My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 60A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
05/05/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 60A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 2:54:07 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 10:40:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
5/5/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
jurisdiction <br />Surmnary and Citations <br />City of Los Angeles <br />Staff identified that the rent freeze only applies tenants subject to the City's rent <br />stabilization ordinance. However, the order does not annlvannly to single-family <br />homes, condominiums or townhomes, and rental units built after 1978.E <br />City of Glendale <br />Glendale explicitly exempts: (1) single family homes, condominiums or <br />townhomes, and rental units built on or after February 1, 1995.7 <br />City of Oakland <br />Staff identified for residential tenants regulated under the Oakland Rent <br />Adjustment Ordinance, however conveniently left out is the fact rents are allowed <br />to increase on those units by 3 5% (Consumer Price Indexl 8 The ordinance <br />inherently does not apply to single-family homes, condominiums or townhomes, <br />owner -occupied duplexes, and rental units built after to 1980. <br />City of Concord <br />Section 10 subtitled "Exceptions and Exemptions" expressly exemi2ts single- <br />family owner -occupied residences, duplexes, housing that has been issued a <br />certificate of occupancy within the previous 15 years, and "for units if exempt <br />under State law." 9 <br />City of Eureka <br />Staff identified that the City of Eureka approved a rent freeze that applies to all <br />landlords. CAA will request the City to consider compliance with state law. <br />Except for Eureka (a rural city of 27,000 residents), four metropolitan cities that share similarities to Santa Ana have <br />specific language in their ordinances to ensure their compliance with the Costa -Hawkins Act. Santa Ana is not <br />consistent with other cities cited in the staff report. It would be incumbent upon the City of Santa Ana to rescind or <br />amend its order. <br />CONCLUSION <br />By May 5th, it will be a total of 27 days in which City staff appears to have ignored CAA's efforts to help the City of <br />Santa Ana implement legally compliant housing policy. Given the lack of an adequate response, it would be reasonable <br />to conclude that CAA and its partner organizations have more than lived up to the commitment to exert patience. <br />With the help of the City Council, all parties should be called on to relieve themselves of grievances and move <br />forward on an amicable resolution with a defined timetable. <br />Option 1 provided in the staff report remains insufficient because it makes the same mistake of glossing over the need <br />for the City to comply with state law. For these reasons, CAA is respectfully asking the City Council to reconsider its <br />rent freeze provision by either (a) rescinding the provision in its entirety, or (b) directing the City Attorney to rewrite <br />the provision in order to conform with state law. <br />Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration. <br />Respectfully, <br />1,41 <br />9 <br />Victor Cao <br />Vice President of Public Affairs <br />California Apartment Association <br />Enclosures (3) <br />8 https://hcidla2.lacity.org/covid-19-renter-protections <br />'Glendale Renters & Landlords "Exceptions" https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showdocument?id=48950 <br />8 r11.....11-- .....f ndf <br />�7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.