My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75C
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
08/18/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2020 3:38:45 PM
Creation date
8/14/2020 11:38:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
8/18/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Vince Fregoso <br />August 13, 2020 <br />Page 2 <br />JWA by the ALUC, particularly as it relates to AELUP sections 1.2 and 2.1.4, and <br />the California Public Utilities Code (PUC), section 21674 (a). The Division <br />understands the ALUC's concern and interpretation of their role specifically as it <br />regards the proposed 1,100 residential units within the Approach/Departure of <br />JWA's primary runway. This is in accordance with the AELUP for JWA, section <br />2.1.3 pages 13-14, which states: <br />A Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation does not <br />automatically equate to a Consistency determination by the <br />ALUC. The FAA may also conclude in their aeronautical study that <br />a project is an Obstruction but not a Hazard to Air Navigation. The <br />Commission may find a project Inconsistent based on an <br />Obstruction determination. The commission may utilize criteria for <br />protecting aircraft traffic patterns at individual airports which may <br />differ from those contained in FAR Part 77, should evidence of <br />health, welfare, or air safety surface sufficient to justify such an <br />action. <br />Although the proposed Project will meet the requirements of PUC, section <br />21670(a) (1) and (2), another issue Caltrans is concerned about is environmental <br />justice for this proposed residential site. If the City overrules the ALUC to change <br />the established Light Industrial zone to Specific Development No. 96 (SD-96), it <br />Will place the new community's residents under a commercial airline approach <br />path, which may place an undue burden on sensitive community segments <br />Within the newly established community. In 2016, the Legislature passed Senate <br />Bill 1000, which requires environmental justice to be addressed in local <br />government General Plan documents, so that planners engage with <br />environmental justice communities and air quality analyses are completed. <br />The Division understands the determination of inconsistency by the ALUC to be <br />following the intent of the AELUP for JWA and its role to concurrently protect <br />public safety and airport viability in concert with local development, as directed <br />by PUC 21674 (a). The Division also acknowledges the concerns noted by the <br />Orange County ALUC and JWA regarding the aircraft noise impact on all <br />residents who will occupy the site for the foreseeable future. Additionally, the <br />ALUC cited statistical data indicating that the proposed site will experience a <br />substantial frequency of commercial overflights to JWA. Therefore, the Division <br />also has concerns that the proposed Project could limit JWA's future operational <br />capacity and thereby diminish the airport's ability to meet the region's growing <br />air service demand. <br />"Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated, and efficient transportation system <br />to enhance California's economy and livability" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.