL LL (O 1� O O (h O (h O r O 0_ •O M N C M� M O O u'� a` 'o L O 2� � LL LL LL LL jy W W p U LL LL LL LL LL W O Y N V a o a y o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O LLn LLn 6 N (O O O E E `o E O c a�i O � c O O, N O O_ E O. E E E m -a `5 .o a i m ' M c C C N C z� C -EO O ML O O O 0 0 0 N O O O •'K O a o c ,ro N a m d a y U U y O m m 0 'o 'o y> > > m Nm = m m E > Cd E m Q Parking As described in Section 2, Modifications to the Original Project, the Modified Project includes a central parking structure that would provide 407 spaces for the onsite residential uses and a surface parking lot that would contain 284 parking spaces, of which 104 would be dedicated to the onsite residential uses and 180 would be shared with the OC Discovery Cube that is located across N. Main Street from the Project site and currently utilizes the site for 180 parking spaces. The shared parking spaces would be used by the OC Discovery Cube from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. daily and would be available for the onsite residences between 5:00 p.m. to %00 p.m. daily. A rolling gate would separate the onsite residential and OC Discovery Cube parking areas and be opened and closed for management of onsite parking. Overall, the Modified Project would provide 511 spaces for onsite residential and 180 shared spaces. In comparison, the Original Project included 904 parking spaces within a central parking structure to accommodate the demand of the multi -family residences. The Original Project did not include a surface parking lot and did not include shared parking for the OC Discovery Cube. It was planned for the existing OC Discovery Cube onsite parking to relocate. Table T-13 provides the estimated parking demand per the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Edition) Land Use 221 - "Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise)" that provides both average parking needs and 85th percentile parking needs (which provides the highest parking demand 85 percent of the time). As shown, the highest demand from the proposed multi -family residences would be 412 spaces on a weekday. As the Modified Project is proposed to include 511 parking spaces that would be dedicated to the multi -family residences, the Modified Project's parking would accommodate needs of the development pursuant to the ITE rates, which indicates that impacts related to parking would be less than significant. Table T-13: Parking Demand Per the ITE Rates ITE Vehicle Parking Generation Rates Project Parking Demand Land Average Rate 85th Percentile Avera a Rate 85th Percentile Use Units Weekday Saturday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Sunday Weekday Saturday 221 256 1.2 1.03 1.05 1.61 1.14 307 264 269 412 292 Total Residential Parking Provided 511 511 511 511 511 Total Residential Parking Required Per ITE Rates 307 264 269 412 292 Parking Surplus 204 247 242 99 219 Source: ITE Trip Generation (10th Edition) Land Use 221 -'Multi-family Housing (Mid -Rise) To identify actual existing parking demands and provide a comparison to the ITE parking rates, parking demand surveys were completed at two multifamily residential developments in the City that are similar to the Modified Project in terms of rent pricing, market segment, and amenities (included as Attachment C). The surveys were completed at the Nineteen01 multi -family development located at 1901 East First Street (254 units) that includes 48.4 percent 1 bedroom units, 49.2 percent 2 bedroom units, and 2.4 percent 3 bedroom units, and the Marke multi -family development located at 100 E MacArthur Boulevard (300 units) that includes 51.7 percent 1 bedroom units, 43.6 percent 2 bedroom units and 4.7 percent 3 bedroom units. Thus, the surveyed projects have units that are larger (don't include studios) and have a greater need for parking than the 68 studios proposed for the Modified Project. The parking surveys were conducted on a weekday (Thursday) and a weekend day (Saturday) for a period of 24 hours. This Parking Analysis is included as Attachment C and Table T-14 provides summary of the parking survey data. Table T-14: Parking Survey Data Summary Survey Location Number of Units Day of Week Parking Occu an Parking Rate Nineteen01 264 Peak Weekday Demand 344 1.35 Peak Weekend Demand 342 1.35 The Marke 300 Peak Weekday Demand 230 0.77 Peak Weekend Demand 193 0.64 Average Demand(Weekday) 1.06 Average Demand Weekend 0.99 Peak Demand Per Unit(Weekday & Weekend 1.35 Total Project Parking Provided 539 Total Project Parking Required Per Peak Demand 365 Project Parking Surplus 174 Source: Trans lutions, 2019. Attachment C. As identified on Table T-14, the peak parking demand is 1.35 spaces per unit at Nineteen01 and The Marke has much lower parking rates. Applying the Nineteen01 peak parking rate to the Modified Project would result in a need for 346 parking spaces. As described previously, the Modified Project includes 511 parking spaces, which is 165 more than the number of spaces forecast to be needed for the Modified Project based on recent parking surveys done at similar multi -family developments. As a result, no potentially significant impact related to residential parking would occur. In addition, the site currently provides 180 parking spaces for use by the OC Discovery Cube. The Modified Project would maintain the use of these spaces for the OC Discovery Cube by implementation of a perpetual easement of the shared surface lot area. As this is an existing condition, no impacts related to the use of the site for OC Discovery Cube parking would occur. Conclusion for Transportation/Traffic and Circulation The Modified Project would develop 48.4 percent fewer residential units than the Original Project, which would result in more than 79 fewer a.m. peak hour trips, 96 fewer p.m. peak hour trips, and 1,186 fewer daily trips than the Original Project. Thus, no new impacts related to the volume of vehicular trips would occur from the Modified Project. Additionally, the Modified Project would implement changes to the Main Street and Walkie Way intersection geometrics that would result in less than significant impacts to study area intersections, roadway segments, and vehicle queues, which is consistent with the impacts of the Original Project as detailed in the EIR. The Modified Project would also provide parking for the proposed onsite multi -family residential uses that meet the anticipated parking demand pursuant to ITE rates and parking surveys at similar developments within the City. As a result, parking related impacts would be less than significant. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to transportation and traffic would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. 3.12 Tribal Cultural Resources Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Impacts related to tribal cultural resources were evaluated in Section 4.12, Tribal Cultural Resources, of the DEIR. As described, the Project site has been heavily disturbed to substantial depths in various areas and no substantial evidence exists that tribal cultural resources are present. However, during the SB 18/AB 52 consultation, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation stated that the Project lies within its ancestral tribal territory within a sensitive area. Therefore, to avoid potential adverse effects to unknown tribal cultural resources Mitigation Measure TCR-1 was included to provide for Native American resource sensitivity training and to prescribe activities should any inadvertent discoveries of tribal cultural resources be unearthed by Project construction activities. Additionally, California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered at the Project site, disturbance of the site shall halt and remain halted until the coroner has conducted an investigation. If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR-1 and the existing regulations, impacts to tribal cultural resources from implementation of the Original Project was determined to be less than significant. Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Consistent with Original Project, the Modified Project would also involve demolition, excavation, and grading activities that would disturb the site soils. As a result, the Modified Project would also be required to implement Mitigation Measure TCR-1, which would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. However, the subterranean parking for the Modified Project would be 13,300 square feet smaller than the subterranean parking for the Original Project. Thus, less excavation would occur, and increased impacts related to tribal cultural resources would not result from implementation of the Modified Project. No new or greater impacts related to tribal cultural resources would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Tribal Cultural Resources Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would involve excavation and disturbance of onsite soils and Mitigation Measure TCR-1 would be required to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. With Mitigation Measure TCR-1 no new or greater impacts related to tribal cultural resources would occur. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Inadvertent Discoveries. The Project's grading and construction plans and specifications shall state that prior to commencement of any excavation activities, a Native American shall be contacted to conduct a Native American Indian Sensitivity Training for construction personnel. The training session includes a handout and focus on how to identify Native American resources encountered during earthmoving activities and the procedures followed if resources are discovered. In the event that tribal cultural resources are inadvertently discovered during ground -disturbing activities, work must be halted within 50 feet of the find until it can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist in cooperation with a Native American monitor to determine if the potential resource meet the CEQA definition of historical (State CEQA Guidelines 15064.5(a)) and/or unique resource (Public Resources Code 21083.2(g)). Construction activities could continue in other areas. If the find is considered a "resource" the archaeologist, in cooperation with a Native American monitor shall pursue either protection in place or recovery, salvage and treatment of the deposits. Recovery, salvage and treatment protocols shall be developed in accordance with applicable provisions of Public Resource Code Section 21083.2 and State CEQA Guidelines 15064.5 and 15126.4. If unique a tribal cultural resource cannot be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state, recovery, salvage and treatment shall be required at the Project Applicant's expense. All recovered and salvaged resources shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation in an established accredited professional repository. 3.13 Utilities and Service Systems Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Water As detailed in DEIR Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, the Original Project would result in a total demand of 131.53 AFY of water at full occupancy. The EIR describes that the City's Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) anticipates a water supply and demand increase of 8.2 percent (3,028 acre feet) per year. The Original Project would result in an increase in demand for water supplies that is 4.3 percent of the UWMP's anticipated increase per year. Therefore, the EIR determined that City would have water supplies available to serve the Original Project. (DEIR, p. 4.13-7 through 4.13-8.) Wastewater As detailed in DEIR Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, based on results of the sewer flow monitoring and the City's Design Criteria wastewater generation rates, it was determined that existing sewer lines that serve the Project site would be able to adequately accommodate the additional wastewater flows from the Original Project. Additionally, it was determined that the existing wastewater treatment facilities have adequate capacity to accommodate the increase in wastewater flow from full occupancy of the Original Project and impacts were determined to be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.13-11.) Drainage and Water Quality As detailed in DEIR Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, all projects in the watershed are required to implement measures to comply with the LID, Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit, Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) requirements for implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). These requirements were developed to reduce the potential of impacts to water quality, and to ensure that development projects accommodate stormwater drainage. The EIR determined that the Original Project would result in an increase of pervious area from creation of larger areas of landscape and open space than currently exist onsite, and that stormwater from the site would be filtered through detention and drywell systems prior to discharge off -site to manage stormwater drainage and protect water quality. The EIR determined that the Original Project would result in less than significant impacts related to drainage facilities and water quality. (DEIR, pp. 4.13-16 through 4.13-19.) Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Water Consistent with the methodology of the EIR, the estimated water demand that would result from the Modified Project was based on the City of Santa Ana Design Guidelines that assume 120 gpd per capita and 3,000 gallons per day per acre of landscaping. As shown in Table U-1, the reduction of 453 residents and 0.46 acre of landscaping would reduce the water demand from the Project site by 55,740 gallons per day (gpd) or 62.44 acre feet yearly (AFY) in comparison to the Original Project, as shown on Table U-1. Table U-1: Comparison of Water Demands Water Use Water Demand Kesraenrs or I uauy uemano Annual Acreage 1 (aodl 1 Demand(AFYI Residents 120 gpolcapita 955 114,600 128.37 Landscaping 3,000 gpdracre 0.94 1 2,820 1 3.16 Original Project Total 1 117,420 1 131.53 Modified Project Residents I 120 rllca ita 502 60,240 67.48 Landscaping3,000 rllacre 0.48 1,440 1.61 Modified Project Total 61,660 69.19 Reduction in Water Demand 55,740 -62.44 GPD gallons per day; AFY = Acre Feet Yearly. The increase in demand for water supplies from the Modified Project would be 2.3 percent of the UWMP's anticipated annual increase of 3,028 AFY (DEIR page 4.13-8), which is less than the 4.3 percent increase that would result from the Original Project. Therefore, the Modified Project would require less water from existing entitlements than the Original Project, and no new or greater impacts related to water would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Wastewater As shown in Table UT-1, the reduction of 240 residential units that would occupy an estimated 453 residents would result in a 55,740 gpd reduction of water demand. The reduction of water demand would generate a reduction in wastewater generation. As the existing wastewater infrastructure would be able to adequately accommodate the Original Project, it would also be able to accommodate the reduced flows from the Modified Project. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to wastewater would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Drainage Consistent with the Original Project, implementation of the Modified Project would include compliance with all required laws, permits, and plans, through implementation of a SWPPP and WQMP that would be approved by the City prior to receipt of construction and operational permits. The DAMP would require runoff volume to be filtered through the detention and drywell systems prior to discharge off -site to manage stormwater drainage and protect water quality. Thus, the Modified Project would not generate additional runoff volumes, and DAMP required treatment systems would remove pollutants from onsite runoff. Therefore, consistent with the Original Project, the Modred Project would result in less than significant impacts related to drainage facilities and water quality. No new or greater impacts related to drainage and water quality would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Utilities and Service Systems The Modified Project would develop 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent less) than the Original Project, which would result in 453 fewer residents at full occupancy. The reduction in residents would equate to a reduced demand for water supplies and wastewater infrastructure capacity. In addition, the Modified Project would also filter runoff pursuant to permitting requirements. Thus, no new or greater impacts related to utilities or services systems would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to utilities and service systems would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. 3.14 Energy Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR As discussed in Section 4.14, Energy, of the DEIR, the Original Project would be developed pursuant to the California Green Building Standards Code (24 California Code of Regulations [CCR] Part 11 [CALGreen Code]), which would provide for sustainable construction and operational practices, including energy efficiency. (DEIR, pp. 4.14-5 through 4.14-7.) The Ch's administration of the Title 24 requirements and the City's Climate Action Plan includes review of design components and energy conservation measures ensures that all requirements are met. In addition, the EIR describes that the Original Project would represent an urban infill development because it would occur on a currently developed site, and would be located near existing off -site employment, commercial, residential, and retail destinations and in proximity to existing public bus stops and freeways, which would result in reduced vehicle trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) in comparison to a project of similar size and land without close access to employment, service, and retail, destinations, in addition to public transit and freeways. The land use characteristics of the Project are consistent with the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) guidance related to a reduction of vehicle trip distances that would achieve a reduction in associated transportation - related fuel demand. Also, the EIR describes that the Project site is within an area where existing infrastructure would provide for efficient delivery of electricity and natural gas to the Project and the Project would not inhibit the development of other alternative energy sources Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project The Modified Project would reduce the number of multi -family residential units that would be developed on the site by 240 units, which is a 48.4 percent reduction. As a result, the energy demand for the onsite uses would also be reduced. Also, like the Original Project, the Modified Project would be required to comply with state and federal programs that are designed to improve energy efficiency, including the California Title 24, California Energy Code, and the CALGreen Code. Typical Title 24 measures include insulation, use of energy -efficient heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment (HVAC), solar -reflective roofing materials, energy -efficient indoor and outdoor lighting systems, reclamation of heat rejection from refrigeration equipment to generate hot water, and incorporation of skylights, etc. In addition, Project Design Feature PDF-2 that provides for a minimum of 15 electric vehicle charging stations to promote usage of electric vehicles is included in the Modified Project. Although the Modified Project would result in 240 fewer residential units near existing off -site employment, commercial, residential, and retail destinations and in proximity to existing public bus stops and freeways, it would continue to result in reduced VMT in comparison to a project of similar size and land without close access to these destinations and transportation faclli ies. Thus, the land use characteristics of the Modified Project are also consistent with the CAPCOA guidance related to reducing vehicle trip distances to reduce associated transportation -related fuel demand. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to energy would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Energy Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would generate demand for energy. However, because the Modified Project is 48.4 percent smaller than the Original Project it would result in less energy usage on the site. Also, like the Original Project, the Modified Project would locate residences near employment and shopping destinations and transportation facilities and would be required to comply with state and federal programs that are designed to improve energy efficiency. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to energy would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. Attachment A: Supplemental Operational Noise Analysis OURBAM 260 E. Baker St. I Suite 200 1 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 1 (949) 660-1994 C111055ROADS ,m October 9, 2019 Ms. Renee Escario RE Consulting SUBJECT: THE ADDINGTON FOCUSED NOISE ASSESSMENT MEMORANDUM Dear Ms. Renee Escario: Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the following Focused Noise Assessment for The Addington Project ("Project"), which is located at 2525 N. Main Street in the City of Santa Ana. The Project is proposed to consist of up to 256 dwelling units in a two to four-story residential building surrounding a parking structure with 5 above ground levels of parking and an amenity deck. This Focused Noise Assessment calculates the potential Project -related operational noise levels at nearby noise -sensitive residential receiver locations east and south of the Project. This Focused Noise Assessment is consistent with the methods and procedures used in the July 2018 Magnolia at the Park Noise Impact Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc. (1) This Focused Noise Assessment calculates the potential operational noise levels due to the Project's stationary noise sources at seven off -site receiver locations adjacent to the Project site. Exhibit A identifies the receiver and noise source locations used to calculate the Project -related operational noise levels. The Project -related operational noise sources based on a review of the site plan include: roof -top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, pad -mounted transformers, parking lot vehicle movements, outdoor courtyard activity, outdoor pool/spa activity and roof -top parking activities. REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS To estimate the Project operational noise impacts, reference noise level measurements were collected from similar types of activities to represent the noise levels expected with the development of the proposed Project. The Reference Project operational noise levels are based on the noise sources provided in Table 1. It is important to note that the following projected noise levels assume the worst - case noise environment with the roof -top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, pad -mounted transformers, parking lot vehicle movements, outdoor courtyard activity, outdoor pool/spa activity and roof -top parking activities all operating simultaneously. In reality, the noise sources will likely vary throughout the day. OPERATIONAL NOISE The operational noise level calculations shown on Table 2 account for the distance attenuation provided due to geometric spreading, when sound from a localized stationary source (i.e., a point source) propagates uniformly outward in a spherical pattern. Hard site conditions are used in the operational noise analysis which result in noise levels that attenuate (or decrease) at a rate of 6 dBAfor each doubling of distance from a point source. 11177-09 Noise Assessment Ms. Renee Escario RE Consulting October 9, 2019 Page 2 EXHIBIT A: OPERATIONAL NOISE SOURCE AND RECEIVER LOCATIONS Receiver Locations Existing Barrier Height (in feet( iiiiiiiii Existing Barrier —0 Distance from receiver to noise source (in feet) Roof- lop Air Conditioning Unit O Parking Lot Vehicle Movements Trash Enclosure O Courtyard Activity Transformer 11 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 11177-09 Noise Assessment C� Ms. Renee Escario RE Consulting October 9, 2019 Page 3 TABLE 1: REFERENCE NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Noise Reference Noise Duration Ref. Source Hourly Level (dBA Lse) Noise Source Distance Activity @ Ref. @ 50 (hh:mm:ss) (Feet) Height (Mins)7 (Feet) Dist. Feet Roof -Top Air ConditioningUnitt 96:00:00 5' 5' 39 74.4 54.4 Trash Enclosure Activity' 00:00:32 5' 5' 60 69.0 49.0 Pad -Mounted Transformer3 3 6' 5' 60 56.0 37.6 Parking Lot Vehicle Movements° 01:00:00 10, 5' 60 44.0 33.5 Courtyard Activity' 00:08:00 10, 4' 60 73.8 59.8 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity' 00:10:00 5' 4' 60 68.7 48.7 Roof -Top Parking° 00:10:00 5' 4' 60 1 68.7 1 48.7 'As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 7/27/2015 at the Santee Walmart located at 170 Town Center Parkway. 7 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 5/3/2018 at a commercial and office park trash enclosure in the City of Costa Mesa. ' Source: NEMA TR 1-2013 Transformers, Step Voltage Regulators and Reactors, Table 2 sound level for a 500 kVA transformer. 4 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 8/24/2016 in the parking lot of the Windemere Apartment community in the City of Riverside. s As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on Saturday night, September 21, 2019 in the City of Newport Beach. `As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 7/5/2017 at the Covenant Hill Clubhouse pool in Ladera Ranch. 7 Anticipated duration (minutes within the hour) of noise activity during typical hourly conditions expected at the Project site based on the reference noise level measurement activity. The basic noise attenuation equation shown below is used to calculate the distance attenuation based on a reference noise level (SPL1): SPL2 = SPL1 - 20log(D2/Di) Where SPL2 is the resulting noise level after attenuation, SPL1 is the source noise level, D2 is the distance to the reference sound pressure level (SPL1), and D1 is the distance to the receiver location. Table 2 indicates that the hourly noise levels associated with the roof -top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, pad -mounted transformers, parking lot vehicle movements, outdoor courtyard activity, outdoor pool/spa activity and roof -top parking activities are expected to range from 31.4 to 46.9 dBA Lso at the sensitive off -site receiver locations. The operational noise level calculation worksheets are included in Appendix A and include barrier attenuation provided by intervening structures between each noise source and the receiver locations, where applicable, from the existing noise barriers and planned Project buildings. 11177-09 Noise Assessment Ms. Renee Escario RE Consulting October 9, 2019 Page 4 TABLE 2: PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS Receiver Location' Noise Source' Project Operational Noise Levels (dBA)a L50 (30 mins) Les (15 mins) La (5 mins) L2 (1 min) L.. (Q min) Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) 15.6 17.3 18.6 18.9 19.4 Trash Enclosure Activity 27.7 33.7 40.7 45.7 47.2 Pad -Mounted Transformer 14.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 20.4 1 23.4 31.4 1 37.4 45.0 Rl Courtyard Activity 36.8 39.0 41.5 43.9 46.6 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 28.1 31.1 34.4 37.5 42.9 Roof -Top Parking 9.4 12.4 20.4 26.4 34.0 Combined Noise Level: 37.9 40.7 44.8 48.7 51.8 Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) 20.7 22.4 23.7 24.0 24.5 Trash Enclosure Activity 13.4 19.4 26.4 31.4 32.9 Pad -Mounted Transformer 28.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 32.4 35.4 43.4 49.4 57.0 R2 Courtyard Activity 42.3 1 44.5 47.0 1 49.4 52.1 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 31.6 34.6 37.9 41.0 46.4 Roof -Top Parking 14.4 17.4 25.4 31.4 39.0 Combined Noise Level: 43.2 45.4 49.0 52.8 58.6 Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) 22.4 24.1 25.4 25.7 26.2 Trash Enclosure Activity 14.4 20.4 27.4 32.4 33.9 Pad -Mounted Transformer 24.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 32.7 35.7 43.7 49.7 57.3 R3 Courtyard Activity 45.8 1 48.0 50.5 1 52.9 55.6 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 33.6 36.6 39.9 43.0 48.4 Roof -Top Parking 15.9 18.9 26.9 32.9 40.5 Combined Noise Level: 46.3 48.6 51.7 54.9 59.9 Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) 23.2 24.9 26.2 26.5 27.0 Trash Enclosure Activity 13.5 19.5 26.5 31.5 33.0 Pad -Mounted Transformer 25.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 32.2 35.2 43.2 49.2 56.8 R4 Courtyard Activity 46.5 48.7 51.2 53.6 56.3 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 33.2 36.2 39.5 42.6 48.0 Roof -Top Parking 17.6 20.6 28.6 34.6 42.2 Combined Noise Level: 46.9 49.1 52.1 55.3 59.9 11177-09 Noise Assessment 0 Ms. Renee Escario RE Consulting October 9, 2019 Page 5 Receiver Location' Noise Source' Project Operational Noise Levels (dBA)a Lsu (30 mins) Lis (15 mins) La (5 mins) L2 (1 min) L.. (<1 min) Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) 21.0 22.7 24.0 24.3 24.8 Trash Enclosure Activity 11.9 17.9 24.9 29.9 31.4 Pad -Mounted Transformer 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 33.5 1 36.5 44.5 1 50.5 58.1 RS Courtyard Activity 30.0 32.2 34.7 37.1 39.8 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 30.6 33.6 36.9 40.0 45.4 Roof -Top Parking 16.6 19.6 27.6 33.6 41.2 Combined Noise Level: 36.7 39.4 45.7 51.2 58.5 Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) 18.1 19.8 21.1 21.4 21.9 Trash Enclosure Activity 11.6 17.6 24.6 29.6 31.1 Pad -Mounted Transformer 17.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 30.5 33.5 41.5 47.5 55.1 R6 Courtyard Activity 25.5 27.7 30.2 32.6 35.3 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 29.8 32.8 36.1 39.2 44.6 Roof -Top Parking 21.9 24.9 32.9 38.9 46.5 Combined Noise Level: 34.3 37.2 43.3 48.8 56.0 Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) 19.4 21.1 22.4 22.7 23.2 Trash Enclosure Activity 12.3 18.3 25.3 30.3 31.8 Pad -Mounted Transformer 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 19.6 22.6 30.6 36.6 44.2 R7 Courtyard Activity 24.6 26.8 29.3 31.7 34.4 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 28.4 31.4 34.7 37.8 43.2 Roof -Top Parking 22.9 25.9 33.9 39.9 47.5 Combined Noise Level: 31.4 34.2 1 39.0 43.6 50.3 'See A for the receiver and noise source locations. ' Reference noise sources as shown on Table 10-1. ' Operational noise level calculations are provided in Appendix A. OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE To demonstrate compliance with local noise regulations, the Project -only operational noise levels are evaluated against exterior noise level threshold based on the City of Santa Ana exterior noise level standards. Table 3 shows the operational noise levels associated with The Addington Project will satisfy the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code daytime and nighttime exterior noise level standards at all receiver locations. 11177-09 Noise Assessment 01 Ms. Renee Escario RE Consulting October 9, 2019 Page 6 TABLE 3: OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE Receiver Location' Land Use Noise Level at Receiver Locations (dBA)' Threshold Exceeded?' Lso (30 mins) L25 (15 mins) La (5 mins) Li (1 min) L.. (<1 min) Daytime Residential Standards 55 60 65 70 75 - Nighttime 50 55 60 65 70 - R1 Residential 37.9 40.7 44.8 48.7 51.8 No R2 Residential 43.2 1 45.4 49.0 1 52.8 58.6 No R3 Residential 46.3 48.6 51.7 54.9 59.9 No R4 Residential 46.9 49.1 52.1 55.3 59.9 No R5 Residential 36.7 39.4 45.7 51.2 58.5 No R6 Residential 34.3 37.2 43.3 48.8 56.0 No R7 Residential 31.4 34.2 39.0 43.6 50.3 No 'See Exhibit A forth e receiver and noise source locations. Estimated unmitigated Project operational noise levels as shown on Table 2. ' Do the estimated Project operational noise levels meet the operational noise level standards? CONCLUSIONS Using reference noise levels to represent the expected noise sources from The Addington site, this analysis estimates the Project -related stationary -source noise levels at nearby sensitive receiver locations. The normal activities associated with The Addington are anticipated to include roof -top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, pad -mounted transformers, parking lot vehicle movements, outdoor courtyard activity, outdoor pool/spa activity and roof -top parking activities. The operational noise analysis shows that the Project -related stationary -source noise levels at the nearby sensitive receiver locations will satisfy the City of Santa Ana exterior noise level standards. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (949) 336-5979. Respectfully submitted, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. Bill Lawson, P.E., INCE Principal REFERENCES 1. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Magnolia at the Park. July 2018. 11177-09 Noise Assessment 0 APPENDIX A OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL CALCULATIONS 11177-09 Noise Assessment This page intentionally left blank 11177-09 Noise Assessment L1 URBAN CROSSROADS Observer Location: R1 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 393.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 390.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 3.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Height: 4.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 74.4 76.1 77.4 77.7 78.2 Distance Attenuation 393.0 -37.9 -37.9 -37.9 -37.9 -37.9 -37.9 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 390.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -56.9 17.5 19.2 20.5 20.8 21.3 39 Minute Hourly Adjustment -58.8 15.6 17.3 18.6 18.9 19.4 Observer Location: R1 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Trash Enclosure Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 582.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 582.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 69.0 75.0 82.0 87.0 88.5 Distance Attenuation 582.0 -41.3 -41.3 -41.3 -41.3 -41.3 -41.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 582.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -41.3 27.7 33.7 40.7 45.7 47.2 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -41.3 27.7 33.7 40.7 45.7 47.2 Observer Location: R1 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Pad -Mounted Transformer Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 214.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 214.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 6.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distance Attenuation 214.0 -31.0 -31.0 -31.0 -31.0 -31.0 -31.0 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 214.0 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -41.2 14.8 -41.2 -41.2 -41.2 -41.2 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -41.2 14.8 -41.2 -41.2 -41.2 -41.2 Observer Location: R1 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Parking Lot Veh. Movements Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 166.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 19.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 147.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 166.0 -18.3 -18.3 -18.3 -18.3 -18.3 -18.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 19.0 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -23.6 20.4 23.4 31.4 37.4 45.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -23.6 20.4 23.4 31.4 37.4 45.0 Observer Location: R1 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Courtyard Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 394.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 233.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 161.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 75.2 73.8 76.0 78.5 80.9 83.6 Distance Attenuation 394.0 -31.9 -31.9 -31.9 -31.9 -31.9 -31.9 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 233.0 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 Raw (Distance + Barrier) 38.2 36.8 39.0 41.5 43.9 46.6 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment 38.2 36.8 39.0 41.5 43.9 46.6 Observer Location: R1 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 537.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 527.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Source Height. 4.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 68.7 71.7 75.0 78.1 83.5 Distance Attenuation 537.0 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 527.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -40.6 28.1 31.1 34.4 37.5 42.9 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -40.6 28.1 31.1 34.4 37.5 42.9 Observer Location: R1 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Roof -Top Parking Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 601.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 441.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 160.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 40.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 15.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 601.0 -26.7 -26.7 -26.7 -26.7 -26.7 -26.7 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 441.0 -7.9 -7.9 -7.9 -7.9 -7.9 -7.9 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -34.6 9.4 12.4 20.4 26.4 34.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -34.6 9.4 12.4 20.4 26.4 34.0 Observer Location: R2 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 218.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 215.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 3.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Height: 4.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 74.4 76.1 77.4 77.7 78.2 Distance Attenuation 218.0 -32.8 -32.8 -32.8 -32.8 -32.8 -32.8 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 215.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -51.8 22.6 24.3 25.6 25.9 26.4 39 Minute Hourly Adjustment -53.7 20.7 22.4 23.7 24.0 24.5 Observer Location: R2 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Trash Enclosure Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 418.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 130.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 288.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 69.0 75.0 82.0 87.0 88.5 Distance Attenuation 418.0 -38.4 -38.4 -38.4 -38.4 -38.4 -38.4 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 130.0 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -55.6 13.4 19.4 26.4 31.4 32.9 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -55.6 13.4 19.4 26.4 31.4 32.9 Observer Location: R2 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Pad -Mounted Transformer Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 81.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 66.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 15.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 6.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distance Attenuation 81.0 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 66.0 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -28.0 28.0 -28.0 -28.0 -28.0 -28.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -28.0 28.0 -28.0 -28.0 -28.0 -28.0 Observer Location: R2 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Parking Lot Veh. Movements Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 24.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 9.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 15.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 24.0 -5.7 -5.7 -5.7 -5.7 -5.7 -5.7 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 9.0 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -11.6 32.4 35.4 43.4 49.4 57.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -11.6 32.4 35.4 43.4 49.4 57.0 Observer Location: R2 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Courtyard Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 206.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 183.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 23.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 75.2 73.8 76.0 78.5 80.9 83.6 Distance Attenuation 206.0 -26.3 -26.3 -26.3 -26.3 -26.3 -26.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 183.0 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) 43.7 42.3 44.5 47.0 49.4 52.1 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment 43.7 42.3 44.5 47.0 49.4 52.1 Observer Location: R2 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 357.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 347.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Source Height. 4.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 68.7 71.7 75.0 78.1 83.5 Distance Attenuation 357.0 -37.1 -37.1 -37.1 -37.1 -37.1 -37.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 347.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -37.1 31.6 34.6 37.9 41.0 46.4 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -37.1 31.6 34.6 37.9 41.0 46.4 Observer Location: R2 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Roof -Top Parking Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 417.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 394.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 23.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 40.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 417.0 -24.3 -24.3 -24.3 -24.3 -24.3 -24.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 394.0 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -29.6 14.4 17.4 25.4 31.4 39.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -29.6 14.4 17.4 25.4 31.4 39.0 Observer Location: R3 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 180.0 feet Barrier Height: 4.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 177.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 3.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 50.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 74.4 76.1 77.4 77.7 78.2 Distance Attenuation 180.0 -31.1 -31.1 -31.1 -31.1 -31.1 -31.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 177.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -50.1 24.3 26.0 27.3 27.6 28.1 39 Minute Hourly Adjustment -52.0 22.4 24.1 25.4 25.7 26.2 Observer Location: R3 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Trash Enclosure Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 370.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 195.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 175.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 69.0 75.0 82.0 87.0 88.5 Distance Attenuation 370.0 -37.4 -37.4 -37.4 -37.4 -37.4 -37.4 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 195.0 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -54.6 14.4 20.4 27.4 32.4 33.9 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -54.6 14.4 20.4 27.4 32.4 33.9 Observer Location: R3 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Pad -Mounted Transformer Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 119.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 105.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 14.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 6.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distance Attenuation 119.0 -25.9 -25.9 -25.9 -25.9 -25.9 -25.9 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 105.0 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -31.3 24.7 -31.3 -31.3 -31.3 -31.3 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -31.3 24.7 -31.3 -31.3 -31.3 -31.3 Observer Location: R3 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Parking Lot Veh. Movements Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 23.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 8.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 15.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 23.0 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 8.0 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -11.3 32.7 35.7 43.7 49.7 57.3 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -11.3 32.7 35.7 43.7 49.7 57.3 Observer Location: R3 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Courtyard Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 135.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 121.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 14.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 75.2 73.8 76.0 78.5 80.9 83.6 Distance Attenuation 135.0 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 121.0 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 Raw (Distance + Barrier) 47.2 45.8 48.0 50.5 52.9 55.6 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment 47.2 45.8 48.0 50.5 52.9 55.6 Observer Location: R3 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 283.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 273.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Source Height. 4.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 68.7 71.7 75.0 78.1 83.5 Distance Attenuation 283.0 -35.1 -35.1 -35.1 -35.1 -35.1 -35.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 273.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -35.1 33.6 36.6 39.9 43.0 48.4 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -35.1 33.6 36.6 39.9 43.0 48.4 Observer Location: R3 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Roof -Top Parking Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 332.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 315.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 17.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 40.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 15.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 332.0 -22.8 -22.8 -22.8 -22.8 -22.8 -22.8 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 315.0 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -28.1 15.9 18.9 26.9 32.9 40.5 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -28.1 15.9 18.9 26.9 32.9 40.5 Observer Location: R4 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 164.0 feet Barrier Height: 4.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 161.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 3.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 50.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 74.4 76.1 77.4 77.7 78.2 Distance Attenuation 164.0 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 161.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -49.3 25.1 26.8 28.1 28.4 28.9 39 Minute Hourly Adjustment -51.2 23.2 24.9 26.2 26.5 27.0 Observer Location: R4 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Trash Enclosure Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 412.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 124.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 288.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 69.0 75.0 82.0 87.0 88.5 Distance Attenuation 412.0 -38.3 -38.3 -38.3 -38.3 -38.3 -38.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 124.0 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -55.5 13.5 19.5 26.5 31.5 33.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -55.5 13.5 19.5 26.5 31.5 33.0 Observer Location: R4 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Pad -Mounted Transformer Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 106.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 93.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 13.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 6.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distance Attenuation 106.0 -24.9 -24.9 -24.9 -24.9 -24.9 -24.9 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 93.0 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -30.3 25.7 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -30.3 25.7 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 Observer Location: R4 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Parking Lot Veh. Movements Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 25.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 11.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 14.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 25.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 11.0 -5.8 -5.8 -5.8 -5.8 -5.8 -5.8 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -11.8 32.2 35.2 43.2 49.2 56.8 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -11.8 32.2 35.2 43.2 49.2 56.8 Observer Location: R4 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Courtyard Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 125.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 111.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 14.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 75.2 73.8 76.0 78.5 80.9 83.6 Distance Attenuation 125.0 -21.9 -21.9 -21.9 -21.9 -21.9 -21.9 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 111.0 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 Raw (Distance + Barrier) 47.9 46.5 48.7 51.2 53.6 56.3 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment 47.9 46.5 48.7 51.2 53.6 56.3 Observer Location: R4 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 298.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 288.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Source Height. 4.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 68.7 71.7 75.0 78.1 83.5 Distance Attenuation 298.0 -35.5 -35.5 -35.5 -35.5 -35.5 -35.5 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 288.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -35.5 33.2 36.2 39.5 42.6 48.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -35.5 33.2 36.2 39.5 42.6 48.0 Observer Location: R4 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Roof -Top Parking Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 255.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 243.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 12.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 40.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 15.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 255.0 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 243.0 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -26.4 17.6 20.6 28.6 34.6 42.2 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -26.4 17.6 20.6 28.6 34.6 42.2 Observer Location: R5 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 210.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 207.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 3.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Height: 4.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 74.4 76.1 77.4 77.7 78.2 Distance Attenuation 210.0 -32.5 -32.5 -32.5 -32.5 -32.5 -32.5 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 207.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -51.5 22.9 24.6 25.9 26.2 26.7 39 Minute Hourly Adjustment -53.4 21.0 22.7 24.0 24.3 24.8 Observer Location: R5 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Trash Enclosure Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 534.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 220.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 314.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 69.0 75.0 82.0 87.0 88.5 Distance Attenuation 534.0 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 220.0 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -57.1 11.9 17.9 24.9 29.9 31.4 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -57.1 11.9 17.9 24.9 29.9 31.4 Observer Location: R5 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Pad -Mounted Transformer Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 224.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 201.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 23.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 6.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distance Attenuation 224.0 -31.4 -31.4 -31.4 -31.4 -31.4 -31.4 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 201.0 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -36.6 19.4 -36.6 -36.6 -36.6 -36.6 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -36.6 19.4 -36.6 -36.6 -36.6 -36.6 Observer Location: R5 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Parking Lot Veh. Movements Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 20.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 9.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 11.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 20.0 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 9.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -10.5 33.5 36.5 44.5 50.5 58.1 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -10.5 33.5 36.5 44.5 50.5 58.1 Observer Location: R5 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Courtyard Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 232.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 12.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 220.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 20.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 75.2 73.8 76.0 78.5 80.9 83.6 Distance Attenuation 232.0 -27.3 -27.3 -27.3 -27.3 -27.3 -27.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 12.0 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 Raw (Distance + Barrier) 31.4 30.0 32.2 34.7 37.1 39.8 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment 31.4 30.0 32.2 34.7 37.1 39.8 Observer Location: R5 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 402.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 392.0 feet Noise Source Height. 4.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 68.7 71.7 75.0 78.1 83.5 Distance Attenuation 402.0 -38.1 -38.1 -38.1 -38.1 -38.1 -38.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 392.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -38.1 30.6 33.6 36.9 40.0 45.4 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -38.1 30.6 33.6 36.9 40.0 45.4 Observer Location: R5 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Roof -Top Parking Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 302.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 289.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 13.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 40.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 15.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 302.0 -22.2 -22.2 -22.2 -22.2 -22.2 -22.2 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 289.0 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -27.4 16.6 19.6 27.6 33.6 41.2 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -27.4 16.6 19.6 27.6 33.6 41.2 Observer Location: R6 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 295.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 292.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 3.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Height: 4.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 74.4 76.1 77.4 77.7 78.2 Distance Attenuation 295.0 -35.4 -35.4 -35.4 -35.4 -35.4 -35.4 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 292.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -54.4 20.0 21.7 23.0 23.3 23.8 39 Minute Hourly Adjustment -56.3 18.1 19.8 21.1 21.4 21.9 Observer Location: R6 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Trash Enclosure Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 561.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 238.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 323.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 69.0 75.0 82.0 87.0 88.5 Distance Attenuation 561.0 -41.0 -41.0 -41.0 -41.0 -41.0 -41.0 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 238.0 -16.4 -16.4 -16.4 -16.4 -16.4 -16.4 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -57.4 11.6 17.6 24.6 29.6 31.1 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -57.4 11.6 17.6 24.6 29.6 31.1 Observer Location: R6 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Pad -Mounted Transformer Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 298.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 229.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 69.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 6.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distance Attenuation 298.0 -33.9 -33.9 -33.9 -33.9 -33.9 -33.9 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 229.0 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -39.0 17.0 -39.0 -39.0 -39.0 -39.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -39.0 17.0 -39.0 -39.0 -39.0 -39.0 Observer Location: R6 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Parking Lot Veh. Movements Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 80.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 80.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 80.0 -13.5 -13.5 -13.5 -13.5 -13.5 -13.5 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 80.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -13.5 30.5 33.5 41.5 47.5 55.1 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -13.5 30.5 33.5 41.5 47.5 55.1 Observer Location: R6 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Courtyard Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 295.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 12.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 283.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 75.2 73.8 76.0 78.5 80.9 83.6 Distance Attenuation 295.0 -29.4 -29.4 -29.4 -29.4 -29.4 -29.4 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 12.0 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 Raw (Distance + Barrier) 26.9 25.5 27.7 30.2 32.6 35.3 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment 26.9 25.5 27.7 30.2 32.6 35.3 Observer Location: R6 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 440.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 430.0 feet Noise Source Height. 4.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 68.7 71.7 75.0 78.1 83.5 Distance Attenuation 440.0 -38.9 -38.9 -38.9 -38.9 -38.9 -38.9 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 430.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -38.9 29.8 32.8 36.1 39.2 44.6 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -38.9 29.8 32.8 36.1 39.2 44.6 Observer Location: R6 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Roof -Top Parking Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 296.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 296.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 40.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 15.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 296.0 -22.1 -22.1 -22.1 -22.1 -22.1 -22.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 296.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -22.1 21.9 24.9 32.9 38.9 46.5 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -22.1 21.9 24.9 32.9 38.9 46.5 Observer Location: R7 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 254.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 251.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 3.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Height: 4.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 74.4 76.1 77.4 77.7 78.2 Distance Attenuation 254.0 -34.1 -34.1 -34.1 -34.1 -34.1 -34.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 251.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -53.1 21.3 23.0 24.3 24.6 25.1 39 Minute Hourly Adjustment -55.0 19.4 21.1 22.4 22.7 23.2 Observer Location: R7 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Trash Enclosure Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 506.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 219.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 287.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 69.0 75.0 82.0 87.0 88.5 Distance Attenuation 506.0 -40.1 -40.1 -40.1 -40.1 -40.1 -40.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 219.0 -16.6 -16.6 -16.6 -16.6 -16.6 -16.6 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -56.7 12.3 18.3 25.3 30.3 31.8 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -56.7 12.3 18.3 25.3 30.3 31.8 Observer Location: R7 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Pad -Mounted Transformer Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 370.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 107.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 263.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 6.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distance Attenuation 370.0 -35.8 -35.8 -35.8 -35.8 -35.8 -35.8 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 107.0 -17.4 -17.4 -17.4 -17.4 -17.4 -17.4 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -53.2 2.8 -53.2 -53.2 -53.2 -53.2 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -53.2 2.8 -53.2 -53.2 -53.2 -53.2 Observer Location: R7 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Parking Lot Veh. Movements Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 88.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 88.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 88.0 -14.2 -14.2 -14.2 -14.2 -14.2 -14.2 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 88.0 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -24.4 19.6 22.6 30.6 36.6 44.2 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -24.4 19.6 22.6 30.6 36.6 44.2 Observer Location: R7 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Courtyard Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 328.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 12.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 316.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 75.2 73.8 76.0 78.5 80.9 83.6 Distance Attenuation 328.0 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 12.0 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 Raw (Distance + Barrier) 26.0 24.6 26.8 29.3 31.7 34.4 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment 26.0 24.6 26.8 29.3 31.7 34.4 Observer Location: R7 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 515.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 505.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Source Height. 4.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 68.7 71.7 75.0 78.1 83.5 Distance Attenuation 515.0 -40.3 -40.3 -40.3 -40.3 -40.3 -40.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 505.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -40.3 28.4 31.4 34.7 37.8 43.2 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -40.3 28.4 31.4 34.7 37.8 43.2 Observer location: R7 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Roof -Top Parking Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 257.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 257.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 40.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 257.0 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 257.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -21.1 22.9 25.9 33.9 39.9 47.5 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -21.1 22.9 25.9 33.9 39.9 47.5 Clarification to the 2525 N Main Street Multi -Family Residential Project Final EIR Attachment B: Supplemental Traffic Analysis City of Santa Ana October 2019 memorandum DATE: October 6, 2019 TO: Zed Kekula, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer FROM: Sandipan Bhattacharjee, P.E., T.E., AICP, ENV-SP SUBJECT: The Addington — Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis Translutions, Inc. (Translutions) is pleased to provide this memorandum discussing the supplemental traffic impact analysis for the Addington project (previously Magnolia at the Park). The project is located at 2525 Main Street in the City of Santa Ana, California. Translutions prepared a traffic impact analysis (TIA) for the project in July 2018. Since then, the project has been modified to include 278 units instead of 496 units and the project access has been changed. As proposed now, the project will have one main access and will move the east leg of the intersection of Main StreeNWalkie Way -Santiago Park approximately 90 feet to the south to create an offset intersection. Along with offsetting the intersection, the project will be modifying the existing traffic signal, channelization and other components of the intersection as deemed necessary during the redesign process. This Option is being called Option E. Under Option E, the existing southbound left turn pocket on Main Street at Walkie Way will serve both the project and the park and will be extended from 80 feet to 90 feet with the removal of the north leg crosswalk. The east leg of the intersection is intermittently dosed off by an existing gate but provides full access to park maintenance vehicles and to the public who by reservation use park facilities. Under the current project proposal, maintenance vehicles and the public will access the park through the proposed project site access as shown in Figure 1. The signalization of the east and west legs will operate with split -phasing and the northbound and southbound left -turn lanes will operate with lead/lag phasing. The Main Street pedestrian crossing will be relocated to the south leg of the intersection. The south side of the lot will be dedicated to the Discovery Cube. Access for Cube Parking will be through a right-in/right-out driveway south of the Main Street/Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway and used by only Cube patrons and not by the project. A shared parking agreement will be made between the Cube and the Addington, wherein residents and/or guests for the Addington will not be allowed to use the parking lot between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Based on discussion with the City, the Addington Management will ensure that the parking area dedicated to the Cube will not be used by Addington residents and/or guests. Further, the right-in/right-out driveway will be restricted to Cube patrons only. It should be noted that Cube patrons use the parking lot under existing conditions. The existing trips for the Discovery Cube are low and have been included in the analysis at Main Street and Discovery Cube Driveway based on existing traffic counts. Once the project is completed, the Discovery Cube parking lot will include 180 parking stalls. This access scenario (Option E) is very similar to Option B (Santiago Park-Walkie Way Project Access) evaluated in the July 2018 TIA, with the following two differences: 1. The existing signalized access has been relocated on site and a right-in/right-out driveway for the Discovery Cube has been added; and 2. The number of units has been reduced from 496 to 278. The analysis for Option E includes evaluation of all intersections, roadway segments, and freeway segments that were evaluated in the July 2018 TIA for consistency between analyses. Figure 1 (all figures and tables attached) illustrates the site plan. Project Trip Generation. The number of apartment units has been reduced from 496 apartment units to 278 apartments. The trip generation has been revised to reflect the reduced number of apartment units. Trip generation for the proposed project is Memorandum: The Addington Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis based on trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Edition) and are based on Land Use 221 — 'Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise)". Table A shows the calculation of the project trip generation. As shown in Table A, the project is forecast to generate 100 a.m. peak hour trips, 123 p.m. peak hour trips, and 1,512 daily trips. Project Trip Distribution. As stated previously, the project access has been modified to include only one access point for the project at Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway. The trip distribution patterns for project trips were developed consistent with the trip distribution from the July 2018 TIA and modified to reflect only one project access at Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway. The project trip generation was applied to the trip distribution patterns for the proposed project to develop trip assignments for project trips. Table B lists the trip distribution by origin/destination. Figure 2 shows the trip distribution for project trips, and Figure 3 shows the trip assignment at the study intersections. METHODOLOGY The analysis will use the same methodology for traffic operations at all study area intersections, roadway segments, and freeway segments included in the July 2018 TIA. It should be noted that the intersection of Main Street and Walkie Way - Santiago Park -Driveway was analyzed in the July 2018 TIA using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology to assess traffic operations. However, to account for the proposed signal timing and phasing, this intersection was analyzed using Synchro 10, which uses the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition methodology. The TIA submitted in July 2018 included the Main Street/Edgewood Road-1-5 HOV On/Off Ramp under existing conditions. The July 2018 TIA evaluated the ramp closures for opening year and 2040 scenarios, but the existing and existing plus project scenarios included the ramps since they were open when the Notice of Preparation (NOP) was released and counts conducted. Therefore, the same analysis parameters were used for the evaluation of Option E (Main Street and Walkie Way - Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube parking) conditions. The ramps have been permanently closed for construction as of April 2019. TRAFFIC VOLUMES The existing, opening year cumulative, and year 2040 without project traffic volumes were taken from the July 2018 TIA. The project traffic assignment was added to the without project traffic volumes to develop the Option E traffic volumes for existing, opening year cumulative, and year 2040 with project conditions. INTERSECTION LOS ANALYSIS Intersection level of service analyses were conducted for existing, opening year cumulative, and year 2040 with Option E conditions. The existing, opening year cumulative, and year 2040 with project Option E levels of service are shown in Tables C, D, and E. As shown in Tables C, D, and E, the intersections are projected to operate at the same or better levels of service as under Option B (Santiago Park-Walkie Way Project Access) from the July 2018 TIA. Therefore, the intersection levels of service under Option E are forecast to be the same or better than the findings disclosed in the July 2018 under Option B (Santiago Park-Walkie Way Project Access). ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS ANALYSIS Roadway segment level of service analyses were conducted for existing, opening year cumulative, and year 2040 with Option E conditions. The existing, opening year cumulative, and year 2040 with project Option E levels of service are shown in Tables F, G and H. As shown in Tables F, G, and H, the roadway segments are projected to operate at the same or better levels of service as Option B (Santiago Park-Walkie Way Project Access) from the July 2018 TIA. Therefore, the roadway segment levels of service under Option E are forecast to be the same or better than the findings disclosed in the July 2018 under Option B (Santiago Park-Walkie Way Project Access). U:\PRUECTSV2E-25Z WIN STREE NALYSIS OFFSETSEPTWER219 REVISEEAWMOSUPPLEWNTALANALYSIS UOC% W01b 6, 2919 Memorandum: The Addington Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis FREEWAY SEGMENT LOS ANALYSIS Freeway segment level of service analyses were conducted for existing and year 2040 with Option E conditions. The existing and year 2040 with project Option E levels of service are shown in Tables I, and J. As shown in Tables I and J, the freeway segments are projected to operate at the same or better levels of service as Option B (Santiago Park-Walkie Way Project Access) from the July 2018 TIA. Therefore, the freeway levels of service under Option E are forecast to be the same or better than the findings disclosed in the July 2018 under Option B (Santiago Park-Walkie Way Project Access). QUEUEING ANALYSIS A queueing analysis was included for the northbound through lanes of Main Street south of Memory Lane to Santa Clara Avenue and for the turn lanes at Main Street and Walkie Way -Driveway and Main Street and Edgewood Road. With the change to intersection geometrics, the storage length for the northbound left turn and the northbound through lanes at the intersection of Main Street/Walkie Way -Driveway, and the southbound through lane at Main Street/Edgewood Road will be reduced by approximately 90 feet. Table K lists the queueing analysis for existing, opening year cumulative, and year 2040 without project conditions. As shown in Table K, all queues fit within the available storage length with the exception of the southbound left -turn lane at Main StreeUEdgewood Road under year 2040 conditions. Table L lists the queueing analysis for Option E Main Street and Walkie Way -Driveway project access conditions. As shown in Table L, all queues fit within the available storage length with the exception of the southbound left -turn lane at Main StreeUEdgewood Road under year 2040, under the with and without project conditions. It should be noted, that the southbound left -turn queue at Main Street/Edgewood Road also exceeded the available storage length under year existing, opening year, and year 2040 with project Option & Main Street Access scenario in the TIA submitted in July 2018 Occasionally, additional queueing may occur as a result of the added vehicle travel delay that is expected on Main Street at Walkie Way due to the additional phase necessary to accommodate the intersection offset. However, although Option E does not result in substantial changes to queueing operations surrounding the project site, the project applicant will work with the City to modify the existing raised curb median on Main Street between Walkie Way and Edgewood Road. CONCLUSION The project has been modified to include 278 units instead of 496 units and the project access has been changed to include the east leg of the intersection of Main Street/Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway to create an offset intersection. Under Option E Main Street/Walkie Way -Driveway project access, the study area intersections, roadway segments, and freeway segments are projected to operate at the same or better levels of service as the findings disclosed in the July 2018 TIA. The revised project does not create a significant impact at any intersection based on the thresholds adopted by the City of Santa Ana and other agencies. The revised project also does not result in substantial changes to queueing operations at any intersection. We hope you will find this information helpful. Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at (949) 656- 3131. Sincerely, tran u ib s, Inc. r Sandipan Bhattacharjee, P.E., T.E., AICP, ENV SP Principal QRVFESSiVN Q�VFESSIVN q q BHATTq BHA?1q �z �z No. C81872 No. TR 2847 Exp. 03-31-20 Exp 03-31-20 sj CIV1E- TRAFF\F' �P �lFOF CALIF�CFOF CAUF��� O:\PRQIECTSV2E-25Z MAIN STREE NALYSIS OFFSUSEPT WER2619 REVISEE)MMOSNPPLEWNFALANALYSIS OOa Wob r6, 2919 z Z 3 Q 4 i 6 d li u } 1'e Z Z E E 3 _ � 3 a : a' a Z E E n E Ai Ai E a 3 q ro 3 3 {� o a+v I hai15 a6e Pm5- - Aeryl easweT _ i -. , i. f I r w fRb A" - i Table A - Project Trip Generation Land Use Units A.M. Peak Hour In Out Total P.M. Peak Hour In Out Total Daily Future Use Apartments Trip Generation Rates " 0.09 0.27 0.36 0.27 0.17 0.44 5.44 Trip Generation 278 DU 26 74 100 75 48 123 1,512 Total Trip Generation 26 74 100 75 48 123 1,512 Trip generation based on rates for Land Use 221 -"Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise)" from Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Edition). D:IProjectslRE - 2525 Main StreeOAnalysis Offset September 2019 RevisedlProject Trips Final (9/10/2019) Table 13: Project Trip Distribution Origin 1 Destination Distribution La Veta Avenue -West 3% Main Street - North 7% La Vets Avenue - East 4% SR-22 - West 8% SR-22 - East 13% Park Street - Batavia Street - North 5% Broadway - South 11% 1-5 - North 16% 1-5 - South 20% 17th Street - West 5% Main Street - South 5% 17th Street - East 3% Total 100% D:Wr"%RE-2525 Main&t Analyss Othet May MgTmje Trip Distribution T&.UIST O m 0000000000000000 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z p d E U 6 U 2 Q O Q .1000 Q V- O V Q m m Q V Q Q Q U_ O U W Q Q Q Q O Q Q O Q m V V V V Q V- d O V Q m Q Q V Q Q E � U o O Q m V O O m Q V W O U W Q Q Q Q O Q Q Q — m V O V U > (n m _' _ (n -A-1 (n O c O w O O w w O O O O O O O O O O o V In In O (n (n 00M.00. E K � � O y E 0T o a a3�m Ez0 m E¢ K m m V Q o a 01 o V Q— n>�� o c o m o _ 0> 0000000000000000 �o A \§ ,::_: \> mE \:\ Z \\§\\\\ :�i ^- \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ 0000000000000000 0000- o o o o o \> ME \:\ Z \\§\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ | | | � | | ƒ ) § j 00000 \ \ \ 0 \ ( \ }0000 } \ } o o t^ } \ \ \ \ „ _,�/_)_/_ /�/,) ; ;;;;; ; ; ; \ \ ( \ })\() } \ ( z ! !!!!! ! ! ! / < , a a a a : a : a { ) ! )!!!! ) ) ) )! ®!;)\ ) ! ! E;;;;`af.! -mlo / \ } ) }}\\\ \ § } o \ \ \ § (\\§} } § § z : z o o o o \ \}«`^ \ \ \ |\.\ \ , e „ ... ... ... .;..__ ... ... ! ! / ,._ !�! .r..66 ... ... ... .;..__ ... ... ! ,._ !�! .r..66 ) }&} &(&}// }&} }&} {\\ \{E \\\ !\ /\\ }\\ \ 0 ,000 ,g0z0 )kW\\ \2 )\\\ { {a£:: |k\)) !!!! !2¥¥&!§ w!_ /[[ §7; ... ... �! §/§ §§§ 11 _ {/\000 CL \\\ \ \\ 0. !\/m �� .0 W �)\\ \o CL !|/�� 15{{ w !z£:: 2))¥!]! �!_}} L L U O c N d � � a d o O L d 0 j = L O C � N Q d U O O � O L 1 2 C ar y N m N N d a d 7 E L o a R 2 c N N O. O O .... . ` O C d O Q d O � L d d V O CO O) m N d a. _ � N � O j L O p� = C C d � W a o d y J _ C N NQ R C 6 m � Z R �O �O N � R O C N � o (j R Y d O C d R 'O R O N N N N N N N N d L C C C C O C co r rn o � 3 L Z O d 3 � 3 L N = � '2 3 Q U d = L O O d d CY U =`L � O d 2 c 1 Q cy O 0 L_ O O 2 cc 3 = L O O p� 2 c d W d = Q 3 Q d L d N J = _ H m J H J J K J K m m m m m m m J H J K K K m m m m m m H m d O Z Z Z W W m m Z Z (n W W Z m MQ R NR 0 m Z R �!J R C j 0 O o U s d d R 0) 'O C R O N N N N Z d N d (n d 65 d n d (n cn � rn o Memorandum: The Addington Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis ATTACHMENT A: VOLUME DEVELOPMENT WORKSHEETS U:\PRUEOTSV2E-25Z WIN STREE NALYSIS OFFSETSEPTWER219 REVISEEAWMOSUPPLEWNTALANALYSIS UOC% Septert 12, 2919 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PIVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 1 . Broadwayl1-5 SB Off Ramp NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 435 0 435 778 0 778 NBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 SET 605 0 605 569 0 569 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 891 4 895 835 12 847 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WET 0 0 0 0 0 0 WEIR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 605 0 0 605 569 0 0 569 Departure 435 0 0 435 778 0 0 778 Total 1,040 0 0 1,040 1,347 0 0 1,347 South Leg Approach 435 0 0 435 778 0 0 778 Departure 1,496 0 4 1,500 1,404 0 12 1,416 Total 1,931 0 4 1,935 2,182 0 12 2,194 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Leg Approach 891 0 4 895 835 0 12 847 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 891 0 4 895 835 0 12 847 Total Approaches Approach 1,931 0 4 1,935 2,182 0 12 2,194 Departure 1,931 0 4 1,935 2,182 0 12 2,194 Total 3,862 0 8 3,870 4,364 0 24 4,388 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 2 . Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 295 0 295 620 0 620 NBR 342 3 345 420 8 428 SBL 37 4 41 97 12 109 SET 1,459 0 1,459 1,307 0 1,307 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 134 0 134 144 0 144 EBT 321 0 321 233 0 233 EBR 193 0 193 67 0 67 WBL 76 8 84 90 5 95 WET 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 6 0 6 14 0 14 North Leg Approach 1,496 0 4 1,500 1,404 0 12 11416 Departure 435 0 0 435 778 0 0 778 Total 1,931 0 4 1,935 2,182 0 12 2,194 South Leg Approach 637 0 3 640 1,040 0 8 11048 Departure 1,728 0 8 1,736 1,464 0 5 1,469 Total 2,365 0 11 2,376 2,504 0 13 2,517 East Leg Approach 82 0 8 90 104 0 5 109 Departure 700 0 7 707 750 0 20 770 Total 782 0 15 797 854 0 25 879 West Leg Approach 648 0 0 648 444 0 0 444 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 648 0 0 648 444 0 0 444 Total Approaches Approach 2,863 0 15 2,878 2,992 0 25 31017 Departure 2,863 0 15 2,878 2,992 0 25 3,017 Total 5,726 0 30 5,756 5,984 0 50 6,034 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 3 . Broadway/Buffalo Avenue NBL 9 0 9 6 0 6 NBT 597 3 600 1,009 8 1,017 NBR 141 0 141 253 1 254 SBL 210 0 210 139 0 139 SET 1,495 8 1,503 1,267 5 1,272 SBR 11 0 11 7 0 7 EBL 1 0 1 0 0 0 EBT 4 0 4 1 0 1 EBR 3 0 3 10 0 10 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WET 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 1,716 0 8 1,724 1,413 0 5 11418 Departure 598 0 3 601 1,009 0 8 1,017 Total 2,314 0 11 2,325 2,422 0 13 2,435 South Leg Approach 747 0 3 750 1,268 0 9 11277 Departure 1,498 0 8 1,506 1,277 0 5 1,282 Total 2,245 0 11 2,256 2,545 0 14 2,559 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 355 0 0 355 393 0 1 394 Total 355 0 0 355 393 0 1 394 West Leg Approach 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 11 Departure 20 0 0 20 13 0 0 13 Total 28 0 0 28 24 0 0 24 Total Approaches Approach 2,471 0 11 2,482 2,692 0 14 21706 Departure 2,471 0 11 2,482 2,692 0 14 2,706 Total 4,942 0 22 4,964 5,384 0 28 5,412 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 4 . Main Street/La Veta Avenue NBL 75 2 77 287 1 288 NBT 613 5 618 962 3 965 NBR 274 9 283 455 6 461 SBL 197 0 197 161 0 161 SET 1,071 2 1,073 897 5 902 SBR 135 0 135 223 0 223 EBL 305 0 305 326 0 326 EBT 456 0 456 427 0 427 EBR 190 1 191 201 2 203 WBL 295 4 299 268 13 281 WET 317 0 317 514 0 514 WEIR 207 0 207 237 0 237 North Leg Approach 1,403 0 2 1,405 1,281 0 5 11286 Departure 1,125 0 5 1,130 1,525 0 3 1,528 Total 2,528 0 7 2,535 2,806 0 8 2,814 South Leg Approach 962 0 16 978 1,704 0 10 11714 Departure 1,556 0 7 1,563 1,366 0 20 1,386 Total 2,518 0 23 2,541 3,070 0 30 3,100 East Leg Approach 819 0 4 823 1,019 0 13 11032 Departure 927 0 9 936 1,043 0 6 1,049 Total 1,746 0 13 1,759 2,062 0 19 2,081 West Leg Approach 951 0 1 952 954 0 2 956 Departure 527 0 2 529 1,024 0 1 1,025 Total 1,478 0 3 1,481 1,978 0 3 1,981 Total Approaches Approach 4,135 0 23 4,158 4,958 0 30 4,988 Departure 4,135 0 23 4,158 4,958 0 30 4,988 Total 8,270 0 46 8,316 9,916 0 60 9,976 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PIVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 5 . Main Street/Town and Country Road NBL 49 0 49 66 0 66 NBT 860 16 876 1,101 11 1,112 NBR 140 7 147 187 5 192 SBL 262 0 262 401 0 401 SET 1,075 7 1,082 1,025 20 1,045 SBR 31 0 31 118 0 118 EBL 21 0 21 128 0 128 EBT 64 0 64 136 0 136 EBR 68 0 68 139 0 139 WBL 271 2 273 195 5 200 WET 52 0 52 99 0 99 WEIR 378 0 378 414 0 414 North Leg Approach 1,368 0 7 1,375 1,544 0 20 11564 Departure 1,259 0 16 1,275 1,643 0 11 1,654 Total 2,627 0 23 2,650 3,187 0 31 3,218 South Leg Approach 1,049 0 23 1,072 1,354 0 16 11370 Departure 1,414 0 9 1,423 1,359 0 25 1,384 Total 2,463 0 32 2,495 2,713 0 41 2,754 East Leg Approach 701 0 2 703 708 0 5 713 Departure 466 0 7 473 724 0 5 729 Total 1,167 0 9 1,176 1,432 0 10 1,442 West Leg Approach 153 0 0 153 403 0 0 403 Departure 132 0 0 132 283 0 0 283 Total 285 0 0 285 686 0 0 686 Total Approaches Approach 3,271 0 32 3,303 4,009 0 41 41050 Departure 3,271 0 32 3,303 4,009 0 41 4,050 Total 6,542 0 64 6,606 8,018 0 82 8,100 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 6 . Main Street/E Memory Lane NBL 29 0 29 104 0 104 NBT 870 24 894 955 15 970 NBR 252 6 258 159 4 163 SBL 33 0 33 35 0 35 SET 1,115 9 1,124 1,113 26 1,139 SBR 248 0 248 154 0 154 EBL 155 0 155 263 0 263 EBT 222 0 222 309 0 309 EBR 47 0 47 126 0 126 WBL 168 2 170 207 5 212 WET 209 0 209 162 0 162 WEIR 7 0 7 63 0 63 North Leg Approach 1,396 0 9 1,405 1,302 0 26 11328 Departure 1,032 0 24 1,056 1,281 0 15 1,296 Total 2,428 0 33 2,461 2,583 0 41 2,624 South Leg Approach 1,151 0 30 1,181 1,218 0 19 11237 Departure 1,330 0 11 1,341 1,446 0 31 1,477 Total 2,481 0 41 2,522 2,664 0 50 2,714 East Leg Approach 384 0 2 386 432 0 5 437 Departure 507 0 6 513 503 0 4 507 Total 891 0 8 899 935 0 9 944 West Leg Approach 424 0 0 424 698 0 0 698 Departure 486 0 0 486 420 0 0 420 Total 910 0 0 910 1,118 0 0 1,118 Total Approaches Approach 3,355 0 41 3,396 3,650 0 50 31700 Departure 3,355 0 41 3,396 3,650 0 50 3,700 Total 6,710 0 82 6,792 7,300 0 100 7,400 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 7 . Main Street/Walkie Way -Santiago Part -Driveway NBL 19 0 19 25 4 0 29 NBT 1,249 0 1,249 1,227 0 1,227 NBR 0 16 16 0 45 45 SBL 1 10 11 1 30 31 SET 1,351 0 1,351 1,534 0 1,534 SBR 11 0 11 2 0 2 EBL 2 0 2 8 0 8 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 1 0 1 21 0 21 WBL 0 44 44 0 29 29 WET 0 0 0 0 0 0 WEIR 0 30 30 0 19 19 North Leg Approach 1,363 0 10 1,373 1,537 0 30 11567 Departure 1,251 0 30 1,281 1,235 0 19 1,254 Total 2,614 0 40 2,654 2,772 0 49 2,821 South Leg Approach 1,268 0 16 1,284 1,252 4 45 11301 Departure 1,352 0 44 1,396 1,555 0 29 1,584 Total 2,620 0 60 2,680 2,807 4 74 2,885 East Leg Approach 0 0 74 74 0 0 48 48 Departure 1 0 26 27 1 0 75 76 Total 1 0 100 101 1 0 123 124 West Leg Approach 3 0 0 3 29 0 0 29 Departure 30 0 0 30 27 4 0 31 Total 33 0 0 33 56 4 0 60 Total Approaches Approach 2,634 0 100 2,734 2,818 4 123 2,945 Departure 2,634 0 100 2,734 2,818 4 123 2,945 Total 5,268 0 200 5,468 5,636 8 246 5,890 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 8 . Main Street/Discovery Cube Driveway NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 1,271 16 1,287 1,243 -2 45 1,286 NBR 12 2 0 14 3 0 3 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 SET 1,356 44 1,400 1,555 4 29 1,588 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WET 0 0 0 0 0 0 WEIR 1 0 1 9 6 0 15 North Leg Approach 1,356 0 44 1,400 1,555 4 29 11588 Departure 1,272 0 16 1,288 1,252 4 45 1,301 Total 2,628 0 60 2,688 2,807 8 74 2,889 South Leg Approach 1,283 2 16 1,301 1,246 -2 45 11289 Departure 1,356 0 44 1,400 1,555 4 29 1,588 Total 2,639 2 60 2,701 2,801 2 74 2,877 East Leg Approach 1 0 0 1 9 6 0 15 Departure 12 2 0 14 3 0 0 3 Total 13 2 0 15 12 6 0 18 West Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Approaches Approach 2,640 2 60 2,702 2,810 8 74 2,892 Departure 2,640 2 60 2,702 2,810 8 74 2,892 Total 5,280 4 120 5,404 5,620 16 148 5,784 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 11 . Main Street/Buffalo Avenue-1-5 SB On Ramp NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 976 3 979 1,398 10 1,408 NBR 33 0 33 38 0 38 SBL 717 15 732 679 10 689 SET 1,418 10 1,428 1,103 6 1,109 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 119 0 119 291 1 292 EBT 196 0 196 167 0 167 EBR 26 0 26 46 0 46 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WET 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 2,135 0 25 2,160 1,783 0 16 11799 Departure 1,095 0 3 1,098 1,688 0 11 1,699 Total 3,230 0 28 3,258 3,471 0 27 3,498 South Leg Approach 1,009 0 3 1,012 1,436 0 10 11446 Departure 1,444 0 10 1,454 1,149 0 6 1,155 Total 2,453 0 13 2,466 2,585 0 16 2,601 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 946 0 15 961 884 0 10 894 Total 946 0 15 961 884 0 10 894 West Leg Approach 341 0 0 341 504 0 1 505 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 341 0 0 341 504 0 1 505 Total Approaches Approach 3,485 0 28 3,513 3,722 0 27 3,749 Departure 3,485 0 28 3,513 3,722 0 27 3,749 Total 6,971 0 56 7,027 7,444 0 54 7,498 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 12 . Main Street117th Street NBL 189 0 189 200 0 200 NBT 762 1 763 1,061 4 1,065 NBR 174 0 174 162 0 162 SBL 178 2 180 187 1 188 SET 1,082 4 1,086 810 2 812 SBR 82 4 86 141 2 143 EBL 141 1 142 199 4 203 EBT 1,250 0 1,250 1,219 0 1,219 EBR 78 0 78 58 0 58 WBL 306 0 306 186 0 186 WET 1,335 0 1,335 1,064 0 1,064 WEIR 16 1 17 59 2 61 North Leg Approach 1,342 0 10 1,352 1,138 0 5 11143 Departure 919 0 3 922 1,319 0 10 1,329 Total 2,261 0 13 2,274 2,457 0 15 2,472 South Leg Approach 1,125 0 1 1,126 1,423 0 4 11427 Departure 1,466 0 4 1,470 1,054 0 2 1,056 Total 2,591 0 5 2,596 2,477 0 6 2,483 East Leg Approach 1,657 0 1 1,658 1,309 0 2 11311 Departure 1,602 0 2 1,604 1,568 0 1 1,569 Total 3,259 0 3 3,262 2,877 0 3 2,880 West Leg Approach 1,469 0 1 1,470 1,476 0 4 11480 Departure 1,606 0 4 1,610 1,405 0 2 1,407 Total 3,075 0 5 3,080 2,881 0 6 2,887 Total Approaches Approach 5,593 0 13 5,606 5,346 0 15 5,361 Departure 5,593 0 13 5,606 5,346 0 15 5,361 Total 11,186 0 26 11,212 10,692 0 30 10,722 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 13 . Project Driveway 2-Bush Street/Edgewood Road NBL 58 0 58 85 0 85 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR 1 0 1 0 0 0 SBL 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 SET 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 4 -4 0 0 EBL 2 -2 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 96 0 96 115 1 0 116 EBR 67 0 67 58 1 0 59 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WET 180 0 180 140 0 140 WEIR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 6 -6 0 0 Departure 2 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2 -2 0 0 6 -6 0 0 South Leg Approach 59 0 0 59 85 0 0 85 Departure 67 0 0 67 59 0 0 59 Total 126 0 0 126 144 0 0 144 East Leg Approach 180 0 0 180 140 0 0 140 Departure 97 0 0 97 116 0 0 116 Total 277 0 0 277 256 0 0 256 West Leg Approach 165 -2 0 163 173 2 0 175 Departure 238 0 0 238 229 A 0 225 Total 403 -2 0 401 402 -2 0 400 Total Approaches Approach 404 -2 0 402 404 -4 0 400 Departure 404 -2 0 402 404 A 0 400 Total 808 A 0 804 808 -8 0 800 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 14 . SR-22 WB Ramps/La Veta Avenue NBL 899 0 3 902 415 0 10 425 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR 479 0 0 479 128 0 0 128 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 332 0 3 335 625 0 2 627 EBR 233 0 6 239 946 0 4 950 WBL 266 0 0 266 497 0 0 497 WET 454 0 1 455 440 0 3 443 WEIR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Leg Approach 1,378 0 3 1,381 543 0 10 553 Departure 499 0 6 505 1,443 0 4 1,447 Total 1,877 0 9 1,886 1,986 0 14 2,000 East Leg Approach 720 0 1 721 937 0 3 940 Departure 811 0 3 814 753 0 2 755 Total 1,531 0 4 1,535 1,690 0 5 1,695 West Leg Approach 565 0 9 574 1,571 0 6 11577 Departure 1,353 0 4 1,357 855 0 13 868 Total 1,918 0 13 1,931 2,426 0 19 2,445 Total Approaches Approach 2,663 0 13 2,676 3,051 0 19 31070 Departure 2,663 0 13 2,676 3,051 0 19 3,070 Total 5,326 0 26 5,352 6,102 0 38 6,140 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PIVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 15 . SR-22 EB Rampsrrown & Country Road NBL 25 0 0 25 186 0 0 186 NBT 128 0 4 132 438 0 2 440 NBR 20 0 0 20 52 0 0 52 SBL 348 0 0 348 185 0 0 185 SET 309 0 1 310 107 0 2 109 SBR 609 0 1 610 420 0 4 424 EBL 304 0 6 310 583 0 4 587 EBT 104 0 1 105 103 0 1 104 EBR 118 0 0 118 25 0 0 25 WBL 65 0 0 65 11 0 0 11 WET 64 0 1 65 146 0 2 148 WEIR 107 0 0 107 461 0 0 461 North Leg Approach 1,266 0 2 1,268 712 0 6 718 Departure 539 0 10 549 1,482 0 6 1,488 Total 1,805 0 12 1,817 2,194 0 12 2,206 South Leg Approach 173 0 4 177 676 0 2 678 Departure 492 0 1 493 143 0 2 145 Total 665 0 5 670 819 0 4 823 East Leg Approach 236 0 1 237 618 0 2 620 Departure 472 0 1 473 340 0 1 341 Total 708 0 2 710 958 0 3 961 West Leg Approach 526 0 7 533 711 0 5 716 Departure 698 0 2 700 752 0 6 758 Total 1,224 0 9 1,233 1,463 0 11 1,474 Total Approaches Approach 2,201 0 14 2,215 2,717 0 15 21732 Departure 2,201 0 14 2,215 2,717 0 15 2,732 Total 4,402 0 28 4,430 5,434 0 30 5,464 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 16 . Memory Lane/Lawson Way NBL 1 0 0 1 9 0 0 9 NBT 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 NBR 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 6 SBL 17 0 0 17 17 0 0 17 SET 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 SBR 168 0 1 169 149 0 2 151 EBL 180 0 4 184 284 0 2 286 EBT 272 0 2 274 262 0 1 263 EBR 7 0 0 7 15 0 0 15 WBL 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 WET 285 0 1 286 212 0 2 214 WEIR 8 0 0 8 18 0 0 18 North Leg Approach 186 0 1 187 170 0 2 172 Departure 191 0 4 195 304 0 2 306 Total 377 0 5 382 474 0 4 478 South Leg Approach 7 0 0 7 17 0 0 17 Departure 8 0 0 8 23 0 0 23 Total 15 0 0 15 40 0 0 40 East Leg Approach 293 0 1 294 234 0 2 236 Departure 292 0 2 294 285 0 1 286 Total 585 0 3 588 519 0 3 522 West Leg Approach 459 0 6 465 561 0 3 564 Departure 454 0 2 456 370 0 4 374 Total 913 0 8 921 931 0 7 938 Total Approaches Approach 945 0 8 953 982 0 7 989 Departure 945 0 8 953 982 0 7 989 Total 1,890 0 16 1,906 1,964 0 14 1,978 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Existing Existing Project Existing Existing Existing Project Existing Without Without Trips Plus Without Without Trips Plus Project Project Project Project Project Project 9 . Main StreetlEdgewood Road-11-5 Ramps NBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBL 77 0 77 239 0 239 NBT 471 1 10 482 829 30 859 NBR 83 -1 0 82 103 0 103 SBU 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 SBL 64 -1 0 63 106 2 0 108 SBT 1,275 44 1,319 1,311 2 29 1,342 SBR 17 0 17 138 0 138 EBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 6 0 6 30 0 30 EBT 5 0 5 12 0 12 EBR 79 0 79 73 0 73 WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 129 0 129 97 -2 0 95 WBT 15 0 15 21 0 21 WBR 91 0 91 91 -2 0 89 NWBR 714 5 719 296 15 311 NWHR 22 0 22 6 0 6 North Leg Approach 1,356 0 44 1,400 1,555 4 29 1,588 Departure 1,283 2 15 1,300 1,246 -2 45 1,289 Total 2,639 2 59 2,700 2,801 2 74 2,877 South Leg Approach 631 0 10 641 1,171 0 30 1,201 Departure 1,483 0 44 1,527 1,481 0 29 1,510 Total 2,114 0 54 2,168 2,652 0 59 2,711 East Leg Approach 235 0 0 235 209 A 0 205 Departure 174 -2 0 172 227 2 0 229 Total 409 -2 0 407 437 -2 0 435 West Leg Approach 90 0 0 90 115 0 0 115 Departure 109 0 0 109 398 0 0 398 Total 199 0 0 199 513 0 0 513 Southeast Leg Approach 736 0 5 741 302 0 15 317 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 736 0 5 741 302 0 15 317 Total Approaches Approach 3,049 0 59 3,108 3,352 0 74 3,426 Departure 3,049 0 59 3,108 3,352 0 74 3,426 Total 6,098 0 118 6,216 6,704 0 148 6,852 D:Wro"%RE-257 Main St�ndyo OHad SeGde rM9 Revi I,N inim%fte[ AN TM Se tMo The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Existing Existing Project Existing Existing Existing Project Existing Without Without Trips Plus Without Without Trips Plus Project Project Project Project Project Project 10 . Main Street/Santa Clara Avenue-1-5 NB On Ramp NBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBL 7 0 7 9 0 9 NBT 504 4 508 967 11 978 NBR 584 0 584 712 0 712 SBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 58 12 70 113 8 121 SBT 1,320 24 1,344 1,303 16 1,319 SBR 105 8 113 65 5 70 EBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 127 7 134 204 20 224 EBT 396 0 396 485 0 485 EBR 201 0 201 146 0 146 WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEBR 591 0 591 334 0 334 SEHR 32 0 32 16 0 16 North Leg Approach 1,483 0 44 1,527 1,481 0 29 1,510 Departure 631 0 11 642 1,171 0 31 1,202 Total 2,114 0 55 2,169 2,652 0 60 2,712 South Leg Approach 1,095 0 4 1,099 1,688 0 11 1,699 Departure 2,112 0 24 2,136 1,783 0 16 1,799 Total 3,207 0 28 3,235 3,471 0 27 3,498 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 1,038 0 12 1,050 1,310 0 8 1,318 Total 1,038 0 12 1,050 1,310 0 8 1,318 West Leg Approach 724 0 7 731 835 0 20 855 Departure 144 0 8 152 90 0 5 95 Total 868 0 15 883 924 0 25 949 Northwest Leg Approach 623 0 0 623 350 0 0 350 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 623 0 0 623 350 0 0 350 Total Approaches Approach 3,925 0 55 3,980 4,354 0 60 4,414 Departure 3,925 0 55 3,980 4,354 0 60 4,414 Total 7,851 0 110 7,961 8,707 0 120 8,827 D:Wro"%RE-257 Main St�ndyo OHad SeGde rM9 Revi I,N inim%fte[ AN TM Se tMo The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 1 . Broadwayl1-5 SB Off Ramp NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 442 0 442 789 0 789 NBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 614 0 614 578 0 578 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 914 4 918 890 12 902 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 614 0 0 614 578 0 0 578 Departure 442 0 0 442 789 0 0 789 Total 1,056 0 0 1,056 1,367 0 0 1,367 South Leg Approach 442 0 0 442 789 0 0 789 Departure 1,529 0 4 1,533 1,468 0 12 1,480 Total 1,971 0 4 1,975 2,257 0 12 2,269 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Leg Approach 914 0 4 918 890 0 12 902 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 914 0 4 918 890 0 12 902 Total Approaches Approach 1,971 0 4 1,975 2,257 0 12 2,269 Departure 1,971 0 4 1,975 2,257 0 12 2,269 Total 3,942 0 8 3,950 4,513 0 24 4,537 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 2. Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 300 0 300 629 0 629 NBR 347 3 350 426 8 434 SBL 49 4 53 141 12 153 SBT 1,480 0 1,480 1,327 0 1,327 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 136 0 136 146 0 146 EBT 326 0 326 236 0 236 EBR 196 0 196 68 0 68 WBL 77 8 85 91 5 96 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 6 0 6 14 0 14 North Leg Approach 1,529 0 4 1,533 1,468 0 12 1,480 Departure 442 0 0 442 789 0 0 789 Total 1,971 0 4 1,975 2,257 0 12 2,269 South Leg Approach 647 0 3 650 1,055 0 8 1,063 Departure 1,753 0 8 1,761 1,486 0 5 1,491 Total 2,400 0 11 2,411 2,541 0 13 2,554 East Leg Approach 83 0 8 91 105 0 5 110 Departure 722 0 7 729 803 0 20 823 Total 805 0 15 820 908 0 25 933 West Leg Approach 658 0 0 658 450 0 0 450 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 658 0 0 658 450 0 0 450 Total Approaches Approach 2,917 0 15 2,932 3,078 0 25 3,103 Departure 2,917 0 15 2,932 3,078 0 25 3,103 Total 5,834 0 30 5,864 6,155 0 50 6,205 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 3 . Broadway/Buffalo Avenue NBL 9 0 9 6 0 6 NBT 607 3 610 1,025 8 1,033 NBR 143 0 143 257 1 258 SBL 213 0 213 141 0 141 SBT 1,517 8 1,525 1,286 5 1,291 SBR 11 0 11 7 0 7 EBL 1 0 1 0 0 0 EBT 4 0 4 1 0 1 EBR 3 0 3 10 0 10 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 1,741 0 8 1,749 1,434 0 5 1,439 Departure 608 0 3 611 1,025 0 8 1,033 Total 2,349 0 11 2,360 2,459 0 13 2,472 South Leg Approach 759 0 3 762 1,288 0 9 1,297 Departure 1,520 0 8 1,528 1,296 0 5 1,301 Total 2,279 0 11 2,290 2,584 0 14 2,598 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 360 0 0 360 399 0 1 400 Total 360 0 0 360 399 0 1 400 West Leg Approach 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 11 Departure 20 0 0 20 13 0 0 13 Total 28 0 0 28 24 0 0 24 Total Approaches Approach 2,508 0 11 2,519 2,733 0 14 2,747 Departure 2,508 0 11 2,519 2,733 0 14 2,747 Total 5,016 0 22 5,038 5,466 0 28 5,494 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 4 . Main Street/La Veta Avenue NBL 81 2 83 294 1 295 NBT 749 5 754 1,042 3 1,045 NBR 347 9 356 506 6 512 SBL 211 0 211 175 0 175 SBT 1,132 2 1,134 1,059 5 1,064 SBR 142 0 142 234 0 234 EBL 317 0 317 338 0 338 EBT 469 0 469 435 0 435 EBR 194 1 195 209 2 211 WBL 315 4 319 303 13 316 WBT 328 0 328 523 0 523 WBR 221 0 221 252 0 252 North Leg Approach 1,485 0 2 1,487 1,468 0 5 1,473 Departure 1,287 0 5 1,292 1,632 0 3 1,635 Total 2,772 0 7 2,779 3,100 0 8 3,108 South Leg Approach 1,177 0 16 1,193 1,842 0 10 1,852 Departure 1,641 0 7 1,648 1,571 0 20 1,591 Total 2,818 0 23 2,841 3,413 0 30 3,443 East Leg Approach 864 0 4 868 1,078 0 13 1,091 Departure 1,027 0 9 1,036 1,116 0 6 1,122 Total 1,891 0 13 1,904 2,194 0 19 2,213 West Leg Approach 980 0 1 981 982 0 2 984 Departure 551 0 2 553 1,051 0 1 1,052 Total 1,531 0 3 1,534 2,033 0 3 2,036 Total Approaches Approach 4,506 0 23 4,529 5,370 0 30 5,400 Departure 4,506 0 23 4,529 5,370 0 30 5,400 Total 9,012 0 46 9,058 10,740 0 60 10,800 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 5 . Main Street/Town and Country Road NBL 53 0 53 69 0 69 NBT 962 16 978 1,188 11 1,199 NBR 160 7 167 238 5 243 SBL 269 0 269 519 0 519 SBT 1,149 7 1,156 1,114 20 1,134 SBR 33 0 33 120 0 120 EBL 21 0 21 132 0 132 EBT 70 0 70 157 0 157 EBR 69 0 69 141 0 141 WBL 296 2 298 229 5 234 WBT 69 0 69 108 0 108 WBR 498 0 498 458 0 458 North Leg Approach 1,451 0 7 1,458 1,753 0 20 1,773 Departure 1,481 0 16 1,497 1,778 0 11 1,789 Total 2,932 0 23 2,955 3,531 0 31 3,562 South Leg Approach 1,175 0 23 1,198 1,495 0 16 1,511 Departure 1,514 0 9 1,523 1,484 0 25 1,509 Total 2,689 0 32 2,721 2,979 0 41 3,020 East Leg Approach 863 0 2 865 795 0 5 800 Departure 499 0 7 506 914 0 5 919 Total 1,362 0 9 1,371 1,709 0 10 1,719 West Leg Approach 160 0 0 160 430 0 0 430 Departure 155 0 0 155 297 0 0 297 Total 315 0 0 315 727 0 0 727 Total Approaches Approach 3,649 0 32 3,681 4,473 0 41 4,514 Departure 3,649 0 32 3,681 4,473 0 41 4,514 Total 7,298 0 64 7,362 8,946 0 82 9,028 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 6 . Main Street/E Memory Lane NBL 35 0 35 123 0 123 NBT 931 24 955 1,047 15 1,062 NBR 195 6 201 265 4 269 SBL 36 0 36 40 0 40 SBT 1,189 9 1,198 1,186 26 1,212 SBR 269 0 269 200 0 200 EBL 201 0 201 297 0 297 EBT 237 0 237 332 0 332 EBR 65 0 65 139 0 139 WBL 319 2 321 208 5 213 WBT 230 0 230 179 0 179 WBR 29 0 29 77 0 77 North Leg Approach 1,494 0 9 1,503 1,426 0 26 1,452 Departure 1,161 0 24 1,185 1,421 0 15 1,436 Total 2,655 0 33 2,688 2,847 0 41 2,888 South Leg Approach 1,161 0 30 1,191 1,435 0 19 1,454 Departure 1,573 0 11 1,584 1,533 0 31 1,564 Total 2,734 0 41 2,775 2,968 0 50 3,018 East Leg Approach 578 0 2 580 464 0 5 469 Departure 468 0 6 474 637 0 4 641 Total 1,046 0 8 1,054 1,101 0 9 1,110 West Leg Approach 503 0 0 503 768 0 0 768 Departure 534 0 0 534 502 0 0 502 Total 1,037 0 0 1,037 1,270 0 0 1,270 Total Approaches Approach 3,736 0 41 3,777 4,093 0 50 4,143 Departure 3,736 0 41 3,777 4,093 0 50 4,143 Total 7,472 0 82 7,554 8,186 0 100 8,286 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 7 . Main StreetlWalkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NBL 19 0 19 25 4 0 29 NBT 1,260 0 1,260 1,444 0 1,444 NBR 0 16 16 0 45 45 SBL 1 10 11 1 30 31 SBT 1,595 0 1,595 1,621 0 1,621 SBR 11 0 11 2 0 2 EBL 2 0 2 8 0 8 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 1 0 1 21 0 21 WBL 0 44 44 0 29 29 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 30 30 0 19 19 North Leg Approach 1,607 0 10 1,617 1,624 0 30 1,654 Departure 1,262 0 30 1,292 1,452 0 19 1,471 Total 2,869 0 40 2,909 3,076 0 49 3,125 South Leg Approach 1,279 0 16 1,295 1,469 4 45 1,518 Departure 1,596 0 44 1,640 1,642 0 29 1,671 Total 2,875 0 60 2,935 3,111 4 74 3,189 East Leg Approach 0 0 74 74 0 0 48 48 Departure 1 0 26 27 1 0 75 76 Total 1 0 100 101 1 0 123 124 West Leg Approach 3 0 0 3 29 0 0 29 Departure 30 0 0 30 27 4 0 31 Total 33 0 0 33 56 4 0 60 Total Approaches Approach 2,889 0 100 2,989 3,122 4 123 3,249 Departure 2,889 0 100 2,989 3,122 4 123 3,249 Total 5,778 0 200 5,978 6,244 8 246 6,498 AnalysislOY P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 8 . Main Street/Discovery Cube Driveway NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 1,282 16 1,298 1,460 -2 45 1,503 NBR 12 2 0 14 3 0 3 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 1,600 44 1,644 1,643 4 29 1,676 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 1 0 1 9 6 0 15 North Leg Approach 1,600 0 44 1,644 1,643 29 1,676 Departure 1,283 0 16 1,299 1,469 4 45 1,518 Total 2,883 0 60 2,943 3,112 4 74 3,194 South Leg Approach 1,294 2 16 1,312 1,463 -2 45 1,506 Departure 1,600 0 44 1,644 1,643 4 29 1,676 Total 2,894 2 60 2,956 3,106 2 74 3,182 East Leg Approach 1 0 0 1 9 6 0 15 Departure 12 2 0 14 3 0 0 3 Total 13 2 0 15 12 6 0 18 West Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Approaches Approach 2,895 2 60 2,957 3,115 4 74 3,197 Departure 2,895 2 60 2,957 3,115 8 74 3,197 Total 5,790 4 120 5,914 6,230 12 148 6,394 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 11 . Main Street/Buffalo Avenue-1-5 SB On Ramp NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 1,024 3 1,027 1,532 10 1,542 NBR 42 0 42 51 0 51 SBL 787 15 802 670 10 680 SBT 1,629 10 1,639 1,205 6 1,211 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 121 0 121 295 1 296 EBT 199 0 199 169 0 169 EBR 26 0 26 47 0 47 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 2,416 0 25 2,441 1,876 0 16 1,892 Departure 1,145 0 3 1,148 1,826 0 11 1,837 Total 3,561 0 28 3,589 3,702 0 27 3,729 South Leg Approach 1,066 0 3 1,069 1,583 0 10 1,593 Departure 1,655 0 10 1,665 1,252 0 6 1,258 Total 2,721 0 13 2,734 2,835 0 16 2,851 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 1,028 0 15 1,043 890 0 10 900 Total 1,028 0 15 1,043 890 0 10 900 West Leg Approach 346 0 0 346 511 0 1 512 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 346 0 0 346 511 0 1 512 Total Approaches Approach 3,828 0 28 3,856 3,969 0 27 3,996 Departure 3,828 0 28 3,856 3,969 0 27 3,996 Total 7,657 0 56 7,713 7,938 0 54 7,992 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 12 . Main Street117th Street NBL 210 0 210 208 0 208 NBT 761 1 762 1,137 4 1,141 NBR 196 0 196 214 0 214 SBL 194 2 196 213 1 214 SBT 1,197 4 1,201 853 2 855 SBR 126 4 130 165 2 167 EBL 160 1 161 221 4 225 EBT 1,295 0 1,295 1,286 0 1,286 EBR 86 0 86 67 0 67 WBL 363 0 363 213 0 213 WBT 1,411 0 1,411 1,103 0 1,103 WBR 37 1 38 79 2 81 North Leg Approach 1,517 0 10 1,527 1,231 0 5 1,236 Departure 958 0 3 961 1,437 0 10 1,447 Total 2,475 0 13 2,488 2,668 0 15 2,683 South Leg Approach 1,167 0 1 1,168 1,559 0 4 1,563 Departure 1,646 0 4 1,650 1,133 0 2 1,135 Total 2,813 0 5 2,818 2,692 0 6 2,698 East Leg Approach 1,811 0 1 1,812 1,395 0 2 1,397 Departure 1,685 0 2 1,687 1,713 0 1 1,714 Total 3,496 0 3 3,499 3,108 0 3 3,111 West Leg Approach 1,541 0 1 1,542 1,574 0 4 1,578 Departure 1,747 0 4 1,751 1,476 0 2 1,478 Total 3,288 0 5 3,293 3,050 0 6 3,056 Total Approaches Approach 6,036 0 13 6,049 5,759 0 15 5,774 Departure 6,036 0 13 6,049 5,759 0 15 5,774 Total 12,072 0 26 12,098 11,518 0 30 11,548 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 13 . Project Driveway 2-Bush Street/Edgewood Road NBL 59 0 59 86 0 86 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR 1 0 1 0 0 0 SBL 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 SBT 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 4 -4 0 0 EBL 2 -2 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 101 0 101 120 1 0 121 EBR 68 0 68 59 1 0 60 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 192 0 192 145 0 145 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 6 -6 0 0 Departure 2 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2 -2 0 0 6 -6 0 0 South Leg Approach 60 0 0 60 86 0 0 86 Departure 68 0 0 68 60 0 0 60 Total 128 0 0 128 146 0 0 146 East Leg Approach 192 0 0 192 145 0 0 145 Departure 102 0 0 102 121 0 0 121 Total 294 0 0 294 266 0 0 266 West Leg Approach 171 -2 0 169 179 2 0 181 Departure 251 0 0 251 235 -4 0 231 Total 422 -2 0 420 414 -2 0 412 Total Approaches Approach 423 -2 0 421 416 -4 0 412 Departure 423 -2 0 421 416 -4 0 412 Total 846 -4 0 842 832 -8 0 824 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 14 . SR-22 WB Ramps/La Veta Avenue NBL 922 0 3 925 439 0 10 449 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR 475 0 0 475 213 0 0 213 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 362 0 3 365 653 0 2 655 EBR 293 0 6 299 997 0 4 1,001 WBL 416 0 0 416 526 0 0 526 WBT 480 0 1 481 469 0 3 472 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Leg Approach 1,397 0 3 1,400 652 0 10 662 Departure 709 0 6 715 1,523 0 4 1,527 Total 2,106 0 9 2,115 2,175 0 14 2,189 East Leg Approach 896 0 1 897 995 0 3 998 Departure 837 0 3 840 866 0 2 868 Total 1,733 0 4 1,737 1,861 0 5 1,866 West Leg Approach 655 0 9 664 1,650 0 6 1,656 Departure 1,402 0 4 1,406 908 0 13 921 Total 2,057 0 13 2,070 2,558 0 19 2,577 Total Approaches Approach 2,948 0 13 2,961 3,297 0 19 3,316 Departure 2,948 0 13 2,961 3,297 0 19 3,316 Total 5,896 0 26 5,922 6,594 0 38 6,632 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 15 . SR-22 EB Ramps/Town & Country Road NBL 95 0 0 95 215 0 0 215 NBT 180 0 4 184 461 0 2 463 NBR 28 0 0 28 73 0 0 73 SBL 328 0 0 328 275 0 0 275 SBT 301 0 1 302 159 0 2 161 SBR 645 0 1 646 488 0 4 492 EBL 337 0 6 343 619 0 4 623 EBT 132 0 1 133 181 0 1 182 EBR 170 0 0 170 90 0 0 90 WBL 99 0 0 99 65 0 0 65 WBT 127 0 1 128 171 0 2 173 WBR 132 0 0 132 458 0 0 458 North Leg Approach 1,274 0 2 1,276 922 0 6 928 Departure 649 0 10 659 1,538 0 6 1,544 Total 1,923 0 12 1,935 2,460 0 12 2,472 South Leg Approach 303 0 4 307 749 0 2 751 Departure 570 0 1 571 314 0 2 316 Total 873 0 5 878 1,063 0 4 1,067 East Leg Approach 358 0 1 359 694 0 2 696 Departure 488 0 1 489 529 0 1 530 Total 846 0 2 848 1,223 0 3 1,226 West Leg Approach 639 0 7 646 890 0 5 895 Departure 867 0 2 869 874 0 6 880 Total 1,506 0 9 1,515 1,764 0 11 1,775 Total Approaches Approach 2,574 0 14 2,588 3,255 0 15 3,270 Departure 2,574 0 14 2,588 3,255 0 15 3,270 Total 5,148 0 28 5,176 6,510 0 30 6,540 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 16 . Memory Lane/Lawson Way NBL 1 0 0 1 9 0 0 9 NBT 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 NBR 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 6 SBL 17 0 0 17 17 0 0 17 SBT 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 SBR 341 0 1 342 190 0 2 192 EBL 149 0 4 153 398 0 2 400 EBT 259 0 2 261 279 0 1 280 EBR 7 0 0 7 15 0 0 15 WBL 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 WBT 304 0 1 305 200 0 2 202 WBR 8 0 0 8 18 0 0 18 North Leg Approach 359 0 1 360 211 0 2 213 Departure 160 0 4 164 418 0 2 420 Total 519 0 5 524 629 0 4 633 South Leg Approach 7 0 0 7 17 0 0 17 Departure 8 0 0 8 23 0 0 23 Total 15 0 0 15 40 0 0 40 East Leg Approach 312 0 1 313 222 0 2 224 Departure 279 0 2 281 302 0 1 303 Total 591 0 3 594 524 0 3 527 West Leg Approach 415 0 6 421 692 0 3 695 Departure 646 0 2 648 399 0 4 403 Total 1,061 0 8 1,069 1,091 0 7 1,098 Total Approaches Approach 1,093 0 8 1,101 1,142 0 7 1,149 Departure 1,093 0 8 1,101 1,142 0 7 1,149 Total 2,186 0 16 2,202 2,284 0 14 2,298 AnalysislOY P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour OY OY Project OY OY OY Project OY Without Without Trips Plus Without Without Trips Plus Project Project Project Project Project Project 9 . Main Street/Edgewood Road-11-5 Ramps NBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 499 1 10 510 963 30 993 NBR 93 -1 0 92 120 0 120 SBU 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 SBL 68 -1 0 67 111 2 0 113 SBT 1,533 44 1,577 1,533 2 29 1,564 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 155 0 155 123 -2 0 121 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 94 0 94 95 -2 0 93 NWBR 698 5 703 400 15 415 NWHR 22 0 22 10 0 10 North Leg Approach 1,601 0 44 1,645 1,644 4 29 1,677 Departure 1,292 2 15 1,309 1,458 -2 45 1,501 Total 2,893 2 59 2,954 3,102 2 74 3,178 South Leg Approach 592 0 10 602 1,083 0 30 1,113 Departure 1,688 0 44 1,732 1,656 0 29 1,685 Total 2,280 0 54 2,334 2,738 0 59 2,797 East Leg Approach 249 0 0 249 218 -4 0 214 Departure 183 -2 0 181 241 2 0 243 Total 432 -2 0 430 460 -2 0 458 West Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southeast Leg Approach 720 0 5 725 410 0 15 425 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 720 0 5 725 410 0 15 425 Total Approaches Approach 3,163 0 59 3,222 3,355 0 74 3,429 Departure 3,163 0 59 3,222 3,355 0 74 3,429 Total 6,326 0 118 6,444 6,710 0 148 6,858 Wmjs %W-225 W,i StreetNnalyss ORset September M9 ReviseiNna .%OY P r L% iMSar[u 911212019 Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E -Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour OY OY Project OY OY OY Project OY Without Without Trips Plus Without Without Trips Plus Project Project Project Project Project Project 10 . Main Street/Santa Clara Avenue-1-5 NB On Ramp NBU 0 0 NBL 7 0 NBT 470 4 NBR 667 0 SBU 0 0 SBL 91 12 SBT 1,490 24 SBR 107 8 EBU 0 0 EBL 125 7 EBT 418 0 EBR 204 0 WBU 0 0 WBL 0 0 WBT 0 0 WBR 0 0 SEBR 699 0 SEHR 32 0 North Leg Approach 1,688 0 44 Departure 594 0 11 Total 2,282 0 55 South Leg Approach 1,144 0 4 Departure 2,393 0 24 Total 3,537 0 28 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 Departure 1,176 0 12 Total 1,176 0 12 West Leg Approach 746 0 7 Departure 146 0 8 Total 892 0 15 Northwest Leg Approach 731 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 Total 731 0 0 Total Approaches Approach 4,309 0 55 Departure 4,309 0 55 Total 8,619 0 110 0 0 0 0 7 9 0 9 474 877 11 888 667 940 0 940 0 0 0 0 103 276 8 284 1,514 1,314 16 1,330 115 66 5 71 0 0 0 0 132 207 20 227 418 535 0 535 204 148 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 699 431 0 431 32 16 0 16 1,732 1,656 0 29 1,685 605 1,084 0 31 1,115 2,337 2,739 0 60 2,799 1,148 1,826 0 11 1,837 2,417 1,893 0 16 1,909 3,565 3,719 0 27 3,746 0 0 0 0 0 1,188 1,751 0 8 1,759 1,188 1,751 0 8 1,759 753 889 0 20 909 154 91 0 5 96 907 980 0 25 1,005 731 447 0 0 447 0 0 0 0 0 731 447 0 0 447 4,364 4,818 0 60 4,878 4,364 4,818 0 60 4,878 8,729 9,637 0 120 9,757 Wmjs %W-225 W,i StreetNnalyss ORset September M9 ReviseiNna .%OY P r L% iMSar[u 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 1 . Broadwayl1-5 SB Off Ramp NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 573 0 573 910 0 910 NBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 685 0 685 607 0 607 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 929 4 933 934 12 946 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 685 0 0 685 607 0 0 607 Departure 573 0 0 573 910 0 0 910 Total 1,258 0 0 1,258 1,517 0 0 1,517 South Leg Approach 573 0 0 573 910 0 0 910 Departure 1,614 0 4 1,618 1,541 0 12 1,553 Total 2,187 0 4 2,191 2,451 0 12 2,463 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Leg Approach 929 0 4 933 934 0 12 946 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 929 0 4 933 934 0 12 946 Total Approaches Approach 2,187 0 4 2,191 2,451 0 12 2,463 Departure 2,187 0 4 2,191 2,451 0 12 2,463 Total 4,374 0 8 4,382 4,902 0 24 4,926 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2. Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 393 0 393 730 0 730 NBR 364 3 367 447 8 455 SBL 51 4 55 148 12 160 SBT 1,568 0 1,568 1,393 0 1,393 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 177 0 177 172 0 172 EBT 342 0 342 248 0 248 EBR 206 0 206 72 0 72 WBL 81 8 89 96 5 101 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 6 0 6 15 0 15 North Leg Approach 1,619 0 4 1,623 1,541 0 12 1,553 Departure 576 0 0 576 917 0 0 917 Total 2,195 0 4 2,199 2,458 0 12 2,470 South Leg Approach 757 0 3 760 1,177 0 8 1,185 Departure 1,855 0 8 1,863 1,561 0 5 1,566 Total 2,612 0 11 2,623 2,738 0 13 2,751 East Leg Approach 87 0 8 95 111 0 5 116 Departure 757 0 7 764 843 0 20 863 Total 844 0 15 859 954 0 25 979 West Leg Approach 725 0 0 725 492 0 0 492 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 725 0 0 725 492 0 0 492 Total Approaches Approach 3,188 0 15 3,203 3,321 0 25 3,346 Departure 3,188 0 15 3,203 3,321 0 25 3,346 Total 6,376 0 30 6,406 6,642 0 50 6,692 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 3 . Broadway/Buffalo Avenue NBL 9 0 9 6 0 6 NBT 648 3 651 1,054 8 1,062 NBR 150 0 150 270 1 271 SBL 224 0 224 148 0 148 SBT 1,552 8 1,560 1,350 5 1,355 SBR 12 0 12 7 0 7 EBL 1 0 1 0 0 0 EBT 4 0 4 1 0 1 EBR 3 0 3 11 0 11 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 1,788 0 8 1,796 1,505 0 5 1,510 Departure 649 0 3 652 1,054 0 8 1,062 Total 2,437 0 11 2,448 2,559 0 13 2,572 South Leg Approach 807 0 3 810 1,330 0 9 1,339 Departure 1,555 0 8 1,563 1,361 0 5 1,366 Total 2,362 0 11 2,373 2,691 0 14 2,705 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 378 0 0 378 419 0 1 420 Total 378 0 0 378 419 0 1 420 West Leg Approach 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 12 Departure 21 0 0 21 13 0 0 13 Total 29 0 0 29 25 0 0 25 Total Approaches Approach 2,603 0 11 2,614 2,847 0 14 2,861 Departure 2,603 0 11 2,614 2,847 0 14 2,861 Total 5,206 0 22 5,228 5,694 0 28 5,722 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2,040 WP Project 2,040 2,040 WP Project 2,040 Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 4 . Main Street/La Veta Avenue NBL 94 2 96 335 1 336 NBT 950 5 955 1,446 3 1,449 NBR 364 9 373 531 6 537 SBL 225 0 225 184 0 184 SBT 1,499 2 1,501 1,080 5 1,085 SBR 158 0 158 258 0 258 EBL 437 0 437 387 0 387 EBT 515 0 515 457 0 457 EBR 263 1 264 219 2 221 WBL 331 4 335 318 13 331 WBT 344 0 344 549 0 549 WBR 226 0 226 302 0 302 North Leg Approach 1,882 0 2 1,884 1,522 0 5 1,527 Departure 1,613 0 5 1,618 2,135 0 3 2,138 Total 3,495 0 7 3,502 3,657 0 8 3,665 South Leg Approach 1,408 0 16 1,424 2,312 0 10 2,322 Departure 2,093 0 7 2,100 1,617 0 20 1,637 Total 3,501 0 23 3,524 3,929 0 30 3,959 East Leg Approach 901 0 4 905 1,169 0 13 1,182 Departure 1,104 0 9 1,113 1,172 0 6 1,178 Total 2,005 0 13 2,018 2,341 0 19 2,360 West Leg Approach 1,215 0 1 1,216 1,063 0 2 1,065 Departure 596 0 2 598 1,142 0 1 1,143 Total 1,811 0 3 1,814 2,205 0 3 2,208 Total Approaches Approach 5,406 0 23 5,429 6,066 0 30 6,096 Departure 5,406 0 23 5,429 6,066 0 30 6,096 Total 10,812 0 46 10,858 12,132 0 60 12,192 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 5 . Main Street/Town and Country Road NBL 56 0 56 73 0 73 NBT 1,226 16 1,242 1,607 11 1,618 NBR 168 7 175 250 5 255 SBL 318 0 318 545 0 545 SBT 1,519 7 1,526 1,203 20 1,223 SBR 40 0 40 126 0 126 EBL 26 0 26 135 0 135 EBT 74 0 74 165 0 165 EBR 72 0 72 143 0 143 WBL 311 2 313 240 5 245 WBT 72 0 72 113 0 113 WBR 523 0 523 475 0 475 North Leg Approach 1,877 0 7 1,884 1,874 0 20 1,894 Departure 1,775 0 16 1,791 2,217 0 11 2,228 Total 3,652 0 23 3,675 4,091 0 31 4,122 South Leg Approach 1,450 0 23 1,473 1,930 0 16 1,946 Departure 1,902 0 9 1,911 1,586 0 25 1,611 Total 3,352 0 32 3,384 3,516 0 41 3,557 East Leg Approach 906 0 2 908 828 0 5 833 Departure 560 0 7 567 960 0 5 965 Total 1,466 0 9 1,475 1,788 0 10 1,798 West Leg Approach 172 0 0 172 443 0 0 443 Departure 168 0 0 168 312 0 0 312 Total 340 0 0 340 755 0 0 755 Total Approaches Approach 4,405 0 32 4,437 5,075 0 41 5,116 Departure 4,405 0 32 4,437 5,075 0 41 5,116 Total 8,810 0 64 8,874 10,150 0 82 10,232 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 6 . Main Street/E Memory Lane NBL 37 0 37 129 0 129 NBT 1,130 24 1,154 1,363 15 1,378 NBR 239 6 245 278 4 282 SBL 37 0 37 42 0 42 SBT 1,443 9 1,452 1,264 26 1,290 SBR 310 0 310 210 0 210 EBL 238 0 238 398 0 398 EBT 249 0 249 349 0 349 EBR 68 0 68 154 0 154 WBL 335 2 337 223 5 228 WBT 242 0 242 188 0 188 WBR 30 0 30 84 0 84 North Leg Approach 1,790 0 9 1,799 1,516 0 26 1,542 Departure 1,398 0 24 1,422 1,845 0 15 1,860 Total 3,188 0 33 3,221 3,361 0 41 3,402 South Leg Approach 1,406 0 30 1,436 1,770 0 19 1,789 Departure 1,846 0 11 1,857 1,641 0 31 1,672 Total 3,252 0 41 3,293 3,411 0 50 3,461 East Leg Approach 607 0 2 609 495 0 5 500 Departure 525 0 6 531 669 0 4 673 Total 1,132 0 8 1,140 1,164 0 9 1,173 West Leg Approach 555 0 0 555 901 0 0 901 Departure 589 0 0 589 527 0 0 527 Total 1,144 0 0 1,144 1,428 0 0 1,428 Total Approaches Approach 4,358 0 41 4,399 4,682 0 50 4,732 Departure 4,358 0 41 4,399 4,682 0 50 4,732 Total 8,716 0 82 8,798 9,364 0 100 9,464 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2,040 WP Project 2,040 2,040 WP Project 2,040 Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 7 . Main StreetlWalkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NBL 21 0 NBT 1,482 0 NBR 0 16 SBL 1 10 SBT 1,729 0 SBR 12 0 EBL 2 0 EBT 0 0 EBR 1 0 WBL 0 44 WBT 0 0 WBR 0 30 North Leg Approach 1,742 0 10 Departure 1,484 0 30 Total 3,226 0 40 South Leg Approach 1,503 0 16 Departure 1,730 0 44 Total 3,233 0 60 East Leg Approach 0 0 74 Departure 1 0 26 Total 1 0 100 West Leg Approach 3 0 0 Departure 33 0 0 Total 36 0 0 Total Approaches Approach 3,248 0 100 Departure 3,248 0 100 Total 6,496 0 200 21 28 4 0 32 1,482 1,731 0 1,731 16 0 45 45 11 1 30 31 1,729 1,781 0 1,781 12 2 0 2 2 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 24 0 24 44 0 29 29 0 0 0 0 30 0 19 19 1,752 1,784 0 30 1,814 1,514 1,740 0 19 1,759 3,266 3,525 0 49 3,574 1,519 1,759 4 45 1,808 1,774 1,805 0 29 1,834 3,293 3,564 4 74 3,642 74 0 0 48 48 27 1 0 75 76 101 1 0 123 124 3 33 0 0 33 33 30 4 0 34 36 63 4 0 67 3,348 3,576 4 123 3,703 3,348 3,576 4 123 3,703 6,696 7,152 8 246 7,406 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak Hour WP Project Adjust. Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak Hour WP Project Adjust. Trips 2,040 With Project 8 . Main Street/Discovery Cube Driveway NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 1,502 16 1,518 1,750 -2 45 1,793 NBR 13 2 0 15 3 0 3 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 1,729 44 1,773 1,805 4 29 1,838 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 1 0 1 9 6 0 15 North Leg Approach 1,729 0 44 1,773 1,805 4 29 1,838 Departure 1,503 0 16 1,519 1,759 4 45 1,808 Total 3,232 0 60 3,292 3,564 8 74 3,646 South Leg Approach 1,515 2 16 1,533 1,753 -2 45 1,796 Departure 1,729 0 44 1,773 1,805 4 29 1,838 Total 3,244 2 60 3,306 3,558 2 74 3,634 East Leg Approach 1 0 0 1 9 6 0 15 Departure 13 2 0 15 3 0 0 3 Total 14 2 0 16 12 6 0 18 West Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Approaches Approach 3,245 2 60 3,307 3,567 8 74 3,649 Departure 3,245 2 60 3,307 3,567 8 74 3,649 Total 6,490 4 120 6,614 7,134 16 148 7,298 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 11 . Main Street/Buffalo Avenue-1-5 SB On Ramp NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 1,196 3 1,199 1,721 10 1,731 NBR 44 0 44 54 0 54 SBL 826 15 841 721 10 731 SBT 1,710 10 1,720 1,266 6 1,272 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 135 0 135 369 1 370 EBT 209 0 209 177 0 177 EBR 27 0 27 49 0 49 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 2,536 0 25 2,561 1,987 0 16 2,003 Departure 1,330 0 3 1,333 2,090 0 11 2,101 Total 3,866 0 28 3,894 4,077 0 27 4,104 South Leg Approach 1,240 0 3 1,243 1,775 0 10 1,785 Departure 1,737 0 10 1,747 1,315 0 6 1,321 Total 2,977 0 13 2,990 3,090 0 16 3,106 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 1,079 0 15 1,094 952 0 10 962 Total 1,079 0 15 1,094 952 0 10 962 West Leg Approach 371 0 0 371 595 0 1 596 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 371 0 0 371 595 0 1 596 Total Approaches Approach 4,146 0 28 4,174 4,357 0 27 4,384 Departure 4,146 0 28 4,174 4,357 0 27 4,384 Total 8,293 0 56 8,349 8,715 0 54 8,769 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2,040 WP Project 2,040 2,040 WP Project 2,040 Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 12 . Main Street117th Street NBL 221 0 221 240 0 240 NBT 821 1 822 1,194 4 1,198 NBR 201 0 201 225 0 225 SBL 223 2 225 224 1 225 SBT 1,257 4 1,261 896 2 898 SBR 132 4 136 173 2 175 EBL 168 1 169 223 4 227 EBT 1,486 0 1,486 1,306 0 1,306 EBR 90 0 90 70 0 70 WBL 381 0 381 224 0 224 WBT 1,482 0 1,482 1,211 0 1,211 WBR 39 1 40 83 2 85 North Leg Approach 1,612 0 10 1,622 1,293 0 5 1,298 Departure 1,028 0 3 1,031 1,500 0 10 1,510 Total 2,640 0 13 2,653 2,793 0 15 2,808 South Leg Approach 1,243 0 1 1,244 1,659 0 4 1,663 Departure 1,728 0 4 1,732 1,190 0 2 1,192 Total 2,971 0 5 2,976 2,849 0 6 2,855 East Leg Approach 1,902 0 1 1,903 1,518 0 2 1,520 Departure 1,910 0 2 1,912 1,755 0 1 1,756 Total 3,812 0 3 3,815 3,273 0 3 3,276 West Leg Approach 1,744 0 1 1,745 1,599 0 4 1,603 Departure 1,835 0 4 1,839 1,624 0 2 1,626 Total 3,579 0 5 3,584 3,223 0 6 3,229 Total Approaches Approach 6,501 0 13 6,514 6,069 0 15 6,084 Departure 6,501 0 13 6,514 6,069 0 15 6,084 Total 13,002 0 26 13,028 12,138 0 30 12,168 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2,040 WP Project 2,040 2,040 WP Project 2,040 Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 13 . Project Driveway 2-Bush Street/Edgewood Road NBL 64 0 NBT 0 0 NBR 1 0 SBL 0 0 SBT 0 0 SBR 0 0 EBL 2 -2 0 EBT 107 0 EBR 74 0 WBL 0 0 WBT 200 0 WBR 0 0 North Leg Approach 0 0 0 Departure 2 -2 0 Total 2 -2 0 South Leg Approach 65 0 0 Departure 74 0 0 Total 139 0 0 East Leg Approach 200 0 0 Departure 108 0 0 Total 308 0 0 West Leg Approach 183 -2 0 Departure 264 0 0 Total 447 -2 0 Total Approaches Approach 448 -2 0 Departure 448 -2 0 Total 896 -4 0 64 94 0 94 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 4 -4 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 128 1 0 129 74 64 1 0 65 0 0 0 0 200 156 0 156 0 0 0 0 0 6 -6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 -6 0 0 65 94 0 0 94 74 65 0 0 65 139 159 0 0 159 200 156 0 0 156 108 129 0 0 129 308 285 0 0 285 181 192 2 0 194 264 254 -4 0 250 445 446 -2 0 444 446 448 -4 0 444 446 448 -4 0 444 892 896 -8 0 888 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 14 . SR-22 WB Ramps/La Veta Avenue NBL 968 0 3 971 461 0 10 471 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR 527 0 0 527 224 0 0 224 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 416 0 3 419 669 0 2 671 EBR 308 0 6 314 1,047 0 4 1,051 WBL 437 0 0 437 576 0 0 576 WBT 520 0 1 521 484 0 3 487 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Leg Approach 1,495 0 3 1,498 685 0 10 695 Departure 745 0 6 751 1,623 0 4 1,627 Total 2,240 0 9 2,249 2,308 0 14 2,322 East Leg Approach 957 0 1 958 1,060 0 3 1,063 Departure 943 0 3 946 893 0 2 895 Total 1,900 0 4 1,904 1,953 0 5 1,958 West Leg Approach 724 0 9 733 1,716 0 6 1,722 Departure 1,488 0 4 1,492 945 0 13 958 Total 2,212 0 13 2,225 2,661 0 19 2,680 Total Approaches Approach 3,176 0 13 3,189 3,461 0 19 3,480 Departure 3,176 0 13 3,189 3,461 0 19 3,480 Total 6,352 0 26 6,378 6,922 0 38 6,960 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 15 . SR-22 EB Ramps/Town & Country Road NBL 100 0 0 100 247 0 0 247 NBT 189 0 4 193 462 0 2 464 NBR 33 0 0 33 77 0 0 77 SBL 344 0 0 344 289 0 0 289 SBT 340 0 1 341 167 0 2 169 SBR 677 0 1 678 512 0 4 516 EBL 354 0 6 360 650 0 4 654 EBT 146 0 1 147 190 0 1 191 EBR 196 0 0 196 95 0 0 95 WBL 104 0 0 104 68 0 0 68 WBT 133 0 1 134 174 0 2 176 WBR 139 0 0 139 481 0 0 481 North Leg Approach 1,361 0 2 1,363 968 0 6 974 Departure 682 0 10 692 1,593 0 6 1,599 Total 2,043 0 12 2,055 2,561 0 12 2,573 South Leg Approach 322 0 4 326 786 0 2 788 Departure 640 0 1 641 330 0 2 332 Total 962 0 5 967 1,116 0 4 1,120 East Leg Approach 376 0 1 377 723 0 2 725 Departure 523 0 1 524 556 0 1 557 Total 899 0 2 901 1,279 0 3 1,282 West Leg Approach 696 0 7 703 935 0 5 940 Departure 910 0 2 912 933 0 6 939 Total 1,606 0 9 1,615 1,868 0 11 1,879 Total Approaches Approach 2,755 0 14 2,769 3,412 0 15 3,427 Departure 2,755 0 14 2,769 3,412 0 15 3,427 Total 5,510 0 28 5,538 6,824 0 30 6,854 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 16 . Memory Lane/Lawson Way NBL 1 0 0 1 9 0 0 9 NBT 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 NBR 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 7 SBL 18 0 0 18 22 0 0 22 SBT 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 SBR 358 0 1 359 200 0 2 202 EBL 173 0 4 177 418 0 2 420 EBT 296 0 2 298 355 0 1 356 EBR 7 0 0 7 16 0 0 16 WBL 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 WBT 315 0 1 316 233 0 2 235 WBR 8 0 0 8 19 0 0 19 North Leg Approach 377 0 1 378 226 0 2 228 Departure 184 0 4 188 439 0 2 441 Total 561 0 5 566 665 0 4 669 South Leg Approach 7 0 0 7 18 0 0 18 Departure 8 0 0 8 24 0 0 24 Total 15 0 0 15 42 0 0 42 East Leg Approach 323 0 1 324 256 0 2 258 Departure 317 0 2 319 384 0 1 385 Total 640 0 3 643 640 0 3 643 West Leg Approach 476 0 6 482 789 0 3 792 Departure 674 0 2 676 442 0 4 446 Total 1,150 0 8 1,158 1,231 0 7 1,238 Total Approaches Approach 1,183 0 8 1,191 1,289 0 7 1,296 Departure 1,183 0 8 1,191 1,289 0 7 1,296 Total 2,366 0 16 2,382 2,578 0 14 2,592 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2,040 2,040 Project 2,040 2,040 2,040 Project 2,040 Without Without Trips Plus Without Without Trips Plus Project Project Project Project Project Project 9 . Main StreetlEdgewood Road-11-5 Ramps NBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 688 1 10 699 1,232 30 1,262 NBR 98 -1 0 97 128 0 128 SBU 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 SBL 71 -1 0 70 118 2 0 120 SBT 1,658 44 1,702 1,687 2 29 1,718 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 160 0 160 134 -2 0 132 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 101 0 101 101 -2 0 99 NWBR 726 5 731 420 15 435 NWHR 24 0 24 11 0 11 North Leg Approach 1,729 0 44 1,773 1,805 4 29 1,838 Departure 1,515 2 15 1,532 1,753 -2 45 1,796 Total 3,244 2 59 3,305 3,558 2 74 3,634 South Leg Approach 786 0 10 796 1,360 0 30 1,390 Departure 1,818 0 44 1,862 1,821 0 29 1,850 Total 2,604 0 54 2,658 3,181 0 59 3,240 East Leg Approach 261 0 0 261 235 A 0 231 Departure 193 -2 0 191 257 2 0 259 Total 454 -2 0 452 493 -2 0 491 West Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southeast Leg Approach 750 0 5 755 431 0 15 446 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 750 0 5 755 431 0 15 446 Total Approaches Approach 3,526 0 59 3,585 3,831 0 74 3,905 Departure 3,526 0 59 3,585 3,831 0 74 3,905 Total 7,052 0 118 7,170 7,663 0 148 7,811 D:Wmjs %W-225 Main Stre `Anatys Of1sIX September 2919 Revise mllysrs12059 P&1e9 TMSantiago Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E -Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2,040 2,040 Project 2,040 2,040 2,040 Project 2,040 Without Without Trips Plus Without Without Trips Plus Project Project Project Project Project Project 10 . Main Street/Santa Clara Avenue-1-5 NB On Ramp NBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBL 8 0 8 10 0 10 NBT 605 4 609 1,070 11 1,081 NBR 717 0 717 1,010 0 1,010 SBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 148 12 160 356 8 364 SBT 1,555 24 1,579 1,397 16 1,413 SBR 115 8 123 68 5 73 EBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 181 7 188 290 20 310 EBT 458 0 458 586 0 586 EBR 223 0 223 162 0 162 WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEBR 744 0 744 467 0 467 SEHR 36 0 36 18 0 18 North Leg Approach 1,818 0 44 1,862 1,821 0 29 1,850 Departure 786 0 11 797 1,360 0 31 1,391 Total 2,604 0 55 2,659 3,181 0 60 3,241 South Leg Approach 1,330 0 4 1,334 2,090 0 11 2,101 Departure 2,522 0 24 2,546 2,026 0 16 2,042 Total 3,852 0 28 3,880 4,116 0 27 4,143 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 1,323 0 12 1,335 1,952 0 8 1,960 Total 1,323 0 12 1,335 1,952 0 8 1,960 West Leg Approach 862 0 7 869 1,038 0 20 1,058 Departure 159 0 8 167 96 0 5 101 Total 1,020 0 15 1,035 1,134 0 25 1,159 Northwest Leg Approach 780 0 0 780 485 0 0 485 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 780 0 0 780 485 0 0 485 Total Approaches Approach 4,790 0 55 4,845 5,434 0 60 5,494 Departure 4,790 0 55 4,845 5,434 0 60 5,494 Total 9,580 0 110 9,690 10,868 0 120 10,988 D:Wmjs %W-225 Main Stre `Anatys Of1sIX September 2919 Revise mllysrs12059 P&1e9 TMSantiago Table B-4 - Existing With Option E -Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Roadway Segment Daily Volume Worksheet Roadway Segment Existing 2017 Daily Project Trips Existing Plus Project Santa Clara Avenue 1 Broadway to Main Street 9,344 280 9,624 Buffalo Avenue 2 Broadway to Main Street 4,293 s 4,301 Main Street 3 Town and Country Road to La Veta Street 34,853 370 35,223 4 Memory Lane to Town and Country Road 30,066 499 30,565 5 1-5 Northbound Ramps to Memory Lane 31,196 908 32,104 6 1-5 Northbound Ramps to 15 Southbound On -Ramp 27,140 756 27,896 7 South of 1-5 Southbound On -Ramp to 17th Street 30,532 198 30,730 La Veta Avenue 8 Main Street to SR-22 Westbound Ramps 24,136 220 24,356 Town and Country Road 9 Main Street to Lawson Way 18,649 129 18,778 Memory Lane 10 Main Street to Lawson Way 9,500 1 107 1 9,607 D:AProjedsARE - 2525 Main StreedMalysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAxRomlw y LOSAExist P Santiago V olomes (9/12/2019) Table B-5 -Opening Year Cumulative With Option E -Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Roadway Segment Daily Volume Worksheet Roadway Segment OY NP Daily Project Trips OY With Project Santa Clara Avenue 1 Broadway to Main Street 9,479 280 9,759 Buffalo Avenue 2 Broadway to Main Street 4,355 s 4,363 Main Street 3 Town and Country Road to La Veta Street 39,066 370 39,436 4 Memory Lane to Town and Country Road 32,972 499 33,471. 5 1-5 Northbound Ramps to Memory Lane 34,976 908 35,884 6 1-5 Northbound Ramps to 15 Southbound On -Ramp 31,460 756 32,216 7 South of 1-5 Southbound On -Ramp to 17th Street 33,679 198 33,877 La Veta Avenue 8 Main Street to SR-22 Westbound Ramps 26,222 220 26,442 Town and Country Road 9 Main Street to Lawson Way 23,294 129 23,423 Memory Lane 10 Main Street to Lawson Way 11,794 1 107 1 11,901 D:AProjedsARE - 2525 Main StmedMalysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAxRomlw y LOSAOY P Santiago Volumes (9/12/2019) Table B-6 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Roadway Segment Daily Volume Worksheet Roadway Segment 2040 NP Daily Project Trips 2040 With Project Santa Clara Avenue 1 Broadway to Main Street 10,382 280 10,662 Buffalo Avenue 2 Broadway to Main Street 4,770 8 4,778 Main Street 3 Town and Country Road to La Veta Street 41,530 370 41,900 4 Memory Lane to Town and Country Road 34,935 499 35,434 5 1-5 Northbound Ramps to Memory Lane 35,210 908 36,118 6 1-5 Northbound Ramps to 15 Southbound On -Ramp 33,033 756 33,789 7 South of 1-5 Southbound On -Ramp to 17th Street 35,363 198 35,561 La Veta Avenue 8 Main Street to SR-22 Westbound Ramps 27,533 220 27,753 Town and Country Road 9 Main Street to Lawson Way 24,459 129 24,588 Memory Lane 10 Main Street to Lawson Way 12,384 1 107 1 12,491 D:AProjedsARE - 2525 Main StmedMalysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAxRomlw y LOSA2040 P Santiago Volumes (9/12/2019) ! (§ ! !m )!CL ;; 0 ;i\))\\ 9 z t !.9m2 2 § :: ¥§ ) §!G@\ / !�e!- (§ ! !m )!CL ;; 0 !i\))\\ 9 z t !.9m2 2 §);/ !7/ Memorandum: The Addington Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis ATTACHMENT B: LOS WORKSHEETS P%RE-2525 MAIN STREEMNALYSIS OFFSEFSEPTENBER Z1MIEWSNPPLENENTALANALYSIS N X SW.3,F 19 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Broadway & 1-5 SB Off -Ramp 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow r ++ ++ 891 0 435 605 0 891 0 435 605 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 96 96 96 96 96 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 928 0 453 630 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 1 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 - 0 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 0 - HCM Lane LOS - A - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - - The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago ParkM/alkie Way 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j T+ 41) ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 0 0 0 19 1249 0 1 1351 11 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 0 0 0 19 1249 0 1 1351 11 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 0 1 0 0 0 21 1373 0 1 1485 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 683 0 555 0 654 0 30 2676 0 2 2656 21 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 5274 0 1781 5225 42 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 0 1 0 0 0 21 1373 0 1 968 529 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1863 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 23.4 23.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 23.4 23.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 683 0 555 0 654 0 30 2676 0 2 1730 947 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.51 0.00 0.51 0.56 0.56 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 683 0 555 0 654 0 193 2676 0 193 1730 947 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.68 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.4 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.7 0.0 0.0 59.9 20.3 20.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.7 0.0 44.3 0.9 1.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.1 9.3 10.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.4 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 0.7 0.0 104.2 21.2 21.9 LnGrp LOS C A C A A A E A A F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 3 0 1394 1498 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.4 0.0 1.7 21.5 Approach LOS C A C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 47.0 7.0 66.0 47.0 5.1 67.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 13.0 61.0 31.0 13.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.1 3.4 25.4 0.0 2.1 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 0.0 9.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 12.0 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 1 1271 12 0 1 1271 12 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 1 1382 92 92 2 2 13 0 1356 1356 0 Free None 0 0 92 2 1474 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 698 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 328 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 0 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 328 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 328 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0 - The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 119 196 26 0 0 0 0 976 33 717 1418 0 Future Volume (vehrh) 119 196 26 0 0 0 0 976 33 717 1418 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 127 209 28 0 1038 35 763 1509 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 158 278 38 0 1712 58 1449 4056 0 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.56 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1208 2127 293 0 5241 171 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 190 0 174 0 696 377 763 1509 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/lnl810 0 1818 0 1702 1840 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.3 0.0 11.0 0.0 20.4 20.5 16.6 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.3 0.0 11.0 0.0 20.4 20.5 16.6 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.67 0.16 0.00 0.09 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 236 0 237 0 1149 621 1449 4056 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.53 0.37 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 354 0 356 0 1149 621 1449 4056 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.51 0.51 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.7 0.0 50.1 0.0 33.1 33.1 19.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.9 0.0 4.3 0.0 2.4 4.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr6.1 0.0 5.3 0.0 8.8 9.8 5.9 0.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 58.6 0.0 54.4 0.0 35.5 37.5 19.3 0.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A D A D D B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 364 1073 2272 Approach Delay, s/veh 56.6 36.2 6.6 Approach LOS E D A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),54.8 45.0 20.2 99.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (GmaqS 40.5 23.5 87.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+[M,6; 22.5 14.3 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.0 7.0 1.4 18.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 20.0 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.6 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44 44 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 2 96 67 0 180 0 58 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 2 96 67 0 180 0 58 0 1 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 116 81 0 217 0 70 0 1 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RighNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.3 8.8 8.6 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 58% 100% 100% 2% 41% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 59 165 180 0 58 2 0 0 0 96 180 0 1 67 0 0 71 199 217 0 1 1 1 1 0.099 0.226 0.26 0 5.01 4.101 4.314 4.929 Yes Yes Yes Yes 717 879 835 0 3.031 2.115 2.327 2.955 0.099 0.226 0.26 0 8.6 8.3 8.8 8 A A A N 0.3 0.9 1 0 The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/03/2019 Movement --10 -�* 4\ /,* I�:i��:la9r1:1�9r1:i9� �I:l� �I:l 7 Lane Configurations ttlL r ►j ttt ►) jr Traffic Volume (veh/h) 332 233 266 454 899 479 Future Volume (veh/h) 332 233 266 454 899 479 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 369 0 296 504 999 532 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Q Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1455 339 2713 1231 866 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.00 0.19 0.53 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 369 0 296 504 999 532 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 0.0 12.9 4.1 20.9 18.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 0.0 12.9 4.1 20.9 18.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1455 339 2713 1231 866 V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.87 0.19 0.81 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1455 412 2713 1231 866 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.0 0.0 31.5 9.8 23.3 12.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 16.1 0.2 5.9 3.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr9.8 0.0 6.9 1.4 9.0 6.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.5 0.0 47.5 9.9 29.2 15.6 LnGrp LOS C D A C B Approach Vol, veh/h 369 A 800 1531 Approach Delay, s/veh 22.5 23.8 24.5 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), fi9.7 27.3 47.0 33.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmalo S 19.5 42.5 28.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+[M,9; 6.5 6.1 22.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 2.0 3.8 3.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 24.0 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/03/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 304 104 118 65 64 107 25 128 20 348 309 609 Future Volume (veh/h) 304 104 118 65 64 107 25 128 20 348 309 609 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 342 117 133 73 72 120 28 144 22 391 600 516 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 357 208 237 94 746 333 356 620 93 511 536 454 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.29 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 799 908 1781 3554 1585 1781 3098 465 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 342 0 250 73 72 120 28 81 85 391 600 516 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/lnl728 0 1707 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1787 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.9 0.0 11.4 3.6 1.5 5.8 1.1 3.5 3.6 18.1 25.8 25.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.9 0.0 11.4 3.6 1.5 5.8 1.1 3.5 3.6 18.1 25.8 25.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 357 0 445 94 746 333 356 355 357 511 536 454 V/C Ratio(X) 0.96 0.00 0.56 0.78 0.10 0.36 0.08 0.23 0.24 0.77 1.12 1.14 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 357 0 445 129 746 333 356 355 357 511 536 454 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh40.2 0.0 28.8 42.1 28.7 30.4 29.3 30.2 30.2 29.3 32.1 32.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 36.5 0.0 5.1 18.3 0.3 3.0 0.4 1.5 1.6 10.5 75.9 84.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/Ir5.5 0.0 5.2 2.1 0.6 2.5 0.5 1.6 1.7 9.0 22.5 20.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 76.7 0.0 33.9 60.4 28.9 33.4 29.7 31.7 31.8 39.8 108.0 117.0 LnGrp LOS E A C E C C C C C D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 592 265 194 1507 Approach Delay, s/veh 58.6 39.6 31.4 93.4 Approach LOS E D C F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.2 28.0 30.3 13.8 23.4 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma)4,5 21.7 25.8 9.3 18.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l'�,6; 13.4 27.8 10.9 7.8 5.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 75.1 HCM 6th LOS E User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & 1-5 NB Ramps/Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR2 WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL2 SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r ►) ++T+ ►j +TT r Traffic Volume (vph) 6 5 79 129 15 91 77 471 83 64 1275 17 Future Volume (vph) 6 5 79 129 15 91 77 471 83 64 1275 17 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 1583 1783 1583 3433 4971 1770 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.85 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1585 1583 1377 1583 3433 4971 1770 5085 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 5 86 140 16 99 84 512 90 70 1386 18 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 74 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 11 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 12 12 0 156 14 84 602 0 70 1386 7 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 4.0 39.8 7.8 43.6 43.6 Effective Green, g (s) 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 4.0 39.8 7.8 43.6 43.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.33 0.06 0.36 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 221 221 192 221 114 1648 115 1847 575 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.12 0.04 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.01 c0.11 0.01 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.05 0.81 0.06 0.74 0.37 0.61 0.75 0.01 Uniform Delay, d1 44.7 44.7 50.1 44.8 57.5 30.5 54.6 33.4 24.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.13 0.67 0.59 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 22.4 0.1 21.1 0.6 7.9 2.6 0.0 Delay (s) 44.8 44.8 72.4 44.9 81.9 35.0 44.5 22.4 24.5 Level of Service D D E D F C D C C Approach Delay (s) 44.8 61.7 40.7 23.5 Approach LOS D E D C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 37.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & 1-5 NB Ramps/Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 t r Movement I0PDICa0LTA I.: Traffic Volume (vph) 714 22 Future Volume (vph) 714 22 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.88 Frt 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2787 Flt Permitted 1.00 Q Satd. Flow (perm) 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 776 24 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 800 0 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 9 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 37.6 Effective Green, g (s) 37.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 873 v/s Ratio Prot c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.92 Uniform Delay, d1 39.7 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 14.1 Delay (s) 53.8 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 127 396 201 7 504 584 58 1320 105 591 32 Future Volume (vph) 127 396 201 7 504 584 58 1320 105 591 32 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3219 3433 5085 1583 3433 5029 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3219 3433 5085 1583 3433 5029 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 135 421 214 7 536 621 62 1404 112 629 34 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 45 0 0 0 402 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 121 604 0 7 536 219 62 1516 0 663 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.3 24.3 1.0 40.2 40.2 6.8 46.0 30.7 Effective Green, g (s) 24.3 24.3 1.0 40.2 40.2 6.8 46.0 30.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.38 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 326 651 28 1703 530 194 1927 713 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.19 0.00 0.11 0.02 c0.30 c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm c0.14 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.93 0.25 0.31 0.41 0.32 0.79 0.93 Uniform Delay, d1 41.3 47.0 59.1 29.7 30.8 54.4 32.7 43.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.53 0.43 4.12 0.49 0.23 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 19.5 3.9 0.4 2.0 0.7 2.3 18.4 Delay (s) 42.0 66.5 94.4 13.3 128.9 27.1 10.0 62.0 Level of Service D E F B F C B E Approach Delay (s) 62.6 75.5 10.7 Approach LOS E E B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 46.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Broadway & 1-5 SB Off -Ramp 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow r ++ ++ 835 0 778 569 0 835 0 778 569 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 96 96 96 96 96 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 870 0 810 593 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 1 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 - 0 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 0 - HCM Lane LOS - A - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - - The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago ParkM/alkie Way 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j T+ 41) ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 0 0 0 25 1227 0 1 1534 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 0 0 0 25 1227 0 1 1534 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 0 23 0 0 0 27 1319 0 1 1649 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 678 0 550 0 649 0 35 2691 0 2 2677 3 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 5274 0 1781 5267 6 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 0 23 0 0 0 27 1319 0 1 1066 585 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1869 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 26.9 26.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 26.9 26.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 678 0 550 0 649 0 35 2691 0 2 1730 950 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.49 0.00 0.51 0.62 0.62 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 678 0 550 0 649 0 193 2691 0 193 1730 950 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.66 0.66 0.66 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.7 0.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.4 0.0 0.0 59.9 21.1 21.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.5 0.6 0.0 96.6 1.1 2.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 10.7 12.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.8 0.0 26.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 85.8 0.6 0.0 156.5 22.2 23.1 LnGrp LOS C A C A A A F A A F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 32 0 1346 1652 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.0 0.0 2.4 22.6 Approach LOS C A C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.6 7.4 66.0 46.6 5.1 68.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 13.0 61.0 31.0 13.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.2 3.8 28.9 0.0 2.1 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 15.5 0.0 0.0 14.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 13.6 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 9 1243 3 0 9 1243 3 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 10 1351 92 92 2 2 3 0 1555 1555 0 Free None 0 0 92 2 1690 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 677 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 339 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 0 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 339 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.9 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 339 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.029 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 15.9 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0.1 - The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 291 167 46 0 0 0 0 1398 38 679 1103 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 291 167 46 0 0 0 0 1398 38 679 1103 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 310 178 49 0 1487 40 722 1173 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 351 278 77 0 1896 51 1105 3718 0 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.64 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1412 389 0 5280 138 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 310 0 227 0 990 537 722 1173 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1800 0 1702 1846 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 20.3 0.0 13.9 0.0 31.0 31.0 15.5 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.3 0.0 13.9 0.0 31.0 31.0 15.5 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.07 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 351 0 354 0 1262 684 1105 3718 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.65 0.32 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 396 0 401 0 1262 684 1105 3718 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.70 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.9 0.0 44.3 0.0 33.5 33.5 17.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 18.9 0.0 2.8 0.0 4.9 8.8 1.0 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/Ilr0.8 0.0 6.5 0.0 13.5 15.4 4.4 0.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 65.7 0.0 47.1 0.0 38.4 42.3 18.5 0.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A D A D D B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 537 1527 1895 Approach Delay, s/veh 57.9 39.8 7.1 Approach LOS E D A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),42.9 49.0 28.1 91.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma'0,3 44.5 26.7 84.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+IM,E5 33.0 22.3 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.6 7.5 1.3 12.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 26.6 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.6 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 115 58 0 140 0 85 0 0 1 1 4 Future Vol, veh/h 0 115 58 0 140 0 85 0 0 1 1 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 139 70 0 169 0 102 0 0 1 1 5 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.6 8.6 8.8 7.6 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q 100% 0% 0% 17% 0% 66% 100% 17% 0% 34% 0% 67% Stop Stop Stop Stop 85 173 140 6 85 0 0 1 0 115 140 1 0 58 0 4 102 208 169 7 1 1 1 1 0.141 0.243 0.207 0.009 4.967 4.196 4.428 4.532 Yes Yes Yes Yes 723 859 813 789 2.993 2.211 2.446 2.563 0.141 0.242 0.208 0.009 8.8 8.6 8.6 7.6 A A A A 0.5 1 0.8 0 The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/03/2019 --10 -�* 4\ /,* Movement Lane Configurations ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 625 Future Volume (veh/h) 625 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 658 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 Cap, vehrh Arrive On Green Sat Flow, vehrh MD.% 946 497 440 415 128 946 497 440 415 128 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No No 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 523 463 437 135 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 2 2 2 2 2 570 3383 778 864 0.29 0.00 0.32 0.66 0.22 0.22 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 658 0 523 463 437 135 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.4 0.0 22.6 2.7 9.0 3.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.4 0.0 22.6 2.7 9.0 3.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1462 570 3383 778 864 V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.92 0.14 0.56 0.16 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1462 679 3383 778 864 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.4 0.0 26.2 5.0 27.5 9.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 15.8 0.1 2.9 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr8.4 0.0 11.6 0.8 3.9 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.4 0.0 42.0 5.1 30.4 9.4 LnGrp LOS C D A C A Approach Vol, veh/h 658 A 986 572 Approach Delay, s/veh 24.4 24.7 25.5 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 a 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),30.1 27.4 57.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma3q,5 18.0 53.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+124,t� 10.4 4.7 11.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 2.6 3.6 1.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.8 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/03/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 583 103 25 11 146 461 186 438 52 185 107 420 Future Volume (veh/h) 583 103 25 11 146 461 186 438 52 185 107 420 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 614 108 26 12 154 485 196 461 55 195 360 278 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 672 554 133 26 711 317 366 658 78 356 374 317 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 1457 351 1781 3554 1585 1781 3199 380 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 614 0 134 12 154 485 196 255 261 195 360 278 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/lnl728 0 1807 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1802 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.7 0.0 4.5 0.6 3.3 18.0 8.8 12.0 12.1 8.9 17.2 15.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.7 0.0 4.5 0.6 3.3 18.0 8.8 12.0 12.1 8.9 17.2 15.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 672 0 687 26 711 317 366 365 370 356 374 317 V/C Ratio(X) 0.91 0.00 0.20 0.47 0.22 1.53 0.54 0.70 0.70 0.55 0.96 0.88 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 672 0 687 99 711 317 366 365 370 356 374 317 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.5 0.0 18.7 44.0 30.1 36.0 31.9 33.2 33.2 32.3 35.7 34.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 17.1 0.0 0.1 12.7 0.2 253.9 5.5 10.6 10.7 5.9 38.0 27.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr8.0 0.0 1.9 0.4 1.4 29.1 4.3 6.1 6.3 4.3 11.6 8.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.6 0.0 18.8 56.7 30.3 289.9 37.4 43.8 43.9 38.3 73.6 62.1 LnGrp LOS D A B E C F D D D D E E Approach Vol, veh/h 748 651 712 833 Approach Delay, s/veh 46.5 224.2 42.1 61.5 Approach LOS D F D E Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 5.8 38.7 22.5 22.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 5.0 30.5 18.0 17.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 14.1 2.6 6.5 19.2 17.7 20.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 89.0 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & 1-5 NB Ramps/Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR2 WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL2 SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r ►) ++T+ ►j +TT r Traffic Volume (vph) 30 12 73 97 21 91 239 829 103 106 1311 138 Future Volume (vph) 30 12 73 97 21 91 239 829 103 106 1311 138 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1798 1583 1789 1583 3433 5001 1770 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.69 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1292 1583 1369 1583 3433 5001 1770 5085 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 31 12 75 100 22 94 246 855 106 109 1352 142 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 65 0 0 82 0 0 0 0 0 51 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 43 10 0 122 12 246 961 0 109 1352 91 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 13.2 53.2 15.2 55.2 55.2 Effective Green, g (s) 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 13.2 53.2 15.2 55.2 55.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.11 0.44 0.13 0.46 0.46 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 166 204 176 204 377 2217 224 2339 728 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.19 0.06 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.01 c0.09 0.01 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.05 0.69 0.06 0.65 0.43 0.49 0.58 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 47.1 45.8 50.0 45.9 51.2 23.0 48.8 23.8 18.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.68 0.42 0.17 0.09 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.1 11.2 0.1 3.5 0.5 1.4 0.9 0.3 Delay (s) 47.9 45.9 61.2 46.0 54.8 39.2 21.7 5.0 2.0 Level of Service D D E D D D C A A Approach Delay (s) 46.6 54.6 42.3 5.9 Approach LOS D D D A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & 1-5 NB Ramps/Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 t r Movement I0PDICa0LTA I.: Traffic Volume (vph) 296 6 Future Volume (vph) 296 6 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.88 Frt 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2787 Flt Permitted 1.00 Q Satd. Flow (perm) 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 305 6 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 311 0 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 9 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 18.1 Effective Green, g (s) 18.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 420 v/s Ratio Prot C0.11 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.74 Uniform Delay, d1 48.7 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.9 Delay (s) 55.6 Level of Service E Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 204 485 146 9 967 712 113 1303 65 334 16 Future Volume (vph) 204 485 146 9 967 712 113 1303 65 334 16 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3271 3433 5085 1583 3433 5049 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3271 3433 5085 1583 3433 5049 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 222 527 159 10 1051 774 123 1416 71 363 17 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 21 0 0 0 254 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 200 687 0 10 1051 520 123 1487 0 380 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 27.2 27.2 1.0 49.9 49.9 6.0 54.9 18.9 Effective Green, g (s) 27.2 27.2 1.0 49.9 49.9 6.0 54.9 18.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.01 0.42 0.42 0.05 0.46 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 364 741 28 2114 658 171 2309 438 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.21 0.00 0.21 0.04 c0.29 c0.14 v/s Ratio Perm c0.33 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.93 0.36 0.50 0.79 0.72 0.64 0.87 Uniform Delay, d1 41.0 45.4 59.2 25.8 30.5 56.2 25.0 49.3 Progression Factor 1.05 1.06 0.53 0.22 0.61 1.21 0.88 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 13.1 5.1 0.6 6.4 11.8 1.2 16.4 Delay (s) 44.4 61.2 36.3 6.2 24.9 80.0 23.3 65.7 Level of Service D E D A C E C E Approach Delay (s) 57.5 14.2 27.6 Approach LOS E B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T+ ►j T+ ►j ++T+ ►j TTi� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 44 0 30 19 1249 16 11 1351 11 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 44 0 30 19 1249 16 11 1351 11 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 0 1 48 0 33 21 1373 18 12 1485 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 387 0 344 74 0 66 29 2997 39 19 2985 24 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.58 0.58 0.01 0.57 0.57 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 5194 68 1781 5225 42 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 0 1 48 0 33 21 900 491 12 968 529 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1702 1858 1781 1702 1863 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 0.1 3.5 0.0 2.6 1.5 19.8 19.8 0.9 22.1 22.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.1 3.5 0.0 2.6 1.5 19.8 19.8 0.9 22.1 22.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 387 0 344 74 0 66 29 1964 1072 19 1945 1064 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.50 0.72 0.46 0.46 0.62 0.50 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 387 0 344 343 0 305 96 1964 1072 82 1945 1064 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.9 0.0 39.9 61.4 0.0 61.0 63.6 15.8 15.8 64.0 16.7 16.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 0.0 5.9 28.2 0.8 1.4 20.0 0.6 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 1.2 0.9 7.6 8.5 0.5 8.5 9.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.9 0.0 39.9 70.7 0.0 66.9 91.8 16.6 17.2 84.0 17.3 17.8 LnGrp LOS D A D E A E F B B F B B Approach Vol, veh/h 3 81 1412 1509 Approach Delay, s/veh 39.9 69.1 17.9 18.0 Approach LOS D E B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 33.2 7.1 79.3 10.4 6.4 80.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 7.0 73.0 25.0 6.0 75.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.1 3.5 24.1 5.5 2.9 21.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 14.6 0.2 0.0 13.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 19.4 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4T+ ++T+ ► i +tt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 119 196 26 0 0 0 0 979 33 732 1428 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 119 196 26 0 0 0 0 979 33 732 1428 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 125 206 27 0 1031 35 771 1503 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 157 276 37 0 1683 57 1437 4027 0 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.83 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1209 2132 287 0 5240 172 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 187 0 171 0 692 374 771 1503 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1810 0 1819 0 1702 1839 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.0 0.0 9.9 0.0 18.7 18.8 7.5 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.0 0.0 9.9 0.0 18.7 18.8 7.5 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.67 0.16 0.00 0.09 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 234 0 236 0 1130 610 1437 4027 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.54 0.37 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 337 0 339 0 1130 610 1437 4027 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.49 0.49 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.5 0.0 46.0 0.0 30.8 30.8 6.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.4 0.0 4.3 0.0 2.5 4.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 5.5 0.0 4.8 0.0 7.9 8.9 1.8 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 54.9 0.0 50.3 0.0 33.3 35.4 6.2 0.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A D A C D A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 358 1066 2274 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.7 34.0 2.2 Approach LOS D C A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 50.2 41.0 18.8 91.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.5 36.5 20.5 80.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 9.5 20.8 13.0 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.1 6.2 1.2 17.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 16.3 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 6 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.6 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44 4+ 44 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 96 67 0 180 0 58 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 96 67 0 180 0 58 0 1 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 116 81 0 217 0 70 0 1 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB > B Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.3 8.8 8.6 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 98% 0% 0% 0% Vol Thru, % 0% 59% 100% 100% Vol Right, % 2% 41% 0% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 59 163 180 0 LT Vol 58 0 0 0 Through Vol 0 96 180 0 RT Vol 1 67 0 0 Lane Flow Rate 71 196 217 0 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.099 0.223 0.26 0 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.004 4.096 4.311 4.923 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 717 880 835 0 Service Time 3.026 2.109 2.324 2.95 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.099 0.223 0.26 0 HCM Control Delay 8.6 8.3 8.8 8 HCM Lane LOS A A A N HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.9 1 0 The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 7 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 10/06/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft r ►j +T+ ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 310 105 118 65 65 107 25 132 20 348 310 610 Future Volume (veh/h) 310 105 118 65 65 107 25 132 20 348 310 610 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 348 118 133 73 73 120 28 148 22 391 601 516 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 357 209 236 94 746 333 356 622 91 511 536 454 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.29 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 803 905 1781 3554 1585 1781 3111 455 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 348 0 251 73 73 120 28 83 87 391 601 516 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 0 1708 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1789 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.0 0.0 11.5 3.6 1.5 5.8 1.1 3.5 3.7 18.1 25.8 25.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.0 0.0 11.5 3.6 1.5 5.8 1.1 3.5 3.7 18.1 25.8 25.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 357 0 445 94 746 333 356 355 358 511 536 454 V/C Ratio(X) 0.97 0.00 0.56 0.78 0.10 0.36 0.08 0.23 0.24 0.77 1.12 1.14 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 357 0 445 129 746 333 356 355 358 511 536 454 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.2 0.0 28.8 42.1 28.7 30.4 29.3 30.2 30.3 29.3 32.1 32.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 40.7 0.0 5.1 18.3 0.3 3.0 0.4 1.5 1.6 10.5 76.5 84.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 5.8 0.0 5.2 2.1 0.7 2.5 0.5 1.6 1.7 9.0 22.6 20.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 80.9 0.0 33.9 60.4 28.9 33.4 29.7 31.8 31.9 39.8 108.6 117.0 LnGrp LOS F A C E C C C C C D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 599 266 198 1508 Approach Delay, s/veh 61.2 39.6 31.5 93.6 Approach LOS E D C F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.2 28.0 30.3 13.8 23.4 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 21.7 25.8 9.3 18.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 5.6 13.5 27.8 11.0 7.8 5.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 75.7 HCM 6th LOS E User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 10/06/2019 --O� -�* f" 4\ /01 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ttt r ►j ttt ► i r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 335 239 266 455 902 479 Future Volume (veh/h) 335 239 266 455 902 479 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 372 0 296 506 1002 532 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1455 339 2713 1231 866 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.00 0.19 0.53 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 372 0 296 506 1002 532 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 0.0 12.9 4.1 21.0 18.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 0.0 12.9 4.1 21.0 18.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1455 339 2713 1231 866 V/C Ratio(X) 0.26 0.87 0.19 0.81 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1455 412 2713 1231 866 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.1 0.0 31.5 9.8 23.3 12.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 16.1 0.2 6.0 3.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.8 0.0 6.9 1.4 9.1 6.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.5 0.0 47.5 9.9 29.3 15.6 LnGrp LOS C D A C B Approach Vol, veh/h 372 A 802 1534 Approach Delay, s/veh 22.5 23.8 24.6 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.7 27.3 47.0 33.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 19.5 42.5 28.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 14.9 6.5 6.1 23.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 2.0 3.9 3.1 j Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 24.1 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR2 WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL2 SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r ►) ++T+ ►j +TT r Traffic Volume (vph) 6 5 79 129 15 91 77 482 82 64 1319 17 Future Volume (vph) 6 5 79 129 15 91 77 482 82 64 1319 17 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1813 1583 1783 1583 3433 4974 1770 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.86 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 1583 1378 1583 3433 4974 1770 5085 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 6 5 81 133 15 94 79 497 85 66 1360 18 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 70 0 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 12 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 11 11 0 148 13 79 582 0 66 1360 6 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 4.0 35.9 7.3 39.2 39.2 Effective Green, g (s) 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 4.0 35.9 7.3 39.2 39.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.33 0.07 0.36 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 228 224 195 224 124 1623 117 1812 564 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.12 0.04 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.01 c0.11 0.01 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.05 0.76 0.06 0.64 0.36 0.56 0.75 0.01 Uniform Delay, d1 40.8 40.8 45.4 40.9 52.3 28.3 49.8 31.1 22.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 15.5 0.1 9.9 0.6 6.1 2.9 0.0 Delay (s) 40.9 40.9 60.9 41.0 34.2 8.6 55.9 34.0 22.9 Level of Service D D E D C A E C C Approach Delay (s) 40.9 53.2 11.7 34.9 Approach LOS D D B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 35.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 t r Movement I0PDII 0LYNI.% Traffic Volume (vph) 719 22 Future Volume (vph) 719 22 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.88 Frt 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2787 Flt Permitted 1.00 Q Satd. Flow (perm) 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 741 23 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 764 0 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 9 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 33.2 Effective Green, g (s) 33.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 841 v/s Ratio Prot c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.91 Uniform Delay, d1 36.9 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 13.4 Delay (s) 50.4 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave & Sasnta Clara Ave 09/13/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 134 396 201 7 508 584 70 1344 113 591 32 Future Volume (vph) 134 396 201 7 508 584 70 1344 113 591 32 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3219 3433 5085 1583 3433 5026 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3219 3433 5085 1583 3433 5026 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 141 417 212 7 535 615 74 1415 119 622 34 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 49 0 0 0 387 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 594 0 7 535 228 74 1534 0 656 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.3 22.3 1.0 36.2 36.2 6.8 42.0 26.7 Effective Green, g (s) 22.3 22.3 1.0 36.2 36.2 6.8 42.0 26.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.01 0.33 0.33 0.06 0.38 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 326 652 31 1673 520 212 1919 676 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.18 0.00 0.11 0.02 c0.31 c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm c0.14 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.91 0.23 0.32 0.44 0.35 0.80 0.97 Uniform Delay, d1 38.0 42.9 54.1 27.7 28.9 49.5 30.3 41.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.60 4.55 0.48 0.25 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 16.9 3.1 0.4 2.2 0.7 2.6 27.3 Delay (s) 38.7 59.8 33.8 17.1 133.8 24.7 10.1 68.5 Level of Service D E C B F C B E Approach Delay (s) 56.3 79.2 10.8 Approach LOS E E B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 47.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T+ ►j T+ ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 29 0 19 29 1227 45 31 1534 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 29 0 19 29 1227 45 31 1534 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 0 23 31 0 20 31 1319 48 33 1649 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 387 0 345 50 0 45 39 2918 106 42 3047 4 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.58 0.58 0.02 0.58 0.58 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 5057 184 1781 5267 6 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 0 23 31 0 20 31 888 479 33 1066 585 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1702 1837 1781 1702 1869 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 0.0 1.5 2.2 0.0 1.6 2.3 19.4 19.4 2.4 25.0 25.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 0.0 1.5 2.2 0.0 1.6 2.3 19.4 19.4 2.4 25.0 25.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 387 0 345 50 0 45 39 1964 1060 42 1969 1081 V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.62 0.00 0.45 0.79 0.45 0.45 0.79 0.54 0.54 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 387 0 345 343 0 305 96 1964 1060 82 1969 1081 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.64 0.64 0.64 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.0 0.0 40.4 62.5 0.0 62.2 63.3 15.7 15.7 63.1 16.8 16.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.4 11.6 0.0 6.8 28.4 0.8 1.4 18.3 0.7 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.2 0.0 0.6 1.2 0.0 0.7 1.3 7.5 8.3 1.3 9.6 10.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.1 0.0 40.8 74.1 0.0 69.0 91.7 16.5 17.1 81.4 17.5 18.1 LnGrp LOS D A D E A E F B B F B B Approach Vol, veh/h 32 51 1398 1684 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.6 72.1 18.4 19.0 Approach LOS D E B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 33.3 7.9 80.2 8.7 8.1 80.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 7.0 73.0 25.0 6.0 75.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.5 4.3 27.0 4.2 4.4 21.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.1 0.0 12.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 19.8 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/13/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 15 1286 3 0 15 1286 3 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 16 1398 92 92 2 2 3 0 1588 1588 0 Free None 0 0 92 2 1726 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 701 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 327 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 327 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.6 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 327 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.05 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16.6 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0.2 - The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 292 167 46 0 0 0 0 1408 38 689 1109 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 292 167 46 0 0 0 0 1408 38 689 1109 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 307 176 48 0 1482 40 725 1167 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 360 286 78 0 1770 48 977 3499 0 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.57 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1415 386 0 5280 138 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 307 0 224 0 987 535 725 1167 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1801 0 1702 1846 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.3 0.0 9.1 0.0 21.4 21.4 12.6 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.3 0.0 9.1 0.0 21.4 21.4 12.6 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.21 0.00 0.07 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 360 0 364 0 1179 639 977 3499 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.84 0.84 0.74 0.33 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 0 407 0 1179 639 977 3499 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.8 0.0 29.1 0.0 24.1 24.1 15.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 14.7 0.0 2.3 0.0 7.2 12.4 2.0 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr9.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 9.1 10.8 3.5 0.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.5 0.0 31.4 0.0 31.2 36.5 17.2 0.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A C A C D B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 531 1522 1892 Approach Delay, s/veh 39.5 33.1 6.7 Approach LOS D C A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),27.1 32.2 20.7 59.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma,t 27.7 18.1 52.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+[M,6; 23.4 15.3 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.6 3.3 0.9 10.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 21.3 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.6 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 116 59 0 140 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 116 59 0 140 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 140 71 0 169 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB >A/S': N♦3 SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.5 8.6 8.8 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 66% 100% 100% 0% 34% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 85 175 140 0 85 0 0 0 0 116 140 0 0 59 0 0 102 211 169 0 1 1 1 1 0.141 0.245 0.207 0 4.957 4.177 4.413 4.903 Yes Yes Yes Yes 724 862 815 0 2.984 2.194 2.431 2.937 0.141 0.245 0.207 0 8.8 8.5 8.6 7.9 A A A N 0.5 1 0.8 0 The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/13/2019 --10 -�* 4\ /,* Movement Lane Configurations ttlL r ►j ttt ►) jr Traffic Volume (veh/h) 627 950 497 443 425 128 Future Volume (veh/h) 627 950 497 443 425 128 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 660 0 523 466 447 135 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Q Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1462 570 3383 778 864 Arrive On Green 0.29 0.00 0.32 0.66 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 660 0 523 466 447 135 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.5 0.0 22.6 2.7 9.2 3.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.5 0.0 22.6 2.7 9.2 3.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1462 570 3383 778 864 V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.92 0.14 0.57 0.16 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1462 679 3383 778 864 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.4 0.0 26.2 5.0 27.6 9.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 15.8 0.1 3.1 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr8.4 0.0 11.6 0.8 4.0 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.4 0.0 42.0 5.1 30.7 9.4 LnGrp LOS C D A C A Approach Vol, veh/h 660 A 989 582 Approach Delay, s/veh 24.4 24.6 25.7 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),30.1 27.4 57.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma3q,5 18.0 53.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+124,(� 10.5 4.7 11.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 2.6 3.6 1.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.8 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/13/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 587 104 25 11 148 461 186 440 52 185 109 424 Future Volume (veh/h) 587 104 25 11 148 461 186 440 52 185 109 424 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 618 109 26 12 156 485 196 463 55 195 363 280 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 672 555 132 26 711 317 366 658 78 356 374 317 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 1460 348 1781 3554 1585 1781 3201 379 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 618 0 135 12 156 485 196 256 262 195 363 280 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1728 0 1808 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1802 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.8 0.0 4.5 0.6 3.3 18.0 8.8 12.0 12.2 8.9 17.3 15.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.8 0.0 4.5 0.6 3.3 18.0 8.8 12.0 12.2 8.9 17.3 15.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 672 0 687 26 711 317 366 365 370 356 374 317 V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 0.00 0.20 0.47 0.22 1.53 0.54 0.70 0.71 0.55 0.97 0.88 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 672 0 687 99 711 317 366 365 370 356 374 317 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.6 0.0 18.7 44.0 30.1 36.0 31.9 33.2 33.2 32.3 35.7 35.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 17.9 0.0 0.1 12.7 0.2 253.9 5.5 10.7 10.8 5.9 39.7 28.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr8.2 0.0 1.9 0.4 1.4 29.1 4.3 6.2 6.3 4.3 11.8 8.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 53.5 0.0 18.8 56.7 30.3 289.9 37.4 43.9 44.1 38.3 75.4 63.0 LnGrp LOS D A B E C F D D D D E E Approach Vol, veh/h 753 653 714 838 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.3 223.6 42.2 62.6 Approach LOS D F D E Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 5.8 38.7 22.5 22.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 5.0 30.5 18.0 17.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 14.2 2.6 6.5 19.3 17.8 20.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 89.3 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/12/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR2 WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL2 SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r ►) ++T+ ►j +TT r Traffic Volume (vph) 30 12 73 95 21 89 239 859 103 108 1342 138 Future Volume (vph) 30 12 73 95 21 89 239 859 103 108 1342 138 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1798 1583 1790 1583 3433 5004 1770 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.75 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1399 1583 1370 1583 3433 5004 1770 5085 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 31 12 75 98 22 92 246 886 106 111 1384 142 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 64 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 92 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 43 11 0 120 14 246 992 0 111 1384 50 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 8.6 30.4 6.1 27.9 27.9 Effective Green, g (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 8.6 30.4 6.1 27.9 27.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.38 0.08 0.35 0.35 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 213 241 208 241 369 1901 134 1773 552 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.20 0.06 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.01 c0.09 0.01 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.05 0.58 0.06 0.67 0.52 0.83 0.78 0.09 Uniform Delay, dl 29.6 28.9 31.5 29.0 34.3 19.2 36.4 23.3 17.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.1 3.8 0.1 3.8 0.9 32.5 3.5 0.3 Delay (s) 30.1 29.0 35.3 29.1 23.2 13.6 68.9 26.8 17.8 Level of Service C C D C C B E C B Approach Delay (s) 29.4 32.6 15.5 28.9 Approach LOS C C B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 25.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/12/2019 t r Movement REME :8 Traffic Volume (vph) 311 6 Future Volume (vph) 311 6 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.88 Frt 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2787 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 321 6 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 327 0 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 9 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 13.3 Effective Green, g (s) 13.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 463 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.71 Uniform Delay, dl 31.5 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.9 Delay (s) 36.4 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary ow The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/12/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 224 485 146 9 978 712 121 1319 70 334 16 Future Volume (vph) 224 485 146 9 978 712 121 1319 70 334 16 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3271 3433 5085 1583 3433 5047 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3271 3433 5085 1583 3433 5047 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 236 511 154 9 1029 749 127 1388 74 352 17 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 31 0 0 0 262 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 212 658 0 9 1029 487 127 1462 0 369 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.2 28.2 4.1 31.3 11.7 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.2 28.2 4.1 31.3 11.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.39 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 362 735 42 1792 558 175 1974 407 v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.20 0.00 0.20 0.04 c0.29 c0.13 v/s Ratio Perm c0.31 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.90 0.21 0.57 0.87 0.73 0.74 0.91 Uniform Delay, dl 27.7 30.1 39.1 21.0 24.2 37.4 20.9 33.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85 1.36 1.00 0.47 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 13.4 1.5 0.8 10.7 9.9 1.8 23.2 Delay (s) 30.1 43.5 37.3 18.6 43.8 47.3 11.6 56.8 Level of Service C D D B D D B E Approach Delay (s) 40.3 29.3 14.5 Approach LOS D C B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 28.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.90 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Broadway & 1-5 SB Off -Ramp 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow r ++ ++ 914 0 442 614 0 914 0 442 614 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 96 96 96 96 96 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 952 0 460 640 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 1 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 - 0 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 0 - HCM Lane LOS - A - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - - The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago ParkM/alkie Way 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j T+ 41) ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 0 0 0 19 1260 0 1 1595 11 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 0 0 0 19 1260 0 1 1595 11 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 0 1 0 0 0 21 1385 0 1 1753 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 683 0 555 0 654 0 30 2676 0 2 2660 18 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 5274 0 1781 5232 36 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 0 1 0 0 0 21 1385 0 1 1140 625 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1864 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 21.3 0.0 0.1 29.7 29.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 21.3 0.0 0.1 29.7 29.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 683 0 555 0 654 0 30 2676 0 2 1730 947 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.52 0.00 0.51 0.66 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 683 0 555 0 654 0 193 2676 0 193 1730 947 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.54 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.4 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.7 18.7 0.0 59.9 21.8 21.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.8 0.7 0.0 82.7 1.1 2.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 8.4 0.0 0.1 11.8 13.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.4 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 84.5 19.4 0.0 142.6 22.9 23.8 LnGrp LOS C A C A A A F B A F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 3 0 1406 1766 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.4 0.0 20.3 23.3 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 47.0 7.0 66.0 47.0 5.1 67.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 13.0 61.0 31.0 13.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.1 3.4 31.7 0.0 2.1 23.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 16.1 0.0 0.0 13.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 22.0 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 1 1282 12 0 1 1282 12 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 1 1393 92 92 2 2 13 0 1600 1600 0 Free None 0 0 92 2 1739 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 703 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 326 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 0 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 326 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.1 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 326 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16.1 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0 - The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 121 199 26 0 0 0 0 1024 42 787 1629 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 121 199 26 0 0 0 0 1024 42 787 1629 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 129 212 28 0 1089 45 837 1733 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 159 280 38 0 1715 71 1399 4016 0 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.81 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1210 2129 289 0 5198 208 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 193 0 176 0 737 397 837 1733 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/lnl810 0 1818 0 1702 1833 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.4 0.0 10.2 0.0 20.0 20.1 9.8 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.4 0.0 10.2 0.0 20.0 20.1 9.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.67 0.16 0.00 0.11 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 238 0 239 0 1160 625 1399 4016 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.63 0.64 0.60 0.43 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 321 0 322 0 1160 625 1399 4016 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.32 0.32 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.4 0.0 45.9 0.0 30.5 30.5 7.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.7 0.0 5.8 0.0 2.7 4.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr5.8 0.0 5.0 0.0 8.5 9.6 2.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 57.1 0.0 51.7 0.0 33.1 35.4 7.4 0.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A D A C D A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 369 1134 2570 Approach Delay, s/veh 54.5 33.9 2.5 Approach LOS D C A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),49.0 42.0 19.0 91.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma3q,5 37.5 19.5 81.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+[M,B; 22.1 13.4 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.4 6.8 1.1 24.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 16.0 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.7 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44 44 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 2 101 68 0 192 0 59 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 2 101 68 0 192 0 59 0 1 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 122 82 0 231 0 71 0 1 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RighNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.4 9 8.7 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 59% 100% 100% 2% 40% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 60 171 192 0 59 2 0 0 0 101 192 0 1 68 0 0 72 206 231 0 1 1 1 1 0.102 0.236 0.278 0 5.057 4.127 4.328 4.98 Yes Yes Yes Yes 710 871 833 0 3.081 2.141 2.342 3.011 0.101 0.237 0.277 0 8.7 8.4 9 8 A A A N 0.3 0.9 1.1 0 The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/03/2019 --10 -�* 4\ /,* Movement Lane Configurations ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 362 Future Volume (veh/h) 362 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 402 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 Cap, vehrh Arrive On Green Sat Flow, vehrh MDR 293 416 480 922 475 293 416 480 922 475 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No No 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 462 533 1024 528 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 2 2 2 2 2 496 2904 1102 947 0.23 0.00 0.28 0.57 0.32 0.32 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 402 0 462 533 1024 528 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.2 0.0 20.2 4.0 23.0 16.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.2 0.0 20.2 4.0 23.0 16.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1195 496 2904 1102 947 V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.93 0.18 0.93 0.56 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1195 501 2904 1102 947 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.5 0.0 28.1 8.3 26.4 9.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 24.3 0.1 14.7 2.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr2.1 0.0 11.5 1.4 11.2 5.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.2 0.0 52.4 8.4 41.1 12.1 LnGrp LOS C D A D B Approach Vol, veh/h 402 A 995 1552 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.2 28.9 31.2 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),26.8 23.2 50.0 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma2Z 5 18.5 45.5 25.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+QR,2, 7.2 6.0 25.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.0 4.1 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 29.8 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative - AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/03/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 337 132 170 99 127 132 95 180 28 328 301 645 Future Volume (veh/h) 337 132 170 99 127 132 95 180 28 328 301 645 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 379 148 191 111 143 148 107 202 31 369 628 532 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 365 186 240 137 790 352 356 619 94 485 509 431 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.27 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 741 957 1781 3554 1585 1781 3095 468 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 379 0 339 111 143 148 107 115 118 369 628 532 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1728 0 1698 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1786 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.5 0.0 16.8 5.5 2.9 7.2 4.6 5.0 5.1 17.1 24.5 24.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.5 0.0 16.8 5.5 2.9 7.2 4.6 5.0 5.1 17.1 24.5 24.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 365 0 426 137 790 352 356 355 357 485 509 431 V/C Ratio(X) 1.04 0.00 0.79 0.81 0.18 0.42 0.30 0.32 0.33 0.76 1.23 1.23 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 365 0 426 137 790 352 356 355 357 485 509 431 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh40.3 0.0 31.5 40.9 28.4 30.0 30.6 30.8 30.8 30.1 32.8 32.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 57.6 0.0 14.2 29.9 0.5 3.7 2.2 2.4 2.5 10.7 121.2 123.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr6.9 0.0 8.4 3.5 1.3 3.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 8.6 27.9 23.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 97.9 0.0 45.7 70.8 28.9 33.7 32.8 33.2 33.3 40.8 154.0 156.3 LnGrp LOS F A D E C C C C C D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 718 402 340 1529 Approach Delay, s/veh 73.2 42.2 33.1 127.5 Approach LOS E D C F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), E1.4 27.1 29.0 14.0 24.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma)4,9 22.6 24.5 9.5 20.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I�,EB 18.8 26.5 11.5 9.2 7.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 92.2 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR NWR2 Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 155 94 499 93 68 0 1533 0 698 22 Future Volume (vph) 155 94 499 93 68 0 1533 0 698 22 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 4965 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 4965 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 168 102 542 101 74 0 1666 0 759 24 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 14 643 0 74 0 1666 0 783 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 34.9 7.7 47.1 34.4 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 15.0 34.9 7.7 47.1 34.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.32 0.07 0.43 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 241 215 1575 123 2177 871 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.13 0.04 c0.33 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.06 0.41 0.60 0.77 0.90 Uniform Delay, d1 45.3 41.4 29.5 49.7 26.7 36.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.5 0.1 0.8 8.0 2.6 12.0 Delay (s) 53.8 41.5 13.1 57.7 29.4 48.1 Level of Service D D B E C D Approach Delay (s) 49.2 13.1 30.6 48.1 Approach LOS D B C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 125 418 204 7 470 667 91 1490 107 699 32 Future Volume (vph) 125 418 204 7 470 667 91 1490 107 699 32 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3224 3433 5085 1583 3433 5034 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3224 3433 5085 1583 3433 5034 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 133 445 217 7 500 710 97 1585 114 744 34 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 46 0 0 0 423 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 120 629 0 7 500 287 97 1699 0 778 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.5 20.5 1.0 33.2 33.2 8.8 41.0 29.5 Effective Green, g (s) 20.5 20.5 1.0 33.2 33.2 8.8 41.0 29.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.30 0.30 0.08 0.37 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 300 600 31 1534 477 274 1876 747 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.20 0.00 0.10 0.03 c0.34 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm c0.18 v/c Ratio 0.40 1.05 0.23 0.33 0.60 0.35 0.91 1.04 Uniform Delay, d1 39.3 44.8 54.1 29.7 32.8 47.9 32.7 40.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.46 3.17 0.61 0.40 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 49.8 2.9 0.5 4.4 0.5 5.3 44.2 Delay (s) 40.2 94.6 39.5 14.1 108.2 29.9 18.4 84.5 Level of Service D F D B F C B F Approach Delay (s) 86.4 69.1 19.0 Approach LOS F E B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 55.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Broadway & 1-5 SB Off -Ramp 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow r ++ ++ 890 0 789 578 0 890 0 789 578 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 96 96 96 96 96 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 927 0 822 602 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 1 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 - 0 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 0 - HCM Lane LOS - A - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - - The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago ParkM/alkie Way 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j T+ 41) ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 0 0 0 25 1444 0 1 1621 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 0 0 0 25 1444 0 1 1621 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 0 23 0 0 0 27 1553 0 1 1743 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 678 0 550 0 649 0 35 2691 0 2 2678 3 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 5274 0 1781 5267 6 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 0 23 0 0 0 27 1553 0 1 1126 619 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1869 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 24.8 0.0 0.1 29.2 29.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 24.8 0.0 0.1 29.2 29.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 678 0 550 0 649 0 35 2691 0 2 1730 950 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.58 0.00 0.51 0.65 0.65 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 678 0 550 0 649 0 193 2691 0 193 1730 950 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.52 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.7 0.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.5 19.3 0.0 59.9 21.7 21.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.5 0.9 0.0 80.3 1.0 1.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 9.8 0.0 0.1 11.6 13.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.8 0.0 26.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 87.0 20.2 0.0 140.2 22.7 23.5 LnGrp LOS C A C A A A F C A F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 32 0 1580 1746 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.0 0.0 21.3 23.0 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.6 7.4 66.0 46.6 5.1 68.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 13.0 61.0 31.0 13.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.2 3.8 31.2 0.0 2.1 26.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 22.3 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 9 1460 3 0 9 1460 3 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 10 1587 92 92 2 2 3 0 1643 1643 0 Free None 0 0 92 2 1786 Major/Minor Mina ; Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 795 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 284 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 0 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 284 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18.1 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 284 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 18.1 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0.1 - The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 295 169 47 0 0 0 0 1532 51 670 1205 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 295 169 47 0 0 0 0 1532 51 670 1205 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 314 180 50 0 1630 54 713 1282 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 366 289 80 0 1897 63 871 3483 0 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.25 0.68 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1409 391 0 5244 168 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 314 0 230 0 1093 591 713 1282 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1800 0 1702 1840 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.6 0.0 9.3 0.0 23.7 23.7 15.6 8.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.6 0.0 9.3 0.0 23.7 23.7 15.6 8.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.09 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 366 0 370 0 1272 688 871 3483 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.86 0.86 0.82 0.37 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 0 407 0 1272 688 871 3483 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.7 0.0 29.0 0.0 23.1 23.1 28.2 5.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 15.6 0.0 2.5 0.0 7.7 13.2 3.2 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr9.2 0.0 4.1 0.0 10.2 12.1 6.6 2.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.3 0.0 31.5 0.0 30.8 36.3 31.4 5.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A C A C D C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 544 1684 1995 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.0 32.7 14.8 Approach LOS D C B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),24.7 34.4 20.9 59.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmalo,5 29.9 18.1 52.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+Itt1/,6; 25.7 15.6 10.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 3.4 0.8 12.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 25.2 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.7 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 120 59 0 145 0 86 0 0 1 1 4 Future Vol, veh/h 0 120 59 0 145 0 86 0 0 1 1 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 145 71 0 175 0 104 0 0 1 1 5 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.6 8.7 8.9 7.6 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q 100% 0% 0% 17% 0% 67% 100% 17% 0% 33% 0% 67% Stop Stop Stop Stop 86 179 145 6 86 0 0 1 0 120 145 1 0 59 0 4 104 216 175 7 1 1 1 1 0.144 0.252 0.215 0.009 4.995 4.209 4.44 4.562 Yes Yes Yes Yes 718 854 811 783 3.024 2.228 2.46 2.599 0.145 0.253 0.216 0.009 8.9 8.6 8.7 7.6 A A A A 0.5 1 0.8 0 The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/03/2019 --10 -�* 4\ /,* Movement Lane Configurations ttlL r ►j ttt ►) jr Traffic Volume (veh/h) 653 997 526 469 439 213 Future Volume (veh/h) 653 997 526 469 439 213 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 687 0 554 494 462 224 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Q Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1381 598 3383 778 889 Arrive On Green 0.27 0.00 0.34 0.66 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 687 0 554 494 462 224 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.1 0.0 24.0 2.9 9.6 5.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.1 0.0 24.0 2.9 9.6 5.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1381 598 3383 778 889 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.93 0.15 0.59 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1381 679 3383 778 889 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.6 0.0 25.6 5.0 27.7 9.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 0.0 17.5 0.1 3.3 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr8.7 0.0 12.5 0.9 4.2 2.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.9 0.0 43.1 5.1 31.1 9.7 LnGrp LOS C D A C A Approach Vol, veh/h 687 A 1048 686 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.9 25.2 24.1 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 a a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),31.4 26.1 57.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma1q,5 18.0 53.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+Qp,(b 11.1 4.9 11.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 2.6 3.9 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.1 HCM 6th LOS C � G Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/03/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 619 181 90 65 171 458 215 461 73 275 159 488 Future Volume (veh/h) 619 181 90 65 171 458 215 461 73 275 159 488 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 652 191 95 68 180 482 226 485 77 289 427 340 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 672 407 202 88 711 317 366 632 100 356 374 317 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 1179 586 1781 3554 1585 1781 3074 486 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 652 0 286 68 180 482 226 279 283 289 427 340 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1728 0 1765 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1783 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 16.9 0.0 11.4 3.4 3.8 18.0 10.4 13.3 13.5 13.9 18.0 18.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.9 0.0 11.4 3.4 3.8 18.0 10.4 13.3 13.5 13.9 18.0 18.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 672 0 609 88 711 317 366 365 366 356 374 317 V/C Ratio(X) 0.97 0.00 0.47 0.77 0.25 1.52 0.62 0.76 0.77 0.81 1.14 1.07 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 672 0 609 178 711 317 366 365 366 356 374 317 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.0 0.0 23.0 42.3 30.3 36.0 32.5 33.7 33.8 34.4 36.0 36.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 27.4 0.0 0.6 13.4 0.2 249.8 7.6 14.1 14.5 17.9 90.9 71.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr9.5 0.0 4.7 1.8 1.6 28.8 5.2 7.1 7.2 7.7 17.4 13.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 63.4 0.0 23.6 55.7 30.5 285.8 40.1 47.8 48.3 52.3 126.9 107.2 LnGrp LOS E A C E C F D D D D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 938 730 788 1056 Approach Delay, s/veh 51.2 201.4 45.8 100.1 Approach LOS D F D F Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 8.9 35.6 22.5 22.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 9.0 26.5 18.0 17.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 15.5 5.4 13.4 20.0 18.9 20.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.3 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 95.9 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 123 95 963 120 111 0 1533 0 400 10 Future Volume (vph) 123 95 963 120 111 0 1533 0 400 10 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 5001 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 5001 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 127 98 993 124 114 0 1580 0 412 10 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 12 1117 0 114 0 1580 0 422 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.7 9.7 29.6 6.0 40.1 16.7 Effective Green, g (s) 9.7 9.7 29.6 6.0 40.1 16.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.37 0.08 0.50 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 214 191 1850 132 2548 581 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.22 0.06 c0.31 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.06 0.60 0.86 0.62 0.73 Uniform Delay, d1 33.3 31.1 20.4 36.6 14.4 29.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.4 0.1 1.2 40.4 1.1 4.5 Delay (s) 37.6 31.3 19.9 77.0 15.6 34.0 Level of Service D C B E B C Approach Delay (s) 34.9 19.9 19.7 34.0 Approach LOS C B B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 207 535 148 9 877 940 276 1314 66 431 16 Future Volume (vph) 207 535 148 9 877 940 276 1314 66 431 16 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5049 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5049 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 225 582 161 10 953 1022 300 1428 72 468 17 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 28 0 0 0 261 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 202 738 0 10 953 761 300 1500 0 485 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 26.9 26.9 5.0 30.9 12.1 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 26.9 26.9 5.0 30.9 12.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.39 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 362 737 42 1709 532 214 1950 421 v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.23 0.00 0.19 c0.09 0.30 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm c0.48 v/c Ratio 0.56 1.00 0.24 0.56 1.43 1.40 0.77 1.15 Uniform Delay, d1 27.5 31.0 39.1 21.7 26.6 37.5 21.4 34.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.82 1.25 1.16 0.48 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 33.5 1.7 0.7 200.0 202.8 2.5 92.4 Delay (s) 29.3 64.5 36.1 18.5 233.1 246.1 12.8 126.3 Level of Service C E D B F F B F Approach Delay (s) 57.2 129.1 51.7 Approach LOS E F D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 88.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.25 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T+ ►j T+ ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 44 0 30 19 1260 16 11 1595 11 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 44 0 30 19 1260 16 11 1595 11 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 0 1 48 0 33 21 1385 18 12 1753 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 378 0 337 74 0 66 55 2997 39 27 2938 20 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.58 0.58 0.02 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 5195 68 1781 5232 36 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 0 1 48 0 33 21 908 495 12 1140 625 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1702 1858 1781 1702 1864 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 0.1 3.5 0.0 2.6 1.5 20.0 20.0 0.9 28.7 28.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.1 3.5 0.0 2.6 1.5 20.0 20.0 0.9 28.7 28.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 378 0 337 74 0 66 55 1964 1072 27 1912 1047 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.50 0.38 0.46 0.46 0.44 0.60 0.60 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 378 0 337 343 0 305 96 1964 1072 82 1912 1047 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 0.45 0.45 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh40.4 0.0 40.3 61.4 0.0 61.0 61.8 15.9 15.9 63.4 18.8 18.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 0.0 5.9 4.3 0.8 1.4 4.9 0.6 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.1 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 1.2 0.7 7.7 8.6 0.4 11.1 12.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.4 0.0 40.4 70.7 0.0 66.9 66.1 16.6 17.3 68.3 19.4 19.9 LnGrp LOS D A D E A E E B B E B B Approach Vol, veh/h 3 81 1424 1777 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.4 69.1 17.6 19.9 Approach LOS D E B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 32.6 9.0 78.0 10.4 7.0 80.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 7.0 73.0 25.0 6.0 75.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.1 3.5 30.7 5.5 2.9 22.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 18.3 0.2 0.0 13.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 20.2 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/13/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 1 1298 14 0 1 1298 14 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 1 1411 92 92 2 2 15 0 1644 1644 0 Free None 0 0 92 2 1787 Major/Minor Mina ; Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 713 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 321 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 - 0 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 321 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.3 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 321 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16.3 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0 - The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 121 199 26 0 0 0 0 1027 42 802 1639 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 121 199 26 0 0 0 0 1027 42 802 1639 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 127 209 27 0 1081 44 844 1725 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 157 277 37 0 1670 68 1436 4025 0 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.83 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1211 2134 284 0 5201 205 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 190 0 173 0 731 394 844 1725 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/lnl810 0 1819 0 1702 1834 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.2 0.0 10.1 0.0 20.1 20.1 8.9 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.2 0.0 10.1 0.0 20.1 20.1 8.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.67 0.16 0.00 0.11 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 235 0 236 0 1130 608 1436 4025 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.59 0.43 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 321 0 323 0 1130 608 1436 4025 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh46.5 0.0 46.0 0.0 31.3 31.3 6.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.3 0.0 5.5 0.0 2.9 5.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/Ir5.7 0.0 4.9 0.0 8.5 9.6 2.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.8 0.0 51.5 0.0 34.1 36.5 6.3 0.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A D A C D A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 363 1125 2569 Approach Delay, s/veh 54.3 35.0 2.1 Approach LOS D C A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),50.2 41.0 18.8 91.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmakg,5 36.5 19.5 81.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+[M,9s 22.1 13.2 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.4 6.3 1.1 22.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 15.9 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.7 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44 44 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 101 68 0 192 0 59 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 101 68 0 192 0 59 0 1 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 122 82 0 231 0 71 0 1 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.4 9 8.6 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 60% 100% 100% 2% 40% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 60 169 192 0 59 0 0 0 0 101 192 0 1 68 0 0 72 204 231 0 1 1 1 1 0.101 0.233 0.278 0 5.051 4.12 4.323 4.974 Yes Yes Yes Yes 711 874 833 0 3.076 2.134 2.337 3.004 0.101 0.233 0.277 0 8.6 8.4 9 8 A A A N 0.3 0.9 1.1 0 The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 10/06/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft r ►j +T+ ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 343 133 170 99 128 132 95 184 28 328 302 646 Future Volume (veh/h) 343 133 170 99 128 132 95 184 28 328 302 646 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 385 149 191 111 144 148 107 207 31 369 629 532 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 365 187 240 137 790 352 356 621 92 485 509 431 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.27 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 744 954 1781 3554 1585 1781 3106 458 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 385 0 340 111 144 148 107 117 121 369 629 532 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 0 1699 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1788 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.5 0.0 16.9 5.5 3.0 7.2 4.6 5.1 5.2 17.1 24.5 24.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.5 0.0 16.9 5.5 3.0 7.2 4.6 5.1 5.2 17.1 24.5 24.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 365 0 427 137 790 352 356 355 358 485 509 431 V/C Ratio(X) 1.06 0.00 0.80 0.81 0.18 0.42 0.30 0.33 0.34 0.76 1.24 1.23 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 365 0 427 137 790 352 356 355 358 485 509 431 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.3 0.0 31.6 40.9 28.4 30.0 30.6 30.8 30.9 30.1 32.8 32.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 62.5 0.0 14.3 29.9 0.5 3.7 2.2 2.5 2.5 10.7 122.0 123.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 7.1 0.0 8.4 3.5 1.3 3.1 2.2 2.4 2.5 8.6 28.0 23.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 102.7 0.0 45.9 70.8 28.9 33.7 32.8 33.3 33.4 40.8 154.8 156.3 LnGrp LOS F A D E C C C C C D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 725 403 345 1530 Approach Delay, s/veh 76.1 42.2 33.2 127.8 Approach LOS E D C F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.4 27.1 29.0 14.0 24.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.9 22.6 24.5 9.5 20.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 7.5 18.9 26.5 11.5 9.2 7.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 93.0 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 10/06/2019 --O� -�* f" 4\ /01 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ttt r ►j ttt ► i r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 365 299 416 481 925 475 Future Volume (veh/h) 365 299 416 481 925 475 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 406 0 462 534 1028 528 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1195 496 2904 1102 947 Arrive On Green 0.23 0.00 0.28 0.57 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 406 0 462 534 1028 528 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.3 0.0 20.2 4.0 23.1 16.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.3 0.0 20.2 4.0 23.1 16.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1195 496 2904 1102 947 V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.93 0.18 0.93 0.56 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1195 501 2904 1102 947 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.5 0.0 28.1 8.3 26.4 9.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 24.3 0.1 15.2 2.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.2 0.0 11.5 1.4 11.3 5.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.3 0.0 52.4 8.4 41.6 12.1 LnGrp LOS C D A D B Approach Vol, veh/h 406 A 996 1556 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.3 28.8 31.6 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 a 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.8 23.2 50.0 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.5 18.5 45.5 25.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 22.2 7.3 6.0 25.