Laserfiche WebLink
Table 25: Fiscal Expenditures - Industrial Prototype <br />Table 5.4: Industrial Prototype - Calculated Per Service Population <br />Costs to General Fund <br />City Cost <br />Burden <br />of Cost for <br />City of Santa <br />per Service <br />New Service <br />Department <br />Ana Budget <br />Population <br />Population <br />Police <br />$131,600,000 <br />$312.81 <br />100% <br />$312.81 <br />Fire <br />$45,600,000 <br />$108.39 <br />100% <br />$108.39 <br />Planning and Building <br />$13,200,000 <br />$31.38 <br />60% <br />$18.83 <br />Finance and Management Services <br />$9,700,000 <br />$23.06 <br />60% <br />$13.83 <br />City Manager's Office <br />$2,200,000 <br />$5.23 <br />40% <br />$2.09 <br />City Attorney's Office <br />$3,200,000 <br />$7.61 <br />40% <br />$3.04 <br />Clerk of the Council's Office <br />$1,700,000 <br />$4.04 <br />40% <br />$1.62 <br />Public Works Agency <br />$13,200,000 <br />$31.38 <br />100% <br />$31.38 <br />Community Development Agency <br />$3,300,000 <br />$7.84 <br />60% <br />$4.71 <br />Human Resources <br />$2,500,000 <br />$5.94 <br />80% <br />$4.75 <br />Parks, Recreation, Community Services <br />$21,400,000 <br />$50.87 <br />100% <br />$50.87 <br />Bower's Museum <br />$1,500,000 <br />$3.57 <br />100% <br />$3.57 <br />Library <br />$5,400,000 <br />$12.84 <br />100% <br />$12.84 <br />Civic Center <br />$1,200,000 <br />$2.85 <br />100% <br />$2.85 <br />Strategic Plan <br />$2,500,000 <br />$5.94 <br />60% <br />$3.57 <br />Transfer to Project Funds <br />$9,000,000 <br />$21.39 <br />100% <br />$21.39 <br />Total Cannabis Program <br />$6,200,000 <br />$14.74 <br />100% <br />$14.74 <br />Total Budgeted Expenditures <br />$273,400,000 <br />Total Pro Rata Cost per Service Population <br />$610 <br />Total Incremental Service Population <br />305 <br />Total Cost of New Service to Incremental Population <br />$185,000 <br />Note: Numbers are rounded and may not sum <br />Source: Santa Ana FY2019-2020 Adopted Budget, AECOM <br />While it is estimated the Industrial Prototype requires fewer services from the City, the Project would likely generate a <br />more significant increase in property taxes through assessed improvements and induce greater sales taxes from <br />increased households in the City. <br />The Project could lead to capital deficits for Focus Area because of higher densities of households and businesses <br />concentrated in and around the current institutions and infrastructures. A further analysis of the current capacity and <br />distribution of public facilities should be conducted to understand the impact of the incremental growth in service <br />population on facilities such as schools, police/fire stations, or other capital investments associated with the provision <br />of public services. The City will consider commissioning an infrastructure needs assessment after the environmental <br />assessment has been completed. <br />Assumptions on Revenues: <br />Property Taxes: Property taxes for both the Project and Industrial Prototype were assessed on the total construction <br />costs of the improvements discounted by 5% to account for the difference between market value and assessed value. <br />The corresponding Tax Rate Area (TRA) allocates 19.4% of the tax assessment to the City's General Fund. Detailed <br />tables are shown in Appendix A. <br />5 For the purposes of this study, AECOM assumed all expenditures to the City would be based on a pro-rata allocation tothe service <br />population, which is the industry -standard for anticipating long-term citywide fiscal impacts. Developers are required to pay <br />development fees designed to offset immediate capital costs to the City. AECOM did not work with City staff or public service agents <br />to analyze the thresholds required for new fixed costs to service provision, such as an additional police or fire station. <br />75C-657 <br />