Laserfiche WebLink
LS 11.19.19 <br />session to overview the Project and fifty-eight (58) verbal comments were received <br />(twenty-five (25) in support; thirty (31) in opposition and two (2) neutral) and eleven (11) <br />written comments were received (two (2) in support and nine (9) in opposition); and <br />WHEREAS, on January 14, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly <br />noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, <br />General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and <br />solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, seventy-nine (79) members of the <br />public spoke on the item, thirty (30) speakers supported the project, forty-eight (48) <br />opposed it and one speaker was neutral. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, <br />the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to <br />recommend that the City Council not certify the EIR or adopt the findings, the statement <br />of overriding considerations and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program and <br />deny the Project; and <br />WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed <br />public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan <br />Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited <br />comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-one (61) members of the public spoke on <br />the item, thirty-eight (38) speakers supported the project, twenty (20) speakers opposed <br />it and three (3) speakers were neutral and the public hearing was continued to the next <br />regular adjourned City Council meeting on February 19, 2019; and <br />WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, the City Council continued to conduct the <br />duly noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, <br />General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and <br />solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, one hundred and thirty-one (131) <br />members of the public spoke on the item, twenty-six (26) speakers supported the <br />project and one hundred and five (105) speakers opposed it. Furthermore, one hundred <br />and sixty-six (166) written comments were received with nine (9) in support and one <br />hundred and fifty-seven (157) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from <br />staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted that the <br />applications go back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration after further <br />consultation with the community; and <br />WHEREAS, in June 2019, the applicant submitted a revised plan consisting of <br />development 347 multi -family units (59 dwelling units per acre), with 642 parking spaces <br />(1.85 parking spaces per unit) and parking capacity at 2.0 spaces per unit, within a 4- <br />story residential building wrapped around a five -level parking structure with an amenity <br />deck on the sixth -level, private open space, and redesigned the intersection of Main <br />Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive to provide access to the project on a 5.93- <br />acre site (the "June Revised Plan"); and <br />WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly <br />noticed public hearing to consider the June Revised Plan. At the meeting, seventy- <br />seven (77) members of the expressed opposition; nine (9) supported the project, and <br />Resolution No. 2019-107 <br />Page 5 of 11 <br />