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.0 4.1 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 29.9 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR NWR2 Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 155 94 510 92 68 0 1577 0 703 22 Future Volume (vph) 155 94 510 92 68 0 1577 0 703 22 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 4969 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 4969 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 168 102 554 100 74 0 1714 0 764 24 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 14 654 0 74 0 1714 0 788 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 8 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 35.2 7.5 47.2 34.3 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 15.0 35.2 7.5 47.2 34.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.32 0.07 0.43 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 241 215 1590 120 2181 869 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.13 0.04 c0.34 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.06 0.41 0.62 0.79 0.91 Uniform Delay, d1 45.3 41.4 29.3 49.9 27.0 36.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.5 0.1 0.8 9.1 2.9 12.9 Delay (s) 53.8 41.5 10.0 58.9 30.0 49.3 Level of Service D D B E C D Approach Delay (s) 49.2 10.0 31.2 49.3 Approach LOS D B C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave & Sasnta Clara Ave 09/13/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 132 418 204 7 474 667 103 1514 115 699 32 Future Volume (vph) 132 418 204 7 474 667 103 1514 115 699 32 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3223 3433 5085 1583 3433 5031 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3223 3433 5085 1583 3433 5031 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 139 440 215 7 499 702 108 1594 121 736 34 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 46 0 0 0 398 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 125 623 0 7 499 304 108 1715 0 770 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 23.6 23.6 1.0 30.9 30.9 10.1 40.0 27.4 Effective Green, g (s) 23.6 23.6 1.0 30.9 30.9 10.1 40.0 27.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.36 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 345 691 31 1428 444 315 1829 694 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.19 0.00 0.10 0.03 c0.34 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.90 0.23 0.35 0.69 0.34 0.94 1.11 Uniform Delay, d1 36.8 42.1 54.1 31.5 35.2 46.8 33.8 41.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.43 0.74 2.97 0.56 0.32 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 14.9 2.9 0.5 6.7 0.4 7.3 68.3 Delay (s) 37.4 57.0 26.3 24.0 111.3 26.4 18.1 109.6 Level of Service D E C C F C B F Approach Delay (s) 53.9 74.7 18.6 Approach LOS D E B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 54.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago Park/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T+ ►j T+ ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 29 0 19 29 1444 45 31 1621 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 29 0 19 29 1444 45 31 1621 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 0 23 31 0 20 31 1553 48 33 1743 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 387 0 345 50 0 45 39 2936 91 42 3047 3 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.58 0.58 0.02 0.58 0.58 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 5089 157 1781 5267 6 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 0 23 31 0 20 31 1039 562 33 1126 619 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1702 1842 1781 1702 1869 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 0.0 1.5 2.2 0.0 1.6 2.3 24.2 24.2 2.4 27.1 27.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 0.0 1.5 2.2 0.0 1.6 2.3 24.2 24.2 2.4 27.1 27.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 387 0 345 50 0 45 39 1964 1063 42 1969 1081 V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.62 0.00 0.45 0.79 0.53 0.53 0.79 0.57 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 387 0 345 343 0 305 96 1964 1063 82 1969 1081 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 0.54 0.54 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.0 0.0 40.4 62.5 0.0 62.2 63.3 16.7 16.7 63.1 17.3 17.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.4 11.6 0.0 6.8 28.4 1.0 1.9 15.8 0.7 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.2 0.0 0.6 1.2 0.0 0.7 1.3 9.5 10.6 1.3 10.6 11.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.1 0.0 40.8 74.1 0.0 69.0 91.7 17.8 18.6 78.9 17.9 18.5 LnGrp LOS D A D E A E F B B E B B Approach Vol, veh/h 32 51 1632 1778 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.6 72.1 19.5 19.2 Approach LOS D E B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 33.3 7.9 80.2 8.7 8.1 80.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 7.0 73.0 25.0 6.0 75.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.5 4.3 29.1 4.2 4.4 26.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 19.2 0.1 0.0 17.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 20.3 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/13/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 15 1503 3 0 15 1503 3 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 16 1634 92 92 2 2 3 0 1676 1676 0 Free None 0 0 92 2 1822 Major/Minor Mina ; Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 819 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 273 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 0 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 273 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 19 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 273 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.06 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 19 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0.2 - The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 296 169 47 0 0 0 0 1542 51 680 1211 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 296 169 47 0 0 0 0 1542 51 680 1211 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 315 180 50 0 1640 54 723 1288 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 367 290 81 0 1758 58 965 3481 0 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.28 0.68 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1409 391 0 5246 167 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 315 0 230 0 1099 595 723 1288 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1800 0 1702 1840 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.6 0.0 9.3 0.0 24.9 25.0 15.3 8.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.6 0.0 9.3 0.0 24.9 25.0 15.3 8.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.09 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 367 0 371 0 1179 637 965 3481 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.93 0.93 0.75 0.37 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 0 407 0 1179 637 965 3481 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.6 0.0 28.9 0.0 25.3 25.3 26.3 5.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 15.8 0.0 2.5 0.0 14.4 22.5 1.4 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr7.3 0.0 4.1 0.0 11.8 14.2 6.2 2.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.4 0.0 31.4 0.0 39.6 47.8 27.7 5.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A C A D D C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 545 1694 2011 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.1 42.5 13.5 Approach LOS D D B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),26.8 32.2 21.0 59.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma,t 27.7 18.1 52.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+q,3; 27.0 15.6 10.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.6 0.8 12.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 28.5 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.7 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 121 60 0 145 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 121 60 0 145 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 146 72 0 175 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB >A/S': N♦3 SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.6 8.7 8.9 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 67% 100% 100% 0% 33% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 86 181 145 0 86 0 0 0 0 121 145 0 0 60 0 0 104 218 175 0 1 1 1 1 0.144 0.254 0.215 0 4.986 4.192 4.425 4.936 Yes Yes Yes Yes 719 859 812 0 3.014 2.21 2.445 2.973 0.145 0.254 0.216 0 8.9 8.6 8.7 8 A A A N 0.5 1 0.8 0 The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/13/2019 --10 -�* 4\ /,* Movement Lane Configurations ttlL r ►j ttt ►) jr Traffic Volume (veh/h) 655 1001 526 472 449 213 Future Volume (veh/h) 655 1001 526 472 449 213 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 689 0 554 497 473 224 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Q Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1381 598 3383 778 889 Arrive On Green 0.27 0.00 0.34 0.66 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 689 0 554 497 473 224 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.1 0.0 24.0 2.9 9.8 5.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.1 0.0 24.0 2.9 9.8 5.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1381 598 3383 778 889 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.93 0.15 0.61 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1381 679 3383 778 889 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.6 0.0 25.6 5.0 27.8 9.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 0.0 17.5 0.1 3.5 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr8.7 0.0 12.5 0.9 4.3 2.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.9 0.0 43.1 5.1 31.4 9.7 LnGrp LOS C D A C A Approach Vol, veh/h 689 A 1051 697 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.9 25.2 24.4 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),31.4 26.1 57.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma1q,5 18.0 53.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+Qp,(b 11.1 4.9 11.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 2.6 3.9 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.2 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/13/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 623 182 90 65 173 458 215 464 73 275 161 492 Future Volume (veh/h) 623 182 90 65 173 458 215 464 73 275 161 492 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 656 192 95 68 182 482 226 488 77 289 431 344 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 672 408 202 88 711 317 366 632 99 356 374 317 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 1181 584 1781 3554 1585 1781 3077 483 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 656 0 287 68 182 482 226 281 284 289 431 344 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1728 0 1765 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1783 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.0 0.0 11.4 3.4 3.9 18.0 10.4 13.4 13.6 13.9 18.0 18.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.0 0.0 11.4 3.4 3.9 18.0 10.4 13.4 13.6 13.9 18.0 18.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 672 0 609 88 711 317 366 365 367 356 374 317 V/C Ratio(X) 0.98 0.00 0.47 0.77 0.26 1.52 0.62 0.77 0.78 0.81 1.15 1.09 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 672 0 609 178 711 317 366 365 367 356 374 317 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.0 0.0 23.0 42.3 30.4 36.0 32.5 33.7 33.8 34.4 36.0 36.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 28.7 0.0 0.6 13.4 0.2 249.8 7.6 14.4 14.8 17.9 94.8 75.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr9.7 0.0 4.7 1.8 1.7 28.8 5.2 7.1 7.2 7.7 17.9 13.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 64.8 0.0 23.6 55.7 30.5 285.8 40.1 48.1 48.6 52.3 130.8 111.2 LnGrp LOS E A C E C F D D D D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 943 732 791 1064 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.3 200.9 46.0 103.1 Approach LOS D F D F Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 8.9 35.6 22.5 22.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 9.0 26.5 18.0 17.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 15.6 5.4 13.4 20.0 19.0 20.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 97.0 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/12/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 121 93 993 120 113 0 1564 0 415 10 Future Volume (vph) 121 93 993 120 113 0 1564 0 415 10 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 5003 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 5003 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 125 96 1024 124 116 0 1612 0 428 10 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 125 12 1148 0 116 0 1612 0 438 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 9.6 28.2 7.0 39.7 17.2 Effective Green, g (s) 9.6 9.6 28.2 7.0 39.7 17.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.35 0.09 0.50 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 212 189 1763 154 2523 599 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.23 0.07 c0.32 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.06 0.65 0.75 0.64 0.73 Uniform Delay, d1 33.3 31.2 21.8 35.7 14.9 29.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.2 0.1 1.6 18.6 1.3 4.6 Delay (s) 37.5 31.3 20.7 54.3 16.1 33.8 Level of Service D C C D B C Approach Delay (s) 34.8 20.7 18.7 33.8 Approach LOS C C B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/12/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 227 535 148 9 888 940 284 1330 71 431 16 Future Volume (vph) 227 535 148 9 888 940 284 1330 71 431 16 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5047 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5047 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 247 582 161 10 965 1022 309 1446 77 468 17 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 28 0 0 0 210 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 222 740 0 10 965 812 309 1523 0 485 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.0 28.0 6.5 33.5 9.5 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.0 28.0 6.5 33.5 9.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.42 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 362 737 42 1779 554 278 2113 330 v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.23 0.00 0.19 c0.09 0.30 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm c0.51 v/c Ratio 0.61 1.00 0.24 0.54 1.47 1.11 0.72 1.47 Uniform Delay, d1 27.9 31.0 39.1 20.9 26.0 36.8 19.4 35.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.87 1.23 1.20 0.43 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.1 34.2 1.4 0.6 214.4 82.6 1.8 227.2 Delay (s) 30.9 65.2 38.0 18.8 246.3 126.6 10.1 262.5 Level of Service C E D B F F B F Approach Delay (s) 57.5 135.3 29.8 Approach LOS E F C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 96.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.29 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Broadway & 1-5 SB Off -Ramp 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow r ++ ++ 929 0 573 685 0 929 0 573 685 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 95 95 95 95 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 978 0 603 721 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 1 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 - 0 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 0 - HCM Lane LOS - A - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - - The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago ParkM/alkie Way 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j T+ 41) ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 0 0 0 21 1482 0 1 1729 12 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 0 0 0 21 1482 0 1 1729 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 0 1 0 0 0 22 1560 0 1 1820 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 682 0 554 0 653 0 31 2678 0 2 2659 19 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 5274 0 1781 5230 37 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 0 1 0 0 0 22 1560 0 1 1184 649 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1864 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 25.1 0.0 0.1 31.5 31.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 25.1 0.0 0.1 31.5 31.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 682 0 554 0 653 0 31 2678 0 2 1730 947 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.58 0.00 0.51 0.68 0.68 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 682 0 554 0 653 0 193 2678 0 193 1730 947 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.37 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.4 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.7 19.5 0.0 59.9 22.2 22.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.0 0.9 0.0 61.1 0.8 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 9.9 0.0 0.1 12.5 13.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.4 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 84.7 20.5 0.0 121.0 23.1 23.8 LnGrp LOS C A C A A A F C A F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 3 0 1582 1834 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.4 0.0 21.4 23.4 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.9 7.1 66.0 46.9 5.1 67.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 13.0 61.0 31.0 13.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.1 3.5 33.5 0.0 2.1 27.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 16.2 0.0 0.0 15.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 22.4 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 1 1502 13 0 1 1502 13 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 0 1 1581 95 95 2 2 14 0 1729 1729 0 Free None 0 0 95 2 1820 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 798 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 282 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 0 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 282 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 17.8 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 282 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 17.8 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0 - The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 135 209 27 0 0 0 0 1196 44 826 1710 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 135 209 27 0 0 0 0 1196 44 826 1710 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 142 220 28 0 1259 46 869 1800 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 175 290 38 0 1724 63 1375 3981 0 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.80 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1260 2095 274 0 5225 185 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 204 0 186 0 848 457 869 1800 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1807 0 1821 0 1702 1837 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.0 0.0 10.8 0.0 24.0 24.0 11.4 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.0 0.0 10.8 0.0 24.0 24.0 11.4 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.70 0.15 0.00 0.10 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 251 0 252 0 1160 626 1375 3981 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.73 0.73 0.63 0.45 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 337 0 339 0 1160 626 1375 3981 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh46.0 0.0 45.5 0.0 31.8 31.8 7.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.6 0.0 5.6 0.0 4.1 7.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr6.1 0.0 5.3 0.0 10.4 11.8 2.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.6 0.0 51.1 0.0 35.9 39.2 8.2 0.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A D A D D A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 390 1305 2669 Approach Delay, s/veh 53.9 37.0 2.7 Approach LOS D D A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),48.3 42.0 19.7 90.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma30,5 37.5 20.5 80.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+M,,t 26.0 14.0 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.6 6.5 1.2 26.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 17.6 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.5 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 2 107 74 0 200 0 64 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 2 107 74 0 200 0 64 0 1 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 113 78 0 211 0 67 0 1 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SIB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RighNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.2 8.8 8.5 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 58% 100% 100% 2% 40% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 65 183 200 0 64 2 0 0 0 107 200 0 1 74 0 0 68 193 211 0 1 1 1 1 0.095 0.219 0.252 0 4.984 4.087 4.313 4.896 Yes Yes Yes Yes 720 880 838 0 3.006 2.1 2.313 2.923 0.094 0.219 0.252 0 8.5 8.2 8.8 7.9 A A A N 0.3 0.8 1 0 The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 10/06/2019 --O� -�* f" 4\ /01 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ttt r ►j ttt ► i r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 416 308 437 520 968 527 Future Volume (veh/h) 416 308 437 520 968 527 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 438 0 460 547 1019 555 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1245 479 2904 1102 931 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.00 0.27 0.57 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 438 0 460 547 1019 555 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 0.0 20.4 4.1 22.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 0.0 20.4 4.1 22.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1245 479 2904 1102 931 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.96 0.19 0.93 0.60 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1245 479 2904 1102 931 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.0 0.0 28.8 8.3 26.3 10.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 31.2 0.1 14.2 2.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.3 0.0 12.4 1.4 11.0 6.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.8 0.0 60.1 8.5 40.5 13.3 LnGrp LOS C E A D B Approach Vol, veh/h 438 A 1007 1574 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.8 32.0 30.9 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.0 24.0 50.0 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.5 19.5 45.5 25.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 22.4 7.7 6.1 24.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.3 4.3 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 30.6 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/0312019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 10/06/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft r ►j +T+ ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 354 146 196 104 133 139 100 189 33 344 340 677 Future Volume (veh/h) 354 146 196 104 133 139 100 189 33 344 340 677 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 373 154 206 109 140 146 105 199 35 362 624 536 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 365 174 233 137 750 335 356 606 105 505 530 449 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.28 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 725 970 1781 3554 1585 1781 3029 524 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 373 0 360 109 140 146 105 115 119 362 624 536 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 0 1696 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1776 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.5 0.0 18.4 5.4 2.9 7.2 4.5 5.0 5.2 16.5 25.5 25.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.5 0.0 18.4 5.4 2.9 7.2 4.5 5.0 5.2 16.5 25.5 25.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 365 0 407 137 750 335 356 355 355 505 530 449 V/C Ratio(X) 1.02 0.00 0.88 0.80 0.19 0.44 0.29 0.32 0.33 0.72 1.18 1.19 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 365 0 407 137 750 335 356 355 355 505 530 449 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.3 0.0 33.0 40.9 29.2 30.8 30.6 30.8 30.9 29.0 32.3 32.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 53.0 0.0 23.4 27.4 0.5 4.1 2.1 2.4 2.5 8.5 98.2 107.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 6.7 0.0 10.0 3.4 1.3 3.1 2.1 2.3 2.4 8.0 25.6 22.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 93.2 0.0 56.4 68.2 29.7 34.9 32.7 33.2 33.4 37.5 130.5 139.4 LnGrp LOS F A E E C C C C C D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 733 395 339 1522 Approach Delay, s/veh 75.1 42.3 33.1 111.5 Approach LOS E D C F Timer - Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.4 26.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.9 21.6 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 7.4 20.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 84.5 HCM 6th LOS F 30.0 14.0 23.5 22.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 25.5 9.5 19.0 18.0 27.5 11.5 9.2 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.2 User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 160 101 688 98 71 0 1658 0 726 24 Future Volume (vph) 160 101 688 98 71 0 1658 0 726 24 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 4990 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 4990 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 168 106 724 103 75 0 1745 0 764 25 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 16 827 0 75 0 1745 0 789 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 35.2 7.8 47.5 34.0 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 15.0 35.2 7.8 47.5 34.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.32 0.07 0.43 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 241 215 1596 125 2195 861 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.17 0.04 c0.34 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.08 0.52 0.60 0.79 0.92 Uniform Delay, d1 45.3 41.4 30.5 49.6 27.0 36.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.5 0.1 1.1 7.5 3.1 14.2 Delay (s) 53.8 41.6 14.0 57.1 30.1 50.9 Level of Service D D B E C D Approach Delay (s) 49.1 14.0 31.2 50.9 Approach LOS D B C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 181 458 223 8 605 717 148 1555 115 744 36 Future Volume (vph) 181 458 223 8 605 717 148 1555 115 744 36 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3224 3433 5085 1583 3433 5033 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3224 3433 5085 1583 3433 5033 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 191 482 235 8 637 755 156 1637 121 783 38 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 46 0 0 0 392 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 172 690 0 8 637 363 156 1758 0 821 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.5 20.5 1.0 34.3 34.3 9.7 43.0 27.5 Effective Green, g (s) 20.5 20.5 1.0 34.3 34.3 9.7 43.0 27.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.31 0.31 0.09 0.39 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 300 600 31 1585 493 302 1967 696 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.21 0.00 0.13 0.05 c0.35 c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm c0.23 v/c Ratio 0.57 1.15 0.26 0.40 0.74 0.52 0.89 1.18 Uniform Delay, d1 40.8 44.8 54.1 29.8 33.8 47.9 31.4 41.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.46 2.33 0.60 0.38 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.6 85.9 3.2 0.5 6.9 0.9 4.3 95.2 Delay (s) 43.4 130.7 46.8 14.4 85.6 29.8 16.1 136.5 Level of Service D F D B F C B F Approach Delay (s) 114.1 53.0 17.2 Approach LOS F D B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 64.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.05 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.8% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Broadway & 1-5 SB Off -Ramp 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow r ++ ++ 883 0 910 607 0 883 0 910 607 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 95 95 95 95 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 929 0 958 639 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 1 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 - 0 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 0 - HCM Lane LOS - A - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - - The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago ParkM/alkie Way 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j T+ 41) ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 9 0 24 0 0 0 28 1731 0 1 1781 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 9 0 24 0 0 0 28 1731 0 1 1781 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 0 25 0 0 0 29 1822 0 1 1875 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 676 0 548 0 647 0 37 2695 0 2 2678 3 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 5274 0 1781 5268 6 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 0 25 0 0 0 29 1822 0 1 1212 665 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1869 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 31.4 0.0 0.1 32.6 32.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 31.4 0.0 0.1 32.6 32.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 676 0 548 0 647 0 37 2695 0 2 1730 950 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.68 0.00 0.51 0.70 0.70 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 676 0 548 0 647 0 193 2695 0 193 1730 950 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.41 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.8 0.0 26.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.5 20.8 0.0 59.9 22.5 22.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.9 1.4 0.0 66.4 1.0 1.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 12.5 0.0 0.1 12.9 14.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.8 0.0 26.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 88.4 22.2 0.0 126.3 23.5 24.3 LnGrp LOS C A C A A A F C A F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 34 0 1851 1878 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.1 0.0 23.2 23.8 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.5 7.5 66.0 46.5 5.1 68.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 13.0 61.0 31.0 13.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.3 3.9 34.6 0.0 2.1 33.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 16.3 0.0 0.0 16.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 23.6 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 9 1750 3 0 9 1750 3 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 0 9 1842 95 95 2 2 3 0 1805 1805 0 Free None 0 0 95 2 1900 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 923 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 233 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 0 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 233 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 21.1 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 233 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.041 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 21.1 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0.1 - The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 369 177 49 0 0 0 0 1721 54 721 1266 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 369 177 49 0 0 0 0 1721 54 721 1266 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 388 186 52 0 1812 57 759 1333 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 403 318 89 0 1901 60 799 3376 0 Arrive On Green 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.46 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1406 393 0 5254 160 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 388 0 238 0 1212 657 759 1333 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1800 0 1702 1842 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.2 0.0 9.4 0.0 27.7 27.8 16.8 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.2 0.0 9.4 0.0 27.7 27.8 16.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.09 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 403 0 407 0 1272 688 799 3376 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.96 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.39 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 0 407 0 1272 688 799 3376 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.35 0.35 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.6 0.0 27.6 0.0 24.4 24.4 21.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 35.1 0.0 2.1 0.0 16.2 24.7 9.6 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/IY9.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 13.2 16.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 65.7 0.0 29.7 0.0 40.6 49.1 30.7 0.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A C A D D C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 626 1869 2092 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.0 43.6 11.2 Approach LOS D D B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),K.0 34.4 22.6 57.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmalo,5 29.9 18.1 52.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+[M,8; 29.8 19.2 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 14.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 30.0 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.5 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 128 64 0 156 0 94 0 0 1 1 4 Future Vol, veh/h 0 128 64 0 156 0 94 0 0 1 1 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 135 67 0 164 0 99 0 0 1 1 4 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB Vf(BI KI3 SIB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.5 8.5 8.7 7.6 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q 100% 0% 0% 17% 0% 67% 100% 17% 0% 33% 0% 67% Stop Stop Stop Stop 94 192 156 6 94 0 0 1 0 128 156 1 0 64 0 4 99 202 164 6 1 1 1 1 0.136 0.234 0.201 0.008 4.94 4.177 4.407 4.5 Yes Yes Yes Yes 726 861 816 795 2.964 2.195 2.425 2.53 0.136 0.235 0.201 0.008 8.7 8.5 8.5 7.6 A A A A 0.5 0.9 0.7 0 The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/03/2019 --10 -�* 4\ /,* Movement Lane Configurations ttlL r ►j ttt ►) jr Traffic Volume (veh/h) 669 1047 576 484 461 224 Future Volume (veh/h) 669 1047 576 484 461 224 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 704 0 606 509 485 236 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Q Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1251 643 3383 778 929 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.00 0.36 0.66 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 704 0 606 509 485 236 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.7 0.0 26.3 3.0 10.1 5.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.7 0.0 26.3 3.0 10.1 5.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1251 643 3383 778 929 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.94 0.15 0.62 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1251 679 3383 778 929 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.4 0.0 24.7 5.1 27.9 8.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 20.9 0.1 3.8 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr4.0 0.0 14.1 0.9 4.4 1.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.3 0.0 45.7 5.2 31.7 8.7 LnGrp LOS C D A C A Approach Vol, veh/h 704 A 1115 721 Approach Delay, s/veh 28.3 27.2 24.2 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 a a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),33.4 24.1 57.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma1q,5 18.0 53.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+QP,3; 11.7 5.0 12.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 2.5 4.0 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.6 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/0312019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/03/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 650 190 95 68 174 481 247 462 77 289 167 512 Future Volume (veh/h) 650 190 95 68 174 481 247 462 77 289 167 512 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 684 200 100 72 183 506 260 486 81 304 448 358 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 672 403 201 93 711 317 366 627 104 356 374 317 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 1176 588 1781 3554 1585 1781 3050 506 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 684 0 300 72 183 506 260 282 285 304 448 358 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1728 0 1764 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1779 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.5 0.0 12.1 3.6 3.9 18.0 12.2 13.5 13.6 14.8 18.0 18.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.5 0.0 12.1 3.6 3.9 18.0 12.2 13.5 13.6 14.8 18.0 18.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 672 0 604 93 711 317 366 365 366 356 374 317 V/C Ratio(X) 1.02 0.00 0.50 0.77 0.26 1.60 0.71 0.77 0.78 0.85 1.20 1.13 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 672 0 604 182 711 317 366 365 366 356 374 317 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.3 0.0 23.5 42.1 30.4 36.0 33.3 33.8 33.8 34.7 36.0 36.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 39.3 0.0 0.6 12.7 0.2 282.7 11.1 14.6 15.1 22.0 112.1 90.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lk0.9 0.0 5.0 1.9 1.7 31.7 6.3 7.2 7.3 8.4 19.6 14.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 75.5 0.0 24.1 54.8 30.6 318.7 44.4 48.4 48.9 56.8 148.1 126.2 LnGrp LOS F A C D C F D D D E F F Approach Vol, veh/h 984 761 827 1110 Approach Delay, s/veh 59.9 224.4 47.3 116.0 Approach LOS E F D F Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 9.2 35.3 22.5 22.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 9.2 26.3 18.0 17.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 15.6 5.6 14.1 20.0 19.5 20.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 108.0 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 134 101 1232 128 118 0 1687 0 420 11 Future Volume (vph) 134 101 1232 128 118 0 1687 0 420 11 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 5013 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 5013 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 141 106 1297 135 124 0 1776 0 442 12 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 141 15 1432 0 124 0 1776 0 454 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.6 11.6 26.4 6.3 37.2 17.7 Effective Green, g (s) 11.6 11.6 26.4 6.3 37.2 17.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.33 0.08 0.47 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 256 229 1654 139 2364 616 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 c0.29 0.07 c0.35 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.07 0.87 0.89 0.75 0.74 Uniform Delay, d1 31.8 29.5 25.1 36.5 17.6 29.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.6 0.1 4.8 45.5 2.3 4.6 Delay (s) 34.3 29.7 36.1 82.0 19.9 33.6 Level of Service C C D F B C Approach Delay (s) 32.3 36.1 23.9 33.6 Approach LOS C D C C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 29.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 277 586 162 10 1082 1010 356 1397 68 467 18 Future Volume (vph) 277 586 162 10 1082 1010 356 1397 68 467 18 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5050 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5050 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 292 617 171 11 1139 1063 375 1471 72 492 19 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 28 0 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 263 789 0 11 1139 856 375 1543 0 511 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 2 7 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.0 28.0 6.5 33.5 9.5 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.0 28.0 6.5 33.5 9.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.42 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 362 737 42 1779 554 278 2114 330 v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.24 0.00 0.22 c0.11 0.31 c0.18 v/s Ratio Perm c0.54 v/c Ratio 0.73 1.07 0.26 0.64 1.54 1.35 0.73 1.55 Uniform Delay, d1 28.7 31.0 39.1 21.8 26.0 36.8 19.5 35.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.49 0.84 1.52 0.51 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.1 53.7 1.2 0.6 248.3 172.4 1.5 261.4 Delay (s) 35.8 84.7 27.9 11.3 270.2 228.2 11.5 296.6 Level of Service D F C B F F B F Approach Delay (s) 72.8 135.7 53.9 Approach LOS E F D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 110.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.39 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.6% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T+ ►j T+ ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 44 0 30 21 1482 16 11 1729 12 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 44 0 30 21 1482 16 11 1729 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 0 1 46 0 32 22 1560 17 12 1820 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 340 0 302 71 0 63 96 3004 33 69 2937 21 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.04 0.00 0.06 0.05 0.58 0.58 0.04 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 5207 57 1781 5230 37 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 0 1 46 0 32 22 1020 557 12 1184 649 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1702 1860 1781 1702 1864 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 0.1 3.3 0.0 2.6 1.5 23.5 23.5 0.8 30.4 30.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.1 3.3 0.0 2.6 1.5 23.5 23.5 0.8 30.4 30.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 340 0 302 71 0 63 96 1964 1073 69 1912 1047 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.50 0.23 0.52 0.52 0.18 0.62 0.62 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 340 0 302 343 0 305 96 1964 1073 82 1912 1047 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 0.41 0.41 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh42.6 0.0 42.6 61.5 0.0 60.1 58.9 16.6 16.6 60.5 19.2 19.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 0.0 6.1 5.5 1.0 1.8 0.5 0.6 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.1 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 1.1 0.8 9.1 10.2 0.4 11.7 13.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.6 0.0 42.6 70.9 0.0 66.2 64.4 17.6 18.4 61.0 19.8 20.3 LnGrp LOS D A D E A E E B B E B C Approach Vol, veh/h 3 78 1599 1845 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.6 69.0 18.5 20.2 Approach LOS D E B C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.8 12.0 78.0 10.2 10.0 80.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 7.0 73.0 25.0 6.0 75.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.1 3.5 32.4 5.3 2.8 25.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 19.1 0.2 0.0 16.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 20.6 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/13/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 1 1518 15 0 1 1518 15 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 0 1 1598 95 95 2 2 16 0 1773 1773 0 Free None 0 0 95 2 1866 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 807 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 279 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 279 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 279 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 18 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0 - The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main StfWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 135 209 27 0 0 0 0 1199 44 841 1720 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 135 209 27 0 0 0 0 1199 44 841 1720 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 142 220 28 0 1262 46 885 1811 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 173 288 38 0 1752 64 1360 3987 0 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.79 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1260 2095 274 0 5225 184 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 204 0 186 0 849 459 885 1811 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1807 0 1821 0 1702 1837 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.1 0.0 10.8 0.0 23.9 23.9 12.3 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.1 0.0 10.8 0.0 23.9 23.9 12.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.70 0.15 0.00 0.10 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 248 0 250 0 1179 636 1360 3987 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.65 0.45 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 320 0 323 0 1179 636 1360 3987 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh46.1 0.0 45.6 0.0 31.3 31.3 8.4 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 12.3 0.0 6.7 0.0 3.8 6.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr6.2 0.0 5.3 0.0 10.2 11.5 2.7 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 58.4 0.0 52.2 0.0 35.1 38.2 8.7 0.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A D A D D A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 390 1308 2696 Approach Delay, s/veh 55.5 36.2 2.9 Approach LOS E D A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),47.8 42.6 19.6 90.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma30,9 38.1 19.5 81.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+[M,3s 25.9 14.1 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.5 6.6 1.1 25.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 17.5 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.5 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 107 74 0 200 0 64 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 107 74 0 200 0 64 0 1 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 113 78 0 211 0 67 0 1 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SIB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.2 8.8 8.5 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 59% 100% 100% 2% 41% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 65 181 200 0 64 0 0 0 0 107 200 0 1 74 0 0 68 191 211 0 1 1 1 1 0.095 0.216 0.252 0 4.979 4.082 4.31 4.891 Yes Yes Yes Yes 721 882 838 0 3 2.095 2.31 2.917 0.094 0.217 0.252 0 8.5 8.2 8.8 7.9 A A A N 0.3 0.8 1 0 The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 10/06/2019 --O� -�* f" 4\ /01 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ttt r ►j ttt ► i r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 419 314 437 521 971 527 Future Volume (veh/h) 419 314 437 521 971 527 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 441 0 460 548 1022 555 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1245 456 2840 1145 931 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.00 0.26 0.56 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 441 0 460 548 1022 555 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 0.0 20.5 4.3 22.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 0.0 20.5 4.3 22.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1245 456 2840 1145 931 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 1.01 0.19 0.89 0.60 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1245 456 2840 1145 931 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.0 0.0 29.8 8.8 25.4 10.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 44.1 0.2 10.7 2.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.3 0.0 14.0 1.5 10.4 6.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.8 0.0 73.8 9.0 36.1 13.3 LnGrp LOS C F A D B Approach Vol, veh/h 441 A 1008 1577 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.8 38.6 28.1 Approach LOS C D C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.0 24.0 49.0 31.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 19.5 44.5 26.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 22.5 7.7 6.3 24.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.3 4.3 1.4 j Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 31.2 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 10/06/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft r ►j +T+ ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 360 147 196 104 134 139 100 193 33 344 341 678 Future Volume (veh/h) 360 147 196 104 134 139 100 193 33 344 341 678 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 379 155 206 109 141 146 105 203 35 362 625 536 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 365 186 247 129 790 352 356 608 103 485 509 431 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.27 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 728 968 1781 3554 1585 1781 3039 515 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 379 0 361 109 141 146 105 117 121 362 625 536 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 0 1696 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1778 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.5 0.0 18.1 5.4 2.9 7.1 4.5 5.1 5.2 16.7 24.5 24.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.5 0.0 18.1 5.4 2.9 7.1 4.5 5.1 5.2 16.7 24.5 24.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 365 0 433 129 790 352 356 355 356 485 509 431 V/C Ratio(X) 1.04 0.00 0.83 0.85 0.18 0.41 0.29 0.33 0.34 0.75 1.23 1.24 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 365 0 433 129 790 352 356 355 356 485 509 431 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.3 0.0 31.7 41.3 28.3 30.0 30.6 30.8 30.9 29.9 32.8 32.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 57.6 0.0 16.9 38.0 0.5 3.6 2.1 2.5 2.6 10.0 118.8 127.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 6.9 0.0 9.2 3.7 1.3 3.0 2.1 2.4 2.5 8.3 27.5 24.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 97.9 0.0 48.6 79.3 28.8 33.6 32.7 33.3 33.5 40.0 151.6 160.1 LnGrp LOS F A D E C C C C C D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 740 396 343 1523 Approach Delay, s/veh 73.8 44.5 33.2 128.0 Approach LOS E D C F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.0 27.5 29.0 14.0 24.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 23.0 24.5 9.5 20.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 7.4 20.1 26.5 11.5 9.1 7.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 92.8 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/12/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 160 101 699 97 71 0 1702 0 731 24 Future Volume (vph) 160 101 699 97 71 0 1702 0 731 24 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 4992 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 4992 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 168 106 736 102 75 0 1792 0 769 25 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 16 838 0 75 0 1792 0 794 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 8 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 35.2 7.4 47.1 34.4 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 15.0 35.2 7.4 47.1 34.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.32 0.07 0.43 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 241 215 1597 119 2177 871 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.17 0.04 c0.35 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.08 0.52 0.63 0.82 0.91 Uniform Delay, d1 45.3 41.4 30.6 50.0 27.8 36.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.5 0.1 1.1 10.4 3.7 13.6 Delay (s) 53.8 41.6 10.9 60.4 31.5 49.9 Level of Service D D B E C D Approach Delay (s) 49.1 10.9 32.6 49.9 Approach LOS D B C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave & Sasnta Clara Ave 09/12/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 188 458 223 8 609 717 160 1579 123 744 36 Future Volume (vph) 188 458 223 8 609 717 160 1579 123 744 36 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3224 3433 5085 1583 3433 5030 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3224 3433 5085 1583 3433 5030 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 198 482 235 8 641 755 168 1662 129 783 38 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 46 0 0 0 403 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 178 691 0 8 641 352 168 1791 0 821 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.5 20.5 1.0 32.8 32.8 10.2 42.0 28.5 Effective Green, g (s) 20.5 20.5 1.0 32.8 32.8 10.2 42.0 28.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.30 0.30 0.09 0.38 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 300 600 31 1516 472 318 1920 722 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.21 0.00 0.13 0.05 c0.36 c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm c0.22 v/c Ratio 0.59 1.15 0.26 0.42 0.75 0.53 0.93 1.14 Uniform Delay, d1 40.9 44.8 54.1 31.0 34.8 47.6 32.6 40.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.50 2.42 0.59 0.36 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.1 86.6 3.1 0.6 7.5 0.9 6.2 78.0 Delay (s) 44.1 131.3 42.1 16.1 91.8 29.2 18.0 118.8 Level of Service D F D B F C B F Approach Delay (s) 114.3 57.0 19.0 Approach LOS F E B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 62.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.06 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago ParkM/alkie Way 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T+ ►j T+ ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 9 0 24 29 0 19 32 1731 45 31 1781 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 9 0 24 29 0 19 32 1731 45 31 1781 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 0 25 31 0 20 34 1822 47 33 1875 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 387 0 345 50 0 45 43 2953 76 42 3035 3 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.58 0.58 0.02 0.58 0.58 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 5119 132 1781 5268 6 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 0 25 31 0 20 34 1211 658 33 1212 665 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1702 1847 1781 1702 1869 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 0.0 1.6 2.2 0.0 1.6 2.5 30.4 30.4 2.4 30.5 30.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 0.0 1.6 2.2 0.0 1.6 2.5 30.4 30.4 2.4 30.5 30.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 387 0 345 50 0 45 43 1964 1065 42 1961 1077 V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.62 0.00 0.45 0.78 0.62 0.62 0.79 0.62 0.62 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 387 0 345 343 0 305 96 1964 1065 82 1961 1077 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.44 0.44 0.44 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.0 0.0 40.4 62.5 0.0 61.2 63.1 18.1 18.1 63.1 18.1 18.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.4 11.6 0.0 6.8 25.7 1.5 2.7 13.2 0.7 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.2 0.0 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.7 1.4 12.0 13.4 1.2 11.9 13.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.1 0.0 40.9 74.1 0.0 68.0 88.8 19.5 20.8 76.3 18.8 19.3 LnGrp LOS D A D E A E F B C E B B Approach Vol, veh/h 34 51 1903 1910 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.7 71.7 21.2 20.0 Approach LOS D E C B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 33.3 8.2 79.9 8.7 8.1 80.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 7.0 73.0 25.0 6.0 75.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.6 4.5 32.5 4.2 4.4 32.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 20.7 0.1 0.0 21.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 21.4 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/13/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 15 1793 3 0 15 1793 3 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 0 16 1887 95 95 2 2 3 0 1838 1838 0 Free None 0 0 95 2 1935 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 945 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 226 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 226 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 22.1 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 226 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.07 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 22.1 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0.2 - The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 370 177 49 0 0 0 0 1731 54 731 1272 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 370 177 49 0 0 0 0 1731 54 731 1272 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 389 186 52 0 1822 57 769 1339 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 403 318 89 0 1761 55 894 3376 0 Arrive On Green 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.26 0.66 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1406 393 0 5255 159 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 389 0 238 0 1219 660 769 1339 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1800 0 1702 1842 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.3 0.0 9.4 0.0 27.7 27.7 17.0 9.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.3 0.0 9.4 0.0 27.7 27.7 17.0 9.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.09 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 403 0 407 0 1179 638 894 3376 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.97 0.00 0.58 0.00 1.03 1.04 0.86 0.40 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 0 407 0 1179 638 894 3376 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.6 0.0 27.6 0.0 26.1 26.2 28.3 6.2 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 35.7 0.0 2.1 0.0 35.4 45.1 3.1 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/IY9.1 0.0 4.2 0.0 16.3 19.3 7.1 2.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 66.3 0.0 29.7 0.0 61.5 71.2 31.4 6.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A C A F F C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 627 1879 2108 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.5 64.9 15.5 Approach LOS D E B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),25.2 32.2 22.6 57.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma,t 27.7 18.1 52.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+q,0; 29.7 19.3 11.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.0 0.0 13.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 40.6 HCM 6th LOS D The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.5 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 129 65 0 156 0 94 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 129 65 0 156 0 94 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 136 68 0 164 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB Vf(BI NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.5 8.5 8.7 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 66% 100% 100% 0% 34% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 94 194 156 0 94 0 0 0 0 129 156 0 0 65 0 0 99 204 164 0 1 1 1 1 0.136 0.236 0.201 0 4.933 4.164 4.396 4.873 Yes Yes Yes Yes 727 864 818 0 2.957 2.179 2.413 2.903 0.136 0.236 0.2 0 8.7 8.5 8.5 7.9 A A A N 0.5 0.9 0.7 0 The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/13/2019 __10 _�* 4\ /,* Movement Lane Configurations ttlL r ►j ttt ►) jr Traffic Volume (veh/h) 671 1051 576 487 471 224 Future Volume (veh/h) 671 1051 576 487 471 224 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 706 0 606 513 496 236 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Q Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1251 643 3383 778 929 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.00 0.36 0.66 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 706 0 606 513 496 236 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.7 0.0 26.3 3.0 10.4 5.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.7 0.0 26.3 3.0 10.4 5.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1251 643 3383 778 929 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.94 0.15 0.64 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1251 679 3383 778 929 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.5 0.0 24.7 5.1 28.1 8.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 20.9 0.1 4.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr4.0 0.0 14.1 0.9 4.6 1.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.3 0.0 45.7 5.2 32.0 8.7 LnGrp LOS C D A C A Approach Vol, veh/h 706 A 1119 732 Approach Delay, s/veh 28.3 27.1 24.5 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),33.4 24.1 57.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma1q,5 18.0 53.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+QP,3; 11.7 5.0 12.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 2.5 4.0 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.7 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/13/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 654 191 95 68 176 481 247 464 77 289 169 516 Future Volume (veh/h) 654 191 95 68 176 481 247 464 77 289 169 516 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 688 201 100 72 185 506 260 488 81 304 452 360 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 672 403 201 93 711 317 366 627 104 356 374 317 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 1179 586 1781 3554 1585 1781 3052 504 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 688 0 301 72 185 506 260 283 286 304 452 360 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1728 0 1765 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1780 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.5 0.0 12.2 3.6 4.0 18.0 12.2 13.6 13.7 14.8 18.0 18.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.5 0.0 12.2 3.6 4.0 18.0 12.2 13.6 13.7 14.8 18.0 18.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 672 0 604 93 711 317 366 365 366 356 374 317 V/C Ratio(X) 1.02 0.00 0.50 0.77 0.26 1.60 0.71 0.78 0.78 0.85 1.21 1.14 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 672 0 604 182 711 317 366 365 366 356 374 317 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.3 0.0 23.5 42.1 30.4 36.0 33.3 33.8 33.8 34.7 36.0 36.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 40.9 0.0 0.6 12.7 0.2 282.7 11.1 14.8 15.2 22.0 116.3 92.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/IY9.0 0.0 5.0 1.9 1.7 31.7 6.3 7.2 7.3 8.4 20.1 14.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 77.2 0.0 24.1 54.8 30.6 318.7 44.4 48.6 49.1 56.8 152.3 128.4 LnGrp LOS F A C D C F D D D E F F Approach Vol, veh/h 989 763 829 1116 Approach Delay, s/veh 61.0 223.9 47.4 118.6 Approach LOS E F D F Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 9.2 35.3 22.5 22.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 9.2 26.3 18.0 17.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 15.7 5.6 14.2 20.0 19.5 20.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 109.0 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 132 99 1262 128 120 0 1718 0 435 11 Future Volume (vph) 132 99 1262 128 120 0 1718 0 435 11 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 5015 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 5015 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 139 104 1328 135 126 0 1808 0 458 12 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 15 1463 0 126 0 1808 0 470 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 8 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.5 11.5 26.1 6.3 36.9 18.1 Effective Green, g (s) 11.5 11.5 26.1 6.3 36.9 18.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.33 0.08 0.46 0.23 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 254 227 1636 139 2345 630 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 c0.29 0.07 c0.36 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.07 0.89 0.91 0.77 0.75 Uniform Delay, d1 31.8 29.6 25.6 36.6 18.0 28.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 0.1 6.0 48.8 2.5 4.8 Delay (s) 34.2 29.7 28.7 85.4 20.5 33.6 Level of Service C C C F C C Approach Delay (s) 32.3 28.7 24.8 33.6 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/13/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 310 586 162 10 1081 1010 364 1413 73 467 18 Future Volume (vph) 310 586 162 10 1081 1010 364 1413 73 467 18 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5048 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5048 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 326 617 171 11 1138 1063 383 1487 77 492 19 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 27 0 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 293 794 0 11 1138 856 383 1564 0 511 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.0 28.0 6.5 33.5 9.5 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.0 28.0 6.5 33.5 9.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.42 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 362 737 42 1779 554 278 2113 330 v/s Ratio Prot 0.18 c0.24 0.00 0.22 c0.11 0.31 c0.18 v/s Ratio Perm c0.54 v/c Ratio 0.81 1.08 0.26 0.64 1.54 1.38 0.74 1.55 Uniform Delay, d1 29.4 31.0 39.1 21.8 26.0 36.8 19.6 35.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.87 1.19 1.26 0.35 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 12.5 55.9 0.3 0.2 245.8 184.2 1.6 261.4 Delay (s) 41.9 86.9 37.6 19.1 276.7 230.5 8.5 296.6 Level of Service D F D B F F A F Approach Delay (s) 75.1 143.0 52.2 Approach LOS E F D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 112.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.39 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.4% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 INTERSECTION: 2 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Santa Clara Avenue Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 295 0.19 620 0.31 NBR 0.0 P 0 342 0.00 420 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 37 0.02 97 0.06 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,459 0.43 * 1,307 0.38 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 134 0.00 144 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 321 0.38 * 233 0.26 EBR 0.0 P 0 193 0.00 67 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 76 0.05 * 90 0.06 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 6 0.00 14 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.43 0.38 E/W Critical Movements 0.43 0.32 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.751 Level of Service (LOS) C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 2 INTERSECTION: 3 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/BuffaloAvenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Buffalo Avenue Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 9 0.01 6 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 597 0.22 1,009 0.37 NBR 0.0 P 0 141 0.00 253 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 210 0.13 139 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,495 0.44 * 1,267 0.38 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 7 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 4 0.01 * 1 0.01 EBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 10 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 * 0 0.00 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.45 0.46 E/W Critical Movements 0.01 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.504 0.514 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 3 INTERSECTION: 4 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/La Vets Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: La Vets Avenue Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,400 75 0.02 287 0.08 NBT 3.0 5,100 613 0.12 962 0.19 NBR 1.0 0 1,700 274 0.00 455 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 197 0.06 161 0.05 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,071 0.24 * 897 0.22 SBR 0.0 P 0 135 0.00 223 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 305 0.09 326 0.10 EBT 3.0 5,100 456 0.13 * 427 0.12 EBR 0.0 P 0 190 0.00 201 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 295 0.09 * 268 0.08 WBT 2.0 3,400 317 0.09 514 0.15 WBR 1.0 0 1,700 207 0.00 237 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.26 0.30 E/W Critical Movements 0.21 0.25 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.522 0.601 Level of Service (LOS) A B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 4 INTERSECTION: 5 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/Town and Country Road NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Town and Country Road Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 49 0.02 66 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 860 0.17 1,101 0.22 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 140 0.00 187 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 262 0.08 401 0.13 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,075 0.21 1,025 0.20 SBR 1.0 0 1,600 31 0.00 118 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 21 0.01 128 0.08 EBT 2.0 3,400 64 0.02 136 0.04 EBR 1.0 0 1,600 68 0.02 139 0.05 WBL 1.0 1,600 271 0.17 195 0.12 WBT 2.0 3,400 52 0.02 99 0.03 WBR 2.0 0 3,200 378 0.02 414 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.25 0.34 E/W Critical Movements 0.19 0.16 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.05 0.05 Clearance Interval 0.05 ICU EJ10.05 0.600 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 5 INTERSECTION: 6 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/E Memory Lane NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: E Memory Lane Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 29 0.01 104 0.03 NBT 3.0 5,100 870 0.22 955 0.22 NBR 0.0 P 0 252 0.00 159 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 33 0.01 35 0.01 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,115 0.27 * 1,113 0.25 SBR 0.0 P 0 248 0.00 154 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 155 0.05 * 263 0.08 EBT 3.0 5,100 222 0.05 309 0.09 EBR 0.0 P 0 47 0.00 126 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 168 0.05 207 0.07 WBT 2.0 3,400 209 0.06 * 162 0.05 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 63 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.28 0.28 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.15 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.481 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 6 INTERSECTION: 7 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/WalIds Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Wallde Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 19 0.01 25 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,249 0.25 1,227 0.24 NBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 1 0.00 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,351 0.27 1,534 0.30 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 2 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 2 0.00 * 8 0.01 EBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 1 0.00 21 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.28 0.32 E/W Critical Movements 0.00 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.372 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 7 INTERSECTION: 12 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street117th Street NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: 17th Street Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 189 0.06 200 0.06 NBT 2.0 3,400 762 0.22 1,061 0.31 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 174 0.00 162 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 178 0.06 187 0.06 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,082 0.34 * 810 0.28 SBR 0.0 P 0 82 0.00 141 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 141 0.04 199 0.06 EBT 3.0 5,100 1,250 0.26 * 1,219 0.25 EBR 0.0 P 0 78 0.00 58 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 306 0.10 * 186 0.06 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,335 0.27 1,064 0.22 WBR 0.0 P 0 16 0.00 59 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.40 0.37 E/W Critical Movements 0.36 0.31 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.728 Level of Service (LOS) C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P -Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 12 INTERSECTION: 16 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Memory Lane/Lawson Way NORTHISOUTH: Memory Lane EASTIWEST: Lawson Way Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 9 0.01 NBT 1.0 1,700 3 0.00 2 0.01 NBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 6 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 17 0.01 17 0.01 SBT 1.0 1,700 1 0.00 4 0.00 SBR 1.0 P 1,600 168 0.05 149 0.02 EBL 2.0 3,200 180 0.06 284 0.09 EBT 2.0 3,400 272 0.08 262 0.08 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 15 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 0 0.00 4 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 285 0.06 212 0.05 WBR 0.0 P 0 8 0.00 18 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.02 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.13 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.05 0.02 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.230 0.216 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 16 INTERSECTION: 2 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Santa Clara Avenue Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 295 0.19 620 0.31 NBR 0.0 P 0 345 0.00 428 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 41 0.03 109 0.07 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,459 0.43 * 1,307 0.38 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 134 0.00 144 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 321 0.38 * 233 0.26 EBR 0.0 P 0 193 0.00 67 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 84 0.05 * 95 0.06 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 6 0.00 14 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.43 0.38 E/W Critical Movements 0.43 0.32 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.754 Level of Service (LOS) C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 2 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 3 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/BuffaloAvenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Buffalo Avenue Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 9 0.01 6 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 600 0.22 1,017 0.37 NBR 0.0 P 0 141 0.00 254 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 210 0.13 139 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,503 0.45 * 1,272 0.38 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 7 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 4 0.01 * 1 0.01 EBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 10 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 * 0 0.00 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.45 0.46 E/W Critical Movements 0.01 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.506 0.517 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 3 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 4 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/La Veta Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: La Veta Avenue Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/WalIda Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,400 77 0.02 288 0.09 NBT 3.0 5,100 618 0.12 965 0.19 NBR 1.0 0 1,700 283 0.00 461 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 197 0.06 161 0.05 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,073 0.24 * 902 0.22 SBR 0.0 P 0 135 0.00 223 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 305 0.09 326 0.10 EBT 3.0 5,100 456 0.13 * 427 0.12 EBR 0.0 P 0 191 0.00 203 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 299 0.09 * 281 0.08 WBT 2.0 3,400 317 0.09 514 0.15 WBR 1.0 0 1,700 207 0.00 237 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.26 0.31 E/W Critical Movements 0.22 0.25 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.603 Level of Service (LOS) B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 4 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 5 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/Town and Country Road NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Town and Country Road Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 49 0.02 66 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 876 0.17 1,112 0.22 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 147 0.00 192 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 262 0.08 401 0.13 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,082 0.21 1,045 0.21 SBR 1.0 0 1,600 31 0.00 118 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 21 0.01 128 0.08 EBT 2.0 3,400 64 0.02 136 0.04 EBR 1.0 0 1,600 68 0.02 139 0.05 WBL 1.0 1,600 273 0.17 200 0.13 WBT 2.0 3,400 52 0.02 99 0.03 WBR 2.0 0 3,200 378 0.02 414 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.25 0.34 E/W Critical Movements 0.19 0.17 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.05 0.05 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.605 Level of Service (LOS) B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 5 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 6 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/E Memory Lane NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: E Memory Lane Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 29 0.01 104 0.03 NBT 3.0 5,100 894 0.23 970 0.22 NBR 0.0 P 0 258 0.00 163 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 33 0.01 35 0.01 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,124 0.27 * 1,139 0.25 SBR 0.0 P 0 248 0.00 154 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 155 0.05 * 263 0.08 EBT 3.0 5,100 222 0.05 309 0.09 EBR 0.0 P 0 47 0.00 126 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 170 0.05 212 0.07 WBT 2.0 3,400 209 0.06 * 162 0.05 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 63 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.28 0.29 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.15 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.488 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 6 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 7 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/WalIda Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Welke Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 19 0.01 29 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,249 0.25 1,227 0.25 NBR 0.0 P 0 16 0.00 45 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 11 0.01 31 0.02 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,351 0.27 1,534 0.30 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 2 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 2 0.00 * 8 0.01 EBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 1 0.00 21 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 44 0.00 29 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.03 WBR 0.0 P 0 30 0.00 19 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.28 0.32 E/W Critical Movements 0.05 0.03 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.402 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 7 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 12 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street117th Street NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: 17th Street Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 189 0.06 200 0.06 NBT 2.0 3,400 763 0.22 1,065 0.31 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 174 0.00 162 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 180 0.06 188 0.06 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,086 0.35 * 812 0.28 SBR 0.0 P 0 86 0.00 143 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 142 0.04 203 0.06 EBT 3.0 5,100 1,250 0.26 * 1,219 0.25 EBR 0.0 P 0 78 0.00 58 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 306 0.10 * 186 0.06 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,335 0.27 1,064 0.22 WBR 0.0 P 0 17 0.00 61 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.40 0.37 E/W Critical Movements 0.36 0.31 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.730 Level of Service (LOS) C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P -Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 12 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 16 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Memory Lane/Lawson Way NORTHISOUTH: Memory Lane EASTIWEST: Lawson Way Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 9 0.01 NBT 1.0 1,700 3 0.00 2 0.01 NBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 6 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 17 0.01 17 0.01 SBT 1.0 1,700 1 0.00 4 0.00 SBR 1.0 P 1,600 169 0.05 151 0.02 EBL 2.0 3,200 184 0.06 286 0.09 EBT 2.0 3,400 274 0.08 263 0.08 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 15 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 0 0.00 4 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 286 0.06 214 0.05 WBR 0.0 P 0 8 0.00 18 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.02 E/W Critical Movements 0.12 0.13 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.05 0.02 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.ESEENOW 217 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 16 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 2 ALTERNATIVE: Opening Year Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Santa Clara Avenue Right Opening Year Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 300 0.19 629 0.31 NBR 0.0 P 0 347 0.00 426 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 49 0.03 141 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,480 0.44 * 1,327 0.39 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 136 0.00 146 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 326 0.39 * 236 0.27 EBR 0.0 P 0 196 0.00 68 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 77 0.05 * 91 0.06 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 6 0.00 14 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.44 0.40 E/W Critical Movements 0.44 0.32 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.920 0.770 Level of Service (LOS) E C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 2 INTERSECTION: 3 ALTERNATIVE: Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/BuffaloAvenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Buffalo Avenue Right Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 9 0.01 6 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 607 0.22 1,025 0.38 NBR 0.0 P 0 143 0.00 257 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 213 0.13 141 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,517 0.45 * 1,286 0.38 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 7 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 4 0.01 * 1 0.01 EBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 10 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 * 0 0.00 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.46 0.47 E/W Critical Movements 0.01 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.510 in 0.521 Level of Service (LOS) AI A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul3 INTERSECTION: 4 ALTERNATIVE: Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/La Vets Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: La Vets Avenue Right Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,400 81 0.02 294 0.09 NBT 3.0 5,100 749 0.15 1,042 0.20 NBR 1.0 0 1,700 347 0.00 506 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 211 0.06 175 0.05 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,132 0.25 * 1,059 0.25 SBR 0.0 P 0 142 0.00 234 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 317 0.09 338 0.10 EBT 3.0 5,100 469 0.13 * 435 0.13 EBR 0.0 P 0 194 0.00 209 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 315 0.09 * 303 0.09 WBT 2.0 3,400 328 0.10 523 0.15 WBR 1.0 0 1,700 221 0.00 252 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.27 0.34 E/W Critical Movements 0.22 0.25 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.647 Level of Service (LOS) B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul4 INTERSECTION: 5 ALTERNATIVE: Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/Town and Country Road NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Town and Country Road Right Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 53 0.02 69 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 962 0.19 1,188 0.23 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 160 0.00 238 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 269 0.08 519 0.16 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,149 0.23 1,114 0.22 SBR 1.0 0 1,600 33 0.00 120 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 21 0.01 132 0.08 EBT 2.0 3,400 70 0.02 157 0.05 EBR 1.0 0 1,600 69 0.02 141 0.04 WBL 1.0 1,600 296 0.19 229 0.14 WBT 2.0 3,400 69 0.02 108 0.03 WBR 2.0 0 3,200 498 0.05 458 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.27 0.40 E/W Critical Movements 0.21 0.19 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.07 0.04 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.603 0.676 Level of Service (LOS) B B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 5 INTERSECTION: 6 ALTERNATIVE: Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/E Memory Lane NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: E Memory Lane Right Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 35 0.01 123 0.04 NBT 3.0 5,100 931 0.22 1,047 0.26 NBR 0.0 P 0 195 0.00 265 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 36 0.01 40 0.01 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,189 0.29 * 1,186 0.27 SBR 0.0 P 0 269 0.00 200 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 201 0.06 297 0.09 EBT 3.0 5,100 237 0.06 * 332 0.09 EBR 0.0 P 0 65 0.00 139 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 319 0.10 * 208 0.07 WBT 2.0 3,400 230 0.07 179 0.05 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 29 0.00 77 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.30 0.31 E/W Critical Movements 0.16 0.16 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.517 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 6 INTERSECTION: 7 ALTERNATIVE: Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/WalIds Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Wallde Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Right Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 19 0.01 25 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,260 0.25 1,444 0.28 NBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 1 0.00 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,595 0.32 1,621 0.32 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 2 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 2 0.00 * 8 0.01 EBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 1 0.00 21 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 * 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.33 0.33 E/W Critical Movements 0.00 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.389 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul7 INTERSECTION: 12 ALTERNATIVE: Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street117th Street NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: 17th Street Right Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 210 0.07 208 0.07 NBT 2.0 3,400 761 0.22 1,137 0.33 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 196 0.00 214 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 194 0.06 213 0.07 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,197 0.39 853 0.30 SBR 0.0 P 0 126 0.00 165 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 160 0.05 221 0.07 EBT 3.0 5,100 1,295 0.27 1,286 0.27 EBR 0.0 P 0 86 0.00 67 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 363 0.11 213 0.07 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,411 0.28 1,103 0.23 WBR 0.0 P 0 37 0.00 79 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.46 0.40 E/W Critical Movements 0.38 0.33 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.783 Level of Service (LOS) C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P -Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 12 INTERSECTION: 16 ALTERNATIVE: Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Memory Lane/Lawson Way NORTHISOUTH: Memory Lane EASTIWEST: Lawson Way Right Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 9 0.01 NBT 1.0 1,700 3 0.00 2 0.01 NBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 6 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 17 0.01 17 0.01 SBT 1.0 1,700 1 0.00 4 0.00 SBR 1.0 P 1,600 341 0.17 190 0.02 EBL 2.0 3,200 149 0.05 398 0.12 EBT 2.0 3,400 259 0.08 279 0.08 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 15 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 0 0.00 4 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 304 0.06 200 0.04 WBR 0.0 P 0 8 0.00 18 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.02 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.17 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.17 0.02 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.248 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 16 INTERSECTION: 2 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Santa Clara Avenue Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 300 0.19 629 0.31 NBR 0.0 P 0 350 0.00 434 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 53 0.03 153 0.10 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,480 0.44 * 1,327 0.39 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 136 0.00 146 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 326 0.39 * 236 0.27 EBR 0.0 P 0 196 0.00 68 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 85 0.05 * 96 0.06 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 6 0.00 14 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.44 0.41 E/W Critical Movements 0.44 0.33 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.925 0.783 Level of Service (LOS) E C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 2 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 3 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/BuffaloAvenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Buffalo Avenue Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 9 0.01 6 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 610 0.22 1,033 0.38 NBR 0.0 P 0 143 0.00 258 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 213 0.13 141 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,525 0.45 * 1,291 0.38 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 7 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 4 0.01 * 1 0.01 EBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 10 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 * 0 0.00 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.46 0.47 E/W Critical Movements 0.01 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.513 0.524 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul3 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 4 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/La Veta Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: La Veta Avenue Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,400 83 0.02 295 0.09 NBT 3.0 5,100 754 0.15 1,045 0.21 NBR 1.0 0 1,700 356 0.00 512 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 211 0.06 175 0.05 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,134 0.25 * 1,064 0.26 SBR 0.0 P 0 142 0.00 234 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 317 0.09 338 0.10 EBT 3.0 5,100 469 0.13 * 435 0.13 EBR 0.0 P 0 195 0.00 211 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 319 0.09 * 316 0.09 WBT 2.0 3,400 328 0.10 523 0.15 WBR 1.0 0 1,700 221 0.00 252 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.27 0.34 E/W Critical Movements 0.22 0.25 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.648 Level of Service (LOS) B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul4 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 5 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/Town and Country Road NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Town and Country Road Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 53 0.02 69 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 978 0.19 1,199 0.24 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 167 0.00 243 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 269 0.08 519 0.16 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,156 0.23 1,134 0.22 SBR 1.0 0 1,600 33 0.00 120 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 21 0.01 132 0.08 EBT 2.0 3,400 70 0.02 157 0.05 EBR 1.0 0 1,600 69 0.02 141 0.04 WBL 1.0 1,600 298 0.19 234 0.15 WBT 2.0 3,400 69 0.02 108 0.03 WBR 2.0 0 3,200 498 0.05 458 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.28 0.40 E/W Critical Movements 0.21 0.19 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.07 0.04 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.607 0.681 Level of Service (LOS) B Ila B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 5 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 6 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/E Memory Lane NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: E Memory Lane Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 35 0.01 123 0.04 NBT 3.0 5,100 955 0.23 1,062 0.26 NBR 0.0 P 0 201 0.00 269 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 36 0.01 40 0.01 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,198 0.29 * 1,212 0.28 SBR 0.0 P 0 269 0.00 200 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 201 0.06 297 0.09 EBT 3.0 5,100 237 0.06 * 332 0.09 EBR 0.0 P 0 65 0.00 139 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 321 0.10 * 213 0.07 WBT 2.0 3,400 230 0.07 179 0.05 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 29 0.00 77 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.30 0.32 E/W Critical Movements 0.16 0.16 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.524 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 6 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 7 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/WalIda Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Wallde Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 19 0.01 29 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,260 0.25 1,444 0.29 NBR 0.0 P 0 16 0.00 45 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 11 0.01 31 0.02 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,595 0.32 1,621 0.32 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 2 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 2 0.00 8 0.01 EBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 1 0.00 21 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 44 0.00 29 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.03 WBR 0.0 P 0 30 0.00 19 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.33 0.34 E/W Critical Movements 0.05 0.03 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.419 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul7 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 12 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street117th Street NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: 17th Street Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 210 0.07 208 0.07 NBT 2.0 3,400 762 0.22 1,141 0.34 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 196 0.00 214 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 196 0.06 214 0.07 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,201 0.39 * 855 0.30 SBR 0.0 P 0 130 0.00 167 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 161 0.05 225 0.07 EBT 3.0 5,100 1,295 0.27 * 1,286 0.27 EBR 0.0 P 0 86 0.00 67 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 363 0.11 * 213 0.07 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,411 0.28 1,103 0.23 WBR 0.0 P 0 38 0.00 81 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.46 0.40 E/W Critical Movements 0.38 0.33 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.785 Level of Service (LOS) C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P -Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 12 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 16 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Memory Lane/Lawson Way NORTHISOUTH: Memory Lane EASTIWEST: Lawson Way Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 9 0.01 NBT 1.0 1,700 3 0.00 2 0.01 NBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 6 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 17 0.01 17 0.01 SBT 1.0 1,700 1 0.00 4 0.00 SBR 1.0 P 1,600 342 0.17 192 0.02 EBL 2.0 3,200 153 0.05 400 0.13 EBT 2.0 3,400 261 0.08 280 0.08 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 15 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 0 0.00 4 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 305 0.06 202 0.04 WBR 0.0 P 0 8 0.00 18 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.02 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.17 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.17 0.02 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.341 0.250 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 16 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 2 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Santa Clara Avenue Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 393 0.22 730 0.35 NBR 0.0 P 0 364 0.00 447 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 51 0.03 148 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,568 0.46 * 1,393 0.41 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 177 0.00 172 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 342 0.43 248 0.29 EBR 0.0 P 0 206 0.00 72 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 81 0.05 * 96 0.06 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 6 0.00 15 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.46 0.44 E/W Critical Movements 0.48 0.35 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.988 in 0.838 Level of Service (LOS) E I D Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 2 INTERSECTION: 3 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/BuffaloAvenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Buffalo Avenue Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 9 0.01 6 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 648 0.24 1,054 0.39 NBR 0.0 P 0 150 0.00 270 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 224 0.14 148 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,552 0.46 * 1,350 0.40 SBR 0.0 P 0 12 0.00 7 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 4 0.01 * 1 0.01 EBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 11 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 * 0 0.00 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.47 0.48 E/W Critical Movements 0.01 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.521 in 0.539 Level of Service (LOS) AI A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 3 INTERSECTION: 4 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/La Vets Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: La Vets Avenue Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,400 94 0.03 335 0.10 NBT 3.0 5,100 950 0.19 1,446 0.28 NBR 1.0 0 1,700 364 0.00 531 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 225 0.07 184 0.05 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,499 0.33 * 1,080 0.26 SBR 0.0 P 0 158 0.00 258 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 437 0.13 387 0.11 EBT 3.0 5,100 515 0.15 * 457 0.13 EBR 0.0 P 0 263 0.00 219 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 331 0.10 * 318 0.09 WBT 2.0 3,400 344 0.10 549 0.16 WBR 1.0 0 1,700 226 0.00 302 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.35 0.36 E/W Critical Movements 0.25 0.28 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.653 0.686 Level of Service (LOS) B B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 4 INTERSECTION: 5 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/Town and Country Road NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Town and Country Road Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 56 0.02 73 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,226 0.24 1,607 0.32 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 168 0.00 250 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 318 0.10 545 0.17 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,519 0.30 1,203 0.24 SBR 1.0 0 1,600 40 0.00 126 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 26 0.02 135 0.08 EBT 2.0 3,400 74 0.02 165 0.05 EBR 1.0 0 1,600 72 0.02 143 0.04 WBL 1.0 1,600 311 0.19 240 0.15 WBT 2.0 3,400 72 0.02 113 0.03 WBR 2.0 0 3,200 523 0.04 475 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.34 0.49 E/W Critical Movements 0.22 0.20 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.07 0.04 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.775 Level of Service (LOS) C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 5 INTERSECTION: 6 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/E Memory Lane NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: E Memory Lane Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 37 0.01 129 0.04 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,130 0.27 1,363 0.32 NBR 0.0 P 0 239 0.00 278 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 37 0.01 42 0.01 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,443 0.34 * 1,264 0.29 SBR 0.0 P 0 310 0.00 210 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 238 0.07 398 0.12 EBT 3.0 5,100 249 0.06 * 349 0.10 EBR 0.0 P 0 68 0.00 154 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 335 0.11 * 223 0.07 WBT 2.0 3,400 242 0.07 188 0.06 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 30 0.00 84 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.36 0.34 E/W Critical Movements 0.17 0.18 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.564 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 6 INTERSECTION: 7 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/WalIds Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Wallde Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 21 0.01 28 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,482 0.29 1,731 0.34 NBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 1 0.00 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,729 0.34 * 1,781 0.35 SBR 0.0 P 0 12 0.00 2 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 2 0.00 9 0.01 EBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 1 0.00 24 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.35 0.37 E/W Critical Movements 0.00 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.424 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 7 INTERSECTION: 12 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street117th Street NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: 17th Street Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 221 0.07 240 0.08 NBT 2.0 3,400 821 0.24 1,194 0.35 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 201 0.00 225 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 223 0.07 224 0.07 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,257 0.41 * 896 0.31 SBR 0.0 P 0 132 0.00 173 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 168 0.05 223 0.07 EBT 3.0 5,100 1,486 0.31 * 1,306 0.27 EBR 0.0 P 0 90 0.00 70 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 381 0.12 * 224 0.07 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,482 0.30 1,211 0.25 WBR 0.0 P 0 39 0.00 83 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.48 0.42 E/W Critical Movements 0.43 0.34 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.811 Level of Service (LOS) D Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P -Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 12 INTERSECTION: 16 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Memory Lane/Lawson Way NORTHISOUTH: Memory Lane EASTIWEST: Lawson Way Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 9 0.01 NBT 1.0 1,700 3 0.00 2 0.01 NBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 7 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 18 0.01 22 0.01 SBT 1.0 1,700 1 0.00 4 0.00 SBR 1.0 P 1,600 358 0.17 200 0.01 EBL 2.0 3,200 173 0.05 418 0.13 EBT 2.0 3,400 296 0.09 355 0.10 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 16 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 0 0.00 4 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 315 0.06 233 0.05 WBR 0.0 P 0 8 0.00 19 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.02 E/W Critical Movements 0.12 0.18 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.17 0.01 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU EnilLevel 0.354 0.262 of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 16 INTERSECTION: 2 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D- Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Santa Clara Avenue Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 393 0.22 730 0.35 NBR 0.0 P 0 367 0.00 455 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 55 0.03 160 0.10 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,568 0.46 * 1,393 0.41 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 177 0.00 172 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 342 0.43 * 248 0.29 EBR 0.0 P 0 206 0.00 72 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 89 0.06 * 101 0.06 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 6 0.00 15 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.46 0.45 E/W Critical Movements 0.48 0.35 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.993 0.851 Level of Service (LOS) E D Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 2 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 3 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/BuffaloAvenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Buffalo Avenue Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 9 0.01 6 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 651 0.24 1,062 0.39 NBR 0.0 P 0 150 0.00 271 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 224 0.14 148 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,560 0.46 * 1,355 0.40 SBR 0.0 P 0 12 0.00 7 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 4 0.01 * 1 0.01 EBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 11 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 * 0 0.00 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.47 0.49 E/W Critical Movements 0.01 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.523 0.542 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 3 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 4 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/La Veta Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: La Veta Avenue Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,400 96 0.03 336 0.10 NBT 3.0 5,100 955 0.19 1,449 0.28 NBR 1.0 0 1,700 373 0.00 537 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 225 0.07 184 0.05 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,501 0.33 * 1,085 0.26 SBR 0.0 P 0 158 0.00 258 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 437 0.13 387 0.11 EBT 3.0 5,100 515 0.15 * 457 0.13 EBR 0.0 P 0 264 0.00 221 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 335 0.10 * 331 0.10 WBT 2.0 3,400 344 0.10 549 0.16 WBR 1.0 0 1,700 226 0.00 302 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.35 0.36 E/W Critical Movements 0.25 0.28 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.687 Level of Service (LOS) B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 4 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 5 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/Town and Country Road NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Town and Country Road Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 56 0.02 73 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,242 0.24 1,618 0.32 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 175 0.00 255 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 318 0.10 545 0.17 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,526 0.30 1,223 0.24 SBR 1.0 0 1,600 40 0.00 126 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 26 0.02 135 0.08 EBT 2.0 3,400 74 0.02 165 0.05 EBR 1.0 0 1,600 72 0.02 143 0.04 WBL 1.0 1,600 313 0.20 245 0.15 WBT 2.0 3,400 72 0.02 113 0.03 WBR 2.0 0 3,200 523 0.04 475 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.34 0.49 E/W Critical Movements 0.22 0.20 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.07 0.04 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.677 0.780 Level of Service (LOS) B C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 5 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 6 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/E Memory Lane NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: E Memory Lane Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 37 0.01 129 0.04 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,154 0.27 1,378 0.33 NBR 0.0 P 0 245 0.00 282 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 37 0.01 42 0.01 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,452 0.35 * 1,290 0.29 SBR 0.0 P 0 310 0.00 210 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 238 0.07 398 0.12 EBT 3.0 5,100 249 0.06 * 349 0.10 EBR 0.0 P 0 68 0.00 154 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 337 0.11 * 228 0.07 WBT 2.0 3,400 242 0.07 188 0.06 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 30 0.00 84 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.36 0.34 E/W Critical Movements 0.17 0.18 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 ICU EJ10.05 0.567 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 6 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 7 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/WalIda Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Wallde Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 21 0.01 32 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,482 0.29 1,731 0.35 NBR 0.0 P 0 16 0.00 45 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 11 0.01 31 0.02 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,729 0.34 1,781 0.35 SBR 0.0 P 0 12 0.00 2 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 2 0.00 9 0.01 EBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 1 0.00 24 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 44 0.00 29 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.03 WBR 0.0 P 0 30 0.00 19 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.35 0.37 E/W Critical Movements 0.05 0.03 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.454 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 7 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 12 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D- Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street117th Street NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: 17th Street Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 221 0.07 240 0.08 NBT 2.0 3,400 822 0.24 1,198 0.35 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 201 0.00 225 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 225 0.07 225 0.07 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,261 0.41 * 898 0.32 SBR 0.0 P 0 136 0.00 175 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 169 0.05 227 0.07 EBT 3.0 5,100 1,486 0.31 * 1,306 0.27 EBR 0.0 P 0 90 0.00 70 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 381 0.12 * 224 0.07 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,482 0.30 1,211 0.25 WBR 0.0 P 0 40 0.00 85 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.48 0.42 E/W Critical Movements 0.43 0.34 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.958 0.812 Level of Service (LOS) E D Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P -Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 12 P Santiago INTERSECTION: INTERSECTION NAME: NORTHISOUTH: EASTIWEST: 16 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc Memory Lane/Lawson Way Memory Lane Lawson Way Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 9 0.01 NBT 1.0 1,700 3 0.00 2 0.01 NBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 7 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 18 0.01 22 0.01 SBT 1.0 1,700 1 0.00 4 0.00 SBR 1.0 P 1,600 359 0.17 202 0.01 EBL 2.0 3,200 177 0.06 420 0.13 EBT 2.0 3,400 298 0.09 356 0.11 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 16 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 0 0.00 4 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 316 0.06 235 0.05 WBR 0.0 P 0 8 0.00 19 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.02 E/W Critical Movements 0.12 0.18 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.17 0.01 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU EnilLevel 0.356 0.264 of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 16 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 13 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Bush Street/Edgewood Road NORTHISOUTH: Bush Street EASTIWEST: Edgewood Road Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 58 0.00 85 0.00 NBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.05 NBR 0.0 P 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 1 0.00 SBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 1 0.00 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 4 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 2 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 96 0.10 115 0.10 EBR 0.0 P 0 67 0.00 58 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 180 0.11 140 0.08 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.04 0.05 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.10 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.202 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet for HCM\Existing 13 INTERSECTION: 13 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Bush Street/Edgewood Road NORTHISOUTH: Bush Street EASTIWEST: Edgewood Road Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 58 0.00 85 0.00 NBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.05 NBR 0.0 P 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 96 0.10 116 0.10 EBR 0.0 P 0 67 0.00 59 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 180 0.11 140 0.08 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.04 0.05 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.10 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.203 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet for HCM\Existing 13 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 13 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Bush Street/Edgewood Road NORTHISOUTH: Bush Street EASTIWEST: Edgewood Road Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 59 0.00 86 0.00 NBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.05 NBR 0.0 P 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 1 0.00 SBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 1 0.00 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 4 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 2 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 101 0.10 120 0.11 EBR 0.0 P 0 68 0.00 59 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 192 0.11 145 0.09 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.04 0.05 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.11 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.206 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet for HCMVCumul 13 INTERSECTION: 13 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Bush Street/Edgewood Road NORTHISOUTH: Bush Street EASTIWEST: Edgewood Road Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 59 0.00 86 0.00 NBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.05 NBR 0.0 P 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 101 0.10 121 0.11 EBR 0.0 P 0 68 0.00 60 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 192 0.11 145 0.09 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.04 0.05 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.11 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.207 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet for HCMVCumul 13 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 13 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Bush Street/Edgewood Road NORTHISOUTH: Bush Street EASTIWEST: Edgewood Road Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 64 0.00 94 0.00 NBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.06 NBR 0.0 P 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 1 0.00 SBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 1 0.00 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 4 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 2 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 107 0.11 128 0.11 EBR 0.0 P 0 74 0.00 64 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 200 0.12 156 0.09 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.04 0.06 E/W Critical Movements 0.12 0.11 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.206 0.218 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet for HCM\2040 13 INTERSECTION: 13 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Bush Street/Edgewood Road NORTHISOUTH: Bush Street EASTIWEST: Edgewood Road Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 64 0.00 94 0.00 NBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.06 NBR 0.0 P 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 107 0.11 129 0.11 EBR 0.0 P 0 74 0.00 65 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 200 0.12 156 0.09 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.04 0.06 E/W Critical Movements 0.12 0.11 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.206 0.219 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet for HCM\2040 13 P Santiago Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving 17th St On to Main St Off 1530 6 2 Basic Basic Main St Off to Main St On 2200 5 3 Weaving Weaving Main St On to SR-22 Connector 1730 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 8990 13380 0.89 16.2 92.6 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 7470 11485 0.94 16.1 92.9 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 4068 4068 2.01 15.1 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mVin T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 15.9 76.5 72.2 3.9 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 15.9 Density, veh/mi/In 72.2 Average Travel Time, min 3.9 Density, pc/mi/In 76.5 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 52043 PM NB Exist AM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving 17th St On to Main St Off 1530 6 2 Basic Basic Main St Off to Main St On 2200 5 3 Weaving Weaving Main St On to SR-22 Connector 1730 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 8500 13488 0.73 14.7 96.6 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 7491 11485 0.81 16.9 88.8 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5032 5032 1.63 18.6 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mVin T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 16.4 76.3 71.9 3.8 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 16.4 Density, veh/mi/In 71.9 Average Travel Time, min 3.8 Density, pc/mi/In 76.3 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 520:58 PM NB Exist PM.mf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Diverge Diverge Broadway Off -Ramp 1500 3 2 Diverge Basic Main Street Off -Ramp 700 3 3 Basic Basic 5280 2 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 0.943 4991 1060 7200 2000 0.69 0.53 60.4 55.4 27.5 31.8 D Segment 2: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 0.943 1 3930 712 7200 1 2000 0.55 1 0.36 69.9 - 18.7 - C Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 3035 4774 0.64 67.8 22.4 C Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 65.8 23.3 22.7 1.3 C Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 65.8 Density, veh/mi/In 22.7 Average Travel Time, min 1.3 Density, pc/mi/In 23.3 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 521:14 PM SB Diverge AM.xuf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Diverge Diverge Broadway Off -Ramp 1500 3 2 Diverge Basic Main Street Off -Ramp 700 3 3 Basic Basic 5280 2 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 0.943 4828 1000 7200 2000 0.67 0.50 60.5 55.5 26.6 31.0 D Segment 2: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 0.943 1 3828 402 7200 1 2000 0.53 1 0.20 69.9 1 18.3 - C Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 3231 4774 0.68 67.1 24.1 C Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 65.5 24.1 23.5 1.3 C Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 65.5 Density, veh/mi/In 23.5 Average Travel Time, min 1.3 Density, pc/mi/In 24.1 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 52131 PM SB Diverge PM.xuf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 4 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Basic Basic South of SR-22 2850 4 2 Merge Basic 1-5 Connector 600 6 3 Basic Basic 1-5 Connector Lane Drop 940 5 4 Weaving Weaving Main St On to 17th St Off 1400 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 8093 9188 0.88 56.6 35.7 E Segment 2: Merge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 1 0.943 11311 3218 14400 1 4000 0.56 1 0.80 69.7 - 19.4 - C Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 11311 11485 0.98 51.9 43.6 E Segment 4: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 12383 13374 0.93 50.7 40.7 E Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 55.0 36.4 33.8 1.2 E Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 55.0 Density, veh/mi/In 33.8 Average Travel Time, min 1.2 Density, pc/mi/In 36.4 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. FICSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 521 44 PM SB Exist AM.xuf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 4 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Basic Basic South of SR-22 2850 4 2 Merge Basic 1-5 Connector 600 6 3 Basic Basic 1-5 Connector Lane Drop 940 5 4 Weaving Weaving Main St On to 17th St Off 1400 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 9068 9188 1.10 48.3 46.9 F Segment 2: Merge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 1 0.943 10495 3426 14400 1 4000 0.70 1 0.86 43.2 - 40.5 - E Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 10495 11485 1.18 55.0 34.6 F Segment 4: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 10523 10523 1.09 39.0 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 45.8 43.5 41.0 1.4 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 45.8 Density, veh/mi/In 41.0 Average Travel Time, min 1.4 Density, pc/mi/In 43.5 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. FICSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 521:58 PM SB Exist PM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving SR-57 SB Collector to Town & Country Rd Off -Ramp 1100 4 2 Basic Basic Town & Country Off to Town & Country On 1480 3 3 Weaving Weaving Town & Country Rd On to Grand Ave Off 1300 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 2181 2181 3.24 12.1 45.0 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5660 6951 1.44 55.6 29.2 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 4831 4831 1.30 26.8 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 29.3 40.0 37.7 1.5 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 29.3 Density, veh/mi/In 37.7 Average Travel Time, min 1.5 Density, pc/mi/In 40.0 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 520:03 PM EB Exist AM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 6/14/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving SR-57 SB Collector to Town & Country Rd Off -Ramp 1100 4 2 Basic Basic Town & Country Off to Town & Country On 1480 3 3 Weaving Weaving Town & Country Rd On to Grand Ave Off 1300 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 2675 2675 2.65 14.9 45.0 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5660 6951 1.28 55.9 29.2 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5163 5163 1.42 28.7 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 31.0 40.0 37.7 1.4 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 31.0 Density, veh/mi/In 37.7 Average Travel Time, min 1.4 Density, pc/mi/In 40.0 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC51Gi9 Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 52028 PM EB Exist PM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave Off to Grand Ave On 1080 4 2 Basic Basic La Veta Ave Off to La Veta Ave On 1580 3 3 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave On to 1-5/SR-57 Connector 1530 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 8205 8205 1.03 45.6 45.0 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 6951 6951 1.00 55.6 41.7 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 7483 8804 0.85 48.3 38.7 E Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 49.7 41.4 40.0 1.0 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 49.7 Density, veh/mi/In 40.0 Average Travel Time, min 1.0 Density, pc/mi/In 41.4 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 522:11 PM WB Exist AM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave Off to Grand Ave On 1080 4 2 Basic Basic La Veta Ave Off to La Veta Ave On 1580 3 3 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave On to 1-5/SR-57 Connector 1530 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 6043 8555 0.95 17.2 87.6 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5302 6951 1.08 22.6 78.4 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 3236 3236 1.88 18.0 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 19.3 67.5 64.7 2.5 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 19.3 Density, veh/mi/In 64.7 Average Travel Time, min 2.5 Density, pc/mi/In 67.5 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 52224 PM WB Exist PM.mf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving 17th St On to Main St Off 1530 6 2 Basic Basic Main St Off to Main St On 2200 5 3 Weaving Weaving Main St On to SR-22 Connector 1730 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 8843 13397 0.89 15.6 94.3 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 7330 11485 0.95 15.5 94.7 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 3589 3589 2.23 13.3 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mVin T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 15.1 77.7 73.3 4.1 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 15.1 Density, veh/mi/In 73.3 Average Travel Time, min 4.1 Density, pc/mi/In 77.7 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 524:00 PM NB 2040 AM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving 17th St On to Main St Off 1530 6 2 Basic Basic Main St Off to Main St On 2200 5 3 Weaving Weaving Main St On to SR-22 Connector 1730 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 7733 13530 0.76 12.0 107.1 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 6713 11485 0.86 13.4 100.1 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 2939 2939 2.50 10.9 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mVin T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 12.4 83.5 78.7 5.0 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 12.4 Density, veh/mi/In 78.7 Average Travel Time, min 5.0 Density, pc/mi/In 83.5 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 524:17 PM NB 2040 PM.xuf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 4 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Basic Basic South of SR-22 2850 4 2 Merge Basic 1-5 Connector 600 6 3 Basic Basic 1-5 Connector Lane Drop 940 5 4 Weaving Weaving Main St On to 17th St Off 1400 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 8412 9188 0.93 43.9 47.9 F Segment 2: Merge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 1 0.943 10694 3700 14400 1 4000 0.59 1 0.93 35.5 - 50.3 - F Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 10694 11485 1.07 52.7 35.8 F Segment 4: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 11822 11822 1.01 43.8 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 44.0 45.3 42.7 1.5 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 44.0 Density, veh/mi/In 42.7 Average Travel Time, min 1.5 Density, pc/mi/In 45.3 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 524:34 PM SB 2040 AM.xuf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 4 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Basic Basic South of SR-22 2850 4 2 Merge Basic 1-5 Connector 600 6 3 Basic Basic 1-5 Connector Lane Drop 940 5 4 Weaving Weaving Main St On to 17th St Off 1400 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 9064 9188 1.11 48.3 47.0 F Segment 2: Merge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 1 0.943 10483 3691 14400 1 4000 0.71 1 0.92 37.5 - 46.6 - F Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 10483 11485 1.21 53.3 34.5 F Segment 4: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 10303 10303 1.12 38.2 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 44.6 44.3 41.7 1.5 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 44.6 Density, veh/mi/In 41.7 Average Travel Time, min 1.5 Density, pc/mi/In 44.3 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 524:50 PM SB 2040 PM.xuf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Diverge Diverge Broadway Off -Ramp 1500 3 2 Diverge Basic Main Street Off -Ramp 700 3 3 Basic Basic 5280 2 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 0.943 5629 1041 7200 2000 0.78 0.52 60.5 55.4 31.0 34.4 D Segment 2: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 1 0.943 4588 887 7200 1 2000 0.64 1 0.44 68.7 - 22.3 - C Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 3489 4774 0.73 65.8 26.5 D Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 64.6 27.2 26.5 1.3 D Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 64.6 Density, veh/mi/In 26.5 Average Travel Time, min 1.3 Density, pc/mi/In 27.2 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 525:06 PM SB Diverge AM.xuf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed pM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Diverge Diverge Broadway Off -Ramp 1500 3 2 Diverge Basic Main Street Off -Ramp 700 3 3 Basic Basic 5280 2 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 0.943 5300 1056 7200 2000 0.74 0.53 60.5 55.4 291 33.1 D Segment 2: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 0.943 1 4244 553 7200 1 2000 0.59 1 0.28 69.5 1 20.4 1 C Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 3481 4774 0.73 65.8 26.4 D Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 64.7 26.4 25.8 1.3 D Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 64.7 Density, veh/mi/In 25.8 Average Travel Time, min 1.3 Density, pc/mi/In 26.4 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 52522 PM SB Diverge PM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking Access Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving SR-57 SB Collector to Town & Country Rd Off -Ramp 1100 4 2 Basic Basic Town & Country Off to Town & Country On 1480 3 3 Weaving Weaving Town & Country Rd On to Grand Ave Off 1300 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 2056 2056 3.48 11.4 45.0 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5634 6951 1.49 55.5 29.0 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 4573 4573 1.40 25.4 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 28.4 40.0 37.7 1.6 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 28.4 Density, veh/mi/In 37.7 Average Travel Time, min 1.6 Density, pc/mi/In 40.0 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 523:15 PM EB 2040 AM.mf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving SR-57 SB Collector to Town & Country Rd Off -Ramp 1100 4 2 Basic Basic Town & Country Off to Town & Country On 1480 3 3 Weaving Weaving Town & Country Rd On to Grand Ave Off 1300 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 2932 2932 2.43 16.3 45.0 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 6046 6951 1.32 56.1 32.3 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5706 5706 1.37 31.7 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 33.1 41.0 38.7 1.3 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 33.1 Density, veh/mi/In 38.7 Average Travel Time, min 1.3 Density, pc/mi/In 41.0 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 523:36 PM EB 2040 PM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave Off to Grand Ave On 1080 4 2 Basic Basic La Veta Ave Off to La Veta Ave On 1580 3 3 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave On to 1-5/SR-57 Connector 1530 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 7817 8054 1.03 39.7 49.3 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 6064 6951 0.96 32.3 62.6 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 6854 6939 0.99 46.7 36.7 E Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 39.0 48.4 46.5 1.2 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 39.0 Density, veh/mi/In 46.5 Average Travel Time, min 1.2 Density, pc/mi/In 48.4 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 525:38 PM WB 2040 AM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave Off to Grand Ave On 1080 4 2 Basic Basic La Veta Ave Off to La Veta Ave On 1580 3 3 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave On to 1-5/SR-57 Connector 1530 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5803 8539 1.02 15.9 91.5 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 4872 6951 1.15 18.6 87.1 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 2198 2198 2.54 12.2 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 15.9 71.4 68.3 3.0 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 15.9 Density, veh/mi/In 68.3 Average Travel Time, min 3.0 Density, pc/mi/In 71.4 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 525:50 PM WB 2040 PM.mf Memorandum: The Addington Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis ATTACHMENT C: QUEUE ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS P%RE-2525 MAIN STREEMNALYSIS OFFSEFSEPTENBER Z191NEWSNPPLENENTALANALYSIS N X SW.3,F 19 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/03/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 178 309 193 240 8 33 1290 38 1567 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.21 0.56 0.22 0.01 0.17 0.60 0.14 0.69 Control Delay 58.5 28.3 58.4 32.4 0.0 64.6 35.4 51.1 27.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 58.5 28.3 58.4 32.4 0.0 64.6 35.4 51.1 27.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 68 57 74 73 0 13 223 13 358 Queue Length 95th (ft) 101 79 109 105 0 31 352 30 405 Internal Link Dist (ft) 486 468 678 587 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 357 1472 343 1067 585 343 2159 343 2279 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.50 0.21 0.56 0.22 0.01 0.10 0.60 0.11 0.69 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago ParkANalkie Way 09/03/2019 'A 4\ T '* Lane Group EBL EBT NBL NBT SB Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1 21 1373 1 1497 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.24 0.42 0.01 0.48 Control Delay 33.0 0.0 64.4 12.4 88.0 2.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.0 0.0 64.4 12.8 88.0 2.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 0 17 167 1 19 Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 0 m31 193 ml 30 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 110 675 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 150 80 Base Capacity (vph) 364 563 191 3262 191 3135 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 1201 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 177 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.67 0.01 0.51 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & 1-5 NB Ramps/Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 --P� -,* -*--- 4- 4\ + I I i Lane Group EBT EBR2 WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL2 SBT SBR NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 86 156 99 84 602 70 1386 18 800 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.25 0.81 0.29 0.59 0.36 0.53 0.74 0.03 0.92 Control Delay 44.2 3.3 80.2 5.1 76.0 36.6 48.3 22.7 0.5 55.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.2 3.3 80.2 5.1 76.0 36.6 48.3 23.3 0.5 55.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 0 117 0 27 99 48 367 0 330 Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 11 #219 23 m#59 m140 91 423 m0 #450 Internal Link Dist (ft) 192 268 811 225 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 60 175 150 130 450 Base Capacity(vph) 244 359 212 359 143 1684 151 1885 646 917 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.24 0.74 0.28 0.59 0.36 0.46 0.81 0.03 0.87 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 121 649 7 536 621 62 1516 663 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.93 0.05 0.29 0.65 0.43 0.73 0.93 Control Delay 45.1 64.2 85.3 12.5 15.1 33.6 9.2 64.2 Queue Delay 0.0 26.8 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 45.1 91.0 85.3 12.5 19.3 33.6 9.2 64.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 89 252 2 30 183 21 54 282 Queue Length 95th (ft) 153 #370 m4 62 244 m29 101 #403 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity (vph) 328 702 146 1856 961 145 2077 731 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 258 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 84 0 0 0 0 1 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 1.05 0.05 0.29 0.88 0.43 0.73 0.91 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/03/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 274 453 216 169 66 108 1161 36 1319 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.28 0.64 0.16 0.12 0.42 0.57 0.13 0.70 Control Delay 56.2 25.1 60.7 32.2 0.4 38.7 34.3 51.0 34.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56.2 25.1 60.7 32.2 0.4 38.7 34.3 51.0 34.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 105 76 83 51 0 45 344 12 309 Queue Length 95th (ft) 151 108 124 80 0 69 394 30 377 Internal Link Dist (ft) 489 501 678 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 443 1606 371 1032 571 343 2067 338 1882 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.62 0.28 0.58 0.16 0.12 0.31 0.56 0.11 0.70 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago ParkANalkie Way 09/03/2019 'A 4\ T '* Lane Group EBL EBT NBL NBT SBL S Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 23 27 1319 1 1651 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.04 0.25 0.41 0.01 0.55 Control Delay 33.6 0.1 72.6 10.7 45.0 30.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.6 0.1 72.6 11.0 45.0 30.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 0 20 117 1 478 Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 0 m45 390 ml 531 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 110 679 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 150 80 Base Capacity (vph) 364 558 191 3254 191 3008 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 1109 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.04 0.14 0.61 0.01 0.55 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & 1-5 NB Ramps/Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 --P� -,* -*--- 4- 4\ + I I i Lane Group EBT EBR2 WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL2 SBT SBR NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 75 122 94 246 961 109 1352 142 311 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.23 0.69 0.29 0.65 0.43 0.49 0.58 0.18 0.74 Control Delay 49.1 1.7 69.4 4.6 58.6 41.3 26.9 5.3 1.3 59.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.1 1.7 69.4 4.6 58.6 41.3 26.9 5.4 1.3 59.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 30 0 91 0 104 241 61 19 0 131 Queue Length 95th (ft) 64 1 152 18 m148 m289 113 75 0 181 Internal Link Dist (ft) 192 268 811 225 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 60 175 150 130 450 Base Capacity(vph) 220 383 233 383 419 2216 224 2339 779 499 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.52 0.25 0.59 0.43 0.49 0.61 0.18 0.62 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 200 708 10 1051 774 123 1487 380 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.93 0.07 0.50 0.85 0.72 0.60 0.87 Control Delay 47.9 61.1 29.9 6.2 15.5 88.5 21.4 69.8 Queue Delay 0.0 13.5 0.0 0.2 19.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 47.9 74.6 29.9 6.4 35.0 88.5 21.4 69.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 152 274 4 67 147 52 177 164 Queue Length 95th (ft) ml92 m#355 m4 80 #195 #102 304 #250 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity (vph) 368 769 143 2118 912 170 2463 452 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 361 152 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 66 0 0 0 0 13 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 1.01 0.07 0.60 1.02 0.72 0.61 0.84 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 2: Broadway & Santa Clara Ave 09/13/2019 f-- f �• l Lane Group EBT WBL WBR NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 682 88 6 674 43 1536 v/c Ratio 1.12 0.91 0.03 0.49 0.46 0.96 Control Delay 106.7 117.6 0.2 16.7 62.7 41.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 106.7 117.6 0.2 16.7 62.7 41.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) —477 55 0 103 26 461 Queue Length 95th (ft) #798 #164 0 181 #74 #740 Internal Link Dist (ft) 394 243 218 Turn Bay Length (ft) 160 Base Capacity (vph) 608 97 398 1373 94 1603 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.12 0.91 0.02 0.49 0.46 0.96 Intersection Summary M — Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/13/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 178 309 195 240 8 33 1325 38 1577 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.20 0.62 0.22 0.01 0.17 0.61 0.14 0.69 Control Delay 58.5 27.9 61.0 32.4 0.0 55.8 27.6 51.1 28.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 58.5 27.9 61.0 32.4 0.0 55.8 27.6 51.1 28.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 68 57 75 73 0 12 300 13 362 Queue Length 95th (ft) 101 79 110 105 0 28 338 30 408 Internal Link Dist (ft) 347 457 678 361 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 357 1509 343 1067 585 343 2159 343 2279 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.50 0.20 0.57 0.22 0.01 0.10 0.61 0.11 0.69 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 � � � � + I I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1 48 33 21 1391 12 1497 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.02 0.36 0.28 0.22 0.36 0.15 0.40 Control Delay 62.5 62.0 63.4 61.2 63.4 6.6 64.1 8.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.5 62.0 63.4 61.2 63.4 7.0 64.1 8.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 1 39 27 17 110 10 187 Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 8 78 60 45 214 32 256 Internal Link Dist (ft) lll� "118 96 287 678 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 90 100 80 Base Capacity(vph) 54 48 340 304 103 3861 81 3731 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1726 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.02 0.14 0.11 0.20 0.65 0.15 0.40 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 --P� -,* -*--- 4- 4\ + I I i Lane Group EBT EBR2 WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL2 SBT SBR NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 81 148 94 79 582 66 1360 18 764 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.23 0.76 0.27 0.51 0.35 0.49 0.73 0.03 0.91 Control Delay 39.6 1.5 69.4 3.2 34.9 9.0 60.5 34.8 0.1 52.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 39.6 1.5 69.4 3.2 34.9 9.0 60.5 34.8 0.1 52.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 7 0 100 0 29 34 45 329 0 284 Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 0 #182 11 m55 m42 90 390 0 #403 Internal Link Dist (ft) 179 268 811 44 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 60 175 150 130 450 Base Capacity(vph) 263 383 225 383 156 1665 154 1856 644 883 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.21 0.66 0.25 0.51 0.35 0.43 0.74 0.03 0.87 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave & Sasnta Clara Ave 09/13/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 643 7 535 615 74 1534 656 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.92 0.04 0.29 0.65 0.47 0.74 0.97 Control Delay 42.0 58.1 29.0 15.8 18.6 31.8 9.2 69.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 42.0 58.1 29.0 15.8 25.1 31.8 9.2 69.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 85 224 2 129 345 26 52 262 Queue Length 95th (ft) 150 #336 m3 149 455 m32 61 #394 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity (vph) 329 708 156 1841 941 159 2082 677 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 272 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.91 0.04 0.29 0.92 0.47 0.74 0.97 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/13/2019 T \* i Lane Group EBT NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 358 1066 771 1503 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.57 0.63 0.38 Control Delay 50.5 29.5 18.2 1.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.2 Total Delay 50.5 29.6 18.8 1.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 125 216 141 32 Queue Length 95th (ft) 168 279 ml63 m40 Internal Link Dist (ft) 501 421 357 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 Base Capacity (vph) 646 1871 1232 3911 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 166 1193 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 76 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.59 0.72 0.55 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 6 Queues 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/13/2019 --O� -�* f" 4\ /01 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR _ Lane Group Flow (vph) 353 252 280 479 949 504 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.16 0.77 0.18 0.78 0.48 Control Delay 24.3 0.2 44.5 9.9 28.2 6.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.3 0.2 44.5 9.9 28.2 6.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 52 0 128 42 213 68 Queue Length 95th (ft) 77 0 #218 59 285 129 Internal Link Dist (ft) 465 261 309 Turn Bay Length (ft) 330 275 185 Base Capacity(vph) 1367 1583 409 2701 1223 1077 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.16 0.68 0.18 0.78 0.47 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 7 Queues 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/13/2019 -,* --P� ` .0--- k- 4\ T Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 326 235 68 68 113 26 160 366 506 462 v/c Ratio 0.90 0.44 0.58 0.09 0.25 0.07 0.23 0.76 1.06 0.62 Control Delay 69.1 23.4 61.7 28.2 6.0 30.0 27.9 42.0 89.5 6.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 69.1 23.4 61.7 28.2 6.0 30.0 27.9 42.0 89.5 6.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 95 82 38 16 0 12 35 191 -322 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #173 153 #96 33 35 34 63 #320 #528 80 Internal Link Dist (ft) 484 439 376 296 Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 180 160 100 450 Base Capacity(vph) 362 531 118 786 450 354 707 481 478 745 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.90 0.44 0.58 0.09 0.25 0.07 0.23 0.76 1.06 0.62 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/13/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 274 453 221 169 66 108 1180 36 1346 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.28 0.65 0.16 0.12 0.42 0.57 0.14 0.72 Control Delay 56.2 25.2 61.1 32.2 0.4 57.3 29.0 51.9 34.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56.2 25.2 61.1 32.2 0.4 57.3 29.0 51.9 34.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 105 77 85 51 0 41 271 13 318 Queue Length 95th (ft) 151 108 127 80 0 70 323 30 387 Internal Link Dist (ft) 414 461 678 442 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 443 1602 371 1032 571 343 2065 314 1881 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.62 0.28 0.60 0.16 0.12 0.31 0.57 0.11 0.72 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 � � � � + I I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 23 31 20 31 1367 33 1651 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.48 0.35 0.20 0.30 0.36 0.41 0.44 Control Delay 68.4 92.9 67.7 60.7 64.8 6.7 76.1 8.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 68.4 92.9 67.7 60.7 64.8 7.0 76.1 8.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 20 26 16 26 153 28 211 Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 #61 58 43 58 196 64 285 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 96 287 676 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 100 100 80 Base Capacity(vph) 54 48 265 304 111 3818 81 3765 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1566 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.48 0.12 0.07 0.28 0.61 0.41 0.44 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 --P� -,* -*--- 4- 4\ + I I i Lane Group EBT EBR2 WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL2 SBT SBR NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 75 120 92 246 992 111 1384 142 327 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.18 0.57 0.22 0.67 0.51 0.68 0.78 0.22 0.71 Control Delay 30.0 1.0 41.5 1.2 29.3 14.4 57.1 28.2 4.8 41.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.0 1.0 41.5 1.2 29.3 14.4 57.1 28.2 4.8 41.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 0 56 0 66 168 55 236 0 86 Queue Length 95th (ft) 44 0 101 0 m#122 m215 #127 #302 38 #159 Internal Link Dist (ft) 193 268 811 44 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 60 175 150 130 450 Base Capacity(vph) 314 515 308 515 368 1957 168 1772 645 467 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.15 0.39 0.18 0.67 0.51 0.66 0.78 0.22 0.70 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/13/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 212 689 9 1029 749 127 1462 369 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.90 0.04 0.56 0.90 0.58 0.66 0.90 Control Delay 35.3 45.5 32.7 18.6 26.0 44.7 10.4 61.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 35.3 45.5 32.7 18.6 33.3 44.7 10.4 61.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 104 174 2 209 303 22 195 104 Queue Length 95th (ft) 181 #281 m3 253 m#492 m34 336 #191 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity(vph) 362 766 214 1850 833 218 2200 408 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.90 0.04 0.56 0.97 0.58 0.66 0.90 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/03/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group _ EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 218 329 347 250 32 38 1224 39 1584 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.24 1.01 0.25 0.06 0.20 0.60 0.13 0.72 Control Delay 63.2 28.1 105.2 34.5 0.2 77.0 24.8 50.2 30.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 63.2 28.1 105.2 34.5 0.2 77.0 24.8 50.2 30.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 85 58 -142 79 0 16 165 13 377 Queue Length 95th (ft) 127 86 #242 116 0 36 234 31 449 Internal Link Dist (ft) 487 449 678 504 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 343 1395 343 992 555 343 2079 365 2190 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.64 0.24 1.01 0.25 0.06 0.11 0.59 0.11 0.72 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago ParkANalkie Way 09/03/2019 'A 4\ T '* Lane Group EBL EBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1 21 1385 1 1765 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.20 0.43 0.01 0.57 Control Delay 33.0 0.0 57.8 11.6 72.0 10.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.0 0.0 57.8 12.1 72.0 10.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 0 16 169 0 135 Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 0 42 260 m0 ml51 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 110 681 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 150 80 Base Capacity (vph) 364 556 191 3254 191 3118 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 1249 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.69 0.01 0.57 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 102 643 74 1666 783 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.33 0.40 0.52 0.76 0.90 Control Delay 60.6 10.8 13.8 61.1 30.7 50.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 Total Delay 60.6 10.8 13.8 61.1 31.9 50.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 114 0 51 50 377 289 Queue Length 95th (ft) 183 46 m69 99 456 #388 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 225 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 289 346 1617 162 2179 926 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 285 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.29 0.40 0.46 0.88 0.85 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER - Lane Group Flow (vph) 120 675 7 500 710 97 1699 778 v/c Ratio 0.40 1.04 0.04 0.29 0.76 0.60 0.83 1.04 Control Delay 44.0 87.5 34.6 12.8 22.1 42.2 16.2 84.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.0 87.5 34.6 12.8 72.7 42.2 16.2 84.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 82 -265 2 117 411 33 69 -338 Queue Length 95th (ft) 146 #390 m3 110 529 m42 #532 #470 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity (vph) 300 647 156 1701 932 162 2041 747 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 286 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 1.04 0.04 0.29 1.10 0.60 0.83 1.04 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/03/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 309 491 217 186 80 128 1367 42 1443 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.33 0.58 0.19 0.15 0.46 0.74 0.15 0.81 Control Delay 60.9 27.7 57.9 34.0 0.6 83.0 29.3 51.5 39.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 60.9 27.7 57.9 34.0 0.6 83.0 29.3 51.5 39.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 120 88 84 58 0 55 171 15 363 Queue Length 95th (ft) 169 121 125 89 0 88 278 34 438 Internal Link Dist (ft) 488 344 678 527 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 429 1481 371 973 547 343 1852 314 1771 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.72 0.33 0.58 0.19 0.15 0.37 0.74 0.13 0.81 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago ParkANalkie Way 09/03/2019 'A 4\ T '* Lane Group EBL EBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 23 27 1553 1 1745 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.04 0.25 0.48 0.01 0.58 Control Delay 33.6 0.1 58.7 12.2 64.0 9.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.6 0.1 58.7 12.9 64.0 9.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 0 20 199 1 131 Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 0 51 303 ml 146 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 110 678 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 150 80 Base Capacity (vph) 364 557 191 3254 191 3008 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 1190 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.04 0.14 0.75 0.01 0.58 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 98 1117 114 1580 422 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.29 0.57 0.70 0.61 0.73 Control Delay 39.0 4.4 21.6 59.6 16.8 37.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 39.0 4.4 21.6 59.6 16.8 37.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 60 0 203 56 211 110 Queue Length 95th (ft) 106 18 m260 #133 287 165 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 225 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 398 467 1961 165 2606 593 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.21 0.57 0.69 0.61 0.71 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 202 766 10 953 1022 300 1500 485 v/c Ratio 0.56 1.00 0.05 0.56 1.29 1.40 0.69 1.15 Control Delay 34.3 64.4 31.4 18.7 156.0 237.6 11.5 125.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 34.3 64.4 31.4 18.7 156.4 237.6 11.5 125.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 98 -202 2 186 -629 -98 48 -164 Queue Length 95th (ft) 172 #331 m3 m228 m1826 #177 #90 #266 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity(vph) 362 765 214 1709 793 214 2177 421 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 1.00 0.05 0.56 1.38 1.40 0.69 1.15 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/13/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 231 347 369 264 33 40 1329 41 1686 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.23 1.08 0.25 0.06 0.21 0.66 0.13 0.77 Control Delay 62.4 27.1 120.9 33.1 0.2 56.0 30.8 50.4 31.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.4 27.1 120.9 33.1 0.2 56.0 30.8 50.4 31.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 90 61 -163 82 0 15 307 14 402 Queue Length 95th (ft) 128 84 #249 114 0 32 345 31 452 Internal Link Dist (ft) 347 457 678 361 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 357 1477 343 1047 577 343 2023 343 2181 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.23 1.08 0.25 0.06 0.12 0.66 0.12 0.77 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 � � � � + I I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1 48 33 21 1403 12 1765 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.02 0.36 0.28 0.22 0.36 0.15 0.47 Control Delay 62.5 62.0 63.4 61.2 63.4 6.6 64.1 9.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.5 62.0 63.4 61.2 63.4 7.0 64.1 9.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 1 39 27 17 112 10 239 Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 8 78 60 45 216 32 323 Internal Link Dist (ft) lll� "118 96 287 678 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 90 100 90 Base Capacity(vph) 54 48 340 304 103 3861 81 3731 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1720 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.02 0.14 0.11 0.20 0.66 0.15 0.47 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 102 654 74 1714 788 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.33 0.40 0.53 0.78 0.91 Control Delay 60.6 10.8 10.4 62.6 31.2 51.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 Total Delay 60.6 10.8 10.4 62.6 32.7 51.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 114 0 42 50 395 290 Queue Length 95th (ft) 183 46 m68 100 469 #414 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 44 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 289 346 1635 153 2185 911 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 282 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.29 0.40 0.48 0.90 0.86 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave & Sasnta Clara Ave 09/13/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 125 669 7 499 702 108 1715 770 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.91 0.04 0.31 0.80 0.53 0.86 1.11 Control Delay 40.1 55.5 22.1 21.9 28.7 34.3 15.1 108.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 40.1 55.5 22.1 21.9 55.1 34.3 15.1 108.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 82 232 2 130 376 38 51 -359 Queue Length 95th (ft) 145 #341 m3 170 493 m45 #555 #491 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity(vph) 352 752 156 1594 876 202 1993 693 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 198 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.89 0.04 0.31 1.04 0.53 0.86 1.11 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/13/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 309 491 222 186 80 128 1386 42 1471 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.31 0.65 0.18 0.14 0.46 0.72 0.15 0.79 Control Delay 59.2 25.8 61.1 32.4 0.5 57.8 33.4 51.5 37.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.2 25.8 61.1 32.4 0.5 57.8 33.4 51.5 37.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 119 85 85 56 0 49 332 15 362 Queue Length 95th (ft) 168 117 127 87 0 80 391 34 437 Internal Link Dist (ft) 362 381 678 493 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 443 1602 371 1032 571 343 1934 314 1856 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.70 0.31 0.60 0.18 0.14 0.37 0.72 0.13 0.79 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago Park/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 � � � � + I I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 23 31 20 31 1601 33 1745 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.48 0.35 0.20 0.30 0.42 0.41 0.46 Control Delay 68.4 92.9 67.7 60.7 64.8 7.2 76.1 8.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 68.4 92.9 67.7 60.7 64.8 7.6 76.1 8.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 20 26 16 26 191 28 229 Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 #61 58 43 58 242 64 309 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 96 287 677 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 90 100 90 Base Capacity(vph) 54 48 265 304 111 3822 81 3765 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1465 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.48 0.12 0.07 0.28 0.68 0.41 0.46 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 125 96 1148 116 1612 438 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.29 0.63 0.75 0.62 0.73 Control Delay 39.1 4.2 21.8 66.6 17.3 37.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 39.1 4.2 21.8 66.6 17.3 37.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 59 0 204 58 222 113 Queue Length 95th (ft) 104 17 m258 #142 296 171 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 44 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 398 467 1820 154 2580 606 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.21 0.63 0.75 0.62 0.72 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/13/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 222 768 10 965 1022 309 1523 485 v/c Ratio 0.61 1.00 0.05 0.54 1.34 1.11 0.65 1.47 Control Delay 36.2 65.0 33.3 19.0 177.9 124.8 8.6 256.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 36.2 65.0 33.3 19.0 178.3 124.8 8.6 256.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 109 -204 3 194 -659 -84 28 -192 Queue Length 95th (ft) 189 #333 m3 m217 m#775 #165 61 #293 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity(vph) 362 765 214 1779 764 278 2339 330 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.61 1.00 0.05 0.54 1.42 1.11 0.65 1.47 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/03/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 251 334 353 255 32 39 1441 39 1845 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.24 1.03 0.26 0.06 0.20 0.69 0.14 0.84 Control Delay 67.5 28.3 109.1 34.7 0.2 76.7 26.2 51.1 34.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 67.5 28.3 109.1 34.7 0.2 76.7 26.2 51.1 34.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 98 60 -150 81 0 16 182 14 479 Queue Length 95th (ft) #152 87 #247 118 0 m34 294 31 #602 Internal Link Dist (ft) 480 364 678 516 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 343 1395 343 982 551 343 2080 343 2189 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.73 0.24 1.03 0.26 0.06 0.11 0.69 0.11 0.84 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago ParkANalkie Way 09/03/2019 'A 4\ T '* Lane Group EBL EBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1 22 1560 1 1833 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.21 0.48 0.01 0.61 Control Delay 33.0 0.0 58.0 12.3 73.0 9.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.0 0.0 58.0 12.9 73.0 9.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 0 17 200 0 126 Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 0 44 305 m0 ml36 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 110 679 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 150 80 Base Capacity (vph) 364 555 191 3254 191 3016 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 1187 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.75 0.01 0.61 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 106 827 75 1745 789 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.35 0.50 0.52 0.79 0.92 Control Delay 60.6 11.7 14.5 61.1 31.1 53.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 Total Delay 60.6 11.7 14.5 61.1 33.1 53.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 114 1 65 51 405 291 Queue Length 95th (ft) 183 50 m101 99 472 #427 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 225 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 289 346 1642 164 2199 886 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 294 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.31 0.50 0.46 0.92 0.89 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 172 736 8 637 755 156 1758 821 v/c Ratio 0.57 1.14 0.05 0.36 0.82 0.82 0.82 1.18 Control Delay 49.3 118.5 41.0 13.0 24.6 54.3 14.4 132.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.3 118.5 41.0 13.0 74.9 54.3 14.5 132.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 123 -316 2 149 448 52 70 -395 Queue Length 95th (ft) 203 #445 m3 132 569 m#76 #541 #530 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity(vph) 300 646 156 1752 919 190 2132 696 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 278 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.57 1.14 0.05 0.36 1.18 0.82 0.83 1.18 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/03/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 419 529 235 198 88 136 1728 44 1552 v/c Ratio 0.98 0.35 0.68 0.20 0.16 0.48 0.93 0.16 0.88 Control Delay 90.6 27.7 62.2 34.1 0.6 81.7 39.9 51.6 43.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 90.6 27.7 62.2 34.1 0.6 81.7 39.9 51.6 43.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 169 96 91 62 0 58 -224 16 405 Queue Length 95th (ft) #272 130 134 94 1 93 #578 35 #512 Internal Link Dist (ft) 478 366 678 524 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 429 1514 371 973 547 343 1850 314 1765 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.98 0.35 0.63 0.20 0.16 0.40 0.93 0.14 0.88 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago ParkANalkie Way 09/03/2019 'A 4\ T '* Lane Group EBL EBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 25 29 1822 1 1877 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.05 0.26 0.56 0.01 0.63 Control Delay 33.7 0.2 58.8 13.4 62.0 9.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.7 0.2 58.8 14.5 62.0 9.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 0 22 252 1 142 Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 0 53 381 ml 157 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 110 680 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 150 80 Base Capacity (vph) 364 555 191 3254 191 3002 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 1095 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.05 0.15 0.84 0.01 0.63 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 141 106 1432 124 1776 454 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.30 0.87 0.89 0.75 0.74 Control Delay 39.2 4.8 37.6 92.2 20.7 38.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Delay 39.2 4.8 37.6 92.2 20.7 38.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 66 0 291 63 270 115 Queue Length 95th (ft) 114 23 m#366 #161 331 #211 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 225 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 398 467 1653 139 2363 615 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 39 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.23 0.87 0.89 0.76 0.74 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 263 817 11 1139 1063 375 1543 511 v/c Ratio 0.73 1.07 0.05 0.64 1.40 1.35 0.66 1.55 Control Delay 42.2 82.9 24.4 11.4 200.2 214.6 10.0 289.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 42.2 82.9 24.4 11.4 200.9 214.6 10.0 289.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 134 -244 3 135 -685 -135 42 -207 Queue Length 95th (ft) #251 #364 m3 ml51 mW54 m#206 160 #311 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity (vph) 362 765 214 1779 761 278 2341 330 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.73 1.07 0.05 0.64 1.55 1.35 0.66 1.55 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/13/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 251 334 355 255 32 39 1473 39 1854 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.23 1.03 0.24 0.06 0.20 0.68 0.14 0.82 Control Delay 64.8 26.8 110.4 33.1 0.2 55.9 29.9 51.1 32.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 64.8 26.8 110.4 33.1 0.2 55.9 29.9 51.1 32.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 98 58 -152 79 0 14 356 14 468 Queue Length 95th (ft) 143 85 #250 115 0 33 416 31 552 Internal Link Dist (ft) 347 457 678 361 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 357 1477 343 1042 575 343 2162 343 2273 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.70 0.23 1.03 0.24 0.06 0.11 0.68 0.11 0.82 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 � � � � + I I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1 46 32 22 1577 12 1833 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.02 0.28 0.21 0.07 0.42 0.15 0.63 Control Delay 62.5 62.0 56.9 55.6 51.0 8.2 64.1 20.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.5 62.0 56.9 55.6 51.0 8.6 64.1 20.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 1 35 25 17 168 10 364 Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 8 75 57 44 266 32 413 Internal Link Dist (ft) lll� "118 96 287 678 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 90 100 90 Base Capacity(vph) 54 48 340 304 296 3764 81 2892 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1508 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.02 0.14 0.11 0.07 0.70 0.15 0.63 Intersection Summary 41 The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 106 838 75 1792 794 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.35 0.51 0.54 0.82 0.91 Control Delay 60.6 11.7 11.3 63.1 32.7 51.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 Total Delay 60.6 11.7 11.3 63.1 35.4 51.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 114 1 60 51 427 290 Queue Length 95th (ft) 183 50 m70 100 499 #421 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 44 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 289 346 1638 153 2178 910 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 267 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.31 0.51 0.49 0.94 0.87 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main StfWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave & Sasnta Clara Ave 09/13/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 178 737 8 641 755 168 1791 821 v/c Ratio 0.59 1.14 0.05 0.38 0.83 0.82 0.86 1.14 Control Delay 50.1 119.1 36.8 14.6 25.9 51.0 15.4 116.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 50.1 119.1 36.8 14.6 75.9 51.0 15.4 116.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 127 -317 2 157 442 55 65 -385 Queue Length 95th (ft) 210 #445 m3 157 #563 m#71 #570 #519 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity(vph) 300 646 156 1682 907 205 2084 722 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 259 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 1.14 0.05 0.38 1.17 0.82 0.86 1.14 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main StfWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/13/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 419 529 240 198 88 136 1748 44 1579 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.33 0.69 0.19 0.15 0.48 0.90 0.16 0.85 Control Delay 83.2 26.3 62.8 32.5 0.6 58.1 42.6 51.6 40.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 83.2 26.3 62.8 32.5 0.6 58.1 42.6 51.6 40.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 168 93 93 60 0 52 475 16 404 Queue Length 95th (ft) #267 126 137 92 1 84 #590 35 482 Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 347 678 458 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 443 1593 371 1032 571 343 1933 314 1848 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.95 0.33 0.65 0.19 0.15 0.40 0.90 0.14 0.85 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago ParkANalkie Way 09/13/2019 � � � � + I I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 25 31 20 34 1869 33 1877 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.52 0.35 0.20 0.31 0.49 0.41 0.50 Control Delay 68.3 97.4 67.8 60.7 65.3 8.0 76.1 9.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 Total Delay 68.3 97.4 67.8 60.7 65.3 8.5 76.1 9.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 21 26 16 28 242 28 258 Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 #64 58 43 62 305 64 347 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 96 287 679 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 90 100 90 Base Capacity(vph) 54 48 265 304 113 3821 81 3760 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1347 0 730 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.52 0.12 0.07 0.30 0.76 0.41 0.62 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 104 1463 126 1808 470 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.30 0.90 0.91 0.77 0.74 Control Delay 39.2 4.7 31.1 95.2 21.5 37.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 39.2 4.7 31.1 95.2 21.5 37.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 0 293 64 282 119 Queue Length 95th (ft) 113 22 m#382 #164 345 #213 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 44 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 398 467 1632 139 2341 631 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 18 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.22 0.90 0.91 0.78 0.74 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/13/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 293 821 11 1138 1063 383 1564 511 v/c Ratio 0.81 1.07 0.05 0.64 1.40 1.38 0.67 1.55 Control Delay 48.7 85.1 33.8 19.3 200.7 220.8 7.5 289.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 48.7 85.1 33.8 19.3 201.1 220.8 7.5 289.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 152 -247 3 231 -704 -125 22 -207 Queue Length 95th (ft) #293 #367 m3 m230 m#693 m#190 85 #311 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity (vph) 362 764 214 1779 761 278 2341 330 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.81 1.07 0.05 0.64 1.49 1.38 0.67 1.55 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Clarification to the 2525 N Main Street Multi -Family Residential Project Final EIR Attachment C: Parking Analysis City of Santa Ana October 2019 WOOLmemorandum SATE: September 13, 2019 0: Ms. Selena Kelaher, AICP City of Santa Ana ROM: Sandipan Bhattacharjee, P.E., TE, AICP, ENV-SP UBJECT: 2525 Main Street — Parking Analysis Translutions, Inc. (Translutions) is has prepared this memorandum for the proposed 2525 Main Street Residential Project in the City of Santa Ana. The project proposes the following types of multi -family units: Studio - 68 units (25.19%) 1 Bedroom - 123 units (45.56%) 2 Bedroom - 75 units (27.78%) 3 Bedroom - 4 units (1.48%) City Code. Section 41 of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), Off -Street Parking Requirements discusses off-street parking requirements for development projects. Sec. 41-1322 discusses the off-street parking requirements for multi -family dwellings. a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for each dwelling unit in multiple -family dwellings are as follows: one (1) space in a garage or carport. b) Each multiple -family dwelling site shall provide off-street parking spaces, in addition to the minimum requirements of subsection (a) of this section, in an amount not less than the number of bedrooms on the site. Such spaces may be open or covered and may be assigned to particular units or not so assigned. Bachelor units shall be considered as one -bedroom units. c) In addition to the minimum requirements of subsections (a) and (b) of this section, each multiple -family dwelling site shall provide guest parking, identified as such, in an amount of spaces not less than twenty-five (25) per cent of the minimum required spaces under subsections (a) and (b) of this section, but in no case less than three (3) spaces. The SAMC also requires that a portion of the required off-street parking spaces be designed for physically handicapped persons. Parking for handicapped persons at a rate of 2% of total parking for parking facilities between 501 and 1,000 stalls, and 1% thereafter is required. Note that handicapped parking is portion of the required parking and not an additional requirement. Table A calculates the required parking using the SAMC. As seen on Table A, the residential parking requirement for the project would be 779 spaces based on City Code. Table A: Project Parking Demand Code Subsection Land Use Units Rate Parking Required (a) Total Units (b) Studio 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 270 68 123 75 4 1 1 1 2 3 270 68 123 150 12 Parking Required (Residential) 623 Handicap (2% up to 1000 spaces, 1%thereafter - Included in Residential) 192 Parking Required (Guest - 25% of Minimum of a & b) 156 Handicap (2% of Guest - Included in Guest) 3 Total Parking Required I tmnslutions, inc. 117632 Irvine Boulevard, Suite 200, Tustin, California 927801 P (949) 656-3131 l solutions@translutions.com l Memorandum: 2525 Main Parking Analysis General Plan Circulation Element. The City's General Plan acknowledges that while adequate supply of parking is essential to the economic success of businesses, parking needs should be evaluated to determine needed changes based upon changing circumstances in land use patterns and the public's mode of travel. Policy 7.4 of the General Plan Circulation Element also states that parking requirements be re-evaluated and updated on a regular basis. It should be noted that the City's parking ratios are from 1997 and are over 20 years old. With changes in demographics, increased transit, and increased uses of active transportation modes in the City, an update to the parking standards is needed. Parking Study & Rate Calculation. Translutions surveyed two similar facilities in the area to identify parking generation factors for similar multi -family residential projects. The two facilities surveyed are Nineteen01 and The Marke. Both properties are similar to the proposed project in terms of rents, target population, apartment types, and amenities. Nineteen01 is located at 1901 East First Street in the City of Santa Ana and has 254 units. The unit breakdown for Noneteen01 is as follows: 1 Bedroom - 123 units (48.4%) 2 Bedroom - 125 units (49.2%) 3 Bedroom - 6 units (2.4%) The Marke is located at 100 E MacArthur Boulevard in the City of Santa Ana and has 300 units. The unit breakdown for Noneteen01 is as follows: 1 Bedroom - 155 units (51.7%) 2 Bedroom - 131 units (43.6%) 3 Bedroom - 14 units (4.7%) To identify parking demand for the two projects, Translutions contracted with Counts Unlimited, Inc. to conduct a parking occupancy survey for the two facilities identified above. The surveys were conducted on one weekday (Thursday) and one weekend day (Saturday) in April 2018 for a period of 24 hours. Table B shows the findings of this analysis. Detailed parking accumulation data is included in Attachment A. Table B: Parking Survey Summary Survey Location Units Day of Week Parking Parking Nineteen01 254 Peak Weekday 344 1.354 Peak Weekend 342 1.346 The Marke 300 Peak Weekday 230 0.767 Peak Weekend 193 0.643 Average Demand (Weekday) 1.060 Average Demand (Weekend) 0.995 Peak Parking Demand Per Unit (Weekday & Weekend) 1.354 Project Maximum Parking Demand (270 Units) 270 366 As seen on Table B, the peak weekday parking demand is 1.354 spaces per unit observed at Nineteen01. The peak weekend parking demand is 1.346 spaces per unit observed at Nineteen01. Therefore, the peak parking demand based on empirical data occurred at Nineteen01, at the rate of 1.354 parking spaces per unit. Parking Needs for Proposed Project. Applying the peak parking rate based on empirical data, the peak parking demand for the proposed project is anticipated to be 366 spaces. The project will include 539 parking spaces, which is approximately 32% more than the number of spaces forecast based on empirical data. Shared Parking Analysis. Shared parking is based on the use of a single parking space to serve two or more individual land uses without conflict or encroachment. The ability to share parking spaces is the result of variations in the accumulation of vehicles by hour at the individual land use and the relationship among the land uses that result in visiting multiple lands on the same auto trip. A shared %PRWECi VE-2525 WIN Si EE ARKINGANALYSIS%PARKING2M%PARKINGWW REW DXX Memorandum: 2525 Main Parking Analysis parking analysis was conducted to identify the parking demand when considering the variations in parking demand among the project and Discovery Cube. The forecast parking demand for the project was calculated based on rates from ULI's Shared Parking (2nd Edition). The rates for low- rise apartments range from 0.68 to 1.94 spaces per dwelling unit. The rates for high-rise apartments range from 1.15 to 1.52 spaces per dwelling unit. To provide a conservative analysis the higher rate of 1.94 spaces per dwelling unit were used underweekday and weekend conditions. The parking demand for the Discovery Cube was provided by data from the Science Center. It is anticipated that 60 patrons will utilize the parking lot on weekdays and 90 patrons will utilize the parking lot on weekends. Table C summarizes the forecast parking demand for the project after applying parking rates from ULI. As shown in Table C, the weekday parking demand is 584 parking spaces and the weekend parking demand is 614 parking spaces. The parking needs of individual land uses vary by hour of day. Since parking needs may peak at different times, it generally means that fewer parking spaces are required to serve a mixed -use project than if each land use has its own dedicated parking. As such, time -of - day factors for weekdays/weekends were applied to the forecast parking demand to develop the total shared parking demand. The time - of -day factors for the proposed project are based on Land Use "Residential" from ULI's Shared Parking (2nd Edition). The time -of -day factors for the Discovery Cube are based on data provided by the Science Center. The time -of -day factors for weekdays were applied to the parking demand for each land use to develop the shared parking demand. The shared parking demand on weekdays is illustrated in Table D. As shown in Table D, the total peak shared parking demand on weekdays is 571 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 148 parking spaces on weekdays. The time -of -day factors forweekends were applied to the parking demand for each land use to develop the shared parking demand. The shared parking demand on weekends is illustrated in Table E. As shown in Table E, the total peak shared parking demand on weekends is 601 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 118 parking spaces on weekdays. The Discovery Cube hosts an event each year called Bubblefest that will draw higher than normal patrons. A shared parking analysis on weekdays and weekends was conducted for the Bubblefest. It is anticipated that 200 parking spaces will be used on weekdays and 200 parking spaces will be used on weekends during Bubblefest. The shared parking demand for the Bubblefest on weekdays is illustrated in Table F. As shown in Table F, the total peak shared parking demand on weekdays is 711 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 8 parking spaces on weekdays. The shared parking demand for the Bubblefest on weekends is illustrated in Table G. As shown in Table G, the total peak shared parking demand on weekends is 711 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 8 parking spaces on weekdays. Conclusion. The parking supply required for the project using parking rates from the SAMC is 779 spaces. Since the parking requirements in the SAMC are over 20 years old, Translutions conducted surveys at two similar facilities currently in operation. The peak parking demand was observed to be 1.354 spaces per unit. Using the parking demand rates from empirical data, the project parking needs are forecast to be 366 spaces. The project will include 539 parking spaces, which is approximately 32% more than the number of spaces forecast based on empirical data. A shared parking analysis was conducted on weekdays and weekends for the project and Discovery Cube. The total peak shared parking demand on weekdays is 571 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 148 parking spaces on weekdays. Also, the total peak shared parking demand on weekends is 601 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 118 parking spaces on weekdays. The shared parking demand for the Bubblefest on weekdays is 711 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 8 parking spaces on weekdays. The shared parking demand for the Bubblefest on weekends is 711 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 8 parking spaces on weekdays. N:IPREOi VE-2525 WINS REE ARKINGANALYSIS%PARKING2M%PARKINGWW REV1 WC% 3 Memorandum: 2525 Main Parking Analysis If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (949) 656-3131. Q�oFESS/01 O OF T O�� BHA F�c� Q � m No. C81872 Exp. 03-31-20 `Tl HIVA� �P �FOF CALAFA�� QftBFESS/ON9 BHATjq No. TR 2847 Exp.03-31-202 OF CAL D:%PRWECTSWE-25Z R V O a C Y d � y � O a C N a O N V a N � C R N C_ R 1 T R Y d N O W N C N a O N V N y � � R C O ~ � O r N a c N s � y a`� T � U s R d o_ N V O O H � a N c N d y N d O) m � LL a A 0 a?i c_ � d y N R m � J N V O O H � N a y O y d m a 0 (7 c d � N � N N a O N � J — U R C N d � O 55 O Table D: Weekday Shared Parking Demand Proposect Project Discovery Cube Parking Parking Resident Time of Parking Guest Time of Day Parking Parking parking Parking Surpl Spaces Day Factor Spaces Factor Spaces Spaces p Spaces p Parkin g Hour of Day equ Rid equ Rired Time of Da Factor Required Required Provided Deficit 6.00 100% 419 0% 0 - 419 719 300 7:00 90% 377 10% 11 - 388 719 331 8:00 85 % 356 20% 21 - 377 719 342 900 80% 335 20% 21 - 356 719 363 10:00 75% 314 20% 21 100% 60 395 719 324 11:00 70% 293 20% 21 100% 60 374 719 345 12:00 65 % 272 20% 21 100 / 60 353 719 366 13:00 70% 293 20% 21 100% 60 374 719 345 14:00 70% 293 20% 21 100 / 60 374 719 345 15:00 70% 293 20% 21 100% 60 374 719 345 16:00 75 % 314 20% 21 100 / 60 395 719 324 17:00 85 % 356 40 % 42 100 / 60 458 719 251 18:00 90 % 377 60 % 63 100 / 60 500 719 219 19:00 97% 406 100% 105 100/ 60 571 719 148 20:00 98 % 411 100 / 105 516 719 203 21:00 99 % 415 100 / 105 520 719 199 22:00 1000/0 419 1000/0 105 524 719 195 23:00 100 / 419 80 % 84 503 719 216 000 1 100% 419 1 50% 53 1 1 472 1 719 247 Peak Hour Shared Parking Required 571 Parking Supply 719 Parking Surplus/(Parking Deficit) 148 `Timeuf-0ay factors from the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parkirg, 2nd Edition. 2Time4-0ay factors provided from the Discovery Cube. D9 gedsM 2525MainS edTwm ngAmlyvsTwtl ng270ASt ed PmltivgAWeek ySt red Pmltivg(9/13/2019) Table E: Weekend Shared Parking Demand Pro osed Project Discovery Cube Parking Resident Time of Parking Guest Time of Day Parking Parking parking Parking Surrking Spaces Day Factor Spaces Facer Spaces Spaces p Spaces p Parkin g Hour of Day Required Required z Required Time of Da Factor Required Provided Deficit HO 100% 419 0% 0 - 419 719 300 7:00 90 % 377 20% 21 - 398 719 321 8:00 85 % 356 20% 21 - 377 719 342 9:00 80 % 335 20% 21 - 356 719 363 10:00 75 % 314 20% 21 100 / 90 425 719 294 11:00 70% 293 20% 21 100/ 90 404 719 315 12:00 65% 272 20% 21 100/ 90 383 719 336 13:00 70 % 293 20% 21 100% 90 404 719 315 14:00 70 % 293 20% 21 100 % 90 404 719 315 15:00 70 % 293 20% 21 100% 90 404 719 315 16:00 75 % 314 20% 21 100 % 90 425 719 294 17:00 85 % 356 40 % 42 100% 90 488 719 231 18:00 90 % 377 60 % 63 100% 90 530 719 189 19:00 97% 406 100% 105 100/ 90 601 719 118 20:00 98 % 411 100 / 105 516 719 203 21:00 99 % 415 100 / 105 520 719 199 22:00 100/ 419 100/ 105 524 719 195 23:00 100 / 419 80 % 84 503 719 216 000 1 100% 419 1 50% 53 1 1 472 1 719 247 Peak Hour Shared Parking Required 601 Parking Supply 719 Parking Surplus/(Parking Deficit) 118 'Tim Uday factors from the Urban Land Institute(ULI) Shared Parking, 2nd Edtion. Time-of-0ay faders pews ed hem the Urscovery Cube. DTMectsM 2525 Meier St drP ngAreyasPm ng2715 edPu nffeekmd9 mdPwl ng(9/13nO 19) Table F: Weekday With Bubblefest Shared Parking Demand Proposed Project Discovery Cube Parking Parking Resident Time of Parking Guest Time of Day Parking Parking parking Parking Surpl Spaces Day Factor Spaces Factor Spaces Spaces p Spaces p Parkin g Hour of Day equ Rid equ Rired Time of Da Factorz Required Required Provided Deficit 6.00 100% 419 0% 0 - 419 719 300 7:00 90% 377 10% 11 - 388 719 331 8:00 85 % 356 20% 21 - 377 719 342 900 80% 335 20% 21 - 356 719 363 10:00 75% 314 20% 21 100/ 200 535 719 184 11:00 70% 293 20% 21 100/ 200 514 719 205 12:00 65 % 272 20% 21 100 / 200 493 719 228 13:00 70% 293 20% 21 100% 200 514 719 205 14:00 70% 293 20% 21 100/ 200 514 719 205 15:00 70% 293 20% 21 100% 200 514 719 205 16:00 75% 314 20% 21 100/ 200 535 719 184 17:00 85 % 356 40 % 42 100 / 200 598 719 121 18:00 90 % 377 60 % 63 100% 200 640 719 79 19:00 97% 406 100% 105 100/ 200 711 719 8 20:00 98 % 411 100 / 105 516 719 203 21:00 99 % 415 100 / 105 520 719 199 22:00 1000/0 419 1000/0 105 524 719 195 23:00 100 / 419 80 % 84 503 719 216 000 1 100% 419 1 50% 53 1 1 472 1 719 247 Peak Hour Shared Parking Required 711 Parking Supply 719 Parking Surplus/(Parking Deficit) 8 ITimeuf-0ay factors from the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parkirg, 2nd Edition. 21bmeuf-0ay factors provided from the Discovery Cube. D9 gedsM 2525MainS ebTwlleng AbblyvsTwlleng27MIlared Pmlenffeektlay Bubble 5tvared PwIeng (9/13/2019 ) Table G: Weekend with Bubblefest Shared Parking Demand Proposect Project Discovery Cube Parking Parking Resident Time of Parking Guest Time of Day Parking Parking parking Parking Surpl Spaces Day Factor Spaces Factor Spaces Spaces p Spaces p Parkin g Hour of Day equ Rid equ Rired Time of Da Factorz Required Required Provided Deficit . 6.00 100% 419 0% 0 - 419 719 300 7:00 90% 377 20% 21 - 398 719 321 8:00 85 % 356 20% 21 - 377 719 342 900 80 % 335 20% 21 - 356 719 363 10:00 75% 314 20% 21 100/ 200 535 719 184 11:00 70% 293 20% 21 100/ 200 514 719 205 12:00 65 % 272 20% 21 100 / 200 493 719 228 13:00 70% 293 20% 21 100% 200 514 719 205 14:00 70% 293 20% 21 100/ 200 514 719 205 15:00 70% 293 20% 21 100% 200 514 719 205 16:00 75% 314 20% 21 100/ 200 535 719 184 17:00 85 % 356 40 % 42 100 / 200 598 719 121 18:00 90 % 377 60 % 63 100% 200 640 719 79 19:00 97% 406 100% 105 100/ 200 711 719 8 20:00 98 % 411 100 / 105 516 719 203 21:00 99 % 415 100 / 105 520 719 199 22:00 1000/0 419 1000/0 105 524 719 195 23:00 100 / 419 80 % 84 503 719 216 000 1 100% 419 1 50% 53 1 1 472 1 719 247 Peak Hour Shared Parking Required 711 Parking Supply 719 Parking Surplus/(Parking Deficit) 8 `Timeuf-0ay factors from the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parkirg, 2nd Edition. 2Time4-0ay factors provided from the Discovery Cube. D9 gedsM 2525MainS edTwm ngAmlyvsTwtl ng270ASt ed PmltingAWeekmd Bubble St edPmlting(9/13/2019) City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana Ninteen0l 4/26/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 332 Beginning Occupancy First St Dwy Cabrillo Park Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 0:00 1 0 0 0 333 0:15 1 2 1 0 333 0:30 3 4 2 1 333 0:45 1 3 0 2 329 1:00 0 1 2 2 326 1:15 2 0 1 0 331 1:30 0 1 0 1 329 1:45 3 1 0 0 331 2:00 0 0 1 0 332 2:15 1 0 1 0 334 2:30 1 0 1 0 336 2:45 0 0 0 0 336 3:00 3:15 0 1 0 0 0 0 337 336 3:30 0 1 0 0 337 3:45 0 0 0 1 336 4:00 0 0 0 0 336 4:15 0 0 0 0 336 4:30 0 0 0 0 336 4:45 2 0 0 1 337 5:00 0 1 0 2 334 5:15 0 1 2 3 332 5:30 1 4 0 3 326 5:45 1 2 0 2 323 6:00 2 1 0 5 319 6:15 1 4 0 2 314 6:30 0 3 0 4 307 6:45 3 5 1 6 300 Ong 700 7:15 2 2 5 2 1 0 6 9 292 263 7:30 2 14 0 11 260 7:45 3 7 1 7 250 8:00 3 6 2 11 236 6:15 2 5 3 9 229 6:30 6 11 2 12 214 6:45 9 5 1 3 216 900 9:15 6 5 6 3 2 1 5 1 213 215 9:30 2 B 0 6 203 9:45 4 2 0 5 200 10:00 1 5 1 B 169 10:15 0 6 3 9 177 10:30 3 3 1 9 169 10:45 6 4 1 3 169 MENEW 1100 11:15 3 3 4 4 1 1 2 5 167 162 11:30 3 2 1 7 157 11:451 5 2 1 1 1 B 1 153 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1176 Corona, CA 92676 (951) 266-6266 City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana Ninteen0l 4/26/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 332 Beginning Occupancy First St Dwy Cabrillo Park Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 12:00 8 5 3 7 152 12:15 4 4 6 3 155 12:30 3 7 1 3 149 12:45 10 4 2 6 151 13:00 6 1 3 6 153 13:15 5 3 6 3 158 13:30 5 5 5 4 159 13:45 4 3 3 5 158 14:00 2 4 4 4 156 14:15 8 6 3 3 158 14:30 9 2 0 6 159 14:45 7 3 4 4 163 2 3 6 166 15:15 9 4 4 6 169 15:30 6 5 3 6 167 15:45 11 5 4 4 173 16:00 7 3 4 2 179 16:15 5 3 1 6 176 16:30 7 5 0 9 169 16:45 9 2 6 1 181 17:00 10 4 9 8 188 17:15 16 2 6 6 202 17:30 10 3 5 3 211 17:45 12 2 5 4 222 18:00 9 4 8 2 233 18:15 15 2 6 15 237 18:30 12 5 5 11 238 18:45 14 8 5 3 246 19:00 12 5 8 4 257 19:15 2 6 8 4 257 19:30 8 1 5 6 263 19:45 9 7 7 7 265 20:00 9 5 7 4 272 20:15 9 2 6 5 280 20:30 12 3 6 7 288 20:45 6 7 5 3 289 21:15 2 4 5 2 297 21:30 8 1 10 5 309 21:45 7 1 9 5 319 22:00 5 1 4 1 326 22:15 1 7 2 1 321 22:30 6 4 6 4 325 22:45 3 2 1 5 322 23:00 8 2 4 2 330 23:15 1 1 2 1 331 23:30 6 2 2 1 336 23:45 4 0 5 1 344 0:00 0 0 0 3 341 TOTAL 452 307 252 388 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 268-6268 City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana Ninteen0l 4/28/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 331 Beginning Occupancy First St Dwy Cabrillo Park Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 0:00 3 0 3 1 330 0:15 2 4 5 2 331 0:30 3 1 1 0 334 0:45 1 2 2 2 333 1:00 4 5 3 0 335 1:15 2 4 1 2 332 1:30 4 2 1 2 333 1:45 2 3 0 2 330 2:00 2 2 2 1 331 2:15 0 0 1 0 332 2:30 1 0 0 0 333 2:45 4 2 2 1 336 300 3:15 4 0 0 0 3 0 339 339 3:30 1 1 1 0 340 3:45 0 0 1 2 339 4:00 0 0 1 0 340 4:15 0 1 0 0 339 4:30 0 0 2 1 340 4:45 1 0 1 0 342 5:00 0 0 0 1 341 5:15 0 0 0 1 340 5:30 0 0 1 0 341 5:45 2 2 0 0 341 6:00 0 2 0 0 339 6:15 0 0 1 2 336 6:30 0 2 2 2 336 6:45 0 1 0 2 333 7:00 0 2 1 0 332 7:15 0 0 0 4 326 7:30 1 11 0 6 312 7:45 1 0 1 4 310 8:00 6 5 1 6 306 6:15 1 2 0 3 302 6:30 1 4 2 6 295 6:45 2 4 0 7 266 9:15 5 3 1 5 7 263 279 9:30 6 1 0 7 277 9:45 3 2 1 6 273 10:00 7 5 5 7 273 10:15 0 9 1 5 260 10:30 4 4 0 4 256 10:45 11:15 4 5 5 4 4 7 253 3 5 1 0 10 4 246 242 11:30 4 2 3 13 234 11:45 6 3 3 7 233 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1176 Corona, CA 92676 (951) 266-6266 City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana Ninteen0l 4/28/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 331 Beginning Occupancy First St Dwy Cabrillo Park Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 12:00 7 1 1 9 231 12:15 4 2 3 11 225 12:30 6 4 4 12 219 12:45 7 B 7 7 216 13:00 2 6 3 3 214 13:15 4 1 5 B 214 13:30 9 6 5 3 219 13:45 9 4 4 5 223 14:00 5 2 2 6 222 14:15 4 1 1 2 224 14:30 2 2 2 5 221 14:45 5 6 2 5 217 15:00 11 2 7 B 225 15:15 3 1 5 6 226 15:30 9 1 3 11 226 15:45 4 4 5 5 226 16:00 11 9 4 6 226 16:15 9 3 2 6 226 16:30 3 3 5 3 230 16:45 7 1 2 10 228 17:00 9 0 3 6 234 17:15 7 5 3 6 233 17:30 9 3 5 B 236 17:45 B 3 0 6 235 16:00 9 3 4 6 239 16:15 12 4 11 4 254 16:30 7 9 3 6 249 16:45 B 3 3 9 246 19:00 5 1 6 7 251 19:15 7 9 6 7 248 19:30 6 6 3 7 244 19:45 5 3 3 7 242 20:00 7 1 7 6 249 20:15 11 4 5 4 257 20:30 3 5 6 11 250 20:45 7 3 6 3 257 262 21:15 B 3 3 3 267 21:30 6 1 3 7 266 21:45 7 2 3 2 274 22:00 5 2 4 5 276 22:15 5 3 2 4 276 22:30 9 3 2 3 261 22:45 9 6 2 2 264 23:00 5 3 4 5 265 23:15 6 0 2 0 293 23:30 5 2 4 3 297 23:45 4 4 4 1 300 0:00 0 0 0 0 300 TOTAL 417 266 240 416 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1176 Corona, CA 92676 (951) 266-6266 City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana The Marke 4/26/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 219 Beginning Occupancy Main St Dwy Rear Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 0:00 0 0 4 4 219 0:15 0 0 2 0 221 0:30 0 0 1 0 222 0:45 0 0 1 1 222 1:00 0 0 2 2 222 1:151 0 0 0 1 221 1:30 0 0 2 0 223 1:45 0 0 0 2 221 2:00 0 0 1 0 222 2:15 0 0 2 0 224 2:30 0 0 2 0 226 2:45 0 0 1 0 227 3:00 3:15 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 229 3:301 0 0 1 0 230 3:45 0 0 1 3 226 4:00 0 0 2 2 228 4:15 0 0 2 1 229 4:30 0 0 0 3 226 4:45 0 0 2 4 224 5:00 0 0 0 3 221 5:15 0 0 0 5 216 5:30 0 0 2 6 212 5:451 0 0 2 10 204 6:00 0 0 1 4 201 6:15 0 0 1 9 193 6:30 0 3 3 4 169 6:45 1 6 4 4 164 7:00 0 3 2 11 172 7:15 2 7 2 11 156 7:30 0 5 3 10 146 7:45 0 B 1 10 129 8:00 0 4 3 12 116 6:15 1 5 1 11 102 6:30 1 6 2 12 67 6:45 0 B 4 9 74 9:00 1 6 4 6 67 9:15 0 0 6 7 66 9:30 0 5 5 7 59 9:45 0 9 5 3 52 10:00 0 3 4 3 50 10:15 1 3 6 6 46 10:30 0 4 3 2 1 45 10:45 2 2 6 5 46 11:00 0 4 5 7 40 11:15 1 3 4 5 37 11:30 1 5 3 5 31 11:45 2 2 4 5 30 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1176 Corona, CA 92676 (951) 266-6266 City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana The Marke 4/26/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 219 Beginning Occupancy Main St Dwy Rear Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 12:00 3 2 16 2 45 12:15 0 4 3 4 40 12:30 1 3 5 9 34 12:45 3 4 4 10 27 13:00 1 5 9 4 26 13:151 0 1 10 6 31 13:30 1 4 B 7 29 13:45 0 3 3 5 24 14:00 3 3 10 11 23 14:15 0 2 7 6 22 14:30 0 1 B 3 26 14:45 1 1 7 2 31 15:00 15:15 1 0 2 B 7 10 7 30 15:301 1 4 B 5 30 15:45 1 3 11 1 36 16:00 1 3 3 2 37 16:15 3 4 11 6 41 16:30 1 1 B 5 44 16:45 3 5 9 7 44 17:00 0 6 14 5 47 17:15 1 5 24 1 66 17:30 0 3 15 1 77 17:451 2 3 14 5 65 16:00 0 7 24 B 94 16:15 0 4 24 4 110 16:30 1 0 11 12 110 16:45 0 0 13 B 115 19:00 0 0 10 12 113 19:15 0 0 17 5 125 19:30 0 0 22 B 139 19:45 0 0 14 7 146 20:00 0 0 19 B 157 20:15 0 0 17 10 164 20:30 0 0 15 B 171 20:45 1 0 13 B 177 21:00 21:15 0 0 0 0 13 10 7 169 21:30 0 0 11 7 193 21:45 0 0 11 5 199 22:00 0 0 10 4 205 22:15 0 0 9 4 210 22:30 0 0 7 3 214 22:45 0 0 5 2 217 23:00 0 0 9 5 221 23:15 0 0 7 3 225 23:30 0 0 2 2 225 23:45 0 0 1 1 225 0:00 0 0 0 0 225 TOTAL 42 192 632 476 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1176 Corona, CA 92676 (951) 266-6266 City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana The Marke 4/26/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 166 Beginning Occupancy Main St Dwy Rear Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 0:00 0 0 7 4 169 0:15 0 0 7 4 172 0:30 0 0 5 3 174 0:45 0 0 6 6 174 1:00 0 0 1 1 174 1:151 0 0 4 2 176 1:30 0 0 5 3 176 1:45 0 0 2 1 179 2:00 0 0 3 2 160 2:15 0 0 2 0 162 2:30 0 0 3 0 165 2:45 0 0 0 0 165 3:00 3:15 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 190 3:301 0 0 2 1 191 3:45 0 0 2 0 193 4:00 0 0 0 0 193 4:15 0 0 0 0 193 4:30 0 0 0 0 193 4:45 0 0 0 0 193 5:00 0 0 0 0 193 5:15 0 0 0 1 192 5:30 0 0 0 1 191 5:451 0 0 2 1 192 6:00 0 0 0 1 191 6:15 0 0 1 0 192 6:30 0 0 0 1 191 6:45 2 0 1 2 192 7:00 1 1 3 2 193 7:15 0 1 1 4 169 7:30 0 4 2 4 163 7:45 0 2 1 4 176 8:00 0 2 2 2 176 6:15 0 3 2 4 171 6:30 0 5 3 5 164 6:45 2 2 2 9 157 9:00 3 B 4 5 151 9:15 0 4 4 7 144 9:30 1 7 5 2 141 9:45 1 3 1 B 132 10:00 0 4 5 2 131 10:15 0 3 1 2 127 10:30 0 4 5 4 124 10:45 0 5 5 6 116 11:00 1 10 7 4 112 11:15 1 2 4 4 111 11:30 1 4 6 4 110 11:45 0 7 B 2 109 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1176 Corona, CA 92676 (951) 266-6266 City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana The Marke 4/26/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 166 Beginning Occupancy Main St Dwy Rear Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 12:00 1 3 4 3 106 12:15 0 5 9 B 104 12:30 0 4 9 4 105 12:45 2 7 6 B 96 13:00 1 3 6 3 99 13:151 0 6 3 2 94 13:30 1 3 B 4 96 13:45 1 4 B 6 95 14:00 2 2 9 6 96 14:15 2 B 12 2 102 14:30 2 5 11 3 107 14:45 2 B 10 6 105 15:00 15:15 0 2 6 0 1 1 5 97 15:301 2 5 5 1 96 15:45 2 7 12 5 100 16:00 0 1 4 6 97 16:15 0 6 7 5 93 16:30 3 6 14 3 101 16:45 0 1 3 1 102 17:00 2 4 5 1 104 17:15 1 4 5 3 103 17:30 3 5 5 5 101 17:451 4 5 5 3 102 16:00 2 3 B 3 106 16:15 2 1 6 0 113 16:30 0 0 5 4 114 16:45 1 0 B 6 117 19:00 1 0 14 B 124 19:15 0 0 12 10 126 19:30 0 0 17 4 139 19:45 1 1 10 11 136 20:00 1 1 13 B 143 20:15 0 0 6 3 146 20:30 0 0 S B 146 20:45 0 0 9 5 150 21:00 0 0 3 21:15 0 0 10 10 144 21:30 0 0 B 6 146 21:45 0 0 11 4 153 22:00 0 0 9 4 156 22:151 0 0 12 B 162 22:30 0 0 9 7 164 22:45 0 0 4 6 162 23:00 0 0 11 5 166 23:15 0 0 6 3 171 23:30 0 0 9 3 177 23:45 0 0 5 2 160 0:00 0 0 0 0 160 TOTAL 54 195 504 349 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1176 Corona, CA 92676 (951) 266-6266 EXHIBIT 3 LS 11.19.19 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2018-01 BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND AC 2525 MAIN, LLC FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET WITHIN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65864, ET SEQ. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana ("City") is authorized pursuant to Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5 to enter into development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the purpose of establishing certainty for both City and owner in the development process; and WHEREAS, the City has found that development agreements strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning by providing a greater degree of certainty in that process, reduce the economic costs of development, allow for the orderly planning of public improvements and services, allocate costs to achieve maximum utilization of public and private resources in the development process, and ensure that appropriate measures to enhance and protect the environment are achieved; and WHEREAS, the City enters into this Development Agreement pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code and applicable City policies; and WHEREAS, AC 2525 Main, LLC ("Applicant") seeks to develop the Addington Multi -Family Residential Project ("proposed Project"), originally proposed as a 496-unit multi -family project on a 5.93-acre site at 2525 North Main Street in Santa Ana, California ("Project Site"); and WHEREAS, during the entitlement and environmental review process, and in response to comments and concerns raised by the public and the City's elected officials, the Applicant has proposed modifications to the original proposal; and WHEREAS, the Project as currently proposed now entails, among other things, (1) demolition of the existing 81,172 square foot vacant two-story office building and 442-space surface parking lot on the Project Site; (2) redevelopment of the 5.93-acre Ordinance NS-XXXX EXHIBIT 3 Page 1 of 10 site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 284 space surface level parking lot with residential and commercial parking; (3) approval of Development Agreement No. 2018-01 between the City of Santa Ana ("City") and Applicant; (4) approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, which would change the Project Site's existing land use designation of Professional & Administration Office (PAO) to District Center (DC); and (5) approval of Amendment Application No. 2018-10, which would change the zoning of the Project Site from Professional (P) to Specific Development No. 93 (SD-93) designation; and WHEREAS, on August 27, 2018, the Planning Commission conducted a work study session to overview the Project and thirty-two (32) verbal comments were received (three (3) in support and twenty-nine (29) in opposition) and nine (9) written comments were received (one (1) in support and eight (8) in opposition); and WHEREAS, on November 26, 2018, the Planning Commission continued a duly noticed public hearing for the project to January 14, 2019 and held a second study session to overview the Project and fifty-eight (58) verbal comments were received (twenty-five (25) in support; thirty-one (31) in opposition and two (2) neutral) and eleven (11) written comments were received (two (2) in support and nine (9) in opposition); and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, seventy-nine (79) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty (30) speakers supported the project, forty-eight (48) opposed it and one speaker was neutral. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council does not certify the EIR, adopt the findings, the statement of overriding considerations and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program and deny the Project; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-one (61) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty-eight (38) speakers supported the project, twenty (20) speakers opposed it and three (3) speakers were neutral and the public hearing was continued to the next regular adjourned City Council meeting on February 19, 2019; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, the City Council continued to conduct a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, Ordinance NS-XXXX Page 2 of 10 General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, one hundred and thirty-one (131) members of the public spoke on the item, twenty-six (26) speakers supported the project and one hundred and five (105) speakers opposed it and one hundred and sixty- six (166) written comments were received with nine (9) in support and one hundred and fifty-seven (157) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted that the applications go back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration after further consultation with the community; and WHEREAS, in June 2019, the applicant submitted a revised plan consisting of development 347 multi -family units (59 dwelling units per acre), with 642 parking spaces (1.85 parking spaces per unit) and parking capacity at 2.0 spaces per unit, within a 4- story residential building wrapped around a five -level parking structure with an amenity deck on the sixth -level, private open space, and redesigned the intersection of Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive to provide access to the project on a 5.93- acre site (the "June Revised Plan"); and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the June Revised Plan. At the meeting, seventy-seven (77) members of the expressed opposition; nine (9) supported the project, and one speaker was neutral. In addition, one -hundred (100) written comments were received with six (6) in support and ninety-four (94) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission vote resulted in an impasse; and WHEREAS, in October 2019, in response to comments received the applicant submitted a further revised plan, including redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 284 space surface level parking lot which also reduced the Project's height, increased the Project's setbacks, and modified the Project entrance ("October Modified Project"); and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-two (62) expressed opposition and two (2) in expressed support the project. In addition, ninety-eight (98) individuals submitted comments with ninety-four (94) in opposition and four (4) in support; and WHEREAS, after hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission by a vote of 3:2, voted to recommend Ordinance NS-XXXX Page 3 of 10 denial of the project. Since the entitlements require final action by the City Council, the actions were forwarded to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2019, the City gave public notice of a City Council public hearing for consideration of Development Agreement No. 2018-01 by advertising in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation, and by mailing to owners of property and residents within 500 feet of the Project; and WHEREAS, on November 19, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and Environmental Impact Report for the Project, at which hearing members of the public were afforded an opportunity to comment upon Development Agreement No. 2018-01; and WHEREAS, entering into this Development Agreement would provide the City with extraordinary and significant benefits that are of regional significance, relate to existing deficiencies in public facilities, require the owner of 2525 North Main Street to contribute a greater percentage of benefits than would otherwise be required, and represent benefits which would not otherwise be required as part of the development process; and WHEREAS, the Project and the use that the Developer proposes in connection with the Property have been extensively reviewed and considered by the City, and such proposed development and use have been found to accommodate the City's recommendations and suggestions in order to protect the public's interest to enhance the desirability of such proposed development and use. The terms and conditions of this Development Agreement have been found to be fair, just and reasonable, and the City has concluded that the pursuit of the Project will serve the interests of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that by entering into the Development Agreement: (i) the City will promote orderly growth and quality development on the Property in accordance with the goals and policies set forth in the General Plan; and, (ii) significant benefits will be created for City residents and the public generally from increased employment, housing, parks and/or park improvements; and WHEREAS, Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 (State Clearinghouse No. 2018021031) for the proposed Project was circulated between August 7, 2018 and October 4, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts related to the proposed amendment to the zoning map and adoption of Specific Development No. 93; and Ordinance NS-XXXX Page 4 of 10 WHEREAS, the City and Developer have reached mutual agreement and desire to voluntarily enter into the Development Agreement to facilitate development of the Project subject to the conditions and requirements set forth therein; and WHEREAS, the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement have undergone review by the City Council at a publicly noticed hearing and have been found to be fair, just, and reasonable, and consistent with the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed Project will not adversely affect the General Plan, as amended by General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, as is expressly set forth in the Request for City Council Action dated November 19, 2019 and Request for Planning Commission Action dated October 28, 2019, together with all supporting documents, including but not limited to, proposed resolutions, which are incorporated herein by this reference. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 2. CEQA. The requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been satisfied in that a Final Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been prepared for the Project, including the Development Agreement. Section 3. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY. Pursuant to California Government Code section 65867.5(b) and based on the entire record before the City Council, including all written and oral evidence presented to the City Council, the City Council hereby finds that the Development Agreement is compatible with the objectives, policies, and general plan land use programs specified in the General Plan for the City of Santa Ana in that: A. The City of Santa Ana has officially adopted a General Plan. B. The land uses authorized by the General Plan Amendment, and the General Plan Amendment itself, are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan, for the following reasons: i. The existing General Plan land use designation for the project is Professional and Administrative Office (PAO), which allows business and professional offices uses with a floor area ratio of 1.5. In order to facilitate the construction of a multi -family housing project with a maximum floor area ratio of 1.43, the general plan land use designation is proposed to be changed to District Center (DC), which permits high intensity, mixed -use urban villages and pedestrian -oriented experiences that support mid- to high-rise office Ordinance NS-XXXX Page 5 of 10 centers, commercial activity, and cultural activities with floor area ratios ranging from 0.5 to 5.0. Focusing growth within District Centers and along major corridors reduces the pressure for growth in low density residential neighborhoods. ii. The proposed Project will support several goals/objectives and policies of the General Plan. Housing Element (HE) Goal 2: to create diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that accommodate Santa Ana's residents and workforce of all household types, income levels, and age groups to foster an inclusive community. HE Policy 2.2 District Centers. Create high intensity, mixed -use urban villages and pedestrian -oriented experiences that support the mid- to high-rise office centers, commercial activity, and cultural activities in the varied District Centers. HE Policy 2.4 to facilitate diverse types, prices and sizes of housing. Housing Element (HE) Goal 4: to provide adequate rental and ownership housing opportunities and supportive services. The Project will provide 256 rental housing units. The amendment will expand the District Center designation and provide a connection between the existing District Centers to the north and south of the site by providing a residential development that will support a mixed -use environment. Land Use (LU) Element Goal 1: to promote a balance of land uses to address basic community needs. LU Policy 1.2 Maintain and foster a variety of residential land uses in the City. LU Policy 4.3 Support land uses which provide community and regional economic and service benefits. LU Policy 4.4 Encourage the development of projects which promote the City's image as a regional activity center. LU Policy 5.5 Encourage development which is compatible with, and supportive of surrounding land uses. LU Policy 5.7 Anticipate that the intensity of new development will not exceed available infrastructure capacity. Land Use (LU) Element Goal 6: to reduce residential overcrowding to promote public health and safety. The Project is within '/z mile of existing transportation infrastructure such as the Santa Ana (1-5) freeway and State Route 22 (SR 22) Ordinance NS-XXXX Page 6 of 10 highway which provide vehicular access to the region; the Orange County Transportation Agency bus routes along Main Street which connects to the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center and the Anaheim Regional Intermodal Center which provides rail service throughout California; and the project is immediately adjacent to Santiago Park and the Santiago Creek Bike Trail which connects to regional bike trails. Main Street, a major urban corridor with cultural, educational, employment and retail destinations such as the Bowers Museum, Discovery Science Center, Main Place Mall and in the City of Orange; the Children's Hospital of Orange County and St. Joseph's Hospital of Orange County. Therefore, the residential development and parking lot would be within close proximity to major employment centers and retail establishments. The Project will also provide an additional housing option for those seeking housing within the jobs rich northern area of the City. The multi -storied development will complement the nearby mid -rise office buildings located along Main Street to the north and west of the site. Although the density will be higher than the adjacent single-family residential neighborhood, the residential use is consistent with the residential uses to the east and south. In addition, multi -family uses are often used in planning and zoning practice to buffer higher intensity uses like commercial or industrial uses from single-family residential uses. Urban Design (UD) Element, Goal 1: to improve the physical appearance of the City through development of districts that project a sense of place, positive community image, and quality environment. UD Policy 1.1. New development and redevelopment must have the highest quality design, materials, finishes and construction. UD Policy 1.11 Visual and physical links between districts, nodes, and significant sites, landmarks and other points of interest, are to be provided in all public and private projects. The residential buildings are of high quality design and include high quality materials such as stone veneer, brick veneers, metal panels, and canopies. The building is designed with courtyards and landscaped areas to reduce the mass of the building. The Project has street frontage on Main Street which is identified as a major path in the General Plan and supports the North Main Street Node described as an opportunity for the establishment of a cohesive, height intensity, mixed activity center with a strong presence in the region. The setback along the east side of the project has been increased to 90 feet and the setback from Edgewood Road has been increased to 134 feet to minimize impacts to the neighboring single-family residences. The new Ordinance NS-XXXX Page 7 of 10 development will include public art and convey a sense of place and contribute to the urban image for the City along a street corridor that includes regional, local and cultural landmarks. The development will be in scale with the buildings along Main Street to the north and west of the site. In addition, the Urban Design Element of the General Plan identifies the site as a Gateway; the Project promotes elements of a Gateway by developing the site with a building with attractive architectural features, projecting a positive image for the City of Santa Ana. C. The proposed Development Agreement will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare in that the Development Agreement will not result in incompatible land uses on adjacent properties, inconsistencies with any General Plan goals or policies, or adverse impacts to the environment. Section 4. The Development Agreement, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby recommended for City Council approval. Section 5. The Development Agreement shall not be effective unless and until Resolution No. 2019- (Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01), Resolution No. 2019- (General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06) and Ordinance No. NS- (Amendment Application No. 2018-10) are adopted and become effective. If said resolution and Development Agreement are for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or otherwise does not go into effect for any reason, then the Development Agreement shall be null and void and have no further force and effect. Section 6. INDEMNIFICATION. The Developer shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the Project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent Ordinance NS-XXXX Page 8 of 10 jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Developer shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Developer of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Developer in the defense of the Action. Section 7. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 8. CITY COUNCIL ACTION. The City Council hereby takes the following action: 1. The City Council approves Development Agreement No. 2018-01, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A, as follows: A. The Development Agreement shall not take effect unless and until Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 is certified by the City Council, and General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06 and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 are each approved by the City Council. Section 9. EXECUTION OF ORDINANCE. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the Clerk of the Council shall attest and certify to the adoption thereof. ADOPTED this day of 2019. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor Ordinance NS-XXXX Page 9 of 10 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By: Lisorck Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , 2019 and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Ordinance NS-XXXX Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT A Schedule l Legal Description THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: (003-010-28) THAT PORTION OF CERTAIN LANDS ALLOTTED TO GLASSELL AND CHAPMAN, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL DECREE OF PARTITION OF THE RANCHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, 1868, IN BOOK "B" PAGE 410, OF JUDGMENTS OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE 17CH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF MAIN STREET WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF TRACT NO. 139, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK I I PAGE 36 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 00 45' EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF MAIN STREET, 148.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 760 22' EAST L21.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 560 59' EAST 393.56 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO W. L. GRUBB AND WIFE, BY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 20, 1920 IN BOOK 390 PAGE 10 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 391.91 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO W. L. GRUBB AND WIFE, BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 14, 1921, IN BOOK 392 PAGE 83, OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LAST MENTIONED PARCEL OF LAND AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 139, AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREON TO THE POINT OP BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 52 FEET THEREOF, INCLUDED, WITHIN MAIN STREET, AS GRANTED TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY DEED RECORDED JULY 30, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 28274, IN BOOK 10824 PAGE 107, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPT TIEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN PARCEL 2, AS DESCRIBED BELOW: ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 10824 PAGE 107, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LAND CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, NORTH 01 ° 45' 44" EAST 151.68 FEET TO A POINT BEING DISTANT 9.54 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LAND; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE; SOUTH 00' 58' 30" EAST 151.80 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT I OF BLOCK "A" OF TRACT NO. 139, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK RECORDED IN BOOK 1 I PAGE 36 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, NORTH 88' 37' 48" WEST 7.25 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEEDS RECORDED APRIL 2. 1993 AS INSTRUMENTS NOS. 93-219530, 93-219531 AND 93-219532, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 2: (003-010-01) THAT PORTION OF CERTAIN LANDS ALLOTTED TO GI ASSELL AND CHAPMAN, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL DECREE OF PARTITION OF THE RANCHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, 1868, IN BOOK "B" PAGE 410, OF JUDGMENTS OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE CENTER OF EDGFWOOD ROAD, 444.6 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF TIIE CENTER LINES OF EDGEWOOD ROAD AND MAIN STREET; RUNNING THENCE NORTH I' EAST PARALLEL WITH MAIN STREET, 686.375 FEET; THENCE NORTH 60' EAST 114.3 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1° WEST 743.75 FEET TO THE CENTER OF EDGEWOOD ROAD; THENCE WEST ALONG THE CENTER OF SAID EDGEWOOD ROAD 98 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO RESERVATION OF A STRIP OF LAND 26 FEET WIDE OFF THE SOUTH SIDE FOR EDGEWOOD ROAD. PARCEL 3: (003-010-03) THAT PORTION OF CERTAIN LANDS ALLOTTED TO GLASSELL AND CHAPMAN, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL DECREE OF PARTITION OF THE RANCHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, 1868, IN BOOK "B" PAGE 410, OF JUDGMENTS OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN EDGEWOOD ROAD AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 157, PAGE 223 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, SAID POINT BEING SOUTH 0° 53' WEST 1369.04 FEET AND SOUTH 890 30-1/2' EAST 344.7 FEET FROM A STONE MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION SIX, TOWNSHIP FIVE SOUTH, RANGE NINE WEST, S. B. B. & M., RUNNING THENCE NORTH PARALLEL TO THE CENTER LINE OF MAIN STREET, 259.4 FEET; THENCE EAST PARALLEL TO THE CENTER LINE OF EDGEWOOD ROAD 100 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE CENTER LINE OF MAIN STREET, 259.4 FEET AND THENCE WEST 100 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTIONTHEREOF INCLUDED WITHIN THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO JOHN S. BLOWER, ET AL.., RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 1957, IN BOOK 4084, PAGE 109, Of OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. PARCEL 4: AN EAS'EMENTFOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES CREATED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 6, 1981 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 7937 IN BOOK 14048 PAGE 766, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, OVER THAT CERTAIN STRIP OF LAND, 10.00 FEET WIDE, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING 5.00 FEET ON EACI I SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE. BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF MAIN STREET WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF TRACT NO, 139 AS SAID TRACT IS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 11 PAGE 36 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 0' 52' 45" EAST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF MAIN STREET, 148.26 FEET; 'THENCE NORTH 760 29' 45" EAST 121.