My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 19E
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
07/07/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 19E
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2020 8:20:14 AM
Creation date
7/7/2020 8:42:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
7/7/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orozco, Norma <br />From: <br />Diane Fradkin <dianefradkin@hotmail.com> <br />Sent: <br />Monday, July 06, 2020 6:49 PM <br />To: <br />Pulido, Miguel; Sarmiento, Vicente; Penaloza, David; Bacerra, Phil; Villegas, Juan; <br />Mendoza, Nelida; Solorio, Jose <br />Cc: <br />Ridge, Kristine; Thai, Minh; eComment <br />Subject: <br />July 7th Agenda Item 19E - General Plan Update Land Uses <br />Importance: High <br />Honorable Mayor & Councilmembers: <br />I am happy to see that the Planning Department is working on updating the City's General Plan. <br />I personally contributed my input by way of the online survey as well as attending 2 community <br />meetings..... one last year and one in early 2020. 1 also provided direct feedback to the Planners regarding <br />specific comments to the area located north of 17th Street & west of Grand Ave (Medical Arts and adjacent <br />Shopping Center). <br />1 have to say, 1 am rather disappointed at the resulting land use designation of "District Center" for that area. <br />There has been an overwhelming response from the citizens of Santa Ana about not desiring any more high <br />density for our City (medium density is more acceptable). Again, as you know, we are one of the densest <br />Cities in US based on our population and size. I believe that the Planning Department, during this General Plan <br />Update, has already predetermined the land uses and then does the "check the box ....... meet with the <br />community in order to satisfy the requirements. They never have any intent to incorporate any of the <br />community's ideas or alternatives for their land use vision. It really is a disingenuous process! <br />The specific area located at 17th & Grand Ave (Medical Arts) is a very physically constricted property. It is <br />bound on the west with NO access due to the rail road tracks. There is limited access directly onto 17th Street <br />and traffic can only turn right out as 17th Street has a risen divider and therefore, is limited to u-turns at <br />Lincoln. The other outstanding issue is the proposed grade separation at 17th Street and Lincoln for the rail <br />road ..... this will further constrain the access onto 17th Street from the Medical Arts property and therefore <br />cause a burdening to other over congested areas along Grand Ave. <br />Also, there is certainly a need for a specific called out use for a "Park/Open Space" component at the 17th & <br />Grand properties. I had mentioned this on numerous occasions, but it apparently fell on deaf ears. <br />There is a culture within the Planning Department which is one direction..... in my experience, they are not at <br />all willing to listen to the community. They continue to solicit community input, but flat out refuse to include <br />any input from the community and do what they have set out to do from the beginning. Its time to take a <br />stand .... there needs to be some change to the Planning Department culture and way of thinking. If you want <br />community input and solicit community input, then it should be seriously considered, otherwise, don't waste <br />our time and make a big deal that "you've gone out to the community for their input"! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.