My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - NON-AGENDA
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
07/07/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - NON-AGENDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 10:20:28 AM
Creation date
7/6/2020 8:54:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
7/7/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Per medical recommendation, I am carefully engaging in social distancing and <br />limiting myself to public spaces where masks are worn for my own safety due to the <br />global pandemic; COVID-19. Therefore, I request access to engage in public comment in <br />a way that will be safe for me given the medical advice that I take significant precautions <br />to reduce my risk of contracting COVID-19. If the City is not prepared to grant my <br />request today, I am available immediately to discuss a way that I can have meaningful <br />participation in the City meeting and to resolve this discriminatory policy. <br />BROWN ACT <br />Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 which states there should be <br />"a local legislative body or state body is authorized to hold public meetings via <br />teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise <br />electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local <br />legislative body ..." While this allows local government to limit comment to telephone <br />or video, it does not allow them to do away with the right to address the local body or to <br />require in person participation during a dangerous pandemic. In fact, it goes on to state <br />that the local body must have a swift plan to resolve request for a reasonable <br />accommodation and advertise the procedure. The City continues to be obligated to both <br />allow public comment, and to ensure that disability accommodation are made as needed. <br />Limiting participation to writing that is not read into the meeting is no different <br />than blocking all participation. When my written comments are left in an unread <br />email, and not shared with the meeting viewers and the Board, I am not permitted to <br />meaningfully engage as required by the Brown Act. I see the impact of this when I watch <br />the meeting. It allows the governing body to those who were unable to participate due to <br />age or medical condition. <br />URGENCY <br />Through the last meeting, comments by phone were permitted. Last week with, <br />with no notice, the City converted to in -person only. This is at the height of the pandemic <br />with our City reaching new Covid-19 milestones daily. Due to the recent change, <br />upcoming <br />meeting, and critical nature of my access to engage with those elected to govern in Santa <br />Ana, I request an answer to this request for reasonable accommodation before the <br />meeting tomorrow. <br />The CDC continues to recommend that seniors and people with disabilities who <br />may be designated as "higher -risk" for life -threatening impacts if they contract <br />COVID-19 take all possible precautions to avoid infection. In Orange County, as <br />infection rates continue to rise, we see new records for hospitalization, ICU, and death. <br />Currently, the only way to participate in public comment would be to attend a crowded <br />room, in a crowded line, where some individuals are likely not wearing masks and in fact, <br />have shown aggression toward those who do at other in -person meetings in Orange <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.