| LS 11.20.19 
<br />Resolution No. 2019-xx 
<br />Page 3 of 5 
<br />property within the proposed project.  Public access easements 
<br />currently exist on the properties since the site is the Civic Center 
<br />complex for the County of Orange.  The Applicant will be modifying 
<br />and maintaining all easements necessary to ensure reciprocal rights 
<br />between the properties, including but not limited to access, egress 
<br />and drainage. 
<br /> 
<br /> Section 2.  In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act the 
<br />recommended action is exempt from further review per Section 15315 (Class 15). This 
<br />Class 15 exemption allows for the division of property in urbanized areas zoned for 
<br />residential, commercial, or industrial use into four or fewer parcels when the division is 
<br />in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are 
<br />required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are 
<br />available, and does not contain an average slope of greater than 20 percent. 
<br /> As the project entails the subdivision of an existing parcel of land into two lots, 
<br />the buildings and sites will be in compliance with all provisions of the Municipal Code, 
<br />no adverse environmental impacts will result from the subdivision of land, the project 
<br />does not require any variances, and the proposal involves a relatively flat parcel, it has 
<br />been determined that the project will not have an effect on the environment, Categorical 
<br />Exemption Environmental Review No. 2018-139 will be filed for this project. 
<br />Section 3. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City 
<br />and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, 
<br />authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all 
<br />claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether 
<br />legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative 
<br />dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, 
<br />and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively “Actions”), 
<br />brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, 
<br />departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek 
<br />to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by 
<br />the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, 
<br />agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of 
<br />the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the 
<br />Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning 
<br />Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or 
<br />any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, 
<br />regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction.  It is expressly agreed 
<br />that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably 
<br />withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that Applicant shall 
<br />reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by 
<br />the City in the course of the defense.  City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any 
<br />Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. 
<br /> |