My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - PH ADOPT RESO FOR PR NO 15-6827
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
06/16/2020
>
75B - PH ADOPT RESO FOR PR NO 15-6827
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2020 5:42:11 PM
Creation date
6/12/2020 2:55:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
75B
Date
6/16/2020
Destruction Year
2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L S A FAIRVIEW BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS <br />(9TH STREET TO 16TH STREET( PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA MAY 2020 <br />Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO-6, the proposed <br />Project would not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat <br />modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in <br />local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS. Impacts would be less <br />than significant with mitigation incorporated. <br />b. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive <br />natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California <br />Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? <br />Less Than Significant Impact. Habitats are considered to be of special concern based on the <br />following: (1) federal, State, and/or local laws regulating their development; (2) limited distributions; <br />and/or (3) the habitat requirements of special -status plants or animals. <br />There are no habitats or natural communities of concern within or immediately adjacent to the BSA. <br />The BSA is composed entirely of developed areas, with some ornamental and weedy vegetation. The <br />BSA has low biological value to native plant and wildlife species. Therefore, the proposed Project <br />would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural <br />community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS. This <br />impact would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. <br />c. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands <br />(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, <br />hydrological interruption, or other means? <br />Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. As identified above, the BSA contains one <br />jurisdictional drainage feature (the Santa Ana River), as discussed in further detail in the <br />corresponding Jurisdictional Delineation Report (Appendix D of the NES). The Santa Ana River within <br />the BSA is an unvegetated, concrete -lined intermittent drainage feature. This channel conveys flows <br />attributed to local urban runoff and seasonal storm water. The low -flow channel located within the <br />center of the channel bed had standing water at the time of the field survey. The Santa Ana River <br />has an ordinary high water mark (OHWM) determined to be 21 ft up from the channel bed. <br />Downstream of the BSA, the channel has a direct nexus to the Pacific Ocean (a navigable Water of <br />the United States) and is tidally influenced at its mouth. However, the tidal influence does not <br />extend to the BSA, and there are no waters subject to jurisdiction under Section 10 of the Rivers and <br />Harbors Act. There are no wetlands or riparian areas present within the BSA. The total acreage of <br />potential nonwetland USACE jurisdiction within the BSA is 4.18 ac. <br />Because there is no current publicly issued guidance on determining Regional Water Quality Control <br />Board (RWQCB) jurisdictional areas, jurisdiction was determined based on the federal definition of <br />Waters of the United States as recommended by the State Water Resources Control Board's <br />Workplan: Filling the Gaps in Wetland Protection.10 RWQCB jurisdiction is considered coincident <br />with USACE jurisdiction (4.18 ac) for purposes of CWA Section 401 certification. <br />10 Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2004. Workplan: Filling the Gaps in Wetland Protection. <br />3-24 75E125W5 ND\FinalISMND\Fairview Street Bridge Final ISMND.docx(OS/26/20) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.