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 57' 06' 45" EAST 126.62 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 30' 23' 10" WEST TO THE NORTHWESTERLY FACE OF THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY EXISTING CONCRETE RUBBLE STORM DRAIN CHANNEL WALL, KNOWN AS SANTIAGO CREEK. PARCEL 5: (003-OLO-25; 003-010-30; 003-010-26) LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4 AND 5 OF BLOCK A OF TRACT NO. 139, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 11, PAGE 36 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION INCLUDED WITHIN THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN ORDER OF CONDEMNATION, SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NO. 212621, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH W RECORDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1977 IN BOOK 12397, PAGE 164 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID LANDS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEEDS RECORDED JANUARY 14, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO.93-032178 AND APRIL 2, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO.93-0217354, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY. EXHIBIT B RECORDED AT REQUEST OF: AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (N1-30) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Attention: Clerk of the Council Exempt from tiling fees pursuant to Government Code §27383 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 21118-01 A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF SANTA ANA and AC 2525 MAM A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 55394.00002`31553137.13 DEYELOI'MEN'I' :%GREE\1EN'P NO. 2018-01 Phis Development Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") is entered into as of this _ day of . 2019 b} and bemeen the Cit} of Santa Ana, California (hereinafter "CITY"), and AC 2525 Main, a California limited liability company (hereinafter -OWNER-): RFCITALS WHEREAS, CfIY is authorized to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property, pursuant to Section 65864, et sue. of the Government Code: and WHEREAS, This Agreement constitutes a current exercise of CITY'S police powers to provide predictability to OWNER in the development approval process by vesting the permitted uses, density. intensity of use, and timing and phasing of development consistent with the Development Plan in exchange for OWNER'S commitment to provide significant public benefits to CITY as set forth in Section 4. below. WHEREAS, OWNER has requested CI-1 Y to enter into a development agreement and proceedings have been taken in accordance with the rules and regulations of CITY; and WHEREAS, the best interests of the citizens of the City of Santa Ana and the public health, safety and welfare will be served by entering into this Agreement and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that this Agreement is of major significance because it will enable the CITY to fund much needed capital improvements and provide much needed public services and will therefore also have a major, beneficial economic impact on the City: and WHEREAS, the provision by OWNER of the public benefits allows the CITY to realize significant economic, recreational, park, open space, educational, social and public facilities benefits. -I he public benefits will advance the interests and meet the needs of Santa Ana residents and visitors to a significantly greater extent than would development of the Property without this Agee 111 11t. WHEREAS, the physical effects, if any, of the Project and this Agreement have been analyzed pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act as amended to date and as documented in the Final Environmental Impact Report entitled "Magnolia at the Park Multi -Family Residential Project" (State Clearinghouse House No. 2018021031 and City of Santa Ana DP No. 2017.34); and WHEREAS, this Agreement and the Project are consistent with the Santa Ana General Plan and any specific plan applicable thereto; and WHEREAS, all actions taken and approvals given by CITY have been duly taken or approved in accordance with all applicable legal requirements for notice, public hearings, findings, votes, and other procedural matters: and WHEREAS, development of the Property in accordance with this Agreement will provide substantial benefits to CITY and will further important policies and goals of CITY; and WHEREAS, this Agreement will eliminate uncertainty in planning and provide for the orderly development of the Property, ensure progressive installation of necessary improvements, provide for public services appropriate to the development of the Project and generally serve the purposes for which 553941N1002 31553187.13 development agreements under Section 65864, et seq. of the Government Code are intended; COVENANTS NOW, THEREFORE. in consideration of the above recitals and of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained and for other good and valuable consideration. the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS. 1.1 Definitions. 'The following tertns when used in this Agreement shall be defined as follows: 1.1.1 "Agreement" means this Development Agreement. 1.1.2 "CITY" means the City of Santa Ana. a charter city and California municipal corporation. 1.1.3 "City Council' means the duly elected city council of the City of Santa Ana. 1.1.4 'Commencement Date" means the date the Term of this Agreement couunences. 1.1.5 "Development" means the improvement of the Property for the purposes of completing the structures, improvements and facilities comprising the Project including, but not limited to: grading; the construction of infrastructure and public facilities related to the Project whether located within or outside the Property; the construction of buildings and structures: and the installation of landscaping. "Development' does not include the maintenance, repair, reconstruction or redevelopment of any building, structure, improvement or facility after the construction and completion thereof. 1.1.6 "Development Exaction- means any requirement of CITY in connection with or pursuant to any Land Use Regulation or development approval for the dedication of land. the construction of improvements orpublic facilities, or the payment of fees in order to lessen, offset, mitigate or compensate for the impacts of development on the environment or other public interests. 1.1.7 "Development Impact Fee" a monetary exaction other than a tax or special assessment, whether established for a broad class of projects by legislation of general applicability or imposed on a specific project on an ad hoc basis, that is charged by a local agency to the applicant in connection with approval of a development project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the development project, but does not include park "in lieu" fees specified in Government Code Section 66477, fees for processing applications for governmental regulatory actions or approvals, or fees collected under development agreements adopted pursuant to Article 2.5 of the Government Code (commencing with Section 65864) of Chapter 4. 1.1.8 "Development Plan' means the plan for development of the Property as set forth in Exhibit "C. 55394 0000231553187.13 1.1.9 "Discretionary Action(s)" or "Discretionary Approval(s)" means an action which requires the exercise of judgment, deliberation or discretion on the part of the City, including any board, agency, commission or department and any officer or employee thereof; in the process of approving or disapproving Development of the Project, as distinguished from an activity which is defined herein as a Ministerial Permit or Ministerial Approval. 1.1.10 "Effective Date" means the date the ordinance approving and authorizing this Agreement becomes effective. I.I.II "Existing Land Use Regulations' means all ordinances, laws, resolutions, codes, rules, regulations, policies, requirements, guidelines or other actions of City, including but not limited to the provisions set forth in the City's General Plan, Municipal Code which affect, govern or apply to the Development of the Project and use of the Property in a manner consistent with this Agreement, including, without limitation, the permitted use of land, the density or intensity of use, subdivision requirements, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, and the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to the Development of the Property, subject to the tens of this Agreement, whether adopted by the City Council or the voters in an initiative, which are in effect on the Effective Date, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65366. 1.1.12 "Existing Project Approvals' means all Project Approvals approved or issued on or before the Effective Date. 1.1.13 "Land Use Regulations" means all ordinances. resolutions, codes. rules, regulations and official policies of CITY governing the development and use of land, including, without limitation, the permitted use of land, the density or intensity of use, subdivision requirements, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, and the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to the development of the Property. "Land Use Regulations" does not include any CITY ordinance. resolution, code. rule. regulation or official policy, governing: (a) the conduct of businesses. professions, and occupations; (b) taxes (special or general) and assessments; (c) the control and abatement of nuisances; (d) the granting of encroachment permits and the conveyance of rights and interests that provide for the use of or the entry upon public property; (e) the exercise of the power of eminent domain. 1.1.14 Reserved. I.I.I5 -OWNER" means the persons and entities listed as OWNER on page I of this Agreement and their successors in interest to all or any part of the Property. -3- 55393.IRNIIR!31553187.13 1.1.16 "Ministerial Approvals(s)." or "Ministerial Act(s)" means any approval or act that is not a Discretionary Approval. 1.1.17 "Mortgagee" means it mortgagee of a mortgage. a beneficiary under a deed of trust or any other security -device lender. and their successors and assigns. 1.1.19 , Project" means the development of the Property located at 2525 Main Street, Santa Ana, CA, contemplated by the Development Plan as such Plan may be further defined, enhanced or modified pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 1.1.19 Project Approvals" means all site -specific (meaning specifically applicable to the Project only and not generally applicable to some or all other properties within the City) plans, maps, pennits, and entitlements to use of every kind and nature that are sought or agreed to in writing by OWNER in its sole and absolute discretion to Develop the project and that have been approved by the City. Project Approvals include, but are not limited to, general plan amendments, site plans, tentative and final subdivision maps, design guidelines, variances, zoning designations, conditional use permits, grading, building, and other similar pennits, the site -specific provisions of general plans, environmental assessments, including environmental impact reports and negative declarations. 1.1.20 "Property" means the real property described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit " f3" to this Agreement. 1.1.21 "Public Benefit- refers to those benetits provided to the CITY and the community by OWNER pursuant to Section 4 below. 1.1.22 "Reservation of Rights" means the rights and authority excepted from the assurances and rights provided to OWNER under this Agreement and reserved to CITY under Section 3.3 of this Agreement. 1.2 Exhibits. The following documents are attached to, and by this reference made a part of. this Agreement: Exhibit "A"— Legal Description of the Property Exhibit " 13" — Map showing Property and its location Exhibit "C" — Development Plan Exhibit "D" — Development Impact Fees Exhibit "E" - Development Impact Fee Credits Exhibit " F" — Santiago Park Access Rights Exhibit "G" — Santiago Park Improvements Exhibit " H" — Park Santiago Patrol Area Map Exhibit "I" — Conditions of Discretionary Approvals -4- ii394.(NH)ll'_'31 ii3147.13 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 2.1 Binding Effect of Agreement. The Property is hereby made subject to this Agreement. Development of the Property is hereby authorized and shall be carried out in accordance with the tenns of the Development Plan and this Agreement. 2.2 Ownership of Property. OWNER represents and covenants that it is the owner of the fee simple title to, or has an equitable interest in, the Property or a portion thereof. 2.3 City Council Findings. The City Council finds that: 2.3.1 This Agreement is consistent with the CITY'S General Plan. 2.3.2 This Agreement ensures a desirable and functional community environment, provides effective and efficient development of public facilities, infrastructure, and services appropriate for the development of the Project, enhances effective utilization of resources within the City. 2.3.3 This Agreement provides public benefits beyond those which are necessary to mitigate the development of the Project. 2.3.4 This Agreement strengthens the public planning process, encourages private participation in comprehensive planning and reduces costs of development and government. 2.35 The best interests of the citizens of the CITY and the public health. safety, and welfare will be served by entering into this Agreement. 2.4 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date (the -Commencement Date") that is the Effective Date, and shall continue for a period of four (4) years thereafter, unless this term is modified or extended pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. Thereafter, the OWNER shall have no vested right under this Agreement, regardless of whether or not OWNER has paid any Development Impact Fee. 2.4.1 The Tenn of this Agreement may be extended upon the mutual written agreement of the City's City Manager and the OWNER for no more than two (2) additional consecutive one ( 1) year periods ("Extension Term"). Nomithstanding the immediately preceding sentence or any other part of this Agreement, in no event shall the Development Agreement Period exceed 2160 consecutive calendar days from the Effective Date. Prior to the City granting each Extension Tenn: (a) OWNER shall demonstrate to the City Manager's reasonable satisfaction that OWNER has and will continue to diligently pursue the development of the Project; (b) OWNER shall pay to the City Fifty Thousand Dollars (S50.000) to partially compensate the City for the significant lost revenue to be received by the City had the Project been completed. i i39Y.01)1102'31513187.13 2.4.2 If any party other than OWNER initiates litigation that challenges the Project or the Existing Protect Approvals, the OWNER will have the right to toll commencement of the fern and any obligations of OWNER under the Agreement during the period ot'such litigation. 1'he tolling shall commence upon receipt by the City of written notice from OWNER invoking this right to tolling. -rbe tolling shall terminate when ( I) a final order is issued in said litigation that upholds the Project and the Existing Project Approvals or (2) the litigation is dismissed with prejudice by all parties: whichever occurs first. 2.5 Assienntent. 25.1 Rieht to Assien. OWNER shall have the right to sell, transferor assign the property in whole or in part (provided that no such partial transfer shall violate the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66410, et seq.) to any person, partnership, joint venture, Jinn or corporation at any time during the term of this Agreement: provided, however, that any such sale, transfer or assignment shall include the assignment and assumption of the rights, duties and obligations arising under or from this AgReement and be made in strict compliance with the following conditions precedent: (a) No sale, transfer or assignment of any right or interest under this Agreement shall be made unless made together with the sale, transfer or assignment of all or a part of the Property to which such rights or interests apply. Any sale, transfer or assignment shall require the consent of the City which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. (b) Concurrent with any such sale, transfer or assignment, OWNER shall notify CITY, in writing, of such sale, transfer or assignment and shall provide CITY with an executed agreement ("Assignment and Assumption Agreement'), in a firm reasonably acceptable to Crm by the purchaser, transferee or assignee and providing therein that the purchaser, transferee or assignee expressly and unconditionally assumes all the duties, obligations, agreements, covenants, waivers of OWNER under this Agreement, including, without limitation, the covenants not to sue and waivers contained in Sections 7.2 and 8.4 hereof. (c) OWNER shall provide CITY with such information reasonably requested by CITY that demonstrates such transferee or assignee has sufficient development experience and financial capability to complete the Project and perform all obligations assumed. (d) Any sale, transfer or assignment not made in strict compliance with the foregoing conditions shall constitute a default by Owner under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the failure of any purchaser, transferee or assignee to execute the agreement required by Paragraph (b) of this Subsection 2.5.1, the burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon such purchaser, transferee or assignee, but the benefits of this AgReement shall not inure to such purchaser, transferee or assignee until and unless such agreement is executed. (e) The Executive Director for the Planning and Building Agency shall have the administrative authority to determine that OWNER has complied with the above conditions. Such determination shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. 2.5.2 Release of Transferrint; Owner. Notwithstanding any sale, transfer or assignment, a transferring OWNER shall continue to be obligated under this Agreement with respect to the transferred property or any transferred portion thereof, unless such transferring -6- 55391 MR12 31553187.13 OWNER is given a release in writing by CITY, which release shall be provided by CITY upon the full satistaction by such transferring OWNER of the following conditions: (a) OWNER no longer has a legal or equitable interest in all or any part of the Property subject to the transfer. (b) OWNER is not then in default under this Agreement. (c) OWNER has provided CITY with the notice and executed agreement required under Paragraph (b) of Subsection 2.5.1 above. (d) The purchaser, transferee or assignee provides CITY with security equivalent to any security previously provided by OWNER to secure performance of its obligations hereunder. 2.5.3 Subsequent Assienment. Any subsequent sale, transfer or assignment after an initial sale. transferor assignment shall be made only in accordance with and subject to the tenns and conditions of this Section. 2.5.4 Utilities. The Project shall be connected to all utilities necessary to provide adequate water, sewer, gas, electric. and other utility service to the Project, prior to the issuance of final approval for occupancy or the certificate of occupancy rurally portion of the Pool ect. 2.5.5 Sale to Public and Completion of Construction. 'file provisions of Subsection 2.5.1 shall not apply to the sale or lease (for a period longer than one year) of any lot that has been finally subdivided and is individually (and not in "bulk") sold or leased to a member of the public or other ultimate user. This Agreement shall terminate with respect to any lot and such lot shall be released and no longer be subject to this Agreement without the execution or recordation of any further document upon satisfaction of both of the following conditions: (a) The lot has been finally subdivided and individually (and not in "bulk") sold or leased (for a period longer than one year) to a member of the public or other ultimate user: and (b) City final approval for occupancy or the certificate of occupancy has been issued for a building on the lot, and the fees for such lot set forth in this Agreement have been paid. 2.6 Amendment or Cancellation of Mreement. This Agreement may be amended or canceled in whole or in part only by written consent of all parties in the manner provided for in Government Code Section 65868. This provision shall not limit any remedy of CITY or OWNER as provided by this Agreement. 2.7 'rennination. This Agreement shall be deemed tenninated and of no further effect upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) Expiration of the stated "Fenn of this Agreement as set forth in Section 2.4. (b) Entry of a final judgment setting aside, voiding or annulling the adoption of the ordinance approving this Agreement. 7- 55394 M0231333187,13 (e) The adoption of a referendum measure overriding or repealing the ordinance approving this Agreement. ( I ) Within rive (3) days of receipt of a referendum petition by the CITY. OWNER shall deposit Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50.000) ('Referendum Deposit") with the CITY. CITY may use the funds to pay any and all costs associated with the said referendum measure. If at any time the Referendum Deposit account has Five Thousand Dollars ($3000) or less remaining, Developer shall, within three (3) days of receiving notice from the CITY, deposit with the City additional funds as requested by the CITY to cover all costs and expenses associated with processing the referendum and holding the related election. Following certification of the election results, any funds remaining in the Referendum Deposit account shall be returned to the OWNER. (d) Completion of the Project in accordance with the tenns of this Agreement including issuance of all required occupancy pennits, final approval for occupancy by the City, and acceptance by CITY or applicable public agency of all required dedications. (e) Tennination of this Agreement shall not constitute tennination of any other land use entitlements approved for the Property. Upon the tennination of this Agreement, no party shall have any further light or obligation hereunder except with respect to any obligation to have been perfonned prior to such tennination or with respect to any default in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement that has occurred prior to such tennination or with respect to any obligations that are specifically set forth as surviving this Agreement. Upon such tennination, any Development Impact Fees paid by OWNER to CITY for residential units on which construction has not yet begun shall be refunded to OWNER by CITY. 2.8 Notices. (a) As used in this Agreement, "notice" includes, but is not limited to, the communication of notice, request, demand, approval, statement, report, acceptance, consent, waiver, appointment or other communication required or pennitted hereunder- (b) All notices shall be in writing and shall be considered given either (i) when delivered in person to the recipient named below; or (it) on the date of delivery shown on the return receipt, after deposit in the United States mail in a sealed envelope as either registered orcertified mail with return receipt requested, and postage and postal charges prepaid, and addressed to the recipient named below; or (iii) on the date of delivery shown in the records of the telegraph company after transmission by telegraph to the recipient named below. All notices shall be addressed as follows: If to CITY: City Clerk 20 Civic Center Plaza, 8" Floor PO Box 1999 M-30 Santa Ana, Ca 92702 Copy to: City Manager City Attorney Executive Director of Planning and Building Agency m 5531;4. (N M )02'31553187.13 If to OWNER: AC 2525 MAIN, LLC 240 Newport Center Drive, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA. 92660 Attn: Manager Telephone: } Facsimile: f 1 (c) Either party may, by notice given at any time, require subsequent notices to be given to another person or entity, whether a party or an officer or representative of a party, or to a different address, or both. Notices given before actual receipt of notice of change shall not be invalidated by the change. 3. DEVELOPMENT OFTEIE PROPERI'N'. 3.1 Riehts to Develop. Subject to the ternis of this Agreement including the Reservation of Rights, OWNER shall have a vested right to develop the Property in accordance with, and to the extent of, this Agreement. Except as expressly provided otherwise herein, the Project shall remain subject to all Existing Land Use Regulations and Development Approvals. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, and notwithstanding the authority of the CffY to further revise the Land Use Regulations pursuant to Government Code section 65966, the permitted uses of the Property, the density and intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation and dedication of land for public purposes shall be those set forth in the Land Existing Use Regulations and Development Approvals. OWNER shall comply with all mitigation measures required to be undertaken pursuant to any document prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to the Project. 3.2 Effect of Agreement on Land Use Regulations. Except as otherwise provided under the terms of this Agreement including the Reservation of Rights, the rules, regulations and official policies governing pennitted uses of the Property, the density and intensity of use of the Property, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to development of the Property shall be the Existing Land Use Regulations and Development Approvals. In connection with any subsequently adopted Project Approvals and except as specifically provided otherwise herein, CITY may exercise its discretion in accordance with the Land Use Regulations then in effect, as provided by this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the Reservation of Rights. CITY shall accept for processing, review and action all applications for subsequent Project Approvals, and such applications shall be processed in the same manner and the CITY shall exercise its discretion, when required or authorized to do so, to the same extent it would otherwise be entitled in the absence of this Agreement. 3.3 Reservation of Riehts. -9- 55391.00002 31553187.13 3.3. I Limitations, Reservations and Exceptions. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the following regulations shall apply to the development of the property: (a) Processing fees and charges of every kind and nature imposed by CITY to cover the actual costs to CITY of processing applications for Development Approvals or for monitoring compliance with any Development Approvals granted or issued. (b) procedural regulations relating to hearing bodies, petitions, applications, notices, findings, records, hearings, reports, recommendations, appeals and any other matter of procedure. (c) Regulations, policies and rules governing engineering and construction standards and specifications applicable to public and private improvements, including, without limitation, all uniform codes adopted by the City and any local amendments to those codes adopted by the CITY, including, without limitation, the CITY's Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code, Electrical Code, and Grading Ordinance. (d) Regulations imposing Development Exactions; provided, however, that no such Development Exaction adopted after the Effective Date shall apply to development of the Property under this Agreement unless agreed to by OWNER. In the event any such subsequently adopted Development Exaction, agreed to by OWNER, fulfills the same purposes, in whole or in part, as the fees set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement, CITY shall allow a credit against such subsequently adopted Development Exaction for the fees paid under Section 4 of this Agreement to the extent such fees fulfill the same purposes. (e) Regulations that may be in material conflict with this Agreement but that are reasonably necessary to protect the residents of the project or the immediate community from a condition perilous to their health or satety. To the extent possible, any such regulations shall be applied and construed so as to provide OWNER with the rights and assurances provided under this Agreement. (t) Regulations that are not in material conflict with this Agreement or the Development Plan. Any regulation, whether adopted by initiative or otherwise, limiting the rate or timing of development of the property shall be deemed to materially conflict with the Development Plan and shall therefore not be applicable to the development of the property. (g) Regulations that are in material conflict with the Development Plan; provided OWNER has given written consent to the application of such regulations to development of that property in which the OWNER has a legal or equitable interest. (h) Regulations that impose, levy, alter or amend fees, or charges relating to consumers or end users, including, without limitation, trash can placement, service charges and limitations on vehicle parking. (i) Regulations of other public agencies, including Development Impact Fees adopted or imposed by such other public agencies, although collected by CITY. 3.3.2 Subsequent project Approvals. This Agreement shall not prevent CITY, in acting on subsequent Project Approvals and to the same extent it would otherwise be authorized to do so absent this Agreement, from applying subsequently adopted or amended Land Use Regulations that do not materially conflict with this Agreement. -10- 5j394.10 12 31553187.13 3.3.3 Llodification or Suspension by State or Federal Law. In the event that State, County or Federal laws or regulations, enacted after the Effective Date of this Agreement, prevent or preclude compliance with one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, such provisions of this Agreement shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such State or Federal laws or regulations; provided, however, that this .Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the extent it is not inconsistent with such laws or regulations and to the extent such laws or regulations do not render such remaining provisions impractical to enforce. 3.3.4 Intent. The parties acknowledge and agree that CITY is restricted in its authority to limit certain aspects of its police power by contract and that the foregoing limitations, reservations and exceptions are intended to reserve to CITY all of its police power that cannot be or are not expressly so limited. This Agreement shall be construed, contrary to its stated terms if necessary, to reserve to CITY all such power and authority that cannot be or is not by this Agreement's express ternis so restricted. 3.4 Regulation by Other Public Agencies. It is acknowledged by the parties that other public agencies not within the control of CITY may possess authority to regulate aspects of the development of the Property separately from or jointly with CI I Y and this .Agreement does not limit the authority of such other public agencies. 3.5 Timing of Development. Because the California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo. 37 Cal. 3d 465 (1984), that the failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later - adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties' agreement, it is the specific intent of the Parties to provide for the timing of the Project in this Agreement. To do so, the Parties acknowledge and provide that OWNER shall have the right, but not the obligation, to complete the Project in such order, at such rate, at such times, and in as many development phases and sub -phases as Owner deems appropriate in its sole subjective business judgnnent 3.6 Conditions Covenants and Restrictions 3.6.1 OWNER shall have the ability to reserve and record such covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) against the Property as OWNER deems appropriate, in its sole and absolute discretion. Such CC&Rs may not conflict with this Agreement or the General Plan. Before recording any CC&Rs, OWNER shall provide a copy of the CC&Rs to the CITY for review and approval by the City Attorney, whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 3.6.2 The City Attorneys review shall be limited to determining if the CC&Rs substantially comply with this Agreement and Project's conditions of approval as approved by the City Council and that the CC&Rs incorporate and reference the following infonnation regarding the approved development: (a) The Parking Management Plan (b) The Overcrowding Mitigation Implementation Plan (c) I lie Property Maintenance flan 55394.00o0213155318 7 13 (d) "I'he project Conditions of Approval 3.6.3 Within thirty (30) days after receiving a copy of the proposed CC&Rs front OWNER, the City Attorney shall provide OWNER with either (i) a statement that the CC&Rs comply with this Agreement (" CC&R Approval") or (ii) written comments identifying each aspect of the CC&Rs which the City Attorney believes not to be in compliance with this Agreement (a "Statement of Non -Compliance"). If the City Attorney tails to provide OWNER with either CC&R Approval or a Statement of Non -Compliance within thirty (30) days following a written request by OWNER, City shall be deemed to have approved the CC&Rs and OWNER may record the CC&Rs against the property. If the City Attorney provides a Statement of Non -Compliance, OWNER shall have thirty (30) days in which to respond to the Statement of Non -Compliance. Upon submittal of OWNER'S response, the procedure described above for the initial submittal and City Attorney review of proposed CC&Rs shall again be followed. This procedure shall be followed until OWNER either (1) receives CC&R Approval, (2) submits the compliance issues to binding arbitration pursuant to the rules of the American Arbitration Association, (3) tiles an action for declaratory relief in Orange County Superior Court seeking a judicial detennination of the compliance of the proposed CC&Rs, or (4) agreement is otherwise reached between the parties allowing for the recording of the CC&Rs. "I'he CC&Rs may run with the land and bind OWNER'S successors and assigns. Except as provided above. any dispute between the parties regarding the CI Y'S approval or rejection of the CC&Rs shall be subject to immediate and binding arbitration pursuant to the rules of the American Arbitration Association. 3.7 Moratoria. Except as specifically set forth in this section, City agrees that no moratorium or other similar limitation (whether relating to the rate, timing, or sequencing of the development of the Project or any part thereof and whether or not enacted by local initiative or otherwise) affecting subdivision,hract maps, grading or building permits, occupancy certificates, or other entitlements approved, issued, or granted within the City, after the Effective Date of this Agreement, shall apply to the Project. OWNER acknowledges and agrees that the provisions hereof shall not preclude the application to the project of a moratorium or other similar limitation (of the type described in the preceding sentence) enacted in order to protect an imminent threat to the public health or safety. 3.3 Development Agreement/Project Approvals. In the event of any inconsistency between any Existing Land Use Regulation and a Project Approval, the provisions of the Project Approval shall control. In the event of any inconsistency between any Existing Land Use Regulation, any Project Approval and this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall control. 3.9 LEED Certification. OWNER shall design and construct the building to achieve not less than a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (-'LEED") Silver Standard equivalent. OWNER shall focus design efforts to ensure the Project meets the environmental needs of the community, as well as, the Project, itself, maintains an eco-friendly design. It is anticipated the Project will include, but is not limited to, drought tolerant landscaping and irrigation systems, solar and EV systems, and reclaimed water. 4. PUBLIC BENEFITS. 12- 55194.M002 31551187.17 4.1 Intent. The Parties acknowledge and ap ee that development of the Property will result in substantial public needs that will not be fully met by the Development Plan and further acknowledge and agree that this Agreement confers substantial private benefits on OWNER that should be balanced by commensurate public benefits. 4? Public Benefits. OWNER has committed by this Agreement to contribute to the acquisition, construction and maintenance of certain "Public Benefits" as provided below 4.3.1 CITY Facilities. OWNER shall provide the following benefits towards the acquisition, construction and maintenance of the CITY' Facilities. as follows: (a) Public Art. OWNER shall create, install, and maintain a public an project with a value equivalent to one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the total construction cost of the Project. Total construction cost shall mean all design, engineering and construction costs. OWNER shall prepare and submit to the City, no later than one hundred eighty ( 180) days before final approval for occupancy or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, a public art plan that is consistent with Chapter 15 of the Citywide Design Guidelines, Public Art Guidelines. The approved art shall be installed prior to final approval for occupancy or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Project. (b) Santiago Park Improvement Construction. At the City*s determination, Owner shall manage and construct the Santiago Park Phase 11 Park Improvements ("Park Improvements") subject to review and approval by the City. The Park Improvements shall include, but are not limited to design, engineering, pennitting, construction, and installation of irrigation, landscaping, security lighting and bike trail enhancement, as described in more detail on Exhibit G. "Ihe total expenditure for the Park Improvements shall not exceed One Million Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,400.000) ("Phase 11 Expenditure"). The State Coastal Conservancy has notified the City that it has allocated up to Two Hundred Fifty "Ihousand Dollars (5350,000) for the Design of the Park Improvements. If and when the City receives the funds, in the event that the Design work for the Park Improvements is less than "I wo Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars (S350,000), the City at its sole discretion, may make a request to State Coastal Conservancy, and if approved by the Agency, the City will apply the excess grant funds to construction as part of the City's contribution to the Park Improvements. Owner shall be responsible for all aspects of the Park Improvements. Prior to issuance of pennits, City shall have the rights to review, approve, and accept the design and material quality of the Park Improvements. Owner shall complete the Park Improvements in a timely fashion, by the earlier of 36 months following issuance by the City the first building pennit for the construction of the Development, or prior to issuance of final approval of occupancy for the Development. Following completion of the Park Improvements, and no later than three years from the issuance of a notice of acceptance of Park Improvements, City shall reimburse Owner an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the total cost of the Park Improvements, up to Seven Hundred "I housand Dollars ($700,000) ("Reimbursement Amount") for actual. third party costs associated with the Park Improvements. 13- 55394.0U00I 31553197.13 IF DETERMINED TO BE APPLICABLE BY THE CITY. OWNER HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES, CONSENTS AND AGREES THAT THE PARK IMPROVEMENTS ARE A PUBLIC WORK PURSUANT TO LABOR CODE SECTION 1720 ET SEQ_ AND THAT LABORERS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION OR OPERATION OF THE PARK IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE PAID THE PREVAILING PER DIEM WAGE RATE FOR THEIR LABOR CLASSIFICATION, AS DETERMINED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO LABOR CODE SECTIONS 1720, ET SFQ. THE OWNER AGREES WITH "twE CITY THAT THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME THE RESPONSIBILITY AND BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PAYMENT OF LABORERS RMPLOYED RELATIVE TO THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION OR OPERATION OF THE. PROJECT AT THE PREVAILING PER DIEM WAGE RATE FOR THEIR LABOR CLASSIFICATION, AS DETERMINED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO LABOR CODE SECTIONS 1720, ET SEQ. THE DEVELOPER, ON BEHALF OF ITSELF, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS, WAIVES AND RELEASES THE CITY FROM ANY RIGHT OF ACTION THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE TO .ANY OF THEM PURSUANT1'0 LABOR CODE SECTION 1781. THE DEVELOPER ACKNOWLEDGES THE PROTECTIONS OF CIVIL CODE SECTION 1542 RELATIVE TO THE WAIVER AND RELEASE CONTAINED IN THIS SECTION 5.8, WHICH READS AS FOLLOWS: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT THE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TU�1F, OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER, WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WfFH I'HE DEBTOR OR RELEASED PARTY. BY INITIALING BELOW, THE OWNER KNOWINGLY AND VOLUNTARILY WAIVES TILE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1542 SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH THE WAIVERS AND RELEASES OF THIS ' ION 5.8: e opees Initials ADDITIONALLY, THE DEVELOPER SHALL INDEMNIFY, DEFEND A.ND HOLD HARMLRSS THE CITY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 8 AGAINST ANY CLAIMS PURSUANT TO LABOR CODE SF,CTION 1720 Er. SEQ., INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SECTION 1781, ARISING FROM THIS AGREEMENT OR THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION OR OPERATION OF ALL OR ANY PORTION OF THE PARK MPROVEMENTS. (a) Park Santiago Neighborhood Benefits. OWNER has met with residents of Park Santiago and has agreed to provide the following amenities: (1) Limited access to onsite amenities in a manner to be determined by OWNER as reasonably acceptable to Planning and Building Agency Executive Director. l4- 5094.0000MIS53M 13 (2) Security patrol in the residential neighborhood and Santiago Park a. patrol area: Project, Park Santiago and Park Santiago area as depicted on attached Exhibit "IT' b. Type of patrol: Periodic roving security twenty four (24) hours a day. e. Term: 55 years subieet to annual review during which review it may be detennined that such tens shall end earlier. (d) Park Santiago Publie Improvements and Traffic Calming. Subject to the approval by the Executive Director of Publie Works Agency and the Executive Direetorof Planning and Building Agency and meeting City design specifications and standards, OWNER shall design and construct the public improvements identified below prior to final approval for occupancy or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Owner shall be solely responsible for all aspects of the public improvements including, but not limited to, the analysis, design, engineering, construction and inspeetiorvadministration of: ( I ) Santiago Park neighborhood improvements at up to three locations on Edgewood andlor Bush Street to achieve traffic calming. Improvements may be based on input from the Santiago Park Neighborhood Association and may include, but not be limited to, bulb -outs, traffic circles and medians within the neighborhood streets. (2) Street lighting enhaneements by replacing all existing non LED light and/or fixture with LED light and or fixture throughout the Santiago Park Neighborhood. (3) A street light at the Santiago park Drive/ Main Street intersection. (4) Decorative concrete pavement within the intersection of Main Street/Walkie Way and Main StreevSantiago park Drive. 422 Reserved. 4.2.3 Graffiti Removal. OWNER shall also install and maintain graffiti protection on new surfaces and shall, within 24 hours of discovery of graffiti, cause it to be removed and associated restorations completed throughout the Projeet. 4.3 Development Impact Fees. 4.3.1 Amount of Fee. The Development Impact Fees set forth in Exhibit "D" shall be charged to the Projeet. These fee amounts are estimated and will be subject to change based on the fee rate applicable at the time of issuance of the Building Pennit. 4.3 2 Time of Payment. The fees required pursuant to Subsection 4.3.1 shall be paid to CITY prior to the issuance of building pennits for each residential unit. No fees shall be payable for building pennits issued prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement, but the fees required pursuant to Subsection 4.3.1 shall be paid prior to the re -issuance or extension of any building pennit for a residential unit for which such fees have not previously been paid. -15- 5539b,IM1o0_ 31553197.13 4.3.3 Fee Credits. OWNER shall be entitled to credit against the fees required pursuant to Subsection 4.2.1 for the dedication of land. the construction of improvements or the payment of lees as specifically set forth in Exhibit "E. 4.3.4 Future Development Impact Fee Program Changes. The parties herebv agree that. in addition to the Development Impact Fees included in Exhibit -D the project shall be subject to any increase in fees, or amendment or alteration, of Development Impact Fee programs in effect on the Effective Date. 4.3.5 Prepayment. In no event shall the prepayment of any Development Impact Fees required hereunder establish a vested right on the part of OWNER or any other owner of the property or any person or entity with an interest therein to develop the Project or the property following the expiration, cancellation or termination of the Term of this Agreement. Following the expiration, cancellation or termination of this Agreement, all Development Impact Fees then in effect shall be applicable to the project and property notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement and notwithstanding the prepayment of the Development Impact Fees set forth in Exhibit "D". any increase or amendment of any Development Impact Fee, or any combination thereof. Nothing contained in this Subsection 4.3.5 shall be construed as limiting the right of OWNER to a credit against any Development Impact Fees as set forth in Section 4.3.3 hereof. 4.4 Dedication of On -Site Easements and Rights of Way. OWNER shall dedicate to CITY all on -site rights of way and easements deemed necessary for public improvements as indicated on the approved Development plan for the project within 15 days of receipt of written demand from CITY. 4.5 Timing of Construction of Off -Site Infrastructure. Approval of any issuance of final approval for occupancy on the property shall be conditioned upon CITY's determination, in its sole discretion, that sufficient progress is being trade on construction of off -site infrastructure serving development of OWNER's property. 4.6 Santiago park Access. OWNER shall grant the City a public use, access, ingress, and egress easement in perpetuity on and within the Development to provide public access to Santiago park. The scope, location, and all aspects of the easement shall meet the requirements reasonably set forth by the City as determined by the Executive Directors of the parks, Recreation and Community Services, public Works, and the Planning and Building Agency and consistent with the conceptual design as describe& depicted on Exhibit F 4.6.1 Owner shall be responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the easement area. The easement area shall be maintained consistent with City standards and to Citv's reasonable satisfaction at all times. 4.6.2 Reserved. 4.6.3 Reserred. 4.7 1lousing Opportunity Ordinance. Project shall comply with the requirements of the I lousing Opportunity Ordinance (the -HOO") in effect on the Effective Date. 16- ii3e4.IXNN)r315531 M7.13 4.8 Overcrowding Mitigation Implementation Plan. The City of Santa Ana has one of the highest average number of people per household in the nation at 4.34 people per household. Owner commits to limit occupancy of the residential units within the project site to levels in compliance with local, state and federal fair housing standards. prior to applying to the City for occupancy permit, the Owner shall submit to the City an Overcrowding Mitigating Implementation Plan. prior to changing or revising the implementation plan, Owner shall provide a 60-day minimum written notice to the City Community Development Agency and the Planning and Building Safety Agency infonning of any proposed changes or revisions. 4.9 Local Live -Work Preference. prior to issuance of any Building Pennits, OWN ER shall develop and submit to the City Manager or his/her designee, a local live -work plan for the Project targeting, to the extent feasible and consistent with state and federal fair housing laws, a preference or priority for persons who currently either live or work in the City of Santa Ana for the rental of units at the Project. 4.10 Local Sourcing Plan. Developer agrees to make a good faith effort to encourage contractors and suppliers to hire and procure locally, to the extent that it is cost effective and does not delay the overall project development schedule. prior to issuance of any Building Pennits, Developer shall develop and submit to the Planning Agency (the " PBA") a local sourcing plan for the Project targeting, to the extent feasible, the hiring of qualified workers, construction contractors, or the purchasing of goods locally within the City of Santa Ana. The plan must be reviewed in a timely manner and approved by the PBA and be implemented for the construction of the project prior to issuance of any Building Permits. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. �. FINANCING & MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC INIPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES OWNER may propose, and if requested by CITY shall cooperate in, the formation of any special assessment district, community facilities district or alternate financing mechanism to pay for the construction and/or maintenance and operation of public infrastructure facilities required as pan of the Development Plan by providing up to $50,000 toward the costs of CITY in preparing a study to detennine the need for any such district or alternate financing mechanism. To the extent any such district or other financing entity is funned and sells bonds in order to finance such reimbursements, OWNER may be reimbursed to the extent that OWNER spends funds or dedicates land for the establishment of public facilities. If such a district or other financing entity is proposed OWNER agrees not to oppose such formation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is acknowledged and agreed by the parties that nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring CITY or the City Council to fonn any such district or other financing entity or to issue and sell bonds. In addition, it is acknowledged and agreed by the parties that nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring OWNER to vote in support of or annex to such district or other financing entity. It shall be the sole right of OWNER to detennine whether to be in or out of any such district or other financing entity. fi. REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE 6.1 periodic Review. The CITY shall review this Agreement annually, on or before the anniversary of the Effective Date, in order to ascertain the compliance by OWNER with the terms of the Agreement. OWNER shall submit an Annual Monitoring Report, in a fonn acceptable to the City Manager, within thirty (30) days -17- i i31N.(HH)0I.31553187.13 after written notice from the City Manager. the Annual Monitoring Report shall be accompanied by an annual review and administration fee sufficient to defray the estimated costs of review and administration of the Agreement during the succeeding year. the amount ofthe annual review and administration fee shall be set annually by resolution of the City Council. 6? Special Review. the City compliance with this Agreement at any ti designee, shall conduct such special reviews. 6.3 Procedure. Council may order a special review of me. the City Manager, or his or her (a) During either a periodic review or a special review, OWNER shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the Agreement. the burden of proof on this issue shall be on OWNER. (b) Upon completion of a periodic review or a special review, the City Manager, or his or her designee, shall submit a report to the Planning Commission setting forth the evidence concerning good faith compliance by OWNER with the terms of this Agreement and his or her recommended finding on that issue. (c) If the Planning Commission finds and determines on the basis of substantial evidence that OWNER has complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the review shall be concluded. (d) If the Planning Commission finds and determines on the basis of substantial evidence that OWNER has not complied in good faith with the tenns and conditions of this Agreement, the Commission shall provide written notice to OWNER of such findings setting forth the nature of the problem and the actions, if any, required by OWNER to cure such problem and, where the problem can be cured, OWNER has tailed to take such actions and cure such problem within thirty (30) days after the effective date of such notice or, in the event that such problem cannot be cured within such thirty (30) day period but can be cured within a longer time, has failed to commence the actions necessary to cure such problem within such thirty (30) day period and to diligently proceed to complete such actions and cure such problem. If OWNER fails to take the necessary actions, the Commission may recommend to the City Council modification or termination of this Agreement. OWNER may appeal a Planning Commission detennination pursuant to this Section 6.3(d) pursuant to CITY's rules for consideration of appeals in zoning matters then in effect. Notice of default as provided under Section 7.3 of this Agreement shall be given to OWNER prior to or concurrent with proceedings under Section 6.4 and Section 6.5. 6.4 Proceedings Upon Modification or Tennination. If, upon a finding under Section 6.3, CITY determines to proceed with modification or termination of this Agreement, Cl fY shall give written notice to OWNER of its intention so to do. the notice shall be given at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the scheduled hearing and shall contain: (a) The time and place of the hearing; (b) A statement as to whether or not CITY proposes to terminate or to modify the Agreement: and, go 55394.IXIW2 315i31 N7.13 (c) Such other information that the C'ITl' considers necessary to inform OWNER of the nature of the proceeding. 6.5 Hearing on Modification or Termination. At the time and place set for the hearing on modification or termination, OWNER shall be given an opportunity to be heard. OWNER shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. "rhe burden of proof on this issue shall be on OWNER. If the City Council finds, based upon substantial evidence, that OWNER has not complied in good faith with the temis or conditions of the Agreement, the City Council may terminate this Agreement or modify this Agreement and impose such conditions as are reasonably necessary to protect the interests of the CITY. The decision of the City Council shall be final. 6.6 Certificate of Agreement Compliance. If, at the conclusion of a Periodic or Special Review, OWNER is found to be in compliance with this Agreement, CITY shall, upon request by OWNER, issue a Certificate of Agreement Compliance ("Certificate") to OWNER stating that after the most recent Periodic or Special Review and based upon the inforniation known or made known to the City Manager and City Council that: (I ) this Agreement remains in effect; and (2) OWNER is not in default. "rhe Certificate shall be in recordable form, shall contain inforniation necessary to communicate constructive record notice of the finding of compliance, shall state whether the Certificate is issued after a Periodic or Special Review and shall state the anticipated date of commencement of the next Periodic Review. OWNER may record the Certificate with the County Recorder. 6.6.1 Whether or not the Certificate is relied upon by assignees or other transferees or OWNER, CffY shall not be bound by a Certificate if a default existed at the time of the Periodic or Special Review, but was concealed from or otherwise not known to the City Manager or City Council. 6.7 Conditions of Discretionary Approvals. "rhe requirements imposed as conditions of any discretionary approval received through the City's existing regulatory process shall be governed by the ternis of those approvals, and in no event shall such conditions be affected by the termination, cancellation, rescission, revocation, or default or expiration of this Development Agreement (although such conditions must comply with the Applicable Rules). "rhe Conditions of approval are incorporated herein by reference an as attached as Exhibit "I". DEFAULT AND REMEDIES. 7.1 Remedies in General. It is acknowledged by the parties that CITY would not have entered into this Agreement if it were to be liable in damages under this Agreement, or with respect to this Agreement or the application thereof'. In general, each of the parties hereto may pursue any remedy at law or equity available for the breach ofany provision of this Agreement, except that CITY shall not be liable in damages to OWNER, or to any successor in interest of OWNER, or to any other person, and OWNER covenants not to sue for damages or claim any damages: (a) For any breach of this Agreement or for any cause of action that arises out of this -19- 55394.00002" 3 1553 187.13 Agreement; or (b) For the taking, impairment or restriction of any right or interest conveyed or provided under or pursuant to this Agreement; or (e) Arising out of or connected with any dispute, controversy or issue regarding the application or interpretation or effect of the provisions of this Agreement. 71 Release. Except for non -monetary remedies, OWNER, for itself, its successors and assignees, hereby releases CITY, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims, demands, actions, or suits of any kind or nature arising out of any liability, known or unknown, present or future, including, but not limited to, any claim or liability, based or asserted, piusuant to Article I, Section 19 of the California Constitution, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, or any other law or ordinance which seeks to impose any other liability or damage, whatsoever, upon CITY because it entered into this Agreement or because of the terms of this Agreement. OWNER hereby acknowledges that it has read and is familiar with the provisions of Cali forma Civil Code Section 1542, which is sea forth below: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT THE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT Tl-IE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HLM OR HER, WOIJLD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH l'HE DEBTOR OR RELEASED PARTY. BY INITIALING BELOW, OWNER HEREBY WAIVES THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1542 IN CONNECTION WITH THE NLATMRS THAT ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE FOREGOING WAIVERS AND RELEASES. I, 1 0"I'S Initials 7.3 Termination or Modification of Agreement for Default of OWNER. CITY may terminate or modify this Agmement for any failure of OWNER to perform any material duty or obligation of OWNER under this Agreement, or to comply in good faith with the terms of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "default"): provided, however. CITY may terminate or modify this Agreement pursuant to this Section only after providing written notice to OWNER of default setting forth the nature of the default and the actions, if any, required by OWNER to cure such default and, where the default can be cured, OWNER has failed to take such actions and cure such default within sixty (60) days after the effective date of such notice or, in the event that such default cannot be cured within such sixty (60) day period 'out can be cured within a longer time, has failed to commence the actions necessary to cum such default within such sixty (60) day period and to diligently proceed to complete such actions and cure such default. -20- 55394 "M31553187.13 7.4 Tennination of Agreement for Default of CITY. OWNER may tenninate this Agreement only in the event of a default by CITY in the perfimmnee of a material term of this Agreement and only after providing written notice to CITY of detault setting forth the nature of the default and the aetions, if any, required by CITY to cure sueh default and, where the default can be eared, CITY has failed to take sueh aetions and cure sueh default within sixty (60) days after the effective date of sueh notice or, in the event that sueh default eannot be eared within such sixty (00) day period but can be eared within a longer time, has failed to eommenee the aetions necessary to eure sueh default within such sixty (60) day period and to diligently proceed to eomplete sueh aetions and eure sueh default. R. LITIGATION. 9.1 'third Partv Litigation Coneemine Agreement. OWNER shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys' fees, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its agents, offieers and employees from any elaim, aetion or proceeding against CITY, its agents, officers, or employees to attaek, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Agreement, or the approval of any pennit or entitlement granted pursuant to this Agreement. CITY shall promptly notify OWNER of any elaim. aetion, proceeding or detennination ineluded within this Section R.I, and CITY shall cooperate in the defense. If CITY fails to promptly notify OWNER of any sueh elaim, aetion, proceeding or detennination. or if CITY fails to eooperate in the defense, OWNER shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless CITY. CITY may in its diseretion participate in the defense of any sueh elaim, aetion, proceeding or detennination. 9.2 Environmental Assurances. OWNER shall indemnify and hold CITY, its of ieers, agents, and employees free and harmless from any liability, based or asserted, upon any aet or omission of OWNER, its offieers, agents, employees, subcontractors, predecessors in interest, successors, assigns and independent eontraetors for any violation of any federal, state or Ioeal law, ordinance or regulation relating to industrial hygiene or to environmental eonditions on, under or about the property, including, but not limited to, soil and groundwater eonditions, and OWNER shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys' fees, CITY, its offieers, agents and employees in any aetion based or asserted upon any sueh alleged aet or omission. CITY may in its diseretion participate in the defense of any sueh aetion. 9.3 Reservation of Ritzhts. With respect to Section 9.1 and Section 9.2 herein, CITY reserves, the right to either (I) approve the attorney(s) that the indemnifying party seleets, hires or otherwise engages to defend the indemnified party hereunder, whieh approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, or (2) eonduet its own defense; provided, however, that the indemnifying party shall reimburse the indemnified party forthwith for any and all reasonable expenses ineurred for such defense, including attorneys' flees, upon billing and aeeounting therefor. 9.4 Challenge to Existing Land Use Approvals. By aeeepting the benefits ofthis Agreement, OWNER, oil behalfof itselfand its successors in interest, hereby expressly agrees and covenants not to sue or otherwise challenge any land use approval affecting the property and in effeet as ofthe Effective Date. Sueh agreement and eovenant ineludes, without limitation, the eovenant against any direet suit by _21_ 5i39J M00' 31553137.13 OWNER or its successor in interest, or any participation, encouragement or involvement whatsoever that is adverse to CITY by OWNER or its successor to interest, other than as part of reeuired response to 'awful orders of a court or other body of compotent)unsdiction. OWNER hereby expressly waives, on behalf of itself and itssuccessors in mterest,any claim or challenge to any land use approval affect ng the Property and in effect as of the Effective Date. OWNER hereby acknowledges that it has read and is familiar with the provisions of California Civil Code Section 1542, which is set forth below: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THATTHE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECU'T1NG THE RELEASE AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER, WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR OR RELEASED PARTY BY INITIALING BELOW, OWNER HEREBY WANES THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1542 IN CONNECI'ION WITH THE MATTERS THAT ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE FOREGOING WAIVERS AND RELEASES. 1 O S Initials 8.5 Survival. The provisions of Sections 8.1 through 8,4, inclusive, shall survive the termination of this Agreement. MORTGAGEE PROTECTION. The Parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall not prevent or limit OWNER, in any manner, ar OWNER's sole discretion, from encumbenng the Properly or any portion thereof or any unprovement thereon by any mortgage, dead of trust or other security device securing financing with respect to the Property. CITY acknowledges that the lenders providing such financing may require certain Agreement interpretations and modifications and agrees upon request, from time to time, to meet with OWNER mid representatives of such lenders to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation or modification. CI'l'Y will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such requested interpretation or modification provided such interpretation or modification is consistent with the intent and purposes of this Agreement. Any Mortgagee of the Property shall be entitled to the following rights and privileges: (a) Neither entering into this Agreement nor a breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any mortgage on the Property made in good faith and for value, unless otherwise required by ;aw. (b) The Mortgagee of any mortgage or deed of trust encumbering the Property, or any part thereof, which Mortgagee, has submitted a requcst in writing to the CITY in the manner specified herein for giving notices, shall be entitled to receive written notification from CITY of any default by OWNER in the performance of OWNER's ohligations under this Agreement. -22- 55..194.0000213 ISS3197.13 (c) 11CITY timely receives a request from a mortgagee requesting a copy ofany notice of default given to OWNER under the terms of this Agreement, CITY shall provide a copy of that notice to the Mortgagee within ten (10) days of sending the notice of default to OWNER. The Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure the default during the remaining cure period allowed such party under this Agreement. (d) Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of the Property, or any part thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the mortgage or deed of trust. or deed in lieu of such foreclosure, shall take the Property, or part thereof, subject to the terms of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, no Mortgagee shall have an obligation or duty under this Agreement to perform any ol'OW'NER's obligations orother affirmative covenants of OWNER hereunder, or to guarantee such performance; provided, however, that to the extent that any covenant to be performed by OWNER is a condition precedent to the performance of a covenant by CITY, the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition precedent to CITY's performance hereunder, and further provided that any sale, transfer or assignment by any Mortgagee in possession shall be subject to the provisions of Section 2.5 of this Agreement. 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS, 10.1 Recordation of Agreemment. This Agreement and any amendment or cancellation thereol'shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder by the Clerk of the City Council within ten (10) days after the City enters into the Agreement, in accordance with Section 65868.5 of the Goverment Code. If the Parties to this Agreement or their successors in interest amend or cancel this Agreement, or if the CITY terminates or modifies this Agreement as provided herein for failure of the OWNER to comply in good faith with the terns and conditions of this Agreement, the City Clerk shall have notice of such action recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 10.2 Entire Agreemment. This Agreement sets forth and contains the entire understanding and agreement of the parties, and there are no oral or written representations, understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements that are not contained or expressly referred to herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations, understandings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this Agreement. 10.3 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be determined invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby to the extent such remaining provisions are not rendered impractical to perform taking into consideration the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provision of the Public Benefits set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement, including the payment of the Development Impact Fees set forth therein, are essential elements of this Agreement and CITY would not have entered into this Agreement but for such provisions, and therefore in the event such provisions are detennined to be invalid, void or unenforceable, this entire Agreement shall be null and void and of no force and effect whatsoever. -23- �i394.00O02.31553197,13 10.4 Interpretation and Govemine Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, with venue in Orange County. This Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the objectives and purposes of the parties hereto, and the rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement, all parties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation hereof. 10.5 Section Fleadines. All section headings and subheadings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement. 10.6 Singular and Plural. As used herein, the singular of any word includes the plural. 10.7 Joint and Several Obligations. If at any time during the Term of this Agreement the Property is owned, in whole or in part, by more than one OWNER, all obligations of such OWNERS under this Agreement shall be joint and several, and the default of any such OWNER shall be the default of all such OWNERS. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no OWNER of a single lot that has been finally subdivided and sold to such OWNER as a member of the general public or otherwise as an ultimate user shall have any obligation under this Agreement except as expressly provided for herein. 10.8 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement as to which time is an element. 10.9 Waiver. Failure by a party to insist upon the strict perfornance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other party, or the failure by a party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other party. shall not constitute a waiver of such party's right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other party with the teens of this Agreement thereafter. 10.10 No Third Partv Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the parties and their successors and assigns. No other person shall have any right of action based upon any provision of this Agreement. 10.11 Force Ntaieure. Neitherparty shall be deemed to be in default where failure or delay in perfomtanee of any of its obligations under this Agreement is caused by: ( I ) strikes, lockouts or labor disputes; (2) inability to obtain labor or materials or reasonable substitutes therefor; (3) inclement weather which delays or precludes construction; (4) acts of God, including but not limited to earthquakes, or the public enemy or civil commotion; (5) condemnation, (6) fire or other casualty; (7) shortage of fuel, electricity ornatural gas; (S) action or nonaction of public utilities or of local, state or federal governments, affecting the work, including, but not limited to, any delays in the pennitting process as a result of the action or inaction or such governmental authorities; (9) criminal acts or acts of terrorism; or (10) other conditions similar to those enumerated above which are beyond the reasonable _24_ 5539y,1 =131553187.13 anticipation or control of such Party, or other causes beyond the Party's reasonable control. It' any such events shall occur, the term of this Agreement and the time for perf'ornmance shall be extended f'or the duration of each such event, , provided that the Tenn of this Agreement shall not be extended under any circumstances for more than five (5) years. 10.12 Mutual Covenants. The covenants contained herein are mutual covenants and also constitute conditions to the concurrent or subsequent performance by the party benefited thereby of the covenants to be performed hereunder by such benefited party. 10.13 Successors in Interest. The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the Parties to this Agreement. All provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitudes and constitute covenants running with the land. Each covenant to do or refrain from doing some act hereunder with regard to development of the Property: (a) is for the benefit of and is a burden upon every portion of the Property: (b) runs with the Property and each portion thereof; and (c) is binding upon each party and each successor in interest during ownership of the Property or any portion thereof'. 10.14 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the parties in counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all of the parties had executed the same instrument. 10.15 Jurisdiction and Venue. Any action at law or in equity arising under this Agreement or brought by a party hereto for the purpose of enforcing, construing or detennining the validity of any provision of this Agreement shall be filed and tried in the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, and the parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for the tiling, removal or change of venue to any other cowl. 10.16 Project as a Private Undertaking. It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the development of the Project is a private development, that neither party is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and that each party is an independent contracting entity with respect to the teams, covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement. No partnership, joint venture or other association of any kind is foamed by this Agreement. The only relationship between CITY and OWNER is that of a government entity regulating the development of private property and the owner of such property. 10.17 Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the Parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Agreement. Upon the request of either party at any time, the other party shall promptly execute and file or record such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary under the teams of this Agreement to carry out the intent and to fulfill the provisions of this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. _2j_ ?5394AMAAR 315531,47.13 10.13 Eminent Domain. No provision of this Agreement shall be construed to limit or restrict the exercise by CITY" of its power of eminent domain. 10.19 Aeent for Service of Process. In the event OWNER is not a resident of the State of California or it is an association, partnership or joint venture without a member, partner or joint venturer resident of the State of California, or it is a foreign corporation, then in any such event, OWNER shall File with the City Manager, upon its execution of this Agreement, a designation of a natural person residing in the State of California, giving his or her name. residence and business addresses, as its agent for the purpose of service of process in any court action arising out of or based upon this Agreement, and the delivery to such agent of a copy of any process in any such action shall constitute valid service upon OWNER. If for any reason service of such process upon such agent is not feasible, then in such event OWNER maybe personally served with such process and such service shall constitute valid service upon OWNER. OWNER is amenable to the process so served, submits to the jurisdiction of the Court so obtained and waives any and all objections and protests thereto. 1020 Certificate of Compliance. At any time during the term of this Agreement, any lender or either party may request either party to this Agreement to confirm that ( I ) this Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect (or if there have been modifications hereto, that this Agreement is in full force and effect as modified and stating the date and nature of such modifications); (2) to the best of such Party's knowledge. no defaults exist under this Agreement or if defaults do exist. to describe the nature of such defaults: and (3) any other information reasonably requested. Each Party hereby agrees to provide a Certificate to such lender or other Party within thirty (30) days of receipt of the written request therefor. 10.21 Authority to Execute. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of OWNER warrants and represents that he or she/they have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of his or heritheir corporation, partnership or business entity and warrants and represents that he or she/they hasihave the authority to bind OWNER to the performance of its obligations hereunder. -2G- 55194.00002 3 1553 187.13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Development Agreement on the last day and year set forth below. _27_ 55394.0000 9[553187.13 OWNER AC 2525 MAIN, LLC, a California limited liability company By: P112,1Manager LLC Its: ManageDated: 0 / CITY CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California municipal corporation Mayor Dated: ATTEST: By: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: REST REST & KRIBGER LLP City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" (Legal Description ofthe Property) 5 5 J 94, 00002'.315 5 318 7.13 i fi4). > •ti��lll Si • L �iw� � V alp 411111111. Will a �.0 .rya Edye_w_oodt-_Rc t i> got '�AIR EXHIBIT "C" Development Plans Development Plans and entitlement applications as presented in the City Staff Report Dated are incorporated herein by reference. project entitlements and applications include. but may not he limited to the following entitlements: I. Development Agreement No. 2018-01 2. General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06 3. Amendment Application No. 2018-10 4. Specific Development No. 93 i. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 55394.IXMM)2`.31553187.13 EXHIBIT "D" Development Impact Fees (Estimated) The estimated amount of Development Impact Fees associated with the project based upon the site plan documentation submitted as part of the PrpjLet Approvals include but are not limited to the following fees and deposits; applicable sewer fee, street lee. stonn drain fee, traffic fee, deposits, and all applicable tees associated with demolition of existing structures, drainage, site development, and construction are based on actual square footage of any commercial development and number of residential units. Based on 256 Residential Units, the Development Impact Fees are estimated at: Gee Estimated Total Sewer Y 199,344 Capital Facilities Capacity Charges (Orange County Sanitation District Charges) $607.279 Stonn Drain $11,776 Traffic .5305,009 Parks & Recreation .974,250 Fire Facilities Fee .5252,326 Santa Ana Unified School Fees S1,050,895 Estimated Dotal .53,444,878 55394.(XXM)2 31553 187.13 EXHIBIT "E" Development Impact Fees Credits, if any will be detennined at time of building permit issuance and shall be incorporated herein by reference. 55394.00002'31553187.13 EXI-IIBIT'F" Santiago Park Access Rights (Conceptual) 55391.fNl01@'31 553187.13 EXI IIBi*r'(3" Park Design and Improvements (Conceptual) \A6 SANTIAGO CREEK TRAIL ACCESS ON O: SAWA ANA 3331)4 M002 31333187.13 EXHIBrr Ii Park Santiago Security Patrol .Area Map (Conceptual) nY 5,394 WW2 31,13187.13 EXHIBIT I Conditions of Discretionary Approvals 2525 N. Main - Project Approval Conditions: The project is approved subject to compliance. to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Codc, the California Administrative Code, the Calif'omia Building Standards Code, and all other applicable regulations. In addition, it shall meet the conditions of approval articulated in the sections below. The Applicant or Owner. or Owner's successorts) or assiutee(s) (collectively. "Applicant') with the C'ity's consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, nmst comply with each and every condition listed below The Applicant nmst remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the development project. Failure to comply with each and every condition may also result in breach of the Development Agreement. GENERAL CONDITIONS Project Description and Entitlements: Approval of this application is to build (Insert Final Approved Project Description and specific entitlements) with such additions, revisions, changes or modifications as required by the Planning Commission as articulated in Planning Commission Resolution No. XXXX, dated XXXX. Subsequent submittals for this project shall be consistent with the Planning Commission's approval and in compliance with the applicable land use regulations of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and any applicable State law and the associated plans presented to the Planning Commission on (Insert PC hearing date) and on file with the City. 2. Acknowledgment of Conditions of Approval. The Applicant shall file an Acknowledgnent of Conditions of Approval with the Planning and Building Agency within 30 days of final approval of all resolutions. The property Applicant shall be required to record the Acknowledgment of these Conditions of Approval with the Office of the Orange County Recorder and proof of such recordation shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Agency. 3. Enforcement of Conditions. In case of violation of any of the conditions of approval of applicable law, the property owner and tenant will be issued a Notice of Correction pursuant City regulations or pursuant to applicable ternis of the Development Agreement, the Maintenance Agreement, and the CC&Rs if said violation is not remedied in accordance with the specified period of time and/or subsequent violations of the conditions of approval anchor City law occurs within ninety days of any Notice of Correction, the property owner shall be held responsible to reimburse the City for all Staff time directly attributable to enforcement of the conditions of approval, mitigation measures as stipulated in the various agreements and/or City law including but not limited to, revocation of the herein approvals. 4. Project Plans. Project plans for the development shall be subject to a complete code compliance review with the Planning and Building Agency when the plans are submitted for plan check and shall comply with all applicable City of Santa Ana ordinances, regulations, and policies prior to building pennit issuance, including, but not limited to, the requirements established or authorized by Chapter 3 ( Building and Structures) and Chapter 4l (Zoning) of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. 5531A.M002 31553187.13 LEGAL 5. Indemnity. The Applicant shall defend, indemnity, and hold harmless the City of Santa Ana, its agents, officers, or employees 1 om any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul an approval of the City, its legislative body, advisory agencies or administrative officers the subject application. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding against the City and the Applicant will either undertake defense of the matter and pay the City's associated legal costs, or will advance funds to pay for defense of the matter by the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City retains the right to settle or abandon the matter without the Applicant's consent, but should it do so, the City shall waive the indemnification herein, except the City's decision to settle or abandon a matter following an adverse judgment or failure to appeal, shall not cause a waiver of the indemnification rights herein. 6. Approval Time Period. The approval of the entitlements herein shall be valid for a time period consistent with the Development Agreement. IMPACT FEES Project Development Impact Fees. The following Development Impact fees shall be charged to the Project. These tee amounts are estimated and will be subject to change based on the tee rate applicable at the time of issuance of the Building Permit. Fee Estimated Total Sewer $199,344 Capital Facilities Capacity Charges (Orange County Sanitation District Charges) $607,279 Storm Drain $55,776 Traffic $305,009 Parks & Recreation $974,250 Fire Facilities Fee $252,326 Santa Ana Unified School Fees $1,050,895 Estimated Total $3,444,878 1. City Invoices. All invoices the Applicant has received from the City shall be paid to a zero balance prior final approval for occupancy by the City or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. PROJECT DESIGN AND OPERATIONS 55394-W001'315531 XT13 2. 1 he appro%el project is a multi-familt apartment rental project. Any propos.il in the future ro comert tnc :'ar.t.il unr,. ;o .ondommmm w%nership, the Owner Shill comply etch the requirementS ior'a condominium project In accordaticc '.%tth local And State zonin_" and subdt� cton regwremells. 3. knit Mix: Number of family units to be a minimum of thirty percent (30%,) of the proposed units to contain 2 & 3 bedrooms. Onsite Property Manager. The Project shall include the provision to have 24-hour on -site Property Management services and personnel. Up-to-date 24-hour contact infonnation for the on - site personnel shall be provided to the following City Agencies on an ongoing basis: (a) Police Department (b) Fire Department (e) Planning and Building Agency (d) Community Development Agency �. Emergency Evacuation Plan. Developer shall submit and obtain approval of an Emergency Evacuation Plan (the "EEP") from City Police and Fire Protection agencies prior to final approval for occupancy or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Up-to-date 24-hour emergency contact infonnation for the on -site personnel shall be provided to the City on an ongoing basis and the approved EEP shall be kept onsite and also be submitted to the following City Agencies: (a) Police Department (b) Fire Department (c) Planning and Building Agency (d) Community Development Agency 6. Crime Free Flousing Plan. Applicant shall work with City Staff to develop a crime free housing policy. procedure. and design plan (the " CFI -I Plan") and shall submit and obtain approval from the Planning and Building Agency of the CHI Plan prior to final approval for occupancy or the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The approved CHI Plan shall be implemented and administered by Property Management. The approved CH I Plan shall be implemented, adhered to, and be enforced by the Project at all times. Onsite Parking Management Plan. Developer shall provide onsite parking for residents and visitors of the Project and actively monitor the parking demand of the Project site. Developer shall continually monitor and take appropriate measures to manage the parking demand of the Project site to mitigate the use of offsite parking spaces on private or public properties and `or right-of-way. Prior to final approval for occupancy or the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, Developer shall submit and obtain approval from the PBA a Parking Management Plan (the " PMP") meeting the requirements of this Condition. The approved I'MP shall be adhered to and be enforced by the Project at all times. S. Good ?Neighbor Policy. The Applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Planning Division a good neighbor policy implementation plan that will provide a process for the neighborhood to report nuisance issues to the property management to help manage and address potential nuisance issues including but not limited to noise, lighting, property maintenance, parking overflow into the street and neighborhood, and landscape maintenance. 553e4A0()0] 3l.153187.13 9. Parking Ratio. Number ofspaees and onsite ratio of parking shall be a mininmm oftwo (2) spaces per unit. 10. Privacy along east property line. To ensure maximum privacy screening between the project site and the residential uses along the eastern property, the Applicant is eonsuvcting an eight (8) foot tall property line decorative block wall. In addition to this wall, and installation and maintenance of all existing mature trees along the eastern property line, all windows facing the eastern property with a direct line of sight to the adjacent properties bordering the eastern property line shall be design incorporating opaque view obscuring glass. II. Protect and Preserve Existing Mature Trees along the Eastern Property Line. To ensure maximum privacy screening between the project site and the residential uses along the eastern property, the Applicant shall protect and preserve all existing mature trees along the east property line. 12. Protect and Preserve Existing Mature Trees on the Property not Located Along the East Property Line. To the extent feasible, the Applicant shall protect and preserve all other mature trees on the property. If the perseveration of the existing matures trees in not feasible because of the location of the approved structures on the property, the Applicant shall work with Staff to evaluate the feasibility of relocating the tree(s) to other locations on the property. 13. Edgewood Street Improvements. Only one emergency vehicular access may be permitted along Edgewood Street. No other vehicular access or curb approach openings will be approved on this street for the project. In addition, mature canopy and vertical specimen trees shall be planted along the southern property line between the building and the adjacent sidewalk to integrate the building with the adjacent single-family development across the street. 14. Property Line Wall. The project Applicant shall install an 3-foot tall property line block wall along the entire eastern edge of the Project as part of the site construction and preparation process and prior installation of the foundation. The design of the wall shall be approved by the Planning Manager and shall be decoratively designed to include a mix of decorative materials, colors, and decorative pilasters. 15. Santiago Park Entrance and Interface. If approved by the City Council, the Applicant shall design the Project and residential units to also front onto Santiago Park, Main Street, and Santiago Street entrance. The Project fapade along Santiago Park shall be consistent with and reflect the natural, current state of the Park and include articulation of the building fagade to include open garden areas. The conceptual design is as shown in Attachment 1 to these conditions. The Santiago Park Entrance design shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planning, Public Works. and Parks and Recreation Directors to ensure compliance with the Agreement. Approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. 16. Green Project Features. Alterative Transportation and Energy Source, Resource Conservation, and LEED Certification. The project shall obtain Silver Standard or better LEED equivalent and shall at the minimum, incorporate bike lockers, bikesharing programing, electric vehicle charging stations, rain capturing systems, grey water capturing systems, and to the extent feasible, automobile sharing programing. 17. Landscape Plan. A Landscape Plan (including Irrigation) prepared by a licensed landscape architect shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building pennits. The 5 3394MM02 315 53187.13 Irrigation Plan shall include an irrigation system layout with the location of controllers and points of connection with data on valve sizes and gallons per minute (G.P.M.), the size and location of sleeves and all spray heads. including the location of conventional systems and drip systems; an irrigation legend with complete specifications; irrigation notes and construction details of all assemblies and components; a recommended irrigation schedule, preferably on an annual basis; and a summary block on the initial page of submitted plans that will present the above information clearly and accurately. The City reserves the right to require subsequent checks, or approval of the landscape plans prior to issuance of a grading pennit. IR. Water Conservation. Landscaping shall comply %kith the City's water conservation ordinances in accordance with SAMC Section and the State mandated Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MW'ELO) 2015 update. 19. Installation. Landscaping for the project shall be complete in phases by building and shall be installed and inspected prior to occupancy of units within that building. The developer shall be responsible for maintaining all common area landscaping within the development. 20. Landscape Details. The landscape plan shall include a Plant Legend containing: plant symbol, scientific name of plant material, common name of plant material, plant container size, and plant spacing. Very low, low and medium water usage plant materials are encouraged. The applicant shall construct a landscape planter along the eastern property line. In this eastern planter, a combination of vertical and canopy specimen trees shall be planted with minimum size of 60 inch box. The landscape plan shall provide a cross section showing the planter at time of planting, after five (5) years and at full maturity. The cross section shall demonstrate the landscaping will adequately screen the project from the adjacent residential uses along the eastern portion of the Property. 21. Minimum 'Free Box Size. The applicant shall install minimum 36 inch box trees, when planting trees for all required trees along street setbacks, open space areas and shared parking areas. All other tree sizes may be dependent on the location, species and spacing. The Final landscaping is subject to the review and approval of the Planning Manager. 22. Maintenance of existing site. The site and the public R.O.W. adjacent to any portions of the site shall be maintained in a condition which is free of debris while the property is vacant and undergoing development and during and after the construction, addition or implementation of the entitlements granted herein. All trash and refuse shall be disposed of in dumpsters and be removed from the premises on an -as needed basis. Anysurplus construction materials shall be screened front public view when not actually in use and be removed from the property upon completion of construction activities. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, the Applicant or by a pennined waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, and construction areas within the City. 23. On Going Property Maintenance. Subject to review and applicability by the Planning and Building Agency, the Community Development Agency, the Public Works Agency, and the City Attorney to ensure that the property and all improvements located thereupon are properly maintained, Developer (and the owner of the property upon which the authorized use and/or authorized improvements are located if different from the Applicant) shall execute a maintenance agreement with the City of Santa Ana which shall be recorded against the property and which shall 55344.0000231553187. 13 be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney. The maintenance agreement shall contain covenants, conditions and restrictions relating to the following: (a) Compliance with operational conditions applicable during any period(s) of construction or major repair (e.g., proper screening and securing of the construction site; implementation of proper erosion control, dust control and noise mitigation measure; adherence to approved project phasing etc.); (b) Compliance with ongoing operational conditions, requirements and restrictions, as applicable (including but not limited to hours of operation, security requirements, the proper storage and disposal of trash and debris, enforcement of the Parking Management Plan, enforcement of the Overcrowding Mitigation Implementation Plan, and/or restrictions on certain uses. etc... ) (c) Ongoing compliance with approved design and construction parameters, signage parameters and restrictions as well as landscape designs and maintenance, as applicable; (d) Ongoing maintenance, repair and upkeep of the property and all improvements located thereupon at all times (including but not limited to controls on the proliferation of trash and debris about the property; the proper and timely removal of graffiti; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of damaged, vandalized and%or weathered buildings, structures and/or improvements; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of exterior paint, parking striping, lighting and irrigation fixtures, walls and fencing, publicly accessible bathrooms and bathroom fixtures, landscaping and related landscape improvements and the like, as applicable); (e) If Developer and the owner of the property are different (e.g., if the applicant is a tenant or licensee of the property or any portion thereof), both the applicant and the owner of the property shall be signatories to the maintenance agreement and both shall be jointly and severally liable for compliance with its terms. (f) The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any party responsible for complying with its terns shall not assimm its ownership interest in the property or any interest in any lease, sublease, license or sublicense, unless the prospective assignee agrees in writing to assume all of the duties and obligations and responsibilities set forth under the maintenance agreement. (g) The maintenance agreement shall contain provisions relating to the enforcement of its conditions by the City and shall also contain provisions authorizing the City to recover costs and expenses which the City may incur arising out of any enforcement and/or remediation efforts which the City may undertake in order to cure any deficiency in maintenance, repair or upkeep or to enforce any restrictions or conditions upon the use of the property and a 50% administration fee. The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any unreimbursed costs and/or expenses incurred by the City to cure a deficiency in maintenance or to enforce use restrictions shall become a lieu upon the property in an amount equivalent to the actual costs and expense incurred by the City and a MIN) administration fee. (h) I'he execution and recordation of the maintenance agreement shall be a condition precedent to the issuance of final approval for any construction permit related to this entitlement. LIGHTING 55394.IMJ002 3 1553 187.13 24. Site and Building Lighting. The developer shall submit for review by the Planning Division and the Engineering Department, the design and specifications for all proposed lighting fixtures proposed for the buildings. drive aisles, parkways, parking areas, pathways, and surrounding areas within the development. The fixtures shall be reviewed for quality, aesthetics, illumination values, sustainability values such as LED and shall be decoratively and architecturally consistent with the ouilding design. The number, location, height, style and desigi shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division and Engineering Department prior to issuance of building pennits. UTILITIES 25. Undergrounding of Utilities. All utility service lines shall be underground. This includes all existing above ground wires that cross over the property that feed adjacent properties. 26. Composite Utility Plan. The applicant shall submit a composite utility plan depicting the location of all above ground utility appurtenances. The exact location of the equipment shall be approved by the Planning Division, during the plan check process, and shall be installed as per approved plans. They shall not be allowed within a required parking, turnaround and landscape areas or on any fagade facing a public street. 27. Screening of ,Ylechanical Equipment. All mechanical equipment placement and screening shall be included on the development plan and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to installation. Where practicable and as shown on the plans approved by the Planning Commission in the course of obtaining the requested entitlements, mechanical equipment, heating, ventilation, air conditioning (I-IVAC) units, satellite dish systems, solar panels, thernial solar heaters, utility meters, above ground utility and fire safety connections will be. screened, located out of public view or be architectural integrated into the project design. CONSTRUCTION 28. Construction Information. During construction, the Applicant will display sigis visible to the public from the public right-of-way with a contact number of the construction superintendant to address any questions or concerns about demolition, grading, and construction activities including dust, noise and vibration. 29. Vehicles and Equipment. All construction vehicles or equipment, fixed or mobile, operated within 1,000 feet of an existing dwelling shall be equipped with properly operat ing and maintained mufflers. 30. Warning Devices. Replace backup audible warning devices with backup strobe lights or other warning devices during evening construction activity to the extent permitted by the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health. 31. Pest Control. The Applicant shall have rodent and pest controls on site during demolition and "ading activities to mitigate impacts to the surrounding properties and neighborhood. 32. Perimeter Fence. Prior to demolition and construction, a perimeter security fence not exceeding seven feet in height, shall be installed around the project site. The fencing shall include a green 55394AXWO2 3 1553 187.13 screen material or approved equivalent. The fence/screen material shall be properly maintained and be free of rips, tears, fraying, graffiti, and any other damage or vandalism. 33. Site Maintenance. The site and the public R.O.W. adjacent to any portions of the site shall be maintained in a condition which is free of debris, trash, weeds and overgrown vegetation both during and after the construction, addition or implementation of the entitlements granted herein. All trash and refuse shall be disposed of in dumpsters and be removed from the premises on an as needed basis. Any surplus construction materials shall be stored so as to be screened from public view when not actually in use and be removed from the property upon completion of construction activities. 34. Construction Traffic Management Plan. A truck/traffic construction management plan is required for this project pursuant to the City's Public Works Department. All construction tratiic regarding the movement of heavy equipment and graded materials are limited to off peak hours. This plan shall be approved prior to the issuance of Building Pennits. 35. Construction Staging. During the construction process all related activities, including but not limited to, loading, unloading, storage of equipment and materials, and parking of employee vehicles are prohibited within the public R.O.W. All such activities shall be conducted only on the project site and not in the public R.O.W. All staging areas and storage of equipment and materials shall be set back from adjacent residential uses. 36. Construction (lours. In accordance with SAMC Section 13.314(e), Demolition, grading, and exterior building construction activities shall be limited to the hours of between 7:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction activity shall be allowed on Sundays or federal holidays. Compliance with this measure is subject to field inspection by City Staff. 37. Noise. All onsite activities shall comply with the City of Santa Ana Noise Ordinance at all times. 33. Fire Protection. Fire protection facilities: including access, must be provided prior to and during construction. 39. Fencing. prior to commencing demolition and site preparation activities, the project site shall be secured with a fence to prevent unauthorized access to the site and the fence shall contain a screening material to screen construction activities from view. The temporary screening fence shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Economic Development Department and shall be maintained in good condition (free of tears, holes, crack lines, debris, etc.) at all times. At the primary entrance to the site, the screening material shall be reduced to a maximum height of four feet to provide visibility into the site at all times and for public safety purposes. The project site shall also have a minimum of one sign of quality material depicting the proposed development, which shall include renderings, project opening date, and City Council information. The signs shall be designed and installed to the satisfaction of the Economic Development Department and maintained in good condition (free of tears, graffiti, holes, cracks, fading, debris, etc.) at all times. 40. Fence Coordination. prior to the demolition of any existing property line walls and/or fences and construction of a new property line concrete block wall(s), the developer shall make reasonable efforts to coordinate and obtain approval from neighboring property owner(s) to remove any existing wall(s) and/or fence(s). Written authorization from the neighboring property owner shall be provided for the removal of an existing wall and construction of a new shared property line wall upon submittal for plan check. 55394.e4N112 3155313Z13 41. Pre -Construction Meeting. Prior to the commencement of construction on the site, the developer shall schedule a pre -construction meeting between the general superintendent or field representative and the Planning Division to discuss the approved plans and construction requirements. ENGINEERING 42. The Applicant shall submit Improvement Plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for public works (off -site) improvements, and on -site improvements. Plan check fees shall bepaid in advance. =13. An on -site grading and drainage plan shall be prepared and submitted to the City Engineer for approval. Plan shall be 24" x 36", with elevations to nearest 0.01 foot, minimum scale I" = 20'. Plan shall be prepared by Registered Civil Engineer. Public works improvements may be shown on this plan. Grading plan check fees must be paid in advance. 44. Hydrologic and hydraulic calculations demonstrating adequate site drainage from a 10-year return frequency stonn (25-year frequency in sump areas) prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted with the Grading Plan. 45. Driveway slope shall be a minimum slope of one (1) percent for asphalt and .5% for concrete. 46. If utility cuts are excessive in the street the street must have a grid and overlay placed on it per the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 47. All existing off -site public improvements (sidewalk, curb and gutter, driveways, and street paving) at the development site which are in a damaged condition or demolished due to the proposed work shall be reconstructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and per OCPFRD Standard Plan. =13. A City Encroachment (Public Works) pennit shall be taken out for all work in public right-of-way prior to start of work. All work shall be done in accordance with APWA Standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and must be completed prior to final approval for occupancy or the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 49. A bond or surety device shall be posted with the City in an amount and type sufficient to cover the amount of off -site work to be done, as approved by the City Engineer. 50. Pad certification by the Design Civil Engineer and Soil Engineer is required prior to the commencement of structural construction. 51. Final compaction report prepared by a qualified Soil Engineer shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the commencement of structural construction. 52. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits or prior to recordation upon subdivision of land if detennined applicable by the City Building Official, the applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval a Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQNIP) that: 553940000+ 3 1553 187.13 • Addresses Site Design BMPs (Best Management Practices) such as minimizing impervious areas, maximizing permeability, minimizing directly connected impervious areas. creating reduced or "zero discharge" areas, and conserving natural areas. • Incorporates the applicable Routine Source Control BMPs as defined in the DAMP. • Incorporates Treatment Control BMPs as defined in the DAMP. • Generally describes the long-tenn operation and maintenance requirements for the Treatment Control BMPs. • Identifies the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs. • Describes the mechanism for funding the long-tenn operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs. 55394.1NNNI_` 31553197.13 Attachmem I Building Aniculation and Setback Along Santiago Park (Conceptual) 55394 (MO2 31553187.I J EXHIBIT 4 LS 11.19.19 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-06 AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT TO DISTRICT CENTER FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: WHEREAS, Article 5 of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 (commencing with Section 65300) of the Government Code requires the City to prepare and adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the City; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 1998, the City of Santa Ana adopted the Land Use Element of the General Plan, which has since been amended from time to time; and WHEREAS, AC 2525 Main, LLC ("Applicant") seeks to develop the Addington Multi -Family Residential Project ("proposed Project"), originally proposed as a 496-unit multi -family project on a 5.93-acre site at 2525 North Main Street in Santa Ana, California ("Project Site"); and WHEREAS, during the entitlement and environmental review process, and in response to comments and concerns raised by the public and the City's elected officials, the Applicant has proposed several modifications to the original proposal; and WHEREAS, the Project as currently proposed now entails, among other things, (1) demolition of the existing 81,172 square foot vacant two-story office building and 442-space surface parking lot on the Project Site; (2) redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 284 space surface level parking lot with residential and commercial parking; (3) approval of Development Agreement No. 2018-01 between the City of Santa Ana ("City') and Applicant; (4) approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, which would change the Project Site's existing land use designation of Professional & Administration Office (PAO) to District Center (DC); and (5) approval of Amendment Application No. 2018-10, which would change the zoning of the Project Site from Professional (P) to Specific Development No. 93 (SD-93) designation; and EXHIBIT 4 Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 1 of 10 WHEREAS, the requested General Plan Amendment would change the General Plan land use designation of the property from Professional and Administrative Office (PAO) to District Center (DC) and to update text portions of the City's Land Use Element to reflect this change in order to allow for development of the multi -family housing Project; and WHEREAS, Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 (State Clearinghouse No. 2018021031) for the proposed Project was circulated between August 7, 2018 and October 4, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts related to the proposed amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 2018, the City invited recognized Native American tribes to engage in consultation regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment pursuant to Government Code Section 65352.3; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 2018, the City received a request for consultation from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation and a conference call between the City and Chairman Salas occurred on March 15, 2018 during which the history of uses and development of the Project Site and the depth of previous and existing infrastructure on the site was discussed. On March 21, 2018 additional information in follow up of the meeting was sent to Chairman Salas. Chairman Salas did not respond to the City with any information or evidence pertaining to Tribal Cultural Resources; and WHEREAS, on August 27, 2018, the Planning Commission conducted a work study session to overview the Project and thirty-two (32) verbal comments were received (three (3) in support and twenty-nine (29) in opposition) and nine (9) written comments were received (one (1) in support and eight (8) in opposition); and WHEREAS, on November 26, 2018, the Planning Commission continued a duly noticed public hearing for the project to January 14, 2019 and held a second study session to overview the Project and fifty-eight (58) verbal comments were received (twenty-five (25) in support; thirty-one (31) in opposition and two (2) neutral) and eleven (11) written comments were received (two (2) in support and nine (9) in opposition); and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, seventy-nine (79) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty (30) speakers supported the project, forty-eight (48) opposed it and one speaker was neutral. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public, the Applicant, and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council does not certify the EIR, adopt the findings, Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 2 of 10 the statement of overriding considerations and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program and deny the Project; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-one (61) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty-eight (38) speakers supported the project, twenty (20) speakers opposed it and three (3) speakers were neutral and the public hearing was continued to the next regular adjourned City Council meeting on February 19, 2019; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, the City Council continued to conduct a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, one hundred and thirty-one (131) members of the public spoke on the item, twenty-six (26) speakers supported the project and one hundred and five (105) speakers opposed it and one hundred and sixty- six (166) written comments were received with nine (9) in support and one hundred and fifty-seven (157) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted that the applications go back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration after further consultation with the community; and WHEREAS, in June 2019, the applicant submitted a revised plan consisting of development 347 multi -family units (59 dwelling units per acre), with 642 parking spaces (1.85 parking spaces per unit) and parking capacity at 2.0 spaces per unit, within a 4- story residential building wrapped around a five -level parking structure with an amenity deck on the sixth -level, private open space, and redesigned the intersection of Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive to provide access to the project on a 5.93- acre site (the "June Revised Plan"); and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the June Revised Plan. At the meeting, seventy- seven (77) members of the expressed opposition; nine (9) supported the project, and one speaker was neutral. In addition, one -hundred (100) written comments were received with six (6) in support and ninety-four (94) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission vote resulted in an impasse; and WHEREAS, in October 2019, in response to comments received the Applicant submitted a further revised plan including redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 284 space surface level parking lot which also reduced the Project's height, increased the Project's setbacks, and modified the Project entrance ("October Modified Project"); and Resolution No, 2019-xx Page 3 of 10 WHEREAS, the City has prepared "Clarifications to the Final EIR" to determine if the Modified Project would result in new or substantially increased environmental effects than those analyzed in the EIR such that the EIR would require recirculation prior to its certification; and WHEREAS, the Clarifications to the Final EIR include detailed analysis, based upon substantial evidence, that demonstrate that the Modified Project would not result in any new or substantially greater impacts than are disclosed in the EIR, no new mitigation measures beyond those identified in the EIR are required, and no additional feasible alternatives or mitigation measures considerably different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-two (62) expressed opposition and two (2) in expressed support the project. In addition, ninety-eight (98) individuals submitted comments with ninety-four (94) in opposition and four (4) in support; and WHEREAS, after hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission by a vote of 3:2, voted to recommend denial of the project. Since the entitlements require final action by the City Council, the actions were forwarded to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2019, the City gave public notice of a City Council public hearing for consideration of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06 by advertising in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation, and by mailing to owners of property and residents within 500 feet of the Project; and WHEREAS, on November 19, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the Environmental Impact Report for the Project, at which hearing members of the public were afforded an opportunity to comment upon General Plan Amendment Application No. 2018-06; and NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT: The City Council has reviewed and certified Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01, adopted the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and Statement of Overriding Consideration for the proposed Project, including this General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 4 of 10 SECTION 3. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT: The General Plan Amendment consists of amendments to the Land Use Element and text updates, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4. LOCATION OF DOCUMENTS: The General Plan Amendment, Environmental Impact Report and all supporting documents are on file and available for public review at Santa Ana City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92702. SECTION 5. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY: The City Council hereby finds that the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible with the objectives, policies, and general plan land use programs specified in the General Plan for the City of Santa Ana in that: A. The City of Santa Ana has officially adopted a General Plan. B. The land uses authorized by the General Plan Amendment, and the General Plan Amendment itself, are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan, for the following reasons: i. The existing General Plan land use designation for the site is Professional and Administrative Office (PAO), which allows business and professional offices uses with a floor area ratio of 1.5. In order to facilitate the construction of a multi -family housing project with a maximum floor area ratio of 1.43, the general plan land use designation is proposed to be changed to District Center (DC), which permits high intensity, mixed -use urban villages and pedestrian -oriented experiences that support mid- to high-rise office centers, commercial activity, and cultural activities with floor area ratios ranging from 0.5 to 5.0. Focusing growth within District Centers and along major corridors reduces the pressure for growth in low density residential neighborhoods. ii. The proposed Project will support several goals/objectives and policies of the General Plan. Housing Element (HE) Goal 2: to create diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that accommodate Santa Ana's residents and workforce of all household types, income levels, and age groups to foster an inclusive community. HE Policy 2.2 District Centers. Create high intensity, mixed -use urban villages and pedestrian -oriented experiences that support the mid- to high-rise office centers, commercial activity, and cultural activities in the varied District Centers. HE Policy 2.4 to facilitate diverse types, prices and sizes of housing. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 5 of 10 Housing Element (HE) Goal 4: to provide adequate rental and ownership housing opportunities and supportive services. The Project will provide 256 rental housing units. The amendment will expand the District Center designation and provide a connection between the existing District Centers to the north and south of the site by providing a residential development that will support a mixed -use environment. Land Use (LU) Element Goal 1: to promote a balance of land uses to address basic community needs. LU Policy 1.2 Maintain and foster a variety of residential land uses in the City. LU Policy 4.3 Support land uses which provide community and regional economic and service benefits. LU Policy 4.4 Encourage the development of projects which promote the City's image as a regional activity center. LU Policy 5.5 Encourage development which is compatible with, and supportive of surrounding land uses. LU Policy 5.7 Anticipate that the intensity of new development will not exceed available infrastructure capacity. Land Use (LU) Element Goal 6: to reduce residential overcrowding to promote public health and safety. The Project is within '/2 mile of existing transportation infrastructure such as the Santa Ana (1-5) freeway and State Route 22 (SR 22) highway which provide vehicular access to the region; the Orange County Transportation Agency bus routes along Main Street which connects to the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center and the Anaheim Regional Intermodal Center which provides rail service throughout California; and the project is immediately adjacent to Santiago Park and the Santiago Creek Bike Trail which connects to regional bike trails. Main Street, a major urban corridor with cultural, educational, employment and retail destinations such as the Bowers Museum, Discovery Science Center, Main Place Mall and in the City of Orange; the Children's Hospital of Orange County and St. Joseph's Hospital of Orange County. Therefore, the residential development and parking lot would be within close proximity to major employment centers and retail establishments. The Project will also provide an additional housing option for those seeking housing within the jobs Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 6 of 10 rich northern area of the City. The multi -storied development will complement the nearby mid -rise office buildings located along Main Street to the north and west of the site. Although the density will be higher than the adjacent single-family residential neighborhood, the residential use is consistent with the residential uses to the east and south. In addition, multi -family uses are often used in planning and zoning practice to buffer higher intensity uses like commercial or industrial uses from single-family residential uses. Urban Desiqn (LID) Element, Goal 1:, to improve the physical appearance of the City through development of districts that project a sense of place, positive community image, and quality environment. LID Policy 1.1. New development and redevelopment must have the highest quality design, materials, finishes and construction. LID Policy 1.11 Visual and physical links between districts, nodes, and significant sites, landmarks and other points of interest, are to be provided in all public and private projects. The residential buildings are of high quality design and include high quality materials such as stone veneer, brick veneers, metal panels, and canopies. The building is designed with courtyards and landscaped areas to reduce the mass of the building. The Project has street frontage on Main Street which is identified as a major path in the General Plan and supports the North Main Street Node described as an opportunity for the establishment of a cohesive, height intensity, mixed activity center with a strong presence in the region. The setback along the east side of the project has been increased to 90 feet and the setback from Edgewood Road was increased to 134 feet to minimize impacts to the neighboring single-family residences. The new development will include public art and convey a sense of place and contribute to the urban image for the City along a street corridor that includes regional, local and cultural landmarks. The development will be in scale with the buildings along Main Street to the north and west of the site. In addition, the Urban Design Element of the General Plan identifies the site as a Gateway; the Project promotes elements of a Gateway by developing the site with a building with attractive architectural features, projecting a positive image for the City of Santa Ana. C. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare in that the General Plan Amendment will not result in incompatible land uses on adjacent properties, inconsistencies with any General Plan goals or policies, or adverse impacts to the environment. ECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 7 of 10 and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the Project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. SECTION 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: The City Council hereby takes the following action: 1. The City Council approves General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06 as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, subject to compliance with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth below: A. Subject to compliance with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the Land Use Element map and text shall be amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. B. The General Plan Amendment shall not take effect unless and until Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 is certified and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 is approved by the City Council, and the associated Development Agreement No. 2018-01 is approved by the City Council and executed by all parties thereto. SECTION 8. EXECUTION OF RESOLUTION. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the Clerk of the Council shall attest and certify to the adoption thereof. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 8 of 10 ADOPTED this day of APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By::_ zA �/ Lisa torck Assistant City Attorney AYES: NOES: Councilmembers Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers KIM0 Miguel A. Pulido Mayor CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on November 19, 2019. Date: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 9 of 10 EXHIBIT A City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element 1998 City of Santa Ana Planning Division Adopted February 2, 1998 (Reformatted January 2010) The following is a chronology of the approved general plan amendments that have been incorporated into this document since the comprehensive update of the General Plan Land Use Element adopted by the Santa Ana City Council February 2, 1998 (GPA 1997- 05): GPA 2018 06 (Pending) GPA 201902 (October 1, 2019) GPA 201901 (June 4, 2019) GPA 2017-03 (June 4, 2019) GPA 2018-05 (December 4, 2018) GPA 2018-03 (September 18, 2018) GPA 2018-02 (May 15, 2018) GPA 201501 (May 15, 2018) GPA 2017-02 (December 19,2017) GPA 2017-01(June 20, 2017) GPA 2016 03 (Febmary, 21, 2017) GPA 2016 02 (May 17, 2016) GPA 2016 01 (Apni 19, 2016) GPA 201503 (February 2, 2016) GPA 201402 (October 21, 2014) GPA 201401 (June 3, 2014) GPA 2011-03 (March 19, 2012f GPA 2011-02 (June 6, 2011) GPA 2010-01 (June 7, 2010) GPA 200902 (Jdy 20, 2009) GPA 2007-03 (May 18, 2009) GPA 200403 (February 2, 2009) GPA 2W901 (May 5, 20W) GPA 2007-02 (June 18, 2007) GPA 2007-01 (March 19, 2007) GPA 2006 01 (October 2, 20W) GPA 200501 (December 5, 2005) GPA 200502 (October 17, 2005) GPA 200401 (April 5, 2005, as passed by the voters of Santa Ana) GPA 200404 (July 19, 2004) GPA 200406 (Jay 6, 2004) GPA 200302 (June 16, 2003) GPA 200301 (Febmary 18, 2003) GPA 2002-01 (September 3, 2002) GPA 2002-03 (August 19, 2002) GPA 2001-03 (February 19, 2002) GPA 2001-02 (January 7, 2002) GPA 2000-09 (May 7, 2001) GPA 200008 (February 5, 2001) GPA 2000-03 (December 4, 2000) GPA 200002 (November 20, 2000) GPA 199H2(October 18, 1999) GPA 199901 (August 16, 1999) GPA 199804 (October 5,1998) GPA 1998-05 (September 21, 1998) GPA 199801 (May 4,1998) LAND USE ELEMENT Reduce residential overcrowding to promote public health and safety. Policy 6.1 Support legislative and regulatory changes to laws and codes concerning safe occupancy standards. Policy 6.2 Support reducing the number of units in multiple -family developments by allowing the property owner to combine two or more units into a larger unit. Policy 6.3 Prohibit new development and building alterations which can readily be converted to improper occupancy. Policy 6.4 Target educational programs concerning overcrowding to tenants, owners, and property managers. Policy 6.5 Promote health and safety programs which address the occupancy of housing units and overcrowding. LAND USE PLAN The Land Use Plan is comprised of three components that direct and regulate land use in Santa Ana. These include a Land Use Map, development intensity standards, and adopted Specific Plans. These key components establish a framework for land use and development in the City. The Land Use Plan indicates the location, types, and extent of development and land uses throughout Santa Ana. It consists of a map which designates land use categories and their relative location, as well as development intensity standards for each category. The Land Use Plan is further supported by Specific Plans which correlate to the Land Use Plan. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY STANDARDS As required by State law, the Land Use Element also establishes standards for development intensity. These standards ensure that the types of development permitted under each land use designation are well understood by the property owner, decision -makers, developer, and the general public. Development intensity refers to the size or degree of development possible within a particular land use category. The development intensity standard used for nonresidential development is floor area ratio, which is the ratio of the building's floor area to the total area of the lot on which the building is located. The development intensity standard for residential developments is "units per acre" which is a measure of the number of units allowed for each acre of land - with the exception of Metro East District Center, Transit Village District Center, Downtown District Center, Harbor Corridor District Center, Heritage District Center, 2525 North Main District 14 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT Center and Urban Neighborhood areas. To encourage a dynamic mixture of residential, office and commercial uses, within these areas both building intensity and residential density is based on floor area ratio and zoning development standards. In calculating either the allowable floor area or the allowable residential density, it is the City's policy to not allow upward rounding. The Land Use Plan is illustrated in Exhibit 2. Additional information concerning the Land Use Plan and the land use designations is provided in Table 1 (Land Use Development Intensity Standards), and in the Appendix. Table 1 Development Intensity Standards Density/Intensity Standards Land Use Designation (du/acre - FAR)' . r. Low Density Residential (LR-7) 7 du/acre Low -Medium Density Residential (LMR-11) 11 du/acre Medium Density Residential (MR-15) DesignationsMixed Use Land Use District Center'(DC) 15 du/acre Other District Center (Midtown, MacArthur Place, etc.) 90 du/acre and FAR 1.0-2.0 2525 North Main District Center FAR 1.43 Heritage District Center FAR 1.7 Downtown District Center FAR 3.0 Metro East District Center FAR 3.0 Transit Village District Center FAR 5.0 Harbor Corridor District Center FAR 5.0 Urban Neighborhood Transit Zoning Code Area/ Segerstrom, First, Fifth & 17" Corridor FAR 0.5-1.80 Harbor Corridor FAR 3.0 Metro East DesignationsCommercial Land Use Professional and Administrative Office (PAO) FAR 0.75-1.5 FAR 0.5-1.0 General Commercial (GC) FAR 0.5-1.0 One Broadway Plaza District Center (OBPDC) ^ DesignationsIndustrial Land Use Industrial (IND) Other Land use Designations Institutional (INS) FAR 2.9 FAR 0.45 FAR 0.5 Open Space (0) FAR 0.2 Notes: The intensity standards shown refer to the theoretical maximum amount of development permitted for each land use designation (du -dwelling units; FAR -floor area ratio). Development must also adhere to zoning regulations, and/or specific plan requirements. The District Center and Urban Neighborhood land use designations permit both residential and non-residential development. 3 Commercial intensities may vary. Baseline FAR is 0.5. Specific areas allowing greater intensities are indicated in Exhibit A-3. 4 One Broadway Plaza District Center land use designation permits office, restaurant and ancillary retail for a master planned development. `Refer to Appendixfor description of Land Use designations. CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 15 cox o ,p J ®I111 I111 11 wa� Jo IP LAND USE ELEMENT LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION To effectively achieve the broad range of goals outlined for the City's future growth and development, a variety of plans, programs, and regulations must be relied upon. This section of the Element discusses these tools, and how they correlate with implementation of the City's land use goals. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY STANDARDS Table A-1 summarizes the development intensity standard for each of the General Plan designations, and provides land use distribution by acreage for the land use. The intensity standards for the categories permitting residential development are expressed in density, measured in "units per acre," or floor area ratio and zoning development standards in the case of certain Mixed Use land use designations. The intensity standards for non-residential development are expressed as "floor area ratio" or FAR. The FAR concept is illustrated in Exhibit A-3. The intensity standards in concert with the zoning and development standards regulate the massing, form and building size. Table A-1 Development Intensity Standards Land Use DesignationsResidential Land Use I Density/Intensity Standards Low Density 7 du/acre Low -Medium Density 11 du/acre Medium Density15 DesignationsMixed Use Land Use District Center du/acre Other District Centers Midtown, etc. 90 du/acre and FAR 1.0-2.0 2525 North Main District Center FAR 1.43 Heritage District Center FAR 1.7 Downtown District Center FAR 3.0 Metro East District Center FAR 3.0 Transit Village District Center FAR 5.0 Harbor Corridor District Center FAR 5.0 Urban Neighborhood Transit Zoning Code Area/ Segerstrom, First, Fifth & 1 To Corridor FAR 0.5-1.80 Harbor Corridor FAR 3.0 Metro East DesignationsCommercial Land Use Professional/Admin. Office FAR 0.75-1.5 FAR 0.5-1.0 General Commercial FAR 0.5-1.0 One Broadway Plaza District Center* DesignationsIndustrial Land Use FAR 2.9 Industrial Other Land Use Designations Institutional FAR 0.45 FAR 0.5 Open Space FAR 0.2 Notes: do -dwelling unit, FAR -floor area ratio -Residential dwelopment is not a permilted use. CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN A-11 LAND USE ELEMENT The City established development intensity standards in 1988, for nonresidential land use designations. The standards measure intensity through the use of floor area ratios. The floor area ratios proposed for the City's major commercial corridors are expected to remain in place over the life of the Land Use Element. Those areas of the City proposed for the most intensive levels of development include district centers, professional and administrative office districts, and several other commercial centers with a unique character, or special development concerns. Some of these areas correspond to those for which Specific Plans have been prepared. The proposed floor area ratio(s) for most of the City's commercial corridors allows structures of two to three stories with surface parking. The major development areas -the District Centers and Professional/Administrative Office Districts along Tustin Avenue and East First Street -allow mid -rise and high-rise buildings with structured parking. These areas are expected to generate the highest level of development activity in the City as centers of commerce. These areas are listed in Table A-2 and are shown in Exhibit A-4. The floor area ratios indicated in Table A-2 are the maximum building intensity allowed for development. Table A-2 Key Area- Floor Area Ratios Area Project/Area FAR 1 MainPlace 2.1 2 City Place 2.54 3 North Main Street 1.5 4 North Broadway 1.0 5 Museum District 1.5 6 Hutton Development 1.0 7 Civic Center Specific Development Plan 1.0 8 Midtown Specific Plan 0.5-1.0 9 Civic Center 1.0 10 Downtown 3.0 11 Orange County Register 1.15 12 First StreeVTustin Avenue 1.0 13 Bentall Center Development 1.5 14 2720 Hotel Terrace Drive 1.0 15 1951 East Came ie Avenue 0.55 16 4040 West Carriage Avenue 0.47 17 Lake Center Development 0.72 18 South Coast Metro 1.0 19 MacArthur Place North 2.0 20 MacArthur Place South 1.0 21 Pac Tel Office 1.5 22 Metro East 3.0 23 Transit Village 5.0 24 Town & Country Manor 1.27 25 Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor 5.0 26 Heritage 1.7 27 2525 North Main 1.43 A-12 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN }� :§mgy ■1■� � � ®�»wm_,mw 2 2 j a < >)ƒ 3/« @ LAND USE ELEMENT Commercial The Land Use Plan identifies three land use designations that encourage a variety of office, retail and commercial enterprises to serve the community. The Professional/Administrative Office (PAO) designation applies to those areas where professional and/or administrative offices are predominant, or where such development is being encouraged. Land included in this designation is found primarily near the Civic Center, and along the First Street and Tustin Avenue Corridors in close proximity to freeways. There are other smaller PAO areas in the City such as along North Broadway and along portions of east and west Seventeenth Street. A total of 594.9600.8 acres is included in this land use designation. The floor area ratio intensity standard applicable to this land use designation ranges from 0.5 to 1.0. The Professional and Administrative Office areas are intended to provide a unique environment for office development in those areas of the City where office uses are the predominant land use. The purpose for maintaining and supporting these areas exclusively for office and office -related uses is to encourage major employment centers at locations which significantly lessen the impact to the City's local street system. The First Street/Tustin Avenue office corridor between the Santa Ana (I-5) and Costa Mesa (SR-55) Freeways serves this purpose. In addition, the orderly, well -maintained quality of existing development supports a continuation of these areas as functional office/employment centers. The Professional and Administrative Office designation includes a range of floor area ratios to differentiate development intensity and character in relation to adjacent land uses. The areas with a FAR of 0.5 are not major office centers, but rather have an established character of lower intensity garden office and professional service uses. These areas are typically adjacent to low density residential neighborhoods, or are converted residential office uses. Office development along East Fourth Street, between Grand Avenue and the Santa Ana Freeway, is typical of this low-rise office character. The PAO area located adjacent to the Civic Center contains a range of office development intensity which supports the City's functional role as the government center of the County. The types of uses typically located in the PAO district include the following: Professional and administrative offices/office parks; Service activities such as copy centers, courier services, travel agencies, and restaurants when such uses are an integral component of a planned office development; and Professional uses such as accountants, attorneys, doctors, engineers, and insurance brokers. A-20 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT Mixed Use The Land Use Plan provides for two distinct mixed use land use designations. These designations allow for both vertical and horizontal mixed use developments, with an emphasis on linkages to a range of transportation options: The District Center (DC) land use designation includes the major activity areas in the City. Seven areas of the City, totaling 687.0 681.1- acres, are designated as District Center. The intensity standard for the District Center designation ranges from a floor ratio of 1.0 to 5.0. District Centers are designed to serve as anchors to the City's commercial corridors, and to accommodate major development activity. District Centers are to be developed with an urban character that includes a mixture of high- rise office, commercial, and residential uses which provide shopping, business, cultural, education, recreation, entertainment, and housing opportunities. Residential developments within some District Centers are allowed at a density of up to 90 units per acre when developed as an integral component of master planned mixed use project. In Harbor Corridor, Metro East, Downtown, and Transit Village District Centers residential development intensity is based on a combination of floor area ratio and zoning overlay and/or development standards. Some District Centers serve as major retail and employment centers locally and regionally, and should include development which promotes the City as a regional activity center while creating an environment conducive to business on a regional scale. District Centers in Santa Ana include the following: • The Main Place/City Place District Center includes a regional shopping center and office complex, as well as high intensity housing and mixed -use development. • The Museum District located between the Downtown and MainPlace/City Place District Centers is proposed as a major office/cultural center which will be developed over the next 15 to 20 years. The area will focus upon the expanded Bowers Museum, the Discovery Science Center and the construction of additional museums and cultural centers. The Downtown District serves as one of the County's major employment and governmental operations centers complemented with a mix of residential, commercial, and services uses to enhance its urban vibrancy. Emphasis on streets that accommodate all modes of transportation, including mass transit, pedestrian and bicyclist is key in this urban setting. A-22 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT The South Coast Metro District serves as a regional retail shopping area which includes a range of commercial services and office projects. The MacArthur Place District Center contains an existing office/hotel complex and a proposed major mixed use project which will include professional offices, supporting commercial, and mid and high-rise residential components. The Metro East District is envisioned as a vibrant urban village with a balance of office, residential, and service uses. Pedestrian and transportation linkages are key in this urban setting. The Transit Village District is envisioned as a vibrant intense urban village with a balance of employment centers, residential and service uses. Pedestrian and transit linkages to the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center is key in this district. The Harbor Corridor Mixed Use Transit Corridor creates a vision for a more livable, sustainable setting through higher intensity housing and mixed use development, convenient access to transit, complete streets, and amenities that promotes active lifestyles. The Heritage District allows for mixed use development with higher density residential and supportive commercial and office uses within proximity to surrounding employment centers. The 2525 North Main District allows for higher density residential development along the North Main Street corridor, in proximity to employment centers, the MainPlace Mall, and cultural destinations. District Centers are considered to be the City's "major development areas." The most intense development in the City is targeted to these areas. The Tustin Avenue corridor is a major development area even though it is not a designated District Center. This area has developed over the years as a prime office corridor and employment area. The PAO designation facilitates the continued development ofthis area with high intensity, high quality regional office projects. The Urban Neighborhood (UN) land use designation applies to primarily residential areas with pedestrian oriented commercial uses, schools and small parks. The Urban Neighborhood allows for a mix of residential uses and housing types, such as mid to low rise multiple family, townhouses and single family dwellings; with some opportunities for live -work, neighborhood serving retail and service, public spaces and use, and other amenities. Either vertical or horizontal integration of uses is permitted based on zoning standards, with an emphasis on tying together the uses with pedestrian linkages and street frontages. Street connectivity is CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN A-23 LAND USE ELEMENT interagency Development Review Committee (DRC) to ensure consistent and comprehensive application of City regulations and policies for all projects. Redevelopment Plans. The City will apply redevelopment tools associated with the implementation ofthe adopted redevelopment plans, as appropriate. The City will encourage the further development of industrial, commercial, and residential projects in suitable locations to strengthen the City's tax and employment base. Special Studies. In certain instances, a special study may be required to address a particular issue. In these cases, a specific effort to identify staff resources needed to conduct the appropriate investigation and analysis will be identified. Zoning Code Review. The zoning code serves as a primary tool used by the City to regulate development. The City will develop a program to revise the Zoning Ordinance to ensure that development regulations and standards are consistent with community needs and high quality development. The City will initiate appropriate changes to the ordinance to ensure, where appropriate, conformity between the Land Use Element and Zoning Map. LAND USE PLAN BUILDOUT As indicated previously, the City of Santa Ana has been almost completely developed for many years. As a result, any new development will necessarily consist of redevelopment and infill development on the remaining vacant and underutilized parcels. Many parcels with nonresidential land use designations will never be developed to the maximum intensity permitted under the General Plan. Table A-4 indicates the development possible under the build -out of the Land Use Plan. The build -out for residential land uses considered two scenarios. Effective build -out for residential development is calculated by adding the 21,73724 484- units possible in the areas designated as District Center and Urban Neighborhood to the existing 74,588 units presently found in the City per Census 2000. Theoretical build -out for residential development considered the development possible if all of the areas designated as residential were developed according to the permitted Land Use Plan intensities. Since the Land Use Element does not contemplate the elimination of existing housing in the City, the effective build -out figure represents a more realistic estimate of future residential development. As indicated in TableA-4, three ofthe non-residential land use designations have a range in FAR intensities. For the non-residential land use designations, effective build -out considered the development possible under the lower range of FAR intensities while theoretical build -out considered the upper FAR range. Typically, parking and landscaping requirements will result in significantly less floor area CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN A-33 LAND USE ELEMENT for commercial and industrial developments than that which is permitted under the General Plan. As indicated in Table A-4, between 76,97246-,?�ro to 96,3259H,669 housing units are allowed by the Land Use Plan. The additional units which presently exist in the City beyond the maximum number permitted under the theoretical buildout scenario are a reflection of the higher density multiple -family developments constructed in the 1970's and 1980's. However, the purpose ofthe Land Use Plan as it applies to the residential areas is to preserve and maintain the stability of existing neighborhoods, regardless ofthe character of development. The intent of the Plan is not to create any displacement, nor decrease existing development densities. Rather, it is to ensure a safe, healthy, and livable environment for City residents. Existing residential development entitlements are protected through this Land Use Element, applicable Zoning regulations, and sections of the City code pertaining to legal nonconforming uses. The Land Use Element's implementation may result in an increase in the amount of commercial, office, and industrial development in the City. As indicated in Table A-4, up to 37,271,727 square feet of commercial, 25,913,84926zo �11,^011 square feet ofoffice, and 42,199,991 square feet of industrial development are possible under the effective capacity parameters of Land Use Plan. A-34 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT Table A-4 Land Use Plan Build -out Capacities Intensity/ Effective Buffdout' Theoretical Land Use Residential Acres ften—sik Buddout Low Density Residential LR-7 6,448.3 7 du/ac 45,138 du Low Medium Density Residential LMR-11 420.6 11 du/ac 4,627 du Medium Density Residential MR-15 364.7 15 du/ac 5,471 du Subtotal 7,233.6 96,325 55,235 Mixed Use Non Res. du' Res. Non -Res. du Res. District Center Other' DC 309.5 90 du /ac FAR 1.0-2.0 11,955,583 sf 3,017 du 23,764,534 sf 3,017 du 2525 North Main DC 5_9 FAR 1.43 1256 du 256 du Heritage DC 18.8 FAR 1.7 54,090 sf 1,221 du 54,090 si 1,221 du Downtown DC 62.5 FAR 3.0 2,057,824 sf 1,661du 2,057,824 sf 1,661 du Metro East DC 113.9 FAR 0.75- 3.0 2,464,776 sf 5,037 du 2,464,776 si 5,037 du Transit Village DC 51.4 FAR 5.0 402,864 sf 2,761 du 402,864 sf 2,761 du Harbor Corridor DC 125.0 FAR 5.0 1,836,155 sf 2,029 du 1,836,155 sf 2,029 du Urban Neighborhood UN 317.0 FAR 0.5-3.0 1,656,955 sf 5,755 du 1,656,955 sf 5,755 du Subtotal888.3 1,004.0 20,428,247 sf 21�737 32,237,198 sf 21�737 Commercial do a,—o, do Professional & Admin. Office PAO 594.9 FAR 0.5-1.0 12,956,922 25,913.84 6004 „ "�� "�" sf 4&4;9 °A9 s General Commercial GC 855.6 FAR 0.5-1.0 18,635,863 37,271,727 sf s One Broadway Plaza District CIO OBPDC 4.3 FAR 2.9 543,193 sf 543,193 s 1 454.8 32.135.979 63,728.7 Subtotal 4,469.7 32,264,484 63,995,76 Industrial sf s Industrial I IND 1 2,152.81 FAR 0.45 1 42,199,991 sf 42,199,991 s Other Institutional I INS 1 800.61 FAR 0.2-0.5 1 6,974,740 sf 17,436,850 s Open Space OS 1,010.9 FAR 0.2 8,806,961 sf 8,806,961 s Subtotal 1,811.5 15,781,701 sf 1 26,243,811 s FAR=Boor area ratio; d.u.=dwelling unit; s.f.=square feet (of floor area). Acreage shown in table does not include roads in right-of-way. ' Effective capacity for non-residential development assumes development possible under the lower range of FAR intensity standards with the exception of the Metro East District Center, Transit Village District Center, Downtown District Center, Heritage District Center, and Urban Neighborhood areas. The Harbor Corridor District Center, Metro East District Center, Transit Village District Center, Downtown District Center, and Urban Neighborhood areas allow a range of intensity for mixture of residential and non-residential development based on the zoning development standards. Residential effective capacity was calculated by adding the 2121 73724494 units possible in the District Center and Urban Neighborhood v*h the existing 74,588 (Census 2000) housing units. 2 Land use designation permits both residential and non-residential development. Build -out assumes 90% of land area will be deve ed as commercial and 10%will be developed as residential; with the exception of Town and Country Manor project intended for continuum of care a ousing seniors. 3 Land use designation permits high intensity office development with ancillary retail use. This table has been revised to correspond with the GIS Land Use Map illustrated in Exhibit 2. a A CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN A-35 EXHIBIT 5 Ls 11.1919 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2018-10 REZONING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET FROM PROFESSIONAL (P) TO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 93 (SD-93) (AA NO. 2018-10) AND ADOPTING SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 93 (SD-93) FOR SAID PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: WHEREAS, Chapter 41, Article 1, Division 1, Section 41-1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code establishes the necessity of segregating the location of residences, businesses, trades and industries; regulating the use of buildings, structures, and land regulation; the location, height, bulk and size of buildings and structures, the size of yards and open space; the City is divided into land -use districts of such number, shape and area as may be considered best suited to carry out these regulations and provide for their enforcement; and WHEREAS, the regulations are considered necessary in order to: encourage the most appropriate use of land, conserve and stabilize property value, provide adequate open spaces for light and air and to prevent and fight fires, prevent undue concentration of population, lessen congestion on streets and highways, and promote the health, safety and general welfare of the people, all as part of the general plan of the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana has adopted a zoning map which has since been amended from time to time; and WHEREAS, AC 2525 Main, LLC ("Applicant') seeks to develop the Addington Multi -Family Residential Project ("proposed Project'), originally proposed as a 496-unit multi -family project on a 5.93-acre site at 2525 North Main Street in Santa Ana, California ("Project Site"); and WHEREAS, during the entitlement and environmental review process, and in response to comments and concerns raised by the public and the City's elected officials, the Applicant has proposed modifications to the original proposal; and WHEREAS, the Project as currently proposed now entails, among other things, (1) demolition of the existing 81,172 square foot vacant two-story office building and 442-space surface parking lot on the Project Site; (2) redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of Ordinance No. NS-XXXX EXHIBIT 5 Page 1 of 10 residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 284 space surface level parking lot with residential and commercial parking; (3) approval of Development Agreement No. 2018-01 between the City of Santa Ana ("City") and Applicant; (4) approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, which would change the Project Site's existing land use designation of Professional & Administration Office (PAO) to District Center (DC); and (5) approval of Amendment Application No. 2018-10, which would change the zoning of the Project Site from Professional (P) to Specific Development No. 93 (SD-93) designation; and WHEREAS, the requested Amendment Application would change the zoning designation of the property from Professional (P) to Specific Development No. 93 (SD-93) and adoption of Specific Development No. 93 to reflect this change in order to facilitate the construction of the multi -family housing project; and WHEREAS, Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 (State Clearinghouse No. 2018021031) for the proposed Project was circulated between August 7, 2018 and October 4, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts related to the proposed amendment to the zoning map and adoption of Specific Development No. 93; and WHEREAS, on August 27, 2018, the Planning Commission conducted a work study session to overview the project and thirty-two (32) verbal comments were received (three (3) in support and twenty-nine (29) in opposition) and nine (9) written comments were received (one (1) in support and eight (8) in opposition); and WHEREAS, on November 26, 2018, the Planning Commission continued a duly noticed public hearing for the project to January 14, 2019 and held a second study session to overview the Project and fifty-eight (58) verbal comments were received (twenty-five (25) in support; thirty-one (31) in opposition and two (2) neutral) and eleven (11) written comments were received (two (2) in support and nine (9) in opposition); and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, seventy-nine (79) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty (30) speakers supported the project, forty-eight (48) opposed it and one speaker was neutral. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council does not certify the EIR, adopt the findings, the statement of overriding considerations and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program and deny the Project; and Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 2 of 10 WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-one (61) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty-eight (38) speakers supported the project, twenty (20) speakers opposed it and three (3) speakers were neutral and the public hearing was continued to the next regular adjourned City Council meeting on February 19, 2019; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, the City Council continued to conduct a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, one hundred and thirty-one (131) members of the public spoke on the item, twenty-six (26) speakers supported the project and one hundred and five (105) speakers opposed it and one hundred and sixty- six (166) written comments were received with nine (9) in support and one hundred and fifty-seven (157) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted that the applications go back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration after further consultation with the community; and WHEREAS, in June 2019, the applicant submitted a revised plan consisting of development 347 multi -family units (59 dwelling units per acre), with 642 parking spaces (1.85 parking spaces per unit) and parking capacity at 2.0 spaces per unit, within a 4- story residential building wrapped around a five -level parking structure with an amenity deck on the sixth -level, private open space, and redesigned the intersection of Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive to provide access to the project on a 5.93- acre site (the "June Revised Plan"); and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the June Revised Plan. At the meeting, seventy- seven (77) members of the expressed opposition; nine (9) supported the project, and one speaker was neutral. In addition, one -hundred (100) written comments were received with six (6) in support and ninety-four (94) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission vote resulted in an impasse; and WHEREAS, in October 2019, in response to comments received the applicant submitted a further revised plan. including redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 284 space surface level parking lot which also reduced the Project's height, increased the Project's setbacks, and modified the Project entrance ("October Modified Project"); and WHEREAS, the City has prepared "Clarifications to the Final EIR" to determine if the Modified Project would result in new or substantially increased environmental effects Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 3 of 10 than those analyzed in the EIR such that the EIR would require recirculation prior to its certification; and WHEREAS, the Clarifications to the Final EIR include detailed analysis, based upon substantial evidence, that demonstrate that the Modified Project would not result in any new or substantially greater impacts than are disclosed in the EIR, no new mitigation measures beyond those identified in the EIR are required, and no additional feasible alternatives or mitigation measures considerably different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-two (62) expressed opposition and two (2) in expressed support the project. In addition, ninety-eight (98) individuals submitted comments with ninety-four (94) in opposition and four (4) in support; and WHEREAS, after hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission by a vote of 3:2, voted to recommend denial of the project. Since the entitlements require final action by the City Council, the actions were forwarded to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2019, the City gave public notice of a City Council public hearing for consideration of Amendment Application No. 2018-10 by advertising in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation, and by mailing to owners of property and residents within 500 feet of the Project; and WHEREAS, on November 19, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, Amendment Application No. 2018-10, and Development Agreement No. 2018-01, and the Environmental Impact Report for the Project, at which hearing members of the public were afforded an opportunity to comment upon Amendment Application No. 2018-10; and NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT: The City Council has reviewed and certified Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01; adopted the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP); and adopted the Statement of Overriding Consideration for the proposed Project, including this Amendment Application No. 2018-10. SECTION 3. AMENDMENT APPLICATION: The Amendment Application consists of amendments to the zoning map (SDM 6-5-9) and adoption of Specific Development Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 4 of 10 No. 93, as shown in Exhibit A and Exhibit B respectively, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4. LOCATION OF DOCUMENTS: The Amendment Application, Environmental Impact Report and all supporting documents are on file and available for public review at Santa Ana City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92702. SECTION 5. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY: The City Council hereby finds that the proposed Amendment Application is compatible with the objectives, policies, and general plan land use programs as amended by General Plan Amendment No. 2018- 06 in that: A. The proposed Amendment Application will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare in that the Amendment Application will not result in incompatible land uses on adjacent properties, inconsistencies with any General Plan goals or policies, or adverse impacts to the environment. B. The amendment application to change the zoning designation from Professional (P) to Specific Development 93 (SD-93) is consistent with Santa Ana Municipal Code section 41-593.1 for the following reasons: (1) Protecting and enhancing the value of properties by encouraging the use of good design principles and concepts, as related to the division of property, site planning and individual improvements with full recognition of the significance and effect they have on the proper planning and development of adjacent and nearby properties. The site plan has been designed with the vehicular entrance on Main Street away from the residential neighborhood to the south and east. In addition, the parking structure and rooftop amenity deck, which are the tallest building elements are positioned closer to Main Street, with residential buildings wrapped around the structure to screen it. There is a 90-foot rear (east) setback requirement which creates a buffer between the multi -family buildings and single-family homes. In addition, the existing healthy trees along the east property line will be protected in place and new mature trees will be planted or replaced as needed. The wall along the eastern property line will be increased to 8-feet in height and the east side of the building will tier in height from two, three, to four stories to provide a transition in height when compared to the single -story residential dwellings to the east. The building is also designed with courtyards rather than one large 'box" to provide open space and variation in the massing. Furthermore, the units along Edgewood Road will have patios with access to the Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 5 of 10 street to mimic single-family dwelling porches and to connect the project with the residential neighborhood. (2) Encouraging, securing and maintaining the orderly and harmonious appearance, attractiveness and aesthetic development of structures and grounds in order that the most appropriate use and value thereof be determined and protected. The property is a 5.93-acre site with street frontage along Main Street, a major urban corridor with cultural, educational, employment and retail destinations such as the Bowers Museum, Discovery Science Center, Main Place Mall and in the City of Orange; the Children's Hospital of Orange County and St. Joseph's Hospital of Orange County. Therefore, the residential development would be within close proximity of major employment centers and retail establishments. The site is also located just north of the Santa Ana (1-5) freeway which provides regional access to and from the City. The multi -storied development will complement the nearby mid -rise office buildings located along Main Street to the north and west of the site and the multi -family residential use supports a mixed -use setting. In addition, the new building will have a variety of materials such as multiple brick veneers, stone veneer, metal panels, ceramic tile, metal canopies, flat and metal seamed roofs to assist in creating a modern contemporary design. The residential development will replace a potential office use with a residential use. Although a professional office use is typically considered a low intensity land use when compared to commercial or industrial uses, issues with parking, traffic and noise may still arise. When comparing land uses multi -family uses are more compatible in nature with single- family residential neighborhoods than office uses. (3) Providing a method whereby specific development plans are to be based on the general plan as well as other regulations, programs, and legislation as may in the judgment of the city be required for the systematic execution of the general plan. With approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, the Project will be consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element. Although the Project requires an amendment to the Land Use Element to allow for residential use of the property, the Project still supports and is consistent with several other overarching goals and policies of the General Plan. For example, as described in the associated General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06: Housing Element Goal 2, to create diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 6 of 10 accommodate Santa Ana's residents and workforce of all household types, income levels, and age groups to foster an inclusive community. Land Use Element Goal 4, to protect and enhance development sites and districts which are unique community assets that enhance the quality of life. Urban Design Element, Goal 1, to improve the physical appearance of the City through development of districts that project a sense of place, positive community image, and quality environment. (4) Recognizing the interdependence of land values and aesthetics and providing a method to implement this interdependence in order to maintain the values of surrounding properties and improvements and encouraging excellence of property development, compatible with the general plan for, and character of, the city, with due regard for the public and private interests involved. Development of the Project would result in a substantial change in views and a significant and unavoidable impact to aesthetics. However, the Project will replace an over 30-year old structure with a modern building with enhanced landscaping contributing to the character of the City. Furthermore, a Development Agreement between the developer/property owner and the City of Santa Ana has been entered into. Public benefits of the agreement include: public art, Santiago Park for improvements, Park Santiago Neighborhood benefits including access to on -site amenities for Park Santiago residents, security patrol of the residential neighborhood and Santiago Park, and Park Santiago Neighborhood for traffic improvements and calming such as street calming, traffic diversion, and street lights. (5) Insuring that the public benefits derived from expenditures of public funds for improvements and beautification of streets and public facilities shall be protected by exercise of reasonable controls over the character and design of private buildings, structures and open spaces. The multi -family residential development will utilize existing water, sewer, and drainage infrastructure and will not result in the expansion of infrastructure. In addition, the Project will not result in the expansion of new or altered police or fire facilities. The Project will be subject to utility user tax, property taxes based on the valuation of the new construction and management company business taxes. The building facades and new landscaping are designed to deter graffiti, existing sidewalks will be removed and replaced with new sidewalks that are constructed to City standards, new street lights will be installed and the City's Building Security Ordinance will be implemented which includes Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 7 of 10 security and crime preventing measures to help reduce City expenditures on public services and maintenance. In addition, the residential development will be subject to all required development impact fees. SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. SECTION 7. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 8. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: The City Council hereby takes the following actions: 1. The City Council hereby adopts an Ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2018-10 as follows: A. Subject to compliance with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 8 of 10 Program, the property at 2525 North Main Street shall be amended to Specific Development No. 93 and Specific Development No. 93 plan shall be adopted as set forth in Exhibit A and Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. B. The Amendment Application shall not take effect unless and until Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 and General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, are each certified and approved by the City Council, and the associated Development Agreement No. 2018-01 is approved by the City Council and executed by all parties thereto. SECTION 9. EXECUTION OF ORDINANCE. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the Clerk of the Council shall attest and certify to the adoption thereof. ADOPTED this day of APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By: � - Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney , 2019. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 9 of 10 AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xxx to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on November 19, 2019. Date: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-XXXX Page 10 of 10 *A :11:1 Y r_1 LN 6 R1 f Ci-MB j Ci-HBII Ci-HBII C1 C1 cl SP3 SP3 'm SP3 e1 Q PO W� Al u L eoN R1 p LL g max Lx u1 G1 Al viacixw A— _ v A R1 caw[mOW ST a R1 Rl Sam ST R1 _ g O sr Rixn SR1 v.Nre cieae fiffiffi x R1 vAR, A ML� �ccTARl v 1LLLW ��I}TI}�IT—TI�TI—�I�1 LL1L=tRi g HE J Rj Ri '�iCJ�L1L2 Rig HE R1 — —Ri Si R1 R1-B .,� R1 R1 C-77 111 � F 17TH ST n % C5j p -05 A' F-fol 12111121 Ics D1 Pt w-11441&1 cl R1-B w 3 ¢ Ri Q yLrypNT Si CS LOAw. oa Ri-B C5 afaava R1 S p � g O � e Q ffc ASPEN g= Al R1� R1 _L. siNrA CwRAAVQ S x — Z ALOHA, C5 R1 R1 C1 Al GENERALAGRICULTURAL CSM SOUTH MAIN STREETCOMMERCIAL DIST_ R2 TWO-FAMLYRESIDENCE -B PARKING MODIFICATION C1 COMMUNITYCOMMERCIAL GC GOVERNMENTCENTER US MULTIPLE- FAMILY RESIDENCE -OZ OVERLAYZONE C1MD COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL -MUSEUM DIST M1 LGHTINDUSTRl4L R4 SUBURBAN APARTMENT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL -PRD DEVELOPMENT C2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL M2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL RE RESIDENTIAL ESTATE C4 PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER 0 OPENSPACE SD SPECIFICDEVELOPMENT -HD2 HEGHTDISTRICTI C5 ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL P PROFESSIONAL SP SPECIFIC PLAN CR COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL R1 SINGLE- FAMILYRESIDENCE SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP: 6-5-9 e CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT B SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 93 2525 North Main Street Development Project SECTION 1— APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE The Specific Development Zoning District No. 93 (SD-93) for the 2525 North Main Street development project is authorized by Chapter 41, Division 26 Section 41-593 et seq. of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. SD-93 contains specific standards and regulations for the purpose of establishing land use regulations and development and operational standards for the project site. All other applicable chapters, articles, and sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code are in effect unless expressly superseded by regulations contained in this ordinance. The boundaries of the 2525 North Main Street development project shall be defined pursuant to Attachment I (attached hereto and incorporated a though fully set forth herein). The 2525 North Main Street Development District shall have two zones, Zone 1 and Zone 2, as depicted in Attachment 1. SECTION 2 — PURPOSE The Specific Development Plan No. 93 for the 2525 North Main Street project consists of standards and regulations established for the purpose of protecting the health, safety, and general welfare of the people of the City of Santa Ana by promoting and enhancing the value of property and encouraging the orderly development of the property. Obiectives The objectives of the 2525 North Main Street project specific development plan include provisions of the following: 1. Promote the City's image as providing high -quality residential projects for individuals and families of all income groups. 2. Create a clean and safe environment for the City's residents, workers, and visitors. 3. Contribute to the North Main Street corridor by providing a high density residential development that supports nearby cultural, office and commercial uses. 4. Provide regulations that allow development, in response to market conditions while achieving overall City and community goals. 5. Provide parking opportunities for nearby museum uses and/or commercial uses. 1of12 SECTION 3 — Uses permitted in Zone 1 The following uses are permitted in the SD-93 district: (a) A maximum of 256 multiple -family dwelling units not exceeding a density of 58 dwelling units/acre. (1) The unit mix shall be comprised of: a. 70% studio and one -bedroom units b. 30% two -bedroom and three -bedroom units (2) Unit square footages ranging from a. 556 to 592 square foot studios b. 633 to 930 square foot one -bedrooms c. 909 to 1,179 square foot two -bedrooms d. 1,362 square foot three -bedrooms (b) Home occupations, pursuant to section 41-192.1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. (c) Accessory recreational rooms, dog wash, club room, fitness room, wellness center, bike rooms, pools and spas for residential use. SECTION 4 — Uses subject to a conditional use permit in Zone 1 (a) Childcare facilities caring for more than eight (8), but no more than fourteen (14) children. SECTION 5 — Uses permitted in Zone 2 (a) Surface parking lot containing with 180 spaces (1.4 acre lot) to be used by a commercial, museum, or professional offices uses. (b) Parking may be shared with the residential development through a shared parking agreement. (c) All other uses and/or structures are prohibited. SECTION 6 — Maximum permitted floor area ratio (FAR) The maximum authorized building intensity for the 2525 North Main Street project is a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.43, including residential areas, community -serving areas (e.g., leasing office, gym and club room) and interior corridors. SECTION 7 — Minimum lot size in Specific Development No. 93 The minimum lot size is 1.4 acres. 2of12 SECTION 8 — Minimum street frontage in Specific Development No. 93 Lots shall have a minimum street frontage of at least 250 feet. SECTION 9 — Building height in Specific Development No. 93 (a) No residential structure shall exceed 50 feet (four stories) in height, as measured from the lowest adjacent grade of the structure to the top of the structure. (b) The six level parking structure (five levels with one level subterranean) and amenity deck shall not exceed 61 feet as measured from the lowest adjacent grade to the top of the structure. (c) The stair tower and elevator tower shall not exceed 74 feet as measured from the lowest adjacent grade to the top of structure. (d) Along the east property line the building shall tier from two, three, and four stories as shown on the approved site plan. SECTION 10 — Setback standards in Specific Development No. 93 (a) North setback. A minimum building setback of ten (10) feet shall be provided between the property line and buildings along Santiago Park. (b) South setback. A minimum building setback of one hundred thirty-four (134) feet shall be provided from Edgewood Road. (c) West setback. A minimum building setback of twelve (12) feet shall be provided between the property line and buildings along Main Street. (d) East setback. A minimum building setback of ninety (90) feet shall be provided between the east property line and buildings. SECTION 11— Off-street parking standard in Specific Development No. 93 (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for the project are as follows: (1) 2.0 spaces per unit shall be provided (407 spaces within the parking structure and 104 space surface level parking lot). (2) Parking stalls shall not be less than eight (8) feet six (6) inches wide and eighteen (18) feet long. Double -striping is required, with the width of stalls measured from lines midway between each pair of stripes. Structural, mechanical, utility or similar appurtenances are only permitted adjacent to required stall areas if the required width of the stall is increased at least six (6) inches and if the appurtenance is not 3of12 located so as to interfere with safe and free parking movement, car door opening, or of visibility. (3) Aisles to and from parking stalls shall not be less than: Twenty-three (23) feet wide for 90-degree parking. (4) Drive aisles shall not dead-end; a turn -around method be provided to allow cars to exit if all stalls are occupied (5) The interior of the parking structure without natural lighting shall be painted white or shall be equipped with lighting devices which will provide a minimum maintained two (2) footcandle of light on the parking surface during hours of darkness. Subterranean parking areas shall maintain lighting twenty-four (24) hours a day. Lighting devices shall be protected by vandal resistant covers. (6) A minimum of ten (10) bicycle spaces shall be provided onsite. The design and materials shall comply with the approved materials board submitted for the project during building plan check. (7) Prior to submittal into building plan check, a parking management plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review, identifying parking per unit, and guest parking. The plan is subject to approval of the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency. Onsite parking shall be provided for residents and visitors of the Project and the parking demand of the Project site shall be actively monitored. Property owner "Owner" shall continually monitor and take appropriate measures to manage the parking demand of the Project site to mitigate the use of offsite parking spaces on private or public properties and/or right-of-way. SECTION 12 — Vehicular Access in Specific Development No. 93 The development shall prepare all necessary plans per City Standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to: (a) Provide public access via Walkie Way/Park Santiago Drive and Main Street. The Santiago Park Entrance design and construction shall be subject to the review and approval of the City's Planning & Building, Public Works, and Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency Directors, including residential units to front onto Santiago Park, Main Street, and the Santiago Park Drive entrance. (b) Reconstruct the existing intersection of Main Street and Walkie Way/Park Santiago Drive to accommodate the southerly relocation the east leg of the intersection, including, but not limited to: i. Removal of all portions of the existing east leg of the intersection. ii. Construction of PCC curb, gutter and sidewalk along the east side of Main Street. iii. Reconstruct pavement within the intersection. 4of12 iv. Modification of the Traffic Signal for the Walkie Way/Park Santiago Drive intersection for the intended signal operation shall include new signals poles, traffic cabinet, install conduits and wiring, traffic signal, interconnect, provide Accessible Pedestrian Signals pedestrian push buttons, vehicle/bike video detection, signing and striping as needed to accommodate the proposed entrance to the development and Santiago Park. (c) Remove and reconstruct the raised -curb median in Main Street between Walkie Way and Edgewood Road to provide increased left turn pocket lengths per Attachment 2, including, but not limited to: i. Reconstruct asphalt pavement in Main Street to maintain standard cross slopes, positive drainage and smooth vertical transitions. ii. Provide landscaping and irrigation in the median. iii. Modify the existing channelization striping extending through intersections. (d) Coordinate with Caltrans to enter into a Cooperative Agreement with City of Santa Ana to implement traffic signal synchronization timing along Main Street between the I-5 ramps and the modified traffic signal at Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park to enhance traffic flow and reduce congestions between city streets and the State Highway System. The scope of work shall include but not limited to preparation of cooperative agreement, any required improvements, preparation and implementation of timing plans, and required permits. (e) The Emergency Vehicular Access Lane (Fire Lane) with access to Edgewood Road shall be gated per Orange County Fire Authority and City Public Works Agency requirements and standards. The emergency lane shall not be used for trash staging, trash loading and/or move-ins/outs. No other vehicular access or curb approach openings will be approved on Edgewood Road for the project. SECTION 13 — Open Space standard in Specific Development No. 93 (a) Pedestrian Walkways and Open Space. The project will provide a minimum of 15% of the total lot size shall be open space in the form of common, landscaped open space areas, pools, spas, deck, courtyard and lobby, interior community room, dining room, gym, business room, etc. (b) Courtyards. (1) East courtyards shall be a minimum of 34 feet wide by 100 feet in depth and shall not contain any pools, spas or recreational rooms. (2) West courtyard shall be a minimum of 48 feet wide by 58 feet in depth. (c) Private Open Space. Each residential unit shall have a patio or balcony a minimum of 50 square feet in size. 5of12 SECTION 14 — Walls/Fences standard in Specific Development No. 93 (a) East property line. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, a solid block wall with a minimum height of eight (8) feet shall be constructed along the east property line. The block wall shall be designed to contain a decorative cap, regularly -spaced decorative pilasters, and a decorative finish in accordance to the design provisions contained within the most recent version of the City's design guidelines. (b) North property line. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, a new wrought iron fence shall be constructed. The fence shall also incorporate decorative pilasters located a maximum of 50 feet on center. Any walls and/or fences are limited to eight (8) feet in height. (c) South and West property line walls are prohibited. Within the front and street side setbacks, walls and/or fences shall be limited to four (4) feet in height. SECTION 15 — Landscape standard in Specific Development No. 93 (a) A Landscape Plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The Irrigation Plan shall include an irrigation system layout with the location of controllers and points of connection with data on valve sizes and gallons per minute (G.P.M.), the size and location of sleeves and all spray heads, including the location of conventional systems and drip systems; an irrigation legend with complete specifications; irrigation notes and construction details of all assemblies and components; a recommended irrigation schedule, preferably on an annual basis; and a summary block on the initial page of submitted plans that will present the above information clearly and accurately. The landscape plan shall include a Plant Legend containing: plant symbol, scientific name of plant material, common name of plant material, plant container size, and plant spacing. Very low, low and medium water usage plant materials are encouraged. The landscape plan shall provide a cross section of the eastern planter showing the planter at time of planting, after five (5) years and at full maturity. The cross section shall demonstrate the landscaping will adequately screen the project from the adjacent residential uses along the eastern portion of the Property. A minimum size of 36-inch box trees shall be planted along street setbacks, open space areas and shared parking areas. (b) Per the arborist report dated May 4, 2018: (1) Retain and protect in place the existing eleven (11) healthy Ficus benjamina trees adjacent to the east property line. (2) Remove the existing eight (8) unhealthy trees (Liquidambar styraciva) in the eastern planter and plant eight (8) minimum size of 60-inch box trees in their place. 6of12 (3) Plant new vertical and canopy specimen trees with a minimum size of 48- inch box, 20-feet on center in the east planter within 150 feet of the front property line and within 150 feet of the rear property line. (4) The planter along the east property line shall be sized to allow for future growth and health of the trees. (5) To the extent feasible, all other healthy mature trees on the property shall be protected and preserved. If the perseveration of the existing healthy, mature trees is not feasible because of the location of the approved structures on the property, the Owner shall work with Staff to evaluate the feasibility of relocating the healthy tree(s) to other locations on the property. (c) Project Landscaping: Landscaping shall be compliant with the City of Santa Ana's Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance Chapter 41, Article XVI of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. All landscape areas shall have a fully automatic irrigation system (including spray or drip) as required by the City of Santa Ana Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance. (d) All meters shall be appropriately screened from public view with trellis work and vines or hedge -type shrubs, or be incorporated into the residential structure. (e) Installation: Landscaping for the project shall be completed in phases by building and shall be installed and inspected prior to occupancy of units within that building. The Owner shall be responsible for maintaining all common area landscaping within the development. (f) Maintenance: All plant material shall be maintained per Section 41-609 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. SECTION 16 — Residential Si$na$e in Specific Development No. 93 (a) Signage for the project shall be consistent with Section 41-868 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. SECTION 17 — Architectural Design in Specific Development No. 93 (a) Exterior materials. Prior to submittal into building plan check, the Owner shall submit revised architectural elevations subject to the review and approval of the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency. Exterior materials and finishes for the project shall comply with the approved materials board submitted for the project including stone veneer, brick veneer, ceramic tile, metal canopies, flat and metal seamed roofs. All trash enclosures and similar ancillary structures shall match the texture, material and color of the building. (1) The east building wall windows (at the 90 foot building setback) shall be opaque or clerestory (above eye level) windows. 7of12 (2) The east wall of the parking structure shall incorporate screen materials and be designed to screen the views from the amenity deck or parking structure to the neighborhood. (b) Green Building. Alternative Transportation and Energy Source, Resource Conservation, and LEED Certification. The project shall be constructed to Silver Standard or better LEED equivalent and shall at the minimum, incorporate bike lockers, bike sharing programing, electric vehicle charging stations, rain capturing systems, grey water capturing systems, and to the extent feasible, automobile sharing programing. (c) Public Art. Public Art shall be installed, and maintained with a value equivalent to one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the total construction cost of the Project. Total construction cost shall mean all design, engineering and construction costs. A public art plan shall be prepared and submitted to the City no later than one hundred eight (180) days before final approval for occupancy or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy and the approved art shall be installed prior to final approval for occupancy of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Project. (d) Storage. A minimum of 250 cubic feet of storage, in addition to interior bedroom closets, shall be provided with minimum dimensions of 4 feet by 8 feet per unit. (e) Hardscape materials. Enhanced paving materials shall be installed at the Main Street driveway entrance. The actual paving materials shall be approved by the Planning Division. (f) Lighting standards/fixtures. The light fixtures are to integrate design elements of the building and landscape architecture. Lighting is to be designed to confine the direct rays of the artificial lighting within the boundaries of the development. Specifications of light standards/fixtures and photometrics plan shall be submitted to Planning Division for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. (g) Composite Utility Plan. Composite utilities shall not be allowed within required parking, turnaround and landscape areas or on any fagade facing a public street. (h) Mechanical Equipment, Appurtenances, and Conduits. All mechanical equipment, heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC) units, satellite dish systems, solar panels, thermal solar heaters, utility meters, above ground utility and fire safety connections will be, screened, located out of public view or be architectural integrated into the project design within designated rooms, inside walls, behind parapets, or through a combination of landscape and hardscape materials. (i) Trash Enclosures. Trash bins shall be stored in designated trash enclosures. There shall be an onsite designated trash staging area only to be used on service days and the staging area and bins shall not disrupt vehicular use of the driveway. The minimum requirements needed to service the location shall be clearly indicated on the 8of12 plans and subject to the approval of the Public Works Agency. SECTION 18 — Property Maintenance in Specific Development No. 93 (a) Onsite Property Manager. The Project shall include 24-hour on -site Property Management services and personnel. Up-to-date 24-hour contact information for the on -site personnel shall be provided to the following City Agencies on an ongoing basis: (1) Police Department (2) Fire Authority (3) Planning and Building Agency (4) Community Development Agency (b) Maintenance. The property shall be maintained free of trash, debris and graffiti. Graffiti shall be removed within 24-hours after its appearance in accordance with Section 10-227 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. (c) Crime Free Housing. Prior to submittal into building plan check, a Crime Free Housing Plan shall be submitted for review. The Plan shall be approved prior to occupancy of the first unit and shall be implemented and administered by the Owner. (d) Building Security. All structures and parking lots shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8, Article IL Division 3 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Building Security Ordinance). (e) Emergency Evacuation Plan. An approved Emergency Evacuation Plan (EEP) from City Police and Fire Protection agencies shall be on file for the project. Up-to-date 24-hour emergency contact information for the on -site personnel shall be provided to the City on an ongoing basis and the approved EEP shall be kept onsite and also be submitted to the following City Agencies: (1) Police Department (2) Fire Authority (3) Planning and Building Agency (4) Community Development Agency (f) On Going Property Maintenance. Developer (and the owner of the property upon which the authorized use and/or authorized improvements are located if different from the Developer) shall execute a maintenance agreement with the City of Santa Ana which shall be recorded against the property and which shall be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney. The maintenance agreement shall contain covenants, conditions and restrictions relating to the following: (1) Compliance with operational conditions applicable during any period(s) of construction or major repair (e.g., proper screening and securing of the construction site; implementation of proper erosion control, dust control and noise mitigation measure; adherence to approved project phasing etc.). 9of12 (2) Compliance with ongoing operational conditions, requirements and restrictions, as applicable (including but not limited to hours of operation, security requirements, the proper storage and disposal of trash and debris, enforcement of the parking management plan, and/or restrictions on certain uses). (3) Ongoing compliance with approved design and construction parameters, signage parameters and restrictions as well as landscape designs, as applicable. (4) Ongoing maintenance, repair and upkeep of the property and all improvements located thereupon at all times (including but not limited to controls on the proliferation of trash and debris about the property; the proper and timely removal of graffiti; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of damaged, vandalized and/or weathered buildings, structures and/or improvements; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of exterior paint, parking striping, lighting and irrigation fixtures, walls and fencing, publicly accessible bathrooms and bathroom fixtures, landscaping and related landscape improvements and the like, as applicable). (5) If Developer and the owner of the property are different (e.g., if the applicant is a tenant or licensee of the property or any portion thereof), both the applicant and the owner of the property shall be signatories to the maintenance agreement and both shall be jointly and severally liable for compliance with its terms. (6) The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any party responsible for complying with its terms shall not assign its ownership interest in the property or any interest in any lease, sublease, license or sublicense, unless the prospective assignee agrees in writing to assume all of the duties and obligations and responsibilities set forth under the maintenance agreement. (7) The maintenance agreement shall contain provisions relating to the enforcement of its conditions by the City and shall also contain provisions authorizing the City to recover costs and expenses which the City may incur arising out of any enforcement and/or remediation efforts which the City may undertake in order to cure any deficiency in maintenance, repair or upkeep or to enforce any restrictions or conditions upon the use of the property. The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any unreimbursed costs and/or expenses incurred by the City to cure a deficiency in maintenance or to enforce use restrictions shall become a lien upon the property in an amount equivalent to the actual costs and/or expense incurred by the City. (8) The execution and recordation of the maintenance agreement shall be a condition precedent to the issuance of final approval for any construction permit related to this entitlement. 10 of 12 ATTACHMENT 1 11 of 12 ATTACHMENT 2 12 of 12 EXHIBIT 6 REQUEST FOR Planning Commission Action PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 2019 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING — FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 2018-01, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2018-01, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-06 AND AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2018-10 FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET {STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 3, 2} Vince Fregoso, AICP Prepared by Selena Kelaher, AICP PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY APPROVED ❑ As Recommended ❑ As Amended ❑ Set Public Hearing For DENIED ❑ Applicant's Request ❑ Staff Recommendation CONTINUED TO Executive Director Planning Ntanager / RECOMMENDED ACTION It is recommended that the Planning Commission evaluate the modified project and consider recommending to the City Council: 1. Adoption of a resolution certifying Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 (SCH No. 2018021031), adoption of environmental findings of fact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 2. Adoption of an ordinance approving the Development Agreement No. 2018-01. 3. Adoption of a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06. 4. Adoption of an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2018-10 for Specific Development No. 93. Background Jeremy Ogulnick, representing AC 2525 Main, LLC, has submitted a modified project application to construct a 256-unit multi -family housing project (58 dwelling units per acre) on an approximately 4.4-acre parcel and surface level parking lot with 180 parking spaces proposed to be used by the Discovery Cube and may be shared with the residential development on an approximately 1.4- acre parcel a located at 2525 North Main Street. Entitlements requested include a development agreement between the City and applicant/owner, a general plan amendment to redesignate the property from Professional & Administrative Office (PAO) to District Center (DC), and an amendment application to rezone the property from Professional (P) to Specific Development No. 2525 North Main Street October 28, 2019 Page 2 93 (SD-93). In addition, a Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR), and Clarification to the Final EIR, that studied the environmental impacts of the project, a mitigation monitoring and reporting program and a statement of overriding considerations have been prepared. Prior Planning Commission and City Council Action On January 14, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the applicant's proposed 496-unit (84 dwelling units per acre) development project. Among other design recommendations, staff recommended that the number of units be reduced to 476-units (81 dwelling units per acre). After several hours of public testimony, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council not certify the Final EIR, and not adopt the findings, statement of overriding consideration and mitigation monitoring and reporting program. Further, the Commission recommended that the City Council deny the development agreement, general plan amendment, and amendment application (zone change). On February 5 and February 19, 2019, the City Council held public hearings on the development project as presented to the Commission on January 14, 2019. After receiving public testimony both in support of and in opposition to the project, the City Council voiced a number of concerns with the project, including project density, the height of the building and parking structure, the number of parking spaces per unit, and the expected traffic associated with a 476-unit project. At the conclusion of the hearings, the City Council directed that the applications go back to the Planning Commission after consultation with the community. Based on City Council direction, between March and June 2019 the applicant met with both the community and staff on five occasions to discuss revisions to the project. In June 2019, the applicant submitted a revised project which consisted of the following: • A reduction in the number of units to 347 units (formerly 496 units) • A reduction in the project density to 58 dwelling units per acre (formerly 84 du/ac) • A reduction in the total number of residential stories to a maximum of 4-stories (formerly 5- stories with mezzanines) o Tiering of the height of the northeast corner of the residential building to range from 2-4 stories o Tiering the height of the residential building along a portion of Edgewood Road to a tiered height of 3 to 4-stories • A reduction in the levels of the parking structure to 6-levels with one level below grade and five levels above grade (formerly 8-level) • Relocated the project entry along Main Street to the northernmost section of the site that will be part of a redesigned intersection at Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive • Increased the setback on the east from 40 feet to 66 feet • Increased the parking from 1.8 parking spaces to 1.85 parking spaces per unit and continuing to provide valet parking which would increase parking to 2.0 per unit. 2525 North Main Street October 28, 2019 Page 3 The North Santa Ana Preservation Alliance continued to voice opposition to the project and stated that they would support three development options: rehabilitation and reuse of the existing office building, redevelopment of the site with a new office building built in compliance with the Professional zoning standards, or a residential project at a maximum density of 15 dwelling units per acre (89 dwelling units). The first two options would be feasible under the existing zoning and general plan. The third option would require a zone change to Two -Family Residential (R2) and a general plan amendment to Medium Density Residential (MR-15) General Plan land use designation. The applicant has indicated that the three development options proposed would make the residential development project infeasible. At its regular meeting on August 12, 2019, and after receiving public testimony on the item, the Planning Commission vote resulted in an impasse on the proposed 347-unit residential development. Based on the Planning Commission's bylaws, the applicant chose to appeal the project to the City Council. The project was in process to be scheduled for a City Council public hearing; however, in September the applicant advised staff that they would be making further modifications to the project to address the comments received at the August 12t" Planning Commission meeting. Modified Proiect On September 5, 2019, a meeting with the applicant and neighborhood was held to discuss another series of modifications to the project that could include a reduction the number of units proposed, reduction in project density and intensity, an increase in the parking ratio, and an additional increase in the building setbacks. The applicant expressed that their goals in making these modifications are to: address community input and concerns, create an opportunity for additional parking for the Discovery Cube and the proposed development, to maintain as much of the existing development pattern and existing parking lot as feasible, and to minimize changes to the neighborhood at the project's edge. The modifications to the project to date represent a significant reduction from previous submissions. However, the modified project remains inconsistent with the development options that the North Santa Ana Preservation Alliance expressed they would support. In early October, the applicant formally submitted a modified project that consists of the following elements: • A reduction in the number of units to 256 units (formerly 347 units) • A reduction in the project density to 58 dwelling units per acre (formerly 59 du/ac) • An increase in the building setback on the east to 90 feet (formerly 66 feet) • An increase in the building setback on the south to 134 feet (formerly 15 feet) • The addition of residential surface level parking (104 spaces) along the east property line • The addition of a surface level parking lot with shared parking with the Discover Cube along the south property line (180 spaces) • An increase in parking to 2.0 parking spaces per unit and 2.7 spaces per unit when utilizing the shared parking lot (formerly 1.85 parking spaces per unit with 2.0 valet) • A reduction in the amount of common open space (exterior and interior) • Revised development agreement terms 2525 North Main Street October 28, 2019 Page 4 The Planning Commission, in evaluating the modifications to the project and its recommendations to the City Council, should consider whether the project has addressed the concerns expressed by the City Council regarding reducing density, building height and massing, increasing the parking ratio, and the reducing the expected traffic associated with the project. As described in the following analysis of the project and by the various updated technical studies, all previously identified concerns have been addressed and the project as modified merits an approval recommendation by the Planning Commission. Project Location and Site Description The subject site is a 5.93-acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Main Street and Edgewood Road. Regional access to the site is provided from the Santa Ana (1-5) Freeway via Main Street, a 6-lane arterial roadway, and via the State Route 22 (SR-22) Freeway. The properties immediately adjacent to the site include Santiago Park to the north, single-family residential homes to the south and east and the Discovery Cube across Main Street to the west. The project site is located on North Main Street, an urban corridor within the City. The site is also located at a main entry point to the Park Santiago Neighborhood, a residential neighborhood predominantly comprised of detached single-family dwellings. The site is currently improved with an 81,172 square foot, two-story office building with 442 parking spaces and associated mature trees and landscaping. The building has been vacant since summer 2017 and was last occupied by Wells Fargo. The Discovery Cube leases the parking lot for employee and overflow parking. Table 1: Project Location Information Project Address 2525 North Main Street Nearest Intersection Main Street and Edgewood Road General Plan Existing: Professional & Proposed: District Center (DC) Designation Administrative Office (PAO) Zoning Designation Existing: Professional (P) Proposed: Specific Development No. Surrounding Land Uses North Santiago Park — East Single -Family R South I Sinale-Familv Ri 93 — R1 — R1 — SD-65 Property Size 5.93 acres (258,310 square feet) Existing Site The site contains a two-story, 81,172 square foot office building with 442 parking Development spaces Applicable Zoning Existing: SAMC Chapter 41, Article Proposed: SAMC Chapter 41, Article III, Code Sections III, Division 8 (Professional) Division 26 (Specific Development) Entitlements SAMC Chapter 41, Article V, Division II (Amendments and Change to District Boundaries) SAMC Chapter 27, Articles I and II (Planning) 2525 North Main Street October 28, 2019 Page 5 Project Description The applicant proposes to demolish the existing office building and develop a 256-unit multi -family residential development and surface level parking on the site. The modified project includes a lot line adjustment to create two separate lots. The residential lot will be approximately 4.4 acres in size with the shared parking lot parcel being 1.4 acres. The lot line adjustment is a ministerial process, with no Planning Commission or City Council action required. The residential project is proposed at a density of 58 dwelling units per acre which is derived by calculating the number of units by the net size of the residential property (4.4 acres). This project would result in approximately 444,634 square feet of development (277,281 square feet of residential building and 167,253 square feet of parking structure and common open space structures). The maximum floor area ratio for the subject site will be 1.43 which is derived by calculating the square footage of the gross building square footage (residential development and common open space rooms, excluding the parking structure square footage) by net size of the property. The modified project includes surface level parking lots along the eastern and southern sections of the site. A new driveway on Main Street will provide access to the parking lots with right -in and right -out only turn movements. The east parking lot will be dedicated to the residential development (104 spaces) and is accessible either through the parking structure or via a rolling gate that separates the two lots. The south parking lot is proposed to be used by the Discovery Cube (180 spaces). Use of the parking lot would be managed through a shared parking and reciprocal access agreement. The proposed hours of use for the Discovery Cube southern parking lot are 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. with residents being able to utilize the spaces after 7 p.m. The unit mix is a maximum of 70 percent studio and one -bedroom units and 30 percent two and three -bedroom units. The project proposes 21 different floor plans with an average unit size of 763 square feet. The unit breakdown can be found on Table 2 below. Table 2: Unit Mix and Unit Square Footage �f£YpeTNurtlbei��j�o)a pp �S nits re Fo e o ev Qu ro rofec' ets �o 74 29% e Studios 556 - 592 60 18% One -Bedrooms 103 400/o 633 - 930 181 52% Two -Bedrooms 75 290/b 9 99 - 1,179 84 24% Three -Bedrooms 4 2% 1,362 22 6% Total 256 units 100% 556-1,362 347 units The residential portion of the building will tier from 2-stories in height (24-feet 8-inches) to 3-stories in height (36-feet 9 inches) to 4-stories (49-feet 5-inches) in height along the eastern edge of the project. The remainder of the residential buildings are a maximum of 4-stories (49-feet 5-inches). The parking structure is 1-level below grade and 5-levels above grade with an outdoor amenity deck on level 6 (60-feet 7-inches). The tallest element of the building is the elevator tower on the amenity deck which reaches a maximum height of 74 feet, 5 inches. One level of the parking 2525 North Main Street October 28, 2019 Page 6 structure and amenity deck would extend approximately 10-feet above the residential portion of the building. However, the four-story residential building wraps around the structure to minimizes views of the parking structure from the street level. The applicant is proposing an elongated four-way intersection be constructed at Main Street and Santiago Park/Walkie Way. This will result in an off -set intersection design, alterations to the northbound left -turn pocket for the Discovery Cube, and modifications to the traffic flow on Main Street. Modifications will be made to the existing raised center median on Main Street (from Edgewood Road to Santiago Park/Walkie Way) to provide turn pockets of approximately 200 feet, which is more than the existing approximately 150 foot long turn pockets. All improvements to the intersection, median and the closure of the Santiago Park entrance on Main Street will be the responsibility of the applicant. The modified project no longer proposes to use the existing park for access. The existing Santiago Park vehicular entrance on Main Street will be closed permanently with new curb gutter and sidewalk. Access to the park and the project will be from the modified Main Street/Santiago Park intersection. Project residents and park users would enter and exit the site via Main Street at the intersection. Residents would veer south to enter the parking structure; park users would continue north to the park access road. The entrances to both the park and the project will be on private property, with park access provided via an onsite public access easement allowing park patrons access to the park site. The parking structure is 5-levels above grade and 1-level below grade and is topped by an amenity deck at the 6t" level. A total of 407 parking spaces are proposed within the parking structure and 104 surface level stalls. A total of 511 parking spaces are proposed for a ratio of 2.0 spaces per unit. No tandem parking is proposed. The project may also potentially enter into a shared use arrangement with the ultimate owner of the 1.4-acre parcel to the south which could increase the parking ratio to 2.7 spaces per unit for the project. However, the shared parking arrangement parking is not counted as part of the 2.0 required parking for the project. Table 3 below provides a breakdown of the proposed parking for the project. Table 3: Applicant Proposed Parking itJtii IT p `UW 9" iPrevtqus;g ec£x Studios 74 1.00 74 60 One -Bedroom 103 1.00 103 181 Two -Bedrooms 75 2.00 150 110 Three -Bedrooms 4 3.00 12 66 Guest Parking .25 64 167 Leasing Office 4 Surface Level Stalls East 104 58 tandem Total Residential Spaces 256 2.00 511 spaces 642 spaces 1.85 rate 2525 North Main Street October 28, 2019 Page 7 Did. k Unit$ °;Spices=Pro `,osecl a' .".. , ,, „ ,Rate'„, ;PbreulousP„ro eCY Surface Level Parking N/A South 180 spaces Valet Parkin N/A 52 spaces Total with Valet Total with Shared Parking 256 2.7 691 spaces 694 spaces 2.0 rate The project has retained a contemporary architectural design. Elements such as stone and brick veneers, metal panels, ceramic tile, metal canopies, flat and metal seamed roofs all assist in conveying a modern design. The color scheme encompasses earth tones of tans, browns and greys. Courtyards are provided along Main Street, Edgewood Road and the internal east elevation to break up massing and create distinct building sections. In addition, units along Edgewood Road will front the street, providing direct street access and assisting in activating the street. A total of 25,947-square feet of common open space will be dispersed throughout the project. These areas will consist of 4 ground level courtyards with amenities such as seating areas, tables and chairs, shade trellises, fire pits, and enhanced landscaping. A 9,281-square foot rooftop amenity deck will also be provided that will include a pool and spa, cabanas, fire pits, lounge chairs, shade structures and stairwells, an elevator tower and restrooms. The rooftop deck is surrounded by parapet walls to minimize views of the neighborhood and is approximately 240-feet from the east property line. The club room and fitness center provide residents with opportunities for on -site services and entertainment space. In addition, private open space in the form of patios or balconies will be provided for each unit. The balconies and patios range from 53 to 77 square feet in size. As proposed, there are 46 studio unit which do not have a private patio or balcony, however the Specific Development requires that all units have a balcony or open space and this will be incorporated and verified during plan check and prior to permit issuance. The amount of open space has decreased due to the increased setback along the east and south property lines and surface level parking lots. In addition, interior common area amenities such as the dog wash room, bike repair room, bike share, Amazon parcel lockers, and business services room have been eliminated. The applicant is proposing to retain the healthy trees along the east property line and the trees along the southern property lines. An arborist report was prepared, with mitigation measures included to ensure the trees remain in a healthy condition pre and post -construction. The report also identified 8 trees (7 Sweet Gum trees and 1 Cypress tree) along the eastern property line that are in an unhealthy condition and are recommended for removal. Additional trees similar in size and type to the mature trees will be planted to fill in areas where trees were removed or are missing. Two existing Palm Trees on Edgewood Road will need to be removed in order to accommodate the emergency roadway at the east end of the site. This tree removal will require review from the Environmental and Transportation Advisory Committee, which will occur at a later date. In addition, the applicant will raise the height of the wall adjacent to the single-family dwellings from six feet to eight feet in height. 