My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2020-07-07
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
07/07/2020
>
FULL PACKET_2020-07-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2020 10:35:19 AM
Creation date
7/2/2020 6:16:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
7/7/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
982
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A-2020-122 <br />Could Fund petymrents be used for capital baprnvenreat proJects that bronrllyprovide potential <br />economic development in a community? <br />In general, no. if capital improvement projects are not necessary expenditures incurred due to the <br />COVID-19 public health emergency, then Fund payments may not be used for such projects. <br />However, Fund payments may be used for the expenses of, for example, establishing temporary public <br />medical facilities and other measures to increase COVID-19 treatment capacity or improve mitigation <br />measures, including related construction costs. <br />The Guidance includes workforce bonuses as an exannple of ineligible expenses but provides that <br />hazard pay nvould be eligible if otherwise tleterrrtined to be a rnecesstny expense. Is there a specific <br />definition of "hazard pay"? <br />Hazard pay means additional pay for performing hazardous duty or work involving physical hardship, in <br />each case that is related to COVID-19. <br />The Guidance provides that ineligible expenditures include "[playroll or benefits expenses for <br />employees whose work duties are not substantially dedicated to ntitigatitrg or responding to tine <br />COVID-19 public health emeergency." Is this intended to relate ordy to public employees? <br />Yes. This particular nonexclusive example of an ineligible expenditure relates to public employees. A <br />recipient would not be permitted to pay for payroll or benefit expenses of private employees and any <br />financial assistance (such as grants or short -tern loans) to private employers are not subject to the <br />restriction that the private employers' employees must be substantially dedicated to mitigating or <br />responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency. <br />May counties pre -pay with CARES Act funds for expenses such as a Oise or two year facility lease, <br />such as to house stuff hired in response to COVID-19? <br />A government should not matte prepayments on contracts using payments from the Fund to the extent that <br />doing so would not be consistent with its ordinary course policies and procedures. <br />Most a stay-atdrarne order or otter public health mandate be in effect in order for a government to <br />provide assistance to susall businesses using paymnenis firont the Fund? <br />No. The Guidance provides, as an example of an eligible use of payments from the Fund, expenditures <br />related to the provision of grants to small businesses to reimburse the costs of business interruption <br />caused by required closures. Such assistance may be provided using amounts received from the Fund in <br />the abscnce of a requirement to close businesses if the relevant government determines that such <br />expenditures are necessary in response to the public health emergency. <br />20A-25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.