My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDANCE - 60A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
01/21/2020
>
CORRESPONDANCE - 60A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2020 12:12:41 PM
Creation date
1/21/2020 8:33:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
60A
Date
1/21/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, uAOMN vlw L` N-I--K <br />NEWMEYER <br />DILLIDN 0s <br />November 18, 2019 <br />Charles S. Krolikowski <br />Charles.Krolikowski@ndlf.com <br />VIA HAND DELIVERY AT MEETING <br />VIA E-MAIL CITYCOUNCIL@SANTA-ANA.ORG <br />Santa Ana City Council <br />20 Civic Center Plaza <br />P.O. Box 1988, M31 <br />Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br />Re: Magnolia at the Park Multi -Family Residential Project (the "Addington") <br />Located at 2525 N. Main Street <br />Final Environmental Impact Report, No. 2018-01 (SCH No. 2018021031) <br />Honorable Mayor Pulido and Members of the City Council: <br />This office represents the Park Santiago Neighborhood Association ("PSNA"), a <br />coalition of interested property owners located in the City of Santa Ana ("City"), within <br />the zone of impacts of the proposed residential development project commonly referred <br />to as Magnolia at the Park Multi -Family Residential Project or the Addington, located at <br />2525 N. Main Street Project"). This letter addresses AC 2525 Main LLC's ("Applicant") <br />appeal of the City of Santa Ana Planning Commission's ("Planning Commission") recent <br />denial of the Proposed Project at its meeting on October 28, 2019. <br />PSNA is concerned regarding the Applicant's continued pursuit of approvals that do not <br />conform to the policies and objectives of the City's General Plan and its efforts to do so <br />by way of bribing adjacent property owners. In addition, the City's continued willingness <br />to consider a high density multi -family residential development in an area where it would <br />not mesh raises concerns as to why the City has not asked the Applicant to consider <br />other viable development options for the site that would not have a detrimental effect on <br />the community and that would conform with the policies and objectives of the General <br />Plan. <br />PSNA respectfully requests that the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council <br />("City Council") affirm the Planning Commission's denial, in accordance with <br />recommendation one in the Staff Report. PSNA submits that the Planning Commission <br />correctly rejected the modified Project. Indeed, despite multiple revisions, the Project <br />remains grossly inconsistent with the City of Santa Ana's General Plan and the <br />character of the surrounding community. At the same time, the Project documents <br />4398.101/ 8504501.2 <br />newmeverdillion co <br />01%ell <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.