Laserfiche WebLink
Discuss Executive Orders Issued Pursuant to Declaration of Local COVID-19 Emergency <br />May 5, 2020 <br />Page 3 <br />Shortly after the issuance of Order No. 2, Victor Cao of the California Apartment Association <br />contacted City officials asking for clarification in some cases and seeking a repeal of the prohibition <br />in other cases. The Manufactured Housing Education Trust also contacted City staff with concerns <br />about the prohibition would impact its members. On April 17, 2020, Mr. Cao indicated that he would <br />work with his coalition group and ask everyone to be patient while staff provided clarification and tried <br />to understand how Santa Ana businesses would be impacted. On April 20, 2020, the City Manager <br />responded to the coalition with additional information and on April 22, 2020, shared the FAQS with <br />the group. On April 23, 2020, the City received a letter calling the City's temporary prohibition on rent <br />increases a rent control measure and asking the City to revise it. The California Apartment <br />Association's website on the other hand suggests CAA is taking a more aggressive legal approach: <br />"The California Apartment Association has challenged the city of Santa Ana and Contra Costa County <br />for violating the Costa Hawkins Rental Housing Act" (April 23, 2020 CAA Website: <br />https://caanet.org/caa-challenges-local-governments-over-violating-costa-hawkins/). <br />The City Council, in responding to the letter, may consider one of the following two options: <br />Option No. 1: The City may maintain that its prohibition is a temporary measure only, valid until May <br />31, 2020, and that the extraordinary circumstances of COVID-19, together with the impacts in Santa <br />Ana, require the measure. The intent was to impose the prohibition through May 31, 2020 and to <br />extend it only if the State of California adopted a similar measure. The City Council might also ask <br />the CAA and its coalition members to allow staff to speak to those property owners who intended to <br />increase rents prior to May 31, 2020, so the City might better understand the consequences to specific <br />property owners and how regulations might be balanced to protect renters and landlords alike. <br />Option No. 2: The City Council may rescind that portion of Order No. 2 pertaining to the temporary <br />prohibition on rent increases. <br />STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT <br />Approval of this item supports the City's effort to meet Goal #3 - Community Health, Livability, <br />Engagement & Sustainability, Objective #4 (support neighborhood vitality and livability). <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. <br />Exhibits: 1. Letter from California Apartment Association Coalition <br />2. Summary of Effective Periods of Executive Orders <br />3. Summary of Cities with Rent Freeze Provisions <br />60A-3 <br />