CORRESPONDENCE - 19E - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Dear City Officials, In case it is helpful, I wanted to provide a summary of the main demands regarding the community outreach process that were expressed by the (30+?) youth and adult CUAL committee members from MPNA during the meetings a couple weeks ago, several of which echo what ELC has sent. 1. The City's General Plan outreach should be designed to collect community input that will be incorporated into the plan, not just provide updates. 2. The community needs advance notice of all meetings, and sufficient time to provide public comment. 3. Meetings and events should be held at convenient times for working families, and have remote options for participation and comment. 4. Planners and city officials should visit the community to see the needs firsthand and hear residents' input in community forums. 5. The City, rather than the residents, is responsible for initiating public outreach and research on community needs. 6. All outreach needs to be bilingual/multilingual so all community members can participate. 7. Community outreach for the General Plan process should be multi-pronged, including outreach to residents on radio, social media, publicly posted fliers, email, and mailers. 8. There is a widespread lack of trust in the City because of its record of excluding community voices through insufficient or inadequate opportunities for public comment. There are other key themes from these meetings that may also be relevant to mention: 1. SE Santa Ana is uniquely and directly impacted by EJ issues in the General Plan, because the industrial zone abuts the residential zone and several schools. 2. Every member of the community has a neighbor or family member with asthma, and SE Santa Ana has the highest rates of asthma ER visits in the city. 3. Residents' health and wellbeing are widely impacted by the cumulative effects of multiple forms of pollution, including foul odors, noise pollution, air pollution, and soil and groundwater pollution (including lead). 4. The lack of transparency about the planning, zoning, and permitting processes has stymied the community's concerted efforts to monitor air pollution and its effects on their neighborhoods. 5. Previously scheduled community outreach activities related to the General Plan update process have been delayed, and the community has been given minimal notice, context, or additional information regarding opportunities to engage in the process. th 6. Today’s July 7 Council meeting had insufficient notice, and offers inadequate means for the public to engage and comment. 7. The city’s idea of “Community Outreach” seems to be merely providing information about EJ to community members, not the robust engagement envisioned by SB 1000 and