My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE- 75A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
04/21/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE- 75A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2020 3:31:24 PM
Creation date
4/13/2020 8:06:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
4/21/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salas, Diana <br />From: <br />Keren Clark <kerenlclark@gmail.com> <br />Sent: <br />Sunday, April 19, 2020 8:53 PM <br />To: <br />eComment <br />Subject: <br />Keren Clark Public Comment #75A <br />To the Santa Ana City Council, <br />Regarding One Broadway Plaza. <br />I have been a resident since 2011 when I moved here for my daughter to attend the Orange County <br />School of the Arts. One Broadway Plaza has been sitting for the duration of my time here. In addition, <br />I have been involved with the neighborhood association of the adjacent Washington Square. I do not <br />believe this is an appropriate site for a building of this height nor for residential space with no onsite <br />parking, among other issues. <br />MY ISSUES: <br />HEIGHT: I don't think 37-stories is appropriate for this site. Yes it was approved by Santa Ana citizens <br />in 2005 but at a narrow margin. Many voted for it because it had a stipulation that it be 50% rented <br />before construction. That had a 10 year time limit which has expired. Also the wording of the ballot <br />measure was tricky, voting no meant you approved of the building which was misunderstood by <br />many. OBP is 1.5 miles from the 5fryiup Broadway, 1 mile using Main and 17tb and 3 miles to Bristol's <br />22fry on ramp. It is in the wrong place. <br />TRAFFIC: The traffic plan is outdated. It was written in 2006 and made projections to 2020, which is <br />now! The tower construction will take 3 years. A new traffic study of the main routs to the 5 and 22 <br />freeways that projects out to 2033 is needed. Also right now there are 1,731 proposed housing units <br />approved or in process in the surrounding area. How can proper mitigation be planned using the 2006 <br />study? <br />HOUSING: The developer has proposed 415 apartments in the tower. He presented the project at a Sunshine <br />Meeting at which he boasted of having affordable housing included. He now wants to buy his way out of the <br />obligation, which is legal. But lets not pass up a great opportunity to have affordable housing included in such a <br />small footprint of land with no onsite parking which will put even more pressure on adjacent neighborhoods. <br />I think the council should vote no at this time. <br />Very Sincerely, <br />Keren Clark <br />Keren L Clark, LMFT <br />DISCLAIMER: <br />CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message is legally privileged and confidential information intended for <br />the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent <br />responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any release, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.