My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75C
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
08/18/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2020 3:38:45 PM
Creation date
8/14/2020 11:38:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
8/18/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Bowery Mixed -Use Project 2, Response to Comments <br />As described previously, sports fields are used by approximately 14 percent of the adults and 33.1 percent <br />of those under 18 years old that utilize park and recreation facilities (per California State Parks data). The <br />use of the sports -oriented recreational facilities is largely by organized sports leagues that pay fees to the <br />City for use of the facilities, which is used to fund maintenance and improvements related to use of the <br />facilities. Although the proposed Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy, which is 31.5 acres and 0.9 mile <br />from the Project site would offer new amenities that would be attractive to Project site residents, the <br />anticipated usage of the facility based on the data from the California State Parks indicates that the <br />potential deterioration of the facility from use by Project residents would be less than significant. <br />Comment 5: This comment states that the park fees collected by the Project would not directly benefit any <br />park facilities in the City of Tustin. The comment also states that the payment of fees to offset park usage <br />would only apply to parks in Santa Ana and should not be used to reach the conclusion regarding <br />deterioration of parks in Tustin. <br />Response 5: Although the Draft EIR states on page 5.13-7 that the payment of fees would provide funding <br />for park and recreation facility improvements, the statement is not the basis for the less than significant <br />determination. The basis for the less than significant determination is described previously in Response 2, As <br />described previously, and detailed on page 5.13-7 of the Draft EIR, based on the data from the California <br />State Parks, the existing amount of park and recreation facilities in the vicinity of the Project site, the amount <br />and qualify of recreation facilities that would be provided as part of the Project, and the number of residents <br />at full capacity of the proposed Project, the Project is not anticipated to increase the use of existing parks <br />and recreation facilities, including those within the City of Tustin, such that substantial physical deterioration <br />of the facility would occur or be accelerated. <br />Comment 6: This comment states that it is incorrectly stated on page 5.13-5 of the DEIR that 5,136.35 acres <br />of parkland will be provided per Project resident at full occupancy. <br />Response 6: The last sentence on page 5.13-5 of the Draft EIR contains a typographical error, referring to <br />acres instead of square feet, and has been modified as provided below and in Chapter 3, Revisions to the <br />Draft EIR. In addition, the existing parkland information in the second to last sentence has been updated to <br />reflect the additional park information provided previously in Comment 3. Thus, the last two sentences on <br />page 5.13-5 have been revised as provided below. <br />In addition, there are 94.4 97.9 acres of parkland within the City of Tustin and 63.6 acres <br />of parkland within the City of Irvine Park facilities (listed in Table 5.13-2) that are also <br />within 3 miles of the Project site and are likely (due to location) to be used by residents of <br />the proposed Project. This equals approximately 24638 243.38 acres of existing parkland <br />within three miles of the site, which equates to 5,136 e; 5,094.49 square feet of <br />parkland per Project resident at full occupancy. <br />Comment 7: This comment states that Table 5.13-3 appears to be missing a column for average travel <br />times between 13 and 20 minutes. <br />Response 7: Table 5.13-3 includes a typographical error. The fourth column was to provide average travel <br />times between 11 and 20 minutes and has been modified as provided below and in Chapter 3, Revisions <br />to the Draft EIR. <br />Table 5.13-3: Average Travel Time in Southern California to Outdoor Recreation Areas <br />Mode 0<5 1min -10 min 21-81.20 min 21.60 min >06.0 min <br />Driving 31-3% 16% Walking 127.5% 1 20.3% 1 31,5% 1 18.9% 1 1.8% <br />City of Santa Ana 2-58 <br />Final EIR <br />April 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.