My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75C - PH - THE BOWERY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
08/18/2020
>
75C - PH - THE BOWERY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2020 5:10:27 PM
Creation date
8/13/2020 4:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75C
Date
8/18/2020
Destruction Year
2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1021
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Sams Ana -The Bowery <br />May 11, 2020 <br />Urge 10 of 2s <br />D. 'Ibc IiI It Pails to Disclose SiWufican 1. and Umniligatcd Iinvimnmuival <br />Impacts Relating to Air Quality <br />As stated alinve, an FIR must disclose, evaluate, and ultimately provide feasible <br />mitigation measures for significant environmental impacts. Here, the FIR fails to <br />disclose sifmi(icanL impacL$ relating to Construction and operational health risks. <br />According to Mr. Hagemann and Dr. Rosenfeld, the DFIR finds a less than significant <br />impact "without conducting a quantified construction or health risk assessment" which <br />the DRIR incorrectly justified. Mt. Hagemann and Dr. Rosenfeld make the following <br />three points on the DEIR Air Quality analysis: <br />the use of the LST method to determine the Projects health risk <br />impacts on nearby, existing sensitive receptors is incorrect, While <br />the LST method assesses the impact of pollutants at a local level, it <br />only evaluates impacts from criteria air pollutants. According to the <br />Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology document <br />prepared by the SCAQMD, the LST analysis is only applicable to <br />NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions, which are collectively <br />referred to as criteria air pollutants. Because the LST method can <br />onlybe applied to criteria air pollutants, this method cannot be used <br />to determine whether emissions from DPM, a known human <br />carcinogen, will result in a sibmifrcant health risk impact to nearby <br />sensitive receptors_ As a result, health impacts from exposure to <br />toxic air contaminants (PACs), such as diesel particulate matter <br />(DPM), were not analyzed, thus leaving a gap within the DEIR's <br />analysis. <br />I.he omission of a quantified IIRA is inconsistent with the most <br />recent guidance published by the Office of I?nvironmenlal I lealth <br />IIazaxd Assessment (CIr1111A), the organization responsible for <br />providing guidance on conductingHRAs in California. In Ecbruan <br />of 2015, ORHITA released its most recent Risk Assessment <br />Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk <br />Assessments. This guidance document describes the types of <br />projects that warrant the preparation of an ITR_A. Construction of <br />the Project will produce emissions of DPM, a human carcinogen, <br />through the exhaust stacks of construction equipment over a <br />75C-130 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.