My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 11A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
12/17/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 11A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 3:35:04 PM
Creation date
12/16/2019 10:17:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
12/18/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MARK A. ROTHENBERG, ESQ. <br />2042 NORTH ROSS STREET <br />SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 <br />MARK 1 1 AA@M E.COM <br />November 18, 2019 <br />VIA EMAIL <br />Ms. Selena Kelaher <br />Associate Planner <br />Planning and Building Agency <br />City of Santa Ana <br />PO Box 1988 <br />Santa Ana, California 92702 <br />Re: Letter of Objection/Comments/Magnolia at the Park/Draft EIR (State Clearing <br />House No. 2018021031-Santa Ana DP No. 2017-34 <br />Dear Mr. Kelaher: <br />This letter supplements my prior written policy and legal objections to the proposed 2525 <br />North Main Street Project (the "Project") dated September 12, 2018 (incorporated and restated <br />herein despite the project's modifications). The Project subordinates adjacent neighborhoods to <br />the blight associated with an overly intensive, under -parked, and aesthetically uninteresting <br />development. I am a resident of Santa Ana, a land use practitioner and professor of land use law. <br />My prior letter was not adequately responded to in the EIR and the issues raised continue to plague <br />the redesigned project. In addition and as summarized below, the amendment to the General Plan, <br />re -zoning and adoption of the development agreement constitute extraordinarily poor planning <br />and appear violative of California law (including the Brown Act). <br />Request for Deferral to Mid -January <br />As a threshold matter, the City has scheduled consideration of the Project on November <br />211 (one week prior to Thanksgiving). Given the magnitude and lasting impacts associated with <br />the City's decision and the arrival of the Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Years, I respectfully <br />request that the City defer consideration of the application until mid -January to ensure that all <br />impacted residents are afforded a reasonable opportunity to offer comment and attend Council <br />meetings. As explained below, the description of the project in notices must be revised to reflect <br />the shifting of a portion of the Discovery Cube's business operations (parking) to the Project site. <br />Piecemeal General Planning <br />The subject property is a marquis property in the City. Unfortunately, the City has not <br />completed its General Plan update. From information available online, it appears that the City's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.