My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 60A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
05/05/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 60A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 2:54:07 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 10:40:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
5/5/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kristine Ridge, City Manager <br />Sonia Carvahlo, City Attorney <br />City of Santa Ana <br />April 22, 2020 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />ATTORNEY -CLIENT COMMUNICATION <br />PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL <br />Costa -Hawkins "permits owners of certain types of property to <br />adjust the rent on such property at will, '[n]otwithstanding any other <br />provision of law.' (Civ. Code § 1954.52, subd. (a).)" DeZerega v. Meggs, 83 <br />Cal. App. 4th 28, 40-41 (2000) (emphasis added). Simply put, it permits the <br />landlords of single family homes, rental units for which a certificate of <br />occupancywas issued after February 1,1995, and earlier -constructed rental <br />units which were already exempt by local law to raise rents without local <br />interference at all, see Civ. Code § 1954.52(a), and with respect to all other <br />units it permits landlords to raise rents upon vacancy, see Civ. Code § <br />1954.53(a). Section 3 of the Executive Order runs contrary to this statute. <br />Assembly Bill 1482, codified at 2019 Cal. Stats. 597, qualifies <br />Costa -Hawkins somewhat. It directly limits rent increases on certain units <br />that would otherwise be totally exempt from regulation under Costa - <br />Hawkins. Civ. Code § 1947.12. However, it does so as a matter of state law; <br />it does not give local governments any greater power to regulate rent <br />increases than they had under Costa -Hawkins itself. In fact, AB 1482 is <br />explicit about this fact. See Civ. Code § 1947.12 (k)(1) & (2). So AB 1482 does <br />not authorize Section 3 of the Executive Order either. <br />Finally, during emergencies Penal Code § 396(e) makes it <br />unlawful for a landlord "to increase the rental price, as defined in paragraph <br />(11) of subdivision 0), advertised, offered, or charged for housing, to an <br />existing or prospective tenant, by more than 10 percent," with certain <br />exceptions. The Executive Order, by contrast, purports to make it illegal for <br />a landlord to increase the rental price by any amount whatsoever. This, it <br />cannot do. <br />While Governor Newsom's Executive Order N-28-20 waived <br />certain provisions of state law to permit local governments to restrict <br />evictions during the emergency, it did not go so far as to waive provisions — <br />like Costa -Hawkins —that give landlords the ability to set their rents. To the <br />contrary, it provided that "Nothing in this order shall relieve a tenant of the <br />obligation to pay rent, nor restrict a landlord's ability to recover rent due." <br />In other words, it made an explicit distinction between the substantive <br />power of a landlord to set initial and substantive rents, and the procedural <br />[CES2221.030] <br />97 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.