Laserfiche WebLink
and approved by the Cities of Santa Ana, Irvine and Tustin and conform to accepted traffic engineering <br />methods. The traffic section of the EIR as well as the supporting Traffic Impact Analysis appropriately <br />analyses the foreseeable impacts and provides reasonable mitigation measures and is therefore consistent <br />with the intent and standards of CEQA. <br />Comment 11: This comment asserts that the Project will have a significant impact on population and <br />housing by displacing 200 homeless people. The comment states that although the City is working on <br />various homeless shelter solutions that are anticipated to be available for the existing persons on the <br />Project site prior to construction of the proposed Project, the EIR does not provide substantial evidence to <br />support the conclusion that the Project would not have a significant impact; and thus, violates CEQA. <br />Response 11: Mercy House Living Centers, Inc., has a two-year contract with the City of Santa Ana to <br />operate an Interim Emergency Homeless Shelter at the Project site, which is set to expire in October 2020, <br />with an optional one-year extension. The current zoning, Light Industrial (M-1), does not permit permanent <br />residential uses and the temporary emergency facility is an interim use which will be relocated prior to the <br />construction of the proposed Project. Independent of the proposed Project, the City has been taking the <br />required steps to identify a new location for the Interim Emergency Homeless Shelter, given the temporary <br />nature of the facility described earlier. The City of Santa Ana Community Development Agency is taking <br />steps to identify a new location for City Council consideration, tentatively within the next 30 days. <br />Comment 12- This comment asserts that the EIR fails to disclose that the Project site is contaminated with <br />hazardous materials and is on the Cortese List, and provides the Draft EIR discussion related to impacts <br />related to sites on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section <br />65962.5. The comment also asserts that the Final EIR includes a statement that "Sites where response <br />actions have been completed and no operation and maintenance activities are required are not included <br />on the list." <br />Response 12: As detailed in the EIR, the Project site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites <br />pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Section 65962.5(a)(4) requires that DTSC shall compile <br />and update as appropriate, a list of hazardous substance release sites subject to a response action. The <br />DTSC's list of sites are published in the DTSC "Envirostor" database at the following weblink: <br />https://www.envi rostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/search.asp?cmd=sea rch&reporttype=CORTESE&site_type=CS I <br />TES,OP EN,FU DS,CLOS E&status=ACT,BKLG,COM&reporttitle=HAZARDOUS+WASTE+AND+SUBSTANCES <br />+SITE+LIST. In addition, Cortese List sites are mapped on the DTSC website: <br />https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov. The Project site is not on the DTSC list or mapping. <br />In addition, the EIR does not include the statement that "Sites where response actions have been completed <br />and no operation and maintenance activities are required are not included on the list" However, that <br />language is provided on the CaIEPA website related to the Cortese List: <br />https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/section-65962-5a/ <br />Comment 13- This comment asserts that the DTSC has indicated that the site is on the Cortese List. The <br />comment also states that closure of an underground storage tank case does not take a site off the Cortese <br />List because residual contamination may remain at levels that would not be safe for residential <br />development. The comment further asserts that the site would be put on the Cortese List for remedial <br />contamination. <br />Response 13: As described in Response 12, the Project site is not on the Cortese List. As detailed in the <br />Final EIR, the DTSC did not state that the Project is on the Cortese List. The DTSC comment requested <br />additional information be provided from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) <br />75C-111 <br />