Laserfiche WebLink
(Xw <br />Wr <br />WZ <br />�O <br />3J <br />W J <br />ZO <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />herein along with all other issues raised during the administrative process for the Project's <br />approvals. <br />25. On November 19, 2019, despite opposition from the community, Petitioner's <br />members, and the Planning Commission, the City Council adopted Resolution 2019-107 <br />("Resolution"). The Resolution certifies the Final EIR: <br />[A]dopting findings of fact pursuant to [CEQA], adopting a <br />Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopting the <br />Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; conducted first <br />reading of an ordinance approving Development Agreement No. <br />2018-01, as amended; adopted a resolution approving General Plan <br />Amendment No. 2018-06; and Conducted first reading of an <br />ordinance approving Amendment Application 2018-10 for Specific <br />Development No. 93. <br />(See Notice of Determination, filed Nov. 20, 2019.) <br />26. The Resolution states that the "EIR" consists of the Final EIR, Clarifications to the <br />Final EIR, as well as the Draft EIR (as modified by the Final EIR) ("EIR"). <br />27. The EIR does not, as discussed in detail in the comments submitted by Petitioner's <br />members, among others, and incorporated by reference herein, effectively study, determine, or <br />evaluate recent changes made to the Project. Instead, the EIR focuses on the Initial Plan and <br />description —a completely different project than that finally contemplated. <br />28. The EIR also fails to sufficiently evaluate, determine, and mitigate for the <br />Project's environmental impacts, as outlined in the comments incorporated by reference herein. <br />The EIR, for the first time, incorporates substantial and significant new information and analyses <br />that must be allowed to undergo further public review. <br />29. For example, the Project for the first time proposes an offset intersection <br />configuration at Walkie Way and Main St., as well as a proposed new curb cut into the Project's <br />parking lot on Main —extremely close to the Main St. and Edgewood intersection. <br />30. The Project's technical studies acknowledge that this change will add traffic to the <br />preexisting backup traffic, but fail to evaluate or mitigate for the same in the EIR. <br />31. Additionally, the EIR for the first time appears to include an Arborist Report as a <br />designed mitigation measure with respect to the existing mature trees that the Project would <br />4516.101 18560319.1 - 7 - <br />VERIFIED PETMON FOR WRIT OF MANDATE/MANDAMUS <br />