My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75C - PH - THE BOWERY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
08/18/2020
>
75C - PH - THE BOWERY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2020 5:10:27 PM
Creation date
8/13/2020 4:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75C
Date
8/18/2020
Destruction Year
2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1021
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of s=u Ana -The tina,i7' <br />May 11, 2020 <br />Page 17 of 23 <br />The DF.IR's Non , JVactAa#sis it Not Su. pporled by Substantual <br />Evidence <br />The 17FIR incorrectly concludes, without substantial evidence, that the proposed <br />Project will not have a substantial impact relating to noise on its Riture residents or <br />worker} in the area. The Project Applicant and City conducted no on -site study to <br />determine aircraft noise levels from John Wayne Airport at the site and rely solely on <br />the fact that the Project is located outside the 60 decibel or higher contour zone for <br />the airport to conclude there will be no significant noise impact. This analysis fails <br />because it needs to include sitc-specific facts and application relating to the actual <br />aircraft noise levels and their effects.' A more detailed analysis of this issue can be <br />found below under section III of this comment letter. <br />2. The DEIA Finding That the I'ra}'ect Conflict nntb theJohn Wayne Aa'rpart <br />Envlanns Land Use Plan 01;-2) and that the Pavject Would Not Racult in <br />Ex sssive No se for a Pnject Subyect to an Aatporl hand Use Plan (IIA7. <br />5) iu Mitegakd to Less Than Szgnrficavt Levels is Not Supported by <br />Substantial Evidence <br />The Project has the potential to expose residents of the Project to significant aviation <br />noise conflicts with the John Wayne Airport rmrvirores band Use Plan Policies 3.2.1 <br />and 3.2.4; as well as a conflict with the City of Santa Ana's General Plan Goals 1, <br />Policy L3 (DF.IR at 5.7-26, 59-22) The Project site is 2 miles fmtn John Wayne <br />Airport and within that airport's flight path. Although the EIR theorises without <br />supporting evidence that impacts may be insignificant because the site is outside the 60 <br />CNEL contour for excessive noise, it nevertheless also proposes that the Project will <br />comply with Title 24 of the California Code on interior noise levels, which could (again <br />theoretically) ensure a less than significant impact with mitigation. This mitigation <br />measure is impermissibly deferred because there is no project -specific analysis relating <br />to how compliance with the noise code sections will sufficiently mitigate potential <br />noise impacts on residents <br />The IDEIR needs to specify bow code compliance will ensure safe and insignificant <br />noise levels for residents and works on the site. <br />5 <br />3. The DEIA'sAntheiicsAnal4&isNot Supported bvSubstantial Evddence 116 <br />See The Bowery, Noise Impact Analysis, Dec. 3, 2019. Available at <br />httns: (/ceganetagcca.eov 120190800d 1 /31Attxhment/jsSTi--. <br />75C-137 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.