My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Appendix A Traffic Analysis Report
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
06/16/2020
>
75B - FAIRVIEW BRIDGE PROJECT CD
>
Appendix A Traffic Analysis Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2020 8:40:23 AM
Creation date
6/16/2020 8:25:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
6/16/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FAIRVIEW STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 9T" STREET TO 16T" STREET AND /\ <br />JUNE 2018 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT J" <br />SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA <br />and 5-foot-wide Class II bicycle lanes (with a 2-foot buffer) where they currently do not exist on both <br />sides of Fairview Street between Civic Center Drive and 17th Street. <br />The planned improvements include the construction of a continuous raised median between <br />9th Street and 161h Street. This continuous raised median would change the intersection of Fairview <br />Street/121h Street from full access to right-in/right-out (RIRO) access. Figure 3 illustrates intersection <br />control changes associated with the project. <br />METHODOLOGY <br />LSA prepared this TIA consistent with the City's Circulation Element and Capacity Calculations and <br />Level of Service Standards. Intersection level of service (LOS) calculations use the intersection <br />capacity utilization (ICU) methodology for signalized intersections, whereas Highway Capacity <br />Manual (HCM) methodology is used for unsignalized intersections. Roadway segment volume -to - <br />capacity ratios (v/c) are determined using the City's theoretical daily roadway capacities. Traffix <br />Version 8.0 computer software was used to determine the LOS at signalized intersections based on <br />the ICU methodology, while Synchro Version 10.1 computer software was used at the unsignalized <br />intersections using the HCM methodology. <br />The ICU methodology was implemented using City requirement inputs including 5 percent loss time, <br />1,700 vehicles per hour per lane (vphpl) capacity for through lanes, and 1,600 vphpl capacity for turn <br />lanes. The ICU methodology compares the v/c ratios of conflicting turn movements at an <br />intersection, sums these critical conflicting v/c ratios for each intersection approach, and determines <br />the overall ICU. The HCM methodology calculates the delay experienced by vehicles passing through <br />the intersection. The resulting ICU or delay is expressed in terms of LOS, where LOS A represents <br />free -flow activity and LOS F represents overcapacity operation. LOS is a qualitative assessment of <br />the quantitative effects of such factors as traffic volume, roadway geometrics, speed, delay, and <br />maneuverability on roadway and intersection operations. The following table describes in detail LOS <br />criteria for intersections. <br />LOS <br />Description <br />A <br />No approach phase is fully utilized by traffic, and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication. Typically, the <br />approach appears quite open, turns are made easily, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. <br />B <br />This service level represents stable operation, where an occasional approach phase is fully utilized, and a <br />substantial number are nearing full use. Many drivers begin to feel restricted within platoons of vehicles. <br />C <br />This level still represents stable operating conditions. Occasionally, drivers may have to wait through more than <br />one red signal indication, and backups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feel somewhat <br />restricted, but not objectionably so. <br />D <br />This level encompasses a zone of increasing restriction approaching instability at the intersection. Delays to <br />approaching vehicles may be substantial during short peaks within the peak period; however, enough cycles <br />with lower demand occur to permit periodic clearance of developing queues, thus preventing excessive backups. <br />E <br />Capacity occurs at the upper end of this service level. It represents the most vehicles that any particular <br />intersection approach can accommodate. Full utilization of every signal cycle is attained no matter how great <br />the demand. <br />F <br />This level describes forced flow operations at low speeds, where volumes exceed capacity. These conditions <br />usually result from queues of vehicles backing up from a restriction downstream. Speeds are reduced <br />substantially, and stoppages may occur for short or long periods of time due to the congestion. In the extreme <br />case, speed can drop to zero. <br />LOS = level of service <br />P:\WKE1702\Traffic\doc\Traffic Analysis Report rev - Caltrans Comments.docx u06/07/18» 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.