Laserfiche WebLink
neither the applicant nor the City have the ability to reduce. Greenhouse Gas Emissions impacts <br />stem from approximately 60 percent of the GHG emissions being generated by vehicle trips. <br />Neither the applicant nor the City can substantively or materially reduce the vehicular -source <br />GHG emissions. Lastly, Transportation impacts stem from the project's requirement to pay fair <br />share funds to improve right -turn overlap phasing at the intersections of Grand and Warner <br />avenues and Redhill and Alton avenues, calculated at 5.93 and 8.57 percent, respectively, and <br />to construct or fully fund right -turn overlap phasing at the intersection of Redhill Avenue and <br />Barranca Parkway. <br />As a result of these impacts that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, adoption of a <br />Statement of Overriding Considerations is required prior to approving the project. A Statement of <br />Overriding Considerations is the process through which decision makers balance the economic, <br />legal, social, and technological or other benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable <br />environmental impacts. <br />Economic Development <br />The City utilized the services of AECOM to prepare an economic and fiscal analysis of the <br />proposed project and to compare its impacts again those of an industrial prototype that could be <br />built pursuant to the M-1 zoning district standards on the project site. The analysis reviewed key <br />areas including residential, industrial, and retail market assessments; development feasibility; and <br />economic and fiscal impacts of the project. <br />AECOM's analysis reveals positive economic and fiscal impacts from either the proposed <br />development or the industrial prototype due to the project site's location in a high -value, jobs -rich <br />area surrounded by employment centers and commercial developments. The report's conclusions <br />about the proposed project and the industrial prototype are illustrated in Table 6. <br />Table 6: Kev Findings of the Proposed Project and Industrial Prototype Comparison of Impacts <br />Topic <br />Proposed Project <br />Industrial Prototype <br />Residential Market <br />The proposed quantity of residential units <br />N/A — Residential not permitted by current M- <br />Assessment <br />could be absorbed with low vacancy and <br />1 zoning designation <br />high rents <br />Industrial Market <br />N/A —The proposed project does not contain <br />The industrial prototype (up to 320,000- <br />Assessment <br />industrial buildings or uses <br />square foot light industrial office/industrial <br />building) could be absorbed into the broader <br />market, as the expected incremental demand <br />for new industrial square footage by 2026 is <br />2.2 millionsquare feet <br />Retail Market <br />The proposed 80,000 square feet of leasable <br />N/A —The industrial prototype does not <br />Assessment <br />commercial square footage could be <br />contain a significant commercial component <br />absorbed by the market area due to the <br />as commercial uses are limited by the M-1 <br />buildout anticipated within a two-mile market <br />zoning designation <br />area <br />Development <br />$65 million ($100/square foot of land) <br />$17 million ($26/square foot of land) <br />Feasibility/Residual <br />Land Value RLV <br />Economic Impact <br />$498 million in one-time construction <br />$76 million in one-time construction impacts, <br />impacts, $58 million in annual economic <br />$153 million in annual economic impacts, <br />75C-407 <br />