My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - PH ADOPT RESO FOR PR NO 15-6827
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
06/18/2020 Adjourned Meeting
>
75B - PH ADOPT RESO FOR PR NO 15-6827
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2020 5:42:11 PM
Creation date
8/11/2020 9:03:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
75B
Date
6/16/2020
Destruction Year
2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L S A FAIRVIEW BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS <br />(9TH STREET TO 16TH STREET( PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA MAY 2020 <br />channel and is not susceptible to hydro mod ification.40 Therefore, increasing flow to this channel <br />would not change sediment transport or increase downstream erosion and accretion. In <br />addition, the proposed Project would not alter the course of a stream or river. As such, <br />operational impacts related to on -site or off -site erosion or siltation would be less than <br />significant. <br />ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in <br />flooding on- or ofilsite <br />Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. During construction activities, soil would be <br />exposed and disturbed, drainage patterns would be temporarily altered during grading and <br />other construction activities, and there would be an increased potential for soil erosion and <br />siltation compared to existing conditions. Additionally, during a storm event, soil erosion and <br />siltation could occur at an accelerated rate. As discussed above in Response 3.10.2(a), Mitigation <br />Measure HYDRO-1 requires compliance with the CGP and preparation of a SWPPP to identify <br />construction BMPs to be implemented as part of the proposed Project to manage and convey <br />storm water during construction. Proper management of storm water during construction <br />would reduce impacts associated with flooding. Therefore, impacts related to on- or off -site <br />flooding would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. <br />Once operational, the proposed Project would improve the hydraulics of the Santa Ana River. As <br />part of the bridge replacement, the proposed Project would replace eight existing pier walls <br />within the Santa Ana River (totaling an area of 0.09 ac) with four new pier walls (totaling an area <br />of 0.05 ac). In the existing condition, a hydraulic jump occurs upstream of the bridge (i.e., flows <br />transition from supercritical to subcritical, which represents a high energy loss with erosive <br />potential). The proposed Project would improve the river hydraulics upstream of the bridge by <br />lowering the water surface elevation and reducing the length of the subcritical flows by <br />approximately 300 ft. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would have a <br />beneficial effect on the river hydraulics upstream of the Project area. Additionally, the proposed <br />Project would maintain the overall drainage patterns in the Project area. <br />Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would have a beneficial effect on the flood <br />control functions of the surface waters upstream of the Project area. Additionally, the proposed <br />Project would maintain the overall drainage patterns in the Project area. Therefore, the <br />proposed Project would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a <br />manner that would result in flooding on or off site. As such, operational impacts related to on - <br />site or off -site flooding would be less than significant. <br />iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned <br />storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff <br />Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. As discussed above in Response 3.10.2(a), <br />there is a potential for chemicals, liquid products, petroleum products (such as paints, solvents, <br />and fuels), and concrete -related waste to be spilled or leaked and transported via storm runoff <br />40 County of Orange. 2012b. op. cit. <br />3-60 75 4ND\FinalISMND\Fairview Street Bridge Final ISMND.docx(OS/26/20) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.