2525 North Main Street October 28, 2019 Page 8 This project is required to comply with the City's Housing Opportunity Ordinance (HOO). To satisfy the provisions of the HOO, applicant is proposing to pay an in -lieu fee in excess of $3,000,000. See Table 4 below for a preliminary breakdown of the proposed HOO fee. Table 4: Housing Opportunity Fee Summary HA bi " )il $ uare ,Fo fa e; I,nclusiona _Holism ",Fee Es imated,Fee, ", , Previou's,` P,ro'pct` 205,865 $15 per square foot $3,087,975 $4,236,900 282,460 SF *As measured from the exterior walls of the residential units. This calculation does not include exterior hallways, common areas, landscape, open space or exterior stairways* Analysis Environmental Impact Report The applicant submitted a development proposal that requires the approval of several discretionary applications. Given the size and location of the project, as well as the proposed zoning and general plan modifications, extensive environmental review was needed. After completion of the Initial Study for the project, it was determined that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) required the preparation and certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) for this project. The purpose of an EIR is to identify the significant effects on the environment of a project, to identify alternatives to the project, and to indicate the manner in which those significant effects can be mitigated or avoided. To determine what potential effects would be caused by the project, the EIR analyzed issues related to Aesthetics; Air Quality; Biological Resources; Cultural/Historic Resources; Greenhouse Gas Emissions; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Land Use and Planning; Noise; Population and Housing; Public Services; Transportation and Circulation; Tribal Cultural Resources; Utilities and Service Systems; and Energy. Previously, on February 12, 2018, the Initial Study and Notice of Preparation were released to solicit comments regarding the scope and content of the Draft EIR (DEIR). A scoping meeting was held on March 1, 2018 with approximately 164 people in attendance and a total of 163 written comment letters received at the conclusion of the 30-day public comment period. The comments were reviewed and additional areas of analysis and studies were added to the scope of the Draft EIR as appropriate. The comments are included as Appendix A of the Draft EIR. The Draft EIR analyzed the direct and indirect impacts resulting from construction and operation of the originally proposed project. In addition to analyzing fourteen environmental topic areas, the EIR also evaluated three options for access and egress to the project. The analysis included Main Street access only as proposed (Option A), access from Main Street plus a secondary access/egress driveway at the Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park intersection (Option B), and access/egress from both Main Street and Edgewood Road (Option C). Three project alternatives were also analyzed within the document. These included a no build alternative, where the existing approximately 80,000 square foot building would remain as is and be reoccupied by an office use (Alternative 1); a reduced multi -family project consisting of a 30 percent reduction in density (Alternative 2); and build out of the site under the existing Professional 2525 North Main Street October 28, 2019 Page 9 zoning district development standards, which could result in an approximately 390,000 square foot office building (Alternative 3). The Draft EIR determined that the originally proposed project would require mitigation related to aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, hazardous materials, construction noise and vibration, interior noise, and tribal resources. Aesthetic impacts would remain significant and unavoidable after mitigation. On August 7, 2018, the Draft EIR was circulated for review and comment to public, City Council, Planning Commission, local, regional and state agencies, and interested parties for a 45-day public comment review period. In addition, a Planning Commission public hearing was held on August 27, 2018 where staff presented the EIR process and environmental information to the Planning Commission and pubic and received public comments on the DEIR. To allow for additional time for public review and comment, and at the request of the North Santa Ana Preservation Alliance, the City extended the DEIR public comment period by an additional two weeks. At the close of the review and comment period on October 4, 2018, a total of 44 comment letters were received on the Draft EIR. The City has evaluated the comments received from persons and agencies on the Draft EIR and completed detailed Response to Comments, revisions to the Draft EIR including clarifications and/or corrections to typographical errors, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). The response to comments, MMRP and Final EIR were published on November 15, 2018 for public review. The Draft EIR, responses to comments document, and revisions to the Draft EIR the Final EIR for the project. The EIR identified one significant and unavoidable impact associated with the originally proposed project, which pertains to aesthetics. Based on the City's visual criteria related to scale, height and setbacks, it was determined that the originally project would result in a substantial change in views from existing conditions and would result in a significant and unavoidable impact to the aesthetics. The October Modified Project would have similar aesthetic impacts compared to the originally proposed project. As a result of this impact that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations is required before the City Council can approve the October modified project. A Statement of Overriding Considerations is the process through which decision makers balance the economic, legal, social, and technological or other benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental impacts. Clarifications to the Final EIR Clarifications to the Final EIR (October 2019) have been prepared to determine if any new or additional environmental impacts would result from the October modified project. The analysis concludes that the October modified project, which reduces the number of units by 240 units from 496 to 256 (48.3 percent reduction), reduces the height of the structures, revises the vehicular entry to the project, incorporates surface level parking lots to increase building setbacks along the east and south property lines, and creates a separate parcel of land for parking purposes would not result in any new adverse environmental impacts from those that were previously disclosed 2525 North Main Street October 28, 2019 Page 10 and discussed in the Final EIR. As previously concluded, aesthetics remains a significant and unavoidable impact after mitigation. The projected population is estimated to be 502 residents, which is a reduction of 453 residents from the original 496-unit project. In addition, the number of daily trips is projected to be reduced to 1,512 trips, a reduction of 1,186 trips projected forthe 496- unit project. Water demands are reduced to 69.09 acre feet per year, which is a reduction of 62.44 acre feet per year. Based on the fact that the October modified project did not have or create any impacts that were not previously studied and disclosed, recirculation of the EIR is not required for the modified project pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 (Exhibit 1). Development Agreement Due to a reduction in the size of the project and the elimination of the need for a land exchange with the City, the applicant is proposing to amend the terms of the development agreement (Exhibit 2). The agreement is a legal contract between the developer and the City that defines the terms and nature of development proposed for the project site. Highlights of the revised DA include: 1. Term of Agreement. The terms of the agreement remain the same. The right to build the project as entitled for a period of four years, with an opportunity for up to two, consecutive one-year extensions. Extensions shall be subject to approval by both the Owner and the City Manager. Prior to granting an extension, the Owner shall pay $50,000 to the City's General Fund to compensate the City for lost revenue to be received by the City had the project been completed within the first four years. 2. Public Art. The inclusion of public art remains the same. The Owner shall create, install, and maintain a public art project with a value equivalent to 0.5% of the total construction cost of the project. The work(s) of art shall be in place prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the project and shall be maintained in perpetuity by the property owner. 3. Modification to the Santiago Park Improvement. The term to construct park improvements up to $1,400,000 remains. However, the terms have been modified to propose that the City and developer equally share in the cost of the Santiago Park improvements. The developer will be responsible to front the cost of construction and construct the park improvements and contribute up to 50% of the estimated construction cost ($700,000). The City's 50% portion would be repaid over a period of three years. These park improvements include, but are not limited to, installation of irrigation, landscaping, security lighting and bike trail enhancements to Santiago Park. 4. Modification to the Park Santiago Neighborhood Benefits Package. The developer has eliminated the on -site Amazon lockers from the benefit package. The developer has retained the terms to provide Park Santiago Neighborhood residents with access to on - site amenities, 24-hour roving security patrol within the Park Santiago Neighborhood and Santiago Park as shown on Exhibit H to the Development Agreement for a 55-year period unless determined during an annual review that the term shall end earlier. 2525 North Main Street October 28, 2019 Page 11 5. Elimination of Historic District Application. The developer has eliminated the term to contribute up to $150,000 towards the costs and expenses associated with processing the application for historic district consideration, including reimbursing the City for costs incurred conducting the survey and any environmental review. 6. Modification to Park Santiago Public Improvements. The developer has eliminated the term to install neighborhood entry monuments at three locations. The developer has retained the terms to provide traffic calming at up to three locations, street lighting enhancements in the Park Santiago neighborhood, and a street light, and themed decorative pavement at Main Street/Walkie Way and Main Street/Santiago Park Drive at the direction of the Public Works Agency. The agreement also includes provisions for an overcrowding management plan, parking management plan, live work preference plan, local sourcing plan, construction management, and property maintenance plans. The development agreement has been signed by the applicant indicating agreement to the terms. The agreement is not considered final until the City Council has reviewed and approved the agreement and the agreement is executed by all parties. General Plan Amendment To allow for the construction of a multi -family residential development on this parcel, a general plan amendment is still required. Currently, the land use designation for this site is Professional and Administrative Office (PAO) with a maximum floor area ratio of 1.5, which applies to areas that are predominately professional offices and/or administrative offices or areas where such development is encouraged. The modified project will require an amendment to the Land Use Element to amend the General Plan Land Use designation of the site to District Center (DC) with a density of 58 dwelling units per acre or a floor area ratio of 1.43 (Exhibit 3). The modified project is consistent with the existing allowable floor area ratio of 1.5. District Centers are major activity areas of the City. Currently, several areas to the northwest, northeast, south of the Santa Ana 1-5 Freeway and along Main Street north of Seventeenth Street are designated as District Centers. District Centers are designed to serve as anchors to the City's commercial corridors and to accommodate higher density development projects. These areas are to be developed with an urban character that includes a mixture of high-rise offices, commercial and multi -family residential uses which provide shopping, business, cultural and housing opportunities within close proximity to each other, close to transportation opportunities and in prime development focus areas. Residential development within these areas is allowed at a density of up to 90 acres. If approved, the project could support several goals and policies of the Housing Element. First, the project would be consistent with Goal 2, which encourages diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that accommodate Santa Ana's residents and workforce of all household types, income levels and age groups to foster an inclusive community. Second, the project would support Goal 4, to provide adequate rental and ownership housing opportunities and supportive services. Further, the project would be consistent with Policy HE-2.2 to create 2525 North Main Street October 28, 2019 Page 12 District Centers with high intensity, mixed -use urban villages and pedestrian oriented experiences. Finally, the project would be consistent with Policy HE-2.4 to facilitate diverse types, prices and sizes of housing. The project would also be consistent with goals of the Land Use Element, including Goal 1 to promote a balance of land uses to address basic community needs, and Goal 6 to reduce residential overcrowding to promote public health and safety. The proposed project will provide additional market rate housing in the City, thereby assisting in addressing the shortage of available housing within the region. The project will also provide additional housing options for those seeking housing within the jobs rich northern area of the City. The upscale multi -family development will also support Urban Design Element Goal 1 to improve the physical appearance of the City through development of a district that projects a sense of place, positive community image, and quality environment. Amendment Application Currently, the zoning designation for this site is Professional (P) which permits a variety of business uses that aim to create a professional business environment and prohibits residential uses. To allow the construction of a multi -family residential development and parking on this parcel, an amendment application (zone change) request to change from Professional (P) to a Specific Development No. 93 (SD-93) designation is required. The SD designation will allow a residential development (Zone 1) and parking (Zone 2) with all other uses prohibited, this will ensure consistency between zoning and the General Plan, assuming the associated general plan amendment is approved (Exhibit 4). 16 When considering a zone change it is important to look at the surrounding land uses and economic factors. The jobs to housing balance is evaluated by comparing project -generated jobs and housing units to forecasts of employment and housing. An imbalance in the ratio, either too much housing or too many jobs, can result in longer commutes and the air quality and traffic problems associated with commuting. Based on SCAG profiles and projections, Santa Ana is a jobs rich area with 2.06 jobs per housing unit. SCAG considers an area as balanced when the jobs -housing ratio is 1.36, therefore providing more housing would reduce the ratio to 2.05. Furthermore, in the second quarter of 2019, the City's office occupancy rate was 12.72 percent, which remains higher than the neighboring central cities of Orange (10.64%) and Tustin (10.37%) and the County as a whole (11.4%), with the exception of Anaheim which currently has a higher vacancy rate (16.34%). Therefore, the change from Professional to Specific Development would not be a significant impact to professional office districts. In addition, use of the site for residential development is supported as the location has elements to make the site a viable residential development. The elements include having regional access to freeway and transportation systems, the site is within close proximity to educational, cultural activities, employment centers, and retail and commercial shopping opportunities. Furthermore, several nearby properties and properties along Main Street are designated as Specific Developments. The property would be developed at a higher density than the nearby single-family residential uses. However, multi -family uses are often used in planning and zoning practice to buffer higher intensity uses like commercial or industrial uses from single-family residential uses and multi -family and single-family uses are more compatible in nature to each other. 2525 North Main Street October 28, 2019 Page 13 The Specific Development No. 93 (SD-93) will be established for the purpose of protecting and promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the City and its residents. If the zone change is approved, a series of site -specific objectives and development standards will guide the development of the project. Specifically, the SD-93 document includes a menu of development standards which establish permitted and conditional uses and regulate density, circulation, open space, setbacks, parking, height and landscape requirements and includes provisions for construction and maintenance to allow the exclusive entitlement of the residential project. Approval of the proposal would allow for the construction of a high density residential development in an urbanized setting that is within close proximity to neighborhood services and amenities. If approved, the zone change would need to be approved in conjunction with the proposed general plan amendment. This would result in a project that is consistent with the goals and objectives of City's General Plan land use designation of District Center. The project will promote an urban development where office, retail and residential activities would coexist in close proximity and in a mixed -use setting. Further, the project will contribute towards the improvement of the character of the northern section of the City. Finally, the development, through the construction of the proposed public improvements and site amenities, will contribute to the enhancement of the area and serve as a buffer between commercial and high intensity uses and the lower density residential area. Economic Analysis The proposed project would convert an office development into a residential development. A fiscal and economic impact analysis was prepared by RSG, Inc. A memorandum was provided based on the reduced 256-unit project (Exhibit 8). In addition to the financial contributions included in the Development Agreement, RSG anticipates the following fiscal outcomes over a 25-year forecast period: • Approximately $16.6 million in revenue to the City's General Fund (construction period revenues, recurring property tax revenue, utility user tax, residential sales tax and business tax) (formerly $22.5 million) • Approximately $5.0 million in expenditures from the City General Fund (public services) (formerly $6.7 million) • The net new General Fund revenue is projected to be approximately $11.6 million from the acquisition and development of the Project (formerly $15.8 million) Table 5: Public Notification ^` � .. '..' ♦ �« a >. ST^, cK..0 }Av aw.Y.aF� m. .. ..�. a a.".A `i Required Measures A Sunshine Ordinance Community Meeting was held on November 15, 2017 from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. The sign in sheet included 263 names. A public notice was posted on the project site on October 17, 2019. 2525 North Main Street October 28, 2019 Page 14 Notification & Measures Notification by mail was mailed on October 17, 2019 to all property owners and occupants within 500 feet of the project site and notification was provided to all interested parties that have requested to receive a notice with contact information Newspaper posting was published in the Orange County Register on Conclusion General Plan Amendment No. 2018-01 and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 support redevelopment of the site with a residential project that will provide new market -rate housing in a prime location that is accessible to retail and employment opportunities with multimodal transportation options. Additionally, public benefits of the Development Agreement will lead to new public art, access to on -site amenities for Park Santiago residents, and security patrol of the residential neighborhood and Santiago Park. The project will also enhance the City's economic and fiscal viability through the increase in property tax values as well as an increase in sales tax generated from the residents. The project has been reduced in density and height in response to comments received from the community and City Council and merits consideration for an approval recommendation to the City Council. Strategic Plan Alignment Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal No. 3 Economic Development, Objective No. 2 (create new opportunities for business/job growth and encourage private development through new General Plan and Zoning Ordinance policies). UAdIIW Selena Kelaher, AIC Associate Planner Vince Fregoso, AICP Planning Manager SK/VF:sb SAPIanning Co nrnlsslon�2019k10-28-1912525 N Main Street\2525 N Main PC Staff Report 10.28.19.docx Exhibits: 1. EIR Resolution, Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations, MMRP & EIR Link 2. Development Agreement Resolution & Agreement 3. General Plan Amendment Resolution & Exhibits 4. Amendment Application Resolution & Exhibits 5. Sunshine Meeting Minutes & Sign -in 6. Economic Analysis Update 2525 North Main Street October 28, 2019 Page 15 7. Vicinity Map 8. Site Photos 9. Overall Site Plan 10. Floor Plans 11. Building Elevations 12. Renderings 13. Landscape Plan This page left blank intentionally. TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM NO. 3 - PUBLIC HEARING FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 2018.01, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2018.01 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018.06 AND AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2018.10 FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI -FAMILY PROJECT LOCATED AT 2626 N MAIN STREET Exhibit 2 - Development Agreement Resolution & Agreement Exhibit 3 - General Plan Amendment Resolution & Exhibits Exhibit 4 - Amendment Application Resolution & Exhibits Exhibit 5 - Sunshine Meeting Minutes & Sign -in Exhibit 6 - Economic Analysis Update Exhibit 7 -Vicinity Map Exhibit 8 - Site Photos Exhibit 9 - Overall Site Plan Exhibit 10 - Floor Plans Exhibit 11 - Building Elevations Exhibit 12 - Renderings Exhibit 13 - Landscape Plan This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 1 This page left blank intentionally. 0:Y0ILIA I Eel 010 161r.95 Ilsea37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA: (1) ADOPT ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, (2) CERTIFY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH #2018021031), (3) ADOPT A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT, AND (4) ADOPT THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM WHEREAS, AC 2525 Main, LLC ("Applicant") seeks to develop The Addington a Multi -Family Residential Project ("proposed Project"), originally proposed as a 496-unit multi -family project on a 5.93-acre site at 2525 North Main Street in Santa Ana, California ("Project Site"); WHEREAS, during the entitlement and environmental review process, and in response to comments and concerns raised by the public and the City's elected officials, the Applicant has proposed several modifications to the original proposal; and WHEREAS, the Project as currently proposed now entails (1) demolition of the existing 81,172 square foot vacant two-story office building and 442-space surface parking lot on the Project Site; (2) redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 292 space surface level parking lot with residential and commercial parking; (3) approval of Development Agreement No. 2018-01 between the City of Santa Ana ("City") and Applicant; (4) approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, which would change the Project Site's existing land use designation of Professional & Administration Office (PAO) to District Center (DC); and (5) approval of Amendment Application No. 2018-10, which would change the zoning of the Project Site from Professional (P) to Specific Development No. 93 (SD-93) designation; and WHEREAS, the proposed Project has been submitted and requires review and certification of an Environmental Impact Report (the "EIR") (SCH# 2018021031) (Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01), and approval of Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10; and WHEREAS, the Project Site is located at the northeast corner of North Main Street and Edgewood Road and the properties immediately adjacent to the site include Santiago Park to the north, single-family residential homes to the south and east and the Discovery Science Center of Orange County across Main Street to the west. The Project Site is located on North Main Street, an urban corridor EXHIBIT 1 Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 1 of 10 within the City. The Project Site is also located at a main entry point to the Park Santiago Neighborhood, a residential neighborhood predominantly comprised of detached single-family dwellings; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 21067 of the Public Resources Code, and section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, § 15000 et seq.), the City of Santa Ana is the lead agency for the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines section 15063, the City conducted an Initial Study to determine if the Project may have a significant effect on the environment and to evaluate whether an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was required; and WHEREAS, after conducting the Initial Study, the City determined that an EIR should be prepared to evaluate the Project's potential to have a significant effect on the environment in the following areas: Aesthetics, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Land Use and Planning, Noise, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation/Traffic, and Utilities; and WHEREAS, based on the Initial Study, the City further determined that impacts to Aesthetics regarding scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway; to Agriculture and Forestry Resources regarding farmland; agricultural land, forest land timberland or conversion of; to Biological Resources regarding wetlands, conflicts with a tree preservation policy or ordinance, conflicts with a Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan; to Geology and Soils regarding a known earthquake fault, landslides, or soils incapable of adequately supporting septic tanks or waste water disposal; to Hazards regarding sites listed on a hazardous materials site, an airport land use plan, private airstrip or wildland fires; to Hydrology and Water Quality regarding housing within a 100-year flood hazard area; to Land Use and Planning regarding conflicts with a Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan; to Mineral Resources regarding loss of a mineral resource to the region or locally; to Noise regarding conflicts with an airport land use plan or private airstrip; Population and Housing regarding displacing existing housing necessitating replacement housing or displacing a substantial number of persons necessitating construction of replacement housing; to Transportation/Traffic regarding a change in air traffic patterns; to Utilities and Service Systems regarding federal, state and local solid waste regulations would have no impact or be less than significant and thus need not be analyzed further in the EIR; and WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines section 15082, on February 12, 2018, the City sent to the Office of Planning and Research and each responsible and trustee agency a Notice of Preparation ("NOP") - which was also published in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation - stating that an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number #2018021031) would be prepared; and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 2 of 10 WHEREAS, during the public comment period, copies of the Initial Study were available for review and inspection at City Hall (20 Civic Center Plaza), on the City's website, and at the Santa Ana Public Library (26 Civic Center Plaza); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083.9 and State CEQA Guidelines sections 15082(c) and 15083, the City held a duly noticed Scoping Meeting on March 1, 2018, to solicit comments on the scope of the environmental review of the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, one hundred sixty-three (163) comment letters were received in response to the NOP; and WHEREAS, a Draft Environmental Impact Report ("Draft EIR") was prepared for the proposed Project, addressing comments received in response to the NOP and evaluating the proposed Project's potentially significant environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR concluded that the proposed Project would have a significant and unavoidable impact to Aesthetics with the implementation of mitigation measures regarding the existing visual character of the Project Site and its surroundings, as implementation of the proposed Project would result in a significant and unavoidable change in visual scale, height, and setbacks from Santiago Park, Edgewood Road, and North Bush Street; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR further determined that mitigation measures were required to mitigate impacts to a less than significant level for the following resource areas: Air Quality, Biological Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources; and WHEREAS, in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines section 15085, a Notice of Completion was prepared and filed with the Office of Planning and Research on August 7, 2018; and WHEREAS, as required by State CEQA Guidelines section 15087(a), the City provided a Notice of Availability of the Draft EIR to the public - and published the Notice of Availability in the Orange County Register - at the same time that the City sent a Notice of Completion to the Office of Planning and Research, on August 7, 2018; and WHEREAS, during the public comment period, copies of the Draft EIR and technical appendices were available for review and inspection at City Hall (20 Civic Center Plaza), on the City's website, and at the Santa Ana Public Library (26 Civic Center Plaza); and WHEREAS, during the public comment period, on August 27, 2018, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to receive comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15087(i); and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 3 of 10 WHEREAS, in response to a request from Chatten-Brown & Cartens LLP, on behalf of the North Santa Ana Preservation Alliance, the City extended the Draft Environmental Impact Report public review and comment period to October 4, 2018 to allow additional time for public review and input; and WHEREAS, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines section 15087(e), the Draft EIR was circulated for a 59-day review period, from August 7, 2018 to October 4, 2018; and WHEREAS, during the 59-day public comment period, the City consulted with and requested comments from all responsible and trustee agencies, other regulatory agencies, and others pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15086; and WHEREAS, the City received forty-four (44) written comment letters and six verbal comments on the Draft EIR at the August 27, 2018 public hearing, including a written acknowledgement from the State Clearinghouse that the City has complied with CEQA environmental review requirements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21092.5, on November 15, 2018, the City provided copies of its responses to commenting public agencies and interested organizations and parties more than ten (10) days prior to the City's consideration of the Final EIR: and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2018, the City released the Final EIR ("Final EIR"), which consists of the Draft EIR, all technical appendices prepared in support of the Draft EIR, all written comment letters received on the Draft EIR, written responses to all written comment letters received and verbal comments received on the Draft EIR, revisions to the Draft EIR and technical appendices, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and WHEREAS, on November 26, 2018, the Planning Commission continued a duly noticed public hearing for the project to January 14, 2019. A second study session was held to review the Project. During the public comment period fifty-eight (58) verbal comments were received (twenty-five (25) in support; thirty-one (31) in opposition and two (2) neutral) and eleven (11) written comments were received (two (2) in support and nine (9) in opposition); and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, seventy-nine (79) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty (30) speakers supported the project, forty-eight (48) speakers opposed it and one speaker was neutral. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council not certify the EIR, adopt the findings, the statement of overriding considerations and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program and deny the Project; and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 4 of 10 WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-one (61) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty-eight (38) speakers supported the project, twenty (20) speakers opposed it and three (3) speakers were neutral and the public hearing was continued to the next regular adjourned City Council meeting on February 19, 2019; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, the City Council continued to conduct the duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, one hundred and thirty-one (131) members of the public spoke on the item, twenty-six (26) speakers supported the project and one hundred and five (105) speakers opposed it and one hundred and sixty- six (166) written comments were received with nine (9) in support and one hundred and fifty-seven (157) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public, the Applicant and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted that the project be remanded to the Planning Commission after further consultation with staff, Applicant and community to address comments and concerns raised during the public hearing process; and WHEREAS, in June 2019, the applicant submitted a revised plan consisting of development 347 multi -family units (59 dwelling units per acre), with 642 parking spaces (1.85 parking spaces per unit) and parking capacity at 2.0 spaces per unit, within a 4- story residential building wrapped around a five -level parking structure with an amenity deck on the sixth -level, private open space, and redesigned the intersection of Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive to provide access to the project on a 5.93- acre site (the "June Revised Plan"); and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the June Revised Plan. At the meeting, seventy- seven (77) members of the expressed opposition; nine (9) supported the project, and one speaker was neutral. In addition, one -hundred (100) written comments were received with six (6) in support and ninety-four (94) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission vote resulted in an impasse; and WHEREAS, in October 2019, in response to comments received the applicant submitted a further revised plan. including redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 292 space surface level parking lot which also reduced the Project's height, increased the Project's setbacks, and modified the Project entrance ("October Modified Project"); and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 5 of 10 WHEREAS, the City has prepared "Clarifications to the Final EIR (October 2019)" to determine if the October Modified Project would result in new or substantially increased environmental effects than those analyzed in the EIR such that the EIR would require recirculation prior to its certification; and WHEREAS, the Clarifications to the Final EIR include detailed analysis, based upon substantial evidence, that demonstrate that the October Modified Project would not result in any new or substantially greater impacts than are disclosed in the EIR, no new mitigation measures beyond those identified in the EIR are required, and no additional feasible alternatives or mitigation measures considerably different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project; and WHEREAS, October 18, 2019, the City gave public notice of a Planning Commission public hearing for consideration of Environmental Impact Report No. 2018- 01 (State Clearinghouse Number #2018021031) by advertising in the Orange County Register a newspaper of general circulation, and on October 17, 2019 by mailing to owners of property and residents within 500 feet of the Project and posting on the project site; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for consideration of Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 (State Clearinghouse Number #2018021031), and Clarifications to the EIR, at which time all persons wishing to testify were heard and the Project was fully considered; and WHEREAS, the "EIR" consists of the Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, and all attachments and appendices to both the Final EIR and the Clarifications to the Final EIR, as well as the Draft EIR and its attachments and appendices (as modified by the Final EIR); and WHEREAS, all potentially significant adverse environmental impacts were sufficiently analyzed in the EIR; and WHEREAS, as contained herein, the Planning Commission has endeavored in good faith to set forth the basis for its decision and recommendations on the Project; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of the Public Resources Code and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City in connection with the preparation of the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Project have been adequately evaluated; and WHEREAS, all of the findings and conclusions made by the Planning Commission pursuant to this Resolution are based upon the oral and written evidence presented to it as a whole and the entirety of the administrative record for the Project, Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 6 of 10 which are incorporated herein by this reference, and not based solely on the information provided in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Project's significant environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level even with the incorporation of all feasible mitigation measures, as identified in the EIR, are described in Section 7 of the CEQA Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Project's environmental impacts that are less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation measures, as identified in the EIR, are described in Section 8 of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that environmental impacts that are identified in the EIR as less than significant and do not require mitigation are described in Section 9 of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the cumulative impacts of the Project identified in the EIR are described in Section 9.17 of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the potential significant and irreversible environmental changes that would result from the proposed Project identified in the EIR and set forth herein, are described in Section 10 of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as "Exhibit A"; and WHEREAS, the existence of any growth -inducing impacts resulting from the proposed Project identified in the EIR and set forth herein, are described in Section 11 of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, alternatives to the proposed Project that might further reduce the proposed Project's environmental impacts are described in Section 12 of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, prior to taking action, the Planning Commission has heard, been presented with, reviewed and considered all of the information and data in the administrative record, including but not limited to the EIR, and all oral and written evidence presented to it during all meetings and hearings; and WHEREAS, the EIR reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission and is deemed adequate for purposes of making decisions on the merits of the Project; and WHEREAS, no comments made in the public hearing conducted by the Planning Commission and no additional information submitted to the City have produced substantial new information requiring recirculation of the EIR or additional environmental review of the Project under Public Resources Code section 21092.1 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5: and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 7 of 10 WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred: and WHEREAS, the Applicant has agreed to and shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the Project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: The Planning Commission hereby finds that it has been presented with the EIR, which it has reviewed and considered, and further finds that the EIR is an accurate and objective statement that has been completed in full compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and that the EIR reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City. 2. The Planning Commission declares that no evidence of new significant impacts or any new information of "substantial importance", as defined by State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5, has been received by the City after circulation of the Draft EIR that would require recirculation of the EIR. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL: Adopt the Findings of Fact, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A." Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 8 of 10 2. Certify the EIR based on the entirety of the record of proceedings. 3. Adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", after balancing the significant and unavoidable aesthetic impacts of the Project against the benefits of the Project. 4. Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "C", consistent with Public Resources Code section 21081.6; make implementation of the Mitigation Measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program a condition of approval of the Project; and find that in the event of any inconsistencies between the Mitigation Measures set forth herein and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program shall control. 5. Direct City staff to cause a Notice of Determination to be filed and posted with the County of Orange Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and the State Clearinghouse within five (5) working days of the City Council's final Project approval. SECTION 1. EXECUTION OF RESOLUTION. The Chairperson shall sign this Resolution and the Planning Commission Recording Secretary shall attest and certify to the adoption thereof. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of October 2019. AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: Mark McLoughlin Chairperson APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 9 of 10 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, SARAH BERNAL, Recording Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on 12019. Date: Recording Secretary City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT A CEQA FINDINGS, FACTS IN SUPPORT OF FINDINGS FINAL EIR FOR THE MAGNOLIA AT THE PARK MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT STATE CLEARINGHOUSE No: 2018021031 City of Santa Ana: DP No. 2017-34 1.0 1.1 Statutory Requirements for Findings The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that written findings be made by the lead agency in connection with certification of an Environmental hnpact Report (EIR) prior to approval of the Project (Sections 15091 and 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21081 of the State of California Public Resources Code). CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 states: a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings are: 1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. 2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can or should be adopted by such other agency. 3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. b) The findings required by subdivision (a) shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. c) The finding in subdivision (a)(2) shall not be made if the agency making the finding has concurrent jurisdiction with another agency to deal with identified feasible mitigation measures or alternatives. The finding in subdivision (a)(3) shall describe the specific reasons for rejecting identified mitigation measures and project alternatives. d) When making the findings required in subdivision (a)(1), the agency shall also adopt a program for reporting on or monitoring the changes which it has either required in the project or made a condition of approval to avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental effects. These measures must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. e) The public agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other materials The CEQA Guidelines are codified in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing at section 15000. Resolution No. Page 1 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A which constitute the record of the proceedings upon which its decision is based. f) A statement made pursuant to Section 15093 does not substitute for the findings required by this section. CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 provides that: a) CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits of a proposed project, against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, or a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." b) When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final FIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final FIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section 15091. The City of Santa Ana, as lead agency, having received, reviewed and considered the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Magnolia at the Park Multi -Family Residential Project (currently known as "The Addington") (Project), the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), and the Clarifications to the Final FIR (Clarifications), SCH No. 2018021031, as well as all other information in the record of proceedings on this matter, hereby adopts the following Findings and Facts in Support of Findings (Findings) and Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC). These Findings set forth the environmental basis for the discretionary actions to be undertaken by the City of Santa Ana for the development and operation of the Project. This action includes the approval of the DEIR SCH No. 2018021031. 1.2 Organization/Format of Findings These Findings have been organized into the following sections: • Section 1.0: Introduction, provides the organization and records information for these Findings. • Section 2.0: Project Location, provides a summary of the location of the Project. • Section 3.0: Project Description, provides a summary of the Project, including an overview of the discretionary actions required for Project approval and a statement of the Project objectives. • Section 4.0: Discretionary Actions, provides a list of the discretionary approvals that are required by the Project. • Section 5.0: Statement of Project Objectives, provides the statement of objective sought by the Project. Resolution No. Page 2 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A • Section 6.0: Environmental Review and Public Participation provides a description of the CEQA process conducted for the Project. • Section 7.0: Significant Effects that Cannot be Mitigated to a Less than Significant Level, provides the Findings for the impacts that would remain significant and unavoidable after implementation of regulations that reduce impacts and project -specific mitigation measures. • Section 8.0: Effects Determined to be Mitigated to Below a Level of Significance, provides the Findings for impacts that can feasibly be mitigated to a less than significant level through implementation of regulations that reduce impacts, Project Design Features (PDFs), and mitigation measures. • Section 9.0: Effects Determined Not to be Significant, provides the Findings regarding the environmental impacts that were determined to be less than significant as a result of the Initial Study/Notice of Preparation (NOP) and/or analysis within the FIR. • Section 10.0: Significant Irreversible Environmental Change and Energy Use. • Section 11.0: Growth Inducing Effects, provides the Findings regarding the CEQA-required analysis for growth inducement. • Section 12.0: Alternatives, provides Findings regarding project alternatives. 1.3 Record of Proceedings For purposes of CEQA and these Findings, the Record of Proceedings for the Project consists of, but is not limited to, the following documents and other evidence, at a minimum: • The NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the Project • The DEIR, including all technical studies included in the appendices for the Project • All written comments submitted by agencies or members of the pubic during the public review comment period on the DEIR • The reports and technical memoranda included or referenced in the Response to Comments • All written and verbal public testimony presented during a noticed public hearing for the proposed Project • The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program • All documents, studies, EIRs or other materials incorporated by reference in the DEIR and FEIR including Clarifications • The Resolutions adopted by the City of Santa Ana in connection with the Project and all documents incorporated by reference therein • Matters of common knowledge to the City, including but not limited to federal, state and local laws and regulations • Any documents expressly cited in these Findings • Any other relevant materials required to be in the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code Section 21167.6(e) Resolution No. Page 3 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A • The Final FIR for the Project, including the "Clarifications to the Final EIR" 1.4 Custodian and Location of Records The documents and other material that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City of Santa Ana, Planning Division Counter at 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20 Santa Ana, California, 92701. The custodian for these documents is the City of Santa Ana. Copies of these documents which constitute the record of proceedings are and at all relevant times have been and will be available upon request at the City of Santa Ana. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(e). 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION The Project is located at 2525 North (N.) Main Street, in the northern portion of the City of Santa Ana approximately 500 feet east of Interstate (I)-5. The site is located on the northeast corner of N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. Regional access to the Project site is provided by 1-5 and the N. Main Street exit; and local access to the Project site is provided by N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. The Project site consists of 6 contiguous parcels that include Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 003-010- 028, 003-010-01, 003-010-03, 003-010-025, 003-010-026, 003-010-030 and is located within the U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) Orange County 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Quadrangle. 3.0 3.1 Originally Proposed Project As originally proposed and as described and analyzed in the FIR, the Project would redevelop the 5.9- acre Project site to provide 496 for -rent multi -family residential units. The residences would be provided within approximately 572,075 square feet of residential structures. The development would be 5 stories and be topped with mezzanines reaching approximately 65-feet 8-inches in height. The development would tier down to 2-stories (slightly over 20-feet in height) on the eastern portion of the site. The residential units would be wrapped around a 358,630 square foot central parking/fitness center/club room structure with a roofline of approximately 90 feet from the ground surface, which is the highest point of the Project. The Project would result in approximately 930,705 square feet of development and a density of 84 dwelling units per acre, and would provide a mix of studio, one -bedroom, two -bedroom, and three - bedroom units, as shown in Table 1. Table 1: Residential Unit Summary (Originally Proposed Project) Unit Type Number of Units Square Footage of Units Percentage' Studio 73 590 — 740 15% 1 Bedroom 307 610 —1,090 62% 2 Bedroom 88 910 —1,470 18% 3 Bedroom 28 1,360-1,520 6% Total 496 100% 'Rounded to the nearest percentage. As originally proposed and as described and analyzed in the FIR, the residential units would be setback a minimum of 40 feet from the cement block wall that forms the eastern Project site boundary and would be separated by 4 courtyards and landscaped areas. The central parking structure would have 9 levels of parking, one of which would be underground; thus, 8 levels of parking would be above ground. The Resolution No. Page 4 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A parking structure would provide direct access to the leasing office and walkways to residential units, a bicycle parking/sharing station, and 904 parking spaces, which is an average of 1.8 spaces per residential unit. The parking spaces would include 122 tandem spaces, 25 electric vehicle charging stations, and 21 spaces compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The parking structure would also provide direct access to the fitness center, club room, and amenity deck located on top of the western portion of the structure. As originally proposed and as described and analyzed in the EIR, the Project would provide open space and recreation facilities that includes approximately 34,300 square feet of exterior open space and recreation facilities and 6,960 square feet of indoor recreation facilities that would contain: 5 recreational courtyard areas, a rooftop amenity deck and fitness center on the roof of the parking structure, community room, and a wellness center. In addition, each residential unit includes a private patio or balcony area. The open space, recreation areas, and other amenities are listed in Table 2. Table 2: Summary of Project Open Space / Recreation Amenities (Originally Proposed Project) Open Space Approximate Square Footage Open Space Recreational Courtyards 1-5 22,900 Wellness Center 1,600 Community Room 4,700 Resident Services Business Center 3,900 Bicycle Repair Room 280 Dog Wash Room 40 Fitness Center 5,400 Amenity Deck (not including Fitness Center) 11,400 As originally proposed and as described and analyzed in the EIR, the Project would provide vehicular access via a driveway on N. Main Street that would guide vehicles to the parking structure that provides direct access to the residential units, guest parking, and the leasing office. The Project was also originally proposed to implement a secondary access from either Santiago Park (Option 13) or Edgewood Road (Option C). Additionally, separate emergency access would be provided from Edgewood Road by knoxbox-gated entrances and onsite emergency lanes that meet the City's Fire Code requirements. As originally proposed and as described and analyzed in the FIR, the Project would connect to the existing water, sewer, and drainage infrastructure in the N. Main Street and Edgewood Road right-of-ways. Water Infrastructure: The Project would install new water infrastructure on the Project site that would connect to the existing 16-inch water pipelines in N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. The new onsite water system would be compliant with the CalGreen Plumbing Code (Title 24) for efficient use of water. Wastewater Infrastructure: Wastewater from the Project site currently discharges into existing City -owned 6- and 12-inch sewer lines within Edgewood Road. The Project would install a new onsite sewer system that connects to the existing sewer lines in Edgewood Road. Drainage Infrastructure: Surface runoff from the site is conveyed within onsite curb and gutters to an existing catch basin in N. Main Street and sheet flows to an existing drain inlet at the south- west corner of the parking lot. In addition, sheet flows on the north side of the building flow to the existing 10-inch storm water drain that conveys unfiltered runoff to Santiago Creek. The Project would cap this existing 10-inch storm water drain. It would remain in place but would no longer Resolution No. Page 5 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A be used. All of the runoff from the site would be conveyed to infiltrating landscaping areas, catch basins, and storm water drains that would be installed as part of the Project and would be sized to meet the Project's needs. The onsite system would connect to the existing City drain system in N. Main Street and Edgewood Road, which discharges to Santiago Creek. 3.2 Modified Project Subsequent to the circulation of the Draft EIR and preparation of the Final EIR for the Project, the Project applicant submitted a revised development proposal to the City (Modified Project). The Modified Project proposes reducing the number of residential units by 48 percent, reducing the scale of the structures, surface level parking and revising the vehicular access to the site. Specifically, the Modified Project would development the Project site with 256 multi -family residential units surrounding a central parking garage. The residential units are proposed to be provided within approximately 277,281 square feet of residential structures that range between 2 and 4 stories in height. The 2-story residential structures (24- feet, 8-inches in height) would be located on the eastern portion of the site, and be setback a minimum of 90-feet from the eastern boundary of the site with the inclusion of a surface level parking lot. The 3-story residential structures (36-feet, 9-inches in height) would be located both behind the 2-story structures. The remainder of the residential structures would be 4-stories (49-feet, 5-inches in height). The setback of the building along the southern boundary (Edgewood Road) has been increased from 13 feet to approximately 134-feet, with inclusion of a surface parking lot. The residential units would be developed around a 167,253-square foot central parking structure that would have one level of parking underground and 5 levels of parking aboveground. The structure would be centrally located on the site, and be approximately 59-feet in height. The highest point of the Modified Project would be the top of the elevator tower to the amenity deck on top of the parking structure, which would be approximately 75 feet from the ground. Table 1: Proposed Project Modifications Project Characteristic Original Project (per EIR) ModifiedPro'ect Change Number of Units 496 units 256 units -240 units Density of Residential 84 units per acre 58 units per acre* -26 units per acre* Development Area Residential Unit Mix Studio: 73 units — 15% Studio: 74 units — 29% Studio: +1 units 1 bdr: 307 units — 62% 1 bdr: 103 units — 40% 1 bdr: -204 units 2 bdr: 88 units —18% 2 bdr: 75 units — 29% 2 bdr: -13 units 3 bdr: 28 units — 6% 3 bdr: 4 units — 2% 3 bdr: -24 units Residential Unit Sizes Studios: 590 — 740 SF Studios: 560 — 590 SF Average unit size is 1 bdr: 610 —1,090 SF 1 bdr: 630 — 930 SF smaller 2 bdr: 910 —1,470 SF 2 bdr: 910 —1,180 SF 3 bdr: 1,360 —1,520 SF 3 bdr: 1,360 SF Stories of Residential 2 to 5 stories with 2 to 4 stories -1 story Structures mezzanines Maximum Height of 65-feet 8-inches 49-feet 5-inches -16-feet 3-inches Residential Structures Height of Parking Structure 90 feet (7 above -ground 59 feet (5 above -ground -31 feet Roofline levels) levels) Highest Structure Fitness Center Roofline on Elevator Tower Roofline -15 feet 5 inches Western portion of the towards western portion Amenity Deck — 90 feet of site — 74 feet 5-inches. Resolution No. Page 6 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Project Characteristic Original Project erEIR ModifiedPro'ect Change Building Setback from 40 foot minimum 90 foot minimum +50 feet Eastern Side Boundary Building Setback from Between 10 feet and 13 feet 134 feet 6-inches +121 feet Southern Side Boundary 4 inches Size of Subterranean Parking 1 level 40,000 square feet 1 level 26,700 square feet -13,300 square feet Parking — Total 904 total spaces 511 spaces dedicated -393 dedicated spaces 691 including shared parking Spaces Per Unit 1.8 2.0 dedicated +0.2 dedicated 2.7 w/ shared parking +0.9 w/ shared arkin Tandem Spaces 122 0 -122 Electric Vehicle Spaces 1 25 15 -10 ADA Spaces 1 21 12 -9 Notes: bdr = bedroom, SF = square feet; w/ = with; w/o = without s not including the OC Discovery Cube sbared parking area of 1.42 acres As shown, the proposed Modified Project would reduce the development by 240 units; from 496 units to 256 units, a 48 percent reduction. The proposed Modified Project's residential structures would be one- story lower in height and eliminate mezzanines (approximately 16-feet lower), reduce the residential density by 26 units per acre, and be separated from the eastern side of the site by an additional 50 feet in increased setback when compared to the Project as originally proposed. The height of the centrally located parking structure would be reduced by approximately 31 feet and the highest point of the proposed structures would be 15 feet lower. The Modified Project would provide 12,920 square feet of exterior open space and recreation facilities; this is a reduction of 9,980 square feet from the 22,900 square feet of exterior open space that was included in the Original Project. The types of exterior recreational amenities proposed for the Modified Project are similar to those described in the FIR and includes 3 open space courtyards, and a rooftop amenity deck. The Modified Project also reduces interior amenities by 12,799 square feet, as a result of removing the originally proposed Wellness Center, Community Room, Resident Services/Business Center, Bicycle Repair Room, Dog Wash Room, and reducing the size of the Fitness Center. Consistent with the Original Project, the proposed Modified Project would provide vehicular access by a driveway on N. Main Street that would guide vehicles to the parking structure and provide direct access to the residential units, guest parking, and the leasing office. An optional access was proposed at the intersection of Walkie Way and Main Street. However, the Modified Project proposes to created a single shared access for Santiago Park and the Project. To do this the intersection of Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive will be redesigned. Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive will shift to the south creating an off -set intersection. Santiago Park and the Project will share access from the relocated street. The existing gated vehicular entry along Main Street to Santiago Park would be permanently closed. The proposed emergency access to the Project site would continue to be provided from Edgewood Road by a knoxbox gated entrance and onsite emergency lanes that meet the City's Fire Code requirements. 3.3 Project Design Features A reduction in the number of electric vehicle charging stations are proposed. The Original Project included at least 25 electric vehicle charging stations and the Modified Project includes at least 15 electric vehicle charging stations. No other changes in Project Design Features (PDFs) are proposed. The Project has been Resolution No. Page 7 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A designed to incorporate the following Project Design Features (PDFs) that would prevent or lessen potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the Project. These PDFs will be implemented in the same manner as mitigation measures. PDF-1: The landscape plan will incorporate the existing mature trees located along the eastern Project site boundary and to the extent feasible protect and preserve the existing mature trees within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary that were identified as healthy by the Arborist Report. PDF-2: The Project will include at least 15 electric vehicle charging stations. PDF-3: The Project will include installation and maintenance of air filtration systems with efficiencies equal to or exceeding a Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) 16 as defined by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 52.2 within all buildings. PDF-4: Outdoor trash receptacles will be provided throughout the common areas of the site, including the dog park area, for the tenants to dispose of their refuse in a proper manner. Property maintenance will provide trash and waste material removal, including dog feces disposal bags, to maintain a trash -free property. All wastes shall be collected and properly disposed of off -site. PDF-5: The Project will include safety design features for security, such as low -intensity security lighting, key pads for building access, security cameras, and 24-hour security personnel. 3.4 Construction Activities and Schedule The Project would be developed over an 18-month period, in one construction phase that includes the following stages: (1) demolition of existing building, pavement, removal of infrastructure and some landscaping; (2) grading and excavation; (3) construction of drainage, utilities, and subgrade infrastructure; (4) building construction; and (5) paving and application of architectural coatings. No units will be leased until construction of the entire Project is completed and occupancy permits have been received from the City. Construction activities would be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday and excluding Sundays and federal holidays, which would be consistent with the City's Noise Ordinance (Municipal Code Section 18-314; Special Provisions). However, typical construction activities would occur Monday through Friday, generally 20 days a month. Initial site preparation would include demolition of the existing building and several areas of asphaltic concrete pavements. Demolition would remove all subsurface remnants, including foundations, floor slabs, and any utilities that will not be reutilized with the new development. It is anticipated that a maximum of 120 construction workers would be onsite at one time, which would occur during the building construction phase. Resolution No. Page 8 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A 4.0 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS Implementation of the Project requires several actions by the City, including: Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2018021031). Certification of the Final FIR (SCH No. 201802103 1) evaluating the environmental impacts resulting from the Project, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), as amended (Pubic Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000 et seq.). The Final FIR provides additional environmental information to responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and other public agencies that may be required to grant approvals and permits or coordinate with the City as part of Project implementation. The Final FIR includes "Clarifications to the Final EIR" which describes the Modified Project and analyzes the potential of the Modified Project to result in new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. • General Plan Land Use Amendment. The Project requires City approval of General Land Use Amendment, which would change the General Plan Land Use designation of the Project area from PAO (Professional & Administration Office) to District Center (DC), which allows residential uses to a maximum density of 90 dwelling units per acre. Amendment Application for a Zone Change. The Project requires approval of an Amendment Application from the City for a zone change a c from Professional (P) to Specific Development (SD). The SD zone provides site specific development standards. • Development Agreement. To guide development and services as described in the Project Description previously pursuant to a contract between the City of Santa Ana and Project Applicant. 5.0 STATEMENT OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES The following objectives support the project's underlying purpose to develop multi -family residential uses on the project site and assist with meeting the City's housing needs: • Redevelop existing underutilized parcels to implement development of new high -quality housing. • Increase high -quality housing near existing employment centers. • Promote an improved jobs/housing balance by locating attractive new housing in proximity to employment centers. • Provide housing in close proximity to commercial areas, freeways, and transit. • Redevelop existing land uses that would utilize existing infrastructure, including: water, sewer, arterial roadways, transit, and freeways. • Implement capital investment to enhance the City's economic and fiscal viability pursuant to the City of Santa Ana Strategic Plan. • Provide a safe, high -quality, modern residential community with open space and various recreation amenities. Resolution No. Page 9 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION In conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City conducted an extensive environmental review of the Project. • The City circulated a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Initial Study for a 30-day public review period, which commenced on February 12, 2018, and ended on March 13, 2018. The NOP was distributed to all public agencies, trustee agencies, and the State Office of Planning and Research; posted in the OC Register, posted at the Orange County Clerk -Recorder's office and on the City's website; and provided for public review at the Santa Ana Public Library and at the City's Planning Division counter. • Based on the Initial Study and Environmental Check List Form (CEQA Guidelines Appendix G), the City staff determined that an EIR should be prepared for the Project. A scoping meeting was held during the NOP review period to allow public agencies, local residents, and interested persons an opportunity to review the Project and provide input on issues to be addressed in the FIR. The scoping meeting was held on March 1, 2018 from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. at the First Congressional Church of Santa Ana, located at 2555 Santiago Street. Notice of the scoping meeting was sent to state and local agencies, cities, individuals who expressed interest in the Project and notice of the meeting was also included in the Notice of Preparation. • The scope of the DEIR was determined based on the City's Initial Study, comments received in response to the NOP, and comments received at the scoping meeting conducted by the City. Section 2.4, Areas of Controversy of the DEIR summarizes the issues identified for analysis. • The DEIR was originally made available for a 45-day public review period from August 7, 2018 to September 20, 2018. The public review period was then extended to 59-days (an additional 2 weeks to October 4, 2018) in response to a request from the public. The Notice of Completion was sent to all interested persons, agencies, cities and organizations and notice posted at the Orange County Clerk -Recorder's office and in the OC Register. The Notice of Completion was also sent to the State Clearinghouse for distribution to additional public agencies. Copies of the DEIR were made available on the City's website at: http://santa- ana.org/pba/planning/2525mainresidentialdevelopment.asp, and at the following locations: o City of Santa Ana, Planning Division Counter, 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20, Santa Ana, CA 92701 o City of Santa Ana Public Library, 26 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 • On August 27, 2018, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to receive comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report. Notice of the meeting was posted in the OC Register and mailed to property owner and occupants within 500 feet. • On November 15, 2018, the City released the Final FIR which consists of the Draft FIR, all technical appendices prepared in support of the Draft EIR, all written comment letters received on the Draft FIR, written responses to all written comment letters received, revisions to the Draft FIR and technical appendices, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. • On November 26, 2018, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing for the project to January 14, 2019. • On January 14, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicit further comments on the FIR. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council not certify the EIR, adopt the findings, the Resolution No. Page 10 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A statement of overriding considerations and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program and deny the Project. • On February 5, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EK Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicit further comments on the FIR. The public hearing was continued to the next regular adjourned City Council meeting on February 19, 2019. • On February 19, 2019, the City Council continued a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicit further comments on the FIR. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted that the project be taken back to the Planning Commission after further consultation with staff, Applicant and community to address comments and concerns raised. • After further consultation with the public, the Applicant submitted the Modified Project to the City, which reduced the total number of proposed multi -family dwelling units to 256 and include surface level parking, and also reduced the Project's height, increased the Project's setbacks, and modified the Project entrance. • The City then prepared "Clarifications to the Final EIR" (October 2019) which included detailed analysis, based upon substantial evidence, that demonstrate that the Modified Project would not result in any new or substantially greater impacts than are disclosed in the EIR, no new mitigation measures beyond those identified in the EIR are required, and no additional feasible alternatives or mitigation measures considerably different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the Project. 7.0 SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE MITIGATED TO A LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVEL The City hereby finds that, despite the incorporation of Mitigation Measures identified in the FIR, in the and in this document, the following environmental impact cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level. A Statement of Overriding Considerations is therefore required. The following summary describes the adverse impacts of the Project that would remain significant and unavoidable after implementation of standard regulatory requirements, PDFs, and all feasible mitigation measures. 7.1 Aesthetics 7.1.1 Visual Character Threshold: Would the Project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Findings: Significant and Unavoidable. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-16 through 4.1-26.) Facts in Support of Finding: As described in Section 4.1, Aesthetics, of the DEIR, with implementation of the Project, views of the Project site from the adjacent Santiago Park area would change from setback views of the existing 2-story office building partially screened by mature landscaping to that of forefront views of the 5-story residential building, with a landscaped tree buffer directly adjacent to the park. This would result in a significant and unavoidable change in views of the Project site from the park. The difference in scale and height, due to the Project's location adjacent to the park, and limited visual setback buffer with the proposed landscaping, would result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property Resolution No. Page 11 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A setbacks that is considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria related to the visual character of the site in comparison to the park. Thus, the visual change in height, scale, and setbacks from Santiago Park would be significant and unavoidable. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-16 through 4.1-26.) In addition, implementation of the Project would result in a significant and unavoidable change in visual scale, height, and setbacks from Edgewood Road and N. Bush Street. The background views of urban buildings would become forefront views, and the proposed size and scale of the Project would substantially increase the overall visual density of the built environment. The difference in visual scale and height with the proposed structure adjacent to the roadway and limited of visual setback buffer, would be substantial and considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria. Thus, the visual change related to the height, scale, and setback from Edgewood Road and N. Bush Street would be significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-21.) The Project includes the following PDF that would reduce the visual impacts of the Project: • PDF-1: The landscape plan will incorporate the existing mature trees located along the eastern Project site boundary and to the extent feasible protect and preserve the existing mature trees within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary that were identified as healthy by the Arborist Report. (DEK p. 3-18.) In addition, Mitigation Measure AES-1 require measures be implemented to retain and protect the trees along the eastern and southern Project site boundary and would reduce these impacts. Mitigation Measure AES-I provides: Mitigation Measure AES-1: Construction plans and specifications shall state that the following measures shall be implemented by the construction contractor to protect the trees along the eastern Project site boundary and to the extent feasible protect and preserve the existing mature trees within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary that are planned for preservation during construction of the proposed Project pursuant to the 2018 Arborist Report: • If the wall along the eastern boundary of the Project site cannot be heightened in -place and must be replaced, it shall be reconstructed with a precast concrete fence or a wall without a continuous footing. • Before finalizing construction plans, a contractor with an AirSpade or AirKnife shall explore the locations adjacent to the preserved trees to locate large lateral roots. The root locations shall be marked, and a survey provided to update the construction plans to avoid cutting any significant large roots. The cutting of small roots shall be planned for late spring or winter and made with clean cuts. No pruning paint or sealants shall be used. • Any grade changes near the preserved trees or pruning of trees to provide clearances for construction equipment shall be coordinated with a Registered Consulting Arborist before construction begins, and precautions pursuant to the arborist's recommendations shall be taken to mitigate potential tree injuries. • Prior to construction, a one -pound soil sample shall be taken from the top 18-inches of soil in each area where trees will be preserved. The samples shall be sent to an appropriate laboratory for analysis and soil supplement recommendations. Fertilization of the preserved trees shall be completed pursuant to the laboratory analysis' soil supplement recommendations. • Prior to construction, augur 6-inch diameter holes about 3 feet deep at a 3-foot spacing between large roots in the more compacted and crowded spaces. Avoid large visible roots, relocating the Resolution No. Page 12 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A holes as needed. Start augur holes at three times the trunk diameter, i.e. 6-feet from a 24-inch tree. Back fill with amended soil, based on an agronomic lab's testing and recommendations. • Prior to construction, mulch all exposed soil areas using a topical application of a well -composted, coarse -texture mulch, without manure or bio-solids, e.g. Aguinaga Forest Floor'/2 to 1'/2" particle size. Apply it 2-inches deep, but not against the tree trunks. • Deep water before construction and check soil moisture monthly during construction by means of a soil test probe. Slow water with a soaker hose or water spike for 12 hours, or as long as necessary to reach 4-feet deep. • Rinse tree foliage at the end of each work week, using a strong stream of water from a high- pressure nozzle. • During construction in areas without pavement near the preserved trees, 3 or more inches of coarse mulch or tree chips under 1-inch plywood for light vehicle parking and steel plates for larger vehicles is required to prevent compaction and protect surface roots. • Protection Barrier: A protection barrier shall be installed around the trees to be preserved. The barrier shall be constructed of durable fencing material, such as chain link fencing. The barrier shall be placed as far from the base of the tree(s) as possible and shall be maintained in good repair throughout the duration of construction, and shall not be removed, relocated, or encroached upon without permission of the Project arborist. o Storage of Materials: There shall be NO storage of materials or supplies of any kind within the area of the protection barriers. Concrete and cement materials, block, stone, sand and soil shall not be placed within the drip -line of the tree. o Fuel Storage: Fuel storage shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of any tree to be preserved. Refueling, servicing and maintenance of equipment and machinery shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of the protected trees. o Debris and Waste Materials: Debris and waste from construction or other activities shall NOT be permitted within protected areas. Wash down of concrete or cement handling equipment, in particular, shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of protected trees. • Any damages or injuries should be reported to the Project arborist as soon as possible. Severed roots shall be pruned cleanly to healthy tissue, using proper pruning tools. Broken branches or limbs shall be pruned according to International Society of Arboriculture Pruning Guidelines and ANSI A-300 Pruning Standards. However, even with implementation of the PDF-I and Mitigation Measure AES-1, the Project would still result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks that is considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria. As a result, impacts related to existing visual character or quality of the site would be significant and unavoidable. (DEK pp. 4.1-16 through 4.1-26.) Consistent with the methodology in the FIR, photo -simulations were also prepared to demonstrate the degree of visual change that would result from implementation of the Modified Project. The photo - simulations show that, as described in the EK the Modified Project would alter the existing views by development of forefront residential buildings that would result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks that is considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria related to visual character from specific viewpoints. However, the Modified Project would be lower in height and smaller in scale than the Original Project. The contrast in views that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project is less than what would occur from the Original Project. Thus; although impacts related to specific viewpoints would remain significant and unavoidable, no new or greater impacts would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. (Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.1.) Resolution No. Page 13 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A 8.0 FINDINGS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS MITIGATED TO A LEVEL OF LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT. The City hereby finds that feasible Mitigation Measures have been identified in the DEIR and this Resolution that will avoid or substantially lessen the following potentially significant environmental impacts to a less than significant level. Compliance with existing laws, codes and statutes, PDFs, and the identification of feasible mitigation measures have reduced potential impacts to a level of less than significant as determined by the City. All of the PDFs and mitigation measures will be included in a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in order to ensure compliance with all conditions adopted by the City. Where potentially significant impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels through adherence to PDFs or existing regulations that reduce environmental impacts, the EIR and these Findings specify how those impacts were reduced to an acceptable level. The potentially significant impacts, and the Mitigation Measures that will reduce them to a less than significant level, are as follows: 8.1 Air Quality 8.1.1 Exposure of Substantial Pollutant Concentrations to Sensitive Receptors Threshold: Would the Project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.2-17 through 4.2-18.) Facts in Support of Findings: As detailed in the DEIR, the Project has the potential to exceed the SCAQMD's localized significance thresholds for emissions of PMto during construction activities. Therefore, SCAQMD Rules 403(4), 1113, and 1186 to reduce particulate matter and Mitigation Measure AQ-1 requiring the construction contractor to use off -road diesel construction equipment that complies with EPA/GARB Tier 3 emissions standards, would be implemented to reduce construction emissions below a level of significance. With implementation of SCAQMD Rules 403(4), 1113, and 1186 and Mitigation Measure AQ-I that would be confirmed through the City's permitting process for the Project, localized construction emissions of PMto would be below SCAQMD thresholds and reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure AQ-1: Construction plans and specifications shall state that the construction contractor shall use off -road diesel construction equipment that complies with EPA/GARB Tier 3 emissions standards and shall ensure that all construction equipment be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. With the implementation of the mitigation measure identified above (MM-AQ-1), the Project's impact in Air Quality would be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.2-17 through 4.2-18.) Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would generate air quality emissions from construction and operation of the proposed multi -family residential units. However, the same construction Resolution No. Page 14 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A mitigation would reduce impacts to a less than significant level and the Modified Project would constitute growth that is consistent with the AQMP. In addition, because the Modified Project is 48 percent smaller than the Original Project, it would result in fewer stationary source and vehicular related emissions. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final FIR, Section 3.2.) 8.2 Biological Resources 8.2.1 Movement of Fish or Wildlife Threshold: Would the Project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.3-3 through 4.3-4.) Facts in Support of Findings: Section 4.3, Biological Resources, of the DEIR identified that the Project could impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. The 180 mature ornamental trees on the Project site provide potentially suitable foraging and breeding habitat for nesting migratory birds and raptor species associated with urban areas such as red-tailed hawk, red -shouldered hawk, and Cooper's hawk. The Project includes removal of many of the existing trees on the Project site that could disrupt nesting birds and raptors if vegetation is removed or construction begins during the nesting season (February 1 to August 31). Disruption of migratory nesting birds and raptors is prohibited by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code. Therefore, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 is included to require a nesting bird survey to be conducted by a qualified biologist within 3 days prior any disturbance of the site during nesting season, including: vegetation removal, disking, demolition activities, and grading. With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1, potential impacts related to nesting birds and raptors would be reduced to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure BI0-1: Construction plans and specifications shall state that vegetation clearing during nesting season (February 1 through September 15) shall be avoided, if feasible. If avoidance of the nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified biologist shall be required to conduct a nesting bird survey within 3 days prior any disturbance of the site, including disking, demolition activities, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around nests at an appropriate distance that is a minimum of 250 feet for raptors and 100 feet for non -raptors. The buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied, and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. With the implementation of the mitigation measure identified above (MM-BIO-1), the Project's impact on Biological Resources would be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.3-3 through 4.3-4.) Consistent with the determinations of the FIR, the Modified Project would avoid potential impacts through implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 and compliance with the City's Municipal Code. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. Because the Modified Project increases the distance of the building footprint from nesting sites in the existing trees and Resolution No. Page 15 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A vegetation on site, it would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final EK Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.3.) 8.3 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 8.3.1 Accident Conditions Involving the Release of Hazardous Materials Threshold: Would the Project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous material into the environment? Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.6-7 through 4.6-8.) Facts in Support of Findings: Impacts related to hazards were evaluated in Section 4.6, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the DEIR. As described, due to the existence of hazardous materials within on - site soils, ground disturbing activity has the potential to result in the accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment. The contaminated soils would need to be excavated and removed as required by DTSC, California Integrated Waste Management Board, RWQCB, OCFA, and the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). As a result, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 has been required to reduce the potential risks related to accidental release and exposure of people and the environment to the contaminated soils. Due to the existence of hazardous materials within on -site soils, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 would be implemented to reduce the potential risks related to accidental release and exposure of people and the environment to these hazardous materials. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 requires that a qualified consultant prepare a Soil Management Plan (SMP) to be used by construction workers to remove and dispose of the areas of arsenic impacted soil. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 requires excavation of contaminated soils be completed pursuant to existing DTSC and RWQCB requirements, soils sampling ensure all contaminated soils are removed, and that a certified hazardous waste hauler remove and transport all arsenic impacted soil and other potentially hazardous materials per California Hazardous Waste Regulations to a landfill permitted by the state to accept hazardous materials. Excavated soil containing hazardous substances would be classified as a hazardous waste if they exhibit the characteristics of ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity (CCR, Title 22, Division 4.5, Chapter 11, Article 3). The SMP would detail hazardous materials excavation and disposal methods and requirements pursuant to the regulation of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations (CalOSHA) and Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) that regulates the removal, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste to protect human health and the environment. With implementation of Mitigation Measure Haz-1 impacts related to hazards of the onsite contaminated soils would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Soil Management Plan (SMP) shall be prepared by a qualified hazardous materials consultant and shall detail procedures and protocols for excavation and disposal of onsite hazardous materials, including: • A certified hazardous waste hauler shall remove all potentially hazardous soils. Excavation of contaminated soils shall be to the depth of approximately 0.5 feet below the existing ground surface in areas identified as having arsenic impacted soils. In addition, sampling of soil shall be conducted during excavation to ensure that all arsenic impacted soils are removed, and that residential Resolution No. Page 16 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for residential uses are not exceeded. Excavated materials shall be transported per California Hazardous Waste Regulations to a landfill permitted by the state to accept hazardous materials. • Any subsurface materials exposed during construction activities that appear suspect of contamination, either from visual staining or suspect odors, shall require immediate cessation of excavation activities. Soils suspected of contamination shall be tested for potential contamination. If contamination is found to be present per the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) or Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) ESLs for residential uses, it shall be transported and disposed of per California Hazardous Waste Regulations to an appropriately permitted landfill. • A Health and Safety Plan (HSP) shall be prepared for each contractor that addresses potential safety and health hazards and includes the requirements and procedures for employee protection. The HSP shall also outline proper soil handling procedures and health and safety requirements to minimize worker and public exposure to hazardous materials during construction. • All SMP measures shall be printed on the construction documents, contracts, and Project plans prior to issuance of grading permits. With the implementation of the mitigation measure identified above (MM-HAZ-1), the Project's potential impacts relating to hazards and hazardous materials would be less than significant. (DEK pp. 4.6-7 through 4.6-8.) Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would involve handling of hazardous materials and implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, which would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level such that no new or greater impacts related to hazardous materials would occur. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final EK Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.6.) 8.4 Noise 8.4.1 Noise Levels in Excess of Established Standards Threshold: Would the Project result in exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-10 through 4.8-13.) Facts in Support of Findings: The Project would not result in generation of noise levels in excess standards established by the City's Municipal Code. Per Section 18-314 (Special Provisions) of the City's Municipal Code noise sources associated with construction activities are exempt from the established noise standards as long as the activities do not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. The Project's construction activities would occur pursuant to these regulations. Thus, the Project would be in compliance with the City's construction related noise standards. Resolution No. Page 17 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A However, the Project has the potential to result in exposure of persons to noise levels in excess of relevant standards as a result of increased traffic -related noise. As discussed in the DEIR, traffic along the roadways near the Project site would generate noise that could exceed interior noise standards within some of the Project units. Thus, some of the residential units would require upgraded windows and sliding glass doors with increased Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings to meet the interior noise standards. As described in Section 4.8, Noise, of the DEIR, the residential units along N. Main Street would require upgraded windows and sliding glass doors with minimum STC ratings of between 27 and 30 to meet the interior noise standards. Mitigation Measure N0I-1 would ensure that the appropriate windows and doors are installed, which would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. (DEK pp. 4.8-10 through 4.8-13.) Mitigation Measure N0I-1: The Project plans and specifications shall include the following construction requirements to be implemented and verified prior to provision of occupancy permits: • Windows/Glass Doors: Residential units adjacent to N. Main Street (all floors) require upgraded windows and sliding glass doors (all windows/doors on all floors) with minimum STC ratings of 30; and all other buildings require standards windows and sliding glass doors with a minimum STC rating of 27. • Exterior Doors (Non -Glass): Exterior doors facing N. Main Street (all floors) require upgraded exterior doors with minimum STC ratings of 30 and shall be well weather-stripped; and all other residential building exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped and have minimum STC ratings of 27. Well -sealed perimeter gaps around the doors are essential to achieve the optimal STC rating. • Walls: At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtight seal. • Ventilation: Residential exterior vents shall be oriented away from I-5 and N. Main Street. If such an orientation cannot be avoided, then an acoustical baffle shall be placed in the attic space behind the vents. With the implementation of the mitigation measure identified above (MM-NOI-1), the Project's potential impacts relating to noise levels would be less than significant. (DEK pp. 4.8-10 through 4.8-13.) Consistent with the Original Project, the construction generated by the Modified Project would generate temporary noise and vibration that would require mitigation to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Also, due to the location of the proposed residential units, mitigation is required to ensure that interior noise is within City standards. With implementation mitigation identified in the FIR, potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final EK Clarifications to the Final FIR, Section 3.8.) 8.4.2 Groundborne Vibrations Threshold: Would the Project result in exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Resolution No. Page 18 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-16 through 4.8-17.) Facts in Support of Findings: Construction activities for of the Project would generate short-term vibration levels that would exceed the distinctly perceptible vibration standard at receiver locations within 50 feet of large bulldozers usage. Therefore, Mitigation Measure NOI-2 is included to prohibit the use of large mobile equipment (greater than 80,000 pounds) and loaded trucks within 50 feet of the residences to the east of the Project site. With implementation of this measure, vibration impacts at the nearby sensitive receptors would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure N0I-2: The Project plans and specifications shall include the following requirements: • Large loaded trucks and mobile equipment, such as bulldozers (greater than or equal to 80,000 pounds) shall not be used within 50 feet of the eastern boundary of the Project site. Instead, smaller, rubber -tired mobile equipment (less than 80,000 pounds) or equivalent alternative equipment shall be used within this area during Project construction. • All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the Project site. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receivers nearest the Project site during all construction. With the implementation of the mitigation measure identified above (MM-NOI-2), the Project's potential impacts relating to groundborne vibration and noise levels would be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.8- 16 through 4.8-17.) Consistent with the Original Project construction activities for of the Modified Project would generate short-term vibration levels that would exceed the distinctly perceptible vibration standard at receiver locations within 50 feet of large bulldozers usage. Therefore, like the Original Project, Mitigation Measure NOI-2 would be required to reduce vibration impacts to a less than significant level. No new or greater impacts related to vibration would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. (Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.8.) 8.4.3 Temporary Increase in Ambient Noise Threshold: Would the Project result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project? Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-22 through 4.8-24.) The City hereby makes Finding 2 that "changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment." Mitigation Measure NOI-3 has been included to minimize and/or avoid the Project's potential impacts relating to temporary increases in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity. Resolution No. Page 19 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Facts in Support of Findings: Construction of the Project would generate short-term periodic increases in ambient noise levels at sensitive receptors in the Project vicinity. With implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-2, noise from operation of large mobile construction equipment (greater than 80,000 pounds) and loaded trucks would be reduced; and Mitigation Measure NOI-3 is included to require installation of a temporary noise barrier that would be a minimum 11-feet high, constructed of frame - mounted materials such as vinyl acoustic curtains or quilted blankets, and attached to the masonry wall along the eastern Project site boundary or temporary fence posts. In addition, due to the location of existing sensitive receptors, Mitigation Measures NOI-2 and NOI-3 would require a 50-foot setback for use of large mobile construction equipment and require installation of a temporary noise barrier, which would reduce the temporary and intermittent increase in noise from construction to a less than significant level. With implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI-2 and NOI-3 temporary and periodic construction noise level increases at receiver locations would be reduced to below the 10 dBA Leq temporary noise level increase threshold. Therefore, with implementation of mitigation, impacts related to periodic temporary increases in noise would be less than significant. To ensure that the Project's potential impacts relating to temporary increases in ambient noise levels are mitigated to a less than significant level, in addition to Mitigation Measure NOI-2, discussed above, the following mitigation measure has been identified: Mitigation Measure N0I-3: The Project plans and specifications shall include the requirement to install a minimum 11-foot high temporary construction noise barrier along the Project site eastern boundary for the duration of Project construction. The noise control barriers shall have a solid face from top to bottom and shall meet the following height and constructed requirements: • The temporary noise barrier shall provide a minimum transmission loss of 20 dBA (Federal Highway Administration, Noise Barrier Design Handbook). The noise barrier shall be constructed using an acoustical blanket (e.g. vinyl acoustic curtains or quilted blankets) attached to the construction site perimeter fence or temporary fence posts. • The noise barrier shall be maintained, and any damage promptly repaired. Gaps, holes, or weaknesses in the barrier or openings between the barrier and the ground shall be promptly repaired; • The noise control barrier and associated elements shall be completely removed, and the site appropriately restored upon the conclusion of the construction activity. With the implementation of the mitigation measures identified above (MM-NOI-2 and MM-NOI-3), the Project's potential impacts relating to temporary increases in ambient noise levels would be less than significant. (DEH2, pp. 4.8-16 through 4.8-17.) The Modified Project would involve the same types of construction equipment that would be operated in similar locations as the Original Project. However, the building setback along the eastern side of the project site would be 50 feet greater. Thus, construction of building structures would be farther from the residences located to the east of the Project site. However, consistent with the Original Project, Mitigation Measures NOI-2 and NOI-3 would be required to prohibit the use of large mobile equipment and loaded trucks within 50 feet of the residences to the east of the Project site and install a temporary noise barrier to reduce the temporary increase in ambient noise to a less than significant level. No new or greater impacts Resolution No. Page 20 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A related to temporary construction noise would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. (Final FIR, Clarifications to the Final FIR, Section 3.8.) 8.5 Tribal Cultural Resources 8.5.1 Impact on Significant Tribal Cultural Resource Threshold: Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code section 5024.1? Finding: Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. (DEIR, pp. 4.12-4 through 4.12-5.) Facts in Support of Findings: The Project site has been heavily disturbed to substantial depths in various portions of the Project site. The Project involves excavation and no substantial evidence exists that tribal cultural resources are present in the Project site. However, during the SB 18/AB 52 consultation, the Gabrieleho Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation stated that the Project lies within its ancestral tribal territory within a sensitive area. Therefore, to avoid potential adverse effects to unknown tribal cultural resources, Mitigation Measure TCR-I has been included to provide for Native American resource sensitivity training and to prescribe activities should any inadvertent discoveries of tribal cultural resources be unearthed by Project construction activities. Additionally, California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered at the Project site, disturbance of the site shall halt and remain halted until the coroner has conducted an investigation. If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR-1 and the existing regulations, impacts to tribal cultural resources would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Inadvertent Discoveries. The Project's grading and construction plans and specifications shall state that prior to commencement of any excavation activities, a Native American shall be contacted to conduct a Native American Indian Sensitivity Training for construction personnel. The training session includes a handout and focus on how to identify Native American resources encountered during earthmoving activities and the procedures followed if resources are discovered. In the event that tribal cultural resources are inadvertently discovered during ground -disturbing activities, work must be halted within 50 feet of the find until it can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist in cooperation with a Native American monitor to determine if the potential resource meet the CEQA definition of historical (State CEQA Guidelines 15064.5(a)) and/or unique resource (Public Resources Code 21083.2(g)). Construction activities could continue in other areas. If the find is considered a "resource" the archaeologist, in cooperation with a Native American monitor shall pursue either protection in place or recovery, salvage and treatment of the deposits. Recovery, salvage and treatment protocols shall be developed in accordance with applicable provisions of Public Resource Code Section 21083.2 and State CEQA Guidelines 15064.5 and 15126.4. If unique a tribal Resolution No. Page 21 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A cultural resource cannot be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state, recovery, salvage and treatment shall be required at the Project Applicant's expense. All recovered and salvaged resources shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation in an established accredited professional repository. With the implementation of the mitigation measure identified above (Mitigation Measure TCR-1), the Project's potential impacts relating to temporary increases in ambient noise levels would be less than significant. (DEH2, pp. 4.12-4 through 4.12-5.) Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would involve excavation and disturbance of onsite soils and Mitigation Measure TCR-1 would be required to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. With Mitigation Measure TCR-I no new or greater impacts related to tribal cultural resources would occur. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final FIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.12.) 9.0 FINDINGS REGARDING LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS NOT REQUIRING MITIGATION Consistent with Public Resources Code section 21002.1 and section 15128 of the CEQA Guidelines, the FIR focused its analysis on potentially significant impacts, and limited discussion of other impacts for which it can be seen with certainty there is no potential for significant adverse environmental impacts. CEQA Guidelines section 15091 does not require specific findings to address environmental effects that an EIR identifies as "no impact" or a "less than significant" impact. Nevertheless, the City hereby findsonsistent with Chapter 4.0, Environmental Setting and Impact Analysis, of the DEIR and the Initial Study (Appendix A of the DEIR�--that the Project would either have no impact or a less than significant impact to the following resource areas: 9.1 Aesthetics 9.1.1 Scenic Vistas Threshold: Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.1-9 through 4.1-16.) Facts in Support of Findings: The Project site and surrounding areas are urbanized and do not contain any sensitive scenic vistas. (DEIR, p. 4.1-3, 4.1-9.) Moreover, as described in Section 4.1, Aesthetics of the DEK implementation of the Project would change the character of the site to more closely align with the General Plan Scenic Corridors Element designation as a Major City Entry and the Urban Design Element identification of the site as within the Main Street Concourse node. Additionally, it would align with the Scenic Corridors Element designation of Santiago Creek as an Inter -City Corridor. Hence, the Project would result in a substantial change, but this change would not result in an adverse effect to a scenic vista, and impacts related to a scenic vista would be less than significant. This conclusion also Resolution No. Page 22 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.1.2 Scenic Resources within State Scenic Highways Threshold: Would the Project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway and/or local scenic road? Finding: No impact. (Initial Study, pp. 14-15.) Facts in Support of Finding: There are no officially designated state highways or County -designated scenic highways in the vicinity of the proposed Project. (Initial Study, pp. 14-15.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.1.3 Light and Glare Threshold: Would the proposed Project create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? Finding: Less than significant impact. (Initial Study, pp. 15-16.) Facts in Support of Finding: All outdoor lighting would be hooded, appropriately angled away from adjacent land uses, and would comply with the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 8-210 and Section 41- 611.1 that provides specifications for shielding lighting away from adjacent uses and relate to intensity of security lighting. (Initial Study, p. 15.) Moreover, the Project would be required to comply with the City's lighting regulations and such compliance would be verified during the permitting process. The lighting increase in light that would be generated by the Project would not adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area and would be less than significant. (Initial Study, pp. 15-16.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.2 Agriculture and Forest Resources 9.2.1 Farmland Conversion Threshold: Would the Project result in the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural land use? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 18.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is developed for urban uses and located in an area that is completely developed for urban uses. The Project site and vicinity are void of agricultural uses and the Project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use because no important farmland exists within the Project site and the site is designated as Urban and Built -Up land. (Initial Study, p. 18.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.2.2 Agricultural Zoning Resolution No. Page 23 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Threshold: Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 18.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site and vicinity is void of agricultural uses. No agricultural zoning is located in the vicinity of the Project area and no parcels within the Project vicinity have Williamson Act contracts. The Project would not conflict with a Williamson Act contract. The Project site also does not contain any lands that are subject to Williamson Act contracts, either active or in nonrenewal. (Initial Study, p. 18.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.2.3 Forestland Zoning Threshold: Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 18.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not conflict with existing zoning, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g)) because no forest land or timberland exists within the Project site and the Project site is zoned for Professional (P) uses. (Initial Study, p. 18.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.2.4 Loss of Forest Land Threshold: Would the Project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non - forest use? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 18.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site and vicinity is void of forestland or timberland. (Initial Study, p. 18.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.2.5 Conversion Threshold: Would the Project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Finding: No impact. (DEK p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 18.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion forest land to non -forest use because there is no existing farmland or forest land within or adjacent to the Project site. No other changes to the existing environment would occur from Resolution No. Page 24 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A implementation of the Project that could result in conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use of forest land to non -forest use. (Initial Study, p. 18.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.3 Air Quality 9.3.1 Applicable Air Quality Plans Threshold: Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 4.2-14.) Facts in Support of Finding: As discussed in the DEIR, Projects that are consistent with the regional population, housing, and employment forecasts identified by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are considered to be consistent with the AQMP. Here, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the SCAQMD's 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which is the applicable air quality plan for the Project, because the Project is consistent with SCAG's population, housing, and employment forecasts. Notably, the 496 new multi -family units resulting from the Project would constitute a 0.6 percent increase in the total number of residential units in the City, and a 2 percent increase in the number of the multi -family residential units (5+ units) within the City. The Project's multi -family units would be within the SCAG projected growth. The housing added by the Project would also help to meet housing demands from projected employment growth in the City while maintaining a healthy vacancy rate. (DEK pp. 4.2-14 through 4.2-15.) Moreover, the Santa Ana and City of Orange areas are jobs -rich. The existing jobs -housing ratio is 2.06 in Santa Ana and is projected to be 2.13 in 2040. The Project would reduce the jobs -housing ratio slightly to 2.05; and to 2.11 in 2040, as shown in Section 4.9, Population and Housing, of the DEIR. The balance of jobs and housing and the bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure implemented by the Project would reduce vehicle miles traveled and the related air quality emissions, as employees could easily travel to employment opportunities within the Santa Ana and City of Orange areas. Thus, the Project would support AQMP objectives to reduce trips, promote infill development, and balance jobs and housing, and would not conflict with implementation of the AQMP. (DEIR, p. 4.2-15.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Further still, as discussed in the DEIR, the Project would not exceed any air quality standards. (DEH2, p. 4.2-15.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.3.2 Air Quality Standards Threshold: Would the Project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.2-15 through 4.2-16.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. As detailed in DEIR Section 4.2, Air Quality, the maximum daily construction and operational emissions would not exceed any of SCAQMD's daily Resolution No. Page 25 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A significance thresholds. Thus, the construction and operation of the Project would not result in a violation of an air quality standard or substantially contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. (DEIR, p. 4.2-15 through 4.2-16.) Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would generate air quality emissions from construction and operation of the proposed multi -family residential units. However, the same construction mitigation would reduce impacts to a less than significant level and the Modified Project would constitute growth that is consistent with the AQMP. In addition, because the Modified Project is 48 percent smaller than the Original Project, it would result in fewer stationary source and vehicular related emissions. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final FIR, Clarifications to the Final FIR, Section 3.2.) 9.3.3 Cumulative Increase of Criteria Pollutant Threshold: Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.2-16 through 4.2-17.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (DEIR, p. 4.2-16 through 4.2-17.) SCAQMD's cumulative air quality methodology provides that if an individual project results in air emissions of criteria pollutants that exceed the SCAQMD's daily thresholds for project -specific impacts, then the project would also result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutant(s) for which the project region is in non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. As shown in the DEIR, implementation of the Project would not exceed SCAQMD's applicable thresholds. Therefore, impacts related to a cumulatively considerable net increase of a criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non -attainment would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.2-16 through 4.2-17.) Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would generate air quality emissions from construction and operation of the proposed multi -family residential units. However, the same construction mitigation would reduce impacts to a less than significant level and the Modified Project would constitute growth that is consistent with the AQMP. In addition, because the Modified Project is 48 percent smaller than the Original Project, it would result in fewer stationary source and vehicular related emissions. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.2.) 9.3.4 Objectionable Odors Threshold: Would the Project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Resolution No. Page 26 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 22.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. The Project must comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which seeks to prevent odor nuisances (Initial Study, p. 22.) Moreover, odors resulting from the temporary construction of the Project are not likely to affect a substantial number of people due to the fact that construction activities do not usually emit offensive odors. Additionally, the Project would only involve residential uses, which are not land uses that are typically associated with the generation of objectionable odors such as large commercial or industrial uses. (Initial Study, p. 22.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.4 Biological Resources 9.4.1 Candidate, Non -listed Sensitive, or Special -Status Animal and Plant Species Threshold: Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.3-4.) Facts in Support of Finding: As described in DEIR Section 4.3, Biological Resources, the Project site and adjacent Santiago Park areas consist of developed or ornamentally landscaped areas that do not contain native habitat, special -status habitat, or special -status plants and none are expected to occur due to a lack of suitable habitat. As described by the DEIR, the site could be used by one special -status wildlife species, the western mastiff bat, that has a low potential to roost in the large trees and palms. However, its typical habitat involves conifer and deciduous woodlands, coastal scrub, grasslands, and chaparral, which do not occur on the Project site, within Santiago Park, or in the adjacent areas. Therefore, potential impacts to the western mastiff bat from implementation of the Project would be less than significant. No other candidate, sensitive, or special status species have the potential to occur on or adjacent to the Project site. Therefore, impacts from implementation of the proposed Project would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.3-4.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.4.2 Riparian Habitat Threshold: Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Finding: No hnpact. (DEIR, pp. 4.3-4 through 4.3-5.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site and adjacent areas do not contain native habitat or special - status habitat, including riparian habitat, wetlands, or other sensitive natural community. Therefore, the Project would not result in impacts related to these types of biological resources. (DEIR, pp. 4.3-4 through 4.3-5.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Resolution No. Page 27 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A 9.4.3 Wetlands Threshold: Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Finding: No Impact. (DEK p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 24.) Facts in Support of Finding: Wetlands are defined under the federal Clean Water Act as land that is flooded or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that normally does support, a prevalence of vegetation adapted to life in saturated soils. Wetlands include areas such as swamps, marshes, and bogs. The Project area is developed and does not contain natural wetlands. While Santiago Creek is located approximately 130 feet to the north of the Project site, the creek area is separated from the Project site by a roadway within Santiago Park, and the Project would not extend into the park area. Therefore, the Project would not result in impacts to wetlands. (Initial Study, p. 24.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.4.4 Local Policies and Ordinances Protecting Biological Resources Threshold: Would the Project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Finding: No Impact. (DEK p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 24) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. Trees in the public right-of-way in Santa Ana are protected under Chapter 33, Article VII of the Municipal Code, which regulates the planting, maintenance, and removal of trees in public locations in Santa Ana. The Project would not remove any existing healthy street trees, and the additional street trees installed by the Project would be planted in compliance with the Municipal Code regulations. Moreover, the existing ornamental trees on the Project site are on private property and are not subject to the Municipal Code regulation. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not conflict with local polices or ordinances protecting trees and no impact would occur. (Initial Study, p. 24) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.4.5 Adopted Habitat Conservation Plans Threshold: Would the Project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Finding: No Impact. (DEK p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 25) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site does not contain any lands that are subject to an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Therefore, the Project would not result in impacts to biological habitat plans. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.5 Cultural Resources Resolution No. Page 28 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A 9.5.1 Historical Resources Threshold: Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.4-9 through 4.4-15) Facts in Support of Finding: As described in DEIR Section 4.4, Cultural/Historic Resources, the Project would not impact any historic resources. The DEIR describes the viewsheds of the properties listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties near the Project site as already significantly affected by urban and modern structures that are taller than the Project's tallest structure, the proposed 8-level above ground parking structure. As a result, the setting has changed and no longer provides an aesthetic sense of a particular period of history. The Historic Review, referenced in the DEIR, also describes that tall trees throughout Park Santiago screen views toward the Project site, and that many of the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties in Park Santiago are not within the viewshed of the Project site. Overall, as detailed in the Historic Review referenced in the DEIR, due to the existing built environment, location of the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties, and the existing viewsheds, the integrity of the historic setting and feeling aspects of properties in Park Santiago would not be reduced by construction of the proposed Project. Accordingly, a reduction in the historic significance of the properties would not occur from implementation of the Project. (DEIR, p. 4.4-9 through 4.4-15) Due to the reduced height and scale of the Modified Project, the existing built environment, and location of the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties, the integrity of the historic setting and feeling aspects of properties in Park Santiago would not be reduced by implementation of the Modified Project. Thus, consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would not result in a reduction in the historic significance of properties. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.4.) 9.5.2 Archaeological Resources Threshold: Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, pp. 26-27.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site has been disturbed various times for different uses and developments. This includes excavation to depths for installation and removal of the previous gas station tanks, and septic tanks, and utility lines from previous developments in the southern portion of the site. In addition, the Property Condition Report referenced in the Initial Study describes that the foundation of the existing building in the northern portion of the site is developed on a 4-inch thick concrete slab on top of 24-inch diameter, 20-36-foot-deep piles. Thus, previous excavation in the area of the existing building reaches 20-36 feet deep, and excavation in other areas of the site were deep enough to provide for utilities, septic tanks, and gasoline tanks. Also, as described in the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation prepared for the site (referenced in the Initial Study), up to 5.5 feet of fill soils were observed in soil borings. Due Resolution No. Page 29 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A to the extent and depth of previous ground disturbances throughout the site, the potential for archaeological resources to be on site is low. hi addition, the Project is anticipated to involve grading and excavations to depths of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface, which would not extend below previous excavations into native soils. As a result, potential impacts related to archaeological resources would be less than significant. (Initial Study, pp. 26-27.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.5.3 Paleontological Resources or Geologic Feature Threshold: Would the Project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 27) Facts in Support of Finding: Soils beneath the subject site are mapped as Quaternary Alluvium deposited by the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek. Quaternary alluvial materials in Orange County are assigned a low paleontological resource sensitivity due to their relatively recent age. As described above, the Project site has been extensively disturbed to various depths across the site, and the Project will involve grading and excavations to depths of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface, which would not extend below previous excavations into native soils. As a result, potential impacts related to paleontological resources would be less than significant. (Initial Study, p. 27). In addition, the Project site is developed with a building, parking areas, and landscaping, and no unique geologic feature exists on the Project site. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.5.4 Human Remains Threshold: Would the Project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 27) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site has been extensively disturbed, as described above, and has not been previously used as a cemetery. Thus, impacts related to human remains are less than significant. However, in the unanticipated event that human remains are found during Project construction activities, compliance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 will ensure that human remains will be treated with dignity and as specified by law, which will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. As specified by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, if human remains are found on the Project site, the County Coroner's office shall be immediately notified and no further excavation or disturbance of the discovery or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code 5097.98. If the Coroner recognizes the remains to be Native American, he or she shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC will make a determination as to the Most Likely Descendent. Ultimately, compliance with the existing California Health and Safety Code regulations will ensure impacts related to potential disturbance of human remains are less than significant. (Initial Study, p. 27) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6 Geology and Soils Resolution No. Page 30 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A 9.6.1.1 Exposure to Potential Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death — Earthquake Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 29-30) Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of the Project would have no impact related to the exposure of people or structures to the rupture of a known earthquake fault. There are no Alquist-Priolo fault zones or other faults mapped on or adjacent to the Project site. The closest major active faults are the Elsinore Fault Zone, which is 10 miles northeast of the Project site, and the Newport -Inglewood -Rose Canyon Fault Zone, which is located 10 miles to the southwest. Thus, the Project will not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects from rupture of a known earthquake fault that is delineated on an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map or any other known fault. (Initial Study, pp. 29-30) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6.1.2 Exposure to Potential Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death — Seismic Ground Shaking Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving strong seismic ground shaking? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 30) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is located within the seismically active region of Southern California. The principal seismic hazard that could affect the site is ground shaking resulting from an earthquake occurring along several major active or potentially active faults in Southern California. As discussed above, the closest active faults are the Elsinore Fault and the Newport -Inglewood -Rose Canyon Fault Zone that are both located approximately 10 miles from the Project site. Movement along these faults, or other regional faults, could result in seismic ground shaking on the Project site. However, structures built in the City are required to be built in compliance with the California Building Code (CBC [California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2]), as included in the City's Municipal Code as Chapter 8, Article 2, Division 1, which regulates all building and construction Projects within the City and implements a minimum standard for building design and construction that includes specific requirements for seismic safety, excavation, foundations, retaining walls and site demolition. Because the Project must be constructed in compliance with the CBC and the City's Municipal Code, which would be verified through the City's plan check and permitting process, the proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact related to strong seismic ground shaking. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6.1.3 Exposure to Potential Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death — Seismic -Related Ground Failure, Including Liquefaction Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? Resolution No. Page 31 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 30-31) Facts in Support of Finding: Soil liquefaction is a phenomenon in which saturated, cohesionless soil layers, located within approximately 50 feet of the ground surface, lose strength due to cyclic pore water pressure generation from seismic shaking or other large cyclic loading. During the loss of stress, the soil acquires "mobility" sufficient to permit both horizontal and vertical movements. Soil properties and soil conditions such as type, age, texture, color, and consistency, along with historical depths to ground water are used to identify, characterize, and correlate liquefaction susceptible soils. Soils that are most susceptible to liquefaction are clean, loose, saturated, and uniformly graded fine-grained sands that lie below the groundwater table within approximately 50 feet below ground surface. Lateral spreading is a form of seismic ground failure due to liquefaction in a subsurface layer. The California Geological Survey Seismic Hazard Zones Orange Quadrangle map shows the Project site is within a liquefaction zone. However, exploratory borings at the Project site identified groundwater at approximately 110 feet below the ground surface, and borings on the Project site did not encounter groundwater to the maximum depth of 85 feet that was explored. Likewise, the groundwater wells that are located near the Project site identify groundwater levels at 110 feet below the ground surface and 143 feet below the ground surface. In addition, borings on the Project site in 2017 identified that soils consist of silty fine to medium sands with local layers of fine to coarse sands with gravel size rock and some larger rock fragments, which are not the uniform fine-grained sand that typically liquefies. In addition, the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation (Geo 2017) prepared for the Project site conducted liquefaction analysis and determined that thin layers of onsite soils have the potential for liquefaction; however, these soils are confined by less permeable soils that would prevent the manifestation of liquefaction. Thus, because the groundwater level is far below 50 feet below the ground surface and soils are not uniformly graded fine-grained, the potential for liquefaction and related lateral spreading or ground failure to occur on the Project site is low. In addition, as described above, the proposed Project would be required to be constructed in compliance with the CBC and the City's Municipal Code, as detailed in the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation (Geo 2017) prepared for the Project site, which would be verified through the City's permitting process. (Initial Study, pp. 30-31) For the aforementioned reasons, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to liquefaction, lateral spreading, and ground failure. (Initial Study, pp. 30-31) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6.1.4 Exposure to Potential Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death — Landslides Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving landslides? Finding: No impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 31) Facts in Support of Finding: Landslides and other slope failures are secondary seismic effects that are common during or soon after earthquakes. Areas that are most susceptible to earthquake induced landslides are steep slopes underlain by loose, weak soils, and areas on or adjacent to existing landslide deposits. As described above, the Project site is located in a seismically active region subject to strong ground shaking. However, the Project site is not located within or adjacent to an earthquake -induced landslide area. (Initial Study, p. 31.) In addition, the Project site is located in a flat developed urban area Resolution No. Page 32 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A that does not contain or is adjacent to large slopes, and the Project would not generate large slopes. Furthermore, as stated in the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation prepared for the Project site, the Project site is not at risk for earthquake induced landslides. For the foregoing reasons, implementation of the Project would not expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects involving landslides, and impacts related to landslides would not occur. (Initial Study, p. 31.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6.2 Soil Erosion Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 31-32.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is largely impervious, as it is generally covered by pavement or the building structure. However, small areas of landscaping exist within the parking area, along the site boundary, and adjacent to the existing building. The Project would redevelop the site for multi -family residential uses, which would include areas of landscaping that would surround the proposed structures and be located along the site boundary, similar to the areas of landscaping that currently exist. The new paved areas and landscaping from the Project would not result in soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. In addition, Section 18-156 of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code states that all significant redevelopment within the City, such as the Project, shall be undertaken in accordance with the County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). The DAMP requires construction sites to implement control practices that address erosion and sedimentation (DAMP Section 8.0). Additionally, the Statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for General Construction Activity requires implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), by a Qualified SWPPP Developer. The SWPPP is required to be consistent with the County DAMP, address site -specific conditions related to sources of sediment, and implement erosion control and sediment control Best Management Practices to reduce or eliminate sediment during construction. The Project is required to adhere to a City approved SWPPP, which would be verified prior to the issuance of a demolition or grading permit; this will ensure that potential erosion associated with construction activities would constitute a less than significant impact. (Initial Study, pp. 31-32.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6.3 Soil Stability Threshold: Would the Project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 32.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site does not contain unstable soils or unstable geologic units. As discussed above, the Project site is located in a flat, developed urban area that does not contain, and is not adjacent to, large slopes; moreover, the Project would not generate large slopes. Accordingly, impacts related to landslides would not occur as a result of the Project. Also, as discussed above, the depth to groundwater and the types of soils onsite result in a low potential for liquefaction and related lateral spreading or ground failure. In addition, as further discussed above, the Project would be required to have building foundations and pavement areas and must be constructed in compliance with the CBC and the Resolution No. Page 33 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A City's Municipal Code, which requires appropriate back fill, compaction of soils, and foundation design to ensure stable soils. For the aforementioned reasons, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to unstable soil or geologic units. In addition, the Project is not located on a geological unit or soil that would become unstable as a result of subsidence. Subsidence is a general lowering of the ground surface over a large area that is generally attributed to lowering of the groundwater levels within a groundwater basin. Subsidence or settlement of the ground can occur as a result of earthquake motion in an area where groundwater in a basin is lowered. Because the Project does not involve groundwater pumping, impacts related to subsidence will not occur as a result of the Project. (Initial Study, p. 32.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6.4 Soil Expansion Threshold: Would the Project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 32-33.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not be located on expansive soil. Expansive soils contain certain types of clay minerals that shrink or swell as the moisture content changes. As described above, the Project site soils consist of silty fine to medium sands with local layers of fine to coarse sands with gravel size rock and some larger rock fragments, which have a low expansion potential. (Initial Study, p. 32.) In addition, as noted above, the Project would be required to have building foundations and pavement areas constructed in compliance with the CBC and the City's Municipal Code, which requires appropriate back fill, compaction of soils, and foundation design to ensure stable soils. Thus, the Project's impacts related to expansive soils would be less than significant. (Initial Study, p. 33.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.6.5 Septic Tanks Threshold: Would the Project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 33.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is currently connected to the City's sewer system, and the Project would also connect to existing sewers and would not use septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. As a result, impacts related to septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems would not occur from implementation of the Project. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 9.7.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Threshold: Would the Project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Resolution No. Page 34 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.5-9 through 4.5-10.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not generate significant amounts of GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that would have a significant impact on the environment. As further detailed in the DEIR, construction and operation of the Project would generate greenhouse gas emissions that are below the SCAQMD's threshold for greenhouse gas emissions. (DEIR, pp. 4.5-9 through 4.5-10.) In particular, as detailed in the DEIR, the Project's total net annual GHG emissions would be approximately 4.30 metric tons per year per service population, which would be less than the SCAQMD Tier 4 Option 3 threshold of 4.80 metric tons per year per service population. (DEIR, pp. 4.5-9 through 4.5-10.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Consistent with the determinations of the EIR, the Modified Project would generate GHG emissions from construction and operation of the proposed multi -family residential units. However, because the Modified Project is 48 percent smaller than the Original Project it would result in fewer stationary source and vehicular related GHG emissions. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final EK Clarifications to the Final EIR, Section 3.5.) 9.7.2 Conflict with Applicable Plan, Policy, or Regulation Threshold: Would the Project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gasses? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.5-10 through 4.5-13.) Facts in Support of Finding: As detailed in the DEIR, the Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. Indeed, the Project is consistent with the AB 32 Scoping Plan, SB 375, and the Santa Ana Climate Action Plan. Moreover, the Project would comply with state and federal programs that are designed to improve energy efficiency and reduce GHG emissions, including the California Title 24, California Energy Code, and the CALGreen Code. In complying with these measures and standards (including Title 24 standards relating to insulation, use of energy -efficient heating, ventilation and air condition equipment, solar -reflective roofing materials, energy -efficient indoor and outdoor lighting systems, reclamation of heat rejection from refrigeration equipment to generate hot water, among other things), the Project would be implementing regulations that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Also, Project Design Feature PDF-2 would provide a minimum of 25 electric vehicle charging stations to promote usage of electric vehicles. For these reasons, and as further detailed in the DEIR, the Project would be consistent with existing plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. (DEIR, p. 4.5-10 through 4.5-13.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Consistent with the determinations of the EIR, the Modified Project would generate GHG emissions from construction and operation of the proposed multi -family residential units. However, because the Modified Project is 48 percent smaller than the Original Project it would result in fewer stationary source and Resolution No. Page 35 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A vehicular related GHG emissions. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final FIR, Clarifications to the Final FIR, Section 3.5.) 9.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 9.8.1 Hazardous Materials Sites Threshold: Would the Project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 36.) Facts in Support of Finding: Operation of the Project includes activities related to the multi -family residential uses of the Project, which involve use of hazardous materials including solvents, cleaning agents, paints, pesticides, batteries, fertilizers, and aerosol cans. These types of materials are not acutely hazardous and would only be used and stored in limited quantities within the Project area. The normal routine use of these hazardous materials products pursuant to existing regulations set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) that include Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) (Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 261.4) would not result in a significant hazard to people or the environment in the vicinity of the Project. Therefore, the Project would not result in a significant hazard to the public or to the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous waste, and impacts would be less than significant. (Initial Study, p. 36.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.8.2 Hazards within One -Quarter Mile of an Existing or Proposed School Threshold: Would the Project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEM, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 36.) Facts in Support of Finding: The closest existing school to the Project site is the Hoover Elementary School, which is located approximately 0.5 miles away from the Project site at 408 East Santa Clara Avenue. Thus, the Project site is not within one -quarter mile of a school and impacts would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 36.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.8.3 Site Location Threshold: Would the Project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Resolution No. Page 36 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 36-37.) Facts in Support of Finding: Neither the Project site nor any adjacent properties are included on the list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 36-37.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.8.4 Public Airports Threshold: For a Project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 37.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within 2 miles of an airport. The closest airport to the Project site is John Wayne Airport, which is located over 6 miles to the south of the Project site. In addition, the Fullerton Municipal Airport is located approximately 9.35 miles to the northwest of the Project site. Therefore, the Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area. (Initial Study, p. 37.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.8.5 Private Airstrips Threshold: For a Project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 37.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip and would not result in safety hazards related to an airstrip. (Initial Study, p. 37.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.8.6 Emergency Response Plans Threshold: Would the Project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 37.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Direct access to the Project site is, and will continue to be, provided from N. Main Street (to the south) and Edgewood Road (to the east), which are adjacent to the Project site. In addition, fire lanes are proposed for the northern and western boundaries of the Project site. Resolution No. Page 37 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Construction activities would occur within the Project site and would not restrict access of emergency vehicles to the Project site or adjacent areas. In addition, travel along surrounding roadways would remain open and would not interfere with emergency access in the site vicinity. Moreover, the Project must comply with Section 503 of the California Fire Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Part 9) and the City of Santa Ana Fire Code included as Municipal Code Chapter 14. As such, for the reasons discussed herein and in the Initial Study, the Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and impacts would be less than significant. (Initial Study, p. 37.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.8.7 Wildland Fires Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Finding: No impact. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 38.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is located within an urban developed area and is not located within an identified wildland fire hazard area and is not an area where residences are intermixed with wildlands. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEK p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 38.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9 Hydrology and Water Quality 9.9.1 Water Quality Standards Threshold: Would the Project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 40.) Facts in Support of Finding: Section 18-156 of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code states that all new development and significant redevelopment within the City shall be undertaken in accordance with the County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). Accordingly, both construction and operational Best Management Practices (BMPs) would be required to be implemented as part of permitting of the Project. Adherence to a City -approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that includes Low Impact Development (LID) features, which would be verified prior to the issuance of a demolition or grading permit, would ensure that potential water quality degradation associated with construction and operational activities would be minimized to a level of less than significance. For the foregoing reasons and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 40-41.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Resolution No. Page 38 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A 9.9.2 Groundwater Supplies Threshold: Would the Project substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 41.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or lowering of the local groundwater table level. The Project site does not currently provide for groundwater recharge. Moreover, the Project will not result in a substantial increase in impervious surfaces, and thus groundwater recharge would not be affected. Furthermore, groundwater within the Project region is managed by the Orange County Water District (OCWD). To ensure the Basin is not overdrawn, OCWD monitors water levels and recharges the Basin with local and imported water. Continued management of the groundwater basin by OCWD will ensure that substantial depletion of groundwater supplies would not occur. (Initial Study, p. 41.) For the foregoing reasons and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 41.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9.3 Drainage Pattern Threshold: Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 41.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site does not include a stream, river, creek, or other water body, and will not alter the course of any such body of water in a manner that would result in erosion or siltation. The closest body of water is the Santiago Creek, which is located approximately 130 feet to the north of the site within Santiago Park; Santiago Park would not be disturbed by the Project. Moreover, the Project would not substantially alter the drainage pattern onsite. The Project would cap the existing drain to the creek and provide infiltration basins in the northern portion of the Project area. The remainder of the site would have the same type of onsite drainage that currently exists. The Project thus would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern on the site or in the area. Moreover, as to construction activities that would involve excavation and grading of soils, Section 18-156 of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code states that all significant redevelopment within the City, such as the Project, shall be undertaken in accordance with the DAMP, which requires construction sites implement control practices that address erosion and sedimentation. Additionally, the Statewide NPDES Permit for General Construction Activity requires implementation of a SWPP that is required to be consistent with the DAMP and implement erosion control and sediment control BMPs to reduce or eliminate erosion during construction. Adherence to a City approved SWPPP, which would be verified prior to the issuance of a demolition or grading permit, would ensure that potential erosion associated with construction activities would be minimized. (Initial Study, pp. 41-42.) Resolution No. Page 39 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A For the foregoing reasons and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 41-42.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9.4 Flooding Threshold: Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off -site? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 42.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site does not include a stream, river, creek, or other water body. The closest water body is the Santiago Creek, which is located approximately 130 feet to the north of the site within Santiago Park, and would not be disturbed by the Project. The Project site is largely impervious, as it is generally covered by pavement or the building structure. Redevelopment of the site would provide for a similar amount of impervious surface; thus, the rate or amount of surface runoff would not substantially increase with implementation of the Project. In addition, the Project includes redevelopment of the existing onsite drainage system to provide infiltration basins, storm drains, and catch basins that would retain and filter runoff prior to discharge into the existing storm drains in N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. Thus, the Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern on the site or in the area, or substantially increase the rate or amount of runoff that could result in flooding. For the foregoing reasons and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 41-42.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9.5 Water Runoff Threshold: Would the Project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, pp. 42-43.) Facts in Support of Finding: As discussed above, the Project site is largely impervious, and redevelopment of the site would not substantially increase impervious areas, such that an increase in runoff would occur. In addition, the Project would redevelop the existing onsite storm water drainage system, which would convey runoff from buildings and paved areas to infiltration basins, storm drains, and catch basins that would retain and filter storm water prior to discharge into the existing storm drains in N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. Overall, redevelopment of the Project site would not result in an increase in runoff that would exceed the capacity of the existing City storm drain system. For the foregoing reasons and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 41-42.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Resolution No. Page 40 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A 9.9.6 Degradation of Water Quality Threshold: Would the Project otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, pp. 40-43.) Facts in Support of Finding: For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, the Project would not otherwise substantially degrade water quality. (Initial Study, pp. 41-42.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9.7 Flood Hazard Area Zones Threshold: Would the Project place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 43.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) for the Project site and vicinity (FEMA FIRM number 06059C0163) shows that the site is shown adjacent to, but not part of, a 100-year flood zone associated with Santiago Creek (Zone AE21). The Project site is identified on the FEMA map as "Zone X" and is not depicted within a 100- or 500- year flood zone. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 43.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9.8 Structures That Impede or Redirect Flows Threshold: Would the Project place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? Finding: No impact. (DEM, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 43.) Facts in Support of Finding: As discussed above, the Project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area, and it will not place any structure within a 100-year flood hazard area. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 43.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9.9 Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death as a Result of Flooding Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 43.) Resolution No. Page 41 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of the Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a dam. As shown in the General Plan Public Safety Element, Exhibit 4, the Project site is not located within the dam inundation area. Moreover, the site is located 130-feet up -gradient from Santiago Creek, which is generally dry, unless conveying storm flows. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 43.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.9.10 Inundation by Seiche, Tsunami, or Mudflow Threshold: Would the Project have significant effects relating to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 43.) Facts in Support of Finding: A seiche—a surface wave created when a body of water is shaken by earthquake activity is not likely to impact the Project area. The Geotechnical Engineering Investigation prepared for the Project site provides that no bodies of water are close enough to the Project site to result in a sieche impact. Therefore, no seiche impacts would occur. (Initial Study, p. 43.) A tsunami is not likely to impact the Project area since the Project area is approximately 11.5 miles from the Pacific Ocean, outside of the Tsunami Hazard Zone identified by the California Emergency Management Agency. Therefore, impacts related to tsunamis would not occur. (Initial Study, p. 43.) A mudflow is a landslide composed of saturated rock debris and soil with a consistency of wet cement. The Project area is flat and not near any hillsides that could be susceptible to mudflow. Thus, no mudflow impacts would occur. (Initial Study, p. 43.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 43.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.10 Land Use and Planning 9.10.1 Divide a Community Threshold: Would the Project physically divide an established community? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 44.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is developed with a vacant two-story office building that was used by the Wells Fargo bank. The site is adjacent to the south and the east by a single-family residential community, the north by a park, and by a museum and motel to the west across N. Main Street. Implementation of the proposed Project would change the site from an office building to multi -family residential uses, which would extend the residential uses in the community. The existing residential community would not be physically divided by the Project. Rather, the Project would be located at the Resolution No. Page 42 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A edge of the residential community and would extend the community. In addition, the Project would redevelop only the Project site and would not change roadways or areas outside of the Project site. Thus, the Project would result in less than significant impacts related to physical division of an established community. (Initial Study, p. 44.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 44.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.10.2 Conflict with Plans Threshold: Would the Project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, pp. 4.7-16 through 4.7-34.) Facts in Support of Finding: As discussed in Section 4.7, Land Use and Planning, of the DEIR, the Project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The Project would be consistent with the SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Notably, the Project would implement many of the SCAG policies related to high -density, infill development, improvement of the job/housing balance, and use of green building measures, such as water efficiency and Low Impact Development features. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not result in conflict with SCAG policies, and impacts would not occur. Regarding General Plan designations, the Project would require a General Plan Land Use Amendment to change the land use designation from PAO (Professional & Administration Office) to District Center (DC) to allow for the proposed multi -family uses. The General Plan Land Use Element states that DC designation includes the major activity areas in the City and that District Centers are to be developed with an urban character. The proposed DC designation is consistent with the existing DC land uses to the north of Santiago Park and to the southwest across the I-5 freeway. The General Plan also designates the site as the Main Street Concourse node. The proposed DC land use designation and the Project would implement the Main Street Concourse node designation by providing an architecturally cohesive development with a maximum structure height of 90 feet from the ground surface (height intensive) within a regional activity center. The General Plan identifies that the Project is within the Main Street at I-5 Freeway Gateway (Figure 10 of the Urban Design Element) and provides that gateways are located at the City's entry points to help define boundaries and enhance the City's identity, while reinforcing a sense of place. The proposed DC land use designation, along with the proposed height, architecture, and landscaping of the development Project would provide distinctive features that reinforce the sense of place already provided by the Discovery Cube and numerous other urban structures along N. Main Street. Thus, the Project would align with the General Plan's intent for the Main Street at I-5 Freeway Gateway. In addition, although the development under the proposed DC designation would result in a different type Resolution No. Page 43 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A and higher intensity of residential units than the adjacent LR-7 designated Park Santiago neighborhood area, the Project provides a transition through wall heights, landscaping, building plan, and an eastern setback, such that the taller multi -family structures, vehicle parking, and circulation are not sited adjacent to single -story single-family residences. Also, designating lands for multi -family residential uses would be more consistent with the adjacent single-family residential uses, than the existing office uses because high density residential land uses adjacent to low density residential land uses have more similar and consistent activities than office building uses adjacent to low density residential. Furthermore, the proposed land use designation change from PAO to DC would not conflict with a policy or plan adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The Project would also be consistent with the relevant goals, policies, and objectives of the City's General Plan that avoid or mitigate environmental impacts, and impacts related to conflict with a General Plan policy related to an environmental effect would be less than significant. The Project includes a zone change that would change the existing zoning designation change from P (Professional) to a Specific Development (SD) to implement the proposed multi -family residential project. As required by the Zoning Code, the Project's development plans would be reviewed by the City to ensure consistency with development standards. Furthermore, the SD zoning designation would be consistent with the existing SD zoned areas to the north beyond Santiago Park and to the west across N. Main Street. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not result in an impact related to conflict with a plan or policy adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, pp. 4.7-16 through 4.7-34.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.10.3 Habitat Conservation Plans Threshold: Would the Project conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 46.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is developed and located within an urban and developed area. The project site is not subject to an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Thus, impacts related to such a plan would not occur from the Project. (Initial Study, p. 46.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 46.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.11 Mineral Resources 9.11.1 Known and Locally Important Resources Threshold: Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Resolution No. Page 44 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Threshold: Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 47.) Facts in Support of Finding: No active mining operations exist in the City of Santa Ana. The mapping by the California Geological Survey does not indicate that any significant mineral deposits are present within the City. The Project area is developed with urban office uses and has no history of mining. Implementation of the Project would not cause the loss of availability of mineral resources valuable to the region or state. Moreover, the Project site and its surrounding vicinity is not in or near a mining site identified by the City of Santa Ana General Plan. (Initial Study, p. 47.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 47.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.12.0 Noise 9.12.1 Long Term Noise Threshold: Would the Project result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.8.17 through 4.8-22.) Facts in Support of Finding: While the Project's operation would generate some traffic -related noise, such noise would not constitute a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project. Pursuant to the Noise Impact Analysis (Exhibit H to the DEIR), the Project would generate an increase of less than one dBA CNEL on the study area roadway segments, which is less than the relevant threshold. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEK p. 4.8.17 through 4.8-22.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.12.2 Public Airports Threshold: For a Project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? Finding: No Impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, pp. 49-50.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within 2 miles of an airport. The closest airport to the Project site is John Wayne Airport, which is located over 6 miles to the south of the Project site. In addition, the Fullerton Municipal Airport is located approximately 9.35 miles to the northwest of the airport. Therefore, the Project would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels related to airports. (Initial Study, pp. 49-50.) Resolution No. Page 45 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 49-50.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.12.3 Private Airstrips Threshold: For a Project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? Finding: No Impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 50.) Facts in Support of Finding: The proposed Project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip and would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels related to an airstrip. (Initial Study, p. 50.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 50.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.13 Population and Housing 9.13.1 Population Growth Threshold: Would the Project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.9-7 through 4.9-10.) Facts in Support of Finding: As described in Section 4.9, Population and Housing, of the DEIR, the Project would not induce substantial population growth. SCAG anticipates a population increase of 8.4 percent by 2040 or an average annual increase of 0.4 percent throughout the County. The anticipated population that would result from the Project would be 0.28 percent of the City's population, and thus, within the projected population growth. Similarly, SCAG anticipates the number of housing units would increase 6.3 percent or an average annual increase of 0.3 percent through 2040. Thus, the 496 new multi- family units would also be within the SCAG projected growth. Furthermore, the infrastructure improvements needed to serve the Project would be sized to specifically serve the development and excess capacity would not be developed that could generate additional growth. Thus, impacts related to growth would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.9-7 through 4.9-10.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.9-7 through 4.9-10.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.13.2 Displacement of Housing Threshold: Would the Project displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Resolution No. Page 46 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 51.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is currently developed for office uses and is void of any existing residential development. As such, the Project would not displace any existing housing and would not result in the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 51.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.13.3 Displacement of Persons Threshold: Would the Project displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Finding: No impact. (DEK p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 51.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project is currently developed for office uses and does not include any residential uses. The Project would replace the existing office building with multi -family residential uses. The Project would not displace any residents and would not result in the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Moreover, the Project's portion of the cumulative increase in residential units is 9.9 percent, and the remainder of the cumulative projects would generate over 90 percent of the cumulative increase. Thus, the Project's contribution to the cumulative growth in housing is limited. Furthermore, the total cumulative housing growth from all of the cumulative projects identified in the DEIR would equal 7.4 percent, which is consistent with SCAG growth estimates that anticipate an 8.4 percent increase. Thus, cumulative impacts related to population and housing would be less than significant. The cumulative addition of housing within the Santa Ana and City of Orange N. Main Street corridor area would have a favorable effect on the jobs -housing balance, which could reduce environmental effects of long commute trips, such as air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 51.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.14 Public Services As described in Section 4.10, Public Services, of the DEIR, the Project would not result in adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered service facilities. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.14.1 Fire Protection Services Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order Resolution No. Page 47 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection services? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.10-4 through 4.10-5.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is within 2.5 miles of 4 existing fire stations and the Project would not result in the need to construct a new fire station or expand an existing station. In addition, Chapter 8-46 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code requires a fire facilities fee be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of buildings exceeding 2 stories in height, such as the Project. The purpose of the fire facilities fee is to improve fire stations in the City and provide revenue for equipment needed to fight fires in buildings over 2 stories in height. The Project would be required to provide funding to assist in improvement of existing fire facilities and provision of needed equipment. implementation of the Project would not require new or physically altered fire department facilities. (DEIR, p. 4.10-4 through 4.10-5.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.10-4 through 4.10-5.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.14.2 Police Services Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for police protection? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.10-8 through 4.10-9.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would result in an incremental increase in demands on law enforcement services but would not be significant when compared to the current demand levels. The residential population of the Project would be approximately 0.27 percent of the City's population and based on the Police Department's 2016 staffing of 1.04 officers per thousand population, the Project would require less than one additional officer. In addition, the Police Department headquarters are 2.5 miles from the Project and within response distance. Furthermore, typical police operations within the Department's Northeast District deploys coverage to be able to respond to calls from services throughout the area. The addition of one officer on patrol would not require the construction or expansion of the City's existing policing facilities. Therefore, the Project would not result in the need for new or physically altered police protection facilities. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEK p. 4.10-8 through 4.10-9.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.14.3 Education Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or a need for new or physically altered Resolution No. Page 48 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8; Initial Study, p. 54.) Facts in Support of Finding: As described in the Initial Study, the Project is required to pay fees for the provision of school services pursuant to state law AB 2926. This fee would contribute to a fund that would pay for new or expanded buildings, faculty, or equipment. Under state law, payment of school impact fees constitutes mitigation for school facility impacts of projects and such payments are deemed to provide full and complete school facilities mitigation. (Initial Study, p. 54.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 54.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.14.4 Parks Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.10-12 through 4.10-13.) Facts in Support of Finding: As described in Section 3.0, Project Description, the Project includes 34,300 square feet of onsite exterior open space and recreation facilities that includes 5 recreation courtyard areas that total 22,900 square feet and an 11,400-square foot amenity deck on the roof of the parking structure. In addition, interior recreation facilities include a 5,397-square foot fitness center and a 1,566 square foot wellness pavilion. These onsite amenities are anticipated to meet many of the park and recreation needs of Project residents. The new residential population that would be generated from the Project is also anticipated to utilize existing off -site park and recreation facilities. There is currently 93.8 acres of Santa Ana parkland within 3-miles of the Project site. Based on the existing amount of park and recreation facilities in the vicinity of the Project site, the recreation facilities that would be provided as part of the Project, and the number of residents at full capacity of the Project, the Project is not anticipated to require the provision of new or physically altered park facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios. In addition, the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 35-108 requires that residential development fees be paid for the acquisition, construction, and renovation of park and recreation facilities to preserve an appropriate balance between the demand by residents for use of park and recreational facilities and the availability of such facilities. Thus, by payment of the required park fees, the Project would provide funding to offset any increased usage at other park and recreation facilities. Overall, the Project would not result in substantial physical deterioration of park and recreation facilities. (DEIR, p. 4.10-12 through 4.10-13.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEK p. 4.10-12 through 4.10-13.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Resolution No. Page 49 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A 9.14.5 Existing Recreational Facilities Threshold: Would the Project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.10-13 through 4.10-14.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would provide onsite open space and recreational facilities for residents, which is anticipated to reduce the Project's impact on off -site recreational facilities. Moreover, based on the existing amount of park and recreational facilities in the Project site's vicinity, the recreational facilities that would be provided as part of the Project, and the anticipated number of residents at the Project, the Project is not anticipated to increase the use of existing parks and recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would be accelerated. In addition, the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 35-108 requires that residential development fees be paid for the acquisition, construction, and renovation of park and recreation facilities to preserve an appropriate balance between the demand by residents for use of park and recreational facilities and the availability of such facilities. Thus, by payment of the required park fees, the Project would provide funding to offset any increased usage at other park and recreation facilities. Overall, the Project would not result in substantial physical deterioration of park and recreation facilities For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.10-13 through 4.10-14.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.14.6 New Recreational Facilities Threshold: Does the Project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.10-14.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project includes recreational facilities that would be constructed and operated as part of the proposed Project. In addition, access Option B includes repaving the Walkie Way entrance to Santiago Park and the addition of landscaping that includes trees and ground cover in the park and Project site entrance. The impacts of development of the recreational amenities and access options are considered part of the impacts of the Project as a while and are analyzed throughout the various sections of the DEIR. Moreover, the Project would not require the construction or expansion of other recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.10-14) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.14.7 Other Public Facilities Resolution No. Page 50 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for other public facilities? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8; Initial Study, pp. 54-55.) Facts in Support of Finding: As described in the Initial Study, other public facilities include libraries. The City of Santa Ana Public Library includes two branches within 5 miles of the site. Library service needs are changing with increasing resources being available online and the availability of high-speed internet services and the new residences on the Project site do not necessarily result in an incremental need for library facilities. A majority of the residential units would be equipped with internet access, which provides access to many of the same resources provided by the library and would limit the increased need for library services and resources. (Initial Study, pp. 54-55.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 54-55.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.15 Transportation and Traffic 9.15.1 Conflict with Applicable Circulation Plan or with Applicable Congestion Management Program Threshold: Would the Project conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Threshold: Would the Project conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 4.11-12 through 4.11-32.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, including the Orange County Congestion Management Program, Caltrans Measures of Effectiveness, City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, and the City of Orange General Plan Circulation Element. Based on the thresholds identified in these plans, the Project would result in a less than significant impact, as further explained in the DEIR. Notably, the vehicular trips that would be generated by the Project would not cause an exceedance of any traffic level of service threshold at any intersection or roadway segment. (DEK p. 4.11-12 through 4.11-32.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEM, p. 4.11-12 through 4.11-32.) Resolution No. Page 51 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A To evaluate the potential traffic impacts related to the Modified Project, a Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis (included as Attachment B to the Clarifications to the Final FIR) was prepared and peer reviewed by a City -selected independent traffic engineer and the City's traffic engineering staff. The Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis evaluates operation of 278 multi -family units, which is 22 more units than the Modified Project that consists of 256, and therefore, provides an overstated and conservative analysis of potential impacts. The analysis determined that the Modified Project would develop 48 percent fewer residential units than the Original Project, which would result in 79 fewer a.m. peak hour trips, 96 fewer p.m. peak hour trips, and 1,186 fewer daily trips than the Original Project. Thus, no new impacts related to the volume of vehicular trips would occur from the Modified Project. Additionally, the Modified Project would implement changes to the Main Street and Walkie Way intersection geometries that would result in less than significant impacts to study area intersections, roadway segments, and vehicle queues; which is consistent with the impacts of the Original Project as detailed in the EIR. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated FIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. (Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final FIR, Section 3.11.) 9.15.2 Air Traffic Patterns Threshold: Would the Project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8, Initial Study, p. 58.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project does not propose any uses that would affect air traffic patterns or air traffic levels. No portion of the Project would change air traffic patterns by extending into airspace. The closest operating airport is over 6 miles south of the Project site. The Project would not result in a change in air traffic patterns. (DEIR, p. 2-8, Initial Study, p. 58.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEK p. 2-8, Initial Study, p. 58.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.15.3 Design Feature Hazards Threshold: Would the Project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, pp. 4.11-33.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not result in hazards related to a design feature or incompatible use. The Project driveways include direct access to the parking structure, and access from N. Main Street would be restricted to right -turn ingress/right-turn egress to provide for safe and effective circulation. As noted in the Traffic Impact Analysis referenced in the DEIR, motorists entering and exiting the Project site would be able to do so comfortably, safely, and without undue congestion. Moreover, and as noted by the Traffic Impact Analysis, the neighborhood intersections and roadway have adequate capacity to support the Project. (DEIR, pp. 4.11-33.) Resolution No. Page 52 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, pp. 4.11-33.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.15.4 Emergency Access Threshold: Would the Project result in inadequate emergency access? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8; Initial Study, pp. 58-59.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not result in inadequate emergency access. Direct access to the Project site is, and will continue to be, provided from N. Main Street and Edgewood Road, which are adjacent to the Project site. In addition, fire lanes for emergency access are proposed for the northern and western boundaries of the Project site. Construction activities would occur within the Project site and would not restrict access of emergency vehicles to the Project site or adjacent areas. In addition, travel along surrounding roadways would remain open and would not interfere with emergency access in the site vicinity. Moreover, the Project is required to design and construct internal access to conform to OCFA standards to ensure adequate emergency access pursuant to the requirements in Section 503 of the California Fire Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Part 9) and the City of Santa Ana Fire Code included as Municipal Code Chapter 14. (Initial Study, pp. 58-59.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 58-59.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.15.5 Alternative Transportation Threshold: Would the Project conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8; Initial Study, pp. 58-59.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project and would not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting public transit, bicycle, pedestrian or other alternative transportation systems. Notably, the Project would not conflict with existing bus routes or sidewalks, and it would implement new onsite sidewalks to connect to offsite sidewalks and onsite bicycle facilities. (Initial Study, p. 59.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 59.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.16.1 Utilities and Service Systems 9.16.1 Wastewater Treatment Requirements Threshold: Would the Project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Resolution No. Page 53 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEK p. 2-8; Initial Study, pp. 63-64.) Facts in Support of Finding: The multi -family residential land uses proposed by the Project are not anticipated to discharge wastewater that contains harmful levels of toxins that are regulated by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and all effluent would comply with the wastewater treatment standards of the RWQCB. (Initial Study, pp. 63-64.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. 63-64.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.16.2 New Infrastructure and Adequate Capacity Threshold: Would the Project result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities, or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.13-6 through 4.13-7.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities, or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. As discussed in Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, of the DEIR, the Project would receive water supplies through the existing 16-inch water lines located within the N. Main Street and Edgewood Road rights -of -way that have the capacity to provide the increased water supplies needed to serve the Project; no extensions or expansions to the water pipelines that convey water to the Project site would be required. Redevelopment of the existing onsite water distribution lines would only serve the Project and would not provide water to any off -site areas. (DEIR, p. 4.13-6 through 4.13-7.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEK p. 4.13-6 through 4.13-7.) 9.16.3 Storm Water Drainage Requirements Threshold: Would the Project result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8; Initial Study, p. 64.) Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is largely impervious, as it is generally covered by pavement or the building structure, and small areas of landscaping surround the development. The Project would redevelop the site for multi -family residential uses, which would include areas of landscaping that would surround the proposed structures and be located along the site boundary, similar to the areas of landscaping that currently exist. Redevelopment of the site would provide for a similar amount of impervious surface; thus, the rate or amount of surface runoff would not substantially increase with implementation of the Project. In addition, the Project includes redevelopment of the existing onsite drainage system that would accommodate runoff with infiltration basins, storm drains, and catch basins Resolution No. Page 54 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A that would retain and filter runoff prior to discharge into the existing storm drains in N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. Thus, the Project would not increase the rate or amount of runoff that could result in the need for new or expanded offsite drainage facilities. (Initial Study, p. 64.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 64.)This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.16.4 Water Supply Threshold: Would the Project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.13-7 through 4.13-8.) Facts in Support of Finding: The City's Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) anticipates a supply and demand increase of 8.2 percent (3,028 acre feet per year) relating to water. The Project would result in an increase in demand for water supplies that is between just 2.7 and 4.2 percent of the UWMP's anticipated increase. Accordingly, the City would have water supplies available to serve the Project from existing entitlements. (DEIR, p. 4.13-7 through 4.13-8.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.13-7 through 4.13-8.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.16.5 Wastewater Treatment Capacity Threshold: Would the Project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the Project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the Project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.13-11.) Facts in Support of Finding: Based on results of the sewer flow monitoring and the City's Design Criteria wastewater generation rates, the Sewer Study identified that the existing sewer lines that serve the Project site would be able to adequately handle the additional wastewater flows from the Project. Additionally, the existing wastewater treatment facilities have adequate capacity to accommodate the increase in wastewater flow from full occupancy of the Project. As a result, implementation of the Project would not result in inadequate capacity of the wastewater treatment plant to serve the Project's demand in addition to existing service commitments. (DEIR, p. 4.13-11.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.13-11.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.16.6 Solid Waste Facilities Threshold: Would the Project be served by a landfill with insufficient permitted capacity to Resolution No. Page 55 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A accommodate the Project's solid waste disposal needs? Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8; Initial Study, p. 65.) Facts in Support of Finding: The existing landfills that serve the project region have sufficient capacity to accommodate the Project's solid waste needs. (Initial Study, p. 65.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 65.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. 65.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.16 Energy Resources As discussed in Section 4.14, Energy, of the DEM, the Project would not result in an increase in overall or per capita energy consumption, or in a wasteful or unnecessary consumption of energy, or require or result in the construction of new sources of energy supplies or additional energy infrastructure capacity, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects, or conflict with applicable energy efficiency policies or standards. The Project would be developed pursuant to the California Green Building Standards Code (24 California Code of Regulations [CCR] Part 11 [CALGreen Code]), which would provide for sustainable construction and operational practices, including energy efficiency. (DEIR, pp. 4.14-5 through 4.14-7.) The City's administration of the Title 24 requirements and the City's Climate Action Plan includes review of design components and energy conservation measures ensures that all requirements are met. Typical Title 24 measures include insulation; use of energy -efficient heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment (ITVAC); solar -reflective roofing materials; energy -efficient indoor and outdoor lighting systems; reclamation of heat rejection from refrigeration equipment to generate hot water; and incorporation of skylights, etc. hi complying with the Title 24 standards, impacts to peak energy usage periods would be minimized, and impacts on statewide and regional energy needs would be reduced. In addition, the Project would represent an urban infill development because it would occur on a currently developed site, and would be located near existing off -site employment, commercial, residential, and retail destinations and in proximity to existing public bus stops and freeways, which would result in reduced vehicle trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) in comparison to a project of similar size and land without close access to employment, service, and retail, destinations; in addition to public transit and freeways. The land use characteristics of the Project are consistent with the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) guidance related to a reduction of vehicle trip distances that would achieve a reduction in associated transportation -related fuel demand. Also, the Project site is within an area where existing infrastructure would provide for efficient delivery of electricity and natural gas to the Project and the Project would not inhibit the development of other alternative energy sources. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, pp. 4.14-5 through 4.14-7.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project 9.17 Findings Regarding Cumulative Environmental Impacts Resolution No. Page 56 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Consistent with CEQA's requirements, the FIR for the Project includes an analysis of cumulative impacts. As discussed throughout Chapter 4.0, Environmental Setting and Impact Analysis, of the DEIR, the DEIR's cumulative evaluation focuses on whether the impacts of the Project are cumulatively considerable within the context of impacts caused by other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. As described, different types of cumulative impacts occur for different environmental resources that affect different geographic areas. The geographic scope of the cumulative air quality analysis, where cumulative impacts occur over a large area, is different from the geographic scope considered for cumulative analysis of aesthetic resources, for which cumulative impacts are limited to specific viewsheds. Thus, in assessing aesthetic resources impacts, only development within and immediately adjacent to the Project area that would contribute to a cumulative visual effect is analyzed, whereas cumulative traffic impacts are based upon all development within the traffic study area of roadways and intersections. Therefore, the DEIR describes the cumulative geographic scope, and the potential cumulative impacts included in the geographic scope. As detailed in Section 4.0, Environmental Setting and Impact Analysis, of the DEIR, the cumulative evaluation in the DEIR determined that the cumulatively considerable impacts from implementation of the Project would be less than significant with implementation of the PDFs and mitigation measures that would reduce the potential of project level impacts to become cumulatively significant. Overall, cumulative impacts from implementation of the Project would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.14-7 through 4.14-8.) Specifically, the City hereby finds as follows: 9.17.1 Aesthetics The closest cumulative project is the 2700 North Main Street residential development that is located 0.2 miles north of the Project site and is visible from the site because it is currently developed with an 1I- story office building. This related project involves development of multi -family residences on the site, which would be similar to the character to the proposed Project. The two projects would provide similar multi -family development and would not combine to result in cumulatively considerable impacts. The other cumulative projects are similar to the proposed Project, providing multi -family residential uses that would be consistent with the existing urban, developed character of the viewshed area. As a result, cumulative impacts related to scenic views and visual character and site quality would be less than significant. Cumulative impacts related to shade and shadow would occur when development projects are sufficiently close that shadows from individual buildings combine to create areas of consecutive shading of shadow - sensitive areas. The DEIR details that shadows of the Project do not combine with shadows of other projects to create consecutive shading of any shadow -sensitive areas. Thus, the shading from the Project would not cumulatively combine with other projects, and cumulative impacts related to shade and shadow would be less than cumulatively significant. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative aesthetic effects would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-26 through 4.1-27.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.2 Air Quality Resolution No. Page 57 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A SCAQMD's cumulative air quality methodology provides that if an individual project results in air emissions of criteria pollutants that exceed the SCAQMD's daily thresholds for project -specific impacts, then the project would also result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutant(s). As shown in the DEIR, implementation of the Project would not exceed SCAQMD's applicable thresholds. Therefore, impacts related to a cumulatively considerable net increase of a criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in non -attainment would not be cumulatively considerable and would be less than significant. For these reasons, also discussed previously in Section 9.3.3 of these Findings, and in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects on air quality would not be cumulatively considerable. (DEIR, pp. 4.2-7.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.3 Biological Resources The Project site is developed and located within an urban area of the City. The site provides limited areas for natural habitat and wildlife species; but does include mature trees that could be used by birds that are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) for nesting. Thus, implementation of Mitigation Measure BI0-1 would provide for nesting bird surveys that would reduce the potential of the Proposed Project to impact nesting migratory birds or raptors, which would also avoid the potential of the Project to contribute to cumulative effects. As detailed in the DEIR, the Project would result in less than significant impacts to all other candidate, sensitive, or special status species. Therefore, therefore with Mitigation Measure BI0-1, the proposed Project would not contribute to cumulative impacts that could potentially occur from other development projects. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects on biological resources would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEK pp. 4.3-5.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.4 Cultural Resources As detailed in DEIR Section 4.4, Cultural/Historic Resources, due to the existing built environment, location of the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties of properties in Park Santiago, and the existing viewsheds, impacts related to the setting and feeling aspects of integrity of historic properties would not be reduced by implementation of the proposed Project; and the Project would not materially alter any physical characteristics of a historic resource that convey its historical significance. Therefore, the Project would not contribute to cumulative impacts that could potentially occur from other development projects throughout the region, and a cumulatively considerable impact would not occur. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects on cultural resources would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.4-15.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.5 Geology, Soils and Seismicity Geologic and soils related impacts occur in a local or site -specific context, such as immediately adjacent cumulative development. Thus, the scope of analysis for cumulative impacts associated with geology and soils encompasses the Project vicinity. The closest cumulative project is the 2700 North Main Street residential development that is located 0.2 miles north of the Project site. The Project would be required Resolution No. Page 58 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A to comply with CBC building codes, which reduces impacts to a less than significant level. All other projects are also subject to the same CBC building codes to reduce potential effects related to seismic events. As a result, cumulative impacts related to geology and soils would be less than significant. Also, as discussed in the Initial Study, the Project is not located on a site with potential for significant effects related to geology, soils, or seismicity. (Initial Study, pp. 29-33.) Accordingly, the Project will not have cumulative effects on geology, soils, and seismicity, even when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions All GHG emissions are assessed in a cumulative context because no single project can cause a discernible change to climate. AB 32 recognizes the significance of the statewide cumulative impact of GHG emissions from sources throughout the state and sets a performance standard for mitigation of that cumulative impact. Therefore, analysis of GHG emission impacts under CEQA contained in the EIR effectively constitutes an analysis of a project's contribution to the significant cumulative impact of GHG emissions. As described in DEIR Section 4.5 Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the estimated GHG emissions from construction and operation of the proposed Project would be lower than the AQMD Tier 4 Option 3 threshold of 4.8 MTCO2e per year per service population. Therefore, the Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable impact related to GHG emissions, and cumulative impacts would be less than significant. For these reasons discussed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects on greenhouse gas emissions would not be cumulatively considerable. (DEIR, pp. 4.5-13.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hazard related impacts typically occur in a local or site -specific context versus a cumulative context combined with other development projects; although it is possible for combined effects of hazards to occur by adjacent cumulative development that involves hazardous risks. The closest cumulative project is the 2700 North Main Street residential development that is located 0.2 miles north of the Project site. Due to this distance, the potential from hazards to cumulatively increase is limited. In addition, compliance with the relevant federal, state, and local regulations during the construction and operation of related projects would ensure that cumulative impacts from hazardous materials would be less than significant. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, implementation of the Project would not result in the release of hazardous materials into the environment; and therefore, would not result in a cumulative contribution to a hazardous materials impact. Therefore, cumulative impacts related to hazardous materials during construction would be less than significant. In addition, the nearby projects provide residential and commercial uses, that would use the same type of limited hazardous materials as the proposed Project. With regular use and storage of these commonly used household products, such as would occur on the Project site, cumulative impacts would not occur. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to hazards and hazardous materials would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.6-8 through 4.6-9.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.8 Hydrology and Water Quality Resolution No. Page 59 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A The Initial Study (DEIR Appendix A) details that Section 15-156 of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code requires all new development and significant redevelopment within the City be undertaken in accordance with the County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), including but not limited to the development project guidance; and any conditions and requirements established by City agencies related to the reduction or elimination of pollutants in storm water runoff from the Project site, which are verified prior to the issuance by the City of a grading permit or building permit. The DAMP requires implementation of site design, source control and treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs). In addition, because the proposed Project is a priority project as it would replace more than 5,000 square feet of impervious surface on an already developed site, it would be required to implement a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that includes Low impact Development (LID) features and BMPs to limit the potential for pollutants to enter surface water, such as storm water runoff. With implementation of these requirements, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to hydrology and water quality. In addition, all of the cumulative projects would be required to adhere to these State and County regulations, which would reduce cumulative impacts to a less than significant level. Also, as discussed in the Initial Study, the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to hydrology and water quality. (Initial Study, pp. 39-44.) Accordingly, the Project will not have cumulative effects relating to hydrology and water quality, even when considered with past, current, and future probable projects, and cumulative effects would be less than cumulatively considerable. This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.9 Land Use and Planning A large portion of the cumulative projects in the vicinity of the Project consist of multi -family residential development. In addition, the cumulative projects include mixed -uses, retail commercial, hotel, and services. These related projects are similar, consistent, and complementary to the proposed SD zone and multi -family residential development. DEIR Section 4.7, Land Use and Planning, describes that the Project would not result in conflicts with existing land use or zoning designations and would not conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project, which has the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, including applicable regulations, policies, and standards of the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and the SCAG RTP/SCS. Thus, the Project would not cumulatively contribute to such an impact that could occur from related projects. For these reasons detailed in the DEK the Project's cumulative effects relating to land use and planning would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.7-34.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.10 Noise Construction noise is localized in nature and decreases substantially with distance. Consequently, in order to achieve a substantial cumulative increase in construction noise levels, more than one source emitting high levels of construction noise would need to be in close proximity to the proposed Project. The nearest related project to the Project site is the 2700 North Main Street residential development project is located 0.2 miles north of the Project site and is in the site plan review stage of development approval. Thus, it is likely that these projects would not be constructed simultaneously. In addition, should construction of the projects overlap, the distance between the sites and the numerous intervening structures located between Resolution No. Page 60 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A the sites that would serve to reduce construction -related noise levels, a substantial increase in combined construction noise levels would not occur. Therefore, cumulative noise impacts associated with construction activities would be less than significant. Cumulative construction could also result in the exposure of people to or the generation of excessive groundborne vibration. As described above, the nearest related project to the proposed Project is 0.2 miles north of the project site. Due to this distance, and the rapid attenuation of groundborne vibration, the proposed Project and this related project are not in close enough proximity to each other such that vibration levels generated during construction could potentially affect the same sensitive receptor should construction of this related project occur at the same time as the proposed Project. Only receptors located in the immediate vicinity of each construction site would be potentially impacted by each development. As such, cumulative impacts associated with groundborne vibration from construction activities would not be cumulatively considerable and would be less than significant. Additionally, cumulative traffic -generated noise impacts have been assessed based on the contribution of the proposed Project in the Project opening year (2020) and the year 2040 cumulative base traffic volumes on the roadway segments in the Project vicinity. The noise levels associated with these traffic volumes with the proposed Project would increase local noise levels by a maximum of 0.3 dBA CNEL, which is lower than 5 dBA, cumulative impact threshold for traffic noise. For the reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to noise would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-24 through 4.8-25.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.11 Population and Housing The Project's portion of the cumulative increase in residential units is 9.9 percent, and the remainder of the cumulative projects would generate over 90 percent of the cumulative increase. Thus, the Project's contribution to the cumulative growth in housing is limited. Additionally, the total cumulative housing growth from all of the cumulative projects identified in the DEIR would equal 7.4 percent, which is consistent with SCAG growth estimates that anticipate an 8.4 percent increase. Thus, cumulative impacts related to population and housing would be less than significant. Furthermore, the cumulative addition of housing within the Santa Ana and City of Orange N. Main Street corridor area would have a favorable effect on the jobs -housing balance, which could reduce environmental effects of long commute trips, such as air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. For these reasons that are detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to population and housing would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.9-10.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.12 Public Services and Recreation Fire Protection Fire protection service is provided by Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) staffed Fire Stations that are owned by the City of Santa Ana. There are several proposed projects within Santa Ana in the Project vicinity that would combine to generate additional demands for OCFA services. Like the proposed Project, the related projects would be reviewed by City and OCFA staff prior to permit approval and would be Resolution No. Page 61 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A required to implement fire protection design features per California building and fire code regulations that would reduce potential fire hazards. Cumulative increased demands for services would also be offset by the City of Santa Ana fire facilities fee that is required for each development project. As detailed in DEIR Section 4.11, Transportation and Traffic, the Project would not result in cumulative traffic impacts in both years 2020 and 2040. The roadway segments and intersections near the Project site and Fire Stations 70 and 71 would continue to operate at satisfactory LOS. Therefore, the vehicular trips generated by operation of the proposed Project would not result in a substantial increase in emergency response times that could cumulatively combine with other development projects in the City, and impacts related to emergency response times from Fire Stations 70 and 71 would be less than cumulatively considerable. Because 4 of the City's 10 existing fire stations exist within 2.5 miles of the Project site, and related projects would be subject to the same impact fees that provide funding for additional equipment and staffing, and fire safe construction requirements, impacts related to fire services from the proposed Project would not combine with other related projects to result in a cumulative impact related to the need for new or physically altered fire service facilities. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to fire protection services would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.10-5.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Police Services The Project would result in an incremental increase in demands on law enforcement services and based on the Police Department's 2016 staffing of 1.04 officers per thousand population, the proposed Project would require one additional officer for the Department's Northeast District that serves all areas of the City north of First Street and East of Flower Street. In addition, the DEIR estimates that the cumulative projects would require an additional 3 officers to maintain the City's existing officers to population ratio. The addition of less than 1 officer from the proposed Project and 2 officers from the other projects within the Police Department's Northeast District would not require the need for, new or physically altered police protection facilities. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to police services would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.10-8 through 4.10-9.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Parks and Recreation The proposed Project would provide onsite recreational facilities for residents that would meet many recreation and park needs of Project residents. In addition, the Project would be required to pay park fees to offset usage of existing park and recreation facilities. The cumulative projects within the City of Santa Ana would also be required to provide park and recreational facilities and/or pay in -lieu fees as required by each city, which are implemented to preserve an appropriate balance between the demand by residents for use of park and recreational facilities, and as a result reduce cumulative effects of each project. Thus, because the proposed Project would provide the open space and recreation facilities and would provide Resolution No. Page 62 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A payment of the required park fees, the Project's impact would not be cumulatively considerable, and cumulative impacts related to park and recreation facilities would be less than significant. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to parks and recreation would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.10-14.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.13 Transportation and Traffic As detailed in DEIR Section 4.11, Transportation and Traffic, the proposed Project would not result in impacts in the cumulative 2020 and 2040 conditions pursuant to the Caltrans, City of Santa Ana, and City or Orange thresholds and methodology. (DEIR, pp. 4.11-10 and 4.11-11.) As detailed in DEIR Tables 4.11-9 through 4.11-36, the proposed Project would not conflict with or result in an exceedance of a threshold by any of the following: the Orange County Congestion Management Program, Caltrans Measures of Effectiveness, City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, and the City of Orange General Plan Circulation Element. In addition, the Traffic hnpact Analysis details that the capacities of the Park Santiago neighborhood intersections and roadways are substantially higher than the daily trip generation of the proposed Project. As such, cumulative impacts related to neighborhood traffic would be less than cumulatively significant. Also, the DEIR details that Project access locations and circulation around the Project site would be adequate, and cumulative impacts related to queuing would be less than cumulatively considerable. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to transportation and traffic would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.11-41.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 9.17.14 Utilities and Service Systems Water The Project would install new water lines to serve the proposed buildings and connect to the existing system that is adjacent to the Project site. The water system has been designed the proposed Project and would be served by existing infrastructure. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in the requirement for new or expanded off -site water infrastructure that could combine with other water infrastructure needs to result in an environmental impact. Thus, potential cumulative impacts from off -site water system expansions would not occur from the proposed Project. The Water Supply Assessment (WSA) that was prepared for the Project describes that the 2015 MWD UWMP details the ability to meet the demands of its member agencies, including the City of Santa Ana, through 2040. In addition, the City of Santa Ana 2015 UWMP confirmed the ability of the local supplies and the OC Basin to meet the growing demands of the City in multiple climate scenarios. Also, as described previously the increased water demand from the proposed Project would be between 2.7 and 4.3 percent of the 2015 UWMP anticipated increase. Thus, the City would have water supplies available to serve the Project from existing entitlements, and cumulative water supply needs would be able to be met as detailed by the MWD and City's UWMPs. As a result, the proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable increase in water supply demands that would require new or expanded entitlements. Resolution No. Page 63 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to water supplies would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.13-8.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Wastewater DEIR Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, the existing sewer system has sufficient capacity to handle the increased flows resulting from implementation of the proposed Project. Additionally, the OCSD reclamation facilities have an average flow of 184 mgd and a treatment capacity of 462 mgd (OCSD, 2017). Due to this volume of excess capacity that is designed by OCSD to accommodate future regional growth, the increase in wastewater flow from the proposed Project that would require 0.04 percent of this remaining capacity would not significantly impact the OCSD reclamation facilities. As a result, impacts related to cumulative projects wastewater treatment and conveyance capacity would be less than significant. For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to wastewater treatment and conveyance would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.13-12.