My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - PH ADOPT RESO FOR PR NO 15-6827
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
06/18/2020 Adjourned Meeting
>
75B - PH ADOPT RESO FOR PR NO 15-6827
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2020 5:42:11 PM
Creation date
8/11/2020 9:03:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
75B
Date
6/16/2020
Destruction Year
2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L S A FAIRVIEW BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS <br />(9TH STREET TO 16TH STREET( PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA MAY 2020 <br />water that escapes the low -flow channel is diverted back to the low -flow channel before reaching <br />the construction area. A staging area would be located along the riverbank. No materials or <br />equipment would be stored within the river channel. <br />Projects that disturb more than 1 ac of soil are subject to the requirements of the CGP. However, <br />projects that disturb between 1 and 5 ac are potentially eligible for a Small Construction Rainfall <br />Erosivity Waiver, which would exempt the project from coverage under the CGP. To obtain a waiver, <br />a project would need to demonstrate that there would be no adverse water quality impacts, <br />because construction activities would only take place when there is a low erosivity potential (i.e., <br />the rainfall erosivity value in the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation [R factor] for a project is less <br />than 5). Based on a 2-year construction schedule, the R factor for the proposed Project would be <br />approximately 38. Because of the two-year construction schedule, the R factor is well above 5, and <br />the proposed Project would not qualify for a CGP erosivity waiver. Therefore, the proposed Project <br />would be required to obtain coverage under and comply with the requirements of the CGP. <br />Based on the Risk Determination methodology outlined in the CGP, the Project has a low Sediment <br />Risk (the relative amount of sediment that can be discharged, given the Project location and <br />construction schedule—i.e., no work in the river during the wet season) and a low Receiving Water <br />Risk (the risk sediment discharges pose to the receiving waters), which results in a combined Risk <br />Level of 1 (low risk to water quality). Risk Level 1 projects are subject to the BMPs and visual <br />inspection requirements of the CGP. <br />To prevent significant water quality impacts during ground -disturbance activities, the Project would <br />need to prepare and implement a SWPPP that includes construction BMPs that comply with the <br />requirements of the CGP. These requirements are included in Mitigation Measure HYDRO-1. <br />Construction BMPs would include, but not be limited to, Erosion Control and Sediment Control <br />BMPs designed to minimize erosion and retain sediment on site, Good Housekeeping BMPs to <br />prevent spills, leaks, and discharge of construction debris and waste into receiving waters, and <br />Entrance Control BMPs to mitigate any tracking from the Project. Construction BMPs around the <br />work area within the Santa Ana River are anticipated to include a gravel bag or fiber roll perimeter <br />barrier to contain spills and potential runoff, to be installed and maintained year-round. Additional <br />Construction BMPs would be determined during preparation of the SWPPP. When Construction <br />BMPs are properly designed, implemented, and maintained to address pollutants of concern, as <br />required in Mitigation Measure HYDRO-1, pollutants of concern would be retained on site so that <br />they would not reach receiving waters; therefore, the project would not violate any water quality <br />standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or <br />groundwater quality. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. <br />Groundwater dewatering may be required during construction of the bridge piles to ensure that <br />groundwater levels are below the pile cap elevation.35 Release of dewatered groundwater to surface <br />waters can introduce total dissolved solids and other constituents to surface waters. To prevent <br />significant impacts to water quality associated with dewatering during construction, the Project <br />would need to comply with the requirements of the De Minimus Permit. Mitigation Measure <br />HYDRO-2 specifies compliance with this permit for groundwater dewatering. In compliance with this <br />" Earth Mechanics, Inc. 2018. op. cit. <br />3-56 7611V"0,ND\FiD.1ISMND\FairviewSt,EFtBridgPROMISMND.doC.(05/26/20) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.