CORRESPONDENCE - PRESENTATION - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

of neighborhoods not a welcome alternative to it being installed on City owned utility poles. 3. Identifying gaps in service is a good idea and may be helpful to identify where installations are needed allowing for in advance planning and input in the placement of telecommunication equipment. This way there may be an avenue to prevent unsightly wireless telecommunication equipment from being installed near or in front of a historic house or building that is listed on Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties! 4. I agree that looking at what other cities are doing with the intent of finding "best practices" to adapt for use in Santa Ana is a good idea and would be a prudent move. 6. If the City is making money from fees paid to install telecommunication equipment on City owned utility poles I would think that $ money should be used to fund installation of WI-FI on new street lights as promised (or not). Cost should be disclosed and if and when WI-FI installations have been or will be made this information should also be made public. 6. Not just one or another neighborhood is being affected by unsightly teleCOMIAIUniCatlOn equipment. Historic Heninger Park is also negatively impacted by the above ground installation of telecommunication equipment including additional utility pole arms, nodes, handles, pull boxes, antennas, etc. I believe all neighborhoods should be treated equally - a vocal neighborhood is speaking out for those who may feel powerless to fight against installations of ugly wireless telecommunication equipment in front of their house, on their block or in their neighborhood. - Let's make sure what happens in all neighborhoods is the same, if one neighborhood can avoid unsightly equipment installations, then those practices should be applied in all neighborhoods City wide! Thank you for your time and help in this matter. Sincerely, Ginelle Hardy Historic Heninger Park, President ginelleannggmai.com