Laserfiche WebLink
LS 11.20.19 <br />Resolution No. 2019-xx <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />property within the proposed project. Public access easements <br />currently exist on the properties since the site is the Civic Center <br />complex for the County of Orange. The Applicant will be modifying <br />and maintaining all easements necessary to ensure reciprocal rights <br />between the properties, including but not limited to access, egress <br />and drainage. <br /> <br /> Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act the <br />recommended action is exempt from further review per Section 15315 (Class 15). This <br />Class 15 exemption allows for the division of property in urbanized areas zoned for <br />residential, commercial, or industrial use into four or fewer parcels when the division is <br />in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are <br />required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are <br />available, and does not contain an average slope of greater than 20 percent. <br /> As the project entails the subdivision of an existing parcel of land into two lots, <br />the buildings and sites will be in compliance with all provisions of the Municipal Code, <br />no adverse environmental impacts will result from the subdivision of land, the project <br />does not require any variances, and the proposal involves a relatively flat parcel, it has <br />been determined that the project will not have an effect on the environment, Categorical <br />Exemption Environmental Review No. 2018-139 will be filed for this project. <br />Section 3. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City <br />and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, <br />authorized volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all <br />claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other and proceedings (whether <br />legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative <br />dispute resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, <br />and such other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively “Actions”), <br />brought against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, <br />departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek <br />to modify, set aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by <br />the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, <br />agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of <br />the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the <br />Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning <br />Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or <br />any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, <br />regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed <br />that the City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably <br />withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that Applicant shall <br />reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by <br />the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any <br />Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. <br />