My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE- 75A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
04/21/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE- 75A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2020 3:31:24 PM
Creation date
4/13/2020 8:06:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
4/21/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salas, Diana <br />From: Deborah <chzpuff@sbcglobal.net> <br />Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 2:48 PM <br />To: Pulido, Miguel; Sarmiento, Vicente; Villegas, Juan; Bacerra, Phil; Solorio, Jose; Penaloza, <br />David; eComment <br />Subject: Agenda Item No. # 75A - One Broadway Plaza Office Tower <br />Dear Mayor and Councilmen, <br />Thirty -Seven Stories is just too high. There will be significant impact to the following neighborhoods <br />French Court, Willard, Logan, Lacy, Downtown, and French Park <br />Why is the developer being allowed to convert 50% of the project to Market — rate family apartments without the <br />inclusion of affordable units? In Los Angeles it is 15% and San Francisco is 20%. An in lieu fee does nothing to help <br />the housing situation that all of our City leaders espouse whenever they are considering more development. These <br />units need to be part of the actual build. <br />After so many years have passed a new Development Agreement needs to be prepared, which should include <br />community benefits with Developer funding, open space, traffic mitigation, etc. <br />As for the EIR, consider the traffic when this EIR was done and traffic now. It has increased significantly and adding <br />that to the soon to be developed Main Place should make a new one a necessity. <br />This city needs developers who actually live here so that they feel the impact of their decisions. It is very easy to live <br />in Newport Beach and make decisions about what should go on in Santa Ana. I cannot understand why more <br />planners and council -members do not take effrontery to this blatant exploitation of our citizenry. <br />Please delay the public hearing on this until November when the "public" can actually participate in the process. A <br />project evaluation after the Update to the City's General Plan and hopes for a much smaller footprint for this project <br />would be hoped for. <br />Density is not the best choice for Santa Ana. We need to look towards creating lower density, attractive <br />neighborhoods for our citizens. <br />Sincerely, <br />Deborah Hicks - DeBach <br />Santa Ana Resident <br />�5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.