My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - NON-AGENDA
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
07/07/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - NON-AGENDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 10:20:28 AM
Creation date
7/6/2020 8:54:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
7/7/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orozco, Norma <br />From: <br />jaylupe25@twc.com <br />Sent: <br />Monday, July 06, 2020 10:55 PM <br />To: <br />eComment <br />Cc: <br />elizondo.maria1153@gmail.com <br />Subject: <br />CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS (SPECIFICALLY 7/7/2020) <br />City Council Members, <br />We are writing today to you as a pair of very disappointed members of the Santa Ana community. It seems to be a <br />consistent habit of the city council to provide short notice to the public for very important agenda items that are being <br />discussed during the meetings each month. Listed below are some of the issues that our family has with the council and <br />would like to explanations for. Please keep in mind that are the citizens that you work for. You were put there because <br />it was believed that you would do good for the city, but more and more it seems that you did not care about your <br />constituents. <br />The attempt to silence our voices by Mayor Pulido <br />Lack of self-worth or honestly from the council <br />More notice than 24 hours as to when comments can be submitted for the next meeting <br />Lack of public voices being heard <br />Clear and constructive phone call technology for public comment <br />Unfair process for disabled or disadvantage residents <br />And most importantly, a total lack of respect for the public comments / questions that are asked of the council and go <br />unanswered. <br />The last item listed above is perhaps the most important along with the 1" 2 items on the list. During each meeting, <br />citizens speak up / out on issues, and there is rarely a response by the council for basic questions. I understand that <br />there can possibly be hundreds of questions, but the very direct ones can be answered. Also, too many times we hear a <br />council member say they are against an agenda item and want more time to review and the next thing you know when <br />the vote is taken, they vote for the item and it passes instead of being held for more discussions. How do you look at <br />yourself in the mirror each day when you vote against your conscience. A month ago the meeting ran very long and we <br />stayed on the conference call for nearly 6 hours and then another 2-3 hours when the meeting resumed, and it was <br />disappointing to know that there was discussion about not letting the public speak so the meeting would not go long. It <br />is your job to work for us and listen to us and do right by us, the citizens of Santa Ana. <br />It seems like the only time the council listens is when someone starts to talk about replacing you or when one of your <br />financial backers to your election threatens to back out of supporting you. <br />Please, please understand what is being said here. Your were there by us (Santa Ana citizens) and yes you can be <br />replaced by us (Santa Ana citizens). <br />Listen to our voices, understand what we are voicing, and jointly work with us to make Santa Ana better. <br />The Jennings Family <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.