My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3 - WORK STUDY_114 AND 117 EAST FIFTH STREET_COMMENT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2019
>
10-14-19
>
3 - WORK STUDY_114 AND 117 EAST FIFTH STREET_COMMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2020 3:30:01 PM
Creation date
1/27/2020 3:29:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
with the building since 1931. Tim also remarked that the local preservation organizations had <br />not been asked for their input in the process until recently, too late in the process to have <br />any meaningful input. <br />Possible salvage of historic fragments? <br />Mike McCann stated that in addition to allowing photo documentation of the buildings, Toll <br />Bros. could also allow for a 90-day on-site salvage and perhaps support the salvage effort with <br />manpower, tools, trucks, etc. Robert Imboden stated that typically, POC does not engage in <br />salvage efforts as a means of mitigating demolition. Alison Young of Santa Ana Historical <br />Preservation Society said, that although there is precedent for their nonprofit to receive <br />rights to historical salvage, SAHPS did not have the resources to take or store historic <br />fragments of this building, as Mike McCann had offered to allow preservationists to do. She <br />also said that she hoped interior elements, such as a stairway, might be considered to be <br />incorporated into the new project. <br />Toll Bros. considers moving historic building to out-of-county school campus <br />Mike McCann said that Toll Bros. had been in conversation with an out-of-county school, which <br />had expressed interest in taking the historic First American building facade for their campus <br />to provide a historic character and sense of place. <br />Preservation could be limited to two facades, not entire structure: <br />Tim Rush drew a diagram of the property which included the two older buildings that are <br />currently on the site. He stated that POC understands that complete retention/preservation <br />of those buildings was most likely not viable within the proposed project. He proposed, <br />however, that if an investigation shows that the original 1931 building is still in good condition <br />beneath the applied metal panels, the north and west walls of the First American building <br />could be incorporated into the new development on the corner of Main and Fifth. While this <br />not an ideal preservation outcome (the better solution would be to preserve and incorporate <br />the entire building, plus the neighboring historic structure immediately to the south), Tim <br />Rush stated that at this point in the process the incorporation of these preserved facades <br />could be acceptable to POC. <br />Toll Brothers’ issues re: preservation: <br />Mike McCann said that he would consider consulting an historic preservation architect. He was <br />not in favor of a limited demolition to take off part of the metal screening to assess what <br />remains of the original building underneath though, stating that the building is still owned by <br />and under the control of First American, not Toll Brothers. He was also not in favor of altering <br />the currently proposed design, stating that it would be costly, and that the project’s <br />feasibility is based on a thin profit margin. He also indicated that Toll Bros. would not carry <br />out the limited demolition, due to the cost of a hazardous materials survey (which could cost <br />$20,000) and remediation for the entire property.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.