My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 60A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
05/05/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 60A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 2:54:07 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 10:40:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
5/5/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the decision and stress of either paying the rent or paying for food. Because of this, we recognize how <br />vulnerable our community is to this pandemic; susceptible to experiencing financial precarity, <br />housing displacement and particularly at risk of losing their lives. <br />The Executive Order which the council enacted, has ensured that tenants — residential and commercial — <br />are able to confidently push back against unscrupulous attempts by landlords to unlawfully increase rents <br />or attempt illegal evictions during this pandemic. We dispute the claims of the California Apartment <br />Association or any parties against the rent freeze portion of the order therein. We maintain that the <br />current moratorium on rent increases, also referred to as a rent freeze, is not in conflict with <br />restrictions imposed by state laws regarding the applicability of local rent control ordinancesa <br />during this pandemic. We have come to understand that state and local city charters grant powers <br />to elected officials in times of public health emergencies such as the current COVID-19 related <br />epochs. <br />Therefore, we call on the Santa Ana City Council to do the following: <br />Allow the rent freeze to extend for six months beyond the date which statewide emergency orders <br />are lifted. This will ensure that tenants do not fall further behind on rent repayment and will match the <br />timeline of the city's eviction moratorium. <br />Continue to exercise its power in the interest of maintaining housing stability in Santa Ana, <br />tenants, and conummity at large. <br />Use any and all ability to create public media to ensure that landlords in Santa Ana make no <br />attempt to evict, harass, bully, or otherwise render tenants' lives more difficult in our current pandemic. <br />This will ensure that tenants can remain confident in their rights to remain in Santa Ana. <br />Assert and defend tenants' right to quiet enjoyment of their homes and rented units. Landlords <br />claim to operate the business of providing housing as a service. As such, landlords are required to provide <br />certain standards of living under the law throughout the duration of the tenancya. This holds that landlords <br />shall be required to maintain properties up to code and respect tenants whether a temporary rent freeze <br />and eviction moratorium is in effect or not. Without this, residents are forced to live in conditions <br />detrimental to their physical and mental health. <br />As elected members by constituents of Santa Ana, we have faith that you will address our concerns and <br />recommendations. While we continue to ask the City of Santa Ana to do more to protect its residents from <br />the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic by adopting stronger protections (e.g. a complete eviction <br />moratorium and longer repayment periods), at a minimum, the City of Santa Ana should maintain and <br />expand its current Executive Order No. 2-2020 regarding rent freezes. <br />Santa Ana was one of the first California cities bold enough to protect its residents when the COVID-19 <br />pandemic began. We urge that the Council remain bold enough to ensure that residents stay protected <br />against unjust and immoral actions by corporate absentee Santa Ana landlords who are motivated purely <br />by profit. We do not believe in allowing these types of groups and interests to hold weight in our <br />communities. We believe that the value of our city comes from residents and we invite the Council to <br />Itiq <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.