My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 60A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
05/05/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 60A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 2:54:07 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 10:40:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
5/5/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. CAA LEGAL COUNSEL PROVIDED BENIGN ADVICE ON HOW THE CITY CAN COMPLY <br />WITH STATE LAW <br />CAA has a strong track record of working collaboratively with several cities across the state. In fact, the California <br />Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency wrote a memo to cities that references the California Apartment <br />Association's website as a reliable resource on local rental housing policy.'- In contrast, the staff report makes it appear <br />the City unfairly views CAA with prejudice. <br />CAA's actual efforts to inform are vastly different than the staffs false depiction that we have threatener) the City. Prior <br />to April 22, CAA sent several emails to provide resources about rent freezes in other cities.3 CAA extended useful <br />advice from our legal counsel to City staff, which essentially provided pro bono legal work to ensure the City's <br />compliance with state law (enclosure). By carefully reviewing the letter, you will count zero references to threats, <br />demands, or litigation. CAA's counsel simply concluded, "[i]n view of the forgoing, we would ask that you amend the <br />Executive Order to remove Section 3, so as to comply with state law." <br />Additionally, City staff manufactured inflammatory commentary about CAA's member newsletter (enclosure). Again, <br />a careful review of the member correspondence will reveal zero legal threats. The article concludes, "CAA sent this <br />letter to the city of Santa Ana, asIdne that it amend the executive order imposing the rent freeze so that it complies <br />with Costa -Hawkins: '4 The staff report conveniently leaves out a direct reference and cherry -picks statements to fit an <br />combative narrative. I encourage you to read all of the source documents for yourself. <br />We remain open to alternative suggestions for the word "ask" if City staff has determined that an ask is too much of <br />an "aggressive legal approach." As it turns out, a thesaurus provides very few synonyms. The time devoted to <br />misrepresenting CAA simply disguises the deficiencies in the City s adoption of an unlawful rent freeze provision. I <br />encourage the City Council to finally turn its attention to the pertinent issue at hand. <br />3. THE FACTS ABOUT RENT FREEZES LEGALLY AUTHORIZED BY CITIES <br />City staff makes several arguments, but provides zero justification for the rent freeze order. City staff has failed to <br />defend the rent freeze because of several logical fallacies (1) arguing the semantics of a rent freeze, (2) claiming that <br />home rule can override state restrictions on rent control, and (3) referencing ordinances from five other California <br />cities with incomplete information. First, the rent freezes effective period does not change the definition of rent <br />control; to inhibit a change in rental rates is in fact rent control3 The semantics presented by City staff is frivolous. <br />Second, rent control is a matter of statewide concern and not a municipal affair. For 25 years, Costa -Hawkins has <br />prohibited cities (including those with charters) from enacting rent control on units built after 1995 and excluding <br />certain types of properties (e.g. single-family homes). Los Angeles, Oakland, Glendale, and Concord have recently <br />approved rent freezes within the context of the State of California's authority. Your peer cities are also experiencing <br />public health crises, but none have gone so far as to curtail fundamental property rights as the City of Santa Ana has <br />done. <br />Third, the staff report suggests the City has a moral equivalency to other cities who have frozen rents, but staff failed <br />to conduct their research thoroughly or conveniently left out important details for legally compliant rent freezes. For <br />your convenience, CAA has prepared a more comprehensive summary with an analysis and citations in the table on <br />the next page: <br />(remaining page intentionally deft blank) <br />2https:llwvvw.bcsh.ca.gov/coronavirusl9/eviction eos_guidance.pdf <br />3 Emails to Kristine Ridge (City Manager) on April 13, 2020 <br />4 https://cannet.org/caa-challenges-local-governments-over-violating-costa- <br />hawki ns/71=542303&sfmc_sub=84420776&1=426_HT ML&u=11607615&mid=100003558&jb=77 <br />5 Rent control as defined by Mealam-Webster Dictionary: government regulation of the amount charged as rent for housing and often also of <br />eviction <br />T? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.