Laserfiche WebLink
Honorable Mayor Pulido <br />Santa Ana City Council <br />November 18, 2019 <br />Page 12 <br />Finally, notice regarding the City Council's potential action on a matter that required the <br />recommendation from the Planning Commission cannot be given until afterthe <br />Planning Commission has issued its recommendation. Failure to do so results in <br />inadequate notice under established law. Here, only the staff report contained the <br />recommendation from the Planning Commission —not the earlier, defective notice. As <br />the courts have explained, notice without those recommendations is patently <br />insufficient: <br />As we will explain, section 65856 is silent on the timing of <br />the notice and therefore creates an ambiguity as to when, in <br />relation the planning commission's recommendation, the <br />notice may be given. As we will further explain, a <br />construction of section 65856's notice provision is <br />inextricably bound with what must be included in that notice, <br />a question that must be answered by looking to section <br />65094, which states that the contents of that notice must <br />include a "general explanation of the matter to be <br />considered." Consistent with the purpose behind the <br />Planning and Zoning Law, we will interpret the phrase <br />"general explanation of the matter to be considered" to <br />include the planning commission's recommendation. <br />Therefore, notice of a legislative body's hearing cannot be <br />given until the planning commission has made a <br />recommendation on the matter under consideration. <br />(Environmental Defense Project of Sierra County v. County of Sierra (2008) 158 <br />Cal.App.4th 877, 888, as modified (Jan. 9, 2008).) <br />Because inaccurate notice is akin to no notice at all, the Project cannot go forward on <br />the defective notice issued without the requisite recommendations from the Planning <br />Commission. (Drum v. Fresno County Dept. of Public Works, supra, 144 Cal.App.3d at <br />p. 783.) <br />7. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS AND REQUEST FOR WRITTEN NOTICE <br />For the foregoing reasons, among others, PSNA respectfully requests that the City <br />Council deny the proposed Project, consistent with the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation. Additionally, PSNA reserves its rights to submit further public <br />comment at and up to the close of the record on the Project and requests formal, written <br />notice in advance of any future meetings or notices of determination related to the <br />Project. <br />4398.101 / 8504501.2 <br />