My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
60A - 2ND READING NO. 2018-01 2525 MAIN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
01/21/2020
>
60A - 2ND READING NO. 2018-01 2525 MAIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2020 3:19:51 PM
Creation date
1/16/2020 6:41:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
60A
Date
1/21/2020
Destruction Year
2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Second Reading: Development Agreement No. 2018-01/Amendment Application No. 2018-10; or <br />Direct Staff to Prepare an Initiative Measure for City Council Consideration <br />January 21, 2020 <br />Page 2 <br />Since the December 17th City Council meeting, two significant developments have come to light. <br />On December 19, 2019, Santa Ana Citizens for Responsible Development (SACRD) filed a <br />petition for complaint and declaratory relief with the Superior Court of California alleging a <br />violation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by the City, the applicant, and the <br />Discovery Cube. In addition, members of the City Council have sought information on how to <br />submit the zone change and development agreement to the voters of Santa Ana as an initiative <br />measure. These two issues are further discussed below. <br />2019 SACRD CEQA Petition: SACRD has filed a lawsuit alleging the City violated CEQA by not <br />adequately studying potential environmental impacts to adjacent neighborhoods. The City is <br />named as the defendant and the developer and Discovery Cube are named as real parties in <br />interest. The developer's attorney is preparing a defense of this lawsuit as the developer agreed <br />to defend and indemnify the City. <br />City Council Initiative Measure: In accordance with California Election Code Section 9222, the <br />City Council may direct staff to prepare and submit an initiative measure putting the approval of <br />the zone change and development agreement to the voters of Santa Ana. The submission <br />process has preparation requirements and deadlines dictating when the issue may be submitted <br />to the voters either as a special election or as part of a regular election. <br />Based on the requirements and deadlines, a special election can be held in June, July or August <br />2020. The total cost of putting an initiative measure to the voters at a special election will come at <br />an estimated cost of $650,000 or more and the costs would be entirely borne by the City. The <br />alternative to a special election is to prepare an initiative measure for the next regular election on <br />November 3, 2020. This would eliminate the cost to the City associated with calling for a special <br />election. <br />If the City Council desires to pursue the initiative alternative, the City Council should direct staff to <br />prepare the proposed ballot measure and resolutions calling for an election. <br />STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT <br />Approval of this item supports Goal No. 3 - Economic Development, Objective No. 2 (create new <br />opportunities for business/job growth and encourage private development through new General <br />Plan and Zoning Ordinance policies). <br />Daisy Gomez <br />Clerk of the Council <br />Sonia Carvalho <br />City Attorney <br />60A-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.