My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDANCE - 11A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
12/03/2019
>
CORRESPONDANCE - 11A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 3:35:28 PM
Creation date
12/2/2019 12:26:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
12/3/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Questions and Concerns with the Project at 2525 Main Street <br />1.How can City Council approve 2525 when part of the project sits on public parkland? <br />• Why was this use of parkland not clearly disclosed? <br />• I could not find any mention of this encroachment within the development agreement (outside <br />of a blurry Landscape Plan) <br />• Santiago Park (like some other parks in Santa Ana) is under a Land and Water Conservation <br />Grant. Any change of park boundary must be approved at the state and federal level in advance <br />of a land transfer. <br />siws®sWMMV <br />Existing Santiago PoI ark bundary <br />6' HT. TUBULAR STEEL FENCE <br />RELOCATED TO NEW PARK <br />LIMITS <br />Detail from City Council November 19, 2019 Item 75D Staff Report - Landscape Submittal 1R, submitted <br />November 19, 2019, long after the deadline: <br />https://santaana.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view id=2&clip id=2542&meta id=103115 <br />2. How can the developer be awarded a non-competitive contract to design, engineer, and build the <br />Santiago Park renovation when his specialty is high density housing developments, not park design or <br />construction? This is in the development agreement. <br />• Park design and construction is a specialty field <br />• The $250,000 Coastal Conservancy grant that the city of Santa Ana was just awarded did so on <br />the strength of Santa Ana's record of competitive contracts <br />• The grant requires information on the qualifications of the contractors and detailed plans, <br />budgets and timelines <br />• How can we be honest and operate in good faith with the Coastal Conservancy and give the <br />work to the 2525 developer? <br />• How will this be viewed in future grant applications? <br />If the developer has twice tried to fold park land into his project, is it wise to allow him to construct <br />both projects at the same time? <br />In the end, will he just be building a fancy greenbelt for his apartments that will be maintained at the <br />public's expense? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.