My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE- 75A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
04/21/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE- 75A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2020 3:31:24 PM
Creation date
4/13/2020 8:06:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
4/21/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
While listening to the April 2, 2020 Planning Commission meeting, I heard several of its members, including <br />Commissioner Ken Nguyen, offer enthusiastic support for One Broadway Plaza. Except for Commissioner Norma Garcia, <br />I did not notice any of the other Commissioners express substantive concern about the 3,000 plus vehicles trips entering <br />the adjoining neighborhoods to use already over -crowded city streets. Perhaps Commissioner Nguyen should walk <br />through the impacted neighborhoods, to remind him that these are places where working-class families already live, and <br />already suffer from excessive traffic. <br />Quite differently Commissioner Garcia was thoughtful in her persistent effort to discuss the pressures of traffic on the <br />community, despite staff's lax presentation, and their downplaying of OBP's impacts. Mr. Nguyen and the Commission's <br />enthusiasm for increased traffic impacts on working class neighborhoods, where traffic is worsening, and where public's <br />health and safety is at risk, reflect the vast disconnect between the Planning Commission, the Santa Ana City Council, <br />staff, and the community. <br />City Council's lack of care for its downtown -adjacent residents is also evident by its recent approval of 2525 N. Main <br />Street apartment project. Although Councilpersons Sarmiento and Penaloza have since stated they now oppose 2525 N. <br />Main (for which your constituents are grateful), the PC, and City Council continue to assert that the City of Santa Ana <br />cannot exist, let alone thrive, without an iconic project. The PC and City Council continue to replay this tired excuse about <br />the City's downtrodden self-image as a way to justify its actions. This beggarly image was manufactured and vigorously <br />sold by past Councils, and is perpetuated by several Council members, including the Mayor. Their argument is that we <br />must remake the City, often at the expense of neighborhoods, to remain viable. This is thoughtless and insensitive, and <br />reflects some of the antiquated reasoning for decision -making by our elected leaders, especially Mayor Pulido, and <br />Council -members Jose Solorio and Cecilia Iglesias. <br />The PC and Council City want the community to believe that Santa Ana has no other means to improve itself, except to <br />rely on out -of -scale projects which often result in permanent negative impacts, and few if any benefits. Out -of -scale <br />projects invite undue outside influence, and the often aggressive tactics used by these developers, and which undermine <br />and destroy our beloved neighborhoods. <br />In closing, I ask the City Council delay the public hearing on this project, in consideration of the above community <br />concerns, until: <br />* After the November General Election, when a new City Council is seated <br />* The project is evaluated in light of the Comprehensive Update of the City's General Plan, and <br />* In recognition of the likely repeal of 2525 N. Main Street, a similar, but much smaller project <br />Thank you, <br />Jeff Dickman, French Park <br />714 240 0883 <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.