My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11A - 2525 SECOND HEARING
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
12/03/2019
>
11A - 2525 SECOND HEARING
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/27/2019 1:54:46 PM
Creation date
11/27/2019 12:03:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
11A
Date
12/3/2019
Destruction Year
2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
six (166) written comments were received with nine (9) in support and one hundred and <br />fifty-seven (157) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public <br />and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted that the applications go back to <br />the Planning Commission for reconsideration after further consultation with the <br />community; and <br />WHEREAS, in June 2019, the applicant submitted a revised plan consisting of <br />development 347 multi -family units (59 dwelling units per acre), with 642 parking spaces <br />(1.85 parking spaces per unit) and parking capacity at 2.0 spaces per unit, within a 4- <br />story residential building wrapped around a five -level parking structure with an amenity <br />deck on the sixth -level, private open space, and redesigned the intersection of Main <br />Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park Drive to provide access to the project on a 5.93- <br />acre site (the "June Revised Plan"); and <br />WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly <br />noticed public hearing to consider the June Revised Plan. At the meeting, seventy-seven <br />(77) members of the expressed opposition; nine (9) supported the project, and one <br />speaker was neutral. In addition, one -hundred (100) written comments were received with <br />six (6) in support and ninety-four (94) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony <br />from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission vote <br />resulted in an impasse; and <br />WHEREAS, in October 2019, in response to comments received the applicant <br />submitted a further revised plan, including redevelopment of the 5.93-acre site with <br />444,534 square feet of total development, including 277,281 square feet of residential <br />buildings that would provide 256 for -rent multi -family residential units and a 167,253 <br />square foot central parking structure and a 284 space surface level parking lot which <br />also reduced the Project's height, increased the Project's setbacks, and modified the <br />Project entrance ("October Modified Project"); and <br />WHEREAS, on October 28, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a duly <br />noticed public hearing to consider the EIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, <br />General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and <br />solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-two (62) expressed opposition and <br />two (2) in expressed support the project. In addition, ninety-eight (98) individuals <br />submitted comments with ninety-four (94) in opposition and four (4) in support; and <br />WHEREAS, after hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the <br />City's consultant team, the Planning Commission by a vote of 3:2, voted to recommend <br />denial of the project. Since the entitlements require final action by the City Council, the <br />actions were forwarded to the City Council; and <br />WHEREAS, on November 8, 2019, the City gave public notice of a City Council <br />public hearing for consideration of Development Agreement No. 2018-01 by advertising <br />in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation, and by mailing to <br />owners of property and residents within 500 feet of the Project; and <br />Ordinance NS-2979 <br />Page 3 of 10 <br />#191680 <br />11 A-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.