My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 60A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
12/03/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 60A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 3:35:28 PM
Creation date
12/2/2019 12:02:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
12/3/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Per Employee by Business Type.30 Thus, we calculated a service population of 653. Dividing the Project's <br />emissions by a service population value of 653 people, we find that the Project would emit <br />approximately 3.9 MT CO2e/SP/year. When we apply the Project's GHG emissions to the SCAQMD's 3.0 <br />MTCO2e/year threshold for the 2035 target, we find that the Project's emissions would exceed the <br />threshold (see table below). <br />Project Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />Proposed <br />Project Phase Project (MT <br />COze/year) <br />Construction (amortized over 30 years) <br />35.5 <br />Area <br />56.9 <br />Energy <br />713.7 <br />Mobile <br />1661.8 <br />Waste <br />57.9 <br />Water <br />39.3 <br />Total <br />2565.2 <br />Service Population <br />653.3 <br />Service Population Efficiency <br />3.9 <br />Efficiency Threshold <br />3.0 <br />Exceed? <br />Yes <br />As the table above demonstrates, when correct input parameters are used to model Project emissions, <br />the Project's total GHG emissions exceed the SCAQMD efficiency threshold of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, <br />thus resulting in a significant impact not previously assessed or identified in the Addendum. As a result, <br />an updated GHG analysis should be prepared in a Project -specific Addendum and additional mitigation <br />should be incorporated into the Project, such as those listed below. <br />SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become <br />available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional <br />information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of <br />care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants <br />practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is <br />made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing <br />results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was <br />reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or <br />otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by <br />third parties. <br />30USGBC (May 2008), https://www.usgbc.org/drupaI/legacy/usgbc/docs/Archive/General/Docs4111.pdf. <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.