My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-107 - Proposed Addington Multi-Family Residential Project
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2019
>
2019-107 - Proposed Addington Multi-Family Residential Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2020 11:44:22 AM
Creation date
11/25/2019 11:00:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2019-107
Date
11/19/2019
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
holes as needed. Start augur holes at three times the trunk diameter, i.e. 6-feet from a 24-inch tree. <br />Back fill with amended soil, based on an agronomic lab's testing and recommendations. <br />• Prior to construction, mulch all exposed soil areas using a topical application of a well -composted, <br />coarse -texture mulch, without manure or bio-solids, e.g. Aguinaga Forest Floor'/2 to 11/2" particle <br />size. Apply it 2-inches deep, but not against the tree trunks. <br />• Deep water before construction and check soil moisture monthly during construction by means of <br />a soil test probe. Slow water with a soaker hose or water spike for 12 hours, or as long as necessary <br />to reach 4-feet deep. <br />• Rinse tree foliage at the end of each work week, using a strong stream of water from a high- <br />pressure nozzle. <br />• During construction in areas without pavement near the preserved trees, 3 or more inches of coarse <br />mulch or tree chips under 1-inch plywood for light vehicle parking and steel plates for larger <br />vehicles is required to prevent compaction and protect surface roots. <br />• Protection Barrier: A protection barrier shall be installed around the trees to be preserved. The <br />barrier shall be constructed of durable fencing material, such as chain link fencing. The barrier <br />shall be placed as far from the base of the tree(s) as possible and shall be maintained in good repair <br />throughout the duration of construction, and shall not be removed, relocated, or encroached upon <br />without permission of the Project arborist. <br />o Storage of Materials: There shall be NO storage of materials or supplies of any kind within the <br />area of the protection barriers. Concrete and cement materials, block, stone, sand and soil shall <br />not be placed within the drip -line of the tree. <br />o Fuel Storage: Fuel storage shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of any tree to be preserved. <br />Refueling, servicing and maintenance of equipment and machinery shall NOT be permitted <br />within 150 feet of the protected trees. <br />o Debris and Waste Materials: Debris and waste from construction or other activities shall NOT <br />be permitted within protected areas. Wash down of concrete or cement handling equipment, in <br />particular, shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of protected trees. <br />• Any damages or injuries should be reported to the Project arborist as soon as possible. Severed <br />roots shall be pruned cleanly to healthy tissue, using proper pruning tools. Broken branches or <br />limbs shall be pruned according to International Society of Arboriculture Pruning Guidelines and <br />ANSI A-300 Pruning Standards. <br />However, even with implementation of the PDF-I and Mitigation Measure AES-1, the Project would still <br />result in a substantial difference in scale, height, and property setbacks that is considered significant <br />pursuant to the City's criteria. As a result, impacts related to existing visual character or quality of the site <br />would be significant and unavoidable. (DEIR, pp. 4.1-16 through 4.1-26.) <br />Consistent with the methodology in the EIR, photo -simulations were also prepared to demonstrate the <br />degree of visual change that would result from implementation of the Modified Project. The photo - <br />simulations show that, as described in the FIR, the Modified Project would alter the existing views by <br />development of forefront residential buildings that would result in a substantial difference in scale, height, <br />and property setbacks that is considered significant pursuant to the City's criteria related to visual <br />character from specific viewpoints. However, the Modified Project would be lower in height and smaller <br />in scale than the Original Project. The contrast in views that would occur from implementation of the <br />Modified Project is less than what would occur from the Original Project. Thus; although impacts related <br />to specific viewpoints would remain significant and unavoidable, no new or greater impacts would occur <br />from implementation of the Modified Project. (Final EIR, Clarifications to the Final EK Section 3.1.) <br />Resolution No. Page 13 of 76 <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.