My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDANCE - 20E
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
11/19/2019
>
CORRESPONDANCE - 20E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 3:16:37 PM
Creation date
11/27/2019 7:44:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
11/19/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Action entitled "APPROVE APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT AND PURCHASE AND <br />SALE AGREEMENT FOR PORTIONS OF CITY -OWNED REAL PROPERTY AT 1301 <br />AND 1305 WEST 12TH STREET FOR BRISTOL STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT PHASE <br />3A," the City states, "[t]he portions of these properties that will remain after the Bristol <br />Street Improvements are completed, and which will not be used by the project, are being <br />held for purposes of exchange or sale" (emphasis added.). The City cannot now assert that <br />"exchange" and "sale" of other remnant Bristol corridor properties are the same thing. <br />IV. Any Contractual Obligation the City May Have to Sell the Parcels Cannot <br />Override the City's Obligations Under the Act <br />In the course of discussion of the Staff Report during the February 19, 2019 City Council <br />meeting, the Executive Director of the City's Public Works Agency, Fuad Sweiss, appeared <br />to represent that the City is obligated, as a condition of receipt of funds used for acquisition, <br />to sell the Parcels. Mr. Sweiss further appeared to suggest that, in order to honor that <br />funding obligation, the City was determined to avoid any obligations it might have under <br />the Act. <br />The Act contains no exception for land subject to the sort of funding obligations Mr. Sweiss <br />describes. And, of course, the City cannot contract around its statutory obligations. <br />Notably, it is not clear what obligations Mr. Sweiss was referencing in his remarks to the <br />City Council. He specifically referred to "transportation funding," but the agreement <br />between the Orange County Transportation Authority and the City under which the <br />Authority provided funding for Phases I and II of the Bristol Street Widening Project <br />expressly provides that the City has no obligation to sell parcels acquired for, but not used <br />in, the Project. See Cooperative Agreement for the Bristol Street Widening Project between <br />Orange County Transportation Authority and City of Santa Ana, Agreement No. C-6-0069, <br />Article 4, Section D ("Nothing contained herein obligates the CITY to sell such surplus <br />property or guarantees any particular amount of fund returned to AUTHORITY."). <br />Conclusion <br />Thank you for your consideration of these concerns. OCCORD hopes to resolve these <br />concerns without resort to legal action. OCCORD's leadership would be pleased to meet <br />with City officials to engage in productive dialogue regarding how the City will comply with <br />the Act in connection with its disposition of the Parcels. We look forward to further <br />conversation regarding this important matter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.