Laserfiche WebLink
Table 5.2-8: Summary of Operational Emissions <br />Operational Activities <br />Emissions (lbs/day) <br />VOC I NO. I CO SO. PM,. I PMI, <br />Summer Scenario <br />Area Source 3519 <br />2017. <br />10339 <br />0_13 <br />2 07 <br />207 <br />Energy Source 0.86 <br />765 <br />505 <br />0_05 <br />060 <br />060 <br />Mobile Source 38.31 <br />6U 113 <br />280./0 <br />U./S <br />/3.61 <br />2013. <br />Total Pm-ect Daily Emissions 74.36 <br />96.65 <br />389.14 <br />0.93 <br />76.27 <br />22.80 <br />ExhMq Emhs888 i 1.14 <br />143-55 <br />48.79 <br />OAS <br />18.81 <br />6.63 <br />Met Emissions Project - Existin 63.23 <br />-052 <br />-0.42 <br />-3.12e-03 <br />-0.04 <br />-0.04 <br />SCAQMD Regional Threshold <br />55 <br />550 <br />150 <br />150 <br />55 <br />Threshold Exceeded? I Yes <br />No <br />No <br />No <br />No <br />No <br />Winter <br />Scenario <br />Area Source <br />35.19 <br />20.17 <br />103.39 <br />0.13 <br />2.07 <br />2.07 <br />Energy Srxirre, <br />Does <br />7A5 <br />505 <br />0D.5 <br />06n <br />0A0 <br />Mobile Source <br />40.17 <br />70.98 <br />27852 <br />073 <br />7360 <br />2013. <br />Total Project Daily Emissions <br />76.23 <br />98.80 <br />386.96 <br />0.90 <br />76.26 <br />22.80 <br />Emlmg Emhsinru <br />10.90 <br />146.09 <br />39.59 <br />OAS <br />18.74 <br />6.6; <br />Net Emissions Pra'ect- Existin <br />6533 <br />-052 <br />-042 <br />000 <br />-004 <br />-004 <br />SCAOMD Regional Threshold <br />Threshold Exceeded? <br />55 <br />55 <br />No <br />550 <br />No <br />150 <br />No <br />150 <br />No <br />55 <br />No <br />Yes <br />vmon �ronraoos, rV I Y. <br />the DEIR goes on to cl aim, <br />34 <br />"As shown, emissions from operation ofthe proposed Project would exceed the threshold of <br />signitican ce for VOCs. The majority of VOC emissions would he derived tram consumer products <br />and mobile activity. Consumer products Include cleaning supplies, kitchen aerosols, cosmetics <br />and toiletries, the use of which cannot be controlled by the City. Likewise, vehicular emissions <br />cannot ha rnntrnlled by either the Prnjecr applicant nr the tiny_ Thera are nn feacihle mitigation <br />measures that would reduce VOC emissions to below the SCAQMD threshold. Therefore, <br />operational emissions would be significant and unavoidable" (p. 5.2-26). <br />However, while we agree that the Project would result in a significant VOC impact, the DEIR's conclusion <br />that these impacts are" signifcant and unavoidable" is incorrect. According to the California <br />Environmental Quality Act (CEOA), <br />" CEQA requires Lead Agencies to mitigate or avoid significant envi ron mental impacts associated <br />with discretionary projects. Environmental documents for projects that have any significant <br />environmental impacts must identify all feasible mitigation measures or alternatives to reduce <br />the impacts below a level of significance. If after the identification of all feasible mitigation <br />measures, a project is still deemed to have significant environmental impacts, the Lead Agency <br />can approve a project, but must adopt a Statement of Overriding Consideration to explain why <br />75C-175 <br />