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. Drainage and Water Quality All projects in the watershed are required to implement measures to comply with the LID, MS4 Permit, DAMP requirements for implementation of SWPPPs and WQMPs. These requirements were developed to reduce the cumulative impacts to water quality, and to ensure that the incremental effects of individual projects do not cause a substantial cumulative impact related to water quality. Implementation of the proposed Project would include compliance with all required laws, permits, and plans, through implementation of a SWPPP and WQMP that would be approved by the City prior to construction and operational permits and have been designed to reduce impacts associated with drainage and water quality. The proposed Project would result in a decrease in impervious surfaces due to the increase in landscape and open space areas. Additionally, the DAMP required runoff volume would be filtered through the detention and drywell systems prior to discharge off -site to manage stormwater drainage and protect water quality. The detention and drywell treatment systems have high removal effectiveness for all storm water pollutants of concern. Thus, the runoff volume that would result from the proposed Project would not increase, and the proposed treatment systems would remove pollutants from onsite runoff. Therefore, the proposed Project would not generate volumes of stormwater flows or polluted runoff that could combine with other projects to be cumulatively considerable. As a result, cumulative impacts from implementation of the proposed Project would be less than significant. For the reasons discussed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to drainage and water quality would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.13-19.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 10.0 FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES AND ENERGY USE Resolution No. Page 64 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A The CEQA Guidelines require that EIRs reveal the significant environmental changes that would occur as a result of a proposed Project. CEQA also requires decision makers to balance the benefits of a project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve a project. This section addresses non-renewable resources, the commitment of future generations to the proposed uses, and irreversible impacts associated with the Project. The Project would result in or contribute to the following irreversible environmental changes: • Lands in the Project area that are currently developed with office uses would be committed to multi -family residential uses once the proposed buildings are constructed. Secondary effects associated with this irreversible commitment of land resources include: o Changes in views associated with construction of the new buildings and associated development (see Section 4.1 of the DEIR, Aesthetics). o Increased traffic on area roadways (see Section 4.11 of the DEIR, Transportation and Traffic). o Emissions of air pollutants associated with Project construction and operation (see Section 4.2 of the DEIR, Air Quality). o Consumption of non-renewable energy associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project due to the use of automobiles, lighting, heating and cooling systems, appliances, and the like (see Section 4.14 of the DEIR, Energy). o Increased ambient noise associated with an increase in activities and traffic from operation of the Project (see Section 4.8, Noise). • Construction of the Project as described in Section 3.0 of the DEIR, Project Description, would require the use of energy produced from non-renewable resources and construction materials. In regard to energy usage from the proposed Project, the Project would not involve wasteful or unjustifiable use of non-renewable resources, and conservation efforts would be enforced during construction and operation of proposed development. The proposed development would incorporate energy -generating and conserving project design features, including those required by the California Building Code, California Energy Code Title 24, which specify green building standards for new developments. In addition, the Project includes project design features that result in additional energy - efficiency. (DEIR, p. 5-4.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 11.0 Section 15126(d) of the CEQA Guidelines requires a discussion of a proposed project's potential to foster economic or population growth, including ways in which a project could remove an obstacle to growth. Growth does not necessarily create significant physical changes to the environment. However, depending upon the type, magnitude, and location of growth, it can result in significant adverse environmental effects if it requires new development or infrastructure to support it. The Project's growth effects would be considered significant if they could result in significant physical effects in one or more environmental issue areas. As discussed in Section 5.0, Mandatory Findings of Significance, of the DEIR, the limited number of jobs generated by the Project would represent a small portion of the estimated job growth that would be within, and not exceed, SCAG's population forecast. As such, the Project would result in direct employment growth at a level that is already anticipated in regional projections; and thus, would be less than significant. The Project would not remove obstacles to growth, e.g., through the construction or extension of major Resolution No. Page 65 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A infrastructure facilities that do not presently exist in the Project area, or by expansion of public services in the Project area. The infrastructure needed to serve the Project would be sized to specifically serve the site and excess capacity would not be developed that could generate additional growth; and the Project would not create a demand for public services beyond what is already contemplated. Additionally, as described in Section 5.0, Mandatory Findings of Significance, of the DEIR, SCAG projections show that the jobs — housing ratio is anticipated to increase to 1.65 by 2040; and that the Project would reduce the jobs -housing ratio slightly to 2.05; and to 2.11 in 2040. This would be a beneficial effect of providing multi -family housing on the Project site, where employees can easily travel to employment opportunities within the Santa Ana and City of Orange areas, which are jobs -rich. Thus, the Project would provide additional housing to support the regionally forecasted increase in economic activities. In addition, the provision of housing on the Project site would not result in economic activity that would cause the need for additional off -site housing. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, growth inducing impacts from implementation of the Project would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 5-1 through 5-3.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. 12.0 FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES 12.1 Background Where significant impacts are identified, section 15126.6 of the CEQA Guidelines requires EIRs to consider and discuss alternatives to the proposed actions. Subsection (a) states: (a) An FIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project. Rather it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decision -making and public participation. An EIR is not required to consider alternatives which are infeasible. The lead agency is responsible for selecting a range of project alternatives for examination and must publicly disclose its reasoning for selecting those alternatives. There is no ironclad rule governing the nature or scope of the alternatives to be discussed other than the rule of reason. Subsection 15126.6(b) states the purpose of the alternatives analysis: (b) Because an FIR must identify ways to mitigate or avoid the significant effects that a project may have on the environment (Public Resources Code Section 21002.1), the discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be more costly. In subsection 15126.6(c), the State CEQA Guidelines describe the selection process for a range of reasonable alternatives: Resolution No. Page 66 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A (c) The range of potential alternatives to the proposed project shall include those that could feasibly accomplish most of the basic objectives of the Project and could avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the significant effects. The EIR should briefly describe the rationale for selecting the alternatives to be discussed. The EIR should also identify any alternatives that were considered by the lead agency but were rejected as infeasible during the scoping process and briefly explain the reasons underlying the lead agency's determination. Additional information explaining the choice of alternatives may be included in the administrative record. Among the factors that may be used to eliminate alternatives from detailed consideration in an EIR are: (i) failure to meet most of the basic project objectives, (ii) infeasibility, or (iii) inability to avoid significant environmental impacts. The range of alternatives required is governed by a "rule of reason" that requires the EIR to set forth only those alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice. The EIR shall include sufficient information about each alternative to allow meaningful evaluation, analysis, and comparison with the proposed Project. Alternatives are limited to ones that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the Project. Of those alternatives, the EIR need examine in detail only the ones that the lead agency determines could feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the Project. However, when a project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts, the lead agency has no obligation to consider the feasibility of alternatives to lessen or avoid environmental impacts, even if the alternative would reduce the impact to a greater degree than the proposed Project. (Pub. Res. Code § 21002; Laurel Hills Homeowners Association v. City Council (1978) 83 Ca1.App.3d 515, 521; Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 692, 730-731; Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of the University of California (1988) 47 Ca1.3d 376, 400-403.) Here, a range of feasible alternatives to the proposed Project was developed to provide additional information and flexibility to the decision -makers when considering the proposed Project. (DEIR, pp. 6- 1 through 6-26.) 12.2 Project Objectives The following Project objectives support the Project's underlying purpose to develop multi -family residential uses on the Project site and assist with meeting the City's housing needs: • Redevelop existing underutilized parcels to implement development of new high -quality housing. • Increase high -quality housing near existing employment centers. • Promote an improved jobs/housing balance by locating attractive new housing in proximity to employment centers. • Provide housing in close proximity to commercial areas, freeway, and transit. • Redevelop existing land uses that would utilize existing infrastructure, including: water, sewer, arterial roadways, transit, and freeways. • Implement capital investment to enhance the City's economic and fiscal viability pursuant to the City of Santa Ana Strategic Plan. • Provide residents with a safe, high -quality, modern residential community with open space and various recreational amenities. (DEIR, pp. 6-2 through 6-3.) Resolution No. Page 67 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A 12.3 Alternatives Considered and Rejected During the Scoping/Project Planning Process An EIR must briefly describe the rationale for selection and rejection of alternatives. The lead agency may make an initial determination as to which alternatives are potentially feasible, meet most of the project objectives, and avoid significant environmental effects that would occur from the project, and therefore, merit in-depth consideration. Alternatives that are remote or speculative, are infeasible, or the effects of which cannot be reasonably predicted, need not be considered (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(f), (i)(3)). The following alternatives were considered but rejected as part of the environmental analysis for the Project. Alternative Site Alternative An alternative site was considered but eliminated from further consideration. CEQA specifies that the key question regarding alternative site consideration is "whether any of the significant effects of the project would be avoided or substantially lessened by putting the project at another location." In addition, an alternative site need not be considered when implementation is "remote and speculative," such as when the alternative site is beyond the control of a project applicant. The Project Applicant is the owner of the Project site, and the Project site building is vacant, and the site is underutilized in the existing condition. The Project objectives are to redevelop an existing underutilized parcel and implement new high -quality multi -family housing near employment centers to promote an improved jobs/housing balance, provide housing near existing transportation, and utilize existing infrastructure, all of which are consistent with the opportunities provided by the Project site. In addition, due to the urban and built out nature of the City, development of 496 multi -family residential units on another 5.9-acre site at a different location would likely require demolition of existing structures, require similar mitigation, and have similar impacts as the Project. CEQA specifies that the key question regarding alternative site consideration is "whether any of the significant effects of the project would be avoided or substantially lessened by putting the project at another location." Given the size and nature of the Project and the Project objectives, it would be infeasible to develop and operate the Project on an available alternative site with fewer environmental impacts. Therefore, the Alternative Site Alternative was rejected from further consideration. No Project/Vacant Building Alternative An alternative where the building would remain vacant and underutilized was eliminated from further consideration. Because the Project site is located within a completely developed and highly used urban corridor, near freeways and transit, and contains an existing useable structure, it is not reasonable due to the need for new residential and employment space in the area or financially feasible for the existing site owner for the site to remain vacant and underutilized in the long-term. Therefore, the No Project/Vacant Building Alternative would be remote and infeasible. In addition, this alternative would not meet any of the Project objectives. As described previously, alternatives that are remote, infeasible, and do not meet Project objectives, do not need to be considered. Thus, the No Project/Vacant Building Alternative was rejected from further consideration. 12.4 Alternatives Selected for Further Analysis In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, "An EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project ..." including the "No Project" alternative. The following alternatives have Resolution No. Page 68 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A been determined to represent a reasonable range of alternatives to supplement the access alternatives presented in the DEIR. The alternatives presented have been determined to be physically feasible and have the potential to avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the significant effects of the Project. The Alternatives include: • Alternative 1: No Project/No Build • Alternative 2: Reduced Project Alternative • Alternative 3: Build Out of the Existing Zoning Alternative 12.5 Evaluation of Alternatives Selected for Analysis Alternative 1: No Project/No Build Description: Pursuant to Section 15126.6(e)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, the EIR is required to "discuss the existing conditions at the time the Notice of Preparation is published, or if no notice of preparation is published, at the time the environmental analysis is commenced, as well as what would be reasonably expected to occur in the foreseeable future if the Project were not approved, based on current plans and consistent with available infrastructure and community services." Therefore, under this alternative, no development would occur on the Project site and it would remain in its existing condition. However, as described in Section 6.4 of the DEIR, the Project site is located within a completely developed and highly used urban corridor, near freeways and transit, and contains an existing useable structure, and it is not reasonable to assume that the Project site would remain vacant and underutilized in the long-term. In the No Project/No Build condition, it is reasonably expected that the existing 81,172 square foot office building would be re -occupied. Hence, this alternative compares impacts of the Project with re -occupation at full capacity of the existing office building. (DEIR, p. 6-4.) Environmental Effects: The No Project/No Build Alternative would avoid the significant and unavoidable aesthetic impact that would result from the Project and all of the potential construction impacts. Additionally, operational impacts would be reduced and the mitigation measures that are identified in Chapter 4.0, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, of the Final EIR which include measures related to aesthetics, biological resources, hazards and hazardous materials, noise and vibration, and tribal cultural resources would not be required. (DEK pp. 6-6 through 6-11.) However, the environmental benefits of the Project would also not be realized, such as improvements to storm water quality, removal of contaminated soils, improvements to the jobs/housing balance, and the potential to reduce vehicle miles traveled. The No Project/No Build Alternative would not install storm water filtration features in accordance with DAMP and LID design guidelines that would filter and slow the volume and rate of runoff; the arsenic contaminated soils would remain onsite; and this alternative would provide for the projected employment growth but would not improve the jobs to housing balance within the region and could generate more vehicle miles traveled. Ability to Achieve Project Objectives: The No Project/No Build Alternative would not meet any of the Project objectives. (DEIR, p. 6-11.) The site would not be redeveloped into new high -quality housing near existing employment centers, commercial areas, freeways, and transit. Capital investment related to the Project site to enhance the City's economic and fiscal viability pursuant to the City of Santa Ana Strategic Plan would not occur, and a safe, high -quality, modern residential community with open space and various recreation amenities would not be implemented by this alternative. Overall, this alternative would not meet any of the objectives of the Project. (DEK p. 6-11.) Resolution No. Page 69 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A Finding: The No Project/No Build Alternative would avoid the significant and unavoidable aesthetic impacts and would avoid the need for mitigation to ensure impacts to various environmental resources would not occur. Additionally, this alternative would not require a General Plan amendment or zone change. However, the No Project/No Build Alternative would not achieve the Project objectives and the environmental benefits of the Project would not be realized. Therefore, the City hereby rejects the No Project/No Build Alternative. Alternative 2: Reduced Project Alternative Description: Under this alternative, described in further detail in the DEIR (DEIR, p. 6-12), a 30 percent reduction in the number of residential units would be built, which would result in increased setbacks and reduced building heights. Like the Project, 77 percent of the units would be studio or one -bedroom units, 18 percent would be 2-bedroom units, and 6 percent would be 3-bedroom units. This alternative would develop and operate 347 multi -family residential units on the 5.9-acre site, which would result in 59 dwelling units per acre, which is a 149-unit (and 25 unit per acre) reduction compared to the Project. Reducing these units from the Project would eliminate 51 units along the eastern portion of the Project site to provide a 90-foot building setback from the eastern boundary of the site; and the 5th floor residential units along the eastern side would be eliminated to provide a maximum of 4-stories adjacent to the 90- foot setback. Under the Reduced Project Alternative, the development would be 3-stories in height along Santiago Park and Edgewood Road, and would be 5 stories in height along N, Main Street and adjacent to the parking structure. To support the 347 multi -family residential units under this alternative 625 parking spaces (an average of 1.8 spaces per unit consistent with the Project) would be provided within a 6-level parking structure, that would have 5 levels above ground and one level underground. Like the Project, the residential units would be wrapped around the parking structure. Under the Reduced Project Alternative, the Wellness Room and Community Rooms would not be developed (as they are planned to be located within the 90-foot setback) and the recreation amenities would also be reduced by 30 percent. Thus, approximately 4,870 of indoor recreation facilities would be provided by this alternative. However, the 90-foot setback would create a large open space area (approximately 54,000 square feet) along the eastern side of the Project site that could be used for open space recreation. Like the Project, this alternative would require a General Plan Amendment from the existing land use designation of PAO (Professional and Administrative Office) to District Center (DC), and a Zone change from P (Professional) to a Specific Development (SD) designation. Environmental Effects: As further discussed in the DEIR (DEIR, pp. 6-12 through 6-17), the Reduced Project Alternative would result in a 90-foot building setback from the eastern boundary of the site resulting in an open space area that could be used for recreation. In addition, views of the Project site would be visually less dense and structure heights would be lower from several viewpoints. Also, the shade and shadow generated from the Reduced Project Alternative would be less than the Project and would extend into fewer off -site areas. However, the same mitigation to protect the trees to remain onsite would be necessary to ensure views of the Project site are screened, and (although less) this alternative would also result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks in comparison to the existing views of the site that is considered significant pursuant to the City's aesthetics criteria. Thus, this Alternative does not eliminate a significant and unavoidable impact. Resolution No. Page 70 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A This alternative would also require the same types of construction activities and related mitigation measures as the proposed Project. Therefore, although the Reduced Project Alternative would be lower in height, scale, and mass, generate fewer greenhouse gas and air quality emissions, require fewer services, result in less traffic trips, and create a large open space area on the eastern portion of the Project site, it would not reduce the need for mitigation or the level of impact significance compared to the Project. Finding: The Reduced Project Alternative would reduce impacts in comparison to the proposed Project; however, the alternative would not reduce significant unavoidable aesthetic impacts to a less than significant level and would continue to require the same mitigation measures that would be implemented for the Project. Therefore, the City hereby rejects the Reduced Project Alternative. (DEIR, p. 6-18.) Alternative 3: Build Out of the Existing Zoning Alternative Description: Under this alternative described in further detail in the DEIR (DEK pp. 6-18 through 6- 24), the Project site would be redeveloped for new professional office uses as allowed by the City's Zoning Code Sections 41-312 through 41-323. The Project site has a Zoning designation of P (Professional), which allows buildings up to 3-stories or 35-feet in height. The building setbacks required in the P zone include a 15-foot setback from the front and side property lines, and a 50-foot rear setback when the site backs to residential areas. The maximum office building structure that could be developed under the existing zoning code requirements would be 3-stories high and 387,465 square feet (floor area ratio of 1.5), which would require 1,161 parking spaces (per the P zone requirement of 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet). The office building would be surrounded by drought tolerant ornamental landscaping. Under this alternative, the existing onsite development would be demolished, removed, and replaced to provide a new building structure that would be developed pursuant to current building requirements, such as energy efficient power systems, drought tolerant landscaping, storm water filtration, and other Low Impact Development (LID) requirements. This alternative would be consistent with the existing land use designation, which is PAO (Professional and Administrative Office) and P zoning designation. (DEK p. 6-18.) Environmental Effects: The Build Out of the Existing Zoning Alternative would result in a lower building height than the Project, and a 10-foot larger setback from the eastern boundary of the site; but would be 4.77 times larger than the existing 8 1, 172 square foot 2-story building, and like the Project, this alternative would substantially change the scale, height, and setbacks in comparison to existing views of the Project site, which would result in a significant impact pursuant to the City's aesthetics criteria. Furthermore, the character of the office building under this alternative would be less visually consistent with the adjacent single-family residential than the proposed multi -family residential. (DEIR, p. 6-23.) The Build Out Under the Existing Zoning Alternative would result in approximately 1,275 employees at full capacity and generate approximately 3,774 vehicle trips per day, which is 40 percent more daily trips than the proposed Project. As a result, impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas, traffic noise, and traffic congestion would be increased in comparison to the Project. Similarly, construction of this alternative would require the same construction related mitigation measures that are required for the Project. Overall, the Build Out Under the Existing Zoning Alternative would result in greater impacts than the Project. (DEIR, p. 6-23.) Ability to Achieve Project Objectives: The Build Out of the Existing Zoning Alternative would not meet Resolution No. Page 71 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A a majority of the Project objectives. The site would not be redeveloped into new high -quality housing near existing employment centers, commercial areas, freeways, and transit. It would not promote an improved jobs/housing balance, and would not provide residents with a safe, high -quality, modern residential community with open space and various recreation amenities. Although the Project would meet the objectives of redeveloping land uses that would utilize existing infrastructure and would implement capital investment related to the Project site to enhance the City's economic and fiscal viability pursuant to the City of Santa Ana Strategic Plan, a majority (5 out of 7) of the Project objectives would not be met. (DEIR, pp. 6-23 through 6-24.) Finding: The Build Out of the Existing Zoning Alternative would continue to result in a significant unavoidable aesthetic impact, would continue to require the same mitigation measures that would be implemented for the Project, and would result in greater impacts to other environmental topics than the Project. In addition, the Existing Zoning Alternative would not meet a majority of the Project objectives. Therefore, the City hereby rejects the Existing Zoning Alternative. 12.6 Environmentally Superior Alternative The Environmentally Superior Alternative for the Project is the No Project/No Build Alternative. The No Project/No Build Alternative would avoid the significant and unavoidable impact of the Project and all of the potential construction impacts, reduce many of the operational impacts, and would not be required to implement the mitigation measures that are identified in Chapter 4.0 of this EIR that are related to: aesthetics, biological resources, hazards and hazardous materials, noise and vibration, and tribal cultural resources. However, this alternative would not improve the storm water runoff quality that runs directly into Santiago Creek, not remove the contaminated soils from the site, not improve the jobs/housing balance and the related reduction in vehicle miles traveled. (DEIR, pp. 6-24 through 6-25.) CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(3)(1) states that if the environmentally superior alternative is the "no project" alternative, the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives. The Environmentally Superior Alternative among the other alternatives is Alternative 2: Reduced Project Alternative, which would develop 30 fewer units than the Project. (DEIR, p. 6-24.) The potential impacts from this alternative are less than the Project because the residential structure under this alternative would be lower in height, at a lower density, and be sited at least 90-feet from the eastern property line resulting in a large open space area that could be used for recreation. However, the Reduced Project Alternative would result in a significant and unavoidable aesthetics impact related to a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks in comparison to the existing views of the site and the alternative would not reduce the need for mitigation compared to the proposed Project. (DEIR, p. 6-24.) Furthermore, the Reduced Project Alternative would result in a reduced beneficial effect; providing fewer multi -family housing units on the Project site that would result in a reduced improvement to the City's 3.2 percent vacancy rate, fewer residents traveling to local employment opportunities, a reduced improvement to the jobs -housing balance, and is not as reflective of the General Plan Major City Entry and Main Street Concourse node designations as the Project. In addition, the Reduced Project Alternative would not meet the Project objectives to the same extent as the Project. The site would be redeveloped for new high - quality housing near existing employment centers, commercial areas, freeways, and transit; however, fewer residential units would be provided and a reduced improvement to the jobs -housing balance would occur. Additionally, fewer residents would be accommodated by the safe, high -quality, modern residential Resolution No. Page 72 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT A community with open space and various recreation amenities on the Project site. (DEIR, pp. 6-24 through 6-25.) CEQA does not require the City to choose the environmentally superior alternative. Instead CEQA requires the City to consider environmentally superior alternatives, explain the considerations that led it to conclude that those alternatives were infeasible from a policy standpoint, weigh those considerations against the environmental impacts of the proposed Project, and make findings that the benefits of those considerations outweighed the harm. Resolution No. Page 73 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT B Statement of Overriding Considerations STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS MAGNOLIA AT THE PARK MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT STATE CLEARINGHOUSE No: 2018021031 CITY OF SANTA ANA: DP No. 2017-34 Introduction The City of Santa Ana is the Lead Agency under CEQA responsible for preparation, review and certification of the Final EIR for the Magnolia at the Park Multi -Family Residential Project (Project). As the Lead Agency, the City is also responsible for determining the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action and which of those impacts are significant and can be mitigated through imposition of mitigation measures to avoid or minimize those impacts to a level of less than significant. CEQA then requires the Lead Agency to balance the benefits of a proposed action against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in determining whether or not to approve the Project. In making this determination, the City is guided by CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 which provides as follows: 15093. Statement of Overriding Considerations. a) CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." b) When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section 15091. In addition, Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) requires that where a public agency finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in an EIR and thereby leave significant unavoidable effects, the public agency must also find that overriding economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects of the project. Resolution No. Page 74 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT B Statement of Overriding Considerations Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the City has balanced the benefits of the Project against the following unavoidable adverse impacts associated with the Project and has adopted all feasible mitigation measures with respect to these impacts. The City also has examined alternatives to the Project, most of which do not meet the Project objectives and are environmentally preferable to the Project for the reasons discussed in the Findings and Facts in Support of Findings. The City of Santa Ana, the Lead Agency for this Project, having reviewed the DEIR for the Project and reviewed all written materials within the City's public record and heard all oral testimony presented at public hearings, adopts this Statement of Overriding Considerations, which has balanced the benefits of the Project against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in reaching its decision to approve the Project. Overriding Considerations The City, after balancing the specific economic, legal, social, technological and other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits of the Project, has determined that the unavoidable adverse environmental impact identified above may be considered acceptable due to the following specific considerations which outweigh the unavoidable, adverse environmental impact of the Project, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15093. Each of the benefits identified below provides a separate and independent basis for overriding the significant environmental effects of the Project. The specific economic, legal, social, technological and other benefits of the Project are as follows: 1. The Project would implement capital investment to enhance the City's economic and fiscal viability pursuant to the City of Santa Ana Strategic Plan. 2. The Project would implement the General Plan Scenic Corridors Element Major City Entry designation along N. Main Street at the Project site. 3. The Project would implement the General Plan Urban Design Element Main Street at I-5 Freeway Gateway designation. 4. The Project would provide consistency with the General Plan Scenic Corridors Element Inter - City Corridor designation along the Santiago Creek area at N. Main Street. 5. The Project would provide needed multi -family rental housing to improve the City's 3.2 percent vacancy rate and provide a variety of housing options for existing and future residents. 6. The Project would reduce the jobs -housing ratio, providing a beneficial effect of providing multi- family housing in a jobs -rich area so that employees can easily travel to employment opportunities. 7. The Project would result in a potential reduction of vehicle miles traveled and the related traffic congestion, air quality, and greenhouse gas emissions from the provision of housing near regional shopping areas and employment, and by improving the jobs -housing balance. Resolution No. Page 75 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT B Statement of Overriding Considerations 8. The Project would provide additional multi -family housing to support the regionally forecasted increase in economic activities and employment increases. 9. The Project would redevelop an underutilized parcel to implement high -quality multi -family housing with recreation amenities, near transportation facilities and utilizing existing infrastructure capacity. 10. The Project would improve storm water filtration, such that unfiltered runoff would no longer be conveyed to Santiago Creek. All of the runoff from the site would be conveyed to infiltrating landscaping areas and catch basins that would improve the existing storm water quality that conveys to the creek. 11. The Project would install additional24- and 36-inch box trees and tree wells along the Edgewood Road and N. Main Street right-of-way, providing additional public street trees. 12. The Project would result in the creation, installation, and maintenance of a public art project with a value equivalent to one-half of one percent of the total construction cost of the Project, pursuant to a development agreement entered into between the City and the Project Applicant, AC 2525 Main St., a California limited liability company ("Project Applicant"). 13. The Project would result in the Project Applicant constructing park improvements including, but not limited to, installation of irrigation, landscaping, security lighting and bike trail enhancements to Santiago Park pursuant to a development agreement entered into between the City and the Project Applicant, AC 2525 Main St., a California limited liability company ("Project Applicant"). 14. The Project would result in providing benefits to the Park Santiago neighborhood for a period of 55-year (subject to annual review) including access to on -site amenities, private 24-hour roving security patrol of Santiago Park and the Park Santiago Neighborhood pursuant to a development agreement entered into between the City and the Project Applicant, AC 2525 Main St., a California limited liability company ("Project Applicant"). 15. The Project would result in the Applicant preforming the analysis, design, engineering, construction, and inspection/administration of (1) Santiago Park neighborhood improvements at up to three locations on Edgewood and/or Bush Street to achieve traffic calming and traffic diversion. hnprovements may be based on input from the Santiago Park Neighborhood Association and may include, but not be limited to, bulb -outs, traffic circles and medians within the neighborhood streets. (2) Street lighting enhancements within the Santiago Park Neighborhood. (3) A street light at the Santiago Park Drive / Main Street intersection. (4) Decorative concrete pavement within the intersection of Main Street/Walkie Way and Main Street/Santiago Park Drive pursuant to a development agreement entered into between the City and the Project Applicant, AC 2525 Main St., a California limited liability company ("Project Applicant"). Resolution No. Page 76 of 76 Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR EXHIBIT C 2525 N. MAIN STREET MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 1.1 Introduction The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead or public agency that approves or carries out a project for which an Environmental Impact Report has been certified which identifies one or more significant adverse environmental effects and where findings with respect to changes or alterations in the project have been made, to adopt a "...reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment' (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21081, 21081.6). A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is required to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are successfully implemented for the 2525 N. Main Street Multi -Family Residential Project (project). The City of Santa Ana is the Lead Agency for the proposed project and is responsible for implementation of the MMRP. This report describes the MMRP for the project and identifies the parties that will be responsible for monitoring implementation of the individual mitigation measures in the MMRP. 1.2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program The MMRP for the project will be active through all phases of the project, including design, construction, and operation. The attached table identifies the mitigation program required to be implemented by the City for the project to avoid or reduce potentially significant impacts on the environment. The table identifies the timing of implementation, and the responsible party or parties for monitoring compliance. The MMRP also includes a column for the compliance monitor (individual responsible for monitoring compliance) to document when implementation of the measure is completed. As individual mitigation measures are completed, the compliance monitor will sign and date the MMRP, indicating that the required mitigation measure has been completed. The project includes specific Project Design Features (PDFs) that are incorporated to avoid and/or minimize potential environmental impacts. In addition, the EIR analysis describes the existing regulations that effectively avoid or reduce environmental impacts. The PDFs and the existing regulations that are implementable actions related to project construction and operation activities are included in the following MMRP table to ensure implementation and appropriate monitoring of each, in the same manner as the mitigation measures. N � dd� 0 U m c c c c c c N N N N N t0 m w w w w w w w N �_ C �_ C �_ N - C � .O � .O � .O p- OI d N N N N N N N N N N N N N C O O O O O �iO. T U U .L' U ..T. U ,T. U U ocf O_ c C O O O- C O aO Y U 'C 2 ao o = w J O C N T t0 ((JJa ((JJa N T� N y Jc OV OC - co OC y U. c o o 0 N o c 0 = c 0 c 0 0 o o. s E .o N a$ o w.m m o a t0 a o 'o •' b= cr cr o N L O N U C_ d N y O O N O NOI !0 $ � >` N LVOi N N a y 0¢ H Oj O7 !0 w L P; 0,0 l0 C T C !0 N O E O UC N O Q^ N YJ C O i N Q O 0' L O b = .+d" E O_ c N i N0, E N O O_ -O T-+ NN C i 2 E U O ¢ R N O_ U w _ (O O O ... O- y ¢ � nL+ ¢ O N L g � N M lO O w0 U " m L A i= p_ y 'S 1E c c� t E £ m w E o c oa S' c .�. m .0 �i c E o U O y y 3 E N> a� cTi CJ m c o o o y U c `m y a p o y o — d E_ O N E12 '+.. W d .'a' C U= N O ry _ OI N .� N N -O ~ 0 bzo C y o o o d N T y d N OI OCl Y d N L O_ N N .00 H N " C d aL. 0 E E E E '° ti= o o o y O a o_ Y O y£ a w u m V O E 2 N L N O y U t0 .((JJ -O O_ N 0 OI iJ y 0 C N y R a+ � � C O U m m U w C N C a E 0 U m � � � N C y C W O1 C E f 0 O C N N 6 E f�0 d N L E O C C 0 E Q R R` 3$ 0 0' L 0 y ~ y N O co d 0) _ L a N y O d Q U c y N 0 O C O Y y H U Q V c S c S N O . _O m O 67 ON ON C Fa > W. O O NU YO C C EQ ryy C aE d U -O E y E ' y R R p_ OI b .> O N 'O Q .� y y .R E_ LL o +.. C O Gi N 'O y N N �[ FLU, U 'O C O N w a 0 R y R N R -O T' y m U L L y O C C R y R E OI N C y C y R m y a c -O O Off— d C O +L,,. c O Jg O N y d y Yi O L d O U a R .� P3 C E E E 2 R R w ROLRmoE aO Rcpj . —P $R wFpN UOcQ E E NUR CO UR� R"N -cm aNOc. �E_?iC LEC L6Ry oO Lai d 0 0 O Ry "RUE ECo ayyON _CRO LNO 'yO —ytOOn R LOSR O I O N O '0 S N S E y -¢OryyypN '- W. m ydd E mN N OO Z N N N cZa N i N .a O` R y O .0 a (O O _O EO— R j .0 C `yam O_ ORy� O -O d NCO. C -O 00�. OE Nc.L.. o�� LEN R o.'S E � OI c N R_ R 0 UU. 'VOEa� 23p OO iO0o m yT o Oc Oo . 0 To oo m. 8 Jot gOc' O y a 3 � Z LR m OO O O 4 pp E 21, N C c O t -0mN c R E N N R R o 0 m o: y N A a+ E o O U m d OI 'C OI OI w {Cp a T a T C y c c d C. O C QdI C QdI CO .N y C '5 .o (TI .N '5 .o CO .N y O d OI d y lY y j9 N c y N O N y c VI O 2i V% O 0 O O to to to to N to y O O O o W U U 4. U L L U U U 0 c o c c 4 c c .0 i i c m e m y€ m m'o r a a� d m � m P p a S m o a a a c `o `oa c `o m c `o o `o c 4 y u .o c c c_ c o c o .o .o m o m a a y . c J c N y . b J OO m e OU. b O b O E a O p CJ N '� U ccp �i' y U O N O p h O p C m m m m b w E - C U ON_ Z O Z L Y 'C O C !0 0 N N O' _ �ij O C Q p_ y i �p C y N !0 N N " E aj N Z N pcp m C N >i c L N y g O C N O C C '� N N c O U E N y y c C c o c c t O !0 N N C Q Q N N E O T Y !0 w O E M N L c Q c N N a Z C m !0 a w L_ L 3 w o E �� y oa9 c 3� w .3 .�. t5 o'o y .w �N o a'� c N O O y b O U N O N M N C ~ U y O � N N Of s E c N c O 'N O- A b& O C 9 pC a0" N S .O � O +LO„ U N y y C r O O N O. p y '> a� N y 8 ¢ w c L a 6% d L ~ 2 P .� ems' E - c4 0 3 d O ai e E O E O O .L,. c O N O N m N y N tsn .0 U c T= U L O 2 O O 0 d E y L_ �- o_ o$ -s Eb ~ d "' c a g 2 m o .m 2 L C O 02 U O E n^ y m a ox $E y-y O ON N o ioZ OdY E H Oc>f P— O y � s vaso oo O` O N OI y E N cyi O 0 O M r N �� L Q � � C) N y L_ .C_ N (n s '=� E y .= M t0 f+f y MOsvl R T O Of t0 6 w C y L_ L 3 N N Z O L Q N O O �-. U E Q O O P C O. O O C N O Q L 0v o O . £ 8 No L yEacQ O O JN O O O O O U c O (7 O E 0 TO ¢ E s N O O Q a` G O C 6 O 6 T 6 -O O O c c O U O Q 1- L • N O N O: E � y � N N A a+ N N N O C E o O U m o w w m U C C E C 6 O CO .N CO .N N C CO y �Uk Qom, Qom, yo '> Qom, y(n N (n N N U) O C O O O rile. U U U - - c a N c o E m E€ aEi c r m a m o a m o o m S c a S= a c a Z a o N '� o '`0 2 o if E E 0 =O Q � O Q o- CS CS U -o U U - m tUo a d N 'c .y N 82 O O 0 F O -O C N o> O O- E o m s o_ °' a t o 4 L 4' o c' N O 4 e s o O > O N y C y !0 C S c O oC > OC H U > (n Q U .� N _ C °i of m UyU m > b ai u m o c _ = o_ 43 d O O a o = 0 w O N N > .4 m 8 o oc E= y 3 E >'. O -Z w O C y O -Q 0 O y o o� o_m L y o N 0 C Q N O U N f0 Of S N L19 > e O -OO 2.. N O N Nl o C N E fE 0 0 o C T .k a6 N E c N E2 N c '-O�p C N OI'C O T N_ N O1- aLy+ (Uj�- ,S ! 'N N .2 O Ol- -COS A e �. O U 42 Of N E N E O N E N 0 N CO e O .cc Oy_O�� 42 O O. O U M N N '4 d 0 0 O_ N E y N U L i N E t0 O s" 3 E m :° m a o E a o c +L... e z E s s 0 0 0 u o N N`m o o 2` o o m c d¢ S d s t° �- y 3 'L >i Z` d E S OI C _ -O - U f0 N t0 -O d NN y N '- 'p aj C f0 N N nT+ O D U L '� NN y .4 O N iJ d w d N= y ^2 L O p y N -O N p N O .- (n N OI .- c N U -O N N O y 4 0 O_ t0 C y p O .Pi E Ip -0 i N U +L.. C a0.. O 41 L C= N RI N-Z N N O 'i 3 TJ d O O. N O O C! c N w o p U y 0 N a m0= `° c" o E �.0 ' a A ?.mo d ycOO° 'tmc �E' O 4c QE +-O O O U N = Oe- 2 u N • N U p- O G r .L.. O_ J 'O o Z y 'NO A := X. m N .0 2 ^2 9 N N A a+ E o O U m c m m U w C_ a E'� m > G U Q a Ol N O N N C > C !0 N C W O _T U U m N 0_ E E p U N OU ~ $ C o a o y .E ma E a a E � o O c U N 0mN. .UO 0Tmw" mp6 '' S OC Nom? +LaNm• -�mm SNc O N .OcNN.. 0 NW O N CN a �L: O m m = N .�Uy N7 - Ea U0 E o c `m S S E U p o m o N o LE g ac > " E o T' N 8 .c o N E LE O N d E m O .L.. -O O E y N O m m m O O m '� OL$ -O -O !LO U Of -O +N.. -BOO�O 'O 'm .0 ,a U T ry N O C% t0 m m o 'E '�� O i m a 2• o �Noi m E 'E " m e 'm o Ti m $ i ':OOyc O o OOo ZN'c 0--`y E JS -oo 16 ' OyO`mm O o o yNU 2cc o .�No 0 m> O O $aO � c U O O o a U_C o pi ma o 8i'aE m c— 'OO O b ¢ y y .y O. N C O a •G N fn y0 O S y O O O T U m N m g W to O O O O N i3 — '> .y N U m= N O c m m -i — a s O 'O y 'O E 'O „m. N O c m V am :° w 0_ t0 N E H a N m Eco � m a� N N y� 0 � 0 > y U N O m wm� m N N ` OWf O ca O O L-O O LL m N N m Ncm -OLm 3m Cc 20 $ ~ Z7 �_o IN 6 Z 0 OE y 'm I m C Op1-8 a 'm n N S-cmo ` o v o.o m -co a C U m t0 T C mm d 03 d • • • '� 'a�J Q K Z � m dy dd� 0 U m m w w = w a _ 5.0 cU Q� Q o>_ Q� Q p� R y Ry O R �y N U U N U a c .� c a E a r O y U= O= of = O= R O y O= O 9 c g -o_ c a$ o'o 2 a z 0'� 2 c t0 UN U y a o a o U C U O N = 2C '0 O +�+ c '0 O O a d O TO O !0 C � `ry R = 2 N � 0 m Of N Ley Of N c c o d O O LL s R y d s 6 S to O _O = O C O N '_ � .N � y .O O. R �p N O V a0. � _ _ O a NT 0 Q N E O R O O ;F O R R _id Uy_ U N E Y E C O N U R N tp R U C 2 O_ f0/_l !0 O O_ N.J O y m R -O O O m 'O T� C C Cp Z c U pE '� C U!0 O O -O R m -O 0= 2 d �Uj y 2 L w o a R 2 N o G O 5 E _ d o� m 8 o 7, N c 2 E a� d ¢t 3 oOthO= a coNi wC O p O RC Oid .L c X o Em OLE U O N O =3 p O R¢ R N E tOn O- U =O y C U E .O tp O E0 N !0 R m R ty O'J E O N O O Y N U c Ln tg U N U tLn '� tLn = U N � Ln = C O_ ry Z N C y= N t0 O O N '� E -¢m w EO0 0P f/y1 Otn 2 $2 a y ".RT c N y ENg 'No at e aT N E E _ .� R '� N +0., 'RO +0. 2 U c y .� c O O L O L �i O L iP R = U C ia N O O L p= Z L N d ii L d U N y= R O pO J O_ tEii m Q E O_ N F-' -O d O S H S U R H+ H R � Ot OI �+ Ol'� �O, • • • U � 'p N N jQ O U m p d pf O 01 p1 of U 0 U m S c R a _ 'o `o_ J3 .f3 R S c€ a a 2 € c a a o.o a 'E5 O O m N C7 C O t z L .0 R ._ E. .0 > 15 U O yO R p O R = 0� C 'N c 5 c .� O p >> p' S S r _p R Z R O R ry U y O w �0 N A ,lam R O p p O C~ E''c p N O z.J N O LL M N N N > E E Q '00>_ O R p Z N p O N c Y 7:c U ON O .R 8 N¢ O NOp NE L0RR Z E .pQ OL p > 0pN 0 d z U ¢ RE R W a+ L_ N i w , o0 .-OO N y U Cp.J pW ts U O N-,a 'O "2 O_ o(h m d o Ei (O N N W 9 O O O 'Z ` 'o_ �3 O U O U a? m U p m ? -po U N R .� 'p&' .N y a N N d 6 S 6 p =O D =O _� U C N y m O U O O U Lm S a N > N > > - O> A f o'p> y L m> $ ad m¢ �d y N R a+ N n C � � C O U m m m m w m L E m m m m c U Q T Q T Q y> Q T R C N C C N _ � C yn {`Op � y O C O O O 4. O W U 41 U U U U S $ $ S � $ O c pi O c R GN � as as as `c°a a c7 tO ma T a .O E O n-QyUj m -QyUj m -QyUj O C m yEy O o m 7 o .o Z CK C d� _ 3 c m �' = c c4 m aci aci ox E c m U N '�. U m = N N C S CD y c a ti E Ya E .°.� m c m d� `m a a o N m C a C ntF W N L ^.g p $ fG U t0 O O O c C ct6 O y C O N (O(Jt N SO 2$ V_ N w J N N y a U N y p d N N y +0 N N c N c R 3 N c N p` N no R c.y .0 n •V � ry c ry c U .E m .� z O-Z This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT D ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The Draft Environmental Impact Report, Final Environmental Impact Report, Clarifications to the Final Environmental Impact Report (October 2019), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Technical Appendices are available at the following locations: Online: https://www.santa-ana.orq/pb/planning-division/major-planning-projects-and- documents/2525-n-main-residential-development Paper Copies: Planning and Building Agency Planning Counter, First Floor 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Santa Ana Public Library 26 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT LINK 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET EIR NO. 2018-01, DA NO. 2018-01, GPA NO. 2018-06, AA NO. 2018-10 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK EXHIBIT E CLARIFICATION TO THE 2525 N. MAIN STREET (MAGNOLIA AT THE PARK) MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse Number: 2018021031 City of Santa Ana: DP No. 2017-34 Prepared for: City of Santa Ana October 2019 Prepared by: RE Consulting RE Consulting Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose and Scope......................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Environmental Procedures...........................................................................................................................1 1.3 Summary of CEQA Analysis.........................................................................................................................1 1.4 Project Location............................................................................................................................................2 1.5 Project Objectives.........................................................................................................................................2 MODIFICATIONS TO THE ORIGINAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION......................................................................3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS...............................................................................................13 3.1 Aesthetics...................................................................................................................................................14 3.2 Air Quality ...................................................................................................................................................27 3.3 Biological Resources..................................................................................................................................28 3.4 Cultural/Historic Resources........................................................................................................................29 3.5 Greenhouse Gas Emissions.......................................................................................................................30 3.6 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.............................................................................................................31 3.7 Land Use and Planning..............................................................................................................................33 3.8 Noise..........................................................................................................................................................35 3.9 Population and Housing.............................................................................................................................41 3.10 Public Services...........................................................................................................................................43 3.11 Transportation and Traffic..........................................................................................................................45 3.12 Tribal Cultural Resources...........................................................................................................................61 3.13 Utilities and Service Systems.....................................................................................................................62 3.14 Energy........................................................................................................................................................64 Tables Table 1: Proposed Project Modifications...................................................................................................................3 Table 2: Comparison of Open Space / Recreation Areas..........................................................................................5 Table N-1: Reference Noise Levels.........................................................................................................................37 Table N-2: Project Operational Noise Levels...........................................................................................................37 Table N-3: Project Operational Noise Level Compliance.........................................................................................40 Table P-1: Comparison of Residents at Full Occupancy.........................................................................................42 Table P-2: City of Santa Ana Jobs — Housing Balance Comparison.......................................................................42 Table T-1 Comparison of Vehicular Trip Generation...............................................................................................46 Table T-2: Existing Condition with Modified Project- Intersection Levels of Service ...............................................47 Table T-3: Existing Condition with Modified Project — Roadway Segment Levels of Service..................................48 Table T4 Existing Condition with Modified Project Queuing..................................................................................49 Table T-5: Existing Condition with Modified Project Freeway Segment Levels of Service......................................51 Table T-6: Opening Year (2020) with Modified Project - Intersection Levels of Service..........................................52 Table T-7: Opening Year (2020) with Modified Project — Roadway Segment Levels of Service .............................53 Table T-8: Opening Year (2020) with Modified Project Queuing.............................................................................54 Table T-9: Year 2040 with Modified Project - Intersection Levels of Service...........................................................55 Table T-10: Year 2040 with Modified Project — Roadway Segment Levels of Service ............................................56 Table T-11: Year 2040 with Modified Project Queuing............................................................................................57 Table T-12: Year 2040 with Modified Project Freeway Segment Levels of Service................................................58 Table T-1I Parking Demand Per the ITE Rates.....................................................................................................59 Table T-14: Parking Survey Data Summary ............................................................................................................60 Table U-1: Comparison of Water Demands.............................................................................................................63 Figures Figure 1: Modified Project Site Plan..........................................................................................................................4 Figure 2: Modified Project Open Space Plan.............................................................................................................6 Figure 3: Modified Project Site Access......................................................................................................................8 Figure 4: Modified Project North and West Building Elevations.................................................................................9 Figure 5: Modified Project South and East Building Elevations...............................................................................10 Figure 6: Modified Project Conceptual Renderings.................................................................................................11 Figure 7: Visual Simulation Viewpoint Locations....................................................................................................15 Figure 8: N. Main Street View Simulations..............................................................................................................17 Figure 9: Eastbound Santiago Park View Simulations.............................................................................................18 Figure 10: Westbound Santiago Park View Simulations..........................................................................................19 Figure 11: N. Spurgeon Avenue View Simulations..................................................................................................21 Figure 12: Edgewood Road at N. Bush Street View Simulations............................................................................22 Figure 13: Original Project Shade and Shadow.......................................................................................................24 Figure 14: Modified Project Shade and Shadow......................................................................................................25 Figure 15: Modified Project Operationals Noise Source and Receiver Locations....................................................39 Attachment A: Supplemental Operational Noise Analysis Attachment B: Supplemental Traffic Analysis Attachment C: Parking Analysis Acronyms AFY acre feet yearly APNs Assessor Parcel Numbers AQMP Air Quality Management Plan ASHRAE American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resource Board CCR California Code of Regulations CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level DAMP Drainage Area Management Plan DEIR Draft Environmental Impact Report DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control EIR Environmental Impact Report EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESLs Environmental Screening Levels GHG greenhouse gas gpd gallons per day HOV High Occupancy Vehicle HSP Health and Safety Plan HVAC heating, ventilation and air conditioning I Interstate ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers LID Low Impact Development LOS Level of Service MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MERV Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value OCFA Orange County Fire Authority OCHA Orange County Health Care Agency OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PDF Project Design Feature PM Particulate Matter RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SMP Soil Management Plan STC Sound Transmission Class SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan USGS United States Geologic Survey UWMP Urban Water Management Plan VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled WQMP Water Quality Management Plan 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Scope This document is a Clarification to the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Magnolia at the Park Multi - Family Residential Project (Original Project) (SCH Number: 2018021031) located at 2525 N. Main Street in the City of Santa Ana. The Draft EIR (DEIR), Final EIR, in conjunction with this Clarification, serve as the environmental review for the proposed Modified Project. Subsequent to circulation of the Draft EIR and preparation of the Final EIR for the Original Project, but prior to certification of the Final EIR, the Project applicant has revised the development proposal to the City. This Clarification document evaluates the revised development proposal (Modified Project), as described herein. The Modified Project proposes reducing the number of residential units by 48.4 percent, reducing the scale of the structures, and revising the vehicular parking and access to the site. This Clarification evaluates these modifications to determine if any new or substantially more severe environmental impacts would occur from implementation of the Modified Project that were not identified in the EIR. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.) (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, Section 15000 et sec.), the City is the Lead Agency charged with deciding whether or not to approve the Project with or without the proposed modifications. This Clarification addresses the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Modified Project and will be considered by the City during the Project approval process, in tandem with the Draft EIR, the Final EIR, all oral and written comments presented to the City, and all other documents comprising the Project's administrative record. 1.2 Environmental Procedures This Clarification to the Final EIR, which will be incorporated into the Final EIR, has been prepared to determine if the proposed Modified Project would result in new or substantially increased environmental effects than were originally identified in the EIR, and to determine if any of the conditions triggering the need to recirculate the EIR are present. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5, a Lead Agency is required to recirculate an EIR when significant new information is added to the EIR after public notice is given of the availability of a draft EIR for public review, but before the EIR is certified. `New information" includes changes in the proposed project or environmental setting, as well as additional data or other information. CEQA considers new information to be "significant" when it deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect. CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5(a) specifies that "Significant new information" related to impacts that requires recirculation include: (1) A new significant environmental impact would result from the project or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be implemented, or (2) A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result unless mitigation measures are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance. In addition, CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5(e) states that a decision not to recirculate an EIR must be supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record. Therefore, this Clarification considers whether the proposed Modified Project would result in a new significant environmental impact, or a substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact previously identified in the EIR. 1.3 Summary of CEQA Analysis In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, and as detailed herein, the City of Santa Ana completed a comprehensive analysis of the proposed Modified Project and found that none of the conditions specified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 are present. Accordingly, recirculation of the EIR is not required prior to the City's consideration of the Modified Project, and no new or substantially more severe adverse environmental effects would occur from implementation of the Modred Project. Pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, this Clarification focuses on the potential environmental impacts associated with the Modified Project that might cause a change in the conclusions of the EIR, including significant new information related to new or increased adverse environmental effects. In other words, this document compares the environmental effects of the Project as evaluated in the EIR to those of the Modified Project and considers whether the proposed modifications would result in new or substantially more severe impacts than was disclosed in the EIR. Specifically, this document analyzes whether a reduction of 240 residential units (a 48.4 percent reduction), a reduction in the height of the proposed structures, and a re -design of the proposed site entrance (as detailed below), the addition of surface level parking, and a lot line adjustment would result in the new or substantially more severe impacts than were identified in the EIR. As detailed herein, implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in any new or substantially greater impacts and no new mitigation measures are required. On the basis of these findings and the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, no recirculated EIR is required for the modified multi -family residential project. As required by CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5(e) the analysis throughout this Clarification provides substantial evidence to support these findings. 1.4 Project Location The Project is located at 2525 North (N.) Main Street, in the northern portion of the City of Santa Ana approximately 500 feet east of Interstate (1)-5. The site is located on the northeast comer of N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. Regional access to the Project site is provided by 1-5 and the N. Main Street exit, and local access to the Project site is provided by N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. The Project site consists of 6 contiguous parcels that include Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 003-010-028, 003- 010-01, 003-010-03, 003-010-025, 003-010-026, 003-010-030 and is located within the U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) Orange County 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Quadrangle. 1.5 Project Objectives The Project objectives have not been modified. As described by the EIR, the following objectives support the Project's underlying purpose to develop multi -family residential uses on the Project site and assist with meeting the City's housing needs: • Redevelop existing underutilized parcels to implement development of new high -quality housing. • Increase high -quality housing near existing employment centers. • Promote an improved jobs/housing balance by locating attractive new housing in proximity to employment centers. • Provide housing in close proximity to commercial areas, freeways, and transit. • Redevelop existing land uses that would utilize existing infrastructure, including: water, sewer, arterial roadways, transit, and freeways. • Implement capital investment to enhance the City's economic and fiscal viability pursuant to the City of Santa Ana Strategic Plan. • Provide a safe, high -quality, modem residential community with open space and various recreation amenities. 2 MODIFICATIONS TO THE ORIGINAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Modified Project would reduce the height, size, and scale of the Project that was analyzed in the EIR. The Modified Project would redevelop the 5.9-acre Project site to provide 256 for -rent multi -family. The residential units would be provided within approximately 277,281 square feet of residential structures that range between 2 and 4 stories in height. The 2-story residential structures (24-feet 8-inches in height), located on the eastern portion of the site, and be setback a minimum of 90-feet from the eastern boundary of the site, as shown in Figure 1, Modified Project Site Plan. The 3-story residential structures (36-feet 9-inches in height) would be located behind the two-story structures on the eastern portion of the site. The remainder of the residential structures would be 4-stories with a roofline of approximately (49-feet 5-inches in height). The setback of the building along the southern boundary (Edgewood Road) has been increased from 13 feet to approximately 134-feet, with inclusion of a surface parking lot. The residential units would be developed around a 167,253 square foot central parking structure that would have one 26,700 square foot level of underground parking and 5 levels of aboveground parking. The parking structure would be centrally located onsite and would be approximately 59-feet in height. The highest point of the proposed development would be the top of the elevator tower to the amenity deck on top of the parking structure, which would be approximately 74 feet 5 inches from the ground surface. Table 1 provides a comparison between the Original Project as evaluated in the EIR and the proposed Modified Project. Table 1: Proposed Project Modifications Project Characteristic Original Project(per EIR) Modified Project Change Number of Units 496 units 256 units -240 units Density of Residential 84 units per acre 58 units per acre` -26 units per acre` Development Area Residential Unit Mix Studio: 73 units —15% Studio: 74 units — 29% Studio: +1 units 1 bdr: 307 units — 62% 1 bdr: 103 units — 40% 1 bdr: -204 units 2 bdr: 88 units —18% 2 bdr: 75 units — 29% 2 bdr: -13 units 3 bdr: 28 units — 6% 3 bdr: 4 units — 2% 3 bdr: -24 units Residential Unit Sizes Studios: 590 — 740 SF Studios: 560 — 590 SF Average unit size is 1 bdr: 610 —1,090 SF 1 bdr: 630 — 930 SF smaller 2 bdr: 910 —1,470 SF 2 bdr: 910 —1,180 SF 3 bdr: 1,360 —1,520 SF 3 bdr: 1,360 SF Stories of Residential Structures 2 to 5 stories with mezzanines 2 to 4 stories -1 story Maximum Height of Residential 65-feet 8-inches 49-feet 5-inches -1 6-feet 3-inches Structures Height of Parking Structure 90 feet (7 above -ground levels) 59 feet (5 above -ground -31 feet Roofline levels Highest Structure Fitness Center Roofline on Elevator Tower Roofline -15 feet 5 inches Western portion of the Amenity towards western portion of Deck — 90 feet site — 74 feet 5-inches. Building Setback from Eastern 40 foot minimum 90 foot minimum +50 feet Side Boundary Building Setback from Southern Between 10 feet and 13 feet 4 134 feet 6-inches +121 feet Side Boundary inches Size of Subterranean Parking 1 level 40,000 square feet 1 level 26,700 square feet -13,300 square feet Parking — Total 904 total spaces 511 spaces dedicated -393 dedicated spaces 691 including shared parking Spaces Per Unit 1.8 2.0 dedicated +0.2 dedicated 2.7 w/ shared parking +0.9 w/ shared parking Tandem Spaces 122 0 -122 Electric Vehicle S aces 25 15 -10 ADA Spaces 21 1 12 -9 Notes: bdr = bedroom, SF = square feet, w/ = with, w/o = without `not including the OC Discovery Cube shared parking area of 1.42 acres i �3 _..- Edgewood Road 46 U' o r � iar.e6e i , � p� ry may` m i s 4 I > a o a 0 2 m — E '3 m � 63 � f R W � - .�'i'p oQatW s � m � U � C r� I � U C O � O O � O N j o � LL r F' LL 1 0 As shown in Table 1, the proposed Modified Project would reduce the development by 240 units, from 496 units to 256 units, a 48.4 percent reduction. This would result in a residential density of 58 units per acre, not including the OC Discovery Cube shared parking area of 1.42 acres (described below). The proposed Modified Project's residential structures would be one-story lower in height and eliminate mezzanines (approximately 16-feet lower) and would be separated from the eastern side of the site by an additional 50 feet in increased building setback compared to the Original Project. The height of the centrally located parking structure would be reduced by approximately 31 feet and the highest point of the proposed structures (the roof elevator shaft) would be 15.5 feet lower. Additionally, the level of subterranean parking would be reduced in size by 13,300 square feet from approximately 40,000 square feet for the Original Project to approximately 26,700 square feet for the Modified Project. Open Space, Recreation, and Other Amenities The Modified Project would provide 3 open space recreational courtyards totaling 12,920 square feet of exterior open space and recreation facilities, this is a reduction of 9,980 square feet from the 22,900 square feet of exterior open space within 5 open space recreational courtyards that were included in the Original Project. The open space areas are shown in Figure 2, Modified Project Open Space Plan. The types of exterior recreational amenities proposed for the Modified Project are the same as those provided for the Original Project and include outdoor kitchens/barbeques, fire pits, water features, seating areas, tables, and trellis covered patios. The Modified Project would also provide a rooftop amenity deck with a pool, spa, restrooms, poolside seating, and other amenities, however, the amenity deck would be 2,119 square feet smaller (Table 2). The interior residential amenities would also be reduced in comparison to the Original Project. As shown in Table 2, the Modified Project would not include the originally proposed Wellness Center, Community Room, Resident Services/Business Center room, Bicycle Repair Room, and Dog Washroom. In addition, the size of the Fitness Center would be reduced by 2,279 square feet. Table 2: Comparison of Open Space / Recreation Areas Amenity Original Project Modified Project Change Open Space Recreational Courtyards 22,900 SF 12,920 SF -9,980 Wellness Center 1,600 SF 0 -1,600 SF Community Room 4,700 SF 0 - 4,700 SF Resident Services /Business Center 3,900 SF 0 -3,900 SF Bicycle Repair Room 280 SF 0 SF -280 SF Dog Wash Room 40 SF 0 SF -40 SF Fitness Center 5,400 SF 3,121 SF -2,279 SF Amenity Deck 11,400 SF 9,281 SF -2,119 SF Notes: SF square feet Parking The Modified Project would provide onsite parking in both a central parking structure and a surface parking lot that would be located on the eastern and southern portions of the site, as shown in Figure 1. The central parking structure would provide 407 spaces that would be dedicated to the onsite residential uses. The surface parking lot would contain 284 parking spaces, of which 104 would be dedicated to the onsite residential uses and 180 would be shared with the OC Discovery Cube that is located across N. Main Street from the Project site and currently utilizes the site for 180 parking spaces. Edgewood Road � � m IIIIIIIIIIII .............................., _ N 0 3 R w N N \ M \ ® b U N AV 0 U 5 N 5 N ca a i L UUL W \ CN E , a C N J a R U N m o. c m c s N O c Q - Q 4 LL O The Modified Project would share the 180 spaces provided in the southern portion of the site. The parking spaces would be used by the OC Discovery Cube from %00 a.m. to HO p.m. daily and would be available for the onsite residences between HO p.m. to %00 p.m. daily. A rolling gate would separate the onsite residential and OC Discovery Cube parking areas and be opened and closed for management of onsite parking. As part of the agreement for use of the space for OC Discovery Cube parking, the Modified Project includes a perpetual easement of the shared surface lot area. The number of parking spaces for the residential units would be increased to provide 2.0 parking spaces per unit that are dedicated to the onsite residences, which would increase onsite parking capacity in comparison to the Original Project. In addition, the Modified Project would include 180 shared parking spaces that would be available for residential uses after HO p.m. daily, which results in 2.7 parking spaces per units between HO p.m. to %00 p.m. daily. Site Access and Circulation The proposed Modified Project would provide vehicular access to the site from two driveways along N. Main Street. The southern driveway would provide right -in and right -out access to the parking area to be used by the OC Discovery Cube. The northern driveway would be used for the residential uses and would guide vehicles to the parking structure and provide direct access to the residential units, guest parking, and the leasing office. The residential parking on the east side of the site would also be accessed through the parking structure. The northern driveway would also include a public use access easement to Santiago Park, and the existing gated access at the east leg of the N. Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive intersection would be removed. To provide for left -turn vehicular access into and out of the Project site, the southern leg of the intersection of N. Main Street at Walkie Way (including the pedestrian crossings and signals) would be moved approximately 80 to 90-feet to the south. The north leg of the N. Main Street crosswalk would be removed, the south leg of the crosswalk would connect the Project site and the Discovery Cube, and the median would be modified during construction of the Modified Project. The proposed site access is shown on Figure 3, Modified Project Site Access. The intersection signalization of Walkie Way (going east and west into and out of the site) would be modified to operate with split - phasing' and the N. Main Street northbound and southbound left -turn lanes (into and out of the site) would operate with lead/lag phasing2. Architecture and Design No changes to the architecture style and aesthetic design of the Project are proposed. As described in the EIR, the Project's architectural design would integrate the proposed structures, landscaping, and open space courtyard areas and also provide varied building heights and projections. Conceptual building elevations showing the Modified Project are provided in Figures 4 and 5 and conceptual renderings of the Modified Project are provided in Figure 6. The architecture retains vertical variations, horizontal roof elements, and various setbacks. The exterior color palate remains the same including various earth toned colors, such as beige, brown, and grey with black and metal accents, as well as stone veneer, stucco, sand plaster finishes, and wood facade accents. Walls and Fencing No changes to the walls and fencing are proposed. As detailed in the EIR, the existing 6-foot high masonry wall along the eastern portion of the site would be raised to 8-feet in height, and the existing fence along the northern boundary of the site would be replaced with a 6-foot-high tubular steel fence, which, along with landscaping, would delineate the Project site from the Santiago Park area. In addition, the fire lane entrances would be secured with a decorative tubular steel gate with a knoxbox for emergency access. I Split phasing is a signal that gives a green phase for all vehicle movements of one direction (e.g., northbound through, right, and left) followed by a phase for all movements of the opposite direction (e.g., southbound through, right, and left). 2 Lead/lag phasing is a signal sequence where the green left turn arrow is either before or after the oncoming thru green. T N « I m3 y5 n No mU I xt a2 my I y n ¢ 6 N 20 R d0. dU IT -- - -- - - I '1 I kll W 3 : w m m p O a fa« N J O. d3' . O I h'aro . y U N m m a U m N O y :+ 0 ° t 813: ° o � o a OfY �k C U ... m n e U y o C ` \$ b J .:� a T T O > ~ y OW �01 06 m OA N 0 W W fA \ \ \ \ 0 m O 2 N � N" a-2 O� a`� LL 71 C O v �e e`�rE LK iq Lx E F o a @ B @ 11J N LL W I r I N z Ili � UOIIUA013 43noS y d y � W LL 1. View At Main Street & Edgewood Road Looking East 3. View On Main Street Looking At Leasing Center 5. View On Main Street Looking Southeast 7. View At Edgewood Road Looking West SOURCE: Architects Orange, 2019 2. View On Main Street Looking Northeast 4. View On Main Street Looking Southeast 6. View At Northeast Comer Looking West 6 7 i KeyMap U� I 5 4A ? 21 3 Figure 6: Modified Project Conceptual Renderings Landscaping and Lighting No changes to lighting are proposed, however, due to the provision of surface parking on the site, the amount of landscaping would be reduced from approximately 0.94 acre of landscaping to approximately 0.48 acre of landscaping on the site. The landscaped areas would be located throughout the site and additional street trees would be planted along N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. The residential building would be adjacent to landscaped courtyards. Many of the existing mature trees that line the eastern and southern site boundary would remain, however, trees that are located throughout the remainder of the site, within construction areas, or are in poor or declining health would be removed. New ornamental landscaping would be installed throughout the site that would include a variety of 24- through 48-inch box trees, 1 — 5-gallon shrubs, and ground covers. Additional trees ranging in size from 24- to 48-inch box trees would be added to the eastern property line to fill in gaps in the mature landscaping to screen views between the site and adjacent residential areas. The Project would also install 24- and 36-inch box trees and tree wells along Edgewood Road and N. Main Street and may replace existing street trees. New plant species used in the landscaping would be drought -tolerant, non-invasive, and compliant with the City of Santa Ana's landscaping requirements. Likewise, the new irrigation installed onsite would meet the City's requirements for water efficiency (Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-1503, Landscape Water Use Standards). As described in the EIR, new exterior lighting onsite would be provided for security and to accent the landscaping, Project signage, light walkways, and parking areas. The new lighting would be focused on the Project site, shield offsite areas, and would be compliant with the City's lighting regulations (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 8-210 and Section 41-611.1). Infrastructure No changes to the proposed infrastructure connections are proposed, and these connections would include the following: • Water Infrastructure: As detailed in the EIR, the Project would install new water infrastructure on site that would connect to the existing 16-inch water pipelines in N. Main Street and Edgewood Road. The new onsite water system would be compliant with the CalGreen Plumbing Code (Title 24) for efficient use of water. • Wastewater Infrastructure: Wastewater from the Project site currently discharges into existing City -owned 6- and 12-inch sewer lines within Edgewood Road. As detailed in the EIR, the Project would install a new onsite sewer system that connects to the existing sewer lines in Edgewood Road. • Drainage Infrastructure: As detailed in the EIR, the existing 10-inch storm water drain that conveys unfiltered runoff to Santiago Creek would be capped and all of the runoff from the site would be conveyed to new infiltrating landscaping areas, catch basins, and storm water drains that would be sized to meet the Project's needs. The onste system would connect to the existing City drain system in N. Main Street and Edgewood Road, which discharges to Santiago Creek. Project Design Features A reduction in the number of electric vehicle charging stations are proposed. The Original Project included at least 25 electric vehicle charging stations and the Modified Project includes at least 15 electric vehicle charging stations. No other changes in Project Design Features (PDFs) are proposed. The following PDFs would prevent or lessen environmental impacts and would be implemented in the same manner as mitigation measures: • PDF-1: The landscape plan will incorporate the existing mature trees located along the eastern Project site boundary and to the extent feasible protect and preserve the existing mature trees within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary that were identified as healthy by the Arborist Report. 0 PDF-2: The Project will include at least 15 electric vehicle charging stations. PDF-3: The Project will include installation and maintenance of air filtration systems with efficiencies equal to or exceeding a Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) 16 as defined by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 52.2 within all buildings. • PDF-4: Outdoor trash receptacles will be provided throughout the common areas of the site, including the dog park area, for the tenants to dispose of their refuse in a proper manner. Property maintenance will provide trash and waste material removal, including dog feces disposal bags, to maintain a trash -free property. All wastes shall be collected and properly disposed of off -site. PDF-5: The Project will include safety design features for security, such as low -intensity security lighting, keypads for building access, security cameras, and 24-hour security personnel. Construction Activities and Schedule No changes to the proposed construction schedule are proposed. The Modified Project would be developed within the 18-month period evaluated by the EIR and involve one construction phase that includes: (1) demolition of existing building, pavement, removal of infrastructure and some landscaping, (2) grading and excavation, (3) construction of drainage, utilities, and subgrade infrastructure, (4) building construction, and (5) paving and application of architectural coatings. No units will be leased until construction of the entire Project is completed and occupancy permits have been received from the City. As described in the EIR, construction activities would be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday and excluding Sundays and federal holidays, which would be consistent with the City's Noise Ordinance (Municipal Code Section 18-314, Special Provisions). However, typical construction activities would occur Monday through Friday, generally 20 days a month. Initial site preparation would include demolition of the existing building and several areas of asphaltic concrete pavements. Demolition would remove all subsurface remnants, including foundations, floor slabs, and any utilities that will not be reutilized with the new development. It is anticipated that a maximum of 120 construction workers would be onsite at one time, which would occur during the building construction phase. General Plan Land Use and Zoning Amendments The Modified Project would require City approval of the same General Plan Land Use and zoning amendments that are required by the Original Project. These amendments would change the land use designation of the site from Professional & Administration Office (PAO) to District Center (DC) and an Amendment Application (zone change) from Professional (P) to Specific Development (SD) to provide site specific development standards. 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The evaluation of environmental impacts in this Clarification summarizes conclusions made in the EIR and compares them to the impacts of the proposed Modified Project. Mitigation measures referenced are from the EIR Mitigation Monitoring Program and would be applied to proposed Modified Project. This comparative analysis has been undertaken pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, to provide the factual basis for determining whether potential impacts related to the proposed Modified Project requires recirculation of the Draft EIR. As discussed in further detail in Section 1.2, Environmental Procedures, of this Clarification, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5, a recirculated EIR is not required unless the Lead Agency determines that one or more of the following conditions related to environmental impacts are met: 1) a new significant environmental impact would result from the project or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be implemented, and/or 2) a substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result. 3.1 Aesthetics Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Viewshed Impacts Section 4.1, Aesthetics, of the DEIR describes that with implementation of the Project, views of the Project site from the adjacent Santiago Park area would change from setback views of the existing 2-story office building partially screened by mature landscaping to that of forefront views of the 5-story residential building, with a landscaped tree buffer directly adjacent to the park. This would result in a significant and unavoidable change in views of the Project site from the park. The difference in scale and height, due to the Projects location adjacent to the park, and limited visual setback buffer with the proposed landscaping, would result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks that is considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria related to the visual character of the site in comparison to the park. Thus, the EIR determined that the visual change in height, scale, and setbacks from Santiago Park would be significant and unavoidable. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-16 through 4.1-26.) In addition, the EIR describes that implementation of the Project would result in a significant and unavoidable change in visual scale, height, and setbacks from Edgewood Road and N. Bush Street. The background views of urban buildings would become forefront views, and the proposed size and scale of the Project would substantially increase the overall visual density of the built environment. The difference in visual scale and height with the proposed structure adjacent to the roadway and limited visual setback buffer, would be substantial and considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria. Thus, the EIR determined that the visual change related to the height, scale, and setback from Edgewood Road and N. Bush Street would be significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-21.) The EIR describes that PDF-1 that would incorporate the existing mature trees located along the eastern Project site boundary and to the extent feasible protect and preserve the existing mature trees within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary that were identified as healthy by the Arborist Report. This was determined to reduce the visual impacts of the Project. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-18.) The EIR also included Mitigation Measure AES-1 that requires measures be implemented to retain and protect the trees along the eastern and southern Project site boundary. This measure was determined to reduce visual impacts. However, even with implementation of PDF-1 and Mitigation Measure AES-1, the EIR determined that the Project would still result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks that was considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria. As a result, impacts related to existing visual character or quality of the site were determined to be significant and unavoidable. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-16 through 4.1-26.) Shade and Shadow Impacts Section 4.1, Aesthetics, of the DEIR describes that the Original Project would not exceed the City's thresholds for shade and shadow impacts. The EIR determined that shadow -sensitive use areas (where sunlight is important to its function) would not be shaded by project -related structures for more than 3 hours between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. between fall and spring, or for more than 4 hours between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. between spring and fall compared to existing conditions. Because these City's thresholds were not exceeded, impacts related to shade and shadow were determined to be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-24 through 4.1-26.). Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Viewshed Impacts Consistent with the methodology in the EIR, photo -simulations were prepared to demonstrate the degree of visual change that would result from implementation of the Modified Project. The photo -simulations have been utilized to depict, at a realistic yet conceptual level of detail, the proposed conditions from public locations after construction and with 5-years maturity of the proposed landscaping. Figure 7 provides the public viewpoint locations for each of the visual simulations. Figure 7: Visual Simulation Viewpoint Locations SOURCE: Wenjie Studio, 2019 Viewpoint A: N. Main Street. Figure 8 provides a comparison of the existing northbound view of the Project site along, N. Main Street at Edgewood Road, the change to the view as described in the EIR, and the change to the view that would occur from the Modified Project. As shown, and described in the EIR, in the existing condition, the predominant visual feature on the site from this viewpoint is a large parking lot that is partially screened behind mature ornamental landscaping of various species. Similar to the change detailed in the EIR, the Modified Project would alter the existing view by development of forefront structures that would be larger in height and scale than the existing office building on the site. However, the Modified Project would be lower in height and smaller in scale than the Original Project structures, and the existing prominent structures along the N. Main Street view corridor, such as the OC Discovery Cube and the 10-story office buildings would remain the visual focal point. The structures proposed by the Modified Project along the N. Main Street frontage would be 4-stories with a roofline that is approximately 49-feet 5-inches; this is 16-feet lower in height than the Original Project's 5-story, plus mezzanine structure that had a roofline of approximately 64 feet high along N. Main Street. The parking structure for the Modified Project is proposed to be approximately 59-feet high, which would be 31 feet lower than the 90-foot high parking structure that was evaluated in the EIR. Likewise, the highest point of the Modified Project in the western portion of the site is 15 feet 5 inches lower than the highest point of the Original Project. Figure 8 shows that the smaller buildings constructed by the Modified Project would have greater screening by landscaping and would be less prominent than the structures developed by the Original Project. As shown, the contrast in views that would occur from the Modified Project is less than what would occur from the Original Project. Thus; no new or greater impact related to changes to views along N. Main Street would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Viewpoints B and C: Santiago Park. Figures 9 and 10 provide comparisons of the existing views of the Project site from the adjacent Santiago Park area, the change to the views as described in the EIR, and the change to the views that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. As shown, and described in the EIR, the existing features in Santiago Park adjacent to the Project site include an asphalt bike trail, scattered landscaping, weedy vegetation, tree stumps, and limited groundcover. Similar to the changes detailed in the EIR, the Modified Project would alter the existing views by development of forefront residential buildings adjacent to Santiago Park that would be greater in scale, height, and closer than the existing office building and would be partially screened by new trees on the site. The development would change views from middle ground views of a 2-story office building to forefront views of a modern urban development. Thus, like the Original Project, the Modred Project would also result in a significant and unavoidable impact because the difference in scale and height, due to the developments location adjacent to the park, and limited visual setback buffer with the proposed landscaping, would result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks that is considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria related to visual character. However, the Modified Project would be lower in height and smaller in scale than the Original Project structures. The structures proposed by the Modified Project along the Santiago Park frontage would be 4-stories with a roofline that is approximately 49-feet 5-inches. This is more than 16-feet lower in height than the Original Project's 5-story, plus mezzanine structure that had a roofline of approximately 65-feet along the northern elevation (as shown in Figure 4). In addition, the Modified Project includes a 10-foot minimum landscaped setback between Santiago Park and the residential structures (shown in Figure 2, Modified Project Open Space Plan), which is slightly larger than the 7-foot minimum setback provided by the Original Project (see, DER, Figure 3-5). Figures 9 and 10 show that the smaller buildings constructed by the Modified Project and increased landscaped setback along Santiago Park would result in greater landscape screening and the views of the Modified Project would be less prominent than those of the Original Project. As shown, the contrast in views that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project is less than what would occur from the Original Project. Thus, although impacts Existing View Draft EIR Project Proposed Modified Project Figure 8: Viewpoint A: N. Main Street SOURCE: Wenjie Studio, 2019 Existing View Draft EIR Project Proposed Modified Project Figure 9: Viewpoint B: Santiago Park at N. Main Street and Walkie Way SOURCE: Wenjie Studio, 2019 LAN 4 pp� would remain significant and unavoidable, no new or greater impacts related to changes to views from Santiago Park would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Viewpoint D: N. Spurgeon Street. Figure 11 provides a comparison of the existing view of the Project site from N. Spurgeon Street, the change to the view as described in the EIR, and the change to the view that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. The Modified Project includes a minimum of a 90-foot building setback from the eastern boundary of the Project site and buffered by landscaping. This is an increased setback of 50-feet in comparison to the Original Project, which included a 40-foot minimum setback. As shown on Figure 1, Modified Project Site Plan, and Figure 5, Modified Project Conceptual Building Elevations, the proposed 4-story (approximately 49-foot 5-inch high) structures would be set behind the 2-story (approximately 24-feet high) and 3-story (approximately 36 feet high) portions of the Project. The 4-story structure would be more than 16 feet lower in height than the approximately 65-foot high structures that were previously proposed. As shown in Figure 11, with implementation of Mitigation Measure AES-1 and Project Design Feature PDF-1, which would increase landscaping along the eastern boundary through installation of new trees ranging in size from 24- to 48-inch box trees and protection of the existing healthy trees, a large majority of the Project structure rooflines generated by the Modified Project would not be seen from N. Spurgeon Street. The 50-foot increased setback and lower structures would screen views of the buildings developed by the Modified Project. Limited views of the Modified Project could occur at some points along N. Spurgeon Street. However, these views would be less than what would occur by the Original Project, under which views of some of the 5th floor units would be visible from N. Spurgeon Street, as shown in Figure 11. Also, due to the planned location of the parking structure in the central portion of the Project site, it would not be visible from N. Spurgeon Street. The trajectory of views from the viewpoint along N. Spurgeon Street are shown on Figure 11. The design of the Project in combination with line -of -sight from N. Spurgeon result in the parking structure being screened from view. Any potential views of the parking structure from other locations to the east of the Project site would be within background views, which would be similar to, but lower in height than, views of the Original Project. Therefore, the Modified Project would result in reduced visual impacts from N. Spurgeon Street compared to the Original Project, and no new or greater impacts related to changes to views from N. Spurgeon Street would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Viewpoint F: Edgewood Road at N. Bush Street. Figure 12 provides a comparison of the existing view of the Project site from Edgewood Road at N. Bush Street, the change to the view as described in the EIR, and the change to the view that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. The Modified Project would change views from Edgewood Road at N. Bush Street from that of a vacant surface parking lot to views of a multi -story residential building set behind a surface parking lot that provides a building setback of approximately 134 feet. The background views of urban buildings would become middle ground views, and forefront views would be of the surface parking lot. The size and scale of the proposed structures would increase the overall visual density of the built environment. The difference in visual scale and height with the proposed structure, would be substantial and considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria. Thus, the visual change related to the height, scale, and setback from the Modified Project at the Edgewood Road and N. Bush Street viewpoint would continue to be significant and unavoidable. However, the Modified Project would be lower in height and smaller in scale than the Original Project. The structures proposed by the Modified Project on the southern portion of the Project site near Edgewood Road at Bush Street would be 4-stories with a rootline of approximately 49-feet 5-inches from the ground surface (shown on Figure 5 [south elevation]). The buildings along Edgewood Road at Bush Street would be between 16-feet 3-inches lower in height than the approximately 65-foot high 5-story Original Project buildings in the southern portion of the site and would be set behind the surface parking lot, providing greater visual distance and less visual density (as shown in Figure 12). The 59 foot high parking structure (that would be 31 feet lower than the Original Project parking structure) would not be visible from this viewpoint/trajectory, as it would be located behind the 4-story residential building, but it could be visible in background views from other locations farther back from the Project site that may allow for a higher/taller view perspective. } 1 IWO- ems} Y akIr : r. t �r y Mile ❑- _' { e�i[!+{ IIIR�ia�p pips nilurt 'tR,i�i¢IPdlpgiplllBP�fl;iih.. � l ae 11 11 �■ ` e vu As shown, the change in Viewpoint F that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project is similar in character to the change from the Original Project. However, the smaller buildings constructed by the Modified Project would result in reduced visual scale, as they would be set behind the surface parking lot. Thus, the views of the Modified Project would be visually less dense and provide a greater visual setback than those of the Original Project. As shown, the contrast in views that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project is less than what would occur from the Original Project. Thus, although impacts from the Modified Project to Viewpoint F would be significant and unavoidable due to a substantial visual contrast from existing conditions, no new or greater impacts related to changes to views from Edgewood Road at N. Bush Street would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Shade and Shadow Impacts Consistent with the methodology applied in the EIR, shade/shadow diagrams were developed by using three- dimensional massing models of the Modified Project and software that induces sunlight conditions to illustrate the shadow effects of the proposed structures. The shadows shown are the summer/winter solstices and the spring/autumnal equinoxes as they show the longest and shortest shadows. Further, the time periods of 9:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., and 3:00 p.m., show the shade pattern throughout the day. In addition, the spring and autumn (March/September) shadow patterns are similar in nature, and are therefore grouped together. As described previously, the structures developed by the Modified Project would be between 16 and 31 feet lower in height than the structures described in the EIR. In addition, the setback on the east has increased to 90-feet from 40- feet and the setback along the south has increased from 13 feet to approximately 134-feet, with inclusion of a surface parking lot. Figures 13 and 14 show that the shade and shadow that would be generated by the Modified Project is very similar to, but slightly less than the shade and shadow that would be generated by the Original Project. In both project conditions, shadow from the proposed structures would encroach into N. Main Street and Santiago Park. However, the shadows from the Modified Project would not encroach into the adjacent residential areas. Figure 14 shows that shadows from the Modified Project at 3:00 p.m. during the winter solstice would be limited to the Project site. The shadows on the adjacent residential areas would be limited to shadows from the existing walls, fencing and residential structures. Thus, shadows from the Modified Project would be less than those generated by the Original Project. In both the Original Project and Modified Project conditions, shadows from the proposed development would not result in shadows to sensitive use areas (where sunlight is important to its function) for more than 3 hours between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. between fall and spring, or for more than 4 hours between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. between spring and fall. Therefore, similar to the Original Project, the Modified Project would not exceed the City's shade and shadow thresholds. Thus, no new or greater impacts related to shade and shadow would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Aesthetics As described in the EIR for the Original Project, the Modified Project would alter the existing views by development of forefront residential buildings that would result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks that is considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria related to visual character from specific viewpoints. However, the Modified Project would be lower in height and smaller in scale than the Original Project. The contrast in views that would occur from implementation of the Modified Project is less than what would occur from the Original Project. Thus, although impacts related to specific viewpoints would remain significant and unavoidable, no new or greater impacts would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. Spring/Autumn Equinox SANTIAGO PARK >rW Q/-i R,RTwOPa.. Pi North „�„ III 7 o- , �' n-, North March/September - gam March/September - 12pm Summer Solstice urmaLOPARK IYYIr���f� !yi I UR j G Nort December - 9am Source: DEIR Figure 4.1-13 Prepared By: RT Design, Ron Teitel North June-12pm Winter Solstice December - 12pm I ARK \ l"''• urm i I. U1 � December - 3pm Figure 13: Original Project Project Shade and Shadow March/September - 9am E North June - 9am December - 9am Source: Architects Orange, 2019 Prepared By: RT Design, Ron Teel Spring/Autumn Equinox March/September - 12pm Summer Solstice TI North; f June-12pm North March/September - 3pm Q � T 7i e� r'of m 111 North June - 3pm Winter Solstice December - 12pm December - 3pm Figure 14: Modified Project Shade and Shadow EIR Mitigation Measure Mitigation Measure AES-1: Construction plans and specifications shall state that the following measures shall be implemented by the construction contractor to protect the trees along the eastern Project site boundary and to the extent feasible protect and preserve the existing mature trees within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary within the 15-foot setback along the southern boundary that are planned for preservation during construction of the proposed Project pursuant to the 2018 Arborist Report: • If the wall along the eastern boundary of the Project site cannot be heightened in -place and must be replaced, it shall be reconstructed with a precast concrete fence or a wall without a continuous footing. • Before finalizing construction plans, a contractor with an AirSpade or AirKnife shall explore the locations adjacent to the preserved trees to locate large lateral roots. The root locations shall be marked, and a survey provided to update the construction plans to avoid cutting any significant large roots. The cutting of small roots shall be planned for late spring or winter and made with clean cuts. No pruning paint or sealants shall be used. • Any grade changes near the preserved trees or pruning of trees to provide clearances for construction equipment shall be coordinated with a Registered Consulting Arborist before construction begins, and precautions pursuant to the arborist's recommendations shall be taken to mitigate potential tree injuries. • Prior to construction, a one -pound soil sample shall be taken from the top 18-inches of soil in each area where trees will be preserved. The samples shall be sent to an appropriate laboratory for analysis and soil supplement recommendations. Fertilization of the preserved trees shall be completed pursuant to the laboratory analysis' soil supplement recommendations. • Prior to construction, augur 6-inch diameter holes about 3 feet deep at a 3-foot spacing between large roots in the more compacted and crowded spaces. Avoid large visible roots, relocating the holes as needed. Start augur holes at three times the trunk diameter, i.e. 6-feet from a 24-inch tree. Back fill with amended soil, based on an agronomic lab's testing and recommendations. • Prior to construction, mulch all exposed soil areas using a topical application of a well -composted, coarse - texture mulch, without manure or bio-solids, e.g. Aguinaga Forest Floor %: to 11/ particle size. Apply it 2- inches deep, but not against the tree trunks. • Deep water before construction and check soil moisture monthly during construction by means of a soil test probe. Slow water with a soaker hose or water spike for 12 hours, or as long as necessary to reach 4-feet deep. • Rinse tree foliage at the end of each work week, using a strong stream of water from a high-pressure nozzle. • During construction in areas without pavement near the preserved trees, 3 or more inches of coarse mulch or tree chips under 1-inch plywood for light vehicle parking and steel plates for larger vehicles is required to prevent compaction and protect surface roots. • Protection Barrier: A protection barrier shall be installed around the trees to be preserved. The barrier shall be constructed of durable fencing material, such as chain link fencing. The barrier shall be placed as far from the base of the tree(s) as possible and shall be maintained in good repair throughout the duration of construction, and shall not be removed, relocated, or encroached upon without permission of the Project arborist. o Storage of Materials: There shall be NO storage of materials or supplies of any kind within the area of the protection barriers. Concrete and cement materials, block, stone, sand and soil shall not be placed within the drip -line of the tree. o Fuel Storage: Fuel storage shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of any tree to be preserved. Refueling, servicing and maintenance of equipment and machinery shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of the protected trees. o Debris and Waste Materials: Debris and waste from construction or other activities shall NOT be permitted within protected areas. Wash down of concrete or cement handling equipment, in particular, shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of protected trees. • Any damages or injuries should be reported to the Project arborist as soon as possible. Severed roots shall be pruned cleanly to healthy tissue, using proper pruning tools. Broken branches or limbs shall be pruned according to International Society of Arboriculture Pruning Guidelines and ANSI A-300 Pruning Standards. 3.2 Air Quality Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Construction Impacts As detailed in the EIR, the Project has the potential to exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) localized significance thresholds for emissions of PMro during construction activities. Therefore, SCAQMD Rules 403(4), 1113, and 1186 to reduce particulate matter and Mitigation Measure AQ-1 requiring the construction contractor to use off -road diesel construction equipment that complies with Environmental Protection Agency/Califomia Air Resource Board (EPA/CARB) Tier 3 emissions standards, would be implemented to reduce construction emissions below a level of significance. With implementation of SCAQMD Rules 403(4), 1113, and 1186 and Mitigation Measure AQ-1 that would be confirmed through the City's permitting process for the Project, localized construction emissions of PMio would be below SCAQMD thresholds and reduced to a less than significant level. (DEIR, p. 4.2-17.) Air Quality Plan Impacts As discussed in the EIR, Projects that are consistent with the regional population, housing, and employment forecasts identified by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are considered to be consistent with the AQMP. The EIR determined the Original Project is consistent with SCAG's population, housing, and employment forecasts because the 496 new multi -family units resulting from the Original Project would constitute a 0.6 percent increase in the total number of residential units in the City, and a 2 percent increase in the number of the multi -family residential units (5+ units) within the City, and within SCAG's projected growth. In addition, the EIR determined that the Original Project would support AQMP objectives to reduce trips, promote infill development, and balance jobs and housing. (DEIR, p. 4.2-15.) Operational Impacts As detailed in EIR Section 4.2, Air Quality, the maximum daily operational emissions would not exceed any of SCAQMD's daily significance thresholds. Thus, the construction and operation of the Project would not result in a violation of an air quality standard or substantially contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. (DEIR, p. 4.2-15 through 4.2-16.) Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Construction Impacts The Modified Project would be smaller and therefore require less overall construction activity than the Original Project. The Modified Project would develop 240 fewer multi -family residential units and a smaller parking structure with 13,300 square feet less of subterranean parking. However, it would require similar daily construction activities and use of machinery that have the potential to exceed the SCAQMD's localized significance thresholds for emissions of PMio during construction activities. Therefore, SCAQMD Rules 403(4), 1113, and 1186 to reduce particulate matter and Mitigation Measure AQ-1 requiring the construction contractor to use off -road diesel construction equipment that complies with EPA/CARB Tier 3 emissions standards, would also be required to reduce construction emissions below a level of significance. No new or greater impacts related to construction air quality would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Air Quality Plan Impacts Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project is consistent with SCAG's population, housing, and employment forecasts because the 256 new multi -family units that would be developed by the Modified Project would constitute a 0.33 percent increase in the total number of residential units in the City, and a 1.0 percent increase in the number of the multi -family residential units (5+ units) within the City, which is within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) projected growth. In addition, the Modified Project would also support Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) objectives to reduce trips, promote infill development, and balance jobs and housing. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to air quality plans would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Operational Impacts As the Modified Project would reduce the number of multi -family residential units that would be developed on the site by 48.4 percent, the stationary source emissions that would be generated by the residences would also be reduced. Similarly, Section 3.11, Transportation and Traffic, of this document details that operation of 278 multi -family units, (which is 22 more units than the Modified Project's proposed 256 units and thus provides an overstated and conservative analysis of potential impacts), would result in 1,186 fewer daily vehicular trips than the Original Project. The reduction of vehicular trips would correlate directly to a reduction of vehicular emissions being generated by operation of the site. As described previously, the Original Project's maximum daily operational emissions would not exceed any of SCAQMD's daily significance thresholds. Thus, the Modified Project, which would result in 240 fewer residential units and 1,186 fewer daily vehicle trips would also not result in a violation of an air quality standard or substantially contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to operational air quality emissions would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Air Quali Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would generate air quality emissions from construction and operation of the proposed multi -family residential units. However, the same construction mitigation would reduce impacts to a less than significant level and the Modified Project would constitute growth that is consistent with the AQMP. In addition, because the Modified Project is 48.4 percent smaller than the Original Project, it would result in fewer stationary source and vehicular related emissions. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure Mitigation Measure AQ-1: Construction plans and specifications shall state that the construction contractor shall use off -road diesel construction equipment that complies with EPA/CARB Tier 3 emissions standards and shall ensure that all construction equipment be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers specifications. 3.3 Biological Resources Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Section 4.3, Biological Resources, of the EIR describes that the 180 mature ornamental trees on the Project site provide potentially suitable foraging and breeding habitat for nesting migratory birds and raptor species. Removal of existing trees on the site could disrupt nesting birds and raptors 6 vegetation is removed or construction begins during the nesting season (February 1 to August 31). Disruption of migratory nesting birds and raptors is prohibited by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code. Therefore, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 was included to require a nesting bird survey to be conducted by a qualified biologist within 3 days prior any disturbance of the site during nesting season to ensure that impacts would not occur. In addition, the EIR describes that trees in the public right-of-way in Santa Ana are protected under Chapter 33, Article VII of the Municipal Code, which regulates the planting, maintenance, and removal of trees in public locations. Any street trees installed or removed are required to be in compliance with the Municipal Code regulations, which would be regulated as part of the City's project permitting procedures. Therefore, the EIR determined that implementation of the Original Project would not conflict with local polices or ordinances protecting trees. Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would include removal of many of the existing trees that could disrupt nesting birds and raptors if vegetation is removed or construction begins during the nesting season. However, the Modified Project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure BIO-1 to ensure that impacts to nesting birds would not occur. In addition, any street trees installed or removed by the Modified Project would also be required to be in compliance with the Municipal Code regulations. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to biological resources would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Biological Resources Consistent with the determinations of the EIR, the Modified Project would avoid potential impacts through implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 and compliance with the City's Municipal Code. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure Mitigation Measure 131O-1: Construction plans and specifications shall state that vegetation clearing during nesting season (February 1 through September 15) shall be avoided, if feasible. If avoidance of the nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified biologist shall be required to conduct a nesting bird survey within 3 days prior any disturbance of the site, including disking, demolition activities, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around nests at an appropriate distance that is a minimum of 250 feet for raptors and 100 feet for non -raptors. The buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied, and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. 3.4 Cultural/Historic Resources Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR As described in DEIR Section 4.4, Cuffural/Historic Resources, the Original Project would not impact any historic resources. The EIR describes the viewsheds of the properties listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties near the Project site as already significantly affected by urban and modern structures that are taller than the Original Project's tallest structure. As a result, the setting has changed and no longer provides an aesthetic sense of a particular period of history. The EIR also describes that tall trees throughout Park Santiago screen views toward the Project site, and that many of the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties in Park Santiago are not within the viewshed of the Project site. Overall, as detailed in the EIR, due to the existing built environment, location of the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties, and the existing viewsheds, the integrity of the historic setting and feeling aspects of properties in Parts Santiago would not be reduced by implementation of the Original Project. Accordingly, the EIR determined that an impact related to historic resources would not occur from implementation of the Original Project. (DEIR, p. 4.4-9 through 4.4-15) Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project As detailed previously in the discussion of aesthetics (Section 3.1), the structures developed by the Modified Project would be between 16 and 31 feet lower in height than the Original Project structures and would be setback 50 feet further from the eastern property line and 121 feet further from the southern property line than the Original Project structures. The lower building heights and increased setbacks would result in a reduction of views of the new development from historic properties. The views of surface parking areas would be similar to the surface parking areas that currently exist on the site. Therefore, the Modified Project would not result in an increased impact to the integrity of the historic setting in Park Santiago compared to the Original Project. Also, as described previously, views of the Project site are screened by many tall trees with dense leaves throughout the Park Santiago neighborhood and along boundary of the Project site. This landscape screening would remain with implementation of Mitigation Measure AES-1 and Project Description Feature PDF-1, which would increase landscaping along the eastern boundary through installation of new trees ranging in size from 24- to 48-inch box trees and protection of the existing healthy trees. In addition, the subterranean parking for the Modified Project would be 13,300 square feet smaller than the subterranean parking for the Original Project. Thus, less excavation would occur, and no potentially increased impacts related to archaeological resources would result from implementation of the Modified Project. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to cultural/historic resources would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Cultural/Historic Resources Due to the reduced height and scale of the Modified Project, the existing built environment, and location of the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties, the integrity of the historic setting and feeling aspects of properties in Park Santiago would not be reduced by implementation of the Modified Project. Thus, consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would not result in a reduction in the historic significance of properties. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to cultural/historic resources would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. 3.5 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR As described in DEIR Section 4.5, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the Original Project construction and operation of the Project would generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are below the SCAQMD's threshold for greenhouse gas emissions. (DEIR, pp. 4.5-9 through 4.5-10.) In particular, as detailed in the EIR, the Project's total net annual GHG emissions would be approximately 4.30 metric tons per year per service population, which would be less than the SCAQMD Tier 4 Option 3 threshold of 4.80 metric tons per year per service population, and therefore, less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.5-9 through 4.5-10.) The EIR also describes that projects in the City are required to comply with state and federal programs that are designed to improve energy efficiency and reduce GHG emissions, including the California Title 24, California Energy Code, and the CALGreen Code. In addition, Project Design Feature PDF-2 would provide a minimum of 25 electric vehicle charging stations to promote usage of electric vehicles. The EIR determined that the Project would be consistent with existing plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. (DEIR, p. 4.5-10 through 4.5-13.) Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project The Modified Project would reduce the number of multifamily residential units that would be developed on the site by 240 units, which is a 48.4 percent reduction. As a result, the stationary source GHG emissions that would be generated by the residences on the site would also be reduced. Section 3.11, Transportation and Traffic, of this document details that the Modified Project would result in 1,186 fewer daily vehicular trips than the Original Project. The reduction of vehicular trips would correlate directly to a reduction of vehicular emissions being generated by operation of the site. As described previously, the Original Project's GHG emissions would not exceed the significance thresholds. Thus, the Modified Project, which would result in 240 fewer residential units and 1,184 fewer daily vehicle trips would also not exceed the significance thresholds. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to GHG emissions would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Also, like the Original Project, the Modified Project would be required to comply with state and federal programs that are designed to improve energy efficiency and reduce GHG emissions, including the California Title 24, California Energy Code, and the CALGreen Code. In addition, Project Design Feature PDF-2 that provides for a minimum of 15 electric vehicle charging stations to promote usage of electric vehicles is included in the Modified Project. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to GHG emissions would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Consistent with the determinations of the EIR, the Modified Project would generate GHG emissions from construction and operation of the proposed multifamily residential units. However, because the Modified Project is 48.4 percent smaller than the Original Project it would result in fewer stationary source and vehicular related GHG emissions. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. 3.6 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Impacts related to hazards were evaluated in Section 4.6, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the DEIR. As described, due to the existence of hazardous materials within on -site soils, ground disturbing activity has the potential to result in the accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment. The contaminated soils would need to be excavated and removed as required by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), the California Integrated Waste Management Board, Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA), and the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). As a result, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 has been required to reduce the potential risks related to accidental release and exposure of people and the environment to the contaminated soils. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 requires that a qualified consultant prepare a Soil Management Plan (SMP) to be used by construction workers to remove and dispose of the areas of arsenic impacted soil. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 requires excavation of contaminated soils be completed pursuant to existing DTSC and RWQCB requirements, soils sampling ensure all contaminated soils are removed, and that a certified hazardous waste hauler remove and transport all arsenic impacted soil and other potentially hazardous materials per California Hazardous Waste Regulations to a landfill permitted by the state to accept hazardous materials. Excavated soil containing hazardous substances would be classed as a hazardous waste if they exhibit the characteristics of ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity (CCR, Title 22, Division 4.5, Chapter 11, Article 3). The SMP would detail hazardous materials excavation and disposal methods and requirements pursuant to the regulation of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations (CalOSHA) and DTSC that regulates the removal, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste to protect human health and the environment. The EIR determined that with implementation of Mitigation Measure Haz-1, impacts related to hazards of the onsite contaminated soils would be less than significant. Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Consistent with Original Project, the Modified Project would also involve demolition, excavation, and grading activities that would disturb existing hazardous materials on the site. However, the subterranean parking for the Modified Project would be 13,300 square feet smaller than the subterranean parking for the Original Project. Thus, less excavation would occur, and no potentially increased impacts related to hazardous materials in excavation soils would occur. The Modified Project would be required to implement Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, which would ensure that excavation and disposal of contaminated soils and other potentially hazardous materials be completed pursuant to existing DTSC, RWQCB, CalOSHA, and other applicable requirements that would reduce potential impacts to humans and/or the environment from release of hazardous materials. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, impacts related to hazards of the onsite contaminated soils from construction of the Modified Project would be less than significant. No new or greater impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials would occur from implementation of the Modred Project. Conclusion for Hazards and Hazardous Materials Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would involve handling of hazardous materials and implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, which would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level such that no new or greater impacts related to hazardous materials would occur. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Soil Management Plan (SMP) shall be prepared by a qualified hazardous materials consultant and shall detail procedures and protocols for excavation and disposal of onsite hazardous materials, including: • A certified hazardous waste hauler shall remove all potentially hazardous soils. Excavation of contaminated soils shall be to the depth of approximately 0.5 feet below the existing ground surface in areas identified as having arsenic impacted soils. In addition, sampling of soil shall be conducted during excavation to ensure that all arsenic impacted soils are removed, and that residential Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for residential uses are not exceeded. Excavated materials shall be transported per California Hazardous Waste Regulations to a landfill permitted by the state to accept hazardous materials. • Any subsurface materials exposed during construction activities that appear suspect of contamination, either from visual staining or suspect odors, shall require immediate cessation of excavation activities. Soils suspected of contamination shall be tested for potential contamination. If contamination is found to be present per the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) or Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) ESLs for residential uses, it shall be transported and disposed of per California Hazardous Waste Regulations to an appropriately permitted landfill. • A Health and Safety Plan (HSP) shall be prepared for each contractor that addresses potential safety and health hazards and includes the requirements and procedures for employee protection. The HSP shall also outline proper soil handling procedures and health and safety requirements to minimize worker and public exposure to hazardous materials during construction. • All SMP measures shall be printed on the construction documents, contracts, and Project plans prior to issuance of grading permits. 3.7 Land Use and Planning Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR As discussed in Section 4.7, Land Use and Planning, of the DEIR, the Original Project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation that was adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The Original Project would be consistent with the SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Notably, the Original Project would implement many of the SCAG policies related to high -density, infill development, improvement of the job/housing balance, and use of green building measures, such as water efficiency and Low Impact Development (LID) features. Therefore, implementation of the Original Project would not result in conflict with SCAG policies, and the EIR determined that impacts would not occur. Regarding General Plan designations, the EIR described the Original Project as requiring a General Plan Land Use Amendment to change the land use designation from Professional & Administration Office (PAO) to District Center (DC) to allow for multi -family uses. The General Plan Land Use Element states that DC designation includes the major activity areas in the City and that District Centers are to be developed with an urban character. The proposed DC designation is consistent with the existing DC land uses to the north of Santiago Park and to the southwest across the 1-5 freeway. Although the Original Project under the proposed DC designation would result in a different type and higher intensity of residential units than the adjacent LR-7 designated Park Santiago neighborhood area, the EIR determined that the Project would provide a transition through wall heights, open space courtyard locations, structures tiering down to 2- stories along the eastern side, and a 40-foot eastern setback, such that the taller multifamily structures, vehicle parking, and circulation are not sited adjacent to single -story single-family residences. The EIR also determined that the proposed land use designation change from PAO to DC would not conflict with a policy or plan adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The Original Project was determined to be consistent with the relevant goals, policies, and objectives of the City's General Plan that avoid or mitigate environmental impacts, and that impacts related to conflict with a General Plan policy related to an environmental effect would be less than significant. The Original Project also required an Amendment Application (zone change) to change the existing zoning designation change from P (Professional) to a Specific Development (SD) to implement the multifamily residential project. As required by the Zoning Code, the development plans would be reviewed by the City to ensure consistency with development standards. Additionally, the SD zoning designation would be consistent with the existing SD zoned areas to the north beyond Santiago Park and to the west across N. Main Street. Therefore, the EIR determined that implementation of the Original Project would not result in an impact related to conflict with a plan or policy adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. (DEIR, pp. 4.7-16 through 4.7-34.) Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project The Modified Project would consist of the same uses as the Original Project and would require the same General Plan and zoning amendments for implementation. Like the Original Project, and although 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent) would be developed, the Modified Project would implement many of the SCAG policies related to high - density, infill development, improvement of the job/housing balance, and use of green building measures, such as water efficiency and LID features. Therefore, implementation of the Modified Project would also not result in conflict with SCAG policies. The Modified Project would also require a General Plan Land Use Amendment to change the land use designation from PAO (Professional R Administration Office) to District Center (DC) to allow for multi -family uses, which would continue to be consistent with the existing DC land uses to the north of Santiago Park and to the southwest across the 1-5 freeway. Although the Modified Project under the proposed DC designation would also result in a different type and higher intensity of residential units than the adjacent LR-7 designated Park Santiago neighborhood area, the Modified Project (that includes 58 units per acre, not including the OC Discovery Cube shared parking area of 1.42 acres) would be 26 units per acre lower in density than the Original Project that included 84 units per acre. The Modified Project would provide residences in structures that are a maximum of 4-stories high (one less story than the 5-story residential structures proposed by the Original Project). In addition, 2-story buildings would be located along the eastern side of the Project and 3-story buildings would be located behind the 2-story buildings to provide a transition between N. Main Street, the taller Project structures, and the existing single-family residential neighborhood on the east side of the site. Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would provide a transition through tiering up to taller structures, wall heights, open space courtyard locations on the east side of the site. However, the 90-foot minimum eastern setback for the Modified Project would be 50 feet wider than the 40-foot minimum setback that was included in the Original Project and the 134 foot southern building setback is 121 feet greater than that was included in the Original Project. Thus, providing a greater separation and transition between the proposed multi -family residences and the existing single-family residential neighborhood. Consistent with the findings of the EIR, the land use designation change from PAO to DC that would occur for the Modified Project would not conflict with a policy or plan adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The Modified Project would also require a zone change from P (Professional) to a Specific Development (SD) to implement multifamily residential development. As required by the Zoning Code, the development plans would be reviewed by the City to ensure consistency with development standards. Consistent with the Original Project, the SD zoning designation would be located near the existing SD zoned areas to the north beyond Santiago Park and to the west across N. Main Street and would not result in an impact related to conflict with a plan or policy adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to land use and planning would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Land Use and Planning The Modified Project would require the same General Plan land use and zoning designation amendments as the Original Project. Consistent with the determinations of the EIR, the Modified Project would not result in an impact related to conflict with a plan or policy adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to land use and planning would occur. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to land use and planning would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. 3.8 Noise Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Construction Noise Standards: The EIR determined that the Original Project would not result in generation of noise levels in excess standards established by the Citys Municipal Code. Per Section %314 (Special Provisions) of the City's Municipal Code noise sources associated with construction activities are exempt from the established noise standards as long as the activities do not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. The Original Project's construction activities would occur pursuant to these regulations. Thus, the Project would be in compliance with the City's construction related noise standards. (DEIR p. 4.8-11.) Temporary Increase in Ambient Noise: The EIR determined that construction activities would generate short-term periodic increases in ambient noise levels at sensitive receptors in the Project vicinity. Therefore, Mitigation Measure NO1-2 was provided to prohibit the use of large mobile equipment (greater than 80,000 pounds) and loaded trucks within 50 feet of the residences to the east of the Project site and Mitigation Measure NO1-3 was included to require installation of a temporary noise barrier that would be a minimum 11-feet high, constructed of frame -mounted materials such as vinyl acoustic curtains or quilted blankets, and attached to the masonry wall along the eastern Project site boundary or temporary fence posts. In addition, due to the location of existing sensitive receptors. The EIR determined that with implementation of Mitigation Measures NO1-2 and NO1-3 temporary and periodic construction noise level increases at receiver locations would be reduced to below the 10 dBA Leq temporary noise level increase threshold. Therefore, with implementation of mitigation, impacts related to periodic temporary increases in noise were determined to be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-16 through 4.8-17.) Groundborne Vibration: Construction activities for of the Original Project would generate short-term vibration levels that would exceed the distinctly perceptible vibration standard at receiver locations within 50 feet of large bulldozers usage. Thus, Mitigation Measure NO1-2 was included to prohibit the use of large mobile equipment and loaded trucks within 50 feet of the residences to the east of the Project site. With implementation of this measure, vibration impacts at the nearby sensitive receptors were determined to be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-16 through 4.8-17.) Operation Interior Noise: Section 4.8, Noise, of the DEIR, describes that traffic along the roadways near the Project site would generate noise that could exceed interior noise standards within some of the proposed residential units. Thus, some of the residential units would require upgraded windows and sliding glass doors with increased Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings to meet the interior noise standards. As described in Section 4.8, Noise, of the DEIR, the residential units along N. Main Street would require upgraded windows and sliding glass doors with minimum STC ratings of between 27 and 30 to meet the interior noise standards. Mitigation Measure NO1-1 would ensure that the appropriate windows and doors are installed, which would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. (DEIR, pp. 4.8-10 through 4.8-13.) Traffic Generated Noise: Section 4.8, Noise, of the DEIR, also describes that operation of the Original Project would generate a one dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) increase in traffic -related noise, which is less than the 3 dBA CNEL threshold for areas above 60 CNEL and less than the 1.5 dBA CNEL threshold for areas above 65 CNEL. Thus, the EIR determined that traffic noise impacts would be less than significant. Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Construction Noise Standards: Consistent with the Original Project, construction activities of the Modified Project are subject to the City Municipal Code regulations. Thus, the Modified Project would be in compliance with the City's construction related noise standards. No new or greater impacts related to temporary construction noise would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Temporary Increase in Ambient Noise: The Modified Project would be smaller and therefore require less overall construction activity than the Original Project. The Modified Project would develop 240 fewer multi -family residential units and a smaller parking structure with 13,300 square feet less of subterranean parking. The Modified Project would involve the same types of construction equipment that would be operated in similar locations as the Original Project. However, the building setback along the eastern side of the Project site would be 50 feet greater. Thus, construction of building structures would be farther from the residences located to the east of the Project site. Consistent with the Original Project, Mitigation Measures NO1-2 and NO1-3 would be required to prohibit the use of large mobile equipment and loaded trucks within 50 feet of the residences to the east of the Project site and install a temporary noise barrier to reduce the temporary increase in ambient noise to a less than significant level. No new or greater impacts related to temporary construction noise would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Groundborne Vibration: Consistent with the Original Project construction activities for of the Modified Project would generate short-term vibration levels that would exceed the distinctly perceptible vibration standard at receiver locations within 50 feet of large bulldozers usage. Therefore, like the Original Project, Mitigation Measure NO1-2 would be required to reduce vibration impacts to a less than significant level. However, the Modified Project would include a smaller parking structure with 13,300 square feet less of subterranean parking. Therefore, no additional vibration related to ground excavation for the parking structure would result, and overall, no new or greater impacts related to vibration would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Operation Interior Onsite Noise: Consistent with the conditions of the Original Project traffic along the roadways near the Project site would generate noise that could exceed interior noise standards within some of the proposed residential units. Thus, like the Original Project, Mitigation Measure NO1-1 would be required to ensure that the appropriate windows and doors are installed, which would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. No new or greater impacts related to interior noise would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Traffic Generated Noise: As described in Section 3.11, Transportation and Traffic, of this document, the Modified Project is estimated to generate 79 fewer a.m. peak hour trips, 96 fewer p.m. peak hour trips, and 1,186 fewer daily trips than the Original Project. The reduction of vehicular trips would also reduce traffic -related noise. Thus, consistent with the Original Project traffic related noise impacts would be less than significant, because fewer vehicular trips would be generated, no new or greater impacts related to traffic noise would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Project Generated Operational Noise: To evaluate the potential noise impacts from operation of the Modified Project, a Focused Noise Assessment (included as Attachment A) was prepared. This Focused Noise Assessment calculates the potential operational noise levels due to the Project's stationary noise sources including: roof -top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, pad -mounted transformers, parking lot vehicle movements, outdoor courtyard activity, outdoor pool/spa activity, and parking structure activities, at seven off -site receiver locations adjacent to the Project site. To estimate the Project operational noise impacts, the Focused Noise Assessment used reference noise level measurements from similar types of activities, which are provided in Table N-1. Table N-1: Reference Noise Levels Noise Source Duration (hh:mm:ss) Ref' Distance (Feet) Noise Source Height (Feet) Hourly Activity (Mins) Reference Noise Level (dBA Lsa) @Ref. Dist. 950 Feet Roof -Top Air Conditioning Unit' 960000 5' 5' 39 74.4 54.4 Trash Enclosure Activit 2 000032 5' 5' 60 69.0 49.0 Pad -Mounted Transformer3 3 6' 5' 60 56.0 37.6 Parking Lot VehicleMovements4 010000 10, 5' 60 44.0 33.5 Courtyard Activit s 00:08:00 10' 4' 60 73.8 59.8 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activi 00:10:00 5' 4' 60 68.7 48.7 Roof -Top Parkin 4 00:10:00 5' 4' 60 68.7 48.7 Source: Urban Crossroads, 2019. Attachment A. As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 7/2712015 at the Santee Walmart located at 170 Town Center Parkway. 2 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 51312018 at a commercial and office park trash enclosure in the City of Costa Mesa. Source: NEMA TR 1-2013 Transformers, Step Voltage Regulators and Reactors, Table 2 sound level for a 500 kVA transformer. 4 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 8/24/2016 in the parking lot of the Windemere Apartment community in the City of Riverside. 5 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on Saturday night, September 21, 2019 in the City of Newport Beach. 6 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 71512017 at the Covenant Hill Clubhouse pool in Ladem Ranch. 7 Anticipated duration (minutes within the hour) of noise activity during typical hourly conditions expected at the Project site based on the reference noise level measurement activity. Table N-2 identifies that the operational noise from the Project would range from 31.4 to 46.9 dBA L5o at the sensitive off -site receiver locations. These operational noise level calculations are based on the reference noise level measurements in Table N-1 and include barrier attenuation provided by intervening structures between each noise source and the receivers, which are shown in Figure 15. These noise levels also assume the worst -case with the roof- top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, pad -mounted transformers, parking lot vehicle movements, outdoor courtyard activity, outdoor pool/spa activity and roof -top parking activities all operating simultaneously. In reality, the noise sources would most likely not occur simultaneously and would vary throughout the day. Table N-2: Project Operational Noise Levels Receiver Location Noise Source Project Operational Noise Levels (dBA) Lso (30 mins) Us (15 mins) Lo (5 mins) L2 (1 min) Lmax (<1 min) Air Conditioning Unit Roof -To 15.6 17.3 18.6 18.9 19.4 Trash Enclosure Activity 27.7 33.7 40.7 45.7 47.2 Pad -Mounted Transformer 14.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 20.4 23.4 31.4 37.4 45.0 R1 Courtyard Activity 36.8 39.0 41.5 43.9 46.6 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 28.1 31.1 34.4 37.5 42.9 Roof -Top Parking 9.4 12.4 1 20.4 26.4 1 34.0 Combined Noise Level: 37.9 40.7 44.8 48.7 51.8 Air Conditioning Unit Roof -To 20.7 22.4 23.7 24.0 24.5 Trash Enclosure Activity 13.4 19.4 26.4 31.4 32.9 Pad -Mounted Transformer 28.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 32.4 35.4 43.4 49.4 57.0 R2 Courtyard Activity 42.3 44.5 47.0 49.4 52.1 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 31.6 34.6 37.9 41.0 46.4 Roof -Top Parking 14.4 17.4 25.4 31.4 39.0 Combined Noise Level: 43.2 45.4 49.0 52.8 58.6 Air Conditioning Unit Roof -To 22.4 24.1 25.4 25.7 26.2 R3 Trash Enclosure Activity 14.4 20.4 27.4 32.4 33.9 Pad -Mounted Transformer 24.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Receiver Location Noise Source Project 0 erab nal Noise Levels dBA Lsn (30 mins) L25 (15 mins) LB (5 mins) L2 (1 min) L,= (<1 min) Parking Lot Veh. Movements 32.7 35.7 43.7 49.7 57.3 Courtyard Activity 45.8 48.0 50.5 52.9 55.6 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 33.6 36.6 39.9 43.0 48.4 Roof -Top Parking 15.9 18.9 26.9 32.9 40.5 Combined Noise Level: 46.3 48.6 51.7 54.9 59.9 Air Conditioning Unit(Roof-Top) 23.2 24.9 26.2 26.5 27.0 Trash Enclosure Activity 13.5 19.5 26.5 1 31.5 33.0 Pad -Mounted Transformer 25.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 32.2 35.2 43.2 49.2 56.8 R4 Courtyard Activity 46.5 48.7 51.2 53.6 56.3 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 33.2 36.2 39.5 42.6 48.0 Roof -Top Parking 17.6 20.6 28.6 34.6 42.2 Combined Noise Level: 46.9 49.1 52.1 55.3 59.9 Air Conditioning Unit(Roof-Top) 21.0 22.7 24.0 24.3 24.8 Trash Enclosure Activity 11.9 17.9 24.9 29.9 31.4 Pad -Mounted Transformer 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 33.5 36.5 44.5 50.5 58.1 R5 Courtyard Activity 30.0 32.2 34.7 37.1 39.8 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 30.6 33.6 36.9 40.0 45.4 Roof -Top Parking 16.6 19.6 27.6 33.6 41.2 Combined Noise Level: 36.7 39.4 45.7 51.2 58.5 Air Conditioning Unit Roof -To 18.1 19.8 21.1 21.4 21.9 Trash Enclosure Activity 11.6 17.6 24.6 29.6 31.1 Pad -Mounted Transformer 17.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 30.5 33.5 41.5 47.5 55.1 R6 Courtyard Activity 25.5 27.7 30.2 32.6 35.3 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 29.8 32.8 36.1 39.2 44.6 Roof -Top Parking 21.9 24.9 32.9 38.9 46.5 Combined Noise Level: 34.3 37.2 43.3 48.8 56.0 Air Conditioning Unit(Roof-Top) 19.4 21.1 22.4 22.7 23.2 Trash Enclosure Activity 12.3 18.3 25.3 30.3 31.8 Pad -Mounted Transformer 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 19.6 22.6 30.6 36.6 44.2 R7 Courtyard Activity 24.6 26.8 29.3 31.7 34.4 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 28.4 31.4 34.7 37.8 43.2 Roof -Top Parking 22.9 25.9 33.9 39.9 47.5 Combined Noise Level: 31.4 34.2 39.0 1 43.6 50.3 Source: Urban Crossroads, 2019. Attachment A. As shown on Table N-3, the Project generated noise levels at the sensitive off -site receivers would not exceed the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code daytime and nighttime exterior noise level standards. Therefore, operation of the Modified Project would result in less than significant noise impacts. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to noise would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. is Receiver Locations FVI Existing Barrier Height (in feet) Existing Barrier -0 Distance from Receiver to Noise Source (in feet) SOURCE: Urban Crossroads, 2019 E Rooftop Air Conditioning Unit ♦ Trash Enclosure Transformer 13 Parking Lot Vehicle Movements ®Courtyard Activity ❑ Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Figure 15: Operational Noise Source and Receiver Locations Table N-3: Project Operational Noise Level Compliance Receiver Location Land Use Noise Level at Receiver Locations (dBA) Threshold Exceeded? Lso 30 mins L25 15 mins LB 5 mins L2 1 min Lmax <1 min Daytime Residential Standards 55 60 65 70 75 Nighttime 50 55 60 65 70 R1 Residential 37.9 40.7 44.8 48.7 51.8 No R2 Residential 43.2 45.4 49.0 52.8 58.6 No R3 Residential 46.3 48.6 51.7 54.9 59.9 No R4 Residential 46.9 1 49.1 52.1 55.3 59.9 No R5 Residential 36.7 39.4 45.7 51.2 58.5 No R6 Residential 34.3 37.2 43.3 48.8 56.0 No R7 Residential 31.4 34.2 39.0 43.6 50.3 No Source: Urban Crossroads, 2019. Attachment A. Conclusion for Noise Consistent with the Original Project, the construction generated by the Modified Project would generate temporary noise and vibration that would require mitigation to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Also, due to the location of the proposed residential units, mitigation is required to ensure that interior noise is within City standards. With implementation mitigation identified in the EIR, potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure NO1-1: The Project plans and specifications shall include the following construction requirements to be implemented and verified prior to provision of occupancy permits: • Windows/Glass Doors: Residential units adjacent to N. Main Street (all floors) require upgraded windows and sliding glass doors (all windows/doors on all floors) with minimum STC ratings of 30, and all other buildings require standards windows and sliding glass doors with a minimum STC rating of 27. • Exterior Doors (Non -Glass): Exterior doors facing N. Main Street (all floors) require upgraded exterior doors with minimum STC ratings of 30 and shall be well weather-stripped, and all other residential building exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped and have minimum STC ratings of 27. Well -sealed perimeter gaps around the doors are essential to achieve the optimal STC rating. • Walls: At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtight seal. • Ventilation: Residential exterior vents shall be oriented away from 1-5 and N. Main Street. If such an orientation cannot be avoided, then an acoustical baffle shall be placed in the attic space behind the vents. Mitigation Measure NO1-2: The Project plans and specifications shall include the following. requirements: • Large loaded trucks and mobile equipment, such as bulldozers (greater than or equal to 80,000 pounds) shall not be used within 50 feet of the eastern boundary of the Project site. Instead, smaller, rubber -tired mobile equipment (less than 80,000 pounds) or equivalent alternative equipment shall be used within this area during Project construction. • All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the Project site. The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receivers nearest the Project site during all construction. Mitigation Measure NOW: The Project plans and specifications shall include the requirement to install a minimum 11-foot high temporary construction noise barrier along the Project site eastern boundary for the duration of Project construction. The noise control barriers shall have a solid face from top to bottom and shall meet the following height and constructed requirements: • The temporary noise barrier shall provide a minimum transmission loss of 20 dBA (Federal Highway Administration, Noise Barrier Design Handbook). The noise barrier shall be constructed using an acoustical blanket (e.g. vinyl acoustic curtains or quilted blankets) attached to the construction site perimeter fence or temporary fence posts. • The noise barrier shall be maintained, and any damage promptly repaired. Gaps, holes, or weaknesses in the barrier or openings between the barrier and the ground shall be promptly repaired, • The noise control barrier and associated elements shall be completely removed, and the site appropriately restored upon the conclusion of the construction activity. 3.9 Population and Housing Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR As described in Section 4.9, Population and Housing, of the DEIR, the Original Project would not induce substantial population growth. SCAG anticipates a population increase of 8.4 percent by 2040 or an average annual increase of 0.4 percent throughout the County. The anticipated population that would result from the Original Project would be 0.28 percent of the City's population, and thus, within the projected population growth. Similarly, SCAG anticipates the number of housing units would increase 6.3 percent or an average annual increase of 0.3 percent through 2040. Thus, the 496 new multi -family units developed by the Original Project would also be within the SCAG projected growth. Furthermore, the infrastructure improvements needed to serve the Original Project would be sized to specifically serve the development and excess capacity would not be developed that could generate additional growth. Thus, the EIR determined that impacts related to population, housing, and related growth would be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.9-7 through 4.9-10.) In addition, the EIR determined that addition of housing by the Project would have a favorable effect on the jobs -housing balance. (DEIR p. 4.9-9.) Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Housing and Population Growth As described previously, the Modified Project would develop 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent less) than the Original Project. As shown on Table P-1, the reduction in units and change in the unit type mix proposed by the Modified Project would result in 453 fewer residents at full occupancy. Table P-1: Comparison of Residents at Full Occupancy Unit Type Persons perUnif Ori inal Project Modified Project Number of Units Total Residents Number of Units Total Residents Studio 1.6 73 117 74 118 One -bedroom 1.6 307 491 103 165 Two -bedroom 2.7 88 238 75 203 Three -bedroom 3.9 28 109 4 16 Total 1 496 955 256 502 Reduction in Residential Units -240 Reduction in Residents at Full Occupancy -453 'Source: DEIR Table 4.M. The 502 residents at full occupancy of the Modified Project would constitute a 0.15 percent increase over the 2017 City of Santa Ana population of 341,341, which would be less than the 0.28 percent increase that would occur from the Original Project (DEIR p. 4.9-8). In addition, the 256 new multi -family units would constitute a 0.33 percent increase in the total number of residential units in the City, which is lower than the 0.64 percent increase that would occur from the Original Project, and a 1.0 percent increase in the number of the multifamily residential units (5+ units) within the City, which is less than the 2 percent increase that would occur from the Original Project. Because the population from the Modified Project would be less than the Original Project, the anticipated population that would result from the Modified Project would also be within the SCAG projected growth. Thus, consistent with the impacts of the Original Project, the Modified Project would result in less than significant impacts related to induction of substantial population growth. Jobs -Housing Balance As described in the DEIR, the Santa Ana area is jobs -rich. The EIR describes that the existing jobs -housing ratio is 2.06 in Santa Ana and is projected to be 2.13 in 2040 (DEIR p. 4.9-6). The Modified Project would result in 240 fewer housing units within the employment rich area. However, Table P-2 shows that consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would result in a slight improvement to the jobs -housing balance, which is a beneficial effect of providing multi -family housing on a site where employees can easily travel to local employment opportunities. Table P-2: City of Santa Ana Jobs - Housing Balance Comparison Ori inal Project I Modified Project Year Projected Employment Projected Housing Units Plus Project Jobs - Housing Ratio Projected Housing Units Plus Project Jobs- Housing Ratio 2015 159,459 77,477 + 496 = 77,971 2.05 77,477 + 256 = 77,733 2.05 2040 166,000 78,000 + 496 = 78,496 2.11 78,000 + 256 = 78,256 2.12 Source: DEIR Table 4.9-6. Conclusion for Population and Housing Consistent with the Original Project, the number of residential units and residents that would result from the Modified Project be within the SCAG projected growth forecast and would result in a slight improvement to the jobs -housing balance. Thus, the Modified Project would result in less than significant impacts related to population and housing. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to population and housing would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. 3.10 Public Services Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Fire Protection The EIR describes that the Project site is within 2.5 miles of 4 existing fire stations and the Original Project would not result in the need to construct a new fire station or expand an existing station. In addition, the EIR describes that Chapter &46 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code requires a fire facilities fee be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of buildings exceeding 2 stories in height, such as the Original Project. The purpose of the fire facilities fee is to improve fire stations in the City and provide revenue for equipment needed to fight fires in buildings over 2 stories in height. The EIR describes that redevelopment of the Project site would require fee payments to provide funding to assist in improvement of existing fire facilities and needed equipment. The EIR determined that implementation of the Original Project would not require new or physically altered fire department facilities. (DEIR, p. 4.10-4 through 4.10-5.) Police Services The EIR describes that the Original Project would result in an incremental increase in demands on law enforcement services but would not be significant when compared to the current demand levels. The residential population of the Original Project (955 residents at full occupancy) would be approximately 0.27 percent of the City's population and based on the Police Department's 2016 staffing of 1.04 officers per thousand population, the EIR determined that the Original Project would require less than one additional officer. In addition, the Police Department headquarters are 2.5 miles from the Project site, within response distance, and typical police operations within the Department's Northeast District deploys coverage to be able to respond to calls from services throughout the area. Furthermore, the EIR determined that the addition of one officer on patrol would not require the construction or expansion of the City's existing policing facilities. Therefore, the EIR determined that the Original Project would result in a less than significant impact related to police protection. Park and Recreation Services The Original Project planned 34,300 square feet of onsite exterior open space and recreation facilities that included 5 recreation courtyard areas that total 22,900 square feet and an 11,400-square foot amenity deck on the roof of the parking structure. In addition, interior recreation facilities include a 5,397-square foot fitness center and a 1,566 square foot wellness pavilion. In addition, the EIR describes that is currently 93.8 acres of Santa Ana parkland within 3-miles of the Project site and that based on the existing amount of park and recreation facilities in the vicinity of the Project site, the recreation facilities that would be provided as part of the Original Project, and the number of residents at full capacity, the Original Project would not require the provision of new or physically altered park facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios. In addition, the EIR describes that the Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 35-108 requires residential development fees be paid for the acquisition, construction, and renovation of park and recreation facilities to preserve an appropriate balance between the demand by residents for use of park and recreational facilities and the availability of such facilities. Thus, the EIR determined that the Original Project would not result in substantial physical deterioration of park and recreation facilities. (DEIR, p. 4.10-12 through 4.10-13.) Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Fire Protection As detailed previously in Section 3.9, Population and Housing, of this document, the Modified Project would develop 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent less) than the Original Project, which would result in 453 fewer residents at full occupancy. The reduction in residents would equate to a reduced number of calls for service. As described in the EIR, service calls to OCFA are largely related to medical emergencies, which consist of 80 percent of service calls, while fire calls consist of 1.9 percent of OCFA service calls in Santa Ana (DEIR p. 4.10-4). Hence, fewer residents would equate to fewer calls for services. In addition, the maximum height of the tallest structures of the Modified Project would be 15-feet 5-inches lower in height than the Original Project. Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would be required to pay fees to provide funding for needed fire facilities and equipment and implementation of the Modified Project would not require new or physically altered fire department facilities. Thus, no new or greater impacts related to fire protection services would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Police Services As described previously, the Modified Project would develop 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent less) than the Original Project, which would result in 453 fewer residents at full occupancy. The reduction in residents would equate to a reduced number of calls for police services. Based on the staffing of 1.04 officers per thousand population, the Modified Project would require less than one additional officer, which is consistent with the needs of the Original Project. Therefore, consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would also result in a less than significant impact related to police protection. Park and Recreation Services As described previously, the Modified Project would develop 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent less) than the Original Project, which would result in 453 fewer residents at full occupancy, which would result in a reduced need for park and recreation services. The Modified Project would provide 12,920 square feet of open space and recreation facilities in courtyards, which is a decrease of 9,980 square feet over the 22,900 square feet of courtyard open space that was included in the Original Project. The Modified Project also includes a 9,281 square foot amenity deck that is 2,119 square feet smaller than the Original Project. Likewise, the fitness center would be 2,279 square feet smaller than the one included in the Original Project. Although the Modified Project would result in an overall decrease in exterior recreational space by 12,099 square feet in comparison to the Original Project, it would result in a 17 square foot increase in park and recreational space per residential unit. The Modified Project would also be required to pay park and recreation fees to `preserve an appropriate balance between the demand by residents for use of park and recreational facilities", as stated in Municipal Code Section 35-110. Due to the overall increase in open space and recreational space provided by the Modified Project and payment of required fees, the Modified Project would not require the provision of new or physically altered park facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios. Thus, consistent with the Original Project, impacts related to park and recreation from implementation of the Modified Project would be less than significant. In addition, the Modified Project does not utilize a portion of Santiago Park for access as was proposed by access Option B of the Original Project. Therefore, potential impacts related to acquisition of parkland would not occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Public Services The Modified Project would develop 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent less) than the Original Project, which would result in 453 fewer residents at full occupancy. The reduction in residents would equate to a reduced demand for services from the Project site, including police, fire, park, and recreational services. In addition, the total amount of park and recreation space onsite would be increased in comparison to the Original Project. Thus, consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would result in less than significant impacts related to public services. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to public services would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. 3.11 Transportation and Traffic Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR As detailed in DEIR Section 4.11, Transportation and Traffic, the Original Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, including the Orange County Congestion Management Program, Caltrans Measures of Effectiveness, City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, and the City of Orange General Plan Circulation Element. Based on the thresholds identified in these plans, the Original Project would result in a less than significant impact. Specifically, the vehicular trips that would be generated by the Original Project would not cause an exceedance of any traffic level of service threshold at any intersection or roadway segment. (DEIR, p. 4.11-12 through 4.11-32.) Moreover, and as detailed in the EIR, the Park Santiago neighborhood intersections and roadways have adequate capacity to support the Original Project and impacts to local street systems would also be less than significant. (DEIR, pp. 4.11-33.) Also, the EIR details that Project access locations and circulation around the Project site would be adequate, and cumulative impacts related to queuing would be less than significant. Regarding parking, the Final EIR describes that the highest parking demand from the Original Project would be 799 spaces on a weekday pursuant to the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Edition) Land Use 221 - "Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise)" rates. As the Original Project is proposed to include 904 parking spaces within a central parking structure, the Project's parking would accommodate needs of the Project pursuant to the ITE rates, which indicates that impacts related to parking would be less than significant. In addition, the Final EIR included a comparison of actual parking demands at existing multi -family developments within the City, which determined that the Original Project would have sufficient parking and would not result in significant impacts related to parking. Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project As described previously, the Modified Project would develop 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent less) than the Original Project and would continue to provide onsite parking for use by the OC Discovery Center. The parking area for the OC Discovery Center would be accessed from a right -in right -out driveway on N. Main Street. The proposed residences would be served by another driveway adjacent to Santiago Park that would provide direct access to the parking structure and residential surface parking area. As described in Section 2, Modifications to the Original Project Description, and shown on Figure 3, Modified Project Site Access, to provide for left-tum vehicular access into the Project site, the southern leg of the intersection of N. Main Street at Walkie Way (including the pedestrian crossings and signals) would be moved approximately 80 to 90-feet to the south as part of the Modified Project. The relocated pedestrian crossing on N. Main Street would connect the Project site and the Discovery Cube, and the median would be modified. The intersection signalization of Walkie Way (going east and west into and out of the site) would be modified to operate with split-phasing3 and the Main Street northbound and southbound leff4um lanes (into and out of the site) would operate with lead/lag phasing4. The proposed northern driveway for the Modified Project would also provide an easement to Santiago Park for maintenance vehicles and the public who reserve park facilities, and the existing gated vehicular entry along N. Main Street to Santiago Park would be closed. To evaluate the potential traffic impacts related to the Modified Project, a Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis (included as Attachment B) was prepared and peer reviewed by a City selected independent traffic engineer and the City's traffic engineering staff. The Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis evaluates operation of 278 multi -family units, which is 22 more units than the Modified Project's proposed 256 units. Therefore, the Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis provides an overstated and conservative analysis of potential impacts. Consistent with the Project Traffic Impact Analysis (included in Appendix J of the DEIR) the roadway conditions that are evaluated in the Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis include the ongoing 1-5 from SR-55 to SR-57 High 3 Split phasing is a signal that gives a green phase for all vehicle movements of one direction (e.g., northbound through, right, and left) followed by a phase for all movements of the opposite direction (e.g., southbound through, right, and left). 4 Lead/lag phasing is a signal sequence where the green left turn arrow is either before or after the oncoming thru green. Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Improvement project that is planned to be completed in 2020. This project includes the addition of one continuous HOV lane in each direction along the northbound and southbound 1-5 between SR-55 and SR-57 and the 1-5 HOV northbound entrance and southbound exist ramps at the intersection of N. Main Street/Edgewood Road-1-5 Ramps have been removed. Project Trip Generation The vehicle trip generation rates are from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Edition) and are based on Land Use 221 - "Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise)", which is consistent with the EIR analysis. Table T-1 shows that 278 units (22 units more than the Modified Project of 256 units) is estimated to generate 79 fewer a.m. peak hour trips, 96 fewer p.m. peak hour trips, and 1,186 fewer daily trips than the Original Project. Table T-1 Comparison of Vehicular Trip Generation Land Use A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Dail In Total In Out Total TripGeneration Rates 0.09 0.36 0.27 0.17 0.44 5.44 Or inal Project TripGeneration 496 units 46 j-59J 179 133 86 219 2,698 Modified Project TripGeneration 278 units 26 100 75 48 123 1,512 Reduction in Trips 20 79 58 38 96 1,186 Source: Trans lutions, 2019. Attachment B. Because the Original Project resulted in less than significant traffic impacts, and the Modified Project would result in fewer peak hour and daily vehicular trips, the Modified Project would not result in any new or increased traffic impacts. Although the intersection of N. Main Street and Walkie Way would be modified to accommodate southbound left turns into the Project site, the traffic analysis modeling shows that the existing roadway network would be able to accommodate the change, as none of the traffic criteria thresholds would be exceeded, as detailed below. Therefore, no new or increased transportation, traffic, or circulation impacts would occur from implementation of the Modred Project. Existing Plus Modified Project Intersections: In the existing plus project with the Modified Project condition, Table T-2 shows that all of the study area intersections are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service except for the SR-22 eastbound ramps at Town and Country Road in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This intersection is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans and currently operates at an unsatisfactory LOS E in the a.m. peak hour and LOS F in the p.m. peak hour. With the addition of traffic from the Modified Project, the intersection would continue to operate at an unsatisfactory LOS E in the a.m. peak hour and LOS F in the p.m. peak hour. This is the same conditions that would occur by the Original Project, as shown in Table 4.11-9 of the DEIR. Therefore, like the Original Project, the Modified Project would not result in exceedance of the Caltrans criteria, and no impacts at other intersections would occur in the existing plus Modified Project condition. Thus, overall impacts would be less than significant. Roadway Segments: In addition, as shown in Table T-3, all study area roadway segments are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service and implementation of the Modified Project would not cause an exceedance of LOS criteria on any of the roadway segments in the traffic study area. Therefore, impacts to roadway segments in the existing plus Modified Project scenario would also be less than significant, which is consistent with the EIR findings identified in DEIR Table 4.11-10. Queueing: As described previously, the Modified Project would implement changes to the Main Street and Walkie Way intersection geometrics that would provide a left turn into the Project site. This would result in a reduction in the storage length for the northbound left turn and the northbound through lanes at the intersection of Main Street/Walkie Way -Driveway, and for the southbound through lanes at the Main Street/Edgewood Road intersection by approximately 90 feet. Table T-4 shows the queueing in the existing without and with Modified Project conditions. As E 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O E z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c a x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c L A W p o O O O O O O O Q 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O Q [0 U U U U Q U �y J Y W N 6 y � O U Q rA c0 Q U Q Q a J O O O O O O O O O a` O Q [0 U 0 O m Q U J m N !� Y N 6 H � O W Q Q Q Q O Q Q Q O O O O O O O O N O Q [0 U U U U Q U LLL S O L2 N (h N m N m Y W N a O U Q m ¢ Q U Q Q a J d S t O Q CO U O fd Q U J O x d B C O M a O N m N r Y A Y 6 N Q O W Q Q Q Q O Q Q L O O N M (h O O) (h (,J — O O O O O O O O 9 m J �p N m N m m E J C O C O O O 'gyp 'gyp 'N 'tO 'tO .� N m .� O CO N N C m m E U a O O O O O O O O O O E d U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U> C C O O O O O O O O O O N O ¢ Q m¢ Q¢ O Q Q Q J N o �n v co m o �n rn m > C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L_ v T E > N O Q Q m Q Q Q J y O U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o > L �S J U N m O o O uQ o in O in O in O in O u� O in O u� O in N A t0 O J J J J J J J J (d (b (b (b 4 9 N O C J �p W O O W O O W p p W N N � y d c O N s O J L R• U N u O 19 d y y 5 E E S N w w N Ed E U Table T-4: Existing Condition with Modified Project Queuing Without Pro ect With Pro ect Storage AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Length Hour Hour Hour Hour Queue Queue Queue Queue (In Intersection Movement Feet) Length' Length' Length' Length' Main Street/Memory Lane NBT 680 352 394 338 323 Main Street/Walkie Way NBL 150 31 45 45 58 NBT 390 193 390 214 196 SBL 80 1 1 32 64 EBL 70 8 19 11 27 EBR 150 0 0 8 61 WBL 100 - - 78 58 WBR 100 - - 60 43 Main StreeNEdgewood Road-1-5 Ramps NBL 175 59 148 55 122 NBT 690 140 289 42 215 SBL 150 91 113 90 127 SBR 130 0 0 0 38 EBTL 1353 27 64 23 44 EBR 150 11 1 0 0 WBTL 250 219 152 182 101 WBR 60 23 18 11 0 Main Street/Santa Clara Avenue-1-5 NB On -Ramp NBT 1 350 1 62 1 80 1 149 1 253 Source: Trans lutions, 2019. Attachment B. 'Queues reported are 95th Percentile queue lengths per movement in feet. EBL =eastbound left; EBTL=eastbound thmugh-left turn; NBL = northbound left; NWR = northwest bound right; SBL = southbound left; SBT=southbound turn; SBT2 = southbound second turn; SER = southeast bound right turn; WBTL = westbound thoughaeft turn shown all queues are forecast to fit within the storage lengths at each location. Therefore, impacts related to queuing would not occur with implementation of the Modified Project in the existing condition. Freeway Segments: Freeway segments are under Caltrans jurisdiction. As shown in Table T-5, both with and without the Modified Project in the existing condition, all traffic study area freeway facilities would operate at unsatisfactory levels of service E or F except for the 1-5 southbound Broadway and Main Street off -ramps in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This is the same condition that would occur with implementation of the Original Project, as shown on DEIR Table 4.11-15. Thus, like the Original Project, the Modified Project would also result in less than significant impacts to freeway segments per Caltrans criteria. Opening Year (2020) Plus Modified Project Intersections: In the opening year (2020) plus Modified Project condition, all study area intersections are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service except for the Main Street/Santa Clara/1-5 NB On Ramp and the SR-22 eastbound ramps at Town and Country Road in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, as shown in Table T-6. With the addition of traffic from the Modified Project, the LOS at these locations would not be reduced. Therefore, like the Original Project, the Modified Project would not result in exceedance of the City or Caltrans criteria, and no impacts at other intersections would occur in the opening year (2020) plus Modified Project condition. Thus, impacts would be less than significant. Roadway Segments: As shown in Table T-7, all study area roadway segments are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service and implementation of the Modified Project would not cause an exceedance of LOS criteria on any of the roadway segments in the traffic study area. Therefore, impacts to roadway segments in this scenario would also be less than significant. Queueing: As described previously, the Modified Project would result in reducing the storage length along N. Main Street. Table T-8 shows the queueing in the opening year (2020) plus Modified Project condition. As shown all queues are forecast to fit within the storage length at each location. Therefore, impacts related to queuing would not occur with implementation of the Modified Project in the year 2020 condition. Year 2040 Plus Modified Project Intersections: As shown in Table T-9, in the year 2040 plus Modred Project condition, all study area intersections are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service except for: • N. Main Street and Santa Clara Avenue-1-5 northbound ramps in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, • N. Main Street and 17th Street in the a.m. peak hour, and • SR-22 eastbound ramps at Town and Country Road in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours (same as existing condition). These intersections would operate at an unsatisfactory LOS under 2040 both without and with project conditions, which would also occur by the Original Project, (DEIR Table 4.11-29). In addition, the LOS at these intersections would not change with implementation of the Modified Project in 2040 conditions. Therefore, the Modified Project would not result in a significant impact in the 2040 scenario, and impacts would be less than significant. Roadway Segments: As shown in Table T-10, all study area roadway segments are forecast to operate at satisfactory levels of service in 2040 with implementation of the Modified Project. Therefore, impacts to roadway segments in this scenario would also be less than significant. `O z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z E N O LL LL LL LL jy LL LL p U LL LL LL LL LL LL J (O m O m N (O O O N O (O Q O q C (O 67 N (O O N co a c a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y O N 6 N t O J LL LL LL W U W W p U LL LL LL LL LL LL O a p a 9 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O J LL LL LL LL W LL LL p U LL LL LL LL LL LL i Y .N m O O m LL7 (O O 67 N N O N Q O OJ LLn O a y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Q N ^ N m 6 N (00 (00 O 3 O LL LL LL W (,J W W p U LL LL LL LL LL W O 2 u C Q,Q, (O (O r r N O r r tY 0 N rn N rn LL� Q N in m � (h Q O Q in 67 a o a y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N m y y m N T E E o m 0 00 0 m S m O O O U O O CJ m } c o o m C7 N> Q '� .ro N �C� O ° J .20 O E E E C N E tO K N K N LL' 0 0 yyyyy;;;; 0 LL' E N tO K 9 C 0 O LL' O p' L G K K K E 9 c 9 C c J 0 0 0 c c 0 0 0 N p 0 0 a o c a N d N N d N U U y O y U O O > N N d>> N N N N C_ N C 0 N N Z S .c .c N c N N .c 00 3 'O 3 7 7 7 Y] I� � � i!) uJ � � C Cn Q' O O C N N N O �zzaz zz z z z zzz z zz o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a w 0 c a x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn U Q 6 x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O Q U U U LLL U Q U LLL J - O N O U7 ^ N O Y W N 6 N � O U Q m m Q U Q Q a J a` t N 3 O Q U U U O m Q U LLL O Y to 6 y O W Q Q m¢ U Q Q U rn in u�i m u'� m N O Q U U U LLL U Q U LLL M N ^ D7 x 0 O N m N N m N m Y W N a O U Q m m Q U Q Q a J } U a` o O Q U U U LlJ m Q U LLL L_ J ry O O m O ^ m N N m 04 1-5 m m N m W N O W Q Q m Q U Q Q Q — o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 m J ry N 14 m N m> m > Td C 3 U o a m m o m c o E. 3 E Y_ (mJ C\ W o to o W w J C d N �+ O O O v m` m` m` c g g E z O m N N C c -O w !0 O Ln m N (h m V> LLJ O m C A N (h C LL� 0.' m r (n m m4' �— � (n Co m E U a O O O O O O O O O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z d V d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O Q Q U Q m Q w Q m Q J a :> N L_ C O O O O O O O O O O (h (h (h (h th N N N O Q Q m Q m Q 0 ¢ m Q J y O O iQ o > L T (O N (O O m N s{ E t O Iz m ur C t0 a r (O N N N OI I� O j of .i of (h N fh v (h (h (h m �6 N m N U O O O O O O O O O O N m o uO in in in in in d a a a a Lo p - C c o W 0 0 0 W W W W � N A t0 O J J J J J J J J �-% N (O (0 (O (b 416 4 (b a N O C W W O O W 0 W J ry N c O N L � c � 6 UI N p p H E E p S N c N c N 4 N N v N Y N c U c c c m m N y c O c Cd E U ,(}}{as23E=G:`2J-, $)/li;2R=®eGG§§;S CY $fi/ +k77------------- 2m§«z Jz \ ) 0 ^ \ E\) �Z zzz zz z z z ZZZ Z Z Z E Y o 0 0 0 0 � c Off. u1Oi a x 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c L Q y O O O O O O O O O U a x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O Q U U U LLL LL. J O O �p I� O O x O N N N n a m N n Y W N 6 N a O O Q m U Q U Q Q O O O O O O O O O a` L N O Q U U U Q U jy 30 N O [O O [O (O N N N N 0 O N O M � ^ m m � Y N a a o w Q m m Q w Q Q O O O O O O O O N O Q U U U iLL U Q U �y J W N 6 N � O O Q m U Q O Q Q a J a O L N O Q U U U uJ m Q U LLL Y W N a � o w Q m m Q iu Q Q Q J O O O O O O O O 9 m O C 0 W 0 0 W W 0 C� U 0 0 0 0 0 C) O J ry N O `m ¢' > J m> U Q O N N NmN� tN ONE O � O O 2 Cd N E U L Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z E d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O Q Q U m m Q W Q m Q J a C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L_ N E .S O 'N (O ^ O G O O Q M M M M N N N V N O Q Q U m m Q W Q m Q J U O U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o � L_ M W M O) N O (h N a C7 U N ry O o O N O (h O (h O (h O (h O N O (h O N O (h N O (O O J J J J J J J J J U J IL 16 ui IL v IL d' IL � N N 'a O C J �p W p p W p p W p p W N N o N s N N y C y � N O O N C U N N u O 19 m m m m m 9 9 y O C N N O E E S N N O O v c c $ a 3 3 a c 3 t0 0 0 0 E z z o > o m m N y c O c m E m Queueing: As described previously, construction of the Modified Project includes changes to the N. Main Street at Walkie Way intersection to provide a left turn into the Project site and changes to the median to provide adequate storage length. Table T-11 provides the queueing in the year 2040 plus Modified Project condition. As shown, all queues are forecast to fit within the storage length, except for the southbound left turn at Main Street and Edgewood Road in the p.m. peak hour with the existing median. An exceedance of the storage length by 11-feet is forecast to occur in the p.m. peak hour without the Modified Project. With Modified Project, the exceedance would increase by 3 feet in year 2040 conditions. As detailed in Section 2, Modifications to the Original Project, the median would be modified to accommodate these queues. Thus, operation of the Modified Project would result in a less than significant impact related to queuing. In addition, this operational condition is improved in comparison to the conditions that would occur from implementation of the Original Project Option A, which included one driveway to the Project site that was sited along N. Main Street, and resulted in a p.m. peak hour queue of 235 feet (71 feet greater than the queue of 164 feet shown in Table T-11). Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to queuing would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Table T-11: Year 2040 with Modified Project Queuing Without Project With Pro ect AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Storage Length Hour Hour Hour Hour Queue Queue Queue Queue (In Intersection Movement Feet) Length' Length' Length' Length' Main Street/Memory Lane NBT 680 294 578 416 590 Main Street/Walkie Way NBL 150 44 53 44 62 NBT 390 305 381 266 305 SBL 80 0 1 32 64 EBL 70 8 19 11 27 EBR 150 0 0 8 64 WBL 100 0 1 75 58 WBR 100 0 1 57 43 Main Street/Edgewood Road-1-5 Ramps NBT 690 101 366 70 382 SBL 150 99 161 100 164 WBTL 250 183 114 183 113 WBR 1 60 1 50 1 23 1 50 1 22 Main Street/Santa Clara Avenue-1-5 NB On -Ramp NBT 1 350 1 132 1 151 1 157 1 230 Source: Translutions, 2019. Attachment B. Bold = Exceeds storage length 'Queues reported are 95th Percentile queue lengths per movement in feet. EBL =eastbound left; EBTL=eastbound through -left turn; NBL = northbound left; NWR = northwest bound right; SBL = southbound left; SBT= southbound turn; SBT2 = southbound second turn; SER = southeast bound right turn; WBTL = westbound though -left turn Freeway Segments: As shown in Table T-12, both with and without the Modified Project in Year 2040 condition, all traffic study area freeway facilities would operate at unsatisfactory levels of service E or F except for the 1-5 southbound Broadway and Main Street off -ramps in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This is the same condition that would occur with implementation of the Original Project, as shown on DER Table 4.11-28. Thus, like the Original Project, the Modified Project would also result in less than significant impacts to freeway segments per Caltrans criteria. ZZZ Z ZZZZZ Z Z Z Z zz E N O J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL p U LL LL LL LL LL LL S W C 0 0 M a o a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O 6 N L O J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL p U LL LL LL LL LL W O S" M m M Co O V M O O O M m r a o a s O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LP r CO LL� LL� LL� M M V LL� M N LL� M a O m m m LL� LL� LL� N O M N M m a N N O J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL p U LL LL LL LL LL LL a c a ,o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a` 0 L_ NO 2� J LL LL LL LL LL W W p U LL LL LL LL LL W J O � Y V a o a y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m v,v, � LL� LL� M M LL� N M 6 coLL� LL� 6N m N N E! `y E `o E O c a3 O c t,La�i O O, U O 3o m O C� c U Q N a J E E E N c 0 0 O .tL 0 .tML O O 3 0p N o o o a o c 0 c m N d N N a N U U N O m N U O, p N O N N Z N N N o N "' E 3 3 E `� > E> E .n .� .� .ma .� C m o 0 o m C m m Cd E m Q Parking As described in Section 2, Modifications to the Original Project, the Modified Project includes a central parking structure that would provide 407 spaces for the onsite residential uses and a surface parking lot that would contain 284 parking spaces, of which 104 would be dedicated to the onsite residential uses and 180 would be shared with the OC Discovery Cube that is located across N. Main Street from the Project site and currently utilizes the site for 180 parking spaces. The shared parking spaces would be used by the OC Discovery Cube from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. daily and would be available for the onsite residences between 5:00 p.m. to %00 p.m. daily. A rolling gate would separate the onsite residential and OC Discovery Cube parking areas and be opened and closed for management of onsite parking. Overall, the Modified Project would provide 511 spaces for onsite residential and 180 shared spaces. In comparison, the Original Project included 904 parking spaces within a central parking structure to accommodate the demand of the multi -family residences. The Original Project did not include a surface parking lot and did not include shared parking for the OC Discovery Cube. It was planned for the existing OC Discovery Cube onsite parking to relocate. Table T-13 provides the estimated parking demand per the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Edition) Land Use 221 - "Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise)" that provides both average parking needs and 85th percentile parking needs (which provides the highest parking demand 85 percent of the time). As shown, the highest demand from the proposed multi -family residences would be 412 spaces on a weekday. As the Modified Project is proposed to include 511 parking spaces that would be dedicated to the multi -family residences, the Modified Project's parking would accommodate needs of the development pursuant to the ITE rates, which indicates that impacts related to parking would be less than significant. Table T-13: Parking Demand Per the ITE Rates ITE Vehicle Parkin Generation Rates Pro'ec[ Parkin Demand Land Avera a Rate 85th Percentile AveraRate 85th Percentile Use Units Weekday Saturday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Sunday Weekday Saturday 221 256 1.2 1.03 1.05 1.61 1 1.14 307 264 269 412 292 Total Residential Parking Provided 511 511 511 511 511 Total Residential Parking Required Per ITE Rates 307 264 269 412 292 Parking Surplus 204 247 242 99 219 Source: ITE Trip Generation (10th Edition) Land Use 221 -'Multi-family Housing (Mid -Rise) To identify actual existing parking demands and provide a comparison to the ITE parking rates, parking demand surveys were completed at two multifamily residential developments in the City that are similar to the Modified Project in terms of rent pricing, market segment, and amenities (included as Attachment C). The surveys were completed at the Nineteen01 multi -family development located at 1901 East First Street (254 units) that includes 48.4 percent 1 bedroom units, 49.2 percent 2 bedroom units, and 2.4 percent 3 bedroom units, and the Marke multi -family development located at 100 E MacArthur Boulevard (300 units) that includes 51.7 percent 1 bedroom units, 43.6 percent 2 bedroom units and 4.7 percent 3 bedroom units. Thus, the surveyed projects have units that are larger (don't include studios) and have a greater need for parking than the 68 studios proposed for the Modified Project. The parking surveys were conducted on a weekday (Thursday) and a weekend day (Saturday) for a period of 24 hours. This Parking Analysis is included as Attachment C and Table T-14 provides summary of the parking survey data. Table T-14: Parking Survey Data Summary Survey Location Number of Units Day of Week Parking Occu anc Parking Rate Nineteen0l 264 Peak Weekday Demand 344 1.35 Peak Weekend Demand 342 1.35 The Marke 300 Peak Weekday Demand 230 0.77 Peak Weekend Demand 193 0.64 Average Demand(Weekday) 1.06 Average Demand Weekend 0.99 Peak Demand Per Unit(Weekday & Weekend 1.35 Total Project Parking Provided 539 Total Project Parking Required Per Peak Demand 365 Project Parking Surplus 174 Source: Trans lutions, 2019. Attachment C. As identified on Table T-14, the peak parking demand is 1.35 spaces per unit at Nineteen01 and The Marke has much lower parking rates. Applying the Nineteen01 peak parking rate to the Modified Project would result in a need for 346 parking spaces. As described previously, the Modified Project includes 511 parking spaces, which is 165 more than the number of spaces forecast to be needed for the Modified Project based on recent parking surveys done at similar multi -family developments. As a result, no potentially significant impact related to residential parking would occur. In addition, the site currently provides 180 parking spaces for use by the OC Discovery Cube. The Modified Project would maintain the use of these spaces for the OC Discovery Cube by implementation of a perpetual easement of the shared surface lot area. As this is an existing condition, no impacts related to the use of the site for OC Discovery Cube parking would occur. Conclusion for Transportation/Traffic and Circulation The Modified Project would develop 48.4 percent fewer residential units than the Original Project, which would result in more than 79 fewer a.m. peak hour trips, 96 fewer p.m. peak hour trips, and 1,186 fewer daily trips than the Original Project. Thus, no new impacts related to the volume of vehicular trips would occur from the Modified Project. Additionally, the Modified Project would implement changes to the Main Street and Walkie Way intersection geometrics that would result in less than significant impacts to study area intersections, roadway segments, and vehicle queues, which is consistent with the impacts of the Original Project as detailed in the EIR. The Modified Project would also provide parking for the proposed onsite multi -family residential uses that meet the anticipated parking demand pursuant to ITE rates and parking surveys at similar developments within the City. As a result, parking related impacts would be less than significant. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CECIA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to transportation and traffic would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. 3.12 Tribal Cultural Resources Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Impacts related to tribal cultural resources were evaluated in Section 4.12, Tribal Cultural Resources, of the DEIR. As described, the Project site has been heavily disturbed to substantial depths in various areas and no substantial evidence exists that tribal cultural resources are present. However, during the SB 18/AB 52 consultation, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation stated that the Project lies within its ancestral tribal territory within a sensitive area. Therefore, to avoid potential adverse effects to unknown tribal cultural resources Mitigation Measure TCR-1 was included to provide for Native American resource sensitivity training and to prescribe activities should any inadvertent discoveries of tribal cultural resources be unearthed by Project construction activities. Additionally, California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered at the Project site, disturbance of the site shall halt and remain halted until the coroner has conducted an investigation. If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR-1 and the existing regulations, impacts to tribal cultural resources from implementation of the Original Project was determined to be less than significant. Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Consistent with Original Project, the Modified Project would also involve demolition, excavation, and grading activities that would disturb the site soils. As a result, the Modified Project would also be required to implement Mitigation Measure TCR-1, which would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. However, the subterranean parking for the Modified Project would be 13,300 square feet smaller than the subterranean parking for the Original Project. Thus, less excavation would occur, and increased impacts related to tribal cultural resources would not result from implementation of the Modified Project. No new or greater impacts related to tribal cultural resources would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Tribal Cultural Resources Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would involve excavation and disturbance of onsite soils and Mitigation Measure TCR-1 would be required to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. With Mitigation Measure TCR-1 no new or greater impacts related to tribal cultural resources would occur. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Inadvertent Discoveries. The Project's grading and construction plans and specifications shall state that prior to commencement of any excavation activities, a Native American shall be contacted to conduct a Native American Indian Sensitivity Training for construction personnel. The training session includes a handout and focus on how to identify Native American resources encountered during earthmoving activities and the procedures followed if resources are discovered. In the event that tribal cultural resources are inadvertently discovered during ground -disturbing activities, work must be halted within 50 feet of the find until it can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist in cooperation with a Native American monitor to determine if the potential resource meet the CEQA definition of historical (State CEQA Guidelines 15064.5(a)) and/or unique resource (Public Resources Code 21083.2(g)). Construction activities could continue in other areas. If the find is considered a "resource" the archaeologist, in cooperation with a Native American monitor shall pursue either protection in place or recovery, salvage and treatment of the deposits. Recovery, salvage and treatment protocols shall be developed in accordance with applicable provisions of Public Resource Code Section 21083.2 and State CEQA Guidelines 15064.5 and 15126.4. If unique a tribal cultural resource cannot be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state, recovery, salvage and treatment shall be required at the Project Applicant's expense. All recovered and salvaged resources shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation in an established accredited professional repository. 3.13 Utilities and Service Systems Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR Water As detailed in DEIR Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, the Original Project would result in a total demand of 131.53 AFY of water at full occupancy. The EIR describes that the City's Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) anticipates a water supply and demand increase of 8.2 percent (3,028 acre feet) per year. The Original Project would result in an increase in demand for water supplies that is 4.3 percent of the UWMP's anticipated increase per year. Therefore, the EIR determined that City would have water supplies available to serve the Original Project. (DEIR, p. 4.13-7 through 4.13-8.) Wastewater As detailed in DEIR Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, based on results of the sewer flow monitoring and the City's Design Criteria wastewater generation rates, it was determined that existing sewer lines that serve the Project site would be able to adequately accommodate the additional wastewater flows from the Original Project. Additionally, it was determined that the existing wastewater treatment facilities have adequate capacity to accommodate the increase in wastewater flow from full occupancy of the Original Project and impacts were determined to be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.13-11.) Drainage and Water Quality As detailed in DEIR Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, all projects in the watershed are required to implement measures to comply with the LID, Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit, Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) requirements for implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). These requirements were developed to reduce the potential of impacts to water quality, and to ensure that development projects accommodate stormwater drainage. The EIR determined that the Original Project would result in an increase of pervious area from creation of larger areas of landscape and open space than currently exist onsite, and that stormwater from the site would be filtered through detention and drywell systems prior to discharge off -site to manage stormwater drainage and protect water quality. The EIR determined that the Original Project would result in less than significant impacts related to drainage facilities and water quality. (DEIR, pp. 4.13-16 through 4.13-19.) Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project Water Consistent with the methodology of the EIR, the estimated water demand that would result from the Modified Project was based on the City of Santa Ana Design Guidelines that assume 120 gpd per capita and 3,000 gallons per day per acre of landscaping. As shown in Table U-1, the reduction of 453 residents and 0.46 acre of landscaping would reduce the water demand from the Project site by 55,740 gallons per day (gpd) or 62.44 acre feet yearly (AFY) in comparison to the Original Project, as shown on Table U-1. Table U-1: Comparison of Water Demands Water Use Water Demand Kesraents or I uarry uemana Annual Acreage I (aod) I Demand(AFY) Oriqinal Project Residents 120 gpolcapita 955 114,600 128.37 Landscaping 3,000 gprllacre 0.94 2,820 1 3.16 Original Project Total 117,420 1 131.53 Modified Project Residents I 120 rllca ita 502 60,240 67.48 Landscaping3,000 rllacre 0.48 1,440 1.61 ModifiedPro'ectTotal 61,680 69.09 Reduction in Water Demand -55,740 -62.44 GPD gallons per day; AFY = Acre Feet Yearly. The increase in demand for water supplies from the Modified Project would be 2.3 percent of the UWMP's anticipated annual increase of 3,028 AFY (DEIR page 4.13-8), which is less than the 4.3 percent increase that would result from the Original Project. Therefore, the Modified Project would require less water from existing entitlements than the Original Project, and no new or greater impacts related to water would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Wastewater As shown in Table UT-1, the reduction of 240 residential units that would occupy an estimated 453 residents would result in a 55,740 gpd reduction of water demand. The reduction of water demand would generate a reduction in wastewater generation. As the existing wastewater infrastructure would be able to adequately accommodate the Original Project, it would also be able to accommodate the reduced flows from the Modified Project. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to wastewater would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Drainage Consistent with the Original Project, implementation of the Modified Project would include compliance with all required laws, permits, and plans, through implementation of a SWPPP and WQMP that would be approved by the City prior to receipt of construction and operational permits. The DAMP would require runoff volume to be filtered through the detention and drywell systems prior to discharge off -site to manage stormwater drainage and protect water quality. Thus, the Modified Project would not generate additional runoff volumes, and DAMP required treatment systems would remove pollutants from onsite runoff. Therefore, consistent with the Original Project, the Modred Project would result in less than significant impacts related to drainage facilities and water quality. No new or greater impacts related to drainage and water quality would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Utilities and Service Systems The Modified Project would develop 240 fewer residential units (48.4 percent less) than the Original Project, which would result in 453 fewer residents at full occupancy. The reduction in residents would equate to a reduced demand for water supplies and wastewater infrastructure capacity. In addition, the Modified Project would also filter runoff pursuant to permitting requirements. Thus, no new or greater impacts related to utilities or services systems would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to utilities and service systems would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. 3.14 Energy Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR As discussed in Section 4.14, Energy, of the DER, the Original Project would be developed pursuant to the California Green Building Standards Code (24 California Code of Regulations [CCR] Part 11 [CALGreen Code]), which would provide for sustainable construction and operational practices, including energy efficiency. (DEIR, pp. 4.14-5 through 4.14-7.) The City's administration of the Title 24 requirements and the City's Climate Action Plan includes review of design components and energy conservation measures ensures that all requirements are met. In addition, the EIR describes that the Original Project would represent an urban infill development because it would occur on a currently developed site, and would be located near existing off -site employment, commercial, residential, and retail destinations and in proximity to existing public bus stops and freeways, which would result in reduced vehicle trips and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) in comparison to a project of similar size and land without close access to employment, service, and retail, destinations, in addition to public transit and freeways. The land use characteristics of the Project are consistent with the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) guidance related to a reduction of vehicle trip distances that would achieve a reduction in associated transportation - related fuel demand. Also, the EIR describes that the Project site is within an area where existing infrastructure would provide for efficient delivery of electricity and natural gas to the Project and the Project would not inhibit the development of other alternative energy sources Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project The Modified Project would reduce the number of multi -family residential units that would be developed on the site by 240 units, which is a 48.4 percent reduction. As a result, the energy demand for the onsite uses would also be reduced. Also, like the Original Project, the Modified Project would be required to comply with state and federal programs that are designed to improve energy efficiency, including the California Title 24, California Energy Code, and the CALGreen Code. Typical Title 24 measures include insulation, use of energy -efficient heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment (HVAC), solar -reflective roofing materials, energy -efficient indoor and outdoor lighting systems, reclamation of heat rejection from refrigeration equipment to generate hot water, and incorporation of skylights, etc. In addition, Project Design Feature PDF-2 that provides for a minimum of 15 electric vehicle charging stations to promote usage of electric vehicles is included in the Modified Project. Although the Modified Project would result in 240 fewer residential units near existing off -site employment, commercial, residential, and retail destinations and in proximity to existing public bus stops and freeways, it would continue to result in reduced VMT in comparison to a project of similar size and land without close access to these destinations and transportation faclli ies. Thus, the land use characteristics of the Modified Project are also consistent with the CAPCOA guidance related to reducing vehicle trip distances to reduce associated transportation -related fuel demand. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to energy would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. Conclusion for Enerov Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would generate demand for energy. However, because the Modified Project is 48.4 percent smaller than the Original Project it would result in less energy usage on the site. Also, like the Original Project, the Modified Project would locate residences near employment and shopping destinations and transportation facilities and would be required to comply with state and federal programs that are designed to improve energy efficiency. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. EIR Mitigation Measure The EIR determined that impacts related to energy would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. Attachment A: Supplemental Operational Noise Analysis October 9, 2019 Ms. Renee Escario RE Consulting SUBJECT: THE ADDINGTON FOCUSED NOISE ASSESSMENT MEMORANDUM Dear Ms. Renee Escario: Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the following Focused Noise Assessment for The Addington Project ("Project"), which is located at 2525 N. Main Street in the City of Santa Ana. The Project is proposed to consist of up to 256 dwelling units in a two to four-story residential building surrounding a parking structure with 5 above ground levels of parking and an amenity deck. This Focused Noise Assessment calculates the potential Project -related operational noise levels at nearby noise -sensitive residential receiver locations east and south of the Project. This Focused Noise Assessment is consistent with the methods and procedures used in the July 2018 Magnolia at the Park Noise Impact Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc. (1) This Focused Noise Assessment calculates the potential operational noise levels due to the Project's stationary noise sources at seven off -site receiver locations adjacent to the Project site. Exhibit A identifies the receiver and noise source locations used to calculate the Project -related operational noise levels. The Project -related operational noise sources based on a review of the site plan include: roof -top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, pad -mounted transformers, parking lot vehicle movements, outdoor courtyard activity, outdoor pool/spa activity and roof -top parking activities. REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS To estimate the Project operational noise impacts, reference noise level measurements were collected from similar types of activities to represent the noise levels expected with the development of the proposed Project. The Reference Project operational noise levels are based on the noise sources provided in Table 1. It is important to note that the following projected noise levels assume the worst - case noise environment with the roof -top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, pad -mounted transformers, parking lot vehicle movements, outdoor courtyard activity, outdoor pool/spa activity and roof -top parking activities all operating simultaneously. In reality, the noise sources will likely vary throughout the day. OPERATIONAL NOISE The operational noise level calculations shown on Table 2 account for the distance attenuation provided due to geometric spreading, when sound from a localized stationary source (i.e., a point source) propagates uniformly outward in a spherical pattern. Hard site conditions are used in the operational noise analysis which result in noise levels that attenuate (or decrease) at a rate of 6 dBAfor each doubling of distance from a point source. EXHIBIT A: OPERATIONAL NOISE SOURCE AND RECEIVER LOCATIONS Existing Barrier Height (in feet( iiiiiiiii Existing Barrier —0 Distance from receiver to noise source (in feet) ♦ Trash Enclosure O Courtyard Activity . Transformer 11 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity TABLE 1: REFERENCE NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Noise Reference Noise Duration Ref. Source Hourly Level (dBA L50) Noise Source Distance Activity @ Ref. @ 50 (hh:mm:ss) (Feet) Height (Mins)7 (Feet) Dist. Feet Roof -Top Air ConditioningUnitl 96:00:00 5' S' 39 74.4 54.4 Trash Enclosure Activity' 00:00:32 5' S' 60 69.0 49.0 Pad -Mounted Transformer3 3 6' S' 60 56.0 37.6 Parking Lot Vehicle Movements° 01:00:00 10, S' 60 44.0 33.5 Courtyard Activity' 00:08:00 10, 4' 60 73.8 59.8 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity' 00:10:00 5' 4' 60 68.7 48.7 Roof -Top Parking° 00:10:00 5' 4' 60 1 68.7 1 48.7 'As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 7/27/2015 at the Santee Walmart located at 170 Town Center Parkway. 7 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 5/3/2018 at a commercial and office park trash enclosure in the City of Costa Mesa. ' Source: NEMA TR 1-2013 Transformers, Step Voltage Regulators and Reactors, Table 2 sound level for a 500 kVA transformer. 4 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 8/24/2016 in the parking lot of the Windemere Apartment community in the City of Riverside. s As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on Saturday night, September 21, 2019 in the City of Newport Beach. `As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 7/5/2017 at the Covenant Hill Clubhouse pool in Ladera Ranch. 7 Anticipated duration (minutes within the hour) of noise activity during typical hourly conditions expected at the Project site based on the reference noise level measurement activity. The basic noise attenuation equation shown below is used to calculate the distance attenuation based on a reference noise level (SPL1): SPL2 = SPL1 - 20log(D2/Di) Where SPL2 is the resulting noise level after attenuation, SPL1 is the source noise level, D2 is the distance to the reference sound pressure level (SPL1), and D1 is the distance to the receiver location. Table 2 indicates that the hourly noise levels associated with the roof -top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, pad -mounted transformers, parking lot vehicle movements, outdoor courtyard activity, outdoor pool/spa activity and roof -top parking activities are expected to range from 31.4 to 46.9 dBA L5o at the sensitive off -site receiver locations. The operational noise level calculation worksheets are included in Appendix A and include barrier attenuation provided by intervening structures between each noise source and the receiver locations, where applicable, from the existing noise barriers and planned Project buildings. TABLE 2: PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS Receiver Location' Noise Source' Project Operational Noise Levels (dBA)a L50 (30 mins) Les (15 mins) La (5 mins) L2 (1 min) L.. (Q min) Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) 15.6 17.3 18.6 18.9 19.4 Trash Enclosure Activity 27.7 33.7 40.7 45.7 47.2 Pad -Mounted Transformer 14.