Laserfiche WebLink
Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project <br />The Modified Project would consist of the same uses as the Original Project and would require the same General Plan <br />and zoning amendments for implementation. Like the Original Project, and although 240 fewer residential units (48.4 <br />percent) would be developed, the Modified Project would implement many of the SCAG policies related to high- <br />density, infill development, improvement of the job/housing balance, and use of green building measures, such as <br />water efficiency and LID features. Therefore, implementation of the Modified Project would also not result in conflict <br />with SCAG policies. <br /> <br />The Modified Project would also require a General Plan Land Use Amendment to change the land use designation <br />from PAO (Professional & Administration Office) to District Center (DC) to allow for multi-family uses, which would <br />continue to be consistent with the existing DC land uses to the north of Santiago Park and to the southwest across the <br />I-5 freeway. <br /> <br />Although the Modified Project under the proposed DC designation would also result in a different type and higher <br />intensity of residential units than the adjacent LR-7 designated Park Santiago neighborhood area, the Modified Project <br />(that includes 58 units per acre, not including the OC Discovery Cube shared parking area of 1.42 acres) would be 26 <br />units per acre lower in density than the Original Project that included 84 units per acre. The Modified Project would <br />provide residences in structures that are a maximum of 4-stories high (one less story than the 5-story residential <br />structures proposed by the Original Project). In addition, 2-story buildings would be located along the eastern side of <br />the Project and 3-story buildings would be located behind the 2-story buildings to provide a transition between N. Main <br />Street, the taller Project structures, and the existing single-family residential neighborhood on the east side of the site. <br /> <br />Consistent with the Original Project, the Modified Project would provide a transition through tiering up to taller <br />structures, wall heights, open space courtyard locations on the east side of the site. However, the 90-foot minimum <br />eastern setback for the Modified Project would be 50 feet wider than the 40-foot minimum setback that was included in <br />the Original Project and the 134 foot southern building setback is 121 feet greater than that was included in the <br />Original Project. Thus, providing a greater separation and transition between the proposed multi-family residences and <br />the existing single-family residential neighborhood. Consistent with the findings of the EIR, the land use designation <br />change from PAO to DC that would occur for the Modified Project would not conflict with a policy or plan adopted for <br />the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. <br /> <br />The Modified Project would also require a zone change from P (Professional) to a Specific Development (SD) to <br />implement multi-family residential development. As required by the Zoning Code, the development plans would be <br />reviewed by the City to ensure consistency with development standards. Consistent with the Original Project, the SD <br />zoning designation would be located near the existing SD zoned areas to the north beyond Santiago Park and to the <br />west across N. Main Street and would not result in an impact related to conflict with a plan or policy adopted for the <br />purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to land use <br />and planning would occur from implementation of the Modified Project. <br /> <br />Conclusion for Land Use and Planning <br />The Modified Project would require the same General Plan land use and zoning designation amendments as the <br />Original Project. Consistent with the determinations of the EIR, the Modified Project would not result in an impact <br />related to conflict with a plan or policy adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. <br />Therefore, no new or greater impacts related to land use and planning would occur. Based on the foregoing, none of <br />the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR <br />or other environmental document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental <br />impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. <br /> <br /> <br />2-156