Laserfiche WebLink
haulers. An initial listing of items that will be considered as part of EcoNomics' evaluation <br />assistance is included below. <br />• Examination of what programs and participation rates are proposed to meet diversion <br />goals/mandates set forth in SB 1383, AB 1826, and AB 341 <br />• Review of options proposed for residential curbside organics diversion programs to <br />comply with SB 1383, including 2-cart wet/dry routing, 3-cart co -collection of food scraps <br />in yard trimmings container, or 4-cart system with an additional cart for source -separated <br />food scraps only. <br />• Cost evaluation of organics diversion requirements set forth in 513 1383, AB 1826, and AB <br />1594. Implementation could be expensive unless the method (composting vs. anaerobic <br />digestion) and facility siting (local County -run facilities versus long hauls of over 50 miles) <br />are anticipated in the agreement between the selected hauler and the City. The City's <br />ability to direct the flow of organics and to change to the most cost-effective manner of <br />processing will be critical. As such, a review of the timing of expanding of a long-term <br />restaurant organics diversion program that provides cost -incentives to the restaurant <br />community will need to be coordinated with processing options. <br />• Evaluation of the proposed rate for single -stream recycling and organics collection to <br />determine if an incentive for the remaining businesses and multi -family properties in the <br />City to implement cost-effective recycling programs to be in compliance with AB 341. <br />• Review of feasibility of proposed hauler staffing to implement state -mandated diversion <br />programs. <br />• Evaluate "niche recycling" approach for the collection and diversion of Household <br />Hazardous Waste, Medical Waste, Sharps, Electronic Waste, and Universal Waste. <br />• Review any issues of tonnage origin verification, tracking and reporting from the MRF's, <br />compost facilities and any transfer stations used for the City's waste and recyclables. <br />• Evaluate the accuracy of tonnage data and to document the allocation methodology that <br />will be used to calculate and report the City's diversion tonnages and to comply with <br />enhanced reporting requirements included in AB 901. <br />• Evaluate proposed incentives and disincentives to ensure that the selected hauler meets <br />or exceeds diversion requirements. <br />At the direction of the City, EcoNomics can prepare a presentation of its <br />findings/recommendations for delivery to the Ad Hoc committee, consulting team, or the <br />Council -at- large. EcoNomics will work with the City and its consultant team to determine how <br />best to evaluate key programmatic elements into the scope of work and contract body. <br />Task 3: Assistance with CALGreen Compliance <br />CALGreen requires nearly all building projects to divert 65% or more of C&D waste away from <br />landfills. The next triennial update, effective January 1, 2020, may increase this diversion rate <br />requirement to 75% and will reduce the amount of project exemptions. The City may need to <br />overhaul its current permitting and application processes to strengthen compliance incentives <br />3 <br />