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 20.4 1 23.4 31.4 1 37.4 45.0 Rl Courtyard Activity 36.8 39.0 41.5 43.9 46.6 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 28.1 31.1 34.4 37.5 42.9 Roof -Top Parking 9.4 12.4 20.4 26.4 34.0 Combined Noise Level: 37.9 40.7 44.8 48.7 51.8 Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) 20.7 22.4 23.7 24.0 24.5 Trash Enclosure Activity 13.4 19.4 26.4 31.4 32.9 Pad -Mounted Transformer 28.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 32.4 35.4 43.4 49.4 57.0 R2 Courtyard Activity 42.3 1 44.5 47.0 1 49.4 52.1 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 31.6 34.6 37.9 41.0 46.4 Roof -Top Parking 14.4 17.4 25.4 31.4 39.0 Combined Noise Level: 43.2 45.4 49.0 52.8 58.6 Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) 22.4 24.1 25.4 25.7 26.2 Trash Enclosure Activity 14.4 20.4 27.4 32.4 33.9 Pad -Mounted Transformer 24.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 32.7 35.7 43.7 49.7 57.3 R3 Courtyard Activity 45.8 1 48.0 50.5 1 52.9 55.6 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 33.6 36.6 39.9 43.0 48.4 Roof -Top Parking 15.9 18.9 26.9 32.9 40.5 Combined Noise Level: 46.3 48.6 51.7 54.9 59.9 Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) 23.2 24.9 26.2 26.5 27.0 Trash Enclosure Activity 13.5 19.5 26.5 31.5 33.0 Pad -Mounted Transformer 25.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 32.2 35.2 43.2 49.2 56.8 R4 Courtyard Activity 46.5 48.7 51.2 53.6 56.3 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 33.2 36.2 39.5 42.6 48.0 Roof -Top Parking 17.6 20.6 28.6 34.6 42.2 Combined Noise Level: 46.9 49.1 52.1 55.3 59.9 Receiver Location' Noise Source' Project Operational Noise Levels (dBA)a Lsu (30 mins) Lis (15 mins) La (5 mins) L2 (1 min) L.. (<1 min) Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) 21.0 22.7 24.0 24.3 24.8 Trash Enclosure Activity 11.9 17.9 24.9 29.9 31.4 Pad -Mounted Transformer 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 33.5 1 36.5 44.5 1 50.5 58.1 RS Courtyard Activity 30.0 32.2 34.7 37.1 39.8 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 30.6 33.6 36.9 40.0 45.4 Roof -Top Parking 16.6 19.6 27.6 33.6 41.2 Combined Noise Level: 36.7 39.4 45.7 51.2 58.5 Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) 18.1 19.8 21.1 21.4 21.9 Trash Enclosure Activity 11.6 17.6 24.6 29.6 31.1 Pad -Mounted Transformer 17.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 30.5 33.5 41.5 47.5 55.1 R6 Courtyard Activity 25.5 27.7 30.2 32.6 35.3 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 29.8 32.8 36.1 39.2 44.6 Roof -Top Parking 21.9 24.9 32.9 38.9 46.5 Combined Noise Level: 34.3 37.2 43.3 48.8 56.0 Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) 19.4 21.1 22.4 22.7 23.2 Trash Enclosure Activity 12.3 18.3 25.3 30.3 31.8 Pad -Mounted Transformer 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parking Lot Veh. Movements 19.6 22.6 30.6 36.6 44.2 R7 Courtyard Activity 24.6 26.8 29.3 31.7 34.4 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity 28.4 31.4 34.7 37.8 43.2 Roof -Top Parking 22.9 25.9 33.9 39.9 47.5 Combined Noise Level: 31.4 34.2 1 39.0 43.6 50.3 'See A for the receiver and noise source locations. ' Reference noise sources as shown on Table 10-1. ' Operational noise level calculations are provided in Appendix A. OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE To demonstrate compliance with local noise regulations, the Project -only operational noise levels are evaluated against exterior noise level threshold based on the City of Santa Ana exterior noise level standards. Table 3 shows the operational noise levels associated with The Addington Project will satisfy the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code daytime and nighttime exterior noise level standards at all receiver locations. TABLE 3: OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE Receiver Location' Land Use Noise Level at Receiver Locations (dBA)' Threshold Exceeded?' Lso (30 mins) L25 (15 mins) La (5 mins) Li (1 min) L.. (<1 min) Daytime Residential Standards 55 60 65 70 75 - Nighttime 50 55 60 65 70 - R1 Residential 37.9 40.7 44.8 48.7 51.8 No R2 Residential 43.2 1 45.4 49.0 1 52.8 58.6 No R3 Residential 46.3 48.6 51.7 54.9 59.9 No R4 Residential 46.9 49.1 52.1 55.3 59.9 No R5 Residential 36.7 39.4 45.7 51.2 58.5 No R6 Residential 34.3 37.2 43.3 48.8 56.0 No R7 Residential 31.4 34.2 39.0 43.6 50.3 No 'See Exhibit A forth e receiver and noise source locations. Estimated unmitigated Project operational noise levels as shown on Table 2. ' Do the estimated Project operational noise levels meet the operational noise level standards? CONCLUSIONS Using reference noise levels to represent the expected noise sources from The Addington site, this analysis estimates the Project -related stationary -source noise levels at nearby sensitive receiver locations. The normal activities associated with The Addington are anticipated to include roof -top air conditioning units, trash enclosure activity, pad -mounted transformers, parking lot vehicle movements, outdoor courtyard activity, outdoor pool/spa activity and roof -top parking activities. The operational noise analysis shows that the Project -related stationary -source noise levels at the nearby sensitive receiver locations will satisfy the City of Santa Ana exterior noise level standards. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (949) 336-5979. Respectfully submitted, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. Bill Lawson, P.E., INCE Principal REFERENCES 1. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Magnolia at the Park. July 2018. APPENDIX A OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL CALCULATIONS This page intentionally left blank Observer Location: R1 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 393.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 390.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 3.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Height: 4.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 74.4 76.1 77.4 77.7 78.2 Distance Attenuation 393.0 -37.9 -37.9 -37.9 -37.9 -37.9 -37.9 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 390.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -56.9 17.5 19.2 20.5 20.8 21.3 39 Minute Hourly Adjustment -58.8 15.6 17.3 18.6 18.9 19.4 Observer Location: R1 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Trash Enclosure Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 582.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 582.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 69.0 75.0 82.0 87.0 88.5 Distance Attenuation 582.0 -41.3 -41.3 -41.3 -41.3 -41.3 -41.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 582.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -41.3 27.7 33.7 40.7 45.7 47.2 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -41.3 27.7 33.7 40.7 45.7 47.2 Observer Location: R1 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Pad -Mounted Transformer Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 214.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 214.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 6.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distance Attenuation 214.0 -31.0 -31.0 -31.0 -31.0 -31.0 -31.0 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 214.0 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -41.2 14.8 -41.2 -41.2 -41.2 -41.2 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -41.2 14.8 -41.2 -41.2 -41.2 -41.2 Observer Location: R1 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Parking Lot Veh. Movements Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 166.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 19.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 147.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 166.0 -18.3 -18.3 -18.3 -18.3 -18.3 -18.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 19.0 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -23.6 20.4 23.4 31.4 37.4 45.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -23.6 20.4 23.4 31.4 37.4 45.0 Observer Location: R1 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Courtyard Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 394.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 233.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 161.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 75.2 73.8 76.0 78.5 80.9 83.6 Distance Attenuation 394.0 -31.9 -31.9 -31.9 -31.9 -31.9 -31.9 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 233.0 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 Raw (Distance + Barrier) 38.2 36.8 39.0 41.5 43.9 46.6 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment 38.2 36.8 39.0 41.5 43.9 46.6 Observer Location: R1 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 537.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 527.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Source Height. 4.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 68.7 71.7 75.0 78.1 83.5 Distance Attenuation 537.0 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 527.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -40.6 28.1 31.1 34.4 37.5 42.9 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -40.6 28.1 31.1 34.4 37.5 42.9 Observer Location: R1 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Roof -Top Parking Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 601.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 441.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 160.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 40.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 15.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 601.0 -26.7 -26.7 -26.7 -26.7 -26.7 -26.7 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 441.0 -7.9 -7.9 -7.9 -7.9 -7.9 -7.9 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -34.6 9.4 12.4 20.4 26.4 34.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -34.6 9.4 12.4 20.4 26.4 34.0 Observer Location: R2 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 218.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 215.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 3.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Height: 4.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 74.4 76.1 77.4 77.7 78.2 Distance Attenuation 218.0 -32.8 -32.8 -32.8 -32.8 -32.8 -32.8 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 215.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -51.8 22.6 24.3 25.6 25.9 26.4 39 Minute Hourly Adjustment -53.7 20.7 22.4 23.7 24.0 24.5 Observer Location: R2 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Trash Enclosure Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 418.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 130.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 288.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 69.0 75.0 82.0 87.0 88.5 Distance Attenuation 418.0 -38.4 -38.4 -38.4 -38.4 -38.4 -38.4 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 130.0 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -55.6 13.4 19.4 26.4 31.4 32.9 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -55.6 13.4 19.4 26.4 31.4 32.9 Observer Location: R2 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Pad -Mounted Transformer Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 81.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 66.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 15.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 6.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distance Attenuation 81.0 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 66.0 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -28.0 28.0 -28.0 -28.0 -28.0 -28.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -28.0 28.0 -28.0 -28.0 -28.0 -28.0 Observer Location: R2 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Parking Lot Veh. Movements Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 24.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 9.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 15.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 24.0 -5.7 -5.7 -5.7 -5.7 -5.7 -5.7 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 9.0 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -11.6 32.4 35.4 43.4 49.4 57.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -11.6 32.4 35.4 43.4 49.4 57.0 Observer Location: R2 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Courtyard Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 206.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 183.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 23.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 75.2 73.8 76.0 78.5 80.9 83.6 Distance Attenuation 206.0 -26.3 -26.3 -26.3 -26.3 -26.3 -26.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 183.0 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) 43.7 42.3 44.5 47.0 49.4 52.1 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment 43.7 42.3 44.5 47.0 49.4 52.1 Observer Location: R2 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 357.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 347.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Source Height. 4.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 68.7 71.7 75.0 78.1 83.5 Distance Attenuation 357.0 -37.1 -37.1 -37.1 -37.1 -37.1 -37.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 347.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -37.1 31.6 34.6 37.9 41.0 46.4 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -37.1 31.6 34.6 37.9 41.0 46.4 Observer Location: R2 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Roof -Top Parking Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 417.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 394.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 23.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 40.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 417.0 -24.3 -24.3 -24.3 -24.3 -24.3 -24.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 394.0 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -29.6 14.4 17.4 25.4 31.4 39.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -29.6 14.4 17.4 25.4 31.4 39.0 Observer Location: R3 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 180.0 feet Barrier Height: 4.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 177.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 3.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 50.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 74.4 76.1 77.4 77.7 78.2 Distance Attenuation 180.0 -31.1 -31.1 -31.1 -31.1 -31.1 -31.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 177.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -50.1 24.3 26.0 27.3 27.6 28.1 39 Minute Hourly Adjustment -52.0 22.4 24.1 25.4 25.7 26.2 Observer Location: R3 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Trash Enclosure Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 370.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 195.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 175.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 69.0 75.0 82.0 87.0 88.5 Distance Attenuation 370.0 -37.4 -37.4 -37.4 -37.4 -37.4 -37.4 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 195.0 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -54.6 14.4 20.4 27.4 32.4 33.9 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -54.6 14.4 20.4 27.4 32.4 33.9 Observer Location: R3 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Pad -Mounted Transformer Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 119.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 105.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 14.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 6.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distance Attenuation 119.0 -25.9 -25.9 -25.9 -25.9 -25.9 -25.9 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 105.0 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -31.3 24.7 -31.3 -31.3 -31.3 -31.3 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -31.3 24.7 -31.3 -31.3 -31.3 -31.3 Observer Location: R3 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Parking Lot Veh. Movements Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 23.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 8.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 15.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 23.0 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 8.0 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 -5.9 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -11.3 32.7 35.7 43.7 49.7 57.3 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -11.3 32.7 35.7 43.7 49.7 57.3 Observer Location: R3 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Courtyard Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 135.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 121.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 14.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 75.2 73.8 76.0 78.5 80.9 83.6 Distance Attenuation 135.0 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 -22.6 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 121.0 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 Raw (Distance + Barrier) 47.2 45.8 48.0 50.5 52.9 55.6 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment 47.2 45.8 48.0 50.5 52.9 55.6 Observer Location: R3 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 283.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 273.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Source Height. 4.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 68.7 71.7 75.0 78.1 83.5 Distance Attenuation 283.0 -35.1 -35.1 -35.1 -35.1 -35.1 -35.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 273.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -35.1 33.6 36.6 39.9 43.0 48.4 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -35.1 33.6 36.6 39.9 43.0 48.4 Observer Location: R3 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Roof -Top Parking Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 332.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 315.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 17.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 40.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 15.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 332.0 -22.8 -22.8 -22.8 -22.8 -22.8 -22.8 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 315.0 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -28.1 15.9 18.9 26.9 32.9 40.5 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -28.1 15.9 18.9 26.9 32.9 40.5 Observer Location: R4 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 164.0 feet Barrier Height: 4.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 161.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 3.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 50.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 74.4 76.1 77.4 77.7 78.2 Distance Attenuation 164.0 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 161.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -49.3 25.1 26.8 28.1 28.4 28.9 39 Minute Hourly Adjustment -51.2 23.2 24.9 26.2 26.5 27.0 Observer Location: R4 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Trash Enclosure Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 412.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 124.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 288.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 69.0 75.0 82.0 87.0 88.5 Distance Attenuation 412.0 -38.3 -38.3 -38.3 -38.3 -38.3 -38.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 124.0 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 -17.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -55.5 13.5 19.5 26.5 31.5 33.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -55.5 13.5 19.5 26.5 31.5 33.0 Observer Location: R4 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Pad -Mounted Transformer Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 106.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 93.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 13.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 6.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distance Attenuation 106.0 -24.9 -24.9 -24.9 -24.9 -24.9 -24.9 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 93.0 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -30.3 25.7 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -30.3 25.7 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 Observer Location: R4 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Parking Lot Veh. Movements Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 25.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 11.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 14.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 25.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 11.0 -5.8 -5.8 -5.8 -5.8 -5.8 -5.8 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -11.8 32.2 35.2 43.2 49.2 56.8 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -11.8 32.2 35.2 43.2 49.2 56.8 Observer Location: R4 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Courtyard Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 125.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 111.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 14.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 75.2 73.8 76.0 78.5 80.9 83.6 Distance Attenuation 125.0 -21.9 -21.9 -21.9 -21.9 -21.9 -21.9 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 111.0 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4 Raw (Distance + Barrier) 47.9 46.5 48.7 51.2 53.6 56.3 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment 47.9 46.5 48.7 51.2 53.6 56.3 Observer Location: R4 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 298.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 288.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Source Height. 4.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 68.7 71.7 75.0 78.1 83.5 Distance Attenuation 298.0 -35.5 -35.5 -35.5 -35.5 -35.5 -35.5 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 288.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -35.5 33.2 36.2 39.5 42.6 48.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -35.5 33.2 36.2 39.5 42.6 48.0 Observer Location: R4 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Roof -Top Parking Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 255.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 243.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 12.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 40.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 15.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 255.0 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 243.0 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 -5.3 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -26.4 17.6 20.6 28.6 34.6 42.2 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -26.4 17.6 20.6 28.6 34.6 42.2 Observer Location: R5 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 210.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 207.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 3.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Height: 4.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 74.4 76.1 77.4 77.7 78.2 Distance Attenuation 210.0 -32.5 -32.5 -32.5 -32.5 -32.5 -32.5 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 207.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -51.5 22.9 24.6 25.9 26.2 26.7 39 Minute Hourly Adjustment -53.4 21.0 22.7 24.0 24.3 24.8 Observer Location: R5 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Trash Enclosure Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 534.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 220.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 314.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 69.0 75.0 82.0 87.0 88.5 Distance Attenuation 534.0 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 -40.6 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 220.0 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -57.1 11.9 17.9 24.9 29.9 31.4 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -57.1 11.9 17.9 24.9 29.9 31.4 Observer Location: R5 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Pad -Mounted Transformer Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 224.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 201.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 23.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 6.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distance Attenuation 224.0 -31.4 -31.4 -31.4 -31.4 -31.4 -31.4 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 201.0 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -36.6 19.4 -36.6 -36.6 -36.6 -36.6 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -36.6 19.4 -36.6 -36.6 -36.6 -36.6 Observer Location: R5 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Parking Lot Veh. Movements Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 20.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 9.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 11.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 20.0 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 9.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -10.5 33.5 36.5 44.5 50.5 58.1 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -10.5 33.5 36.5 44.5 50.5 58.1 Observer Location: R5 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Courtyard Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 232.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 12.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 220.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 20.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 75.2 73.8 76.0 78.5 80.9 83.6 Distance Attenuation 232.0 -27.3 -27.3 -27.3 -27.3 -27.3 -27.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 12.0 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 Raw (Distance + Barrier) 31.4 30.0 32.2 34.7 37.1 39.8 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment 31.4 30.0 32.2 34.7 37.1 39.8 Observer Location: R5 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 402.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 392.0 feet Noise Source Height. 4.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 68.7 71.7 75.0 78.1 83.5 Distance Attenuation 402.0 -38.1 -38.1 -38.1 -38.1 -38.1 -38.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 392.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -38.1 30.6 33.6 36.9 40.0 45.4 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -38.1 30.6 33.6 36.9 40.0 45.4 Observer Location: R5 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Roof -Top Parking Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 302.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 289.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 13.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 40.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 15.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 302.0 -22.2 -22.2 -22.2 -22.2 -22.2 -22.2 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 289.0 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 -5.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -27.4 16.6 19.6 27.6 33.6 41.2 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -27.4 16.6 19.6 27.6 33.6 41.2 Observer Location: R6 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 295.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 292.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 3.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Height: 4.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 74.4 76.1 77.4 77.7 78.2 Distance Attenuation 295.0 -35.4 -35.4 -35.4 -35.4 -35.4 -35.4 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 292.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -54.4 20.0 21.7 23.0 23.3 23.8 39 Minute Hourly Adjustment -56.3 18.1 19.8 21.1 21.4 21.9 Observer Location: R6 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Trash Enclosure Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 561.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 238.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 323.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 69.0 75.0 82.0 87.0 88.5 Distance Attenuation 561.0 -41.0 -41.0 -41.0 -41.0 -41.0 -41.0 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 238.0 -16.4 -16.4 -16.4 -16.4 -16.4 -16.4 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -57.4 11.6 17.6 24.6 29.6 31.1 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -57.4 11.6 17.6 24.6 29.6 31.1 Observer Location: R6 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Pad -Mounted Transformer Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 298.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 229.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 69.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 6.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distance Attenuation 298.0 -33.9 -33.9 -33.9 -33.9 -33.9 -33.9 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 229.0 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 -5.1 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -39.0 17.0 -39.0 -39.0 -39.0 -39.0 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -39.0 17.0 -39.0 -39.0 -39.0 -39.0 Observer Location: R6 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Parking Lot Veh. Movements Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 80.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 80.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 80.0 -13.5 -13.5 -13.5 -13.5 -13.5 -13.5 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 80.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -13.5 30.5 33.5 41.5 47.5 55.1 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -13.5 30.5 33.5 41.5 47.5 55.1 Observer Location: R6 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Courtyard Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 295.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 12.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 283.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 75.2 73.8 76.0 78.5 80.9 83.6 Distance Attenuation 295.0 -29.4 -29.4 -29.4 -29.4 -29.4 -29.4 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 12.0 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 Raw (Distance + Barrier) 26.9 25.5 27.7 30.2 32.6 35.3 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment 26.9 25.5 27.7 30.2 32.6 35.3 Observer Location: R6 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 440.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 430.0 feet Noise Source Height. 4.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 68.7 71.7 75.0 78.1 83.5 Distance Attenuation 440.0 -38.9 -38.9 -38.9 -38.9 -38.9 -38.9 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 430.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -38.9 29.8 32.8 36.1 39.2 44.6 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -38.9 29.8 32.8 36.1 39.2 44.6 Observer Location: R6 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Roof -Top Parking Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 296.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 296.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 40.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 15.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 296.0 -22.1 -22.1 -22.1 -22.1 -22.1 -22.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 296.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -22.1 21.9 24.9 32.9 38.9 46.5 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -22.1 21.9 24.9 32.9 38.9 46.5 Observer Location: R7 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Air Conditioning Unit (Roof -Top) Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 254.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 251.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 3.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Height: 4.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 74.4 76.1 77.4 77.7 78.2 Distance Attenuation 254.0 -34.1 -34.1 -34.1 -34.1 -34.1 -34.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 251.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 -19.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -53.1 21.3 23.0 24.3 24.6 25.1 39 Minute Hourly Adjustment -55.0 19.4 21.1 22.4 22.7 23.2 Observer Location: R7 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Trash Enclosure Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 506.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 219.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 287.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 69.0 75.0 82.0 87.0 88.5 Distance Attenuation 506.0 -40.1 -40.1 -40.1 -40.1 -40.1 -40.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 219.0 -16.6 -16.6 -16.6 -16.6 -16.6 -16.6 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -56.7 12.3 18.3 25.3 30.3 31.8 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -56.7 12.3 18.3 25.3 30.3 31.8 Observer Location: R7 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Pad -Mounted Transformer Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 370.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 107.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 263.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 6.0 0.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Distance Attenuation 370.0 -35.8 -35.8 -35.8 -35.8 -35.8 -35.8 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 107.0 -17.4 -17.4 -17.4 -17.4 -17.4 -17.4 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -53.2 2.8 -53.2 -53.2 -53.2 -53.2 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -53.2 2.8 -53.2 -53.2 -53.2 -53.2 Observer Location: R7 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Parking Lot Veh. Movements Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 88.0 feet Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 88.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 88.0 -14.2 -14.2 -14.2 -14.2 -14.2 -14.2 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 88.0 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 -10.2 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -24.4 19.6 22.6 30.6 36.6 44.2 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -24.4 19.6 22.6 30.6 36.6 44.2 Observer Location: R7 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Courtyard Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 328.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 12.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 316.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 50.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient. 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 75.2 73.8 76.0 78.5 80.9 83.6 Distance Attenuation 328.0 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 -30.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 12.0 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 -18.9 Raw (Distance + Barrier) 26.0 24.6 26.8 29.3 31.7 34.4 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment 26.0 24.6 26.8 29.3 31.7 34.4 Observer Location: R7 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst: B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 515.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 505.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 50.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Source Height. 4.0 feet Observer Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 5.0 0.0 68.7 71.7 75.0 78.1 83.5 Distance Attenuation 515.0 -40.3 -40.3 -40.3 -40.3 -40.3 -40.3 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 505.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -40.3 28.4 31.4 34.7 37.8 43.2 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -40.3 28.4 31.4 34.7 37.8 43.2 Observer location: R7 Project Name: TheAddington Source: Roof -Top Parking Job Number: 11177 Condition: Operational Analyst. B. Lawson NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 257.0 feet Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 257.0 feet Noise Source Height. 5.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height: 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, f-Berm): 0 Noise Source Elevation: 40.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient. 15.0 Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet 20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax Reference (Sample) 10.0 0.0 44.0 47.0 55.0 61.0 68.6 Distance Attenuation 257.0 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 -21.1 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) 257.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Raw (Distance + Barrier) -21.1 22.9 25.9 33.9 39.9 47.5 60 Minute Hourly Adjustment -21.1 22.9 25.9 33.9 39.9 47.5 Clanfcation to the 2525 N Main Street Multi -Family Residential Project Final EIR Attachment B: Supplemental Traffic Analysis City of Santa Ana October 2019 memorandum DATE: October 6, 2019 TO: Zed Kekula, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer FROM: Sandipan Bhattacharjee, P.E., T.E., AICP, ENV-SP SUBJECT: The Addington — Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis Translutions, Inc. (Translutions) is pleased to provide this memorandum discussing the supplemental traffic impact analysis for the Addington project (previously Magnolia at the Park). The project is located at 2525 Main Street in the City of Santa Ana, California. Translutions prepared a traffic impact analysis (TIA) for the project in July 2018. Since then, the project has been modified to include 278 units instead of 496 units and the project access has been changed. As proposed now, the project will have one main access and will move the east leg of the intersection of Main StreeNWalkie Way -Santiago Park approximately 90 feet to the south to create an offset intersection. Along with offsetting the intersection, the project will be modifying the existing traffic signal, channelization and other components of the intersection as deemed necessary during the redesign process. This Option is being called Option E. Under Option E, the existing southbound left turn pocket on Main Street at Walkie Way will serve both the project and the park and will be extended from 80 feet to 90 feet with the removal of the north leg crosswalk. The east leg of the intersection is intermittently dosed off by an existing gate but provides full access to park maintenance vehicles and to the public who by reservation use park facilities. Under the current project proposal, maintenance vehicles and the public will access the park through the proposed project site access as shown in Figure 1. The signalization of the east and west legs will operate with split -phasing and the northbound and southbound left -turn lanes will operate with lead/lag phasing. The Main Street pedestrian crossing will be relocated to the south leg of the intersection. The south side of the lot will be dedicated to the Discovery Cube. Access for Cube Parking will be through a right-in/right-out driveway south of the Main Street/Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway and used by only Cube patrons and not by the project. A shared parking agreement will be made between the Cube and the Addington, wherein residents and/or guests for the Addington will not be allowed to use the parking lot between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Based on discussion with the City, the Addington Management will ensure that the parking area dedicated to the Cube will not be used by Addington residents and/or guests. Further, the right-in/right-out driveway will be restricted to Cube patrons only. It should be noted that Cube patrons use the parking lot under existing conditions. The existing trips for the Discovery Cube are low and have been included in the analysis at Main Street and Discovery Cube Driveway based on existing traffic counts. Once the project is completed, the Discovery Cube parking lot will include 180 parking stalls. This access scenario (Option E) is very similar to Option B (Santiago Park-Walkie Way Project Access) evaluated in the July 2018 TIA, with the following two differences: 1. The existing signalized access has been relocated on site and a right-in/right-out driveway for the Discovery Cube has been added; and 2. The number of units has been reduced from 496 to 278. The analysis for Option E includes evaluation of all intersections, roadway segments, and freeway segments that were evaluated in the July 2018 TIA for consistency between analyses. Figure 1 (all figures and tables attached) illustrates the site plan. Project Trip Generation. The number of apartment units has been reduced from 496 apartment units to 278 apartments. The trip generation has been revised to reflect the reduced number of apartment units. Trip generation for the proposed project is Memorandum: The Addington Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis based on trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Edition) and are based on Land Use 221 — 'Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise)". Table A shows the calculation of the project trip generation. As shown in Table A, the project is forecast to generate 100 a.m. peak hour trips, 123 p.m. peak hour trips, and 1,512 daily trips. Project Trip Distribution. As stated previously, the project access has been modified to include only one access point for the project at Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway. The trip distribution patterns for project trips were developed consistent with the trip distribution from the July 2018 TIA and modified to reflect only one project access at Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway. The project trip generation was applied to the trip distribution patterns for the proposed project to develop trip assignments for project trips. Table B lists the trip distribution by origin/destination. Figure 2 shows the trip distribution for project trips, and Figure 3 shows the trip assignment at the study intersections. METHODOLOGY The analysis will use the same methodology for traffic operations at all study area intersections, roadway segments, and freeway segments included in the July 2018 TIA. It should be noted that the intersection of Main Street and Walkie Way - Santiago Park -Driveway was analyzed in the July 2018 TIA using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology to assess traffic operations. However, to account for the proposed signal timing and phasing, this intersection was analyzed using Synchro 10, which uses the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition methodology. The TIA submitted in July 2018 included the Main Street/Edgewood Road-1-5 HOV On/Off Ramp under existing conditions. The July 2018 TIA evaluated the ramp closures for opening year and 2040 scenarios, but the existing and existing plus project scenarios included the ramps since they were open when the Notice of Preparation (NOP) was released and counts conducted. Therefore, the same analysis parameters were used for the evaluation of Option E (Main Street and Walkie Way - Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube parking) conditions. The ramps have been permanently closed for construction as of April 2019. TRAFFIC VOLUMES The existing, opening year cumulative, and year 2040 without project traffic volumes were taken from the July 2018 TIA. The project traffic assignment was added to the without project traffic volumes to develop the Option E traffic volumes for existing, opening year cumulative, and year 2040 with project conditions. INTERSECTION LOS ANALYSIS Intersection level of service analyses were conducted for existing, opening year cumulative, and year 2040 with Option E conditions. The existing, opening year cumulative, and year 2040 with project Option E levels of service are shown in Tables C, D, and E. As shown in Tables C, D, and E, the intersections are projected to operate at the same or better levels of service as under Option B (Santiago Park-Walkie Way Project Access) from the July 2018 TIA. Therefore, the intersection levels of service under Option E are forecast to be the same or better than the findings disclosed in the July 2018 under Option B (Santiago Park-Walkie Way Project Access). ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS ANALYSIS Roadway segment level of service analyses were conducted for existing, opening year cumulative, and year 2040 with Option E conditions. The existing, opening year cumulative, and year 2040 with project Option E levels of service are shown in Tables F, G and H. As shown in Tables F, G, and H, the roadway segments are projected to operate at the same or better levels of service as Option B (Santiago Park-Walkie Way Project Access) from the July 2018 TIA. Therefore, the roadway segment levels of service under Option E are forecast to be the same or better than the findings disclosed in the July 2018 under Option B (Santiago Park-Walkie Way Project Access). U:\PRUECTSV2E-25Z WIN STREE NALYSIS OFFSETSEPTWER219 REVISEEAWMOSUPPLEWNTALANALYSIS UOC% W01b 6, 2919 Memorandum: The Addington Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis FREEWAY SEGMENT LOS ANALYSIS Freeway segment level of service analyses were conducted for existing and year 2040 with Option E conditions. The existing and year 2040 with project Option E levels of service are shown in Tables I, and J. As shown in Tables I and J, the freeway segments are projected to operate at the same or better levels of service as Option B (Santiago Park-Walkie Way Project Access) from the July 2018 TIA. Therefore, the freeway levels of service under Option E are forecast to be the same or better than the findings disclosed in the July 2018 under Option B (Santiago Park-Walkie Way Project Access). QUEUEING ANALYSIS A queueing analysis was included for the northbound through lanes of Main Street south of Memory Lane to Santa Clara Avenue and for the turn lanes at Main Street and Walkie Way -Driveway and Main Street and Edgewood Road. With the change to intersection geometrics, the storage length for the northbound left turn and the northbound through lanes at the intersection of Main Street/Walkie Way -Driveway, and the southbound through lane at Main Street/Edgewood Road will be reduced by approximately 90 feet. Table K lists the queueing analysis for existing, opening year cumulative, and year 2040 without project conditions. As shown in Table K, all queues fit within the available storage length with the exception of the southbound left -turn lane at Main StreeUEdgewood Road under year 2040 conditions. Table L lists the queueing analysis for Option E Main Street and Walkie Way -Driveway project access conditions. As shown in Table L, all queues fit within the available storage length with the exception of the southbound left -turn lane at Main StreeUEdgewood Road under year 2040, under the with and without project conditions. It should be noted, that the southbound left -turn queue at Main Street/Edgewood Road also exceeded the available storage length under year existing, opening year, and year 2040 with project Option & Main Street Access scenario in the TIA submitted in July 2018 Occasionally, additional queueing may occur as a result of the added vehicle travel delay that is expected on Main Street at Walkie Way due to the additional phase necessary to accommodate the intersection offset. However, although Option E does not result in substantial changes to queueing operations surrounding the project site, the project applicant will work with the City to modify the existing raised curb median on Main Street between Walkie Way and Edgewood Road. CONCLUSION The project has been modified to include 278 units instead of 496 units and the project access has been changed to include the east leg of the intersection of Main Street/Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway to create an offset intersection. Under Option E Main Street/Walkie Way -Driveway project access, the study area intersections, roadway segments, and freeway segments are projected to operate at the same or better levels of service as the findings disclosed in the July 2018 TIA. The revised project does not create a significant impact at any intersection based on the thresholds adopted by the City of Santa Ana and other agencies. The revised project also does not result in substantial changes to queueing operations at any intersection. We hope you will find this information helpful. Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at (949) 656- 3131. Sincerely, Iran u io s, Inc. r Sandipan Bhattacharjee, P.E., T.E., AICP, ENV SP Principal QRVFESSiVN Q�VFESSIVN q q BHATTq BHA?1q �z �z No. C81872 No. TR 2847 Exp. 03-31-20 Exp 03-31-20 sj CIV1E- TRAFF\F' �P �lFOF CALIF�CFOF CAUF��� O:\PRQIECTSV2E-25Z MAIN STREE NALYSIS OFFSUSEPT WER2619 REVISEE)MMOSNPPLEWNFALANALYSIS OOa Wob r6, 2919 z Z 3 Q 4 i 6 d li u } 1'e Z a — _ z E E 3 a a' a : a � 3 E E E n Ai 3 E E a Ai 3 ro 3 {� o e i Y o " N — _. r yy ✓ i _ i A d Table A - Project Trip Generation Land Use Units A.M. Peak Hour In Out Total P.M. Peak Hour In Out Total Daily Future Use Apartments Tdp Generation Rates 0.09 0.27 0.36 0.27 0.17 0.44 5.44 Trip Generation 278 DU 26 74 100 75 48 123 1.512 Total Trip Generation 26 74 100 75 48 123 1,512 'Trip generation based on rates for Land Use 221 -'Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise)" from Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Edition). D:IPmjectslRE -2525 Main Street'Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedlProject Trips Final (911012019) Table 13: Project Trip Distribution Origin 1 Destination Distribution La Veta Avenue -West 3% Main Street - North 7% La Vets Avenue - East 4% SR-22 - West 8% SR-22 - East 13% Park Street - Batavia Street - North 5% Broadway - South 11% 1-5 - North 16% 1-5 - South 20% 17th Street - West 5% Main Street - South 5% 17th Street - East 3% Total 100% D:Wr"%RE-2525 Main&t Analyss Othet May MgTmje Trip Distribution T&.UIST O m 0000000000000000 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z p d E U 6 U 2 Q O Q .1000 Q V- O V Q m m Q V Q Q Q U_ O U W Q Q Q Q O Q Q O Q m V V V V Q V- d O V Q m Q Q V Q Q E � U o O Q m V O O m Q V W O U W Q Q Q Q O Q Q Q — m V O V U > (n m _' _ (n -A-1 (n O c O w O O w w O O O O O O O O O O o V In In O (n (n 00M.00. E K � � O y E 0T o a a3�m Ez0 m E¢ K m m V Q o a 01 o V Q— n>�� o c o m o _ 0> 0000000000000000 �o A \§ ,::_: \> mE \:\ Z \\§\\\\ :�i ^- \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ 0000000000000000 0000- o o o o o \> ME \:\ Z \\§\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ | | | � | | \ § § §§!/§ § § § ƒ \ ( \ }\(\( } \ } K ! !!!!! ! # ! \ \ \ \\\\) \ \ \ )! ®!;)\ \ )}{)) ; ;;;;; ; ; ; \ \ ( \ })\() } \ ( z ! !!!!! ! ! ! / < , a a a a : a : a { ) ! )!!!! ) ) ) )! ®!;)\ ) ! ! E;;;;`af.! -mlo ;;;;; ; ; ; \ \ \ § (\\§} } § § z ! !!!!! ! ! ! / < , a a a a : a : a { ) ! )!!!! ) ) ) )! ®!;)\ E;;;;`af.! zl ,._ ! zl \\\ \\\\\\ \\\ \\\ �{ ,._ I#=([ jog ! mim!!: !mm !!! !!! 08 ! ttL tL /I / !/m ! ' #f( _ / / 0 ,)Z0M/ 0 , ==,0 - ,0 !\\\ !|((!2! !&]] �®!l;i; !a:!! 000 o'o E zzz zzz zzzzzz z zzzzz zzz zzz zzz zzz N � LL LL LL LL jy LL LL 0 U LL LL LL LL LL LL � 6 v E c 6 N 'C G p p OO OO OO O o p O N 6 + + + • + + • + • + + L 3 O J LL LL LL LL jy LL LL U U LL LL LL LL LL W - � M � 6 q G 6 c c N � LL LL LL LL 11 LL LL � U LL LL LL LL LL LL � zl 6 0 q n r Om� 6 N G C 6 m L_ � LL LL LL LL jy LL LL 0 U LL LL LL LL LL W 3 o. � E c d fp b 6 N av «o m m o 00 u?r Oom �i � orm a�i �i or<or E K O m � K E E o E U 4 K K T 4 K a O O 00 OCg � C� UI N N 8 c v 9Q c ._ m- CL Q ie m i� o 0 o 0 899 m g f 8 0 m m m A N c 0 0 0 c K ci v v v v eN ci C4 ci S SNO ¢'¢'¢' D O N M 2 L L U O c N d � � a d o O L d 0 j = L O C � N Q d U O O � O L 1 2 C ar y N m N N d a d 7 E L o a R 2 c N N O. O O .... . ` O C d O Q d O � L d d V O CO O) m N d a. _ � N � O j L O p� = C C d � W a o d y J _ C N NQ R C 6 m � Z R �O �O N � R O C N � o (j R Y d O C d R 'O R O N N N N N N N N d L C C C C O C co r rn o � 3 L Z O d 3 � 3 L N = � '2 3 Q U d = L O O d d CY U =`L � O d 2 c 1 Q cy O 0 L_ O O 2 cc 3 = L O O p� 2 c d W d = Q 3 Q d L d N J = _ H m J H J J K J K m m m m m m m J H J K K K m m m m m m H m d O Z Z Z W W m m Z Z (n W W Z m MQ R NR 0 m Z R �!J R C j 0 O o U s d d R 0) 'O C R O N N N N Z d N d (n d 65 d n d (n cn � rn o Memorandum: The Addington Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis ATTACHMENT A: VOLUME DEVELOPMENT WORKSHEETS U:\PRUEOTSV2E-25Z WIN STREE NALYSIS OFFSETSEPTWER219 REVISEEAWMOSUPPLEWNTALANALYSIS UOC% Septert 12, 2919 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PIVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 1 . Broadwayl1-5 SB Off Ramp NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 435 0 435 778 0 778 NBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 SET 605 0 605 569 0 569 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 891 4 895 835 12 847 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WET 0 0 0 0 0 0 WEIR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 605 0 0 605 569 0 0 569 Departure 435 0 0 435 778 0 0 778 Total 1,040 0 0 1,040 1,347 0 0 1,347 South Leg Approach 435 0 0 435 778 0 0 778 Departure 1,496 0 4 1,500 1,404 0 12 1,416 Total 1,931 0 4 1,935 2,182 0 12 2,194 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Leg Approach 891 0 4 895 835 0 12 847 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 891 0 4 895 835 0 12 847 Total Approaches Approach 1,931 0 4 1,935 2,182 0 12 2,194 Departure 1,931 0 4 1,935 2,182 0 12 2,194 Total 3,862 0 8 3,870 4,364 0 24 4,388 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 2 . Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 295 0 295 620 0 620 NBR 342 3 345 420 8 428 SBL 37 4 41 97 12 109 SET 1,459 0 1,459 1,307 0 1,307 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 134 0 134 144 0 144 EBT 321 0 321 233 0 233 EBR 193 0 193 67 0 67 WBL 76 8 84 90 5 95 WET 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 6 0 6 14 0 14 North Leg Approach 1,496 0 4 1,500 1,404 0 12 11416 Departure 435 0 0 435 778 0 0 778 Total 1,931 0 4 1,935 2,182 0 12 2,194 South Leg Approach 637 0 3 640 1,040 0 8 11048 Departure 1,728 0 8 1,736 1,464 0 5 1,469 Total 2,365 0 11 2,376 2,504 0 13 2,517 East Leg Approach 82 0 8 90 104 0 5 109 Departure 700 0 7 707 750 0 20 770 Total 782 0 15 797 854 0 25 879 West Leg Approach 648 0 0 648 444 0 0 444 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 648 0 0 648 444 0 0 444 Total Approaches Approach 2,863 0 15 2,878 2,992 0 25 31017 Departure 2,863 0 15 2,878 2,992 0 25 3,017 Total 5,726 0 30 5,756 5,984 0 50 6,034 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 3 . Broadway/Buffalo Avenue NBL 9 0 9 6 0 6 NBT 597 3 600 1,009 8 1,017 NBR 141 0 141 253 1 254 SBL 210 0 210 139 0 139 SET 1,495 8 1,503 1,267 5 1,272 SBR 11 0 11 7 0 7 EBL 1 0 1 0 0 0 EBT 4 0 4 1 0 1 EBR 3 0 3 10 0 10 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WET 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 1,716 0 8 1,724 1,413 0 5 11418 Departure 598 0 3 601 1,009 0 8 1,017 Total 2,314 0 11 2,325 2,422 0 13 2,435 South Leg Approach 747 0 3 750 1,268 0 9 11277 Departure 1,498 0 8 1,506 1,277 0 5 1,282 Total 2,245 0 11 2,256 2,545 0 14 2,559 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 355 0 0 355 393 0 1 394 Total 355 0 0 355 393 0 1 394 West Leg Approach 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 11 Departure 20 0 0 20 13 0 0 13 Total 28 0 0 28 24 0 0 24 Total Approaches Approach 2,471 0 11 2,482 2,692 0 14 21706 Departure 2,471 0 11 2,482 2,692 0 14 2,706 Total 4,942 0 22 4,964 5,384 0 28 5,412 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 4 . Main Street/La Veta Avenue NBL 75 2 77 287 1 288 NBT 613 5 618 962 3 965 NBR 274 9 283 455 6 461 SBL 197 0 197 161 0 161 SET 1,071 2 1,073 897 5 902 SBR 135 0 135 223 0 223 EBL 305 0 305 326 0 326 EBT 456 0 456 427 0 427 EBR 190 1 191 201 2 203 WBL 295 4 299 268 13 281 WET 317 0 317 514 0 514 WEIR 207 0 207 237 0 237 North Leg Approach 1,403 0 2 1,405 1,281 0 5 11286 Departure 1,125 0 5 1,130 1,525 0 3 1,528 Total 2,528 0 7 2,535 2,806 0 8 2,814 South Leg Approach 962 0 16 978 1,704 0 10 11714 Departure 1,556 0 7 1,563 1,366 0 20 1,386 Total 2,518 0 23 2,541 3,070 0 30 3,100 East Leg Approach 819 0 4 823 1,019 0 13 11032 Departure 927 0 9 936 1,043 0 6 1,049 Total 1,746 0 13 1,759 2,062 0 19 2,081 West Leg Approach 951 0 1 952 954 0 2 956 Departure 527 0 2 529 1,024 0 1 1,025 Total 1,478 0 3 1,481 1,978 0 3 1,981 Total Approaches Approach 4,135 0 23 4,158 4,958 0 30 4,988 Departure 4,135 0 23 4,158 4,958 0 30 4,988 Total 8,270 0 46 8,316 9,916 0 60 9,976 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PIVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 5 . Main Street/Town and Country Road NBL 49 0 49 66 0 66 NBT 860 16 876 1,101 11 1,112 NBR 140 7 147 187 5 192 SBL 262 0 262 401 0 401 SET 1,075 7 1,082 1,025 20 1,045 SBR 31 0 31 118 0 118 EBL 21 0 21 128 0 128 EBT 64 0 64 136 0 136 EBR 68 0 68 139 0 139 WBL 271 2 273 195 5 200 WET 52 0 52 99 0 99 WEIR 378 0 378 414 0 414 North Leg Approach 1,368 0 7 1,375 1,544 0 20 11564 Departure 1,259 0 16 1,275 1,643 0 11 1,654 Total 2,627 0 23 2,650 3,187 0 31 3,218 South Leg Approach 1,049 0 23 1,072 1,354 0 16 11370 Departure 1,414 0 9 1,423 1,359 0 25 1,384 Total 2,463 0 32 2,495 2,713 0 41 2,754 East Leg Approach 701 0 2 703 708 0 5 713 Departure 466 0 7 473 724 0 5 729 Total 1,167 0 9 1,176 1,432 0 10 1,442 West Leg Approach 153 0 0 153 403 0 0 403 Departure 132 0 0 132 283 0 0 283 Total 285 0 0 285 686 0 0 686 Total Approaches Approach 3,271 0 32 3,303 4,009 0 41 41050 Departure 3,271 0 32 3,303 4,009 0 41 4,050 Total 6,542 0 64 6,606 8,018 0 82 8,100 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 6 . Main Street/E Memory Lane NBL 29 0 29 104 0 104 NBT 870 24 894 955 15 970 NBR 252 6 258 159 4 163 SBL 33 0 33 35 0 35 SET 1,115 9 1,124 1,113 26 1,139 SBR 248 0 248 154 0 154 EBL 155 0 155 263 0 263 EBT 222 0 222 309 0 309 EBR 47 0 47 126 0 126 WBL 168 2 170 207 5 212 WET 209 0 209 162 0 162 WEIR 7 0 7 63 0 63 North Leg Approach 1,396 0 9 1,405 1,302 0 26 11328 Departure 1,032 0 24 1,056 1,281 0 15 1,296 Total 2,428 0 33 2,461 2,583 0 41 2,624 South Leg Approach 1,151 0 30 1,181 1,218 0 19 11237 Departure 1,330 0 11 1,341 1,446 0 31 1,477 Total 2,481 0 41 2,522 2,664 0 50 2,714 East Leg Approach 384 0 2 386 432 0 5 437 Departure 507 0 6 513 503 0 4 507 Total 891 0 8 899 935 0 9 944 West Leg Approach 424 0 0 424 698 0 0 698 Departure 486 0 0 486 420 0 0 420 Total 910 0 0 910 1,118 0 0 1,118 Total Approaches Approach 3,355 0 41 3,396 3,650 0 50 31700 Departure 3,355 0 41 3,396 3,650 0 50 3,700 Total 6,710 0 82 6,792 7,300 0 100 7,400 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 7 . Main Street/Walkie Way -Santiago Part -Driveway NBL 19 0 19 25 4 0 29 NBT 1,249 0 1,249 1,227 0 1,227 NBR 0 16 16 0 45 45 SBL 1 10 11 1 30 31 SET 1,351 0 1,351 1,534 0 1,534 SBR 11 0 11 2 0 2 EBL 2 0 2 8 0 8 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 1 0 1 21 0 21 WBL 0 44 44 0 29 29 WET 0 0 0 0 0 0 WEIR 0 30 30 0 19 19 North Leg Approach 1,363 0 10 1,373 1,537 0 30 11567 Departure 1,251 0 30 1,281 1,235 0 19 1,254 Total 2,614 0 40 2,654 2,772 0 49 2,821 South Leg Approach 1,268 0 16 1,284 1,252 4 45 11301 Departure 1,352 0 44 1,396 1,555 0 29 1,584 Total 2,620 0 60 2,680 2,807 4 74 2,885 East Leg Approach 0 0 74 74 0 0 48 48 Departure 1 0 26 27 1 0 75 76 Total 1 0 100 101 1 0 123 124 West Leg Approach 3 0 0 3 29 0 0 29 Departure 30 0 0 30 27 4 0 31 Total 33 0 0 33 56 4 0 60 Total Approaches Approach 2,634 0 100 2,734 2,818 4 123 2,945 Departure 2,634 0 100 2,734 2,818 4 123 2,945 Total 5,268 0 200 5,468 5,636 8 246 5,890 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 8 . Main Street/Discovery Cube Driveway NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 1,271 16 1,287 1,243 -2 45 1,286 NBR 12 2 0 14 3 0 3 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 SET 1,356 44 1,400 1,555 4 29 1,588 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WET 0 0 0 0 0 0 WEIR 1 0 1 9 6 0 15 North Leg Approach 1,356 0 44 1,400 1,555 4 29 11588 Departure 1,272 0 16 1,288 1,252 4 45 1,301 Total 2,628 0 60 2,688 2,807 8 74 2,889 South Leg Approach 1,283 2 16 1,301 1,246 -2 45 11289 Departure 1,356 0 44 1,400 1,555 4 29 1,588 Total 2,639 2 60 2,701 2,801 2 74 2,877 East Leg Approach 1 0 0 1 9 6 0 15 Departure 12 2 0 14 3 0 0 3 Total 13 2 0 15 12 6 0 18 West Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Approaches Approach 2,640 2 60 2,702 2,810 8 74 2,892 Departure 2,640 2 60 2,702 2,810 8 74 2,892 Total 5,280 4 120 5,404 5,620 16 148 5,784 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 11 . Main Street/Buffalo Avenue-1-5 SB On Ramp NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 976 3 979 1,398 10 1,408 NBR 33 0 33 38 0 38 SBL 717 15 732 679 10 689 SET 1,418 10 1,428 1,103 6 1,109 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 119 0 119 291 1 292 EBT 196 0 196 167 0 167 EBR 26 0 26 46 0 46 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WET 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 2,135 0 25 2,160 1,783 0 16 11799 Departure 1,095 0 3 1,098 1,688 0 11 1,699 Total 3,230 0 28 3,258 3,471 0 27 3,498 South Leg Approach 1,009 0 3 1,012 1,436 0 10 11446 Departure 1,444 0 10 1,454 1,149 0 6 1,155 Total 2,453 0 13 2,466 2,585 0 16 2,601 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 946 0 15 961 884 0 10 894 Total 946 0 15 961 884 0 10 894 West Leg Approach 341 0 0 341 504 0 1 505 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 341 0 0 341 504 0 1 505 Total Approaches Approach 3,485 0 28 3,513 3,722 0 27 3,749 Departure 3,485 0 28 3,513 3,722 0 27 3,749 Total 6,971 0 56 7,027 7,444 0 54 7,498 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 12 . Main Street117th Street NBL 189 0 189 200 0 200 NBT 762 1 763 1,061 4 1,065 NBR 174 0 174 162 0 162 SBL 178 2 180 187 1 188 SET 1,082 4 1,086 810 2 812 SBR 82 4 86 141 2 143 EBL 141 1 142 199 4 203 EBT 1,250 0 1,250 1,219 0 1,219 EBR 78 0 78 58 0 58 WBL 306 0 306 186 0 186 WET 1,335 0 1,335 1,064 0 1,064 WEIR 16 1 17 59 2 61 North Leg Approach 1,342 0 10 1,352 1,138 0 5 11143 Departure 919 0 3 922 1,319 0 10 1,329 Total 2,261 0 13 2,274 2,457 0 15 2,472 South Leg Approach 1,125 0 1 1,126 1,423 0 4 11427 Departure 1,466 0 4 1,470 1,054 0 2 1,056 Total 2,591 0 5 2,596 2,477 0 6 2,483 East Leg Approach 1,657 0 1 1,658 1,309 0 2 11311 Departure 1,602 0 2 1,604 1,568 0 1 1,569 Total 3,259 0 3 3,262 2,877 0 3 2,880 West Leg Approach 1,469 0 1 1,470 1,476 0 4 11480 Departure 1,606 0 4 1,610 1,405 0 2 1,407 Total 3,075 0 5 3,080 2,881 0 6 2,887 Total Approaches Approach 5,593 0 13 5,606 5,346 0 15 5,361 Departure 5,593 0 13 5,606 5,346 0 15 5,361 Total 11,186 0 26 11,212 10,692 0 30 10,722 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 13 . Project Driveway 2-Bush Street/Edgewood Road NBL 58 0 58 85 0 85 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR 1 0 1 0 0 0 SBL 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 SET 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 4 -4 0 0 EBL 2 -2 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 96 0 96 115 1 0 116 EBR 67 0 67 58 1 0 59 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WET 180 0 180 140 0 140 WEIR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 6 -6 0 0 Departure 2 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2 -2 0 0 6 -6 0 0 South Leg Approach 59 0 0 59 85 0 0 85 Departure 67 0 0 67 59 0 0 59 Total 126 0 0 126 144 0 0 144 East Leg Approach 180 0 0 180 140 0 0 140 Departure 97 0 0 97 116 0 0 116 Total 277 0 0 277 256 0 0 256 West Leg Approach 165 -2 0 163 173 2 0 175 Departure 238 0 0 238 229 A 0 225 Total 403 -2 0 401 402 -2 0 400 Total Approaches Approach 404 -2 0 402 404 -4 0 400 Departure 404 -2 0 402 404 A 0 400 Total 808 A 0 804 808 -8 0 800 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 14 . SR-22 WB Ramps/La Veta Avenue NBL 899 0 3 902 415 0 10 425 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR 479 0 0 479 128 0 0 128 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 332 0 3 335 625 0 2 627 EBR 233 0 6 239 946 0 4 950 WBL 266 0 0 266 497 0 0 497 WET 454 0 1 455 440 0 3 443 WEIR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Leg Approach 1,378 0 3 1,381 543 0 10 553 Departure 499 0 6 505 1,443 0 4 1,447 Total 1,877 0 9 1,886 1,986 0 14 2,000 East Leg Approach 720 0 1 721 937 0 3 940 Departure 811 0 3 814 753 0 2 755 Total 1,531 0 4 1,535 1,690 0 5 1,695 West Leg Approach 565 0 9 574 1,571 0 6 11577 Departure 1,353 0 4 1,357 855 0 13 868 Total 1,918 0 13 1,931 2,426 0 19 2,445 Total Approaches Approach 2,663 0 13 2,676 3,051 0 19 31070 Departure 2,663 0 13 2,676 3,051 0 19 3,070 Total 5,326 0 26 5,352 6,102 0 38 6,140 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PIVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 15 . SR-22 EB Rampsrrown & Country Road NBL 25 0 0 25 186 0 0 186 NBT 128 0 4 132 438 0 2 440 NBR 20 0 0 20 52 0 0 52 SBL 348 0 0 348 185 0 0 185 SET 309 0 1 310 107 0 2 109 SBR 609 0 1 610 420 0 4 424 EBL 304 0 6 310 583 0 4 587 EBT 104 0 1 105 103 0 1 104 EBR 118 0 0 118 25 0 0 25 WBL 65 0 0 65 11 0 0 11 WET 64 0 1 65 146 0 2 148 WEIR 107 0 0 107 461 0 0 461 North Leg Approach 1,266 0 2 1,268 712 0 6 718 Departure 539 0 10 549 1,482 0 6 1,488 Total 1,805 0 12 1,817 2,194 0 12 2,206 South Leg Approach 173 0 4 177 676 0 2 678 Departure 492 0 1 493 143 0 2 145 Total 665 0 5 670 819 0 4 823 East Leg Approach 236 0 1 237 618 0 2 620 Departure 472 0 1 473 340 0 1 341 Total 708 0 2 710 958 0 3 961 West Leg Approach 526 0 7 533 711 0 5 716 Departure 698 0 2 700 752 0 6 758 Total 1,224 0 9 1,233 1,463 0 11 1,474 Total Approaches Approach 2,201 0 14 2,215 2,717 0 15 21732 Departure 2,201 0 14 2,215 2,717 0 15 2,732 Total 4,402 0 28 4,430 5,434 0 30 5,464 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our RVI Peakour Existing WP Project Existing Existing WP Project Existing Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 16 . Memory Lane/Lawson Way NBL 1 0 0 1 9 0 0 9 NBT 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 NBR 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 6 SBL 17 0 0 17 17 0 0 17 SET 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 SBR 168 0 1 169 149 0 2 151 EBL 180 0 4 184 284 0 2 286 EBT 272 0 2 274 262 0 1 263 EBR 7 0 0 7 15 0 0 15 WBL 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 WET 285 0 1 286 212 0 2 214 WEIR 8 0 0 8 18 0 0 18 North Leg Approach 186 0 1 187 170 0 2 172 Departure 191 0 4 195 304 0 2 306 Total 377 0 5 382 474 0 4 478 South Leg Approach 7 0 0 7 17 0 0 17 Departure 8 0 0 8 23 0 0 23 Total 15 0 0 15 40 0 0 40 East Leg Approach 293 0 1 294 234 0 2 236 Departure 292 0 2 294 285 0 1 286 Total 585 0 3 588 519 0 3 522 West Leg Approach 459 0 6 465 561 0 3 564 Departure 454 0 2 456 370 0 4 374 Total 913 0 8 921 931 0 7 938 Total Approaches Approach 945 0 8 953 982 0 7 989 Departure 945 0 8 953 982 0 7 989 Total 1,890 0 16 1,906 1,964 0 14 1,978 Analysis\Exist TM Santiago - 9112/2019 The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Existing Existing Project Existing Existing Existing Project Existing Without Without Trips Plus Without Without Trips Plus Project Project Project Project Project Project 9 . Main StreetlEdgewood Road-11-5 Ramps NBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBL 77 0 77 239 0 239 NBT 471 1 10 482 829 30 859 NBR 83 -1 0 82 103 0 103 SBU 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 SBL 64 -1 0 63 106 2 0 108 SBT 1,275 44 1,319 1,311 2 29 1,342 SBR 17 0 17 138 0 138 EBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 6 0 6 30 0 30 EBT 5 0 5 12 0 12 EBR 79 0 79 73 0 73 WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 129 0 129 97 -2 0 95 WBT 15 0 15 21 0 21 WBR 91 0 91 91 -2 0 89 NWBR 714 5 719 296 15 311 NWHR 22 0 22 6 0 6 North Leg Approach 1,356 0 44 1,400 1,555 4 29 1,588 Departure 1,283 2 15 1,300 1,246 -2 45 1,289 Total 2,639 2 59 2,700 2,801 2 74 2,877 South Leg Approach 631 0 10 641 1,171 0 30 1,201 Departure 1,483 0 44 1,527 1,481 0 29 1,510 Total 2,114 0 54 2,168 2,652 0 59 2,711 East Leg Approach 235 0 0 235 209 A 0 205 Departure 174 -2 0 172 227 2 0 229 Total 409 -2 0 407 437 -2 0 435 West Leg Approach 90 0 0 90 115 0 0 115 Departure 109 0 0 109 398 0 0 398 Total 199 0 0 199 513 0 0 513 Southeast Leg Approach 736 0 5 741 302 0 15 317 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 736 0 5 741 302 0 15 317 Total Approaches Approach 3,049 0 59 3,108 3,352 0 74 3,426 Departure 3,049 0 59 3,108 3,352 0 74 3,426 Total 6,098 0 118 6,216 6,704 0 148 6,852 D:Wro"%RE-257 Main St�ndyo OHad SeGde rM9 Revi I,N inim%fte[ AN TM Se tMo The Addington Table B-1 - Existing With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Existing Existing Project Existing Existing Existing Project Existing Without Without Trips Plus Without Without Trips Plus Project Project Project Project Project Project 10 . Main Street/Santa Clara Avenue-1-5 NB On Ramp NBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBL 7 0 7 9 0 9 NBT 504 4 508 967 11 978 NBR 584 0 584 712 0 712 SBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 58 12 70 113 8 121 SBT 1,320 24 1,344 1,303 16 1,319 SBR 105 8 113 65 5 70 EBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 127 7 134 204 20 224 EBT 396 0 396 485 0 485 EBR 201 0 201 146 0 146 WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEBR 591 0 591 334 0 334 SEHR 32 0 32 16 0 16 North Leg Approach 1,483 0 44 1,527 1,481 0 29 1,510 Departure 631 0 11 642 1,171 0 31 1,202 Total 2,114 0 55 2,169 2,652 0 60 2,712 South Leg Approach 1,095 0 4 1,099 1,688 0 11 1,699 Departure 2,112 0 24 2,136 1,783 0 16 1,799 Total 3,207 0 28 3,235 3,471 0 27 3,498 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 1,038 0 12 1,050 1,310 0 8 1,318 Total 1,038 0 12 1,050 1,310 0 8 1,318 West Leg Approach 724 0 7 731 835 0 20 855 Departure 144 0 8 152 90 0 5 95 Total 868 0 15 883 924 0 25 949 Northwest Leg Approach 623 0 0 623 350 0 0 350 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 623 0 0 623 350 0 0 350 Total Approaches Approach 3,925 0 55 3,980 4,354 0 60 4,414 Departure 3,925 0 55 3,980 4,354 0 60 4,414 Total 7,851 0 110 7,961 8,707 0 120 8,827 D:Wro"%RE-257 Main St�ndyo OHad SeGde rM9 Revi I,N inim%fte[ AN TM Se tMo The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 1 . Broadwayl1-5 SB Off Ramp NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 442 0 442 789 0 789 NBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 614 0 614 578 0 578 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 914 4 918 890 12 902 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 614 0 0 614 578 0 0 578 Departure 442 0 0 442 789 0 0 789 Total 1,056 0 0 1,056 1,367 0 0 1,367 South Leg Approach 442 0 0 442 789 0 0 789 Departure 1,529 0 4 1,533 1,468 0 12 1,480 Total 1,971 0 4 1,975 2,257 0 12 2,269 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Leg Approach 914 0 4 918 890 0 12 902 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 914 0 4 918 890 0 12 902 Total Approaches Approach 1,971 0 4 1,975 2,257 0 12 2,269 Departure 1,971 0 4 1,975 2,257 0 12 2,269 Total 3,942 0 8 3,950 4,513 0 24 4,537 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 2. Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 300 0 300 629 0 629 NBR 347 3 350 426 8 434 SBL 49 4 53 141 12 153 SBT 1,480 0 1,480 1,327 0 1,327 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 136 0 136 146 0 146 EBT 326 0 326 236 0 236 EBR 196 0 196 68 0 68 WBL 77 8 85 91 5 96 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 6 0 6 14 0 14 North Leg Approach 1,529 0 4 1,533 1,468 0 12 1,480 Departure 442 0 0 442 789 0 0 789 Total 1,971 0 4 1,975 2,257 0 12 2,269 South Leg Approach 647 0 3 650 1,055 0 8 1,063 Departure 1,753 0 8 1,761 1,486 0 5 1,491 Total 2,400 0 11 2,411 2,541 0 13 2,554 East Leg Approach 83 0 8 91 105 0 5 110 Departure 722 0 7 729 803 0 20 823 Total 805 0 15 820 908 0 25 933 West Leg Approach 658 0 0 658 450 0 0 450 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 658 0 0 658 450 0 0 450 Total Approaches Approach 2,917 0 15 2,932 3,078 0 25 3,103 Departure 2,917 0 15 2,932 3,078 0 25 3,103 Total 5,834 0 30 5,864 6,155 0 50 6,205 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 3 . Broadway/Buffalo Avenue NBL 9 0 9 6 0 6 NBT 607 3 610 1,025 8 1,033 NBR 143 0 143 257 1 258 SBL 213 0 213 141 0 141 SBT 1,517 8 1,525 1,286 5 1,291 SBR 11 0 11 7 0 7 EBL 1 0 1 0 0 0 EBT 4 0 4 1 0 1 EBR 3 0 3 10 0 10 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 1,741 0 8 1,749 1,434 0 5 1,439 Departure 608 0 3 611 1,025 0 8 1,033 Total 2,349 0 11 2,360 2,459 0 13 2,472 South Leg Approach 759 0 3 762 1,288 0 9 1,297 Departure 1,520 0 8 1,528 1,296 0 5 1,301 Total 2,279 0 11 2,290 2,584 0 14 2,598 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 360 0 0 360 399 0 1 400 Total 360 0 0 360 399 0 1 400 West Leg Approach 8 0 0 8 11 0 0 11 Departure 20 0 0 20 13 0 0 13 Total 28 0 0 28 24 0 0 24 Total Approaches Approach 2,508 0 11 2,519 2,733 0 14 2,747 Departure 2,508 0 11 2,519 2,733 0 14 2,747 Total 5,016 0 22 5,038 5,466 0 28 5,494 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 4 . Main Street/La Veta Avenue NBL 81 2 83 294 1 295 NBT 749 5 754 1,042 3 1,045 NBR 347 9 356 506 6 512 SBL 211 0 211 175 0 175 SBT 1,132 2 1,134 1,059 5 1,064 SBR 142 0 142 234 0 234 EBL 317 0 317 338 0 338 EBT 469 0 469 435 0 435 EBR 194 1 195 209 2 211 WBL 315 4 319 303 13 316 WBT 328 0 328 523 0 523 WBR 221 0 221 252 0 252 North Leg Approach 1,485 0 2 1,487 1,468 0 5 1,473 Departure 1,287 0 5 1,292 1,632 0 3 1,635 Total 2,772 0 7 2,779 3,100 0 8 3,108 South Leg Approach 1,177 0 16 1,193 1,842 0 10 1,852 Departure 1,641 0 7 1,648 1,571 0 20 1,591 Total 2,818 0 23 2,841 3,413 0 30 3,443 East Leg Approach 864 0 4 868 1,078 0 13 1,091 Departure 1,027 0 9 1,036 1,116 0 6 1,122 Total 1,891 0 13 1,904 2,194 0 19 2,213 West Leg Approach 980 0 1 981 982 0 2 984 Departure 551 0 2 553 1,051 0 1 1,052 Total 1,531 0 3 1,534 2,033 0 3 2,036 Total Approaches Approach 4,506 0 23 4,529 5,370 0 30 5,400 Departure 4,506 0 23 4,529 5,370 0 30 5,400 Total 9,012 0 46 9,058 10,740 0 60 10,800 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 5 . Main Street/Town and Country Road NBL 53 0 53 69 0 69 NBT 962 16 978 1,188 11 1,199 NBR 160 7 167 238 5 243 SBL 269 0 269 519 0 519 SBT 1,149 7 1,156 1,114 20 1,134 SBR 33 0 33 120 0 120 EBL 21 0 21 132 0 132 EBT 70 0 70 157 0 157 EBR 69 0 69 141 0 141 WBL 296 2 298 229 5 234 WBT 69 0 69 108 0 108 WBR 498 0 498 458 0 458 North Leg Approach 1,451 0 7 1,458 1,753 0 20 1,773 Departure 1,481 0 16 1,497 1,778 0 11 1,789 Total 2,932 0 23 2,955 3,531 0 31 3,562 South Leg Approach 1,175 0 23 1,198 1,495 0 16 1,511 Departure 1,514 0 9 1,523 1,484 0 25 1,509 Total 2,689 0 32 2,721 2,979 0 41 3,020 East Leg Approach 863 0 2 865 795 0 5 800 Departure 499 0 7 506 914 0 5 919 Total 1,362 0 9 1,371 1,709 0 10 1,719 West Leg Approach 160 0 0 160 430 0 0 430 Departure 155 0 0 155 297 0 0 297 Total 315 0 0 315 727 0 0 727 Total Approaches Approach 3,649 0 32 3,681 4,473 0 41 4,514 Departure 3,649 0 32 3,681 4,473 0 41 4,514 Total 7,298 0 64 7,362 8,946 0 82 9,028 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 6 . Main Street/E Memory Lane NBL 35 0 35 123 0 123 NBT 931 24 955 1,047 15 1,062 NBR 195 6 201 265 4 269 SBL 36 0 36 40 0 40 SBT 1,189 9 1,198 1,186 26 1,212 SBR 269 0 269 200 0 200 EBL 201 0 201 297 0 297 EBT 237 0 237 332 0 332 EBR 65 0 65 139 0 139 WBL 319 2 321 208 5 213 WBT 230 0 230 179 0 179 WBR 29 0 29 77 0 77 North Leg Approach 1,494 0 9 1,503 1,426 0 26 1,452 Departure 1,161 0 24 1,185 1,421 0 15 1,436 Total 2,655 0 33 2,688 2,847 0 41 2,888 South Leg Approach 1,161 0 30 1,191 1,435 0 19 1,454 Departure 1,573 0 11 1,584 1,533 0 31 1,564 Total 2,734 0 41 2,775 2,968 0 50 3,018 East Leg Approach 578 0 2 580 464 0 5 469 Departure 468 0 6 474 637 0 4 641 Total 1,046 0 8 1,054 1,101 0 9 1,110 West Leg Approach 503 0 0 503 768 0 0 768 Departure 534 0 0 534 502 0 0 502 Total 1,037 0 0 1,037 1,270 0 0 1,270 Total Approaches Approach 3,736 0 41 3,777 4,093 0 50 4,143 Departure 3,736 0 41 3,777 4,093 0 50 4,143 Total 7,472 0 82 7,554 8,186 0 100 8,286 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 7 . Main StreetlWalkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NBL 19 0 19 25 4 0 29 NBT 1,260 0 1,260 1,444 0 1,444 NBR 0 16 16 0 45 45 SBL 1 10 11 1 30 31 SBT 1,595 0 1,595 1,621 0 1,621 SBR 11 0 11 2 0 2 EBL 2 0 2 8 0 8 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 1 0 1 21 0 21 WBL 0 44 44 0 29 29 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 30 30 0 19 19 North Leg Approach 1,607 0 10 1,617 1,624 0 30 1,654 Departure 1,262 0 30 1,292 1,452 0 19 1,471 Total 2,869 0 40 2,909 3,076 0 49 3,125 South Leg Approach 1,279 0 16 1,295 1,469 4 45 1,518 Departure 1,596 0 44 1,640 1,642 0 29 1,671 Total 2,875 0 60 2,935 3,111 4 74 3,189 East Leg Approach 0 0 74 74 0 0 48 48 Departure 1 0 26 27 1 0 75 76 Total 1 0 100 101 1 0 123 124 West Leg Approach 3 0 0 3 29 0 0 29 Departure 30 0 0 30 27 4 0 31 Total 33 0 0 33 56 4 0 60 Total Approaches Approach 2,889 0 100 2,989 3,122 4 123 3,249 Departure 2,889 0 100 2,989 3,122 4 123 3,249 Total 5,778 0 200 5,978 6,244 8 246 6,498 AnalysislOY P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 8 . Main Street/Discovery Cube Driveway NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 1,282 16 1,298 1,460 -2 45 1,503 NBR 12 2 0 14 3 0 3 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 1,600 44 1,644 1,643 4 29 1,676 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 1 0 1 9 6 0 15 North Leg Approach 1,600 0 44 1,644 1,643 29 1,676 Departure 1,283 0 16 1,299 1,469 4 45 1,518 Total 2,883 0 60 2,943 3,112 4 74 3,194 South Leg Approach 1,294 2 16 1,312 1,463 -2 45 1,506 Departure 1,600 0 44 1,644 1,643 4 29 1,676 Total 2,894 2 60 2,956 3,106 2 74 3,182 East Leg Approach 1 0 0 1 9 6 0 15 Departure 12 2 0 14 3 0 0 3 Total 13 2 0 15 12 6 0 18 West Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Approaches Approach 2,895 2 60 2,957 3,115 4 74 3,197 Departure 2,895 2 60 2,957 3,115 8 74 3,197 Total 5,790 4 120 5,914 6,230 12 148 6,394 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 11 . Main Street/Buffalo Avenue-1-5 SB On Ramp NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 1,024 3 1,027 1,532 10 1,542 NBR 42 0 42 51 0 51 SBL 787 15 802 670 10 680 SBT 1,629 10 1,639 1,205 6 1,211 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 121 0 121 295 1 296 EBT 199 0 199 169 0 169 EBR 26 0 26 47 0 47 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 2,416 0 25 2,441 1,876 0 16 1,892 Departure 1,145 0 3 1,148 1,826 0 11 1,837 Total 3,561 0 28 3,589 3,702 0 27 3,729 South Leg Approach 1,066 0 3 1,069 1,583 0 10 1,593 Departure 1,655 0 10 1,665 1,252 0 6 1,258 Total 2,721 0 13 2,734 2,835 0 16 2,851 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 1,028 0 15 1,043 890 0 10 900 Total 1,028 0 15 1,043 890 0 10 900 West Leg Approach 346 0 0 346 511 0 1 512 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 346 0 0 346 511 0 1 512 Total Approaches Approach 3,828 0 28 3,856 3,969 0 27 3,996 Departure 3,828 0 28 3,856 3,969 0 27 3,996 Total 7,657 0 56 7,713 7,938 0 54 7,992 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 12 . Main Street117th Street NBL 210 0 210 208 0 208 NBT 761 1 762 1,137 4 1,141 NBR 196 0 196 214 0 214 SBL 194 2 196 213 1 214 SBT 1,197 4 1,201 853 2 855 SBR 126 4 130 165 2 167 EBL 160 1 161 221 4 225 EBT 1,295 0 1,295 1,286 0 1,286 EBR 86 0 86 67 0 67 WBL 363 0 363 213 0 213 WBT 1,411 0 1,411 1,103 0 1,103 WBR 37 1 38 79 2 81 North Leg Approach 1,517 0 10 1,527 1,231 0 5 1,236 Departure 958 0 3 961 1,437 0 10 1,447 Total 2,475 0 13 2,488 2,668 0 15 2,683 South Leg Approach 1,167 0 1 1,168 1,559 0 4 1,563 Departure 1,646 0 4 1,650 1,133 0 2 1,135 Total 2,813 0 5 2,818 2,692 0 6 2,698 East Leg Approach 1,811 0 1 1,812 1,395 0 2 1,397 Departure 1,685 0 2 1,687 1,713 0 1 1,714 Total 3,496 0 3 3,499 3,108 0 3 3,111 West Leg Approach 1,541 0 1 1,542 1,574 0 4 1,578 Departure 1,747 0 4 1,751 1,476 0 2 1,478 Total 3,288 0 5 3,293 3,050 0 6 3,056 Total Approaches Approach 6,036 0 13 6,049 5,759 0 15 5,774 Departure 6,036 0 13 6,049 5,759 0 15 5,774 Total 12,072 0 26 12,098 11,518 0 30 11,548 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 13 . Project Driveway 2-Bush Street/Edgewood Road NBL 59 0 59 86 0 86 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR 1 0 1 0 0 0 SBL 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 SBT 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 4 -4 0 0 EBL 2 -2 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 101 0 101 120 1 0 121 EBR 68 0 68 59 1 0 60 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 192 0 192 145 0 145 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 6 -6 0 0 Departure 2 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2 -2 0 0 6 -6 0 0 South Leg Approach 60 0 0 60 86 0 0 86 Departure 68 0 0 68 60 0 0 60 Total 128 0 0 128 146 0 0 146 East Leg Approach 192 0 0 192 145 0 0 145 Departure 102 0 0 102 121 0 0 121 Total 294 0 0 294 266 0 0 266 West Leg Approach 171 -2 0 169 179 2 0 181 Departure 251 0 0 251 235 -4 0 231 Total 422 -2 0 420 414 -2 0 412 Total Approaches Approach 423 -2 0 421 416 -4 0 412 Departure 423 -2 0 421 416 -4 0 412 Total 846 -4 0 842 832 -8 0 824 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 14 . SR-22 WB Ramps/La Veta Avenue NBL 922 0 3 925 439 0 10 449 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR 475 0 0 475 213 0 0 213 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 362 0 3 365 653 0 2 655 EBR 293 0 6 299 997 0 4 1,001 WBL 416 0 0 416 526 0 0 526 WBT 480 0 1 481 469 0 3 472 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Leg Approach 1,397 0 3 1,400 652 0 10 662 Departure 709 0 6 715 1,523 0 4 1,527 Total 2,106 0 9 2,115 2,175 0 14 2,189 East Leg Approach 896 0 1 897 995 0 3 998 Departure 837 0 3 840 866 0 2 868 Total 1,733 0 4 1,737 1,861 0 5 1,866 West Leg Approach 655 0 9 664 1,650 0 6 1,656 Departure 1,402 0 4 1,406 908 0 13 921 Total 2,057 0 13 2,070 2,558 0 19 2,577 Total Approaches Approach 2,948 0 13 2,961 3,297 0 19 3,316 Departure 2,948 0 13 2,961 3,297 0 19 3,316 Total 5,896 0 26 5,922 6,594 0 38 6,632 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 15 . SR-22 EB Ramps/Town & Country Road NBL 95 0 0 95 215 0 0 215 NBT 180 0 4 184 461 0 2 463 NBR 28 0 0 28 73 0 0 73 SBL 328 0 0 328 275 0 0 275 SBT 301 0 1 302 159 0 2 161 SBR 645 0 1 646 488 0 4 492 EBL 337 0 6 343 619 0 4 623 EBT 132 0 1 133 181 0 1 182 EBR 170 0 0 170 90 0 0 90 WBL 99 0 0 99 65 0 0 65 WBT 127 0 1 128 171 0 2 173 WBR 132 0 0 132 458 0 0 458 North Leg Approach 1,274 0 2 1,276 922 0 6 928 Departure 649 0 10 659 1,538 0 6 1,544 Total 1,923 0 12 1,935 2,460 0 12 2,472 South Leg Approach 303 0 4 307 749 0 2 751 Departure 570 0 1 571 314 0 2 316 Total 873 0 5 878 1,063 0 4 1,067 East Leg Approach 358 0 1 359 694 0 2 696 Departure 488 0 1 489 529 0 1 530 Total 846 0 2 848 1,223 0 3 1,226 West Leg Approach 639 0 7 646 890 0 5 895 Departure 867 0 2 869 874 0 6 880 Total 1,506 0 9 1,515 1,764 0 11 1,775 Total Approaches Approach 2,574 0 14 2,588 3,255 0 15 3,270 Departure 2,574 0 14 2,588 3,255 0 15 3,270 Total 5,148 0 28 5,176 6,510 0 30 6,540 AnalysisW P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak our PM Peakour OY WP Project OY OY WP Project OY Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 16 . Memory Lane/Lawson Way NBL 1 0 0 1 9 0 0 9 NBT 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 NBR 3 0 0 3 6 0 0 6 SBL 17 0 0 17 17 0 0 17 SBT 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 SBR 341 0 1 342 190 0 2 192 EBL 149 0 4 153 398 0 2 400 EBT 259 0 2 261 279 0 1 280 EBR 7 0 0 7 15 0 0 15 WBL 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 WBT 304 0 1 305 200 0 2 202 WBR 8 0 0 8 18 0 0 18 North Leg Approach 359 0 1 360 211 0 2 213 Departure 160 0 4 164 418 0 2 420 Total 519 0 5 524 629 0 4 633 South Leg Approach 7 0 0 7 17 0 0 17 Departure 8 0 0 8 23 0 0 23 Total 15 0 0 15 40 0 0 40 East Leg Approach 312 0 1 313 222 0 2 224 Departure 279 0 2 281 302 0 1 303 Total 591 0 3 594 524 0 3 527 West Leg Approach 415 0 6 421 692 0 3 695 Departure 646 0 2 648 399 0 4 403 Total 1,061 0 8 1,069 1,091 0 7 1,098 Total Approaches Approach 1,093 0 8 1,101 1,142 0 7 1,149 Departure 1,093 0 8 1,101 1,142 0 7 1,149 Total 2,186 0 16 2,202 2,284 0 14 2,298 AnalysislOY P TM Santiago - 911212019 The Addington Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour OY OY Project OY OY OY Project OY Without Without Trips Plus Without Without Trips Plus Project Project Project Project Project Project 9 . Main Street/Edgewood Road-11-5 Ramps NBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 499 1 10 510 963 30 993 NBR 93 -1 0 92 120 0 120 SBU 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 SBL 68 -1 0 67 111 2 0 113 SBT 1,533 44 1,577 1,533 2 29 1,564 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 155 0 155 123 -2 0 121 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 94 0 94 95 -2 0 93 NWBR 698 5 703 400 15 415 NWHR 22 0 22 10 0 10 North Leg Approach 1,601 0 44 1,645 1,644 4 29 1,677 Departure 1,292 2 15 1,309 1,458 -2 45 1,501 Total 2,893 2 59 2,954 3,102 2 74 3,178 South Leg Approach 592 0 10 602 1,083 0 30 1,113 Departure 1,688 0 44 1,732 1,656 0 29 1,685 Total 2,280 0 54 2,334 2,738 0 59 2,797 East Leg Approach 249 0 0 249 218 -4 0 214 Departure 183 -2 0 181 241 2 0 243 Total 432 -2 0 430 460 -2 0 458 West Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southeast Leg Approach 720 0 5 725 410 0 15 425 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 720 0 5 725 410 0 15 425 Total Approaches Approach 3,163 0 59 3,222 3,355 0 74 3,429 Departure 3,163 0 59 3,222 3,355 0 74 3,429 Total 6,326 0 118 6,444 6,710 0 148 6,858 Wmjs %W-225 W,i StreetNnalyss ORset September M9 ReviseiNna .%OY P r L% iMSar[u 911212019 Table B-2 - Opening Year Cumulative With Option E -Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour OY OY Project OY OY OY Project OY Without Without Trips Plus Without Without Trips Plus Project Project Project Project Project Project 10 . Main Street/Santa Clara Avenue-1-5 NB On Ramp NBU 0 0 NBL 7 0 NBT 470 4 NBR 667 0 SBU 0 0 SBL 91 12 SBT 1,490 24 SBR 107 8 EBU 0 0 EBL 125 7 EBT 418 0 EBR 204 0 WBU 0 0 WBL 0 0 WBT 0 0 WBR 0 0 SEBR 699 0 SEHR 32 0 North Leg Approach 1,688 0 44 Departure 594 0 11 Total 2,282 0 55 South Leg Approach 1,144 0 4 Departure 2,393 0 24 Total 3,537 0 28 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 Departure 1,176 0 12 Total 1,176 0 12 West Leg Approach 746 0 7 Departure 146 0 8 Total 892 0 15 Northwest Leg Approach 731 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 Total 731 0 0 Total Approaches Approach 4,309 0 55 Departure 4,309 0 55 Total 8,619 0 110 0 0 0 0 7 9 0 9 474 877 11 888 667 940 0 940 0 0 0 0 103 276 8 284 1,514 1,314 16 1,330 115 66 5 71 0 0 0 0 132 207 20 227 418 535 0 535 204 148 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 699 431 0 431 32 16 0 16 1,732 1,656 0 29 1,685 605 1,084 0 31 1,115 2,337 2,739 0 60 2,799 1,148 1,826 0 11 1,837 2,417 1,893 0 16 1,909 3,565 3,719 0 27 3,746 0 0 0 0 0 1,188 1,751 0 8 1,759 1,188 1,751 0 8 1,759 753 889 0 20 909 154 91 0 5 96 907 980 0 25 1,005 731 447 0 0 447 0 0 0 0 0 731 447 0 0 447 4,364 4,818 0 60 4,878 4,364 4,818 0 60 4,878 8,729 9,637 0 120 9,757 Wmjs %W-225 W,i StreetNnalyss ORset September M9 ReviseiNna .%OY P r L% iMSar[u 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 1 . Broadwayl1-5 SB Off Ramp NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 573 0 573 910 0 910 NBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 685 0 685 607 0 607 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 929 4 933 934 12 946 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 685 0 0 685 607 0 0 607 Departure 573 0 0 573 910 0 0 910 Total 1,258 0 0 1,258 1,517 0 0 1,517 South Leg Approach 573 0 0 573 910 0 0 910 Departure 1,614 0 4 1,618 1,541 0 12 1,553 Total 2,187 0 4 2,191 2,451 0 12 2,463 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Leg Approach 929 0 4 933 934 0 12 946 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 929 0 4 933 934 0 12 946 Total Approaches Approach 2,187 0 4 2,191 2,451 0 12 2,463 Departure 2,187 0 4 2,191 2,451 0 12 2,463 Total 4,374 0 8 4,382 4,902 0 24 4,926 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2. Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 393 0 393 730 0 730 NBR 364 3 367 447 8 455 SBL 51 4 55 148 12 160 SBT 1,568 0 1,568 1,393 0 1,393 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 177 0 177 172 0 172 EBT 342 0 342 248 0 248 EBR 206 0 206 72 0 72 WBL 81 8 89 96 5 101 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 6 0 6 15 0 15 North Leg Approach 1,619 0 4 1,623 1,541 0 12 1,553 Departure 576 0 0 576 917 0 0 917 Total 2,195 0 4 2,199 2,458 0 12 2,470 South Leg Approach 757 0 3 760 1,177 0 8 1,185 Departure 1,855 0 8 1,863 1,561 0 5 1,566 Total 2,612 0 11 2,623 2,738 0 13 2,751 East Leg Approach 87 0 8 95 111 0 5 116 Departure 757 0 7 764 843 0 20 863 Total 844 0 15 859 954 0 25 979 West Leg Approach 725 0 0 725 492 0 0 492 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 725 0 0 725 492 0 0 492 Total Approaches Approach 3,188 0 15 3,203 3,321 0 25 3,346 Departure 3,188 0 15 3,203 3,321 0 25 3,346 Total 6,376 0 30 6,406 6,642 0 50 6,692 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 3 . Broadway/Buffalo Avenue NBL 9 0 9 6 0 6 NBT 648 3 651 1,054 8 1,062 NBR 150 0 150 270 1 271 SBL 224 0 224 148 0 148 SBT 1,552 8 1,560 1,350 5 1,355 SBR 12 0 12 7 0 7 EBL 1 0 1 0 0 0 EBT 4 0 4 1 0 1 EBR 3 0 3 11 0 11 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 1,788 0 8 1,796 1,505 0 5 1,510 Departure 649 0 3 652 1,054 0 8 1,062 Total 2,437 0 11 2,448 2,559 0 13 2,572 South Leg Approach 807 0 3 810 1,330 0 9 1,339 Departure 1,555 0 8 1,563 1,361 0 5 1,366 Total 2,362 0 11 2,373 2,691 0 14 2,705 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 378 0 0 378 419 0 1 420 Total 378 0 0 378 419 0 1 420 West Leg Approach 8 0 0 8 12 0 0 12 Departure 21 0 0 21 13 0 0 13 Total 29 0 0 29 25 0 0 25 Total Approaches Approach 2,603 0 11 2,614 2,847 0 14 2,861 Departure 2,603 0 11 2,614 2,847 0 14 2,861 Total 5,206 0 22 5,228 5,694 0 28 5,722 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2,040 WP Project 2,040 2,040 WP Project 2,040 Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 4 . Main Street/La Veta Avenue NBL 94 2 96 335 1 336 NBT 950 5 955 1,446 3 1,449 NBR 364 9 373 531 6 537 SBL 225 0 225 184 0 184 SBT 1,499 2 1,501 1,080 5 1,085 SBR 158 0 158 258 0 258 EBL 437 0 437 387 0 387 EBT 515 0 515 457 0 457 EBR 263 1 264 219 2 221 WBL 331 4 335 318 13 331 WBT 344 0 344 549 0 549 WBR 226 0 226 302 0 302 North Leg Approach 1,882 0 2 1,884 1,522 0 5 1,527 Departure 1,613 0 5 1,618 2,135 0 3 2,138 Total 3,495 0 7 3,502 3,657 0 8 3,665 South Leg Approach 1,408 0 16 1,424 2,312 0 10 2,322 Departure 2,093 0 7 2,100 1,617 0 20 1,637 Total 3,501 0 23 3,524 3,929 0 30 3,959 East Leg Approach 901 0 4 905 1,169 0 13 1,182 Departure 1,104 0 9 1,113 1,172 0 6 1,178 Total 2,005 0 13 2,018 2,341 0 19 2,360 West Leg Approach 1,215 0 1 1,216 1,063 0 2 1,065 Departure 596 0 2 598 1,142 0 1 1,143 Total 1,811 0 3 1,814 2,205 0 3 2,208 Total Approaches Approach 5,406 0 23 5,429 6,066 0 30 6,096 Departure 5,406 0 23 5,429 6,066 0 30 6,096 Total 10,812 0 46 10,858 12,132 0 60 12,192 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 5 . Main Street/Town and Country Road NBL 56 0 56 73 0 73 NBT 1,226 16 1,242 1,607 11 1,618 NBR 168 7 175 250 5 255 SBL 318 0 318 545 0 545 SBT 1,519 7 1,526 1,203 20 1,223 SBR 40 0 40 126 0 126 EBL 26 0 26 135 0 135 EBT 74 0 74 165 0 165 EBR 72 0 72 143 0 143 WBL 311 2 313 240 5 245 WBT 72 0 72 113 0 113 WBR 523 0 523 475 0 475 North Leg Approach 1,877 0 7 1,884 1,874 0 20 1,894 Departure 1,775 0 16 1,791 2,217 0 11 2,228 Total 3,652 0 23 3,675 4,091 0 31 4,122 South Leg Approach 1,450 0 23 1,473 1,930 0 16 1,946 Departure 1,902 0 9 1,911 1,586 0 25 1,611 Total 3,352 0 32 3,384 3,516 0 41 3,557 East Leg Approach 906 0 2 908 828 0 5 833 Departure 560 0 7 567 960 0 5 965 Total 1,466 0 9 1,475 1,788 0 10 1,798 West Leg Approach 172 0 0 172 443 0 0 443 Departure 168 0 0 168 312 0 0 312 Total 340 0 0 340 755 0 0 755 Total Approaches Approach 4,405 0 32 4,437 5,075 0 41 5,116 Departure 4,405 0 32 4,437 5,075 0 41 5,116 Total 8,810 0 64 8,874 10,150 0 82 10,232 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 6 . Main Street/E Memory Lane NBL 37 0 37 129 0 129 NBT 1,130 24 1,154 1,363 15 1,378 NBR 239 6 245 278 4 282 SBL 37 0 37 42 0 42 SBT 1,443 9 1,452 1,264 26 1,290 SBR 310 0 310 210 0 210 EBL 238 0 238 398 0 398 EBT 249 0 249 349 0 349 EBR 68 0 68 154 0 154 WBL 335 2 337 223 5 228 WBT 242 0 242 188 0 188 WBR 30 0 30 84 0 84 North Leg Approach 1,790 0 9 1,799 1,516 0 26 1,542 Departure 1,398 0 24 1,422 1,845 0 15 1,860 Total 3,188 0 33 3,221 3,361 0 41 3,402 South Leg Approach 1,406 0 30 1,436 1,770 0 19 1,789 Departure 1,846 0 11 1,857 1,641 0 31 1,672 Total 3,252 0 41 3,293 3,411 0 50 3,461 East Leg Approach 607 0 2 609 495 0 5 500 Departure 525 0 6 531 669 0 4 673 Total 1,132 0 8 1,140 1,164 0 9 1,173 West Leg Approach 555 0 0 555 901 0 0 901 Departure 589 0 0 589 527 0 0 527 Total 1,144 0 0 1,144 1,428 0 0 1,428 Total Approaches Approach 4,358 0 41 4,399 4,682 0 50 4,732 Departure 4,358 0 41 4,399 4,682 0 50 4,732 Total 8,716 0 82 8,798 9,364 0 100 9,464 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2,040 WP Project 2,040 2,040 WP Project 2,040 Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 7 . Main StreetlWalkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NBL 21 0 NBT 1,482 0 NBR 0 16 SBL 1 10 SBT 1,729 0 SBR 12 0 EBL 2 0 EBT 0 0 EBR 1 0 WBL 0 44 WBT 0 0 WBR 0 30 North Leg Approach 1,742 0 10 Departure 1,484 0 30 Total 3,226 0 40 South Leg Approach 1,503 0 16 Departure 1,730 0 44 Total 3,233 0 60 East Leg Approach 0 0 74 Departure 1 0 26 Total 1 0 100 West Leg Approach 3 0 0 Departure 33 0 0 Total 36 0 0 Total Approaches Approach 3,248 0 100 Departure 3,248 0 100 Total 6,496 0 200 21 28 4 0 32 1,482 1,731 0 1,731 16 0 45 45 11 1 30 31 1,729 1,781 0 1,781 12 2 0 2 2 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 24 0 24 44 0 29 29 0 0 0 0 30 0 19 19 1,752 1,784 0 30 1,814 1,514 1,740 0 19 1,759 3,266 3,525 0 49 3,574 1,519 1,759 4 45 1,808 1,774 1,805 0 29 1,834 3,293 3,564 4 74 3,642 74 0 0 48 48 27 1 0 75 76 101 1 0 123 124 3 33 0 0 33 33 30 4 0 34 36 63 4 0 67 3,348 3,576 4 123 3,703 3,348 3,576 4 123 3,703 6,696 7,152 8 246 7,406 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak Hour WP Project Adjust. Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak Hour WP Project Adjust. Trips 2,040 With Project 8 . Main Street/Discovery Cube Driveway NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 1,502 16 1,518 1,750 -2 45 1,793 NBR 13 2 0 15 3 0 3 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 1,729 44 1,773 1,805 4 29 1,838 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 1 0 1 9 6 0 15 North Leg Approach 1,729 0 44 1,773 1,805 4 29 1,838 Departure 1,503 0 16 1,519 1,759 4 45 1,808 Total 3,232 0 60 3,292 3,564 8 74 3,646 South Leg Approach 1,515 2 16 1,533 1,753 -2 45 1,796 Departure 1,729 0 44 1,773 1,805 4 29 1,838 Total 3,244 2 60 3,306 3,558 2 74 3,634 East Leg Approach 1 0 0 1 9 6 0 15 Departure 13 2 0 15 3 0 0 3 Total 14 2 0 16 12 6 0 18 West Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Approaches Approach 3,245 2 60 3,307 3,567 8 74 3,649 Departure 3,245 2 60 3,307 3,567 8 74 3,649 Total 6,490 4 120 6,614 7,134 16 148 7,298 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 11 . Main Street/Buffalo Avenue-1-5 SB On Ramp NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 1,196 3 1,199 1,721 10 1,731 NBR 44 0 44 54 0 54 SBL 826 15 841 721 10 731 SBT 1,710 10 1,720 1,266 6 1,272 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 135 0 135 369 1 370 EBT 209 0 209 177 0 177 EBR 27 0 27 49 0 49 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 2,536 0 25 2,561 1,987 0 16 2,003 Departure 1,330 0 3 1,333 2,090 0 11 2,101 Total 3,866 0 28 3,894 4,077 0 27 4,104 South Leg Approach 1,240 0 3 1,243 1,775 0 10 1,785 Departure 1,737 0 10 1,747 1,315 0 6 1,321 Total 2,977 0 13 2,990 3,090 0 16 3,106 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 1,079 0 15 1,094 952 0 10 962 Total 1,079 0 15 1,094 952 0 10 962 West Leg Approach 371 0 0 371 595 0 1 596 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 371 0 0 371 595 0 1 596 Total Approaches Approach 4,146 0 28 4,174 4,357 0 27 4,384 Departure 4,146 0 28 4,174 4,357 0 27 4,384 Total 8,293 0 56 8,349 8,715 0 54 8,769 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2,040 WP Project 2,040 2,040 WP Project 2,040 Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 12 . Main Street117th Street NBL 221 0 221 240 0 240 NBT 821 1 822 1,194 4 1,198 NBR 201 0 201 225 0 225 SBL 223 2 225 224 1 225 SBT 1,257 4 1,261 896 2 898 SBR 132 4 136 173 2 175 EBL 168 1 169 223 4 227 EBT 1,486 0 1,486 1,306 0 1,306 EBR 90 0 90 70 0 70 WBL 381 0 381 224 0 224 WBT 1,482 0 1,482 1,211 0 1,211 WBR 39 1 40 83 2 85 North Leg Approach 1,612 0 10 1,622 1,293 0 5 1,298 Departure 1,028 0 3 1,031 1,500 0 10 1,510 Total 2,640 0 13 2,653 2,793 0 15 2,808 South Leg Approach 1,243 0 1 1,244 1,659 0 4 1,663 Departure 1,728 0 4 1,732 1,190 0 2 1,192 Total 2,971 0 5 2,976 2,849 0 6 2,855 East Leg Approach 1,902 0 1 1,903 1,518 0 2 1,520 Departure 1,910 0 2 1,912 1,755 0 1 1,756 Total 3,812 0 3 3,815 3,273 0 3 3,276 West Leg Approach 1,744 0 1 1,745 1,599 0 4 1,603 Departure 1,835 0 4 1,839 1,624 0 2 1,626 Total 3,579 0 5 3,584 3,223 0 6 3,229 Total Approaches Approach 6,501 0 13 6,514 6,069 0 15 6,084 Departure 6,501 0 13 6,514 6,069 0 15 6,084 Total 13,002 0 26 13,028 12,138 0 30 12,168 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2,040 WP Project 2,040 2,040 WP Project 2,040 Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project Volumes Adjust. Trips With Project 13 . Project Driveway 2-Bush Street/Edgewood Road NBL 64 0 NBT 0 0 NBR 1 0 SBL 0 0 SBT 0 0 SBR 0 0 EBL 2 -2 0 EBT 107 0 EBR 74 0 WBL 0 0 WBT 200 0 WBR 0 0 North Leg Approach 0 0 0 Departure 2 -2 0 Total 2 -2 0 South Leg Approach 65 0 0 Departure 74 0 0 Total 139 0 0 East Leg Approach 200 0 0 Departure 108 0 0 Total 308 0 0 West Leg Approach 183 -2 0 Departure 264 0 0 Total 447 -2 0 Total Approaches Approach 448 -2 0 Departure 448 -2 0 Total 896 -4 0 64 94 0 94 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 4 -4 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 128 1 0 129 74 64 1 0 65 0 0 0 0 200 156 0 156 0 0 0 0 0 6 -6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 -6 0 0 65 94 0 0 94 74 65 0 0 65 139 159 0 0 159 200 156 0 0 156 108 129 0 0 129 308 285 0 0 285 181 192 2 0 194 264 254 -4 0 250 445 446 -2 0 444 446 448 -4 0 444 446 448 -4 0 444 892 896 -8 0 888 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 14 . SR-22 WB Ramps/La Veta Avenue NBL 968 0 3 971 461 0 10 471 NBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBR 527 0 0 527 224 0 0 224 SBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 416 0 3 419 669 0 2 671 EBR 308 0 6 314 1,047 0 4 1,051 WBL 437 0 0 437 576 0 0 576 WBT 520 0 1 521 484 0 3 487 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 North Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Leg Approach 1,495 0 3 1,498 685 0 10 695 Departure 745 0 6 751 1,623 0 4 1,627 Total 2,240 0 9 2,249 2,308 0 14 2,322 East Leg Approach 957 0 1 958 1,060 0 3 1,063 Departure 943 0 3 946 893 0 2 895 Total 1,900 0 4 1,904 1,953 0 5 1,958 West Leg Approach 724 0 9 733 1,716 0 6 1,722 Departure 1,488 0 4 1,492 945 0 13 958 Total 2,212 0 13 2,225 2,661 0 19 2,680 Total Approaches Approach 3,176 0 13 3,189 3,461 0 19 3,480 Departure 3,176 0 13 3,189 3,461 0 19 3,480 Total 6,352 0 26 6,378 6,922 0 38 6,960 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 15 . SR-22 EB Ramps/Town & Country Road NBL 100 0 0 100 247 0 0 247 NBT 189 0 4 193 462 0 2 464 NBR 33 0 0 33 77 0 0 77 SBL 344 0 0 344 289 0 0 289 SBT 340 0 1 341 167 0 2 169 SBR 677 0 1 678 512 0 4 516 EBL 354 0 6 360 650 0 4 654 EBT 146 0 1 147 190 0 1 191 EBR 196 0 0 196 95 0 0 95 WBL 104 0 0 104 68 0 0 68 WBT 133 0 1 134 174 0 2 176 WBR 139 0 0 139 481 0 0 481 North Leg Approach 1,361 0 2 1,363 968 0 6 974 Departure 682 0 10 692 1,593 0 6 1,599 Total 2,043 0 12 2,055 2,561 0 12 2,573 South Leg Approach 322 0 4 326 786 0 2 788 Departure 640 0 1 641 330 0 2 332 Total 962 0 5 967 1,116 0 4 1,120 East Leg Approach 376 0 1 377 723 0 2 725 Departure 523 0 1 524 556 0 1 557 Total 899 0 2 901 1,279 0 3 1,282 West Leg Approach 696 0 7 703 935 0 5 940 Departure 910 0 2 912 933 0 6 939 Total 1,606 0 9 1,615 1,868 0 11 1,879 Total Approaches Approach 2,755 0 14 2,769 3,412 0 15 3,427 Departure 2,755 0 14 2,769 3,412 0 15 3,427 Total 5,510 0 28 5,538 6,824 0 30 6,854 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary 2,040 Volumes AM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 2,040 Volumes PM Peak WP Adjust. Hour Project Trips 2,040 With Project 16 . Memory Lane/Lawson Way NBL 1 0 0 1 9 0 0 9 NBT 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 NBR 3 0 0 3 7 0 0 7 SBL 18 0 0 18 22 0 0 22 SBT 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 SBR 358 0 1 359 200 0 2 202 EBL 173 0 4 177 418 0 2 420 EBT 296 0 2 298 355 0 1 356 EBR 7 0 0 7 16 0 0 16 WBL 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 WBT 315 0 1 316 233 0 2 235 WBR 8 0 0 8 19 0 0 19 North Leg Approach 377 0 1 378 226 0 2 228 Departure 184 0 4 188 439 0 2 441 Total 561 0 5 566 665 0 4 669 South Leg Approach 7 0 0 7 18 0 0 18 Departure 8 0 0 8 24 0 0 24 Total 15 0 0 15 42 0 0 42 East Leg Approach 323 0 1 324 256 0 2 258 Departure 317 0 2 319 384 0 1 385 Total 640 0 3 643 640 0 3 643 West Leg Approach 476 0 6 482 789 0 3 792 Departure 674 0 2 676 442 0 4 446 Total 1,150 0 8 1,158 1,231 0 7 1,238 Total Approaches Approach 1,183 0 8 1,191 1,289 0 7 1,296 Departure 1,183 0 8 1,191 1,289 0 7 1,296 Total 2,366 0 16 2,382 2,578 0 14 2,592 Analysis12040 P TM Santiago - 9/12/2019 The Addington Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2,040 2,040 Project 2,040 2,040 2,040 Project 2,040 Without Without Trips Plus Without Without Trips Plus Project Project Project Project Project Project 9 . Main StreetlEdgewood Road-11-5 Ramps NBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBT 688 1 10 699 1,232 30 1,262 NBR 98 -1 0 97 128 0 128 SBU 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 SBL 71 -1 0 70 118 2 0 120 SBT 1,658 44 1,702 1,687 2 29 1,718 SBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 160 0 160 134 -2 0 132 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 101 0 101 101 -2 0 99 NWBR 726 5 731 420 15 435 NWHR 24 0 24 11 0 11 North Leg Approach 1,729 0 44 1,773 1,805 4 29 1,838 Departure 1,515 2 15 1,532 1,753 -2 45 1,796 Total 3,244 2 59 3,305 3,558 2 74 3,634 South Leg Approach 786 0 10 796 1,360 0 30 1,390 Departure 1,818 0 44 1,862 1,821 0 29 1,850 Total 2,604 0 54 2,658 3,181 0 59 3,240 East Leg Approach 261 0 0 261 235 A 0 231 Departure 193 -2 0 191 257 2 0 259 Total 454 -2 0 452 493 -2 0 491 West Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southeast Leg Approach 750 0 5 755 431 0 15 446 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 750 0 5 755 431 0 15 446 Total Approaches Approach 3,526 0 59 3,585 3,831 0 74 3,905 Departure 3,526 0 59 3,585 3,831 0 74 3,905 Total 7,052 0 118 7,170 7,663 0 148 7,811 D:Wmjs %W-225 Main Stre `Anatys Of1sIX September 2919 Revise mllysrs12059 P&1e9 TMSantiago Table B-3 - Year 2040 With Option E -Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Peak Hour Volume Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2,040 2,040 Project 2,040 2,040 2,040 Project 2,040 Without Without Trips Plus Without Without Trips Plus Project Project Project Project Project Project 10 . Main Street/Santa Clara Avenue-1-5 NB On Ramp NBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 NBL 8 0 8 10 0 10 NBT 605 4 609 1,070 11 1,081 NBR 717 0 717 1,010 0 1,010 SBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBL 148 12 160 356 8 364 SBT 1,555 24 1,579 1,397 16 1,413 SBR 115 8 123 68 5 73 EBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 EBL 181 7 188 290 20 310 EBT 458 0 458 586 0 586 EBR 223 0 223 162 0 162 WBU 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 WBR 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEBR 744 0 744 467 0 467 SEHR 36 0 36 18 0 18 North Leg Approach 1,818 0 44 1,862 1,821 0 29 1,850 Departure 786 0 11 797 1,360 0 31 1,391 Total 2,604 0 55 2,659 3,181 0 60 3,241 South Leg Approach 1,330 0 4 1,334 2,090 0 11 2,101 Departure 2,522 0 24 2,546 2,026 0 16 2,042 Total 3,852 0 28 3,880 4,116 0 27 4,143 East Leg Approach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Departure 1,323 0 12 1,335 1,952 0 8 1,960 Total 1,323 0 12 1,335 1,952 0 8 1,960 West Leg Approach 862 0 7 869 1,038 0 20 1,058 Departure 159 0 8 167 96 0 5 101 Total 1,020 0 15 1,035 1,134 0 25 1,159 Northwest Leg Approach 780 0 0 780 485 0 0 485 Departure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 780 0 0 780 485 0 0 485 Total Approaches Approach 4,790 0 55 4,845 5,434 0 60 5,494 Departure 4,790 0 55 4,845 5,434 0 60 5,494 Total 9,580 0 110 9,690 10,868 0 120 10,988 D:Wmjs %W-225 Main Stre `Anatys Of1sIX September 2919 Revise mllysrs12059 P&1e9 TMSantiago Table B-4 - Existing With Option E -Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Roadway Segment Daily Volume Worksheet Roadway Segment Existing 2017 Daily Project Trips Existing Plus Project Santa Clara Avenue 1 Broadway to Main Street 9,344 280 9,624 Buffalo Avenue 2 Broadway to Main Street 4,293 s 4,301 Main Street 3 Town and Country Road to La Veta Street 34,853 370 35,223 4 Memory Lane to Town and Country Road 30,066 499 30,565 5 1-5 Northbound Ramps to Memory Lane 31,196 908 32,104 6 1-5 Northbound Ramps to 15 Southbound On -Ramp 27,140 756 27,896 7 South of 1-5 Southbound On -Ramp to 17th Street 30,532 198 30,730 La Veta Avenue 8 Main Street to SR-22 Westbound Ramps 24,136 220 24,356 Town and Country Road 9 Main Street to Lawson Way 18,649 129 18,778 Memory Lane 10 Main Street to Lawson Way 9,500 1 107 1 9,607 D:AProjedsARE - 2525 Main StreedMalysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAxRomlw y LOSAExist P Santiago V olomes (9/12/2019) Table B-5 -Opening Year Cumulative With Option E -Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Roadway Segment Daily Volume Worksheet Roadway Segment OY NP Daily Project Trips OY With Project Santa Clara Avenue 1 Broadway to Main Street 9,479 280 9,759 Buffalo Avenue 2 Broadway to Main Street 4,355 s 4,363 Main Street 3 Town and Country Road to La Veta Street 39,066 370 39,436 4 Memory Lane to Town and Country Road 32,972 499 33,471. 5 1-5 Northbound Ramps to Memory Lane 34,976 908 35,884 6 1-5 Northbound Ramps to 15 Southbound On -Ramp 31,460 756 32,216 7 South of 1-5 Southbound On -Ramp to 17th Street 33,679 198 33,877 La Veta Avenue 8 Main Street to SR-22 Westbound Ramps 26,222 220 26,442 Town and Country Road 9 Main Street to Lawson Way 23,294 129 23,423 Memory Lane 10 Main Street to Lawson Way 11,794 1 107 1 11,901 D:AProjedsARE - 2525 Main StmedMalysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAxRomlw y LOSAOY P Santiago Volumes (9/12/2019) Table B-6 - Year 2040 With Option E - Main street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Access and Discovery Cube Parking Roadway Segment Daily Volume Worksheet Roadway Segment 2040 NP Daily Project Trips 2040 With Project Santa Clara Avenue 1 Broadway to Main Street 10,382 280 10,662 Buffalo Avenue 2 Broadway to Main Street 4,770 8 4,778 Main Street 3 Town and Country Road to La Veta Street 41,530 370 41,900 4 Memory Lane to Town and Country Road 34,935 499 35,434 5 1-5 Northbound Ramps to Memory Lane 35,210 908 36,118 6 1-5 Northbound Ramps to 15 Southbound On -Ramp 33,033 756 33,789 7 South of 1-5 Southbound On -Ramp to 17th Street 35,363 198 35,561 La Veta Avenue 8 Main Street to SR-22 Westbound Ramps 27,533 220 27,753 Town and Country Road 9 Main Street to Lawson Way 24,459 129 24,588 Memory Lane 10 Main Street to Lawson Way 12,384 1 107 1 12,491 D:AProjedsARE - 2525 Main StmedMalysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAxRomlw y LOSA2040 P Santiago Volumes (9/12/2019) ! (§ ! !m )!CL ;; 0 ;i\))\\ 9 z t !.9m2 2 § :: ¥§ ) §!G@\ / !�e!- (§ ! !m )!CL ;; 0 !i\))\\ 9 z t !.9m2 2 §);/ !7/ Memorandum: The Addington Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis ATTACHMENT B: LOS WORKSHEETS P%RE-2525 MAIN STREEMNALYSIS OFFSEFSEPTENBER Z1MIEWSNPPLENENTALANALYSIS N X SW.3,F 19 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Broadway & 1-5 SB Off -Ramp 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow r ++ ++ 891 0 435 605 0 891 0 435 605 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 96 96 96 96 96 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 928 0 453 630 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 1 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 - 0 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 0 - HCM Lane LOS - A - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - - The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago ParkM/alkie Way 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j T+ 41) ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 0 0 0 19 1249 0 1 1351 11 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 0 0 0 19 1249 0 1 1351 11 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 0 1 0 0 0 21 1373 0 1 1485 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 683 0 555 0 654 0 30 2676 0 2 2656 21 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 5274 0 1781 5225 42 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 0 1 0 0 0 21 1373 0 1 968 529 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1863 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 23.4 23.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 23.4 23.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 683 0 555 0 654 0 30 2676 0 2 1730 947 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.51 0.00 0.51 0.56 0.56 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 683 0 555 0 654 0 193 2676 0 193 1730 947 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.68 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.4 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.7 0.0 0.0 59.9 20.3 20.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.7 0.0 44.3 0.9 1.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.1 9.3 10.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.4 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.3 0.7 0.0 104.2 21.2 21.9 LnGrp LOS C A C A A A E A A F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 3 0 1394 1498 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.4 0.0 1.7 21.5 Approach LOS C A C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 47.0 7.0 66.0 47.0 5.1 67.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 13.0 61.0 31.0 13.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.1 3.4 25.4 0.0 2.1 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 0.0 9.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 12.0 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 1 1271 12 0 1 1271 12 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 1 1382 92 92 2 2 13 0 1356 1356 0 Free None 0 0 92 2 1474 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 698 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 328 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 0 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 328 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 328 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0 - The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 119 196 26 0 0 0 0 976 33 717 1418 0 Future Volume (vehrh) 119 196 26 0 0 0 0 976 33 717 1418 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 127 209 28 0 1038 35 763 1509 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 158 278 38 0 1712 58 1449 4056 0 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.56 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1208 2127 293 0 5241 171 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 190 0 174 0 696 377 763 1509 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/lnl810 0 1818 0 1702 1840 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.3 0.0 11.0 0.0 20.4 20.5 16.6 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.3 0.0 11.0 0.0 20.4 20.5 16.6 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.67 0.16 0.00 0.09 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 236 0 237 0 1149 621 1449 4056 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.53 0.37 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 354 0 356 0 1149 621 1449 4056 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.51 0.51 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 50.7 0.0 50.1 0.0 33.1 33.1 19.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.9 0.0 4.3 0.0 2.4 4.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr6.1 0.0 5.3 0.0 8.8 9.8 5.9 0.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 58.6 0.0 54.4 0.0 35.5 37.5 19.3 0.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A D A D D B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 364 1073 2272 Approach Delay, s/veh 56.6 36.2 6.6 Approach LOS E D A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),54.8 45.0 20.2 99.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (GmaqS 40.5 23.5 87.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+[M,6; 22.5 14.3 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.0 7.0 1.4 18.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 20.0 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.6 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44 44 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 2 96 67 0 180 0 58 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 2 96 67 0 180 0 58 0 1 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 116 81 0 217 0 70 0 1 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RighNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.3 8.8 8.6 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 58% 100% 100% 2% 41% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 59 165 180 0 58 2 0 0 0 96 180 0 1 67 0 0 71 199 217 0 1 1 1 1 0.099 0.226 0.26 0 5.01 4.101 4.314 4.929 Yes Yes Yes Yes 717 879 835 0 3.031 2.115 2.327 2.955 0.099 0.226 0.26 0 8.6 8.3 8.8 8 A A A N 0.3 0.9 1 0 The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/03/2019 Movement --10 -�* 4\ /,* I�:i��:la9r1:1�9r1:i9� �I:l� �I:l 7 Lane Configurations ttlL r ►j ttt ►) jr Traffic Volume (veh/h) 332 233 266 454 899 479 Future Volume (veh/h) 332 233 266 454 899 479 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 369 0 296 504 999 532 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Q Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1455 339 2713 1231 866 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.00 0.19 0.53 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 369 0 296 504 999 532 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 0.0 12.9 4.1 20.9 18.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 0.0 12.9 4.1 20.9 18.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1455 339 2713 1231 866 V/C Ratio(X) 0.25 0.87 0.19 0.81 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1455 412 2713 1231 866 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.0 0.0 31.5 9.8 23.3 12.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 16.1 0.2 5.9 3.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr9.8 0.0 6.9 1.4 9.0 6.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.5 0.0 47.5 9.9 29.2 15.6 LnGrp LOS C D A C B Approach Vol, veh/h 369 A 800 1531 Approach Delay, s/veh 22.5 23.8 24.5 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), fi9.7 27.3 47.0 33.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmalo S 19.5 42.5 28.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+[M,9; 6.5 6.1 22.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 2.0 3.8 3.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 24.0 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/03/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 304 104 118 65 64 107 25 128 20 348 309 609 Future Volume (veh/h) 304 104 118 65 64 107 25 128 20 348 309 609 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 342 117 133 73 72 120 28 144 22 391 600 516 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 357 208 237 94 746 333 356 620 93 511 536 454 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.29 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 799 908 1781 3554 1585 1781 3098 465 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 342 0 250 73 72 120 28 81 85 391 600 516 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/lnl728 0 1707 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1787 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.9 0.0 11.4 3.6 1.5 5.8 1.1 3.5 3.6 18.1 25.8 25.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.9 0.0 11.4 3.6 1.5 5.8 1.1 3.5 3.6 18.1 25.8 25.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 357 0 445 94 746 333 356 355 357 511 536 454 V/C Ratio(X) 0.96 0.00 0.56 0.78 0.10 0.36 0.08 0.23 0.24 0.77 1.12 1.14 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 357 0 445 129 746 333 356 355 357 511 536 454 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh40.2 0.0 28.8 42.1 28.7 30.4 29.3 30.2 30.2 29.3 32.1 32.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 36.5 0.0 5.1 18.3 0.3 3.0 0.4 1.5 1.6 10.5 75.9 84.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/Ir5.5 0.0 5.2 2.1 0.6 2.5 0.5 1.6 1.7 9.0 22.5 20.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 76.7 0.0 33.9 60.4 28.9 33.4 29.7 31.7 31.8 39.8 108.0 117.0 LnGrp LOS E A C E C C C C C D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 592 265 194 1507 Approach Delay, s/veh 58.6 39.6 31.4 93.4 Approach LOS E D C F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.2 28.0 30.3 13.8 23.4 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma)4,5 21.7 25.8 9.3 18.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l'�,6; 13.4 27.8 10.9 7.8 5.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 75.1 HCM 6th LOS E User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & 1-5 NB Ramps/Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR2 WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL2 SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r ►) ++T+ ►j +TT r Traffic Volume (vph) 6 5 79 129 15 91 77 471 83 64 1275 17 Future Volume (vph) 6 5 79 129 15 91 77 471 83 64 1275 17 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 1583 1783 1583 3433 4971 1770 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.85 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1585 1583 1377 1583 3433 4971 1770 5085 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 5 86 140 16 99 84 512 90 70 1386 18 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 74 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 11 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 12 12 0 156 14 84 602 0 70 1386 7 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 4.0 39.8 7.8 43.6 43.6 Effective Green, g (s) 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 4.0 39.8 7.8 43.6 43.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.33 0.06 0.36 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 221 221 192 221 114 1648 115 1847 575 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.12 0.04 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.01 c0.11 0.01 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.05 0.81 0.06 0.74 0.37 0.61 0.75 0.01 Uniform Delay, d1 44.7 44.7 50.1 44.8 57.5 30.5 54.6 33.4 24.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.13 0.67 0.59 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 22.4 0.1 21.1 0.6 7.9 2.6 0.0 Delay (s) 44.8 44.8 72.4 44.9 81.9 35.0 44.5 22.4 24.5 Level of Service D D E D F C D C C Approach Delay (s) 44.8 61.7 40.7 23.5 Approach LOS D E D C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 37.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & 1-5 NB Ramps/Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 t r Movement I0PDICa0LTA I.: Traffic Volume (vph) 714 22 Future Volume (vph) 714 22 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.88 Frt 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2787 Flt Permitted 1.00 Q Satd. Flow (perm) 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 776 24 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 800 0 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 9 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 37.6 Effective Green, g (s) 37.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 873 v/s Ratio Prot c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.92 Uniform Delay, d1 39.7 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 14.1 Delay (s) 53.8 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 127 396 201 7 504 584 58 1320 105 591 32 Future Volume (vph) 127 396 201 7 504 584 58 1320 105 591 32 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3219 3433 5085 1583 3433 5029 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3219 3433 5085 1583 3433 5029 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 135 421 214 7 536 621 62 1404 112 629 34 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 45 0 0 0 402 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 121 604 0 7 536 219 62 1516 0 663 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.3 24.3 1.0 40.2 40.2 6.8 46.0 30.7 Effective Green, g (s) 24.3 24.3 1.0 40.2 40.2 6.8 46.0 30.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.38 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 326 651 28 1703 530 194 1927 713 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.19 0.00 0.11 0.02 c0.30 c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm c0.14 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.93 0.25 0.31 0.41 0.32 0.79 0.93 Uniform Delay, d1 41.3 47.0 59.1 29.7 30.8 54.4 32.7 43.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.53 0.43 4.12 0.49 0.23 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 19.5 3.9 0.4 2.0 0.7 2.3 18.4 Delay (s) 42.0 66.5 94.4 13.3 128.9 27.1 10.0 62.0 Level of Service D E F B F C B E Approach Delay (s) 62.6 75.5 10.7 Approach LOS E E B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 46.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Broadway & 1-5 SB Off -Ramp 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow r ++ ++ 835 0 778 569 0 835 0 778 569 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 96 96 96 96 96 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 870 0 810 593 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 1 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 - 0 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 0 - HCM Lane LOS - A - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - - The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago ParkM/alkie Way 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j T+ 41) ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 0 0 0 25 1227 0 1 1534 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 0 0 0 25 1227 0 1 1534 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 0 23 0 0 0 27 1319 0 1 1649 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 678 0 550 0 649 0 35 2691 0 2 2677 3 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 5274 0 1781 5267 6 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 0 23 0 0 0 27 1319 0 1 1066 585 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1869 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 26.9 26.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 26.9 26.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 678 0 550 0 649 0 35 2691 0 2 1730 950 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.49 0.00 0.51 0.62 0.62 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 678 0 550 0 649 0 193 2691 0 193 1730 950 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.66 0.66 0.66 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.7 0.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.4 0.0 0.0 59.9 21.1 21.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.5 0.6 0.0 96.6 1.1 2.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 10.7 12.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.8 0.0 26.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 85.8 0.6 0.0 156.5 22.2 23.1 LnGrp LOS C A C A A A F A A F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 32 0 1346 1652 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.0 0.0 2.4 22.6 Approach LOS C A C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.6 7.4 66.0 46.6 5.1 68.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 13.0 61.0 31.0 13.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.2 3.8 28.9 0.0 2.1 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 15.5 0.0 0.0 14.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 13.6 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 9 1243 3 0 9 1243 3 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 10 1351 92 92 2 2 3 0 1555 1555 0 Free None 0 0 92 2 1690 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 677 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 339 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 0 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 339 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.9 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 339 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.029 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 15.9 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0.1 - The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 291 167 46 0 0 0 0 1398 38 679 1103 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 291 167 46 0 0 0 0 1398 38 679 1103 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 310 178 49 0 1487 40 722 1173 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 351 278 77 0 1896 51 1105 3718 0 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.64 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1412 389 0 5280 138 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 310 0 227 0 990 537 722 1173 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1800 0 1702 1846 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 20.3 0.0 13.9 0.0 31.0 31.0 15.5 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.3 0.0 13.9 0.0 31.0 31.0 15.5 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.07 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 351 0 354 0 1262 684 1105 3718 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.65 0.32 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 396 0 401 0 1262 684 1105 3718 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.70 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.9 0.0 44.3 0.0 33.5 33.5 17.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 18.9 0.0 2.8 0.0 4.9 8.8 1.0 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/Ilr0.8 0.0 6.5 0.0 13.5 15.4 4.4 0.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 65.7 0.0 47.1 0.0 38.4 42.3 18.5 0.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A D A D D B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 537 1527 1895 Approach Delay, s/veh 57.9 39.8 7.1 Approach LOS E D A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),42.9 49.0 28.1 91.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma'0,3 44.5 26.7 84.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+IM,E5 33.0 22.3 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.6 7.5 1.3 12.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 26.6 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.6 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 115 58 0 140 0 85 0 0 1 1 4 Future Vol, veh/h 0 115 58 0 140 0 85 0 0 1 1 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 139 70 0 169 0 102 0 0 1 1 5 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.6 8.6 8.8 7.6 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q 100% 0% 0% 17% 0% 66% 100% 17% 0% 34% 0% 67% Stop Stop Stop Stop 85 173 140 6 85 0 0 1 0 115 140 1 0 58 0 4 102 208 169 7 1 1 1 1 0.141 0.243 0.207 0.009 4.967 4.196 4.428 4.532 Yes Yes Yes Yes 723 859 813 789 2.993 2.211 2.446 2.563 0.141 0.242 0.208 0.009 8.8 8.6 8.6 7.6 A A A A 0.5 1 0.8 0 The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/03/2019 --10 -�* 4\ /,* Movement Lane Configurations ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 625 Future Volume (veh/h) 625 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 658 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 Cap, vehrh Arrive On Green Sat Flow, vehrh MD.% 946 497 440 415 128 946 497 440 415 128 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No No 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 523 463 437 135 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 2 2 2 2 2 570 3383 778 864 0.29 0.00 0.32 0.66 0.22 0.22 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 658 0 523 463 437 135 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.4 0.0 22.6 2.7 9.0 3.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.4 0.0 22.6 2.7 9.0 3.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1462 570 3383 778 864 V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.92 0.14 0.56 0.16 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1462 679 3383 778 864 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.4 0.0 26.2 5.0 27.5 9.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 15.8 0.1 2.9 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr8.4 0.0 11.6 0.8 3.9 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.4 0.0 42.0 5.1 30.4 9.4 LnGrp LOS C D A C A Approach Vol, veh/h 658 A 986 572 Approach Delay, s/veh 24.4 24.7 25.5 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 a 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),30.1 27.4 57.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma3q,5 18.0 53.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+124,t� 10.4 4.7 11.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 2.6 3.6 1.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.8 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/03/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 583 103 25 11 146 461 186 438 52 185 107 420 Future Volume (veh/h) 583 103 25 11 146 461 186 438 52 185 107 420 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 614 108 26 12 154 485 196 461 55 195 360 278 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 672 554 133 26 711 317 366 658 78 356 374 317 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 1457 351 1781 3554 1585 1781 3199 380 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 614 0 134 12 154 485 196 255 261 195 360 278 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/lnl728 0 1807 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1802 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.7 0.0 4.5 0.6 3.3 18.0 8.8 12.0 12.1 8.9 17.2 15.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.7 0.0 4.5 0.6 3.3 18.0 8.8 12.0 12.1 8.9 17.2 15.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 672 0 687 26 711 317 366 365 370 356 374 317 V/C Ratio(X) 0.91 0.00 0.20 0.47 0.22 1.53 0.54 0.70 0.70 0.55 0.96 0.88 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 672 0 687 99 711 317 366 365 370 356 374 317 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.5 0.0 18.7 44.0 30.1 36.0 31.9 33.2 33.2 32.3 35.7 34.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 17.1 0.0 0.1 12.7 0.2 253.9 5.5 10.6 10.7 5.9 38.0 27.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr8.0 0.0 1.9 0.4 1.4 29.1 4.3 6.1 6.3 4.3 11.6 8.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.6 0.0 18.8 56.7 30.3 289.9 37.4 43.8 43.9 38.3 73.6 62.1 LnGrp LOS D A B E C F D D D D E E Approach Vol, veh/h 748 651 712 833 Approach Delay, s/veh 46.5 224.2 42.1 61.5 Approach LOS D F D E Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 5.8 38.7 22.5 22.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 5.0 30.5 18.0 17.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 14.1 2.6 6.5 19.2 17.7 20.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 89.0 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & 1-5 NB Ramps/Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR2 WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL2 SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r ►) ++T+ ►j +TT r Traffic Volume (vph) 30 12 73 97 21 91 239 829 103 106 1311 138 Future Volume (vph) 30 12 73 97 21 91 239 829 103 106 1311 138 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1798 1583 1789 1583 3433 5001 1770 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.69 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1292 1583 1369 1583 3433 5001 1770 5085 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 31 12 75 100 22 94 246 855 106 109 1352 142 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 65 0 0 82 0 0 0 0 0 51 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 43 10 0 122 12 246 961 0 109 1352 91 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 13.2 53.2 15.2 55.2 55.2 Effective Green, g (s) 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 13.2 53.2 15.2 55.2 55.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.11 0.44 0.13 0.46 0.46 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 166 204 176 204 377 2217 224 2339 728 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.19 0.06 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.01 c0.09 0.01 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.05 0.69 0.06 0.65 0.43 0.49 0.58 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 47.1 45.8 50.0 45.9 51.2 23.0 48.8 23.8 18.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.68 0.42 0.17 0.09 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.1 11.2 0.1 3.5 0.5 1.4 0.9 0.3 Delay (s) 47.9 45.9 61.2 46.0 54.8 39.2 21.7 5.0 2.0 Level of Service D D E D D D C A A Approach Delay (s) 46.6 54.6 42.3 5.9 Approach LOS D D D A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & 1-5 NB Ramps/Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 t r Movement I0PDICa0LTA I.: Traffic Volume (vph) 296 6 Future Volume (vph) 296 6 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.88 Frt 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2787 Flt Permitted 1.00 Q Satd. Flow (perm) 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 305 6 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 311 0 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 9 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 18.1 Effective Green, g (s) 18.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 420 v/s Ratio Prot C0.11 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.74 Uniform Delay, d1 48.7 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.9 Delay (s) 55.6 Level of Service E Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 204 485 146 9 967 712 113 1303 65 334 16 Future Volume (vph) 204 485 146 9 967 712 113 1303 65 334 16 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3271 3433 5085 1583 3433 5049 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3271 3433 5085 1583 3433 5049 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 222 527 159 10 1051 774 123 1416 71 363 17 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 21 0 0 0 254 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 200 687 0 10 1051 520 123 1487 0 380 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 27.2 27.2 1.0 49.9 49.9 6.0 54.9 18.9 Effective Green, g (s) 27.2 27.2 1.0 49.9 49.9 6.0 54.9 18.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.01 0.42 0.42 0.05 0.46 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 364 741 28 2114 658 171 2309 438 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.21 0.00 0.21 0.04 c0.29 c0.14 v/s Ratio Perm c0.33 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.93 0.36 0.50 0.79 0.72 0.64 0.87 Uniform Delay, d1 41.0 45.4 59.2 25.8 30.5 56.2 25.0 49.3 Progression Factor 1.05 1.06 0.53 0.22 0.61 1.21 0.88 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 13.1 5.1 0.6 6.4 11.8 1.2 16.4 Delay (s) 44.4 61.2 36.3 6.2 24.9 80.0 23.3 65.7 Level of Service D E D A C E C E Approach Delay (s) 57.5 14.2 27.6 Approach LOS E B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T+ ►j T+ ►j ++T+ ►j TTi� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 44 0 30 19 1249 16 11 1351 11 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 44 0 30 19 1249 16 11 1351 11 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 0 1 48 0 33 21 1373 18 12 1485 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 387 0 344 74 0 66 29 2997 39 19 2985 24 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.58 0.58 0.01 0.57 0.57 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 5194 68 1781 5225 42 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 0 1 48 0 33 21 900 491 12 968 529 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1702 1858 1781 1702 1863 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 0.1 3.5 0.0 2.6 1.5 19.8 19.8 0.9 22.1 22.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.1 3.5 0.0 2.6 1.5 19.8 19.8 0.9 22.1 22.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 387 0 344 74 0 66 29 1964 1072 19 1945 1064 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.50 0.72 0.46 0.46 0.62 0.50 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 387 0 344 343 0 305 96 1964 1072 82 1945 1064 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.9 0.0 39.9 61.4 0.0 61.0 63.6 15.8 15.8 64.0 16.7 16.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 0.0 5.9 28.2 0.8 1.4 20.0 0.6 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 1.2 0.9 7.6 8.5 0.5 8.5 9.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 39.9 0.0 39.9 70.7 0.0 66.9 91.8 16.6 17.2 84.0 17.3 17.8 LnGrp LOS D A D E A E F B B F B B Approach Vol, veh/h 3 81 1412 1509 Approach Delay, s/veh 39.9 69.1 17.9 18.0 Approach LOS D E B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 33.2 7.1 79.3 10.4 6.4 80.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 7.0 73.0 25.0 6.0 75.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.1 3.5 24.1 5.5 2.9 21.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 14.6 0.2 0.0 13.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 19.4 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4T+ ++T+ ► i +tt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 119 196 26 0 0 0 0 979 33 732 1428 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 119 196 26 0 0 0 0 979 33 732 1428 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 125 206 27 0 1031 35 771 1503 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 157 276 37 0 1683 57 1437 4027 0 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.83 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1209 2132 287 0 5240 172 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 187 0 171 0 692 374 771 1503 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1810 0 1819 0 1702 1839 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.0 0.0 9.9 0.0 18.7 18.8 7.5 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.0 0.0 9.9 0.0 18.7 18.8 7.5 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.67 0.16 0.00 0.09 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 234 0 236 0 1130 610 1437 4027 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.54 0.37 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 337 0 339 0 1130 610 1437 4027 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.49 0.49 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.5 0.0 46.0 0.0 30.8 30.8 6.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.4 0.0 4.3 0.0 2.5 4.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 5.5 0.0 4.8 0.0 7.9 8.9 1.8 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 54.9 0.0 50.3 0.0 33.3 35.4 6.2 0.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A D A C D A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 358 1066 2274 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.7 34.0 2.2 Approach LOS D C A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 50.2 41.0 18.8 91.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.5 36.5 20.5 80.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 9.5 20.8 13.0 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.1 6.2 1.2 17.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 16.3 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 6 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.6 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44 4+ 44 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 96 67 0 180 0 58 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 96 67 0 180 0 58 0 1 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 116 81 0 217 0 70 0 1 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB > B Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.3 8.8 8.6 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 98% 0% 0% 0% Vol Thru, % 0% 59% 100% 100% Vol Right, % 2% 41% 0% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 59 163 180 0 LT Vol 58 0 0 0 Through Vol 0 96 180 0 RT Vol 1 67 0 0 Lane Flow Rate 71 196 217 0 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.099 0.223 0.26 0 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.004 4.096 4.311 4.923 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 717 880 835 0 Service Time 3.026 2.109 2.324 2.95 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.099 0.223 0.26 0 HCM Control Delay 8.6 8.3 8.8 8 HCM Lane LOS A A A N HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.9 1 0 The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 7 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 10/06/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft r ►j +T+ ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 310 105 118 65 65 107 25 132 20 348 310 610 Future Volume (veh/h) 310 105 118 65 65 107 25 132 20 348 310 610 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 348 118 133 73 73 120 28 148 22 391 601 516 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 357 209 236 94 746 333 356 622 91 511 536 454 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.29 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 803 905 1781 3554 1585 1781 3111 455 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 348 0 251 73 73 120 28 83 87 391 601 516 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 0 1708 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1789 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.0 0.0 11.5 3.6 1.5 5.8 1.1 3.5 3.7 18.1 25.8 25.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.0 0.0 11.5 3.6 1.5 5.8 1.1 3.5 3.7 18.1 25.8 25.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 357 0 445 94 746 333 356 355 358 511 536 454 V/C Ratio(X) 0.97 0.00 0.56 0.78 0.10 0.36 0.08 0.23 0.24 0.77 1.12 1.14 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 357 0 445 129 746 333 356 355 358 511 536 454 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.2 0.0 28.8 42.1 28.7 30.4 29.3 30.2 30.3 29.3 32.1 32.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 40.7 0.0 5.1 18.3 0.3 3.0 0.4 1.5 1.6 10.5 76.5 84.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 5.8 0.0 5.2 2.1 0.7 2.5 0.5 1.6 1.7 9.0 22.6 20.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 80.9 0.0 33.9 60.4 28.9 33.4 29.7 31.8 31.9 39.8 108.6 117.0 LnGrp LOS F A C E C C C C C D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 599 266 198 1508 Approach Delay, s/veh 61.2 39.6 31.5 93.6 Approach LOS E D C F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.2 28.0 30.3 13.8 23.4 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 21.7 25.8 9.3 18.9 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 5.6 13.5 27.8 11.0 7.8 5.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 75.7 HCM 6th LOS E User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 10/06/2019 --O� -�* f" 4\ /01 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ttt r ►j ttt ► i r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 335 239 266 455 902 479 Future Volume (veh/h) 335 239 266 455 902 479 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 372 0 296 506 1002 532 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1455 339 2713 1231 866 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.00 0.19 0.53 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 372 0 296 506 1002 532 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 0.0 12.9 4.1 21.0 18.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 0.0 12.9 4.1 21.0 18.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1455 339 2713 1231 866 V/C Ratio(X) 0.26 0.87 0.19 0.81 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1455 412 2713 1231 866 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.1 0.0 31.5 9.8 23.3 12.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 16.1 0.2 6.0 3.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.8 0.0 6.9 1.4 9.1 6.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.5 0.0 47.5 9.9 29.3 15.6 LnGrp LOS C D A C B Approach Vol, veh/h 372 A 802 1534 Approach Delay, s/veh 22.5 23.8 24.6 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.7 27.3 47.0 33.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 19.5 42.5 28.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 14.9 6.5 6.1 23.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 2.0 3.9 3.1 j Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 24.1 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR2 WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL2 SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r ►) ++T+ ►j +TT r Traffic Volume (vph) 6 5 79 129 15 91 77 482 82 64 1319 17 Future Volume (vph) 6 5 79 129 15 91 77 482 82 64 1319 17 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1813 1583 1783 1583 3433 4974 1770 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.86 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 1583 1378 1583 3433 4974 1770 5085 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 6 5 81 133 15 94 79 497 85 66 1360 18 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 70 0 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 12 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 11 11 0 148 13 79 582 0 66 1360 6 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 4.0 35.9 7.3 39.2 39.2 Effective Green, g (s) 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 4.0 35.9 7.3 39.2 39.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.33 0.07 0.36 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 228 224 195 224 124 1623 117 1812 564 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.12 0.04 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.01 c0.11 0.01 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.05 0.76 0.06 0.64 0.36 0.56 0.75 0.01 Uniform Delay, d1 40.8 40.8 45.4 40.9 52.3 28.3 49.8 31.1 22.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 15.5 0.1 9.9 0.6 6.1 2.9 0.0 Delay (s) 40.9 40.9 60.9 41.0 34.2 8.6 55.9 34.0 22.9 Level of Service D D E D C A E C C Approach Delay (s) 40.9 53.2 11.7 34.9 Approach LOS D D B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 35.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 t r Movement I0PDII 0LYNI.% Traffic Volume (vph) 719 22 Future Volume (vph) 719 22 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.88 Frt 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2787 Flt Permitted 1.00 Q Satd. Flow (perm) 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 741 23 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 764 0 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 9 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 33.2 Effective Green, g (s) 33.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 841 v/s Ratio Prot c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.91 Uniform Delay, d1 36.9 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 13.4 Delay (s) 50.4 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave & Sasnta Clara Ave 09/13/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 134 396 201 7 508 584 70 1344 113 591 32 Future Volume (vph) 134 396 201 7 508 584 70 1344 113 591 32 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3219 3433 5085 1583 3433 5026 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3219 3433 5085 1583 3433 5026 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 141 417 212 7 535 615 74 1415 119 622 34 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 49 0 0 0 387 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 594 0 7 535 228 74 1534 0 656 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.3 22.3 1.0 36.2 36.2 6.8 42.0 26.7 Effective Green, g (s) 22.3 22.3 1.0 36.2 36.2 6.8 42.0 26.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.01 0.33 0.33 0.06 0.38 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 326 652 31 1673 520 212 1919 676 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.18 0.00 0.11 0.02 c0.31 c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm c0.14 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.91 0.23 0.32 0.44 0.35 0.80 0.97 Uniform Delay, d1 38.0 42.9 54.1 27.7 28.9 49.5 30.3 41.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.60 4.55 0.48 0.25 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 16.9 3.1 0.4 2.2 0.7 2.6 27.3 Delay (s) 38.7 59.8 33.8 17.1 133.8 24.7 10.1 68.5 Level of Service D E C B F C B E Approach Delay (s) 56.3 79.2 10.8 Approach LOS E E B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 47.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T+ ►j T+ ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 29 0 19 29 1227 45 31 1534 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 29 0 19 29 1227 45 31 1534 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 0 23 31 0 20 31 1319 48 33 1649 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 387 0 345 50 0 45 39 2918 106 42 3047 4 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.58 0.58 0.02 0.58 0.58 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 5057 184 1781 5267 6 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 0 23 31 0 20 31 888 479 33 1066 585 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1702 1837 1781 1702 1869 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 0.0 1.5 2.2 0.0 1.6 2.3 19.4 19.4 2.4 25.0 25.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 0.0 1.5 2.2 0.0 1.6 2.3 19.4 19.4 2.4 25.0 25.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 387 0 345 50 0 45 39 1964 1060 42 1969 1081 V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.62 0.00 0.45 0.79 0.45 0.45 0.79 0.54 0.54 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 387 0 345 343 0 305 96 1964 1060 82 1969 1081 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.64 0.64 0.64 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.0 0.0 40.4 62.5 0.0 62.2 63.3 15.7 15.7 63.1 16.8 16.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.4 11.6 0.0 6.8 28.4 0.8 1.4 18.3 0.7 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.2 0.0 0.6 1.2 0.0 0.7 1.3 7.5 8.3 1.3 9.6 10.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.1 0.0 40.8 74.1 0.0 69.0 91.7 16.5 17.1 81.4 17.5 18.1 LnGrp LOS D A D E A E F B B F B B Approach Vol, veh/h 32 51 1398 1684 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.6 72.1 18.4 19.0 Approach LOS D E B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 33.3 7.9 80.2 8.7 8.1 80.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 7.0 73.0 25.0 6.0 75.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.5 4.3 27.0 4.2 4.4 21.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.1 0.0 12.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 19.8 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/13/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 15 1286 3 0 15 1286 3 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 16 1398 92 92 2 2 3 0 1588 1588 0 Free None 0 0 92 2 1726 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 701 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 327 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 327 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.6 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 327 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.05 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16.6 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0.2 - The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 292 167 46 0 0 0 0 1408 38 689 1109 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 292 167 46 0 0 0 0 1408 38 689 1109 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 307 176 48 0 1482 40 725 1167 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 360 286 78 0 1770 48 977 3499 0 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.57 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1415 386 0 5280 138 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 307 0 224 0 987 535 725 1167 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1801 0 1702 1846 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.3 0.0 9.1 0.0 21.4 21.4 12.6 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.3 0.0 9.1 0.0 21.4 21.4 12.6 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.21 0.00 0.07 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 360 0 364 0 1179 639 977 3499 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.84 0.84 0.74 0.33 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 0 407 0 1179 639 977 3499 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.63 0.63 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.8 0.0 29.1 0.0 24.1 24.1 15.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 14.7 0.0 2.3 0.0 7.2 12.4 2.0 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr9.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 9.1 10.8 3.5 0.1 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.5 0.0 31.4 0.0 31.2 36.5 17.2 0.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A C A C D B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 531 1522 1892 Approach Delay, s/veh 39.5 33.1 6.7 Approach LOS D C A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),27.1 32.2 20.7 59.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma,t 27.7 18.1 52.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+[M,6; 23.4 15.3 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.6 3.3 0.9 10.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 21.3 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.6 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 116 59 0 140 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 116 59 0 140 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 140 71 0 169 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB >A/S': N♦3 SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.5 8.6 8.8 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 66% 100% 100% 0% 34% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 85 175 140 0 85 0 0 0 0 116 140 0 0 59 0 0 102 211 169 0 1 1 1 1 0.141 0.245 0.207 0 4.957 4.177 4.413 4.903 Yes Yes Yes Yes 724 862 815 0 2.984 2.194 2.431 2.937 0.141 0.245 0.207 0 8.8 8.5 8.6 7.9 A A A N 0.5 1 0.8 0 The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/13/2019 --10 -�* 4\ /,* Movement Lane Configurations ttlL r ►j ttt ►) jr Traffic Volume (veh/h) 627 950 497 443 425 128 Future Volume (veh/h) 627 950 497 443 425 128 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 660 0 523 466 447 135 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Q Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1462 570 3383 778 864 Arrive On Green 0.29 0.00 0.32 0.66 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 660 0 523 466 447 135 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.5 0.0 22.6 2.7 9.2 3.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.5 0.0 22.6 2.7 9.2 3.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1462 570 3383 778 864 V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.92 0.14 0.57 0.16 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1462 679 3383 778 864 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.4 0.0 26.2 5.0 27.6 9.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 15.8 0.1 3.1 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr8.4 0.0 11.6 0.8 4.0 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.4 0.0 42.0 5.1 30.7 9.4 LnGrp LOS C D A C A Approach Vol, veh/h 660 A 989 582 Approach Delay, s/veh 24.4 24.6 25.7 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),30.1 27.4 57.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma3q,5 18.0 53.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+124,(� 10.5 4.7 11.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 2.6 3.6 1.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.8 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/13/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 587 104 25 11 148 461 186 440 52 185 109 424 Future Volume (veh/h) 587 104 25 11 148 461 186 440 52 185 109 424 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 618 109 26 12 156 485 196 463 55 195 363 280 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 672 555 132 26 711 317 366 658 78 356 374 317 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 1460 348 1781 3554 1585 1781 3201 379 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 618 0 135 12 156 485 196 256 262 195 363 280 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1728 0 1808 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1802 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.8 0.0 4.5 0.6 3.3 18.0 8.8 12.0 12.2 8.9 17.3 15.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.8 0.0 4.5 0.6 3.3 18.0 8.8 12.0 12.2 8.9 17.3 15.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 672 0 687 26 711 317 366 365 370 356 374 317 V/C Ratio(X) 0.92 0.00 0.20 0.47 0.22 1.53 0.54 0.70 0.71 0.55 0.97 0.88 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 672 0 687 99 711 317 366 365 370 356 374 317 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 35.6 0.0 18.7 44.0 30.1 36.0 31.9 33.2 33.2 32.3 35.7 35.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 17.9 0.0 0.1 12.7 0.2 253.9 5.5 10.7 10.8 5.9 39.7 28.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr8.2 0.0 1.9 0.4 1.4 29.1 4.3 6.2 6.3 4.3 11.8 8.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 53.5 0.0 18.8 56.7 30.3 289.9 37.4 43.9 44.1 38.3 75.4 63.0 LnGrp LOS D A B E C F D D D D E E Approach Vol, veh/h 753 653 714 838 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.3 223.6 42.2 62.6 Approach LOS D F D E Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 5.8 38.7 22.5 22.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 5.0 30.5 18.0 17.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 14.2 2.6 6.5 19.3 17.8 20.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 89.3 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/12/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR2 WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL2 SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r ►) ++T+ ►j +TT r Traffic Volume (vph) 30 12 73 95 21 89 239 859 103 108 1342 138 Future Volume (vph) 30 12 73 95 21 89 239 859 103 108 1342 138 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1798 1583 1790 1583 3433 5004 1770 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.75 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1399 1583 1370 1583 3433 5004 1770 5085 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 31 12 75 98 22 92 246 886 106 111 1384 142 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 64 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 92 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 43 11 0 120 14 246 992 0 111 1384 50 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 8.6 30.4 6.1 27.9 27.9 Effective Green, g (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 8.6 30.4 6.1 27.9 27.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.38 0.08 0.35 0.35 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 213 241 208 241 369 1901 134 1773 552 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.20 0.06 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.01 c0.09 0.01 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.05 0.58 0.06 0.67 0.52 0.83 0.78 0.09 Uniform Delay, dl 29.6 28.9 31.5 29.0 34.3 19.2 36.4 23.3 17.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.1 3.8 0.1 3.8 0.9 32.5 3.5 0.3 Delay (s) 30.1 29.0 35.3 29.1 23.2 13.6 68.9 26.8 17.8 Level of Service C C D C C B E C B Approach Delay (s) 29.4 32.6 15.5 28.9 Approach LOS C C B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 25.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/12/2019 t r Movement REME :8 Traffic Volume (vph) 311 6 Future Volume (vph) 311 6 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.88 Frt 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2787 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 321 6 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 327 0 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 9 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 13.3 Effective Green, g (s) 13.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 463 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.71 Uniform Delay, dl 31.5 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.9 Delay (s) 36.4 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary ow The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/12/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 224 485 146 9 978 712 121 1319 70 334 16 Future Volume (vph) 224 485 146 9 978 712 121 1319 70 334 16 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3271 3433 5085 1583 3433 5047 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3271 3433 5085 1583 3433 5047 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 236 511 154 9 1029 749 127 1388 74 352 17 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 31 0 0 0 262 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 212 658 0 9 1029 487 127 1462 0 369 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.2 28.2 4.1 31.3 11.7 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.2 28.2 4.1 31.3 11.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.39 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 362 735 42 1792 558 175 1974 407 v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.20 0.00 0.20 0.04 c0.29 c0.13 v/s Ratio Perm c0.31 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.90 0.21 0.57 0.87 0.73 0.74 0.91 Uniform Delay, dl 27.7 30.1 39.1 21.0 24.2 37.4 20.9 33.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85 1.36 1.00 0.47 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 13.4 1.5 0.8 10.7 9.9 1.8 23.2 Delay (s) 30.1 43.5 37.3 18.6 43.8 47.3 11.6 56.8 Level of Service C D D B D D B E Approach Delay (s) 40.3 29.3 14.5 Approach LOS D C B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 28.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.90 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Broadway & 1-5 SB Off -Ramp 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow r ++ ++ 914 0 442 614 0 914 0 442 614 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 96 96 96 96 96 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 952 0 460 640 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 1 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 - 0 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 0 - HCM Lane LOS - A - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - - The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago ParkM/alkie Way 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j T+ 41) ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 0 0 0 19 1260 0 1 1595 11 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 0 0 0 19 1260 0 1 1595 11 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 0 1 0 0 0 21 1385 0 1 1753 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 683 0 555 0 654 0 30 2676 0 2 2660 18 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 5274 0 1781 5232 36 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 0 1 0 0 0 21 1385 0 1 1140 625 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1864 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 21.3 0.0 0.1 29.7 29.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 21.3 0.0 0.1 29.7 29.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 683 0 555 0 654 0 30 2676 0 2 1730 947 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.52 0.00 0.51 0.66 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 683 0 555 0 654 0 193 2676 0 193 1730 947 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.54 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.4 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.7 18.7 0.0 59.9 21.8 21.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.8 0.7 0.0 82.7 1.1 2.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 8.4 0.0 0.1 11.8 13.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.4 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 84.5 19.4 0.0 142.6 22.9 23.8 LnGrp LOS C A C A A A F B A F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 3 0 1406 1766 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.4 0.0 20.3 23.3 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 47.0 7.0 66.0 47.0 5.1 67.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 13.0 61.0 31.0 13.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.1 3.4 31.7 0.0 2.1 23.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 16.1 0.0 0.0 13.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 22.0 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 1 1282 12 0 1 1282 12 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 1 1393 92 92 2 2 13 0 1600 1600 0 Free None 0 0 92 2 1739 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 703 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 326 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 0 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 326 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.1 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 326 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16.1 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0 - The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 121 199 26 0 0 0 0 1024 42 787 1629 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 121 199 26 0 0 0 0 1024 42 787 1629 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 129 212 28 0 1089 45 837 1733 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 159 280 38 0 1715 71 1399 4016 0 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.81 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1210 2129 289 0 5198 208 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 193 0 176 0 737 397 837 1733 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/lnl810 0 1818 0 1702 1833 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.4 0.0 10.2 0.0 20.0 20.1 9.8 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.4 0.0 10.2 0.0 20.0 20.1 9.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.67 0.16 0.00 0.11 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 238 0 239 0 1160 625 1399 4016 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.63 0.64 0.60 0.43 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 321 0 322 0 1160 625 1399 4016 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.32 0.32 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.4 0.0 45.9 0.0 30.5 30.5 7.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.7 0.0 5.8 0.0 2.7 4.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr5.8 0.0 5.0 0.0 8.5 9.6 2.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 57.1 0.0 51.7 0.0 33.1 35.4 7.4 0.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A D A C D A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 369 1134 2570 Approach Delay, s/veh 54.5 33.9 2.5 Approach LOS D C A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),49.0 42.0 19.0 91.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma3q,5 37.5 19.5 81.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+[M,B; 22.1 13.4 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.4 6.8 1.1 24.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 16.0 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.7 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44 44 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 2 101 68 0 192 0 59 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 2 101 68 0 192 0 59 0 1 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 122 82 0 231 0 71 0 1 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RighNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.4 9 8.7 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 59% 100% 100% 2% 40% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 60 171 192 0 59 2 0 0 0 101 192 0 1 68 0 0 72 206 231 0 1 1 1 1 0.102 0.236 0.278 0 5.057 4.127 4.328 4.98 Yes Yes Yes Yes 710 871 833 0 3.081 2.141 2.342 3.011 0.101 0.237 0.277 0 8.7 8.4 9 8 A A A N 0.3 0.9 1.1 0 The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/03/2019 --10 -�* 4\ /,* Movement Lane Configurations ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 362 Future Volume (veh/h) 362 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 402 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 Cap, vehrh Arrive On Green Sat Flow, vehrh MDR 293 416 480 922 475 293 416 480 922 475 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 No No 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 462 533 1024 528 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 2 2 2 2 2 496 2904 1102 947 0.23 0.00 0.28 0.57 0.32 0.32 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 402 0 462 533 1024 528 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.2 0.0 20.2 4.0 23.0 16.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.2 0.0 20.2 4.0 23.0 16.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1195 496 2904 1102 947 V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.93 0.18 0.93 0.56 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1195 501 2904 1102 947 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.5 0.0 28.1 8.3 26.4 9.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 24.3 0.1 14.7 2.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr2.1 0.0 11.5 1.4 11.2 5.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.2 0.0 52.4 8.4 41.1 12.1 LnGrp LOS C D A D B Approach Vol, veh/h 402 A 995 1552 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.2 28.9 31.2 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),26.8 23.2 50.0 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma2Z 5 18.5 45.5 25.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+QR,2, 7.2 6.0 25.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.0 4.1 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 29.8 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative - AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/03/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 337 132 170 99 127 132 95 180 28 328 301 645 Future Volume (veh/h) 337 132 170 99 127 132 95 180 28 328 301 645 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 379 148 191 111 143 148 107 202 31 369 628 532 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 365 186 240 137 790 352 356 619 94 485 509 431 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.27 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 741 957 1781 3554 1585 1781 3095 468 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 379 0 339 111 143 148 107 115 118 369 628 532 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1728 0 1698 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1786 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.5 0.0 16.8 5.5 2.9 7.2 4.6 5.0 5.1 17.1 24.5 24.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.5 0.0 16.8 5.5 2.9 7.2 4.6 5.0 5.1 17.1 24.5 24.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 365 0 426 137 790 352 356 355 357 485 509 431 V/C Ratio(X) 1.04 0.00 0.79 0.81 0.18 0.42 0.30 0.32 0.33 0.76 1.23 1.23 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 365 0 426 137 790 352 356 355 357 485 509 431 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh40.3 0.0 31.5 40.9 28.4 30.0 30.6 30.8 30.8 30.1 32.8 32.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 57.6 0.0 14.2 29.9 0.5 3.7 2.2 2.4 2.5 10.7 121.2 123.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr6.9 0.0 8.4 3.5 1.3 3.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 8.6 27.9 23.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 97.9 0.0 45.7 70.8 28.9 33.7 32.8 33.2 33.3 40.8 154.0 156.3 LnGrp LOS F A D E C C C C C D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 718 402 340 1529 Approach Delay, s/veh 73.2 42.2 33.1 127.5 Approach LOS E D C F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), E1.4 27.1 29.0 14.0 24.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma)4,9 22.6 24.5 9.5 20.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I�,EB 18.8 26.5 11.5 9.2 7.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 92.2 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR NWR2 Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 155 94 499 93 68 0 1533 0 698 22 Future Volume (vph) 155 94 499 93 68 0 1533 0 698 22 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 4965 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 4965 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 168 102 542 101 74 0 1666 0 759 24 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 14 643 0 74 0 1666 0 783 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 34.9 7.7 47.1 34.4 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 15.0 34.9 7.7 47.1 34.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.32 0.07 0.43 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 241 215 1575 123 2177 871 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.13 0.04 c0.33 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.06 0.41 0.60 0.77 0.90 Uniform Delay, d1 45.3 41.4 29.5 49.7 26.7 36.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.5 0.1 0.8 8.0 2.6 12.0 Delay (s) 53.8 41.5 13.1 57.7 29.4 48.1 Level of Service D D B E C D Approach Delay (s) 49.2 13.1 30.6 48.1 Approach LOS D B C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 125 418 204 7 470 667 91 1490 107 699 32 Future Volume (vph) 125 418 204 7 470 667 91 1490 107 699 32 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3224 3433 5085 1583 3433 5034 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3224 3433 5085 1583 3433 5034 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 133 445 217 7 500 710 97 1585 114 744 34 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 46 0 0 0 423 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 120 629 0 7 500 287 97 1699 0 778 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.5 20.5 1.0 33.2 33.2 8.8 41.0 29.5 Effective Green, g (s) 20.5 20.5 1.0 33.2 33.2 8.8 41.0 29.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.30 0.30 0.08 0.37 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 300 600 31 1534 477 274 1876 747 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.20 0.00 0.10 0.03 c0.34 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm c0.18 v/c Ratio 0.40 1.05 0.23 0.33 0.60 0.35 0.91 1.04 Uniform Delay, d1 39.3 44.8 54.1 29.7 32.8 47.9 32.7 40.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.46 3.17 0.61 0.40 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 49.8 2.9 0.5 4.4 0.5 5.3 44.2 Delay (s) 40.2 94.6 39.5 14.1 108.2 29.9 18.4 84.5 Level of Service D F D B F C B F Approach Delay (s) 86.4 69.1 19.0 Approach LOS F E B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 55.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Broadway & 1-5 SB Off -Ramp 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow r ++ ++ 890 0 789 578 0 890 0 789 578 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 96 96 96 96 96 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 927 0 822 602 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 1 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 - 0 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 0 - HCM Lane LOS - A - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - - The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago ParkM/alkie Way 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j T+ 41) ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 0 0 0 25 1444 0 1 1621 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 0 0 0 25 1444 0 1 1621 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 0 23 0 0 0 27 1553 0 1 1743 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 678 0 550 0 649 0 35 2691 0 2 2678 3 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 5274 0 1781 5267 6 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 0 23 0 0 0 27 1553 0 1 1126 619 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1869 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 24.8 0.0 0.1 29.2 29.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 24.8 0.0 0.1 29.2 29.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 678 0 550 0 649 0 35 2691 0 2 1730 950 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.58 0.00 0.51 0.65 0.65 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 678 0 550 0 649 0 193 2691 0 193 1730 950 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.52 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.7 0.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.5 19.3 0.0 59.9 21.7 21.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.5 0.9 0.0 80.3 1.0 1.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 9.8 0.0 0.1 11.6 13.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.8 0.0 26.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 87.0 20.2 0.0 140.2 22.7 23.5 LnGrp LOS C A C A A A F C A F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 32 0 1580 1746 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.0 0.0 21.3 23.0 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.6 7.4 66.0 46.6 5.1 68.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 13.0 61.0 31.0 13.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.2 3.8 31.2 0.0 2.1 26.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 22.3 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 9 1460 3 0 9 1460 3 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 10 1587 92 92 2 2 3 0 1643 1643 0 Free None 0 0 92 2 1786 Major/Minor Mina ; Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 795 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 284 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 0 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 284 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18.1 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 284 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.034 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 18.1 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0.1 - The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 295 169 47 0 0 0 0 1532 51 670 1205 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 295 169 47 0 0 0 0 1532 51 670 1205 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 314 180 50 0 1630 54 713 1282 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 366 289 80 0 1897 63 871 3483 0 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.25 0.68 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1409 391 0 5244 168 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 314 0 230 0 1093 591 713 1282 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1800 0 1702 1840 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.6 0.0 9.3 0.0 23.7 23.7 15.6 8.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.6 0.0 9.3 0.0 23.7 23.7 15.6 8.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.09 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 366 0 370 0 1272 688 871 3483 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.86 0.86 0.82 0.37 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 0 407 0 1272 688 871 3483 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.7 0.0 29.0 0.0 23.1 23.1 28.2 5.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 15.6 0.0 2.5 0.0 7.7 13.2 3.2 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr9.2 0.0 4.1 0.0 10.2 12.1 6.6 2.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.3 0.0 31.5 0.0 30.8 36.3 31.4 5.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A C A C D C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 544 1684 1995 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.0 32.7 14.8 Approach LOS D C B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),24.7 34.4 20.9 59.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmalo,5 29.9 18.1 52.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+Itt1/,6; 25.7 15.6 10.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 3.4 0.8 12.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 25.2 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.7 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 120 59 0 145 0 86 0 0 1 1 4 Future Vol, veh/h 0 120 59 0 145 0 86 0 0 1 1 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 145 71 0 175 0 104 0 0 1 1 5 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.6 8.7 8.9 7.6 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q 100% 0% 0% 17% 0% 67% 100% 17% 0% 33% 0% 67% Stop Stop Stop Stop 86 179 145 6 86 0 0 1 0 120 145 1 0 59 0 4 104 216 175 7 1 1 1 1 0.144 0.252 0.215 0.009 4.995 4.209 4.44 4.562 Yes Yes Yes Yes 718 854 811 783 3.024 2.228 2.46 2.599 0.145 0.253 0.216 0.009 8.9 8.6 8.7 7.6 A A A A 0.5 1 0.8 0 The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/03/2019 --10 -�* 4\ /,* Movement Lane Configurations ttlL r ►j ttt ►) jr Traffic Volume (veh/h) 653 997 526 469 439 213 Future Volume (veh/h) 653 997 526 469 439 213 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 687 0 554 494 462 224 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Q Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1381 598 3383 778 889 Arrive On Green 0.27 0.00 0.34 0.66 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 687 0 554 494 462 224 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.1 0.0 24.0 2.9 9.6 5.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.1 0.0 24.0 2.9 9.6 5.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1381 598 3383 778 889 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.93 0.15 0.59 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1381 679 3383 778 889 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.6 0.0 25.6 5.0 27.7 9.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 0.0 17.5 0.1 3.3 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr8.7 0.0 12.5 0.9 4.2 2.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.9 0.0 43.1 5.1 31.1 9.7 LnGrp LOS C D A C A Approach Vol, veh/h 687 A 1048 686 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.9 25.2 24.1 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 a a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),31.4 26.1 57.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma1q,5 18.0 53.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+Qp,(b 11.1 4.9 11.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 2.6 3.9 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.1 HCM 6th LOS C � G Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/03/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 619 181 90 65 171 458 215 461 73 275 159 488 Future Volume (veh/h) 619 181 90 65 171 458 215 461 73 275 159 488 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 652 191 95 68 180 482 226 485 77 289 427 340 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 672 407 202 88 711 317 366 632 100 356 374 317 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 1179 586 1781 3554 1585 1781 3074 486 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 652 0 286 68 180 482 226 279 283 289 427 340 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1728 0 1765 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1783 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 16.9 0.0 11.4 3.4 3.8 18.0 10.4 13.3 13.5 13.9 18.0 18.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.9 0.0 11.4 3.4 3.8 18.0 10.4 13.3 13.5 13.9 18.0 18.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 672 0 609 88 711 317 366 365 366 356 374 317 V/C Ratio(X) 0.97 0.00 0.47 0.77 0.25 1.52 0.62 0.76 0.77 0.81 1.14 1.07 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 672 0 609 178 711 317 366 365 366 356 374 317 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.0 0.0 23.0 42.3 30.3 36.0 32.5 33.7 33.8 34.4 36.0 36.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 27.4 0.0 0.6 13.4 0.2 249.8 7.6 14.1 14.5 17.9 90.9 71.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr9.5 0.0 4.7 1.8 1.6 28.8 5.2 7.1 7.2 7.7 17.4 13.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 63.4 0.0 23.6 55.7 30.5 285.8 40.1 47.8 48.3 52.3 126.9 107.2 LnGrp LOS E A C E C F D D D D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 938 730 788 1056 Approach Delay, s/veh 51.2 201.4 45.8 100.1 Approach LOS D F D F Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 8.9 35.6 22.5 22.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 9.0 26.5 18.0 17.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 15.5 5.4 13.4 20.0 18.9 20.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.3 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 95.9 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 123 95 963 120 111 0 1533 0 400 10 Future Volume (vph) 123 95 963 120 111 0 1533 0 400 10 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 5001 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 5001 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 127 98 993 124 114 0 1580 0 412 10 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 12 1117 0 114 0 1580 0 422 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.7 9.7 29.6 6.0 40.1 16.7 Effective Green, g (s) 9.7 9.7 29.6 6.0 40.1 16.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.37 0.08 0.50 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 214 191 1850 132 2548 581 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.22 0.06 c0.31 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.06 0.60 0.86 0.62 0.73 Uniform Delay, d1 33.3 31.1 20.4 36.6 14.4 29.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.4 0.1 1.2 40.4 1.1 4.5 Delay (s) 37.6 31.3 19.9 77.0 15.6 34.0 Level of Service D C B E B C Approach Delay (s) 34.9 19.9 19.7 34.0 Approach LOS C B B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 207 535 148 9 877 940 276 1314 66 431 16 Future Volume (vph) 207 535 148 9 877 940 276 1314 66 431 16 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5049 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5049 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 225 582 161 10 953 1022 300 1428 72 468 17 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 28 0 0 0 261 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 202 738 0 10 953 761 300 1500 0 485 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 26.9 26.9 5.0 30.9 12.1 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 26.9 26.9 5.0 30.9 12.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.39 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 362 737 42 1709 532 214 1950 421 v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.23 0.00 0.19 c0.09 0.30 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm c0.48 v/c Ratio 0.56 1.00 0.24 0.56 1.43 1.40 0.77 1.15 Uniform Delay, d1 27.5 31.0 39.1 21.7 26.6 37.5 21.4 34.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.82 1.25 1.16 0.48 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 33.5 1.7 0.7 200.0 202.8 2.5 92.4 Delay (s) 29.3 64.5 36.1 18.5 233.1 246.1 12.8 126.3 Level of Service C E D B F F B F Approach Delay (s) 57.2 129.1 51.7 Approach LOS E F D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 88.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.25 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T+ ►j T+ ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 44 0 30 19 1260 16 11 1595 11 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 44 0 30 19 1260 16 11 1595 11 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 0 1 48 0 33 21 1385 18 12 1753 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 378 0 337 74 0 66 55 2997 39 27 2938 20 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.58 0.58 0.02 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 5195 68 1781 5232 36 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 0 1 48 0 33 21 908 495 12 1140 625 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1702 1858 1781 1702 1864 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 0.1 3.5 0.0 2.6 1.5 20.0 20.0 0.9 28.7 28.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.1 3.5 0.0 2.6 1.5 20.0 20.0 0.9 28.7 28.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 378 0 337 74 0 66 55 1964 1072 27 1912 1047 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.50 0.38 0.46 0.46 0.44 0.60 0.60 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 378 0 337 343 0 305 96 1964 1072 82 1912 1047 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.45 0.45 0.45 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh40.4 0.0 40.3 61.4 0.0 61.0 61.8 15.9 15.9 63.4 18.8 18.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 0.0 5.9 4.3 0.8 1.4 4.9 0.6 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.1 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 1.2 0.7 7.7 8.6 0.4 11.1 12.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.4 0.0 40.4 70.7 0.0 66.9 66.1 16.6 17.3 68.3 19.4 19.9 LnGrp LOS D A D E A E E B B E B B Approach Vol, veh/h 3 81 1424 1777 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.4 69.1 17.6 19.9 Approach LOS D E B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 32.6 9.0 78.0 10.4 7.0 80.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 7.0 73.0 25.0 6.0 75.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.1 3.5 30.7 5.5 2.9 22.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 18.3 0.2 0.0 13.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 20.2 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/13/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 1 1298 14 0 1 1298 14 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 1 1411 92 92 2 2 15 0 1644 1644 0 Free None 0 0 92 2 1787 Major/Minor Mina ; Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 713 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 321 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 - 0 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 321 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.3 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 321 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 16.3 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0 - The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 121 199 26 0 0 0 0 1027 42 802 1639 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 121 199 26 0 0 0 0 1027 42 802 1639 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 127 209 27 0 1081 44 844 1725 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 157 277 37 0 1670 68 1436 4025 0 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.83 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1211 2134 284 0 5201 205 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 190 0 173 0 731 394 844 1725 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/lnl810 0 1819 0 1702 1834 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.2 0.0 10.1 0.0 20.1 20.1 8.9 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.2 0.0 10.1 0.0 20.1 20.1 8.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.67 0.16 0.00 0.11 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 235 0 236 0 1130 608 1436 4025 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.59 0.43 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 321 0 323 0 1130 608 1436 4025 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh46.5 0.0 46.0 0.0 31.3 31.3 6.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.3 0.0 5.5 0.0 2.9 5.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/Ir5.7 0.0 4.9 0.0 8.5 9.6 2.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.8 0.0 51.5 0.0 34.1 36.5 6.3 0.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A D A C D A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 363 1125 2569 Approach Delay, s/veh 54.3 35.0 2.1 Approach LOS D C A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),50.2 41.0 18.8 91.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmakg,5 36.5 19.5 81.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+[M,9s 22.1 13.2 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.4 6.3 1.1 22.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 15.9 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.7 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44 44 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 101 68 0 192 0 59 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 101 68 0 192 0 59 0 1 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 122 82 0 231 0 71 0 1 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.4 9 8.6 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 60% 100% 100% 2% 40% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 60 169 192 0 59 0 0 0 0 101 192 0 1 68 0 0 72 204 231 0 1 1 1 1 0.101 0.233 0.278 0 5.051 4.12 4.323 4.974 Yes Yes Yes Yes 711 874 833 0 3.076 2.134 2.337 3.004 0.101 0.233 0.277 0 8.6 8.4 9 8 A A A N 0.3 0.9 1.1 0 The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 10/06/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft r ►j +T+ ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 343 133 170 99 128 132 95 184 28 328 302 646 Future Volume (veh/h) 343 133 170 99 128 132 95 184 28 328 302 646 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 385 149 191 111 144 148 107 207 31 369 629 532 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 365 187 240 137 790 352 356 621 92 485 509 431 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.27 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 744 954 1781 3554 1585 1781 3106 458 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 385 0 340 111 144 148 107 117 121 369 629 532 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 0 1699 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1788 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.5 0.0 16.9 5.5 3.0 7.2 4.6 5.1 5.2 17.1 24.5 24.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.5 0.0 16.9 5.5 3.0 7.2 4.6 5.1 5.2 17.1 24.5 24.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 365 0 427 137 790 352 356 355 358 485 509 431 V/C Ratio(X) 1.06 0.00 0.80 0.81 0.18 0.42 0.30 0.33 0.34 0.76 1.24 1.23 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 365 0 427 137 790 352 356 355 358 485 509 431 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.3 0.0 31.6 40.9 28.4 30.0 30.6 30.8 30.9 30.1 32.8 32.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 62.5 0.0 14.3 29.9 0.5 3.7 2.2 2.5 2.5 10.7 122.0 123.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 7.1 0.0 8.4 3.5 1.3 3.1 2.2 2.4 2.5 8.6 28.0 23.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 102.7 0.0 45.9 70.8 28.9 33.7 32.8 33.3 33.4 40.8 154.8 156.3 LnGrp LOS F A D E C C C C C D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 725 403 345 1530 Approach Delay, s/veh 76.1 42.2 33.2 127.8 Approach LOS E D C F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.4 27.1 29.0 14.0 24.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.9 22.6 24.5 9.5 20.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 7.5 18.9 26.5 11.5 9.2 7.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 93.0 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 10/06/2019 --O� -�* f" 4\ /01 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ttt r ►j ttt ► i r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 365 299 416 481 925 475 Future Volume (veh/h) 365 299 416 481 925 475 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 406 0 462 534 1028 528 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1195 496 2904 1102 947 Arrive On Green 0.23 0.00 0.28 0.57 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 406 0 462 534 1028 528 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.3 0.0 20.2 4.0 23.1 16.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.3 0.0 20.2 4.0 23.1 16.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1195 496 2904 1102 947 V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.93 0.18 0.93 0.56 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1195 501 2904 1102 947 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.5 0.0 28.1 8.3 26.4 9.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 24.3 0.1 15.2 2.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.2 0.0 11.5 1.4 11.3 5.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 26.3 0.0 52.4 8.4 41.6 12.1 LnGrp LOS C D A D B Approach Vol, veh/h 406 A 996 1556 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.3 28.8 31.6 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 a 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.8 23.2 50.0 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.5 18.5 45.5 25.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 22.2 7.3 6.0 25.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.0 4.1 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 29.9 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR NWR2 Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 155 94 510 92 68 0 1577 0 703 22 Future Volume (vph) 155 94 510 92 68 0 1577 0 703 22 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 4969 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 4969 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 168 102 554 100 74 0 1714 0 764 24 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 14 654 0 74 0 1714 0 788 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 8 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 35.2 7.5 47.2 34.3 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 15.0 35.2 7.5 47.2 34.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.32 0.07 0.43 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 241 215 1590 120 2181 869 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.13 0.04 c0.34 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.06 0.41 0.62 0.79 0.91 Uniform Delay, d1 45.3 41.4 29.3 49.9 27.0 36.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.5 0.1 0.8 9.1 2.9 12.9 Delay (s) 53.8 41.5 10.0 58.9 30.0 49.3 Level of Service D D B E C D Approach Delay (s) 49.2 10.0 31.2 49.3 Approach LOS D B C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave & Sasnta Clara Ave 09/13/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 132 418 204 7 474 667 103 1514 115 699 32 Future Volume (vph) 132 418 204 7 474 667 103 1514 115 699 32 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3223 3433 5085 1583 3433 5031 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3223 3433 5085 1583 3433 5031 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 139 440 215 7 499 702 108 1594 121 736 34 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 46 0 0 0 398 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 125 623 0 7 499 304 108 1715 0 770 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 23.6 23.6 1.0 30.9 30.9 10.1 40.0 27.4 Effective Green, g (s) 23.6 23.6 1.0 30.9 30.9 10.1 40.0 27.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.36 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 345 691 31 1428 444 315 1829 694 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.19 0.00 0.10 0.03 c0.34 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.90 0.23 0.35 0.69 0.34 0.94 1.11 Uniform Delay, d1 36.8 42.1 54.1 31.5 35.2 46.8 33.8 41.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.43 0.74 2.97 0.56 0.32 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 14.9 2.9 0.5 6.7 0.4 7.3 68.3 Delay (s) 37.4 57.0 26.3 24.0 111.3 26.4 18.1 109.6 Level of Service D E C C F C B F Approach Delay (s) 53.9 74.7 18.6 Approach LOS D E B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 54.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago Park/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T+ ►j T+ ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 29 0 19 29 1444 45 31 1621 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 0 21 29 0 19 29 1444 45 31 1621 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 0 23 31 0 20 31 1553 48 33 1743 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 387 0 345 50 0 45 39 2936 91 42 3047 3 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.58 0.58 0.02 0.58 0.58 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 5089 157 1781 5267 6 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 0 23 31 0 20 31 1039 562 33 1126 619 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1702 1842 1781 1702 1869 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 0.0 1.5 2.2 0.0 1.6 2.3 24.2 24.2 2.4 27.1 27.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 0.0 1.5 2.2 0.0 1.6 2.3 24.2 24.2 2.4 27.1 27.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 387 0 345 50 0 45 39 1964 1063 42 1969 1081 V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.62 0.00 0.45 0.79 0.53 0.53 0.79 0.57 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 387 0 345 343 0 305 96 1964 1063 82 1969 1081 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 0.54 0.54 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.0 0.0 40.4 62.5 0.0 62.2 63.3 16.7 16.7 63.1 17.3 17.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.4 11.6 0.0 6.8 28.4 1.0 1.9 15.8 0.7 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.2 0.0 0.6 1.2 0.0 0.7 1.3 9.5 10.6 1.3 10.6 11.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.1 0.0 40.8 74.1 0.0 69.0 91.7 17.8 18.6 78.9 17.9 18.5 LnGrp LOS D A D E A E F B B E B B Approach Vol, veh/h 32 51 1632 1778 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.6 72.1 19.5 19.2 Approach LOS D E B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 33.3 7.9 80.2 8.7 8.1 80.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 7.0 73.0 25.0 6.0 75.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.5 4.3 29.1 4.2 4.4 26.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 19.2 0.1 0.0 17.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 20.3 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/13/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 15 1503 3 0 15 1503 3 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 92 92 92 2 2 2 0 16 1634 92 92 2 2 3 0 1676 1676 0 Free None 0 0 92 2 1822 Major/Minor Mina ; Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 819 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 273 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 0 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 273 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 19 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 273 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.06 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 19 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0.2 - The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 296 169 47 0 0 0 0 1542 51 680 1211 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 296 169 47 0 0 0 0 1542 51 680 1211 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 315 180 50 0 1640 54 723 1288 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 367 290 81 0 1758 58 965 3481 0 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.28 0.68 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1409 391 0 5246 167 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 315 0 230 0 1099 595 723 1288 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1800 0 1702 1840 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.6 0.0 9.3 0.0 24.9 25.0 15.3 8.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.6 0.0 9.3 0.0 24.9 25.0 15.3 8.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.09 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 367 0 371 0 1179 637 965 3481 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.93 0.93 0.75 0.37 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 0 407 0 1179 637 965 3481 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.6 0.0 28.9 0.0 25.3 25.3 26.3 5.4 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 15.8 0.0 2.5 0.0 14.4 22.5 1.4 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr7.3 0.0 4.1 0.0 11.8 14.2 6.2 2.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 46.4 0.0 31.4 0.0 39.6 47.8 27.7 5.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A C A D D C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 545 1694 2011 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.1 42.5 13.5 Approach LOS D D B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),26.8 32.2 21.0 59.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma,t 27.7 18.1 52.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+q,3; 27.0 15.6 10.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.6 0.8 12.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 28.5 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.7 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 121 60 0 145 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 121 60 0 145 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 146 72 0 175 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB >A/S': N♦3 SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.6 8.7 8.9 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 67% 100% 100% 0% 33% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 86 181 145 0 86 0 0 0 0 121 145 0 0 60 0 0 104 218 175 0 1 1 1 1 0.144 0.254 0.215 0 4.986 4.192 4.425 4.936 Yes Yes Yes Yes 719 859 812 0 3.014 2.21 2.445 2.973 0.145 0.254 0.216 0 8.9 8.6 8.7 8 A A A N 0.5 1 0.8 0 The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/13/2019 --10 -�* 4\ /,* Movement Lane Configurations ttlL r ►j ttt ►) jr Traffic Volume (veh/h) 655 1001 526 472 449 213 Future Volume (veh/h) 655 1001 526 472 449 213 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 689 0 554 497 473 224 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Q Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1381 598 3383 778 889 Arrive On Green 0.27 0.00 0.34 0.66 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 689 0 554 497 473 224 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.1 0.0 24.0 2.9 9.8 5.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.1 0.0 24.0 2.9 9.8 5.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1381 598 3383 778 889 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.93 0.15 0.61 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1381 679 3383 778 889 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.6 0.0 25.6 5.0 27.8 9.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 0.0 17.5 0.1 3.5 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr8.7 0.0 12.5 0.9 4.3 2.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.9 0.0 43.1 5.1 31.4 9.7 LnGrp LOS C D A C A Approach Vol, veh/h 689 A 1051 697 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.9 25.2 24.4 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),31.4 26.1 57.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma1q,5 18.0 53.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+Qp,(b 11.1 4.9 11.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 2.6 3.9 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.2 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/13/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 623 182 90 65 173 458 215 464 73 275 161 492 Future Volume (veh/h) 623 182 90 65 173 458 215 464 73 275 161 492 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 656 192 95 68 182 482 226 488 77 289 431 344 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 672 408 202 88 711 317 366 632 99 356 374 317 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 1181 584 1781 3554 1585 1781 3077 483 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 656 0 287 68 182 482 226 281 284 289 431 344 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1728 0 1765 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1783 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.0 0.0 11.4 3.4 3.9 18.0 10.4 13.4 13.6 13.9 18.0 18.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.0 0.0 11.4 3.4 3.9 18.0 10.4 13.4 13.6 13.9 18.0 18.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 672 0 609 88 711 317 366 365 367 356 374 317 V/C Ratio(X) 0.98 0.00 0.47 0.77 0.26 1.52 0.62 0.77 0.78 0.81 1.15 1.09 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 672 0 609 178 711 317 366 365 367 356 374 317 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.0 0.0 23.0 42.3 30.4 36.0 32.5 33.7 33.8 34.4 36.0 36.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 28.7 0.0 0.6 13.4 0.2 249.8 7.6 14.4 14.8 17.9 94.8 75.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr9.7 0.0 4.7 1.8 1.7 28.8 5.2 7.1 7.2 7.7 17.9 13.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 64.8 0.0 23.6 55.7 30.5 285.8 40.1 48.1 48.6 52.3 130.8 111.2 LnGrp LOS E A C E C F D D D D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 943 732 791 1064 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.3 200.9 46.0 103.1 Approach LOS D F D F Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 8.9 35.6 22.5 22.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 9.0 26.5 18.0 17.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 15.6 5.4 13.4 20.0 19.0 20.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 97.0 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/12/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 121 93 993 120 113 0 1564 0 415 10 Future Volume (vph) 121 93 993 120 113 0 1564 0 415 10 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 5003 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 5003 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 125 96 1024 124 116 0 1612 0 428 10 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 125 12 1148 0 116 0 1612 0 438 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 9.6 28.2 7.0 39.7 17.2 Effective Green, g (s) 9.6 9.6 28.2 7.0 39.7 17.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.35 0.09 0.50 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 212 189 1763 154 2523 599 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.23 0.07 c0.32 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.06 0.65 0.75 0.64 0.73 Uniform Delay, d1 33.3 31.2 21.8 35.7 14.9 29.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.2 0.1 1.6 18.6 1.3 4.6 Delay (s) 37.5 31.3 20.7 54.3 16.1 33.8 Level of Service D C C D B C Approach Delay (s) 34.8 20.7 18.7 33.8 Approach LOS C C B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/12/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 227 535 148 9 888 940 284 1330 71 431 16 Future Volume (vph) 227 535 148 9 888 940 284 1330 71 431 16 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5047 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5047 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 247 582 161 10 965 1022 309 1446 77 468 17 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 28 0 0 0 210 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 222 740 0 10 965 812 309 1523 0 485 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.0 28.0 6.5 33.5 9.5 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.0 28.0 6.5 33.5 9.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.42 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 362 737 42 1779 554 278 2113 330 v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.23 0.00 0.19 c0.09 0.30 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm c0.51 v/c Ratio 0.61 1.00 0.24 0.54 1.47 1.11 0.72 1.47 Uniform Delay, d1 27.9 31.0 39.1 20.9 26.0 36.8 19.4 35.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.87 1.23 1.20 0.43 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.1 34.2 1.4 0.6 214.4 82.6 1.8 227.2 Delay (s) 30.9 65.2 38.0 18.8 246.3 126.6 10.1 262.5 Level of Service C E D B F F B F Approach Delay (s) 57.5 135.3 29.8 Approach LOS E F C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 96.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.29 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Broadway & 1-5 SB Off -Ramp 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow r ++ ++ 929 0 573 685 0 929 0 573 685 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 95 95 95 95 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 978 0 603 721 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 1 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 - 0 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 0 - HCM Lane LOS - A - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - - The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago ParkM/alkie Way 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j T+ 41) ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 0 0 0 21 1482 0 1 1729 12 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 0 0 0 21 1482 0 1 1729 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 0 1 0 0 0 22 1560 0 1 1820 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 682 0 554 0 653 0 31 2678 0 2 2659 19 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 5274 0 1781 5230 37 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 0 1 0 0 0 22 1560 0 1 1184 649 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1864 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 25.1 0.0 0.1 31.5 31.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 25.1 0.0 0.1 31.5 31.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 682 0 554 0 653 0 31 2678 0 2 1730 947 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.58 0.00 0.51 0.68 0.68 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 682 0 554 0 653 0 193 2678 0 193 1730 947 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.37 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.4 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.7 19.5 0.0 59.9 22.2 22.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.0 0.9 0.0 61.1 0.8 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 9.9 0.0 0.1 12.5 13.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.4 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 84.7 20.5 0.0 121.0 23.1 23.8 LnGrp LOS C A C A A A F C A F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 3 0 1582 1834 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.4 0.0 21.4 23.4 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.9 7.1 66.0 46.9 5.1 67.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 13.0 61.0 31.0 13.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.1 3.5 33.5 0.0 2.1 27.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 16.2 0.0 0.0 15.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 22.4 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 1 1502 13 0 1 1502 13 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 0 1 1581 95 95 2 2 14 0 1729 1729 0 Free None 0 0 95 2 1820 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 798 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 282 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 0 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 282 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 17.8 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 282 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 17.8 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0 - The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 135 209 27 0 0 0 0 1196 44 826 1710 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 135 209 27 0 0 0 0 1196 44 826 1710 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 142 220 28 0 1259 46 869 1800 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 175 290 38 0 1724 63 1375 3981 0 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.80 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1260 2095 274 0 5225 185 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 204 0 186 0 848 457 869 1800 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1807 0 1821 0 1702 1837 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.0 0.0 10.8 0.0 24.0 24.0 11.4 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.0 0.0 10.8 0.0 24.0 24.0 11.4 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.70 0.15 0.00 0.10 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 251 0 252 0 1160 626 1375 3981 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.81 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.73 0.73 0.63 0.45 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 337 0 339 0 1160 626 1375 3981 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh46.0 0.0 45.5 0.0 31.8 31.8 7.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.6 0.0 5.6 0.0 4.1 7.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr6.1 0.0 5.3 0.0 10.4 11.8 2.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.6 0.0 51.1 0.0 35.9 39.2 8.2 0.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A D A D D A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 390 1305 2669 Approach Delay, s/veh 53.9 37.0 2.7 Approach LOS D D A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),48.3 42.0 19.7 90.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma30,5 37.5 20.5 80.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+M,,t 26.0 14.0 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.6 6.5 1.2 26.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 17.6 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.5 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 2 107 74 0 200 0 64 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 2 107 74 0 200 0 64 0 1 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 113 78 0 211 0 67 0 1 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SIB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach RighNB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.2 8.8 8.5 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 58% 100% 100% 2% 40% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 65 183 200 0 64 2 0 0 0 107 200 0 1 74 0 0 68 193 211 0 1 1 1 1 0.095 0.219 0.252 0 4.984 4.087 4.313 4.896 Yes Yes Yes Yes 720 880 838 0 3.006 2.1 2.313 2.923 0.094 0.219 0.252 0 8.5 8.2 8.8 7.9 A A A N 0.3 0.8 1 0 The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 10/06/2019 --O� -�* f" 4\ /01 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ttt r ►j ttt ► i r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 416 308 437 520 968 527 Future Volume (veh/h) 416 308 437 520 968 527 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 438 0 460 547 1019 555 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1245 479 2904 1102 931 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.00 0.27 0.57 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 438 0 460 547 1019 555 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 0.0 20.4 4.1 22.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 0.0 20.4 4.1 22.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1245 479 2904 1102 931 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.96 0.19 0.93 0.60 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1245 479 2904 1102 931 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.0 0.0 28.8 8.3 26.3 10.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 31.2 0.1 14.2 2.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.3 0.0 12.4 1.4 11.0 6.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.8 0.0 60.1 8.5 40.5 13.3 LnGrp LOS C E A D B Approach Vol, veh/h 438 A 1007 1574 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.8 32.0 30.9 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.0 24.0 50.0 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.5 19.5 45.5 25.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 22.4 7.7 6.1 24.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.3 4.3 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 30.6 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/0312019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 10/06/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft r ►j +T+ ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 354 146 196 104 133 139 100 189 33 344 340 677 Future Volume (veh/h) 354 146 196 104 133 139 100 189 33 344 340 677 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 373 154 206 109 140 146 105 199 35 362 624 536 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 365 174 233 137 750 335 356 606 105 505 530 449 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.28 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 725 970 1781 3554 1585 1781 3029 524 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 373 0 360 109 140 146 105 115 119 362 624 536 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 0 1696 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1776 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.5 0.0 18.4 5.4 2.9 7.2 4.5 5.0 5.2 16.5 25.5 25.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.5 0.0 18.4 5.4 2.9 7.2 4.5 5.0 5.2 16.5 25.5 25.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 365 0 407 137 750 335 356 355 355 505 530 449 V/C Ratio(X) 1.02 0.00 0.88 0.80 0.19 0.44 0.29 0.32 0.33 0.72 1.18 1.19 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 365 0 407 137 750 335 356 355 355 505 530 449 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.3 0.0 33.0 40.9 29.2 30.8 30.6 30.8 30.9 29.0 32.3 32.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 53.0 0.0 23.4 27.4 0.5 4.1 2.1 2.4 2.5 8.5 98.2 107.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 6.7 0.0 10.0 3.4 1.3 3.1 2.1 2.3 2.4 8.0 25.6 22.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 93.2 0.0 56.4 68.2 29.7 34.9 32.7 33.2 33.4 37.5 130.5 139.4 LnGrp LOS F A E E C C C C C D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 733 395 339 1522 Approach Delay, s/veh 75.1 42.3 33.1 111.5 Approach LOS E D C F Timer - Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.4 26.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.9 21.6 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 7.4 20.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 84.5 HCM 6th LOS F 30.0 14.0 23.5 22.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 25.5 9.5 19.0 18.0 27.5 11.5 9.2 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.2 User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 160 101 688 98 71 0 1658 0 726 24 Future Volume (vph) 160 101 688 98 71 0 1658 0 726 24 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 4990 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 4990 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 168 106 724 103 75 0 1745 0 764 25 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 16 827 0 75 0 1745 0 789 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 35.2 7.8 47.5 34.0 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 15.0 35.2 7.8 47.5 34.