Laserfiche WebLink
WHEREAS, the requested General Plan Amendment would change the <br />General Plan land use designation of the property from Professional and <br />Administrative Office (PAO) to District Center (DC) and to update text portions of the <br />City's Land Use Element to reflect this change in order to allow for development of the <br />multi -family housing Project; and <br />WHEREAS, Environmental Impact Report No. 2018-01 (State Clearinghouse <br />No. 2018021031) for the proposed Project was circulated between August 7, 2018 <br />and October 4, 2018; and <br />WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts related to <br />the proposed amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element; and <br />WHEREAS, on February 2, 2018, the City invited recognized Native American <br />tribes to engage in consultation regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment <br />pursuant to Government Code Section 65352.3; and <br />WHEREAS, on February 8, 2018, the City received a request for consultation <br />from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation and a conference call <br />between the City and Chairman Salas occurred on March 15, 2018 during which the <br />history of uses and development of the Project Site and the depth of previous and <br />existing infrastructure on the site was discussed. On March 21, 2018 additional <br />information in follow up of the meeting was sent to Chairman Salas. Chairman Salas <br />did not respond to the City with any information or evidence pertaining to Tribal <br />Cultural Resources; and <br />WHEREAS, on August 27, 2018, the Planning Commission conducted a work <br />study session to overview the Project and thirty-two (32) verbal comments were <br />received (three (3) in support and twenty-nine (29) in opposition) and nine (9) written <br />comments were received (one (1) in support and eight (8) in opposition); and <br />WHEREAS, on November 26, 2018, the Planning Commission continued a duly <br />noticed public hearing for the project to January 14, 2019 and held a second study <br />session to overview the Project and fifty-eight (58) verbal comments were received <br />(twenty-five (25) in support; thirty-one (31) in opposition and two (2) neutral) and <br />eleven (11) written comments were received (two (2) in support and nine (9) in <br />opposition); and <br />WHEREAS, on January 14, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly <br />noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, <br />General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and <br />solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, seventy-nine (79) members of the <br />public spoke on the item, thirty (30) speakers supported the project, forty-eight (48) <br />opposed it and one speaker was neutral. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, <br />the public, the Applicant, and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission <br />voted to recommend that the City Council does not certify the EIR, adopt the findings, <br />Resolution No. 2019-108 <br />Page 2 of 11 <br />