My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
80A - PH AGMT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE 65 YR GROUND LEASE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
02/18/2020
>
80A - PH AGMT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE 65 YR GROUND LEASE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2020 5:09:20 PM
Creation date
2/13/2020 4:59:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
80A
Date
2/18/2020
Destruction Year
2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Joint Powers Authority, Ground Lease, and Option Agreement <br />For the Crossroads at Washington <br />February 18, 2020 <br />Page 10 <br />• Starting with the 2021-29 Planning Period (or as that planning period may be adjusted by <br />SCAG, the Department of Housing and Community Development, or statute), upon SCAG's <br />adoption of a final RHNA, the County and City shall jointly apply to SCAG to reduce the <br />County's RHNA allocation of very -low income units by 20 units and to increase the City's <br />RHNA share of very -low income units by 20 units of the County's original RHNA allocation, <br />as provided for and in conformance with the requirements of Government Code section <br />65584.07. <br />o This will reduce the County's RHNA allocation obligation by twenty (20) very low- <br />income housing units. <br />• Accordingly, upon SCAG's approval, the City's share of its RHNA allocation of very -low <br />income units will increase by 20 units of the County's original allocation and the County's <br />RHNA allocation of very -low income units shall decrease by 20 units of the County's original <br />allocation, as allowed under Government Code section 65584.07. <br />o This will reduce the City's eighty-five (85) extremely low-income housing units that <br />we would have received toward the City's RHNA allocation obligation by twenty (20) <br />units. The City would be left with a net of sixty-five (65) extremely low-income <br />housing units used to meet the City's RHNA allocation obligation. <br />• In addition, the County and City shall also jointly apply to SCAG to reduce the County's <br />RHNA allocation of moderate -income units by 22 units and to increase the City's RHNA <br />share of moderate -income units by 22 units of the County's original RHNA allocation, as <br />provided for and in conformance with the requirements of Government Code section <br />65584.07. This is proportional adjustment is necessary to conform with the requirements of <br />Government Code section 65584.07; specifically, the County must reduce their moderate <br />income unit obligation proportional to their very -low income unit reduction. <br />o This will reduce the County's RHNA allocation obligation by twenty-two (22) <br />moderate -income housing units. <br />• Upon SCAG's approval, the City's share of its RHNA allocation of moderate -income units <br />will increase by 22 units of the County's original allocation and the County's RHNA allocation <br />of moderate -income units shall decrease by 22 units of the County's original allocation, as <br />allowed under Government Code section 65584.07. <br />o This will increase the City's RHNA allocation obligation for moderate -income units <br />by twenty-two (22) units. The City will still have a net of 65 extremely low-income <br />housing units that were used to meet the City's RHNA allocation obligation as <br />mentioned above, but the City's moderate -income unit obligation will increase by <br />twenty-two (22) units. <br />Although this appears to be an unusual arrangement on its face, it is important to remember that <br />the County and the City are working together to develop a joint parcel for the two adjacent land <br />parcels owned by each governmental entity. Each governmental entity on its own would not be <br />able to build the total number of extremely low-income units that will be built on the combined site <br />by Related. Therefore, working together the County and the City are able to build more units on <br />the combined site and reduce the proportionate share of affordable housing units in their respective <br />RHNA allocation obligations. <br />Foorlymul <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.