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.32 0.07 0.43 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 241 215 1596 125 2195 861 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.17 0.04 c0.34 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.08 0.52 0.60 0.79 0.92 Uniform Delay, d1 45.3 41.4 30.5 49.6 27.0 36.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.5 0.1 1.1 7.5 3.1 14.2 Delay (s) 53.8 41.6 14.0 57.1 30.1 50.9 Level of Service D D B E C D Approach Delay (s) 49.1 14.0 31.2 50.9 Approach LOS D B C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 181 458 223 8 605 717 148 1555 115 744 36 Future Volume (vph) 181 458 223 8 605 717 148 1555 115 744 36 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3224 3433 5085 1583 3433 5033 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3224 3433 5085 1583 3433 5033 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 191 482 235 8 637 755 156 1637 121 783 38 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 46 0 0 0 392 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 172 690 0 8 637 363 156 1758 0 821 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.5 20.5 1.0 34.3 34.3 9.7 43.0 27.5 Effective Green, g (s) 20.5 20.5 1.0 34.3 34.3 9.7 43.0 27.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.31 0.31 0.09 0.39 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 300 600 31 1585 493 302 1967 696 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.21 0.00 0.13 0.05 c0.35 c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm c0.23 v/c Ratio 0.57 1.15 0.26 0.40 0.74 0.52 0.89 1.18 Uniform Delay, d1 40.8 44.8 54.1 29.8 33.8 47.9 31.4 41.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.46 2.33 0.60 0.38 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.6 85.9 3.2 0.5 6.9 0.9 4.3 95.2 Delay (s) 43.4 130.7 46.8 14.4 85.6 29.8 16.1 136.5 Level of Service D F D B F C B F Approach Delay (s) 114.1 53.0 17.2 Approach LOS F D B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 64.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.05 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.8% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Broadway & 1-5 SB Off -Ramp 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow r ++ ++ 883 0 910 607 0 883 0 910 607 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 95 95 95 95 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 929 0 958 639 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - Critical Hdwy - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 1 0 0 0 - 0 Stage 2 0 0 0 - 0 Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 0 - HCM Lane LOS - A - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - - The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago ParkM/alkie Way 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j T+ 41) ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 9 0 24 0 0 0 28 1731 0 1 1781 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 9 0 24 0 0 0 28 1731 0 1 1781 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 0 25 0 0 0 29 1822 0 1 1875 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 676 0 548 0 647 0 37 2695 0 2 2678 3 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 5274 0 1781 5268 6 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 0 25 0 0 0 29 1822 0 1 1212 665 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 0 1870 0 1781 1702 0 1781 1702 1869 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 31.4 0.0 0.1 32.6 32.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 31.4 0.0 0.1 32.6 32.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 676 0 548 0 647 0 37 2695 0 2 1730 950 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.68 0.00 0.51 0.70 0.70 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 676 0 548 0 647 0 193 2695 0 193 1730 950 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.41 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.8 0.0 26.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.5 20.8 0.0 59.9 22.5 22.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.9 1.4 0.0 66.4 1.0 1.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 12.5 0.0 0.1 12.9 14.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.8 0.0 26.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 88.4 22.2 0.0 126.3 23.5 24.3 LnGrp LOS C A C A A A F C A F C C Approach Vol, veh/h 34 0 1851 1878 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.1 0.0 23.2 23.8 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.5 7.5 66.0 46.5 5.1 68.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 31.0 13.0 61.0 31.0 13.0 61.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.3 3.9 34.6 0.0 2.1 33.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 16.3 0.0 0.0 16.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 23.6 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/03/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 9 1750 3 0 9 1750 3 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 0 9 1842 95 95 2 2 3 0 1805 1805 0 Free None 0 0 95 2 1900 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 923 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 233 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 Stage 2 0 - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 233 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 21.1 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 233 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.041 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 21.1 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0.1 - The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/03/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 369 177 49 0 0 0 0 1721 54 721 1266 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 369 177 49 0 0 0 0 1721 54 721 1266 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 388 186 52 0 1812 57 759 1333 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 403 318 89 0 1901 60 799 3376 0 Arrive On Green 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.46 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1406 393 0 5254 160 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 388 0 238 0 1212 657 759 1333 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1800 0 1702 1842 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.2 0.0 9.4 0.0 27.7 27.8 16.8 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.2 0.0 9.4 0.0 27.7 27.8 16.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.09 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 403 0 407 0 1272 688 799 3376 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.96 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.39 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 0 407 0 1272 688 799 3376 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.35 0.35 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.6 0.0 27.6 0.0 24.4 24.4 21.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 35.1 0.0 2.1 0.0 16.2 24.7 9.6 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/IY9.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 13.2 16.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 65.7 0.0 29.7 0.0 40.6 49.1 30.7 0.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A C A D D C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 626 1869 2092 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.0 43.6 11.2 Approach LOS D D B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),K.0 34.4 22.6 57.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmalo,5 29.9 18.1 52.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+[M,8; 29.8 19.2 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 14.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 30.0 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.5 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 128 64 0 156 0 94 0 0 1 1 4 Future Vol, veh/h 0 128 64 0 156 0 94 0 0 1 1 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 135 67 0 164 0 99 0 0 1 1 4 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB Vf(BI KI3 SIB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.5 8.5 8.7 7.6 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q 100% 0% 0% 17% 0% 67% 100% 17% 0% 33% 0% 67% Stop Stop Stop Stop 94 192 156 6 94 0 0 1 0 128 156 1 0 64 0 4 99 202 164 6 1 1 1 1 0.136 0.234 0.201 0.008 4.94 4.177 4.407 4.5 Yes Yes Yes Yes 726 861 816 795 2.964 2.195 2.425 2.53 0.136 0.235 0.201 0.008 8.7 8.5 8.5 7.6 A A A A 0.5 0.9 0.7 0 The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/03/2019 --10 -�* 4\ /,* Movement Lane Configurations ttlL r ►j ttt ►) jr Traffic Volume (veh/h) 669 1047 576 484 461 224 Future Volume (veh/h) 669 1047 576 484 461 224 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 704 0 606 509 485 236 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Q Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1251 643 3383 778 929 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.00 0.36 0.66 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 704 0 606 509 485 236 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.7 0.0 26.3 3.0 10.1 5.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.7 0.0 26.3 3.0 10.1 5.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1251 643 3383 778 929 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.94 0.15 0.62 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1251 679 3383 778 929 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.4 0.0 24.7 5.1 27.9 8.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 20.9 0.1 3.8 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr4.0 0.0 14.1 0.9 4.4 1.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.3 0.0 45.7 5.2 31.7 8.7 LnGrp LOS C D A C A Approach Vol, veh/h 704 A 1115 721 Approach Delay, s/veh 28.3 27.2 24.2 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 a a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),33.4 24.1 57.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma1q,5 18.0 53.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+QP,3; 11.7 5.0 12.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 2.5 4.0 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.6 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/0312019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/03/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 650 190 95 68 174 481 247 462 77 289 167 512 Future Volume (veh/h) 650 190 95 68 174 481 247 462 77 289 167 512 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 684 200 100 72 183 506 260 486 81 304 448 358 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 672 403 201 93 711 317 366 627 104 356 374 317 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 1176 588 1781 3554 1585 1781 3050 506 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 684 0 300 72 183 506 260 282 285 304 448 358 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1728 0 1764 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1779 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.5 0.0 12.1 3.6 3.9 18.0 12.2 13.5 13.6 14.8 18.0 18.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.5 0.0 12.1 3.6 3.9 18.0 12.2 13.5 13.6 14.8 18.0 18.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 672 0 604 93 711 317 366 365 366 356 374 317 V/C Ratio(X) 1.02 0.00 0.50 0.77 0.26 1.60 0.71 0.77 0.78 0.85 1.20 1.13 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 672 0 604 182 711 317 366 365 366 356 374 317 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.3 0.0 23.5 42.1 30.4 36.0 33.3 33.8 33.8 34.7 36.0 36.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 39.3 0.0 0.6 12.7 0.2 282.7 11.1 14.6 15.1 22.0 112.1 90.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackOfQ(50%),veh/lk0.9 0.0 5.0 1.9 1.7 31.7 6.3 7.2 7.3 8.4 19.6 14.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 75.5 0.0 24.1 54.8 30.6 318.7 44.4 48.4 48.9 56.8 148.1 126.2 LnGrp LOS F A C D C F D D D E F F Approach Vol, veh/h 984 761 827 1110 Approach Delay, s/veh 59.9 224.4 47.3 116.0 Approach LOS E F D F Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 9.2 35.3 22.5 22.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 9.2 26.3 18.0 17.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 15.6 5.6 14.1 20.0 19.5 20.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 108.0 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 134 101 1232 128 118 0 1687 0 420 11 Future Volume (vph) 134 101 1232 128 118 0 1687 0 420 11 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 5013 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 5013 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 141 106 1297 135 124 0 1776 0 442 12 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 141 15 1432 0 124 0 1776 0 454 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.6 11.6 26.4 6.3 37.2 17.7 Effective Green, g (s) 11.6 11.6 26.4 6.3 37.2 17.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.33 0.08 0.47 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 256 229 1654 139 2364 616 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 c0.29 0.07 c0.35 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.07 0.87 0.89 0.75 0.74 Uniform Delay, d1 31.8 29.5 25.1 36.5 17.6 29.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.6 0.1 4.8 45.5 2.3 4.6 Delay (s) 34.3 29.7 36.1 82.0 19.9 33.6 Level of Service C C D F B C Approach Delay (s) 32.3 36.1 23.9 33.6 Approach LOS C D C C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 29.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 277 586 162 10 1082 1010 356 1397 68 467 18 Future Volume (vph) 277 586 162 10 1082 1010 356 1397 68 467 18 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5050 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5050 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 292 617 171 11 1139 1063 375 1471 72 492 19 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 28 0 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 263 789 0 11 1139 856 375 1543 0 511 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 2 7 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.0 28.0 6.5 33.5 9.5 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.0 28.0 6.5 33.5 9.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.42 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 362 737 42 1779 554 278 2114 330 v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.24 0.00 0.22 c0.11 0.31 c0.18 v/s Ratio Perm c0.54 v/c Ratio 0.73 1.07 0.26 0.64 1.54 1.35 0.73 1.55 Uniform Delay, d1 28.7 31.0 39.1 21.8 26.0 36.8 19.5 35.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.49 0.84 1.52 0.51 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.1 53.7 1.2 0.6 248.3 172.4 1.5 261.4 Delay (s) 35.8 84.7 27.9 11.3 270.2 228.2 11.5 296.6 Level of Service D F C B F F B F Approach Delay (s) 72.8 135.7 53.9 Approach LOS E F D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 110.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.39 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.6% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T+ ►j T+ ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 44 0 30 21 1482 16 11 1729 12 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 0 1 44 0 30 21 1482 16 11 1729 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 0 1 46 0 32 22 1560 17 12 1820 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 340 0 302 71 0 63 96 3004 33 69 2937 21 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.04 0.00 0.06 0.05 0.58 0.58 0.04 0.56 0.56 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 5207 57 1781 5230 37 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 2 0 1 46 0 32 22 1020 557 12 1184 649 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1702 1860 1781 1702 1864 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 0.1 3.3 0.0 2.6 1.5 23.5 23.5 0.8 30.4 30.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.1 3.3 0.0 2.6 1.5 23.5 23.5 0.8 30.4 30.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 340 0 302 71 0 63 96 1964 1073 69 1912 1047 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.50 0.23 0.52 0.52 0.18 0.62 0.62 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 340 0 302 343 0 305 96 1964 1073 82 1912 1047 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 0.41 0.41 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh42.6 0.0 42.6 61.5 0.0 60.1 58.9 16.6 16.6 60.5 19.2 19.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 0.0 6.1 5.5 1.0 1.8 0.5 0.6 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.1 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 1.1 0.8 9.1 10.2 0.4 11.7 13.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.6 0.0 42.6 70.9 0.0 66.2 64.4 17.6 18.4 61.0 19.8 20.3 LnGrp LOS D A D E A E E B B E B C Approach Vol, veh/h 3 78 1599 1845 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.6 69.0 18.5 20.2 Approach LOS D E B C Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.8 12.0 78.0 10.2 10.0 80.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 7.0 73.0 25.0 6.0 75.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.1 3.5 32.4 5.3 2.8 25.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 19.1 0.2 0.0 16.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 20.6 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/13/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 1 1518 15 0 1 1518 15 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 0 1 1598 95 95 2 2 16 0 1773 1773 0 Free None 0 0 95 2 1866 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 807 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 279 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 279 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 279 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 18 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0 - The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main StfWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 135 209 27 0 0 0 0 1199 44 841 1720 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 135 209 27 0 0 0 0 1199 44 841 1720 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 142 220 28 0 1262 46 885 1811 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 173 288 38 0 1752 64 1360 3987 0 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.79 1.00 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1260 2095 274 0 5225 184 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 204 0 186 0 849 459 885 1811 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1807 0 1821 0 1702 1837 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.1 0.0 10.8 0.0 23.9 23.9 12.3 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.1 0.0 10.8 0.0 23.9 23.9 12.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.70 0.15 0.00 0.10 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 248 0 250 0 1179 636 1360 3987 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.65 0.45 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 320 0 323 0 1179 636 1360 3987 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh46.1 0.0 45.6 0.0 31.3 31.3 8.4 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 12.3 0.0 6.7 0.0 3.8 6.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr6.2 0.0 5.3 0.0 10.2 11.5 2.7 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 58.4 0.0 52.2 0.0 35.1 38.2 8.7 0.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A D A D D A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 390 1308 2696 Approach Delay, s/veh 55.5 36.2 2.9 Approach LOS E D A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),47.8 42.6 19.6 90.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma30,9 38.1 19.5 81.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+[M,3s 25.9 14.1 2.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.5 6.6 1.1 25.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 17.5 HCM 6th LOS B The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.5 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 107 74 0 200 0 64 0 1 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 107 74 0 200 0 64 0 1 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 113 78 0 211 0 67 0 1 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SIB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.2 8.8 8.5 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 59% 100% 100% 2% 41% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 65 181 200 0 64 0 0 0 0 107 200 0 1 74 0 0 68 191 211 0 1 1 1 1 0.095 0.216 0.252 0 4.979 4.082 4.31 4.891 Yes Yes Yes Yes 721 882 838 0 3 2.095 2.31 2.917 0.094 0.217 0.252 0 8.5 8.2 8.8 7.9 A A A N 0.3 0.8 1 0 The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 10/06/2019 --O� -�* f" 4\ /01 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ttt r ►j ttt ► i r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 419 314 437 521 971 527 Future Volume (veh/h) 419 314 437 521 971 527 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 441 0 460 548 1022 555 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1245 456 2840 1145 931 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.00 0.26 0.56 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 441 0 460 548 1022 555 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 0.0 20.5 4.3 22.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 0.0 20.5 4.3 22.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1245 456 2840 1145 931 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 1.01 0.19 0.89 0.60 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1245 456 2840 1145 931 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 25.0 0.0 29.8 8.8 25.4 10.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 44.1 0.2 10.7 2.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.3 0.0 14.0 1.5 10.4 6.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 25.8 0.0 73.8 9.0 36.1 13.3 LnGrp LOS C F A D B Approach Vol, veh/h 441 A 1008 1577 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.8 38.6 28.1 Approach LOS C D C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.0 24.0 49.0 31.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 20.5 19.5 44.5 26.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 22.5 7.7 6.3 24.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.3 4.3 1.4 j Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 31.2 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 10/06/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft r ►j +T+ ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 360 147 196 104 134 139 100 193 33 344 341 678 Future Volume (veh/h) 360 147 196 104 134 139 100 193 33 344 341 678 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 379 155 206 109 141 146 105 203 35 362 625 536 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 365 186 247 129 790 352 356 608 103 485 509 431 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.27 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 728 968 1781 3554 1585 1781 3039 515 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 379 0 361 109 141 146 105 117 121 362 625 536 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1728 0 1696 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1778 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.5 0.0 18.1 5.4 2.9 7.1 4.5 5.1 5.2 16.7 24.5 24.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.5 0.0 18.1 5.4 2.9 7.1 4.5 5.1 5.2 16.7 24.5 24.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehrh 365 0 433 129 790 352 356 355 356 485 509 431 V/C Ratio(X) 1.04 0.00 0.83 0.85 0.18 0.41 0.29 0.33 0.34 0.75 1.23 1.24 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 365 0 433 129 790 352 356 355 356 485 509 431 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.3 0.0 31.7 41.3 28.3 30.0 30.6 30.8 30.9 29.9 32.8 32.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 57.6 0.0 16.9 38.0 0.5 3.6 2.1 2.5 2.6 10.0 118.8 127.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 6.9 0.0 9.2 3.7 1.3 3.0 2.1 2.4 2.5 8.3 27.5 24.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 97.9 0.0 48.6 79.3 28.8 33.6 32.7 33.3 33.5 40.0 151.6 160.1 LnGrp LOS F A D E C C C C C D F F Approach Vol, veh/h 740 396 343 1523 Approach Delay, s/veh 73.8 44.5 33.2 128.0 Approach LOS E D C F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.0 27.5 29.0 14.0 24.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 23.0 24.5 9.5 20.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 7.4 20.1 26.5 11.5 9.1 7.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 92.8 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/12/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 160 101 699 97 71 0 1702 0 731 24 Future Volume (vph) 160 101 699 97 71 0 1702 0 731 24 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 4992 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 4992 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 168 106 736 102 75 0 1792 0 769 25 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 16 838 0 75 0 1792 0 794 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 8 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 35.2 7.4 47.1 34.4 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 15.0 35.2 7.4 47.1 34.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.32 0.07 0.43 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 241 215 1597 119 2177 871 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.17 0.04 c0.35 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.08 0.52 0.63 0.82 0.91 Uniform Delay, d1 45.3 41.4 30.6 50.0 27.8 36.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.5 0.1 1.1 10.4 3.7 13.6 Delay (s) 53.8 41.6 10.9 60.4 31.5 49.9 Level of Service D D B E C D Approach Delay (s) 49.1 10.9 32.6 49.9 Approach LOS D B C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave & Sasnta Clara Ave 09/12/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 188 458 223 8 609 717 160 1579 123 744 36 Future Volume (vph) 188 458 223 8 609 717 160 1579 123 744 36 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3224 3433 5085 1583 3433 5030 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3224 3433 5085 1583 3433 5030 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 198 482 235 8 641 755 168 1662 129 783 38 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 46 0 0 0 403 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 178 691 0 8 641 352 168 1791 0 821 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.5 20.5 1.0 32.8 32.8 10.2 42.0 28.5 Effective Green, g (s) 20.5 20.5 1.0 32.8 32.8 10.2 42.0 28.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.30 0.30 0.09 0.38 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 300 600 31 1516 472 318 1920 722 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.21 0.00 0.13 0.05 c0.36 c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm c0.22 v/c Ratio 0.59 1.15 0.26 0.42 0.75 0.53 0.93 1.14 Uniform Delay, d1 40.9 44.8 54.1 31.0 34.8 47.6 32.6 40.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.50 2.42 0.59 0.36 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.1 86.6 3.1 0.6 7.5 0.9 6.2 78.0 Delay (s) 44.1 131.3 42.1 16.1 91.8 29.2 18.0 118.8 Level of Service D F D B F C B F Approach Delay (s) 114.3 57.0 19.0 Approach LOS F E B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 62.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.06 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 7: Main St & Santiago ParkM/alkie Way 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T+ ►j T+ ►j tti� ►j tti� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 9 0 24 29 0 19 32 1731 45 31 1781 2 Future Volume (veh/h) 9 0 24 29 0 19 32 1731 45 31 1781 2 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 0 25 31 0 20 34 1822 47 33 1875 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 387 0 345 50 0 45 43 2953 76 42 3035 3 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.58 0.58 0.02 0.58 0.58 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 5119 132 1781 5268 6 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 9 0 25 31 0 20 34 1211 658 33 1212 665 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1585 1781 0 1585 1781 1702 1847 1781 1702 1869 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 0.0 1.6 2.2 0.0 1.6 2.5 30.4 30.4 2.4 30.5 30.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 0.0 1.6 2.2 0.0 1.6 2.5 30.4 30.4 2.4 30.5 30.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 387 0 345 50 0 45 43 1964 1065 42 1961 1077 V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.62 0.00 0.45 0.78 0.62 0.62 0.79 0.62 0.62 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 387 0 345 343 0 305 96 1964 1065 82 1961 1077 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.44 0.44 0.44 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.0 0.0 40.4 62.5 0.0 61.2 63.1 18.1 18.1 63.1 18.1 18.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.4 11.6 0.0 6.8 25.7 1.5 2.7 13.2 0.7 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr0.2 0.0 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.7 1.4 12.0 13.4 1.2 11.9 13.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 40.1 0.0 40.9 74.1 0.0 68.0 88.8 19.5 20.8 76.3 18.8 19.3 LnGrp LOS D A D E A E F B C E B B Approach Vol, veh/h 34 51 1903 1910 Approach Delay, s/veh 40.7 71.7 21.2 20.0 Approach LOS D E C B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 33.3 8.2 79.9 8.7 8.1 80.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 7.0 73.0 25.0 6.0 75.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 3.6 4.5 32.5 4.2 4.4 32.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 20.7 0.1 0.0 21.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 21.4 HCM 6th LOS C The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC 8: Main St & Project Driveway 1 09/13/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 15 1793 3 0 15 1793 3 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free None None 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 95 2 2 2 0 16 1887 95 95 2 2 3 0 1838 1838 0 Free None 0 0 95 2 1935 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 945 0 0 Stage 1 - Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 226 - - 0 - Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 226 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 x., Stage 2 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 22.1 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnl SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 226 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.07 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 22.1 - HCM Lane LOS - - C - HCM 95th °/dile Q(veh) - - 0.2 - The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/13/2019 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 + tti� ►) ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 370 177 49 0 0 0 0 1731 54 731 1272 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 370 177 49 0 0 0 0 1731 54 731 1272 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1870 1900 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 389 186 52 0 1822 57 769 1339 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 Cap,vehrh 403 318 89 0 1761 55 894 3376 0 Arrive On Green 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.26 0.66 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1781 1406 393 0 5255 159 3456 5274 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 389 0 238 0 1219 660 769 1339 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1781 0 1800 0 1702 1842 1728 1702 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.3 0.0 9.4 0.0 27.7 27.7 17.0 9.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.3 0.0 9.4 0.0 27.7 27.7 17.0 9.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.09 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 403 0 407 0 1179 638 894 3376 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.97 0.00 0.58 0.00 1.03 1.04 0.86 0.40 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 0 407 0 1179 638 894 3376 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.6 0.0 27.6 0.0 26.1 26.2 28.3 6.2 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 35.7 0.0 2.1 0.0 35.4 45.1 3.1 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/IY9.1 0.0 4.2 0.0 16.3 19.3 7.1 2.8 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 66.3 0.0 29.7 0.0 61.5 71.2 31.4 6.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A C A F F C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 627 1879 2108 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.5 64.9 15.5 Approach LOS D E B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),25.2 32.2 22.6 57.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma,t 27.7 18.1 52.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+q,0; 29.7 19.3 11.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.0 0.0 13.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 40.6 HCM 6th LOS D The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th AWSC 13: Bush St/Driveway 2 & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.5 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41) 41) 4* 4* Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 129 65 0 156 0 94 0 0 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 129 65 0 156 0 94 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 136 68 0 164 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB Vf(BI NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.5 8.5 8.7 0 HCM LOS A A A - Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence,Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q NBLn1 EBLnlWBLnl SBLn1 0% 66% 100% 100% 0% 34% 0% 0% Stop Stop Stop Stop 94 194 156 0 94 0 0 0 0 129 156 0 0 65 0 0 99 204 164 0 1 1 1 1 0.136 0.236 0.201 0 4.933 4.164 4.396 4.873 Yes Yes Yes Yes 727 864 818 0 2.957 2.179 2.413 2.903 0.136 0.236 0.2 0 8.7 8.5 8.5 7.9 A A A N 0.5 0.9 0.7 0 The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/13/2019 __10 _�* 4\ /,* Movement Lane Configurations ttlL r ►j ttt ►) jr Traffic Volume (veh/h) 671 1051 576 487 471 224 Future Volume (veh/h) 671 1051 576 487 471 224 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 706 0 606 513 496 236 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Q Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 1251 643 3383 778 929 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.00 0.36 0.66 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, vehrh 5274 1585 1781 5274 3456 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 706 0 606 513 496 236 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1702 1585 1781 1702 1728 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.7 0.0 26.3 3.0 10.4 5.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.7 0.0 26.3 3.0 10.4 5.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 1251 643 3383 778 929 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.94 0.15 0.64 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1251 679 3383 778 929 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.5 0.0 24.7 5.1 28.1 8.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 0.0 20.9 0.1 4.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(500/o),veh/lr4.0 0.0 14.1 0.9 4.6 1.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.3 0.0 45.7 5.2 32.0 8.7 LnGrp LOS C D A C A Approach Vol, veh/h 706 A 1119 732 Approach Delay, s/veh 28.3 27.1 24.5 Approach LOS C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),33.4 24.1 57.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gma1q,5 18.0 53.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+QP,3; 11.7 5.0 12.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 2.5 4.0 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.7 HCM 6th LOS C Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/13/2019 -,* --P� -,* f-- +-- *--4\ t /'�'*♦ -' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► i T+ ►j ft if ►j ti� ►j 1� r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 654 191 95 68 176 481 247 464 77 289 169 516 Future Volume (veh/h) 654 191 95 68 176 481 247 464 77 289 169 516 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 688 201 100 72 185 506 260 488 81 304 452 360 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehrh 672 403 201 93 711 317 366 627 104 356 374 317 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow,veh/h 3456 1179 586 1781 3554 1585 1781 3052 504 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 688 0 301 72 185 506 260 283 286 304 452 360 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In1728 0 1765 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1780 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.5 0.0 12.2 3.6 4.0 18.0 12.2 13.6 13.7 14.8 18.0 18.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.5 0.0 12.2 3.6 4.0 18.0 12.2 13.6 13.7 14.8 18.0 18.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehrh 672 0 604 93 711 317 366 365 366 356 374 317 V/C Ratio(X) 1.02 0.00 0.50 0.77 0.26 1.60 0.71 0.78 0.78 0.85 1.21 1.14 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 672 0 604 182 711 317 366 365 366 356 374 317 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.3 0.0 23.5 42.1 30.4 36.0 33.3 33.8 33.8 34.7 36.0 36.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 40.9 0.0 0.6 12.7 0.2 282.7 11.1 14.8 15.2 22.0 116.3 92.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50%),veh/IY9.0 0.0 5.0 1.9 1.7 31.7 6.3 7.2 7.3 8.4 20.1 14.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 77.2 0.0 24.1 54.8 30.6 318.7 44.4 48.6 49.1 56.8 152.3 128.4 LnGrp LOS F A C D C F D D D E F F Approach Vol, veh/h 989 763 829 1116 Approach Delay, s/veh 61.0 223.9 47.4 118.6 Approach LOS E F D F Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 9.2 35.3 22.5 22.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 9.2 26.3 18.0 17.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 15.7 5.6 14.2 20.0 19.5 20.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Chl Delay 109.0 HCM 6th LOS F User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL2 SBL SBT NWL NWR Lane Configurations I W4 ►j TTT rill Traffic Volume (vph) 132 99 1262 128 120 0 1718 0 435 11 Future Volume (vph) 132 99 1262 128 120 0 1718 0 435 11 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 5015 1770 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 5015 1770 5085 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 139 104 1328 135 126 0 1808 0 458 12 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 15 1463 0 126 0 1808 0 470 0 Turn Type Prot Perm NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 8 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.5 11.5 26.1 6.3 36.9 18.1 Effective Green, g (s) 11.5 11.5 26.1 6.3 36.9 18.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.33 0.08 0.46 0.23 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 254 227 1636 139 2345 630 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 c0.29 0.07 c0.36 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.07 0.89 0.91 0.77 0.75 Uniform Delay, d1 31.8 29.6 25.6 36.6 18.0 28.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 0.1 6.0 48.8 2.5 4.8 Delay (s) 34.2 29.7 28.7 85.4 20.5 33.6 Level of Service C C C F C C Approach Delay (s) 32.3 28.7 24.8 33.6 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/13/2019 -,* --P� --t 4\ I + I \ Movement EBL EBT EBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SER SER2 Lane Configurations I 4T+ ►) ttt r ►j►j ttt rill Traffic Volume (vph) 310 586 162 10 1081 1010 364 1413 73 467 18 Future Volume (vph) 310 586 162 10 1081 1010 364 1413 73 467 18 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5048 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1610 3278 3433 5085 1583 3433 5048 2787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 326 617 171 11 1138 1063 383 1487 77 492 19 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 27 0 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 293 794 0 11 1138 856 383 1564 0 511 0 Turn Type Split NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6 9 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.0 28.0 6.5 33.5 9.5 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 1.0 28.0 28.0 6.5 33.5 9.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.42 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 362 737 42 1779 554 278 2113 330 v/s Ratio Prot 0.18 c0.24 0.00 0.22 c0.11 0.31 c0.18 v/s Ratio Perm c0.54 v/c Ratio 0.81 1.08 0.26 0.64 1.54 1.38 0.74 1.55 Uniform Delay, d1 29.4 31.0 39.1 21.8 26.0 36.8 19.6 35.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.87 1.19 1.26 0.35 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 12.5 55.9 0.3 0.2 245.8 184.2 1.6 261.4 Delay (s) 41.9 86.9 37.6 19.1 276.7 230.5 8.5 296.6 Level of Service D F D B F F A F Approach Delay (s) 75.1 143.0 52.2 Approach LOS E F D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 112.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.39 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.4% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 INTERSECTION: 2 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Santa Clara Avenue Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 295 0.19 620 0.31 NBR 0.0 P 0 342 0.00 420 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 37 0.02 97 0.06 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,459 0.43 * 1,307 0.38 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 134 0.00 144 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 321 0.38 * 233 0.26 EBR 0.0 P 0 193 0.00 67 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 76 0.05 * 90 0.06 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 6 0.00 14 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.43 0.38 E/W Critical Movements 0.43 0.32 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.751 Level of Service (LOS) C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 2 INTERSECTION: 3 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/BuffaloAvenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Buffalo Avenue Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 9 0.01 6 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 597 0.22 1,009 0.37 NBR 0.0 P 0 141 0.00 253 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 210 0.13 139 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,495 0.44 * 1,267 0.38 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 7 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 4 0.01 * 1 0.01 EBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 10 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 * 0 0.00 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.45 0.46 E/W Critical Movements 0.01 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.504 0.514 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 3 INTERSECTION: 4 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/La Vets Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: La Vets Avenue Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,400 75 0.02 287 0.08 NBT 3.0 5,100 613 0.12 962 0.19 NBR 1.0 0 1,700 274 0.00 455 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 197 0.06 161 0.05 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,071 0.24 * 897 0.22 SBR 0.0 P 0 135 0.00 223 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 305 0.09 326 0.10 EBT 3.0 5,100 456 0.13 * 427 0.12 EBR 0.0 P 0 190 0.00 201 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 295 0.09 * 268 0.08 WBT 2.0 3,400 317 0.09 514 0.15 WBR 1.0 0 1,700 207 0.00 237 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.26 0.30 E/W Critical Movements 0.21 0.25 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.522 0.601 Level of Service (LOS) A B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 4 INTERSECTION: 5 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/Town and Country Road NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Town and Country Road Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 49 0.02 66 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 860 0.17 1,101 0.22 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 140 0.00 187 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 262 0.08 401 0.13 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,075 0.21 1,025 0.20 SBR 1.0 0 1,600 31 0.00 118 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 21 0.01 128 0.08 EBT 2.0 3,400 64 0.02 136 0.04 EBR 1.0 0 1,600 68 0.02 139 0.05 WBL 1.0 1,600 271 0.17 195 0.12 WBT 2.0 3,400 52 0.02 99 0.03 WBR 2.0 0 3,200 378 0.02 414 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.25 0.34 E/W Critical Movements 0.19 0.16 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.05 0.05 Clearance Interval 0.05 ICU EJ10.05 0.600 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 5 INTERSECTION: 6 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/E Memory Lane NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: E Memory Lane Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 29 0.01 104 0.03 NBT 3.0 5,100 870 0.22 955 0.22 NBR 0.0 P 0 252 0.00 159 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 33 0.01 35 0.01 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,115 0.27 * 1,113 0.25 SBR 0.0 P 0 248 0.00 154 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 155 0.05 * 263 0.08 EBT 3.0 5,100 222 0.05 309 0.09 EBR 0.0 P 0 47 0.00 126 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 168 0.05 207 0.07 WBT 2.0 3,400 209 0.06 * 162 0.05 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 63 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.28 0.28 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.15 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.481 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 6 INTERSECTION: 7 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/WalIds Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Wallde Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 19 0.01 25 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,249 0.25 1,227 0.24 NBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 1 0.00 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,351 0.27 1,534 0.30 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 2 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 2 0.00 * 8 0.01 EBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 1 0.00 21 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.28 0.32 E/W Critical Movements 0.00 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.372 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 7 INTERSECTION: 12 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street117th Street NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: 17th Street Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 189 0.06 200 0.06 NBT 2.0 3,400 762 0.22 1,061 0.31 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 174 0.00 162 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 178 0.06 187 0.06 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,082 0.34 * 810 0.28 SBR 0.0 P 0 82 0.00 141 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 141 0.04 199 0.06 EBT 3.0 5,100 1,250 0.26 * 1,219 0.25 EBR 0.0 P 0 78 0.00 58 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 306 0.10 * 186 0.06 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,335 0.27 1,064 0.22 WBR 0.0 P 0 16 0.00 59 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.40 0.37 E/W Critical Movements 0.36 0.31 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.728 Level of Service (LOS) C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P -Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 12 INTERSECTION: 16 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Memory Lane/Lawson Way NORTHISOUTH: Memory Lane EASTIWEST: Lawson Way Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 9 0.01 NBT 1.0 1,700 3 0.00 2 0.01 NBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 6 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 17 0.01 17 0.01 SBT 1.0 1,700 1 0.00 4 0.00 SBR 1.0 P 1,600 168 0.05 149 0.02 EBL 2.0 3,200 180 0.06 284 0.09 EBT 2.0 3,400 272 0.08 262 0.08 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 15 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 0 0.00 4 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 285 0.06 212 0.05 WBR 0.0 P 0 8 0.00 18 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.02 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.13 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.05 0.02 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.230 0.216 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 16 INTERSECTION: 2 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Santa Clara Avenue Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 295 0.19 620 0.31 NBR 0.0 P 0 345 0.00 428 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 41 0.03 109 0.07 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,459 0.43 * 1,307 0.38 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 134 0.00 144 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 321 0.38 * 233 0.26 EBR 0.0 P 0 193 0.00 67 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 84 0.05 * 95 0.06 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 6 0.00 14 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.43 0.38 E/W Critical Movements 0.43 0.32 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.754 Level of Service (LOS) C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 2 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 3 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/BuffaloAvenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Buffalo Avenue Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 9 0.01 6 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 600 0.22 1,017 0.37 NBR 0.0 P 0 141 0.00 254 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 210 0.13 139 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,503 0.45 * 1,272 0.38 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 7 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 4 0.01 * 1 0.01 EBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 10 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 * 0 0.00 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.45 0.46 E/W Critical Movements 0.01 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.506 0.517 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 3 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 4 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/La Veta Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: La Veta Avenue Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/WalIda Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,400 77 0.02 288 0.09 NBT 3.0 5,100 618 0.12 965 0.19 NBR 1.0 0 1,700 283 0.00 461 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 197 0.06 161 0.05 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,073 0.24 * 902 0.22 SBR 0.0 P 0 135 0.00 223 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 305 0.09 326 0.10 EBT 3.0 5,100 456 0.13 * 427 0.12 EBR 0.0 P 0 191 0.00 203 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 299 0.09 * 281 0.08 WBT 2.0 3,400 317 0.09 514 0.15 WBR 1.0 0 1,700 207 0.00 237 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.26 0.31 E/W Critical Movements 0.22 0.25 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.603 Level of Service (LOS) B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 4 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 5 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/Town and Country Road NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Town and Country Road Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 49 0.02 66 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 876 0.17 1,112 0.22 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 147 0.00 192 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 262 0.08 401 0.13 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,082 0.21 1,045 0.21 SBR 1.0 0 1,600 31 0.00 118 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 21 0.01 128 0.08 EBT 2.0 3,400 64 0.02 136 0.04 EBR 1.0 0 1,600 68 0.02 139 0.05 WBL 1.0 1,600 273 0.17 200 0.13 WBT 2.0 3,400 52 0.02 99 0.03 WBR 2.0 0 3,200 378 0.02 414 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.25 0.34 E/W Critical Movements 0.19 0.17 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.05 0.05 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.605 Level of Service (LOS) B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 5 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 6 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/E Memory Lane NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: E Memory Lane Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 29 0.01 104 0.03 NBT 3.0 5,100 894 0.23 970 0.22 NBR 0.0 P 0 258 0.00 163 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 33 0.01 35 0.01 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,124 0.27 * 1,139 0.25 SBR 0.0 P 0 248 0.00 154 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 155 0.05 * 263 0.08 EBT 3.0 5,100 222 0.05 309 0.09 EBR 0.0 P 0 47 0.00 126 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 170 0.05 212 0.07 WBT 2.0 3,400 209 0.06 * 162 0.05 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 63 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.28 0.29 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.15 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.488 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 6 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 7 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/WalIda Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Welke Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 19 0.01 29 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,249 0.25 1,227 0.25 NBR 0.0 P 0 16 0.00 45 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 11 0.01 31 0.02 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,351 0.27 1,534 0.30 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 2 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 2 0.00 * 8 0.01 EBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 1 0.00 21 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 44 0.00 29 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.03 WBR 0.0 P 0 30 0.00 19 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.28 0.32 E/W Critical Movements 0.05 0.03 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.402 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 7 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 12 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street117th Street NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: 17th Street Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 189 0.06 200 0.06 NBT 2.0 3,400 763 0.22 1,065 0.31 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 174 0.00 162 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 180 0.06 188 0.06 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,086 0.35 * 812 0.28 SBR 0.0 P 0 86 0.00 143 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 142 0.04 203 0.06 EBT 3.0 5,100 1,250 0.26 * 1,219 0.25 EBR 0.0 P 0 78 0.00 58 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 306 0.10 * 186 0.06 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,335 0.27 1,064 0.22 WBR 0.0 P 0 17 0.00 61 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.40 0.37 E/W Critical Movements 0.36 0.31 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.730 Level of Service (LOS) C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P -Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 12 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 16 ALTERNATIVE: Exist WI Opt. E -Main Street/Walkie Way & SP Lot INTERSECTION NAME: Memory Lane/Lawson Way NORTHISOUTH: Memory Lane EASTIWEST: Lawson Way Right Exist WI Opt. E - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lot AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 9 0.01 NBT 1.0 1,700 3 0.00 2 0.01 NBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 6 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 17 0.01 17 0.01 SBT 1.0 1,700 1 0.00 4 0.00 SBR 1.0 P 1,600 169 0.05 151 0.02 EBL 2.0 3,200 184 0.06 286 0.09 EBT 2.0 3,400 274 0.08 263 0.08 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 15 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 0 0.00 4 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 286 0.06 214 0.05 WBR 0.0 P 0 8 0.00 18 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.02 E/W Critical Movements 0.12 0.13 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.05 0.02 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.ESEENOW 217 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\Existing 16 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 2 ALTERNATIVE: Opening Year Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Santa Clara Avenue Right Opening Year Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 300 0.19 629 0.31 NBR 0.0 P 0 347 0.00 426 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 49 0.03 141 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,480 0.44 * 1,327 0.39 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 136 0.00 146 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 326 0.39 * 236 0.27 EBR 0.0 P 0 196 0.00 68 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 77 0.05 * 91 0.06 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 6 0.00 14 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.44 0.40 E/W Critical Movements 0.44 0.32 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.920 0.770 Level of Service (LOS) E C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 2 INTERSECTION: 3 ALTERNATIVE: Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/BuffaloAvenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Buffalo Avenue Right Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 9 0.01 6 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 607 0.22 1,025 0.38 NBR 0.0 P 0 143 0.00 257 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 213 0.13 141 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,517 0.45 * 1,286 0.38 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 7 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 4 0.01 * 1 0.01 EBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 10 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 * 0 0.00 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.46 0.47 E/W Critical Movements 0.01 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.510 in 0.521 Level of Service (LOS) AI A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul3 INTERSECTION: 4 ALTERNATIVE: Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/La Vets Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: La Vets Avenue Right Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,400 81 0.02 294 0.09 NBT 3.0 5,100 749 0.15 1,042 0.20 NBR 1.0 0 1,700 347 0.00 506 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 211 0.06 175 0.05 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,132 0.25 * 1,059 0.25 SBR 0.0 P 0 142 0.00 234 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 317 0.09 338 0.10 EBT 3.0 5,100 469 0.13 * 435 0.13 EBR 0.0 P 0 194 0.00 209 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 315 0.09 * 303 0.09 WBT 2.0 3,400 328 0.10 523 0.15 WBR 1.0 0 1,700 221 0.00 252 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.27 0.34 E/W Critical Movements 0.22 0.25 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.647 Level of Service (LOS) B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul4 INTERSECTION: 5 ALTERNATIVE: Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/Town and Country Road NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Town and Country Road Right Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 53 0.02 69 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 962 0.19 1,188 0.23 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 160 0.00 238 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 269 0.08 519 0.16 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,149 0.23 1,114 0.22 SBR 1.0 0 1,600 33 0.00 120 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 21 0.01 132 0.08 EBT 2.0 3,400 70 0.02 157 0.05 EBR 1.0 0 1,600 69 0.02 141 0.04 WBL 1.0 1,600 296 0.19 229 0.14 WBT 2.0 3,400 69 0.02 108 0.03 WBR 2.0 0 3,200 498 0.05 458 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.27 0.40 E/W Critical Movements 0.21 0.19 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.07 0.04 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.603 0.676 Level of Service (LOS) B B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 5 INTERSECTION: 6 ALTERNATIVE: Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/E Memory Lane NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: E Memory Lane Right Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 35 0.01 123 0.04 NBT 3.0 5,100 931 0.22 1,047 0.26 NBR 0.0 P 0 195 0.00 265 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 36 0.01 40 0.01 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,189 0.29 * 1,186 0.27 SBR 0.0 P 0 269 0.00 200 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 201 0.06 297 0.09 EBT 3.0 5,100 237 0.06 * 332 0.09 EBR 0.0 P 0 65 0.00 139 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 319 0.10 * 208 0.07 WBT 2.0 3,400 230 0.07 179 0.05 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 29 0.00 77 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.30 0.31 E/W Critical Movements 0.16 0.16 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.517 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 6 INTERSECTION: 7 ALTERNATIVE: Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/WalIds Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Wallde Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Right Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 19 0.01 25 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,260 0.25 1,444 0.28 NBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 1 0.00 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,595 0.32 1,621 0.32 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 2 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 2 0.00 * 8 0.01 EBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 1 0.00 21 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 * 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.33 0.33 E/W Critical Movements 0.00 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.389 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul7 INTERSECTION: 12 ALTERNATIVE: Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street117th Street NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: 17th Street Right Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 210 0.07 208 0.07 NBT 2.0 3,400 761 0.22 1,137 0.33 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 196 0.00 214 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 194 0.06 213 0.07 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,197 0.39 853 0.30 SBR 0.0 P 0 126 0.00 165 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 160 0.05 221 0.07 EBT 3.0 5,100 1,295 0.27 1,286 0.27 EBR 0.0 P 0 86 0.00 67 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 363 0.11 213 0.07 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,411 0.28 1,103 0.23 WBR 0.0 P 0 37 0.00 79 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.46 0.40 E/W Critical Movements 0.38 0.33 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.783 Level of Service (LOS) C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P -Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 12 INTERSECTION: 16 ALTERNATIVE: Cumulative Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Memory Lane/Lawson Way NORTHISOUTH: Memory Lane EASTIWEST: Lawson Way Right Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 9 0.01 NBT 1.0 1,700 3 0.00 2 0.01 NBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 6 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 17 0.01 17 0.01 SBT 1.0 1,700 1 0.00 4 0.00 SBR 1.0 P 1,600 341 0.17 190 0.02 EBL 2.0 3,200 149 0.05 398 0.12 EBT 2.0 3,400 259 0.08 279 0.08 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 15 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 0 0.00 4 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 304 0.06 200 0.04 WBR 0.0 P 0 8 0.00 18 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.02 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.17 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.17 0.02 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.248 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 16 INTERSECTION: 2 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Santa Clara Avenue Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 300 0.19 629 0.31 NBR 0.0 P 0 350 0.00 434 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 53 0.03 153 0.10 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,480 0.44 * 1,327 0.39 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 136 0.00 146 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 326 0.39 * 236 0.27 EBR 0.0 P 0 196 0.00 68 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 85 0.05 * 96 0.06 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 6 0.00 14 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.44 0.41 E/W Critical Movements 0.44 0.33 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.925 0.783 Level of Service (LOS) E C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 2 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 3 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/BuffaloAvenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Buffalo Avenue Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 9 0.01 6 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 610 0.22 1,033 0.38 NBR 0.0 P 0 143 0.00 258 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 213 0.13 141 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,525 0.45 * 1,291 0.38 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 7 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 4 0.01 * 1 0.01 EBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 10 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 * 0 0.00 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.46 0.47 E/W Critical Movements 0.01 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.513 0.524 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul3 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 4 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/La Veta Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: La Veta Avenue Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,400 83 0.02 295 0.09 NBT 3.0 5,100 754 0.15 1,045 0.21 NBR 1.0 0 1,700 356 0.00 512 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 211 0.06 175 0.05 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,134 0.25 * 1,064 0.26 SBR 0.0 P 0 142 0.00 234 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 317 0.09 338 0.10 EBT 3.0 5,100 469 0.13 * 435 0.13 EBR 0.0 P 0 195 0.00 211 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 319 0.09 * 316 0.09 WBT 2.0 3,400 328 0.10 523 0.15 WBR 1.0 0 1,700 221 0.00 252 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.27 0.34 E/W Critical Movements 0.22 0.25 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.648 Level of Service (LOS) B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul4 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 5 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/Town and Country Road NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Town and Country Road Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 53 0.02 69 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 978 0.19 1,199 0.24 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 167 0.00 243 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 269 0.08 519 0.16 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,156 0.23 1,134 0.22 SBR 1.0 0 1,600 33 0.00 120 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 21 0.01 132 0.08 EBT 2.0 3,400 70 0.02 157 0.05 EBR 1.0 0 1,600 69 0.02 141 0.04 WBL 1.0 1,600 298 0.19 234 0.15 WBT 2.0 3,400 69 0.02 108 0.03 WBR 2.0 0 3,200 498 0.05 458 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.28 0.40 E/W Critical Movements 0.21 0.19 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.07 0.04 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.607 0.681 Level of Service (LOS) B Ila B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 5 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 6 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/E Memory Lane NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: E Memory Lane Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 35 0.01 123 0.04 NBT 3.0 5,100 955 0.23 1,062 0.26 NBR 0.0 P 0 201 0.00 269 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 36 0.01 40 0.01 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,198 0.29 * 1,212 0.28 SBR 0.0 P 0 269 0.00 200 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 201 0.06 297 0.09 EBT 3.0 5,100 237 0.06 * 332 0.09 EBR 0.0 P 0 65 0.00 139 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 321 0.10 * 213 0.07 WBT 2.0 3,400 230 0.07 179 0.05 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 29 0.00 77 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.30 0.32 E/W Critical Movements 0.16 0.16 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.524 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 6 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 7 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/WalIda Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Wallde Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 19 0.01 29 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,260 0.25 1,444 0.29 NBR 0.0 P 0 16 0.00 45 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 11 0.01 31 0.02 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,595 0.32 1,621 0.32 SBR 0.0 P 0 11 0.00 2 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 2 0.00 8 0.01 EBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 1 0.00 21 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 44 0.00 29 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.03 WBR 0.0 P 0 30 0.00 19 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.33 0.34 E/W Critical Movements 0.05 0.03 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.419 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul7 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 12 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street117th Street NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: 17th Street Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 210 0.07 208 0.07 NBT 2.0 3,400 762 0.22 1,141 0.34 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 196 0.00 214 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 196 0.06 214 0.07 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,201 0.39 * 855 0.30 SBR 0.0 P 0 130 0.00 167 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 161 0.05 225 0.07 EBT 3.0 5,100 1,295 0.27 * 1,286 0.27 EBR 0.0 P 0 86 0.00 67 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 363 0.11 * 213 0.07 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,411 0.28 1,103 0.23 WBR 0.0 P 0 38 0.00 81 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.46 0.40 E/W Critical Movements 0.38 0.33 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.785 Level of Service (LOS) C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P -Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 12 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 16 ALTERNATIVE: Cumul. WI Opt. D -Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo INTERSECTION NAME: Memory Lane/Lawson Way NORTHISOUTH: Memory Lane EASTIWEST: Lawson Way Right umul. WI Opt. D - Main Street/Walkie Way and SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 9 0.01 NBT 1.0 1,700 3 0.00 2 0.01 NBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 6 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 17 0.01 17 0.01 SBT 1.0 1,700 1 0.00 4 0.00 SBR 1.0 P 1,600 342 0.17 192 0.02 EBL 2.0 3,200 153 0.05 400 0.13 EBT 2.0 3,400 261 0.08 280 0.08 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 15 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 0 0.00 4 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 305 0.06 202 0.04 WBR 0.0 P 0 8 0.00 18 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.02 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.17 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.17 0.02 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.341 0.250 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2VCumul 16 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 2 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Santa Clara Avenue Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 393 0.22 730 0.35 NBR 0.0 P 0 364 0.00 447 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 51 0.03 148 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,568 0.46 * 1,393 0.41 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 177 0.00 172 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 342 0.43 248 0.29 EBR 0.0 P 0 206 0.00 72 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 81 0.05 * 96 0.06 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 6 0.00 15 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.46 0.44 E/W Critical Movements 0.48 0.35 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.988 in 0.838 Level of Service (LOS) E I D Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 2 INTERSECTION: 3 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/BuffaloAvenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Buffalo Avenue Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 9 0.01 6 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 648 0.24 1,054 0.39 NBR 0.0 P 0 150 0.00 270 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 224 0.14 148 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,552 0.46 * 1,350 0.40 SBR 0.0 P 0 12 0.00 7 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 4 0.01 * 1 0.01 EBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 11 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 * 0 0.00 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.47 0.48 E/W Critical Movements 0.01 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.521 in 0.539 Level of Service (LOS) AI A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 3 INTERSECTION: 4 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/La Vets Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: La Vets Avenue Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,400 94 0.03 335 0.10 NBT 3.0 5,100 950 0.19 1,446 0.28 NBR 1.0 0 1,700 364 0.00 531 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 225 0.07 184 0.05 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,499 0.33 * 1,080 0.26 SBR 0.0 P 0 158 0.00 258 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 437 0.13 387 0.11 EBT 3.0 5,100 515 0.15 * 457 0.13 EBR 0.0 P 0 263 0.00 219 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 331 0.10 * 318 0.09 WBT 2.0 3,400 344 0.10 549 0.16 WBR 1.0 0 1,700 226 0.00 302 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.35 0.36 E/W Critical Movements 0.25 0.28 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.653 0.686 Level of Service (LOS) B B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 4 INTERSECTION: 5 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/Town and Country Road NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Town and Country Road Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 56 0.02 73 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,226 0.24 1,607 0.32 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 168 0.00 250 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 318 0.10 545 0.17 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,519 0.30 1,203 0.24 SBR 1.0 0 1,600 40 0.00 126 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 26 0.02 135 0.08 EBT 2.0 3,400 74 0.02 165 0.05 EBR 1.0 0 1,600 72 0.02 143 0.04 WBL 1.0 1,600 311 0.19 240 0.15 WBT 2.0 3,400 72 0.02 113 0.03 WBR 2.0 0 3,200 523 0.04 475 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.34 0.49 E/W Critical Movements 0.22 0.20 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.07 0.04 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.775 Level of Service (LOS) C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 5 INTERSECTION: 6 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/E Memory Lane NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: E Memory Lane Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 37 0.01 129 0.04 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,130 0.27 1,363 0.32 NBR 0.0 P 0 239 0.00 278 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 37 0.01 42 0.01 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,443 0.34 * 1,264 0.29 SBR 0.0 P 0 310 0.00 210 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 238 0.07 398 0.12 EBT 3.0 5,100 249 0.06 * 349 0.10 EBR 0.0 P 0 68 0.00 154 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 335 0.11 * 223 0.07 WBT 2.0 3,400 242 0.07 188 0.06 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 30 0.00 84 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.36 0.34 E/W Critical Movements 0.17 0.18 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.564 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 6 INTERSECTION: 7 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/WalIds Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Wallde Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 21 0.01 28 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,482 0.29 1,731 0.34 NBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 1 0.00 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,729 0.34 * 1,781 0.35 SBR 0.0 P 0 12 0.00 2 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 2 0.00 9 0.01 EBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 1 0.00 24 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.35 0.37 E/W Critical Movements 0.00 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.424 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 7 INTERSECTION: 12 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street117th Street NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: 17th Street Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 221 0.07 240 0.08 NBT 2.0 3,400 821 0.24 1,194 0.35 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 201 0.00 225 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 223 0.07 224 0.07 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,257 0.41 * 896 0.31 SBR 0.0 P 0 132 0.00 173 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 168 0.05 223 0.07 EBT 3.0 5,100 1,486 0.31 * 1,306 0.27 EBR 0.0 P 0 90 0.00 70 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 381 0.12 * 224 0.07 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,482 0.30 1,211 0.25 WBR 0.0 P 0 39 0.00 83 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.48 0.42 E/W Critical Movements 0.43 0.34 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.811 Level of Service (LOS) D Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P -Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 12 INTERSECTION: 16 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Memory Lane/Lawson Way NORTHISOUTH: Memory Lane EASTIWEST: Lawson Way Right Year 2040 Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 9 0.01 NBT 1.0 1,700 3 0.00 2 0.01 NBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 7 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 18 0.01 22 0.01 SBT 1.0 1,700 1 0.00 4 0.00 SBR 1.0 P 1,600 358 0.17 200 0.01 EBL 2.0 3,200 173 0.05 418 0.13 EBT 2.0 3,400 296 0.09 355 0.10 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 16 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 0 0.00 4 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 315 0.06 233 0.05 WBR 0.0 P 0 8 0.00 19 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.02 E/W Critical Movements 0.12 0.18 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.17 0.01 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU EnilLevel 0.354 0.262 of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 16 INTERSECTION: 2 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D- Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/Santa Clara Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Santa Clara Avenue Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 393 0.22 730 0.35 NBR 0.0 P 0 367 0.00 455 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 55 0.03 160 0.10 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,568 0.46 * 1,393 0.41 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 177 0.00 172 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 342 0.43 * 248 0.29 EBR 0.0 P 0 206 0.00 72 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 89 0.06 * 101 0.06 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 6 0.00 15 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.46 0.45 E/W Critical Movements 0.48 0.35 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.993 0.851 Level of Service (LOS) E D Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 2 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 3 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc INTERSECTION NAME: Broadway/BuffaloAvenue NORTHISOUTH: Broadway EASTIWEST: Buffalo Avenue Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 9 0.01 6 0.00 NBT 2.0 3,400 651 0.24 1,062 0.39 NBR 0.0 P 0 150 0.00 271 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 224 0.14 148 0.09 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,560 0.46 * 1,355 0.40 SBR 0.0 P 0 12 0.00 7 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 4 0.01 * 1 0.01 EBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 11 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 * 0 0.00 WBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.47 0.49 E/W Critical Movements 0.01 0.01 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.523 0.542 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 3 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 4 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/La Veta Avenue NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: La Veta Avenue Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,400 96 0.03 336 0.10 NBT 3.0 5,100 955 0.19 1,449 0.28 NBR 1.0 0 1,700 373 0.00 537 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,400 225 0.07 184 0.05 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,501 0.33 * 1,085 0.26 SBR 0.0 P 0 158 0.00 258 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,400 437 0.13 387 0.11 EBT 3.0 5,100 515 0.15 * 457 0.13 EBR 0.0 P 0 264 0.00 221 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,400 335 0.10 * 331 0.10 WBT 2.0 3,400 344 0.10 549 0.16 WBR 1.0 0 1,700 226 0.00 302 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.35 0.36 E/W Critical Movements 0.25 0.28 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.687 Level of Service (LOS) B Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 4 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 5 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/Town and Country Road NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Town and Country Road Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 56 0.02 73 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,242 0.24 1,618 0.32 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 175 0.00 255 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 318 0.10 545 0.17 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,526 0.30 1,223 0.24 SBR 1.0 0 1,600 40 0.00 126 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 26 0.02 135 0.08 EBT 2.0 3,400 74 0.02 165 0.05 EBR 1.0 0 1,600 72 0.02 143 0.04 WBL 1.0 1,600 313 0.20 245 0.15 WBT 2.0 3,400 72 0.02 113 0.03 WBR 2.0 0 3,200 523 0.04 475 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.34 0.49 E/W Critical Movements 0.22 0.20 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.07 0.04 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.677 0.780 Level of Service (LOS) B C Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 5 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 6 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/E Memory Lane NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: E Memory Lane Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 37 0.01 129 0.04 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,154 0.27 1,378 0.33 NBR 0.0 P 0 245 0.00 282 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 37 0.01 42 0.01 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,452 0.35 * 1,290 0.29 SBR 0.0 P 0 310 0.00 210 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 238 0.07 398 0.12 EBT 3.0 5,100 249 0.06 * 349 0.10 EBR 0.0 P 0 68 0.00 154 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 337 0.11 * 228 0.07 WBT 2.0 3,400 242 0.07 188 0.06 WBR 1.0 P 1,600 30 0.00 84 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.36 0.34 E/W Critical Movements 0.17 0.18 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 ICU EJ10.05 0.567 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 6 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 7 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street/WalIda Way -Santiago Park -Driveway NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: Wallde Way -Santiago Park -Driveway Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 21 0.01 32 0.02 NBT 3.0 5,100 1,482 0.29 1,731 0.35 NBR 0.0 P 0 16 0.00 45 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 11 0.01 31 0.02 SBT 3.0 5,100 1,729 0.34 1,781 0.35 SBR 0.0 P 0 12 0.00 2 0.00 EBL 1.0 1,600 2 0.00 9 0.01 EBT 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 1 0.00 24 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 44 0.00 29 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.03 WBR 0.0 P 0 30 0.00 19 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.35 0.37 E/W Critical Movements 0.05 0.03 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.454 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 7 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 12 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D- Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc INTERSECTION NAME: Main Street117th Street NORTHISOUTH: Main Street EASTIWEST: 17th Street Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 2.0 3,200 221 0.07 240 0.08 NBT 2.0 3,400 822 0.24 1,198 0.35 NBR 1.0 P 1,600 201 0.00 225 0.00 SBL 2.0 3,200 225 0.07 225 0.07 SBT 2.0 3,400 1,261 0.41 * 898 0.32 SBR 0.0 P 0 136 0.00 175 0.00 EBL 2.0 3,200 169 0.05 227 0.07 EBT 3.0 5,100 1,486 0.31 * 1,306 0.27 EBR 0.0 P 0 90 0.00 70 0.00 WBL 2.0 3,200 381 0.12 * 224 0.07 WBT 3.0 5,100 1,482 0.30 1,211 0.25 WBR 0.0 P 0 40 0.00 85 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.48 0.42 E/W Critical Movements 0.43 0.34 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.958 0.812 Level of Service (LOS) E D Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P -Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 12 P Santiago INTERSECTION: INTERSECTION NAME: NORTHISOUTH: EASTIWEST: 16 ALTERNATIVE: Year 2040 WI Opt. D - Main Street/Wallde Way & SP Lc Memory Lane/Lawson Way Memory Lane Lawson Way Right Fear 2040 WI Opt. D -Main Street/Wal lde Way & SP Lo AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 1.0 1,600 1 0.00 9 0.01 NBT 1.0 1,700 3 0.00 2 0.01 NBR 0.0 P 0 3 0.00 7 0.00 SBL 1.0 1,600 18 0.01 22 0.01 SBT 1.0 1,700 1 0.00 4 0.00 SBR 1.0 P 1,600 359 0.17 202 0.01 EBL 2.0 3,200 177 0.06 420 0.13 EBT 2.0 3,400 298 0.09 356 0.11 EBR 1.0 P 1,600 7 0.00 16 0.00 WBL 1.0 1,600 0 0.00 4 0.00 WBT 3.0 5,100 316 0.06 235 0.05 WBR 0.0 P 0 8 0.00 19 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.02 E/W Critical Movements 0.12 0.18 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.17 0.01 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU EnilLevel 0.356 0.264 of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet 2\2040 16 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 13 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Bush Street/Edgewood Road NORTHISOUTH: Bush Street EASTIWEST: Edgewood Road Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 58 0.00 85 0.00 NBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.05 NBR 0.0 P 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 1 0.00 SBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 1 0.00 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 4 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 2 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 96 0.10 115 0.10 EBR 0.0 P 0 67 0.00 58 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 180 0.11 140 0.08 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.04 0.05 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.10 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.202 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet for HCM\Existing 13 INTERSECTION: 13 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Bush Street/Edgewood Road NORTHISOUTH: Bush Street EASTIWEST: Edgewood Road Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 58 0.00 85 0.00 NBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.05 NBR 0.0 P 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 96 0.10 116 0.10 EBR 0.0 P 0 67 0.00 59 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 180 0.11 140 0.08 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.04 0.05 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.10 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.203 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet for HCM\Existing 13 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 13 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Bush Street/Edgewood Road NORTHISOUTH: Bush Street EASTIWEST: Edgewood Road Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 59 0.00 86 0.00 NBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.05 NBR 0.0 P 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 1 0.00 SBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 1 0.00 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 4 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 2 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 101 0.10 120 0.11 EBR 0.0 P 0 68 0.00 59 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 192 0.11 145 0.09 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.04 0.05 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.11 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.206 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet for HCMVCumul 13 INTERSECTION: 13 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Bush Street/Edgewood Road NORTHISOUTH: Bush Street EASTIWEST: Edgewood Road Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 59 0.00 86 0.00 NBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.05 NBR 0.0 P 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 101 0.10 121 0.11 EBR 0.0 P 0 68 0.00 60 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 192 0.11 145 0.09 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.04 0.05 E/W Critical Movements 0.11 0.11 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.207 Level of Service (LOS) A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet for HCMVCumul 13 P Santiago INTERSECTION: 13 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Bush Street/Edgewood Road NORTHISOUTH: Bush Street EASTIWEST: Edgewood Road Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 64 0.00 94 0.00 NBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.06 NBR 0.0 P 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 1 0.00 SBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 1 0.00 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 4 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 2 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 107 0.11 128 0.11 EBR 0.0 P 0 74 0.00 64 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 200 0.12 156 0.09 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.04 0.06 E/W Critical Movements 0.12 0.11 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.206 0.218 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet for HCM\2040 13 INTERSECTION: 13 ALTERNATIVE: Existing Conditions INTERSECTION NAME: Bush Street/Edgewood Road NORTHISOUTH: Bush Street EASTIWEST: Edgewood Road Right Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Turn # of Turn Lanegroup Mvmt. Lanes Cond. Capacity Vol. VIC Vol. VIC NBL 0.0 0 64 0.00 94 0.00 NBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.04 0 0.06 NBR 0.0 P 0 1 0.00 0 0.00 SBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBT 1.0 1,700 0 0.00 0 0.00 SBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 EBT 1.0 1,700 107 0.11 129 0.11 EBR 0.0 P 0 74 0.00 65 0.00 WBL 0.0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 WBT 1.0 1,700 200 0.12 156 0.09 WBR 0.0 P 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 N/S Critical Movements 0.04 0.06 E/W Critical Movements 0.12 0.11 Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 ICU 0.206 0.219 Level of Service (LOS) A A Notes: ICU - Intersection Capacity Utilization V/C - Volume to Capacity Ratio Right Turn Conditions: F -Free Right Turn 0 -Overlap Phase P - Permitted Right Turn N - No Right Turn on Red D:AProjects\RE - 2525 Main Street\Analysis Offset September 2019 RevisedAICU Worksheet for HCM\2040 13 P Santiago Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving 17th St On to Main St Off 1530 6 2 Basic Basic Main St Off to Main St On 2200 5 3 Weaving Weaving Main St On to SR-22 Connector 1730 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 8990 13380 0.89 16.2 92.6 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 7470 11485 0.94 16.1 92.9 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 4068 4068 2.01 15.1 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mVin T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 15.9 76.5 72.2 3.9 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 15.9 Density, veh/mi/In 72.2 Average Travel Time, min 3.9 Density, pc/mi/In 76.5 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 52043 PM NB Exist AM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving 17th St On to Main St Off 1530 6 2 Basic Basic Main St Off to Main St On 2200 5 3 Weaving Weaving Main St On to SR-22 Connector 1730 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 8500 13488 0.73 14.7 96.6 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 7491 11485 0.81 16.9 88.8 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5032 5032 1.63 18.6 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mVin T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 16.4 76.3 71.9 3.8 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 16.4 Density, veh/mi/In 71.9 Average Travel Time, min 3.8 Density, pc/mi/In 76.3 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 520:58 PM NB Exist PM.mf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Diverge Diverge Broadway Off -Ramp 1500 3 2 Diverge Basic Main Street Off -Ramp 700 3 3 Basic Basic 5280 2 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 0.943 4991 1060 7200 2000 0.69 0.53 60.4 55.4 27.5 31.8 D Segment 2: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 0.943 1 3930 712 7200 1 2000 0.55 1 0.36 69.9 - 18.7 - C Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 3035 4774 0.64 67.8 22.4 C Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 65.8 23.3 22.7 1.3 C Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 65.8 Density, veh/mi/In 22.7 Average Travel Time, min 1.3 Density, pc/mi/In 23.3 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 521:14 PM SB Diverge AM.xuf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Diverge Diverge Broadway Off -Ramp 1500 3 2 Diverge Basic Main Street Off -Ramp 700 3 3 Basic Basic 5280 2 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 0.943 4828 1000 7200 2000 0.67 0.50 60.5 55.5 26.6 31.0 D Segment 2: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 0.943 1 3828 402 7200 1 2000 0.53 1 0.20 69.9 1 18.3 - C Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 3231 4774 0.68 67.1 24.1 C Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 65.5 24.1 23.5 1.3 C Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 65.5 Density, veh/mi/In 23.5 Average Travel Time, min 1.3 Density, pc/mi/In 24.1 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 52131 PM SB Diverge PM.xuf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 4 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Basic Basic South of SR-22 2850 4 2 Merge Basic 1-5 Connector 600 6 3 Basic Basic 1-5 Connector Lane Drop 940 5 4 Weaving Weaving Main St On to 17th St Off 1400 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 8093 9188 0.88 56.6 35.7 E Segment 2: Merge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 1 0.943 11311 3218 14400 1 4000 0.56 1 0.80 69.7 - 19.4 - C Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 11311 11485 0.98 51.9 43.6 E Segment 4: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 12383 13374 0.93 50.7 40.7 E Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 55.0 36.4 33.8 1.2 E Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 55.0 Density, veh/mi/In 33.8 Average Travel Time, min 1.2 Density, pc/mi/In 36.4 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. FICSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 521 44 PM SB Exist AM.xuf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 4 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Basic Basic South of SR-22 2850 4 2 Merge Basic 1-5 Connector 600 6 3 Basic Basic 1-5 Connector Lane Drop 940 5 4 Weaving Weaving Main St On to 17th St Off 1400 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 9068 9188 1.10 48.3 46.9 F Segment 2: Merge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 1 0.943 10495 3426 14400 1 4000 0.70 1 0.86 43.2 - 40.5 - E Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 10495 11485 1.18 55.0 34.6 F Segment 4: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 10523 10523 1.09 39.0 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 45.8 43.5 41.0 1.4 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 45.8 Density, veh/mi/In 41.0 Average Travel Time, min 1.4 Density, pc/mi/In 43.5 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. FICSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 521:58 PM SB Exist PM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving SR-57 SB Collector to Town & Country Rd Off -Ramp 1100 4 2 Basic Basic Town & Country Off to Town & Country On 1480 3 3 Weaving Weaving Town & Country Rd On to Grand Ave Off 1300 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 2181 2181 3.24 12.1 45.0 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5660 6951 1.44 55.6 29.2 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 4831 4831 1.30 26.8 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 29.3 40.0 37.7 1.5 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 29.3 Density, veh/mi/In 37.7 Average Travel Time, min 1.5 Density, pc/mi/In 40.0 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 520:03 PM EB Exist AM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 6/14/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving SR-57 SB Collector to Town & Country Rd Off -Ramp 1100 4 2 Basic Basic Town & Country Off to Town & Country On 1480 3 3 Weaving Weaving Town & Country Rd On to Grand Ave Off 1300 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 2675 2675 2.65 14.9 45.0 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5660 6951 1.28 55.9 29.2 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5163 5163 1.42 28.7 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 31.0 40.0 37.7 1.4 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 31.0 Density, veh/mi/In 37.7 Average Travel Time, min 1.4 Density, pc/mi/In 40.0 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HC51Gi9 Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 52028 PM EB Exist PM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave Off to Grand Ave On 1080 4 2 Basic Basic La Veta Ave Off to La Veta Ave On 1580 3 3 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave On to 1-5/SR-57 Connector 1530 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 8205 8205 1.03 45.6 45.0 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 6951 6951 1.00 55.6 41.7 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 7483 8804 0.85 48.3 38.7 E Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 49.7 41.4 40.0 1.0 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 49.7 Density, veh/mi/In 40.0 Average Travel Time, min 1.0 Density, pc/mi/In 41.4 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 522:11 PM WB Exist AM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Existing With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave Off to Grand Ave On 1080 4 2 Basic Basic La Veta Ave Off to La Veta Ave On 1580 3 3 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave On to 1-5/SR-57 Connector 1530 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 6043 8555 0.95 17.2 87.6 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5302 6951 1.08 22.6 78.4 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 3236 3236 1.88 18.0 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 19.3 67.5 64.7 2.5 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 19.3 Density, veh/mi/In 64.7 Average Travel Time, min 2.5 Density, pc/mi/In 67.5 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 52224 PM WB Exist PM.mf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving 17th St On to Main St Off 1530 6 2 Basic Basic Main St Off to Main St On 2200 5 3 Weaving Weaving Main St On to SR-22 Connector 1730 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 8843 13397 0.89 15.6 94.3 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 7330 11485 0.95 15.5 94.7 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 3589 3589 2.23 13.3 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mVin T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 15.1 77.7 73.3 4.1 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 15.1 Density, veh/mi/In 73.3 Average Travel Time, min 4.1 Density, pc/mi/In 77.7 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 524:00 PM NB 2040 AM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving 17th St On to Main St Off 1530 6 2 Basic Basic Main St Off to Main St On 2200 5 3 Weaving Weaving Main St On to SR-22 Connector 1730 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 7733 13530 0.76 12.0 107.1 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 6713 11485 0.86 13.4 100.1 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 2939 2939 2.50 10.9 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mVin T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 12.4 83.5 78.7 5.0 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 12.4 Density, veh/mi/In 78.7 Average Travel Time, min 5.0 Density, pc/mi/In 83.5 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 524:17 PM NB 2040 PM.xuf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 4 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Basic Basic South of SR-22 2850 4 2 Merge Basic 1-5 Connector 600 6 3 Basic Basic 1-5 Connector Lane Drop 940 5 4 Weaving Weaving Main St On to 17th St Off 1400 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 8412 9188 0.93 43.9 47.9 F Segment 2: Merge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 1 0.943 10694 3700 14400 1 4000 0.59 1 0.93 35.5 - 50.3 - F Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 10694 11485 1.07 52.7 35.8 F Segment 4: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 11822 11822 1.01 43.8 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 44.0 45.3 42.7 1.5 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 44.0 Density, veh/mi/In 42.7 Average Travel Time, min 1.5 Density, pc/mi/In 45.3 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 524:34 PM SB 2040 AM.xuf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 4 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Basic Basic South of SR-22 2850 4 2 Merge Basic 1-5 Connector 600 6 3 Basic Basic 1-5 Connector Lane Drop 940 5 4 Weaving Weaving Main St On to 17th St Off 1400 6 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 9064 9188 1.11 48.3 47.0 F Segment 2: Merge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 1 0.943 10483 3691 14400 1 4000 0.71 1 0.92 37.5 - 46.6 - F Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 10483 11485 1.21 53.3 34.5 F Segment 4: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mVIn) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 10303 10303 1.12 38.2 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 44.6 44.3 41.7 1.5 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 44.6 Density, veh/mi/In 41.7 Average Travel Time, min 1.5 Density, pc/mi/In 44.3 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 524:50 PM SB 2040 PM.xuf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Diverge Diverge Broadway Off -Ramp 1500 3 2 Diverge Basic Main Street Off -Ramp 700 3 3 Basic Basic 5280 2 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 0.943 5629 1041 7200 2000 0.78 0.52 60.5 55.4 31.0 34.4 D Segment 2: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 1 0.943 4588 887 7200 1 2000 0.64 1 0.44 68.7 - 22.3 - C Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 3489 4774 0.73 65.8 26.5 D Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 64.6 27.2 26.5 1.3 D Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 64.6 Density, veh/mi/In 26.5 Average Travel Time, min 1.3 Density, pc/mi/In 27.2 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 525:06 PM SB Diverge AM.xuf ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Project Information Analyst TR Agency Translutions Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed pM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Diverge Diverge Broadway Off -Ramp 1500 3 2 Diverge Basic Main Street Off -Ramp 700 3 3 Basic Basic 5280 2 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 0.943 5300 1056 7200 2000 0.74 0.53 60.5 55.4 291 33.1 D Segment 2: Diverge Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS F R F R Freeway Ramp Freeway Ramp F R F R Freeway Ramp 1 0.95 0.95 0.943 0.943 1 4244 553 7200 1 2000 0.59 1 0.28 69.5 1 20.4 1 C Segment 3: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 3481 4774 0.73 65.8 26.4 D Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 64.7 26.4 25.8 1.3 D Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 64.7 Density, veh/mi/In 25.8 Average Travel Time, min 1.3 Density, pc/mi/In 26.4 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 52522 PM SB Diverge PM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking Access Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving SR-57 SB Collector to Town & Country Rd Off -Ramp 1100 4 2 Basic Basic Town & Country Off to Town & Country On 1480 3 3 Weaving Weaving Town & Country Rd On to Grand Ave Off 1300 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 2056 2056 3.48 11.4 45.0 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5634 6951 1.49 55.5 29.0 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 4573 4573 1.40 25.4 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 28.4 40.0 37.7 1.6 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 28.4 Density, veh/mi/In 37.7 Average Travel Time, min 1.6 Density, pc/mi/In 40.0 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 523:15 PM EB 2040 AM.mf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving SR-57 SB Collector to Town & Country Rd Off -Ramp 1100 4 2 Basic Basic Town & Country Off to Town & Country On 1480 3 3 Weaving Weaving Town & Country Rd On to Grand Ave Off 1300 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 2932 2932 2.43 16.3 45.0 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 6046 6951 1.32 56.1 32.3 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5706 5706 1.37 31.7 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 33.1 41.0 38.7 1.3 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 33.1 Density, veh/mi/In 38.7 Average Travel Time, min 1.3 Density, pc/mi/In 41.0 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 523:36 PM EB 2040 PM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed AM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave Off to Grand Ave On 1080 4 2 Basic Basic La Veta Ave Off to La Veta Ave On 1580 3 3 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave On to 1-5/SR-57 Connector 1530 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 7817 8054 1.03 39.7 49.3 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 6064 6951 0.96 32.3 62.6 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 6854 6939 0.99 46.7 36.7 E Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 39.0 48.4 46.5 1.2 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 39.0 Density, veh/mi/In 46.5 Average Travel Time, min 1.2 Density, pc/mi/In 48.4 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 525:38 PM WB 2040 AM.xuf Project Information ReportHCS7 Freeway Facilities Analyst TR Agency Translutions, INC. Jurisdiction Caltrans Time Period Analyzed PM Peak Hour Analysis Year Year 2040 With Option E - Main St/Walkie Way Access and Surface Parking Lot Date 9/3/2019 Project Description The Addington Facility Global Input Jam Density, pc/mi/In 190.0 Density at Capacity, pc/mi/In 45.0 Queue Discharge Capacity Drop, % 7 Total Segments 3 Total Time Periods 1 Time Period Duration, min 15 Segment Geometric Data No. Coded Analyzed Name Length, ft Lanes 1 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave Off to Grand Ave On 1080 4 2 Basic Basic La Veta Ave Off to La Veta Ave On 1580 3 3 Weaving Weaving La Veta Ave On to 1-5/SR-57 Connector 1530 4 Facility Segment Data Segment 1: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 5803 8539 1.02 15.9 91.5 F Segment 2: Basic Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 0.943 4872 6951 1.15 18.6 87.1 F Segment 3: Weaving Time Period PHF fHV Flow Rate (pc/h) Capacity (pc/h) d/c Ratio Speed (mi/h) Density (pc/mi/In) LOS 1 0.95 1.000 2198 2198 2.54 12.2 45.0 F Facility Time Period Results T Speed, mi/h Density, pc/mi/In Density, veh/mi/In T Travel Time, min LOS 1 1 15.9 71.4 68.3 3.0 F Facility Overall Results Space Mean Speed, mi/h 15.9 Density, veh/mi/In 68.3 Average Travel Time, min 3.0 Density, pc/mi/In 71.4 Copyright © 2019 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCSUN Freeways Version 7.5 Generated: 9/32019 525:50 PM WB 2040 PM.mf Memorandum: The Addington Supplemental Traffic Impact Analysis ATTACHMENT C: QUEUE ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS P%RE-2525 MAIN STREEMNALYSIS OFFSEFSEPTENBER Z191NEWSNPPLENENTALANALYSIS N X SW.3,F 19 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/03/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 178 309 193 240 8 33 1290 38 1567 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.21 0.56 0.22 0.01 0.17 0.60 0.14 0.69 Control Delay 58.5 28.3 58.4 32.4 0.0 64.6 35.4 51.1 27.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 58.5 28.3 58.4 32.4 0.0 64.6 35.4 51.1 27.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 68 57 74 73 0 13 223 13 358 Queue Length 95th (ft) 101 79 109 105 0 31 352 30 405 Internal Link Dist (ft) 486 468 678 587 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 357 1472 343 1067 585 343 2159 343 2279 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.50 0.21 0.56 0.22 0.01 0.10 0.60 0.11 0.69 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago ParkANalkie Way 09/03/2019 'A 4\ T '* Lane Group EBL EBT NBL NBT SB Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1 21 1373 1 1497 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.24 0.42 0.01 0.48 Control Delay 33.0 0.0 64.4 12.4 88.0 2.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.0 0.0 64.4 12.8 88.0 2.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 0 17 167 1 19 Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 0 m31 193 ml 30 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 110 675 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 150 80 Base Capacity (vph) 364 563 191 3262 191 3135 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 1201 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 177 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.67 0.01 0.51 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & 1-5 NB Ramps/Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 --P� -,* -*--- 4- 4\ + I I i Lane Group EBT EBR2 WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL2 SBT SBR NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 86 156 99 84 602 70 1386 18 800 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.25 0.81 0.29 0.59 0.36 0.53 0.74 0.03 0.92 Control Delay 44.2 3.3 80.2 5.1 76.0 36.6 48.3 22.7 0.5 55.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.2 3.3 80.2 5.1 76.0 36.6 48.3 23.3 0.5 55.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 0 117 0 27 99 48 367 0 330 Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 11 #219 23 m#59 m140 91 423 m0 #450 Internal Link Dist (ft) 192 268 811 225 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 60 175 150 130 450 Base Capacity(vph) 244 359 212 359 143 1684 151 1885 646 917 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.24 0.74 0.28 0.59 0.36 0.46 0.81 0.03 0.87 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 121 649 7 536 621 62 1516 663 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.93 0.05 0.29 0.65 0.43 0.73 0.93 Control Delay 45.1 64.2 85.3 12.5 15.1 33.6 9.2 64.2 Queue Delay 0.0 26.8 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 45.1 91.0 85.3 12.5 19.3 33.6 9.2 64.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 89 252 2 30 183 21 54 282 Queue Length 95th (ft) 153 #370 m4 62 244 m29 101 #403 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity (vph) 328 702 146 1856 961 145 2077 731 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 258 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 84 0 0 0 0 1 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 1.05 0.05 0.29 0.88 0.43 0.73 0.91 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/03/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 274 453 216 169 66 108 1161 36 1319 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.28 0.64 0.16 0.12 0.42 0.57 0.13 0.70 Control Delay 56.2 25.1 60.7 32.2 0.4 38.7 34.3 51.0 34.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56.2 25.1 60.7 32.2 0.4 38.7 34.3 51.0 34.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 105 76 83 51 0 45 344 12 309 Queue Length 95th (ft) 151 108 124 80 0 69 394 30 377 Internal Link Dist (ft) 489 501 678 490 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 443 1606 371 1032 571 343 2067 338 1882 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.62 0.28 0.58 0.16 0.12 0.31 0.56 0.11 0.70 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago ParkANalkie Way 09/03/2019 'A 4\ T '* Lane Group EBL EBT NBL NBT SBL S Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 23 27 1319 1 1651 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.04 0.25 0.41 0.01 0.55 Control Delay 33.6 0.1 72.6 10.7 45.0 30.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.6 0.1 72.6 11.0 45.0 30.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 0 20 117 1 478 Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 0 m45 390 ml 531 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 110 679 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 150 80 Base Capacity (vph) 364 558 191 3254 191 3008 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 1109 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.04 0.14 0.61 0.01 0.55 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & 1-5 NB Ramps/Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 --P� -,* -*--- 4- 4\ + I I i Lane Group EBT EBR2 WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL2 SBT SBR NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 75 122 94 246 961 109 1352 142 311 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.23 0.69 0.29 0.65 0.43 0.49 0.58 0.18 0.74 Control Delay 49.1 1.7 69.4 4.6 58.6 41.3 26.9 5.3 1.3 59.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.1 1.7 69.4 4.6 58.6 41.3 26.9 5.4 1.3 59.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 30 0 91 0 104 241 61 19 0 131 Queue Length 95th (ft) 64 1 152 18 m148 m289 113 75 0 181 Internal Link Dist (ft) 192 268 811 225 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 60 175 150 130 450 Base Capacity(vph) 220 383 233 383 419 2216 224 2339 779 499 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.52 0.25 0.59 0.43 0.49 0.61 0.18 0.62 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 200 708 10 1051 774 123 1487 380 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.93 0.07 0.50 0.85 0.72 0.60 0.87 Control Delay 47.9 61.1 29.9 6.2 15.5 88.5 21.4 69.8 Queue Delay 0.0 13.5 0.0 0.2 19.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 47.9 74.6 29.9 6.4 35.0 88.5 21.4 69.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 152 274 4 67 147 52 177 164 Queue Length 95th (ft) ml92 m#355 m4 80 #195 #102 304 #250 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity (vph) 368 769 143 2118 912 170 2463 452 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 361 152 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 66 0 0 0 0 13 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 1.01 0.07 0.60 1.02 0.72 0.61 0.84 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Existing Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 2: Broadway & Santa Clara Ave 09/13/2019 f-- f �• l Lane Group EBT WBL WBR NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 682 88 6 674 43 1536 v/c Ratio 1.12 0.91 0.03 0.49 0.46 0.96 Control Delay 106.7 117.6 0.2 16.7 62.7 41.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 106.7 117.6 0.2 16.7 62.7 41.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) —477 55 0 103 26 461 Queue Length 95th (ft) #798 #164 0 181 #74 #740 Internal Link Dist (ft) 394 243 218 Turn Bay Length (ft) 160 Base Capacity (vph) 608 97 398 1373 94 1603 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.12 0.91 0.02 0.49 0.46 0.96 Intersection Summary M — Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/13/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 178 309 195 240 8 33 1325 38 1577 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.20 0.62 0.22 0.01 0.17 0.61 0.14 0.69 Control Delay 58.5 27.9 61.0 32.4 0.0 55.8 27.6 51.1 28.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 58.5 27.9 61.0 32.4 0.0 55.8 27.6 51.1 28.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 68 57 75 73 0 12 300 13 362 Queue Length 95th (ft) 101 79 110 105 0 28 338 30 408 Internal Link Dist (ft) 347 457 678 361 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 357 1509 343 1067 585 343 2159 343 2279 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.50 0.20 0.57 0.22 0.01 0.10 0.61 0.11 0.69 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 � � � � + I I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1 48 33 21 1391 12 1497 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.02 0.36 0.28 0.22 0.36 0.15 0.40 Control Delay 62.5 62.0 63.4 61.2 63.4 6.6 64.1 8.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.5 62.0 63.4 61.2 63.4 7.0 64.1 8.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 1 39 27 17 110 10 187 Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 8 78 60 45 214 32 256 Internal Link Dist (ft) lll� "118 96 287 678 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 90 100 80 Base Capacity(vph) 54 48 340 304 103 3861 81 3731 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1726 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.02 0.14 0.11 0.20 0.65 0.15 0.40 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 --P� -,* -*--- 4- 4\ + I I i Lane Group EBT EBR2 WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL2 SBT SBR NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 81 148 94 79 582 66 1360 18 764 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.23 0.76 0.27 0.51 0.35 0.49 0.73 0.03 0.91 Control Delay 39.6 1.5 69.4 3.2 34.9 9.0 60.5 34.8 0.1 52.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 39.6 1.5 69.4 3.2 34.9 9.0 60.5 34.8 0.1 52.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 7 0 100 0 29 34 45 329 0 284 Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 0 #182 11 m55 m42 90 390 0 #403 Internal Link Dist (ft) 179 268 811 44 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 60 175 150 130 450 Base Capacity(vph) 263 383 225 383 156 1665 154 1856 644 883 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.21 0.66 0.25 0.51 0.35 0.43 0.74 0.03 0.87 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave & Sasnta Clara Ave 09/13/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 643 7 535 615 74 1534 656 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.92 0.04 0.29 0.65 0.47 0.74 0.97 Control Delay 42.0 58.1 29.0 15.8 18.6 31.8 9.2 69.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 42.0 58.1 29.0 15.8 25.1 31.8 9.2 69.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 85 224 2 129 345 26 52 262 Queue Length 95th (ft) 150 #336 m3 149 455 m32 61 #394 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity (vph) 329 708 156 1841 941 159 2082 677 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 272 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.91 0.04 0.29 0.92 0.47 0.74 0.97 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 11: Main St & Buffalo Ave/1-5 SB On -Ramp 09/13/2019 T \* i Lane Group EBT NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 358 1066 771 1503 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.57 0.63 0.38 Control Delay 50.5 29.5 18.2 1.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.2 Total Delay 50.5 29.6 18.8 1.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 125 216 141 32 Queue Length 95th (ft) 168 279 ml63 m40 Internal Link Dist (ft) 501 421 357 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 Base Capacity (vph) 646 1871 1232 3911 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 166 1193 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 76 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.59 0.72 0.55 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 6 Queues 14: SR-22 WB Ramps & La Veta Avenue 09/13/2019 --O� -�* f" 4\ /01 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR _ Lane Group Flow (vph) 353 252 280 479 949 504 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.16 0.77 0.18 0.78 0.48 Control Delay 24.3 0.2 44.5 9.9 28.2 6.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.3 0.2 44.5 9.9 28.2 6.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 52 0 128 42 213 68 Queue Length 95th (ft) 77 0 #218 59 285 129 Internal Link Dist (ft) 465 261 309 Turn Bay Length (ft) 330 275 185 Base Capacity(vph) 1367 1583 409 2701 1223 1077 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.16 0.68 0.18 0.78 0.47 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 7 Queues 15: Lawson Way/SR-22 EB Ramps & Town and Country Road 09/13/2019 -,* --P� ` .0--- k- 4\ T Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 326 235 68 68 113 26 160 366 506 462 v/c Ratio 0.90 0.44 0.58 0.09 0.25 0.07 0.23 0.76 1.06 0.62 Control Delay 69.1 23.4 61.7 28.2 6.0 30.0 27.9 42.0 89.5 6.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 69.1 23.4 61.7 28.2 6.0 30.0 27.9 42.0 89.5 6.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 95 82 38 16 0 12 35 191 -322 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #173 153 #96 33 35 34 63 #320 #528 80 Internal Link Dist (ft) 484 439 376 296 Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 180 160 100 450 Base Capacity(vph) 362 531 118 786 450 354 707 481 478 745 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.90 0.44 0.58 0.09 0.25 0.07 0.23 0.76 1.06 0.62 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 8 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/13/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 274 453 221 169 66 108 1180 36 1346 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.28 0.65 0.16 0.12 0.42 0.57 0.14 0.72 Control Delay 56.2 25.2 61.1 32.2 0.4 57.3 29.0 51.9 34.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56.2 25.2 61.1 32.2 0.4 57.3 29.0 51.9 34.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 105 77 85 51 0 41 271 13 318 Queue Length 95th (ft) 151 108 127 80 0 70 323 30 387 Internal Link Dist (ft) 414 461 678 442 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 443 1602 371 1032 571 343 2065 314 1881 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.62 0.28 0.60 0.16 0.12 0.31 0.57 0.11 0.72 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 � � � � + I I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 23 31 20 31 1367 33 1651 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.48 0.35 0.20 0.30 0.36 0.41 0.44 Control Delay 68.4 92.9 67.7 60.7 64.8 6.7 76.1 8.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 68.4 92.9 67.7 60.7 64.8 7.0 76.1 8.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 20 26 16 26 153 28 211 Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 #61 58 43 58 196 64 285 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 96 287 676 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 100 100 80 Base Capacity(vph) 54 48 265 304 111 3818 81 3765 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1566 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.48 0.12 0.07 0.28 0.61 0.41 0.44 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 --P� -,* -*--- 4- 4\ + I I i Lane Group EBT EBR2 WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL2 SBT SBR NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 75 120 92 246 992 111 1384 142 327 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.18 0.57 0.22 0.67 0.51 0.68 0.78 0.22 0.71 Control Delay 30.0 1.0 41.5 1.2 29.3 14.4 57.1 28.2 4.8 41.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.0 1.0 41.5 1.2 29.3 14.4 57.1 28.2 4.8 41.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 0 56 0 66 168 55 236 0 86 Queue Length 95th (ft) 44 0 101 0 m#122 m215 #127 #302 38 #159 Internal Link Dist (ft) 193 268 811 44 Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 60 175 150 130 450 Base Capacity(vph) 314 515 308 515 368 1957 168 1772 645 467 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.15 0.39 0.18 0.67 0.51 0.66 0.78 0.22 0.70 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/13/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 212 689 9 1029 749 127 1462 369 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.90 0.04 0.56 0.90 0.58 0.66 0.90 Control Delay 35.3 45.5 32.7 18.6 26.0 44.7 10.4 61.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 35.3 45.5 32.7 18.6 33.3 44.7 10.4 61.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 104 174 2 209 303 22 195 104 Queue Length 95th (ft) 181 #281 m3 253 m#492 m34 336 #191 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity(vph) 362 766 214 1850 833 218 2200 408 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.90 0.04 0.56 0.97 0.58 0.66 0.90 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 Existing With Option E Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/03/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group _ EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 218 329 347 250 32 38 1224 39 1584 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.24 1.01 0.25 0.06 0.20 0.60 0.13 0.72 Control Delay 63.2 28.1 105.2 34.5 0.2 77.0 24.8 50.2 30.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 63.2 28.1 105.2 34.5 0.2 77.0 24.8 50.2 30.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 85 58 -142 79 0 16 165 13 377 Queue Length 95th (ft) 127 86 #242 116 0 36 234 31 449 Internal Link Dist (ft) 487 449 678 504 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 343 1395 343 992 555 343 2079 365 2190 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.64 0.24 1.01 0.25 0.06 0.11 0.59 0.11 0.72 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago ParkANalkie Way 09/03/2019 'A 4\ T '* Lane Group EBL EBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1 21 1385 1 1765 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.20 0.43 0.01 0.57 Control Delay 33.0 0.0 57.8 11.6 72.0 10.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.0 0.0 57.8 12.1 72.0 10.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 0 16 169 0 135 Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 0 42 260 m0 ml51 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 110 681 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 150 80 Base Capacity (vph) 364 556 191 3254 191 3118 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 1249 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.69 0.01 0.57 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 102 643 74 1666 783 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.33 0.40 0.52 0.76 0.90 Control Delay 60.6 10.8 13.8 61.1 30.7 50.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 Total Delay 60.6 10.8 13.8 61.1 31.9 50.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 114 0 51 50 377 289 Queue Length 95th (ft) 183 46 m69 99 456 #388 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 225 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 289 346 1617 162 2179 926 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 285 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.29 0.40 0.46 0.88 0.85 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER - Lane Group Flow (vph) 120 675 7 500 710 97 1699 778 v/c Ratio 0.40 1.04 0.04 0.29 0.76 0.60 0.83 1.04 Control Delay 44.0 87.5 34.6 12.8 22.1 42.2 16.2 84.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.0 87.5 34.6 12.8 72.7 42.2 16.2 84.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 82 -265 2 117 411 33 69 -338 Queue Length 95th (ft) 146 #390 m3 110 529 m42 #532 #470 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity (vph) 300 647 156 1701 932 162 2041 747 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 286 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 1.04 0.04 0.29 1.10 0.60 0.83 1.04 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/0312019 OY Cumulative -AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/03/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 309 491 217 186 80 128 1367 42 1443 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.33 0.58 0.19 0.15 0.46 0.74 0.15 0.81 Control Delay 60.9 27.7 57.9 34.0 0.6 83.0 29.3 51.5 39.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 60.9 27.7 57.9 34.0 0.6 83.0 29.3 51.5 39.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 120 88 84 58 0 55 171 15 363 Queue Length 95th (ft) 169 121 125 89 0 88 278 34 438 Internal Link Dist (ft) 488 344 678 527 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 429 1481 371 973 547 343 1852 314 1771 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.72 0.33 0.58 0.19 0.15 0.37 0.74 0.13 0.81 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago ParkANalkie Way 09/03/2019 'A 4\ T '* Lane Group EBL EBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 23 27 1553 1 1745 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.04 0.25 0.48 0.01 0.58 Control Delay 33.6 0.1 58.7 12.2 64.0 9.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.6 0.1 58.7 12.9 64.0 9.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 0 20 199 1 131 Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 0 51 303 ml 146 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 110 678 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 150 80 Base Capacity (vph) 364 557 191 3254 191 3008 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 1190 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.04 0.14 0.75 0.01 0.58 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 98 1117 114 1580 422 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.29 0.57 0.70 0.61 0.73 Control Delay 39.0 4.4 21.6 59.6 16.8 37.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 39.0 4.4 21.6 59.6 16.8 37.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 60 0 203 56 211 110 Queue Length 95th (ft) 106 18 m260 #133 287 165 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 225 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 398 467 1961 165 2606 593 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.21 0.57 0.69 0.61 0.71 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 202 766 10 953 1022 300 1500 485 v/c Ratio 0.56 1.00 0.05 0.56 1.29 1.40 0.69 1.15 Control Delay 34.3 64.4 31.4 18.7 156.0 237.6 11.5 125.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 34.3 64.4 31.4 18.7 156.4 237.6 11.5 125.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 98 -202 2 186 -629 -98 48 -164 Queue Length 95th (ft) 172 #331 m3 m228 m1826 #177 #90 #266 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity(vph) 362 765 214 1709 793 214 2177 421 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.56 1.00 0.05 0.56 1.38 1.40 0.69 1.15 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/03/2019 OY Cumulative Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/13/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 231 347 369 264 33 40 1329 41 1686 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.23 1.08 0.25 0.06 0.21 0.66 0.13 0.77 Control Delay 62.4 27.1 120.9 33.1 0.2 56.0 30.8 50.4 31.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.4 27.1 120.9 33.1 0.2 56.0 30.8 50.4 31.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 90 61 -163 82 0 15 307 14 402 Queue Length 95th (ft) 128 84 #249 114 0 32 345 31 452 Internal Link Dist (ft) 347 457 678 361 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 357 1477 343 1047 577 343 2023 343 2181 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.23 1.08 0.25 0.06 0.12 0.66 0.12 0.77 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 � � � � + I I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1 48 33 21 1403 12 1765 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.02 0.36 0.28 0.22 0.36 0.15 0.47 Control Delay 62.5 62.0 63.4 61.2 63.4 6.6 64.1 9.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.5 62.0 63.4 61.2 63.4 7.0 64.1 9.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 1 39 27 17 112 10 239 Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 8 78 60 45 216 32 323 Internal Link Dist (ft) lll� "118 96 287 678 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 90 100 90 Base Capacity(vph) 54 48 340 304 103 3861 81 3731 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1720 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.02 0.14 0.11 0.20 0.66 0.15 0.47 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 102 654 74 1714 788 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.33 0.40 0.53 0.78 0.91 Control Delay 60.6 10.8 10.4 62.6 31.2 51.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 Total Delay 60.6 10.8 10.4 62.6 32.7 51.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 114 0 42 50 395 290 Queue Length 95th (ft) 183 46 m68 100 469 #414 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 44 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 289 346 1635 153 2185 911 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 282 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.29 0.40 0.48 0.90 0.86 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave & Sasnta Clara Ave 09/13/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 125 669 7 499 702 108 1715 770 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.91 0.04 0.31 0.80 0.53 0.86 1.11 Control Delay 40.1 55.5 22.1 21.9 28.7 34.3 15.1 108.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 40.1 55.5 22.1 21.9 55.1 34.3 15.1 108.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 82 232 2 130 376 38 51 -359 Queue Length 95th (ft) 145 #341 m3 170 493 m45 #555 #491 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity(vph) 352 752 156 1594 876 202 1993 693 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 198 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.89 0.04 0.31 1.04 0.53 0.86 1.11 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/13/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 309 491 222 186 80 128 1386 42 1471 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.31 0.65 0.18 0.14 0.46 0.72 0.15 0.79 Control Delay 59.2 25.8 61.1 32.4 0.5 57.8 33.4 51.5 37.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.2 25.8 61.1 32.4 0.5 57.8 33.4 51.5 37.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 119 85 85 56 0 49 332 15 362 Queue Length 95th (ft) 168 117 127 87 0 80 391 34 437 Internal Link Dist (ft) 362 381 678 493 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 443 1602 371 1032 571 343 1934 314 1856 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.70 0.31 0.60 0.18 0.14 0.37 0.72 0.13 0.79 Intersection Summary The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago Park/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 � � � � + I I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 23 31 20 31 1601 33 1745 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.48 0.35 0.20 0.30 0.42 0.41 0.46 Control Delay 68.4 92.9 67.7 60.7 64.8 7.2 76.1 8.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 68.4 92.9 67.7 60.7 64.8 7.6 76.1 8.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 20 26 16 26 191 28 229 Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 #61 58 43 58 242 64 309 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 96 287 677 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 90 100 90 Base Capacity(vph) 54 48 265 304 111 3822 81 3765 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1465 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.48 0.12 0.07 0.28 0.68 0.41 0.46 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 125 96 1148 116 1612 438 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.29 0.63 0.75 0.62 0.73 Control Delay 39.1 4.2 21.8 66.6 17.3 37.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 39.1 4.2 21.8 66.6 17.3 37.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 59 0 204 58 222 113 Queue Length 95th (ft) 104 17 m258 #142 296 171 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 44 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 398 467 1820 154 2580 606 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.21 0.63 0.75 0.62 0.72 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/13/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 222 768 10 965 1022 309 1523 485 v/c Ratio 0.61 1.00 0.05 0.54 1.34 1.11 0.65 1.47 Control Delay 36.2 65.0 33.3 19.0 177.9 124.8 8.6 256.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 36.2 65.0 33.3 19.0 178.3 124.8 8.6 256.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 109 -204 3 194 -659 -84 28 -192 Queue Length 95th (ft) 189 #333 m3 m217 m#775 #165 61 #293 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity(vph) 362 765 214 1779 764 278 2339 330 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.61 1.00 0.05 0.54 1.42 1.11 0.65 1.47 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/12/2019 OY Cumulative With Option E - Main St./Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/03/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 251 334 353 255 32 39 1441 39 1845 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.24 1.03 0.26 0.06 0.20 0.69 0.14 0.84 Control Delay 67.5 28.3 109.1 34.7 0.2 76.7 26.2 51.1 34.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 67.5 28.3 109.1 34.7 0.2 76.7 26.2 51.1 34.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 98 60 -150 81 0 16 182 14 479 Queue Length 95th (ft) #152 87 #247 118 0 m34 294 31 #602 Internal Link Dist (ft) 480 364 678 516 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 343 1395 343 982 551 343 2080 343 2189 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.73 0.24 1.03 0.26 0.06 0.11 0.69 0.11 0.84 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago ParkANalkie Way 09/03/2019 'A 4\ T '* Lane Group EBL EBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1 22 1560 1 1833 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.21 0.48 0.01 0.61 Control Delay 33.0 0.0 58.0 12.3 73.0 9.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.0 0.0 58.0 12.9 73.0 9.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 1 0 17 200 0 126 Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 0 44 305 m0 ml36 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 110 679 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 150 80 Base Capacity (vph) 364 555 191 3254 191 3016 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 1187 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.75 0.01 0.61 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 106 827 75 1745 789 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.35 0.50 0.52 0.79 0.92 Control Delay 60.6 11.7 14.5 61.1 31.1 53.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 Total Delay 60.6 11.7 14.5 61.1 33.1 53.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 114 1 65 51 405 291 Queue Length 95th (ft) 183 50 m101 99 472 #427 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 225 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 289 346 1642 164 2199 886 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 294 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.31 0.50 0.46 0.92 0.89 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 172 736 8 637 755 156 1758 821 v/c Ratio 0.57 1.14 0.05 0.36 0.82 0.82 0.82 1.18 Control Delay 49.3 118.5 41.0 13.0 24.6 54.3 14.4 132.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.3 118.5 41.0 13.0 74.9 54.3 14.5 132.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 123 -316 2 149 448 52 70 -395 Queue Length 95th (ft) 203 #445 m3 132 569 m#76 #541 #530 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity(vph) 300 646 156 1752 919 190 2132 696 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 278 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.57 1.14 0.05 0.36 1.18 0.82 0.83 1.18 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/03/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 419 529 235 198 88 136 1728 44 1552 v/c Ratio 0.98 0.35 0.68 0.20 0.16 0.48 0.93 0.16 0.88 Control Delay 90.6 27.7 62.2 34.1 0.6 81.7 39.9 51.6 43.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 90.6 27.7 62.2 34.1 0.6 81.7 39.9 51.6 43.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 169 96 91 62 0 58 -224 16 405 Queue Length 95th (ft) #272 130 134 94 1 93 #578 35 #512 Internal Link Dist (ft) 478 366 678 524 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 429 1514 371 973 547 343 1850 314 1765 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.98 0.35 0.63 0.20 0.16 0.40 0.93 0.14 0.88 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago ParkANalkie Way 09/03/2019 'A 4\ T '* Lane Group EBL EBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 25 29 1822 1 1877 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.05 0.26 0.56 0.01 0.63 Control Delay 33.7 0.2 58.8 13.4 62.0 9.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.7 0.2 58.8 14.5 62.0 9.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 0 22 252 1 142 Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 0 53 381 ml 157 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 110 680 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 150 80 Base Capacity (vph) 364 555 191 3254 191 3002 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 1095 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.05 0.15 0.84 0.01 0.63 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/03/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 141 106 1432 124 1776 454 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.30 0.87 0.89 0.75 0.74 Control Delay 39.2 4.8 37.6 92.2 20.7 38.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Delay 39.2 4.8 37.6 92.2 20.7 38.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 66 0 291 63 270 115 Queue Length 95th (ft) 114 23 m#366 #161 331 #211 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 225 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 398 467 1653 139 2363 615 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 39 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.23 0.87 0.89 0.76 0.74 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/03/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 263 817 11 1139 1063 375 1543 511 v/c Ratio 0.73 1.07 0.05 0.64 1.40 1.35 0.66 1.55 Control Delay 42.2 82.9 24.4 11.4 200.2 214.6 10.0 289.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 42.2 82.9 24.4 11.4 200.9 214.6 10.0 289.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 134 -244 3 135 -685 -135 42 -207 Queue Length 95th (ft) #251 #364 m3 ml51 mW54 m#206 160 #311 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity (vph) 362 765 214 1779 761 278 2341 330 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.73 1.07 0.05 0.64 1.55 1.35 0.66 1.55 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 Conditions - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/13/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 251 334 355 255 32 39 1473 39 1854 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.23 1.03 0.24 0.06 0.20 0.68 0.14 0.82 Control Delay 64.8 26.8 110.4 33.1 0.2 55.9 29.9 51.1 32.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 64.8 26.8 110.4 33.1 0.2 55.9 29.9 51.1 32.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 98 58 -152 79 0 14 356 14 468 Queue Length 95th (ft) 143 85 #250 115 0 33 416 31 552 Internal Link Dist (ft) 347 457 678 361 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 357 1477 343 1042 575 343 2162 343 2273 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.70 0.23 1.03 0.24 0.06 0.11 0.68 0.11 0.82 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Walkie Way/Project Driveway 09/13/2019 � � � � + I I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 1 46 32 22 1577 12 1833 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.02 0.28 0.21 0.07 0.42 0.15 0.63 Control Delay 62.5 62.0 56.9 55.6 51.0 8.2 64.1 20.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.5 62.0 56.9 55.6 51.0 8.6 64.1 20.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 2 1 35 25 17 168 10 364 Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 8 75 57 44 266 32 413 Internal Link Dist (ft) lll� "118 96 287 678 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 90 100 90 Base Capacity(vph) 54 48 340 304 296 3764 81 2892 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1508 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.02 0.14 0.11 0.07 0.70 0.15 0.63 Intersection Summary 41 The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main SUWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 106 838 75 1792 794 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.35 0.51 0.54 0.82 0.91 Control Delay 60.6 11.7 11.3 63.1 32.7 51.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 Total Delay 60.6 11.7 11.3 63.1 35.4 51.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 114 1 60 51 427 290 Queue Length 95th (ft) 183 50 m70 100 499 #421 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 44 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 289 346 1638 153 2178 910 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 267 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.31 0.51 0.49 0.94 0.87 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main StfWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave & Sasnta Clara Ave 09/13/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 178 737 8 641 755 168 1791 821 v/c Ratio 0.59 1.14 0.05 0.38 0.83 0.82 0.86 1.14 Control Delay 50.1 119.1 36.8 14.6 25.9 51.0 15.4 116.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 50.1 119.1 36.8 14.6 75.9 51.0 15.4 116.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 127 -317 2 157 442 55 65 -385 Queue Length 95th (ft) 210 #445 m3 157 #563 m#71 #570 #519 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity(vph) 300 646 156 1682 907 205 2084 722 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 259 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 1.14 0.05 0.38 1.17 0.82 0.86 1.14 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/12/2019 Year 2040 With Option E Main StfWalkie Way and Surface Parking - AM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Queues 6: Main St & Memory Lane 09/13/2019 , --P� f-- .0---k- 4\ I * I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 419 529 240 198 88 136 1748 44 1579 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.33 0.69 0.19 0.15 0.48 0.90 0.16 0.85 Control Delay 83.2 26.3 62.8 32.5 0.6 58.1 42.6 51.6 40.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 83.2 26.3 62.8 32.5 0.6 58.1 42.6 51.6 40.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 168 93 93 60 0 52 475 16 404 Queue Length 95th (ft) #267 126 137 92 1 84 #590 35 482 Internal Link Dist (ft) 475 347 678 458 Turn Bay Length (ft) 130 230 470 230 160 Base Capacity(vph) 443 1593 371 1032 571 343 1933 314 1848 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.95 0.33 0.65 0.19 0.15 0.40 0.90 0.14 0.85 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Queues 7: Main St & Santiago ParkANalkie Way 09/13/2019 � � � � + I I i Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 25 31 20 34 1869 33 1877 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.52 0.35 0.20 0.31 0.49 0.41 0.50 Control Delay 68.3 97.4 67.8 60.7 65.3 8.0 76.1 9.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 Total Delay 68.3 97.4 67.8 60.7 65.3 8.5 76.1 9.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 21 26 16 28 242 28 258 Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 #64 58 43 62 305 64 347 Internal Link Dist (ft) 118 96 287 679 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 90 100 90 Base Capacity(vph) 54 48 265 304 113 3821 81 3760 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1347 0 730 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.52 0.12 0.07 0.30 0.76 0.41 0.62 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 9: Main St & Edgewood Rd 09/13/2019 ,c T '* ♦ t Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL2 SBT NWR Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 104 1463 126 1808 470 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.30 0.90 0.91 0.77 0.74 Control Delay 39.2 4.7 31.1 95.2 21.5 37.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 39.2 4.7 31.1 95.2 21.5 37.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 0 293 64 282 119 Queue Length 95th (ft) 113 22 m#382 #164 345 #213 Internal Link Dist (ft) 268 811 44 Turn Bay Length (ft) 60 150 450 Base Capacity (vph) 398 467 1632 139 2341 631 Q Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 18 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.22 0.90 0.91 0.78 0.74 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Queues 10: Main St & Santa Clara Ave 09/13/2019 4\ T Z Lane Group EBL EBT NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 293 821 11 1138 1063 383 1564 511 v/c Ratio 0.81 1.07 0.05 0.64 1.40 1.38 0.67 1.55 Control Delay 48.7 85.1 33.8 19.3 200.7 220.8 7.5 289.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 48.7 85.1 33.8 19.3 201.1 220.8 7.5 289.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 152 -247 3 231 -704 -125 22 -207 Queue Length 95th (ft) #293 #367 m3 m230 m#693 m#190 85 #311 Internal Link Dist (ft) 562 357 811 Turn Bay Length (ft) 70 300 450 630 Base Capacity (vph) 362 764 214 1779 761 278 2341 330 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.81 1.07 0.05 0.64 1.49 1.38 0.67 1.55 Intersection Summary - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal The Addington 09/03/2019 Year 2040 With Option E -Main St/Walkie Way and Surface Parking - PM Peak hour Synchro 10 Report Page 5 Clanfcation to the 2525 N Main Street Multi -Family Residential Project Final EIR Attachment C: Parking Analysis City of Santa Ana October 2019 WOOLmemorandum SATE: September 13, 2019 0: Ms. Selena Kelaher, AICP City of Santa Ana ROM: Sandipan Bhattacharjee, P.E., TE, AICP, ENV-SP UBJECT: 2525 Main Street — Parking Analysis Translutions, Inc. (Translutions) is has prepared this memorandum for the proposed 2525 Main Street Residential Project in the City of Santa Ana. The project proposes the following types of multi -family units: Studio - 68 units (25.19%) 1 Bedroom - 123 units (45.56%) 2 Bedroom - 75 units (27.78%) 3 Bedroom - 4 units (1.48%) City Code. Section 41 of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), Off -Street Parking Requirements discusses off-street parking requirements for development projects. Sec. 41-1322 discusses the off-street parking requirements for multi -family dwellings. a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for each dwelling unit in multiple -family dwellings are as follows: one (1) space in a garage or carport. b) Each multiple -family dwelling site shall provide off-street parking spaces, in addition to the minimum requirements of subsection (a) of this section, in an amount not less than the number of bedrooms on the site. Such spaces may be open or covered and may be assigned to particular units or not so assigned. Bachelor units shall be considered as one -bedroom units. c) In addition to the minimum requirements of subsections (a) and (b) of this section, each multiple -family dwelling site shall provide guest parking, identified as such, in an amount of spaces not less than twenty-five (25) per cent of the minimum required spaces under subsections (a) and (b) of this section, but in no case less than three (3) spaces. The SAMC also requires that a portion of the required off-street parking spaces be designed for physically handicapped persons. Parking for handicapped persons at a rate of 2% of total parking for parking facilities between 501 and 1,000 stalls, and 1% thereafter is required. Note that handicapped parking is portion of the required parking and not an additional requirement. Table A calculates the required parking using the SAMC. As seen on Table A, the residential parking requirement for the project would be 779 spaces based on City Code. Table A: Project Parking Demand Code Subsection Land Use Units Rate Parking Required (a) Total Units (b) Studio 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 270 68 123 75 4 1 1 1 2 3 270 68 123 150 12 Parking Required (Residential) 623 Handicap (2% up to 1000 spaces, 1%thereafter - Included in Residential) 192 Parking Required (Guest - 25% of Minimum of a & b) 156 Handicap (2% of Guest - Included in Guest) 3 Total Parking Required I tmnslutions, inc. 117632 Irvine Boulevard, Suite 200, Tustin, California 927801 P (949) 656-3131 l solutions@translutions.com l Memorandum: 2525 Main Parking Analysis General Plan Circulation Element. The City's General Plan acknowledges that while adequate supply of parking is essential to the economic success of businesses, parking needs should be evaluated to determine needed changes based upon changing circumstances in land use patterns and the public's mode of travel. Policy 7.4 of the General Plan Circulation Element also states that parking requirements be re-evaluated and updated on a regular basis. It should be noted that the City's parking ratios are from 1997 and are over 20 years old. With changes in demographics, increased transit, and increased uses of active transportation modes in the City, an update to the parking standards is needed. Parking Study & Rate Calculation. Translutions surveyed two similar facilities in the area to identify parking generation factors for similar multi -family residential projects. The two facilities surveyed are Nineteen01 and The Marke. Both properties are similar to the proposed project in terms of rents, target population, apartment types, and amenities. Nineteen01 is located at 1901 East First Street in the City of Santa Ana and has 254 units. The unit breakdown for Noneteen01 is as follows: 1 Bedroom - 123 units (48.4%) 2 Bedroom - 125 units (49.2%) 3 Bedroom - 6 units (2.4%) The Marke is located at 100 E MacArthur Boulevard in the City of Santa Ana and has 300 units. The unit breakdown for Noneteen01 is as follows: 1 Bedroom - 155 units (51.7%) 2 Bedroom - 131 units (43.6%) 3 Bedroom - 14 units (4.7%) To identify parking demand for the two projects, Translutions contracted with Counts Unlimited, Inc. to conduct a parking occupancy survey for the two facilities identified above. The surveys were conducted on one weekday (Thursday) and one weekend day (Saturday) in April 2018 for a period of 24 hours. Table B shows the findings of this analysis. Detailed parking accumulation data is included in Attachment A. Table B: Parking Survey Summary Survey Location Units Day of Week Parking Parking Nineteen01 254 Peak Weekday 344 1.354 Peak Weekend 342 1.346 The Marke 300 Peak Weekday 230 0.767 Peak Weekend 193 0.643 Average Demand (Weekday) 1.060 Average Demand (Weekend) 0.995 Peak Parking Demand Per Unit (Weekday & Weekend) 1.354 Project Maximum Parking Demand (270 Units) 270 366 As seen on Table B, the peak weekday parking demand is 1.354 spaces per unit observed at Nineteen01. The peak weekend parking demand is 1.346 spaces per unit observed at Nineteen01. Therefore, the peak parking demand based on empirical data occurred at Nineteen01, at the rate of 1.354 parking spaces per unit. Parking Needs for Proposed Project. Applying the peak parking rate based on empirical data, the peak parking demand for the proposed project is anticipated to be 366 spaces. The project will include 539 parking spaces, which is approximately 32% more than the number of spaces forecast based on empirical data. Shared Parking Analysis. Shared parking is based on the use of a single parking space to serve two or more individual land uses without conflict or encroachment. The ability to share parking spaces is the result of variations in the accumulation of vehicles by hour at the individual land use and the relationship among the land uses that result in visiting multiple lands on the same auto trip. A shared %PRWECi VE-2525 WIN Si EE ARKINGANALYSIS%PARKING2M%PARKINGWW REW DXX Memorandum: 2525 Main Parking Analysis parking analysis was conducted to identify the parking demand when considering the variations in parking demand among the project and Discovery Cube. The forecast parking demand for the project was calculated based on rates from ULI's Shared Parking (2nd Edition). The rates for low- rise apartments range from 0.68 to 1.94 spaces per dwelling unit. The rates for high-rise apartments range from 1.15 to 1.52 spaces per dwelling unit. To provide a conservative analysis the higher rate of 1.94 spaces per dwelling unit were used underweekday and weekend conditions. The parking demand for the Discovery Cube was provided by data from the Science Center. It is anticipated that 60 patrons will utilize the parking lot on weekdays and 90 patrons will utilize the parking lot on weekends. Table C summarizes the forecast parking demand for the project after applying parking rates from ULI. As shown in Table C, the weekday parking demand is 584 parking spaces and the weekend parking demand is 614 parking spaces. The parking needs of individual land uses vary by hour of day. Since parking needs may peak at different times, it generally means that fewer parking spaces are required to serve a mixed -use project than if each land use has its own dedicated parking. As such, time -of - day factors for weekdays/weekends were applied to the forecast parking demand to develop the total shared parking demand. The time - of -day factors for the proposed project are based on Land Use "Residential" from ULI's Shared Parking (2nd Edition). The time -of -day factors for the Discovery Cube are based on data provided by the Science Center. The time -of -day factors for weekdays were applied to the parking demand for each land use to develop the shared parking demand. The shared parking demand on weekdays is illustrated in Table D. As shown in Table D, the total peak shared parking demand on weekdays is 571 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 148 parking spaces on weekdays. The time -of -day factors forweekends were applied to the parking demand for each land use to develop the shared parking demand. The shared parking demand on weekends is illustrated in Table E. As shown in Table E, the total peak shared parking demand on weekends is 601 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 118 parking spaces on weekdays. The Discovery Cube hosts an event each year called Bubblefest that will draw higher than normal patrons. A shared parking analysis on weekdays and weekends was conducted for the Bubblefest. It is anticipated that 200 parking spaces will be used on weekdays and 200 parking spaces will be used on weekends during Bubblefest. The shared parking demand for the Bubblefest on weekdays is illustrated in Table F. As shown in Table F, the total peak shared parking demand on weekdays is 711 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 8 parking spaces on weekdays. The shared parking demand for the Bubblefest on weekends is illustrated in Table G. As shown in Table G, the total peak shared parking demand on weekends is 711 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 8 parking spaces on weekdays. Conclusion. The parking supply required for the project using parking rates from the SAMC is 779 spaces. Since the parking requirements in the SAMC are over 20 years old, Translutions conducted surveys at two similar facilities currently in operation. The peak parking demand was observed to be 1.354 spaces per unit. Using the parking demand rates from empirical data, the project parking needs are forecast to be 366 spaces. The project will include 539 parking spaces, which is approximately 32% more than the number of spaces forecast based on empirical data. A shared parking analysis was conducted on weekdays and weekends for the project and Discovery Cube. The total peak shared parking demand on weekdays is 571 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 148 parking spaces on weekdays. Also, the total peak shared parking demand on weekends is 601 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 118 parking spaces on weekdays. The shared parking demand for the Bubblefest on weekdays is 711 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 8 parking spaces on weekdays. The shared parking demand for the Bubblefest on weekends is 711 parking spaces. Given the parking supply of 719 parking spaces, it is anticipated that there will be a surplus of 8 parking spaces on weekdays. N:IPREOi VE-2525 WINS REE ARKINGANALYSIS%PARKING2M%PARKINGWW REV1 WC% 3 Memorandum: 2525 Main Parking Analysis If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (949) 656-3131. Q�oFESS/01 O OF T O�� BHA F�c� Q � m No. C81872 Exp. 03-31-20 `Tl HIVA� �P �FOF CALAFA�� QftBFESS/ON9 BHATjq No. TR 2847 Exp.03-31-202 OF CAL D:%PRWECTSWE-25Z R V O a C Y d � y � O a C N a O N V a N � C R N C_ R 1 T R Y d N O W N C N a O N V N y � � R C O ~ � O r N a c N s � y a`� T � U s R d o_ N V O O H � a N c N d y N d O) m � LL a A 0 a?i c_ � d y N R m � J N V O O H � N a y O y d m a 0 (7 c d � N � N N a O N � J — U R C N d � O 55 O Table D: Weekday Shared Parking Demand Proposect Project Discovery Cube Parking Parking Resident Time of Parking Guest Time of Day Parking Parking parking Parking Surpl Spaces Day Factor Spaces Factor Spaces Spaces p Spaces p Parkin g Hour of Day equ Rid equ Rired Time of Da Factor Required Required Provided Deficit 6.00 100% 419 0% 0 - 419 719 300 7:00 90% 377 10% 11 - 388 719 331 8:00 85 % 356 20% 21 - 377 719 342 900 80% 335 20% 21 - 356 719 363 10:00 75% 314 20% 21 100% 60 395 719 324 11:00 70% 293 20% 21 100% 60 374 719 345 12:00 65 % 272 20% 21 100 / 60 353 719 366 13:00 70% 293 20% 21 100% 60 374 719 345 14:00 70% 293 20% 21 100 / 60 374 719 345 15:00 70% 293 20% 21 100% 60 374 719 345 16:00 75 % 314 20% 21 100 / 60 395 719 324 17:00 85 % 356 40 % 42 100 / 60 458 719 251 18:00 90 % 377 60 % 63 100 / 60 500 719 219 19:00 97% 406 100% 105 100/ 60 571 719 148 20:00 98 % 411 100 / 105 516 719 203 21:00 99 % 415 100 / 105 520 719 199 22:00 1000/0 419 1000/0 105 524 719 195 23:00 100 / 419 80 % 84 503 719 216 000 1 100% 419 1 50% 53 1 1 472 1 719 247 Peak Hour Shared Parking Required 571 Parking Supply 719 Parking Surplus/(Parking Deficit) 148 `Timeuf-0ay factors from the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parkirg, 2nd Edition. 2Time4-0ay factors provided from the Discovery Cube. D9 gedsM 2525MainS edTwm ngAmlyvsTwtl ng270ASt ed PmltivgAWeek ySt red Pmltivg(9/13/2019) Table E: Weekend Shared Parking Demand Pro osed Project Discovery Cube Parking Resident Time of Parking Guest Time of Day Parking Parking parking Parking Surrking Spaces Day Factor Spaces Facer Spaces Spaces p Spaces p Parkin g Hour of Day Required Required z Required Time of Da Factor Required Provided Deficit HO 100% 419 0% 0 - 419 719 300 7:00 90 % 377 20% 21 - 398 719 321 8:00 85 % 356 20% 21 - 377 719 342 9:00 80 % 335 20% 21 - 356 719 363 10:00 75 % 314 20% 21 100 / 90 425 719 294 11:00 70% 293 20% 21 100/ 90 404 719 315 12:00 65% 272 20% 21 100/ 90 383 719 336 13:00 70 % 293 20% 21 100% 90 404 719 315 14:00 70 % 293 20% 21 100 % 90 404 719 315 15:00 70 % 293 20% 21 100% 90 404 719 315 16:00 75 % 314 20% 21 100 % 90 425 719 294 17:00 85 % 356 40 % 42 100% 90 488 719 231 18:00 90 % 377 60 % 63 100% 90 530 719 189 19:00 97% 406 100% 105 100/ 90 601 719 118 20:00 98 % 411 100 / 105 516 719 203 21:00 99 % 415 100 / 105 520 719 199 22:00 100/ 419 100/ 105 524 719 195 23:00 100 / 419 80 % 84 503 719 216 000 1 100% 419 1 50% 53 1 1 472 1 719 247 Peak Hour Shared Parking Required 601 Parking Supply 719 Parking Surplus/(Parking Deficit) 118 'Tim Uday factors from the Urban Land Institute(ULI) Shared Parking, 2nd Edtion. Time-of-0ay faders pews ed hem the Urscovery Cube. DTMectsM 2525 Meier St drP ngAreyasPm ng2715 edPu nffeekmd9 mdPwl ng(9/13nO 19) Table F: Weekday With Bubblefest Shared Parking Demand Proposed Project Discovery Cube Parking Parking Resident Time of Parking Guest Time of Day Parking Parking parking Parking Surpl Spaces Day Factor Spaces Factor Spaces Spaces p Spaces p Parkin g Hour of Day equ Rid equ Rired Time of Da Factorz Required Required Provided Deficit 6.00 100% 419 0% 0 - 419 719 300 7:00 90% 377 10% 11 - 388 719 331 8:00 85 % 356 20% 21 - 377 719 342 900 80% 335 20% 21 - 356 719 363 10:00 75% 314 20% 21 100/ 200 535 719 184 11:00 70% 293 20% 21 100/ 200 514 719 205 12:00 65 % 272 20% 21 100 / 200 493 719 228 13:00 70% 293 20% 21 100% 200 514 719 205 14:00 70% 293 20% 21 100/ 200 514 719 205 15:00 70% 293 20% 21 100% 200 514 719 205 16:00 75% 314 20% 21 100/ 200 535 719 184 17:00 85 % 356 40 % 42 100 / 200 598 719 121 18:00 90 % 377 60 % 63 100% 200 640 719 79 19:00 97% 406 100% 105 100/ 200 711 719 8 20:00 98 % 411 100 / 105 516 719 203 21:00 99 % 415 100 / 105 520 719 199 22:00 1000/0 419 1000/0 105 524 719 195 23:00 100 / 419 80 % 84 503 719 216 000 1 100% 419 1 50% 53 1 1 472 1 719 247 Peak Hour Shared Parking Required 711 Parking Supply 719 Parking Surplus/(Parking Deficit) 8 ITimeuf-0ay factors from the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parkirg, 2nd Edition. 21bmeuf-0ay factors provided from the Discovery Cube. D9 gedsM 2525MainS ebTwlleng AbblyvsTwlleng27MIlared Pmlenffeektlay Bubble 5tvared PwIeng (9/13/2019 ) Table G: Weekend with Bubblefest Shared Parking Demand Proposect Project Discovery Cube Parking Parking Resident Time of Parking Guest Time of Day Parking Parking parking Parking Surpl Spaces Day Factor Spaces Factor Spaces Spaces p Spaces p Parkin g Hour of Day equ Rid equ Rired Time of Da Factorz Required Required Provided Deficit . 6.00 100% 419 0% 0 - 419 719 300 7:00 90% 377 20% 21 - 398 719 321 8:00 85 % 356 20% 21 - 377 719 342 900 80 % 335 20% 21 - 356 719 363 10:00 75% 314 20% 21 100/ 200 535 719 184 11:00 70% 293 20% 21 100/ 200 514 719 205 12:00 65 % 272 20% 21 100 / 200 493 719 228 13:00 70% 293 20% 21 100% 200 514 719 205 14:00 70% 293 20% 21 100/ 200 514 719 205 15:00 70% 293 20% 21 100% 200 514 719 205 16:00 75% 314 20% 21 100/ 200 535 719 184 17:00 85 % 356 40 % 42 100 / 200 598 719 121 18:00 90 % 377 60 % 63 100% 200 640 719 79 19:00 97% 406 100% 105 100/ 200 711 719 8 20:00 98 % 411 100 / 105 516 719 203 21:00 99 % 415 100 / 105 520 719 199 22:00 1000/0 419 1000/0 105 524 719 195 23:00 100 / 419 80 % 84 503 719 216 000 1 100% 419 1 50% 53 1 1 472 1 719 247 Peak Hour Shared Parking Required 711 Parking Supply 719 Parking Surplus/(Parking Deficit) 8 `Timeuf-0ay factors from the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parkirg, 2nd Edition. 2Time4-0ay factors provided from the Discovery Cube. D9 gedsM 2525MainS edTwm ngAmlyvsTwtl ng270ASt ed PmltingAWeekmd Bubble St edPmlting(9/13/2019) City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana Ninteen0l 4/26/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 332 Beginning Occupancy First St Dwy Cabrillo Park Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 0:00 1 0 0 0 333 0:15 1 2 1 0 333 0:30 3 4 2 1 333 0:45 1 3 0 2 329 1:00 0 1 2 2 326 1:15 2 0 1 0 331 1:30 0 1 0 1 329 1:45 3 1 0 0 331 2:00 0 0 1 0 332 2:15 1 0 1 0 334 2:30 1 0 1 0 336 2:45 0 0 0 0 336 3:00 3:15 0 1 0 0 0 0 337 336 3:30 0 1 0 0 337 3:45 0 0 0 1 336 4:00 0 0 0 0 336 4:15 0 0 0 0 336 4:30 0 0 0 0 336 4:45 2 0 0 1 337 5:00 0 1 0 2 334 5:15 0 1 2 3 332 5:30 1 4 0 3 326 5:45 1 2 0 2 323 6:00 2 1 0 5 319 6:15 1 4 0 2 314 6:30 0 3 0 4 307 6:45 3 5 1 6 300 Ong 700 7:15 2 2 5 2 1 0 6 9 292 263 7:30 2 14 0 11 260 7:45 3 7 1 7 250 8:00 3 6 2 11 236 6:15 2 5 3 9 229 6:30 6 11 2 12 214 6:45 9 5 1 3 216 900 9:15 6 5 6 3 2 1 5 1 213 215 9:30 2 B 0 6 203 9:45 4 2 0 5 200 10:00 1 5 1 B 169 10:15 0 6 3 9 177 10:30 3 3 1 9 169 10:45 6 4 1 3 169 MENEW 1100 11:15 3 3 4 4 1 1 2 5 167 162 11:30 3 2 1 7 157 11:451 5 2 1 1 1 B 1 153 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1176 Corona, CA 92676 (951) 266-6266 City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana Ninteen0l 4/26/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 332 Beginning Occupancy First St Dwy Cabrillo Park Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 12:00 8 5 3 7 152 12:15 4 4 6 3 155 12:30 3 7 1 3 149 12:45 10 4 2 6 151 13:00 6 1 3 6 153 13:15 5 3 6 3 158 13:30 5 5 5 4 159 13:45 4 3 3 5 158 14:00 2 4 4 4 156 14:15 8 6 3 3 158 14:30 9 2 0 6 159 14:45 7 3 4 4 163 2 3 6 166 15:15 9 4 4 6 169 15:30 6 5 3 6 167 15:45 11 5 4 4 173 16:00 7 3 4 2 179 16:15 5 3 1 6 176 16:30 7 5 0 9 169 16:45 9 2 6 1 181 17:00 10 4 9 8 188 17:15 16 2 6 6 202 17:30 10 3 5 3 211 17:45 12 2 5 4 222 18:00 9 4 8 2 233 18:15 15 2 6 15 237 18:30 12 5 5 11 238 18:45 14 8 5 3 246 19:00 12 5 8 4 257 19:15 2 6 8 4 257 19:30 8 1 5 6 263 19:45 9 7 7 7 265 20:00 9 5 7 4 272 20:15 9 2 6 5 280 20:30 12 3 6 7 288 20:45 6 7 5 3 289 21:15 2 4 5 2 297 21:30 8 1 10 5 309 21:45 7 1 9 5 319 22:00 5 1 4 1 326 22:15 1 7 2 1 321 22:30 6 4 6 4 325 22:45 3 2 1 5 322 23:00 8 2 4 2 330 23:15 1 1 2 1 331 23:30 6 2 2 1 336 23:45 4 0 5 1 344 0:00 0 0 0 3 341 TOTAL 452 307 252 388 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951) 268-6268 City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana Ninteen0l 4/28/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 331 Beginning Occupancy First St Dwy Cabrillo Park Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 0:00 3 0 3 1 330 0:15 2 4 5 2 331 0:30 3 1 1 0 334 0:45 1 2 2 2 333 1:00 4 5 3 0 335 1:15 2 4 1 2 332 1:30 4 2 1 2 333 1:45 2 3 0 2 330 2:00 2 2 2 1 331 2:15 0 0 1 0 332 2:30 1 0 0 0 333 2:45 4 2 2 1 336 300 3:15 4 0 0 0 3 0 339 339 3:30 1 1 1 0 340 3:45 0 0 1 2 339 4:00 0 0 1 0 340 4:15 0 1 0 0 339 4:30 0 0 2 1 340 4:45 1 0 1 0 342 5:00 0 0 0 1 341 5:15 0 0 0 1 340 5:30 0 0 1 0 341 5:45 2 2 0 0 341 6:00 0 2 0 0 339 6:15 0 0 1 2 336 6:30 0 2 2 2 336 6:45 0 1 0 2 333 7:00 0 2 1 0 332 7:15 0 0 0 4 326 7:30 1 11 0 6 312 7:45 1 0 1 4 310 8:00 6 5 1 6 306 6:15 1 2 0 3 302 6:30 1 4 2 6 295 6:45 2 4 0 7 266 9:15 5 3 1 5 7 263 279 9:30 6 1 0 7 277 9:45 3 2 1 6 273 10:00 7 5 5 7 273 10:15 0 9 1 5 260 10:30 4 4 0 4 256 10:45 11:15 4 5 5 4 4 7 253 3 5 1 0 10 4 246 242 11:30 4 2 3 13 234 11:45 6 3 3 7 233 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1176 Corona, CA 92676 (951) 266-6266 City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana Ninteen0l 4/28/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 331 Beginning Occupancy First St Dwy Cabrillo Park Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 12:00 7 1 1 9 231 12:15 4 2 3 11 225 12:30 6 4 4 12 219 12:45 7 B 7 7 216 13:00 2 6 3 3 214 13:15 4 1 5 B 214 13:30 9 6 5 3 219 13:45 9 4 4 5 223 14:00 5 2 2 6 222 14:15 4 1 1 2 224 14:30 2 2 2 5 221 14:45 5 6 2 5 217 15:00 11 2 7 B 225 15:15 3 1 5 6 226 15:30 9 1 3 11 226 15:45 4 4 5 5 226 16:00 11 9 4 6 226 16:15 9 3 2 6 226 16:30 3 3 5 3 230 16:45 7 1 2 10 228 17:00 9 0 3 6 234 17:15 7 5 3 6 233 17:30 9 3 5 B 236 17:45 B 3 0 6 235 16:00 9 3 4 6 239 16:15 12 4 11 4 254 16:30 7 9 3 6 249 16:45 B 3 3 9 246 19:00 5 1 6 7 251 19:15 7 9 6 7 248 19:30 6 6 3 7 244 19:45 5 3 3 7 242 20:00 7 1 7 6 249 20:15 11 4 5 4 257 20:30 3 5 6 11 250 20:45 7 3 6 3 257 262 21:15 B 3 3 3 267 21:30 6 1 3 7 266 21:45 7 2 3 2 274 22:00 5 2 4 5 276 22:15 5 3 2 4 276 22:30 9 3 2 3 261 22:45 9 6 2 2 264 23:00 5 3 4 5 265 23:15 6 0 2 0 293 23:30 5 2 4 3 297 23:45 4 4 4 1 300 0:00 0 0 0 0 300 TOTAL 417 266 240 416 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1176 Corona, CA 92676 (951) 266-6266 City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana The Marke 4/26/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 219 Beginning Occupancy Main St Dwy Rear Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 0:00 0 0 4 4 219 0:15 0 0 2 0 221 0:30 0 0 1 0 222 0:45 0 0 1 1 222 1:00 0 0 2 2 222 1:151 0 0 0 1 221 1:30 0 0 2 0 223 1:45 0 0 0 2 221 2:00 0 0 1 0 222 2:15 0 0 2 0 224 2:30 0 0 2 0 226 2:45 0 0 1 0 227 3:00 3:15 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 229 3:301 0 0 1 0 230 3:45 0 0 1 3 226 4:00 0 0 2 2 228 4:15 0 0 2 1 229 4:30 0 0 0 3 226 4:45 0 0 2 4 224 5:00 0 0 0 3 221 5:15 0 0 0 5 216 5:30 0 0 2 6 212 5:451 0 0 2 10 204 6:00 0 0 1 4 201 6:15 0 0 1 9 193 6:30 0 3 3 4 169 6:45 1 6 4 4 164 7:00 0 3 2 11 172 7:15 2 7 2 11 156 7:30 0 5 3 10 146 7:45 0 B 1 10 129 8:00 0 4 3 12 116 6:15 1 5 1 11 102 6:30 1 6 2 12 67 6:45 0 B 4 9 74 9:00 1 6 4 6 67 9:15 0 0 6 7 66 9:30 0 5 5 7 59 9:45 0 9 5 3 52 10:00 0 3 4 3 50 10:15 1 3 6 6 46 10:30 0 4 3 2 1 45 10:45 2 2 6 5 46 11:00 0 4 5 7 40 11:15 1 3 4 5 37 11:30 1 5 3 5 31 11:45 2 2 4 5 30 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1176 Corona, CA 92676 (951) 266-6266 City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana The Marke 4/26/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 219 Beginning Occupancy Main St Dwy Rear Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 12:00 3 2 16 2 45 12:15 0 4 3 4 40 12:30 1 3 5 9 34 12:45 3 4 4 10 27 13:00 1 5 9 4 26 13:151 0 1 10 6 31 13:30 1 4 B 7 29 13:45 0 3 3 5 24 14:00 3 3 10 11 23 14:15 0 2 7 6 22 14:30 0 1 B 3 26 14:45 1 1 7 2 31 15:00 15:15 1 0 2 B 7 10 7 30 15:301 1 4 B 5 30 15:45 1 3 11 1 36 16:00 1 3 3 2 37 16:15 3 4 11 6 41 16:30 1 1 B 5 44 16:45 3 5 9 7 44 17:00 0 6 14 5 47 17:15 1 5 24 1 66 17:30 0 3 15 1 77 17:451 2 3 14 5 65 16:00 0 7 24 B 94 16:15 0 4 24 4 110 16:30 1 0 11 12 110 16:45 0 0 13 B 115 19:00 0 0 10 12 113 19:15 0 0 17 5 125 19:30 0 0 22 B 139 19:45 0 0 14 7 146 20:00 0 0 19 B 157 20:15 0 0 17 10 164 20:30 0 0 15 B 171 20:45 1 0 13 B 177 21:00 21:15 0 0 0 0 13 10 7 169 21:30 0 0 11 7 193 21:45 0 0 11 5 199 22:00 0 0 10 4 205 22:15 0 0 9 4 210 22:30 0 0 7 3 214 22:45 0 0 5 2 217 23:00 0 0 9 5 221 23:15 0 0 7 3 225 23:30 0 0 2 2 225 23:45 0 0 1 1 225 0:00 0 0 0 0 225 TOTAL 42 192 632 476 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1176 Corona, CA 92676 (951) 266-6266 City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana The Marke 4/26/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 166 Beginning Occupancy Main St Dwy Rear Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 0:00 0 0 7 4 169 0:15 0 0 7 4 172 0:30 0 0 5 3 174 0:45 0 0 6 6 174 1:00 0 0 1 1 174 1:151 0 0 4 2 176 1:30 0 0 5 3 176 1:45 0 0 2 1 179 2:00 0 0 3 2 160 2:15 0 0 2 0 162 2:30 0 0 3 0 165 2:45 0 0 0 0 165 3:00 3:15 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 190 3:301 0 0 2 1 191 3:45 0 0 2 0 193 4:00 0 0 0 0 193 4:15 0 0 0 0 193 4:30 0 0 0 0 193 4:45 0 0 0 0 193 5:00 0 0 0 0 193 5:15 0 0 0 1 192 5:30 0 0 0 1 191 5:451 0 0 2 1 192 6:00 0 0 0 1 191 6:15 0 0 1 0 192 6:30 0 0 0 1 191 6:45 2 0 1 2 192 7:00 1 1 3 2 193 7:15 0 1 1 4 169 7:30 0 4 2 4 163 7:45 0 2 1 4 176 8:00 0 2 2 2 176 6:15 0 3 2 4 171 6:30 0 5 3 5 164 6:45 2 2 2 9 157 9:00 3 B 4 5 151 9:15 0 4 4 7 144 9:30 1 7 5 2 141 9:45 1 3 1 B 132 10:00 0 4 5 2 131 10:15 0 3 1 2 127 10:30 0 4 5 4 124 10:45 0 5 5 6 116 11:00 1 10 7 4 112 11:15 1 2 4 4 111 11:30 1 4 6 4 110 11:45 0 7 B 2 109 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1176 Corona, CA 92676 (951) 266-6266 City: Location: Date: Count Type: Santa Ana The Marke 4/26/2018 Parking Occupancy / Driveway Count 166 Beginning Occupancy Main St Dwy Rear Dwy Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Total 12:00 1 3 4 3 106 12:15 0 5 9 B 104 12:30 0 4 9 4 105 12:45 2 7 6 B 96 13:00 1 3 6 3 99 13:151 0 6 3 2 94 13:30 1 3 B 4 96 13:45 1 4 B 6 95 14:00 2 2 9 6 96 14:15 2 B 12 2 102 14:30 2 5 11 3 107 14:45 2 B 10 6 105 15:00 15:15 0 2 6 0 1 1 5 97 15:301 2 5 5 1 96 15:45 2 7 12 5 100 16:00 0 1 4 6 97 16:15 0 6 7 5 93 16:30 3 6 14 3 101 16:45 0 1 3 1 102 17:00 2 4 5 1 104 17:15 1 4 5 3 103 17:30 3 5 5 5 101 17:451 4 5 5 3 102 16:00 2 3 B 3 106 16:15 2 1 6 0 113 16:30 0 0 5 4 114 16:45 1 0 B 6 117 19:00 1 0 14 B 124 19:15 0 0 12 10 126 19:30 0 0 17 4 139 19:45 1 1 10 11 136 20:00 1 1 13 B 143 20:15 0 0 6 3 146 20:30 0 0 S B 146 20:45 0 0 9 5 150 21:00 0 0 3 21:15 0 0 10 10 144 21:30 0 0 B 6 146 21:45 0 0 11 4 153 22:00 0 0 9 4 156 22:151 0 0 12 B 162 22:30 0 0 9 7 164 22:45 0 0 4 6 162 23:00 0 0 11 5 166 23:15 0 0 6 3 171 23:30 0 0 9 3 177 23:45 0 0 5 2 160 0:00 0 0 0 0 160 TOTAL 54 195 504 349 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1176 Corona, CA 92676 (951) 266-6266 This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 2 This page left blank intentionally. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND AC 2525 MAIN, LLC FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET WITHIN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65864, ET SEQ. WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana ("City") is authorized pursuant to Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5 to enter into development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the purpose of establishing certainty for both City and owner in the development process; and WHEREAS, the City has found that development agreements strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning by providing a greater degree of certainty in that process, reduce the economic costs of development, allow for the orderly planning of public improvements and services, allocate costs to achieve maximum utilization of public and private resources in the development process, and ensure that appropriate measures to enhance and protect the environment are achieved; and WHEREAS, the City enters into this Development Agreement pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code and applicable City policies; and WHEREAS, AC 2525 Main, LLC ("Developer") proposes to develop a 5.93-acre site located in the City of Santa Ana, more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Property") for residential uses on the Property ("Project'); and WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Report prepared for this project analyzed the impacts related to the proposed amendment to the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines section 15087(e), Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 (State Clearinghouse No. 2018021031) for the proposed Project was circulated for a 45-day review period beginning August 7, 2018 and ending September 21, 2018; and Resolution No. 2019-xx EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 10 WHEREAS, on August 27, 2018, the Planning Commission conducted a work study session to review the Project and thirty-two (32) verbal comments were received, with three (3) in support and twenty-nine (29) in opposition; and nine (9) written comments were received with one (1) in support and eight (8) in opposition; and WHEREAS, in response to a request from Chatten-Brown & Cartens LLP, on behalf of the North Santa Ana Preservation Alliance, the City extended the Draft Environmental Impact Report public review and comment period to October 4, 2018 to allow additional time for public review and input; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was circulated for a 59-day review period, from August 7, 2018 to October 4, 2018; and WHEREAS, on November 26, 2018, the Planning Commission continued a duly noticed public hearing for the project to January 14, 2019. A second study session was held to review the Project and fifty-eight (58) verbal comments were received with twenty-five (25) in support; thirty-one (31) in opposition and two (2) neutral; and eleven (11) written comments were received with two (2) in support and nine (9) in opposition; and WHEREAS, staff recommended additional changes to the project for the Planning Commission consideration at their January 14, 2019 meeting and City Council consideration at their meetings on February 5 and 19, 2019. These recommendations included reducing the number of units and increasing the parking capacity. Staff recommendations were incorporated into the project entitlements prior to the Planning Commission and City Council public hearings. The project reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council proposed construction of 476-units (81 dwelling units per acre), with 904 parking spaces (1.82 parking spaces per unit) and parking capacity for 2.0 parking spaces, within a 5-story residential building with mezzanines wrapped around an eight -level parking structure. The height of the residential buildings along the east property line was tiered from two, to three to four to five stories. The unit mix was 53 studios, 280 one bedrooms, 114 two bedrooms and 29 three bedrooms; and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, seventy-nine (79) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty (30) speakers supported the project, forty-eight (48) speakers opposed it and one speaker was neutral. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council not certify the EIR or adopt the findings, the statement of overriding considerations and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program and deny the Project; and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 2 of 10 WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-one (61) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty-eight (38) speakers supported the project, twenty (20) speakers opposed it and three (3) speakers were neutral and the public hearing was continued to the next regular adjourned City Council meeting on February 19, 2019; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, the City Council continued to conduct a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, one hundred and thirty-one (131) members of the public spoke on the item, twenty-six (26) speakers supported the project and one hundred and five (105) speakers opposed it. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted to that the project be taken back to the Planning Commission after consultation with staff, Developer and community; and WHEREAS, in June 2019, the Developer submitted a revised plan consisting of development 347 multi -family units (59 dwelling units per acre), with 642 parking spaces (1.85 parking spaces per unit) and parking capacity at 2.0 spaces per unit, within a 4- story residential building wrapped around a five -level parking structure with an amenity deck on the sixth -level, private open space, and redesigned the intersection of Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive to provide access to the project; and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 655,826 square feet of total development, including 386,444 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 347 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 269,382 square foot central parking/fitness center/club room structure, the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, seventy-seven (77) members of the expressed opposition; nine (9) supported the project, and one speaker was neutral. In addition, one -hundred (100) written comments were received with six (6) in support and ninety-four (94) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission vote resulted in an impasse; and WHEREAS, in October 2019, in response to comments received the Developer submitted revised plans including redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 292 space surface level parking lot which also reduced Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 3 of 10 the Project's height, increased the Project's setbacks, and modified the Project entrance ("Modified Project"); and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2019, the City gave public notice of a Planning Commission public hearing, for consideration of Development Agreement No. 2018-01 by advertising in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation, and on October 17, 2019 by mailing to owners of property and residents within 500 feet of the Project and posting on the project site; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for consideration of Development Agreement No. 2018-01, at which time all persons wishing to testify were heard and the Project was fully considered; and WHEREAS, entering into this Development Agreement would provide the City with extraordinary and significant benefits that are of regional significance, related to existing deficiencies in public facilities, require the owner of 2525 North Main Street to contribute a greater percentage of benefits than would otherwise be required, and to contribute benefits which would not otherwise be required as part of the development process; and WHEREAS, the Project and the use that the Developer proposes in connection with the Property have been extensively reviewed and considered by the City, and such proposed development and use have been found to accommodate the City's recommendations and suggestions in order to protect the public's interest to enhance the desirability of such proposed development and use. The terms and conditions of this Development Agreement have been found to be fair, just and reasonable, and the City has concluded that the pursuit of the Project will serve the interests of the City; and WHEREAS, the City and Developer have reached mutual agreement and desire to voluntarily enter into the Development Agreement to facilitate development of the Project subject to the conditions and requirements set forth therein; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that by entering into the Development Agreement: (i) the City will promote orderly growth and quality development on the Property in accordance with the goals and policies set forth in the General Plan; and, (ii) significant benefits will be created for City residents and the public generally from increased employment, housing, parks and/or park improvements; and WHEREAS, the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement have undergone review by the Planning Commission at a publicly noticed hearing and have been found to be fair, just, and reasonable, and consistent with the General Plan; and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 4 of 10 WHEREAS, the proposed Project will not adversely affect the General Plan, as amended by General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, as is expressly set forth in the Request for Planning Commission Action dated October 28, 2019, together with all supporting documents, including but not limited to, proposed resolutions, which are incorporated herein by this reference. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the following environmental documents have been prepared and made available to the public: Draft and Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 for the Magnolia at the Park Multi -Family Residential Project, Clarification to the 2525 N. Main Street Multi -Family Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report (Clarification), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and Statement of Overriding Considerations and Findings of Fact. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in these documents and the administrative record for the Project, including all oral and written comments received during the comment period. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find that the EIR, including the Clarifications thereto, contain a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project, has been completed in compliance with CEQA, and reflects the independent judgment of the City. The Planning Commission further recommends that no evidence of new significant impacts or any new information of "substantial importance" as defined by State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5, has been received by the City after circulation of the Draft EIR that would require recirculation of the EIR. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the Findings of Fact, certify the EIR, adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt the MMRP. Any project approvals issued by the Planning Commission in this Resolution shall not become effective unless and until the City Council has completed the actions described above. SECTION 2. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY. Pursuant to California Government Code section 65867.5(b) and based on the entire record before the Planning Commission, including all written and oral evidence presented to the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission hereby finds that the Development Agreement is compatible with the objectives, policies, and general plan land use programs specified in the General Plan for the City of Santa Ana in that: A. The City of Santa Ana has officially adopted a General Plan. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 5 of 10 B. The land uses authorized by the General Plan Amendment, and the General Plan Amendment itself, are compatible with the goals/objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan for the following reasons: i. The existing General Plan land use designations for the project is Professional and Administrative Office (PAO), which allows business and professional offices; with a floor area ratio of 1.5. In order to facilitate the construction of a multi -family housing project with a maximum floor area ratio of 1.43, the general plan land use designation needs to be changed to District Center (DC), which permits a high intensity, mixed -use urban villages and pedestrian -oriented experiences that support mid- to high-rise office centers, commercial activity, and cultural activities with floor area ratios ranging from 0.5 to 5.0. ii. The proposed Project will support several goals/objectives and policies of the General Plan. Housing Element (HE) Goal 2: to create diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that accommodate Santa Ana's residents and workforce of all household types, income levels, and age groups to foster an inclusive community. HE Policy 2.2 District Centers. Create high intensity, mixed -use urban villages and pedestrian -oriented experiences that support the mid- to high-rise office centers, commercial activity, and cultural activities in the varied District Centers. HE Policy 2.4 to facilitate diverse types, prices and sizes of housing Housing Element (HE) Goal 4: to provide adequate rental and ownership housing opportunities and supportive services. The Project will provide 347 rental housing units. The amendment will expand the District Center designation and provide a connection between the existing District Centers to the north and south of the site by providing a residential development that will support a mixed -use environment. Land Use (LU) Element Goal 1: to promote a balance of land uses to address basic community needs. LU Policy 1.2 Maintain and foster a variety of residential land uses in the City. LU Policy 4.3 Support land uses which provide community and regional Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 6 of 10 economic and service benefits. LU Policy 4.4 Encourage the development of projects which promote the City's image as a regional activity center. LU Policy 5.5 Encourage development which is compatible with, and supportive of surrounding land uses. LU Policy 5.7 Anticipate that the intensity of new development will not exceed available infrastructure capacity. Land Use (LU) Element Goal 6: to reduce residential overcrowding to promote public health and safety. The Project is within '/2 mile of existing transportation infrastructure such as the Santa Ana (1-5) freeway and State Route 22 (SR 22) highway which provide vehicular access to the region; the Orange County Transportation Agency bus routes along Main Street which connects to the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center and the Anaheim Regional Intermodal Center which provides rail service throughout California; and the project is immediately adjacent to Santiago Park and the Santiago Creek Bike Trail which connects to regional bike trails. Main Street, a major urban corridor with cultural, educational, employment and retail destinations such as the Bowers Museum, Discovery Science Center, Main Place Mall and in the City of Orange; the Children's Hospital of Orange County and St. Joseph's Hospital of Orange County. Therefore, the residential development would be within close proximity to major employment centers and retail establishments. The Project will also provide an additional housing option for those seeking housing within the jobs rich northern area of the City. The multi -storied development will complement the nearby mid -rise office buildings located along Main Street to the north and west of the site. Although the density will be higher than the adjacent uses, the residential use is consistent with the residential uses to the east and south. Urban Design (UD) Element, Goal 1: to improve the physical appearance of the City through development of districts that project a sense of place, positive community image, and quality environment. UD Policy 1.1. New development and redevelopment must have the highest quality design, materials, finishes and construction. UD Policy 1.11 Visual and physical links between districts, nodes, and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 7 of 10 significant sites, landmarks and other points of interest, are to be provided in all public and private projects. The residential buildings are of high quality design and include high quality materials such as stone veneer, brick veneers, metal panels, and canopies. The building is designed with courtyards that are open to the public right-of-way, and landscaped areas to reduce the mass of the building. The Project has street frontage on Main Street which is identified as a major path in the General Plan and supports the North Main Street Node described as an opportunity for the establishment of a cohesive, height intensity, mixed activity center with a strong presence in the region. The setback along the east side of the project has been increased to 66 feet to minimize impacts to the neighboring single-family residences. The new development will include public art and convey a sense of place and contribute to the urban image for the City along a street corridor that includes regional, local and cultural landmarks. The development will be in scale with the buildings along Main Street to the north and west of the site. In addition, the Urban Design Element of the General Plan identifies the site as a Gateway; the Project promotes elements of a Gateway by developing the site with a building with attractive architectural features, projecting a positive image for the City of Santa Ana. C. The proposed Development Agreement will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare in that the Development Agreement will not result in incompatible land uses on adjacent properties, inconsistencies with any General Plan goals or policies, or adverse impacts to the environment SECTION 3. The Development Agreement, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby recommended for City Council approval. SECTION 4. The Development Agreement shall not be effective unless and until Resolution No. 2019- (Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01), Resolution No. 2019- (General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06) and Ordinance No. NS- (Amendment Application No. 2018-10) are adopted and become effective. If said resolution, ordinance and Development Agreement are for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or otherwise does not go into effect for any reason, then the Development Agreement shall be null and void and have no further force and effect. SECTION 5. INDEMNIFICATION. The Developer shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether legal, Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 8 of 10 equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the Project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Developer shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Developer of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Developer in the defense of the Action. SECTION 6. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. The Planning Commission hereby takes the following action: 1. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Development Agreement No. 2018-01, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B, as follows: A. The Development Agreement shall not take effect unless and until Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 is certified by the City Council, and General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06 and Amendment Application No. 2018-10, are each adopted by the City Council. SECTION 7. EXECUTION OF RESOLUTION. The Chairperson shall sign this Resolution and the Planning Commission Recording Secretary shall attest and certify to the adoption thereof. "*Signature page to follow`*` Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 9 of 10 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of October 2019. AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: Mark McLoughlin Chairperson APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney Bv: Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, SARAH BERNAL, Recording Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on October 28, 2019. Date: Recording Secretary City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT A Schedule I Legal Description THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY. OF SANTA ANA, IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: (003-610-28) THAT PORTION OF CERTAIN LANDS ALLOTTED TO GLASSELL AND CHAPMAN, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL DECREE OF PARTITION OF THE RANCHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, RECORDED SEPTEM13ER 12, 1868, IN BOOK "B" PAGE 410, OF JUDGMENTS OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LOS AN.GELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF MAIN STREET WITH TI-FE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF TRACT NO. 139, IN THE CITY OF SAN17A.ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF.RECORDED IN BOOK 11 PAGE 36 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 0° 45' EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF MAIN STREET, 148.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 760 22' EAST 12.1.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56° 59' EAST 393.56 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO W, L. GRUBB AND WIFE, BY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 20,1920 IN BOOK 3.90 PAGE 10 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE,.391.91 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO W. L. GRUBB AND WIFE, BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 14, 1921, IN BOOK 392 PAGE 83, OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LAST MENTIONED PARCEL OF LAND AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 139, AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREON TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM TITE WESTERLY 52 FEET TI3EREOF, INCLUDED, WITHIN MAIN STREET, AS GRANTED TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY DEED RECORDED JULY 30, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO.28274, IN BOOK 10824 PAGE 107, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN PARCEL 2, AS DESCRIBED BELOW: ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 10824 PAGE 107, OF OFFICIAL .RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LAND CONVEYED TO T14E CITY OF SANTA ANA, NORTH 01 ° 45' 44" EAST 151.68 FEET TO A POINT BEING DISTANT 9.5.4 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LAND; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE; SOUTH 00- 58' 30"EAST 151,80 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1 OF BLOCK "A" OF TRACT NO. 139, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK RECORDED IN BOOK 11 PAGE 36 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, NORTH 88° 37' 48" WEST 7.25 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEEDS RECORDED APRIL 2, 1993 AS INSTRUMENTS NOS. 93-219530, 93-219531 AND 93-219532, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 2: (003-010-01) THAT PORTION OF CERTAIN LANDS ALLOTTED TO GLASSELL AND CHAPMAN, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL DECREE OF PARTITION OF THE RANC140 SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, 1868, IN BOOK "B" PAGE 410. OF JUDGMENTSOF THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE CENTER OF EDGEWOOD ROAD, 444.6 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINES OF EDGEWOOD ROAD AND MAIN STREET; RUNNING THENCE NORTH I' EAST PARALLEL WITH MAIN STREET, 686,375 FEET; THENCE NORTH 600 EAST 114.3 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 0 WEST 743.75 FEET TO THE CENTER OF EDGEWOOD ROAD; THENCE WEST ALONG THE CENTER OF SAID EDGEWOOD ROAD 98 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING, SUBJECT TO RESERVATION OF A STRIP OF LAND 26 FEET WIDE OFF THE SOUTH SIDE FOR EDGEWOOD ROAD, PARCEL 3: (00-010-03) THAT PORTION OF CERTAIN LANDS ALLOTTED TO GLASSELL AND CHAPMAN, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL DECREE OF PARTITION OF THE RANCHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12,1868, IN BOOK "B" PAGE 410, OF JUDGMENTS OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF TIIE 17TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LOS AN.GELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT A POINT IN EDGEWOOD ROAD AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 157, PAGE 223 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, SAID POINT BEING SOUTH 0- 53' WEST 1369.04 FEET AND SOUTH 89° 30-1/2' EAST 344.7 FEET FROM A STONE MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION SIX, TOWNSHIP FIVE SOUTH, RANGE NINE WEST, S. B. B. & M., RUNNING THENCE NORTH PARALLEL TO THE CENTER LINE OF MAIN STREET,;259.4 FEET; THENCE EAST PARALLEL TO THE CENTER LINE OF EDGEWOOD ROAD 100 FEET: THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE CENTER LINE OF MAIN STREET, 259.4 FEET AND THENCE WEST 100 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION THEREOF INCLUDED WITHIN THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO JOHN S. BLOWER, ET AL., RECORDED OCTOBER 29, I957, IN BOOK 4084, PAGE 109, Of OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, PARCEL 4: AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES CREATED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 6,1981 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 7937IN BOOK 14048 PAGE 786, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, OVER THAT CERTAIN STRIP OF LAND, IQ.00 FEET WIDE,. IN THE CITY OF SA.NTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING 5.00 FEET ON EACII SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE. BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF MAIN STREET WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF TRACT NO. 139 AS SAID TRACT IS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 11 PAGE 36 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 00 52' 45" EAST, ALONG SAI.D CENTERLINE OF MAIN STREET, 148.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 760 29' 45" EAST 121.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 570 06' 45" EAST 126.62 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 30° 23.' 10" WEST TO THE NORTHWESTERLY FACE OF THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY EXISTING CONCRETE RUBBLE STORM DRAIN CHANNEL WALL, KNOWN AS SANTIAGO CREEK. PARCEL 5; {003-010-25; 003-01Q-30; 003-010-26) LOTS 1,.2, 3, 4 AND 5 OF BLOCK A OF TRACT NO. 139, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 1.1, PAGE 36 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION INCLUDED WITHIN THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN ORDER OF CONDEMNATION, SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NO.21262.1, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH W RECORDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1977 IN BOOK 12397, PAGE 164 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID LANDS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEEDS RECORDED JANUARY 14, 1993 AS INSTRUMENTNO. 93-032.178 AND APRIL 2, 1993 AS. INSTRUMENT NO. 93-0217354, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY. This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT B RECORDED AT REQUEST OF AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: ) City of Santa Ana ) 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) ) Santa Ana, CA 92702 ) Attention: Clerk of the Council ) Exempt from filing fees pursuant to Government Code §27383 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2018-01 A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF SANTA ANA and AC 2525 MAIN, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2018-01 This Development Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement') is entered into as of this day of , 2019 by and between the City of Santa Ana, California (hereinafter "CITY'), and AC 2525 Main, a California limited liability company (hereinafter "OWNER'): RECITALS WHEREAS, CITY is authorized to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property, pursuant to Section 65864, et seq. of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, This Agreement constitutes a current exercise of CITY'S police powers to provide predictability to OWNER in the development approval process by vesting the permitted uses, density, intensity of use, and timing and phasing of development consistent with the Development Plan in exchange for OWNER'S commitment to provide significant public benefits to CITY as set forth in Section 4, below. WHEREAS, OWNER has requested CITY to enter into a development agreement and proceedings have been taken in accordance with the rules and regulations of CITY; and WHEREAS, the best interests of the citizens of the City of Santa Ana and the public health, safety and welfare will be served by entering into this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that this Agreement is of major significance because it will enable the CITY to fund much needed capital improvements and provide much needed public services and will therefore also have a major, beneficial economic impact on the City; and WHEREAS, the provision by OWNER of the public benefits allows the CITY to realize significant economic, recreational, park, open space, educational, social and public facilities benefits. The public benefits will advance the interests and meet the needs of Santa Ana residents and visitors to a significantly greater extent than would development of the Property without this Agreement. WHEREAS, the physical effects, if any, of the Project and this Agreement have been analyzed pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act as amended to date and as documented in the Final Environmental Impact Report entitled "Magnolia at the Park Multi -Family Residential Project" (State Clearinghouse House No. 2018021031 and City of Santa Ana DP No. 2017.34); and WHEREAS, this Agreement and the Project are consistent with the Santa Ana General Plan and any specific plan applicable thereto; and WHEREAS, all actions taken and approvals given by CITY have been duly taken or approved in accordance with all applicable legal requirements for notice, public hearings, findings, votes, and other procedural matters; and WHEREAS, development of the Property in accordance with this Agreement will provide substantial benefits to CITY and will further important policies and goals of CITY; and WHEREAS, this Agreement will eliminate uncertainty in planning and provide for the orderly development of the Property, ensure progressive installation of necessary improvements, provide for public services appropriate to the development of the Project, and generally serve the purposes for which development agreements under Section 65864, et sec.. of the Government Code are intended; COVENANTS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS. 1.1 Definitions. The following terms when used in this Agreement shall be defined as follows: 1.1.1 "Agreement'' means this Development Agreement. 1.1.2 "CITY" means the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and California municipal corporation. 1.1.3 "City Council" means the duly elected city council of the City of Santa Ana. 1.1.4 "Commencement Date" means the date the Term of this Agreement commences. 1.1.5 "Development'' means the improvement of the Property for the purposes of completing the structures, improvements and facilities comprising the Project including, but not limited to: grading; the construction of infrastructure and public facilities related to the Project whether located within or outside the Property; the construction of buildings and structures; and the installation of landscaping. "Development'' does not include the maintenance, repair, reconstruction or redevelopment of any building, structure, improvement or facility after the construction and completion thereof. 1.1.6 "Development Exaction" means any requirement of CITY in connection with or pursuant to any Land Use Regulation or development approval for the dedication of land, the construction of improvements or public facilities, or the payment of fees in order to lessen, offset, mitigate or compensate for the impacts of development on the environment or other public interests. 1.1.7 "Development Impact Fee" a monetary exaction other than a tax or special assessment, whether established for a broad class of projects by legislation of general applicability or imposed on a specific project on an ad hoc basis, that is charged by a local agency to the applicant in connection with approval of a development project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the development project, but does not include park "in lieu" fees specified in Government Code Section 66477, fees for processing applications for governmental regulatory actions or approvals, or fees collected under development agreements adopted pursuant to Article 2.5 of the Government Code (commencing with Section 65864) of Chapter 4. 1.1.8 "Development Plan" means the plan for development of the Property as set forth in Exhibit "C". 1.1.9 "Discretionary Action(s)" or "Discretionary Approval(s)" means an action which requires the exercise of judgment, deliberation or discretion on the part of the City, including any board, agency, commission or department and any officer or employee thereof, in the process of approving or disapproving Development of the Project, as distinguished from an activity which is defined herein as a Ministerial Permit or Ministerial Approval. 1.1.10 "Effective Date" means the date the ordinance approving and authorizing this Agreement becomes effective. 1.1.11 "Existing Land Use Regulations" means all ordinances, laws, resolutions, codes, rules, regulations, policies, requirements, guidelines or other actions of City, including but not limited to the provisions set forth in the City's General Plan, Municipal Code which affect, govern or apply to the Development of the Project and use of the Property in a manner consistent with this Agreement, including, without limitation, the permitted use of land, the density or intensity of use, subdivision requirements, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, and the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to the Development of the Property, subject to the terms of this Agreement, whether adopted by the City Council or the voters in an initiative, which are in effect on the Effective Date, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65866. 1.1.12 "Existing Project Approvals" means all Project Approvals approved or issued on or before the Effective Date. 1.1.13 "Land Use Regulations" means all ordinances, resolutions, codes, rules, regulations and official policies of CITY governing the development and use of land, including, without limitation, the permitted use of land, the density or intensity of use, subdivision requirements, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, and the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to the development of the Property. `band Use Regulations" does not include any CITY ordinance, resolution, code, rule, regulation or official policy, governing: (a) the conduct of businesses, professions, and occupations; (b) taxes (special or general) and assessments; (c) the control and abatement of nuisances; (d) the granting of encroachment permits and the conveyance of rights and interests that provide for the use of or the entry upon public property; (e) the exercise of the power of eminent domain. 1.1.14 Reserved. 1.1.15 "OWNER" means the persons and entities listed as OWNER on page 1 of this Agreement and their successors in interest to all or any part of the Property. 1.1.16 "Ministerial Approvals(s)," or "Ministerial Act(s)" means any approval or act that is not a Discretionary Approval. 1.1.17 "Mortgagee" means a mortgagee of a mortgage, a beneficiary under a deed of trust or any other security -device lender, and their successors and assigns. 1.1.18 "Projecf'means the development of the Property located at 2525 Main Street, Santa Ana, CA, contemplated by the Development Plan as such Plan may be further defined, enhanced or modified pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 1.1.19 "Project Approvals" means all site -specific (meaning specifically applicable to the Project only and not generally applicable to some or all other properties within the City) plans, maps, permits, and entitlements to use of every kind and nature that are sought or agreed to in writing by OWNER in its sole and absolute discretion to Develop the Project and that have been approved by the City. Project Approvals include, but are not limited to, general plan amendments, site plans, tentative and final subdivision maps, design guidelines, variances, zoning designations, conditional use permits, grading, building, and other similar permits, the site -specific provisions of general plans, environmental assessments, including environmental impact reports and negative declarations. 1.1.20 "Property" means the real property described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit `B" to this Agreement. 1.1.21 "Public Benefit" refers to those benefits provided to the CITY and the community by OWNER pursuant to Section 4 below. 1.1.22 "Reservation of Rights" means the rights and authority excepted from the assurances and rights provided to OWNER under this Agreement and reserved to CITY under Section 3.3 of this Agreement. 1.2 Exhibits. The following documents are attached to, and by this reference made a part of, this Agreement: Exhibit "A" — Legal Description of the Property Exhibit `B" — Map showing Property and its location Exhibit "C" — Development Plan Exhibit "D" — Development Impact Fees Exhibit "E" - Development Impact Fee Credits Exhibit "F" — Santiago Park Access Rights Exhibit "G" — Santiago Park Improvements Exhibit `II — Park Santiago Patrol Area Map Exhibit "I" — Conditions of Discretionary Approvals 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 2.1 Binding Effect of Agreement. The Property is hereby made subject to this Agreement. Development of the Property is hereby authorized and shall be carried out in accordance with the terms of the Development Plan and this Agreement. 2.2 Ownership of Property. OWNER represents and covenants that it is the owner of the fee simple title to, or has an equitable interest in, the Property or a portion thereof. 2.3 City Council Findings. The City Council finds that: 2.3.1 This Agreement is consistent with the CITY' S General Plan. 2.3.2 This Agreement ensures a desirable and functional community environment, provides effective and efficient development of public facilities, infrastructure, and services appropriate for the development of the Project, enhances effective utilization of resources within the City. 2.3.3 This Agreement provides public benefits beyond those which are necessary to mitigate the development of the Project. 2.3.4 This Agreement strengthens the public planning process, encourages private participation in comprehensive planning and reduces costs of development and government. 2.3.5 The best interests of the citizens of the CITY and the public health, safety, and welfare will be served by entering into this Agreement. 2.4 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date (the "Commencement Date") that is the Effective Date, and shall continue for a period of four (4) years thereafter, unless this term is modified or extended pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. Thereafter, the OWNER shall have no vested right under this Agreement, regardless of whether or not OWNER has paid any Development Impact Fee. 2.4.1 The Term of this Agreement may be extended upon the mutual written agreement of the City's City Manager and the OWNER for no more than two (2) additional consecutive one (1) year periods ("Extension Term"). Notwithstanding the immediately preceding sentence or any other part of this Agreement, in no event shall the Development Agreement Period exceed 2160 consecutive calendar days from the Effective Date. Prior to the City granting each Extension Term: (a) OWNER shall demonstrate to the City Manager's reasonable satisfaction that OWNER has and will continue to diligently pursue the development of the Project; (b) OWNER shall pay to the City Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) to partially compensate the City for the significant lost revenue to be received by the City had the Project been completed. 2.4.2 If any party other than OWNER initiates litigation that challenges the Project or the Existing Project Approvals, the OWNER will have the right to toll commencement of the Term and any obligations of OWNER under the Agreement during the period of such litigation. The tolling shall commence upon receipt by the City of written notice from OWNER invoking this right to tolling. The tolling shall terminate when (1) a final order is issued in said litigation that upholds the Project and the Existing Project Approvals or (2) the litigation is dismissed with prejudice by all Parties; whichever occurs first. 2.5 As�ment. 2.5.1 Right to Assign. OWNER shall have the right to sell, transfer or assign the Property in whole or in part (provided that no such partial transfer shall violate the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66410, et seq.) to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm or corporation at any time during the term of this Agreement; provided, however, that any such sale, transfer or assignment shall include the assignment and assumption of the rights, duties and obligations arising under or from this Agreement and be made in strict compliance with the following conditions precedent: (a) No sale, transfer or assignment of any right or interest under this Agreement shall be made unless made together with the sale, transfer or assignment of all or a part of the Property to which such rights or interests apply. Any sale, transfer or assignment shall require the consent of the City which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. (b) Concurrent with any such sale, transfer or assignment, OWNER shall notify CITY, in writing, of such sale, transfer or assignment and shall provide CITY with an executed agreement ("Assignment and Assumption Agreement'), in a form reasonably acceptable to CITY, by the purchaser, transferee or assignee and providing therein that the purchaser, transferee or assignee expressly and unconditionally assumes all the duties, obligations, agreements, covenants, waivers of OWNER under this Agreement, including, without limitation, the covenants not to sue and waivers contained in Sections 7.2 and 8.4 hereof. (c) OWNER shall provide CITY with such information reasonably requested by CITY that demonstrates such transferee or assignee has sufficient development experience and financial capability to complete the Project and perform all obligations assumed. (d) Any sale, transfer or assignment not made in strict compliance with the foregoing conditions shall constitute a default by Owner under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the failure of any purchaser, transferee or assignee to execute the agreement required by Paragraph (b) of this Subsection 2.5.1, the burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon such purchaser, transferee or assignee, but the benefits of this Agreement shall not inure to such purchaser, transferee or assignee until and unless such agreement is executed. (e) The Executive Director for the Planning and Building Agency shall have the administrative authority to determine that OWNER has complied with the above conditions. Such determination shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. 