CORRESPONDENCE - NON-AGENDA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ("Rehab Act"), and other federal and state laws, I have a right to engage in the same way as others, and the right against discrimination based on my age or medical condition. Additionally, I have the right to reasonable accommodations so that I may participate. Therefore, I am writing to request a reasonable accommodation of participation by phone or video and to request that the City immediately end the discriminatory practice of holding meetings in a way that only allows people without high risk medical conditions to participate. Under the change in rules that the City did without public meeting or comment, the only way I am able to engage in public comment at the public meeting is in writing. There is not even a guarantee that the writing will be read by each Council Member before a vote. This policy blocks my participation due to my status as a person with a disability; it forces me to choose between meaningful engagement under the Brown Act and following medical advice; and it has a discriminatory impact against people like me who need to minimize our risk of exposure to Covid-19. I am writing to request an urgent reasonable accommodation to allow me to participate in public comment at the public meetings in the same way that other people are able to participate. Per medical recommendation, I am carefully engaging in social distancing and limiting myself to public spaces where masks are worn for my own safety due to the global pandemic; COVID-19. Therefore, I request access to engage in public comment in a way that will be safe for me given the medical advice that I take significant precautions to reduce my risk of contracting COVID-19. If the City is not prepared to grant my request today, I am available immediately to begin the interactive process and determine a way that I can have meaningful participation in the City meeting. SENIOR Under the Civil Rights Act of California, Fair Housing and Employment Act, and other federal and state laws, I have a right against discrimination based on my age or medical condition. The City's plan to require in -person public comment discriminates against all people over the age of 65 who have been advised by the CDC to avoid gatherings due to higher risk of death if they contract Covid-19. Therefore, I am writing to request participation by phone or video and to request that the City immediately end the discriminatory practice of holding meetings in a way that only allows people who are both under 65 and without high risk medical conditions to participate. Under the change in rules that the City did without public meeting or comment, the only way I am able to engage in public comment at the public meeting is in writing. There is not even a guarantee that the writing will be read by each Council Member before a vote. This policy blocks my participation due to my status as a person with a disability; it forces me to choose between meaningful engagement under the Brown Act and following medical advice; and it has a discriminatory impact against people like me who need to minimize our risk of exposure to Covid-19. Per medical recommendation, I am carefully engaging in social distancing and limiting myself to public spaces where masks are worn for my own safety due to the global pandemic; COVID-19. Therefore, I request access to engage in public comment in a way that will be safe for me given the medical advice that I take significant precautions to reduce my risk of contracting COVID-19. If the City is not prepared to grant my request today, I am available immediately to discuss a way that I can have meaningful participation in the City meeting and to resolve this discriminatory policy. BROWN ACT Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 which states there should be "a local legislative body or state body is authorized to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body ..." While this allows local government to limit comment to telephone or video, it does not allow them to do away with the right to address the local body or to require in person participation during a dangerous pandemic. In fact, it goes on to state that the local body must have a swift plan to resolve request for a reasonable accommodation and advertise the procedure. The City continues to be obligated to both allow public comment, and to ensure that disability accommodation are made as needed. Limiting participation to writing that is not read into the meeting is no different than blocking all participation. When my written comments are left in an unread