2.5.2 Release of Transferring Owner. Notwithstanding any sale, transfer or assignment, a transferring OWNER shall continue to be obligated under this Agreement with respect to the transferred Property or any transferred portion thereof, unless such transferring OWNER is given a release in writing by CITY, which release shall be provided by CITY upon the full satisfaction by such transferring OWNER of the following conditions: (a) OWNER no longer has a legal or equitable interest in all or any part of the Property subject to the transfer. (b) OWNER is not then in default under this Agreement. (c) OWNER has provided CITY with the notice and executed agreement required under Paragraph (b) of Subsection 2.5.1 above. (d) The purchaser, transferee or assignee provides CITY with security equivalent to any security previously provided by OWNER to secure performance of its obligations hereunder. 2.5.3 Subsequent Assignment. Any subsequent sale, transfer or assignment after an initial sale, transfer or assignment shall be made only in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Section. 2.5.4 Utilities. The Project shall be connected to all utilities necessary to provide adequate water, sewer, gas, electric, and other utility service to the Project, prior to the issuance of final approval for occupancy or the certificate of occupancy for any portion of the Project. 2.5.5 Sale to Public and Completion of Construction. The provisions of Subsection 2.5.1 shall not apply to the sale or lease (for a period longer than one year) of any lot that has been finally subdivided and is individually (and not in "bulk") sold or leased to a member of the public or other ultimate user. This Agreement shall terminate with respect to any lot and such lot shall be released and no longer be subject to this Agreement without the execution or recordation of any further document upon satisfaction of both of the following conditions: (a) The lot has been finally subdivided and individually (and not in "bulk") sold or leased (for a period longer than one year) to a member of the public or other ultimate user; and (b) City final approval for occupancy or the certificate of occupancy has been issued for a building on the lot, and the fees for such lot set forth in this Agreement have been paid. 2.6 Amendment or Cancellation of Agreement. This Agreement may be amended or canceled in whole or in part only by written consent of all parties in the manner provided for in Government Code Section 65868. This provision shall not limit any remedy of CITY or OWNER as provided by this Agreement. 2.7 Termination. This Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further effect upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) Expiration of the stated Term of this Agreement as set forth in Section 2.4. (b) Entry of a final judgment setting aside, voiding or annulling the adoption of the ordinance approving this Agreement. (c) The adoption of a referendum measure overriding or repealing the ordinance approving this Agreement. (1) Within five (5) days of receipt of a referendum petition by the CITY, OWNER shall deposit Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) ("Referendum Deposit') with the CITY. CITY may use the funds to pay any and all costs associated with the said referendum measure. If at any time the Referendum Deposit account has Five Thousand Dollars ($5000) or less remaining, Developer shall, within three (3) days of receiving notice from the CITY, deposit with the City additional funds as requested by the CITY to cover all costs and expenses associated with processing the referendum and holding the related election. Following certification of the election results, any funds remaining in the Referendum Deposit account shall be returned to the OWNER. (d) Completion of the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement including issuance of all required occupancy permits, final approval for occupancy by the City, and acceptance by CITY or applicable public agency of all required dedications. (e) Termination of this Agreement shall not constitute termination of any other land use entitlements approved for the Property. Upon the termination of this Agreement, no party shall have any further right or obligation hereunder except with respect to any obligation to have been performed prior to such termination or with respect to any default in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement that has occurred prior to such termination or with respect to any obligations that are specifically set forth as surviving this Agreement. Upon such termination, any Development Impact Fees paid by OWNER to CITY for residential units on which construction has not yet begun shall be refunded to OWNER by CITY. 2.8 Notices. (a) As used in this Agreement, "notice" includes, but is not limited to, the communication of notice, request, demand, approval, statement, report, acceptance, consent, waiver, appointment or other communication required or permitted hereunder. (b) All notices shall be in writing and shall be considered given either: (i) when delivered in person to the recipient named below; or (ii) on the date of delivery shown on the return receipt, after deposit in the United States mail in a sealed envelope as either registered or certified mail with return receipt requested, and postage and postal charges prepaid, and addressed to the recipient named below; or (iii) on the date of delivery shown in the records of the telegraph company after transmission by telegraph to the recipient named below. All notices shall be addressed as follows: If to CITY: City Clerk 20 Civic Center Plaza, 8tn Floor PO Box 1988 M-30 Santa Ana, Ca 82702 Copy to: City Manager City Attorney Executive Director of Planning and Building Agency If to OWNER: AC 2525 MAIN, LLC 240 Newport Center Drive, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA. 92660 Attn: Manager Telephone: [ Facsimile: f (c) Either party may, by notice given at any time, require subsequent notices to be given to another person or entity, whether a party or an officer or representative of a party, or to a different address, or both. Notices given before actual receipt of notice of change shall not be invalidated by the change. 3. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY. 3.1 Rights to Develop. Subject to the terms of this Agreement including the Reservation of Rights, OWNER shall have a vested right to develop the Property in accordance with, and to the extent of, this Agreement. Except as expressly provided otherwise herein, the Project shall remain subject to all Existing Land Use Regulations and Development Approvals. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, and notwithstanding the authority of the CITY to further revise the Land Use Regulations pursuant to Government Code section 65866, the permitted uses of the Property, the density and intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation and dedication of land for public purposes shall be those set forth in the Land Existing Use Regulations and Development Approvals. OWNER shall comply with all mitigation measures required to be undertaken pursuant to any document prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to the Project 3.2 Effect of Agreement on Land Use Regulations. Except as otherwise provided under the terms of this Agreement including the Reservation of Rights, the rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses of the Property, the density and intensity of use of the Property, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to development of the Property shall be the Existing Land Use Regulations and Development Approvals. In connection with any subsequently adopted Project Approvals and except as specifically provided otherwise herein, CITY may exercise its discretion in accordance with the Land Use Regulations then in effect, as provided by this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the Reservation of Rights. CITY shall accept for processing, review and action all applications for subsequent Project Approvals, and such applications shall be processed in the same manner and the CITY shall exercise its discretion, when required or authorized to do so, to the same extent it would otherwise be entitled in the absence of this Agreement. 3.3 Reservation of Rights. 3.3.1 Limitations, Reservations and Exceptions. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the following regulations shall apply to the development of the Property: (a) Processing fees and charges of every kind and nature imposed by CITY to cover the actual costs to CITY of processing applications for Development Approvals or for monitoring compliance with any Development Approvals granted or issued. (b) Procedural regulations relating to hearing bodies, petitions, applications, notices, findings, records, hearings, reports, recommendations, appeals and any other matter of procedure. (c) Regulations, policies and rules governing engineering and construction standards and specifications applicable to public and private improvements, including, without limitation, all uniform codes adopted by the City and any local amendments to those codes adopted by the CITY, including, without limitation, the CITY's Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code, Electrical Code, and Grading Ordinance. (d) Regulations imposing Development Exactions; provided, however, that no such Development Exaction adopted after the Effective Date shall apply to development of the Property under this Agreement unless agreed to by OWNER. In the event any such subsequently adopted Development Exaction, agreed to by OWNER, fulfills the same purposes, in whole or in part, as the fees set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement, CITY shall allow a credit against such subsequently adopted Development Exaction for the fees paid under Section 4 of this Agreement to the extent such fees fulfill the same purposes. (e) Regulations that may be in material conflict with this Agreement but that are reasonably necessary to protect the residents of the project or the immediate community from a condition perilous to their health or safety. To the extent possible, any such regulations shall be applied and construed so as to provide OWNER with the rights and assurances provided under this Agreement. (f) Regulations that are not in material conflict with this Agreement or the Development Plan. Any regulation, whether adopted by initiative or otherwise, limiting the rate or timing of development of the Property shall be deemed to materially conflict with the Development Plan and shall therefore not be applicable to the development of the Property. (g) Regulations that are in material conflict with the Development Plan; provided OWNER has given written consent to the application of such regulations to development of that Property in which the OWNER has a legal or equitable interest. (h) Regulations that impose, levy, alter or amend fees, or charges relating to consumers or end users, including, without limitation, trash can placement, service charges and limitations on vehicle parking. (i) Regulations of other public agencies, including Development Impact Fees adopted or imposed by such other public agencies, although collected by CITY. 3.3.2 Subsequent Project Approvals. This Agreement shall not prevent CITY, in acting on subsequent Project Approvals and to the same extent it would otherwise be authorized to do so absent this Agreement, from applying subsequently adopted or amended Land Use Regulations that do not materially conflict with this Agreement. 3.3.3 Modification or Suspension by State or Federal Law. In the event that State, County or Federal laws or regulations, enacted after the Effective Date of this Agreement, prevent or preclude compliance with one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, such provisions of this Agreement shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such State or Federal laws or regulations; provided, however, that this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the extent it is not inconsistent with such laws or regulations and to the extent such laws or regulations do not render such remaining provisions impractical to enforce. 3.3.4 Intent The parties acknowledge and agree that CITY is restricted in its authority to limit certain aspects of its police power by contract and that the foregoing limitations, reservations and exceptions are intended to reserve to CITY all of its police power that cannot be or are not expressly so limited. This Agreement shall be construed, contrary to its stated terms if necessary, to reserve to CITY all such power and authority that cannot be or is not by this Agreement's express terms so restricted. 3.4 Regulation by Other Public Agencies. It is acknowledged by the parties that other public agencies not within the control of CITY may possess authority to regulate aspects of the development of the Property separately from or jointly with CITY and this Agreement does not limit the authority of such other public agencies. 3.5 Timing of Development. Because the California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal. 3d 465 (1984), that the failure of the parties in that case to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later - adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties' agreement, it is the specific intent of the Parties to provide for the timing of the Project in this Agreement. To do so, the Parties acknowledge and provide that OWNER shall have the right, but not the obligation, to complete the Project in such order, at such rate, at such times, and in as many development phases and sub -phases as Owner deems appropriate in its sole subjective business judgment 3.6 Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions 3.6.1 OWNER shall have the ability to reserve and record such covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) against the Property as OWNER deems appropriate, in its sole and absolute discretion. Such CC&Rs may not conflict with this Agreement or the General Plan. Before recording any CC&Rs, OWNER shall provide a copy of the CC&Rs to the CITY for review and approval by the City Attorney, whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 3.6.2 The City Attorney's review shall be limited to determining if the CC&Rs substantially comply with this Agreement and Project's conditions of approval as approved by the City Council and that the CC&Rs incorporate and reference the following information regarding the approved development: (a) The Parking Management Plan (b) The Overcrowding Mitigation Implementation Plan (c) The Property Maintenance Plan (d) The project Conditions of Approval 3.6.3 Within thirty (30) days after receiving a copy of the proposed CC&Rs from OWNER, the City Attorney shall provide OWNER with either (i) a statement that the CC&Rs comply with this Agreement ("CC&R Approval") or (ii) written comments identifying each aspect of the CC&Rs which the City Attorney believes not to be in compliance with this Agreement (a "Statement of Non -Compliance"). If the City Attorney fails to provide OWNER with either CC&R Approval or a Statement of Non -Compliance within thirty (30) days following a written request by OWNER, City shall be deemed to have approved the CC&Rs and OWNER may record the CC&Rs against the Property. If the City Attorney provides a Statement of Non -Compliance, OWNER shall have thirty (30) days in which to respond to the Statement of Non -Compliance. Upon submittal of OWNER'S response, the procedure described above for the initial submittal and City Attorney review of proposed CC&Rs shall again be followed. This procedure shall be followed until OWNER either (1) receives CC&R Approval, (2) submits the compliance issues to binding arbitration pursuant to the rules of the American Arbitration Association, (3) files an action for declaratory relief in Orange County Superior Court seeking a judicial determination of the compliance of the proposed CC&Rs, or (4) agreement is otherwise reached between the Parties allowing for the recording of the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs may run with the land and bind OWNER'S successors and assigns. Except as provided above, any dispute between the Parties regarding the CITY'S approval or rejection of the CC&Rs shall be subject to immediate and binding arbitration pursuant to the rules of the American Arbitration Association. 3.7 Moratoria. Except as specifically set forth in this section, City agrees that no moratorium or other similar limitation (whether relating to the rate, timing, or sequencing of the development of the Project or any part thereof and whether or not enacted by local initiative or otherwise) affecting subdivision/tract maps, grading or building permits, occupancy certificates, or other entitlements approved, issued, or granted within the City, after the Effective Date of this Agreement, shall apply to the Project OWNER acknowledges and agrees that the provisions hereof shall not preclude the application to the Project of a moratorium or other similar limitation (of the type described in the preceding sentence) enacted in order to protect an imminent threat to the public health or safety. 3.8 Development Agreement/Project Approvals. In the event of any inconsistency between any Existing Land Use Regulation and a Project Approval, the provisions of the Project Approval shall control. In the event of any inconsistency between any Existing Land Use Regulation, any Project Approval and this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall control. 3.9 LEED Certification. OWNER shall design and construct the building to achieve not less than a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (` LEED") Silver Standard equivalent. OWNER shall focus design efforts to ensure the Project meets the environmental needs of the community, as well as, the Project, itself, maintains an eco-friendly design. It is anticipated the Project will include, but is not limited to, drought tolerant landscaping and irrigation systems, solar and EV systems, and reclaimed water. 4. PUBLIC BENEFITS. 4.1 Intent. The Parties acknowledge and agree that development of the Property will result in substantial public needs that will not be fully met by the Development Plan and further acknowledge and agree that this Agreement confers substantial private benefits on OWNER that should be balanced by commensurate public benefits. 4.2 Public Benefits. OWNER has committed by this Agreement to contribute to the acquisition, construction and maintenance of certain 'Public Benefits" as provided below 4.2.1 CITY Facilities. OWNER shall provide the following benefits towards the acquisition, construction and maintenance of the CITY Facilities, as follows: (a) Public Art OWNER shall create, install, and maintain a public art project with a value equivalent to one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the total construction cost of the Project. Total construction cost shall mean all design, engineering and construction costs. OWNER shall prepare and submit to the City, no later than one hundred eighty (180) days before final approval for occupancy or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, a public art plan that is consistent with Chapter 15 of the Citywide Design Guidelines, Public Art Guidelines. The approved art shall be installed prior to final approval for occupancy or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Project. (b) Santiago Park Improvement Construction. At the City's determination, Owner shall manage and construct the Santiago Park Phase II Park Improvements (`Park Improvements") subject to review and approval by the City. The Park Improvements shall include, but are not limited to design, engineering, permitting, construction, and installation of irrigation, landscaping, security lighting and bike trail enhancement, as described in more detail on Exhibit G. The total expenditure for the Park Improvements shall not exceed One Million Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,400,000) (`Phase 11 Expenditure"). The State Coastal Conservancy has notified the City that it has allocated up to Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) for the Design of the Park Improvements. If and when the City receives the funds, in the event that the Design work for the Park Improvements is less than Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000), the City at its sole discretion, may make a request to State Coastal Conservancy, and if approved by the Agency, the City will apply the excess grant funds to construction as part of the City's contribution to the Park Improvements. Owner shall be responsible for all aspects of the Park Improvements. Prior to issuance of permits, City shall have the rights to review, approve, and accept the design and material quality of the Park Improvements. Owner shall complete the Park Improvements in a timely fashion, by the earlier of 36 months following issuance by the City the first building permit for the construction of the Development, or prior to issuance of final approval of occupancy for the Development. Following completion of the Park Improvements, and no later than three years from the issuance of a notice of acceptance of Park Improvements, City shall reimburse Owner an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the total cost of the Park Improvements, up to Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000) ("Reimbursement Amounf') for actual, third party costs associated with the Park Improvements. IF DETERMINED TO BE APPLICABLE BY THE CITY, OWNER HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES, CONSENTS AND AGREES THAT THE PARK IMPROVEMENTS ARE A PUBLIC WORK PURSUANT TO LABOR CODE SECTION 1720 ET. SEQ. AND THAT LABORERS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION OR OPERATION OF THE PARK IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE PAID THE PREVAILING PER DIEM WAGE RATE FOR THEIR LABOR CLASSIFICATION, AS DETERMINED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO LABOR CODE SECTIONS 1720, ET SEQ. THE OWNER AGREES WITH THE CITY THAT THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME THE RESPONSIBILITY AND BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PAYMENT OF LABORERS EMPLOYED RELATIVE TO THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION OR OPERATION OF THE PROMCT AT THE PREVAILING PER DIEM WAGE RATE FOR THEIR LABOR CLASSIFICATION, AS DETERMINED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO LABOR CODE SECTIONS 1720, ET SEQ. THE DEVELOPER, ON BEHALF OF ITSELF, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS, WANES AND RELEASES THE CITY FROM ANY RIGHT OF ACTION THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE TO ANY OF THEM PURSUANT TO LABOR CODE SECTION 1781. THE DEVELOPER ACKNOWLEDGES THE PROTECTIONS OF CIVIL CODE SECTION 1542 RELATIVE TO THE WAIVER AND RELEASE CONTAINED IN THIS SECTION 5.8, WHICH READS AS FOLLOWS: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT THE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER, WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR OR RELEASED PARTY, BY INITIALING BELOW, THE OWNER KNOWINGLY AND VOLUNTARILY WANES THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1542 SOLELY IN CONNECTION WPLH THE WAIVERS AND RELEASES OF THIS ION 5.8: i i e oper's Initials ADDITIONALLY, THE DEVELOPER SHALL INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 8 AGAINST ANY CLAIMS PURSUANT TO LABOR CODE SECTION 1720 ET. SEQ., INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SECTION 1781, ARISING FROM THIS AGREEMENT OR THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION OR OPERATION OF ALL OR ANY PORTION OF THE PARK IMPROVEMENT'S. (c) Park Santiago Neighborhood Benefits. OWNER has met with residents ofPark Santiago and has agreed to provide the follovAng amenities: (1) Limited access to onsite amenities in a manner to be determined by OWNER as reasonably acceptable to Planning and Building Agency Executive Director. -14- 55394. W sa2U 1553197.13 (2) Security patrol in the residential neighborhood and Santiago Park a. Patrol area: Project, Park Santiago and Park Santiago area as depicted on attached Exhibit "H" b. Type of patrol: Periodic roving security twenty four (24) hours a day. C. Term: 55 years subject to annual review during which review it may be determined that such term shall end earlier. (d) Park Santiago Public Improvements and Traffic Calming. Subject to the approval by the Executive Director of Public Works Agency and the Executive Director of Planning and Building Agency and meeting City design specifications and standards, OWNER shall design and construct the public improvements identified below prior to final approval for occupancy or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Owner shall be solely responsible for all aspects of the public improvements including, but not limited to, the analysis, design, engineering, construction and inspection/administration of: (1) Santiago Park neighborhood improvements at up to three locations on Edgewood and/or Bush Street to achieve traffic calming. Improvements may be based on input from the Santiago Park Neighborhood Association and may include, but not be limited to, bulb -outs, traffic circles and medians within the neighborhood streets. (2) Street lighting enhancements by replacing all existing non LED light and/or fixture with LED light and/or fixture throughout the Santiago Park Neighborhood. (3) A street light at the Santiago Park Drive / Main Street intersection. (4) Decorative concrete pavement within the intersection of Main Street/Walkie Way and Main Street/Santiago Park Drive. 4.2.2 Reserved. 4.2.3 Graffiti Removal. OWNER shall also install and maintain graffiti protection on new surfaces and shall, within 24 hours of discovery of graffiti, cause it to be removed and associated restorations completed throughout the Project. 4.3 Development Impact Fees. 4.3.1 Amount of Fee. The Development Impact Fees set forth in Exhibit "D" shall be charged to the Project. These fee amounts are estimated and will be subject to change based on the fee rate applicable at the time of issuance of the Building Permit. 4.3.2 Time of Payment. The fees required pursuant to Subsection 4.3.1 shall be paid to CITY prior to the issuance of building permits for each residential unit. No fees shall be payable for building permits issued prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement, but the fees required pursuant to Subsection 4.3.1 shall be paid prior to the re -issuance or extension of any building permit for a residential unit for which such fees have not previously been paid. 4.3.3 Fee Credits. OWNER shall be entitled to credit against the fees required pursuant to Subsection 4.2.1 for the dedication of land, the construction of improvements or the payment of fees as specifically set forth in Exhibit "E. 4.3.4 Future Development Impact Fee Program Changes. The Parties hereby agree that, in addition to the Development Impact Fees included in Exhibit "D", the Project shall be subject to any increase in fees, or amendment or alteration, of Development Impact Fee programs in effect on the Effective Date. 4.3.5 Prepayment. In no event shall the prepayment of any Development Impact Fees required hereunder establish a vested right on the part of OWNER or any other owner of the Property or any person or entity with an interest therein to develop the Project or the Property following the expiration, cancellation or termination of the Term of this Agreement. Following the expiration, cancellation or termination of this Agreement, all Development Impact Fees then in effect shall be applicable to the Project and Property notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement and notwithstanding the prepayment of the Development Impact Fees set forth in Exhibit "D", any increase or amendment of any Development Impact Fee, or any combination thereof. Nothing contained in this Subsection 4.3.5 shall be construed as limiting the right of OWNER to a credit against any Development Impact Fees as set forth in Section 4.3.3 hereof. 4.4 Dedication of On -Site Easements and Rights of Way. OWNER shall dedicate to CITY all on -site rights of way and easements deemed necessary for public improvements as indicated on the approved Development Plan for the Project within 15 days of receipt of written demand from CITY. 4.5 Timing of Construction of Off -Site Infrastructure. Approval of any issuance of final approval for occupancy on the Property shall be conditioned upon CITY's determination, in its sole discretion, that sufficient progress is being made on construction of off -site infrastructure serving development of OWNER's Property. 4.6 Santiago Park Access. OWNER shall grant the City a public use, access, ingress, and egress easement in perpetuity on and within the Development to provide public access to Santiago Park. The scope, location, and all aspects of the easement shall meet the requirements reasonably set forth by the City as determined by the Executive Directors of the Parks, Recreation and Community Services, Public Works, and the Planning and Building Agency and consistent with the conceptual design as described/depicted on Exhibit F 4.6.1 Owner shall be responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the easement area. The easement area shall be maintained consistent with City standards and to City's reasonable satisfaction at all times. 4.6.2 Reserved 4.6.3 Reserved 4.7 Housing Opportunity Ordinance. Project shall comply with the requirements of the Housing Opportunity Ordinance (the "HOO') in effect on the Effective Date. 4.8 Overcrowding Mitigation Implementation Plan. The City of Santa Ana has one of the highest average number of people per household in the nation at 4.34 people per household. Owner commits to limit occupancy of the residential units within the project site to levels in compliance with local, state and federal fair housing standards. Prior to applying to the City for occupancy permit, the Owner shall submit to the City an Overcrowding Mitigating Implementation Plan. Prior to changing or revising the implementation plan, Owner shall provide a 60-day minimum written notice to the City Community Development Agency and the Planning and Building Safety Agency informing of any proposed changes or revisions. 4.9 Local Live -Work Preference. Prior to issuance of any Building Permits, OWNER shall develop and submit to the City Manager or his/her designee, a local live -work plan for the Project targeting, to the extent feasible and consistent with state and federal fair housing laws, a preference or priority for persons who currently either live or work in the City of Santa Ana for the rental of units at the Project. 4.10 Local Sourcing Plan. Developer agrees to make a good faith effort to encourage contractors and suppliers to hire and procure locally, to the extent that it is cost effective and does not delay the overall project development schedule. Prior to issuance of any Building Permits, Developer shall develop and submit to the Planning Agency (the `PBX) a local sourcing plan for the Project targeting, to the extent feasible, the hiring of qualified workers, construction contractors, or the purchasing of goods locally within the City of Santa Ana. The plan must be reviewed in a timely manner and approved by the PBA and be implemented for the construction of the project prior to issuance of any Building Permits. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 5. FINANCING & MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES OWNER may propose, and if requested by CITY shall cooperate in, the formation of any special assessment district, community facilities district or alternate financing mechanism to pay for the construction and/or maintenance and operation of public infrastructure facilities required as part of the Development Plan by providing up to $50,000 toward the costs of CITY in preparing a study to determine the need for any such district or alternate financing mechanism. To the extent any such district or other financing entity is formed and sells bonds in order to finance such reimbursements, OWNER may be reimbursed to the extent that OWNER spends funds or dedicates land for the establishment of public facilities. If such a district or other financing entity is proposed OWNER agrees not to oppose such formation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is acknowledged and agreed by the parties that nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring CITY or the City Council to form any such district or other financing entity or to issue and sell bonds. In addition, it is acknowledged and agreed by the parties that nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring OWNER to vote in support of or annex to such district or other financing entity. It shall be the sole right of OWNER to determine whether to be in or out of any such district or other financing entity. 6. REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE. 6.1 Periodic Review. The CITY shall review this Agreement annually, on or before the anniversary of the Effective Date, in order to ascertain the compliance by OWNER with the terms of the Agreement. OWNER shall submit an Annual Monitoring Report, in a form acceptable to the City Manager, within thirty (30) days after written notice from the City Manager. The Annual Monitoring Report shall be accompanied by an annual review and administration fee sufficient to defray the estimated costs of review and administration of the Agreement during the succeeding year. The amount of the annual review and administration fee shall be set annually by resolution of the City Council. 6.2 Special Review. The City Council may order a special review of compliance with this Agreement at any time. The City Manager, or his or her designee, shall conduct such special reviews. 6.3 Procedure. (a) During either a periodic review or a special review, OWNER shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the Agreement. The burden of proof on this issue shall be on OWNER. (b) Upon completion of a periodic review or a special review, the City Manager, or his or her designee, shall submit a report to the Planning Commission setting forth the evidence concerning good faith compliance by OWNER with the terms of this Agreement and his or her recommended finding on that issue. (c) If the Planning Commission finds and determines on the basis of substantial evidence that OWNER has complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the review shall be concluded. (d) If the Planning Commission finds and determines on the basis of substantial evidence that OWNER has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Commission shall provide written notice to OWNER of such findings setting forth the nature of the problem and the actions, if any, required by OWNER to cure such problem and, where the problem can be cured, OWNER has failed to take such actions and cure such problem within thirty (30) days after the effective date of such notice or, in the event that such problem cannot be cured within such thirty (30) day period but can be cured within a longer time, has failed to commence the actions necessary to cure such problem within such thirty (30) day period and to diligently proceed to complete such actions and cure such problem. If OWNER fails to take the necessary actions, the Commission may recommend to the City Council modification or termination of this Agreement. OWNER may appeal a Planning Commission determination pursuant to this Section 6.3(d) pursuant to CITY's rules for consideration of appeals in zoning matters then in effect. Notice of default as provided under Section 7.3 of this Agreement shall be given to OWNER prior to or concurrent with proceedings under Section 6.4 and Section 6.5. 6.4 Proceedings Upon Modification or Termination. If, upon a finding under Section 6.3, CITY determines to proceed with modification or termination of this Agreement, CITY shall give written notice to OWNER of its intention so to do. The notice shall be given at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the scheduled hearing and shall contain: (a) The time and place of the hearing; (b) A statement as to whether or not CITY proposes to terminate or to modify the Agreement; and, (c) Such other information that the CITY considers necessary to inform OWNER of the nature of the proceeding. 6.5 Hearing on Modification or Termination. At the time and place set for the hearing on modification or termination, OWNER shall be given an opportunity to be heard. OWNER shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The burden of proof on this issue shall be on OWNER. If the City Council finds, based upon substantial evidence, that OWNER has not complied in good faith with the terms or conditions of the Agreement, the City Council may terminate this Agreement or modify this Agreement and impose such conditions as are reasonably necessary to protect the interests of the CITY. The decision of the City Council shall be final. 6.6 Certificate of Agreement Compliance. If, at the conclusion of a Periodic or Special Review, OWNER is found to be in compliance with this Agreement, CITY shall, upon request by OWNER, issue a Certificate of Agreement Compliance ("Certificate") to OWNER stating that after the most recent Periodic or Special Review and based upon the information known or made known to the City Manager and City Council that: (1) this Agreement remains in effect; and (2) OWNER is not in default. The Certificate shall be in recordable form, shall contain information necessary to communicate constructive record notice of the finding of compliance, shall state whether the Certificate is issued after a Periodic or Special Review and shall state the anticipated date of commencement of the next Periodic Review. OWNER may record the Certificate with the County Recorder. 6.6.1 Whether or not the Certificate is relied upon by assignees or other transferees or OWNER. CITY shall not be bound by a Certificate if a default existed at the time of the Periodic or Special Review, but was concealed from or otherwise not known to the City Manager or City Council. 6.7 Conditions of Discretionary Approvals. The requirements imposed as conditions of any discretionary approval received through the City's existing regulatory process shall be governed by the terms of those approvals, and in no event shall such conditions be affected by the termination, cancellation, rescission, revocation, or default or expiration of this Development Agreement (although such conditions must comply with the Applicable Rules). The Conditions of approval are incorporated herein by reference an as attached as Exhibit "I". 7. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES. 7.1 Remedies in General. It is acknowledged by the parties that CITY would not have entered into this Agreement if it were to be liable in damages under this Agreement, or with respect to this Agreement or the application thereof. In general, each of the parties hereto may pursue any remedy at law or equity available for the breach of any provision of this Agreement, except that CITY shall not be liable in damages to OWNER, or to any successor in interest of OWNER, or to any other person, and OWNER covenants not to sue for damages or claim any damages: (a) For any breach of this Agreement or for any cause of action that arises out of this Agreement; or (b) For the taking, impairment or restriction of any right or interest conveyed or provided under or pursuant to this Agreement; or (c) Arising out of or connected with any dispute, controversy or issue regarding the application or interpretation or effect of the provisions of this Agreement. 7.2 Release. Except for non -monetary remedies, OWNER, for itself, its successors and assignee&, hereby releases CffY, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims, demands, actions, or suits of any kind or nature arising out of any liability, (mown or unknown, present or future, including, but not limited to, any claim or liability, based or asserted, pursuant to Article I, Section 19 of the California Constitution, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, or any other law or ordinance which seeks to impose any other liability or damage, whatsoever, upon CITY because it entered into this Agreement or because of the terms of this Agreement. OWNER hereby acknowledges that it has read and is familiar with the provisions of California Civil Code Section 1542, which is set forth below: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT THE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER, WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR OR RELEASED PARTY. BY INITIALING BELOW, OWNER HEREBY WANES THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1542 IN CONNECTION WITH THE MATTERS TIIAT ARE THE SU13MCT OF THE FOREGOING WAIVERS AND RELEASES. O S Initials 7.3 Termination or Mo 'fication of Agreement for Default of OWNER. CITY may terminate or modify this Agreement for any failure of OWNER to perform any material duty or obligation of OWNER under this Agreement, or to comply in good faith with the terms of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "default"); Provided, however, CITY may terminate or modify this Agreement pursuant to this Section only after providing written notice to OWNER of default setting forth the nature of the default and the actions, if any, required by OWNER to cure such default and, where the default can be cured, OWNER has failed to take such actions and clue such default within sixty (60) days after the effective date of such notice or, in the event that such default cannot be cured within such sixty (60) day period but can be used within a longer time, has failed to commence the actions necessary to cure such default within such sixty (60) day period and to diligently proceed to complete such actions and cure such default. -20- 55344.0M2131553 IV, 13 7.4 Termination of Agreement for Default of CITY. OWNER may terminate this Agreement only in the event of a default by CITY in the performance of a material term of this Agreement and only after providing written notice to CITY of default setting forth the nature of the default and the actions, if any, required by CITY to cure such default and, where the default can be cured, CITY has failed to take such actions and cure such default within sixty (60) days after the effective date of such notice or, in the event that such default cannot be cured within such sixty (60) day period but can be cured within a longer time, has failed to commence the actions necessary to cure such default within such sixty (60) day period and to diligently proceed to complete such actions and cure such default 8. LITIGATION. 8.1 Third PajU Litigation Concerning Agreement. OWNER shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys' fees, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against CITY, its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Agreement, or the approval of any permit or entitlement granted pursuant to this Agreement CITY shall promptly notify OWNER of any claim, action, proceeding or determination included within this Section 8.1, and CITY shall cooperate in the defense. If CITY fails to promptly notify OWNER of any such claim, action, proceeding or determination, or if CITY fails to cooperate in the defense, OWNER shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless CITY. CITY may in its discretion participate in the defense of any such claim, action, proceeding or determination. 8.2 Environmental Assurances. OWNER shall indemnify and hold CITY, its officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from any liability, based or asserted, upon any act or omission of OWNER, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, predecessors in interest, successors, assigns and independent contractors for any violation of any federal, state or local law, ordinance or regulation relating to industrial hygiene or to environmental conditions on, under or about the Property, including, but not limited to, soil and groundwater conditions, and OWNER shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys' fees, CITY, its officers, agents and employees in any action based or asserted upon any such alleged act or omission. CITY may in its discretion participate in the defense of any such action. 8.3 Reservation of Rights. With respect to Section 8.1 and Section 8.2 herein, CITY reserves, the right to either (1) approve the attorny(s) that the indemnifying party selects, hires or otherwise engages to defend the indemnified party hereunder, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, or (2) conduct its own defense; provided, however, that the indemnifying party shall reimburse the indemnified party forthwith for any and all reasonable expenses incurred for such defense, including attorneys' fees, upon billing and accounting therefor. 8.4 Challenge to Existing Land Use Approvals. By accepting the benefits of this Agreement, OWNER, on behalf of itself and its successors in interest, hereby expressly agrees and covenants not to sue or otherwise challenge any land use approval affecting the Property and in effect as of the Effective Date. Such agreement and covenant includes, without limitation, the covenant against any direct suit by OWNER or its successor in interest, or any par rLpafion, encouragement or involvement whatsoever that is adverse to CITY by OWNER or its successor in interest, other than as part of required response to lawfal orders of a court or other body of competent jurisdiction. OWNER hereby expressly waives, on behalf of itself and its successors in interest, any claim or challenge to any land use approval affecting the Property and in effect as of the Effective Date. OWNER hereby acknowledges that it has read and is familiar with the provisions of California Civil Code Section 1542, which is set forth below: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT THE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE T ME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER, WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR OR RELEASED PARTY. BY INITIALING BELOW, OWNER HEREBY WAIVES THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1542 IN CONNECTION WITH THE MATTERS THAT ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE FOREGOING WAIVERS AND RELEASES. O 'S Initials 8.5 Survival. The provisions of Sections 8.1 through 8.4, inclusive, shall survive the termination of Ibis Agreement, 9. MORTGAGEE PROTECTION The Patties hereto agree that this Agreement shall not prevent or limit OWNER, in any manner, at OWNER's sole discretion, from encumbering the Property or any portion thereof or any improvement thereon by any mortgage, deed of trust or other security device securing financing with respect to the Property. CITY acknowledges that the lenders providing such financing may require certain Agreement interpretations and modifications and agrees upon request, from time to time, to meet with OWNER and representatives of such lenders to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation or modification. CITY will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such requested interpretation or modification provided such interpretation or modification is consistent with the intent and purposes of this Agreement. Any Mortgagee of the Property shall be entitled to the following rights and privileges: (a) Neither entering into this Agreement nor a breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any mortgage on the Property made in good faith and for value, unless otherwise required by law. (b) The Mortgagee of any mortgage or deed of trust encumbering the Property, or any part thereof, which Mortgagee, has submitted a request in writing to the CITY in the manner specified herein for giving notices, shall be entitled to receive written notification from CITY of any default by OWNER in the performance of OWNER's obligations under this Agreement. -22- 55394.000102U 15531 a7.13 (c) If CITY timely receives a request from a mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of default given to OWNER under the terms of this Agreement, CITY shall provide a copy of that notice to the Mortgagee within ten (10) days of sending the notice of default to OWNER. The Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure the default during the remaining cure period allowed such party under this Agreement. (d) Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of the Property, or any part thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the mortgage or deed of trust, or deed in lieu of such foreclosure, shall take the Property, or part thereof, subject to the terms of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, no Mortgagee shall have an obligation or duty under this Agreement to perform any of OWNER's obligations or other affirmative covenants of OWNER hereunder, or to guarantee such performance; provided, however, that to the extent that any covenant to be performed by OWNER is a condition precedent to the performance of a covenant by CITY, the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition precedent to CITY's performance hereunder, and further provided that any sale, transfer or assignment by any Mortgagee in possession shall be subject to the provisions of Section 2.5 of this Agreement. 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 10.1 Recordation of Agreement. This Agreement and any amendment or cancellation thereof shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder by the Clerk of the City Council within ten (10) days after the City enters into the Agreement, in accordance with Section 65868.5 of the Government Code. If the Parties to this Agreement or their successors in interest amend or cancel this Agreement, or if the CITY terminates or modifies this Agreement as provided herein for failure of the OWNER to comply in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the City Clerk shall have notice of such action recorded with the Orange County Recorder. 10.2 Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth and contains the entire understanding and agreement of the parties, and there are no oral or written representations, understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements that are not contained or expressly referred to herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations, understandings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this Agreement. 10.3 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be determined invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby to the extent such remaining provisions are not rendered impractical to perform taking into consideration the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provision of the Public Benefits set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement, including the payment of the Development Impact Fees set forth therein, are essential elements of this Agreement and CITY would not have entered into this Agreement but for such provisions, and therefore in the event such provisions are determined to be invalid, void or unenforceable, this entire Agreement shall be null and void and of no force and effect whatsoever. 10.4 Interpretation and Governing Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, with venue in Orange County. This Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the objectives and purposes of the parties hereto, and the rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement, all parties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation hereof. 10.5 Section Headings. All section headings and subheadings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement 10.6 Singular and Plural. As used herein, the singular of any word includes the plural. 10.7 Joint and Several Obligations. If at any time during the Term of this Agreement the Property is owned, in whole or in part, by more than one OWNER, all obligations of such OWNERS under this Agreement shall be joint and several, and the default of any such OWNER shall be the default of all such OWNERS. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no OWNER of a single lot that has been finally subdivided and sold to such OWNER as a member of the general public or otherwise as an ultimate user shall have any obligation under this Agreement except as expressly provided for herein. 10.8 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement as to which time is an element. 10.9 Waiver. Failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other party, or the failure by a party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other party, shall not constitute a waiver of such parry's right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter. 10.10 No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the parties and their successors and assigns. No other person shall have any right of action based upon any provision of this Agreement 10.11 Force Majeure. Neither party shall be deemed to be in default where failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement is caused by: (1) strikes, lockouts or labor disputes; (2) inability to obtain labor or materials or reasonable substitutes therefor; (3) inclement weather which delays or precludes construction; (4) acts of God, including but not limited to earthquakes, or the public enemy or civil commotion; (5) condemnation, (6) fire or other casualty; (7) shortage of fuel, electricity or natural gas; (8) action or nonaction of public utilities or of local, state or federal governments, affecting the work, including, but not limited to, any delays in the permitting process as a result of the action or inaction or such governmental authorities; (9) criminal acts or acts of terrorism; or (10) other conditions similar to those enumerated above which are beyond the reasonable anticipation or control of such Party, or other causes beyond the Party's reasonable control. If any such events shall occur, the term of this Agreement and the time for performance shall be extended for the duration of each such event, , provided that the Term of this Agreement shall not be extended under any circumstances for more than five (5) years. 10.12 Mutual Covenants. The covenants contained herein are mutual covenants and also constitute conditions to the concurrent or subsequent performance by the party benefited thereby of the covenants to be performed hereunder by such benefited party. 10.13 Successors in Interest. The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the Parties to this Agreement. All provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitudes and constitute covenants running with the land. Each covenant to do or refrain from doing some act hereunder with regard to development of the Property: (a) is for the benefit of and is a burden upon every portion of the Property; (b) runs with the Property and each portion thereof, and (c) is binding upon each party and each successor in interest during ownership of the Property or any portion thereof. 10.14 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the parties in counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all of the parties had executed the same instrument. 10.15 Jurisdiction and Venue. Any action at law or in equity arising under this Agreement or brought by a party hereto for the purpose of enforcing, construing or determining the validity of any provision of this Agreement shall be filed and tried in the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, and the parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for the filing, removal or change of venue to any other court. 10.16 Project as a Private Undertaking. It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the development of the Project is a private development, that neither party is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and that each party is an independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement. No partnership, joint venture or other association of any kind is formed by this Agreement. The only relationship between CITY and OWNER is that of a government entity regulating the development of private property and the owner of such property. 10.17 Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the Parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Agreement. Upon the request of either party at any time, the other party shall promptly execute and file or record such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary under the terms of this Agreement to carry out the intent and to fulfill the provisions of this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 10.18 Eminent Domain. No provision of this Agreement shall be construed to limit or restrict the exercise by CITY of its power of eminent domain. 10.19 Agent for Service of Process. In the event OWNER is not a resident of the State of California or it is an association, partnership or jointventure without a member, partner or joint venturer resident of the State of California, or it is a foreign corporation, then in any such event, OWNER shall file with the City Manager, upon its execution of this Agreement, a designation of a natural person residing in the State of California, giving his or her name, residence and business addresses, as its agent for the purpose of service of process in any court action arising out of or based upon this Agreement, and the delivery to such agent of a copy of any process in any such action shall constitute valid service upon OWNER. If for any reason service of such process upon such agent is not feasible, then in such event OWNER may be personally served with such process and such service shall constitute valid service upon OWNER. OWNER is amenable to the process so served, submits to the jurisdiction of the Court so obtained and waives any and all objections and protests thereto. 10.20 Certificate of Compliance. At any time during the term of this Agreement, any lender or either Party may request either Party to this Agreement to confirm that (1) this Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect (or if there have been modifications hereto, that this Agreement is in full force and effect as modified and stating the date and nature of such modifications); (2) to the best of such Party's knowledge, no defaults exist under this Agreement or if defaults do exist, to describe the nature of such defaults; and (3) any other information reasonably requested. Each Party hereby agrees to provide a Certificate to such lender or other Party within thirty (30) days of receipt of the written request therefor. 10.21 Authority to Execute. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of OWNER warrants and represents that he or she/they have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of his or her/their corporation, partnership or business entity and warrants and represents that he or she/they has/have the authority to bind OWNER to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Development Agreement on the last day and year set forth below. -27- 55394.00oly,LV31553187.13 CINIIAZID17 AC 2525 MAIN, LLC, a California limited liability company By. Ap2ai Manager LLC Its: MaraDated. 0 CITY CITY OF SANTA ANA, a California municipal corporation By. Mayor Dated: AMST: By: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" (Legal Description of the Property) EXHIBIT `B" (Map of the Property) I EXHIBIT "C" Development Plans Development Plans and entitlement applications as presented in the City Staff Report Dated are incorporated herein by reference. Project entitlements and applications include, but may not be limited to the following entitlements: 1. Development Agreement No. 2018-01 2. General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06 3. Amendment Application No. 2018-10 4. Specific Development No. 93 5. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 EXHIBIT "D" Development Impact Fees (Estimated) The estimated amount of Development Impact Fees associated with the project based upon the site plan documentation submitted as part of the Project Approvals include but are not limited to the following fees and deposits; applicable sewer fee, street fee, storm drain fee, traffic fee, deposits, and all applicable fees associated with demolition of existing structures, drainage, site development, and construction are based on actual square footage of any commercial development and number of residential units. Based on 256 Residential Units, the Development Impact Fees are estimated at: Fee Estimated Total Sewer $199,344 Capital Facilities Capacity Charges (Orange County Sanitation District Charges) $607,279 Storm Drain $55,776 Traffic $305,009 Parks & Recreation $974,250 Fire Facilities Fee $252,326 Santa Ana Unified School Fees $1,050,895 Estimated Total $3,444,878 EXHIBIT "E" Development Impact Fees Credits, if any will be determined at time of building permit issuance and shall be incorporated herein by reference. EXHIBIT " F" Santiago Park Access Rights (Conceptual) I _� v, EXHIBIT "G" Park Design and Improvements (Conceptual) SANTIAGO CREEK TRAIL ACCESS CITY OF SAMTA ANA EXHIBIT H Park Santiago Security Patrol Area Map (Conceptual) EXHIBIT I Conditions of Discretionary Approvals 2525 N. Main - Project Approval Conditions The project is approved subject to compliance, to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager, with applicable sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the California Administrative Code, the California Building Standards Code, and all other applicable regulations. In addition, it shall meet the conditions of approval articulated in the sections below. The Applicant or Owner, or Owner's successor(s) or assignee(s) (collectively, "Applicant) with the City's consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, must comply with each and every condition listed below The Applicant must remain in compliance with all conditions listed below throughout the life of the development project. Failure to comply with each and every condition may also result in breach of the Development Agreement. 1. Project Description and Entitlements: Approval of this application is to build (Insert Final Approved Project Description and specific entitlements) with such additions, revisions, changes or modifications as required by the Planning Commission as articulated in Planning Commission Resolution No. XXXX, dated XXXX. Subsequent submittals for this project shall be consistent with the Planning Commission's approval and in compliance with the applicable land use regulations of the Santa Ana Municipal Code and any applicable State law and the associated plans presented to the Planning Commission on (Insert PC hearing date) and on file with the City. 2. Acknowledgment of Conditions of Approval. The Applicant shall file an Acknowledgment of Conditions of Approval with the Planning and Building Agency within 30 days of final approval of all resolutions. The property Applicant shall be required to record the Acknowledgment of these Conditions of Approval with the Office of the Orange County Recorder and proof of such recordation shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Agency. 3. Enforcement of Conditions. In case of violation of any of the conditions of approval of applicable law, the property owner and tenant will be issued a Notice of Correction pursuant City regulations or pursuant to applicable terms of the Development Agreement, the Maintenance Agreement, and the CC&Rs if said violation is not remedied in accordance with the specified period of time and/or subsequent violations of the conditions of approval and/or City law occurs within ninety days of any Notice of Correction, the property owner shall be held responsible to reimburse the City for all Staff time directly attributable to enforcement of the conditions of approval, mitigation measures as stipulated in the various agreements and/or City law including but not limited to, revocation of the herein approvals. 4. Project Plans. Project plans for the development shall be subject to a complete code compliance review with the Planning and Building Agency when the plans are submitted for plan check and shall comply with all applicable City of Santa Ana ordinances, regulations, and policies prior to building permit issuance, including, but not limited to, the requirements established or authorized by Chapter 8 (Building and Structures) and Chapter 41(Zoning) of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. LEGAL 5. Indemnity. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Santa Ana, its agents, officers, or employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul an approval of the City, its legislative body, advisory agencies or administrative officers the subject application. The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding against the City and the Applicant will either undertake defense of the matter and pay the City's associated legal costs, or will advance funds to pay for defense of the matter by the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City retains the right to settle or abandon the matter without the Applicant's consent, but should it do so, the City shall waive the indemnification herein, except the City's decision to settle or abandon a matter following an adverse judgment or failure to appeal, shall not cause a waiver of the indemnification rights herein. 6. Approval Time Period. The approval of the entitlements herein shall be valid for a time period consistent with the Development Agreement. IMPACT FEES 7. Project Development Impact Fees. The following Development Impact Fees shall be charged to the Project. These fee amounts are estimated and will be subject to change based on the fee rate applicable at the time of issuance of the Building Permit. Fee Estimated Total Sewer $199,344 Capital Facilities Capacity Charges (Orange County Sanitation District Charges) $607,279 Storm Drain $55,776 Traffic $305,009 Parks & Recreation $974,250 Fire Facilities Fee $252,326 Santa Ana Unified School Fees $1,050,895 Estimated Total $3,444,878 1. City Invoices. All invoices the Applicant has received from the City shall be paid to a zero balance prior final approval for occupancy by the City or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. PROJECT DESIGN AND OPERATIONS 2. The approved project is a multi -family apartment rental project. Any proposal in the future to convert the rental units to condominium ownership, the Owner shall comply with the requirements for a condominium project in accordance with local and state zoning and subdivision requirements. 3. Unit Mix: Number of family units to be a minimum of thirty percent (30%) of the proposed units to contain 2 & 3 bedrooms. 4. Onsite Property Manager. The Project shall include the provision to have 24-hour on -site Property Management services and personnel. Up-to-date 24-hour contact information for the on - site personnel shall be provided to the following City Agencies on an ongoing basis: (a) Police Department (b) Fire Department (c) Planning and Building Agency (d) Community Development Agency 5. Emergency Evacuation Plan. Developer shall submit and obtain approval of an Emergency Evacuation Plan (the "EEP') from City Police and Fire Protection agencies prior to final approval for occupancy or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Up-to-date 24-hour emergency contact information for the on -site personnel shall be provided to the City on an ongoing basis and the approved EEP shall be kept onsite and also be submitted to the following City Agencies: (a) Police Department (b) Fire Department (c) Planning and Building Agency (d) Community Development Agency 6. Crime Free Housing Plan. Applicant shall work with City Staff to develop a crime free housing policy, procedure, and design plan (the "CFH Plan') and shall submit and obtain approval from the Planning and Building Agency of the CFH Plan prior to final approval for occupancy or the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The approved CFH Plan shall be implemented and administered by Property Management. The approved CFH Plan shall be implemented, adhered to, and be enforced by the Project at all times. 7. Onsite Parking Management Plan. Developer shall provide onsite parking for residents and visitors of the Project and actively monitor the parking demand of the Project site. Developer shall continually monitor and take appropriate measures to manage the parking demand of the Project site to mitigate the use of offsite parking spaces on private or public properties and/or right-of-way. Prior to final approval for occupancy or the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, Developer shall submit and obtain approval from the PBA a Parking Management Plan (the `PMP') meeting the requirements of this Condition. The approved PMP shall be adhered to and be enforced by the Project at all times. 8. Good Neighbor Policy. The Applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Planning Division a good neighbor policy implementation plan that will provide a process for the neighborhood to report nuisance issues to the property management to help manage and address potential nuisance issues including but not limited to noise, lighting, property maintenance, parking overflow into the street and neighborhood, and landscape maintenance. 9. Parking Ratio. Number of spaces and onsite ratio of parking shall be a minimum of two (2) spaces per unit. 10. Privacy along east property line. To ensure maximum privacy screening between the project site and the residential uses along the eastern property, the Applicant is constructing an eight (8) foot tall property line decorative block wall. In addition to this wall, and installation and maintenance of all existing mature trees along the eastern property line, all windows facing the eastern property with a direct line of sight to the adjacent properties bordering the eastern property line shall be design incorporating opaque view obscuring glass. 11. Protect and Preserve Existing Mature Trees along the Eastern Property Line. To ensure maximum privacy screening between the project site and the residential uses along the eastern property, the Applicant shall protect and preserve all existing mature trees along the east property line. 12. Protect and Preserve Existing Mature Trees on the Property not Located Along the East Property Line. To the extent feasible, the Applicant shall protect and preserve all other mature trees on the property. If the perseveration of the existing matures trees in not feasible because of the location of the approved structures on the property, the Applicant shall work with Staff to evaluate the feasibility of relocating the tree(s) to other locations on the property. 13. Edgewood Street Improvements. Only one emergency vehicular access may be permitted along Edgewood Street. No other vehicular access or curb approach openings will be approved on this street for the project. In addition, mature canopy and vertical specimen trees shall be planted along the southern property line between the building and the adjacent sidewalk to integrate the building with the adjacent single-family development across the street. 14. Property Line Wall. The project Applicant shall install an 8-foot tall property line block wall along the entire eastern edge of the Project as part of the site construction and preparation process and prior installation of the foundation. The design of the wall shall be approved by the Planning Manager and shall be decoratively designed to include a mix of decorative materials, colors, and decorative pilasters. 15. Santiago Park Entrance and Interface. If approved by the City Council, the Applicant shall design the Project and residential units to also front onto Santiago Park, Main Street, and Santiago Street entrance. The Project fagade along Santiago Park shall be consistent with and reflect the natural, current state of the Park and include articulation of the building fagade to include open garden areas. The conceptual design is as shown in Attachment I to these conditions. The Santiago Park Entrance design shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planning, Public Works, and Parks and Recreation Directors to ensure compliance with the Agreement. Approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. 16. Green Project Features. Alternative Transportation and Energy Source, Resource Conservation, and LEED Certification. The project shall obtain Silver Standard or better LEED equivalent and shall at the minimum, incorporate bike lockers, bike sharing programing, electric vehicle charging stations, rain capturing systems, grey water capturing systems, and to the extent feasible, automobile sharing programing. 17. Landscape Plan. A Landscape Plan (including Irrigation) prepared by a licensed landscape architect shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The Irrigation Plan shall include an irrigation system layout with the location of controllers and points of connection with data on valve sizes and gallons per minute (G.P.M.), the size and location of sleeves and all spray heads, including the location of conventional systems and drip systems; an irrigation legend with complete specifications; irrigation notes and construction details of all assemblies and components; a recommended irrigation schedule, preferably on an annual basis; and a summary block on the initial page of submitted plans that will present the above information clearly and accurately. The City reserves the right to require subsequent checks, or approval of the landscape plans prior to issuance of a grading permit. 18. Water Conservation. Landscaping shall comply with the City's water conservation ordinances in accordance with SAMC Section and the State mandated Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) 2015 update. 19. Installation. Landscaping for the project shall be complete in phases by building and shall be installed and inspected prior to occupancy of units within that building. The developer shall be responsible for maintaining all common area landscaping within the development. 20. Landscape Details. The landscape plan shall include a Plant Legend containing: plant symbol, scientific name of plant material, common name of plant material, plant container size, and plant spacing. Very low, low and medium water usage plant materials are encouraged. The applicant shall construct a landscape planter along the eastern property line. In this eastern planter, a combination of vertical and canopy specimen trees shall be planted with minimum size of 60 inch box. The landscape plan shall provide a cross section showing the planter at time of planting, after five (5) years and at full maturity. The cross section shall demonstrate the landscaping will adequately screen the project from the adjacent residential uses along the eastern portion of the Property. 21. Minimum Tree Box Size. The applicant shall install minimum 36 inch box trees, when planting trees for all required trees along street setbacks, open space areas and shared parking areas. All other tree sizes may be dependent on the location, species and spacing. The final landscaping is subject to the review and approval of the Planning Manager. 22. Maintenance of existing site. The site and the public R.O.W. adjacent to any portions of the site shall be maintained in a condition which is free of debris while the property is vacant and undergoing development and during and after the construction, addition or implementation of the entitlements granted herein. All trash and refuse shall be disposed of in dumpsters and be removed from the premises on an -as needed basis. Any surplus construction materials shall be screened from public view when not actually in use and be removed from the property upon completion of construction activities. The removal of all trash, debris, and refuse, whether during or subsequent to construction shall be done only by the property owner, the Applicant or by a permitted waste contractor, who has been authorized by the City to provide collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste from residential, commercial, and construction areas within the City. 23. On Going Property Maintenance. Subject to review and applicability by the Planning and Building Agency, the Community Development Agency, the Public Works Agency, and the City Attorney to ensure that the property and all improvements located thereupon are properly maintained, Developer (and the owner of the property upon which the authorized use and/or authorized improvements are located if different from the Applicant) shall execute a maintenance agreement with the City of Santa Ana which shall be recorded against the property and which shall be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney. The maintenance agreement shall contain covenants, conditions and restrictions relating to the following: (a) Compliance with operational conditions applicable during any period(s) of construction or major repair (e.g., proper screening and securing of the construction site; implementation of proper erosion control, dust control and noise mitigation measure; adherence to approved project phasing etc.); (b) Compliance with ongoing operational conditions, requirements and restrictions, as applicable (including but not limited to hours of operation, security requirements, the proper storage and disposal of trash and debris, enforcement of the Parking Management Plan, enforcement of the Overcrowding Mitigation Implementation Plan, and/or restrictions on certain uses, etc...) (c) Ongoing compliance with approved design and construction parameters, signage parameters and restrictions as well as landscape designs and maintenance, as applicable; (d) Ongoing maintenance, repair and upkeep of the property and all improvements located thereupon at all times (including but not limited to controls on the proliferation of trash and debris about the property; the proper and timely removal of graffiti; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of damaged, vandalized and/or weathered buildings, structures and/or improvements; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of exterior paint, parking striping, lighting and irrigation fixtures, walls and fencing, publicly accessible bathrooms and bathroom fixtures, landscaping and related landscape improvements and the like, as applicable); (e) If Developer and the owner of the property are different (e.g., if the applicant is a tenant or licensee of the property or any portion thereof), both the applicant and the owner of the property shall be signatories to the maintenance agreement and both shall be jointly and severally liable for compliance with its terms. (f) The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any party responsible for complying with its terms shall not assign its ownership interest in the property or any interest in any lease, sublease, license or sublicense, unless the prospective assignee agrees in writing to assume all of the duties and obligations and responsibilities set forth under the maintenance agreement. (g) The maintenance agreement shall contain provisions relating to the enforcement of its conditions by the City and shall also contain provisions authorizing the City to recover costs and expenses which the City may incur arising out of any enforcement and/or remediation efforts which the City may undertake in order to cure any deficiency in maintenance, repair or upkeep or to enforce any restrictions or conditions upon the use of the property and a 50% administration fee. The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any unreimbursed costs and/or expenses incurred by the City to cure a deficiency in maintenance or to enforce use restrictions shall become a lien upon the property in an amount equivalent to the actual costs and expense incurred by the City and a 50% administration fee. (h) The execution and recordation of the maintenance agreement shall be a condition precedent to the issuance of final approval for any construction permit related to this entitlement. LIGHTING 24. Site and Building Lighting. The developer shall submit for review by the Planning Division and the Engineering Department, the design and specifications for all proposed lighting fixtures proposed for the buildings, drive aisles, parkways, parking areas, pathways, and surrounding areas within the development. The fixtures shall be reviewed for quality, aesthetics, illumination values, sustainability values such as LED and shall be decoratively and architecturally consistent with the building design. The number, location, height, style and design shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division and Engineering Department prior to issuance of building permits. UTILITIES 25. Undergrounding of Utilities. All utility service lines shall be underground. This includes all existing above ground wires that cross over the property that feed adjacent properties. 26. Composite Utility Plan. The applicant shall submit a composite utility plan depicting the location of all above ground utility appurtenances. The exact location of the equipment shall be approved by the Planning Division, during the plan check process, and shall be installed as per approved plans. They shall not be allowed within a required parking, turnaround and landscape areas or on any fagade facing a public street. 27. Screening of Mechanical Equipment. All mechanical equipment placement and screening shall be included on the development plan and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to installation. Where practicable and as shown on the plans approved by the Planning Commission in the course of obtaining the requested entitlements, mechanical equipment, heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC) units, satellite dish systems, solar panels, thermal solar heaters, utility meters, above ground utility and fire safety connections will be, screened, located out of public view or be architectural integrated into the project design. CONSTRUCTION 28. Construction Information. During construction, the Applicant will display signs visible to the public from the public right-of-way with a contact number of the construction superintendant to address any questions or concerns about demolition, grading, and construction activities including dust, noise and vibration. 29. Vehicles and Equipment. All construction vehicles or equipment, fixed or mobile, operated within 1,000 feet of an existing dwelling shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers. 30. Warning Devices. Replace backup audible warning devices with backup strobe lights or other warning devices during evening construction activity to the extent permitted by the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health. 31. Pest Control. The Applicant shall have rodent and pest controls on site during demolition and grading activities to mitigate impacts to the surrounding properties and neighborhood. 32. Perimeter Fence. Prior to demolition and construction, a perimeter security fence not exceeding seven feet in height, shall be installed around the project site. The fencing shall include a green screen material or approved equivalent. The fence/screen material shall be properly maintained and be free of rips, tears, fraying, graffiti, and any other damage or vandalism. 33. Site Maintenance. The site and the public R.O.W. adjacent to any portions of the site shall be maintained in a condition which is free of debris, trash, weeds and overgrown vegetation both during and after the construction, addition or implementation of the entitlements granted herein. All trash and refuse shall be disposed of in dumpsters and be removed from the premises on an as needed basis. Any surplus construction materials shall be stored so as to be screened from public view when not actually in use and be removed from the property upon completion of construction activities. 34. Construction Traffic Management Plan. A truck/traffic construction management plan is required for this project pursuant to the City's Public Works Department. All construction traffic regarding the movement of heavy equipment and graded materials are limited to off peak hours. This plan shall be approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 35. Construction Staging. During the construction process all related activities, including but not limited to, loading, unloading, storage of equipment and materials, and parking of employee vehicles are prohibited within the public R.O.W. All such activities shall be conducted only on the project site and not in the public R.O.W. All staging areas and storage of equipment and materials shall be set back from adjacent residential uses. 36. Construction Hours. In accordance with SAMC Section 18.314(e), Demolition, grading, and exterior building construction activities shall be limited to the hours of between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction activity shall be allowed on Sundays or federal holidays. Compliance with this measure is subject to field inspection by City Staff. 37. Noise. All onsite activities shall comply with the City of Santa Ana Noise Ordinance at all times. 38. Fire Protection. Fire protection facilities; including access, must be provided prior to and during construction. 39. Fencing. Prior to commencing demolition and site preparation activities, the project site shall be secured with a fence to prevent unauthorized access to the site and the fence shall contain a screening material to screen construction activities from view. The temporary screening fence shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Economic Development Department and shall be maintained in good condition (free of tears, holes, crack lines, debris, etc.) at all times. At the primary entrance to the site, the screening material shall be reduced to a maximum height of four feet to provide visibility into the site at all times and for public safety purposes. The project site shall also have a minimum of one sign of quality material depicting the proposed development, which shall include renderings, project opening date, and City Council information. The signs shall be designed and installed to the satisfaction of the Economic Development Department and maintained in good condition (free of tears, graffiti, holes, cracks, fading, debris, etc.) at all times. 40. Fence Coordination. Prior to the demolition of any existing property line walls and/or fences and construction of a new property line concrete block wall(s), the developer shall make reasonable efforts to coordinate and obtain approval from neighboring property owner(s) to remove any existing wall(s) and/or fence(s). Written authorization from the neighboring property owner shall be provided for the removal of an existing wall and construction of a new shared property line wall upon submittal for plan check. 41. Pre -Construction Meeting. Prior to the commencement of construction on the site, the developer shall schedule a pre -construction meeting between the general superintendent or field representative and the Planning Division to discuss the approved plans and construction requirements. ENGINEERING 42. The Applicant shall submit Improvement Plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer for public works (off -site) improvements, and on -site improvements. Plan check fees shall be paid in advance. 43. An on -site grading and drainage plan shall be prepared and submitted to the City Engineer for approval. Plan shall be 24" x 36", with elevations to nearest 0.01 foot, minimum scale 1" = 20'. Plan shall be prepared by Registered Civil Engineer. Public works improvements may be shown on this plan. Grading plan check fees must be paid in advance. 44. Hydrologic and hydraulic calculations demonstrating adequate site drainage from a 10-year return frequency storm (25-year frequency in sump areas) prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted with the Grading Plan. 45. Driveway slope shall be a minimum slope of one (1) percent for asphalt and .5% for concrete. 46. If utility cuts are excessive in the street the street must have a grid and overlay placed on it per the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 47. All existing off -site public improvements (sidewalk, curb and gutter, driveways, and street paving) at the development site which are in a damaged condition or demolished due to the proposed work shall be reconstructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and per OCPFRD Standard Plan. 48. A City Encroachment (Public Works) permit shall be taken out for all work in public right-of-way prior to start of work. All work shall be done in accordance with APWA Standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and must be completed prior to final approval for occupancy or the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 49. A bond or surety device shall be posted with the City in an amount and type sufficient to cover the amount of off -site work to be done, as approved by the City Engineer. 50. Pad certification by the Design Civil Engineer and Soil Engineer is required prior to the commencement of structural construction. 51. Final compaction report prepared by a qualified Soil Engineer shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the commencement of structural construction. 52. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits or prior to recordation upon subdivision of land if determined applicable by the City Building Official, the applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval a Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that: • Addresses Site Design BMPs (Best Management Practices) such as minimizing impervious areas, maximizing permeability, minimizing directly connected impervious areas, creating reduced or "zero discharge" areas, and conserving natural areas. • Incorporates the applicable Routine Source Control BMPs as defined in the DAMP. • Incorporates Treatment Control BMPs as defined in the DAMP. • Generally describes the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for the Treatment Control BMPs. • Identifies the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs. • Describes the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs. F Attachment 1 Building Articulation and Setback Along Santiago Park (Conceptual) w -a M This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 3 This page left blank intentionally. :7: & ti]Lei 1161►1►[6]F.Z11&ON 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-06 AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT TO DISTRICT CENTER FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET WHEREAS, Article 5 of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 (commencing with Section 65300) of the Government Code requires the City to prepare and adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the City; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 1998, the City of Santa Ana adopted the Land Use Element of the General Plan, which has since been amended from time to time; and WHEREAS, AC 2525 Main, LLC ("Applicant") seeks to develop The Addington, a Multi -Family Residential Project ("proposed Project"), originally proposed as a 496-unit multi -family project on a 5.93-acre site at 2525 North Main Street in Santa Ana, California ("Project Site"); WHEREAS, during the entitlement and environmental review process, and in response to comments and concerns raised by the public and the City's elected officials, the Applicant has proposed several modifications to the original proposal; and WHEREAS, the Project as currently proposed now entails (1) demolition of the existing 81,172 square foot vacant two-story office building and 442-space surface parking lot on the Project Site; (2) redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 292 space surface level parking lot with residential and commercial parking; (3) approval of Development Agreement No. 2018-01 between the City of Santa Ana ("City") and Applicant; (4) approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, which would change the Project Site's existing land use designation of Professional & Administration Office (PAO) to District Center (DC); and (5) approval of Amendment Application No. 2018-10, which would change the zoning of the Project Site from Professional (P) to Specific Development No. 93 (SD-93) designation; and WHEREAS, the requested General Plan Amendment would change the General Plan land use designation of the property from Professional and Administrative Office (PAO) to District Center (DC) and to update text portions of the City's Land Use Element to reflect this change in order to allow for development of the multi -family housing Project; and EXHIBIT 3 Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 1 of 10 WHEREAS, Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 analyzed the impacts related to the proposed amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 2018, the City invited recognized Native American tribes to engage in consultation regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment pursuant to Government Code Section 65352.3; and WHEREAS, on February 8, 2018, the City received a request for consultation from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation and a conference call between the City and Chairman Salas occurred on March 15, 2018 during which the history of uses and development of the Project Site and the depth of previous and existing infrastructure on the site was discussed and Chairman Salas requested additional information. On March 21, 2018 the City sent the requested information to Chairman Salas. Chairman Salas did not respond to the City with any information or evidence pertaining to Tribal Cultural Resources; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2018, the Applicant submitted a plan for a 496-units (84 dwelling units per acre), with 908 parking spaces (1.83 parking spaces per unit) within a 5-story residential building with mezzanines wrapped around an eight -level parking structure, tiered the height of the residential buildings along the east property line from two, to three to four to five -stories and revised the unit mix to 73 studios, 307 one bedrooms, 88 two bedrooms, and 28 three bedrooms; and WHEREAS, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines section 15087(e), Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 (State Clearinghouse No. 2018021031) for the proposed Project was circulated for a 45-day review period beginning August 7, 2018 and ending September 21, 2018; and WHEREAS, on August 27, 2018, the Planning Commission conducted a work study session to overview the Project and thirty-two (32) verbal comments were received, with three (3) in support and twenty-nine (29) in opposition; and nine (9) written comments were received with one (1) in support and eight (8) in opposition; and WHEREAS, in response to a request from Chatten-Brown & Cartens LLP, on behalf of the North Santa Ana Preservation Alliance, the City extended the Draft Environmental Impact Report public review and comment period to October 4, 2018 to allow additional time for public review and input; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was circulated for a 59-day review period, from August 7, 2018 to October 4, 2018; and WHEREAS, on November 26, 2018, the Planning Commission continued a duly noticed public hearing for the project to January 14, 2019. A second study session was held to overview the Project and fifty-eight (58) verbal comments were received with twenty-five (25) in support; thirty-one (31) in opposition and two (2) neutral; and eleven (11) written comments were received with two (2) in support and nine (9) in opposition; and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 2 of 10 WHEREAS, staff recommended additional changes to the project for the Planning Commission consideration at their January 14, 2019 meeting and City Council consideration at their meetings on February 5 and 19, 2019. These recommendations included reducing the number of units and increasing the parking capacity. Staff recommendations were incorporated into the project entitlements prior to the Planning Commission and City Council public hearings. The project reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council proposed construction of 476-units (81 dwelling units per acre), with 904 parking spaces (1.82 parking spaces per unit) and parking capacity for 2.0 parking spaces, within a 5-story residential building with mezzanines wrapped around an eight -level parking structure. The height of the residential buildings along the east property line was tiered from two, to three to four to five stories. The unit mix was 53 studios, 280 one bedrooms, 114 two bedrooms and 29 three bedrooms; and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, seventy-nine (79) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty (30) speakers supported the project, forty-eight (48) speakers opposed it and one speaker was neutral. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council not certify the EIR or adopt the findings, the statement of overriding considerations and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program and deny the Project; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-one (61) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty-eight (38) speakers supported the project, twenty (20) speakers opposed it and three (3) speakers were neutral and the public hearing was continued to the next regular adjourned City Council meeting on February 19, 2019; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, the City Council continued to conduct a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, one hundred and thirty-one (131) members of the public spoke on the item, twenty-six (26) speakers supported the project and one hundred and five (105) speakers opposed it. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted to that the project be taken back to the Planning Commission after consultation with staff, Applicant and community; and WHEREAS, in June 2019, the applicant submitted a revised plan consisting of development 347 multi -family units (59 dwelling units per acre), with 642 parking spaces (1.85 parking spaces per unit) and parking capacity at 2.0 spaces per unit, within a 4- story residential building wrapped around a five -level parking structure with an amenity Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 3 of 10 deck on the sixth -level, private open space, and redesigned the intersection of Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive to provide access to the project on a 5.93- acre site; and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 655,826 square feet of total development, including 386,444 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 347 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 269,382 square foot central parking/fitness center/club room structure, the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, seventy-seven (77) members of the expressed opposition; nine (9) supported the project, and one speaker was neutral. In addition, one -hundred (100) written comments were received with six (6) in support and ninety-four (94) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission vote resulted in an impasse; and WHEREAS, in October 2019, in response to comments received the Applicant submitted revised plans including redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 292 space surface level parking lot which also reduced the Project's height, increased the Project's setbacks, and modified the Project entrance ("Modified Project"); and WHEREAS, October 18, 2019, the City gave public notice of a Planning Commission public hearing for consideration of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06 by advertising in the Orange County Register a newspaper of general circulation, and on October 17, 2019 by mailing to owners of property and residents within 500 feet of the Project and posting on the project site; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for consideration of for consideration of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, at which time all persons wishing to testify were heard and the Project was fully considered; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the following environmental documents have been prepared and made available to the public: Draft and Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 for the Magnolia at the Park Multi -Family Residential Project, Clarification to the 2525 N. Main Street (Magnolia at the Park) Multi -Family Residential Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 4 of 10 Project Final Environmental Impact Report (Clarification), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and Statement of Overriding Considerations and Findings of Fact. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in these documents and the administrative record for the Project, including all oral and written comments received during the comment period. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find that the EIR, including the Clarifications thereto, contain a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project, has been completed in compliance with CEQA, and reflects the independent judgment of the City. The Planning Commission further recommends that no evidence of new significant impacts or any new information of "substantial importance", as defined by State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5, has been received by the City after circulation of the Draft EIR that would require recirculation of the EIR. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the Findings of Fact, certify the EIR, adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt the MMRP. Any project approvals issued by the Planning Commission in this Resolution shall not become effective unless and until the City Council has completed the actions described above. SECTION 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT: The General Plan Amendment consists of amendments to the Land Use Element and text updates, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. LOCATION OF DOCUMENTS: The General Plan Amendment, Environmental Impact Report and all supporting documents are on file and available for public review at Santa Ana City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92702. SECTION 4. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY: The Planning Commission hereby finds that the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible with the objectives, policies, and general plan land use programs specified in the General Plan for the City of Santa Ana in that: A. The City of Santa Ana has officially adopted a General Plan. B. The land uses authorized by the General Plan Amendment, and the General Plan Amendment itself, are compatible with the goals/objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan, for the following reasons: The existing General Plan land use designation for the project is Professional and Administrative Office (PAO), which allows business and professional offices; with a floor area ratio of 1.5. In order to facilitate the Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 5 of 10 construction of a multi -family housing project with a maximum floor area ratio of 1.43, the general plan land use designation the proposed amendment changes the designation to District Center (DC), which permits high intensity, mixed -use urban villages and pedestrian -oriented experiences that support mid- to high-rise office centers, commercial activity, and cultural activities with floor area ratios ranging from 0.5 to 5.0. Focusing growth within District Centers and along major corridors reduces the pressure for growth in low density residential neighborhoods. ii. The proposed Project will support several goals/objectives and policies of the General Plan. Housing Element (HE) Goal 2: to create diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that accommodate Santa Ana's residents and workforce of all household types, income levels, and age groups to foster an inclusive community. HE Policy 2.2 District Centers. Create high intensity, mixed -use urban villages and pedestrian -oriented experiences that support the mid- to high-rise office centers, commercial activity, and cultural activities in the varied District Centers. HE Policy 2.4 to facilitate diverse types, prices and sizes of housing. Housing Element (HE) Goal 4: to provide adequate rental and ownership housing opportunities and supportive services. The Project will provide 256 rental housing units. The amendment will expand the District Center designation and provide a connection between the existing District Centers to the north and south of the site by providing a residential development that will support a mixed -use environment. Land Use (LU) Element Goal 1: to promote a balance of land uses to address basic community needs. LU Policy 1.2 Maintain and foster a variety of residential land uses in the City. LU Policy 4.3 Support land uses which provide community and regional economic and service benefits. LU Policy 4.4 Encourage the development of projects which promote the City's image as a regional activity center. LU Policy 5.5 Encourage development which is compatible with, and supportive of surrounding land uses. LU Policy 5.7 Anticipate that the intensity of new development will not Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 6 of 10 exceed available infrastructure capacity Land Use (LU) Element Goal 6: to reduce residential overcrowding to promote public health and safety. The Project is within '/2 mile of existing transportation infrastructure such as the Santa Ana (1-5) freeway and State Route 22 (SR 22) highway which provide vehicular access to the region; the Orange County Transportation Agency bus routes along Main Street which connects to the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center and the Anaheim Regional Intermodal Center which provides rail service throughout California; and the project is immediately adjacent to Santiago Park and the Santiago Creek Bike Trail which connects to regional bike trails. Main Street, a major urban corridor with cultural, educational, employment and retail destinations such as the Bowers Museum, Discovery Science Center, Main Place Mall and in the City of Orange; the Children's Hospital of Orange County and St. Joseph's Hospital of Orange County. Therefore, the residential development would be within close proximity to major employment centers and retail establishments. The Project will also provide an additional housing option for those seeking housing within the jobs rich northern area of the City. The multi -storied development will complement the nearby mid -rise office buildings located along Main Street to the north and west of the site. Although the density will be higher than the adjacent uses, the residential use is consistent with the residential uses to the east and south. In addition, multi -family uses are often used in planning and zoning practice to buffer higher intensity uses like commercial or industrial uses from single-family residential uses. Urban Design (UD) Element, Goal 1: to improve the physical appearance of the City through development of districts that project a sense of place, positive community image, and quality environment. UD Policy 1.1. New development and redevelopment must have the highest quality design, materials, finishes and construction. UD Policy 1.11 Visual and physical links between districts, nodes, and significant sites, landmarks and other points of interest, are to be provided in all public and private projects. The residential buildings are of high quality design and include high quality materials such as stone veneer, brick veneers, metal panels, and canopies. The building is designed with courtyards and landscaped areas to reduce the mass of the building. The Project has street frontage on Main Street which is identified as a major path in the General Plan and supports the North Main Street Node described as Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 7 of 10 an opportunity for the establishment of a cohesive, height intensity, mixed activity center with a strong presence in the region. The setback along the east side of the project has been increased to 90 feet to minimize impacts to the neighboring single-family residences. The new development will include public art and convey a sense of place and contribute to the urban image for the City along a street corridor that includes regional, local and cultural landmarks. The development will be in scale with the buildings along Main Street to the north and west of the site. In addition, the Urban Design Element of the General Plan identifies the site as a Gateway; the Project promotes elements of a Gateway by developing the site with a building with attractive architectural features, projecting a positive image for the City of Santa Ana. C. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare in that the General Plan Amendment will not result in incompatible land uses on adjacent properties, inconsistencies with any General Plan goals or policies, or adverse impacts to the environment. SECTION 5. INDEMNIFICATION. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the Project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. SECTION 6. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission hereby takes the following action: 1. The Planning Commission recommends approval of General Plan Amendment Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 8 of 10 No. 2018-06 as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, subject to compliance with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth below: A. Subject to compliance with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the Land Use Element map and text shall be amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. B. The General Plan Amendment shall not take effect unless and until Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 is certified and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 is approved by the City Council, and the associated Development Agreement No. 2018-01 is approved by the City Council and executed by all parties thereto. SECTION 7. EXECUTION OF RESOLUTION. The Chairperson shall sign this Resolution and the Planning Commission Recording Secretary shall attest and certify to the adoption thereof. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of October 2019. AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: Mark McLoughlin Chairperson APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 9 of 10 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, SARAH BERNAL, Recording Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on October 28, 2019. Date: Recording Secretary City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT A City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element 1998 City of Santa Ana Planning Division Adopted February 2, 1998 (Reformatted January 2010) The following is a chronology of the approved general plan amendments that have been incorporated into this document since the comprehensive update of the General Plan Land Use Element adopted by the Santa Ana City Council February 2, 1998 (GPA 1997- 05): GPA 2018 06 (Pending) GPA 201902 (October 1, 2019) GPA 201901 (June 4, 2019) GPA 2017-03 (June 4, 2019) GPA 2018-05 (December 4, 2018) GPA 2018-03 (September 18, 2018) GPA 2018-02 (May 15, 2018) GPA 201501 (May 15, 2018) GPA 2017-02 (December 19,2017) GPA 2017-01(June 20, 2017) GPA 2016 03 (Febmary, 21, 2017) GPA 2016 02 (May 17, 2016) GPA 2016 01 (Apni 19, 2016) GPA 201503 (February 2, 2016) GPA 201402 (October 21, 2014) GPA 201401 (June 3, 2014) GPA 2011-03 (March 19, 2012f GPA 2011-02 (June 6, 2011) GPA 2010-01 (June 7, 2010) GPA 200902 (Jdy 20, 2009) GPA 2007-03 (May 18, 2009) GPA 200403 (February 2, 2009) GPA 2W901 (May 5, 20W) GPA 2007-02 (June 18, 2007) GPA 2007-01 (March 19, 2007) GPA 2006 01 (October 2, 20W) GPA 200501 (December 5, 2005) GPA 200502 (October 17, 2005) GPA 200401 (April 5, 2005, as passed by the voters of Santa Ana) GPA 200404 (July 19, 2004) GPA 200406 (Jay 6, 2004) GPA 200302 (June 16, 2003) GPA 200301 (Febmary 18, 2003) GPA 2002-01 (September 3, 2002) GPA 2002-03 (August 19, 2002) GPA 2001-03 (February, 19, 2002) GPA 2001-02 (January 7, 2002) GPA 2000-09 (May 7, 2001) GPA 200008 (February 5, 2001) GPA 2000-03 (December 4, 2000) GPA 200002 (November 20, 2000) GPA 199H2(October 18, 1999) GPA 199901 (August 16, 1999) GPA 199804 (October 5,1998) GPA 1998-05 (September 21, 1998) GPA 199801 (May 4,1998) LAND USE ELEMENT Reduce residential overcrowding to promote public health and safety. Policy 6.1 Support legislative and regulatory changes to laws and codes concerning safe occupancy standards. Policy 6.2 Support reducing the number of units in multiple -family developments by allowing the property owner to combine two or more units into a larger unit. Policy 6.3 Prohibit new development and building alterations which can readily be converted to improper occupancy. Policy 6.4 Target educational programs concerning overcrowding to tenants, owners, and property managers. Policy 6.5 Promote health and safety programs which address the occupancy of housing units and overcrowding. LAND USE PLAN The Land Use Plan is comprised of three components that direct and regulate land use in Santa Ana. These include a Land Use Map, development intensity standards, and adopted Specific Plans. These key components establish a framework for land use and development in the City. The Land Use Plan indicates the location, types, and extent of development and land uses throughout Santa Ana. It consists of a map which designates land use categories and their relative location, as well as development intensity standards for each category. The Land Use Plan is further supported by Specific Plans which correlate to the Land Use Plan. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY STANDARDS As required by State law, the Land Use Element also establishes standards for development intensity. These standards ensure that the types of development permitted under each land use designation are well understood by the property owner, decision -makers, developer, and the general public. Development intensity refers to the size or degree of development possible within a particular land use category. The development intensity standard used for nonresidential development is floor area ratio, which is the ratio of the building's floor area to the total area of the lot on which the building is located. The development intensity standard for residential developments is "units per acre" which is a measure of the number of units allowed for each acre of land - with the exception of Metro East District Center, Transit Village District Center, Downtown District Center, Harbor Corridor District Center, Heritage District Center, 2525 North Main District 14 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT Center and Urban Neighborhood areas. To encourage a dynamic mixture of residential, office and commercial uses, within these areas both building intensity and residential density is based on floor area ratio and zoning development standards. In calculating either the allowable floor area or the allowable residential density, it is the City's policy to not allow upward rounding. The Land Use Plan is illustrated in Exhibit 2. Additional information concerning the Land Use Plan and the land use designations is provided in Table 1 (Land Use Development Intensity Standards), and in the Appendix. Table 1 Development Intensity Standards Density/Intensity Standards Land Use Designation (du/acre - FAR)' . r. Low Density Residential (LR-7) 7 du/acre Low -Medium Density Residential (LMR-11) 11 du/acre Medium Density Residential (MR-15) DesignationsMixed Use Land Use District Center'(DC) 15 du/acre Other District Center (Midtown, MacArthur Place, etc.) 90 du/acre and FAR 1.0-2.0 2525 North Main District Center FAR 1.43 Heritage District Center FAR 1.7 Downtown District Center FAR 3.0 Metro East District Center FAR 3.0 Transit Village District Center FAR 5.0 Harbor Corridor District Center FAR 5.0 Urban Neighborhood Transit Zoning Code Area/ Segerstrom, First, Fifth & 17" Corridor FAR 0.5-1.80 Harbor Corridor FAR 3.0 Metro East DesignationsCommercial Land Use Professional and Administrative Office (PAO) FAR 0.75-1.5 FAR 0.5-1.0 General Commercial (GC) FAR 0.5-1.0 One Broadway Plaza District Center (OBPDC) ^ DesignationsIndustrial Land Use Industrial (IND) Other Land use Designations Institutional (INS) FAR 2.9 FAR 0.45 FAR 0.5 Open Space (0) FAR 0.2 Notes: The intensity standards shown refer to the theoretical maximum amount of development permitted for each land use designation (du -dwelling units; FAR -floor area ratio). Development must also adhere to zoning regulations, and/or specific plan requirements. The District Center and Urban Neighborhood land use designations permit both residential and non-residential development. 3 Commercial intensities may vary. Baseline FAR is 0.5. Specific areas allowing greater intensities are indicated in Exhibit A-3. 4 One Broadway Plaza District Center land use designation permits office, restaurant and ancillary retail for a master planned development. `Refer to Appendixfor description of Land Use designations. CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN 15 cox o ,p J ®I111 I111 11 wa� Jo IP LAND USE ELEMENT LAND USE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION To effectively achieve the broad range of goals outlined for the City's future growth and development, a variety of plans, programs, and regulations must be relied upon. This section of the Element discusses these tools, and how they correlate with implementation of the City's land use goals. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY STANDARDS Table A-1 summarizes the development intensity standard for each of the General Plan designations, and provides land use distribution by acreage for the land use. The intensity standards for the categories permitting residential development are expressed in density, measured in "units per acre," or floor area ratio and zoning development standards in the case of certain Mixed Use land use designations. The intensity standards for non-residential development are expressed as "floor area ratio" or FAR. The FAR concept is illustrated in Exhibit A-3. The intensity standards in concert with the zoning and development standards regulate the massing, form and building size. Table A-1 Development Intensity Standards Land Use DesignationsResidential Land Use I Density/Intensity Standards Low Density 7 du/acre Low -Medium Density 11 du/acre Medium Density15 DesignationsMixed Use Land Use District Center du/acre Other District Centers Midtown, etc. 90 du/acre and FAR 1.0-2.0 2525 North Main District Center FAR 1.43 Heritage District Center FAR 1.7 Downtown District Center FAR 3.0 Metro East District Center FAR 3.0 Transit Village District Center FAR 5.0 Harbor Corridor District Center FAR 5.0 Urban Neighborhood Transit Zoning Code Area/ Segerstrom, First, Fifth & 1 To Corridor FAR 0.5-1.80 Harbor Corridor FAR 3.0 Metro East DesignationsCommercial Land Use Professional/Admin. Office FAR 0.75-1.5 FAR 0.5-1.0 General Commercial FAR 0.5-1.0 One Broadway Plaza District Center* DesignationsIndustrial Land Use FAR 2.9 Industrial Other Land Use Designations Institutional FAR 0.45 FAR 0.5 Open Space FAR 0.2 Notes: do -dwelling unit, FAR -floor area ratio -Residential dwelopment is not a permilted use. CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN A-11 LAND USE ELEMENT The City established development intensity standards in 1988, for nonresidential land use designations. The standards measure intensity through the use of floor area ratios. The floor area ratios proposed for the City's major commercial corridors are expected to remain in place over the life of the Land Use Element. Those areas of the City proposed for the most intensive levels of development include district centers, professional and administrative office districts, and several other commercial centers with a unique character, or special development concerns. Some of these areas correspond to those for which Specific Plans have been prepared. The proposed floor area ratio(s) for most of the City's commercial corridors allows structures of two to three stories with surface parking. The major development areas -the District Centers and Professional/Administrative Office Districts along Tustin Avenue and East First Street -allow mid -rise and high-rise buildings with structured parking. These areas are expected to generate the highest level of development activity in the City as centers of commerce. These areas are listed in Table A-2 and are shown in Exhibit A-4. The floor area ratios indicated in Table A-2 are the maximum building intensity allowed for development. Table A-2 Key Area- Floor Area Ratios Area Project/Area FAR 1 MainPlace 2.1 2 City Place 2.54 3 North Main Street 1.5 4 North Broadway 1.0 5 Museum District 1.5 6 Hutton Development 1.0 7 Civic Center Specific Development Plan 1.0 8 Midtown Specific Plan 0.5-1.0 9 Civic Center 1.0 10 Downtown 3.0 11 Orange County Register 1.15 12 First StreeVTustin Avenue 1.0 13 Bentall Center Development 1.5 14 2720 Hotel Terrace Drive 1.0 15 1951 East Came ie Avenue 0.55 16 4040 West Carriage Avenue 0.47 17 Lake Center Development 0.72 18 South Coast Metro 1.0 19 MacArthur Place North 2.0 20 MacArthur Place South 1.0 21 Pac Tel Office 1.5 22 Metro East 3.0 23 Transit Village 5.0 24 Town & Country Manor 1.27 25 Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor 5.0 26 Heritage 1.7 27 2525 North Main 1.43 A-12 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN }� :§mgy ■1■� � � ®�»wm_,mw 2 2 j a < >)ƒ 3/« @ LAND USE ELEMENT Commercial The Land Use Plan identifies three land use designations that encourage a variety of office, retail and commercial enterprises to serve the community. The Professional/Administrative Office (PAO) designation applies to those areas where professional and/or administrative offices are predominant, or where such development is being encouraged. Land included in this designation is found primarily near the Civic Center, and along the First Street and Tustin Avenue Corridors in close proximity to freeways. There are other smaller PAO areas in the City such as along North Broadway and along portions of east and west Seventeenth Street. A total of 594.9600.8 acres is included in this land use designation. The floor area ratio intensity standard applicable to this land use designation ranges from 0.5 to 1.0. The Professional and Administrative Office areas are intended to provide a unique environment for office development in those areas of the City where office uses are the predominant land use. The purpose for maintaining and supporting these areas exclusively for office and office -related uses is to encourage major employment centers at locations which significantly lessen the impact to the City's local street system. The First Street/Tustin Avenue office corridor between the Santa Ana (I-5) and Costa Mesa (SR-55) Freeways serves this purpose. In addition, the orderly, well -maintained quality of existing development supports a continuation of these areas as functional office/employment centers. The Professional and Administrative Office designation includes a range of floor area ratios to differentiate development intensity and character in relation to adjacent land uses. The areas with a FAR of 0.5 are not major office centers, but rather have an established character of lower intensity garden office and professional service uses. These areas are typically adjacent to low density residential neighborhoods, or are converted residential office uses. Office development along East Fourth Street, between Grand Avenue and the Santa Ana Freeway, is typical of this low-rise office character. The PAO area located adjacent to the Civic Center contains a range of office development intensity which supports the City's functional role as the government center of the County. The types of uses typically located in the PAO district include the following: Professional and administrative offices/office parks; Service activities such as copy centers, courier services, travel agencies, and restaurants when such uses are an integral component of a planned office development; and Professional uses such as accountants, attorneys, doctors, engineers, and insurance brokers. A-20 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT Mixed Use The Land Use Plan provides for two distinct mixed use land use designations. These designations allow for both vertical and horizontal mixed use developments, with an emphasis on linkages to a range of transportation options: The District Center (DC) land use designation includes the major activity areas in the City. Seven areas of the City, totaling 687.0 681.1- acres, are designated as District Center. The intensity standard for the District Center designation ranges from a floor ratio of 1.0 to 5.0. District Centers are designed to serve as anchors to the City's commercial corridors, and to accommodate major development activity. District Centers are to be developed with an urban character that includes a mixture of high- rise office, commercial, and residential uses which provide shopping, business, cultural, education, recreation, entertainment, and housing opportunities. Residential developments within some District Centers are allowed at a density of up to 90 units per acre when developed as an integral component of master planned mixed use project. In Harbor Corridor, Metro East, Downtown, and Transit Village District Centers residential development intensity is based on a combination of floor area ratio and zoning overlay and/or development standards. Some District Centers serve as major retail and employment centers locally and regionally, and should include development which promotes the City as a regional activity center while creating an environment conducive to business on a regional scale. District Centers in Santa Ana include the following: • The Main Place/City Place District Center includes a regional shopping center and office complex, as well as high intensity housing and mixed -use development. • The Museum District located between the Downtown and MainPlace/City Place District Centers is proposed as a major office/cultural center which will be developed over the next 15 to 20 years. The area will focus upon the expanded Bowers Museum, the Discovery Science Center and the construction of additional museums and cultural centers. The Downtown District serves as one of the County's major employment and governmental operations centers complemented with a mix of residential, commercial, and services uses to enhance its urban vibrancy. Emphasis on streets that accommodate all modes of transportation, including mass transit, pedestrian and bicyclist is key in this urban setting. A-22 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT The South Coast Metro District serves as a regional retail shopping area which includes a range of commercial services and office projects. The MacArthur Place District Center contains an existing office/hotel complex and a proposed major mixed use project which will include professional offices, supporting commercial, and mid and high-rise residential components. The Metro East District is envisioned as a vibrant urban village with a balance of office, residential, and service uses. Pedestrian and transportation linkages are key in this urban setting. The Transit Village District is envisioned as a vibrant intense urban village with a balance of employment centers, residential and service uses. Pedestrian and transit linkages to the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center is key in this district. The Harbor Corridor Mixed Use Transit Corridor creates a vision for a more livable, sustainable setting through higher intensity housing and mixed use development, convenient access to transit, complete streets, and amenities that promotes active lifestyles. The Heritage District allows for mixed use development with higher density residential and supportive commercial and office uses within proximity to surrounding employment centers. The 2525 North Main District allows for higher density residential development along the North Main Street corridor, in proximity to employment centers, the MainPlace Mall, and cultural destinations. District Centers are considered to be the City's "major development areas." The most intense development in the City is targeted to these areas. The Tustin Avenue corridor is a major development area even though it is not a designated District Center. This area has developed over the years as a prime office corridor and employment area. The PAO designation facilitates the continued development ofthis area with high intensity, high quality regional office projects. The Urban Neighborhood (UN) land use designation applies to primarily residential areas with pedestrian oriented commercial uses, schools and small parks. The Urban Neighborhood allows for a mix of residential uses and housing types, such as mid to low rise multiple family, townhouses and single family dwellings; with some opportunities for live -work, neighborhood serving retail and service, public spaces and use, and other amenities. Either vertical or horizontal integration of uses is permitted based on zoning standards, with an emphasis on tying together the uses with pedestrian linkages and street frontages. Street connectivity is FrWW IT im CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN A-23 LAND USE ELEMENT interagency Development Review Committee (DRC) to ensure consistent and comprehensive application of City regulations and policies for all projects. Redevelopment Plans. The City will apply redevelopment tools associated with the implementation ofthe adopted redevelopment plans, as appropriate. The City will encourage the further development of industrial, commercial, and residential projects in suitable locations to strengthen the City's tax and employment base. Special Studies. In certain instances, a special study may be required to address a particular issue. In these cases, a specific effort to identify staff resources needed to conduct the appropriate investigation and analysis will be identified. Zoning Code Review. The zoning code serves as a primary tool used by the City to regulate development. The City will develop a program to revise the Zoning Ordinance to ensure that development regulations and standards are consistent with community needs and high quality development. The City will initiate appropriate changes to the ordinance to ensure, where appropriate, conformity between the Land Use Element and Zoning Map. LAND USE PLAN BUILDOUT As indicated previously, the City of Santa Ana has been almost completely developed for many years. As a result, any new development will necessarily consist of redevelopment and infill development on the remaining vacant and underutilized parcels. Many parcels with nonresidential land use designations will never be developed to the maximum intensity permitted under the General Plan. Table A-4 indicates the development possible under the build -out of the Land Use Plan. The build -out for residential land uses considered two scenarios. Effective build -out for residential development is calculated by adding the 21,73724 484- units possible in the areas designated as District Center and Urban Neighborhood to the existing 74,588 units presently found in the City per Census 2000. Theoretical build -out for residential development considered the development possible if all of the areas designated as residential were developed according to the permitted Land Use Plan intensities. Since the Land Use Element does not contemplate the elimination of existing housing in the City, the effective build -out figure represents a more realistic estimate of future residential development. As indicated in TableA-4, three ofthe non-residential land use designations have a range in FAR intensities. For the non-residential land use designations, effective build -out considered the development possible under the lower range of FAR intensities while theoretical build -out considered the upper FAR range. Typically, parking and landscaping requirements will result in significantly less floor area CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN A-33 LAND USE ELEMENT for commercial and industrial developments than that which is permitted under the General Plan. As indicated in Table A-4, between 76,97246-,?�ro to 96,3259H,669 housing units are allowed by the Land Use Plan. The additional units which presently exist in the City beyond the maximum number permitted under the theoretical buildout scenario are a reflection of the higher density multiple -family developments constructed in the 1970's and 1980's. However, the purpose ofthe Land Use Plan as it applies to the residential areas is to preserve and maintain the stability of existing neighborhoods, regardless ofthe character of development. The intent of the Plan is not to create any displacement, nor decrease existing development densities. Rather, it is to ensure a safe, healthy, and livable environment for City residents. Existing residential development entitlements are protected through this Land Use Element, applicable Zoning regulations, and sections of the City code pertaining to legal nonconforming uses. The Land Use Element's implementation may result in an increase in the amount of commercial, office, and industrial development in the City. As indicated in Table A-4, up to 37,271,727 square feet of commercial, 25,913,84926zo �11,^011 square feet ofoffice, and 42,199,991 square feet of industrial development are possible under the effective capacity parameters of Land Use Plan. A-34 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT Table A-4 Land Use Plan Build -out Capacities Intensity/ Effective Buffdout' Theoretical Land Use Residential Acres ften—sik Buddout Low Density Residential LR-7 6,448.3 7 du/ac 45,138 du Low Medium Density Residential LMR-11 420.6 11 du/ac 4,627 du Medium Density Residential MR-15 364.7 15 du/ac 5,471 du Subtotal 7,233.6 96,325 55,235 Mixed Use Non Res. du' Res. Non -Res. du Res. District Center Other' DC 309.5 90 du /ac FAR 1.0-2.0 11,955,583 sf 3,017 du 23,764,534 sf 3,017 du 2525 North Main DC 5_9 FAR 1.43 1256 du 256 du Heritage DC 18.8 FAR 1.7 54,090 sf 1,221 du 54,090 si 1,221 du Downtown DC 62.5 FAR 3.0 2,057,824 sf 1,661du 2,057,824 sf 1,661 du Metro East DC 113.9 FAR 0.75- 3.0 2,464,776 sf 5,037 du 2,464,776 si 5,037 du Transit Village DC 51.4 FAR 5.0 402,864 sf 2,761 du 402,864 sf 2,761 du Harbor Corridor DC 125.0 FAR 5.0 1,836,155 sf 2,029 du 1,836,155 sf 2,029 du Urban Neighborhood UN 317.0 FAR 0.5-3.0 1,656,955 sf 5,755 du 1,656,955 sf 5,755 du Subtotal888.3 1,004.0 20,428,247 sf 21�737 32,237,198 sf 21�737 Commercial do a,—o, do Professional & Admin. Office PAO 594.9 FAR 0.5-1.0 12,956,922 25,913.84 6004 „ "�� "�" sf 4&4;9 °A9 s General Commercial GC 855.6 FAR 0.5-1.0 18,635,863 37,271,727 sf s One Broadway Plaza District CIO OBPDC 4.3 FAR 2.9 543,193 sf 543,193 s 1 454.8 32.135.979 63,728.7 Subtotal 4,469.7 32,264,484 63,995,76 Industrial sf s Industrial I IND 1 2,152.81 FAR 0.45 1 42,199,991 sf 42,199,991 s Other Institutional I INS 1 800.61 FAR 0.2-0.5 1 6,974,740 sf 17,436,850 s Open Space OS 1,010.9 FAR 0.2 8,806,961 sf 8,806,961 s Subtotal 1,811.5 15,781,701 sf 1 26,243,811 s FAR=Boor area ratio; d.u.=dwelling unit; s.f.=square feet (of floor area). Acreage shown in table does not include roads in right-of-way. ' Effective capacity for non-residential development assumes development possible under the lower range of FAR intensity standards with the exception of the Metro East District Center, Transit Village District Center, Downtown District Center, Heritage District Center, and Urban Neighborhood areas. The Harbor Corridor District Center, Metro East District Center, Transit Village District Center, Downtown District Center, and Urban Neighborhood areas allow a range of intensity for mixture of residential and non-residential development based on the zoning development standards. Residential effective capacity was calculated by adding the 2121 73724494 units possible in the District Center and Urban Neighborhood v*h the existing 74,588 (Census 2000) housing units. 2 Land use designation permits both residential and non-residential development. Build -out assumes 90% of land area will be deve ed as commercial and 10%will be developed as residential; with the exception of Town and Country Manor project intended for continuum of care a d ousing seniors. 3 Land use designation permits high intensity office development with ancillary retail use. This table has been revised to correspond with the GIS Land Use Map illustrated in Exhibit 2. f �L, A CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN A-35 This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 4 This page left blank intentionally. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2018-10 REZONING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET FROM PROFESSIONAL (P) TO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 93 (SD-93) (AA NO. 2018-10) AND ADOPTING SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 93 (SD-93) FOR SAID PROPERTY WHEREAS, Chapter 41, Article 1, Division 1, Section 41-1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code establishes the necessity of segregating the location of residences, businesses, trades and industries; regulating the use of buildings, structures, and land regulation; the location, height, bulk and size of buildings and structures, the size of yards and open space; the City is divided into land -use districts of such number, shape and area as may be considered best suited to carry out these regulations and provide for their enforcement; and WHEREAS, the regulations are considered necessary in order to: encourage the most appropriate use of land, conserve and stabilize property value, provide adequate open spaces for light and air and to prevent and fight fires, prevent undue concentration of population, lessen congestion on streets and highways, and promote the health, safety and general welfare of the people, all as part of the general plan of the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana has adopted a zoning map which has since been amended from time to time; and WHEREAS, AC 2525 Main, LLC ("Applicant") seeks to develop The Addington a Multi -Family Residential Project ("proposed Project"), originally proposed as a 496-unit multi -family project on a 5.93-acre site at 2525 North Main Street in Santa Ana, California ("Project Site"); WHEREAS, during the entitlement and environmental review process, and in response to comments and concerns raised by the public and the City's elected officials, the Applicant has proposed several modifications to the original proposal; and WHEREAS, the Project as currently proposed now entails (1) demolition of the existing 81,172 square foot vacant two-story office building and 442-space surface parking lot on the Project Site; (2) redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 292 space surface level parking lot with residential and commercial parking; (3) approval of Development Agreement No. EXHIBIT 4 Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 1 of 12 2018-01 between the City of Santa Ana ("City") and Applicant; (4) approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, which would change the Project Site's existing land use designation of Professional & Administration Office (PAO) to District Center (DC); and (5) approval of Amendment Application No. 2018-10, which would change the zoning of the Project Site from Professional (P) to Specific Development No. 93 (SD- 93) designation; and WHEREAS, the requested Amendment Application would change the zoning designation of the property from Professional (P) to Specific Development No. 93 (SD-93) and adoption of Specific Development No. 93 to reflect this change in order to facilitate the construction of the proposed multi -family housing project and a commercial parking lot; and WHEREAS, Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 (State Clearinghouse No. 2018021031) for the proposed Project was circulated between August 7, 2018 and October 4, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts related to the proposed amendment to the zoning map and adoption of Specific Development No. 93; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 2018, the City invited recognized Native American tribes to engage in consultation regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment pursuant to Government Code Section 65352.3; and WHEREAS, on August 27, 2018, the Planning Commission conducted a work study session to overview the project and thirty-two (32) verbal comments were received (three in support and 29 in opposition) and nine (9) written comments were received (one in support and eight in opposition); and WHEREAS, on November 26, 2018, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing for the project to January 14, 2019 and held a second study session to overview the Project and fifty-eight (58) verbal comments were received (25 in support; 31 in opposition and two neutral) and eleven (11) written comments were received (two in support and nine in opposition); and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, seventy-nine (79) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty (30) speakers supported the project, forty-eight (48) speakers opposed it and one speaker was neutral. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council does not certify the EIR, adopt the findings, the statement of overriding considerations and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program and deny the Project; and Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 2 of 12 WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-one (61) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty-eight (38) speakers supported the project, twenty (20) speakers opposed it and three (3) speakers were neutral and the public hearing was continued to the next regular adjourned City Council meeting on February 19, 2019; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, the City Council continued to conduct a duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, one hundred and thirty-one (131) members of the public spoke on the item, twenty-six (26) speakers supported the project and one hundred and five (105) speakers opposed it. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted that the project be taken back to the Planning Commission after consultation with staff, Applicant and community; and WHEREAS, in June 2019, the Applicant submitted a revised plan consisting of development 347 multi -family units (59 dwelling units per acre), with 642 parking spaces (1.85 parking spaces per unit) and parking capacity at 2.0 spaces per unit, within a 4- story residential building wrapped around a five -level parking structure with an amenity deck on the sixth -level, private open space, and redesigned the intersection of Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive to provide access to the project on a 5.93- acre site; and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 655,826 square feet of total development, including 386,444 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 347 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 269,382 square foot central parking/fitness center/club room structure, the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, seventy-seven (77) members of the expressed opposition; nine (9) supported the project, and one speaker was neutral. In addition, one -hundred (100) written comments were received with six (6) in support and ninety-four (94) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission vote resulted in an impasse; and WHEREAS, in October 2019, in response to comments received the Applicant submitted revised plans including redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with 444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 square foot central parking structure and a 292 space surface level parking lot which also reduced Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 3 of 12 the Project's height, increased the Project's setbacks, and modified the Project entrance ("Modified Project"); and WHEREAS, October 18, 2019, the City gave public notice of a Planning Commission public hearing for consideration of Amendment Application No. 2018-10 by advertising in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation, and on October 17, 2019 by mailing to owners of property and residents within 500 feet of the Project and posting on the project site; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the following environmental documents have been prepared and made available to the public: Draft and Final Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 the Multi -Family Residential Project, Clarification to the 2525 N. Main Street (Magnolia at the Park) Multi -Family Residential Project Final Environmental Impact Report (Clarification), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and Statement of Overriding Considerations and Findings of Fact. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in these documents and the administrative record for the Project, including all oral and written comments received during the comment period. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find that the EIR, including the Clarifications thereto, contain a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project, has been completed in compliance with CEQA, and reflects the independent judgment of the City. The Planning Commission further recommends that no evidence of new significant impacts or any new information of "substantial importance", as defined by State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5, has been received by the City after circulation of the Draft EIR that would require recirculation of the EIR. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the Findings of Fact, certify the EIR, adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt the MMRP. Any project approvals issued by the Planning Commission in this Resolution shall not become effective unless and until the City Council has completed the actions described above. SECTION 2. AMENDMENT APPLICATION: The Amendment Application consists of amendments to the zoning map (SDM 6-5-9) and adoption of Specific Development No. 93, as shown in Exhibit A and Exhibit B respectively, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. LOCATION OF DOCUMENTS: The Amendment Application, Environmental Impact Report and all supporting documents are on file and available Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 4 of 12 for public review at Santa Ana City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92702. SECTION 4. CONSIDERATION OF THE AMENDMENT APPLICATION: In compliance with Santa Ana Municipal Code section 41-662, the Planning Commission has investigated the consistency of the application with the purpose and intent of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the conformity of the application with the General Plan and hereby makes the following findings: A. Consistency with the Intent and Purpose of Santa Ana Municipal Code Chapter 41. The amendment application to change the zoning designation from Professional (P) to Specific Development 93 (SD-93) is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Santa Ana Municipal Code section 41-593.1 for the following reasons: (1) Protecting and enhancing the value of properties by encouraging the use of good design principles and concepts, as related to the division of property, site planning and individual improvements with full recognition of the significance and effect they have on the proper planning and development of adjacent and nearby properties. The site plan has been designed with the vehicular entrance on Main Street away from the residential neighborhood to the south and east. In addition, the parking structure and rooftop amenity deck, which are the tallest building elements are positioned closer to Main Street, with residential buildings wrapped around the structure to screen it. There is a 90-foot rear (east) setback requirement which creates a buffer between the multi -family buildings and single-family homes. In addition, the existing healthy trees along the east property line will be protected in place and new mature trees will be planted or replaced as needed. The wall along the eastern property line will be increased to 8-feet in height and the east side of the building will tier in height from two, to three, to four stories to provide a transition in height when compared to the single -story residential dwellings to the east. The building is also designed with courtyards rather than one large "box" to provide open space and variation in the massing. (2) Encouraging, securing and maintaining the orderly and harmonious appearance, attractiveness and aesthetic development of structures and grounds in order that the most appropriate use and value thereof be determined and protected. The property is a 5.93-acre site with street frontage along Main Street, a major urban corridor with cultural, educational, Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 5 of 12 employment and retail destinations such as the Bowers Museum, Discovery Science Center, Main Place Mall and in the City of Orange; the Children's Hospital of Orange County and St. Joseph's Hospital of Orange County. Therefore, the residential development would be within close proximity of major employment centers and retail establishments. The site is also located just north of the Santa Ana (1-5) freeway which provides regional access to and from the City. The multi -storied development will complement the nearby mid -rise office buildings located along Main Street to the north and west of the site. In addition, the new building will have a variety of materials such as multiple brick veneers, stone veneer, metal panels, ceramic tile, metal canopies, flat and metal seamed roofs to assist in creating a modern contemporary design. The residential development will replace a potential office use with a residential use. Although a professional office use is typically considered a low intensity land use when compared to commercial or industrial uses, issues with parking, traffic and noise may still arise. When comparing land uses, multi -family uses are more compatible in nature with single- family residential neighborhoods than office uses. (3) Providing a method whereby specific development plans are to be based on the general plan as well as other regulations, programs, and legislation as may in the judgment of the city be required for the systematic execution of the general plan. With approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, the Project will be consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element. Although the Project requires an amendment to the Land Use Element to allow for residential use of the property, the Project still supports and is consistent with several other overarching goals and policies of the General Plan. For example, as described in the associated General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06: Housing Element Goal 2, to create diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that accommodate Santa Ana's residents and workforce of all household types, income levels, and age groups to foster an inclusive community; Land Use Element Goal 4, to protect and enhance development sites and districts which are unique community assets that enhance the quality of life; and, Urban Design Element, Goal 1, to improve the physical appearance of the City through development of districts that project a sense of place, positive community image, and quality environment. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 6 of 12 (4) Recognizing the interdependence of land values and aesthetics and providing a method to implement this interdependence in order to maintain the values of surrounding properties and improvements and encouraging excellence of property development, compatible with the general plan for, and character of, the city, with due regard for the public and private interests involved. Development of the Project would result in a substantial change in views and a significant and unavoidable impact to aesthetics. However, the Project will replace an over 30-year old structure with a modern building with enhanced landscaping contributing to the character of the City. Furthermore, a Development Agreement between the developer/property owner and the City of Santa Ana has been entered into. Public benefits of the agreement include: public art, Santiago Park improvements, Park Santiago Neighborhood benefits including access to on -site amenities for Park Santiago residents, security patrol of the residential neighborhood and Santiago Park, and Park Santiago Neighborhood traffic improvements and calming such as street calming, traffic diversion, entry monuments, and street lights. (5) Insuring that the public benefits derived from expenditures of public funds for improvements and beautification of streets and public facilities shall be protected by exercise of reasonable controls over the character and design of private buildings, structures and open spaces. The multi -family residential development will utilize existing water, sewer, and drainage infrastructure and will not result in the expansion of infrastructure. In addition, the Project will not result in the expansion of new or altered police or fire facilities. The Project will be subject to utility user tax, property taxes based on the valuation of the new construction and management company business taxes. The building facades and new landscaping are designed to deter graffiti, existing sidewalks will be removed and replaced with new sidewalks that are constructed to City standards, new street lights will be installed and the City's Building Security Ordinance will be implemented which includes security and crime preventing measures to help reduce City expenditures on public services and maintenance. In addition, the residential development will be subject to all required development impact fees. B. Substantial Conformance with the General Plan. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 7 of 12 The Planning Commission hereby finds that the proposed Amendment Application is compatible with the objectives, policies, and general plan land use programs specified in the General Plan for the City of Santa Ana in that: The proposed Project will support several goals/objectives and policies of the General Plan. Housing Element (HE) Goal 2: to create diversity of quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that accommodate Santa Ana's residents and workforce of all household types, income levels, and age groups to foster an inclusive community. HE Policy 2.2 District Centers. Create high intensity, mixed -use urban villages and pedestrian -oriented experiences that support the mid- to high-rise office centers, commercial activity, and cultural activities in the varied District Centers. HE Policy 2.4 to facilitate diverse types, prices and sizes of housing. Housing Element (HE) Goal 4: to provide adequate rental and ownership housing opportunities and supportive services. The Project will provide 256 rental housing units. The amendment will establish new zoning for the site that provides a connection between the existing District Centers to the north and south of the site by providing a residential development that will support a mixed -use environment. Land Use (LU) Element Goal 1: to promote a balance of land uses to address basic community needs. LU Policy 1.2 Maintain and foster a variety of residential land uses in the City. LU Policy 4.3 Support land uses which provide community and regional economic and service benefits. LU Policy 4.4 Encourage the development of projects which promote the City's image as a regional activity center. LU Policy 5.5 Encourage development which is compatible with, and supportive of surrounding land uses. LU Policy 5.7 Anticipate that the intensity of new development will not exceed available infrastructure capacity. Land Use (LU) Element Goal 6: to reduce residential overcrowding to promote public health and safety. Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 8 of 12 The Project is within '/2 mile of existing transportation infrastructure such as the Santa Ana (1-5) freeway and State Route 22 (SR 22) highway which provide vehicular access to the region; the Orange County Transportation Agency bus routes along Main Street which connects to the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center and the Anaheim Regional Intermodal Center which provides rail service throughout California; and the project is immediately adjacent to Santiago Park and the Santiago Creek Bike Trail which connects to regional bike trails. Main Street is a major urban corridor with cultural, educational, employment and retail destinations such as the Bowers Museum, Discovery Science Center, Main Place Mall and in the City of Orange; the Children's Hospital of Orange County and St. Joseph's Hospital of Orange County. Therefore, the residential development would be within close proximity to major employment centers and retail establishments. The Project will also provide an additional housing option for those seeking housing within the jobs rich northern area of the City. The multi -storied development will complement the nearby mid -rise office buildings located along Main Street to the north and west of the site. Although the density will be higher than the adjacent uses, the residential use is consistent with the residential uses to the east and south. In addition, multi -family uses are often used in planning and zoning practice to buffer higher intensity uses like commercial or industrial uses from single-family residential uses. Urban Design (UD) Element, Goal 1: to improve the physical appearance of the City through development of districts that project a sense of place, positive community image, and quality environment. UD Policy 1.1. New development and redevelopment must have the highest quality design, materials, finishes and construction. UD Policy 1.11 Visual and physical links between districts, nodes, and significant sites, landmarks and other points of interest, are to be provided in all public and private projects. The residential buildings are of high quality design and include high quality materials such as stone veneer, brick veneers, metal panels, and canopies. The building is designed with courtyards that are open to the public right-of-way, and landscaped areas to reduce the mass of the building. The Project has street frontage on Main Street which is identified as a major path in the General Plan and supports the North Main Street Node described as an opportunity for the establishment of a cohesive, height intensity, mixed activity center with a strong presence in the region. The setback along the east side of the project Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 9 of 12 has been increased to 90 feet to minimize impacts to the neighboring single-family residences. The new development will include public art and convey a sense of place and contribute to the urban image for the City along a street corridor that includes regional, local and cultural landmarks. The development will be in scale with the buildings along Main Street to the north and west of the site. In addition, the Urban Design Element of the General Plan identifies the site as a Gateway; the Project promotes elements of a Gateway by developing the site with a building with attractive architectural features, projecting a positive image for the City of Santa Ana. C. The proposed Amendment Application will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare in that the Amendment Application will not result in incompatible land uses on adjacent properties, inconsistencies with any General Plan goals or policies, or adverse impacts to the environment. SECTION 5. INDEMNIFICATION. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. SECTION 6. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS: The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2018-10 as follows: A. Subject to compliance with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the property at 2525 North Main Street shall be amended to Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 10 of 12 Specific Development No. 93 and Specific Development No. 93 plan shall be adopted as set forth in Exhibit A and Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. B. The Amendment Application shall not take effect unless and until Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 and General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06 are each certified and adopted by the City Council, and the associated Development Agreement No. 2018-01 is approved by the City Council and executed by all parties thereto. SECTION 7. EXECUTION OF RESOLUTION. The Chairperson shall sign this Resolution and the Planning Commission Recording Secretary shall attest and certify to the adoption thereof. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of October 2019. AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners: Mark McLoughlin Chairperson APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: Lisa Storck Assistant City Attorney Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 11 of 12 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, SARAH BERNAL, Recording Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2019-xx to be the original resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana on October 28, 2019. Date: Recording Secretary City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2019-xx Page 12 of 12 EXHIBIT A LN 6 R1 Rl R2 R2 .�111.1 R2 vN Ro R , Rl R, R, R z� Rl , C,-MB j C,-HBII C,-HBII C,-HBII Cl Ci Ci p <i F241 SPt SPt 'm SPt 1112111ki [cm D1Pt11:7[y1&1 0 R' cl o � o g ' ma✓. Lx u1 Al ENL. A 1 1 Rl cawemmrt ST m ' Ri B -.3 a R, J Rl J u o �oANA PR R,-B C5 J Rl a 1--- xfam ST E € Rl S o R1 g 0 _ g ff o S g ¢ Q Rl Al ASPEN sr A vfxn Rl R,_� Rl m SARTA cuw.Av cuw. Av � FL .e Avg U-_:�� _ H4V C5 C5 R, C5 R1 C, Al GENERALAGRICULTURAL GSM SOUTH MAIN STREET COMMERCIAL DIST_ R2 TWO-FAMLYRESIDENCE -B PARKING MODIFGATION C1 COMMUNIfYCOMMERCIAL GC GOVERNMENTCENTER R3 MULTIPLE- FAMILY RESIDENCE -OZ OVERLAY ZONE GlMD GOMMUNITYCOMMERCIAL-MUSEUM DIST_ M1 LGHTINDUSTRIAL R4 SUBURBAN APARTMENT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL -PRD DEVELOPMENT C2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL M2 HEAVY IN RE RESIDENTIAL ESTATE C4 PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER 0 OPENSPACE SD SPEGFGDEVELOPMENT -HD2 HEGHTDISTRICTI C5 ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL P PROFESSIONAL SP SPEGFG PLAN CR COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL R1 SINGLE- FAMILYRESIDENCE SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP: 6-5-9 e CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT B SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 93 2525 North Main Street Development Project SECTION 1—APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE The Specific Development Zoning District No. 93 (SD-93) for the 2525 North Main Street development project is authorized by Chapter 41, Division 26 Section 41-593 et seq. of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. SD-93 contains specific standards and regulations for the purpose of establishing land use regulations and development and operational standards for the project site. All other applicable chapters, articles, and sections of the Santa Ana Municipal Code are in effect unless expressly superseded by regulations contained in this ordinance. The boundaries of the 2525 North Main Street development project shall be defined pursuant to Attachment I (attached hereto and incorporated a though fully set forth herein). The 2525 North Main Street Development District shall have two zones, Zone 1 and Zone 2, as depicted in Attachment 1. SECTION 2 —PURPOSE The Specific Development Plan No. 93 for the 2525 North Main Street project consists of standards and regulations established for the purpose of protecting the health, safety, and general welfare of the people of the City of Santa Ana by promoting and enhancing the value of property and encouraging the orderly development of the property. Obiectives The objectives of the 2525 North Main Street project specific development plan include provisions of the following: 1. Promote the City's image as providing high -quality residential projects for individuals and families of all income groups. 2. Create a clean and safe environment for the City's residents, workers, and visitors. 3. Contribute to the North Main Street corridor by providing a high density residential development that supports nearby cultural, office and commercial uses. 4. Provide regulations that allow development, in response to market conditions while achieving overall City and community goals. 5. Provide parking opportunities for nearby museum uses and/or commercial uses. SECTION 3 — Uses permitted in Zone 1 The following uses are permitted in the SD-93 district: (a) A maximum of 256 multiple -family dwelling units not exceeding a density of 58 dwelling units/acre. (1) The unit mix shall be comprised of: a. 70% studio and one -bedroom units b. 30% two -bedroom and three -bedroom units (2) Unit square footages ranging from a. 556 to 592 square foot studios b. 633 to 930 square foot one -bedrooms c. 909 to 1,179 square foot two -bedrooms d. 1,362 square foot three -bedrooms (b) Home occupations, pursuant to section 41-192.1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. (c) Accessory recreational rooms, dog wash, club room, fitness room, wellness center, bike rooms, pools and spas for residential use. SECTION 4 — Uses subject to a conditional use permit in Zone 1 (a) Childcare facilities caring for more than eight (8), but no more than fourteen (14) children. SECTION 5 — Uses permitted in Zone 2 (a) Surface parking lot containing with 180 spaces (1.4 acre lot) to be used by a commercial, museum, or professional offices uses. (b) Parking may be shared with the residential development through a shared parking agreement. (c) All other uses and/or structures are prohibited. SECTION 6 —Maximum permitted floor area ratio (FAR) The maximum authorized building intensity for the 2525 North Main Street project is a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.43, including residential areas, community -serving areas (e.g., leasing office, gym and club room) and interior corridors. SECTION 7 —Minimum lot size in Specific Development No. 93 The minimum lot size is 1.4 acres. SECTION 8—Minimum street frontage in Specific Development No. 93 Lots shall have a minimum street frontage of at least 250 feet. SECTION 9 —Building height in Specific Development No. 93 (a) No residential structure shall exceed 50 feet (four stories) in height, as measured from the lowest adjacent grade of the structure to the top of the structure. (b) The six level parking structure (five levels with one level subterranean) and amenity deck shall not exceed 61 feet as measured from the lowest adjacent grade to the top of the structure. (c) The stair tower and elevator tower shall not exceed 74 feet as measured from the lowest adjacent grade to the top of structure. (d) Along the east property line the building shall tier from two, three, and four stories as shown on the approved site plan. SECTION 10 — Setback standards in Specific Development No. 93 (a) North setback. A minimum building setback of ten (10) feet shall be provided between the property line and buildings along Santiago Park. (b) South setback. A minimum building setback of one hundred thirty-four (134) feet shall be provided from Edgewood Road. (c) West setback. A minimum building setback of twelve (12) feet shall be provided between the property line and buildings along Main Street. (d) East setback. A minimum building setback of ninety (90) feet shall be provided between the east property line and buildings. SECTION 11— Off-street parking standard in Specific Development No. 93 (a) The minimum off-street parking requirements for the project are as follows: (1) 2.0 spaces per unit shall be provided (407 spaces within the parking structure and 104 space surface level parking lot). (2) Parking stalls shall not be less than eight (8) feet six (6) inches wide and eighteen (18) feet long. Double -striping is required, with the width of stalls measured from lines midway between each pair of stripes. Structural, mechanical, utility or similar appurtenances are only permitted adjacent to required stall areas if the required width of the stall is increased at least six (6) inches and if the appurtenance is not located so as to interfere with safe and free parking movement, car door opening, or of visibility. (3) Aisles to and from parking stalls shall not be less than: Twenty-three (23) feet wide for 90-degree parking. (4) Drive aisles shall not dead-end; a turn -around method be provided to allow cars to exit if all stalls are occupied (5) The interior of the parking structure without natural lighting shall be painted white or shall be equipped with lighting devices which will provide a minimum maintained two (2) footcandle of light on the parking surface during hours of darkness. Subterranean parking areas shall maintain lighting twenty-four (24) hours a day. Lighting devices shall be protected by vandal resistant covers. (6) A minimum of ten (10) bicycle spaces shall be provided onsite. The design and materials shall comply with the approved materials board submitted for the project during building plan check. (7) Prior to submittal into building plan check, a parking management plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review, identifying parking per unit, and guest parking. The plan is subject to approval of the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency. Onsite parking shall be provided for residents and visitors of the Project and the parking demand of the Project site shall be actively monitored. Property owner "Owner" shall continually monitor and take appropriate measures to manage the parking demand of the Project site to mitigate the use of offsite parking spaces on private or public properties and/or right-of-way. SECTION 12 —Vehicular Access in Specific Development No. 93 The development shall prepare all necessary plans per City Standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to: (a) Provide public access via Walkie Way/Park Santiago Drive and Main Street. The Santiago Park Entrance design and construction shall be subject to the review and approval of the City's Planning & Building, Public Works, and Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency Directors, including residential units to front onto Santiago Park, Main Street, and the Santiago Park Drive entrance. (b) Reconstruct the existing intersection of Main Street and Walkie Way/Park Santiago Drive to accommodate the southerly relocation the east leg of the intersection, including, but not limited to: i. Removal of all portions of the existing east leg of the intersection. ii. Construction of PCC curb, gutter and sidewalk along the east side of Main Street. iii. Reconstruct pavement within the intersection. iv. Modification of the Traffic Signal for the Walkie Way/Park Santiago Drive intersection for the intended signal operation shall include new signals poles, traffic cabinet, install conduits and wiring, traffic signal, interconnect, provide Accessible Pedestrian Signals pedestrian push buttons, vehicle/bike video detection, signing and striping as needed to accommodate the proposed entrance to the development and Santiago Park. (c) Remove and reconstruct the raised -curb median in Main Street between Walkie Way and Edgewood Road to provide increased left turn pocket lengths per Attachment 2, including, but not limited to: i. Reconstruct asphalt pavement in Main Street to maintain standard cross slopes, positive drainage and smooth vertical transitions. ii. Provide landscaping and irrigation in the median. iii. Modify the existing channelization striping extending through intersections. (d) Coordinate with Caltrans to enter into a Cooperative Agreement with City of Santa Ana to implement traffic signal synchronization timing along Main Street between the I-5 ramps and the modified traffic signal at Main Street and Walkie Way -Santiago Park to enhance traffic flow and reduce congestions between city streets and the State Highway System. The scope of work shall include but not limited to preparation of cooperative agreement, any required improvements, preparation and implementation of timing plans, and required permits. (e) The Emergency Vehicular Access Lane (Fire Lane) with access to Edgewood Road shall be gated per Orange County Fire Authority and City Public Works Agency requirements and standards. The emergency lane shall not be used for trash staging, trash loading and/or move-ins/outs. No other vehicular access or curb approach openings will be approved on Edgewood Road for the project. SECTION 13 — Open Space standard in Specific Development No. 93 (a) Pedestrian Walkways and Open Space. The project will provide a minimum of 15% of the total lot size shall be open space in the form of common, landscaped open space areas, pools, spas, deck, courtyard and lobby, interior community room, dining room, gym, business room, etc. (b) Courtyards. (1) East courtyards shall be a minimum of 34 feet wide by 100 feet in depth and shall not contain any pools, spas or recreational rooms. (2) West courtyard shall be a minimum of 48 feet wide by 58 feet in depth. (c) Private Open Space. Each residential unit shall have a patio or balcony a minimum of 50 square feet in size. SECTION 14 — Walls/Fences standard in Specific Development No. 93 (a) East property line. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, a solid block wall with a minimum height of eight (8) feet shall be constructed along the east property line. The block wall shall be designed to contain a decorative cap, regularly -spaced decorative pilasters, and a decorative finish in accordance to the design provisions contained within the most recent version of the City's design guidelines. (b) North property line. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, a new wrought iron fence shall be constructed. The fence shall also incorporate decorative pilasters located a maximum of 50 feet on center. Any walls and/or fences are limited to eight (8) feet in height. (c) South and West property line walls are prohibited. Within the front and street side setbacks, walls and/or fences shall be limited to four (4) feet in height. SECTION 15 —Landscape standard in Specific Development No. 93 (a) A Landscape Plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The Irrigation Plan shall include an irrigation system layout with the location of controllers and points of connection with data on valve sizes and gallons per minute (G.P.M.), the size and location of sleeves and all spray heads, including the location of conventional systems and drip systems; an irrigation legend with complete specifications; irrigation notes and construction details of all assemblies and components; a recommended irrigation schedule, preferably on an annual basis; and a summary block on the initial page of submitted plans that will present the above information clearly and accurately. The landscape plan shall include a Plant Legend containing: plant symbol, scientific name of plant material, common name of plant material, plant container size, and plant spacing. Very low, low and medium water usage plant materials are encouraged. The landscape plan shall provide a cross section of the eastern planter showing the planter at time of planting, after five (5) years and at full maturity. The cross section shall demonstrate the landscaping will adequately screen the project from the adjacent residential uses along the eastern portion of the Property. A minimum size of 36-inch box trees shall be planted along street setbacks, open space areas and shared parking areas. (b) Per the arborist report dated May 4, 2018: (1) Retain and protect in place the existing eleven (11) healthy Ficus benjamina trees adjacent to the east property line. (2) Remove the existing eight (8) unhealthy trees (Liquidambar styraciva) in the eastern planter and plant eight (8) minimum size of 60-inch box trees in their place. (3) Plant new vertical and canopy specimen trees with a minimum size of 48- inch box, 20-feet on center in the east planter within 150 feet of the front property line and within 150 feet of the rear property line. (4) The planter along the east property line shall be sized to allow for future growth and health of the trees. (5) To the extent feasible, all other healthy mature trees on the property shall be protected and preserved. If the perseveration of the existing healthy, mature trees is not feasible because of the location of the approved structures on the property, the Owner shall work with Staff to evaluate the feasibility of relocating the healthy tree(s) to other locations on the property. (c) Project Landscaping: Landscaping shall be compliant with the City of Santa Ana's Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance Chapter 41, Article XVI of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. All landscape areas shall have a fully automatic irrigation system (including spray or drip) as required by the City of Santa Ana Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance. (d) All meters shall be appropriately screened from public view with trellis work and vines or hedge -type shrubs, or be incorporated into the residential structure. (e) Installation: Landscaping for the project shall be completed in phases by building and shall be installed and inspected prior to occupancy of units within that building. The Owner shall be responsible for maintaining all common area landscaping within the development. (f) Maintenance: All plant material shall be maintained per Section 41-609 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. SECTION 16 —Residential Signage in Specific Development No. 93 (a) Signage for the project shall be consistent with Section 41-868 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. SECTION 17 —Architectural Design in Specific Development No. 93 (a) Exterior materials. Prior to submittal into building plan check, the Owner shall submit revised architectural elevations subject to the review and approval of the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency. Exterior materials and finishes for the project shall comply with the approved materials board submitted for the project including stone veneer, brick veneer, ceramic tile, metal canopies, flat and metal seamed roofs. All trash enclosures and similar ancillary structures shall match the texture, material and color of the building. (1) The east building wall windows (at the 90 foot building setback) shall be opaque or clerestory (above eye level) windows. (2) The east wall of the parking structure shall incorporate screen materials and be designed to screen the views from the amenity deck or parking structure to the neighborhood. (b) Green Building. Alternative Transportation and Energy Source, Resource Conservation, and LEED Certification. The project shall be constructed to Silver Standard or better LEED equivalent and shall at the minimum, incorporate bike lockers, bike sharing programing, electric vehicle charging stations, rain capturing systems, grey water capturing systems, and to the extent feasible, automobile sharing programing. (c) Public Art. Public Art shall be installed, and maintained with a value equivalent to one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the total construction cost of the Project. Total construction cost shall mean all design, engineering and construction costs. A public art plan shall be prepared and submitted to the City no later than one hundred eight (180) days before final approval for occupancy or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy and the approved art shall be installed prior to final approval for occupancy of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Project. (d) Storage. A minimum of 250 cubic feet of storage, in addition to interior bedroom closets, shall be provided with minimum dimensions of 4 feet by 8 feet per unit. (e) Hardscape materials. Enhanced paving materials shall be installed at the Main Street driveway entrance. The actual paving materials shall be approved by the Planning Division. (f) Lighting standards/fixtures. The light fixtures are to integrate design elements of the building and landscape architecture. Lighting is to be designed to confine the direct rays of the artificial lighting within the boundaries of the development. Specifications of light standards/fixtures and photometrics plan shall be submitted to Planning Division for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. (g) Composite Utility Plan. Composite utilities shall not be allowed within required parking, turnaround and landscape areas or on any fagade facing a public street. (h) Mechanical Equipment, Appurtenances, and Conduits. All mechanical equipment, heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC) units, satellite dish systems, solar panels, thermal solar heaters, utility meters, above ground utility and fire safety connections will be, screened, located out of public view or be architectural integrated into the project design within designated rooms, inside walls, behind parapets, or through a combination of landscape and hardscape materials. (i) Trash Enclosures. Trash bins shall be stored in designated trash enclosures. There shall be an onsite designated trash staging area only to be used on service days and the staging area and bins shall not disrupt vehicular use of the driveway. The minimum requirements needed to service the location shall be clearly indicated on the plans and subject to the approval of the Public Works Agency. SECTION 18 —Property Maintenance in Specific Development No. 93 (a) Onsite Property Manager. The Project shall include 24-hour on -site Property Management services and personnel. Up-to-date 24-hour contact information for the on -site personnel shall be provided to the following City Agencies on an ongoing basis: (1) Police Department (2) Fire Authority (3) Planning and Building Agency (4) Community Development Agency (b) Maintenance. The property shall be maintained free of trash, debris and graffiti. Graffiti shall be removed within 24-hours after its appearance in accordance with Section 10-227 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. (c) Crime Free Housing. Prior to submittal into building plan check, a Crime Free Housing Plan shall be submitted for review. The Plan shall be approved prior to occupancy of the first unit and shall be implemented and administered by the Owner. (d) Building Security. All structures and parking lots shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8, Article 11, Division 3 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Building Security Ordinance). (e) Emergency Evacuation Plan. An approved Emergency Evacuation Plan (EEP) from City Police and Fire Protection agencies shall be on file for the project. Up-to-date 24-hour emergency contact information for the on -site personnel shall be provided to the City on an ongoing basis and the approved EEP shall be kept onsite and also be submitted to the following City Agencies: (1) Police Department (2) Fire Authority (3) Planning and Building Agency (4) Community Development Agency (f) On Going Property Maintenance. Developer (and the owner of the property upon which the authorized use and/or authorized improvements are located if different from the Developer) shall execute a maintenance agreement with the City of Santa Ana which shall be recorded against the property and which shall be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorney. The maintenance agreement shall contain covenants, conditions and restrictions relating to the following: (1) Compliance with operational conditions applicable during any period(s) of construction or major repair (e.g., proper screening and securing of the construction site; implementation of proper erosion control, dust control and noise mitigation measure; adherence to approved project phasing etc.). (2) Compliance with ongoing operational conditions, requirements and restrictions, as applicable (including but not limited to hours of operation, security requirements, the proper storage and disposal of trash and debris, enforcement of the parking management plan, and/or restrictions on certain uses). (3) Ongoing compliance with approved design and construction parameters, signage parameters and restrictions as well as landscape designs, as applicable. (4) Ongoing maintenance, repair and upkeep of the property and all improvements located thereupon at all times (including but not limited to controls on the proliferation of trash and debris about the property; the proper and timely removal of graffiti; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of damaged, vandalized and/or weathered buildings, structures and/or improvements; the timely maintenance, repair and upkeep of exterior paint, parking striping, lighting and irrigation fixtures, walls and fencing, publicly accessible bathrooms and bathroom fixtures, landscaping and related landscape improvements and the like, as applicable). (5) If Developer and the owner of the property are different (e.g., if the applicant is a tenant or licensee of the property or any portion thereof), both the applicant and the owner of the property shall be signatories to the maintenance agreement and both shall be jointly and severally liable for compliance with its terms. (6) The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any party responsible for complying with its terms shall not assign its ownership interest in the property or any interest in any lease, sublease, license or sublicense, unless the prospective assignee agrees in writing to assume all of the duties and obligations and responsibilities set forth under the maintenance agreement. (7) The maintenance agreement shall contain provisions relating to the enforcement of its conditions by the City and shall also contain provisions authorizing the City to recover costs and expenses which the City may incur arising out of any enforcement and/or remediation efforts which the City may undertake in order to cure any deficiency in maintenance, repair or upkeep or to enforce any restrictions or conditions upon the use of the property. The maintenance agreement shall further provide that any unreimbursed costs and/or expenses incurred by the City to cure a deficiency in maintenance or to enforce use restrictions shall become a lien upon the property in an amount equivalent to the actual costs and/or expense incurred by the City. (8) The execution and recordation of the maintenance agreement shall be a condition precedent to the issuance of final approval for any construction permit related to this entitlement. ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT 5 This page left blank intentionally. Comments from November 15, 2017 Sunshine Ordinance Meeting regarding 2525 N. Main Street A presentation by the Applicant's team was made to outline the development process and the review that the City of Santa Ana will conduct including the environmental review. A brief description of the project design was provided as well as discussion of anticipated benefits to the community. Comments and questions were received from the attendees. Responses have been provided. Land Use: 1. Why buy a property to rezone? o The site was identified in 2015 by the City ofSanta Ana as a likely rezone site and the City placed it on its Envision Map, designating it as residential with unlimited height and unlimited density. In addition, the site should be residential because the proposed residential use next to singlefamily residential is a prototypical manner in which cities are planned. Typically, it is much more common for home owners to resist commercial uses next to their homes, not a residential use. In fact, the State of California is now focusing on requiring EIRs to study the impacts of commercial uses adjacent to homes. 2. Build an office project. o Ofce would create significantly more traffic than the existing use, for instance, a 5-story office building would generate approximately 10,000 daily trips compared to approximately Z812 daily tripsfor the proposed use (if the existing building were occupied it would create Z938 daily trips). Additionally, office vacancy in this sub -market is approximately 20%, whereas multi family vacancy is less than 3%. Clearly the need for housing in Santa Ana is one of the most extreme. It is well known that Santa Ana is one of the most overcrowded/dense cities in terms of people to housing ratios (for every 1 housing unit, there are 4.5 people, whereas Irvine is 1 to 2.6 and Newport Beach is 1 to 2.2). The existing housing ratio in Santa Ana is detrimental, by creating a shortfall of housing results in over -crowding and unaffordable housing options. 3. Putting Single family units on site will solve crime issue. o We are in the process of researching and studying the effects that a larger amount of people will have on crime in the area. We will share the data with the community once it is completed. 4. No apartments. o We are hopeful that the quality of the community will change these opinions and the neighbors will take the time to learn and better understand about the community and City benefits. S. No re -zoning. IWOMM11:I1110 SUNSHINE MEETING MINUTES 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET EIR NO. 2018-01, DA NO. 2018-01, GPA NO. 2018-06, AA NO. 2018-10 o We are hopeful that the quality of the community will change these opinions and the neighbors will take the time to learn and better understand about the community and City benefits. Need to disclose previous mortuary use on site to people. o Asa part of the environmental impact report, it will investigate all former uses and of course the report will be made public. Would you rezone a property next to your neighborhood? o We believe in urban areas the future of housing is denser than in years past. The data is overwhelming that developing multi family inclose proximity to job centers will reduce traffic, reduce environmental issues, and is less taxing on the infrastructure. On this site you can put 40 single family/for sale homes and they will sell. o The cost of urban infill sites such as this one (17mm) make it cost prohibitive to develop single family. In addition, this is a major thoroughfare with a mixture of uses and significantfreeway noise, all making for the site to be incompatible for single family residences. 9. Oppose apartments of any kind. o It is our understanding the neighbor's impression of an apartment project is not consistent with what we intend to develop. In the upcoming weeks, we will launch a website detailing the quality of construction and vast amenities. The project will resemble a fine resort, not some of the underwhelming projectsfrom years ago. Keep in mind, the folks that will occupy this community will make a minimum income of $58, 000 per year, with an average income of $85, 000 a year. 10. Our neighborhood is a jewel, don't want your project it will damage our neighborhood. o It is our intention to leave the community better than wefound it. We intend to post on our website all of the benefits the project will bring to the City and the Community. 11. Rezone would take away our quality of life, some business use ok. o Again, we are hopeful that the quality of the community will change these opinions and the neighbors will take the time to learn and better understand about the community and City benefits. 12. If the rezoning is going to happen, why are we even talking? o The City of Santa Ana has a processfor review of the application that includes an environmental review before Planning Commission and City Council hearings. The developer would not have acquired this site had City staff not identified itasan unlimited density and unlimited height residential site over 3 years ago. Nevertheless, the site is not re -zoned, City staff, Planning Commission and City Council will take into account both the needs of the City and the existing community in coming to a determination if the site is ultimately rezoned. Please be mindful that Main Street and its businesses, which include the hospitals, retail and services, are supportive of more quality housing stock to its workforce. In addition, the project application will befollowing the process of City review including the CEQA environmental process before any decisions are made. 13.. So it is a foregone conclusion that the re zone will happen? o The City of Santa Ana has a processfor review of the application that includes an environmental review before Planning Commission and City Council hearings. The developer would not have acquired this site had City staff not identified itasan unlimited density and unlimited height residential site over 3 years ago. Nevertheless, the site is not re -zoned, City staff, Planning Commission and City Council will take into account both the needs of the City and the existing community in coming to a determination if the site is ultimately rezoned. Please be mindful that Main Street and its businesses, which include the hospitals, retail and services, are supportive of more quality housing stock to its workforce. In addition, the project application will befollowing the process of City review including the CEQA environmental process before any decisions are made. 14. Why bring apartments to this neighborhood? o Ofcevacancy inthis sub -market is approximately 20%,whereas multi- family vacancy is less than 3%. Clearly the need for housing in Santa Ana is extreme.. It is well known that Santa Ana is one of the most overcrowded/dense cities in terms of people to housing ratios (for every 1 housing unit, there are 4.5 people, whereas Irvine is 1 to 2.6 and Newport Beach is 1 to 2.2). The existing housing ratio in Santa Ana is detrimental, by creating a shortfall of housing results in over -crowding and unaffordable housing options. 15. We need apartments but not on this site. There are a lot of apartments planned for adjacent areas. o We find the location of this site, adjacent to both public transportation and major thoroughfares (the 5 Freeway and the 22 Freeway) make it ideal for multi family housing, not to mention the adjacent retailers and employers are in desperate need for high income households in the sub - market, along with knowledgeable workers (those workers with specific skill sets). Please keep in mind that the culture has changed in that professionals today are renting in fargreater numbers than the previous generation. In addition, we would sell these units as condominiums, once the market allows us to do so, however, post - recession lenders still have not loosened their requirements making it difficultfor many to qualify for mortgage financing. 16. Not appropriate for our neighborhood. o We find the location of this site, adjacent to both public transportation and major thoroughfares (the 5 Freeway and the 22 Freeway) make it ideal for multi family housing, not to mention the adjacent retailers and employers are in desperate need for high income households in the sub - market, along with knowledgeable workers (those workers with specific skill sets). Please keep in mind that the culture has changed in that professionals today are renting in fargreater numbers than the previous generation. In addition, we would sell these units as condominiums, once the market allows us to do so, however, post - recession lenders still have not loosened their requirements making it difficultfor many to qualify for mortgage financing. 17. Is there any research about how it works to have apartments adjacent to older neighborhoods? o The site is situated on a main thoroughfare with all different types of uses, situating a multi family community next to services will reduce the use of cars and support the other adjacent retailers. We are studying potential means to mitigate cut -through traffic into Santiago Park either through reconfiguration of the existing egress, or agate. In general, most cities are planned with multi family housing next to single family housing with commercial next to the multi family. The site makes much more sense as a multi family residential use. Typically residents are unhappy when commercial uses are next to their homes, not residential uses. That is why this site was identified threeyears ago by staff to be rezoned for residential. In addition, the park is having vagrant issues and this problem will be somewhat mitigated with professionals living at this location, because it will create a deterrent via a nighttime presence. 18. Our community opposed apartments being built in our vicinity in the 1960's and they did not get built. o The vision and the needs of the City have changed. The City now is greatly in need of housing stock in order to prevent overcrowding and to provide affordable housing options. Again, the previous generations were able to navigate theirfamilies into home ownership, but the environment has changed and the barriers to acquire a home are significant and real. 19. What is the Sunshine Ordinance? o A City Ordinance that requires a community meeting to be held by the applicant after the application is filed to educate about the proposed project and obtain input. 20. Why doesn't developer put money in a property in a broken neighborhood in Santa Ana? o The developer has been active in Orange County and has developed in all types of neighborhoods. The existing office building was developed as a boiler room/call centerfor Wells Fargo, it is now obsolete because this type of use has been farmed out to other countries. The site will be developed, and again, this type of use will provide for needs of the retailers, of the adjacent employers, produce significant revenue for the City, and is situated on a public transit corridor, ideal for reducing the use of automobiles. 21. This neighborhood has been here for 100 years. o We know this is a fantastic neighborhood and it is our objective to leave the neighborhood better than wefound it. Again, the site is not in Park Santiago, it is on a main thoroughfare, and its position is ideal to work in harmony with the adjacent retail, restaurants, office and main transit corridors. Keep in mind thatfor decades, this site has been a different use than the singlefamily homes located in Park Santiago and it is our understanding that the issues were minimal. 22. No rezoning, no GPA, no apartments o Please refer to responses to comments 4 and 5. 23. Don't want to be packed in like sardines. o The density of this project is consistent with hundreds of other Southern California projects, including those found in Santa Ana, Irvine, Newport Beach, Costa Mesa, Anaheim and Huntington Beach. The projects have added tremendous value to both the cities and the communities they are situated in by providing quality housing, bringing quality folks to the neighborhood, and supporting local businesses. The proposed project will provide more than 1Ox the revenue compared to the existing structure, thereby helping to reduce any fiscal challenges the City currently faces. The City is in need of a variety of new services and better services and this can only be achieved through expansion of its tax base. 24. Concerned about privacy, people would be able to see into backyards of adjacent houses. o We have purposely oriented the unit windows toward the park, toward the courtyards and away from any of the adjacent neighbor homes. We currently are studying sight lines and in the event it is determined that this is an issue, the developer will either revise the design, pay for fencing and/or landscaping to screen the backyards. It is our understanding that the adjacent 9-story of building (which isfar higher) has not created privacy issuesfor the adjacent homes. It is also our intention to bury existing power lines, thereby beautifying the adjacent neighborhood. 25. This project would ruin our quality of life. o Please refer to responses to comments 21, 23 and 24. Traffic and Parking: 1. Where are the 900 cars? o There will be a parking structure that the buildings are wrapped around. The center of the site will contain a 7-level parking structure, the residences will be constructed around the garage, allowing residents to park on the same level as their home. This type of development is both ideal for the residents and screens and screens the parking structure from surrounding area views. Streets aren't wide enough to accommodate apartments. o We will work with our traffic engineers, architects and City staff to make the egress awayfrom Park Santiago community and towards Main Street. 3. Cowan Heights residents cut through our streets already. o We believeyou have a wonderful community and we will look into any means to mitigate this and any existing nuisance. 4. Nearby Apartments are not full and traffic is already miserable. o Santa Ana is among the worst cities in terms of housing shortages in the nation, in fact, Santa Ana's housing share of the housing stock in 2000 was 34% of the housing in the vicinity (including Santa Ana, Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Irvine, Tustin); however, by 2015 Santa Ana's share was down to 27%. As noted above, Santa Ana vacancy rate is less than 3%, it is virtually impossible to have a lower vacancy rate, it is clearly indicative of a housing under -supply. There have been countless studies and articles over the last 3.5 years documenting Orange County's housing shortage, resulting in folks paying far too much for housing, increasing traffic, increasing pollution, and destroying the quality of life (because people end up spending hours a day in their cars commuting). If Orange County's housing shortage is not solved, it will drive out workers and drag down the region's robust economy. Without more places for workers to live, more 20 and 30-somethings will leave and business will struggle to recruit high quality employees. S. Need to account for all the future apartments in Santa Ana and Orange in area in traffic analysis. o The traffic study area is extensive and will address the appropriate area as determined by City staff and will analyze up to 2040 traffic. 6. Need to assume 2 persons per apartment, this is Santa Ana, there won't be 1 person in an apartment. o We have taken into account data from apartment communities in determining the quantity of parking that is necessary to operate an organized and quality community. 7. There is a huge problem with cars running through Park Santiago now. o We will work with our traffic engineers, architects and City staff to make the egress awayfrom Park Santiago community and towards Main Street. 8. You think there will be a benefit of reduced traffic with apartments instead of commercial? o Ofce would create significantly more traffic than the existing use, for instance a 5-story buildings would generate approximately 10,000 daily trips compared to the approximately Z812 daily tripsfor the proposed residential use (if the existing building were fully occupied it would create approximatelyZ938 daily trips). 9. What is a trip? o The movement ofone car in or out. 10. How many trips anticipated for project? You have to assume 90% of people will leave in the morning and come home at same time in evening. o Based on the traffic engineer's study, the proposed project would generate Z812 trips per day, whereas the existing building iffully used would generate Z938 trips per day. 11. How many parking stalls are currently on site? o There are 441 stalls on site. 12. The number of parking spaces on site don't correlate to traffic. o Business uses highlight cars coming in and out all day, in addition, they have visitors and services that create trips throughout the day. Employees also contribute to the trip count with multiple daily trips. 13. Look at current traffic now. o Please keep in mind that the proposed project will result in less daily trips than the current structure would iffully leased and operational. 14. People park on our streets on Spurgeon now, it will get worse. o We are providing ample parking, it will exceed the parking needs of the project. In fact, we would be open to discussion of providing guest parking for the Park Santiago community. 15. Where will Discovery Science Center park? o The Discovery Science Center has plansfor anew garage on their rocket lot. Discovery Science Centerfully supports our project. 16. Take into consideration, Park Santiago only has three access points, traffic at Edgewood and Main is already impacted. o Our main egress will be off of Main Street. Residents leaving the project on Edgewood can only turn right out to Main. In addition, we are open to exploring other means to help any existing issues with cut-thrus. 17. More traffic will result in more accidents. o As stated previously, the current use produces more daily trips than the proposed use. 18. There should be no entrance to the project on Edgewood, keep project traffic on Main. o Our main egress will be off of Main Street. Residents leaving the project on Edgewood can only turn right out to Main. In addition, we are open to exploring other means to help any existing issues with cut-thrus. 19. Parking on neighborhood streets is already a problem. o 2525 N. Main is not in Park Santiago. Residents will be provided with ample parking on site. The logistics of parking blocks away from their homes makes little sense. Again, the community will be over -parked, not under -parked. 20. Can we see the traffic study? o The City will review the traffic analysis and it will be a part of the environmental document, which will be an EIR, which the community will be able to review and comment on as a part of the City review process. Affordable Housing: 1. What is a market rate unit? o It is housing that is either sold or leased at the price the market bears. 2. Would you save money including inclusionary housing? o No. 3. Will there be inclusionary housing, the application says there will below and very low units included? o When the application was submitted on site inclusionary was considered, but the project will propose to pay in -lieu fees and not include on site. 4. Have you made any promises to groups about affordable housing? o No, in our business we meet with affordable housing developers to see what projects are planned, This project will require payment of a fee in excess of$6,500,00 in order to subsidize much needed affordable housing throughout the City. Crime: No affordable units on site o It is not our current plan to provide any affordable units on site. Is there security on site? o Currently there are workers on site during the day, after dusk and until dawn we have on site security. 2. Is the property as is bringing crime to the neighborhood? o Yes, we have had significant vandalism and theft of copper pipes, copper wire and fixtures. The damage is in excess of hundreds of thousands of dollars. Currently there are dozens of vagrants camping/living in the riverbed and under the overpassfrom Main Street. 3. Increasing the population won't decrease crime. o Crime is simply a reality of a urban location. We believe putting residents at this location will result in a nighttime presence, especially in the park, thereby deterring crime. In addition, we will have 24 hour security that will patrol the park and Park Santiago (if the community would like this benefit provided). 4. 1.2 million a year to the General Fund will provide 3 police officers that is nothing. o This amount of revenue will provide significantly more than 3 officers. Importantly, the City, like most City's needs to find more sources of revenue to provide much needed services. The proposed project, unlike others, is a budget surplusfor the City, it is a wonderful opportunity to bring much needed professional housing to the City and additional iracai►rra Putting single family on the site will solve the crime issue. o We believe the more people the greater, in deterring crime in the area. We have one of the first neighborhood watch groups, why haven't you come to talk to us? o We have reached out to the communitygroup and to date they were not available to meet. It is insulting that you talk about crime in our neighborhood. o We are hopeful that crime will be mitigated in the future. Was there vandalism when the building was used as a call center? o We do not have a crime reportfor the area, we have made a requestfor any such reports. Environmental: 1. How many persons will the project bring? o Approximately 850 people. 2. We have a drought where will water come from? o Currently we are not in a drought, but we are aware historically ther has been an issue. We have verified that there is more than enough waterfor this and many other projects. In addition, this question will be addressed in the environmental review. 3. Look at all surrounding projects, will they be considered? o Existing and proposed development will be addressed in the environmental review. 4. What is the impact on current water supply? o This will be addressed in the environmental review. Other: 1. Are you on the Next Door site? o No. 2. Have you made any contributions to City Council persons, have you been promised anything? o The project entity has not and nothing has been promised. 3. Don't care if project brings money for Santa Ana, we shop in Orange. o We hope and suspect it is not the sentiment of the majority of the homeowners in Park Santiago. We want to make the community better than we found it and we are confident we will do that. Keep in mind that current Park Santiago residents will have access to all the onsite amenities, that includes pools, spas, full size gym, rock climbing wall, lounge, roof top pool and much more. 4. How many developments has Vineyard been involved in that required zone changes, were they successful? Did they back up to residential neighborhoods? o The ownership group has been involved in dozens of like projects, and many of these involved successfully rezoning. Many were adjacent to singlefamily homes and in our experience, this type ofzoning is most compatible with single family homes (not an office building). Most cities are planned with single family next to multi family, then retail and commercial uses (typically there is a mixed -sue area with multi family and commercial). This is why more than 3 years ago the City targeted this sitefor multi family housing nd this use would be most beneficial to the City. A recent project was approved at Dyer and Red Hill in an industrial area. S. Is the powerpoint available to the Park Santiago HOA? o We will shortly launch a website with all the information that we attempted to present at the Sunshine meeting. 6. Why didn't you meet with us before you submitted the application? o We tried to meet but the meeting agenda had already been set, we are trying to set a meeting soon. Will you meet with the HOA? o Yes. 8. We don't need this project for Santiago Park to be restored, we have paid taxes and City owes us the park restoration. o It is our understanding the City does not havefunding and certainly has not committed funds to rehab the park. The project will pay significant taxes thatgo directly to the City's generalfund. Sign In Sheet November 15, 2017 Name Email Phone No. 2. Yam+ co.`o�orn�cZ,�� lk�� e,A. Co,r-� 9gOq-g39-7311 3. S(-0- 00uic� 4.- 5. 6. 7. '11s7�? 2 8. nee i s �� �7�3 9. t c..� 13. o�r v n.a c c0 0// 14. O(er�6� 15- u p u 4a4-./sw �aksGel _•rld - :-o9L 16. li sFF L 1r'cAJC9-s1T"-cnC--@-MSAJ, eOA 17. //11,49- ��/�rZ(, Ylcr6cizN� ��IZ�a� �til 7tt(�3S-���� 18. /\j �� 4 19.5"uso� �vnz�T���susa��a5�vrnc,ta��ul �/r���000 �cvr�. 20. 23Z7�y�, 2 ar, UA4e �, sistev-i zEo a 51 oe �,n �a /4(,J s� � 2 3 . Rav�ol�`l.yn ►2Dssi olra,l fnr� 2yaCO (cOv►? C i )7-9f -2145 Cs ell Pkvi0 (T:z-a�f JAll Pc�j-Lc,La- Sta k e4c, f dd�) -s 4COO �po,) tao 1i�-c—N,co�A J ccJ /GLX; n of Pe aC'j4a4vo - C �Yn 3to-a-k-5--5 c5 shc- g ( ohc- (, r, P-7- r CO Av[ Kt C-kp—fe-R l C-1-'Aa koo . Cd`''-�, rL Sign In Sheet November 15, 2017 Name Email Phone No. a 1. 7 `�j -- q 7 2. Dr JtYl22i� �cr ' 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. �y\o, o� Pn ✓k1 w�,�w c✓�t 1 �� csa ✓v , 9. 75-tK LOA-LLAcc Coal Lu 2422rcnal��� t 7r�f ��/ 77 y 10. ►'nlcLoldo A*-ZA,-e- _7 <L/ 12. &J I r_ K CAsWi adTIT✓ �► �0`4 S-41 al-3 }- 14. _ 'i ►--c_ �, o w vU �---JIT 15. 0,41u t Ro-uk,,,A- +V'V 0 s ej� c� 16. ue Mc�onrilo( oldmcCkcaat0(C� sbLT bal. net 17. 18.tc 19. �� P� �C c�rmro� �rrw 20. ivy GUca c= M(t LI'07 �a,l vav I. co of jaivu Chapman J-usfir C hopman tva, Der P, l/ [ 6 w �c�5d� uaArLUa pt�66> E 17 CCU ��JiJ U �\A �� SQ a/,, fame, GInU�Incih�c�YwacQ. juSihvi , q 2to c @ c)rv,&' L cE� Aum VH0iv j d CSp„rts P C. M&Llq . t-o" e�,C�hi^oLV/?I �)kmn, Cz)� C,"c�Svus rGoclIL-4:btl• '74, ne1- s f nY /rs3 � sa as/ad�i. �Qf *0013,YG G-F-W.'I .Come IL s [oki-of\9 Qf�f I q cow) ctw'ds(oef-on @1 �► �toc�m �(�©✓12r��e2-� �rej5kav,Cowl Q7,an u4e Oft, I Sign In Sheet November 15, 2017 Name Email Phone No. 1. 71�-2fsS - 9EG- 3. 4. "` ✓�✓ �� a�Rp E c��.,�a. ��, 7/ y 6Zf Z 36 5.K6 r t2aw) 7. 7 M .0�� 3 rz,zq c4. OA -750� lzi« Shelir,wi -c—i — S cC7t�. .Jot, VZct<�-R-S Laura M �berr� �eG ivf 4'�eYlYll� Le�(Unge� r Kov) ca M 1 o QVYI I YKI Vl cLO� "en n M l J-e4 ►�Ne- µ--ec-44v - J �6:�d d I�e�Man Q,g V ICK-F-F—s - Jo F0 COVL S lain+e-h b"moil I . Cm, Sw eel j-p_n S3@�n�ia(I, t s�v► j CAOdu3Aere}� of alvc . Cam CC'cwtal ,.coAA Vvl 1Y l��L p "}M �1 Yl C6 Cot etAA vv'-a� (. o Jen/�nn � � n2cz�ertn ,c c�w1 �CXiv 4/ ifs C lM--gA9,arjF&WeGMniL. Ce Sign In Sheet November 15, 2017 Name Email Phone No. 1. t4 crf Vu.) 3. 4. 5 . rye Lam, �b reee L OIC1,10B c4c4 71 SS��Ycd 6. 7. 8. Z g Lf 9. 'ce.5 �'��I n�l�, Q�omq y,�3s6-6 3a. 10. A✓Giu I�iPL/V — {�ILLoN�I�LIzc/z 5(�G 6LaBAl NL'T 11. = t = A4— 12. tlalulvn iM. 13.�s1sl�� 14.Tnai c�rr Pin L� t� 3 ® corn 15. L iNAS*-`( 0NnPsaN1u 11 UND Re5l4s$O w.,4;1.c u.^, 16. 17. 18. _ 19. 9�y��a�.��� 20. n1✓��P�, Ts N� w y�; p a/-a-E O,mj�,( Q��k ,�JG ►G-b �70111 J 0 c o f ernav� Y fS� C Az b C,- r--- S 7� ✓ --lit S l! ✓� DA\)�p mkck�L GCk,lki Dmot, -TAk WV2�y %Oyo,- b:. ravel c)-Qs c , [ . � m ,m",�hejv wsit.CQiv Skcu c a,i-, eol�v�cCo-�� a�l c� ryt5a fr%(akg3���fl�2dvtnp�,cd� Ghr gta c vv-\ /may c A, Oe IGtW��9 S6C- �CJba(-b7CI J C����kih @ WebY'SqCoVv� Q ��ct✓�Ofd rota ✓l a l l-( cc) 6,"l k1J(:�-f tt It',- ksme //z &it ® a fixz�dm Sign In Sheet November 15, 2017 Name Email Phone No. 1. N%r,lyr\- Fadl2d- 74�3�-9o73 2. ��v 3.rQa/�runr 4. �an)�� �� �Sa� �t� Y\ rs n pp) �ioo CcT 6. � c` /lam; a 7 •/�C= 8. SG (.(�wLkL 0.S I L�]_� E x h (� Yid �(L e-- 9. 1-7 13. �6m ! rQ,lzs 14.e-E- 15. hApluE CAMCNp RA-ag8a 16. 17. 18. Alq q,- 2p 2(Au Gl u-4po-&77�> 19 . 1 F s I , ne�� -u (31 S-y -s-` - 20. 1_hr�S �i�l « Gkc,'11,AP eUrra, cow -7 S 9S _ L1131 N i 914 -c-�9a gavTy q(4, 9 47,1 Y v z IJ�UC' �KIc✓ 4<�k -71H SSA'-qa[J_ S'USan Purn'7-kNl jord-ei.n Ipurri �,1 c NLA .Dan gu 2AA� .ee,,- 6 f(4c, (le (9 O y/ a r(, e u .•z S r.1►a�� �r 6� G rn n� A r-cm� �az 01ti �SG.'( cow "yU, CUM Cu,'anpu y-fl y�Y1Gho�-na4-C. CGwt CJ )/Lt ha°.�dm '71Y 47r—J-77/ J u Ire of exane rer 3, .mac ql okal t2e f Sign In Sheet November 15, 2017 Name 1. 2. 3. 4. S. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Email Phone No. ep ` ogre l Ac"'i C.NFN,., Z7 C A%TN1ArL, com CLp 'om6r 4N9 LOO L&--x Zu III+a-b�,, caw, /raO-n L w- sa-irs� -5ICA Lc�L-L-!5P CLI, YAfi0o.cv,, Y)t,O co (ncSr EcO aAp V ri nex'. Ca Y) +ohtR k „@ s �c. ('iJ e plc t vie. 71 s477�s`J T- hO-A-C GW1a! P6-t/ot- �evot-dasr�c616Gal. net- 71 � --[4v4e",c C (4 4 - k L �j,>. p/,-, C(Ya- yIs J G;;l `�o��r5 ,0 g5 �l y.�v7 3?63 L157 �Ooe) ���(SGsf_o�Zy Y S6^le _C) F 2 52—t?y 4 2 till- ce33- 83�2 14� (�:,g�)t(3o ?iu 3o� 7izt s IIL4 iD5;�) qI CA96AZ -9ki�0a7LLcm ,cop, l/��s��,r��y��l � FXC�c � �u ov @ Gem), U,• e(o,l(a.awe.co cdn-� EXHIBIT 6 This page left blank intentionally. Via Electronic Mail DATE: October 10, 2019 TO: Jeremy Ogulnick 2525 MAIN ST LLC FROM: James Simon, Principal SUBJECT: SECOND ADDENDUM TO FISCAL IMPACT STUDY 256-UNIT ALTERNATIVE / 2525 MAIN STREET, SANTA ANA In December 2017, RSG provided 2525 Main LLC a fiscal and economic impact analysis of a 517-unit multifamily residential development proposed for the northeast corner of Main Street and Edgewood Lane, in the City of Santa Ana. The first addendum to the fiscal impact study was prepared based on a reduced project scope of 347 units on July 11, 2019. The most recent addendum study estimated that the 347 unit project would generate approximately $15.8 million in net new general fund tax revenues to the City over a 25-year period. RSG was recently informed that the developer is considering an even smaller project, roughly equivalent to half the original project scope, consisting of 256 multifamily residential units. This memorandum provides the approximate reduced impact of the project under this alternative, resulting in the following impacts to the City over a 25-year period: Gross recurring General Fund revenues of $16.6 million; General Fund operating impacts of $5.0 million Net new General Fund impacts of $11.6 million. Our forecast of these projected impacts accompanies this memorandum, which include cumulative 25 year projections and the net present value assuming a 4% discount rate. EXHIBIT 6 �x01010Eel di1[+79►F-3W&I6� 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET EIR NO. 2018-01, DA NO. 2018-01, GPA NO. 2018-06, AA NO. 2018-10 m Q U N M Q U z zQ Q � Z U U) W K LU W W z U) W Z z Q w � W Z LO LO LO N N R O-qT O � W O V V M 0 0 -qT N O V O M 0 M 0-qT O Y O W Ccl O O M W a LA M O O I1 M N O Lf M N f, � � W W O N O � f� � M M ll'l 00 N ll'l 'tt 'tt O O ll'l ' 4) Non monMV V A O O ll'l I z Y d z ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� ff� 1 LA Ln RV O CO CO V M F Ln Ln a;::- Ln V M CO O O M V F CO O M V O 00 = W O CO W CO = N = W M W N CO = r CO W M 0 N 0 0 0 M M CO = W CO CO r CO V M 0 COT N 0 O IT 00N� N N N 00M O 0 CO V CO Ln N O W �= M V V V Ln Ln CO CO r r W W O O O N M M V ------------------------ Ln CO CO EH EH EH EH EH EH EH EH EH EH EH UH UH UH UH UH UH UH UH UH 69 69 69 69 69 b V O O V L(7 ONO W N O Ln r O V M Ln O O W O M r O O � i 0 O CO r O CO W Cb 00 O N = O V O O N O N O CO O O 01 V M M CO CO O Ln M V W V V 0CO = O = CO V Ln O W O Ln V CO I W 0 N N CO CO I W O = M LO r O M CO O V W N r N H M O CO M O N C 0 O W O O = N V 0 CO r O O = M V 0 r W O= M 0 CO W O 0 � N M V V L(7 Ln Ln Ln Ln L(7 Ln Ln CO (O CO CO CO CO CO r � r r r r CO i X CO M W r M O M CO O= V CO MT O CO V n O CO CO O M R O V O r O T M V 0 r = 0 O COT N N M n W M O r n F V I O N 0 W= V r O V r V W N CO O V W M r N � N CO M M M M M 0 0 0 N N N M M V V V 0 0 CO CO 01 C 7 m Efl M V CO O r O 0 M W r 0 M V M CO N N MT 0 0 0 O R d O M O =V= N CO T CO N N CO V r Ln r V CO M 0 M r � Cp CO I CO O O N V CO O N CO O V O V O CO M O W CO 0 V V C Vl T n CO r O O N M 0 CO W O O N V 0 r O O N V CO OO 01 .O R M M M M M V V V V V V V V L(7 Ln Ln Ln Ln L(7 CO CO CO CO CO D 01 F N � � W 0 Efl r M 0 W N O M N W M W n n O M W O r 0 n O W 0 O L O O N O N O N O M N CO CO N N r O W V W = ' r O M r � CO O CO N CO Ln N O CO r CO CO r M CO O N Ln O V i X N V n CO W O N V 0 r O N V CO 000 N 0 r 0)IT'T W F IT IT 'T 'T 'T LO LO LO LO LO LO CO CO CO CO CO r � r r r 00 Y X r— W H O CO W W CO M N M W O M O W O CO O— M r 0 O R O 0 V O N= CO W r M CO CO M 00 N r N CO M O O D W CO F CO W O= M CO O M W V O r 0 M Cl) Cl) V LO W= LO r M= O y O V r = V r O V r= 0 CO N CO O V W N CO = n O V O V O J 0 0 0 CO CO CO � m W W O O O O O N N N N N N N N N O. C O — X CO O O CO M O N W W n O O r N M CO O N_ V O = O 0 R O M O M I0 N CO O N 0 M O O 00 M W Ln CO N O O CO M M r CO i � N Ln W 000 Ln M M N_ N IT CO CO O N Ln O I �N N N N N M M O 0 M O CO N O CO N O V N + Ln M V V L(7 Ln CO CO r� W W O O O N M M V Ln CO CO r CO i O O N M V Ln (O r CO O O N M V Ln (O r W O O N M V 0 N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M V V V V V 00000000000000000000000000 R 01 C�C�� N M V Ln(OI� COO � NNNN N M 00 I N M N � O 1 � � 1 O MT o 1 O W O i O O M LO W I � O � N 1 � � 00 N o M N O 06 07 ( h N N LO 'T LO LA d O 0 M O O M � N00 0 o� N M O N N CO N N O m 00 r C 00 LO LO d, d, N LO o m O O LO O V M f� M O LO M d, d, rn o LO W O O O 4 N LO m 00 V Q 0 Z 0) kiA This page left blank intentionally. 11/19/2018 EIR NO. 2018-01, DA NO. 2018-01 GPA NO. 2018-06.1 AA NO. 2018-10 -__ 2525 North Main Street Multi -family Residential Pri� li Zoning Zone Oescription Single-familyl itlence two-family Pe a ltlence �■ Su hi Apanmmt a■ Munroe-famiy llesidenw ■ f-in a con P. �,■ Commercial it-itlenf I ccienTic Plan ■ specific Development � ■ Planned Shopping Center sauth Main Street Commercial Difi ceminomry comwemiafmo.m. Disco¢ Cnmmnnilyrdnmeraial ■ Artermlfnmmertial aenera[D mmenual ■ lighlndnstnal ■ xeaw Inaeahial ■ ProFesioml � Gnremment ceaoer ■ open spare ■ General Agricohmal Labels: Zoning CODE . Y SD31 lRfv� R1 ILA. R1 Exhibit 7 - Vicinity Zoning & Aerial View Q) http://apps.spatialstream.com/production/dashboard/8/9/0/Current Bu iId/html/Reporting.html A (c) 2018 Diaital Mao Products. All rights reserved. 1 /1 This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 8 This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 8 SITE PHOTO 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET EIR NO. 2018-01, DA NO. 2018-01, GPA NO. 2018-06, AA NO. 2018-10 This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 9 This page left blank intentionally. -> m 110 EXHIBIT 9 SITE PLAN 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET EIR NO. 2018-01, DA NO. 2018-01, GPA NO. 2018-06, AA NO. 2018-10 This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 10 This page left blank intentionally. a ' 3c tt ;,I It 99 `s4pp,` EXHIBIT 10 TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET EIR NO. 2018-01, DA NO. 2018-01, GPA NO. 2018-06, AA NO. 2018-10 Im tt .a f EXHIBIT 10 TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET EIR NO. 2018-01, DA NO. 2018-01, GPA NO. 2018-06, AA NO. 2018-10 EXHIBIT 10 TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET EIR NO. 2018-01, DA NO. 2018-01, GPA NO. 2018-06, AA NO. 2018-10 This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 11 This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 11 ELEVATIONS 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET EIR NO. 2018-01, DA NO. 2018-01, GPA NO. 2018-06, AA NO. 2018-10 This page left blank intentionally. EXHIBIT 12 This page left blank intentionally. C EXHIBIT 12 RENDERINGS 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET EIR NO. 2018-01, DA NO. 2018-01, GPA NO. 2018-06, AA NO. 2018-10 EXHIBIT 12 RENDERINGS 2525 NORTH MAIN STREET EIR NO. 2018-01, DA NO. 2018-01, GPA NO. 2018-06, AA NO. 2018-10 EXHIBIT 13 This page left blank intentionally. § L _ % ( Q k ! �) §�) an awes ` `7 a AL ~ - � " - .........., - : » - » EXHIBIT g LANDSCAPE PLAN 22NORTH MAIN STREET EIR NO. 218-01, o NO. 21841, GPA Na 218-06,a NO. 21840 � This page left blank intentionally.